a report on consumer preference and supply chain analysis ...€¦ · consumer preference and...
TRANSCRIPT
SSH4A is supported by the Australian Government and DGIS.
A Report on Consumer Preference and Supply
Chain Analysis for Sanitation
March 2015
.
…………. ………………
Netherlands
Development
Organization
i | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
A report on Consumer Preference and Supply Chain Analysis
for Sanitation (Dolpa, Jumla, Kalikot, Mahottari, Rukum, Rolpa, Salyan and
Sarlahi)
SNV Nepal Bakhundole, Lalitpur, Nepal
Submitted by: Surya Binod Pokharel Deependra Kaji Thapa
Research Center for Integrated Development Nepal
Gausala, Kathmandu [email protected]
ii | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Acknowledgement RECID Nepal is grateful to SNV Nepal for offering the opportunity of carrying out the Consumer Preference and Supply Chain Analysis study. Special thanks are due to Ms. Nadira Khawaja (WASH Sector Leader) and Mr. Kailash Sharma (Market Development Advisor) and Mr. Anup Regmi (Project Leader) from SNV Nepal for their continuous support and guidance in the finalisation of study methodology, field plans as well as finalisation of the study report.
RECID Nepal would like to thank a wide range of individuals who supported this study. We are grateful to the district advisors of SNV Nepal for supporting the field work in the districts. Special gratitude goes to all the participants and respondents including the staff and representatives of WSSDO/RMSO and the supply chain actors (ring producers, wholesalers, retailers, masons) for their patience, cooperation and valuable time in sharing their insights and experiences. We express our deep appreciation to all the supervisors and enumerators for their hard work and timely completion of field levels.
Surya Binod Pokharel
Deependra Kaji Thapa
Research Center for Integrated Development (RECID) Nepal
Kathmandu, Nepal
March 2015
iii | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Table of Contents
Acknowledgement ............................................................................................. ii
Table of Contents .............................................................................................. iii
List of Tables and Figures .................................................................................. vi
List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................ vii
Executive Summary ......................................................................................... viii
Chapter I. Introduction and Objectives ............................................................. 11
1.1 Background .................................................................................................................. 11
1.2 Supply Chain and Consumer Preferences in Sanitation ................................................. 11
1.3 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................ 12
1.4 Study Area and Methodology ....................................................................................... 12
1.4.1 Study Area ................................................................................................................... 12
1.4.2 Study Methodology ..................................................................................................... 12
1.5 Structure of the Report ................................................................................................ 14
Chapter II. Findings of the Study ....................................................................... 15
2.1 Findings of Consumer Preference Study ....................................................................... 15
2.1.1 General Demographic and Socio-‐Economic Status of the Study Districts ................... 15
2.1.2 Sanitation Status of Study Districts ............................................................................. 16
2.1.3 Current Defecation Practice among Latrine Non-‐users .............................................. 17
2.1.4 Reasons for Having a Latrine ....................................................................................... 17
2.1.5 Reasons for Not Having a Latrine ................................................................................ 18
iv | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
2.1.6 Convenience of Toilet Use by Household Members ................................................... 19
2.1.7 Hand-‐washing Practice ................................................................................................ 19
2.1.8 Types of Latrine Construction Materials ..................................................................... 20
2.1.9 Purchasing Practices .................................................................................................... 21
2.1.10 Transportation of Materials for Latrine Construction ............................................... 22
2.1.11 Construction Period .................................................................................................. 23
2.1.12 Construction Practices and Services .......................................................................... 23
2.1.13 Use and Maintenance of Latrines ............................................................................. 24
2.1.14 Possible Solutions to Challenges in Construction and Maintenance of Latrines ....... 25
2.1.15 Willingness to Pay and Financing .............................................................................. 26
2.2 Findings of Supply Chain Study ..................................................................................... 27
2.2.1 Type of Private Sector Actors Engaged in Sanitation .................................................. 27
2.2.2 Analysis of Current Sanitation Supply Chains .............................................................. 28
2.2.3 Wholesalers/Retailers ................................................................................................. 32
2.2.4 Ring Producers ............................................................................................................ 38
2.2.5 Masons ........................................................................................................................ 40
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendations ............................... 44
3.1 Discussion of the Major Findings of the Consumer Preference Study ............................ 44
3.2 Discussion of the Findings Related to Supply Chain Analysis ......................................... 45
3.2.1 Products ...................................................................................................................... 45
3.2.2 Pricing .......................................................................................................................... 46
3.2.3 Place ............................................................................................................................ 46
3.2.4 Promotion ................................................................................................................... 46
v | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
3.2.5 Policy ........................................................................................................................... 47
3.2.6 Partnership .................................................................................................................. 47
3.3 Role of Local Government and Line Agencies in Supply Chain ....................................... 47
3.4 Overall Analysis ........................................................................................................... 48
3.4.1 Knowledge Challenge .................................................................................................. 48
3.4.2 Technology Challenge ................................................................................................. 49
3.4.3 Affordability Challenge ................................................................................................ 49
3.4.4 Outreach and Fragmentation Challenge ..................................................................... 50
3.5 Conclusion and Recommendations .............................................................................. 50
3.5.1 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 50
3.5.2 Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 51
References ....................................................................................................... 59
Annexes ........................................................................................................... 60
Annex I. Tools used for the Study ....................................................................................... 60
1. FGD guideline with community people .......................................................................... 60
2. Interview guideline for Supply chain (business-‐importer, wholesaler, retailer) .............. 60
3. Interview guideline for mason ...................................................................................... 60
4. Interview guideline for ring producer ............................................................................. 60
5. Checklist for financial institutions/I-‐NGOs ...................................................................... 60
6. Checklist for estimating latrine cost ............................................................................... 60
Annex II. Supply chain mapping of study districts .............................................................. 61
vi | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
List of Tables and Figures
Table 1. Wealth quintile by districts (Source: Data from baseline survey, July 2014). ................ 16
Table 2. Sanitation Coverage of Study Districts (Source: Data from baseline survey, July 2014). 17
Table 3. Reasons (motivation) for toilet adoption and non-‐adoption. ........................................ 19
Table 4. Construction materials used for latrine construction. ................................................... 20
Table 5. Average toilet construction cost (NPR) as per consumer responses .............................. 22
Table 6. Problems in toilet construction and use. ........................................................................ 25
Table 7. Private Sector Actors Engaged in Sanitation Businesses or Related Supply Chains in the
Districts ........................................................................................................................................ 27
Table 8. Sanitary and Construction Materials Cost ...................................................................... 33
Table 9. Sanitation Hardware Transportation Cost ...................................................................... 35
Table 10. The Annual Interest Rate of Bank and Service Charge ................................................. 37
Table 11. Issues Related to Technology, Cost and Supply Chain .................................................. 42
Table 12. Proposed Activities under each Recommendations ..................................................... 56
Figure 1. Map of Nepal showing study districts. .......................................................................... 13
Figure 2. Land ownership by district (Source: Data from baseline survey, July 2014). ................ 16
Figure 3. Sanitation Hardware Supply Chain in the Terai ............................................................. 30
Figure 4. Sanitation Hardware and Supply Chain in the Hills and Mountains .............................. 31
vii | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
List of Abbreviations BCC Behaviour Change Communication CAC Community Awareness Centre CBOs Community Based Organisations CBS Central Bureau of Statistics CLTS Community Led Total Sanitation CSOs Civil Society Organizations DDC District Development Committee DPHO District Public Health Office DWASHCC District WASH Coordination Committee FCHV Female Community Health Volunteer FGDs Focus Group Discussions FNCCI Federation of National Chamber of Commerce and Industries GoN Government of Nepal I/NGOs International / Non-Government Organizations KAP Knowledge, Attitude and Practice KID Key Informant Discussion LCBs Local Capacity Builders LGCDP Local Governance and Community Development Programme LRPs Local Resource Persons NGOs Non-Government Organizations NSHMP National Sanitation and Hygiene Master Plan ODF Open Defecation Free PAF Poverty Alleviation Fund QIS Qualitative Information System RECID/N Research Centre for Integrated Development Nepal RMSO Regional Monitoring and Supervision Office SNV Netherlands Development Organization SSH4A Sustainable Sanitation and Hygiene for All VDC Village Development Committee VSLA Village Saving and Loan Association WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene VWASHCC Village WASH Coordination Committee WCF Ward Citizen Forum WSSDO Water Supply and Sanitation Divisional Office
viii | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Executive Summary Objective and Methodology
The demand and supply of sanitation was assessed in eight districts of Nepal representing the three different
ecological zones. The districts were Kalikot, Jumla and Dolpa in the mountain eco-zone; Rukum, Rolpa, and
Salyan in the hill eco-zone; and Mahottari and Sarlahi in the Terai eco-zone. Consumers as well as supply
chain actors were interviewed to generate the findings.
To understand their needs, preferences and desires including knowledge, attitude and practices related to
sanitation, community people representing both latrine users and non-users were surveyed. Moreover,
different supply chain actors such as input suppliers, wholesalers, retailers, ring producers and masons were
interviewed to investigate the issues related to supply chain and their relationship with the consumers.
Focus group discussions were carried out among consumers while key-informant interviews were carried out
among supply chain actors. Furthermore, secondary data analysis was performed that included findings from
a baseline survey conducted in July 2014 for VDCs targeted under SNV’s Sustainable Sanitation and Hygiene
for All (SSH4A) programme along with previously conducted research within and outside the nation.
Findings from Consumer Preference Study
Data taken from a baseline survey of programme VDCS in July 2014 showed that almost 42.8 percent
households in the targeted VDCs of the programme districts still practice open defecation. The Terai districts
had more than 95 percent households practicing open defecation. Among those who had a latrine, the
majority had a pour-flush (water seal) latrine. The major type of pit for collecting human excreta included
single off-set pit followed by direct pit. Latrine non-users in the hills and mountains defecated in nearby
forest while households in the Terai districts used agricultural lands, river banks and road sides.
The community people used stone, wood, bamboo, mud, sand, gravel, thatch etc. as local materials and
cement, pan, pipe, iron rod and GI sheet as non-local materials. People in the Terai mostly used bricks,
sand, cement and cement rings for latrine construction while those in the hills and mountains mostly used
stones and mud.
Sanitation, health, safety, privacy, prestige as well as pressure by local authorities and ODF movement were
the major reasons behind latrine construction. The major reasons for not having a latrine in the hills and
mountains included illiteracy, ignorance, poverty, poor accessibility of latrine construction materials and
skilled masons for latrine construction. In case of the Terai districts, other reasons cited for not using a
latrine were expensive and inadequate land for latrine construction as well as the age-old tradition of open
defecation.
There were several issues related to maintenance of latrines as well. People in the hills and mountains
mostly faced difficulties in latrine maintenance because of a lack of skilled masons, unavailability of market
in the proximity to buy maintenance materials, inadequate water, etc.
People mostly constructed latrines after major festivals like Dashain, Tihar, and Chhaith and also during
major ceremonies such as marriages of their sons and daughters. The people in the Terai mostly bought
latrine construction materials from district and sub-district level markets as well as highway shops while the
ix | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
people in the hills and mountains had to walk a long distance (mostly up to the headquarter of a district) to
buy construction materials. As a result, the total construction cost of latrines was found to be relatively
higher in the hills and mountains.
Findings from Supply Chain Study
The supply chain actors such as wholesalers and retailers mostly resided in market areas such as district
headquarters and business hubs. Latrine construction materials sold by wholesalers and retailers were
mostly pans, pipes, cement, iron rods, titles and GI Sheets, etc. In addition, they also sold cleansing
materials, pipe fittings and marble. The proportion of money they earned from selling latrine construction
materials ranged from 5 - 20 percent. The majority of them had experienced a rise in their sales over the
last few years. The major reasons they gave for such an increase were increasing awareness among people,
involvement of private sector and NGOs in latrine construction advocacy and support, along with increased
population and urbanization. Masons were mostly employed to construct latrines; family members whose
latrine was under construction as well as their neighbours assisted masons in doing so.
Those who owned latrines were mostly middle-class and rich people, and the quality of latrine they owned
depended on their economic status as the cost of a toilet ranged from as low as NPR 50001 (for simple pit
latrine) to NPR 100,000 (for a modern aesthetically pleasing toilet with many facilities).
The supply chain actors mostly got their customers through personal contacts. In many cases,
wholesalers/retailers assisted their clients in finding masons and vice versa. The buying and selling mostly
occurred in cash.
Wholesalers and retailers as well as ring producers took loans to run their business whereas masons did not
take any loans to run their business. Masons were less certain about the improvement of their business in
the future. All the actors however hoped that their business would improve provided that the awareness and
income of people was raised.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of the study, the following recommendations are made:
1. Product and Service Options
• Develop different latrine options (affordable, technically simple and viable)
• Enhance mason capacity and skills
• Support upgrading of existing facilities for safe use by all
2. Explore Viable Options for Strengthening Sanitation Supply Chain
• Increase capacity of existing supply chain actors for sanitation business expansion
• Develop concrete ring producer for complete sanitation solution
• Link cooperative for supplying sanitation materials
• Engage women in sanitation business
• Develop existing entrepreneurs for sanitation business at the local level
1 1 US $ equivalent 100 NPR (March 2015)
x | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
3. Link Cooperatives for Supplying Sanitation Materials Sales, Promotion and Marketing
• Target seasonal sales opportunity
• Promote product display of latrine options
• Develop motivating communication tools
4. Engaging Stakeholders
• Link sanitation programme with other different programmes in the districts ( e.g. Local Government
Community Development program, Poverty Alleviation Fund Program and so on) so far applicable
and possible
• Develop linkages with financial institutions at the local level (cooperative, microfinance, etc.)
• Mainstream the private sector in ODF campaign
• Place sanitation agenda in the VDC/DDC planning process
• Engage media in the sanitation supply chain
Chapter I. Introduction and Objectives
11 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Chapter I . Introduction and Objectives
1.1 Background
Access to sanitation is essential for human well-being, dignity and economic development. SNV Nepal has
been implementing its Sustainable Sanitation and Hygiene for All (SSH4A) programme since 2010. The
programme has been structured into four key components: sanitation demand creation, supply chain
strengthening, behaviour change communication (BCC) and WASH governance. With the support of the
DFAT-funded Civil Society WASH Fund, the programme is being implemented for a period of four years
(2014 – 2018) in eight districts of Nepal (Sarlahi and Mahottari in the Central Development Region; Salyan,
Rukum, Rolpa, Kalikot, Jumla and Dolpa in the Mid-Western Development Region) with the aim of increasing
access to effective, affordable and sustainable sanitation in rural communities, leading to improved health
and its associated economic and social benefits. Supply chain strengthening, one of the four components of
the programme, aims to increase access to affordable and acceptable sanitation technologies as well as
improve availability and outreach of sanitation services in the target districts.
1.2 Supply Chain and Consumer Preferences in Sanitation
In Nepal, innovations in sanitation demand creation such as Community Led Total Sanitation are providing
an unprecedented opportunity to motivate rural people to construct and use toilets. Evidence shows,
however, that it is difficult to translate the motivation into practice unless a number of key supporting
conditions are met. One of these conditions is access to affordable and appropriate sanitation hardware and
services. Market-based sanitation solutions have the most potential for reaching scale and sustainability.
However, rural sanitation markets are often poorly developed and outreach is limited. Particular attention is
required to address the needs and preferences of different consumer segments, most notably special needs
groups, households living in poverty, ethnic minorities and low caste groups, and people with a disability.
Supply chain is a term used for a system of organisations, people, technology, activities, information and
resources involved in moving a product or service from a supplier to a customer. Supply chain activities
transform natural resources, raw materials or other components into products and services that are
delivered to end customers. The underlying objective of all supply chains is to deliver a successful product or
service at an acceptable profit (Oyo, 2002). In sanitation, major actors in the supply chain are
importers/wholesalers, retailers, concrete product producers as well as masons (IDE, 2007b).
In Nepal, UN-Habitat conducted a supply chain study in its programme districts in 2013 in the hill and Terai
areas; these districts have however different social characteristics from the SSH4A programme area. iDE
also conducted a study on four of its Terai districts2. District specific mapping of supply chain actors and
their interactions and a better understanding of consumer needs is however required for the SSH4A
programme area to be able develop strategies for strengthening the supply chains in the target districts.
2 The studies are: Sanitation Marketing and Supply chain Development Strategies of GSF Programme Areas , 2013, UN Habitat Nepal and Research Deep Dive Report, 2012, Sanitation Marketing Initiatives/ iDE Nepal,
Chapter I. Introduction and Objectives
12 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
There is also an information gap on how demand for sanitation hardware and services develops over the
longer-term, and which factors are most important in determining whether a sustainable market for private
sector actors emerges (SNV, 2012b). Sanitation supply chain analysis provides stakeholders with a deeper
understanding of the rural sanitation market in their area, both in terms of constraints as well as
opportunities for improvement.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The overall objective of the study was to systematically investigate supply and demand for sanitation
products and services across the programme districts. Based on the analyses, concrete and practical options
for interventions that could support improved, market-based access to sanitation products and services to
households are recommended.
Specific objectives of the study were:
1. To conduct detailed analyses of sanitation needs and preferences of different consumer segments.
2. To analyse existing sanitation technologies and their appropriateness based on findings of consumer
preferences for the different groups of consumers including disabled and elderly people.
3. To carry out an in-depth study of sanitation products and service delivery processes in the supply
chain.
4. To map the supply chain actors.
5. To recommend intervention modalities for increasing access to sanitation products and services to
consumers.
6. To identify the role of local government and line agencies in strengthening the supply chain.
1.4 Study Area and Methodology
1.4.1 Study Area The study as a whole looked at the eight districts of Nepal where the SSH4A programme is being
implemented with the support of the CS-WASH Fund (Figure 1). The districts were Sarlahi and Mahottari in
the Central Development Region and Salyan, Rukum, Rolpa, Kalikot, Jumla and Dolpa in the Mid-Western
Development Region. The districts fall in all three main ecological zones of the country with Sarlahi and
Mahottari districts being in the Terai (southern flat lands) eco-zone; Rukum, Rolpa and Salyan districts being
in the hill eco-zone; and Kalikot, Jumla and Dolpa districts being in the mountain eco-zone.
1.4.2 Study Methodology
The study methodology consisted of a literature review and secondary data collection as well as primary
data collection and analyses of consumer preferences and supply chains. The primary assessment methods
consisted of qualitative methods using focus group discussions (FGD), semi-structured interviews and
observation. These were conducted in November and December 2014.
Chapter I. Introduction and Objectives
13 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Figure 1. Map of Nepal showing study districts.
Literature review and secondary data collection
The main aim of reviewing available literature was to gain a broad understanding of the current sanitation
situation in the programme districts, including progress and key challenges related to sanitation market
development, pro-poor strategies, approaches to improving sanitation coverage and hygiene behaviour
change, and policy and institutional issues. To this end, the study team reviewed related documents
(secondary information) from different sources and concerned authorities. Data from a baseline survey
conducted in the target communities (117 programme VDCs) of the eight programme districts in July 2014
were also considered. The baseline was carried out in 2,979 sampled households in 47 sampled VDCs from
8 districts. This data, although not sampled from the whole district, gave an idea as to the situation of
sanitation in the programme area. In addition, findings from the Consumer Preference and Supply Chain
Analysis study conducted in seven separate districts under the DFID-funded SSH4A-Results Programme
were used as a basis for this study (February 2015)3.
Data collection for consumer preference study
Sampling for the consumer preference study was done in all eight programme districts. It was carried out
with households and individuals as consumers of products and services, focusing specifically on product and
service knowledge and preferences. The study also assessed the general purchase behaviour of households.
3 The study districts under the DFID-‐funded SSH4A-‐Results Programme were: Siraha and Saptari in the Eastern Development Region; and Banke, Surkhet, Dailekh, Mugu, and Humla in the Mid-‐Western Development Region.
Chapter I. Introduction and Objectives
14 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with different consumer segments which included
households having a latrine as well as latrine non-owners, women and men, female and male-headed
households, and poor, marginalized and Dalit households. The focus group discussions were used to probe a
number of topics to understand consumer needs, preferences and desires as well as their knowledge,
attitude and practices regarding sanitation behaviour, products and services.
In each district, three to six FGDs were conducted. FGDs in Sarlahi, Mahottari, Rukum, Salyan, Rolpa and
Dolpa were conducted by the study team while FGDs in Kalikot and Jumla were conducted by local resource
persons of SNV’s partner organizations.
Data collection for supply chain study
Data for the supply chain study was collected in six districts, representing the three ecological regions of
Nepal, which included Sarlahi and Mahottari from the Terai; Salyan, Rukum and Rolpa from the hills; and
Dolpa from the mountains.
Interviews and observations were conducted with a range of actors involved in providing sanitation-related
products and services, including input suppliers, wholesalers, retailers, cement-ring producers, transport
service providers, masons, labourers and financial institutions, in order to understand the main market
players and their relationships. The supply of materials used in sanitation such as cement, sanitary hardware
(pan, pipe) as well as construction and maintenance services, transportation services, and other goods and
services (timber, stone, sand, labour cost, etc.) were analysed. These included analysis of price, margin,
and volume of products and services.
Additionally for Jumla and Kalikot Districts, mapping of the current supply chain actors was carried out using
data collected by the Local Resource Persons of SNV’s partner organisation.
1.5 Structure of the Report
The report is divided in to three main chapters:
Chapter 1: presents the background information, objectives and methodology of the study.
Chapter 2: presents the findings of the consumer preference and supply chain analysis parts of the
study.
Chapter 3: presents a discussion of the findings and develops recommendations.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
15 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Chapter I I . Findings of the Study This chapter presents the findings of the study. Firstly, the findings of the consumer preference study are
presented followed by the findings of the supply chain analysis study.
2.1 Findings of Consumer Preference Study
In this section, the socio-demographic characteristics and general purchasing behaviour of the target
population are presented followed by sanitation related knowledge, attitude and practices and their
relationship with the supply chain system. This study presents findings from the perspective of the
consumers whereas Section 2.2 presents findings from the perspective of the supply chain actors in
sanitation.
2.1.1 General Demographic and Socio-Economic Status of the Study Districts
An overview of the demographic and socio-economic status as well as wealth ranking of the eight study
districts is presented here based on data collected from communities targeted under the SSH4A programme
in a baseline survey conducted in July 2014.
The majority of households (81.8%) were male-headed. The average number of household members was
6.7. Nearly 59 percent of the households had member(s) older than 50 years and 13.8 percent of the
households had a person with special needs, which was any member who had difficulty in seeing, walking or
climbing steps, or self-care such as washing or dressing.
Regarding the main source of drinking water, 60.2 percent of the households reported using piped water
and more than one-fourth (26.5%) had access to a tube well or a hand-pump followed by water from a
spring source (10.8%). A higher proportion of households in the hills and mountains were using piped water
and spring water, while households in the Terai were largely using ground water (tube-well/hand-pump).
Table 1 shows the wealth quintile distribution of households across the districts. From five wealth quintiles
spread from the poorest (1st quintile) to the richest (5th quintile), a higher proportion of households in the
Terai districts (Mahottari and Sarlahi) belonged to the poor (2nd) and middle (3rd) wealth quintiles, while in
the mountain and hill districts, a significant proportion of households were in the poorest (1st) quintile. Very
few (0.3%) households in all the districts were from the richest wealth quintile. More people from the Terai
zone possessed household assets such as radio and television compared to people in the hills and
mountains.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
16 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Table 1. Wealth quintile by districts (Source: Data from baseline survey, July 2014).
Quintile Dolpa Jumla Kalikot Rolpa Rukum Salyan Mahottari Sarlahi Total
% % % % % % % % %
Poorest 15.6 28.3 23.5 24.8 17.2 21.8 0.8 3.4 16.8
Poor 56.8 67.5 66.1 58.3 38.6 31.9 26.6 51.3 50.0
Middle 25.0 3.3 9.0 15.6 34.5 21.5 55.6 38.9 25.5
Rich 2.6 1.0 1.4 1.2 9.1 22.8 16.8 6.2 7.3
Richest 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 2.0 0.3 0.3 0.3
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
From the focus group discussions carried out in this study, it was found that agriculture was the major
source of income followed by seasonal labour work. Community people also kept livestock such as buffalo,
cattle, bullock and goat as a source of income. Some people were engaged in fish farming or harvesting
from ponds and rivers and sold the fish in nearby markets. The months in which the households had
comparatively higher income were October to April.
Figure 2. Land ownership by district (Source: Data from baseline survey, July 2014).
Around 82 percent of the total sampled households had their own land for agriculture (Figure 2). The Terai
districts (Sarlahi and Mahottari) had relatively lower proportion of households with land ownership as
compared to the mountain and hill districts.
2.1.2 Sanitation Status of Study Districts
At the time of the baseline survey in July 2014, 42.8 percent of households in the targeted VDCs of the
programme districts practiced open defecation, meaning only 57.2 percent of the households had access to
latrine facilities. The Terai districts had more than 95 percent of households practicing open defecation.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
17 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Kalikot, Rukum and Rolpa districts were relatively in a better position as compared with other districts. It
should be noted however that due to the fast pace of the sanitation movement in the hill and mountain
districts, access to sanitation has changed rapidly, and Rukum District, for example, already became open-
defecation-free in December 2014.
Table 2. Sanitation coverage of study districts (Source: data from baseline survey, July 2014).
District Number of Households Sampled Households with Toilet Sanitation Coverage (%)
Dolpa 340 211 62.1
Jumla 400 224 56.0
Kalikot 366 352 96.2
Rolpa 403 341 84.6
Rukum 383 347 90.6
Salyan 307 203 66.1
Mahottari 394 18 4.6
Sarlahi 386 8 2.1
Total 2979 1704 57.2
Among those who had a latrine, the majority of households in all districts had flush toilets (88.5%) followed
by traditional pit latrines (9.3%).
People in the Terai were mostly advised by their neighbours and VDC offices to construct latrines while those
in the hills and mountains mentioned local WASH related NGOs in addition to VDCs and neighbours.
2.1.3 Current Defecation Practice among Latrine Non-users
The most common place of defecation among latrine non-users in the hills and mountains was a nearby
forest area while households in the Terai districts commonly used agricultural land and the road-side. Focus
group discussions revealed that men and women went to different places for defecation as well as at
different timings. Adult women used bushes and forested areas to defecate, while men defecated in rice
fields and along river banks. The Terai women usually went for open defecation at night (in a group of
around five women) while the men went in the early mornings. Open defecation was more problematic for
women, the elderly and disabled people. In the Terai, the elderly and children used the road-sides for open
defecation.
2.1.4 Reasons for Having a Latrine
The majority of study participants in all ecological zones said that they used latrines to prevent diseases as
well as to maintain their surroundings clean. The participants in the FGDs believed that sanitation was an
important part of their life. They were aware of different diseases and problems that occur as a result of
open defecation. The participants agreed that if they had latrines then roads, house-yards and even farm
land would be clean and that it would improve their sanitation and hygiene behaviour. They believed that it
would improve their social status as well. People in the hills and mountains were reportedly found to have
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
18 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
built latrines because of pressure from the local bodies (Village Development Committee and District
Development Committee) to make their communities free from open defecation.
One of the participants in Rolpa said, “People have to pay NPR 500 for open defecation, but this rule is not
yet strictly implemented”.
Ease, comfort, privacy and safety were other reasons mentioned by FGD participants in all zones as reasons
for toilet adoption. People, especially in the Terai felt that construction and use of toilet was associated with
pride and prestige in their community.
2.1.5 Reasons for Not Having a Latrine
People in all ecological zones said that the main reasons for not having a latrine were weak economic status
and low level of awareness amongst people. However, some of the reasons differed between the ecological
zones. In the case of the Terai districts, other reasons for not constructing a latrine included expensive and
inadequate land as well as the age-old tradition of open defecation. Some of the participants in FGDs from
the Terai districts did not perceive the necessity of constructing a toilet as they had forests, streams and
open fields nearby their house, which they could use for defecation.
In the case of the hill and mountain districts, besides illiteracy, ignorance and poverty, other important
reasons cited for not using latrines were poor accessibility to latrine construction materials and skilled
masons for latrine construction. Some people mentioned lack of suitable land as another barrier to latrine
adoption.
Some households did not construct latrines because they felt that household members would have to wait in
a long queue to get their chance to use the toilet, and hence favoured open defecation. Some people said
that they felt suffocated inside toilets and hence open defecation seemed convenient for them. Some women
FGD participants in Salyan and Rolpa mentioned that it was difficult to manage materials and to find skilled
masons for latrine construction in the absence of male members in their households. Hence, it was difficult
to construct latrines in households headed by women.
FGDs also revealed that some of the households were waiting to receive subsidy for toilet materials so that
they could start constructing their toilet. In the past, many households had received construction materials
such as pan, cement, pipe, etc. free of cost. Households who had not received such materials also expected
the same for latrine construction in their households.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
19 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Table 3. Reasons (motivation) for toilet adoption and non-adoption.
Reasons for having toilet Reasons for not having toilet
Hills/ mountains
Sanitation, health, pressure from local bodies, ODF movement, motivation by CBOs and social mobilisers, privacy, safety, convenience
Cost, lack of information - place to buy latrine and construction materials, lack of supplies/latrine construction materials (pan, pipes, cement) and mason, waiting for subsidy, lack of male member in households
Terai Sanitation and health, prestige, privacy, safety
Cost, lack of land for disadvantaged and poor (Musahar, Malaha, Chamar and Dom) ethnic groups, satisfied with OD, traditional thinking, waiting for subsidy
2.1.6 Convenience of Toilet Use by Household Members
Some households reported inconvenience in using latrines by some members. The major reasons cited were
old age, disability and sickness. According to the baseline survey (July 2014), 13.8 percent of the
households had member(s) with special needs (any member who had difficulty in seeing, walking or
climbing steps, or self-care such as washing or dressing. People from all ecological zones said that the
current latrines were very inconvenient for the physically disabled people because the latrines were not
easily accessible to the disabled persons. No ramp with a landing was provided at the side of the door and it
was difficult to squat on a squatting plate for the disabled. It was difficult for the elderly as well but not as
much as for the disabled people. Latrines were somewhat inconvenient for pregnant women as well because
of difficulties in squatting.
One of the elderly respondent in the hills said, “I have the problem of knee ache and I cannot properly sit to
defecate. So, it would be easy if I had a taller pan”.
2.1.7 Hand-washing Practice
The baseline findings in the programme area showed that from households that had a toilet, the majority of
households (71.9%) did not have a hand-washing facility within 10 m of the toilet and served as a proxy
indicator to show that a high proportion of people were not washing their hands after defecation. A further
13.6 percent had a handwashing facility but no soap or soap substitute available at the handwashing station.
The FGDs carried out in this study further revealed that hand-washing with soap and water was scarcely
practiced even though most of the people were aware of it. However, the majority did not know the
appropriate steps of hand-washing with soap and water (WHO six steps). Latrine users were more likely to
wash hands with soap and water after defecation as compared with non-users. The most common spots for
hand-washing were taps in the hills and mountains and hand-pumps in the case of the Terai. People in rural
areas often used ash instead of soap for hand-washing. The major reasons cited for using ash instead of
soap were low purchasing capacity to afford soap in the Terai and the hills by the poor and unavailability of
soap in the mountains.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
20 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
2.1.8 Types of Latrine Construction Materials
Community people used stone, wood, mud, sand, gravel, etc. as local materials and cement, pan, pipe, iron
rod and galvanized iron sheet as non-local materials. People in the Terai mostly used brick, sand and
cement for latrine construction while those in the hills and mountains mostly used stone and mud. In case of
pour flush latrines, almost all people used single, off-set pits as collection chambers.
For the construction of the sub-structure of the toilet (the part below the pan/slab of the toilet structure),
households in the Terai mostly used cement, concrete ring, sand and gravel while those in the hills and
mountains mostly used stone and mud and rarely used brick, sand and cement. Regarding the type of pan,
people in the hills and mountains used both plastic and ceramic pans while those in the Terai used ceramic
pans only. Some FGD participants mentioned that plastic pans were not good as they were difficult to clean.
Similarly, the items used for construction of the toilet slab (surface) were sand, cement, stone, pan and
metal rods; boulders were used around the outer area of the slab to raise the superstructure. The area in
the slab surrounding the pan was porous, less concrete and rough in the hills as compared to the Terai
because of less availability of sand, brick and gravel.
When enquiring about the super-structure (the part housing the toilet), people in the Terai responded that
they mostly used brick, sand, cement, pebble and thatch for wall construction and galvanized iron (GI) sheet
as roofing material. However, people in the Terai did not prefer the use of GI sheet for roofing because of
high temperatures in the Terai that would make the use of latrines less convenient in the summer season.
They preferred straw, thatch, mud tiles as roofing materials. People in the hills used GI sheet along with
thatch, sand, stone, pebble and cement for construction of the super-structure. In the mountain areas,
people used mud and wooden planks as roofing materials. They also used GI sheet in some cases.
Table 4. Construction materials used for latrine construction.
Pit (Sub-structure) Slab Super-structure
Mountains Stone, mud
Pan (both ceramic and plastic), siphon, cement, iron rod, pipe, sand, gravel, stone
Stone, wood, plastic sheet, bamboo and mud, nails
Hills Stone, mud, brick, cement and sand
Pan (both ceramic and plastic), siphon, cement, sand, iron rod, pipe, gravel, stone
Stone, mud, wood, bamboo, bricks, cement, sand, GI sheet, thatch, nails
Terai Cement ring, cement, sand and brick
Pan (ceramic), siphon, tiles, sand, cement, iron rod and plastic pipe
Bricks (mud, cement), cement, sand, iron rod, GI sheet, bamboo, wood, cement tile, nails
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
21 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
2.1.9 Purchasing Practices
General purchasing practice
Male members of households usually purchased goods as compared with their female counterparts. Very few
households purchased goods on credit. The majority of people purchased goods from retailers as compared
to wholesalers.
People mostly bought expensive goods during major festivals such as Dashain and Tihar in the hills and
mountains and Chhaith in the Terai and also at the time of wedding celebrations of family members. When
asked what they would buy if they had adequate money, they said they preferred to buy electronic goods,
land, jewellery, livestock (buffaloes, goats), bicycles and clothes. Construction and/or improvement of
latrines were rarely mentioned as a purchasing priority.
To purchase construction materials, households in the mountain districts had to go to the district
headquarter. In the hill districts, people went to district headquarter and business hubs along the road side.
Whereas in the Terai districts, people had access to such materials in markets along the highway, sub-
district level business centres and the district headquarter. People living close to the Indian broader in the
Terai districts preferred to buy construction materials from nearby Indian markets where they could buy
materials at a cheaper rate.
Latrine construction material purchasing practice
In the hills and mountains, there was no easy market access to purchase sanitation materials close to the
villages. The majority of households from the hills and mountains had to go to the district headquarter to
purchase latrine construction materials. Some people travelled to neighbouring districts where they found
larger markets. For example, people from Salyan (hill district) mostly went to Dang district to buy toilet
construction materials.
In the case of the Terai, such goods were comparatively easily available in nearby markets, sub-district level
business centres along highways, and the district headquarter. People from the southern VDCs in the Terai
districts preferred to go to nearby Indian markets along the Nepal-India border to buy materials at a
cheaper rate.
Regarding financing materials, general suppliers hesitated to sell materials on credit; customers had to pay
in cash for toilet construction materials at the time of purchase. The major sources of advice for construction
of latrines were social mobilisers, masons, neighbours and local NGOs.
FGDs revealed that the Dalit caste and the poor were more liable to have insufficient resources such as
money and private land for latrine construction and mostly waited for external support. Similarly, women
had little say in latrine design and material purchasing and these tasks were largely carried out by the men
of the family.
Table 5 below gives an overview of different costs incurred for the construction of a typical toilet as per
consumer’s calculations in the study districts. The cost for construction was much higher in the mountain
and hill districts as compared with the Terai districts. It was interesting to note that a large proportion of the
cost was incurred for the construction of the superstructure.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
22 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Table 5. Average toilet construction cost (NPR) as per consumer responses
District
Material cost Labour cost Cost
Pit (lining) Slab
Super-structure (walls, roof)
Pit (digging) Slab
Super-structure (walls, roof)
Total Up to slab level
Mahottari 3600 2800 12400 700 1200 2500 23200 8300
Sarlahi 3500 3000 13500 700 1200 2500 24400 8400
Kalikot 3500 8500 16400 2000 2400 2700 35500 16400
Rukum 3000 5200 9550 4200 2200 2800 26950 14600
Rolpa 3500 5500 12950 3800 1800 3000 30550 14600
Salyan 3800 5000 11600 3200 2200 2500 28300 14200
Jumla 2500 11500 21890 3500 2800 3200 45390 20300
Dolpa 5000 10500 18500 3500 2500 6000 46000 21500
Average 3550 6500 14599 2700 2038 3150 32536 14788
Exchange rate 1 USD = 100 NPR (March 2015)
2.1.10 Transportation of Materials for Latrine Construction
The difficulties involved in material transportation were expressed in all districts. In the hills and mountains,
since the materials required to construct latrines were mostly bought in the district headquarter, this
imposed a high cost of transportation. Furthermore, even though vehicles carried materials up to a certain
point, they ultimately needed to be carried manually up to the site of construction. Customers mostly
transported materials by themselves (using human labour or mule); those who could afford it, used mules
to transport the materials. In the Terai districts, bullock carts, tractors and vans were generally used to
transport rings, slabs and other materials.
People responsible for the transport of materials had to bear the loss caused from damage of materials
during transportation. For example, if businessmen took the responsibility of transportation up to a certain
distance using their own vehicles and drivers, then they had to compensate for any loss caused from
damage of materials during transportation. However, if customers themselves were responsible for
transportation of latrine construction materials then suppliers were not held responsible for any damage
caused during transportation. Such damages occurred more frequently in the hills and mountains as
compared with the Terai. Transportation of materials was more difficult for women customers when male
members were absent in their households.
The mountain district of Dolpa was a special case, as it is not connected by a road network and therefore the
transportation of materials was very difficult. Wholesaler/retailers made bulk purchases from Nepalgunj and
Surkhet (sometimes from Butwal) and transported it via air route. Some businessmen used mules from
Rarijyula (Rukum district) which required more than five or six days from Rarijyula to Dunai Bazaar (district
headquarter of Dolpa district). The air cargo transportation cost was high and charged NPR 130 - 140/kg of
material from Nepalgunj; in contrast, material transportation via mule cost NPR 80 - 90/kg from Rarijyula
(Rukum district) but required more time than air cargo. Poor community people used manual labour and
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
23 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
middle to rich class people generally used mules to transport materials from the district headquarter to the
site of latrine construction. The actual cost of one kilogramme of cement in Nepalgunj was NPR 13 to 14
whereas, in Dolpa the cost rose up to NPR 143 to 154/kg due to costly transportation charges using air
cargo.
2.1.11 Construction Period
People generally constructed latrines during festival times, family ceremonies and rituals (e.g. marriages)
and after harvesting crops between the months of November to May in the hills and the Terai and March to
May in the mountain districts. During that time people generally have money from crop harvest, services
and remittances sent by household members from foreign countries.
2.1.12 Construction Practices and Services
Masons were primarily employed for construction work in all ecological zones. Household members
participated in latrine construction by digging pits, collecting and transporting stone and mud, and
supporting the mason as and when required. In the case of the mountain districts, neighbours and
household members were equally involved in construction work.
The construction work was mostly carried out by community level masons (mistri) who had acquired the
necessary skills through practice and experience. In the mountain districts, a mason offered his services for
NPR 700 – 1000 per day and in the hills for NPR 600 – 800 per day. The wage rate of a mason in the Terai
was relatively cheaper than in the hills and mountains averaging 500 NPR but going up to 800 NPR in certain
areas.
In the mountain and hill districts, latrine construction involved engaging different types of masons for
digging pits, building walls, wood works (carpentry), and plastering, respectively. As a result, it was quite
difficult to identify and hire the different types of masons required to construct a toilet in the hills and
mountains. In contrast, in the Terai one mason was usually hired to complete all parts of the toilet.
People in all ecological zones, but more so in the hills and mountains, said that masons did not possess
adequate skills to construct latrines, especially setting the pan in the slab and connecting the siphon. Some
of the drawbacks of using masons as mentioned by FGD participants were: they charged more money, did
not have adequate skills to set the pan and do plastering, did not construct strong walls, etc.
Challenges in Construction and Services
People in the hills and mountains faced difficulties in digging land for construction of the sub-structure (part
below the surface) of the toilet because of presence of large stones that hindered the digging process.
Moreover, there was a risk of damaging pits due to falling of loose soil and rocks. People in the Terai said
that they faced difficulty in digging pits due to high ground water and therefore water oozing out from
beneath the surface whenever they tried to dig deep.
As described above, one of the major problems associated with the construction of latrines was a lack of
skilled masons; although these issues were faced in all districts, they were found to a greater degree in the
mountains and hills than in the Terai. Masons were not adequately skilled in setting pan and siphon in the
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
24 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
slab. Masons were also found to be less skilled in maintaining appropriate height of the superstructure and
fitting doors properly. One reason for this was that whereas master masons were used for construction of
houses, their semi-skilled subordinates or other masons were used for toilet construction. Another reason
was that households also did not give the same priority to the construction of a superstructure for a toilet as
they did to construction of a house structure. Therefore, issues of leaking roofs of the superstructure and
insufficient height of the superstructure were found. In the mountain districts there was often also the issue
of insufficient lighting in the toilet due to no window and/or low height of the superstructure.
People in the hills and mountains faced more transportation problems as compared with those in the Terai.
There was more chance of damage of construction materials in the hills and mountains because of uneven
topography and fragile landmass; in addition, the cost of transportation of materials through vehicles was
high in the mountains. People themselves had to bear the loss of damage of materials during transportation.
Moreover, even after transporting materials by vehicles, they further had to carry the materials manually up
to their villages and sites of construction. This made the cost of latrine construction quite high in the hills
and mountains.
2.1.13 Use and Maintenance of Latrines
Latrine owners in all districts were directly involved in maintaining toilets in a hygienic condition. In the hills
and mountains, challenges in maintenance were related to having access to materials and water and poor
construction of the toilets. Most of the participants mentioned using water and a locally prepared sweeping
brush (bamboo sweep-sticks) to clean the surface, though some of the participants in Rolpa and Rukum
districts mentioned using chemical disinfectants as well. Owing to the lack of a market at close proximity,
people faced problems of travelling long distances to purchase items needed for hygienic maintenance of
latrines. FGD participants said that some did not have buckets and jugs to be used in their latrines. In
households where these objects were present, many did not keep them filled with water for anal cleansing
or flushing and therefore keeping the toilet in a hygienic condition was difficult. Some households also faced
difficulties in cleaning due to scarcity of water. Furthermore, many people reported that the surface
surrounding the slab tended to be uneven and less washable because of which cleaning was a problem.
People in the Terai had easier access to markets and were reportedly found to be using a toilet brush and
disinfectant chemicals purchased from the market. Furthermore, water in the Terai was easily available to
clean latrines as compared with the hills and mountains. However, some rural communities in the Terai
mentioned excessive breeding of flies in their latrines due to poor cleanliness of toilets.
The problem of foul smell in latrines was an issue in all ecological regions. This was due to leakages between
fitting of pan and pipe, improper slope in setting of pan such that it cannot be used properly and urine does
not flow into the pan properly, improper use of the pan and urine spreading around, and poor ventilation
In the hills and mountains, participants hardly experienced the need to empty their pits as it took many
years to fill up in the permeable soil. When the pits did fill, people closed the old pit and dug a new pit in
the adjacent area. In contrast, people in the Terai faced difficulty with quick filling of pits and tanks because
of regular flooding, high ground water table and surface run-off during the rainy season. People realised
that their tanks were full when faeces did not flush down. In some cases if the pits had not been
constructed at a proper slope, the water level rose up into the toilet. When their pits or tanks flooded,
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
25 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
people either cleaned them out or changed them. Emptying was done manually (often by hiring people of
the community who specially carry out such work) and faecal matter was emptied into nearby rivers, open
lands and forest. Use of excreta as fertilizer was reported by very few participants.
Notably, in the high mountain area, the pour flush technology is found to be challenging as there are
problems in the winter when the ordinary pipes used in latrines crack, water in the toilet pan freezes, and
the toilet does not work due to low temperatures especially when the temperature goes below zero degree
centigrade. In these areas typically dry sanitation systems are found.
Table 6. Problems in toilet construction and use.
Pit Slab Superstructure Other
Hill/Mountain
Difficult to dig due to stones and compaction of soil
Leakage from siphon and pipe joint, difficult to wash the surroundings of pan due to rough surface of pan
Landslide, leakage of water from roof, shortage of adequate light and buckets inside latrine
Lack of sufficient water, difficulties in transportation; unskilled mason -setting pan and siphon on the surface; High Mountain - water seal pan does not work in winter due to frozen water
Terai
Difficult to dig due to high water table and inundation; fast filling and emptying cost
Leakage from joint, nasty odor, rough slab surface and difficult to wash pan and surroundings
Heating of GI sheet, Cost of superstructure
Raised water level
2.1.14 Possible Solutions to Challenges in Construction and Maintenance of Latrines
People mentioned a number of possible solutions to build a stronger sub-structure. According to them,
because of greater availability of stones compared to bricks in the hills and mountains, they demanded that
instruments ought to be available for breaking stones. Similarly, they stressed the need of skilled masons
for proper plastering of pit walls thereby making pits less vulnerable to frequent collapse. People in the Terai
said that substructures can be made strong and durable by selecting an appropriate site for latrine
construction. This would on one hand prevent early sprouting of water while digging pits and on the other
hand protect pits from the effects of floods and rainfall which would otherwise fill it quickly. This according to
them would reduce the maintenance cost as well.
Regarding the surface (slab), people in the hills said that masons should be adequately trained to properly
fit pans in the surface which would solve the problem of leakage and foul smell. They also said it was
necessary to train masons to plaster surfaces around the pans. People in the hills and mountains added that
maintenance of slabs would be easy with the availability of adequate water and cleansing materials such as
brush and phenyl etc.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
26 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
In case of the Terai districts, respondents felt that construction of latrines at a suitable location (preferably
land above frequent flood level) would help solve most of the slab level problems. Those who complained
about excessive breeding of flies and presence of foul smell in latrines thought that such problems could be
solved by ensuring the availability of suitable chemical disinfectants; however, people used it less frequently
because of weak economic conditions.
Regarding the superstructure, people in the hills and the Terai stressed the need of mason training for
plastering and proper fitting of roofs. Availability of strong materials such as galvanized tins and bricks were
also necessary. Moreover, people said that there should be adequate light inside latrines and the height of
the superstructure should be determined properly to make it more durable. People in the Terai said that
superstructures could be made better by choosing a suitable location for latrine construction that had
enough land to construct a proper toilet with a sufficient wall height without disturbing the neighbours. Many
people said that increasing the economic status of people, making them aware and adequately training
masons were necessary measures for making superstructures stronger and more durable.
2.1.15 Willingness to Pay and Financing
The FGD participants from disadvantaged groups (Dalits and poor) were willing to pay some amount of cash
and provide labour work to construct toilets. Participants from disadvantaged groups from the Terai districts
did not own land and were occupying government land; however, they were willing to construct community
toilets by providing non-skilled labour if their VDCs provided community land for toilet construction. In
addition they demanded materials such as cement rings, pan, slab, pipe and cement as well as services of a
mason from their VDC and or the government. Some people in the Terai were requesting to construct
community toilets on public land in coordination with the VDC and had shown willingness to voluntarily clean
toilets on a regular basis by developing rules and regulations.
The amount people were willing to pay for construction of a toilet varied depending on the type facilities
available in a latrine. The respondents in the Terai and hills said that whereas people living in urban areas
expected a fancy flush system, tap, light, as well as painted walls in a latrine and would pay a high amount
for constructing a toilet (NPR 70,000 - 80,000), they were willing to pay a lot less in the rural areas (not
more than NPR 20,000 - 30000). However, the disadvantaged and poor people could not offer cash
contribution and were willing to provide unskilled labour and collect local materials for latrine construction.
In the mountains, due to the high cost of transportation for materials, respondents felt toilets to be very
expensive.
The participants of FGDs had never thought about getting a loan for latrine construction and thought that
they would not be able to procure a loan for construction of latrine. Many of the participants, especially
females, were involved in saving and credit groups in all districts. During discussions, some participants
mentioned that such village level saving and credit groups could be a source of financing to construct
latrines for the poor households. One of the members of such a women’s credit group in the Terai said that
they would think about providing loans to households without latrines.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
27 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
2.2 Findings of Supply Chain Study
This chapter presents the findings of the supply chain study. Firstly, mapping of sanitation supply chain
actors is presented and secondly, the findings of individual actors are described. It should be noted that
although some of the information appears the same as the findings from Section 2.1 on the consumer
preference study, this section presents the findings from the perspective of the supply chain actors in
sanitation.
2.2.1 Type of Private Sector Actors Engaged in Sanitation
Wholesalers/retailers were supplying toilet construction hardware products such as pan, pipe, cement,
bricks, ring, iron rods, etc. Masons and labourers were directly involved in constructing latrines in the
communities. In addition, transportation agents and individuals who carried sanitary hardware up to the
construction sites were also involved in the supply chain.
In the mountain and hill districts, hardware producers were virtually non-existence, whereas in the Terai, a
number of cement concrete ring producers were involved. Table 7 depicts the engagement of private sector
actors in sanitation business in the study districts.
Table 7. Private sector actors engaged in sanitation businesses or related supply chains in the
districts
Type of private sector actors engaged in the sanitation supply chain in the districts
Mountain districts Hill districts Terai districts
Dolpa Jumla Kalikot Salyan Rukum Rolpa Sarlahi Mahottari
1. Sanitation hardware producers (#) 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 30
2. Wholesalers/ retailers (#) 10 11 12 20 40 25 30 25
3. Cement sales agents* (#) 3 5 4 5 11 8 10 10
4. Masons/ carpenters (#) 20 10 55 90 200 145 200 175
5. Pit emptying service providers (#) 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 8
* Cement sales agents are included in wholesalers/retailers.
The concentration of private sector was high in the Terai districts as compared with the hills and mountains
(Table 7). They mostly ran their businesses in the district headquarter and some of them had installed
outreach centres at business hubs along the highway. Wholesalers/retailers had established their business
linkages with community level grocery shops and provided goods/materials to community level shop keepers
to sell their products.
The concentration of masons and carpenters was higher in the hill and Terai districts as compared to the
mountain districts. However, owing to the high population of the Terai and the increasing demand for
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
28 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
sanitation, there was a shortage of masons to be able to fulfil demand. From the mountain and hill districts,
the number of masons was found to be sufficient to respond to the level of demand with the exception of
Jumla which had too few masons.
Notably, there had been various efforts in skill building of masons. The government had provision to
provide skill building trainings in the mountain and hill districts and various I/NGOs had also carried out
trainings in the various districts. The key challenge was retention of the trained masons. In the mountains
and hills, many masons migrated down-country or went abroad and used their qualification certificate for
better opportunities. In the Terai, trained masons preferred to give their services to urban areas.
2.2.2 Analysis of Current Sanitation Supply Chains
In general, rural supply chains in programme districts for sanitary goods and services were characterized by
limited businesses in the mountains and hills as compared with the Terai districts. However due to GoNs
policy, local government efforts and I/NGOs sanitation promotional support, sanitation hardware business
are gradually increasing in rural areas. Most hardware goods (cement, polyethylene pipes, iron rods, bricks,
cement rings) are manufactured in Nepal and sanitary goods like ceramic pan and fittings are imported from
India.
Most existing sanitary and hardware goods and service businesses in the Terai districts were concentrated in
district headquarters and sub-district level business centres near the highway. Some wholesalers/retailers
were specialised to cater for the urban market and sold sanitary ware and bath fittings. Other businesses
sold for the most part cement, iron rod and fittings materials and also had stock of sanitary hardware such
as ceramic pans, bath room materials, tiles, pipes and aesthetic sanitary products. Whereas at the
community level, sanitary hardware materials and toilet cleaning products were sold in ‘General Shops’ and
small-scale retailers that sold groceries and fast moving consumer goods (rice, sugar, cooking oil, snacks,
soap).
In the hills and mountains, sanitary goods were stocked in hardware shops; these businesses were mostly
concentrated in district headquarters and limited business centres which were connected by road or airport
facilities. In a few cases, there were community level, general shops that sold sanitary and hardware items.
Despite limited market size and logistical challenges in the programme districts, deep distribution channels
existed even through the most remote foot trails and seasonal roads. Small purchasers mostly purchased
goods and services from nearby community business hamlets. The amount of goods purchased by
customers in the mountains and hills were generally one man’s load (40-50 Kg) and a mule’s load (70-80
Kg) at a time, which was slightly higher in the Terai where people used bullock carts and tractors to
transport materials and therefore purchased all supplies including cement rings, slab, cement and pipes at
one time from the different shops and then transported the materials all together.
Sanitation marketing is not a single actor engagement and there are multi-actors engaged in this business
such as input suppliers, manufacturers, distributors and constructors from national/international level to
community market hubs. Toilet components and materials move through different and disconnected supply
and distribution channels; however, they are generally considered a part of construction/housing material
supply chains. Figures 3 and 4 present a schematic diagram of supply chains for sanitation hardware
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
29 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
material inputs in the Terai and the hills and mountains. There are two main categories of manufactured
inputs- different types of toilet (ranging from simple pour-flush latrine to stylish flush toilets) and sanitary
components including ceramic pans, shower taps, pipes and fittings. In addition, a third category of inputs
include locally collected materials such as wood, stone, gravel and sand procured locally by individual
households. Ring producers also purchased sand and gravel. Even though, masons and carpenters at local
level provided construction services, most households actively provided unskilled or semi-skilled
construction labour.
District headquarters in the hills and mountains, considering the small volume of demand for sanitation
materials were not able to sustain their business selling solely sanitary hardware. The supply of construction
materials such as cement, iron rods, GI sheets along with pan, plastic pipes, cleaning materials made up a
large volume of the sales. Wholesalers/retailers generally sold 5 to 20 percent sanitary materials from their
total sales; from the total turnover major sales items were construction materials (cement, iron road, GI
sheet). This trend was even more pronounced in the sub-district level in the hills and mountains, sanitary,
construction and daily consumable goods were generally sold by a single shop to sustain the business.
Figure 3 depicts that individual rural households made up a very small fraction (below 20 percent) of overall
sales of the supply chain (for complete turnover of all the actors in the sanitation supply chain). Contractors
and government projects engaged in large scale of construction works (road, hydro-power, irrigation
channel, etc.) were the main consumers of hardware materials and occupied up to 80 percent source of
revenue and income. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate hardware supply chain actors in the Terai and in the hills and
mountains respectively.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
30 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Figure 3. Sanitation hardware supply chain in the Terai
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
31 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Figure 4. Sanitation hardware and supply chain in the hills and mountains
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
32 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
2.2.3 Wholesalers/Retailers
Background Information
Wholesaler and retailers consisted of different types of businesses. Wholesalers could be a dealership which
was an authorised agent of a manufacturer and received direct supply from the manufacturer of cement or
pipes in the country. Wholesalers could also be businesses that purchased cement and pipes directly from
Nepali manufacturers without having a dealership. Wholesalers could also act as retailers for some
customers. Retailers purchased goods from wholesalers or other retailers. Moreover ceramic pans and
fittings manufactured in India were sold by retailers who in turn purchased them from authorised importers
Retailers and wholesalers found in the study area were all male and the majority of them had at least
completed high school. Most of them resided in the urban areas and had registered their shops in PAN/VAT
(registration for tax purposes). They had been running their business since 5 to 31 years individually without
partnership with other people.
Most of them were motivated by their family members to get into this occupation. All shops had some male
staff on a temporary basis. They were mainly responsible for managing accounts, stock and sales;
loading/unloading of materials and goods was done by wage labours. None of the wholesalers/retailers had
acquired formal training to do business; nonetheless they had gradually learnt and developed relevant skills
of doing business from their senior family members as well as friends who had been running a business
since long time back.
Product Information
The items sold by wholesalers/retailers that were used for latrines were mostly pans, pipes and plastics.
However some of them sold cleansing materials, cements, iron rods, pipe fittings and marble. The
proportion of profit earned from selling latrine related items ranged from three to forty percent as individual
product margin.
The average annual profit from the total business ranged from NPR 5 - 16 hundred thousand, with 10 - 20
percent share coming from sanitation related items. The most popular and highly demanded items were
pans and pipes across all zones and tiles as well in the Terai region. The businessmen explained that pans
were popular because of hygiene concern among people whereas tiles were popular because of ongoing new
constructions. The most profitable items were tiles and marble.
Customers in the Terai preferred ceramic pans to other type of pans, whereas people in the hills and
mountains gave high preference to plastic pans which were easy to transport and non-breakable. The
number of pans sold ranged from 20 to 300 per month, with different ranges across the different ecological
zones. The number of pans sold per month in the Terai, hills and mountains were 12-300, 5-50 and 4-15
respectively. The sales were higher in Terai because the suppliers in the Terai also supply pans to sanitation
retailers in the hills and mountains.
Most of the wholesalers and retailers said that the sales of items related to latrines had increased by 20 - 40
percent in the past year across the districts due to the sanitation movement and increasing demand. The
major reasons cited for increase in sales of latrine related items were on-going construction of new buildings
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
33 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
in the neighbouring areas, government policy, changing consumer behaviour (cautious in sanitation hygiene
through awareness campaign), pride and dignity, etc.
The majority of wholesalers/retailers said that the price of sanitary items had increased compared to the
previous year and the reported increase in price was 5 to 20 percent. The prices mostly increased for
sanitary materials, pipes and fittings rather than for cements and iron rods because they were imported and
the exchange rate had increased cost.
The months with highest sales were March through June; this was because most procurement by
government contracts occurred in these months. Similarly, months with least sales were from July through
September. Dry season was said to be the most favourable season for selling goods.
Some wholesalers/retailers provided suggestions and advice to their costumers related to quality, durability,
prices of products and types of toilets without service charges for business promotion.
Table 8. Cost of sanitation related construction materials
Description Common Brand Retailer Price per Unit Cost (NPR) Ecological Zone
Super flush pan Hind ware, parry ware 15000-17000 Terai districts- Sarlahi and Mahottari
Ceramic Pan (No) Hind ware, Parry ware 550-650 Terai districts- Sarlahi and Mahottari
Plastic Pan (No) 350-500 Terai districts- Sarlahi and Mahottari
Plastic Pan (No) 850-1200 Mountain district- Dolpa
Plastic pipe (4”)/M NS marked 124-150 Terai districts- Sarlahi and Mahottari
Plastic pipe (4”)/M NS marked 250-350 Hills district- Dolpa
Plastic pipe (4”)/M NS marked 350-450 Mountain district- Salyan, Rukum and Rolpa
Cement/Bag (50 Kg)
Jagdamba, Biswakarma, Maruti, Shivam, etc. 625-725 Terai districts- Sarlahi and
Mahottari
Cement/Bag (50 Kg)
Jagdamba, Biswakarma, Maruti, Shivam, etc. 800-950 Hills districts- Salyan, Rukum
and Rolpa
Cement/Bag (50 Kg)
Jagdamba, Biswakarma, Maruti, Shivam, etc. 10,000-10,500 Mountain districts- Dolpa
Cement Ring/Per ring 360-600 Terai districts- Sarlahi and
Mahottari
Cement slab/per slab 360-600 Terai districts- Sarlahi and
Mahottari
Easy Slab (slab with pan)/slab 2500-2800 Terai District-Sarlahi and
Mahottari
Iron rods (10 mm)/Kg NS marked 85 Terai districts- Sarlahi and
Mahottari
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
34 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Description Common Brand Retailer Price per Unit Cost (NPR) Ecological Zone
Iron rods (10 mm)/Kg NS marked 90-100 Hills districts- Salyan, Rukum
and Rolpa
Cement Bricks (10”x 8 x 6”)/PC 50-60 Terai districts- Sarlahi and
Mahottari
Cement tiles (18’’ x24”) (No) 100-120 Terai districts- Sarlahi and
Mahottari
Cement (50 Kg bag) 800-100 Hill district-Dailekh
Iron rods, fittings materials etc.
Mountain district Dolpa: 12-15 times higher prices than the actual cost in Nepalgunj.
Customer Information
All businessmen said that their customers mostly belonged to medium to high class families. The majority of
them said quality of product, durability and market price of products were the major determinants of sales
of items. According to them, people mainly constructed latrines at their households due to influence of
people constructing latrines around them, increased awareness, and availability of support from NGOs and
government.
In the Terai, customers mostly came to buy pan, pipe and cement at their shops and preferred to buy latrine
products in instalments; majority of them bought pipes at first followed by tools and then pans. Customers
purchased cement rings and slabs from ring producers and went to shopkeepers for plastic pipes, pan and
fittings. If they had hired bullock carts or tractors for transportation, then they purchased all materials from
the different suppliers at one time and transported them all together. They paid their bills in cash at the
time of purchase of goods. In the hill and mountains, customers purchased all they required at one time
from suppliers and arranged for transportation. In all districts, the majority of consumers acquired
necessary information before coming to the shops; however, shopkeepers also provided information
regarding the products and their usage.
Some of the businessmen said that customers, at times, ordered items not available at their shops. They
were ready to sell sanitation related items on credit based on mutual understanding between shopkeepers
and buyers; however, all of them said that selling on credit would sometimes create problems. Most of the
businessmen sold goods directly to customers and few of them sold their goods through outreach shops
along main roads and community level shops. Some of them had bid for latrine construction works a few
times with NGOs/INGOs in the past when subsidy was being given and large-scale purchases were being
done. Customers mostly bought products based on price and durability and bargained as well. Households
were the major consumers of latrine products. The number of customers who bought latrine items per
retailer/wholesaler (last year) ranged from 200 to 1200 and the majority of them knew the
retailers/wholesalers through reference of masons, neighbours, relatives and friends.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
35 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Transportation
Customers mostly carried purchased items to their homes
by themselves. However, shopkeepers made provision for
transportation of purchased items for large quantity of
goods or if women had come to buy at their shops without
taking any extra charge for home delivery within city area
and also within half a kilometre distance. In case of cement
ring, slab, cement and iron rods, the Terai people generally
used thela (Man pulled cart) and three-tire bicycle for
transporting materials within 1 km distance; for distances
up to 5-6 km they used bullock carts and for distances
greater than that, customers used tractors and vans as
means of transportation. In the hills they transported goods and materials from district headquarters and
business centres in Butwal, Nepalgunj and Dang.
The majority of wholesalers/retailers said that arrangement of transportation was not an easy job. In the
mountain district Dolpa, wholesalers/retailers of Jufal and Dunai Bazaar mostly used air cargo from
Nepalgunj and Surkhet to transport hardware and daily consumable goods. Business people from Dunai
Bazaar used mules to transport construction materials and daily consumable goods from Rarijyula bazaar in
the neighbouring district of Rukum.
Table 9. Sanitation hardware transportation cost
Description Manufacturer to Wholesaler Costs (NPR) Means of
transportation Ecological Zone
Cement (Ton) Siraha, Birgunj, Hetauda 850-1000 Truck Terai districts Sarlahi, and Mahottari
Iron Rod (Ton) Simara 800-1000 Truck Terai districts Sarlahi and Mahottari
Cement Ring (per ring)
Large, Medium and Community business centre
50-100 Tractor/bullock Cart
Terai districts Sarlahi and Mahottari
Cement slab (Per slab)
Large, Medium and Community business centre
50-100 Tractor/Bullock Cart
Terai districts Sarlahi and Mahottari
Slab with pan (Easy slab) (per slab)
Large, Medium and Community business centre
50-100 Tractor/Bullock Cart
Terai districts Sarlahi and Mahottari
Cement Bricks/Tiles
Large, Medium and Community business centre
1000-1500 Tractor Terai districts Sarlahi and Mahottari
Cement Bricks Large, Medium and Community business centre
300-500 Bullock Cart Terai districts Sarlahi and Mahottari
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
36 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Description Manufacturer to Wholesaler Costs (NPR) Means of
transportation Ecological Zone
Cement (Ton) Nepalgunj 1300-1700 Truck Hill districts Salyan, Rukum and Rolpa
Iron Road (Ton) Nepalgunj 1500-1700 Truck Hill districts Salyan,
Rukum and Rolpa Cement, Iron rod, Pan, fitting etc. (Ton)
Nepalgunj, Surkhet 120,000-140,000 Air Cargo Mountain districts Dolpa, Jumla through air craft or mule
Cement, Iron rod, Pan, fitting etc. (Ton)
Rarijyula, Rukum 80,000-100,000 Mule Mountain District Dolpa
Marketing and Promotion
Businessmen got most of their customers through
personal contacts. Only a few customers knew about
these shops through sign boards and FM radio
advertisements. Similarly, a few knew from
recommendation of other people and masons. The
majority of wholesalers/retailers did not advertise to
promote their goods; however, some of them had done
so through local FM stations and a very few of them had
used agents to promote their goods. They stated that
they competed with other businessmen by establishing
good relationship with customers and by selling quality
goods and products.
When asked about how the latrine construction items could be made accessible to the poor families, they
said that it could be done through the formulation of sound government policy on such matters followed by
subsidy from the government and NGOs, along with the support from business enterprises. None of the
wholesalers/retailers had any complaints filed against them by any customers. Only 8-20 shops (per
wholesaler/retailer) competed in their market and none of them had collaborated with their competitors on
any issues such as price regulations. However, in case of cement ring, slab, bricks and tile producers in the
Terai, they displayed their products at their main entrance to grab customers’ attention. Furthermore, the
businessmen who sold sophisticated sanitary materials such as high quality flush toilets, pan, tap items, sink
basin, tiles in the Terai demonstrated their materials and goods to provide material choice to the customers.
Business Management
All businessmen had taken loan from financial institutions such as banks and cooperatives with interest rates
ranging from 10 to as high as 18 percent per annum at some point for their business. The interest rates at
commercial banks were lower ranging from 8 - 11 percent whereas at cooperatives it ranged from 14 to 18
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
37 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
percent. Also, annual interest rate of development banks was slightly higher (10-12%) than the commercial
banks. Some said that it was difficult to pay the loan back and had managed to do so with great toil.
Table 10. The annual interest rate of bank and service charge
S. No. Types of Financial Institution
Annual Interest rate (%)
Service Charge
(%) Remarks
1 Commercial Bank 8 to 11 0.25 to 1
The interest rate depended on negotiations between bankers and consumers during the loan process. Higher the loan amount, lower the interest rate. If the loan is > 50 million and above the service charge 0.25%, > 5 million 0.5 % and <5 million the service charge is 1% respectively.
2 Development Bank 10-12 The service charge was higher than that of commercial banks
3 Cooperatives 14-18
Simple for loan process, till date loan provided for IGAs and small scale business. If shareholder requested for latrine construction support, they discussed in executive committee and were positive for providing support. In Siraha one cooperative provided cement rings and slabs to shareholder’s households instead of providing bonus/divided for sanitation promotion.
4 Community Level Saving/Credit Groups
12-18
Simple loan process, till date they have provided loan for IGAs. If their member requested for latrine construction support then they responded positively and reduced interest rate than business. Potential option for rural credits.
Some wholesalers/retailers experienced difficulties when customers didn’t pay money adequately and timely
after buying products on credit albeit the small number of people who purchased on credit. About half of
the businessmen planned to expand or enlarge their current business while the remaining said they would
probably not expand their business despite an increasing scope in sanitary hardware as well other hardware
items. Some traders in the Terai coordinated with FNCCI (Federation of Nepal Chamber of Commerce and
Industries) for the promotion of outreach of their products through linkages with the local chapter of the
federation. Some of them mentioned that challenges for expansion of sanitation business were lack of
awareness and motivation among customers.
They said that such challenges could be overcome by raising awareness through campaigns, creating
supportive and sound government policies, technical assistance from government and I/NGOs along with
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
38 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
socio-economic empowerment of people. All of them supported the idea that it was necessary to further
expand sanitation services in nearby villages and rural areas.
2.2.4 Ring Producers
Background Information
Ring producers were concentrated in the Terai ecological zone whereas in the hills and mountains, they were
virtually non-existent. All ring producers found in the districts were male. The majority of cement ring and
slab producers had not received any formal training and had learnt the skills to run such business through
personal skills and experience. Besides products, they provided advice on latrine construction and use of
materials such as single pit, double pit, slab, slab with pan etc. They charged NR 360 to 600 per ring
according to the size of ring with total of 4 to 8 rings per set. Customers who constructed single pit latrines
generally used 4 to 6 rings per pit and those who constructed double pit latrines purchased 8 to 10 rings and
two slabs. The size of cement ring is varied from 14” to 21” height and 3 ft. diameter.
The business was high from October to May whereas the lowest was from June to September. Their supplies
had increased compared to the previous year. The customers were mostly villagers from neighbouring 3 to 7
VDCs. The poor people, according to them received support from local Village Development Committees
(VDCs) through pro-poor support mechanisms. Some of them sold rings on instalment basis to selected
customers who had to pay within a month of purchasing goods. The majority of them intended to expand
their business in the coming years; however, they did not have a definite expansion and business
promotional plan for their business. However, small scale ring producers showed interest in having access to
bank loans for business expansion.
Few of them had coordinated with local VDC and NGOs but the majority of them didn’t work in coordination
with government and NGOs and neither of them had ever bid for contract in NGO or government.
Product Offering
Ring producers sold cement rings, slabs (cover), roofing tiles, cement poles, ventilation and cement blocks
and they mostly sold their own products. The hardest part for them was setting rings accurately in a frame
and pulling out moulds from the rings. They said that cement rings were used for other purposes such as
making garbage collection pits in urban areas, constructing wells for drinking water, constructing cattle
feeders and water collection tanks. Customers were primarily responsible for the transportation of rings,
slabs and other related materials. Sometimes ring producers transported rings via their own bullock carts
and tractors up to customers’ location and charged extra money for it. In one trip, they could usually
transport rings and slabs sufficient to construct one latrine. Delivery of materials was not easy and thus they
preferred to use their own drivers for delivery rather than assign an outsider to do so.
Input Suppliers
Cement ring, tile and slab industries mostly required mould, sand, gravel, cement and iron rods as input
materials. Out of six ring producers interviewed in the Terai, some furthermore supplied hardware materials
such as cement, iron rod, pipes and cleaning materials and some also supplied pans with a slab. The ring
and slab producers purchased sand and gravel from nearby rivers and streams. Similarly, district head
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
39 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
quarter and sub-district level business centres had traders who supplied hardware materials like cement,
iron rod, pipes, pan and cleaning materials in the districts.
Latrine Customers
Ring producers usually built latrines for consumers when they built new houses or if they were hygiene
conscious. They said that there had been increase in construction and use of latrine in recent years because
of rising awareness among people, GoN policy, dignity and pride of latrine owners while arranging sons
and/or daughters marriage in the Eastern Terai. The construction was high in the months of October to June
and low from July to September i.e. low during the rainy season. Most consumers in the Terai districts were
from the middle class families from the nearby villages within the reach of few kilometres distance from the
place of ring production (0-15 km). Ring producers at the Indian borders supplied their products to Indian
costumers as well.
According to ring producers, consumers had some knowledge about latrines; they knew what else they had
to purchase besides rings for latrine construction; however, consulted them in those matters at times.
Promotion and Sales
Personnel linkage, quality products delivery and goodwill were found to be the major promotional activities
of most ring and slab producers. Few of them displayed sign boards and visited government offices such as
VDCs and WSSDO. All ring and slab producers kept their products in stock and showed physical products
and production procedure to consumers who visited their production site. Some of them provided different
sized rings with varying heights, 14” to 21”, and consumers had choice to buy.
Similarly, 80 percent of ring producers produced tiles, cement bricks and ventilation. Few of them
constructed toilets using their own products and used constructed toilets for demonstration to increase their
sales. While discussing about price negotiation between ring producers and customers, they said that they
either reduced sales prices or provided transportation facilities to costumer as the products promotion and
sales.
Finance and Business
The average profit that they made per annum from total sales ranged from around NPR 200 thousands to
around 250 thousands out of which 10 – 20 percent was related to sanitation items. Their customers
typically paid in cash but sometimes, they also bought on instalment basis which was not very common.
Their customers bargained on price and mutually agreed on some price after bargaining.
There was no system of credit for sales. The amount of rings they kept in stock depended on market
situation and most of them did not take loan for maintaining stock. Discussion with financial institutions
revealed that they had provided loan to wholesalers/retailers, ring producers and for construction of
buildings. They did not provide loan for latrine construction but cooperatives were positive about providing
loan to its members upon request. The process for ring producers to get a loan was felt to be cumbersome
however as it was time-consuming and required collateral which was not easy for these entrepreneurs.
Tile, ring and slab producers had initially started their business with their own investment but later, some of
them had taken loan from commercial banks. The banks charged them up to 12 percent interest rate
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
40 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
whereas the cooperatives charged up to 18 percent annually. Whenever the production remained in stock,
producers experienced economic problems and input suppliers would not provide inputs for long on credit.
Generally, producers repaid their previous credit without fail for inputs such as cement and rods and
received inputs for their product production on credit. Ring producers shared that the demand of their
products, especially concrete rings had increased by 20 - 30 percent in recent years which had ultimately
promoted their business. They mostly paid their staff on a monthly basis however some of them paid based
on results i.e. masons were paid NPR 50 – 100 per ring production. Masons were paid on a weekly basis
whereas labourers were paid a daily wage. They ordered items whose demand they predicted would increase
in the near future. The biggest worry they had about their business was the fluctuating market price of raw
materials and fluctuating demand from customers. All ring and slab producers were interested in promoting
their business to fulfil the demand for sanitary products in the days to come.
2.2.5 Masons
General Information
The masons identified in the study were also all men and had engaged in agriculture works and had later
started working as a labourer and then finally started working as a mason. Their experiences ranged from 4
to 20 years. Most of them worked on a daily wage basis. Some masons who were working as contractors
had 8 - 15 workers working under them. The majority of them had not received any formal training of a
mason and learnt the necessary skills through experience.
Their work peaked after major festivals like Dashain, Tihar and Chhaith from October to November when
there was an increase in construction of new houses. The construction work was high during the dry season
as well since they could do construction works in dry season without being hindered by rainfall and had
longer days for work.
Service Offering
The major services offered to people was the construction of buildings while some of them regularly offered
the service of latrine construction as well when needed. Those who worked as contractors hired workers for
construction. In the mountain districts, a mason offered his services for NPR 700 – 1000 per day and
similarly, in the hills for NPR 600 – 800 per day. The wage rate of a mason in the Terai was relatively
cheaper than in the hills and mountains averaging 500 NPR but going up to 800 NPR in certain areas.
Masons who worked on a monthly basis earned NPR 8000 - 10000 per month. Those who worked on a
contractual basis i.e. unit basis received NPR 50 - 100 for casting one cement ring from cement ring factory
owners. When masons took responsibilities to build complete latrines, they charged within a range of NPR
5000 - 15000 per latrine for mason and labour costs.
The commonly built latrines were water seal pour flush latrines and traditional pit latrines. As far as their
role in latrine construction was concerned, they were mostly involved in installing plinth level (pan) and
constructing walls and roofs. Some masons, mostly in the hills and mountains, mentioned setting pan
(squatting base) as the most difficult part of latrine construction. Some mentioned roof and walls to be the
most difficult aspects of construction. Those who could guesstimate said that the proportion of income they
earned from sanitation related work ranged from 20 - 35 percent. In the perception of the masons, there
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
41 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
was no shortage of workers for their job and they had adequate machinery and equipment to construct
latrines. They were positive about developing women masons by providing training so that women
customers could easily communicate with women masons about their needs of toilets and kitchens. Such
provision would make women masons easily available since men mostly go for foreign labour.
Customers
In the Terai, the majority of masons built all the parts of latrine but some did not build the pits (customers
built it by themselves using labour), whereas in the hills and mountains masons were hired for different
tasks in construction. Their usual customers were the middle class and high class families. They said that
customers had options to choose among different masons and that they mostly chose the sincere, skilled
and honest masons. They were usually paid immediately after the completion of construction work. Masons
had not yet bid on government or NGO contracts.
Inputs
Customer themselves decided and bought necessary items to build latrines but sometimes
wholesalers/retailers helped them make decisions and choose items. The items such as pans and cements
were available from traders in a nearby city, whereas sand and gravel were available from tractor owners
who bought from a nearby river. Customers paid 1500-1800/tractor for sand and NPR 2500 to 4000/tractor
for aggregate as transportation cost depending on the distance. Additionally, customers were responsible for
any damage caused during transportation.
Marketing and Promotions
Masons had never done any promotion to sell their products. They did not compete with other masons and
regarded themselves as very sincere in their work. They believed that mason services could be better
marketed to the poorest households through VDC or governmental subsidy. Some masons had contact with
wholesalers/retailers and got new customers, mostly in case of the Terai districts.
Business Management
Latrine construction has been a good business for masons, but they hoped that it would get better. They
expected that its scope would keep on rising because of construction of new houses and therefore more
toilets being constructed. Most of them had never taken any loan. Masons feared that other masons would
distract their clients. The majority of them had no concrete plans to expand their business nor had received
any training related to business expansion. They agreed that such sanitation services could be expanded if
awareness was raised among people and if collaboration was done among different people. Some masons
believed that the role of women could be increased in that sector and they perceived that women could
provide cheap labour; however, some masons were not in favour to increase the role of women as masons,
as they felt that women were slow at work and caused many accidents. Masons had no insurance provision
for their works in their area. They had no definite plan to expand their business at the moment; however,
they said that the training opportunities could, to some extent help them expand their work and services.
The majority of them did not have strong links with retailers and wholesalers.
The issues related to technology, cost and supply chain has been summarized in table 11.
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
42 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Table 11. Issues related to technology, cost and supply chain
Technical/User Challenges Cost/Affordability Supply Issues
Mountains
• Insufficient number of masons available to construct latrines in Jumla district
• Low technical skills of masons for pan and pipe fitting and mortar preparation (cement, sand and gravel)
• In the High Mountains, water seal pans are not workable due to low temperatures. Ecologically suitable latrine design is not available
• The present latrine technology are costly and need to develop cheaper options and maximise the use of local materials
• Community people would like to adopt local materials and labours
• Poor people are reluctant to pay for cement, pipes and pan because of past subsidy practices
• High cost of construction materials.
• No loan available from financial institutions to households level, however hardware suppliers had access to loan
• Difficult to transport material and high transportation cost (air lifted or/and mule).
• Cement, pipes, pans and iron rods are not easily available when required
• Damage and loss of materials
• Takes long time to supply materials from regional hubs such as Nepalgunj and Surkhet, which is beyond the capacity of ordinary people
• In rainy and winter season, no or limited air flights and difficult to get construction materials
• No market centre nearby village and materials are not available in local shops
Hills
• Poor technical skills of masons
• Leakage and poor pan/pipe setting
• Limited latrine design option
• Relatively high cost of materials due to transportation from hub in Terai
• Materials are not available and poor people had problem to cover latrine construction
• No linkages with financial/ cooperatives/ saving & credit groups
• Difficult to transport materials from district and sub district level
• High time consumption for materials transportation using man and mule
• High costs of transportation
• Mostly depend on either manual or mule transportation.
Terai
• Poorly ventilated
• Heat inside latrine due to roofing materials (GI Sheet)
• Low cost technology was not demonstrated
• Limited or no linkage of masons between customers and wholesalers
• Limited or no market/sales promotion
• Difficult to get loan from financial institutions by for building latrines and by ring producers; however wholesalers/retailers had access to loan
• Existing latrine design does not solve problems associated with high ground water table, flood and water logging
• Sanitary materials’ cost are unaffordable by the poor
• In rural area there are limited/no strong suppliers
• No linkages with financial/ cooperatives/ saving & credit groups to finance latrine construction
• Breakage of materials
• Poor supply of construction and cleaning materials in rural areas
• Difficult to transport construction/sanitary materials during rainy season
Chapter II. Findings of the Study
43 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Technical/User Challenges Cost/Affordability Supply Issues
Terai landless
• Inadequate and limited skills by people to build latrines by themselves
• High latrine costs and no low cost option available.
• No or limited land for latrine construction (Dalits: Mushar, Sahani, Dhobi etc.)
• Can afford labour and local material cost but unable to pay for non-local materials and masons
• Materials breakage • Producers unavailable at nearby
places and had to pay higher cost of transport
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
44 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Chapter I I I . Discussion, Conclusion and
Recommendations This chapter presents the overall analysis of findings from the consumer preference study and the supply
chain analysis study. Moreover, the challenges in establishing a good sanitation market (from consumer and
supply chain perspectives) are highlighted along with the possible strategic directions.
3.1 Discussion of the Major Findings of the Consumer Preference Study
Socioeconomic characteristics
Latrine use in communities differed across different economic strata. The hills and mountains faced more
difficulties in fetching water. People in the hills and mountains had relatively low access to household assets
such as radio and television.
Decision making practice
Males were more involved in decision making as compared with females in all ecological zones on major
household activities including decisions on latrine construction and maintenance. In addition, male members
of many households had gone abroad for work which further created difficulties for women to make
decisions about latrine construction. Even for those females who could decide on their own, they faced
difficulties in transportation of construction materials and finding necessary labour (e.g. masons) for
construction without having male members at home.
Latrine construction
Financial barrier was the major constraint for latrine construction. Moreover, in case of the hills and
mountains, people faced difficulties in fetching masons. The majority of households in the hills and
mountains had to travel to the district headquarter for purchasing latrine construction materials. They
further faced difficulties in transportation of the materials. People in the Terai had relatively easier access to
markets for purchasing and transporting latrine construction materials. Thus, the focus should be on making
construction materials easily available in the hills and mountains.
Defecation and hand-washing practice
Non-latrine users practiced open defecation in open areas such as bushes, river banks, forest areas, open
grounds and paddy fields. The elderly and children defecated along road sides as well. This practice is likely
to contaminate water sources and cause diseases that are transmitted by faecal-oral route. However, such
practice was gradually decreasing. Hand-washing with soap and water was more common among those
households that had latrines. Many people in the Terai washed their hands directly in ponds and rivers after
defecation which in the long-term might bring serious health hazards. Thus awareness about hand-washing
practice needs to be raised, especially the importance of hand-washing with soap and water at critical
junctures. Furthermore, the marketing of soap and handwashing facilities was required.
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
45 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Knowledge and perception of latrine construction materials and use
The majority of respondents in all ecological zones were found to have known about the use of materials for
latrine construction. However, they mostly knew the type of materials used as per the construction practices
and latrine designs prevalent in those areas.
People had better knowledge about the benefits of latrine use. The most common benefits of latrine use as
identified by the participants were increased prestige, improved sanitation, saved time, improved health etc.
However, some people felt that use of a latrine was tedious since they had to wait in a long queue for their
turn. Furthermore, some people found it quite convenient to defecate in the open. The female respondents
perceived more benefits of a toilet as compared with male participants. The general awareness and
perception about latrine use can be improved by the joint effort of WASH related NGOs and the local
government through advocacy, communication and social mobilization of sanitation programmes.
Regarding the reasons for not having a latrine, cost of latrine construction was a major issue in all ecological
zones. In addition, people in the Terai said that unavailability of land was another important reason for not
constructing and using a latrine. Some participants in the hills and mountains mentioned lack of information
about places to buy toilet construction materials and that people lacked materials for construction. This
signifies the importance of dissemination of information, especially in the hills and mountains, about the
type of materials required for latrine construction and the place to purchase them.
Construction, use and maintenance of latrine
Masons were mostly employed for latrine construction. In the hills and mountains however, it was very hard
to fetch masons. The family members were also involved in latrine construction. In case of the hills and
mountains, local NGOs assisted in latrine construction by providing technical assistance. The maintenance of
latrine was another issue raised in all ecological zones. The majority of participants from the mountain and
hill districts mostly mentioned using water and brush only. People in the Terai mentioned using disinfectant
chemicals (e.g. phenyl) as well because of easy access to markets in the Terai.
3.2 Discussion of the Findings Related to Supply Chain Analysis
3.2.1 Products
Product refers to construction and maintenance materials needed for toilets. People had general awareness
about the type of products necessary for latrine construction however the access to such products from
nearby markets was a major challenge. Integrated effort from NGOs and local bodies (VDC and district) is
required to strengthen the supply chain market to increase access to such products. Reduction of the cost of
products is also recommended as the survey revealed that financial barriers led to reluctance in latrine
construction. The key qualities the respondents desired in latrines were affordability, durability, ease in
construction and maintenance.
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
46 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
3.2.2 Pricing
Economical feasibility is a key to development initiatives and latrine construction is not an exception. High
cost of latrine construction materials, high transportation cost (as people had to carry the materials up to a
long distance, particularly in the hills and mountains), increased cost of materials because of damage of
materials during transportation and high construction charges (relative to people’s economic condition)
made the overall price of latrines high. The baseline data showed that the majority of people in the hills and
mountains belonged to the low wealth quintile. Thus, the price of latrine is a critical factor for latrine
construction. Even for people in the Terai who belonged to medium to high wealth quintiles there is a need
to develop a range of options with different costs to suit their abilities. The type of products offered could
encourage households to invest in latrine construction. As per the calculations made from the survey data,
an approximate price option for latrine construction (considering the ecological differences) should range
from NPR 20,000 to 30,000.
3.2.3 Place
The study shows that the key players in latrine construction in communities are the mason/artisans and the
hardware suppliers including cement ring producers. Most of the masons working as masons in the districts
didn’t have any formal training except for a few in the Terai and mountains, the key reason being that most
of the trained masons had migrated in search of better opportunities. They depend on the construction of
latrines and houses for their earning.
Most of the people and masons depend on hardware suppliers for materials needed in latrine construction.
The hardware suppliers interviewed in this study stocked latrine construction materials which comprised up
to 20 percent of their total stock and average monthly sales volumes ranged between 10-20 percent from
the sanitation related business. Most wholesalers/retailers supplied hardware materials up to 15 km distance
radius and a few of them supplied to neighboring districts as well. Those suppliers used certain distribution
channels to enhance supply of sanitation products and services. Their stock values and willingness showed
that they would probably expand their businesses in the future if the demand of people for latrine
construction materials increased. Wholesalers and retailers resided in major market hubs and headquarters.
Thus, there was no easy access to markets in the villages. People had to travel a long distance in the hills
and mountains to reach market hubs and headquarters to buy latrine construction materials. It was however
noted that businessmen were willing to expand their businesses on the periphery of district headquarters as
well.
3.2.4 Promotion
Local Resource Person (carrying out demand triggering), Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs),
mass media (radio and TV), and Social Mobilisers were the best sources of sanitation and hygiene
information. The survey revealed that these sources were adopted for promotion of sanitation. Additionally,
supply chain actors promoted their products and services through meetings and discussions with customers.
Some used sign boards and some displayed the products outside their stalls. The promotion of sanitation
market is thus a shared responsibility.
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
47 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
3.2.5 Policy
The current sanitation policies, strategies and action plans are concentrating on building and promoting
toilets by creating demand for sanitation. However, there is an equal need to promote the private sector to
ensure availability of construction materials and skilled masons in the rural areas; to support technology
innovation considering the ecological zones, wealth quintiles, and disability status; and to pursue legal
channels in making approval of house construction design and implementation subject to inclusion of toilets.
Informed choice materials with details specifications should be designed, documented and disseminated to
the masons and or to the households (household also build their latrines). The NSHMP has recognised the
role of private sector but their participation is limited in the development of district strategies. Private
sector engagement can be increased in rural sanitation business by identifying district specific action areas
for strengthening sanitation supply chains. The study also indicates a greater scope for financing latrine
construction and business development that can be enhanced through networking and coordination with
financial institutions such as cooperatives in the rural areas. Policy changes may be required to engage
cooperatives in sanitation business and financing for latrine construction.
3.2.6 Partnership
Improvement in sanitation depends on collaborative efforts from household members, the government,
vocational training institutions, local NGOs, youth clubs, local FM, local leaders, female community health
volunteers, banks and cooperatives as well as donor agencies. The survey revealed that those places which
had better evidence of stronger partnerships had better sanitation status. Such partnership was more
evident in the hills and mountains through the fast pace of the sanitation movement.
3.3 Role of Local Government and Line Agencies in Supply Chain
Till now, local government and line agencies, including WSSDOs are mainly involved in demand creation and
they are less involved in supply chain strengthening. Local government has a major role in market-based
solutions which involves discussing effective use of public funding in sanitation with the aim to reach those
households and communities where market access and product and service affordability remains most
challenging. Local governments (DDC at district level and VDC at community level) can foster support
mechanisms such as linking communities to suppliers of latrine construction materials which are not locally
available (e.g. pan, pipe, cement). Government agencies can facilitate in simplifying the process of
construction material purchase and transportation, to make it less expensive. For example, VDCs can buy
construction materials in bulk amount and facilitate material transportation to rural households at an
affordable price. They can link businesses to households that are ready to purchase. In addition,
government line agencies can organise skill-building trainings for supply chain actors, especially business
entrepreneurs to promote and market their products. On top of that, government agencies (responsible
quality assurance body) should carryout their responsibility to monitor the quality of products available in
the market.
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
48 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
3.4 Overall Analysis
3.4.1 Knowledge Challenge
The applicability and transferability of any health promotion activity is very much dependent on the level of
local knowledge of implementers and beneficiaries. People were aware of the health benefits of using a
latrine. In addition, privacy, improved prestige, convenience and time-saving were other motivators for
using a toilet.
It is important, when addressing sanitation and hygiene promotion efforts, to consider the ‘composition’ of
the communities. Many disadvantaged communities are characterised, among other factors, by their
historical legacy. The legacy that people carry is influential on attitudes of people towards others as well as
the conditions in which they live. For example, some people in the Terai believed that there were no
problems associated with open defecation as they had been practicing it since long. The study identified
three major behavior practices that were believed to be more detrimental to poor health than others. Firstly,
the tradition of open defecation which has shaped their level of knowledge. Secondly, the fact that the
practice of defecating in the open was generally an accepted practice. Thirdly, the practice of hand washing
with soap and water was even lower in case of open defecation. Also people in the hill and mountain districts
said that they were not constructing toilets because of inadequate money, however many people in the Terai
said they were satisfied with open defecation. Many respondents expressed the fact that existing latrines
were too smelly and dirty, and the option of defecating in the open was much more appealing. The level of
awareness and knowledge about disadvantages of open defecation was different in different geographical
locations. An unusual explanation offered for not having a latrine was that the practice of open defecation
was considered a ‘social activity’, especially for women. It was mentioned that women made excuses to
leave home together in search of firewood or some other product and used that time collectively to defecate
in jungle and chat together.
In many communities, especially in the hills and mountains, the present ODF declaration movement bound
households to construct toilets. VDC initiatives to force households into constructing toilets had made a
positive effect. This finding supports the importance of generating political will for consumer’s performance
and sanitation supply chain.
Regarding knowledge, people in the hill and mountain districts were less aware about the use of pans, sand,
bricks and cement in constructing toilet as these materials were not used by them much in comparison to
the Terai districts. The knowledge of use of zinc plate was high in the hill and mountain districts; however,
in the Terai districts, people had negative perception towards the use of zinc plates due to its tendency to
heat their toilets.
Perceived benefits of latrine use included increased comfort, privacy, convenience, dignity and safety for
women and men along with the rise in social status of people who adopted improved sanitation and hygiene
practices.
Most latrine non-users desired to build a toilet. They believed masons, social mobilizers and neighbours who
had constructed toilets were the main sources of information and advice for toilet construction. Very few
households did not know whom to ask for such advice. Local NGOs and social mobilizers working on WASH
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
49 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
at community level should be mobilized for supporting informed decision among consumers. Despite the fact
that households across all study districts were less satisfied with their technical skills on latrine construction,
households still believed masons were the main source of information.
3.4.2 Technology Challenge
Most households discussed within their family about construction of toilets in their home and the majority of
them preferred flush type toilet. There were technology challenges in meeting people’s desire along with a
low level of knowledge. Keeping in mind the geography, culture, and technology, sanitation supply chain
should be varied according to the context of the location and perceptions of consumers.
Transportation of toilet construction materials in the mountain and hill districts was another challenge. Also,
many communities in the hills and mountains had inadequate water for toilet cleaning. Almost half of the
households purchased toilet construction materials from district headquarters. It meant there was no market
access for sanitation supply chain in nearby places for the community people. Sanitation marketing
approach has to be developed within the reach of communities.
The study revealed that the existing technology options were not useable by the physically disabled and it
was difficult for the elderly and pregnant women to use the facility as well. Hygiene and sanitation related
infrastructure should be gender, children, disabled and old-age people friendly. In addition, pour-flush toilets
were not applicable for the high mountains (e.g upper Dolpa) where water freezes during the winter and
ordinary plastic pipes crack due to low temperatures. So, in this situation an ecological option of toilet
design and materials is needed to increase access to sanitation facilities for all.
The construction and maintenance of public and institutional toilets was another challenge in the study
districts. People might have the perception that all toilets are nasty and smelly because of public toilet they
might have visited and discourage them to build toilets in their households.
Ecological toilet offers an option for people who invest on chemical fertilizers in food production. In Nepal,
handling of human faeces is a taboo and it is difficult to convince people that human faeces can be handled
safely once it is properly composted. Urine is traditionally believed to have “healing” powers. Animal urine is
used in religious performances and handling urine is not a “taboo”. Urine has high nutrition content and
therefore it is a very good fertilizer. There are experiences that support that urine can be used as a pesticide
to protect plants. However, there are limited practices of using human excreta as fertilizers. There are small
debates on different latrine options in the communities. People generally perceive pour-flush latrine as an
ideal type and do not have knowledge on other options.
3.4.3 Affordability Challenge
There were numerous responses regarding subsidies being given previously which resulted in latrines being
misused. Some latrines were used for storage, some were abandoned. In addition, many others were
waiting for such subsidies to construct latrines.
Because of lack of adequate money, latrine non-users could not construct toilet at their households;
however, the majority of them were willing to build toilets. Though they perceived the cost of latrine
construction is high, the majority of households had not saved any money for latrine construction.
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
50 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
People mostly bought expensive goods during the major festivals like Dashain and Tihar (in the hills and
mountains) and Chhaith and Holi (in the Terai) and also during marriage ceremonies of any family members
such as sons and daughters. Programmes aiming at increasing the coverage of latrine use should target
such opportunities and extend support in making the purchasing process more easy and convenient.
3.4.4 Outreach and Fragmentation Challenge
The study identified that consumers were facing problems in collecting sanitation and hygiene materials. For
example, they had to travel to district headquarters to buy toilet pans, cement, etc., and they had to collect
sand from another location and stone or brick from another location. If all sanitation and hygiene promotion
materials were available in their own community, people would build toilets and start changing their
sanitation and hygiene behaviours. An approach of sanitation marketing and sanitation supply chain has to
be developed at the community level with convenient procurement of materials. This can be done in
partnership with public private sector and cooperatives.
In addition, the fragmentation challenge was also prevalent in case of finding masons. In hills and
mountains, a household had to rely on different masons for different tasks related to latrine construction
(e.g. stone collection, wall building, pan setting, RCC, door construction, etc.). As a result, it was quite
difficult to identify and hire adequate masons in the hills and mountains. In case of the Terai, a single mason
carried out multiple tasks because of which the cost of a mason was relatively cheaper.
3.5 Conclusion and Recommendations
3.5.1 Conclusion
The supply chain study needs to recognise consumer preferences as well to improve access to affordable
and appropriate sanitation products and services in rural households. The study has shown that households
without latrines would like to install latrine facilities and those who had latrines aimed to improve their
latrine facilities. This creates opportunities for the promotion of businesses in sanitation sector.
Use of locally available materials in all ecological zones was found high. However, wholesaler/retailers and
cement ring builders sold improved latrine construction materials in small volume mostly at district
headquarters. Entrepreneurs at the district headquarter and business hubs sold latrine construction
materials to customers who were 10 to 30 KM far and to those from adjoining districts in the central region.
Latrine construction work was done by mason/artisans who were not formally trained. Construction
materials and expensive goods (e.g. jewellery) were generally purchased by a household head, mostly
males, whereas staple food items were purchased by women as well.
People (mostly latrine users) usually had knowledge about commonly used latrines in their community and
nearby urban areas. Therefore, most of them had an opinion on their preferred latrine types and parts
(substructure, slab and superstructure). Some of the motivation factors behind latrine construction were
government sanitation policy, arrival of daughter-in-law in the family, privacy, health and sanitation.
Community awareness through local resource persons were very strong drivers for latrine construction and
their use.
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
51 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Many people had the ability to afford latrine construction except for the poor households. However,
construction and/or upgradation of toilet facilities were not a priority for most non-latrine and latrine owners
in the study area. They prioritized investing their money on purchasing land, building houses and jewellery.
The supply chain actors (wholesalers/retailers) either inherited business run by their father or started
business as suggested by their relatives and friends. The concrete ring producers entered business when
they saw the scope of business and also after they received suggestions from development workers.
Mason/artisans transitioned from working as labour/unskilled workers. The supply chain was found to be
fragmented and there was little coordination among service providers due to the inadequate flow of
information, lack of WASH stakeholder stimulation and knowledge among the actors.
Materials for latrine construction were available in few hardware shops located in the district headquarter
and business hubs near highways. Latrine construction was increasing by 25 to 30 percent annually. Most
wholesalers/retailers had taken loan from commercial banks to expand business and keep stocks. Products
were mostly sold in cash and very little was sold in credit. They used hoarding boards, business cards and
show rooms to promote their products and services. Cement ring producers mostly demonstrated their
products at main entrance as their business promotion activity. In the hill and mountain districts, relatively
few suppliers were available in the district headquarter. Materials were supplied from the Terai via aircraft in
Dolpa district and the cost of latrine construction materials was many times higher than the actual price of
products.
Wholesalers mostly used trucks to supply latrine and construction materials from manufacturing sites to
shops; while consumers used tractors, auto rickshaws, and bullock carts as transportation means to
transport materials from shops to communities. Aircrafts were the main means of transportation in Dolpa
district while mules, donkeys and manual labour were used for material transportation within Dolpa and the
other mountain and hill districts. Mason/artisans available in communities mostly provided advice on latrine
types, materials required and construction of latrines.
3.5.2 Recommendations
Based on the findings and analysis of consumer preferences and supply chain, following recommendations
are made for the improvement of developing business opportunity and strengthening the supply chain with
some interventions through market0based solutions. The recommendations are presented in four main
areas:
1. Product and service options 2. Business model and supply chain interventions 3. Sales, promotion and marketing 4. Engaging stakeholders
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
52 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
1. Product and Service Options
a. Develop Technological Options of Low Cost Latrine with Standards
Affordable and accessible latrine products are likely to increase construction of toilets provided that the
products meet consumers’ desires. The cost reduction of product should come from research with standards
providing more than one technological option using available materials. The ecological variation, local
materials available, and climatic condition should be considered while providing technological options to the
community people. For example, GI sheets are less preferred in the Terai and water-sealed toilets may not
be feasible in the high mountains. Other upgrading options for current latrines users and higher income
households should also be considered. People were concerned about the problems associated with emptying
pits thus informed choice work should include emptying options.
The notion that the construction of sanitary toilets costs a lot of money and that they are therefore
unaffordable for the poor wealth quintiles living in villages needs to be eradicated. Thus, raising awareness
and demonstrating the actual cost of construction of simple toilets of different types is essential by
considering the ecological zones. The demonstration locations shall be in strategic place for demonstration
and replication effects such as at health facilities, VDC offices, schools, and business outlets e.g. ring
producers.
b. Enhance Mason Capacity and Skills
Most latrines were constructed by local masons with inadequate skills. Improper installation of pan and pipe
causes bad odour and leakages which discourages potential households to construct latrine and increases
latrine construction cost. Masons did not have proper knowledge of making mixture of cementing agent to
be used during latrine construction. Strengthening capacities of masons at the community level ensures
quality in constructing the latrine components and reduces cost of cement to be used in latrine
construction.
c. Upgrading Facilities for Safe Use by All
Not all latrine users were willing to invest in upgrading latrines. Offering simple options for upgrading helps
households to have higher quality facilities. Such improvements should focus on installing water
sealed/flush pan where there is traditional pit and it is suitable for the site conditions. In addition, not all
pour-flush (water sealed) latrines in communities are improved to an acceptable level of having no access
to flies or being environmentally safe. Constructing pits that are safe such that it does not provide access
to flies or contaminate ground or surface water is an important issue. Importantly, the needs of consumer
segments that face difficulties in using a toilet need to be considered, especially the elderly, children,
pregnant women, and people with disabilities. Simple adjustments can be made to toilets such as a guided
pathway for people who cannot see well enough, support structures for the toilet, or adjusted pans for
people who find it difficult to squat.
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
53 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
2. Supply Chain Interventions. a. Increase Capacity of Existing Supply Chain Actors for Sanitation Business Expansion
There were a number of supply chain actors active in selling sanitation materials in rural markets. These
were however focused in district, sub-district or highway market centres and only some suppliers, mostly in
the Terai, had linkages to community shops (general stores). The poor network among supply chain actors,
inadequate knowledge on sanitation business opportunities and weak linkages with financial institutions
were some of the key factors hampering the scaling up of business and enhancing outreach.
Entrepreneurship development and financial linkage might ensure business expansion and sustainability of
business. Though it must be noted that sanitation related sales made up a small proportion (up to 20%) of
the total business of the supply chain actors and therefore scope for a stand-alone sanitation business is
limited. Building network of cement and ring producers as well as masons and wholesalers/retailers would
support expansion of sanitary hardware market and promote the quality of technological options in rural
areas.
b. Develop Concrete Ring Producer for Complete Sanitation Solution
The purchasing and delivery process in sanitation market in the Terai districts were time consuming and
complicated. Promoting concrete ring producers located within the community or in proximity to the
community to sell and deliver all sanitation materials for latrine construction may be one of the options to
simplify the purchasing process. This may be achieved through one business or a combination of businesses
coming together.
c. Link Cooperatives for Supplying Sanitation Materials
Cooperatives can be targeted as focal business centres to reduce the complexity in transportation of
sanitation materials. The linkage of cooperatives with district headquarter-based hardware suppliers can
reduce transportation burden, cost and assure quality supply of sanitation materials in bulk amount.
d. Engage Women in Sanitation Business
Although none of the current actors in the supply chain were found to be women, women are involved in
various groups at the VDC level such as credit and savings groups. Linkages with such groups can be
explored to provide loans for the construction of toilets locally, which has not been happening so far. Also
women engaged in existing micro-enterprises may have potential to be developed as providers of sanitation
related hardware and consumable items at the local level, especially as it was found that the outreach of
sanitation supply chain actors to customers at the local level was limited in all districts.
e. Develop Existing Entrepreneurs for Sanitation Business at the Local Level
Since a major bottle neck in building toilets as well as in maintaining toilets was the inaccessibility and
unavailability of markets in close proximity of communities, local level suppliers of sanitation hardware and
consumable items need to be developed. In order to maintain sustainability of such businesses, it would be
best to identify existing businesses and facilitate them to expand and include sanitation related business. As
the study found that even in major market centres, most businesses were not stand-alone sanitation
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
54 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
businesses, rather sanitation is a part of their larger business (making up to 20 percent of the profit), in the
villages, marketing of sanitation goods could be added to existing businesses. Here it may be possible to
target women entrepreneurs (see d. above). Moreover, such shops should also stock soap and market its
use.
3. Sales, Promotion and Marketing a. Target Seasonal Sales Opportunity
Sanitation demand creation, sales and promotion activities need to be implemented during times such as
marriages, festivals (e.g. Dashain, Tihar, Chhaith and Holi) and immediately after crop harvesting season
when people have cash in their hand and are more receptive to ideas. Linking with financial institutions (e.g.
local level saving and credit groups) available in areas can ease the cash flow burden. Sales and promotion
activities need to be planned accordingly to take advantage of such times.
b. Promote Product Display of Latrine Options
People believe in what they see. The display of different types of latrine (options) helps to deliver message
and promote latrine types. The display might include low cost options of shelters. On one hand, suppliers
can display latrine product options in their shops making it more appealing to consumers and on the other
hand, cheap latrine options can be built in public places (e.g. VDC offices, health facilities, market centres
and location of cement ring producers) so that people can see the available latrine options.
c. Develop Motivating Communication Tools
Clear and encouraging messages that ensure their safety, status and other factors help motivate people to
build latrines. The messages can guide consumers to select appropriate latrine based on affordability, access
and other features. These messages should include issues such as health, sanitation, privacy, comfortability,
safety and availability of construction materials. Communication messages should also target the use of
soap with handwashing after defecation. The communication messages needs to be developed, whenever
and wherever possible, using local dialects and incorporating the cultural context with pictorial illustration.
Moreover, communication messages need to be linked with demand creation events to enhance outreach
and its effectiveness. By doing so, the knowledge gap of the communities about appropriate options will also
be addressed.
d. Provision of Insurance on Damage During Transportation and Construction
Consumers themselves have to bear the damage occurred during transportation and installation. Provision
of insurance for such damages could be one of the important sales promotion strategies. However this is
practically difficult to implement.
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
55 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
4. Engaging Stakeholders a. Linking Sanitation Programme with LGCDP Programme
REFLECT sessions were running at Citizen Awareness Centre (CAC) in all VDCs under Local Governance and
Community Development Programme (LGCDP) through DDC/VDCs and municipalities and can be a good
platform for discussing and educating women on latrine options, cost and purchasing process. VDC social
mobilizers were responsible for facilitating REFLECT sessions. In coordination with the VDC and VWASHCC,
CAC can be used for delivering messages at household and community level.
b. Bringing Financial Institutions for Financing latrines
Most of the people in rural areas had access to micro finance institutions, cooperatives, saving and credit
groups. Different agencies were mobilising significant amount of revolving fund for livelihood enhancement.
These institutions and groups can be brought together for developing financing mechanism at community,
VDC and district level to finance households for latrine construction.
c. Mainstreaming Private Sector in ODF Campaign
Private sector involvement in sanitation campaign was very less. Their engagement was limited to selling
sanitation product as per demand without having any broader knowledge on its scope and market potential.
Increasing communication between demand and supply side actors would allow both parties to identify
opportunities to collaborate resulting in more households constructing latrines. DWASHCCs and VWASHCCs
can play a vital role in mainstreaming the private sector in ODF promotion campaign and supply chain.
d. Sanitation Agenda in VDC/DDC Planning Process
VDCs and DDCs follow participatory planning processes to develop plan and budget in each winter season
for the following fiscal year. In this planning process, Ward Citizen Forum (WCF) and political party leaders
are mainly engaged. There is a need to establish a strong link between WCF and VWASHCC to develop a
mutual understanding and to include sanitation and supply chain promotion in this planning process. Mostly,
WCF and political parties place a higher priority for road construction and electricity which overshadows the
sanitation agenda. Thus, there is a need to orient WCF and political leaders about the participatory planning
process and that sanitation is a prime agenda for allocation of budget to improve the quality of life. VDC
level planning process can also be used to address issues such as lack of land for the people in Terai who do
not own any property and are living on government land; the VDCs can, for example, allocate government
land to this poorest segment for construction of a shared latrine and provide materials for construction
through the pro-poor mechanism of a VDC. The labour would be willingly provided by the landless people as
indicated in the study.
e. Engagement of Media on Supply Chain
The media (printed and aired) were playing a vital role in supply chain promotion, not only the demand
creation. They can disseminate product prices, availability of sanitary materials and masons and uses of
local materials to construct an improved latrine.
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
56 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Table 12 summarises activities that may be possible to undertake for each of the recommendation areas.
Implementing any of the activities would need to be looked at with regards to the context and practicability
of implementation and programme priorities.
Table 12. Proposed activities under each recommendation
Recommendation Proposed Activities Difficulty
Product and Service Options
1
Develop technological options for low-cost latrines with standards
• Design and test prototype of entire latrine construction • Develop simple technology and cost information system
considering the ecological zone • Orient and train supply chain actors on new option • Develop advertising materials for new products
Medium
2 Enhance mason capacities and skills
• Design practical refresher training course for mason • Train masons on quality installation of key components
of latrines Low
3 Upgrade facilities for safe use by all
• Problem identification in latrines and setting up simple steps/ process for upgrading latrines for safe use by all, especially people with difficulties in using a toilet
• Training local resource person and mason for technical advice
Medium
Supply Chain Interventions
1
Increase capacity of existing Supply chain actors for sanitation business expansion
• Train supply chain actors (wholesaler, retailer, ring producer) in business skills: business plan development, preparing marketing strategy etc. for strengthening their entrepreneurship
• Facilitate linkages with financial institutions for business scaling-up
• Exposure tours for ‘seeing is believing’ approach to replicate successful business.
• Network development among similar business actors
Medium
2
Develop concrete ring producer for complete sanitation Solution (Terai district)
• Work closely with one to two ring producers, trailing business model and allow field staffs to understand new mode of business for gaining confidence
• Facilitate formal and informal linkages with government and non-government sector
• Identify business gap and support strengthening for improvement
• Establish network among ring producers to enhance their technical capacity to supply varieties of products
• Develop roster of cement ring producers and encourage them to produce quality products and establish an award mechanism for their contribution to avail sanitary products in rural areas
Medium
3
Link cooperative for supplying sanitation materials
• Identification of potential cooperatives for their engagement in sanitation market business
• Link hardware suppliers/ wholesaler based in district headquarter and business centres with cooperatives
Medium
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
57 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Recommendation Proposed Activities Difficulty
4 Engage women in sanitation business
• Facilitate women’s saving and credit groups to provide loan to households for construction of toilets
• Identify existing women micro-entrepreneurs and developing them to provide sanitation related hardware and consumable items
Medium
5
Develop existing entrepreneurs for sanitation business at the local level
• Identify existing entrepreneurs at the local level with potential to expand business
• Develop linkages of entrepreneur to sanitation related hardware and consumable goods.
Medium
Sales, Promotion and Marketing
1 Target seasonal sales opportunity
• Develop work plan, business calendar and marketing campaign that match with season
• Link consumers with financial institutions • Develop realistic sales target to address seasonal sales
target • Facilitate supply chain actors to maintain inventory to
meet demand
Low
2 Promote product display of latrine options
• Physical product display at sales centre, community centre
• Ensure business investment and lead on promoting product display
• Facilitate and support sanitation supply chain actors to participate in trade fairs and sanitation fairs in coordination with FNCCI
• Facilitate in using marketing brand
Medium
3
Develop motivating communication tools
• Design pictorial information booklet and posters on available latrine options and cost options
• Develop social marketing message to draw attention that actually encourages households to purchase latrine in local dialect incorporating culture wherever and whenever possible
• Link marketing messages and information sharing on the materials and cost with the communities during the triggering workshop
Low
Engaging Stakeholders
1 Link sanitation campaign with LGCDP programme
• Orient VDC social mobilizer on sanitation and hygiene who are facilitating REFLECT session at CAC
• Organise sanitation lectures for CAC members by WASH stakeholders.
• Facilitate and support in organising rallies and awareness campaigns through women and DAG members at CAC
• Orient Ward Citizen Forums along with VWASHCC members and local political leaders that sanitation shall be an agenda in participatory planning process in VDC/DDC plan formulation process
Low
Chapter III. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
58 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Recommendation Proposed Activities Difficulty
2 Bring financial institution for financing latrines
• Identify potential financial institutions, saving and credit groups willing to finance latrine construction
• Facilitate in developing financing mechanism • Facilitate and support organisation of interaction
meeting with financing institutions and groups
High
3 Mainstream private sector in ODF campaign
• Lobby with local line agencies and WASH stakeholders for meaningful representation/ participation of private sector in DWASHCC, VWASHCC.
• Support private sector to engage in rural sanitation promotion by encouraging them to establish outreach in rural area and production centre (cement ring producers)
• Encourage media to promote sanitary supply chain informing about availability of materials, their costs and technology option
High
59 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
References IDE. (2007b). Supply Chain Assessment for Sanitary Latrines in Rural and Peri-Urban Areas of Cambodia:
Prepared for The World Bank Water and Sanitation Program.
Oyo, A. (2002). Creating successful private sector supply chains: a resource guide for rural water supply and sanitation practitioners: World bank.
SNV. (2012b). Rural Sanitation Supply Chains and Finance, PROGRESS BRIEF
SNV. (2014). Report on Preliminary Assessment of Sanitation and hygiene situation in Rukum and Banke district April 2014. Nepal.
60 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Annexes
Annex I. Tools used for the Study
1. FGD guideline with community people
FGD Check list-CP.docx
2. Interview guideline for Supply chain (business-importer, wholesaler,
retailer)
Supply chain- 27 Oct 2014.docx
3. Interview guideline for mason
Mason-Questionnaires_final- neplai.docx
4. Interview guideline for ring producer
Ring producers.docx
5. Checklist for financial institutions/I-NGOs
Check list for Financial institution.docx
Check list for I-NGOs.docx
Checklist-FNCCI.docx
6. Checklist for estimating latrine cost
Check list for Latrine-Construction Costs.docx
61 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Annex II . Supply chain mapping of study districts
Sanitation supply chain actor mapping, Dolpa district
62 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Sanitation supply chain actor mapping, Jumla district
63 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Sanitation supply chain actor mapping, Salyan district
64 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Sanitation supply chain actor mapping, Rukum district
65 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Sanitation supply chain actor mapping, Rolpa district
66 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Sanitation supply chain actor mapping, Kalikot district
67 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Sanitation supply chain actor mapping, Sarlahi district
68 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Sanitation supply chain actor mapping, Mahottari district
69 | P a g e Consumers Preference and Supply Chain Study for Sanitation
Contact Information
SNV Netherlands Development Organisation
Nepal Office
Address: Jawalakhel, Lalitpur
P.O. Box 1966 Kathmandu, Nepal Tel. +977 (0) 1 5523444 Fax. +977 (0) 1 5523155 Email. [email protected]
Contact person: Nadira Khawaja, SL ([email protected])
SNV is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own
sustainable development. We contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local
organisations.