a sample of the book

5
A sample of the Book Since I am not quite ready yet to send you the Book (or e-book) itself, I figured I’d send you a sample…an idea of what the Book is supposed to be about, in case you’d need that so you can have an idea of what type of cover I might need. In doing so, I have asked myself a few questions that I think might help making the book, or the view of the book, quite clear. I will intend to answer simple questions like: What is the Book about? What’s the purpose of the Book? What type of Book is it? Matter of fact, I have generated a set of questions regarding what to talk about and what would be of most importance in this sample. The answers to these questions will be explored here now. Firstly, let me say that the book is about allowing oneself to experience a different aspect of Reality. It provides, for the most part, a unique view of Reality that is mostly weird with a sense of the bizarre. If there is one thing that I have learned, it’s the fact that everybody experiences Reality based on a particular Model. Everybody has a Model of Reality.

Upload: lecks90

Post on 04-Feb-2016

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Just an sample...an idea of the book I am actually working on.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Sample of the Book

A sample of the Book

Since I am not quite ready yet to send you the Book (or e-book) itself, I figured I’d send you a sample…an idea of what the Book is supposed to be about, in case you’d need that so you can have an idea of what type of cover I might need.In doing so, I have asked myself a few questions that I think might help making the book, or the view of the book, quite clear.I will intend to answer simple questions like:What is the Book about?What’s the purpose of the Book?What type of Book is it?Matter of fact, I have generated a set of questions regarding what to talk about and what would be of most importance in this sample. The answers to these questions will be explored here now.

Firstly, let me say that the book is about allowing oneself to experience a different aspect of Reality. It provides, for the most part, a unique view of Reality that is mostly weird with a sense of the bizarre.If there is one thing that I have learned, it’s the fact that everybody experiences Reality based on a particular Model. Everybody has a Model of Reality. That Model can be scientific, mystic, or magical…even supernatural, to a certain extent. The fact is, there is always a Model. Therefore, the primary purpose of this Book is to break that Model.Due to a recent conversations I have had with my DNA (not the Bio-chemical DNA, but the Linguistic DNA we all have), I figured that everyone has a Model through which they look at the world. It has also come to my attention that this Model---whatever it may

Page 2: A Sample of the Book

be---can be broken. Thus, I have elected it best to do so through this e-book.Of course, there is no experience of Reality that can break your Model apart that is not Mystical. Therefore, even the unique experience that this book allows one to have is also, to a certain degree, Mystical.

However, the book has a particular definition (I should say) of Mystical. In no way do I consider the Mystical experience that this book allows one to have, Supernatural.In fact, one of the primary principles of this book is a state of General Agnosticism.That Philosophy is referred to as “Model-Agnosticism”.This, of course, makes me a “Model-Agnostic”.

One only has to look back in time, and even today, to realize that, in the majority of cases, a Mystical experience is usually attributed or connected to some kind of religion. Thus, religious views will also be presented in this e-book. Yet, in no way should it be thought of as a Religious book.Oh yes, it’s spiritual. As long as spiritual does not necessarily mean religious, it’s spiritual. And, it is such because it deals with stuff of the Spirit…where spirit may have a completely different meaning than that usually attributed to it.

Come to think of it, I doubt there is really any real definition of what a Spirit is supposed to be.Try asking someone what a spirit is and see their reactions trying to get out of that situation.That thing is funny, I’m telling you!

In terms of weird, there are a variety of subjects that I have decided to tackle. That includes notions of Consciousness, Alchemy, some aspects of Greek Mythology, Artificial Intelligence

Page 3: A Sample of the Book

and the notion of Transhumanism. I have considered altered states of consciousness…the experience of them in relation to hallucinations.

What if we were in a computer simulation?This may be a theme you find in this book.Could it be that we’re made of Language? What would be the syntax of our being? What kind of Language are we? Mathematical? Computational?What are we talking about, exactly? Do we really have a consciousness? Is this consciousness bio-chemical? Is there something else going on here?Could it be that consciousness is purely Linguistic? Is there such a thing as Prime Language? Is it what some religions call “The Logos”?Is God real? If there is no such thing as supernatural, what is God, then? Does Metaphysical necessarily imply Supernatural? I doubt it.On what basis do I doubt it?

In this exploration, I provide some form of Linguistic Technology that I refer to as “Transpersonal Kabbalah”.It is something that I see as some kind of technology to navigate the soul/psyche. Etymologically, Psychology is the study of the soul. Thus, to a certain measure, there is a psychological theme, or flair, in this Transpersonal Kabbalah of mine.I provide psychic means to navigate and explore the Universe, without necessarily calling to the idea of supernature.Indeed, when everything is Language, there is no such thing as Supernature. It all becomes a simple notion of Higher Languages.

Page 4: A Sample of the Book

The entirety of this book is based on some kind of Techno-Linguistic approach to reality. That Techno-Linguistic approach makes the weird quite normal.I mean, we do have syntactic errors, for sure. Even a complex system as such as Reality may have syntactic errors. Of course, there is the question of whether these so-called syntactic errors can really be regarded as such, or is it just part of the programming?Oh yes…there is also the idea of a Global Operator Designer, as presented in the CTMU. Could it be that the SCSPL (Self-Configuring, Self-Processing Language) is the same as that which referred to as “The Logos”?It could be that everything is possible on a syntactic level, couldn’t it?