a new chapter in the pari passu saga - world...
TRANSCRIPT
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
1
A New Chapter in the
Pari Passu Saga
(clearly not the last one!)
Dr Rodrigo Olivares-Caminal
Washington DC,
December, 2012
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
2
Time constraint, just to ignite the discussion.
Only substantial aspects—no UK/US procedural issues.
Opinions are personal.
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
3
T H E P A R I P A S S U C L A U S E
S t r u c t u r e & I n t e r p r e t a t i o n
Clause Structure Clause Interpretation
1. INTERNAL LIMB: the bonds
rank pari passu with each other
2. EXTERNAL LIMB: the bonds
rank pari passu with other unsecured indebtedness of the issuer
Two Limbs Two Interpretations
1. NARROW or RANKING
INTERPRETATION: obligations rank and will rank pari passu with all other unsecured debt
2. BROAD or PAYMENT
INTERPRETATION: when the debtor is unable to pay all its obligations, they will be paid on
a pro-rata basis
PARI PASSU—STRUCTURE AND INTERPRETATION
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
4
“The Securities [i.e., the bonds] will constitute . . .
direct, unconditional, unsecured and unsubordinated
obligations of the Republic and shall at all times rank
pari passu and without any preference among
themselves. The payment obligations of the Republic under the Securities shall at all times rank at least
equally with all its other present and future
unsecured and unsubordinated External
Indebtedness (as defined in this Agreement).
Internal Limb
With a payment element? What does this really mean?
Wood: “rank means ‘rank’. It does not mean ‘will
pay’, nor does it mean that will give ‘equal treatment
to creditors’. If the clause adopts a variant, such as
‘rank pari passu in priority of payment’ , the result is
the same”.
THE PROSPECTUS (ARGENTINA’S 1994 FAA, CLAUSE 1(C))
External Limb
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
5
It is DECLARED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that the Republic is required ... at
all times to rank its payment obligations
pursuant to NML’s Bonds at least equally
with all the Republic’s other present and
future unsecured and unsubordinated
External Indebtedness.
It is DECLARED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that the Republic violates
Paragraph 1(c) of the FAA whenever it
lowers the rank of its payment obligations
… including (and without limitation) by
relegating NML’s bonds to a non-paying
class …
NML CAPITAL v. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA (08-cv-06978-TPG)
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
6
Why the District Court said that
there has been a breach of the
clause?
Lock Law
It is DECLARED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED
that the Republic lowered the rank of NML's
bonds in violation of Paragraph 1(c) of the FAA
when it enacted Law 26,017 and Law 26,547.
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
7
No CACs or exit consents Argentina run out of options to enhance creditor participation
creatively use of the contractual terms of the bonds, i.e. most-favored creditor clause but there
was a drafting failure !
Argentina passed Law 26,017 (Lock law) to reassure participating creditors that the offer was the
only possible choice.
The Lock law provided a basis for considering an alteration in the legal ranking of the existing
unsecured creditors resulting in the involuntary subordination of the holdout creditors.
Argentina opened the window to a breach of the pari passu clause on legal subordination
rather than on a broad or ratable payment interpretation.
The problem here is not the issuance of performing debt as result of the exchange offer
formally subordinated the holdouts to non-performing status/ i.e. payments do not rank equally
anymore = 2 unsecured obligations ranking differently.
SEC Form 18K (Annual Report): holdouts are a category separate from its regular debt and that
since 2005, it has “not [been] in a legal … position to pay” that category.
Buchheit: ‘you can do pretty much whatever you want in discriminating among creditors (in terms
of who gets paid and who does not) but do not try to justify your behavior by taking steps that
purport to establish a legal basis for discrimination’.
BREACH OF PP CLAUSE: SUBORDINATION
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
8
1. Argentina reserves the right—in its absolute discretion—to: (a) purchase; (b)
exchange; (c) offer to purchase or exchange; or, (d) enter into a settlement in respect of
any eligible securities that are not exchanged pursuant to the exchange offer. And—to the
extent permitted by applicable law—to purchase or offer to purchase eligible securities in
the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise.
Provided that:
2. Any such purchase, exchange, offer to purchase or exchange or settlement
will be made in accordance with applicable law.
3. The terms of any such purchases, exchanges, offers or settlements could
differ from the terms of the exchange offer.
Therefore,
4. Holders of the new bonds will be entitled to participate in any voluntary
purchase, exchange, offer to purchase or exchange extended to or agreed with holders
of eligible securities not exchanged pursuant to the exchange offer [NOTE: the word
settlement does not appear in this paragraph].
THE MFC CLAUSE
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
9
Argentina “lowered the rank” of plaintiff bonds in
two ways: (1) “when it made payments
currently due under the Exchange Bonds, while
persisting in its refusal to satisfy its payment
obligations currently due under [plaintiffs]
Bonds”; and, (2) “when it enacted [the Lock Law”
and [the Lock Law Suspension]”.
“… in pairing the two sentences of its Pari Passu
Clause, the FAA manifested an intention to
protect bondholders from more than just
formal subordination” according to the CoA,
the Pari Passu clause protects against: (1) “the
issuance of other superior debt (first sentence)”;
and, (2) “the giving of priority to other
payment obligations (second sentence)”.
THE VIEW FROM THE BENCH
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
11
Elliott’s
Decision in Brussels
SDRM
(Pub. Sector) NGO Activism
Vulture
Repudiation (Bills/Acts)
Rogue
Debtors Arg. 2001-05
Ecuador 2008
Greece 2012?
CACs
+ Exit Consent
(Priv. Sector)
Increased
Vulture Activity
(mistaken) Re-emergence of Odiousness
+ Illegit. Mut
Rogue
Creditors?
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
12
RESTRUCTURING?
US citizen bondholders to claim the payment of their credit (which
limited the chances of achieving debt restructuring under the IMF's
umbrella) vs. not allowing the claim because it would prejudice NY as a
financial world centre (Pravin case, Court of Appeals)
Operational ramifications that impact on the functioning of the
payment systems vs. enforcement of creditors’ rights least of two
evils = NY will lose !
RATABLE PAYMENT?
Temporary Restraining Order (payment method) + Permanent Injunctions
(aiding and abetting)?
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
13
keep it
simple.
1. Pre-Argentina’s litigation = incorrect
interpretation of the pp clause (Belgium
court)
2. Post-Argentina’s litigation = could have
been based on a correct interpretation and
an actual breach of the pp clause in its
ranking or narrow form A GREAT MISSED
OPPORTUNITY a new wake of litigation.
3. Olivares-Caminal (2009) and Gulati and
Scott (2011) the clause has little or no
meaning in the sovereign context
boilerplates are sticky, even more after the
CoA decision.
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
14
Any Questions ?
谢谢. Cam rá. Efharisto. Obrigado.
Gracias. Grazie. Thank You.
Merci. Dankeshen. Etc.
A NEW CHAPTER IN THE PARI PASSU SAGA
15
Jan 2012 District Court issued a temporary restraining order enjoining Argentina from
altering the payment process (including the use of different firms or other vehicles).
Feb 2012 District Court issued an injunctive relief each time that a payment is done
to exchanged bonds the same fraction of the amount due to them shall be paid to
holdouts justification is equitable relief since Argentina made clear (even by a formal
act) its intention not to pay any money judgment
Since Argy might refuse to comply with the injunction order (under Rule 65(d)(2))
the parties, their officers, agents, servants employees, attorneys as well as other
persons who are in active concert or participation with them are bound by the
injunctions.
Plus the injunctions expressly prohibit Argentina’s agents from aiding and abetting
any further violation of the order by the court.
o NB: Art. 4-A of the UCC pure intermediaries cannot be affected.
SOME PROCEDURAL NOTES