a research report [executive summary only]
TRANSCRIPT
PreparedonbehalfofTheColoradoTrustbySparkPolicyInstitute
Contributingauthorsinclude: JewlyaLynn,Ph.D.
PilarStellaIngargiola,MPH,OneGiving
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessmentAResearchReport[ExecutiveSummaryOnly]
October2013
A R
esea
rch
Rep
ort
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com
ThankyoutothefollowingSparkteammembersfortheirinvolvementintheinterviewprocess,managingthedataandreviewingthedraftreport:
KiranObee,JasonVahling,RebeccaKahn,NataliePortmanMarsh,andRachaelMoore.
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com 1|P a g e
As The Colorado Trust explores a field building strategy, one of the first steps is mapping theadvocacy field. In this field mapping process, which focused on mapping the health and healthequityadvocacyfields,theadvocateshadtheopportunitytoparticipateinasurvey(madewidelyavailable) and an interview (with 30 selected advocates). They were asked about the fivedimensionsofadvocacyfields,asdefinedinabriefpublishedbyTheTrust(Beer,Ingargiola,&Beer,2012).Thisreportsharesthefindingsoftheinterviews,buildingonthefindingsofthesurveyandintegratingmanyoftheexamplesandideassharedinpreviousreportssupportedbyTheColoradoTrust.Foralistof interviewees,pleaseseeAppendixA.Thefollowingdefinitionsareusedforthefivedimensionsoffieldbuilding(Beer,Ingargiola&Lynn,2013):
• Field Frame. A common frame of reference through which organizations identifythemselvesasafieldandaspartofacommonenterprise.
• Infrastructure.Thearrayofadvocacyskillsneededtomakeprogressonawidevarietyofpolicyissuesthroughoutallstagesofthepolicyprocesses.
• Connectivity.Thecapacityofdifferentactorstocommunicateandcooperateinawaythatallowsskillsandresourcestobemarshaledinincreasinglyproductivewaysovertime.
• Composition.Thevarietyofvoicesthatcanparticipatemeaningfullyandhaveinfluenceinthepolicyprocess. Thismay include representingdifferentdemographic, socio-economic,geographic,disabilityandsectorinterests.
• AdaptiveCapacity. The ability to conduct sound political analysis, select the tactics bestsuitedforaparticularsituation,andadapttotheshiftingmovesoftheopposition,allies,andpotentialallies.
1.DEFININGTHEFIELDANDITSFRAMEBasedontheresultsoftheinterviews,buildingontheresultsofthesurvey,thefieldasrelatestohealthadvocacyinColoradoandthefieldasrelatestohealthequityinColoradomaynotbeonefieldincurrentpractice.Whilethetwofieldscouldbeseenasone,withacentralhealthadvocacycoreand a periphery, an equally legitimate choice would be to look at the organizations and see adifferentadvocacyfieldentirely.
TableES-1.ComparingthefieldsandtheirframesHealthAdvocacyField EquityField
• Astronghealthadvocacycommunitywithleadingorganizationsthatplaydistinctandcomplementaryrolesandabroadernetworkofsupportingorganizations
• Definedbytheissuesofhealthandhealthcare
• Prioritizesissueslikecoverage,qualityofcare,accesstocare,andaffordability
• Verylooselydefinedandconnectednetworkoforganizationsthatarepositionedtobuildthepowerandvoiceofpopulationsexperiencinghealthdisparities• Definedbyissuesofdisparitiesandequity• Prioritizesmanyissuesincludinghealthandsocialissuesthataffecthealthandotherlifeoutcomes,suchaseducation,income,environment,housing,andfoodsecurityjusttonameafew
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com 2|P a g e
A small number of organizations appear to sit in both fields – they have advocacy capacitythemselves and engagewith both the organizations on the periphery and themoremainstreamadvocates. Additionally, a few of the mainstream advocacy organizations have taken it uponthemselvestoreachintotheequityfieldanddrawuponothersinordertoachievetheiradvocacywins,includingCCLPandCCHI.
2.NETWORKORGANIZATIONS
Many advocacy organizations have specific populations as the focus of their work. Theorganizationsfocusedonadvocacyforchildrenareamongthemostwellconnectedorganizationsinthe network. In contrast, organizations representing people of color are largely outside of theadvocacynetwork(FigureES-1).TheorganizationsadvocatingforNativeAmericans(bottomrightofthevisual)areverywellconnectedtoeachotheryetfairlyisolatedfromthenetworkasawhole.TheorganizationsadvocatingforAsianAmericanandAfricanAmericanpopulationsaregenerallyconnectedtootherorganizationsadvocatingforpeopleofcolor,butrarelyconnectedintothemainadvocacy network. In fact, in order gain access to the main advocacy network, they have to gothrough other groupswho also have narrow advocacy foci.Multi-cultural organizations are alsogenerally isolated, relying on limited connections that fail to reach to the core center of theadvocacynetwork.OrganizationsadvocatingforLatinosarescatteredthroughouttheperipheryofthenetwork,butaclusterareconnectedontherightside.Thisgrouphasdirecttiesintothecoreofthe advocacy network indicating it has greater involvement with mainstream advocacyorganizations.
FigureES-1
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com 3|P a g e
3.DIAGNOSINGTHESTRENGTHSANDWEAKNESSESOFTHEFIELD
Afieldmappingstrategyseeks todiagnose thestrengthsandweaknessesofa field, revealing theopportunitiestoleverageandissuestoovercomeasthefieldisbuilt.Thistypeofmappinginformsnotonlypotentialfundingstrategies,butalsowheretodeployauxiliaryresourcestobuildthefield.
Dimension SummaryofFindings
InfluenceoverPolicyAgenda
Groupswithgreatestinfluenceinclude:• Executivebranch,regulatorysystemandinsurancecompanies.• Advocates(mostoftennamedwereCCHI,CCMU,CCLP).• Industrygroups(ColoradoHospitalAssociation,ColoradoMedicalSociety).• Funders,includingTheColoradoHealthFoundationandTheColoradoTrust.Withinperipherygroups,organizationsidentifiedasraisingthepowerandvoiceofLatinosweremorelikelytobeseenashavinginfluencethanorganizationsfocusedonotherpopulations.
FramingRelatedtoHealthEquity
Interviewees described how their organization focuses on health equity through alens thatwasmoreaboutequitableaccess tohealthcare thansocialdeterminantsofhealth. A few organizations within this network have missions that allow for abroaderfocusthanjusthealthcarewerenotedaspursuingtheissuesinsiloedways,ratherthanbringingthemtogether.
Infrastructure
• Organizationsontheperipherylackcapacitytoengageinadvocacy.Inadditiontofunding,thesegroupsneedanincreasedunderstandingofadvocacyinordertomorefullyparticipate.
• Shared messaging is needed and there are some examples of it happening.Messagesneedtobecollaborativelydeveloped,relevanttocommunitiesofcolorandmorewidelytranslated.
• Policymakereducationisanareawithcapacity,butprimarilyamongmainstreamadvocates.Mainstreamadvocatesreportedthatahealthequityframewouldnotbeusefulinthissetting.Peripherygroupslackthecapacity,credibility,influenceandaccesstopolicymakers.
• Grassroots engagement is generally weak with significant disconnects betweenadvocates and the communities they seek to recruit. Mainstream intervieweesbelieve the community is not interested in participating, while peripheryorganizations reported advocates don’t understand race, privilege and how tospeaktocommunities.
• Ballot initiatives, voter outreach, and voter canvassingare areas of low capacityandmanyintervieweesareconcernedaboutthisaspartofsuccessfuladvocacyishaving the right people elected as legislators and there is a need to havecommunities of color engaged andvoting.Where capacity exists, it is primarilyamongorganizationsengagingtheLatinocommunity.
• Publicengagementisanotherareawithroomforgrowthwithalackofstrategies,challengeswithfindingtherightchannelsofinformationsharing,anddifferencesofopinionbetweenmainstreamandperipheryorganizationsonhowtoaddressthechallenges.
• Political and policy analysiswas identified as largely focusing on coverage andcare.Theintervieweescalledforamorevisionaryanalysistodrivepolicy.
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com 4|P a g e
Dimension SummaryofFindings
• Coalitionsandpartnershipsareareasofbothstrengthandgreaterneed.TheCivicEngagementRoundtablewashighlightedasanexampleofapartnership,aswasProjectHealthColorado.
Connectivity
Connectivityacrossthesedifferentorganizationsiscomplex.Itisnotjustaquestionof whether relationships exist, but when they exist, who initiates them and theperceptionsandconsequencesoftherelationships.Barrierstoconnectivityinclude:• Limitedcapacityamongperipheryorganizations.• Issueframing.• Lack of mutual understanding about each other’s contexts and disconnects
betweenmissions.• Lackofdiversityamongstaffatcentraladvocacyorganizations.• Unspoken dynamic of conflicts based on individual personalities and
organizationalactions.
AdaptiveCapacity
Limited adaptive capacity was reported, with only four organizations beingrepeatedlyidentifiedashavingcapacity:CCLP,CCC,CCMUandCCHI.Adaptivecapacitydescribedastheabilitytoturnonadime,transitionpriorities,haveaproactiveagendaandebbandflowasneeded.
CompositionIntervieweeswidely agree that the health advocacy arena is composed of a “sea ofwhitepeople”andneedstodiversify.Individualsarethedriversoftheadvocacyfield,notorganizations.
StrengthsandWeaknessesbyPopulationGroup
Interviewees were asked which groups are positioned to raise the power and voice of specificpopulationsexperiencinghealthdisparities.Overall,moreorganizationswithgreatercapacityandconnectivity were identified related to Latino communities than any other groups experiencingdisparities. Organizations raising the power and voice of Native Americans were particularlyisolated and low capacity, as were organizations raising the power and voice of AsianAmerican/Pacific Islander communities. Very little adaptive capacitywas reported across all theorganizationsraisingthepowerandvoiceofdifferentpopulationsexperiencingdisparities.
While the connectivity, infrastructure, and adaptive capacity were all low, it may be thatintervieweeslackedsufficientknowledgeofsomeofthesecommunities.
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com 5|P a g e
FigureES-1.Summaryofinterviewees’perceptionsaboutorganizationstheybelievearebuildingthepowerandvoiceofdifferentpopulationgroups
4.STRATEGIESFORBUILDINGTHEFIELD
Asfieldbuildingisnotnewinpractice,thereareexamplestrategiesthatTheTrustcanlooktoastheydeveloptheirapproaches.Someofthesestrategiesalignwellwiththerecommendationsandthoughtsoftheinterviewees.Someconflictwiththeinterviewees’feedbackandothersareoutsidetherangeofwhatintervieweesidentifiedasimportant.
Strategy BriefDescription
1.Changingthesetoforganizationsworkingtoinfluencethepolicydomain.
The core of this strategy is to engage organizations ininfluencing policy that previouslywere disengaged, either dueto a lack of capacity or lack of priority on the issue. Withoutdedicatedandsufficientresources forperipheryorganizations,participating in advocacy capacity building, much less beingactiveandinfluentialadvocates,isunlikelytohappen.
2.Changingthesetofindividualsworkingtoinfluencethepolicydomain.
Leadership development strategies have potential not only todiversifythefield,butalsotodevelopadvocateswithkeyskills,such as adaptive capacity, that are needed in the field morebroadly.
3.Engagingthefieldindevelopingacommonframefocusedonhealthequity.
Fieldframesarenotmessages,butratherframesofreferencesthatshapehowadvocatesseethemselvesandothersaspartofasharedfield.TheTrustcouldworkwithgranteestouncover,expand,andexplorethefieldframe.Aframingeffortmayneedtobeginwithlearningbeforeanequityframeisevenpossible.
# of Orgs Identified
Connectivity to interviewees
Adaptive Capacity
Use of HE Framing
Grassroots/ Mobilizing
Messaging/ Communications
Political/Policy Analysis & Lobbying
Latinos (25)
Latinos
Latinos
Latinos Latinos
Latinos
Latinos
Rural (8)
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural
Rural Rural Native Americans
(5)
Native Americans Native
Americans Native
Americans
Native Americans
Native Americans Native
Americans
Asian/PI (5)
Asian/PI
Asian/PI
Asian/PI Asian/PI Asian/PI Asian/PI
African Americans (10) African
Americans
African Americans
African Americans
African Americans
African Americans
African Americans
Low Income (14)
Low Income
Low Income
Low Income
Low Income
Low Income
Low Income
Immigrants/ Refugees (12)
Immigrants/ Refugees
Immigrants/ Refugees
Immigrants/ Refugees
Immigrants/ Refugees
Immigrants/ Refugees
Immigrants/ Refugees
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com 6|P a g e
Strategy BriefDescription
4.Engagingthefieldasawholeinopportunitiesfortechnicalassistance,notjustgrantees.
TechnicalassistancethatisbroadlydisseminatedmayallowTheTrusttoreachmoreoftheseorganizationsthanfundingalonewouldpermit.However,givencapacityissuesidentified,thisstrategymightfailtoengagesomeorevenmanyoftheseorganizationsiftheirbasicstaffingcapacityneedsarenotmet.
5.Targetingresourcestospecificgapsininfrastructure,whilebuildingconnectivityamongjustthoseorganizations.
MirroringtherecentworkofProjectHealthColorado,asimilarstrategycouldfocuson:
• Overcomingthecapacitygapsamongtheequityfield,• Building a base of advocacy time and skills for multipleorganizations.
Thisapproachwouldallowforagroupofperipheryadvocatestobuildthecapacitytodeveloptheirpolicyprioritiestogether,withouttheinfluenceofmainstreamadvocatesandtheirtypicalstrategies.
6.Changingthebodyofknowledgeandexperiencethatadvocatesdrawuponthroughcreatinga“hub”
Whilethisconcepthasintuitiveappeal–placingtheresponsibilityforbuildingthecapacityofthefieldinanorganizationoutsideofthefoundationandinoneorganization,ratherthanacoalition,whichcouldbemessierandslowertomove,itmaynotresonateintheColoradocontextduetopowerdynamicsandlimitedfundingfortheadvocacyfield.
7.Changingthebodyofknowledgeandexperiencethatadvocatesdrawuponbyprovidingnewinformationandtechnicalassistance.
Mainstreamadvocatesprimarilysupportedcontinuedinvestmentinconveningsforlearningpurposeswithsomesupportforfundingdatastrategies.Peripheryorganizationsoverwhelminglysupportedbuildingskillsandcapacitiesofindividualorganizationstoengageinadvocacy,buildingknowledgeamongthepublicandpolicymakersofhealthdisparities,andcontinuingtofunddatastrategies.
8.Changethebodyofknowledgethatadvocatesdrawuponbyprovidingassistancetothefieldtodevelopanddeploysharedmessaging.
Developingasharedmessageby:• Bringingorganizationstogethertodevelopit;• Focusingonaccessiblelanguagethatthepublicwill
understand;• Usingdataandevaluationtoguidemessagedevelopment;• Focusthecontentofthemessageoncommunities,notwhat
funderswant;and• Createmessagingthatresonateswithdiversegroups.
9.Changinghowtheadvocatesconnectandinteractthroughconvenings.
Developingaconveningstrategythathassomecombinationoflearning,relationshipbuilding,andtakingactiontogether.Considerusingdifferentconveningapproacheswithdifferentparticipantsovertimeasthefieldisbuilt.
10.Changinghowtheadvocatesconnectandinteractthroughstrategicuseofshort-termtransactionalcampaigns.
Basedonthebeliefthatengagingadvocatesinasharedstrategywillhelpthemtobuildnewhabitsofinteraction.Onlyencouragedbymainstreamadvocates,whichmaysuggestalackofreadinessamongperipheryadvocatestoundertakespecificpolicyprioritiesbeforetheircapacityishigher.
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com 7|P a g e
Strategy BriefDescription
11.Changinghowtheadvocatesconnectandinteractbyfundingcollaborationsandcoalitions,notindividualgrantees.
Requiringorcreatingstrongincentivesforcollaboration.Thisstrategymaybeprematureormay,atleast,requiresomecarefulthoughtinordertoensurethelessinfluentialorganizationsarefullpartnersinthecollaborations.
12.Designfundingmechanismstosupportadaptation.
Considergeneraloperatingsupport,multiyearfunding,andrapidturnaroundfundingtoallowforgreateradaptivityinadvocacyorganizations.
13.Supportingadvocatestoleadthedevelopmentofafieldbuildingstrategy.
Overcomehesitationsaboutintentionsbehindtheprocessandlong-termdisconnectsbetweenfundersandcommunitiesofcolorbyengagingadvocatesintheprocessofdevelopingthestrategy.Itmayalsohelpwithsomeofthedynamicsofdistrustanddislikeamongadvocatesinthefield.
14.Activelyengaginginbuildingtheframing,connectivityandevenadaptivityandcompositionofthefieldofhealthadvocacyandequityfunders.
Convenethefoundationcommunitytotalkaboutwhatwaslearnedinthemappinganddevelopalignedstrategiesforbuildingtheadvocacyfieldorfields.Worktogethertobuildconnectivityandadaptivecapacityamongthefunders.
5.DEPLOYINGANDSEQUENCINGSTRATEGIES
Thedecisionsabouthowtodefinethefield,deploythestrategies,andsequencethestrategiesarejustasimportantaswhichstrategiestodeploy.Witheachchoicemade,TheTrustwillbeshiftingthepowerdynamicswithinthefieldandcausingbothintendedandunintendedconsequences.Thiswouldbe trueof any funding strategyandcertainlyof any fundingstrategy inadvocacy.What isdifferent is that the focus on field building creates an opportunity for funding strategies to bedesignedwithawarenessaboutthewaythatfundingchoiceswillinfluenceanentirefield,notjustanorganizationorsmallsubsetoforganizations.
Deploymentchoices,suchasthetypesofcapacitytobuild,whentoengageadvocates,whethertodoconnectivitystrategiesbeforeoraftercapacitystrategies,whetherTheTrustispartofthefieldor a neutral convener, etc. will have significant impacts on the outcomes. The possibleconsequences of these types of decisions include the extent to which advocates buy in to thestrategy, whether capacities are developed in isolation or in a field context, the extent towhichpolicyprioritiescontinuetobedrivenbymainstreamadvocatesratherthanbyperipherygroups,andtheoverallpowerdynamicsofthefield.
6.NEXTSTEPS
Although this reporthighlightsmany strategies andopportunities, a somekeydecisionsmustbemadebeforeanyofthestrategiescanbedesigned,includingthedesiredoutcomesofthestrategy,thedefinitionofthefield,theidentificationofwhoneedstobeinvolvedindevelopingthefundingstrategyandatwhatpoint,andthetimehorizonforbuildingthefield.
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com 8|P a g e
Oncethestrategyismorefullydesigned,whetherinpartnershipwithadvocatesandotherfundersor largely by The Trust’s staff and leadership, in addition to implementing the strategy, anevaluation will be needed. Questions to explore include which dimensions are priorities for theTrust and given those, what evaluation strategies can provide the most useful information; theextent towhich real-time informationwill be useful; and how advocateswill be involved in theevaluation.
AsTheTrust seeks to answer thesequestions, therearemany fundersnationally thathavegonethrough a similar process – mapping, defining a strategy, implementing and evaluating. Anopportunity exists to learn from these funders aboutwhat hasworked for themaswell aswhattheywouldhavedonedifferently.
REFERENCESBeer,T.,Ingargiola,P.S.,andFlynnBeer,M.(2012).Advocacy&publicpolicygrantmaking:Matching
processtopurpose.Denver,CO:TheColoradoTrust.
Beer,T.,Ingargiola,P.S.,andLynn,J.(2013).Fieldbuildinginadvocacy:Framingthe2013Dialogue.PreparedbybehalfofTheCenterforEvaluationInnovationforthe2013FieldBuildinginAdvocacyConvening.
APPENDIXAThankyoutotheintervieweesfortheirparticipationinthisproject:• Dr.JandelAllen-Davis,VicePresidentofGovernmentandExternalRelations,KaiserPermanente
Colorado• ElisabethArenales,Director,HealthProgram,ColoradoCenterforLawandPolicy• HeidiBaskfield,ExecutiveDirectorofAdvocacy,StrategyandExternalAffairs,Children’sHospital
Colorado• CodyBelzley,VicePresidentofHealthInitiatives,ColoradoChildren’sCampaign• KellyBrough,PresidentandCEO,DenverMetroChamberofCommerce• WadeBuchanan,President,TheBellPolicyCenter• MonicaBuhlig,DirectorofBasicHumanNeeds,DenverFoundation• BradClark,ExecutiveDirector,OneColorado• WhitneyConnor,SeniorProgramOfficer–Health;JanetLopez,ProgramOfficer–Education;and
ElsaHolguin,SeniorProgramOfficer-Child&FamilyDevelopment;RoseCommunityFoundation• DeborahCostin,ExecutiveDirector,ColoradoAssociationforSchool-BasedHealthCare• Denise(Dede)dePercin,ExecutiveDirector,ColoradoConsumerHealthInitiative• CorrineFowler,EconomicJusticeDirector,ColoradoProgressiveCoalition• KelliFritts,AssociateStateDirectorforAdvocacy,AmericanAssociationofRetiredPersons• JimGarcia,ExecutiveDirector,ClinicaTepeyac
HealthAdvocacyFieldAssessment
PreparedbySparkPolicyInstitute|www.sparkpolicy.com 9|P a g e
• RudyGonzales,ExecutiveDirector,ServiciosdeLaRaza• GabrielGuillaume,VicePresidentofCommunityInvestments,LiveWellColorado• GretchenHammer,ExecutiveDirector,ColoradoCoalitionfortheMedicallyUnderserved• AliciaHaywood,PolicyandAdvocacyManager,ColoradoRuralHealthCenter• NitaHenry,ExecutiveDirectorofCareerServiceAuthority,CityandCountyofDenverandFounder/
DirectorofTheKaleidoscopeProject• SusanHill,VicePresidentofPrograms,CaringforColoradoFoundation• JohnJewett,BehavioralHealthSupervisor,DenverIndianFamilyResourceCenter• MoeKeller,VicePresidentforPolicy,MentalHealthAmericaofColorado• AshlinMalouf-Spinden,AssociateDirector,TogetherColorado• LorezMeinhold,CommunityPartnershipsOfficeDirector/DeputyExecutiveDirector,The
DepartmentofHealthCarePolicyandFinancing• OliviaMendoza,ExecutiveDirector,ColoradoLatinoLeadership,AdvocacyandResearch
Organization• SamMurillo,FamilyNavigatoratChildren’sHospital,FamilyVoicesColorado• MauricioPalacio,Director,OfficeofHealthEquity,ColoradoDepartmentofPublicHealthand
Environment• KathyUnderhill,ExecutiveDirector,HungerFreeColorado• LisaVanRaemdonck,ExecutiveDirector,ColoradoAssociationofLocalPublicHealthOfficialsand
ThePublicHealthAllianceofColorado• ChristineWanifuchi,ChiefExecutiveOfficer,AsianPacificDevelopmentCenter