a survey of optical burst switching in the next-generation optical internet

27
A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Upload: bond

Post on 25-Jan-2016

57 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet. Outline. Introduction Switching Techniques Optical Burst Switching QoS Support in All-Optical Networks Performance Issues Conclusions. . Introduction. Introduction IP runs over all-optical WDM layer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Page 2: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Outline

Introduction Switching Techniques Optical Burst Switching QoS Support in All-Optical Networks Performance Issues Conclusions

Page 3: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Introduction

Introduction– IP runs over all-optical WDM layer– Challenging issues– How to support QoS?

Page 4: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Introduction

New optical switches/routers (hardware) are being built for the next-generation optical Internet.

The huge bandwidth of fiber optic networks– Due to DWDM (dense wavelength-division

multiplexing ) technique

Data transmitted optically has to be slowed down at each node if it is to be switched electronically.

Page 5: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Introduction

IP over WDM– Transport IP packets directly over the optical layer

without any O/E/O conversion.

No optical form of RAM available today

Novel protocols (software) running on top of optical switches/routers are needed.

Page 6: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Introduction

Challenging issues– The current lack of optical random acces

s memory– The requirement for synchronization– How to provide basic QoS support?

Page 7: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Introduction

Page 8: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Switching Techniques

Switching Technique– Wavelength routing– Optical packet switching– Optical burst switching

Page 9: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Switching Techniques

Wavelength routing– Two-way reservation is needed to setup lightpaths

Advantages:– No optical buffer or O/E/O conversion of data is neede

d.

Limitations:– Low bandwidth utilization

– There are not enough wavelengths in the fiber to enable full mesh connectivity

– Setting up and tearing down a lightpath would take at least several tens of milliseconds

Page 10: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Switching Techniques

Optical packet/cell switching– The payload(data) is sent along with its header without

setting up a path

Each packet needs to be buffered– Due to the tight coupling in time between the payload

and header, store-and-forward nature

The size of the payload is too small given the high channel bandwidth of optical networks, resulting in relatively high control overhead.

Page 11: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Switching Techniques

Optical burst switching– Combines the best of circuit and packet switching while

avoiding their shortcomings.

– One-way reservation. (a data burst follows a corresponding control packet without waiting for an acknowledgment)

– Control can be performed electronically, but data can be switched optically.

– A burst will cut through intermediate nodes without being buffered.

Page 12: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet
Page 13: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Switching Techniques

Optical switching paradigm

Bandwidth utilization

Latency (including

setup)

Implementation difficulty

Adaptivity (to traffic and

fault)

Wavelength Low High Low Low

Packet/cell High Low High High

OBS High Low Medium High

Page 14: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

OBS

Optical Burst Switching– Open-ended

• TAG ( tell-and-go )• IBT ( in-band-terminator )

– Close-ended• JET ( just-enough-time )

Differ mainly in the way that bandwidth release is triggered

Page 15: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

OBS

TAG (tell-and-go)– The source node sends a release packet

IBT (in-band-terminator)– A burst contains an IBT (e.g., silence in a

voice circuit), and bandwidth is released as soon as the IBT is detected.

Page 16: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

OBS

JET (just-enough-time)

T(i) = T - Σδ(h)

Page 17: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

OBS

JET– Offset Time– Delayed Reservation (DR)

Page 18: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

QoS Support

QoS Support in All-Optical Networks– Without FDLs– With FDLs

( FDL : fiber delay line )

Page 19: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

QoS Support

QoS scheme– Critical data can be transported at the WD

M layer more reliably than noncritical data.

Intraclass contentions and interclass contentions

Page 20: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Without FDLs

t01 > l0

Page 21: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

With FDLs

Page 22: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Multiple Classes

tdiff : the difference in the offset times assigned to class i and

class (i-1)

R : The lower bound of the isolation degree

Page 23: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Performance Issues

Performance Issues– Blocking probability– Queuing delay and end-to-end latency

Page 24: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Performance Issues

Page 25: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Performance Issues

Page 26: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Performance Issues

The impact of the extra offset time, depends on the number of classes, and the offset time difference (tdiff)used.

The mean burst size : 15 kbytes

10 Gb/s => L = 12 μs

Service classes (n) : 4

tdiff = 3L (at least 95% class isolation)

Maximum additional delay = 108 μs (n -1) * tdiff

Page 27: A Survey of Optical Burst Switching in the Next-Generation Optical Internet

Conclusions

The integration of IP and WDM Overview of Optical Burst Switching

– Achieving a balance between wavelength routing and optical packet switching

– Without requiring buffering at the WDM layer– Support QoS in optical networks

An OBS protocol : JET– The use of offset time and DR