a report from the center on educational governance usc ...credits / about the center on educational...

70
USC / School Performance Dashboard 2013 A Report from the Center on Educational Governance 10 10 7 9 10 10 1 2 1 1 6 10 4 10 4 10 1 1 2 1

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jun-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

USC / School Performance Dashboard

2013A Report from the

Center on Educational Governance

10 10 7 9 10 10

1 2 1 1

6 10 4 10 4 10

1 1 2 1

10 9 10 10 10

1 1 4 1 1 1

8 7 3 6 7 8

ForewordIntroduction / School Performance Dashboard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Introduction / Top 10 Performers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Charter School Indicators: Transforming Data into Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Snapshot: California Charter Schools, 2011 to 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Snapshot Highlights: California Charter and Non-Charter Public Schools Compared, 2011 to 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

The Report / Across California

Understanding the Charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Financial Resources and Investment Measures Reserves Ratios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11Liquidity Ratios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Direct Classroom Investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

School Performance Measures English Learner Reclassification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14API Similar Schools Rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15Adequate Yearly Progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16Academic Momentum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

Academic Productivity Measures English/Language Arts Productivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18Math Productivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

High School Performance MeasuresCurriculum Rigor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20High School Graduation Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21College-Readiness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

The Report / Individual SchoolsUnderstanding the Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24Map of California Counties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25Charter School Scores, Grouped by County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

AppendicesAppendix A / Definitions of Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Appendix B / Composition of Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58Appendix C / Primary Data Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

Credits Credits / Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Credits / About the Center on Educational Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

Table of Contents

Foreword

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 2

Charter schools across the United States are proliferating and expanding at a record pace, especially in California. After two decades of offering school choice to families, the charter school movement in California has spurred the creation of 1,065 of the nation’s 6,000 charter schools. The growth, moreover, has been explosive: Nationwide, one in five of the new public charter schools that opened last year was based in California. Statewide, the number of charter schools has doubled every five years.

California has long been a particularly friendly state for charter schools. In 1992, the year after Minnesota became the first state in the nation to pass a law allowing for their creation, California became the second. (In November 2012, Washington became the 42nd state to legalize charter schools.)

Last fall, charter school enrollment jumped by 275,000 students nationwide – the largest one-year increase since the movement’s inception. California charter schools now serve more than 484,000 students. The number of charter schools nationwide rose by 381. Califor-nia led the nation in one-year growth, increasing its school count by 81 and its number of students by a whopping 17 percent. Los Angeles led the state, adding 33 charter schools.

The USC School Performance Dashboard, now in its seventh year, draws on California school data from 2003-2012 to rate charter schools on academic and financial measures of performance. It also provides an accompanying interactive site at www.uscrossier.org/ceg/ Unlike other school databases, ours assigns values – high, medium, low – to the measures and goes beyond state test scores. Dashboard users like to know which schools are doing well, which are in the middle, and which struggle.

Schools use the USC School Performance Dashboard to track their own performance over time and to compare themselves to other schools. Schools also submit our ratings in their renewal packages. A Bay Area charter school reported they used the data when describ-ing their school to college admission officers: “Our school profile gives us bragging rights.” Schools in the Top 10 use their position to help convince funders to invest in their schools. Teachers use the Dashboard as an employment directory – where might they like to work? Parents search it for charter schools in their community – what school is worthy of their child? The Dashboard’s financial ratings warn charter authorizers to put out fires before they blaze. Finally, the many foundations that support California charter schools use the Dashboard to judge the return on their investment.

What’s New

The Dashboard Team keeps up with new trends in education and schooling that may offer ideas for refining the indicators. The District of Columbia and 45 states, including California, have adopted the Common Core State Standards to better prepare students for college and careers. We’ve also observed increasing numbers of charter schools serving high school students – either by adding grades or by opening stand-alone charter high schools.

These developments led the Dashboard Team to develop three new high school-specific performance indices: curriculum rigor, high school graduation rate, and college-readiness.* We also now have two Top 10 lists – one for charter elementary/middle schools and the second for charter high schools.

A Report from the University of Southern California

Introduction / School Performance Dashboard

*Harold Urman, Ph.D. of VitalResearch compiled the high school data under the direction of Professor Dennis Hocevar, Ph.D., Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 3

One of the unique features of the Dashboard from its inception has been its financial data, despite struggles to obtain complete sets of financial data from the California Department of Education. But no more: eureka! With the help of the California Charter Schools Associa-tion, we categorized California charter schools into two types: autonomous charter schools that have total budgetary control, including over personnel costs, and non-autonomous charter schools, which operate under the districts’ collective bargaining agreements. Only financial data for the autonomous schools are reported and we will continue this practice in the future.

Feedback from our funders also led to improvements in this year’s report and the interac-tive site (www.uscrossier.org/ceg/). We added Google Analytics to register downloads of the report and to track users to the interactive site, including the duration of their visits and who they are by role.

Highlights

Over the years, the Dashboard has repeatedly shown that the primary differences between charter and non-charter school performance are at the extremes. Charter schools tend to have a disproportionate number of schools at the top and bottom of the performance spectrum compared to non-charters. This year’s findings continue to show significant dif-ferences at the extremes across many indices, along with dramatic shifts in charter school financing. Below are some highlights:

Reserves Ratios: Reserves ratios had been generally improving until this past year when there was a sharp increase in the proportion of charter schools in the lowest range (28 percent), implying that many charter schools were digging into reserves as a means of con-fronting public funding challenges. Charters saw an increase of 18 percent in the proportion of schools in the lower ratio ranges. There was a decline in all the higher ratio ranges with the largest decline from the 0.25 to 0.5 range where charters saw a drop of 17 percent. The data suggest that the trend of improving financial health among California charter schools came to a halt this last year.

Curriculum Rigor: With regard to curriculum rigor, charter schools reflect a pattern in evidence with a number of other Dashboard measures — overrepresentation at the ex-tremes. The proportion of charter high schools in the highest category is 42 percent versus 20 percent for non-charter high schools, suggesting that charter schools offer more higher level math and science courses than non-charter schools. At the same time, 29 percent of charter schools were represented in the lowest category, compared to 20 percent for non-charter public schools. In comparison to non-charter high schools, charter high schools are disproportionately represented among those that offer both the most higher level math and science courses AND those high schools that offer the fewest higher level math and science courses.

High School Graduation Rate: On average, charter schools experience lower graduation rates compared to all non-charter public schools. Charters are underrepresented in the top four graduation rate ranges and, as a result, are quite over represented in the range with the lowest graduation rate. These results may reflect the fact that charter schools are over represented in high poverty urban neighborhoods which typically experience lower gradu-ation rates.

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 4

This year, we are honoring two groups of high flyers among California’s charter schools, a Top 10 list for elementary and middle schools and a separate Top 10 list for high schools. This separation reflects the addition of high school-specific indicators in this year’s report.

As in previous years, rankings were based on the highest combined ratings on the academic measures, financial measures, and school productivity indicators. Eligible candidates were limited to autonomous charter schools, defined as those that are funded directly through the state and in complete control of their budget. Additionally, charter schools with enrollments of over 100 students that reported data for each of the measures were included. For the high school group, new measures included the Curriculum Rigor, High School Graduation Rate, and College-Readiness indicators.

The winners for Dashboard 2013 are:

Top 10 Charter Elementary/Middle Schools

1. Synergy Charter Academy (Los Angeles)

2. Gabriella Charter (Los Angeles)

3. KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy (San Francisco)

4. KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory (Los Angeles)

5. KIPP Heartwood Academy (Santa Clara)

6. Celerity Nascent Charter (Los Angeles)

7. KIPP Summit Academy (Alameda)

8. Endeavor College Preparatory Charter (Los Angeles)

9. Wilder’s Preparatory Academy Charter (Los Angeles)

10. Global Education Academy (Los Angeles)

Top 10 Charter High Schools

1. High Tech LA (Los Angeles)

2. University High (Fresno)

3. Leadership Public Schools - Hayward (Alameda)

4. Hawthorne Math and Science Academy (Los Angeles)

5. Preuss School UCSD (San Diego)

6. Alliance Gertz-Ressler High (Los Angeles)

7. Camino Nuevo Charter High (Los Angeles)

8. Summit Preparatory Charter High (San Mateo)

9. Orange County School of the Arts (Orange)

10. Renaissance Arts Academy (Los Angeles)

Notable notes:

Introduction / Top 10 Performers

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 5

Notable notes:

> This year’s list includes several “repeat performers”. These are Preuss School UCSD (#1 in 2012), Leadership Public Schools - Hayward (#2 in 2012), KIPP Summit Academy (#6 in 2012), Gertz-Ressler, KIPP Heartwood and University High (all tied for #7 in 2012), and Orange County School of the Arts (OCSA) (#8 in 2011).

> Although the winners are somewhat geographically dispersed, 12 of the 20 are located in Los Angeles County.

> Of the charter elementary and/or middle schools, five of the Top 10 were middle schools, serving either 5th grade through 8th grade or, in one case, 4th grade through 8th grade. There were three schools that served K-5 and two served K-8. Among the high schools, two served 6th through 12th grade and the rest served 9th through 12th grade.

> As in previous years, the top schools varied in size. Not too surprising, the high schools were on average larger than the elementary schools, which had an aver age enrollment of 384 students compared to the high school average of 621 students. Although the high schools varied widely, six served between 300 and 500 students. Global Education Academy was the smallest of the Top 10 winners, with an enrollment of 240, while the largest, OCSA, served 1753 students.

> Fewer of this year’s winners are part of a charter network (CMO, EMO or other type of network), with only 45 percent of this year’s two groups falling under that designation compared to last year’s 70 percent. KIPP stands out this year, with four schools in the Top 10 elementary/middle list.

> All of the Top 10 elementary/middle schools serve a population in which 69 percent or more of the students qualify for Free or Reduced Price Meals, with four serving above 90 percent. In the high schools, the numbers served v aried more widely, from 6 percent to 100 percent; the high school average was 60 percent, with six schools serving more than 50 percent who qualified for Free or Reduced Price Meals.

> The percentage of students classified as English Learners ranged from 3 percent to 44 percent among the elementary/middle schools, with nine schools serving more than 10 percent EL students. Among the high schools, the numbers were also dispersed, ranging from 0 percent to 15 percent and only three schools served more than 10 percent EL students.

> Again this year, the schools vary in age but about half (six out of the ten elementary and middle schools and five out of the ten high schools) were established fewer than ten years ago, with the oldest (Preuss) opening in 1999.

> Eight out of the ten schools in each group served a predominantly Hispanic population.

Introduction / Top 10 Performers

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 6

USC Center on Educational Governance

KEY INDICATORS

Charter School Indicators / Transforming Data into Knowledge

USC / School Performance Dashboard

2013A Report from the

Center on Educational Governance

10 10 7 9 10 10

1 2 1 1

6 10 4 10 4 10

1 1 2 1

10 9 10 10 10

1 1 4 1 1 1

8 7 3 6 7 8

USC School Performance Dashboard 2013

State of California Database

California Public Schools

School Districts/County Offices of Education

Financial Resources and Investment

School Performance

Academic Productivity

High School Performance

ACADEMIC DATA

DATA FROM MANDATORY YEARLY REPORTS

FINANCIAL DATA

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 7

10 11

Snapshot / California Charter Schools, 2011 to 2012

Ethnicity African American 3.8%American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4%Asian 4.9%Filipino 1.5%Hispanic 16.4%Pacific Islander 0.2%White 65.0%Multi-Racial 1.1%Did not report 6.8%

Staff

Ethnicity African American 10.0%American Indian or Alaska Native 0.9%Asian 4.7%Filipino 1.6%Hispanic 45.2%Pacific Islander 0.4%White 32.8%Multi-Racial 2.1%Did not report 2.2%

Graduate School Grad 13.0%College Grad 20.2%Some College 26.1%High School Grad 22.2%Did Not Graduate 17.4%High School

Percentages: Male: 51.4% Female: 48.6% Free or Reduced Price Meals: 54.3% English Learner: 15.0%

Parent Education

Students

K-12 17.9%High 29.6%Middle 11.2%Elementary 40.5%Other 0.7%

School

Averages: School Size: 431 Students/Computer: 10.3/1 Number of Schools Chartered in 2012: 109 (total number of charters 1016)

Charter Type

School Type

New Start 88.1%Conversion 11.9%

Year Chartered

Number of Schools

94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 090

50

100

0 50 100%

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 8

School SizeCalifornia’s charter schools average a smaller enrollment (431) than that of non-charter public schools (645). Charter school enrollment has increased from last year’s average of 416.

Students/Computer RatioNon-charter public schools have a higher student/computer ratio – 15.5 students per computer – than do charter schools (10.3). Last year, charter schools had 10.6 students per computer.

Staff EthnicityCompared to non-charter public schools, charter schools have a higher percentage of staff members who identify themselves as white (65 percent of charter school staff, 60.8 percent of non-charter school staff). This is a shift from last year, when non-charter schools reported a higher percentage of white staff. Charter schools and non-charter schools have a similar percentage of staff members who identify themselves as African-American (3.8 percent of charter school staff, 4 percent of non-charter staff) and as Hispanic (16.4 percent of charter staff, 16.5 percent of non-charter staff).

Free or Reduced Price MealsCharter schools enroll fewer students from low-income families and the gap between non-charter schools and charter schools grew by 1.7 percent. The percentage of students who are eligible for free or reduced price meals at non-charter public schools is 59.2 percent compared to 54.3 percent at charter schools. The percentage of low-income students in both types of public school has increased since last year.

English LearnerOn average, charter schools have lower percentages of English learners (15 percent) than non-charter public schools (22.9 percent). The percentages have increased for both charter and non-charter public schools.

Student EthnicityThe overall ethnic composition of charter schools is similar to that of non-charter public schools, but there are some key differences. Charter schools’ enrollment of African-American students (10 percent) is notably higher than that of non-charter public schools (6.5 percent), and with white students as well (32.8 percent versus 26.1, respectively). Non-charter public schools have a higher proportion of Asian students (8.6 percent compared to 4.7 percent) and Hispanic students (52.0 percent, compared to 45.2 percent in charter schools). These numbers are similar to last year.

Parent EducationParents of charter school students have received more formal education than parents of non-charter public school students. While 59.3 percent of students at charter schools have parents who have received some post-secondary education (attended college, graduated from college, or received graduate education), only 52.5 percent of students at non-charter public schools have parents who have attended school beyond high school. Meanwhile, parents of students at non-charter public schools are more likely not to have finished high school (21 percent com-pared to 17.4 percent). These numbers are similar to last year.

Snapshot Highlights / California Charter and Non-Charter Public Schools Compared, 2011 to 2012

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 9

The Report / Across California

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 10

s

School Performance / Academic Productivity / High School PerformanceAll California public schools with available data are included in the calculation of these indicators.

Each column represents one year of data.

Rankings for all schools were broken into quintiles (equal intervals of 20 percent). If a category is greater than 20 percent, there are more charter schools in that category than non-charters. Less than 20 percent indicates fewer charters in that category than non-charters.

n = the number of charter schools with the data necessary to be included in this ranking.

The vast majority of California public schools are non-charter schools, so their data will fall close to the 20 percent intervals. In some cases, the quintiles do not have exactly 20 percent within each tier due to tied rankings. However, for simplicity, we have rounded to 20 percent for each interval.

Understanding the Charts

Financial Resources and InvestmentThe Financial Indicators are calculated for charter schools only. To be included in the Dashboard, charter schools must report their financial data separately from the financial data of their district.

Each column represents one year of data.

Each color represents a range of valuesused in calculating the scores for the financial indicators.

n = the number of charter schools with the data necessary to be included in this ranking.

100

80

60

40

20

02003/04

n=1822004/05

n=2132005/06

n=2592006/07

n=2862007/08

n=3272008/09

n=3642009/10

n=5452010/11

n=6232011/12

n=683

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

100

80

60

40

20

02004/05

n=4902005/06

n=5562006/07

n=6132007/08

n=6702008/09

n=7312009/10

n=7942011/12

n=8817Non-Charter

Public Schools

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

2010/11n=890

2011/12n=994

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 11

Reserves RatiosCharter Schools, 2003 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The Reserves Ratios Index is the ratio of reserve fund balances to total expenditures. This measures the portion of total expenditures that a school has saved in reserves, and therefore reflects the ability to weather future costs even if revenue is deficient. The Reserves Ratios Index is reported as a ratio instead of a ranking, and is not compared to non-charter schools.

TRENDS: Reserves ratios saw the first year of significant decline since we began reporting in 2003-04. The percent of schools in the lowest range increased drastically (by 28 percent) and the number of schools in the top ranges decreased. The data suggests that California charter schools faced significantly increased funding challenges in the 2011-12 school year.

Financial Resources and Investments Measures

100

80

60

40

20

0

.75 or more.50 to .74.25 to .49

below .25

2.203.85

20.8873.08

2.352.82

21.6073.24

2.705.79

19.6971.81

4.206.99

24.4864.34

4.897.65

23.8563.61

6.599.89

25.5557.97

6.976.42

26.2460.37

8.9911.5629.7049.76

ScoreRanges

2003/04n=182

2004/05n=213

2005/06n=259

2006/07n=286

2007/08n=327

2008/09n=364

2009/10n=545

2010/11n=623

4.255.12

12.7477.89

2011/12n=683

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 12

Financial Resources and Investments Measures

Liquidity RatiosCharter Schools, 2003 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The Liquidity Ratios Index is the ratio of a school’s assets to its liabilities. This reflects the school’s ability to pay off its short-term debts, as well as the ability to raise additional capital, either through selling off or borrowing against its assets. A school with a high liquidity ratio is more financially stable. The Liquidity Ratios Index is reported as a ratio instead of a ranking, and is not compared to non-charter schools.

TRENDS: The gradual improvement in charter school liquidity ratios appears to have leveled off. There was gener-ally very little movement at any level this past year. The largest change in ratios happened at the 0 to 1 range (up approximately 1 percent), accompanied by modest reductions in the most liquid range.

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

2003/04n=173

2004/05n=205

2005/06n=252

2006/07n=276

2007/08n=318

2008/09n=350

2009/10n=403

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

3.0 or more2.0 to 2.91.0 to 1.9

below 1.0

28.3215.6144.5111.56

30.2420.0033.1716.59

34.1315.4835.3215.08

38.7713.7736.2311.23

39.9416.0435.85

8.18

43.9114.4533.71

7.93

41.1215.2232.2511.41

43.3213.5234.04

9.12

2010/11n=614

41.3014.7532.6010.03

2011/12n=678

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 13

Financial Resources and Investments Measures

Direct Classroom InvestmentCharter Schools, 2003 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The Direct Classroom Investment Index is the ratio of classroom investment to total revenues. Class-room investments include such expenditures as teacher salaries and benefits, textbooks, technology software, and curriculum. The Direct Classroom Investment Index is reported as a ratio instead of a ranking, and is not compared to non-charter schools.

TRENDS: The 2011-12 school year saw a change in direct classroom investment, with charter schools increasing the proportion of their budget allocated to resources inside the classroom. There was an increase of almost 10 percent at the highest level. Schools that allocate less than half of their revenues to the classroom declined by al-most 15 percent. These changes suggest that schools are spending greater proportions of their funds on classroom investment, not necessarily that they are spending more money on classroom investment. The change in proportion can also occur as schools cut back on operating expenditures.

37.5619.2615.7327.45

2010/11n=623

47.0021.8319.0312.59

2011/12n=683

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

2003/04n=183

2004/05n=213

2005/06n=259

2006/07n=285

2007/08n=327

2008/09n=364

2009/10n=545

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

.70 or more.60 to .69.50 to .59

below .50

12.0225.6831.6930.60

15.4929.5831.4623.47

11.9726.2535.5226.25

11.9320.7035.7931.58

9.4820.4941.9028.13

5.4920.3336.5437.64

49.1724.7715.4110.64

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 14

School Performance Measures

English Learner ReclassificationCharter Schools, 2004 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The English Learner Reclassification Index ranks schools on the percentage of English Learners (ELs) who are reclassified to fluent-English-proficient (FEP). Only schools which had at least 15 EL students are included.

TRENDS: Rates of English Learner Reclassification continues to improve, if only modestly. Charter schools in the low-est range dropped by 2 percent. Differences between charter and non-charter schools exist mostly at the extremes with charter schools overrepresented, especially, in the lowest categories.

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

2004/05n=490

2005/06n=556

2006/07n=613

2007/08n=670

2008/09n=731

2009/10n=794

2011/12n=8817

Non-Charter Public Schools

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

9-107-85-63-41-2

12.79.2

10.211.256.7

15.810.8

7.213.153.2

16.110.311.214.547.9

17.812.410.316.343.2

19.911.313.013.142.7

12.911.011.99.7

54.5

2010/11n=890

20.213.011.113.941.7

20.312.812.714.539.7

2011/12n=994

20.020.020.020.020.0

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 15

School Performance Measures

API Similar Schools RankCharter Schools, 2004 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: A school’s API Similar Schools Rank is a 1 to 10 scale that compares its API to the APIs of 100 other schools of the same type that have similar opportunities and challenges.

TRENDS: The API Similar Schools Ranking of charter schools saw little overall performance change this year, notwithstanding an increase in the proportion of charter schools in the highest range and a slight decrease in the lowest range. Compared with non-charter public schools, charter schools continue to be disproportionately over-represented at the extremes of performance but charter school performance is becoming increasingly similar to non-charter public schools.

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

2004/05n=241

2005/06n=281

2006/07n=339

2007/08n=381

2008/09n=447

2009/10n=503

2011/12n=7175

Non-Charter Public Schools

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

9-107-85-63-41-2

19.517.817.817.027.8

23.317.115.919.823.9

22.115.521.317.124.2

19.016.817.920.426.0

22.217.716.721.621.8

19.919.619.217.823.5

2010/11n=590

23.118.617.117.523.7

25.716.517.417.423.1

2011/12n=674

20.020.020.020.020.0

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 16

School Performance Measures

Adequate Yearly ProgressCharter Schools, 2004 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Index ranks schools on several components of AYP: whether they met AYP goals in math and English/language arts and the percentage of their students who were rated profi-cient or above in these areas.

TRENDS: Adequate Yearly Progress in charter schools is largely unchanged. Charters saw a small decrease in the proportion of schools in the lowest group in 2011-12. At the same time, the top three categories saw a net decline equal to about 1.5 percent. The second to lowest group (3-4) saw the greatest change with an increase of over 2 percent. As with the API Similar Schools Rank, non-charter schools have a more uniform distribution than charters, which have higher proportions of schools at either end of the performance spectrum and the distribution of charter schools is becoming more similar to the distribution of non-charter public schools, suggesting that over time non-charter public schools and charter schools are becoming more similar.

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

2004/05n=444

2005/06n=490

2006/07n=565

2007/08n=619

2008/09n=700

2009/10n=768

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

9-107-85-63-41-2

23.1822.5317.8414.3222.14

100

80

60

40

20

0

15.118.724.120.321.8

17.617.718.223.323.2

19.418.923.318.220.2

19.021.717.320.921.1

16.518.917.624.322.6

n=7944Non-Charter

Public Schools

2010/11n=868

23.0420.7416.7115.3224.19

21.7422.0515.0117.4923.71

2011/12 2011/12n=966

20.020.020.020.020.0

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 17

School Performance Measures

Academic MomentumCharter Schools, 2004 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The Academic Momentum Index measures changes in a school’s student achievement over time, reflecting whether a school is improving, declining or consistent. It combines three measures of academic prog-ress: annual change in the percentage of students proficient in math; annual change in the percentage of students proficient in English/language arts; and annual API growth.

TRENDS: Academic momentum in charter schools has slowed since last year. The proportion of charter schools in the lowest range increased by 4 percent, and, despite a slight increase in the highest range, the proportion of charter schools in the top three ranges of academic momentum decreased by 7 percent. Compared to non-charter public schools, charter schools have a larger proportion of schools with the highest levels of academic momentum (26 percent versus 20 percent), and at the same time, a higher proportion of schools with the lowest level of academic momentum (22 percent versus 20 percent).

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

2004/05n=363

2005/06n=417

2006/07n=482

2007/08n=555

2008/09n=630

2009/10n=681

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

9-107-85-63-41-2

23.923.120.712.919.3

24.422.219.813.619.9

24.322.316.914.621.8

24.120.221.614.919.2

25.819.819.815.419.1

25.621.117.114.921.4

2011/12n=7982

Non-Charter Public Schools

2010/11n=760

25.721.620.014.917.9

2011/12n=834

26.017.317.417.521.8

20.020.020.020.020.0

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 18

Academic Productivity Measures

English/Language Arts ProductivityCharter Schools, 2004 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The English/Language Arts Productivity Index ranks schools on their student performance on standardized tests of English/Language Arts compared to schools within the same district and districts with similar per-pupil spending.

TRENDS: Charter schools on average are continuing to gradually improve English/Language Arts productivity. The proportion of charter schools represented in the highest two ranges increased from 47 percent to 50 percent with corresponding declines across the bottom three ranges. Generally, charter schools on average outperform non-charter public schools in English/Language Arts productivity. Charter schools have a larger proportion of schools performing in higher ranges than compared to non-charters, and also a lower proportion of schools represented in the lowest range (18 percent vs. 20 percent).

2011/12n=7820

Non-Charter Public Schools

2010/11n=760

25.721.620.014.917.9

26.922.718.913.817.8

2011/12n=843

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

2004/05n=363

2005/06n=417

2006/07n=482

2007/08n=555

2008/09n=630

2009/10n=681

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

9-107-85-63-41-2

23.923.120.712.919.3

24.422.219.813.619.9

24.322.316.914.621.8

24.120.221.614.919.2

25.819.819.815.419.1

25.621.117.114.921.4

20.020.020.020.020.0

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 19

Academic Productivity Measures

Math ProductivityCharter Schools, 2004 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The Math Productivity Index ranks schools based upon math standardized test performance, compar-ing charter schools to non-charter schools within the same district and districts with similar per-pupil spending.

TRENDS: Math productivity is improving. The proportion of charter schools in the highest range increased (19 percent to 23 percent), while at the same time decreasing in the lowest range (from 33 percent to 31 percent). This year’s changes reflect the continuation of a longer, modest trend toward increased math productivity in charter schools. Despite this progress, charter schools continue to be overrepresented at both extremes of math produc-tivity when compared to non-charter public schools. Increased representation at the highest range (23 percent vs. 20 percent) is more than offset by increased representation at the lowest range (31 percent vs. 20 percent).

2011/12n=7755

Non-Charter Public Schools

2010/11n=760

22.915.315.915.230.7

19.314.917.015.833.0

2011/12n=843

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

9-107-85-63-41-2

12.716.016.919.335.1

15.815.215.220.833.0

15.815.514.217.836.6

16.915.414.920.232.6

18.517.215.016.932.5

15.616.111.524.732.1

2004/05n=362

2005/06n=417

2006/07n=481

2007/08n=555

2008/09n=629

2009/10n=681

20.020.020.020.020.0

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 20

High School Performance Measures

Curriculum RigorCharter Schools 2011 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The Curriculum Rigor Index ranks high schools on the extent to which students in the school take higher-level math and science courses, in schools that offer grades 10 and 11.

TRENDS: Similar to many other Dashboard measures, overrepresentation at the extremes is present for Curricu-lum Rigor. The proportion of high school charter schools in the highest category is 42 percent, versus 20 percent for non-charter public schools. At the same time, 29 percent of charter schools were represented in the lowest category, compared to 20 percent for non-charter public schools.

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

2011/12n=1046

Non-Charter Public Schools

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

9-107-85-63-41-2

20.020.020.020.020.0

2011/12n=230

42.012.6

6.910.028.6

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 21

High School Performance Measures

High School Graduation RateCharter Schools 2011 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The High School Graduation Rate measures the percentage of ninth graders in 2009 who successfully graduated from high school in 2012 or earlier, in schools that offer grades 9 through 12 (students are tracked across the four years).

TRENDS: On average, charter schools experience lower graduation rates compared to all non-charter public schools. Charters are underrepresented in all of the top four ranges and, as a result, are heavily overrepresented in the range representing lowest graduation rates. These results may reflect the fact that charter schools are over-represented in high poverty urban neighborhoods which typically experience lower graduation rates.

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

2011/12n=401

Non-Charter Public Schools

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

9-107-85-63-41-2

20.020.020.020.020.0

14.613.916.116.838.7

2011/12n=137

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 22

High School Performance Measures

College-ReadinessCharter Schools 2011 to 2012

Highlights

DEFINITION: The College-Readiness Rate is the proportion of students who score basic or above on state tests in English/Language Arts (11th grade), and higher-level math and science courses, in schools that offer grades 10 and 11.

TRENDS: Similar to the Curriculum Rigor index as well as other Dashboard indices, charter schools are overrep-resented at the extremes of College-Readiness. There is a grater proportion of charter high schools in the highest category (30.8 percent) as well as charter high schools in the lowest range (31.2 precent). Both exceed the propor-tion of non-charter public schools in those ranges (20 percent).

100

80

60

40

20

0

ScoreRanges

% in

eac

h sc

ore

rang

e

9-107-85-63-41-2

2011/12n=1046

Non-Charter Public Schools

20.020.020.020.020.0

30.814.311.312.631.2

2011/12n=230

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 23

The Report / Individual Schools

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 24

.75 or more

.50 to .74

.25 to .49below .25

Alameda County

Academy of Alameda 0.16 1.73 0.62 6 5 3 7 6 3

Achieve Academy yes 0.27 2.37 0.65 9 6 5 2 5 7

Alameda Community Learning Center 0.35 10.99 0.74 5 7 8 5 9 6 10 10

American Indian Public Charter yes 1.08 11.39 0.45 10 10 10 1 10 10

American Indian Public Charter School II yes 0.58 3.06 0.40 10 10 10 1 10 10

American Indian Public High yes 0.70 3.21 0.43 10 10 10 1 9 10 10 10

ARISE High yes 0.00 1.00 0.35 5 1 1 2 1 2 10 6

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

Understanding the Tables / Individual Charter School Scores

9-107-85-63-41-2

The tables on pages 26 to 54 show scores for individual charter schools, organized alphabetically within each county.

Charter schools included in this report were identified as ‘Active’ for the 2011-2012 school year by the CDECharter School Division. Of those, only charter schools with data are included in this section.

Both district and CDE data were used in these calculations. For additional information on rankings and sources used, see Appendices B and C.

Because of the state’s decision to discontinue data collection for CBEDS, the school rankings with regard to Teaching Resources and Teacher Qualifications could not be calculated. Therefore, the columns in the report on individual schools for these two rankings have been deleted from this year’s report.

The colors represent the categories found in the charts on pages 11 to 22.

A blank cell denotes insufficient data.

Autonomous charter schools are defined as those that are funded directly through the state and in complete control of their budget.

Reserves Ratios

Liquidity Ratios

Direct ClassroomInvestment

All OthersA tinted box denotesa high school

3.0 or more2.0 to 2.91.0 to 1.9below 1.0

.70 or more

.60 to .69

.50 to .59below .50

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 25

California Counties

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 26

Alameda County

Academy of Alameda 0.16 1.73 0.62 6 2 3 7 6 3

Achieve Academy yes 0.27 2.37 0.65 9 8 5 2 5 7

Alameda Community Learning Center 0.35 10.99 0.74 5 4 8 5 9 6 10 10

American Indian Public Charter yes 1.08 11.39 0.45 10 10 10 1 10 10

American Indian Public Charter School II yes 0.58 3.06 0.40 10 10 10 1 10 10

American Indian Public High yes 0.70 3.21 0.43 10 10 10 1 9 10 10 10

ARISE High yes 0.00 1.00 0.35 5 1 1 2 1 2 10 6

ASCEND 10 2 3 1 3 4

Aspire Berkley Maynard Academy yes 0.17 1.78 0.83 8 9 7 5 7 6

Aspire California College Preparatory Academy yes 0.08 1.42 0.78 9 9 3 2 9 10

Aspire ERES Academy yes 0.08 1.02 0.93 10 6 8 10 4 7

Aspire Golden State College Preparatory Academy yes 0.08 2.39 0.86 10 6 2 1 2 3

Aspire Lionel Wilson College Preparatory Academy yes 0.13 1.41 0.77 10 8 5 7 5 6 10 3 10

Aspire Millsmont Academy yes 0.08 1.36 0.66 6 3 2 1 2 3

Aspire Monarch Academy yes 0.24 2.06 0.79 9 6 4 2 3 5

Bay Area School of Enterprise yes 0.17 2.69 0.54 2 1 1 1 6 1

Bay Area Technology yes 0.05 1.15 0.79 6 1 7 10 3 3 8 7

Circle of Independent Learning 6 5 4 4 6 2 2 2

Civicorps Corpsmember Academy yes 0.10 3.03 1.07 3 3 4

Civicorps Elementary yes 0.33 1.71 1.02 1 1 1 1

Community School for Creative Education yes 1.06 0.69 1 6

Conservatory of Vocal/Instrumental Arts yes 0.42 4.31 0.60 1 10 9 9 8 8

Cox Academy yes 0.13 1.56 0.95 6 7 3 1

East Oakland Leadership Academy 0.60 3.83 0.79 10 3 1 4 4

East Oakland Leadership Academy High 0.41 2.74 0.32 10 7 10 4 4

Envision Academy for Arts & Technology yes 0.07 1.31 0.57 7 3 1 4 8 5

FAME Public Charter yes 0.09 1.13 0.64 7 4 5 5 3 1 1

Golden Oak Montessori of Hayward yes 0.30 1.98 0.77 4 3 7 3 8 6

Impact Academy of Arts & Technology yes 0.16 2.44 0.55 7 8 8 6 8 9 10 3 10

KIPP Bridge Charter yes 0.03 11.92 0.85 7 10 9 5 8 9

KIPP King Collegiate High yes 0.19 1.99 0.87 10 9 9 5 8 8 10 3 10

KIPP Summit Academy yes 0.55 40.47 0.85 10 9 9 10 9 9

Lazear Charter Academy 8 1 5 2 4

Leadership Public Schools - Hayward yes 0.37 7.11 0.66 10 10 9 5 9 10 10 7 10

Learning Without Limits 8 3 3 4 2 5

Lighthouse Community Charter yes 0.33 3.02 0.84 9 8 5 5 5 6

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 27

Lighthouse Community Charter High yes 0.28 4.34 0.57 10 8 9 1 5 8 6 1 6

Livermore Valley Charter yes 0.59 21.32 0.93 1 8 10 7

Livermore Valley Charter Preparatory High yes -0.08 1.38 0.79 5 5 1

LPS College Park yes 0.01 1.01 0.72 10 1 1 10 1 2 8 1 7

Nea Community Learning Center yes 0.10 1.81 0.84 2 6 6 5 9 7 10 10

North Oakland Community Charter yes 0.20 3.42 0.95 2 9 8 2 8 8

Oakland Charter Academy yes 1.19 18.61 0.55 10 10 8 1 7 7

Oakland Charter High yes 0.00 1.06 0.42 6 10 10 6 9 10 10 10

Oakland Military Institute, College Preparatory Academy yes 0.12 2.02 0.84 10 7 3 2 3 3 8 5

Oakland School for the Arts yes 2.47 9.40 1.09 2 3 8 10 8 5 8 4

Oakland Unity High yes 0.20 1.30 0.84 10 6 2 5 2 3 10 9

REALM High yes 0.28 0.86 0.57 1 1 2 1

REALM Middle yes 0.24 1.03 0.42 1 2 3 2

Reems (Ernestine C.) Academy of Technology and Art yes 0.09 1.19 0.78 1 4 1 2 2 2

Vincent Academy yes 3.28 0.55 4 5 6

World Academy yes 0.40 2.68 0.95 2 9 4 1 3 7

Yu Ming Charter yes 2.01 0.52 6

Butte County

Achieve Charter School of Paradise Inc. yes 0.47 5.65 0.66 1 3 7 9 9 5

Blue Oak Charter yes 0.56 16.62 0.57 2 1 8 7 6

Chico Country Day yes 0.79 7.37 0.98 1 5 8 6 10 8

Children’s Community Charter 0.08 1.03 0.84 1 4 6 1 8 3

CORE Butte Charter yes 0.77 10.10 0.76 1 8 4 4 1 8 3

Forest Ranch Charter yes 0.74 7.61 0.70 1 9 9 9 9

Hometech Charter 1 1 8 3 1

Inspire School of Arts and Sciences 2 6 8 1 10 7 8 8

Ipakanni Early College Charter yes 0.30 0.58 1 1

Learning Community Charter 2 7 2 2

Nord Country yes 0.77 22.21 0.74 5 2 1 4 4

Paradise Charter Middle 1 5 8 4 10 7

Paradise eLearning Academy 2

Pivot Charter School North Valley yes -0.14 1.01 1.03 1

Sherwood Montessori yes 0.11 1.84 0.63 2 7 10 8 5

Wildflower Open Classroom yes 0.01 1.25 0.55 1 2 6 1

Calaveras County

Mountain Oaks 2 4 2 2 1 6 1

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 28

Contra Costa County

Antioch Charter Academy yes 1.52 21.11 0.87 2 3 4 1 7 1

Antioch Charter Academy II yes 0.82 10.08 0.90 2 8 10 5 2

Clayton Valley Charter High 6 2 6 8 6

Eagle Peak Montessori 2 9 9 3 10 9

Leadership Public Schools: Richmond yes 0.28 4.31 0.66 10 7 4 9 6 8 8 1 8

Making Waves Academy yes 0.12 5.20 1.33 10 8 4 8

Manzanita Middle yes 0.65 20.77 0.70 10 1 1 1 2 1

R.A.A.M.P. Charter Academy yes -0.08 0.80 0.73 1 3 8 1 1

Richmond College Preparatory yes 0.07 1.62 0.64 1 6 8 10 4 9

West County Community High yes 9 1 1 1 3 1

Del Norte County

Castle Rock 2 2 9

Klamath River Early College of the Redwoods -0.07 0.86 0.67 1 10

Uncharted Shores Academy yes 0.19 1.78 0.64 1 6 10

El Dorado County

American River Charter yes 1 4 5 7 7 3

Aspire Alexander Twilight College Preparatory Acad yes 0.03 1.80 0.72 2 5 8 10

Aspire Alexander Twilight Secondary Academy yes 0.06 2.89 0.82 6 1 7 10

Aspire APEX Academy yes 0.06 2.15 0.77 1 2 1

Aspire Junior Collegiate Academy yes 0.22 1.98 0.70 10 10 8 1

Aspire Port City Academy yes 0.16 2.70 0.79 2 10 6 1

Aspire Titan Academy yes 0.12 1.55 0.73 8 9 9 5

California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Camp yes 1.15 1.96 0.82 2 7 8 3 9 6

Camino Science and Natural Resources Charter yes 0.03 1.71 0.64 1 10 10 9

Charter Alternative Program (CAP) 1 5

Charter Community School Home Study Academy 2 3 1 1 4 1

Charter Montessori Blue Oak Campus 2 4 1 2 6

EDUHSD Virtual Academy at Shenandoah 2 9

El Dorado COE Charter Community Day 1

Gold Oak Arts Charter 1 6 8 2

Pacific Technology School Orangevale yes -0.02 0.51 0.78 3 7 5 7

Pacific Technology School Santa Ana yes 0.05 1.66 0.94 10 9 10

Rite of Passage 1 1 1

Fresno County

Alvina Elementary Charter 7 2 2 6 2 2

Ambassador Phillip V. Sanchez Public Charter yes 0.03 1.03 0.64 5 1 2 1

Anchor Academy Charter 0.01 3.16 0.46 1 1 1 1

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 29

Big Picture High School - Fresno yes 0.04 0.98 0.70 2 1 1

Carter G. Woodson Public Charter yes 0.24 6.48 0.69 3 1 2 1 1

Clovis Online Charter 3 6 3 7 1 9 10

Crescent View South Charter yes 0.42 1.33 0.58 2 1 8 2 1

Crescent View West Charter yes 0.52 1.34 0.65 3 2 3

Dunlap Leadership Academy 5 5

Edison-Bethune Charter Academy yes 0.00 1.02 5 7 4 7

Fresno Academy for Civic and Entrepreneurial Leaders yes 0.02 1.08 0.54 4 1 1 1 1

Hallmark Charter 2 6 9 9 8 8 6 7 7

Hume Lake Charter yes -0.20 0.73 0.96 1 10 1

Island Community Day 1

Kingsburg Community Charter Extension 2 3 4 9 7 2

Lincoln Elementary 1 7 6 4 6 7

Morris E. Dailey Charter Elementary 0.19 15.76 0.54 4 10 10 8 10 10

National University Academy - Orange Center yes 0.37 0.91 1

New Millennium Institute of Education Charter yes 0.35 1.67 0.63 1 1 8 1 1

Quail Lake Environmental Charter 3 10 10 7 10 10

Rafer Johnson Junior High 6 4 3 4 6 2

Ronald W. Reagan Elementary 5 8 9 9 8 8

Roosevelt Elementary 6 8 6

San Joaquin Valley Charter 6

Sanger Academy Charter 8 10 9 7 9 9

School of Unlimited Learning yes 1.00 0.73 3 1 7 1 1

Sierra Charter yes 0.41 45.74 0.79 1 2 1 3 3 1 1 1 1

Sunset Elementary 6 5 5 3 2 5

University High yes 0.85 9.81 0.74 2 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10

Valley Arts and Science Academy (VASA) yes 0.14 1.42 0.58 1 1 1 5 1 1

Valley Preparatory Academy Charter yes 0.22 3.07 0.64 5 3 9 10 7 6

W. E. B. DuBois Public Charter 0.22 3.03 0.68 5 1 1 1

Washington Elementary 6 8 6

West Park Charter Academy 5 1 3 1 1

Glenn County

Walden Academy yes 1.08 0.60 4 4

William Finch 5 3 1

Humboldt County

Alder Grove Charter yes 0.70 4.38 0.86 1 4 7 6 7 2

Coastal Grove Charter yes 1 4 9 10 8 6

Fortuna Middle 2 5 5 10 8 2

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 30

Freshwater Charter Middle 1 4 1 8 4

Fuente Nueva Charter yes 1 7 3 9 6

Jacoby Creek Charter yes 1 10 9 5 10 8

Laurel Tree Charter yes 1 2 4 2

Mattole Valley Charter (#159) 1 4 8 5 5 4

Norman G. Ambrosini Elementary 2 3 2 1 2

Northcoast Preparatory and Performing Arts Academy yes 0.76 42.35 0.54 1 10 7

Pacific View Charter yes 0.20 2.08 0.65 2 7 6 4 2

Redwood Preparatory Charter 0.27 8.64 0.52 1 8 5 6

Six Rivers Charter High 1 6 1 5 4 3 2

South Bay Charter 4 1 6 1

South Fortuna Elementary 1 4 3 3 5 5

Toddy Thomas Elementary 3 5 3 2 5 2

Trillium Charter 1 6 8 1 7

Union Street Charter 1 10 10 10 10

Imperial County

Ballington Academy for the Arts and Sciences yes 0.07 0.99 0.72 6 9 10 6 6

Imagine Schools at Imperial Valley yes 0.06 1.20 0.61 1 1 1 1 1 1

Imperial Valley Home School Academy 1

Inyo County

Golden State Virtual Academy yes 0.05 1.05 0.18 1

YouthBuild Charter School of California 0.22 2.53 0.79 1 1

YouthBuild Charter School of California Central 0.15 1.64 0.58 1

Kern County

California Pacific Charter School of Kern yes 0.07 1.47 0.60 3 1 4 1

California Virtual Academy @ Kern yes 1.00 1.03 1 1 2 5 2 1 1

Cecil Avenue Math and Science Academy yes 9 6 2 4 3 2

Del Vista Math and Science Academy 5 3 2 3 2 4

Grimmway Academy yes 0.81 0.94 7 5

Kern Workforce 2000 Academy 9 4 5 5 5

Nueva Vista Language Academy 8 1 1 7 1 2

Paramount Bard Academy yes 0.13 1.43 1.03 9 1 1 4 1 1

Pine Mountain Learning Center 1 10 7 10 10

Ridgecrest Charter yes 0.71 4.48 0.72 3 8 8 7

Valley Oaks Charter 2 2 3 4 1 2 3

Kings County

California Pacific Charter School of Central Calif yes 0.02 2.02 0.41 5 4 3 1 1

California Virtual Academy @ Kings yes 1.00 1.01 1 5 3 4 5 1 4 3

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 31

Crossroads Charter 3 1 4 1 1

Crossroads Trade Tech Charter 2 1 1 1

Frontier Elementary 4 8 8 6 7 7

Island Elementary 2 6 5 5 7 5

Kings River-Hardwick Elementary 3 5 9 10 7 8

Lemoore Middle College High 4 10 8 9 9 4 9 9

Lemoore University Elementary Charter 3 2 9 10 7 3

Mid Valley Alternative Charter 1 7 10 5 1

National University Academy, Armona yes 0.21 1.74 0.76 4

Pioneer Elementary 2 9 8 5 7 8

Pioneer Middle 4 5 9 10 8 5

Lake County

Lake County International Charter yes 1.10 1.51 0.60 1 8 10 6 4

Lassen County

Diamond Mountain Charter High 1 10

Juniper Ridge Virtual Academy Charter 1 4 1 6 1

Long Valley Charter yes 0.06 0.94 0.73 1 5 3 1

Mt. Lassen Charter 1 2 4 1

New Day Academy yes 0.17 3.93 0.55 1 4 8 10 6 3

Westwood Charter yes 0.84 -204.58 0.94 1 1 1 2 1

Los Angeles County

Academia Avance Charter yes -0.01 1.00 0.47 10 2 1 6 8 5

Academia Moderna yes 0.63 2.03 0.29 8 8 10 6 6

Accelerated yes 4.83 8.10 0.65 9 7 3 8 5 4

Accelerated Elementary Charter yes 4.12 18.31 0.71 9 5 1 4 5

Alain Leroy Locke 3 College Preparatory Academy yes 0.03 1.11 0.73 9 1 1 2 10 1 10

Albert Einstein Academy for Letters, Arts and Science yes -0.09 1.06 0.62 1 10 10 2 10 8

Alfred B. Nobel Charter Middle 7 7 10 7 10 9

Alliance Christine O’Donovan Middle Academy yes 0.44 6.04 0.37 10 2 3 7 3 1

Alliance Cindy and Bill Simon Technology Academy H yes -0.02 0.97 0.45 10 1 2 2 3 4

Alliance College-Ready Academy High No. 5 yes 0.47 13.47 0.54 10 8 3 5 3 6 10 5 7

Alliance College-Ready Academy High No. 7 yes 0.07 1.34 0.39 9 1 3 1 4 6 1 1

Alliance College-Ready Academy High No. 16 yes -0.03 0.93 0.61 10 3 5 3

Alliance College-Ready Middle Academy No. 4 yes 0.36 3.83 0.42 10 8 5 2 6 3

Alliance College-Ready Middle Academy No. 5 yes 0.31 3.09 0.45 10 2 7 10 6 3

Alliance College-Ready Middle Academy No. 7 yes 0.14 2.40 0.42 10 5 10 2 2

Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High yes 0.64 -5.50 0.62 10 10 8 1 8 10 8 8 9

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 32

Alliance Environmental Science and Technology High yes 0.14 1.53 0.56 10 10 8 3 9 9 9 10

Alliance Gertz-Ressler High yes 0.65 7.87 0.50 10 9 9 5 9 10 8 8 8

Alliance Health Services Academy High yes 0.31 6.09 0.59 10 5 1 8 2 3 4 2

Alliance Huntington Park College-Ready Academy Hig yes 0.78 -3.72 0.52 10 8 8 4 7 9 9 10 4

Alliance Jack H. Skirball Middle yes 0.42 6.85 0.47 10 3 6 10 4 2

Alliance Judy Ivie Burton Technology Academy High yes 0.66 20.10 0.47 10 6 5 9 5 9 10 6 9

Alliance Marc & Eva Stern Math and Science yes 0.40 2.87 0.50 10 9 3 2 5 5 10 7 9

Alliance Media Arts and Entertainment Design High yes 0.24 2.77 0.54 10 3 1 1 2 3 9 6

Alliance Richard Merkin Middle yes 0.50 15.92 0.44 10 5 2 5 5 2

Alliance Technology and Math Science High yes -0.07 0.91 0.62 10 1 1 3

Alliance William and Carol Ouchi Academy High yes 1.11 -2.98 0.41 10 8 7 3 7 8 9 5 6

Anahuacalmecac International University Preparator yes -0.39 0.49 0.78 10 7 10 7 3

Animo Charter Middle No. 3 yes -0.05 0.82 0.70 9 1 1 1

Animo Charter Middle No. 4 yes -0.04 0.86 0.70 7 1 1 1

Animo College Preparatory Academy yes -0.02 0.89 0.68 9 1 1 1

Animo Inglewood Charter High yes 0.14 4.84 0.57 9 7 5 9 6 7 10 7 10

Animo Jackie Robinson High yes 1.05 33.54 0.52 10 8 7 2 4 9 10 5 8

Animo Jefferson Charter Middle yes 0.06 1.33 0.47 9 1 6 10 2 3

Animo Leadership High yes 0.30 1.20 0.59 10 7 9 10 10 6 10

Animo Locke 1 College Preparatory Academy yes 0.32 5.52 0.53 9 1 5 10 2 4 10 1 8

Animo Locke II College Preparatory Academy yes 0.35 5.32 0.57 9 1 1 1 1 10 9

Animo Locke Technology High yes 0.06 1.06 0.54 9 1 1 6 1 3 10 1 5

Animo Oscar De La Hoya Charter High yes 0.47 1.14 0.55 10 6 5 9 6 7 10 5 9

Animo Pat Brown yes 0.47 19.77 0.47 10 8 4 4 6 5 9 4 9

Animo Ralph Bunche High yes 0.73 30.35 0.43 10 3 1 8 2 3 7 2 4

Animo South Los Angeles Charter yes 0.90 52.66 0.47 9 7 2 1 2 3 9 7 8

Animo Venice Charter High yes 0.33 1.16 0.53 10 7 8 2 7 9 9 5 7

Animo Watts College Preparatory Academy yes 0.34 9.97 0.46 9 1 2 8 1 2 10 1 10

Animo Westside Charter Middle yes 0.63 0.20 0.29 7 5 8 5

Antecello Preparatory Academy yes -0.47 0.11 0.98 2 1 4 1

Antelope Valley Learning Academy yes 0.04 1.03 0.61 1 1 6 9 4 1

APEX Academy 10 1 1 10 1 1

Ararat Charter yes 0.32 3.03 0.65 5 9 10 9 9

Arts In Action Community Charter yes -0.01 0.94 0.65 8 1 1 2

Aspire Antonio Maria Lugo Academy yes 0.11 1.41 0.58 9 9 5 1 7 8

Aspire Centennial College Preparatory Academy yes 0.28 2.05 0.59 10 8 4 8 7 5

Aspire Firestone Academy yes 0.13 1.36 0.68 9 8 8 9 8 9

Aspire Gateway Academy yes 0.16 1.42 0.64 7 6 9 10 8 9

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 33

Aspire Huntington Park Charter yes 0.13 1.40 0.55 10 9 9 9 8 10

Aspire Inskeep Academy Charter yes 0.07 1.19 0.63 8 4 4 7

Aspire Juanita Tate Academy Charter yes 0.02 1.05 0.67 9 3 3 5

Aspire Pacific Academy yes 0.12 2.31 0.55 10 8 4 5 6 5 10 9

Aspire Slauson Academy Charter yes 0.09 1.25 0.61 2 3 5 4

Aveson Global Leadership Academy yes 0.05 1.67 0.12 1 2 5 6 9 1 1 1

Aveson School of Leaders yes 0.06 1.67 0.10 1 3 9 9 9 5

Barack Obama Charter yes 0.18 5.38 0.53 3 1 7 10

Beckford Charter for Enriched Studies 4 9 10 6 10 10

Bert Corona Charter yes 0.32 5.07 0.52 10 1 1 7 2 1

Birmingham Community Charter High 0.13 1.75 0.67 10 4 3 7 5 4 8 4 6

Bright Star Secondary Charter Academy yes 0.09 2.31 0.61 10 9 8 4 9 8 9 1 10

CA Academy for Liberal Studies Early College High yes 0.31 -3.61 0.60 10 9 5 2 7 7 9 2 7

Calabash Charter Academy 4 4 8 2 9 9

California Academy for Liberal Studies yes 0.12 1.91 0.68 10 10 5 4 8 7

California Virtual Academy @ Los Angeles yes 1.00 1.00 1 4 3 2 6 1 1 1 2

California Virtual Academy @ Los Angeles High yes 1.00 1.27 1

Camino Nuevo Charter Academy yes 0.49 3.44 0.57 10 9 5 2 7 8

Camino Nuevo CharterAcademy No. 2 yes 2.43 2.77 0.20 10 10 6 2 8 9

Camino Nuevo Elementary No. 3 yes 0.62 2.26 0.46 7 7 4 1 5 7

Camino Nuevo Charter Academy No. 4 yes 0.13 1.59 0.65 9 4 6 6

Camino Nuevo Charter High yes 0.69 7.96 0.50 10 8 8 8 8 9 10 6 10

Canon Elementary 1 10 10 8 10 10

Carpenter Community Charter 3 9 10 6 10 10

Castlebay Lane Charter 4 7 10 7 10 10

Celerity Cardinal Charter yes 0.02 1.09 0.61 10 8 6 10

Celerity Dyad Charter yes 0.66 13.41 0.44 9 10 8 5 8 10

Celerity Nascent Charter yes 1.09 15.40 0.45 8 10 8 9 9 10

Celerity Octavia Charter yes 0.14 1.60 0.58 9 9 1 8 10

Celerity Palmati Charter yes 0.09 2.00 0.54 8 8 7 10

Celerity Sirius Charter yes 0.03 1.09 0.76 3 4

Celerity Troika Charter yes 0.06 1.23 0.54 9 10 10 3 10 10

Center for Advanced Learning yes 0.35 0.08 0.49 7 9 4 4 6 7

Central City Value yes 0.01 1.04 0.47 10 6 2 4 4 2 4 3 2

Century Academy for Excellence yes 0.34 6.25 0.69 4 1 2 10 3 1

Century Community Charter yes -0.24 0.60 0.82 9 4 2 9 7 2

CHAMPS yes -0.01 0.97 0.56 6 5 4 1 9 4 6 2 5

Children of Promise Preparatory Academy yes -0.06 0.97 0.50 4 6 2 1

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 34

Children’s Center 10 9 10

CHIME Charter Middle yes -0.39 0.24 1.05 4 2 2 1 8 2

CHIME Institute’s Schwarzenegger Community yes 0.62 5.56 0.74 6 3 8 8 10 9

Citizens of the World Charter yes 0.25 6.19 0.62 1 9 10 10

City Honors College Preparatory Charter 1 8 6 3 9 7

CLAS Affirmation yes -0.47 0.42 0.55 1 1 2 7 5 2

Colegio New City yes 0.11 0.93 0.78 10 7 4 2 1 1

Colfax Charter Elementary 3 9 10 9 10 10

Community Charter Early College High yes 0.14 6.30 0.57 10 9 8 10 7 9 10 7 9

Community Charter Middle yes 0.74 -2.87 0.52 10 9 9 10 9 8

Community Harvest Charter yes 0.05 1.11 0.48 9 1 1 2 1 6 1

Community Magnet Charter Elementary 7 10 10 10 10 10

Constellation Community Charter Middle yes 0.14 0.56 0.84

Crenshaw Arts-Technology Charter High yes 0.45 60.48 0.80 1 5 2 7 3 3 9 7 4

Crown Preparatory Academy yes 0.22 2.50 0.53 6 3 4 5

Da Vinci Design yes 0.28 2.53 0.84 8 4 5 2 10 9

Da Vinci Science yes 0.31 3.00 0.77 8 3 6 1 10 10

Dearborn Elementary Charter Academy 4 4 6 8 8 8

Desert Sands Charter yes 0.39 1.23 0.66 3 1 1 1 1 1 1

Discovery Charter Preparatory No. 2 yes 0.59 10.82 0.76 10 6 3 10 3 5 4 2 3

Dixie CaNon Community Charter 5 8 7 5 9 9

Doris Topsy-Elvord Academy yes -0.20 0.56 0.58 4 3 8

Downtown Value yes 0.41 3.73 0.61 10 8 6 5 7 5

Dr. Theo. T. Alexander Jr., Science Center 8 2 6 7 5 5

Early College Academy for Leaders and Scholars yes -0.03 0.83 0.73 10 2 3 3

El Camino Real Charter High yes 0.41 3.73 0.61 7 4 6 9 9 8

El Oro Way Charter For Enriched Studies 4 5 7 5 9 9

Emerson Parkside Academy Charter 3 9 7 4 9 9

Enadia Technology Enriched Charter 8 7 8 7 8 8

Encino Charter Elementary 5 10 9 5 10 10

Endeavor College Preparatory Charter yes 0.51 6.76 0.66 9 9 8 10 9 9

Environmental Charter High yes 1.14 10.00 0.64 10 9 9 4 8 9 8 5 7

Environmental Charter Middle yes 0.50 4.11 0.55 8 2

Equitas Academy Charter yes 0.38 3.35 0.50 10 8 2 9 9

Excel Charter Academy yes 0.20 -1.78 0.25 10 7 2 2 5 3

Extera Public yes 0.27 3.56 0.53 7 2 1 5

Fenton Avenue Charter yes 0.77 10.90 0.80 8 8 4 6 6 7

Fenton Primary Center yes 0.39 7.35 0.80 4 7 6

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 35

Frederick Douglass Academy Elementary yes 0.09 1.25 0.49 1 6 1 1 3 2

Frederick Douglass Academy High yes 0.04 1.11 0.48 1 3 1 7 1 2 9 8 4

Frederick Douglass Academy Middle yes -0.06 0.87 0.51 2 2 1 1 2 1

Full Circle Learning Academy yes 0.21 2.69 0.52 4 1 1 1 1

Futuro College Preparatory Elementary yes 0.41 3.44 0.62 2 10 10 10

Gabriella Charter yes 0.58 9.02 0.66 10 10 9 9 10 9

Garr Academy of Math and Entrepreneurial Studies yes 0.24 3.08 0.59 2 6 4 4 5 7

George Ellery Hale Charter Academy 6 5 6 6 9 7

Germain Academy For Academic Achievement 5 4 9 10 9 9

Global Education Academy yes 0.92 34.38 0.52 10 9 9 10 7 9

Goethe International Charter yes 0.41 5.80 0.65 4 10 10 1 9 10

Gorman Learning Center yes 1.20 2.08 1.18 1 1 2 6 6 1 1 2 1

Granada Hills Charter High yes 0.25 2.23 0.76 7 8 7 5 10 10 10 8 10

Guidance Charter 0.85 214.40 0.92 7 4 6 10 4 4

Hamlin Charter Academy 6 10 7 2 9 9

Hawthorne Math and Science Academy 10 10 10 10 8 10 10 10 10

Haynes Charter For Enriched Studies 4 9 9 3 9 10

Hesby Oaks Leadership Charter 5 6 9 4 10 9

High Tech LA yes 0.35 2.77 0.68 9 9 10 10 9 10 10 9 10

ICEF Inglewood Elementary Charter Academy yes 0.02 1.27 0.67 1 5 6 7 8

ICEF Inglewood Middle Charter Academy yes -0.24 0.90 0.59 1 4 1 1 1 1

ICEF Vista Elementary Academy yes 0.23 1.99 0.47 5 2 8 10 7 6

ICEF Vista Middle Academy yes 0.19 1.51 0.43 7 7 4 5 4 2

Ingenium Charter yes -0.33 0.71 0.47 5 5 1

iQ Academy California-Los Angeles yes 1.00 0.77 1 6 10 7 2 10 9

Ivy Academia yes 0.11 1.38 0.72 5 8 9 8 9 9 10 9

Ivy Bound Academy of Math, Science, and Technology yes 0.61 100.68 0.52 8 10 7 3 10 8

James Jordan Middle yes 0.33 3.26 0.57 10 6 3 8 5 3

Jardin de la Infancia 0.09 1.37 0.68 4 7 5

Justice Street Academy Charter 2 4 9 7 9 9

Kenter Canon Elementary 3 9 10 2 10 10

KIPP Academy of Opportunity yes 0.27 6.78 0.62 2 8 9 9 8 6

KIPP Comienza Community Prep yes 0.25 5.26 0.55 10 10 10

KIPP Empower Academy yes 0.16 3.26 0.66 10 10 10

KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory yes 0.37 5.79 0.62 10 10 9 7 10 10

KIPP Raices Academy yes 0.16 2.69 0.58 1 10 10 5 10 10

Knollwood Preparatory Academy 3 8 6 4 9 9

Lakeview Charter Academy yes 0.03 1.26 0.57 10 10 6 3 8 9

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 36

Lakeview Charter High yes 0.01 0.11 0.73 10 4 3 6 6

Larchmont Charter yes 0.27 3.71 0.61 6 10 9 2 10 9

Larchmont Charter-West Hollywood yes 0.34 9.33 0.64 3 10 1 10 10

Learning Works yes 0.11 3.77 1.08 5 1 8 1 1

Lennox Mathematics, Science and Technology Academy 10 7 6 7 9 9 10 10 10

Life Source International Charter yes 1.06 0.51 2 2 1 1

Lifeline Education Charter yes 0.35 2.07 0.69 1 2 1 2 8 1

Lockhurst Drive Charter Elementary 2 5 9 10 9 9

Los Angeles Academy of Arts & Enterprise Charter yes 0.25 2.33 0.50 10 1 5 10 2 1 7 2

Los Angeles Big Picture High yes 0.08 1.40 0.55 10 5 2 1 4 3 1 1

Los Angeles County Online High yes 5 1 4 9 3 2 1 2

Los Angeles International Charter High yes 0.20 1.39 0.63 10 1 6 10 10 9

Los Angeles Leadership Academy yes 0.99 2.57 0.46 10 4 1 2 4 1 7 6

Los Angeles Leadership Primary Academy yes 0.05 1.19 0.49 4 7 5

Los Feliz Charter School for the Arts yes 0.49 2.60 0.54 1 4 5 2 8 7

Lou Dantzler Preparatory Charter Elementary yes 0.09 1.38 0.57 1 6 3 3 6

Lou Dantzler Preparatory Charter High yes 0.00 1.00 0.58 1 1 5 6 3 1 9 4 4

Lou Dantzler Preparatory Charter Middle yes 0.12 1.50 0.44 2 4 1 1 2 1

Magnolia Science Academy yes 0.21 1.84 0.63 10 9 4 8 7 5 10 10

Magnolia Science Academy 2 yes 0.00 1.00 0.71 10 7 2 5 5 1 10 9

Magnolia Science Academy 3 yes 0.16 1.48 0.61 7 4 5 8 7 2

Magnolia Science Academy 4 yes -0.09 0.77 0.85 9 8 2 1 5 3

Magnolia Science Academy 5 yes 0.17 1.56 0.66 10 8 7 10 7 6

Magnolia Science Academy 6 yes -0.10 0.70 0.78 5 6 7 9 10 2

Magnolia Science Academy 7 yes -0.35 0.50 0.75 8 10 10 9 10

Magnolia Science Academy Bell yes 0.45 2.31 0.58 10 1 3 10 3 1

Marquez Avenue Elementary 2 9 10 3 10 10

Mesa Intermediate 6

Milagro Charter yes 0.25 40.29 0.55 8 10 9 1 9 10

Mission View Public yes 0.02 1.01 0.59 2 1 5 1 1

Monsenor Oscar Romero Charter Middle yes 0.10 1.26 0.44 10 6 4 9 5 2

Montague Charter Academy yes 0.59 10.05 0.77 4 6 4 5 5 6

Multicultural Learning Center yes 0.43 3.74 0.62 8 4 3 2 6 4

N.E.W. Academy Canoga Park yes 0.90 27.42 0.63 10 7 9 9 6 9

N.E.W. Academy of Science and Arts yes -0.07 0.84 0.66 10 9 9 10 6 9

Nestle Avenue Charter 9 9 7 3 9 9

New City yes 0.56 3.65 0.74 5 1 2 10 1 1

New Designs Charter yes 0.32 1.55 0.52 7 6 3 7 4 5 10 7

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 37

New Designs Charter School-Watts yes 0.05 1.12 0.66 7 1 3 9 1 2 6 3

New Heights Charter yes 0.65 20.33 0.59 6 8 6 7 6 6

New Los Angeles Charter yes 0.36 2.02 0.51 7 8 2 1 6 2

New Millennium Secondary yes 0.14 1.53 0.57 4 4 4 7 6 2 5 1

New Village Charter High yes 0.66 29.26 0.62 10 1 8 1 1

New West Charter yes 1.27 27.55 0.85 3 10 10 7

North Valley Charter Academy yes 0.34 32.59 0.77 9 1 7 10 5 2 3 3

Nueva Esperanza Charter Academy yes 0.09 3.88 0.61 10 8 8 10 6 8

Ocean Charter yes 2.61 81.66 0.22 1 5 6 7 10 7

Odyssey Charter yes 0.72 3.72 0.81 2 4 5 7

Open Charter Magnet 4 8 8 10 10

Opportunities for Learning - Baldwin Park yes 0.34 3.98 0.57 7 6 3 5 6 1

Opportunities for Learning - Baldwin Park II yes -0.02 1.11 0.56 9 4 1 7 2 1

Opportunities for Learning - Hermosa Beach yes 0.05 1.19 0.51 5 7 3 4 3 1

Opportunities for Learning - Santa Clarita yes 0.37 4.05 0.52 4 6 2 4 3 1 1 1 1

Opportunities Unlimited Charter High yes 0.06 1.13 0.65 7 1 3

Options for Youth - San Gabriel yes 0.59 5.43 0.63 6 3 1 8 2 1

Options for Youth - Burbank Charter yes 0.77 9.53 0.56 9 5 3 9 5 1 1 1 1

Options for Youth - Hermosa Beach, Inc. yes 0.23 1.83 0.50 9 5 4 1 1

Our Community Charter yes 0.47 3.79 0.57 5 6 8 8 9 8

Pacoima Charter Elementary yes 0.72 8.41 2.14 9 7 3 4 4 6

Palisades Charter Elementary 2 8 10 5 10 10

Palisades Charter High 0.26 2.29 0.72 8 6 9 8 9 10 5 5 7

Para Los Ninos - Evelyn Thurman Gratts Primary yes 0.16 3.02 0.66 3 4 6

Para Los Ninos Charter yes 0.13 2.21 0.57 5 2 8 10 4 6

Para Los Ninos Middle yes 0.30 2.74 0.49 10 3 1 5 4

Pasadena Rosebud Academy yes 0.49 1.13 2 10 8 10 10

Paul Revere Middle 7 6 8 8 10 9

Plainview Academic Charter Academy 7 4 4 2 6 5

Pomelo Community Charter 2 4 9 4 10 10

Port of Los Angeles High yes 0.25 8.50 0.70 8 7 9 10 10 9 4 4 7

Puente Charter yes 1.02 6.19 0.49 4 7 5

Renaissance Arts Academy yes 1.46 21.25 0.68 6 9 10 10 10 9 10 10

Riverside Drive Charter Elementary 4 4 7 7 9 9

Robert A. Millikan Middle 8 9 7 8 10 9

Rosie the Riveter Charter High yes -0.15 1.23 1.31 1

San Jose Charter Academy 4 10 10 6 10 10

Santa Clarita Valley International yes 0.52 3.68 0.55 1 5 3 1 4 1

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 38

Santa Monica Boulevard Community Charter yes 0.42 4.92 0.84 8 2 2 5 3 4

Santa Rosa Charter Academy yes 0.23 -6.16 0.59 10 8 2 1 5 3

School of Arts and Enterprise yes 0.99 1.96 0.75 7 5 5 2 9 4 4

School of Extended Educational Options 7 1 5 1 1

Sequoia Charter 6 1 1 1 1

Serrania Avenue Charter For Enriched Studies 4 4 10 10 10 9

Sherman Oaks Elementary Charter 5 5 8 6 9 9

Soledad Enrichment Action Charter High 8 1 6

Stella Middle Charter Academy yes 2.68 3.09 0.56 10 8 4 1 8 4

Superior Street Elementary 3 10 8 6 10 10

Synergy Charter Academy yes 0.94 9.72 0.63 8 10 10 10 10 10

Synergy Kinetic Academy yes 0.74 10.29 0.52 10 9 3 1 6 3

Synergy Quantum Academy yes 0.39 5.49 0.49 10 1 2 2

TEACH Academy of Technologies yes -0.11 0.72 0.48 1 6 10 3 2

Thurgood Marshall Charter Middle yes -0.07 0.78 0.56 1 1 1 5 3 1

Today’s Fresh Start Charter yes 4.10 4.04 0.70 8 7 6 9

Today’s Fresh Start Charter School Inglewood yes 1.02 15.01 0.72 4 4 1 4 5

Topanga Learn-Charter Elementary 2 10 10 5 10 10

Topeka Charter School For Advanced Studies 6 5 7 6 9 10

Triumph Academy yes 0.40 -2.88 0.60 10 9 7 5 6 8

Triumph Charter High yes -0.07 0.70 0.77 10 3 1 3 5

Valley Charter Elementary yes 0.51 16.77 0.51 2 8 1 9 9

Valley Charter Middle yes 0.51 3.01 0.40 5 3 5 3

Valor Academy Charter yes 0.38 2.69 0.47 1 9 9 10 9 10

Van Gogh Charter 3 7 10 6 10 10

Vaughn Next Century Learning Center yes 1.21 19.59 0.42 10 8 4 6 6 7 9 5 8

View Park Preparatory Accelerated Charter yes 0.01 1.03 0.51 1 10 5 1 9 4

View Park Preparatory Accelerated Charter Middle yes -0.03 0.91 0.51 1 8 5 3 6 3

View Park Preparatory Accelerated High yes -0.10 0.81 0.54 1 6 5 3 8 7 9 10 6

Vista Charter Middle yes 0.08 1.25 0.52 10 6 1 6 5 1

Wallis Annenberg High yes 0.96 12.44 0.72 10 7 7 2 8 6 9 6 8

Watts Learning Center yes 0.31 4.16 0.54 5 9 8 9 9 10

Watts Learning Center Charter Middle yes 0.21 2.17 0.48 7 1 4 1 1

Welby Way Elementary Charter 3 9 10 7 10 10

Westside Innovative School House yes 0.09 1.37 0.76 1 9 8 9 10

Westwood Elementary 3 7 10 3 10 10

Wilbur Charter For Enriched Academics 4 5 10 7 10 10

Wilder’s Preparatory Academy Charter yes 0.81 32.00 0.80 1 10 10 10 10 10

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 39

Wilder’s Preparatory Academy Charter Middle yes 0.18 1.26 0.69 2 9 8 9 9 7

Wisdom Academy for Young Scientists yes 0.68 4.67 0.60 1 2

Woodlake Elementary Community Charter 4 4 7 8 9 9

Woodland Hills Elementary Charter For Enriched Stu 2 10 10 4 10 10

Xinaxcalmecac Academia Semillas del Pueblo yes 0.12 1.25 0.60 10 1 1 9 1 2

Madera County

Ezequiel Tafoya Alvarado Academy yes 0.00 1.01 0.57 8 5 8 9 3 6

Glacier High School Charter yes 0.58 4.05 0.82 1 9 1 10 6 1 2

Madera County Independent Academy 7 1 4

Minarets Charter High 1 7 9 5

Mountain Home Charter (Alternative) yes 0.94 4.20 0.75 1 2 8 10 8 3

Pioneer Technical Center 7 1 5

Sherman Thomas Charter yes 0.48 2.94 0.75 2 3 7 7 5 5

Sherman Thomas Charter High yes 0.54 6.92 0.71 1 4 7 2 1

Marin County

Novato Charter yes 0.35 2.01 0.84 2 10 10 4 10 10

Phoenix Academy 5

Willow Creek Academy yes 0.29 2.36 0.98 4 10 6 1 7 6

Mariposa County

Jessie Benton Fremont Community Day 1

Mendocino County

Accelerated Achievement Academy yes 0.65 11.10 0.79 7 3 4 7 3 3

Eel River Charter yes 0.95 9.60 0.71 1 1 1 1 1

La Vida Charter yes 0.30 11.41 0.68 1 2 10 7 1

Pacific Community Charter yes 1.01 4.56 0.82 1 8 6

Redwood Academy of Ukiah yes 0.87 18.30 0.76 8 10 5 2 9 6 10 9

River Oak Charter yes 0.75 2.74 0.80 4 2 8 9 7 6

Three Rivers Charter yes 0.00 43.54 0.39 1 3 6 2

Tree of Life Charter yes 0.63 19.72 0.86 1 6 10 8 5

Willits Charter yes 0.92 1.41 0.75 2 1 8 10 7 2

Merced County

John C. Fremont Charter 5 2 3 5 3 3

Merced Scholars Charter 7 8 1

Mono County

Urban Corps of San Diego County Charter yes 0.20 1.37 0.55 1

Monterey County

Bay View Academy yes 0.01 1.57 0.63 3 6

Big Sur Charter yes 1 5 10 10 9 8

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 40

International School of Monterey yes 0.24 3.14 0.90 2 8 2 10 7

Learning for Life Charter yes 0.65 12.41 0.76 2 5 1 7 1 1

Monterey Bay Charter yes 0.20 5.18 0.78 2 2 9 9

Monterey County Home Charter 8 1 2 9

Oasis Charter Public yes 1.46 10.17 0.69 4 1 4 2 1

South Monterey County Charter Independent Study Pr 10

Napa County

Napa Valley Language Academy 7 3 8 9 4 6

Phillips Charter 10 2 2 3 1 2

River Charter 7 3 7 4 7 1

Shearer Charter 10 6 2 2 1 3

Stone Bridge yes 0.32 4.01 0.85 2 2 9 10 7 6

Nevada County

Bitney College Preparatory High 1 9 8 2 1 3

Chicago Park Community Charter 1

Forest Charter 2 2 3 1 1 1

Grass Valley Charter 1 6 6 2 9 6

Los Angeles Education Corps Charter yes 0.49 4.71 0.81 1 1 2

Muir Charter yes 0.56 5.79 0.80 2

Nevada City Charter 1 7 10 10 7

Nevada City School of the Arts 1 2 3 2

Sierra Montessori Academy 1 7 3

Twin Ridges Home Study Charter 1 5

Union Hill Charter 1 2 4 1

Vantage Point Charter 1 7 1 7 2

Yuba River Charter 1 1 7 9

Orange County

Capistrano Connections Academy Charter yes 0.08 1.39 0.80 2 7 4 2 6 2 2 1 3

Community Roots Academy yes 1.65 0.57 1 10 9 9

Edward B. Cole Academy yes 0.52 6.52 0.74 7 4 3 3 4 7

El Rancho Charter 3 10 10 8 10 10

El Sol Santa Ana Science and Arts Academy yes 0.38 12.41 0.91 8 10 8 3 8 10

Journey yes 0.19 2.14 0.67 1 3 8 9 7 5

Nova Academy yes 0.14 3.21 0.45 10 2 3 5 4 6 9 7

OCSA yes 0.76 1.81 0.90 5 9 9 4 10 9 10 9 10

Opportunities for Learning - Capistrano yes 0.35 3.59 0.54 3 9 2 9 4

Orange County Educational Arts Academy yes 0.13 1.09 0.73 8 2 3 9 5 6

Oxford Preparatory Academy - South Orange County yes 0.05 1.28 0.71 1 10 10 10

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 41

Ralph A. Gates Elementary 3 6 7 6 4 6

Santiago Middle 0.25 3.98 0.76 7 7 7 7 7 2

Placer County

Bowman Charter 2 8 9 9 8 7

CORE Placer Charter yes 0.14 1.35 0.65 3 1 2 6 4 1

Creekside Cooperative Charter 1 10 1 10 9

EV Cain 21st Century STEM Charter 4 5 7 4 8 4

Harvest Ridge Cooperative Charter 1 9 7 8 7

Horizon Charter yes 0.57 7.96 0.64 2 4 3 4 5 1 1 1 2

John Adams Academy yes 0.19 1.47 0.52 2 9 9 8

Loomis Basin Charter 3 10 10 2 10 10

Maria Montessori Charter Academy yes 0.48 2.98 1.11 1 6 8 5 8 4

Milestones Cooperative Charter 1

Newcastle Charter 1 5 9 10 8 8

Partnerships for Student-Centered Learning yes 0.05 10.13 1.00 3 7 5 8 7 2 3 3 4

Rocklin Academy yes 2.10 13.57 0.91 3 10 10 5 10 10

Rocklin Academy at Meyers Street yes -0.04 1.09 0.93 4 10 10 5 10 10

Sierra Expeditionary Learning yes -0.02 1.19 0.71 2 10 1 9 8

Sierra Hills Arts and Sciences Charter Academy 1 8 5 4 7

Weimar Hills Charter 1 6 9 10 9 8

Western Sierra Collegiate Academy yes 0.93 2.14 0.81 2 8 9 3 10 10

Plumas County

Plumas Charter yes 0.26 9.18 0.80 2 5 5 8 6 1

Riverside County

California Military Institute 10 1 8 10 9 6 10 8

Choice 2000 On-Line 8 10 6 8 2 1 1 3 1

Cielo Vista Charter 4 8 6 8 10

Father’s Heart Charter yes 0.41 1.01 3 1 1 1

Gateway to College Early College High yes 0.48 7.10 0.86 1 10

George Washington Charter 3 2 10 6 10 10

Hemet Academy for Applied Academics and Technology 6 2 9 7 8 7 1 9 1

Innovative Horizons Charter 6 5 9 2 3

Keegan Academy yes 0.02 0.75 0.70 1 1 4 4 7 1

Mercury Online Academy of Southern California yes -0.20 0.72 0.52 1 1 1 1 1

Moreno Valley Community Learning Center 6 1 9 1 1

NOVA Academy - Coachella yes 0.03 1.07 0.57 10 9 5 8 4 5 10 6

Nuview Bridge Early College High 10 10 8 8 8 7 10 10 10

Palm Desert Charter Middle 8 6 7 9 8

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 42

Pivot Charter School Riverside County yes 1.05 0.62 1

River Springs Charter yes -0.03 0.98 0.71 2 2 3 9 2 2 1

Riverside County Education Academy 5

San Jacinto Valley Academy yes 0.60 5.82 0.67 3 1 8 10 4 3 7 2

Santa Rosa Academy yes 0.81 10.88 0.68 2 8 7 10 7 4 5 6

Southern California Online Academy 3 2 4 1

Sycamore Academy of Science and Cultural Arts yes 0.27 2.22 0.46 2 2 9 10 6 6

Temecula Preparatory yes 0.40 10.33 0.68 1 9 9 8 9 7 10 9

Temecula Valley Charter 0.14 2.39 0.06 3 9 7 6 9 8

Western Center Academy 2 10 10 9 10 10

Sacramento County

Antelope View Charter 6 1 7 10 3 1

Aspire Capitol Heights Academy yes 0.07 1.39 0.74 4 9 9 10 8 10

Bowling Green Elementary 5 6 3 6 4 6

California Aerospace Academy yes 0.23 1.07 0.87 3 1 1 3 1

California Montessori Project - Capitol Campus yes 0.69 6.54 0.78 4 3 7 6 8 3

California Montessori Project - Elk Grove Campus yes 3.56 2.27 0.79 2 3 4 1 5 2

California Montessori Project-San Juan Campus yes 0.55 6.08 0.81 2 3 5 5 8 3

Capitol Collegiate Academy yes 2.01 0.46 4 6 6

Community Collaborative Charter yes 0.56 5.50 0.69 7 2 4 3 3

Community Outreach Academy yes 1.63 11.11 0.74 9 7 9 10 8 9

Creative Connections Arts Academy 6 9 6 2 9 8 10 6

Delta Elementary Charter yes 0.09 1.04 0.78 3 2 8 10 5 7

Elk Grove Charter 6 5 3 4 4 1

Folsom Cordova K-8 Community Charter 2 8 8 7 5

Fortune yes 0.00 1.16 0.49 1 10

Futures High yes 2.82 13.60 0.60 10 8 7 8 7 9 5 3 5

George Washington Carver School of Arts and Science 4 2 8 9 7 9 9 9

Global College Prep Charter High 8 9 7 7 5

Golden Valley Charter School of Sacramento yes 0.24 6.98 0.78 2 2 3 5 5 3

Heritage Peak Charter yes 0.55 3.86 0.80 6 1 2 8 7 2 1 1 1

Higher Learning Academy yes 0.71 3.77 0.86 2 1 1 2 1 2

Natomas Charter yes 6 10 9 8 10 7 9 7 10

Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep 7 3 6 4 7 6 9 9 9

Natomas Pacific Pathways Prep Middle 6 8 5 4 6 3

New Technology High 8 2 1 9 3 1 5 3 3

Options for Youth-San Juan yes 0.59 7.91 0.59 2 5 1 6 3 1

Rainbow Springs 8 3 4 3

Sacramento Charter High yes 0.16 1.91 0.69 4 7 5 6 8 4 7 5

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 43

San Juan Choices Charter 2 1 7 3 1 1 1 2

SAVA: Sacramento Academic and Vocational Academy yes 1.19 8.98 0.54 6 5 1 1 1 1

Smythe Academy of Arts and Sciences 8 3 3 4 5

Sol Aureus College Preparatory yes 0.13 1.89 0.72 3 10 8 10 7 9

St. HOPE Public School 7 yes 0.05 1.22 0.67 1 2 8 1 9 8

The Language Academy of Sacramento yes 0.35 1.97 0.78 7 1 6 8 5 7

The MET 2 2 3 2 6 3

Visions In Education 6 9 3 6 6 2 1 2 1

Westlake Charter yes 2 10 5 9 10

Westlake Charter Middle yes 2 10 8 8 4

Westside Preparatory Charter 10 2 9 8 10 8

Yav Pem Suab Academy - Preparing for the Future Ch yes 0.17 2.32 0.73 7 4 8 10 4 8

San Bernardino County

Academy for Academic Excellence yes 0.00 1.08 2 9 6 8 7 6 8 5 9

Academy of Careers and Exploration 2 6 3 2 5 4 2 2

Alta Vista Public yes 0.34 1.20 0.65 2 1 6 1 1 1 1 1

ASA Charter yes 0.79 1.49 0.81 1 1 1 2 1 1

Carden Virtual Academy yes 0.06 1.04 0.51 3 1 1 1 1

Casa Ramona Academy for Technology, Community, and yes 0.37 2.16 0.83 10 4 1 1 1 1 4 1

Competitive Edge Charter Academy (CECA) 2 7 8 8

Crosswalk: Higher Education Learning Pathways yes 1.59 10.31 1.15 1 1 1 1

Encore High for the Performing and Visual Arts yes -0.04 0.92 0.67 2 2 2 6 5 1 8 3 7

Excel Prep Charter yes 0.11 0.91 0.71 1 2 1 3 2

Excelsior Charter yes 3.58 304.56 0.69 3 4 4 4 8 4 2 3 4

Grove yes 0.46 11.36 0.73 1 4 9 7 10 3 10 10

Hardy Brown College Prep yes 0.02 1.41 0.49 1 7 8 10 6 7

Hope Academy Charter yes 91.94 0.31 1 1 3 1

Inland Leaders Charter yes 0.42 13.49 0.65 1 8 7 2 9 8

LaVerne Elementary Preparatory Academy yes 0.53 8.25 0.77 1 10 10 10 8 9

Mirus Secondary yes 0.57 7.92 0.80 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 1

Mojave River Academy 0.30 2.27 0.62 4 1 3 1 1

Mountain View Montessori Charter 2 3 2 2 2

New Vision Middle yes 0.01 0.89 0.66 9 1 3 9 2 2

Norton Space and Aeronautics Academy yes 0.09 0.93 1 1 1 4

Options for Youth-San Bernardino yes 0.03 1.17 0.71 6 3 2 3 4 3

Options for Youth-Victorville Charter yes 0.35 3.21 0.56 4 2 1 7 4 1

Oxford Preparatory Academy - Chino Valley yes 0.12 1.14 0.73 2 10 10 6 10 10

Pathways to College yes 0.25 2.11 0.80 6 1 1 1

Provisional Accelerated Learning Academy yes 0.08 1.83 0.64 1 1 8 1 1

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 44

Public Safety Academy yes 0.21 5.46 0.59 8 3 6 3 4 2

Riverside Preparatory 0.17 2.35 0.69 5 9 4 4 6 4 9 10 9

Sixth Street Prep 8 10 10 2 9 10

Sky Mountain Charter yes 0.25 280.45 0.61 1 2 3 7 7 2 2 2

SOAR Charter Academy yes 0.24 4.96 0.69 2 4 2 1 4 2

Summit Leadership Academy-High Desert yes 1.10 2.37 0.83 6 4 4 1 5 3

Sky Mountain Charter 0.27 23.89 0.61 2 3 8 3 5

SOAR Charter Academy 0.32 3.31 0.69 1 3 5 10 6 4 6

Summit Leadership Academy-High Desert 1.16 0.57 1 5 8 6 7 2 2

San Diego County

Albert Einstein Academy Charter Middle yes 0.32 8.48 0.81 7 9 8 9 9 5

All Tribes Charter yes 0.12 1.53 0.43 1 1 1 1 1

All Tribes Elementary Charter yes 0.06 1.30 0.60 1

America’s Finest Charter yes 0.01 0.36 0.60 6 1 2 1

Arroyo Paseo Charter High yes 0.21 1.67 0.87 9 2 10 1 1 2 1

Arroyo Vista Charter 3 9 7 2 9 9

Audeo Charter yes 0.74 16.66 0.69 7 3 9 7 1 1 1 2

Barona Indian Charter yes 1 7 10 6 4

Bayshore Preparatory Charter yes 0.11 1.88 0.51 6 2 9 4 1 4 1 7

California Pacific Charter School of San Diego yes 0.20 1.86 0.56 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 1

California Virtual Academy @ San Diego yes 1.00 1.00 2 5 3 3 6 2 1 1 2

California Virtual Academy @ Santa Ysabel yes 1.00 1.26 1

Charter School of San Diego yes 1.16 21.01 0.79 4 1 5 4 1 1 1 1

Chula Vista Learning Community Charter 6 10 8 4 8 9

Classical Academy yes 0.58 2.01 0.56 2 4 8 6 9 5

Classical Academy High yes 0.23 1.61 0.66 2 6 10 4 10 9 6 10 8

Coastal Academy yes 0.40 8.20 0.52 1 6 8 7 9 7

Coleman Tech Charter High yes 0.01 1.17 1.00 6 2 1 4 3 9 8

College Preparatory Middle yes 2 10 10 9 9

Darnall Charter yes 0.44 20.42 1.09 5 6 6 5 4 7

Dehesa Charter yes 0.33 7.03 0.78 2 1 3 6 6 3 1 5 1

Diego Hills Charter yes 0.36 1.27 0.55 6 1 6 1 2

Diego Valley Public yes 0.02 1.02 0.66 5

Discovery Charter yes 2 5 9 9 8 8

Einstein Academy yes 0.38 9.98 0.86 3 5 10 9 9 9

EJE Elementary Academy Charter yes 0.41 4.40 0.77 8 4 6 3 7 9

EJE Middle Academy yes 0.25 2.55 0.77 10 7 9 10 7 6

Escondido Charter High yes 0.37 15.79 0.72 2 9 8 6 10 9 2 3 5

Evangeline Roberts Institute of Learning yes 0.14 2.46 0.49 1

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 45

Explorer Elementary yes 0.61 5.67 1.03 2 8 7 1 9 9

Feaster (Mae L.) Charter 5 8 9 8 6 8

Gompers Preparatory Academy yes 0.21 3.76 0.91 10 1 1 6 2 1 9 3

Greater San Diego Academy 3 4 4 9 8 3

Guajome Learning Center yes 1.00 0.65 3 1 1 1

Guajome Park Academy Charter yes 0.94 13.39 0.78 9 5 9 10 8 6 2 5 3

Harriet Tubman Village Charter yes 0.17 8.56 0.76 7 8 7 9 6 6

Health Sciences High yes 0.31 10.79 0.72 10 3 9 10 8 9 8 9 4

Helix High yes 0.35 16.00 0.73 1 8 5 8 8 8 8 6 7

Heritage K-8 Charter yes 0.39 5.94 0.64 2 10 8 3 10 6

High Tech Elementary Chula Vista yes 0.00 1.15 0.96 4 4

High Tech High yes 0.12 4.35 0.79 8 6 7 5 8 9 10 10 10

High Tech High Chula Vista yes 0.12 1.73 0.66 8 2 9 3 10 7 8

High Tech High International yes 0.11 1.75 0.76 8 5 8 2 8 8 10 7 9

High Tech High Media Arts yes 0.18 6.14 0.69 7 6 8 2 10 8 10 10 8

High Tech High North County yes 0.07 1.32 0.70 2 4 8 2 10 6 10

High Tech Middle yes 0.17 6.68 0.79 6 3 7 4 8 4

High Tech Middle Chula Vista yes 0.00 1.53 0.63 6 4

High Tech Middle Media Arts yes 0.17 5.73 0.72 6 4 6 7 9 6

High Tech Middle North County yes 0.11 1.79 0.73 3 5 8 4

Holly Drive Leadership Academy yes -0.06 0.57 0.84 6 6 4 5 5

Iftin Charter yes 0.54 9.95 1.04 1 8 3 1 5 4

Iftin High yes 0.06 0.41 1.10 10 1 1 2 2

Imperial Beach Charter 3 6 7 8 8 8

Innovations Academy yes 0.12 3.54 0.82 2 1 2 5 5 1

Integrity Charter yes 6 7 3 1 3 3

Juan Bautista de Anza yes -0.06 0.97 0.57 1 7

Julian Charter yes 0.19 1.37 0.65 1 7 5 4 7 5 2 2 3

Keiller Leadership Academy yes 0.16 3.31 0.79 9 7 2 1 3 2

King-Chavez Academy of Excellence yes 0.09 1.27 0.87 8 1 7 10 3 5

King-Chavez Arts Academy yes 0.06 1.23 0.65 2 6 7 5 3 9

King-Chavez Athletics Academy yes 0.09 1.32 0.89 4 6 4 5 3 8

King-Chavez Community High yes 0.07 1.24 0.65 10 1 1 9 1 1 1 1

King-Chavez Preparatory Academy yes 0.03 1.46 0.64 9 2 1 4 2 1

King-Chavez Primary Academy yes 0.32 2.31 0.92 1 10 9 5 9 9

KIPP Adelante Preparatory Academy yes 0.92 26.38 0.84 9 6 8 10 5 5

Learning Choice Academy yes 0.16 1.40 0.80 4 5 3 8 7 2 2 1 2

Leonardo da Vinci Health Sciences Charter yes 0.13 2.88 0.50 3 5 2 1 3 2

Liberty Charter yes 0.01 1.01 0.69 5 1 7 8 6 1 2

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 46

Literacy First Charter yes 0.66 2.59 0.83 5 10 7 5

MAAC Community Charter yes 0.01 0.99 0.73 6 1 8 1 1

Magnolia Science Academy San Diego yes -0.01 0.95 0.73 4 5 7 10 9 4

Mandarin Language Academy 1 9 10 8 9

McGill School of Success yes 0.37 3.37 0.97 1 3 3 2 2

Mountain Peak Charter yes 3 1 6 10 5 3

Mueller Charter (Robert L.) 7 9 7 5 6 5

Museum yes 0.08 1.29 0.83 2 4 8 3 8 7

National University Academy yes 0.32 2.32 0.73 4 2 1 7 1 2 1 1 1

Nestor Language Academy Charter 7 3 8 9 6 8

North County Trade Tech High yes -0.01 1.03 0.87 7 1 7 1 1

Nubia Leadership Academy 0.26 1.78 1.11 1 1 4 9 2 2

Old Town Academy K-8 Charter yes 0.02 1.24 0.52 1 7 9 9

Pacific American Academy yes -0.33 1.05 0.36 3 1 1 1 1

Pacific View Charter yes 0.29 1.94 0.55 1 6 2 1 6 1

Pivot Charter School - San Diego yes -0.09 1.05 0.58 1 7 1 4 2

Preuss School UCSD yes 1.08 460.00 0.89 10 10 7 2 9 9 10 10 10

RAI Online Charter yes 0.23 0.90 0.75 2 2 2 1 6 2

River Valley Charter 2 10 10 5 10 10 8 9

San Diego Cooperative Charter yes 0.28 3.12 1.00 3 2 3 4 7 2

San Diego Global Vision Academy yes 0.16 2.42 0.55 1 7 8 6 6

San Diego Neighborhood Homeschools yes 9 8 10 6 3

San Diego Virtual yes 2 2 3 3

SIATech yes 0.45 2.61 0.79 2 5 6 6 6

Steele CaNon High yes 0.25 6.36 0.72 5 3 6 9 8 7 8 7 8

The O’Farrell Charter yes 0.49 2.85 0.80 9 2 8 10 6 5

Urban Discovery Academy Charter yes 0.27 6.78 0.86 2 3 9 10 9 7

Vivian Banks Charter 2 8 10 1 9

San Francisco County

City Arts and Tech High yes 0.20 1.68 0.56 9 2 2 8 4 2 8 4 6

Creative Arts Charter yes 0.31 3.06 0.93 2 2 7 10 8 4

Edison Charter Academy yes 0.45 9.15 0.84 6 8 5 6

Five Keys Adult School (SF Sheriff’s) yes 0.25 3.19 0.56

Five Keys Charter (SF Sheriff’s) yes 0.60 13.03 0.59

Five Keys Independence HS (SF Sheriff’s) yes 0.29 17.72 0.69

Gateway High yes 1.50 6.16 1.03 8 2 4 7 6 5 7 4 5

Gateway Middle yes 1.07 9.66 0.52 7 5 8 6

KIPP Bayview Academy yes 0.34 4.79 1.04 4 10 8 5 8 8

KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy yes 0.30 4.41 0.92 10 10 10 10 9 10

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 47

Leadership High yes 0.45 2.25 0.89 8 1 1 9 2 1 7 2

Life Learning Academy Charter 0.67 83.11 3.82 4 4

Metropolitan Arts & Technology High yes 0.23 2.76 0.89 7 1 6 8 2 2 9 7

Mission Preparatory yes 0.63 90.45 0.50 6

San Francisco Flex Academy yes 1.00 1.25 2 6 5 10 9

San Joaquin County

Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy yes 0.45 1.22 0.73 8 10 8 4 9 8 10 10

Aspire Langston Hughes Academy yes -0.03 0.90 0.80 8 7 3 3 5 6 10 10

Aspire River Oaks Charter yes 0.02 1.03 0.76 7 10 9 6 9 10

Aspire Rosa Parks Academy yes 1.52 1.83 0.87 8 7 5 3 7 8

Aspire Vincent Shalvey Academy yes 0.49 4.48 0.91 4 10 10 5 10 10

California Pacific Charter School North Central Ca yes 0.10 1.58 0.49 2 7 4 5 1

California Virtual Academy @ San Joaquin yes 1.00 0.98 1 1 1 5 1 2 4

Delta Charter 0.09 1.43 0.93 6 1 4 7 5 3 1 1 3

Discovery Charter yes 1.33 7.89 0.70 7 3 7 8 8 3

Dr. Lewis Dolphin Stallworth Sr. Charter yes 0.01 0.71 0.72 1 3 10 1 1

Excel Charter Academy 6 1 2 9

Great Valley Academy - Manteca yes 1.72 0.69 1 4 5 5

Health Careers Academy 10 1 5 1

Institute of Business, Management, and Law Charter 7

Joe Serna Jr. Charter 5 1 2 4 1 4

Millennium Charter yes 0.59 5.69 0.85 8 2 4 8 5 4 9 8 7

New Jerusalem yes 0.39 15.46 0.64 6 5 4 4 4 5

Nightingale Charter 7 1 1 8 1 2

one.Charter 2 1 3

Pacific Law Academy 10 9 9 9

Pittman Charter 8 1 1 5 1 2

Primary Charter yes 0.73 7.08 1.05 4 10 9 5 10 8

Rio Valley Charter yes 0.44 1.96 0.82 4 1 2 9 3 1

San Joaquin Building Futures Academy 1

Stockton Collegiate International Elementary yes 0.14 2.17 0.68 5 3 4 8 8 6

Stockton Collegiate International Secondary yes 0.09 1.46 0.71 6 6 3 2 9 1 10 9

Stockton High 4 9

Stockton Unified Early College Academy 10 10 10 4 10 10 10 9

TEAM Charter 0.36 1.66 5 1 1 1

Venture Academy 4 1 1 4 1 1 1

San Luis Obispo County

Bellevue - Santa Fe Charter yes 0.34 2429.62 0.95 1 7 10 6 9 9

Grizzly Challenge Charter 0.80 5.29 0.70 6

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 48

San Mateo County

Arundel Elementary 2 10 10 7 10 10

Aspire East Palo Alto Charter yes 0.01 1.37 0.89 10 10 5 1 6 6

Aspire East Palo Alto Phoenix Academy yes 0.03 1.06 0.79 10 9 10 7 7 10 10

Brittan Acres Elementary 2 4 8 3 9 8

California Pacific Charter School of San Francisco yes 0.08 1.82 0.58 3 4 1 1 1 1

California Virtual Academy @ San Mateo yes 1.00 0.96 2 6 4 6 5 1 4 1 4

Everest Public High yes 0.04 1.16 0.67 8 9 9 4 10 10

Heather Elementary 2 9 10 8 10 10

San Carlos Charter Learning Center yes 0.14 1.54 0.97 1 7 9 5 10 9

Stanford New yes 0.25 2.35 1.01 8 1 2 1 1 4 3 2

Summit Preparatory Charter High yes 0.14 2.92 0.60 9 9 10 8 9 9 10 7 10

Tierra Linda Middle 2 10 10 7 10 10

White Oaks Elementary 1 7 10 3 10 10

Santa Barbara County

Adelante Charter 0.20 2.23 0.89 3 1 4 1 5

Family Partnership Home Study Charter yes 0.82 14.21 0.86 2 6 2 1 6 2

Manzanita Public Charter yes 0.26 3.16 0.85 2 2 8 10 5 7

Olive Grove 4 1 8 10 8 4 1 5 1

Orcutt Academy Charter 4 9 8 3 8 7 10 10

Peabody Charter 0.22 2.34 0.98 2 9 7 9 10

Santa Barbara Charter 2 2 7 8 6

Santa Barbara Charter Middle 2 5 8 2

Santa Ynez Valley Charter yes 2 6 9 8 8 8

Trivium Charter yes 1.92 0.63 1 3 8 1

Santa Clara County

ACE Charter yes 0.18 1.51 0.75 10 5 2 8

Blackford Elementary 4 3 3 3 3 6

Bridges Academy 10 3 2 7 3 1

Bullis Charter yes 0.11 1.79 1.49 2 10 10 6

Capri Elementary 6 7 6 2 8 9

Castlemont Elementary 5 5 6 4 6 8

Charter School of Morgan Hill yes 0.21 3.73 0.83 2 6 9 4 10 7

Cornerstone Academy Preparatory yes 0.31 3.40 0.48 10 10 10 10

Discovery Charter yes 0.32 10.01 0.91 6 9 10 6

Downtown College Prep - Alum Rock yes 1.42 0.51 9 4

Downtown College Preparatory yes 0.40 2.42 0.66 10 4 2 10 3 4 1 2 1

Escuela Popular Accelerated Family Learning yes 0.04 1.18 0.58 8 1 1 6 1 1

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 49

Escuela Popular/Center for Training and Careers, Family yes 0.38 6.52 0.46 3 2 10 1 4

Fammatre Elementary 4 5 9 6 8 9

Farnham Charter 3 4 9 10 9 9

Forest Hill Elementary 6 10 10 8 10 10

Gilroy Prep yes 3.22 0.46 1 10 10 10

Ida Jew Academies 7 3 9 10 7 9

KIPP Heartwood Academy yes 0.82 12.75 0.69 10 10 9 6 9 10

KIPP San Jose Collegiate yes 0.19 13.76 0.94 10 10 10 2 9 10 10 10

Latino College Preparatory Academy 0.40 1.66 0.64 1 1 1 7 1 1 2 5 1

Leadership Public Schools - San Jose yes 0.03 1.32 0.60 10 5 2 1 8 1 6

Lynhaven Elementary 5 4 4 2 4 7

Magnolia Science Academy Santa Clara yes 0.16 0.81 0.77 9 9 4

Marshall Lane Elementary 5 9 10 5 10 10

Monroe Middle 9 4 4 5 6 3

Price Charter Middle 6 5 6 6 8 4

Rocketship Discovery Prep yes -0.02 1.11 0.58 2 5

Rocketship Los Suenos Academy yes 0.10 1.51 0.49 7 9 4 1

Rocketship Mateo Sheedy Elementary yes 0.31 5.65 0.50 9 10 10 9

Rocketship Mosaic Elementary yes 0.00 1.33 0.56 3 7 7 9

Rocketship Si Se Puede Academy yes 0.24 3.75 0.49 10 10 8 4

Rolling Hills Middle 8 10 9 4 10 8

Rosemary Elementary 5 5 8 10 4 9

San Jose Conservation Corps Charter yes 0.72 7.43 0.56 4 6 5

Sartorette Charter 3 7 8 5 8 7

Sherman Oaks Elementary 9 8 8 3 6 9

Silicon Valley Flex Academy yes 1.00 0.61 3 4

Summit Public School: Rainier yes 0.03 1.09 0.47 6 5 7 5

Summit Public School: Tahoma yes 0.03 1.21 0.68 7 6

Sunrise Middle yes 0.79 0.52 10 1 1 1

University Preparatory Academy Charter yes 0.16 3.82 0.65 4 6 8 5 10 10

Village 2 8 10 4 10 10

Voices College-Bound Language Academy yes 0.27 2.78 0.56 9 9 8 9 7 8

Walter L. Bachrodt Elementary 6 2 3 8 5 6

Santa Cruz County

Academic/Vocational Charter Institute 10 9

Alianza Charter 8 1 1 7 1 2

Ceiba College Preparatory Academy yes 0.30 9.16 0.48 10 9 5 4 7 5

Cypress Charter High 3 6 8 8 3

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 50

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Delta Charter 0.57 5.37 1.10 3 8 2

Linscott Charter 5 9 5 1 8 6

Ocean Grove Charter yes 0.31 145.62 0.58 2 3 4 6 9 4 1 2

Pacific Coast Charter 6 2 3 10 7 2

Pacific Collegiate Charter yes 0.81 23.13 0.77 1 10 10 3 10 10 10

SLVUSD Charter 1 2 7 8 9 4

Tierra Pacifica Charter 1.40 2.71 0.84 1 6 9 9 9 9

Watsonville Charter School of the Arts 6 2 4 5 5 6

Shasta County

Academy of Personalized Learning yes 0.14 1.06 0.87 1 5 2 3 5 2 1 1 1

Anderson New Technology High 2 8 9 1 8 8 1 1

Chrysalis Charter yes 0.99 8.92 0.72 1 9 7

Cottonwood Creek Charter 0.11 1.49 0.66 1 9 10 8 7

Monarch Learning Center yes 2 8 9 6 5

North Woods Discovery yes 0.86 7.07 0.84 1 4 3 1 6 2

Redding School of the Arts II yes 0.29 1.71 1.18 2 3 7 6 8 6

Rocky Point Charter yes 0.32 2.79 0.91 2 7 3 6 6

Shasta Secondary Home yes 1.78 12.64 0.69 2 4 8 10 9 4 1 6 2

Stellar Charter 1 7 8 8 3

Stellar Secondary Charter High 1 5 10 8 1 4 4

University Preparatory 1 9 9 8 10 9 10 10 10

Siskiyou County

Golden Eagle Charter yes 0.42 2.64 0.78 1 5 8 10

Solano County

Alternative Cooperative Education Charter 2 8 4 6 7

Dixon Montessori Charter yes 0.13 1.01 1.09 1 4 5 1

Elise P. Buckingham Charter Magnet High 2 8 10 4 10 9 6 5 7

Fairmont Charter Elementary 4 1 5 8 2 2

Mare Island Technology Academy yes 0.92 53.98 0.65 9 3 2 3 6 1

MIT Academy yes 1.06 39.16 0.49 10 1 5 9 3 3 1 1 2

Vallejo Charter 4 5 4 2 7 5

Sonoma County

Abraxis Charter yes 0.30 2.68 0.54 6

Binkley Elementary Charter 6 9 6 5 8 8

Cali Calmecac Language Academy 9 8 4 2 5 4

California Virtual Academy @ Sonoma yes 1.00 1.01 1 4 3 5 6 1 1 1 2

Cinnabar Charter 2 4 9 10 6 6

Credo High yes -0.25 0.51 1.06 1 6 9 1

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 51

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Dunham Charter 1 2 9 10 9 7

Forestville Academy 2 6 5 9 8 6

Gravenstein Elementary 2 8 10 3 9 9

Healdsburg Charter 1 9 7 8

Hillcrest Middle 2 10 10 10 10 8

Insight School of California - North Bay yes 0.16 1.19 1.05 4 1 4 4 1

John B. Riebli Elementary 2 4 6 3 7 7

Kawana Elementary 5 5 2 3 3 4

Kid Street Learning Center Charter yes 0.86 6.62 1.01

Liberty Elementary 2 10 10 3 10 10

Live Oak Charter yes 0.32 1.69 0.89 2 3 4

Mark West Charter yes 0.98 5.09 0.03 7 8 9 10 9 5

Miwok Valley Language Academy Charter 4 3 6 9 5 4

Northwest Prep at Piner-Olivet yes 8 1 1 1 1 3 1

Oak Grove Elementary/Willowside Middle 5 6 8 8 8 7

Old Adobe Elementary Charter 1 8 8 6 8 8

Olivet Charter 2 3 4 4 3 4

Orchard View 2 6 6 8 8 4

Pathways Charter yes 0.18 1.51 0.80 2 3 3 5 5 2 1 1 1

Piner-Olivet Charter yes 0.47 4.20 0.83 7 9 6 5 9 5

Pivot Online Charter - North Bay yes -0.01 1.24 0.24 2

REACH 0.34 7.75 0.63 1 7 3 10 3

Rincon Valley Charter yes 6 9 5 1 9 4

River Montessori Elementary Charter yes 0.60 2.47 0.71 1 5 2

Roseland Charter 0.85 5.85 0.06 10 5 3 6 4 4 8 10 6

Salmon Creek School - A Charter 2 9 9 9 9 7

San Miguel Elementary 5 9 6 4 7 8

Santa Rosa Accelerated Charter 1 7 10

Santa Rosa Charter yes 1.76 17.96 0.84 2 9 8

Santa Rosa Charter School for the Arts 2 4 8

Schaefer Charter 2 4 7 9 6 5

Sebastopol Independent Charter yes 0.52 14.77 0.97 2 6 6 3 9 6

Sonoma Charter yes 0.57 4.00 1.05 2 4 4 1 8 3

Sonoma Mountain Elementary 2 6 6 1 8 7

Spring Creek Matanzas Charter 4 3 7 8 7 7

Sunridge Charter 0.31 1.99 1.08 1 2 9 10 7 4

Twin Hills Charter Middle 2 10 8 4 9 7

Village Charter yes 0.33 1.57 1.03 1 8 10 8 3

Village Elementary Charter 4 10 9 9 9 9

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 52

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Whited Elementary Charter 4 10 8 5 10 10

Woodland Star Charter yes 0.16 1.37 1.15 2 1 5 9 5 2

Wright Charter 7 6 4 5 6 3

Stanislaus County

Aspire Summit Charter Academy yes 0.20 1.63 0.79 7 9 7 2 7 8

Aspire University Charter yes 0.39 2.20 0.85 4 10 10 4 10 10

Aspire Vanguard College Preparatory Academy yes 0.05 1.45 0.85 7 9 8 4

Connecting Waters Charter yes 0.34 438.64 0.68 2 2 3 8 6 2 1 3 1

Denair Academic Avenues 2 9 10 9 9

Denair Charter Academy 4 1 1 8 2 1 1 1 1

eCademy Charter at Crane 5 1 3 1

Gratton Charter 1 10 6 10 10

Grayson Charter 9 9 4 6 3 6

Great Valley Academy yes 0.47 1.89 0.79 2 1 8 10

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter 2 3 6 4 5 1

Hickman Charter yes 1 3 5 6 7 3

Hickman Elementary yes 1 8 6 1 5 8

Hickman Middle yes 3 10 6 4 9 4

Independence Charter 1

Keyes to Learning Charter 2 6 5 7 9 3

La Grange Elementary 1

Oakdale Charter High 2 9

Paradise Charter 6 9 9 8 8

Riverbank Language Academy 8 4 2 3 2 3

Roberts Ferry Charter School Academy 1 5 5 7 1

Shiloh Charter 9 8 8 5 7

Valley Charter High 2 7 7 1

Whitmore Charter High 2 6 7 4 7 3 3 2 6

Whitmore Charter School of Art & Technology 4 9 9 9 8 6

Whitmore Charter School of Personalized Learning 1

Sutter County

California Virtual Academy @ Sutter yes 1.00 1.06 1 2 2 3 2 1 3 1 3

South Sutter Charter yes 0.36 803.16 0.66 4 1 2 6 6 1 1 1 1

Twin Rivers Charter yes 0.64 8.66 0.77 1 9 9 10 10 8

Yuba City Charter yes 0.24 2.31 0.81 3 1 1 4 1 1

Tehama County

Bend Elementary 1 8 3 4 4

Educational Outreach Academy 1 1

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 53

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

eScholar Academy 1 1 1 2 1

Sacramento River Discovery Charter 1.04 11.99 0.73 2 5 4

Tulare County

Bravo Lake High 7

Burton Pathways Charter Academy 8 10

Butterfield Charter High 7 1 6 1 1

Castle Rock Elementary 1 1 2 6 3 5

Central California Connections Academy yes 0.01 1.01 0.80 2 8 2 1 7 1 3 3

Charter Alternatives Academy 7 1 1 1 1

Charter Home School Academy 4 8 7 4 2

Crescent Valley Public Charter yes 0.19 1.15 0.52 3 1 2 1 1

Eleanor Roosevelt Community Learning Center 1.40 46.28 0.81 2 2 2 7

Francis J. White Learning Center 1 2 2 8 3 4

HarmoN Magnet Academy 10 10 9 5 10 9 10 10

La Sierra High 7 2 9

Loma Vista Charter 8

Summit Charter Academy 3 2 2 4 2 1

University Preparatory High yes 1 4 9 9 8 7

Valley Life Charter yes 0.04 1.07 0.73 1 5

Visalia Charter Independent Study 9 7 10 3 1 1 4 3

Visalia Technical Education Center 7 1 1 1 1

Woodlake Community Day 4

Woodlake High 9 1 3 7 5 3

Woodlake Valley Middle 8 2 4 9 4 2

Tuolumne County

California Virtual Academy @ Jamestown yes 1.00 0.98 1 3 1 1 5 1

Connections Visual and Performing Arts Academy 1 10 5 10 7 5 7

Gold Rush Charter yes 0.35 4.05 0.77 1 1 3 10 5 2

Golden Lakes Charter yes 0.21 0.73 0.71 1 2

Ventura County

Architecture, Construction & Engineering Charter HS yes 0.28 2.12 0.62 4 1 1 1 1 1 1

BRIDGES Charter yes 0.23 2.19 0.71 2 4 5 1

Camarillo Academy of Progressive Education yes 1.38 8.03 0.74 2 8 9 3 10 9

Golden Valley Charter yes 0.54 2.78 0.56 1 3 7 6 7 4

Golden Valley Virtual Charter yes 0.38 1.22 0.39 3 1

IvyTech Charter yes 0.06 4.96 0.39 1 1 2 4 1

Meadows Arts and Technology Elementary yes 0.49 3.23 0.69 3 9 10 5

River Oaks Academy yes 0.46 1.80 0.54 1 8 5

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 54USC / School Performance Dashboard / 54

Charter School Scores / Grouped by County

Somis Academy yes 2 4 5 4 1 3 2

University Charter Middle School at CSU Channel Is yes 0.46 2.51 0.55 6 2 6 9 4 2

University Preparation School at CSU Channel Islan yes 0.76 3.58 0.79 4 2 3 2 2 3

Valley Oak Charter yes 1.48 4.09 0.60 1 1 1 4 1

Ventura Charter School of Arts and Global Educatio yes 1.00 13.54 0.74 1 4 7 4

Vista Real Charter High yes 0.54 1.33 0.70 5 1 8

Yolo County

Da Vinci Charter Academy 2 3 8 9 10 8 9 10 9

Sacramento Valley Charter yes 0.62 0.68 7 9 8 9

Science & Technology Academy at Knights Landing 2 8 10 7 5

West Sacramento Early College Prep Charter yes 0.27 3.18 0.54 10 1 1 5 1 1

Woodland Polytechnic Academy yes 0.28 1.10 0.55 6 1

Yuba County

Camptonville Academy yes 0.89 3.97 0.71 2 4 5 3 5 2 5 6

Marysville Charter Academy for the Arts 5 4 8 10 10 5 3 5

Paragon Collegiate Academy yes 0.22 1.43 0.65 1 1 2 1

Wheatland Charter Academy 1 9 10 7 7

Yuba County Career Preparatory Charter 3 1 1 8

Yuba Environmental Science Charter Academy yes 0.34 9.62 0.80 1 5 10 5 2

Colle

ge-R

eadi

ness

Inde

x

Mat

h Pr

oduc

tivity

Inde

x

Curr

icul

um R

igor

Inde

x

Engl

ish/

LA

Prod

uctiv

ity In

dex

High

Sch

ool G

radu

atio

n Ra

te

Adeq

uate

Yea

rly

Prog

ress

Inde

x

Acad

emic

Mom

entu

m In

dex

API S

imila

r Sch

ools

Ran

k

EL R

ecla

ssifi

catio

n In

dex

Dire

ct C

lass

room

In

vest

men

t Ind

ex

Liqu

idity

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Rese

rves

Rat

ios

Inde

x

Is s

choo

l aut

onom

ous?

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 55

Appendices

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 56

The following section describes the measures we used to assess the performance of charter schoolsin California. It explains what data we used and how we calculated values for each of the 12 indices.

Financial Resources and Investment Measures

Reserves Ratios IndexThe Reserves Ratios Index is the ratio of reserve fund balances to total expenditures. This measure of charter school financial stability counts available funds to cover unexpected costs or to compensate if future revenues are less than expected.

Liquidity Ratios IndexThe Liquidity Ratios Index, which measures assets to liabilities, is a measure of a charter school’s financial health. It indicates a school’s ability to meet its liabilities as covered by its assets. A school with a high liquidity ratio is better able to raise additional capital, either through selling off or borrowing against its assets.

Direct Classroom Investment IndexThe Direct Classroom Investment Index is the ratio of classroom investment to total revenues. Class-room investments include such expenditures as teacher salaries and benefits, textbooks, educational software and curriculum.

School Performance Measures

English Learner Reclassification IndexThe English Learner Reclassification Index represents the frequency with which a school transitions students from English Learner (EL) to fluent-English-proficient (FEP).

API Similar Schools RankA school’s API Similar Schools Rank compares its API to the APIs of 100 other schools of the same type that have similar opportunities and challenges.

Adequate Yearly Progress IndexAdequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Index rankings include whether schools met AYP goals in math and English/language arts and the percentage of students rated as proficient or above in these subject areas.

Academic Momentum IndexThe Academic Momentum Index combines three measures of academic progress: annual change in the percentage of students proficient in math; annual change in the percentage of students proficient in English/language arts; and annual API growth. It measures changes in a school’s student achievement over time.

Appendix A / Definitions of Indicators

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 57

Academic Productivity Measures

English/Language Arts Productivity IndexThe English/Language Arts Productivity Index measures academic achievement on standardized tests of English/language arts as compared to non-charter schools within the same district and districts with similar per-pupil spending.

Math Productivity IndexThe Math Productivity Index measures how well a charter school performs on math standardized tests compared to non-charter schools within the same district and districts with similar per-pupil spending.

High School Performance Measures

Curriculum Rigor Index The Curriculum Rigor Index ranks schools on the extent to which students in the school take higher-level math and science courses, in schools that offer grades 10 and 11.

High School Graduation Rate High School Graduation Rate measures the percentage of ninth graders in 2009 who successfully graduated from high school in 2012 or earlier, in schools that offer grades 9 through 12 (students are tracked across the four years).

College-Readiness Rate The College-Readiness Rate is the proportion of students who score basic or above on state tests in English Language Arts (11th grade), and higher-level math and science courses, in schools that offer grades 10 and 11.

Snapshot

The Snapshot compares California charter and non-charter public schools across a variety of metrics, including school size, the number of computers available per student, the student-teacher ratio, percentage of English learners and Free or Reduced Price Meal recipients, average parental educational attainment, and both student and staff ethnicity.

Appendix A / Definitions of Indicators

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 58

Composition of Reserves Ratios Index

SITE: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/fd/

DATA SOURCES:

> Charter School Alternative Form Unaudited Actual Data Sets: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12

> SACS Unaudited Actual Data: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12

Appendix B / Composition of Indicators

Composition of Liquidity Ratios Index

SITE: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/fd/

DATA ELEMENTS:

> Liquidity ratio (Assets/liabilities)

DATA SOURCES:

> Charter School Alternative Form Unaudited Actual Data Sets: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12

> SACS Unaudited Actual Data: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12

Composition of Direct Classroom Investment Index

SITE: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/fd/

DATA ELEMENTS:

> Teachers’ salaries> Certified pupil support salaries> Instructional aides’ salaries> Non-certified support salaries> Approved textbooks and core curriculum materials> Books and other reference materials> Materials and supplies> Tuition to other schools> State teachers’ retirement system> Public employees’ retirement system> OASDI/Medicare/Alternative> Health and welfare benefits> Unemployment insurance> Workers’ compensation insurance> Retiree benefits> PERS reduction (for revenue limit funded schools)

> Other employee benefits

DATA SOURCES:

> Charter School Alternative Form Unaudited Actual Data Sets: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12

> SACS Unaudited Actual Data: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12

Financial Resources and Investment Measures

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 59

Composition of English Learner Reclassification Index

SITE:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/apidatafiles.asp

DATA ELEMENTS

> Percent of students redesignated fully English proficient > DataQuest search: 2011-12

DATA SOURCES

> API Growth 2012: p_rfep

Composition of API Similar Schools Rank

SITES:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/apidatafiles.asp

DATA ELEMENTS:

> API similar schools rank > API base score

DATA SOURCES:

> API - Data File (DBF): 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012

Appendix B / Composition of Indicators

School Performance Measures

Composition of Adequate Yearly Progress Index

SITE: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/aypdatafiles.asp

DATA ELEMENTS:

> Met overall AYP for English/Language Arts (yes or no)> AYP English/Language Arts Achievement (percent proficient or above)> Met overall AYP for math (yes or no)> AYP Math Achievement (percent proficient or above)

DATA SOURCES:

> AYP - Data File (DBF): 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012

Composition of Academic Momentum Index

SITES:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/ http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/apidatafiles.asp

DATA ELEMENTS:

> English/Language Arts Performance> Math Performance> API Growth (percent proficient or above)

DATA SOURCES:

> SARC: 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12

> Growth API - Data File (DBF): 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 60

Composition of English/Language Arts Productivity Index

SITES:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/aypdatafiles.asp http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/

DATA ELEMENTS:

> Percent proficient in English/language arts> Expenditures per ADA

DATA SOURCES:

> AYP - Data File (DBF): 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012

> Current Cost of Education: 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12

Appendix B / Composition of Indicators

Academic Productivity Measures

Composition of Math Productivity Index

SITES:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/aypdatafiles.asp http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/ec/

DATA ELEMENTS

> Percent proficient in math> Expenditures per ADA

DATA SOURCES:

> AYP – Data File (DBF): 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009

> Current Cost of Education: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 61

Composition of Curriculum Rigor Index

SITE:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/apidatafiles.asp

DATA ELEMENTS

> Enrollments in the following courses: Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, Honors/AP math, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics.

DATA SOURCES:

> API Growth 2012

Composition of High School Graduation Rate

SITE:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/sd/filesgrad.asp

DATA ELEMENTS:

> Percentage in the 2009 cohort who graduated in 2012.

DATA SOURCES:

> API Growth 2012

Appendix B / Composition of Indicators

High School Performance Indicators

Composition of College-Readiness Rate

SITE:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/apidatafiles.asp

DATA ELEMENTS

> Basic or Above in the following courses: English Language Arts (Grade 11), Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, Honors/AP math, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics.

DATA SOURCES:

> API Growth 2012

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 62

Snapshot Composition

SITES:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/si/ds/pubschls.asphttp://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/apidatafiles.asphttp://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/AltPage2.asp?cSubject=LChttp://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/sd/filescbedsopusb.asphttp://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/content.asphttp://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/AltPage2.asp?cSubject=Coursehttp://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/downloads/sifenr.asp

DATA ELEMENTS

> Students per computer> School type> Certificated staff ethnicity> Student ethnicity and gender> Students on free or reduced price meals> English learners> Parent education

DATA SOURCES:

> Public school database > Dataquest Search: Course Enrollment, English Learners, Public Schools, Total Enrollment> Growth Academic Performance Index (API)

Appendix B / Composition of Indicators

Snapshot (Charter vs. Non-Charter) Indicators

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 63

Academic Performance Index (API)The API measures the academic performance and growth of public schools in California based on a variety of tests and establishes a statewide ranking of schools according to those scores. Most schools have an API, an overall state ranking, a ranking in comparison to 100 similar schools, and growth tar-gets for the following year.

Further information can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/

Accountability Progress Report (APR)The APR provides information on state API results, federal AYP results and federal program improve-ment information.

Further information can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ar/index.asp

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)A goal of the 2001 federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is to require schools and districts to measure and report students’ annual progress toward proficiency in English/language arts and mathematics. Progress is based on whether the school or district has met its Annual Measurable Objectives, dem-onstrated 95 percent participation on standardized tests, achieved its target on the API and, for high schools, met target graduation rates.

Further information can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/

Charter School Alternative Form DataCalifornia Education Code began requiring charter school financial reporting during fiscal year 2003-2004. Charter schools can choose to use the Charter School Alternative Form. Charter schools that do not report in the Standardized Account Code Structure format must use the Alternative Form.

Further information can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/sf/fr/csalternative.asp

DataQuestDataQuest is a database developed and maintained by the Department of Education that provides reports about California’s schools and school districts. It contains a variety of information, including school performance indicators; student and staff demographics; expulsion, suspension, and truancy data; and a variety of test results.

Further information can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/dataquest.asp

School Accountability Report Card (SARC)California state law requires all public schools receiving state funding to prepare a SARC. The SARC is intended to provide the public with important information about individual public schools, includ-ing school mission and progress towards goals; academic and demographic data; school safety and climate for learning; teacher and staff information; and fiscal and expenditure data.

Further information can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/

Appendix C / Primary Data Sources

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 64

Standardized Account Code Structure (SACS)The SACS is a uniform and comprehensive chart of accounts for classifying the financial activities of California local school districts and county offices of education. Phase-in began in 1997-1998; by 2003-2004, all local educational agencies (LEAs) reported in SACS.

Further information can be found at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/fd/

Appendix C / Primary Data Sources

Credits

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 66

We are deeply grateful to the foundations, charter school partners and individuals who have supported the development of USC School Performance Dashboard 2013 and Dashboard Interactive:

The Ahmanson Foundation, Los Angeles

The John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation, Los AngelesLeon Lowenstein Foundation Inc., New York • Ralph M. Parsons Foundation, Los Angeles

Skirball Foundation, New York • Weingart Foundation, Los Angeles • William E. B. Siart, Los Angeles

The USC School Performance Dashboard Research Team

Priscilla Wohlstetter, Ph.D.; Dennis Hocevar, Ph.D.; Beatrice Fuchs, MPP; Paul Chung, MPP candidate; Joanna Smith, Ph.D.; Guilbert C. Hentschke, Ph.D.

Editor: Elaine Beebe

Founding researchers: Richard S. Brown, Ph.D.; Guilbert C. Hentschke, Ph.D.;Sunny Liu, Ph.D.; Priscilla Wohlstetter, Ph.D.

Credits / Support

USC / School Performance Dashboard / 67

The Center on Educational Governance (CEG), located at the University of Southern California, focuses on the linkages between policy, governance, and the improvement of urban schools and the systems within which they operate. Founded by Priscilla Wohlstetter, CEG researchers use an interdisciplinary approach to study current policy solutions to the educational issues posed by di-verse urban communities– locally, nationally and globally. The main activities of the center are: (1) engaging in rigorous quantitative and qualitative research studies of policy problems; (2) building a knowledge base to provide researchers, educators, parents and policymakers with new tools and strategies for improvement; and (3) working in partnership with educators and policymakers to use research to improve policy and practice.

In addition to the USC School Performance Dashboard, the Center on Educational Governance has developed and produced other products and services for the field -- stakeholder satisfaction surveys for parents, students and staff; “how-to” guidebooks on charter school partnerships, family engagement, and the scale-up of charter management organizations. More broadly, CEG engages in research examining the quality, accountability and sustainability of public schools. Fo-cus areas include school and district governance, public-private partnerships, assessment policy, leadership/entrepreneurship, teacher labor markets and teacher policy, improving the quality of school systems, increasing accountability, and scaling-up innovations between traditional public and charter schools. CEG’s most recent book is Choices & Challenges: Charter School Perfor-mance in Perspective, authored by Priscilla Wohlstetter, Joanna Smith and Caitlin Farrell (Harvard Education Press, 2013).

For more information about CEG research, products and services, and staff, please consult the Center on Educational Governance Web site: http://www.uscrossier.org/ceg/

Center on Educational GovernanceRossier School of Education

University of Southern California3470 Trousdale Parkway

WPH 901Los Angeles, CA 90089-4039

Credits / About the Center on Educational Governance

Copyright ©2013 Center on Educational Governance, Rossier School of Education,

University of Southern California.All rights reserved.