a proposal for a rwanda potato sector development …pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnacx573.pdfa proposal...
TRANSCRIPT
A Proposal for a Rwanda Potato Sector Development Program Agricultural Policy Development Project Research Report No. 17 August 2002 Prepared for United States Agency for International Development/Rwanda B.P. 2848 Kigali, Rwanda Prepared by Charles Crissman International Potato Center
Cambridge, MA Lexington, MA Hadley, MA Bethesda, MD Washington, DC Chicago, IL Cairo, Egypt Johannesburg, South Africa
Abt Associates Inc. Suite 600 4800 Montgomery Lane Bethesda, MD 20814-5341
Title A Proposal for a Rwanda Potato Sector Development Program Author(s) Charles Crissman Date August 2002 Contract Number PCE-I-00-99-00033-00 Task Number 800 Cognizant Technical Officer Andy Karas Strategic Objective: Strategic Objective #2: Increased Ability of Rural Families in Targeted Communities to Improve Household Food Security Contractor Abt Associates Inc. 4800 Montgomery Avenue Hampden Square, Suite 600 Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: (301) 913-0500 Fax: (301) 652-3618 This report was made possible through support provided by the Office of Economic Growth, Agriculture and Trade, Global Bureau, U.S. Agency for International Development, under the terms of Contract No. PCE-I-00-99-00033-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development.
A Proposal for a Rwanda Potato Sector Development Program
Prepared by Charles C. Crissman for the Government of Rwanda
August 2002
Organized by Abt Associates Inc., with financing from the US Agency for International Development, and the Africa Office of the International Potato Center. Charles Crissman is an economist and Regional Representative for the International Potato Center, Sub-Saharan Africa Region, Nairobi, Kenya. The Potato Sector Committee of MINAGRI invited Dr. Crissman to prepare this action plan.
Abt Associates Inc. i
Contents
Preface...............................................................................................................................ii Acronyms and Abbreviations ..............................................................................................iii Introduction........................................................................................................................1 Agriculture Value Chains ....................................................................................................1
Six Characteristics of Value Chains ............................................................................2 The Rwandan potato value chain ................................................................................2
The Potato Sector Development Program..............................................................................3 Impact of the action plan............................................................................................4 Sub-program 1: Stimulate the organization of the potato value chain ............................5 Sub-program 2: Improve the varieties and seed offered to potato farmers ......................6 Sub-program 3: Farmer training and support ...............................................................7 Sub-program 4: Transport, markets and processing......................................................8
References........................................................................................................................10
Figure...............................................................................................................................11 Appendix A: Details of sub-program activities ....................................................................12 Appendix B: Workshop participants ...................................................................................22
Appendix C: Budgetary details ...........................................................................................25
ii Abt Associates Inc.
Preface
The Government of Rwanda is developing policy for rapid agricultural growth within the context of its Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (Government of Rwanda, 2002). The Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Resources and Forestry (MINAGRI) identified potato as one of the priority crops to lead the intensification and transformation of the agriculture sector (GoR, 2000). Policies of the government must attend to priority needs identified by the government and validated by stakeholders. The Agricultural Policy Development Project (APD) in MINAGRI assists the Minister and other ministry leaders by facilitating information gathering, analysis and discussion. This document provides specific suggestions for a five-year plan to support the rapid development of the potato sector in Rwanda. The APD project sponsored a series of events that led to the presentation of this document. First, Dr. Frans Goossens was contracted to study the Rwandan potato sector with special emphasis on the seed potato, potato marketing and the potential for export of ware and consumer potatoes in the regional market (Goossens, 2002). Second, a public workshop attended by 45 potato sector stakeholders was held in November 2001 to discuss his findings. Third, in a series of meetings, the MINAGRI Potato Sector Committee discussed the findings, approved the Goossens study, and requested that the International Potato Center assist in the development of a potato sector development program to convert the recommendations of the Goossens report to concrete proposals for activities. Fourth, a public hearing attended by 25 public and private sector stakeholders on August 6 deliberated the recommendations of the Goossens report. The author combined the information from the Goossens report and the comments from the stakeholders to propose a set of activities that could constitute a potato program for the country. During the following days, the activity plan was discussed with numerous individuals. In particular, it was vetted at a meeting attended by 16 potato sector leaders of Ruhengeri and Gisenyi Provinces in Ruhengeri Town on August 8. Fifth, the contents of this paper were presented and discussed during a public hearing in Kigali on August 14. 1 Once the government endorses the potato sector development program, the next steps are for the relevant public and private sector actors to prepare specific proposals to fund specific portions of the program and present these to the government or interested donors. This document was prepared with numerous and broad-ranging consultations with groups and individuals. This document purports to convey the shared opinions of those many voices.
1 A list of participants in the hearings is available from the office of the Secretary General of MINAGRI.
Abt Associates Inc. iii
Acronyms and Abbreviations
APD Agricultural Policy Development ASARECA Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa BAIR Bureau d'Appui aux Initiatives Rurales (Office to Support Rural Initiatives) COODAF Coopérative de Développement Agricole, Elevage, Foresterie, Epargne et Crédit au
Rwanda (Cooperative for the Development of Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry, Savings and Credit in Rwanda)
FOR Forum des Organisations Rurales (Forum of Rural Organisations) GoR Government of the Republic of Rwanda Ha hectares IMBARAGA "Force" in Kinyarwanda (Co-operative of farmers and livestock rearers) ISAR Institut des Sciences Agronomiques du Rwanda MINARGI Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Resources and Forestry MT metric tons PDMAR Agriculture and Rural Market Development Project SISA Système d'information sur la Sécurité Alimentaire SNS Service National Semencier (National Seed Service)
iv Abt Associates Inc.
Abt Associates Inc. 1
Introduction
The Poverty Reduction Strategy Plan of the Government of Rwanda identifies rural development and agricultural transformation as its number one priority. MINAGRI classifies potato as a priority crop for development and one that can serve as an example to the rest of the agriculture sector of how rapid transformation can take place (Government of Rwanda, 2000). With 57,000 ha under cultivation, the potato sector is a large and dynamic segment of agriculture. Hundreds of thousands of Rwandan farmers across the country are engaged in commercial and subsistence cultivation. Rural and urban-dwelling Rwandans like to eat potatoes and, as a result, the per capita consumption of potatoes is among the highest in the world (Nyarwaya et. al., 2002). Given population growth rates, urbanization rates, and consumption preferences, demand for potatoes in Rwanda is expected to increase by 200-250 percent by the year 2020 (Mellor, 2002). Favorable ecological conditions concentrate production in the two northwest provinces, Ruhengeri and Gisenyi, but many potatoes are grown on poor acid soils. Consequently, the national average yield is one of the lowest in the world at 7MT/ha. The problems and opportunities of the potato sector are well described in various reports. Goossens (2002) synthesizes many earlier reports and offers a series of recommendations regarding potato inputs, production, transport, marketing, and the potential for processing and export. The agriculture value chain provides a logical framework to convert these recommendations to an action plan for the potato sector. A suggested example of the Rwanda potato sector value chain is given in the figure at the end of this document.
Agriculture Value Chains
The agriculture value chain or filière (Raikes, Jensen, and Ponte, 2000) consists of three parts: the groups of actors, the linkages among the actors and the support environment. As illustrated in the figure, the actors are grouped by logical stages in the chain. The downward arrows illustrate a hypothetical product flow from the input suppliers to the final consumers. The farm input suppliers provide such things as varieties, seed, fertilizer and agrochemicals. Farmers obtain what they need from them and produce the crop. Depending on their particular production zone, the farmers may store all or part of their harvest, sell it immediately to transporters, or sell directly to local consumers. The transporters provide the connection between the producers and markets outside of the production zones. Markets are the connection between supply and demand. Wholesalers and retailers add value to potatoes by making them easily available to consumers in the place, time and amounts they wish to buy. Though there are no processors in Rwanda at the present time, they can convert the potato into a variety of products such as starch, chips or crisps. The upward arrows illustrate the flow of Rwandan francs back along the chain. Variations of this standard chain may result in linkages that skip actors. For example, some farmers may directly sell their crop to their neighbors as final consumers. Outside the chain are the set of physical and institutional elements in which the value chain operates. These elements include policies of the government such as credit, communication, rural infrastructure, private sector investors, the legal environment, market information and agriculture
2 Abt Associates Inc.
research. Both the government and private sectors provide important actors and influence the environment for the potato value chain. Six Characteristics of Value Chains
The first characteristic of value chains is value creation. Each group of actors adds value to the final product that reaches consumers. Farmers combine their farm and purchased inputs to grow potatoes. Transporters move those potatoes from the producers to the market. Wholesale marketers distribute the potatoes to retailers. Retailers make the potatoes available to consumers. This sequence is the second characteristic of the value chain as characterized by arrows indicating the product flow. The financial flow also illustrated in the figure is the third characteristic. The fourth characteristic is the flow of information. The value chain transmits many kinds of information. The most obvious kind is price but information about preferences of variety, quality and preferred delivery times are also examples of information flow. Value chains form in response to a drive to become more efficient, control costs, reduce risk and respond to consumer demands (Boelhje, Hoffing, and Schroder, 1999). In developing countries, potato value chains typically remain loosely aligned until a dominant actor demands a consistent product delivered in a consistent manner. This is often a potato chip or crisp processor. For technical and cost reasons, a processor demands potatoes of the same variety with consistent quality characteristics delivered in a pre-arranged schedule. Once formed, the value chain can also provide incentives to the groups of actors to participate in the chain. Examples of these incentives include market access, production contracts and access to credit or technical information. The final characteristic is governance. In many instances, the value chain is self-governing. Mutual self-interest can often be sufficient to promote cooperation and collaboration. In some cases, a single actor or group of actors can impose a structure on the value chain. An example comes from the international coffee value chain. Starbucks Coffee, an international retailer with stores in Europe, Asia and North America, controls a value chain for a line of organic coffee that it brews and sells in its retail outlets. Starbucks, the retailer, through contracts and other conditions, governs the inputs, production, and transport and processing of the coffee it purchases. In potatoes, the processor is often the first actor to emerge in a governance role. Notably, important parts of the potato value chain remain loosely organized while a sub-sector begins to organize for a specific market. The Rwandan potato value chain
A basic characteristic of the Rwandan potato sector is its lack of organization and low level of productivity. The individual elements suffer from inefficiencies and are poorly connected. The paragraph below offers a selection of examples of problems for each of the individual groups of actors. Among the input suppliers, there are inappropriate varieties, very limited supply of good quality seed, limited access to fertilizer, and poor distribution of all of these items into the rural areas. As mentioned above, potato yields are among the world’s lowest. Potato farmers manage crop harvest inadequately, resulting in high perishability. Transport from the farm to the road network is difficult and once on the road, the very small average offer by an individual makes purchase by traders inefficient. Traders generally operate small to medium-size trucks that increase the costs of delivery. Several of the wholesale markets are characterized by their limited price competition and most have
Abt Associates Inc. 3
inadequate facilities. As a result, the consumer is offered just an average quality potato when there are several niche markets that could be exploited to return higher profits. There are several initiatives for developing large-scale processing but none are yet financed. Market price and quantity information is partial and sporadic. In general, knowledge of market opportunities is incomplete. Despite their co-dependency, the groups of actors typically do not know each other and have never cooperatively worked together for the advancement of the sector.
The Potato Sector Development Program
The program consists of four sub-programs. First, is a sub-program to strengthen the potato value chain. The second sub-program is a set of activities to improve the offer of potato varieties and seed to farmers. The third sub-program focuses on the farmer. The fourth and final program improves the performance of the potato markets. The sub-programs are presented in summary form below. More complete details of the set of recommended sub-program activities are given in the appendix. To maximize the potential for poverty reduction, the overall focus of the program is to solve the problems of farmers. Farmers constitute the largest group of actors in the potato value chain and are the poorest. To maximize the potential for sustainable impact, the program also emphasizes training for agriculture professionals that work with the potato sector and for local technicians and farmers. The sub-program activities can all be started quickly and can produce quick results. None of the suggested sub-program activities are excessively complex nor do they require large capital investments. The combination of these factors assure a high probability of success. The activities promote the delivery and use of input-based technologies such as varieties, fertilizer and seed and knowledge-based technologies such as crop management, integrated pest management, harvesting and marketing practices. Potatoes respond extraordinarily well to improved inputs. In optimal conditions, potato yields can exceed 40MT/ha, more than five times the national average in Rwanda. However, potato production requires sophisticated management. Good management combined with good inputs are essential to achieving significant yield improvements. Average yields can reach 14 MT/ha upon the completion of this program. The suggested five-year program is below. All activities would start immediately upon approval and financing and should produce final results within five years. This is a sector-based program. It is not a comprehensive, economic development plan nor a broad agriculture sector program. As such, certain topics that may impact on the progress of the potato sector are not treated. They may be important and several are noted but not addressed. A common theme in many of the suggested programs is training. Training for farmers and other participants in the value chain is highlighted as well as training for government professionals that serve in agencies that provide support to the potato value chain. An important supposition is that these agencies can effectively implement their assigned tasks. Clearly, some departments are more capable than others. This action plan assumes that other programs of the government strengthen and improve the performance of all government departments and agencies. This is a plan to develop the national potato sector. Stakeholders that may participate in the implementation of this plan come from a wide range of domestic, public and private agencies and institutions. There is also a broad range of regional and international stakeholders interested in and
4 Abt Associates Inc.
possibly willing to support the successful implementation of this plan. The Government of Rwanda participates in or is a member of many such organizations through representation by relevant agencies. For example ISAR is a member of ASARECA, the regional grouping of agricultural research and extension agencies. As a member, ISAR and the potato sector can participate in programs of ASARECA that can support research and technology transfer. The International Potato Center, a Future Harvest Center of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research, through its mandate is also concerned with the successful implementation of this action plan. This action plan recruits support from both domestic and international collaborators. The goal of this action plan is to stimulate an annual production growth rate of about 15percent from the potato sector during the five-year planning period (Goossens 2002, Mellor 2002). Most of the growth will come from increasing yields; little should come from increasing area. This growth rate is extraordinarily high and reaching it depends on several key suppositions. Most important is the timely implementation of programs whose goal is to supply steadily increasing amounts of inorganic fertilizer to potato farmers. A significant start on the improvement of rural infrastructure, particularly farm-to-market roads, is also an important assumption. Continuation of peaceful conditions in the countryside and normal weather are additional preconditions to the success of this action plan. The action plan promotes export of ware and seed potatoes. A final assumption is that these export markets remain open to potatoes from Rwanda. Impact of the action plan
Among the major food and industrial crops in Rwanda, potato requires the largest labor input. In Rwanda a hectare of potatoes requires an estimated 120 labor days in land preparation, crop establishment, crop management, harvest and transport to the initial selling point. In contrast a hectare of wheat requires about 50 labor days. Using the 2002 area estimates, potato cultivation creates about 6.2 million labor days in rural Rwanda. Though the labor is spread over many more individuals, for perspective, 6.2 million days is full-time employment for 31,000 people. Because potato cultivation is management intensive, as yields increase, the labor requirement will also increase, growing to about 150 labor days. Sustaining the potato sector is among the most effective rural employment programs that the Government of Rwanda could devise. Potato production produces more income per area than any other major food crops in the country. This is critical for the small-size farms that characterize Rwanda’s rural economy. Mellor (2002) and Mellor and Ranade (2002) show that most of this income remains in the rural sector by increasing the demand for rural non-farm goods and services. This translates into income growth for those rural residents engaged in non-farm activities. The program development sequence follows the steps below. Rwanda PRSP: · “Rural development and agricultural transformation” is the number one priority for action.
(GoR, 2002) Policy objective: · Improve the welfare of potato-farming families, rural agriculture workers and potato
consumers by improving the productivity of the sector and its ability to produce good quality potatoes at an affordable price while protecting the environment.
Abt Associates Inc. 5
Policy problem: · The potato sector is poorly organized. This results in low levels of productivity and slow
response to policy stimulation (Goossens, 2002). Policy challenge: · Stimulate the organization and transformation of the potato sector through key interventions. Design the program: · Identify the key interventions. Define the who, what, when, where and budget to implement
the interventions. Sub-program 1: Stimulate the organization of the potato value chain
Value addition is the most fundamental characte ristic of the activities of the groups of actors in the value chain. In agriculture, much of the final value is added after the crop leaves the farm. This leaves the farmer poorly positioned to reap the benefits of a better-integrated value chain. Since farmers are the most important client group for the poverty reduction goals of the government, special attention should be paid to the potential for innovative value addition practices that can be captured by farmers. Adding quality characteristics such as pre-harvest curing to improve storability and size grading are among those practices that can add value while the crop is still on the farm. Most of the six characteristics of the value chain involve interactions among actors. Information flow among the actors is frequently mentioned as a problem. Impediments to these interactions can seriously affect the performance of the value chain. Activity 1.1: Value-chain improvement This activity will improve the level and quality of interactions in the value chain. This program would hire a value-chain development specialist to reside in Rwanda whose job would be to facilitate the formation and consolidation of groups of actors, facilitate their interaction and improve the performance of this chain. With collaborators, the specialist would seek opportunities for value-chain actors. The specialist would also seek to identify problems and assist their prompt solution. This program would start immediately and continue until the value chain is well established and running independently. The output of this activity would be the achievement of a set of target indicators related to value-chain integration, performance and participation. Activity 1.2: Potato market price information system This activity will improve price information movement in the potato value chain. Building on the existing market information system maintained by SISA, this program will design a potato specific information collection, analysis and dissemination system that will optimally serve the actors in the potato value chain. Prices will be broadcast by radio spot announcements on a daily basis. The output of this activity would be a functioning system to collect, process and diffuse daily price data by potato variety from selected important markets.
6 Abt Associates Inc.
Sub-program 2: Improve the varieties and seed offered to potato farmers
There is a stated need for improved potato varieties that meet present and future projected needs of the fresh and processing domestic demand as well as the demand of seed and ware export markets. ISAR and SNS are the suppliers of this input. Activity 2.1: Accelerated potato variety selection and release This program will aggressively introduce new germplasm materials into the country and rapidly screen them with farmers while simultaneously starting seed multiplication of probable releases. Normal variety selection procedures take up to 7 years to screen introduced material and identify and release a new variety. No provision is made for making seed available at the time of release. The output of this activity will be five new varieties named within five years with 100 MT of basic seed of each new variety available for seed multipliers at the time of release. There is a stated need for increased quantities of improved quality seed of a number of different potato varieties. ISAR, SNS and farmer associations are the suppliers of this input. The proposed seed law (GoR, 2002) is an importing element of the supporting environment for the development of the seed sector. This seed law needs financial support for implementation. Activity 2.2: Increased production of basic seed This activity will support increased production of foundation and basic seed by ISAR and SNS. The foundation program will review and improve rapid multiplication techniques and increase the quantity produced to meet growing demand. The quality of foundation and basic seed production will be improved through installation and implementation of quality control practices consistent with the new seed law. Both ISAR and SNS will introduce an enterprise basis for production. The business approach will emphasize efficient production and effective marketing. A production manager will assure that production goals are met and that seed is produced at the lowest possible cost. As the output of this activity, ISAR and SNS will combine to produce a total of 4,800 MT of basic seed for the varieties demanded by Rwandan producers within five years. When multiplied one additional time as per the present seed scheme, this amount represents the seed requirements for 15percent of 2002 area. Activity 2.3: Increased production of certified seed This activity will support production of certified and quality declared seed by farmer seed producer associations. This program will train farmer multipliers and provide institutional and organizational training for seed grower associations. A special emphasis will be on business plan development for growth and seed marketing. Farmers buy seed as an investment that should provide returns over several production cycles. Seed degeneration rates measure the speed at which certified seed declines in yield until it is no better than common unimproved seed. Seed degeneration rates are thus important indicators of the potential size of the seed market. Lacking such studies and considering the environment of the production zones, we assume a six-year replacement cycle.
Abt Associates Inc. 7
The output of this activity will be at least five viable farmer seed grower organizations that produce and market at total of 19,000 MT of certified seed. This is sufficient seed for every potato farmer in Rwanda to renew his farm stocks every six years based on 2002 planted area. Activity 2.4: Pilot implementation of the new seed law for potato seed production This activity shall support the implementation of the new seed law for quality control and certification in the seed potato sector. This program will train SNS professional and technical staff, acquire the necessary quality testing equipment, assist the development of practices and procedures for certification and promote the benefits of the seed law among seed growers and consumers. The output of this activity will be timely and complete services offered to 100percent of the clients that submit foundation, basic and certified seed for inspection. There is a stated need for increasing the use of fertilizer by potato farmers. Its timely delivery and widespread use is important for the successful implementation of the potato program. Given that there is a separate fertilizer sector action plan in development (Desai, 2002) the potato sector development program makes no recommendation in this arena. There is recognition that fungicides and insecticides can contribute to improving crop yields. Fungicides, in particular, are a key element of late blight control. As farmers’ incomes improve they may begin using pesticides more frequently. Insecticides can be highly toxic and exposure can result in death or injury. Farmers should be educated about the consequences of pesticide exposure. The farmer training activity recommended below includes IPM training. Sub-program 3: Farmer training and support
There is a need for farmer training to improve crop productivity and farm management, especially to alleviate poor crop rotations. The availability of fertilizers will facilitate intensification of production. This implies that already overused soils are in danger of being mined for the characteristics that make them productive. In the long run, this will reduce productivity further. Several well-recognized crop management practices reduce yield and quality of the harvested crop. Most farmers plant seed saved from their previous harvest. This seed is generally of poor quality. There are disease management and storage practices that can improve the quality of self-produced seed. Several organizations and programs serve potato farmers, especially in the Northwest. These include the program to promote potato farmer associations of the Department of Extension and Marketing of MINAGRI (GoR), the national farmers union, IMBARAGA, and regional associations such as BAIR, FOR, and COODAF. The strategic partner for Activities 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 is the Agriculture and Rural Market Development Project (PDMAR). There is a need to strengthen the management and administration of these organizations, as well as the finances and services they can offer farmers (Their technical competence in potato crop cultivation is of particular importance). Lack of production credit was cited as a problem that severely limits the ability of potato farmers from utilizing improved inputs purchased from off the farm. We recognize that potato production is relatively more risky than many farm operations; this makes production credit problematic (see Activity 3.3).
8 Abt Associates Inc.
Activity 3.1: Farmer Training This large-farmer training activity shall emphasize four elements: soil management, potato crop management, on-farm seed potato management, and integrated pest management. This program should be a component of PDMAR. The training should target farmers that are members of farmer associations and should be weighted towards farmers in the volcanic soil potato zones of the Northwest. The output of this activity is 40,000 potato farmers trained in the above subjects within five years. For maximum impact and rural skills transfer, this training program should be conducted using participatory techniques that emphasize the training of farmer trainers. Activity 3.2: Improved management and services from farmer organizations The farmer organization strengthening activity shall work with all farmer organizations and provide training and counseling in organizational management, administration and staff training in technical aspects of potato production and marketing. This program should be a component of PDMAR. The output of this activity will be 100percent of staff of all organizations trained within three years. Activity 3.3: Production credit for potato farmers This activity should expand existing credit schemes with farmer organizations or banks or establish, on a trial basis, at least three micro-credit schemes in key locations in potato producing zones in the country. Current estimates of credit use by potato farmers suggest participation levels of less than 10 percent. This program should be a component of PDMAR. The output of this activity will be 30 percent of farmer members of farm organizations having used credit within five years. Sub-program 4: Transport, markets and processing
There are two types of transporters: those that move the potato crop from the field to the road, and those that pick up the crop on the road and move it to the markets. An output of Activity 1.1 will be greater communication between farmers and transporters. Poor rural roads limit the ability of motorized transport to reach many potato farms. Thus field-to-road transport costs can be a significant portion of total production costs. These field-to-road transporters face problems of poorly designed and maintained footpaths. The stakeholders recommended consideration of a program to improve these footpaths. At present we do not recommend a program in this activity plan. We assume that such a recommendation will be included in other plans of the government. The road-to-market transporters were often seen as a problem but the stakeholders offered no recommendations to address this area. Wholesale markets in various cities and in the rural sector perform poorly. The services offered to sellers and buyers is often limited and poorly coordinated. Prices are often determined through collusion. The markets generally have poor physical infrastructure.
Abt Associates Inc. 9
At present, there are no potato processors operating in Rwanda. The illustration of the potato value chain, therefore, does not include them as actors. However, there are at least two initiatives to establish potato processing plants in Rwanda. These include inquires from a Chinese company for a starch factory and an effort called Potato Enterprise supported by RSSP. We applaud these efforts, but have no specific recommendations for them. Should these initiatives become reality, an output of Activity 1.1 would be their incorporation in the value chain. There are stated desires to develop export markets for ware and seed potatoes. The East and Central African political and economic environment is progressing to a point where regional integration and liberalized trade are serious topics of discussion. Several regional organizations in which various agencies of the Government of Rwanda participate are becoming more effective and influential. These are factors that can facilitate the development of export markets. Governments manage a wide range of instruments that can facilitate the development of foreign commerce. These include information about potential markets, trade missions to facilitate contacts, trade offices, trade credits and agents. Though all of these activities and more can help develop the potato export market these are sufficiently broad tasks that they should be treated in a multi-sectoral program to be efficient. Consumers are the last, and probably the most important, part of the value chain. Their decisions send signals to other actors. At the same time, the other actors must communicate with the consumers to educate them about changes in the product or other aspects of the product offering. In some locales, consumer education programs have been influential in affecting total demand, establishing demand for new differentiated products and for other quality aspects. This may be an important consideration in the future but we make no recommendation during the first, medium-term planning period. Activity 4.1: Wholesale market re-organization This activity will re-organize wholesale markets in Kigali and afterwards in other cities and rural sectors. This program should use appropriate social approaches to gain acceptance of the existing wholesalers to participate in market re-organization. The outputs of this program will be improved market physical infrastructure in Kigali and other locations and improved market performance signaled by free participation in the market by any potential wholesaler and transporter within five years. Activity 4.2: Promotion of potato processing This activity shall provide support for individuals or companies considering investments in potato-processing businesses. The support shall be limited to providing information about investment opportunities and potential markets. Existing business support programs provide lines of credit or technical backstopping for business plan development. The output of this activity shall be a series of events and documents directed towards educating potential investors about the potential of the potato-processing sector in Rwanda.
10 Abt Associates Inc.
References
Boehlje, M.D., S.L. Hofing and R. C. Schroder. (1999) “Value Chains in the Agriculture Industries,” Staff Paper #99-10. Department of Agriculture Economics, Purdue University. August. Desai, Gunvant M. (2002a) “Sustainable Rapid Growth of Fertiliser Use in Rwanda: a Strategy and an Action Plan” in Fertiliser Use and Marketing Policy Workshop Proceedings, Agricultural Policy Development Project, Research Report No. 10, Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc. Goossens, Frans (2002) “Potato Marketing in Rwanda” Agricultural Policy Development Project, Research Report No. 12, Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc. Government of the Republic of Rwanda. (2000) “Agricultural Policy Outline,” May, Kigali, Rwanda: Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Resources & Forestry. _________. (2002a) The Government of Rwanda Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper. National Poverty Reduction Programme. Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning. Draft Version, May. _________. (2002b) “The Government of Rwanda Draft Bill on Production, Quality Control and Commercialization of Plant Quality Seed,” August. _________. “Program for the Promotion of Farmer’s Associations based on their Farming Activities,” Department of Extension and Marketing, MINAGRI. Mimeo. Mellor, John W. (2002) “How Much Employment Can Rapid Agricultural Growth Generate? – Sectoral Policies for Maximum Impact in Rwanda,” Agricultural Policy Development Project, Research Report No. 13, Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc. _________ and C. Ranade. (2002) “The Impact of Agricultural Growth on Employment in Rwanda: A Three-Sector Model,” Agricultural Policy Development Project, Research Report No. 14, Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates Inc. Nyarwaya, J.B., Shingiro, E. and E. Mpyisi. (2002) “Statistiques Agricoles: Production Agricole, Elevage, Superficie et Utilisation des Terres. Année Agricole 2001,” Kigali, Rwanda: FSRP/DSA, MINAGRI. Raikes, P., M. Friis Jensen and S. Ponte. (2000) “Commodity Chain Analysis and the French Filière Approach: Comparison and Critique,” Working Paper Subseries on Globalisation and Economic Restructuring in Africa no. ix. CDR Working Paper 00.3., February, Copenhagen, Denmark: Center for Development Research.
Abt Associates Inc. 11
Figure: Agricultural Value Chain: An example for the potato sector in Rwanda Three parts of the value chain
• The actors • The linkages between actors • The supporting enviornment
Six Characteristics of Value Chains • Value Creation Activities • Product flow • Financial flow • Information flow • Incentive systems • Governance
Input Suppliers
Farmers
Traders & Transporters
Wholesalers & Retailers
Final Consumers
ProductMovement:
Value addition
FRANCS
The Environment: Institutions and agencies that supply: research, credit, infrastructure, regulation, information …
12 Abt Associates Inc.
Appendix A: Details of sub-program activities Activity 1.1: Potato Value Chain Goal: Contribute to improved potato food systems in Rwanda that support food security, poverty reduction and the sustainable use of natural resources Objective: Strategic partners in the potato food system have improved their capacity for technological and institutional innovation to respond to demands from the food value chain and its institutional environment while taking advantages of regional experiences Outputs: 1. Strategic partners implement and put into operation a national agenda for the
development of potato food value systems. 2. Strategic partners improve their capability for institutional development through the
establishment of linkages with relevant other actors in the country. 3. Strategic partners have increased capability to improve the competitiveness of farmers. Methods:
1. Value chain expert and strategic partners identify and convene initial contacts with value chain participants
2. Value chain participants design a series of activities that establish an agenda of mutual interest to the partners
3. Value chain participants begin implementation of joint activities that build capacities for innovation and technological improvement
4. Value chain participants engage national and regional partners for financial, technological and training support.
Participants: ISAR, SNS, DVC, Farmer organizations and other stakeholders Activity 1.1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Identification and convening of value chain participants
Value chain activity design Activity implementation Monitoring and evaluation Activity 1.2: Potato price information system Goal: Farmers and other potato value chain participants utilize daily potato price information for better- informed decisions.
Abt Associates Inc. 13
Output: 1. A system of collection, processing and diffusing daily potato prices from important
markets in Rwanda. Methods: 1. Contracted price gatherers collect price information by variety and grade in selected
important potato markets. 2. Prices are phoned in to SISA technician who enters the information into a SISA
database. 3. The SISA technician distributes the price information by fax, email or other means
before 2PM. FoodNet adds these prices to its website. 4. The national radio broadcaster is contracted to deliver five one-minute announcements of
the prices at appropriate times. Partners: District extension agents Food Security Information System (SISA) Project FoodNET Activity 1.2 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Establish price collection system Implement system Monitor and Evaluate Activity 2.1: Potato Variety Selection and Release Goal: Provide new potato varieties that possess characteristics required by Rwandan producers, consumers and processors and export markets. Outputs: 1. Five varieties released within five years 2. One hundred metric tons of basic seed of each variety for multiplication by seed growers
at the moment of official release. 3. Trained ISAR professionals to conduct screening and variety release on continuous basis Methods: 1. Introduce materials from the International Potato Center 2. ISAR conducts an initial screening in the PNAP-ISAR station in Ruhengeri 3. ISAR and farmer variety selection groups conduct a second on-station screening 4. Variety selection groups manage variety selection trials during two seasons. 5. During first farmer- led variety selection cycle, ISAR begins foundation seed production
of all remaining seed candidates with goal to have 100 MT seed available at the time of harvest.
6. Varieties are released in fourth or fifth year with the projected amount of seed. 7. M.Sc. Training for one ISAR professional at regional university Partners: PNAP-ISAR , SNS
14 Abt Associates Inc.
International Potato Center Seven farmer variety selection groups: two each from Ruhengeri and Gisenyi and
one each from Byumba, Gikongoro, Kibuye Activity 2.1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Introduce and multiply materials First selection on-station Second selection on-station Third selection farmer fields Fourth selection farmer fields Seed multiplication of potential releases
Release new varieties with seed M.Sc. Training
Monitor and Evaluate
Activity 2.2: Increased Basic Seed Production Goal: Sufficient basic seed to meet the needs of the seed sector Outputs 1. 540 metric tons of foundation seed per cycle 2. 3,400 metric tons of basic seed per cycle 3. Trained ISAR and SNS professionals Methods: 1: Produce 36,000 plantlets per cycle from in-vitro laboratory at PNAP-Ruhengeri 2: Produce 600,000 minitubers per cycle in screenhouses at PNAP-Ruhengeri 3: Produce 540 MT Foundation seed after two field multiplications at PNAP-Kinigi 4. Produce 3,400 MT Basic seed after a field multiplication at SNS seed farms 5. Establish and implement a cost accounting system 4. Test feasibility of hydroponic system for minituber production 5. M.Sc. Training for two seed production specialists, one each from ISAR and SNS 6. Short course training for seed production for ISAR and SNS staff 7. Design and implement a monitoring and evaluation system Participants: PNAP-ISAR, SNS, and International Potato Center Methods: Activity 2.2 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Acquire equipment and increase capacity of in vitro lab
Produce rooted in-vitro plantlets
Abt Associates Inc. 15
Test feasibility of hydroponic production
Acquire equipment and increase capacity of screenhouses
Produce foundation seed M.Sc. Training for seed production specialists (ISAR, SNS)
Establish and implement cost accounting system
Short course training for seed production
Produce basic seed Monitor and Evaluate Activity 2.3: Increased Certified Seed Production Goal: Sufficient certified seed to meet the needs of the ware potato producers in Rwanda and other countries Objectives: 1. Produce 19,000MT of certified seed per cycle Methods:
1. Forum for planning growth in production among leading seed grower groups 2. Training for seed grower association management, administration and planning 3. Production of certified seed 4. Develop and implement certified seed marketing plan 5. Monitor and evaluate
Participants: ISAR, SNS, DVC, Provincial and District Agriculture Officers, Farmer Seed Grower Associations Activity 2.3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Forum for planning growth Training for seed grower associations
Production of certified seed Market plan development Market plan implementation Monitoring and evaluation
16 Abt Associates Inc.
Activity 2.4: Pilot Implementation of the New Seed Law Goal: Potato seed growers and seed buyers are satisfied with seed inspection and quality testing services of SNS Outputs: 1. Seed inspection practices and procedures are uniformly known and applied 2. Quality testing practices and procedures are uniformly known and applied 3. High public awareness and appreciation of quality standards of certified seed. Methods: 1. Acquire the necessary equipment to comply with quality testing procedures. 2. Design and implement new practices and procedures contained in the new seed law. 3. Train SNS personnel in inspection and quality testing procedures contained in the new
seed law. 4. Design and implement a quality seed marketing program in collaboration with seed
grower associations and other stakeholders. 5. Design and implement monitoring and evaluation plan Partners: SNS, ISAR, DVC and Farmer Seed Grower Associations Activity 2.4 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Acquire and install quality control equipment
M.Sc. training for SNS Head of Quality Control Lab
Short course training for quality control staff
Design of inspection and control procedures
Implement inspection and quality control for potato seed certification in Ruhengeri and Gisenyi Provinces
Design quality seed marketing program for potato
Implement marketing program Monitoring and Evaluation Activity 3.1: Farmer Training Goal: Farmers achieve higher yields through improved crop and soil management Objectives: 1. Train 40,000 farmers in potato crop and soil management
Abt Associates Inc. 17
Methods: All activities are integrated into ongoing PDMAR program. 1. Design, write and produce potato-training modules on potato crop management, on-farm
seed production, IPM for potato production and soil management for potato production. 2. Select priority communities for training 3. Integrate training program into on-going PDMAR training programs 4. Establish and implement monitoring and evaluation system Participants: PDMAR (or its successor), DVC, Provincial and district agriculture officers,
farmer unions and other farmer organizations Activity 3.1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Produce Training Materials Select priority communities Integrate into ongoing PDMAR training program
Monitor and Evaluate Activity 3.2: Support for farmer organizations Activity 3.2: Improved management and services from farmer organizations
The farmer organization strengthening activity shall work with all farmer organizations and provide training and counselling in organizational management, administration and staff training in technical aspects of potato production and marketing. This program should be a component of PDMAR. The output of this activity will be 100% of staff of all organizations trained within three years.
Goal: Farmers receive improved support from farmer organizations Objective: Staff of farmer organization are trained to provide better services to their farmer members. Methods: All activities are integrated into ongoing PDMAR program. 1. Adapt and produce training modules on administration, management and planning for farmer organizations. 2. Identify and contact organizations to be included in training program 3. Provide training on administration, management, planning and potato production to organization staff members 4. Establish and implement monitoring and evaluation system Participants: PDMAR (or its successor), DVC, Province and District Agriculture Officers, Farmer Organizations Activity 3.2 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Produce training materials
18 Abt Associates Inc.
Identify organizations Conduct training Monitor and Evaluate Activity 3.3: Production credit for farmers Goal: Increase farmer use of inputs through provision of production credit Outputs: 1. Farmer credit use is 30% among members of farmer organizations in Ruhengeri and
Gisenyi 2. Farmers are trained in credit use Methods: 1. Design criteria of lending program, identify possible lending organizations, establish
credit funds in them and open the credit fund for lending 2. Train farmers and farm organizations on credit use and management 3. Promote credit use among farmer organizations 4. Monitor and evaluate progress of credit program Participants: PDMAR (or its successor), Banque Popular, Farmer organizations, Farmer unions Activity 3.3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Establish credit funds with lenders
Train farmers on credit use Promote credit use Maintain credit line open
Monitor and evaluate Activity 4.1: Re-organizing wholesale potato markets Goal: Improved performance of wholesale potato markets in Rwanda Outputs: 1. Re-organization of wholesale markets in Kigali 2. Improvement of Kigali wholesale market facilities 3. Re-organization of selected important wholesale markets in Ruhengeri and Gisenyi
provinces Methods: 1. Establish and maintain contact with wholesaler groups in Kigali and Ruhengeri and
Gisenyi provinces 2. Using participatory methods develop plan for market re-organization in Kigali 3. Design and construct improved wholesale market facilities in Kigali
Abt Associates Inc. 19
4. Using participatory methods develop plans for re-organization in selected markets in Ruhengeri and Gisenyi provinces
5. Design and construct improved wholesale market facilities in selected markets 6. Establish and implement monitoring and evaluation system. Participants: PDMAR, DVC, Municipal and district governments, wholesaler organizations Activity 4.1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Establish and maintain contact with wholesalers groups
Develop and implement plan for market reorganization in Kigali
Improve market facilities in Kigali
Develop and implement plans for market re-organization in provinces
Improve market facilities in provinces
Monitoring and evaluation Activity 4.2: Promotion of potato processing Goal: Improved information for potential investors is used to stimulate investment in potato processing in Rwanda. Output: 1. Information dissemination through seminars and exchange visits and promotional materials Methods: 1. Update review of potential for potato processing in Rwanda 2. Design a program of information dissemination 3. Conduct information dissemination events (seminars, exchange visits) 4. Produce and distribute promotional materials 5. Establish and implement monitoring and evaluation system Participants: DVC, ADAR Activity 4.2 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Update review Design program Conduct dissemination events Produce and disseminate promotional materials
Monitor and evaluate
20 Abt Associates Inc.
Budget Notes: These budgets are very preliminary and need specific adjustments for real costs for example for local hire personnel, vehicle insurance, internal per diem rates and so on. Inflation costs are not built into the budgets and should be. Estimates from the finance ministry should be obtained and used for this calculation. The 11 activity budgets are divided into two parts: operations and management. The operations part is divided into specific outputs. The funds assigned to the outputs are for both operations and for capital investments. The operations component may have personnel, services, supplies and travel components. The management part is divided into the costs of coordination and monitoring and evaluation. Activities for sub-program 3 and 4.1 will be executed as a component of the larger PDMAR program or its successor. Thus the coordination and management components are reduced and costs will be shared with the larger overall PDMAR program. Personnel: There are two international advisors included among the 11 activities. These advisors will work in most of the projects. One advisor is assigned to lead the value chain activity and will also take responsibility for the processing promotion activity and liaise with the training and market re-organization activities. The second advisor is assigned to the variety introduction activity and will also take responsibility for the other activities in sub-program 2. Both should probably be posted with ISAR in Ruhengeri. Most activities have a local hire coordinator. These individuals will oversee the day-to-day operation of the specific activity in under the supervision of the Rwandan director of the particular institution where he or she is assigned and the international advisor. Capital: Several of the activities require capital investments. These include the expansion of the in vitro laboratory and construction of screenhouses at the ISAR Ruhengeri station and wholesale potato markets in various cities. Equipment is also needed. This includes computers for the coordinators for the activities, and vehicles for those coordinators whose job description requires travel. ISAR and SNS also require various types of laboratory equipment to manage the expansion in production of seed potatoes and the associated quality testing that supports it. Travel: The travel budgets include both international and domestic travel. The international advisors and other participants have a limited international travel budget to facilitate their attendance in regional events that my further their professional development. The local travel budgets are for movement around the country for facilitation of particular activities.
Abt Associates Inc. 21
Training : M.Sc. training for four agricultural professionals is funded in activities 2.1 and 2.2 and short course training for professionals for many more. Activity1.1 The operations costs for the three outputs represent funds used to stimulate the formation, consolidation and growth of the value chain as an entity in Rwanda around which the participants can gather for both technical support and as a platform for communication to the other stakeholders. The operations in the third output are specifically designed as funds to stimulate development of new value added enterprises and are should be available to any participant in the chain. This activity also has a steering committee. This steering committee provides policy direction for the international advisor and is constituted from among participants in the value chain. This is the only activity in which a steering committee is contemplated. Activities 2.2 and 2.3 An objective of the basic and certified seed production activities is to promote financial self-sustainability for ISAR, SNS and the farmer seed grower associations. Thus the on-going operations costs for these activities represent not the actual costs of producing that volume of seed but rather a source of financial backstopping and support past key bottlenecks as these institutions reach financial maturity. Activity 3.1 The contract with participating lending organizations will cover the bank operations costs and these will be part of the initial capital endowment. Thus the on-going operations costs are low.
22 Abt Associates Inc.
Par
ticip
ants
at t
he
initi
al w
ork
sho
p fo
r th
e p
ota
to-s
ecto
r ac
tio
n p
lan
on
6th
Au
gu
st 2
002
Nam
e G
iven
nam
e T
itle
A
fflia
tio
n
PO
BC
ity
Tel
eph
on
eC
ellp
ho
ne
e-m
ail a
dd
ress
B
azire
te
Zipo
ra
Pre
side
nt
Ass
. Tur
wan
yinz
ara
K
igal
i
0865
1465
Byu
kuse
nge
Jérô
me
Coo
rdin
ateu
r C
op.
Ibuk
wam
uhin
zi
163
Gis
enyi
0842
7653
byuk
usen
geje
ro@
yaho
o.fr
Coo
k A
ndy
Adv
isor
M
INA
GR
I/Abt
Ass
. 66
17K
igal
i 51
7781
acoo
k@rw
anda
1.co
m
Cris
sman
C
harle
s E
cono
mis
t In
tl. P
otat
o C
ente
r
Nai
robi
0858
5864
G
afar
anga
Jo
seph
A
nim
ateu
r A
gron
ome
Syn
d. Im
bara
ga
36R
uhen
geri
5470
9884
2304
7
Gas
ana
Cha
rles
P
otat
o E
nter
pris
e
K
igal
i
8528
276
Ic
yim
paye
A
imab
le
Age
nt
SN
S
K
igal
i 57
5800
Mba
raga
A
loys
P
resi
dent
A
ss. D
ufat
anye
10
8K
igal
i
8563
029
M
pyis
i E
dson
C
oord
inat
eur
FSR
P
K
igal
i
8301
757
Mug
anw
a
Dav
id
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n M
INIC
OM
73
Kig
ali
5738
6384
9167
4da
vidm
ugan
wa@
yaho
o.co
m
Mur
ekez
i A
nast
ase
Agr
onom
e A
DA
R P
roje
ct
K
igal
i
8525
051
N
dung
utse
Is
sa
Age
nt
MIN
AG
RI
621
Kig
ali
8500
8
N
gara
mbe
Jo
nas
Far
mer
& T
rade
r In
depe
ndan
t 16
3G
isen
yi
83
0076
4
Nse
ngim
ana
Eva
se
V
olca
no P
otat
o
Kig
ali
85
0442
2
Nta
hom
paga
ze
Jean
Bap
tiste
A
gent
M
INA
GR
I 62
1K
igal
i 85
008
8528
050
buta
reja
@ya
hoo.
com
Ruc
akib
ungo
Je
an-P
ierr
e A
ssis
tant
M
INA
GR
I/Abt
Ass
. 66
17K
igal
i 51
7846
8500
128
jpru
cak@
rwan
da1.
com
Rw
akaz
ina
M. C
hant
al
Etu
dian
te
UN
R B
utar
e 11
7B
utar
e 86
3547
8
rwac
hant
al@
yaho
o.fr
Sem
apfa
C
yprie
n
FOR
80
Ruh
enge
ri 54
6090
8507
646
for@
rwan
da1.
com
Sen
kesh
a N
tizo
Che
f de
Pro
gram
me
ISA
R
73R
uhen
geri
5165
3985
2668
8se
nkes
ha@
yaho
o.fr
S
impu
nga
Inno
cent
C
herc
heur
-For
mat
eur
CS
C G
itara
ma
G
itara
ma
85
3327
2
Tug
engw
enay
o Th
éona
s P
lani
ficat
eur
CO
OD
AF
12
6R
uhen
geri
5461
2284
5483
5Th
éona
s001
@ya
hoo.
fr
Uw
iman
a In
noce
nt
Coo
rdin
ateu
r S
NS
Kig
ali
5186
3183
0230
1
Abt Associates Inc. 23
Par
ticip
ants
at t
he v
alid
atio
n w
orks
hop
for
the
pota
to-s
ecto
r ac
tion
plan
on
14th
Aug
ust 2
002
Nam
e G
iven
nam
e T
itle
A
fflia
tio
n
PO
BC
ity
Tel
eph
on
eC
ellp
ho
ne
e-m
ail a
dd
ress
B
azire
te
Zip
ora
Pre
side
nt
Ass
. Tur
wan
yinz
ara
K
igal
i
0865
1465
Bus
okey
e M
. Lae
titia
A
ssis
tant
e C
SA
/E.U
51
5K
igal
i 50
1094
0853
0999
laet
ivav
a@ya
hoo.
fr
But
are
Jam
es
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n M
INA
GR
I 62
1K
igal
i 85
008
0852
8050
buta
reja
@ya
hoo.
com
Byu
kuse
nge
Jérô
me
Coo
rdin
ateu
r C
op.
Ibuk
wam
uhin
zi
163
Gis
enyi
0842
7653
byuk
usen
geje
ro@
yaho
o.fr
Coo
k A
ndy
Adv
isor
M
INA
GR
I/Abt
Ass
. 66
17K
igal
i 51
7781
acoo
k@rw
anda
1.co
m
Gaf
aran
ga
Jose
ph
Ani
mat
eur
Agr
onom
e S
ynd.
Imba
raga
36
Ruh
enge
ri 54
7098
0842
3047
G
akw
aya
Thé
ophi
le
Che
f de
serv
ice
UB
PR
12
34K
igal
i 57
3559
0845
7405
Hab
amen
shi
Pat
rick
Sec
réta
ire G
énér
al
MIN
AG
RI
621
Kig
ali
8464
408
3014
44um
khon
de@
hotm
ail.c
om
Kab
ayiz
a A
ssou
man
i A
gent
M
INA
GR
I 62
1K
igal
i
0851
0344
asso
uman
ik@
yaho
o.fr
K
aman
zi
Fra
nçoi
s D
irect
eur
P
rovi
nce
de G
isen
yi
80G
isen
yi
5400
0908
5114
28
Kan
yaru
kiga
S
am
Dire
cteu
r G
énér
al
CE
PE
X 60
19K
igal
i
0830
3215
cepe
xka@
hotm
ail.c
om
Kar
as
And
y T
eam
Lea
der
US
AID
28
48K
igal
i 57
0940
akar
as@
usai
d.go
v K
aras
ira
Ani
cet
Sec
réta
ire P
artic
ulie
r M
INA
GR
I 62
1K
igal
i 86
104
0855
9639
kara
sira
anic
et@
yaho
o.fr
Kar
ega
Vin
cent
D
irect
or
MIN
EC
OF
IN
158
Kig
ali
5705
2308
3008
96sp
nrp@
rwan
da1.
com
Kay
isan
abo
Fina
A
naly
ste
agro
-indu
st
BR
D
1341
Kig
ali
08
5283
55f.k
ayis
anab
o@br
d.co
m.rw
M
bara
ga
Alo
ys
Pre
side
nt
Ass
. Duf
atan
ye
108
Kig
ali
08
5630
29
Mug
anw
a
Dav
id
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n M
INIC
OM
73
Kig
ali
5738
6308
4916
74da
vidm
ugan
wa@
yaho
o.co
m
Mug
unga
M
uhin
da
Dire
cteu
r G
énér
al
ISA
R
138
But
are
5301
4508
3028
76m
ugun
gelie
@ya
hoo.
com
Mun
yem
ana
Tha
ssie
n R
epre
sent
ant
SIS
A
515
Kig
ali
5173
1808
5249
29m
inag
sisa
@rw
anda
1.co
m
Mus
anga
nya
Fau
stin
P
rési
dent
FO
R
80R
uhen
geri
5460
9008
5076
46fo
r@rw
anda
1.co
m
Mus
isi
Jam
es
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n M
INA
GR
I 62
1K
igal
i 58
5249
Mut
ebw
a A
lfred
A
ct. P
roje
ct C
oord
. M
INA
GR
I 62
1K
igal
i 84
043
0830
0010
amut
ebw
a@ya
hoo.
com
Muz
ira
Tim
D
vpt S
peci
alis
t U
SA
ID
284
8K
igal
i 57
0940
0830
3233
timuz
ira@
usai
d.go
v N
gara
mbe
Jo
nas
Far
mer
& T
rade
r In
depe
ndan
t 16
3G
isen
yi
08
3007
64
Nob
era
Epi
tace
R
epre
sent
ant
Few
sNet
28
48K
igal
i 84
044
0830
2101
enob
era@
few
s.ne
t N
zaba
mw
ita
Esp
éran
ce
Hea
d of
Div
isio
n M
INA
GR
I 62
1K
igal
i
Ruc
akib
ungo
Je
an-P
ierr
e A
ssis
tant
M
INA
GR
I/Abt
Ass
. 66
17K
igal
i 51
7846
0850
0128
jpru
cak@
rwan
da1.
com
24 Abt Associates Inc.
Rw
akaz
ina
M. C
hant
al
Etu
dian
te
UN
R B
utar
e 11
7B
utar
e 86
3547
8rw
acha
ntal
@ya
hoo.
fr
Rw
ican
inyo
ni
Jose
ph
Che
f de
dépa
rtem
ent
AC
DI-V
OC
A
K
igal
i 57
1358
0851
6422
S
ebuh
oro
Val
ens
Vic
e P
rési
dent
C
EC
MA
53
0K
igal
i
0851
2281
Sen
kesh
a N
tizo
Che
f de
Pro
gram
me
ISA
R
73R
uhen
geri
5165
3908
5266
88se
nkes
ha@
yaho
o.fr
Tug
engw
enay
o Th
éona
s P
lani
ficat
eur
CO
OD
AF
12
6R
uhen
geri
5461
2208
4548
35Th
éona
s001
@ya
hoo.
fr
Tw
agira
mun
gu
JMV
S
ecré
taire
C
EC
MA
53
0K
igal
i
0847
6666
javu
20@
hotm
ail.c
om
Dra
ft B
udge
t:Pot
ato
Sec
tor
Dev
elop
men
t Pro
gram
A
ctiv
itie
sY
ear
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5TO
TAL
Sub
prog
ram
1 V
alue
Cha
in(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)A
ctiv
ity 1
.119
2,00
0
17
5,00
0
18
2,00
0
18
2,00
0
18
0,00
0
911,
000
Act
ivity
1.2
45,5
00
40
,500
40,5
00
40
,500
40,5
00
20
7,50
0
S
ubto
tal
237,
500
215,
500
222,
500
222,
500
220,
500
1,
118,
500
Sub
prog
ram
2 V
arie
ties
and
See
dA
ctiv
ity 2
.120
7,00
0
18
7,00
0
20
8,00
0
19
8,00
0
19
8,00
0
998,
000
Act
ivity
2.2
309,
000
179,
000
91,0
00
81
,000
61,0
00
72
1,00
0
A
ctiv
ity 2
.333
,000
34,0
00
23
,000
23,0
00
20
,000
133,
000
Act
ivity
2.4
113,
000
83,0
00
58
,000
48,0
00
46
,000
348,
000
Sub
tota
l66
2,00
0
48
3,00
0
38
0,00
0
35
0,00
0
32
5,00
0
2,20
0,00
0
Sub
prog
ram
3 F
arm
er T
rain
ing
and
Sup
port
Act
ivity
3.1
241,
000
226,
000
177,
000
177,
000
147,
000
96
8,00
0
A
ctiv
ity 3
.287
,000
67,0
00
37
,000
-
1,00
0
192,
000
Act
ivity
3.3
613,
000
13,0
00
3,
000
3,
000
3,
000
63
5,00
0
S
ubto
tal
941,
000
306,
000
217,
000
180,
000
151,
000
1,
795,
000
Sub
prog
ram
4 M
arke
t Dev
elop
men
tA
ctiv
ity 4
.113
6,00
0
26
,000
16,0
00
16
,000
16,0
00
21
0,00
0
A
ctiv
ity 4
.221
,500
21,5
00
21
,500
6,50
0
-
71,0
00
Sub
tota
l15
7,50
0
47
,500
37,5
00
22
,500
16,0
00
28
1,00
0
To
tal
1,99
8,00
0
1,
052,
000
857,
000
775,
000
712,
500
5,
394,
500
A
ctiv
ity 1
.1 V
alu
e C
hai
n D
evel
op
men
tY
ear
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5TO
TAL
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1: N
atio
nal
Ag
end
a9,
000
10,0
00
11
,000
11
,000
9,
000
50,0
00
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
6,00
0
6,
000
7,00
0
7,
000
6,00
0
M
eetin
gs3,
000
4,00
0
4,
000
4,00
0
3,
000
2O
utp
ut
2: In
stit
uti
on
al D
evel
op
men
t6,
000
6,00
0
6,
000
6,00
0
6,
000
30,0
00
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
6,00
0
6,
000
6,00
0
6,
000
6,00
0
3
Ou
tpu
t 3:
Imp
rove
d t
ech
nic
al c
apac
ity
15,0
00
20
,000
25,0
00
25,0
00
10,0
00
95,0
00
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
5,00
0
5,
000
5,00
0
5,
000
5,00
0
P
rom
otio
n fu
nds
10,0
00
15
,000
20,0
00
20,0
00
5,00
0
4C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
162,
000
13
9,00
0
140,
000
140,
000
155,
000
73
6,00
0
4.1.
Per
son
nel
an
d T
rave
l12
6,00
0
126,
000
12
6,00
0
12
6,00
0
14
1,00
0
Inte
rnat
iona
l adv
isor
(al
so in
act
ivity
4.2
)11
5,00
0
115,
000
11
5,00
0
11
5,00
0
11
5,00
0
Rep
atria
tion
15
,000
A
dmin
istr
ativ
e as
sist
ant (
part
tim
e)6,
000
6,00
0
6,
000
6,00
0
6,
000
Tra
vel
5,00
0
5,
000
5,00
0
5,
000
5,00
0
4.2.
Off
ice
and
veh
icle
35,0
00
11
,000
12,0
00
12,0
00
12,0
00
Equ
ipm
ent a
nd m
ater
ials
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
S
ervi
ces
(com
mun
itatio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce)
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
T
rans
port
cos
ts2,
000
2,00
0
2,
000
2,00
0
2,
000
Com
pute
r4,
000
Veh
icle
20,0
00
In
sura
nce
and
mai
nten
ance
3,00
0
3,
000
4,00
0
4,
000
4,00
0
4.3.
Mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d E
valu
atio
n1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
Mon
itorin
g an
d E
valu
atio
n1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
4.4.
Pla
nn
ing
: D
irec
tora
te1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
S
teer
ing
com
mitt
ee1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
TOTA
L A
ctiv
ity 1
.119
2,00
0
175,
000
18
2,00
0
18
2,00
0
18
0,00
0
911,
000
A
ctiv
ity
1.2
Mar
ket
Pri
ce S
yste
mY
ear
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5TO
TAL
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 P
rice
Info
rmat
ion
Sys
tem
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
100,
000
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
2C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
25,5
00
20,5
00
20,5
00
20,5
00
20,5
00
107,
500
2.1
Per
son
nel
an
d T
rave
l14
,000
14
,000
14
,000
14
,000
14
,000
C
oord
inat
or12
,000
12
,000
12
,000
12
,000
12
,000
Tr
avel
2,00
0
2,
000
2,00
0
2,
000
2,00
0
2.2
Off
ice
and
veh
icle
11,0
00
6,00
0
6,
000
6,00
0
6,
000
Equ
ipm
ent a
nd m
ater
ials
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
S
ervi
ces
(com
mun
itatio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce)
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
C
ompu
ter
and
fax
5,00
0
2.3
Mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d E
valu
atio
n50
0
500
50
0
500
50
0
Mon
itorin
g an
d E
valu
atio
n50
0
500
50
0
500
50
0
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
1.2
45,5
00
40,5
00
40,5
00
40,5
00
40,5
00
207,
500
A
ctiv
ity
2.1
Var
iety
Intr
od
uct
ion
Yea
r 1
Yea
r 2
Yea
r 3
Yea
r 4
Yea
r 5
TOTA
L
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 V
arie
ty S
elec
tio
n22
,000
22,0
00
22
,000
22,0
00
22
,000
110,
000
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
20,0
00
20
,000
20,0
00
20
,000
20,0
00
M
eetin
gs2,
000
2,
000
2,
000
2,
000
2,
000
2
Ou
tpu
t 2
See
d M
ult
iplia
tio
n-
-
10
,000
10,0
00
10
,000
30,0
00
O
pera
ting
cost
s
10,0
00
10
,000
10,0
00
3
Ou
tpu
t 3
Tra
inin
g30
,000
30,0
00
40
,000
30,0
00
15
,000
145,
000
MS
Tui
tion
(2 s
tude
nts)
20,0
00
20
,000
30,0
00
20
,000
10,0
00
S
tude
nt S
uppo
rt10
,000
10,0
00
10
,000
10,0
00
5,
000
4C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
155,
000
135,
000
13
6,00
0
13
6,00
0
151,
000
71
3,00
0
4.
1.P
erso
nn
el a
nd
Tra
vel
123,
000
123,
000
12
3,00
0
12
3,00
0
138,
000
In
tern
atio
nal a
dvis
or (
also
in A
ctiv
ity 2
.2,2
.3)
115,
000
115,
000
11
5,00
0
11
5,00
0
115,
000
R
epat
riatio
n
15,0
00
Tr
avel
8,00
0
8,00
0
8,00
0
8,00
0
8,00
0
4.
2.O
ffic
e an
d v
ehic
le31
,000
11,0
00
12
,000
12,0
00
12
,000
Equ
ipm
ent a
nd m
ater
ials
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,00
0
Ser
vice
s (c
omm
unita
tion
and
mai
nten
ance
)3,
000
3,
000
3,
000
3,
000
3,
000
T
rans
port
cos
ts2,
000
2,
000
2,
000
2,
000
2,
000
V
ehic
le20
,000
Insu
ranc
e an
d m
aint
enan
ce3,
000
3,
000
4,
000
4,
000
4,
000
4.3.
Mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d E
valu
atio
n1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
M
onito
ring
and
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,00
0
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
2.1
207,
000
187,
000
20
8,00
0
19
8,00
0
198,
000
99
8,00
0
A
ctiv
ity
2.2
Bas
ic S
eed
Pro
du
ctio
nY
ear
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5TO
TAL
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 F
ou
nd
atio
n S
eed
190,
000
60,0
00
20
,000
20
,000
20
,000
31
0,00
0
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
20,0
00
20
,000
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
Labo
rato
ry a
nd S
cree
nhou
se c
onst
ruct
ion
120,
000
20,0
00
E
quip
men
t50
,000
20,0
00
2
Ou
tpu
t 2
Bas
ic S
eed
20,0
00
20
,000
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
100,
000
O
pera
ting
cost
s20
,000
20,0
00
20
,000
20
,000
20
,000
3
Ou
tpu
t 3
Tra
inin
g60
,000
80,0
00
30
,000
20
,000
-
190,
000
M
S T
uitio
n (2
stu
dent
s)40
,000
40,0
00
20
,000
-
-
S
tude
nt S
uppo
rt (
2 st
uden
ts)
20,0
00
20
,000
10,0
00
-
-
Sho
rt co
urse
s20
,000
20,0
00
4C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
39,0
00
19
,000
21,0
00
21,0
00
21,0
00
121,
000
4.
1.P
erso
nn
el a
nd
Tra
vel
38,0
00
18
,000
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
Inte
rnat
iona
l adv
isor
(co
st in
act
ivity
2.1
)A
ssis
tant
12,0
00
12
,000
12,0
00
12,0
00
12,0
00
Trav
el3,
000
3,
000
4,
000
4,00
0
4,
000
Veh
icle
20,0
00
In
sura
nce
and
Mai
nten
ance
3,00
0
3,00
0
4,00
0
4,
000
4,00
0
4.3.
Mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d E
valu
atio
n1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
Mon
itorin
g an
d E
valu
atio
n1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
2.2
309,
000
179,
000
91
,000
81
,000
61
,000
72
1,00
0
A
ctiv
ity
2.3
Cer
tifi
ed S
eed
Pro
du
ctio
nY
ear
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5TO
TAL
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 C
erti
fied
See
d6,
000
7,00
0
6,
000
6,00
0
5,
000
30,0
00
O
pera
ting
cost
s6,
000
7,00
0
6,
000
6,00
0
5,
000
2O
utp
ut
2 T
rain
ing
10,0
00
10,0
00
-
-
-
20
,000
Sho
rt co
urse
s10
,000
10
,000
-
-
3C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
17,0
00
17,0
00
17,0
00
17,0
00
15,0
00
83,0
00
3.
1P
erso
nn
el a
nd
Tra
vel
16,0
00
16,0
00
16,0
00
16,0
00
14,0
00
Inte
rnat
iona
l adv
isor
(co
st in
act
ivity
2.1
)A
ssis
tant
12,0
00
12,0
00
12,0
00
12,0
00
12,0
00
Trav
el4,
000
4,00
0
4,
000
4,00
0
2,
000
3.
2M
on
ito
rin
g a
nd
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
M
onito
ring
and
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
2.3
33,0
00
34,0
00
23,0
00
23,0
00
20,0
00
133,
000
A
ctiv
ity
2.4
See
d L
aw Im
ple
men
tati
on
Yea
r 1
Yea
r 2
Yea
r 3
Yea
r 4
Yea
r 5
TOTA
L
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 S
eed
Insp
ecti
on
20,0
00
30
,000
20
,000
10
,000
10
,000
90
,000
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
10,0
00
20
,000
20
,000
10
,000
10
,000
Tr
aini
ng (
shor
t cou
rses
for
SN
S s
taff)
10,0
00
10
,000
2O
utp
ut
2 Q
ual
ity
Co
ntr
ol
45,0
00
25
,000
10
,000
10
,000
8,
000
98,0
00
O
pera
ting
cost
s10
,000
15,0
00
10,0
00
10,0
00
8,00
0
Q
ualit
y te
stin
g eq
uipm
ent
25,0
00
Tr
aini
ng (
shor
t cou
rses
for
SN
S s
taff)
10,0
00
10
,000
3S
eed
Law
Pu
blic
Aw
aren
ess
10,0
00
10
,000
10
,000
10
,000
10
,000
50
,000
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
10,0
00
10
,000
10
,000
10
,000
10
,000
3C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
38,0
00
18
,000
18
,000
18
,000
18
,000
11
0,00
0
3.
1P
erso
nn
el a
nd
Tra
vel
37,0
00
17
,000
17
,000
17
,000
17
,000
In
tern
atio
nal a
dvis
or (
cost
in a
ctiv
ity 2
.1)
Ass
ista
nt12
,000
12,0
00
12,0
00
12,0
00
12,0
00
Trav
el2,
000
2,
000
2,00
0
2,
000
2,00
0
V
ehic
le20
,000
Insu
ranc
e an
d M
aint
enan
ce3,
000
3,
000
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
3.2
Mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d E
valu
atio
n1,
000
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
M
onito
ring
and
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
2.4
113,
000
83
,000
58
,000
48
,000
46
,000
34
8,00
0
A
ctiv
ity
3.1
Far
mer
Tra
inin
gY
ear
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5TO
TAL
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 F
arm
er T
rain
ing
Pro
gra
m19
0,00
0
200,
000
150,
000
15
0,00
0
120,
000
81
0,00
0
P
rodu
ctio
n tr
aini
ng m
ater
ials
40,0
00
Tr
aini
ng fa
rmer
trai
ners
100,
000
10
0,00
0
50
,000
50,0
00
20
,000
Farm
er-le
d tra
inin
g50
,000
100,
000
100,
000
10
0,00
0
100,
000
2C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
51,0
00
26
,000
27,0
00
27
,000
27,0
00
15
8,00
0
2.
1P
erso
nn
el a
nd
Tra
vel
16,0
00
16
,000
16,0
00
16
,000
16,0
00
C
oord
inat
or (
shar
ed w
ith P
DM
AR
pro
ject
)12
,000
12,0
00
12
,000
12,0
00
12
,000
Trav
el4,
000
4,
000
4,
000
4,
000
4,
000
2.2
Off
ice
and
veh
icle
34,0
00
9,
000
10
,000
10,0
00
10
,000
Equ
ipm
ent a
nd m
ater
ials
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,00
0
Ser
vice
s (c
omm
unita
tion
and
mai
nten
ance
)3,
000
3,
000
3,
000
3,
000
3,
000
C
ompu
ter
and
fax
5,00
0
Veh
icle
20,0
00
V
ehic
le In
sura
nce
and
Mai
nten
ance
3,00
0
3,00
0
4,00
0
4,00
0
4,00
0
2.
3M
on
ito
rin
g a
nd
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,00
0
Mon
itorin
g an
d E
valu
atio
n1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
3.1
241,
000
22
6,00
0
17
7,00
0
177,
000
14
7,00
0
968,
000
A
ctiv
ity
3.2
Far
mer
Org
aniz
atio
n T
rain
ing
Yea
r 1
Yea
r 2
Yea
r 3
Yea
r 4
Yea
r 5
TOTA
L
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 F
arm
er
Org
aniz
atio
n T
rain
ing
70,0
00
50,0
00
20,0
00
-
-
14
0,00
0
Pro
duct
ion
trai
ning
mat
eria
ls20
,000
Tr
aini
ng50
,000
50
,000
20
,000
2C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
17,0
00
17,0
00
17,0
00
-
1,00
0
52,0
00
2.
1P
erso
nn
el a
nd
Tra
vel
16,0
00
16,0
00
16,0
00
-
-
C
oord
inat
or (
shar
ed w
ith P
DM
AR
)12
,000
12
,000
12
,000
Tr
avel
4,00
0
4,
000
4,00
0
2.
3M
on
ito
rin
g a
nd
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
-
1,
000
M
onito
ring
and
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
3.1
87,0
00
67,0
00
37,0
00
-
1,00
0
192,
000
A
ctiv
ity
3.3
Pro
du
ctio
n C
red
itY
ear
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5TO
TAL
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 C
red
it li
ne
600,
000
-
-
-
-
60
0,00
0
O
pera
ting
cost
s60
0,00
0
2
Ou
tpu
t 2
Tra
inin
g10
,000
10,0
00
-
-
-
20,0
00
S
hort
cour
ses
10,0
00
10
,000
-
-
3C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,
000
3,
000
3,
000
15
,000
3.1
Per
son
nel
an
d T
rave
l2,
000
2,
000
2,00
0
2,00
0
2,00
0
Coo
rdin
atio
n (c
ost s
hare
d in
PD
MA
R p
roje
ct)
Trav
el2,
000
2,
000
2,00
0
2,00
0
2,00
0
3.
2M
on
ito
rin
g a
nd
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
M
onito
ring
and
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,
000
1,
000
1,
000
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
3.3
613,
000
13,0
00
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,00
0
635,
000
A
ctiv
ity
4.1W
ho
lesa
le m
arke
t re
-org
aniz
atio
nY
ear
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5TO
TAL
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 K
igal
i Mar
ket
Reo
rgan
izat
ion
10,0
00
10
,000
-
-
-
20,0
00
O
pera
ting
cost
s10
,000
10,0
00
2O
utp
ut
2 K
igal
i mar
ket
con
stru
ctio
n10
0,00
0
-
-
-
-
100,
000
C
onst
ruct
ion
100,
000
-
-
3O
utp
ut
3 P
rovi
nca
l mar
ket
reo
rgan
izat
ion
10,0
00
20
,000
20
,000
20
,000
10
,000
80
,000
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
10,0
00
20
,000
20
,000
20
,000
10
,000
4C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
16,0
00
16
,000
16
,000
16
,000
16
,000
80
,000
4.1
Per
son
nel
an
d T
rave
l15
,000
15,0
00
15,0
00
15,0
00
15,0
00
Coo
rdin
ator
(sh
are
with
PD
MA
R p
roje
ct)
12,0
00
12
,000
12
,000
12
,000
12
,000
Tr
avel
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,
000
3,00
0
3,
000
4.
2M
on
ito
rin
g a
nd
Eva
luat
ion
1,00
0
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
Mon
itorin
g an
d E
valu
atio
n1,
000
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
4.1
136,
000
26
,000
16
,000
16
,000
16
,000
21
0,00
0
A
ctiv
ity 4
.2 P
roce
ssin
g P
rom
otio
nY
ear
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5TO
TAL
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
(US
$)(U
S$)
1O
utp
ut
1 P
roce
ssin
g P
rom
otio
n20
,000
20
,000
20
,000
5,
000
-
65,0
00
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
20,0
00
20,0
00
20,0
00
5,00
0
2C
oo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
1,50
0
1,
500
1,50
0
1,
500
-
6,00
0
2.
1P
erso
nn
el a
nd
Tra
vel
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
-
Coo
rdin
ator
(co
sts
shar
ed w
ith 1
.1)
Trav
el1,
000
1,00
0
1,
000
1,00
0
2.3
Mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d E
valu
atio
n50
0
500
50
0
500
-
M
onito
ring
and
Eva
luat
ion
500
50
0
500
50
0
TO
TA
L A
ctiv
ity
4.2
21,5
00
21,5
00
21,5
00
6,50
0
-
71
,000