a systems approach for high performance hospitals harvard extension school april 18, 2007 john f....
Post on 21-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
A Systems Approach for High Performance Hospitals
Harvard Extension School April 18, 2007
John F. McCarthy, Sc.D., C.I.H.Environmental Health & Engineering
Newton, MA
Environmental Impactsof Hospitals
10085
110
245
355
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Office
Education
Public Assembly
Healthcare
Laboratories
En
erg
y C
on
sum
pti
on
kBT
U /
ft2
Hospital Mission
• Excellence in clinical practice• Evolving practice• Efficiency• Environment of care
Supported by infrastructure
Multiple Constituencies
Facility
Patients
Local Community
Regulators
Clinical Staff
Operational Staff
Global Communit
y
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
P D CD C O O+
100
80
60
40
20
Distribution of Life Cycle Costs
Rel
ativ
e C
ost
($)
Cu
mu
lati
ve C
ost
(%
)87
78
321
CONSTRUCTIONDESIGNFINANCE
ROUTINE O&MNON ROUTINE O&M
2.7
1.8
0.80.8
1.8
0.9
1.5
1.1
1.5
1.1
8.0
1.0
0.8
Green Strategies
How do we ensure a connection to health mission in the design process?
How do we optimize the design process to consider the facility’s operations?
What protocols are necessary to maintain healthy building operations?
LEED vs. GGHC Project Phases
LEED
Sustainable SitesWater EfficiencyEnergy & AtmosphereMaterials & ResourcesIndoor Environmental QualityInnovation in Design
GGHC - CONSTRUCTION
Integrated DesignSustainable SitesWater EfficiencyEnergy & AtmosphereMaterials & ResourcesIndoor Environmental QualityInnovation in Design
GGHC – OPERATIONS
Integrated OperationsTransportation OperationsEnergy EfficiencyWater ConservationChemical ManagementWaste ManagementEnvironmental ServicesEnvironmental Preferable PurchasingInnovation in Operations
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS
Systems Thinking
The relationship between parts becomes as important as the parts themselves.
Integrated design is one component –integrated business is key.
Global Community
Local Community
Operations Staff
Clinical Staff
Patients Committed Leadership
Clinical Excellence
Commitment to People
Life Cycle Costing
Process Improvements through Sustainable Design
Community Influence
Drivers for ChangeConstituencies
Why LEED for BWH-70F ?
What Are Your Goals?
• High performance– Standard budget
• Energy savings– % > ASHRAE
• Water use– Reuse water, e.g., reverse osmosis (RO)– 100% capture and reuse of rainwater
falling on building
Tie them into opportunities to solve problems
Global Community
Local Community
Operations Staff
Clinical Staff
Patients
Improved Health Outcomes Level of Care Higher Satisfaction
Greater Productivity Improved Sensory Environment Reduced Lost Work Days
Improved Energy Efficiency Compliance Reduced Service Calls
Harmonious Design/ Operations Good Neighbor Code Compliance
Compliance with ASHE/LEED Programs Exemplary Project Recognition
Targets for ImprovementConstituencies
Global Community
Local Community
Operations Staff
Clinical Staff
Patients
Shorter Stays Level of Infection Satisfaction Surveys
Staff Time with Patients Staff Surveys Lost Work Days
Benchmarks Against Energy Star Energy Utilization Reviews Service Calls
Neighborhood Relations Regulatory Complaints Media Coverage
LEED Certification Public and Industry Award Recognition
Key Performance IndicatorsPrioritized Constituencies
Structured Facilitation
ID participant roles
Specify designrequirements
ID System Dependencies (energy, water, materials,
equipment, air flow)
ID Opportunities (energy efficiency,
heat recovery, load mgmt, controllability, IAQ, synergies
Agree on goals For High Performance
(recognize constraints)
AssessFeasibility
(modeling, merits)
Integrate intoDesign
PeoplePatients/
Staff
Lighting
Water DemandEnergy
Demand
BuildingEnvelope
HVAC
Materials/Furnishings
Indoor Environmental
Quality
EquipmentNon-HVAC
Site
InteriorSpaces
Programming
PeoplePatient
s/Staff
Lighting
Water DemandEnergy
Demand
BuildingEnvelope
HVAC
Materials/Furnishings
Indoor Environmental
Quality
EquipmentNon-HVAC
Site
InteriorSpaces
Programming
Example 1: Energy Modeling and Simulation
OBJECTIVES:
• Simulate the predicted overall energy use for the building
• Evaluate by category (e.g., lighting, equipment, space heating and cooling, fan operation, etc.)
• Quantify dominant energy use areas
• Evaluate dominant areas to identify potential energy-saving opportunities
Contribution to Building Cooling Load by Component
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000
Wall Conduction
Roof Conduction
Window Conduction
Window Solar
Ventilation
Occupants
Lighting
Equipment
MBTU/yr
100% Peak Load, 24 Hours Continuous 100% Peak Load Day, Reduced Load Night
Energy Modeling and Simulation Key Findings• Dominant use categories: equipment (43%) and
lighting (22%)• Space cooling and fan systems are lower (~15%
each)
• Major contributor to cooling load is equipment, with equal contribution from lighting, occupants, and ventilation
• Cooling load from solar gain through window is <5%
• To save energy costs and reduce space cooling load, optimize lighting and equipment energy use (controls, dimming, etc.)
• Opportunities to reduce fan system energy use and space cooling load: optimize ventilation, reduce airborne heat load
Example 2: Identify OpportunitiesWater Conservation Strategies
• Using Amory RO reject water to flush valves, sterilizers, wall hydrants,cooling tower through a dedicated pumped distribution system in BWH-70F (Goal: Evaluate for LEED innovation credit)
• Electronic faucets in public restrooms (Include)
• Waterless urinals (Include)
• Minimization of filter backwash (Pending)
• Use of make-up water meter included for the cooling tower (Analysis required)
• Low flow and/or waterless medical air and vacuum systems (Analysis required)
• Equipment spec to include flow control devices on sterilizers (Approval required)
Design Elements
• High deck to ceiling clearance• High efficiency glazing• Large window expanse• Significant concrete massing• Large equipment load
Design Elements
• High efficiency (Low E) glazing
• Upwardly deflecting “window blinds”
• High room ceiling heights (~11 feet)
• Clerestory windows
• Reflect daylight deeper into the central core hallways
• Reduce glare inpatient rooms and radiant heat gain on patients
• Reduce artificial light demand (variable)
• Reduce electrical demand
• Reduce needed cooling capacity
Outcomes
Design Elements
• Utilize T5/T8 lights• Automatic dimming
control (to compensate for changing ambient light levels)
• Further reduces cooling capacity and electrical demand
Outcomes
Design Elements
• High ceilings allow for a low wall displacement ventilation system
• Improve IAQ by providing cleaner/fresher air to occupied zone
• Reduced cooling capacity needed (~50% of heat from lights does not reach occupants
• Requires less fan horsepower since less total air is needed
• Provides expanded use of economizer mode
• Less room noise (due to reduced exit velocities)
Outcomes
Outcomes• Provide a more
comfortable and draft free room (supply higher temperature, lower velocity air)
• Individual room VAVs are not needed
Design Elements
• Radiant surfaces
• More comfortable environment for patients and staff
• Permits a generally lower room air temperature (minimizes thermal loss to floor decking)
• Facilitates effectiveness of displacement ventilation under low occupancy
• Reduces operating costs by using water rather than air to thermally condition
Outcomes
Core Principles Guiding Mechanical System Design
• Optimum health
• Reduced energy use
• Liability avoidance
• Risk aversion
Anticipated LEED submittals to U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC):
Design package (Aug 2006) 17 pointsConstruction package (2008) 14 pointsInnovation credits 5 points
Current Goal 36 pointsLEED- Silver range 33 – 38 points
Projected BWH-70F LEED Goals
High Performance Design Features of BWH-70F
• Community/Site:– Exemplary commuter choice program for
alternative transportation and parking
– Exemplary construction waste management by recycling over 90%
– Exemplary neighborhood rebuilding and community development by relocation of six houses
High Performance Design Features of BWH-70F
• Water Conservation:– Landscape irrigation needs met 100% by
reclaimed water from hospital
– Use of high-efficiency drip irrigation technology to minimize water wastage
– Use of waterless medical equipment and CPD sterilizers with water-saving technologies
High Performance Design Features of BWH-70F
• Indoor Environment:– Access to day lighting from over 75% of
interior spaces
– Use of low-emissions paints, adhesives, sealants inside building
– Minimization of indoor and ambient impacts by program control and monitoring
– IAQ pre-occupancy monitoring
High Performance Design Features of BWH-70F
• Energy Conservation:– Energy savings by high-efficiency light
fixtures, variable speed pumps, drives, etc.
LEED Credit Distribution by Category
SS Sustainable sites
WE Water Efficiency
EA Energy and atmosphere
MR Materials and resources
EQ Environmental Quality
ID Innovation & Design
9
2 16
12
5
35
15
1317
5
14
69
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
SS WE EA MR EQ ID Total
Category
Po
ints # Max Available
# Points
Evidence Based Design
• Relevant HVAC research– Full size mockups
• Regulations and codes• Infection control issues• Curtain wall/HVAC issues• Light shelves• Understand demand
Aids to Success
• Support hospital mission• Centralize costs
– Identify true costs
• Train proactively– Involve directors in training design
• Develop common goals, vocabulary, and key performance indicators