a untitled essay
DESCRIPTION
A rough draft of an essay arguing for a purely economic approval of the Keystone XL pipelineTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A Untitled Essay](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082709/55cf8ff6550346703ba1ba2e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Benjamin Culkin
Tuesday February 10th
ENGL 102
Dr. Barko
Undecided Title
When you think of oil, what’s the first thing that comes to mind? Probably “black gold”
isn’t it? Well, considering it’s about 48 and a half dollars at the time of writing for a 42 gallon
barrel, with gas going at about $2 a gallon, thats about $84 a barrel (OilPrice n.pag.). Even
assuming they have to eat some percentage of that as markup, that’s still quite a bit of profit.
Taking into account the fact that the US produced about 2.7 million thousand-barrel units (EIA
n.pag) in 2013, that is a very large number (113.4B dollars at today’s prices, higher then), and
that is a fairly decent sized chunk of our GDP from simply raw oil alone. To further strengthen
our economy, and provide for our own needs, we should build the Keystone XL pipeline.
First off, why do we need to get more oil domestically? Well, because we import more
than 250 million barrels of oil monthly, and that’s expensive. Doing some back-of-the box
calculations, in full flow the Keystone XL pipeline would carry slightly less than 350 fifty
million gallons, or about 8 million barrels. That may not seem like much compared to our
imports, but imports are trending down, and anything we can do to accelerate that trend helps.
Secondly, this would provide a much needed infusion of cash to our fading
manufacturing sectors with the ridiculous amount of steel the pipeline would need (About 3
times the size of Monacco!)
![Page 2: A Untitled Essay](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022082709/55cf8ff6550346703ba1ba2e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Works Cited
http://www.oil-price.net 2/10/15
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_sum_crdsnd_k_a.htm 2/10/15