a rapid ambulance protocol for acute stroke prof gary ford freeman hospital stroke service newcastle...
TRANSCRIPT
A Rapid Ambulance Protocol for Acute Stroke
Prof Gary Ford
Freeman Hospital Stroke Service
Newcastle Upon Tyne
Assessment of Suspected Acute Stroke by Stroke Teams
• Accurate early diagnosis and initiation treatment non-stroke present in 20% suspected acute stroke
- Subdural haematoma, epilepsy, cerebral tumour• Initiation early rehabilitation• Early interventions – thrombolysis, aspirin• Improved early management
stroke - carotid dissection, cerebral venous thrombosis, ic haemorrhage,
diagnosis TIA complications – dysphagia, DVT, fluids, BP
Advances in Stroke Care
• Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in selected patients with acute ischaemic stroke within first 3 hours
• Aspirin in patients with cerebral infarction within first 48 hours
• Benefits of organised Acute Stroke Unit care • Increasing evidence of the benefits of interventions to
correct disturbed physiology (hypoxia, dehydration, fever, hyperglycaemia) early stages of stroke
• Possible extension thrombolysis time window and use neuroprotective agents within 5 hours
NINDS rt-PA STROKE TRIAL:RESULTS - PART 23-Month Outcome on Four Stroke Scales
NIHSSrt-PAPlacebo
Barthel Indexrt-PAPlacebo
Modified Rankinrt-PAPlacebo
Glasgow Outcomert-PAPlacebo
31 30 22 17
20 32 27 21
50 16 17 17
38 23 19 21
39 21 23 17
26 25 27 21
44 17 22 17
32 22 26 21
% of patients
% of patients
% of patients
% of patients
Minimal/No Disability Moderate Disability Severe Disability Death
Aspirin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke
IST / CASTLancet 1997
Requirements for Early Assessment of Stroke Patients
• Awareness of signs/symptoms of stroke in community
• Rapid Admission to Hospital
• Rapid Assessment at Hospital
• Imaging when required
• Skills to administer interventions
STROKE SYMPTOMS
999 Primary Care Physician
Paramedic AmbulanceAssessment Transport
A&E
Medical/Neurology Stroke UnitWards
Reynolds et al, 1999
Delays in Presentation
• Stroke admissions in Oxford 6 month period• Prospective data collection 183 patients• Uncertain onset time 55% (waking 28%)• 55% arrived within 3 hr, 76% within 6 hr• 24/86 GP cases initially managed at home• Symptom recognition to admission within 3 hr
GP 31% Ambulance 90%• Admission to assessment - 69 min
Wester et al,1999
Delays in Admission
• 15 Swedish Hospitals• 329 patients stroke/TIA• Hospital admission 4.8/4.0 hr• Factors associated with delayed admission
infarct, gradual onset, mild symptoms, not using ambulance, visiting GP
• Factors associated with delayed CT/Stroke unit admissionlarge catchment area, mild/moderate deficitwaiting for ER physician
Acute Stroke
General Practitioner 999
Accident &Emergency Dept
Acute Stroke Unit General Medical WardsFreeman Hospital RVI
Freeman Hospital Stroke Service
• Established Apr 1993• First comprehensive stroke service UK• Accepts all suspected acute stroke patients• 10 acute stroke beds within General Medical Ward• 10-14 Stroke rehabilitation beds non-acute hospital• Multi disciplinary team both units• Initially only GP referrals
Freeman Hospital Stroke Service• 1993 Stroke Discharge Team• 1994 Commenced hyper-acute assessment
stroke trials• 1994 Multidisciplinary stroke review clinics• 1997 Establishment cross city stroke rehabilitation
ward (20 beds)• 1997 Rapid Ambulance Protocol• 1998 IV thrombolysis protocol
Second stroke consultant• 1999 14 bed Acute Stroke Unit• 2000 City wide triage of stroke to unit
30 bed Acute Stroke UnitThird Stroke consultant appointed
Acute Stroke
999 General Practitioner
Rapid Ambulance A & E DeptProtocol
Acute Stroke Unit General Medical WardsFreeman Hospital RVI
Rapid Ambulance ProtocolAcute Stroke Symptoms
Ambulance Control
Paramedical team
Paramedical Assessment
Suspected Stroke Non-stroke
Stroke Unit A & E Dept
radio control
notify unit
Rapid Ambulance Protocol
• All 999 patient with suspected stroke not in coma GCS >6 to be taken to FRH Emergency Admission Suite
• EAS to be informed of pre-arrival information
• FAST assessment to be used to identify and assess suspected stroke cases
Rapid Ambulance Protocol
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Apr Oct Apr Oct Apr
Directive City wide Letter to Letter to Training East End Crews Protocol Crews Crews Programme
MonthlyAmbulanceStroke UnitAdmissions
Rapid Ambulance ProtocolMay 97 -Jul 98
123 Patients
102 Confirmed acute stroke/TIA
21 Non-stroke5 acute confusional state5 collapse secondary to vascular instability3 fall/old CVA3 cerebral neoplasm3 collapse secondary to other cause1 seizure1 normal pressure hydrocephalus
Rapid Ambulance Protocol Symptom onset to admission
Median (range)
GP referrals (n=108) 6.0 (0.5-23.5) hrRapid Ambulance Protocol 1.2 (0.5-18.7) hr
Symptom onset to contact emergency service 33 minContact to arrival paramedical team 8 min Arrival at home to arrival stroke unit 22 min
Purpose Paramedic Stroke Instrument
• Identification stroke - direct to Stroke Unit
- rapid transfer- obtain relevant information
at scene - administer neuroprotective therapies
• Identification non-stroke
• Increase profile stroke
Kothari et al, 1997
Cincinnatti Instrument
• 74 patients treated in thrombolysis trial and 225 non-stroke patients evaluated in ER
• NIHSS all patients• Facial palsy, motor arm and dysarthria
identified 100% stroke patients (specificity 92%)
• Out-of Hospital scale facial palsy, arm weakness, language disturbance
Kothari et al, 1995
Cinicinnati EMS experience
• 4413 evaluations• Paramedic diagnosis Stroke/TIA 96 2%• Confirmed in 62/86 72%
22 paramedic interventions• Mean time to scene 3 min after 911 call• Earlier arrival with basic units compared to
paramedics (40 vs 45 min)• Physician assessment (10 vs 20 min) and
CT (47 vs 69 min) earlier with paramedics
Kidwell et al, 1998
Los Angeles Instrument
• Exclude age<45 yrs, seizure, symptoms >24 hr, patient wheelchair bound or bedridden
• Arm strength, facial smile, grip• Evaluated in patients entered 6 hr intervention
trials• 41 ischaemic stroke by ambulance• 93% ‘would’ have been identified
San Francisco Instrument
• 4 items
• Language - 3 step command, name objects, speech fluency
• Motor - Smile, pronator drift, lift each leg
• Visual fields - confrontation testing
• Gait
Smith et al, 1998
San Francisco experience
• Retrospective review stroke admissions and paramedic evaluations
• Paramedics identified 49/81patients
• 15 patients identified by paramedics non-stroke
• Patients/families waited 2.5hr before calling 911
FAST assessment
Face Arm Speech Test
Facial Palsy
affected side
Arm Weakness
affected side
Speech Impairment
FAST Assessment
Paramedic Training Package
• Lecture notes
• Handout
• Overheads / slides
• Video
• MCQ test
Paramedic knowledge
• MCQ assessment before/following training package 57 ambulance staff
• Score 14.0 before 16.8 following
• Errors GCS scoring affected sideCerebral haemorrhage
commonest cause Headache present >80% patients Depressed conscious level most patients
Identification non-stroke
• Male 75 yrs admitted with suspected stroke via General Practitioner, symptoms dizziness
• Ambulance personnel undertake FAST assessment - negative
• Examine patient - bradycardic
• Complete Heart block - pacemaker insertion
Acute Stroke
999 A&E Dept General PractitionerNGH (Hospital Direct)
Rapid Ambulance Protocol
Acute Stroke Unit Medical WardsFRH - - - - - - - (single Trust) - - - - - - - - RVI
Rapid Ambulance Protocol
02468
1012141618202224262830323436
Apr Oct Apr Oct Apr Oct Apr
Directive City wide Letters to Training A&EEast End Crews Protocol Crews Programme Reconfig
MonthlyAmbulanceStroke UnitAdmissions
Rapid Ambulance Protocol
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
May-97
Jul-97
Sep-97
Nov-97
Jan-98
Mar-98
May-98
Jul-98
Sep-98
Nov-98
Jan-99
Mar-99
May-99
Jul-99
Sep-99
Nov-99
Jan-00
Mar-00
May-00
Nu
mb
er
of
Ad
mis
sio
ns
Stroke
Non stroke
Diagnostic Accuracy Stroke Referrals1 Feb 00 – 31 May 00
GP A&E Paramedic Total
Stroke/TIA 89 45 95 229
Non-stroke 34 12 24 70 Proportion of referrals 28% 21% 20%
Paramedic Stroke Detection
1 Feb – 31 May 2000
129 stroke patients initial contact 999
97 admitted directly via RAP
75% detection
80% accuracy
Stroke Referrals - subtypes Paramedic GP
(n=84) (n=73)
TACS 37% 10% p<0.001
PACS 37% 34% n.s.
LACS 14% 33% p<0.01
POCS 2% 14% p<0.01
PICH 10% 10% n.s.
4 month period (Feb-May 00)
Hospital Assessment
• Emergency Room staff
• Acute medical team
• On call Acute Stroke Team nurse / stroke doctor
SWAT Team
• Stroke Watch Action Team
• St Luke’s Hospital, Kansas City
• SWAT beeper
• Nurses trained to identify stroke and summon doctor
Links with Accident & Emergency
• A&E doctors used to acting quickly
• Clear protocol - who requests imaging?
• Need for stroke recognition instrument
• Support of stroke team
• Admission to Stroke unit vs A&E
Freeman Stroke Service
• Admission suite staff notify stroke nurse• Collect data from paramedics• Stroke nurse undertakes initial evaluation (SNSS/NIH) takes
bloods, speaks to/contact relatives• Contacts stroke doctor further neurological evaluation • If non-stroke direct further management in discussion with
stroke consultant• Urgent CT requested if required• Thrombolysis/neuroprotectant trials initiated in Admission
unit
Freeman Thrombolysis Experience
• 17 patients treated in 2 years (2% referrals)
• 15 admitted via 999 contact
• Main contraindications, delayed admission and co-morbidities
• Outcomes similar to NINDS trials
• 1 symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage as complication
Establishing an Ambulance Protocol
• Go the top• Establish agreement colleagues across district• Incorporate stroke instrument in patient report form• Protocol must be unambiguous and simple• Initiate audit and involve ambulance staff• Regular feedback to crews on the ground• Change takes time
Acute Stroke Patient Flow
Suspected Acute Stroke Community education
Emergency Services Primary Care Physician
Paramedic Paramedical assessment Professional Education
Training
Acute Stroke Unit Emergency Room
Organised rehabilitation Health Care Purchasers