a political economy of community policing

Upload: jordan-phillips

Post on 08-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 a political economy of community policing

    1/2

    Jordan Phillips

    24 January 2011

    Assignment 3

    Similar to The Evolving Strategy of Policing, A Political Economy of Community

    Policing categorizes the evolution of policing into five different eras. In each of these eras

    Barlow argues that maintaining the social order is the primary function of police while the crisis

    of legitimacy is what fuels police change. Barlow begins with a discussion of Pre-Industrial

    Police and the creation of slave patrols and ends with the rise of community policing in the Post-

    Modern Era.(Brandl and Barlow2004)

    Pre-industrial police was categorized by the creation of slave patrols to maintain order

    between plantations and suppress slave rebellion. Barlow argues that these slave patrols were

    the first publically funded municipal police department. After the Dredd Scott Decision denied

    sanctuary to runaway slaves in the northern states, the Texas Rangers (the first state police) were

    in charge of capturing runaway slave trying to escape out of the country. As the industrial

    revolution took place the rise of immigrant populations or dangerous classes became a concern

    for wealthy industrialists who funded public and private police organizations in order to preserve

    a disciplined workforce. To accompany this slave patrols were still in existence even after the

    Civil War, enforcing segregation laws and discriminatory practices carried down from the

    north.federal bureaus, municipal police departments focused on removing officer discretion.

    (Brandl and Barlow2004)

    Following these two early stages of policing, Barlow argues that police organizations

    moved into the modern era. Just as Kelling and Moore noted, this time period was characterized

    by a move towards a more traditional model of policing. Basing their organization strategies on

  • 8/7/2019 a political economy of community policing

    2/2

    the newly forming 1870s forced police into a more professional model as the threat of social

    revolution grew. As the 1960s approached Barlow argues that police moved into the postmodern

    era. During this time public faith in law enforcement began to fail as fear of crime rose due to

    riots over the war and the Civil Rights Movement. The initial response to this social upheaval

    was to increase militarization and professionalization within the department. This created a sense

    of team oriented policing but only served to distance the police from the community, increasing

    the publics lack of trust and dissatisfaction with the department. (Brandl and Barlow2004)

    During the 1980s police entered a new period of development. Barlow states that this

    time is defined by the rise of community policing (or image management policing). This new

    strategy encourages public scrutiny of police practices also requires that the community take a

    bigger role in crime prevention(Brandl and Barlow2004). However, although Skogan praises

    community policing as being effective in reducing the fear of crime he also states that there are

    no current ways to measure the results of implementing this style of policing within a particular

    community. Skogan also argues that community policing is a process or philosophy made up of

    three core elements consisting of citizen involvement, decentralization, and problem-solving, but

    that in reviewing the practices of community policing agencies such as COPS (The Office of

    Community Oriented Policing) are too quick to judge the effectiveness of such programs by

    cities such as Chicago, which experienced dramatic improvements between the relationship of

    the police to the public. These improvements are not the norm for most cities where community

    policing is usually only popular in suburban middle class neighborhoods.(Weisburd and Braga

    2006)