a view into the nucleon: electron scattering at jefferson...

58
Daria Sokhan University of Glasgow, UK International School of Nuclear Physics: 38th Course Erice, Sicily — 21 st September 2016 A view into the nucleon: electron scattering at Jefferson Lab

Upload: others

Post on 05-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Daria SokhanUniversity of Glasgow, UK

    International School of Nuclear Physics: 38th CourseErice, Sicily — 21st September 2016

    A view into the nucleon: electron scattering at Jefferson Lab

  • Prologue…

  • The nucleon through the electromagnetic lens

    Power of a lepton probe: non-strongly interacting, “observes” the structure of the nucleon in a stop-motion picture.

    ✴ Present day state (since ~1ms after the Big Bang).✴ Cold: quarks in confinement.

    ✴ Not well-understood: perturbative QCD cannot describe it. What makes up its spin? Why is its mass so large? …

    What your room-temperature nucleon looks like today

    ✴ Abundant: almost all of the visible mass of the universe.

  • International Mammoth Committee

    Lyuba, baby mamoth found in Siberia, imaged with visible light…

    Scales of resolution – an elephantine analogy

    Q2 ~ MeV2

    ?−e

  • Q2 ~ MeV2

    ?−e −e

    Q2 >> GeV2

    Lyuba, baby mamoth found in Siberia, imaged with visible light… … and X-rays.

    2

    1Q

    ≈λ

    Equivalent wavelength of the probe:

    International Mammoth Committee

    Scales of resolution – an elephantine analogy

  • Q2 ~ MeV2

    ?−e −e

    Q2 >> GeV2

    Lyuba, baby mamoth found in Siberia, imaged with visible light… … and X-rays.

    2

    1Q

    ≈λ

    Equivalent wavelength of the probe:

    International Mammoth Committee

    What you see depends on what you use to look…

    Scales of resolution – an elephantine analogy

  • Deep inelastic scattering (DIS):

    Complementary information on the nucleon’s structure.

    e'

    γ*

    N

    X

    e

    Measurements: ★ Inclusive — only the electron is detected. ★ Semi-inclusive — electron and typically one hadron detected. ★ Exclusive — all final state particles detected. ★ Polarised electrons / hadrons — sensitivity to helicity distributions. ★ Cross-sections, cross-section differences and asymmetries.

    Electromagnetic interaction: sensitive to distributions of charge and magnetisation — information on quark structure of the hadron at different energy scales.

    Electron scattering

  • Structure of the nucleon

  • nucleon

    x: longitudinal momentum fraction carried by struck parton

    or your favourite representation…

    What we would really like to know…

  • G. Renee Guzlas, artist.

    …or “the story of the blind men and the elephant”

    Elastic scattering Deep Inealstic Scattering (DIS) Semi-inclusive DIS Deep exclusive reactions

    What we do know…

  • G. Renee Guzlas, artist.

    …or “the story of the blind men and the elephant”

    Elastic scattering Deep Inealstic Scattering (DIS) Semi-inclusive DIS Deep exclusive reactions

    What we do know…

    What you see depends also on how you to look…

  • Different views of the nucleon: IWigner function:

    full phase space parton distribution of the nucleon

    Transverse Momentum

    Distributions (TMDs)

    ∫ Tbd 2 Semi-inclusive DIS

  • Wigner function: full phase space parton

    distribution of the nucleon

    ∫ Tbd 2

    ∫ Tkd 2

    Parton DistributionFunctions (PDFs)

    Transverse Momentum

    Distributions (TMDs)

    Different views of the nucleon: II

  • Wigner function: full phase space parton

    distribution of the nucleon

    ∫ Tbd 2

    ∫ Tkd 2

    Transverse Momentum

    Distributions (TMDs)

    Deep Inelastic Scattering

    Different views of the nucleon: II

    Parton DistributionFunctions (PDFs)

  • Wigner function: full phase space parton

    distribution of the nucleon

    Generalised Parton Distributions (GPDs)

    • relate transverse position of partons (b┴) to longitudinal momentum (x).

    ∫ Tkd 2

    Deep exclusive reactions

    Different views of the nucleon: III

  • Wigner function: full phase space parton

    distribution of the nucleon

    Generalised Parton Distributions (GPDs)

    ∫ Tkd 2

    ∫ dx

    Form Factorseg: GE, GM

    proton neutron

    Fourier Transform of electric Form Factor: transverse charge density of a

    nucleon

    C. Carlson, M. Vanderhaeghen PRL 100, 032004 (2008)

    Different views of the nucleon: IV

  • What do GPDs tell us? Tomography of the nucleon: transverse spacial distributions of quarks and gluons in longitudinal momentum space.

    Small changes in nucleon transverse momentum allows mapping of transverse structure at large distances: confinement.

    For additionally small x can image the pion cloud: chiral symmetry breaking.

    Provide information on the orbital angular momentum contribution to nucleon spin: the spin puzzle.

    Using transversely polarised targets can map transverse shift of partons due to the polarisation: combine with TMDs to access spin-orbit correlations of quarks and gluons, study non-perturbative interactions of partons.

    x

  • Jefferson Lab

  • Jefferson Lab, Virginia, USA

  • CEBAF: Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility. Energy up to ~6 GeV Energy resolution Longitudinal electron polarisation up to ~85% Three experimental fixed-target halls

    Jefferson Lab: 6 GeV era

    Hall A: Hall B: CLAS Hall C:

    Very large acceptance, detector array for multi-particle final states.

    Two movable spectrometer arms, well-defined acceptance, high luminosity

    �p/p = 10�4

    �E/Ee ⇠ 10�5

    High resolution( ) spectrometers, very high luminosity.

  • Maximum electron energy: 12 GeV to new Hall D 11 GeV deliverable to Halls A, B and C

    Jefferson Lab: 12 GeV era

    Hall B: CLAS12

    Hall C:

    Very large acceptance, high luminosity

    Super-high Momentum Spectrometer added, very high luminosity

    Hall A: High resolution spectrometers, large installation experiments

    Hall D: 9 GeV tagged polarised photons, full acceptance detector

    xB

    Q2(G

    eV2)

  • Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering

  • Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering

    ξ±x longitudinal momentum fractions of quarks

    At high exchanged Q2 and low t access to four GPDs:

    B

    B

    xx−

    ≅2

    ξ

    2)'( nn pp −=t

    γ

    'NN

    )( 2Q∗γ

    ξ+x ξ−x),,( ~ , ,~ , txHHEE ξ

    ep

    t

    np

    'ep

    'np

    22 )'( eeQ pp −−=

    qpn ⋅=2

    2QxBBjorken variable:

    R +1�1 Hdx = F1R +1�1 E dx = F2

    R +1�1 H̃ dx = GA

    R +1�1 Ẽ dx = GP

    H(x, 0, 0) = q(x) H̃(x, 0, 0) = �q(x)

    Can be related to PDFs:

    and form factors:

    Eq, Ẽq, Hq, H̃q(x, ⇠, t)

    the “golden channel” for GPD extraction

    (Dirac and Pauli)

    (axial and pseudo-scalar)

  • ✴ Process measured in experiment:

    e

    e '

    γ*γ

    N 'N

    e

    e '

    γ*

    γ

    N 'N

    e

    e '

    γ*

    γ

    N 'N

    ++DVCS Bethe - Heitler

    BHDVCSDVCSBHBHDVCS TTTTTTd**22 +++∝ σ

    Amplitude calculable from elastic Form Factors and QED

    Amplitude parameterised in terms of Compton

    Form Factors

    Interference term22

    BHDVCS TT

  • σ

    Δσ Only ξ and t are accessible experimentally!

    Compton Form Factors in DVCSExperimentally accessible in DVCS cross-sections and spin asymmetries, eg:

    To get information on x need extensive

    measurements in Q2.

    Need measurements off proton and neutron to get flavour separation

    of CFFs.

  • ( ) ( ){ } 0,,0,,21

    21 1

    1ξξ xExHdxxJJ qqgq +=−= ∫−

    Ji’s relation:

    ✴Need measurements at low t, across wide Q2, of a range of observables to extract both H and E.

    ✴Need flavour separation of GPDs.

    GPDs and the spin puzzle

    gqqN JLJ ++== Σ21

    21 Total angular

    momentum of a nucleon:

    Only ~ 30% contribution

  • ξ = xB/(2-xB) k = t/4M2 Proton Neutron

    What should we measure?γ φ

    e’

    e

    γ∗

    leptonic planehadronic

    planep’

    ΔσUT ~ cosφ Im{k(F2H – F1E) + ….. }dφ

    ~ΔσUL ~ sinφ Im{F1H + ξ(F1+F2)(H + xB/2E) –ξkF2 E+…}dφ

    ~

    ΔσLU ~ sinφ Im{F1H + ξ(F1+F2)H -kF2E}dφ~

    ΔσLL ~ (A+Bcosφ) Re{F1H+ξ(F1+F2) (H + xB/2E)…}dφ

    ~

    e-

    e- p/nIm{Hp, Hp, Ep}Im{Hn, Hn, En}

    ~~

    Im{Hp, Hp}Im{Hn, En, En}

    ~~

    Im{Hp, Ep}Im{Hn}

    Re{Hp, Hp}~

    Re{Hn, En, En}~e-

    e-

    Beam, target polarisation

    Real parts of CFFs accessible in cross-sections and double polarisation asymmetries, imaginary parts of CFFs in single-spin asymmetries.

  • CFFs show scaling in DVCS: leading twist (twist-2) dominance at moderate Q2 (1.5 - 2.3 GeV2).

    M. Defurne et al, PRC 92 (2015) 055202.

    Extraction of amplitude as well as interference terms.

    First DVCS cross-sections in valence region Hall A, ran in 2004, high precision, narrow kinematic range. Data recently re-analysed.

    Q2: 1.5 - 2.3 GeV2, xB = 0.36.

    GPDs can be extracted at JLab kinematics

    Strong deviation of DVCS cross-section from BH: experiment probing its energy-dependence under analysis.

    xB = 0.36, Q2 = 2.3 GeV 2,�t = 0.32 GeV 2

    Hall A

  • What do the CFFs from the cross-sections tell us?

    H.-S. Jo et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRL 115 (2015) 212003

    Slope in t becomes flatter at higher xB

    Valence quarks at centre, sea quarks at the periphery.

    VGG

    Aebt

    CLAS

    High-statistics measurement across a wide kinematic range:

  • DVCS Cross-sections @ 11 GeV

    Experiments: E12-06-114 (Hall A, 100 days), E12-13-010 (Hall C, 65 days) at a range of beam energies.

    Halls

    A & C

    Azimuthal, energy and helicity dependencies of cross-section to separate and interference contributions in a wide kinematic coverage.

  • Beam and target-spin asymmetries

    E. Seder et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRL 114 (2015) 032001S. Pisano et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRD 91 (2015) 052014

    CLAS

    KMM: Kumericki, Mueller, Murray

    GK: Kroll, Moutarde, Sabatié

    GGL: Goldstein, Gonzalez, Liuti

    A = ↵sin�1+�cos�

  • Double-spin Asymmetry (ALL)

    E. Seder et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRL 114 (2015) 032001S. Pisano et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRD 91 (2015) 052014

    CLAS

    Fit parameters extracted from a simultaneous fit to BSA, TSA and DSA.

    CFF extraction from three spin asymmetries at common kinematics.

  • What can we learn from the

    asymmetries?

    E. Seder et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRL 114 (2015) 032001S. Pisano et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRD 91 (2015) 052014

    CLAS

    Im(H )

    Im(H̃ )

    Hq(x, 0, 0) = f1(x)

    H̃q(x, 0, 0) = g1(x)

    Information about the relative spread of the axial and electric charges in the nucleon?

  • 120 days (polarised target) Ptarget = 80% Statistical error: 2% - 15% on sinφ moments Systematic uncertainties: ~ 6 - 8%

    Pbeam = 85% L = 1035 cm-2s-1 1< Q2 < 10 GeV2 0.1

  • DVCS with transversely polarised target at CLAS12

    E12-12-010: transversely polarised HD target.

    Sensitivity to Im(E)ΔσUT ~ cosφ Im{k(F2H – F1E) + ….. }dφ

  • GPDs from proton and neutron: flavour separation

    ( ) ( ){ } 0,,0,,21

    21 1

    1ξξ xExHdxxJJ qqgq +=−= ∫− Ji’s relation:

    Important missing link in the nucleon spin puzzle…

    Neutron DVCSγ φ

    e’

    e

    γ∗

    leptonic plane

    hadronicplane

    n’

    Neutron DVCS extremely sensitive to E, least-known and least-constrained GPD

    Im {En}ΔσLU ~ sinφ Im{F1H + ξ(F1+F2)H - kF2E}dφ~Polarized beam, unpolarized neutron target:e- n

    gqqN JLJ ++== Σ21

    21

    dominates.

    M. Mazouz et al, PRL 99 (2007) 242501First measurement in Hall A, consistent with zero: Analysis on CLAS data in a different kinematic region ongoing…

  • Ee = 11 GeV

    ALU in Neutron DVCS @ 11 GeV

    2GeV 4.0−=t

    )(�φ

    2GeV 22 =QFixed kinematics:

    ALU At 11 GeV, beam spin asymmetry (ALU) in neutron DVCS is very sensitive to Ju, Jd

    Wide coverage needed!

    VGG Model (calculations by M. Guidal)

    Ju = 0.3, Jd = 0.1

    Ju = 0.1, Jd = 0.1 Ju = 0.3, Jd = 0.3

    Ju = 0.3, Jd = -0.1

    17.0=Bx

  • CLAS12 + Forward Calorimeter

    + Neutron Detector

    BS

    A-0

    .20.

    2

    The most sensitive observable to the GPD En

    ALU in Neutron DVCS with CLAS12

    80 days of data taking L = 1035 cm−2s−1/nucleon

    -t0 1.2 Simulated statistical sample:

    e+ d ! e0 + � + n+ (ps)

  • Neutron Detector for CLAS12Available: ★ 10 cm of radial space ★ in a high magnetic field (~ 5T)

    ★ Plastic scintillator barrel: z

    y

    x

    ★ Length ~ 70 cm, inner radius 28.5 cm

    ★ Long (~ 1.5 m) light-guides ★ PMT read-out upstream, out of high B field

    Light guides

    Scintillators

    U-turn light guide

    3 layers, 48 paddles in each

    Detector design

    PMT 1

    PMT 2

  • DVCS on the neutron with a longitudinally polarised deuterium target

    In combination with pDVCS, allow flavour-separation of CFFs. Expected sensitivities:

  • To conclude… Electron scattering is a clean and versatile probe into the structure of the nucleon.

    The past decade saw the start of 3D imaging of the nucleon and the experimental programme at Jefferson Lab will study the valence region in detail.

    A wide programme planned for Halls A, B and C in the 11 GeV era: higher luminosity, higher precision, wider reach of phase space, greater range of observables.

    A full understanding of the nucleon requires diverse measurements, for example form factors in elastic scattering, structure functions (for PDFs) in DIS, Compton form factors (for GPDs) in exclusive reactions and a variety of different functions in SIDIS (for TMDs). Data is required across a wide range of Q2 to image the nucleon at all depths.

  • Thank you

  • Two sites considered: JLab and Brookhaven National Lab Polarised e and light nuclei, unpolarised heavy nuclei Centre of mass energy range: 20 - 140 GeV High luminosity (1033 - 1034 cm-2s-1) High resolution detectors

    Looking to the future: Electron-Ion Collider “Understanding the glue that binds us all”

    Gluon contribution to nucleon spin Tomography of the quark-gluon sea Saturation of gluon density Colour charge propagation in the nuclear medium

    White Paper, 2014

  • https://ukeicworkshop2016.wordpress.com

    https://ukeicworkshop2016.wordpress.com

  • Experimental paths to GPDs

    cliparts.co

    Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering (DVCS) Deeply Virtual Meson Production (DVMP) Time-like Compton Scattering (TCS) Double DVCS

    Accessible in exclusive reactions, where all final state particles are detected.

    Trodden paths, or ones starting to be explored:

    DVCSTCS

    DDVCS DVMP

  • M. Defurne et al, PRC 92 (2015) 055202.

    First DVCS cross-sections in

    valence region

    Target-mass and finite-t corrections (TMC) improve agreement for KM10a model

    KMS parameters tuned on very low xB meson-production data

    xB = 0.36, Q2 = 1.9 GeV 2,�t = 0.32 GeV 2

    Hall A

    VGG model: Vanderhaeghen, Guichon, GuidalKMS model: Kroll, Moutarde, SabatiéKM model: Kumericki, Mueller

  • CLAS unpolarised cross-sectionsCLA

    S

    (sets to zero) H̃

    H.-S. Jo et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRL 115 (2015) 212003

  • e- pBeam-spin Asymmetry (ALU)

    S. Stepanyan et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRL 87 (2001) 182002

    F.-X. Girod et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRL 100 (2008) 162002

    Previous CLAS results

    JLab Hall A results VGG twist-2

    VGG twist-3

    Regge (JML)ALU

    VGG model: Vanderhaeghen, Guichon, Guidal

    ALU from fit to asymmetry:

    CLAS

  • Target-spin Asymmetry (AUL)

    e-

    S. Chen et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRL 97 (2006) 072002

    E. Seder et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRL 114 (2015) 032001S. Pisano et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRD 91 (2015) 052014

    CLAS

  • M. Mazouz et al, PRL 99 (2007) 242501

    Beam-spin asymmetry in neutron DVCS

    First experimental constraint on Eq, through model interpretation gives constraints on orbital angular momentum of quarks.

    Analysis underway on CLAS data.

  • GPDs through other channels

  • At high exchanged Q2, access to four chiral-even (parton helicity conserving) GPDs:

    Enables flavour decomposition.

    Deeply Virtual Meson Production

    and four chiral-odd (parton helicity flipping) GPDs:

    Eq, Ẽq, Hq, H̃q(x, ⇠, t)

    EqT , ẼqT , H

    qT , H̃

    qT (x, ⇠, t)

    Transversity GPDs can be related to transverse anomalous magnetic moment:

    T =R +1�1 ẼT (x, ⇠, t = 0) dx

    and transversity distribution: HT (x, 0, 0) = h1(x)

    which describes distribution of transverse partons in a transverse nucleon.

    'NN

    )( 2Q∗γ

    ξ+x ξ−x),,( ~ , ,~ , txHHEE ξ

    e'e

    t

    p 'p

    qq

  • S. Morrow et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 39, 5-31, 2009 (ρ[email protected])

    J. Santoro et al., Phys. Rev. C 78, 025210, 2008 (φ@5.75 GeV) L. Morand et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 24, 445-458, 2005 (ω@5.75GeV)

    C. Hadjidakis et al., Phys. Lett. B 605, 256-264, 2005 (ρ[email protected] GeV) K. Lukashin et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 065205, 2001 (φ@4.2 GeV)

    A. Fradi, Orsay Univ. PhD thesis (ρ[email protected] GeV)

    Vectormesons

    DVMP Measurements at JLab

    I. Bedlinskiy et al., Phys. Rev. C 90, 039901, 2014 (π[email protected])

    K. Park et al., Eur. Phys. J, A 49, 16, 2013. (π[email protected] GeV)

    R. De Masi et al., Phys. Rev. C 77, 042201(R), 2008 (π[email protected])

    Pseudo-scalar

    mesons A. Kim, submitted to PRL (TSA, DSA π[email protected]) I. Bedlinskiy et al.,under analysis ( @5.75GeV) ⌘

    E. Fuchey et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 025201, 2011 (π[email protected])

  • DVMP Cross-section

    2⇡�

    d

    4�

    dQ

    2dx

    B

    dtd�

    meson

    =

    unpolarised

    longitudinally polarised beam

    longitudinally polarised target

    Target and beam longitudinally polarised

    Sensitivity to longitudinal and transverse structure functions, which in turn are sensitive to transversity GPDs.

  • d�/d

    t(nb/GeV

    2)

    Unpolarised cross-sections: DV P⇡0

    Solid: P. Kroll, S. GoloskokovDashed: G. Goldstei, J. Gonzalez, S. Liuti I. Bedlinskiy et al (CLAS Collaboration),

    PRL 109, (2012) 112001

    Contribution of and is large.

    �T�TT

  • Deeply Virtual Meson Production: ⇡0

    Beam-spin asymmetry

    R. de Masi et al (CLAS Collaboration), PRC 77,(2008) 042201

    ALU = Pb ↵ sin�

    Target-spin and Double-spin asymmetries

    Goloskokov-KrollGoldstein-Gonzalez-Liuti

    A. Kim et al (CLAS Collaboration), submitted to PRL

  • Prospects at CLAS12

    e+e-e

    e'

    N N'

    γ*γ*

    e+

    e-

    N N'

    γ*γ

    TCS DDVCS

    Deeply Virtual Meson Production, e.g.: and (E12-06-108), (E12-12-007).

    Time-like Compton Scattering (E12-12-001)

    Double Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering (Letter of Intent submitted).

    ⌘ ⇡0�

  • Prospects in Halls A & C up to 11 GeV

    Separation of the terms due to transverse and longitudinal virtual photon polarisation in the cross-sections of deeply virtual meson production:

    E12-13-010:

    E12-07-105:

    E12-09-011:

    π+

    π0

    K+

    E12-06-114: π0Hall A:Hall C: