a new suite of construction frameworks keith heard regional programme management
TRANSCRIPT
A Joined up plan
• Join up with the SW and London to create a framework for major projects across the South of England – SCF
• Create a joined up plan with SE7 colleagues for a network of regional and local frameworks
• Protect capacity for Hampshire with local framework for intermediate projects – ICF
• Create new capacity in Hampshire for local projects – Minor Works Framework
Tier 3 (LCF)3 Lots (18 contractors)
£1 to £1.5m
Tier 2 (ICF)1 Lot (10 contractors)
£0.5m to £4m
Tier 2 £750k to £5m (8 contractors)
Tier 3 £50k to £750k (8 contractors)
Tier 4 £1 to £50k (6 contractors)
Tier 2 £750k to £6.5m (11 contractors)
Tier 3 £1 to £750k (11 contractors)
SE SUB REGIONAL FRAMEWORKS
Tier 3 (Minor Works)Work in progress
Complementary frameworks for capacity
• Issues with SEaL framework with interest in smaller projects (especially D&B)
• Analysis showed problem most acute for projects £1m to £4m
• Hence two complementary frameworks SCF (SE) for projects > £4m
8 contractors
ICF (Hampshire) for projects £0.5m to £4m 10 contractors
• Exactly the same operating model
Principles – 2 stage approach
Design Construction
Construct to agreed lump sum
Contractor selected from framework on
OHP, PC fee, construction staff
cost, design & ability to meet client brief and project budget
Integrated team develop designs and
costs, maximise efficiency within
budget whilst finalising package procurement with
tier 2 and 3
The HCC approach has been tried and tested since HCC’s first framework in 2004 for the Nursing Care Programme
Learning - The HCC Feedback
• Frustration with the template approach to the Framework Tender
• Complications with Preliminary pricing tied to templates
• Preconstruction time based, not output based
• Lack of transparency in preconstruction
• No market intelligence
• Contractor performance variable
• Lack of enforcement of framework requirements
New Framework Features• Specified Contractor duties
Framework Director Framework Account Manager
• Not to exceed rates for OHP, Preconstruction, construction and design
• Faster contractor selection process • Primary school extension & secondary school solutions priced
by all contractors Competitive pricing to meet or beat EFA, Scape
• Minimum standards of contractor performance across a range of project, performance and social value KPI’s
• Designed to help authorities implement key initiatives such as BIM and Project Bank Accounts through signed charters
The Contractors
SCF1. BAM
2. Galliford Try
3. Kier
4. Mace
5. Midas
6. Morgan Sindall
7. Wates
8. Willmott Dixon
ICF1. Amiri
2. Beard
3. Interserve
4. Kier
5. Lakehouse
6. Longcross
7. Midas
8. Osborne
9. Raymond Brown
10. Stirland
The Mini Competition Process
Opportunity pipeline published – M2i
Project details published on procurement portal (sets not to exceed price)
MC 1 run through procurement portal
Framework manager / project officer short list to 3
Project Officer issues and runs MC2
Confirmation of (Questions may be weighted):•Preference for type of project•Ability to deliver (capability)•Capacity of contractor and supply chain•Ability to add valueSelf scored responses to pre-set criteria, supported by word limited written evidence. Evaluated by framework manager, who agrees outcome with project officer.
Principles of Mini Competition 1
Preferred outcome is for three contractors to proceed to MC2.•Sensitive to contractor right to appeal•Sensitive to officer view on self scoring•May be more than three in MC2
Framework Manager to feed back to unsuccessful contractors
Outcome of Mini Competition 1
Cost – SCF 20 to 50% ICF 30% TBA•OHP %•Pre construction fee%•Construction fee %•Design fee %•If applicable and appropriate, may include Preliminary items Rates may not exceed the tender percentages from the price point, but may be less, and will be converted to lump sums based on the construction value
Principles of Mini Competition 2
Sub
cat
egor
ies
not w
eigh
ted
– si
ngle
com
mer
cial
sco
re
Technical – SCF 50 to 80% ICF 70% TBA SCF ICF•QA and performance (CI) •BIM •Design Management & Development •Supply Chain Management •Handover and Aftercare •Sustainability and Environment •Social Responsibility – Mandatory question •Financial Control – Mandatory question on cost plan •Framework delivery – Project delivery •Programmes of Work Questions may be weighted
Principles of Mini Competition 2
Award and feed back
• Project Officer to award Agreed costsAgreed programmePre construction agreement
• Project Officer to feed back to unsuccessful contractors
Managing performance
• Minimum standards of performance Exor Gold (Maintain PQQ Status) SCF ICF× Provision of KPI data SCF ICF× Cost predictability SCF ICF Time predictability SCF ICF Team performance scores SCF ICF Defects at handover SCF ICF SME spend SCF ICF Apprenticeships created SCF ICF× Health and safety SCF ICF Fair payment SCF ICF×
Who we are
Keith HeardSenior Programme Manager
Edward CurrieRegional Programme Manager
L. Howell
N. Midmer C. Henderson
Vacancy
T. Moss K Larrive
VacancyRegional Programme Manager
Framework Team Programme Management Team
M. Thomas