a microbial oasis in the hypersaline atacama subsurface...
TRANSCRIPT
A Microbial Oasis in the Hypersaline AtacamaSubsurface Discovered by a Life Detector Chip:
Implications for the Search for Life on Mars
Victor Parro,1 Graciela de Diego-Castilla,1 Mercedes Moreno-Paz,1 Yolanda Blanco,1
Patricia Cruz-Gil,1 Jose A. Rodrıguez-Manfredi,2 David Fernandez-Remolar,3 Felipe Gomez,3
Manuel J. Gomez,1 Luis A. Rivas,1 Cecilia Demergasso,4,5 Alex Echeverrıa,4 Viviana N. Urtuvia,4
Marta Ruiz-Bermejo,1 Miriam Garcıa-Villadangos,1 Marina Postigo,1 Monica Sanchez-Roman,3
Guillermo Chong-Dıaz,5,6 and Javier Gomez-Elvira2
Abstract
The Atacama Desert has long been considered a good Mars analogue for testing instrumentation for planetaryexploration, but very few data (if any) have been reported about the geomicrobiology of its salt-rich subsurface.We performed a Mars analogue drilling campaign next to the Salar Grande (Atacama, Chile) in July 2009, andseveral cores and powder samples from up to 5 m deep were analyzed in situ with LDChip300 (a Life DetectorChip containing 300 antibodies). Here, we show the discovery of a hypersaline subsurface microbial habitatassociated with halite-, nitrate-, and perchlorate-containing salts at 2 m deep. LDChip300 detected bacteria,archaea, and other biological material (DNA, exopolysaccharides, some peptides) from the analysis of less than0.5 g of ground core sample. The results were supported by oligonucleotide microarray hybridization in the fieldand finally confirmed by molecular phylogenetic analysis and direct visualization of microbial cells bound tohalite crystals in the laboratory. Geochemical analyses revealed a habitat with abundant hygroscopic salts likehalite (up to 260 g kg - 1) and perchlorate (41.13 lg g - 1 maximum), which allow deliquescence events at lowrelative humidity. Thin liquid water films would permit microbes to proliferate by using detected organic acidslike acetate (19.14 lg g - 1) or formate (76.06 lg g - 1) as electron donors, and sulfate (15875 lg g - 1), nitrate(13490 lg g - 1), or perchlorate as acceptors. Our results correlate with the discovery of similar hygroscopic saltsand possible deliquescence processes on Mars, and open new search strategies for subsurface martian biota. Theperformance demonstrated by our LDChip300 validates this technology for planetary exploration, particularlyfor the search for life on Mars. Key Words: Atacama Desert—Life detection—Biosensor—Biopolymers—In situmeasurement. Astrobiology 11, 969–996.
1. Introduction
The space science community agrees on the need to ex-plore the martian subsurface for evidence of intact organic
molecules (Kminek and Bada, 2006; Shkrob et al., 2010). Infact, ESA’s ExoMars mission aims to search for life or its re-mains by analyzing samples taken from a drill hole of at least2 m in depth (http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/ExoMars/SEM10VLPQ5F_0.html ). Dartnell et al. (2007) suggested, aftera series of simulation experiments on the effect of solar radi-ation on biological material (bacteria), that a minimum depthof 7.5 m would be needed to find viable cryopreserved cells.
Different robotic missions have shown that Mars is a saltyplanet with a volcanic basement (Murchie et al., 2009).Chlorides and bromides precipitated as cementing salts ineolian deposits (McLennan et al., 2005) or likely as sedi-mentary deposits that infilled shallow basins (Osterloo et al.,2008) due to a strong oversaturation of solutions that leachedto the Mars surface under high evaporative rates. Chloride-bearing salts are excellent matrices for the preservation ofbiological remains (Fish et al., 2002; Stan-Lotter et al., 2006),and their hygroscopic properties can produce deliquescenceevents under low relative humidity (Davila et al., 2008). Infact, the high content of perchlorate (ClO�4 ) at the Phoenix
1–3Departments of 1Molecular Evolution, 2Instrumentation, and 3Planetology and Habitability, Centro de Astrobiologıa (INTA-CSIC),Madrid, Spain.
4Centro de Biotecnologıa, 5Centro de Investigacion Cientıfica y Tecnologica para la Minerıa, and 6Department of Geological Sciences,Universidad Catolica del Norte, Antofagasta, Chile.
ASTROBIOLOGYVolume 11, Number 10, 2011ª Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.DOI: 10.1089/ast.2011.0654
969
lander site on Mars (Hecht et al., 2009) might promote theformation of stable liquid saline water on present-day Mars(Zorzano et al., 2009).
The Atacama Desert is one of the most accurate terrestrialanalogues for martian environments because it combinesthe formation of two key inorganic compounds: chloridesand perchlorates. Similar to events on Mars, harsh aridconditions promoted an extreme oversaturation of theground and surface water solutions, which resulted innearly exclusive precipitation of halite, the end member inevaporation from brines, with no other mineral phase(Chong-Dıaz et al., 1999). The bounding regions of the SalarGrande (Cordillera de la Costa, region de Atacama, Chile)are characterized by saline subsoils associated with nitratedeposits that contain chlorides, sulfates, chlorates, chro-mates, iodates, and perchlorates. These salts are older anddifferent from those of the more central region of the SalarGrande (Chong-Dıaz et al., 1999).
Though the Atacama Desert has been studied for manyyears as a Mars analogue (Cameron, 1969; Cabrol et al., 2001;Glavin et al., 2004; Shafaat et al., 2005; Skelley et al., 2005),very few studies have focused on the microbiology or mo-lecular biomarker content of the subsoil. Lester et al. (2007)described the microbiology from the surface to 15 cm deep,and Bobst et al. (2001) reported a 100 m drilling in the Salarde Atacama (23�S, 68�W) only for paleoclimatic studies.Gramain et al. (2011) described the archaeal community,identified via nested PCR and cultivation, that occupied apure halite core up to 15 m deep from the Salar Grande.However, most of the microbiological and life-detectionstudies on the Atacama Desert have focused mainly on thesurface or very close to it (Navarro-Gonzalez et al., 2003;Lester et al., 2007; Weinstein et al., 2008). Cabrol et al. (2007)used a fluorescence detection system on board a rover (Zoe)to detect fluorescent signals from biological material (e.g.,chlorophyll) along different transects. Piatek et al. (2007) useda combined orbital image analysis and a field rover withinstrumentation aimed to examine the mineralogy, geomor-phology, and chlorophyll potential of field sites on the sur-face. We did not find in the literature any systematic studythat involved the search for life or traces of it or the micro-biology of the Atacama subsurface below a few centimeters.Further, there have been no studies conducted in whichtechniques based on immunological biosensors were used.
Here, we present the results of the July 2009 astrobiologicalfield campaign, AtacaMars2009, in which we tested a newin situ life-detection instrument designed for planetary ex-ploration and study of the geomicrobiology of the Atacamasubsurface at the west side of the Salar Grande. The key in-strument was Signs Of LIfe Detector V3.0 (SOLID3) and itsLDChip300 biosensor (a Life Detector Chip with 300 anti-bodies), which was designed to detect a broad range of mo-lecular biomarkers with different specificities and sensitivitiesat low parts per billion levels for proteins and peptides or 104
to 105 cells per milliliter (Parro et al., 2005, 2008a, 2011a; Rivaset al., 2008; Parro, 2010). The LDChip300 biosensor containsantibodies against universal biomolecules like DNA, nucleo-tides, amino acids, and peptidoglycan, and includes anti-bodies that target general groups of bacteria (e.g., Gram-positive cells or Bacillus spp. spores) and bacterial strains fromdifferent phylogenetic groups and different extreme environ-ments (it contains a relatively high redundancy of antibodies
against environmental extracts and bacterial strains from theacidic sulfur- and iron-rich environment of Rıo Tinto in Spain).LDChip300 also contains some antibodies that target relevantmetabolic pathways.
LDChip300 detected bacteria, archaea, and molecularbiomarkers, all of which were especially abundant around2 m deep. This suggests the presence of a microbial oasis inthe Atacama subsurface. The results obtained in the fieldwere exhaustively checked and validated in the laboratorywith conventional techniques, which confirmed the presenceof a new subsurface hypersaline environment. The mineral-ogical composition together with the extremely low liquidwater availability suggests important analogies with somemartian environments. Our LDChip may open a new era forlife-detection systems in planetary exploration.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Logistics, base camp, and tasks
The campaign was carried out such that it was completedby July 31, 2009, wintertime in the region. A base camp foreight researchers and two assistants was set up at about 1 kmdistance from the drilling site (GPS coordinates: 20�58¢7.30†S,70�2¢2.95†W) (Fig. 1A). The camp included a tent that wasused as a field laboratory with space for three people andsome equipment (a microcentrifuge, a water bath, a scanner,a handheld sonicator, tubes, and other materials and reac-tants). Drilling was usually done by two people, with theassistance of two more during the more complicated opera-tions (removing the cores, changing the corers, etc). Threepeople were stationed permanently in the field laboratoryprocessing and analyzing samples, one of whom performedgeophysical studies and assisted in the lab.
2.2. Drilling and sample collection
The apron at the base of a mountain of volcanic originnearby the Salar Grande was chosen as a Mars analogue forthe drilling and life-detection campaign (Fig. 1A). We mea-sured temperature extremes of - 3�C and 39�C at the drillingsite during the campaign. The drilling was done with aCARDI EN 400, a 4.08–horse power gas-powered motor, and85 mm diameter commercial off-the-shelf diamond-impreg-nated coring drill bits and rods. The drilling operations weredifficult due to the limited power of the apparatus. Tominimize cross contamination and assist drilling, com-pressed air was injected inside the corer to help transportchips up and out of the hole. No filtering devices were usedto avoid potential contamination from the compressed air. Ifany contamination were to come from the compressed air,we would have detected it nearly uniformly in all coresamples, which we did not. Rather, we obtained clearlydifferentiated patterns along the entire hole. Samples rangingfrom 500 g to 3 kg of this material were collected with avacuum sampling system (a commercial aspirator with anew and sterile bag) and were labeled and stored for lateranalysis (Table 1). Samples were collected in plastic bags orwrapped in aluminum foil, and were then stored at roomtemperature (in the shade) inside closed boxes for as long as2 h. The samples were then carried out to the field laboratoryto be analyzed or further stored until transport to the labo-ratory in the Centro de Astrobiologıa, Madrid, Spain.
970 PARRO ET AL.
2.3. Raman spectroscopy in the field
Intact cores were immediately photographed, analyzedwith Raman spectroscopy, and then wrapped in aluminumfoil to be transported to the laboratory in Spain. Ramanspectra were taken in the field with a portable AvantesAvaSpec-2048TEC Raman spectrometer with 10 cm - 1 spec-tral resolution, a 50 mW, 532 nm diode laser, and a fiber opticprobe custom-made by InPhotonics according to these pa-rameters. The Raman excitation source, made by PD-LD, is a‘‘Volume Bragg Grating’’–stabilized module, which consistsof a stabilized laser diode and the associated electronics. This
module provides a high-stability output around 532 nm,with a typical spectral line width of 0.08 nm.
2.4. Antibody production, purification, and labeling
The antibodies used in this research (see Table 2 in Ap-pendix) were the result of several years of work aimed at thedetection of molecular biomarkers for planetary exploration.At the time the present study began we had a collection of300 antibodies, which constituted the so-called im-nunosensor LDChip300. The criteria for antibody productionand selection were explained previously by Parro et al.
FIG. 1. AtacaMars2009 drilling campaign. (A) The drilling site in one apron located at the base of a mountain to the west ofthe Salar Grande (Atacama Desert, Chile). (B) Geological profile of the core with the depth scale and a photograph of thecollected core pieces (left), showing the white halite veins. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ast
LIFE-DETECTION EXPERIMENT IN ATACAMA SUBSURFACE 971
(2005), Parnell et al. (2007), Parro et al. (2008a), Rivas et al.(2008), and Parro et al. (2011a). Because we are developingan instrument for use on Mars, our choice of antibodies isguided by the types of molecular biomarkers found in or-ganisms living on Earth under similar, Mars-like conditions.Consequently, LDChip300 contains antibodies raisedagainst whole microbial cells (archaea and bacteria), extra-
cellular polymers, environmental extracts from terrestrialanalogues for Mars or Europa, proteins and peptides fromwell-conserved anaerobic metabolic pathways (nitrogenfixation, sulfate reduction, nitrate reduction, etc.), exopo-lysaccharides (EPS), and universal molecular biomarkerslike DNA, amino acids, and other biomolecules (Table 2).All the antibodies were purified by Protein A affinity pu-rification and fluorescently labeled as reported previouslyby Parro et al. (2005) and Rivas et al. (2008).
2.5. Design and construction of antibody microarrays
Antibody microarrays were constructed as described byParro et al. (2005) and Rivas et al. (2008) with some modifi-cations, as follows: (i) we used a commercial protein printingbuffer 2 · (Whatman, Schleicher & Schuell, Sandford, ME,USA) and 0.02% Tween 20 as a spotting solution; (ii)printing was done in a duplicate pattern on epoxy-activatedglass slides (Arrayit Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with aMicroGrid II TAS arrayer (Biorobotics, Genomic Solutions,UK). Two microarray designs were performed: one for amanual procedure for the systematic analysis of all thesamples with standard microscope slides (see Section 2.6.1)and another to test the automatic procedure with the SOLID3instrument (Section 2.6.2). For the manual procedure, up tonine identical micoarrays (9 LDChip300) containing a du-plicate spot pattern for the 300 antibodies were spotted on amicroscope slide so that each LDChip300 fits with one of thenine flow cells in a MultiArray Analysis Module (MAAM)device (see Section 3.1; Parro, 2010).
To test SOLID3, the microarray was also designed andconstructed with a MicroGrid II TAS arrayer (BioRobotics,Digilab, Holliston, MA, USA). Five LDChip300 replicas wereprinted in five parallel microarrays so that they fit into thefive different flow cells on the SOLID3 Sample Analysis Unit(Parro et al., 2011a). Antibodies were printed at 1 mg mL - 1 inprotein printing buffer (Whatman, Schleicher & Schuell,Sandford, ME, USA) on a specially designed glass slide (di-mensions 75 · 27 · 0.15 mm) activated with Superepoxychemistry (custom made by Arrayit Corporation, CA, USA).
In all cases, after printing, the antibody microarrays werekept at room temperature until used. We verified that prin-ted antibodies were stable in printing buffer for at least oneyear at room temperature and could be transported to thefield with no significant loss of activity (data not shown).SOLID3 was run and operated as described previously(Parro et al., 2011a).
2.6. Sandwich microarray immunoassay (SMI)procedures
To analyze solid samples by SMI, the potential molecu-lar biomarkers present in the sample have to be extractedinto a liquid solution or suspension and then incubatedin the presence of the capturing antibodies previously im-mobilized on the microarray. After a second incubationwith fluorescent tracer antibodies, the positive antigen-an-tibody reactions are read by fluorescence emission either byCCD device or a scanner. In this campaign, we analyzed thesamples by a manual procedure or automatically by usingthe SOLID3 instrument. Because SOLID3 is designed forsingle use for planetary exploration and it needs a cleanroom to load a new microarray chip, only five assays can be
Table 1. List of the Samples Collected
during the Drilling Campaign
Sample ID Depth (cm) Comments
0 0–5 Chips and powder5 5–10 Chips and powder
10 10–11 Chips and powder20 20–25 Chips and powder25 25–30 Chips and powder30 30–33 Chips and powder35 35–38 Chips and powder40 39–40 Chips and powder45 40–45 Chips and powder60 60–68 Chips and powder (hard crust)68 68–70 Stones90 90–95 Chips and powder (hard crust)
100 100–104 Chips and powder105 105–108 Chips and powder110 110–112 Chips and powder115 115–118 Chips and powder120 120–122 Chips and powder122 122–125 Small core125 125–130 Small core130 130–131 Chips and powder131 131–134 Small core135 135–138 Small core140 140–142 Chips and powder142 142–144 Stones145 145–150 Small core180 180–185 Chips and powder185 185–200 Chips and powder200 200–205 Chips and powder216 216–220 Chips and powder241 241–245 Chips and powder250 250–255 Chips and powder286 286–290 Chips and powder296 296–305 Chips and powder305 305–310 Chips and powder330 330–335 Chips and powder340 340–345 Chips and powder350 350–355 Chips and powder375 375–380 Chips and powder384 384–388 Chips and powder389 389–300 Chips and powder391 391–395 Chips and powder398 398–401 Powder (white)404 404–408 Chips and powder408 408–412 Chips and powder431 431–433 Chips and powder (gray)436 436–440 Chips and powder447 447–450 Chips and powder455 455–560 Chips and powder460 460–465 Chips and powder (hard crust)470 470–475 Chips and powder489 489–499 Chips and powder (gray-brown)507 507–508 Chips and powder (gray crust)508 508–511 Chips and powder
972 PARRO ET AL.
done. Therefore, the samples were assayed by manualprocedure with use of the small and portable MAAM devicefor nine simultaneous analyses (see Section 3.1).
2.6.1. Manual SMI using the MAAM. Immediately beforeuse, the nine microarrays containing printed slides weretreated and washed with a BSA-containing solution to blockall free binding sites on the slides and to remove the excess ofnon-covalently-bound antibodies. For that purpose, theslides were inverted and dropped onto a 0.5 M Tris-HCl pH9, 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution for 2 minand then immersed into 0.5 M Tris-HCl pH 8, 2% BSA so-lution (TBSB, Tris buffered saline–BSA), with gentle agitationfor 1 h. After drying with a short centrifugation, slides wereready for immediate use to analyze samples by a sandwichimmunoassay. The samples to be analyzed were processedas follows: (i) up to 0.5 g of dust or ground core samples weresonicated in 1 mL of TBSTRR buffer (0.4 M Tris-HCl pH 8, 0.3M NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) by using a manual sonicator for3 · 1 min cycles (Dr. Hielscher 50W DRH-UP50H sonicator,Hielscher Ultrasonics, Berlin, Germany); (ii) the sonicatedsamples were filtered through 20-micron nylon filters to re-move sand and coarse material. Then 50 lL of the filtrate wasinjected into one of the nine flow cells of the MAAM deviceto put it in contact with LDChip300, where it was left toincubate at ambient temperature (20–30�C) for 1 h withmixing by pipetting every 15 min. To attain more homoge-neous conditions between different microarray incubations,we avoided extreme temperatures ( - 1�C to 5�C during thenight or up to 35–39�C during the day) by incubating duringmiddle morning or late afternoon, when the ambient tem-perature in the field laboratory was in the range of 15–30�C.Then the microarrays were washed out by passing 3–5 mL ofthe same buffer through the flow cells and evacuating thelast volume by pipetting air. The positive antibody-antigenreactions were revealed by incubation with 50 lL of a cock-tail containing 300 fluorescent antibodies at a final concen-tration of approximately 100 lg mL - 1 for the whole mixtureand an average around 0.4 lg mL - 1 of each antibody. After1 h incubation at ambient temperature, the microarrays werewashed out again to remove the excess fluorescent cocktail;the slide was separated from the MAAM, rinsed by dippinginto a 50 mL falcon tube filled with distilled water, and fi-nally dried by a short centrifugation in a small and portablemicrocentrifuge designed for slides (Arrayit Corp.). Finally,the slides were analyzed in the field laboratory by illumi-nating them with 635 nm light and imaging their fluorescentemission at 650 nm with a GenePix 4100A scanner. The im-ages were quantitatively analyzed in the field by usingGenePix Pro software (Genomic Solutions) installed on alaptop computer. A blank was always run in parallel withonly buffer as an ‘‘antigenic’’ sample and then revealed withthe same fluorescent antibody or antibody cocktail as the realsamples. The final fluorescence intensity (F) for each anti-body spot was calculated with the equation F = (Fsample -Fblank - 3Favcontrol spots), where F is the fluorescent intensity at635 nm minus the local background as quantified by thesoftware (GenePix Pro) and where Fsample is the total fluo-rescence signal of the sample, Fblank the total fluorescencesignal of the blank, and Favcontrol spots the average fluorescentsignal of the control spots. Said control spots are located indifferent parts of the microarray and consist of BSA, only
buffer, and others corresponding to the pre-immune antisera(more than 50). Because, theoretically, they should not ex-hibit any fluorescent signal, we use them as a baseline forfluorescence. We always subtract 2–3 times the Favcontrol spots
as a stringency cutoff to minimize false positives. Those spotshaving obvious defects (missing or very tiny spots, an arti-fact due to a bad wash or dust in the array) or those dupli-cated spots whose standard deviation was 0.2 times higherthan the mean were not considered for quantification.
2.6.2. Automatic SMI in SOLID3. SOLID3 is the thirdprototype of the SOLID (Signs Of Life Detector) instrumentconcept devoted to the detection of molecular biomarkers inplanetary exploration (see Section 3.1). It is an analytical in-strument, based on antibody microarray technology, that candetect a broad range of molecular-sized compounds, fromthe amino acid size level to whole cells, with sensitivities at1–2 ppb (ng mL- 1) for biomolecules and 104 to 105 cells mL - 1
(Fernandez-Calvo et al., 2006; Rivas et al., 2008; Parro et al.,2011a). SOLID3 is currently in Technology Readiness Level(TRL) 5–6, although some of the internal elements are in theTRL 9 stage (Parro et al., 2011a). The instrument accepts bothsolid (dust or ground rock or ice) and liquid samples. Thelimit of sample volume ranges from 0.5–1 cm3 to 2.5 cm3
(mL) at final processing volume (including the extractionbuffer supplied by the instrument). SOLID3 is able to per-form both sandwich and competitive immunoassays andconsists of two separate functional units: a Sample Pre-paration Unit (SPU) for 10 different extractions by ultra-sonication, and a Sample Analysis Unit (SAU) for fluorescentimmunoassays. The SAU consists of five different flow cells,with an antibody microarray LDChip300 in each one. It isalso equipped with an exclusive optical package and a CCDdevice for fluorescence detection.
After loading up to 0.5 g of dust or ground core sampleinto one of the homogenizing chambers of SOLID3’s SPU,the instrument was set to run autonomously as described inParro et al. (2011a). After being started, SOLID3 adds 2 mL ofextraction-incubation buffer, TBSTRR, to the homogenizingchamber. A sonicator horn pushes a ring membrane forward,hermetically closing the chamber, and advances to the son-ication position. After four cycles of sonication, the linearactuator pushes the sample forward through a filtering sys-tem (15 lm pore size). The filtrate is injected into the SAU,floods one of the flow cells, and contacts one of theLDChip300 antibody microarrays. An internal recirculationcircuit allows the sample to be re-circulated for up to 1 h inorder to enhance the reaction kinetics between antigens andspotted antibodies. After the incubation time, the remainingsample is discarded into the waste deposit, and the micro-array cell is washed out with the incubation buffer to removethe nonbound sample. Then the buffer is injected into theauxiliary chambers that are pre-loaded with a cocktail of 300lyophilized fluorescent antibodies. The buffer dissolves theantibodies and floods the microarray chamber, where it is re-circulated for up to 1 h. An additional wash removes theexcess of fluorescent antibodies and leaves the microarrayready for fluorescent detection by excitation with a laserbeam via total internal reflection through the glass support,which acts as a waveguide. The fluorescent signal is capturedby a highly sensitive CCD detector and stored as a FlexibleImage Transport System (i.e.,*.fits) image file that can be
LIFE-DETECTION EXPERIMENT IN ATACAMA SUBSURFACE 973
processed and analyzed by conventional microarray soft-ware as described in Section 2.6.1. One of the microarrays isincubated with only the buffer (blank) and revealed withfluorescent antibodies. The blank image is used as a baselineto calculate spot intensities in the tested sample, as describedin Section 2.6.1.
2.7. Environmental DNA extractionand PCR amplification
Total DNA was extracted from 2 g of sample (powder orground cores) by using the commercial DNA EZNA soilDNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) withsome modification: after cell lysis, the extract was partiallydesalinated by using Amicon 30 filters (Millipore) followingthe manufacturer’s protocol. We used the obtained DNA forsimultaneous fluorescent labeling and PCR amplification byusing the bacterial universal primers for 16S rRNA gene 16SFas forward (positions 8–27 of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA, 5¢-AGAGTTTAGTCATGGCTCA) and 16SR as reverse (posi-tions 1057–1074, 5¢-CACGAGCTGACGACAGCCG). Thereactants were previously set up in a gelified mixture (Bio-tools S.A, Madrid, Spain) containing the buffer, the nucleo-tide precursors, the fluorescent nucleotide Cy3-dUTP, theprimers, and the enzyme as follows: 10 · buffer (5.0 lL),50 mM MgCl2 (3.0 lL), 10 mM dACTPs (0.5 lL), 1 mM dTTP(6.25 lL), 2 nm/lL Cy3-dUTP (5.0 lL), forward primer10 mM 16SF (1.0 lL), reverse primer 10 mM 16SR (1.0 lL),Taq-platinum 5U/lL (Invitrogen) (1.0 lL), and distilled H20(27 lL). The gelification process was carried out by BiotoolsS.A. (Madrid, Spain). The samples prepared in this way canbe stored for long periods at ambient temperature. Ad-ditionally, we prepared PCR mixtures without fluorescentnucleotides: 10 · Buffer (5.0 lL), MgCl2 50 mM (1.5 lL),dNTPs 10 mM (1.0 lL), primer 16SF 10 mM (1.0 lL), primer16SR 10 mM (1.0 lL), Taq-platinum 5U/ul (1.0 lL), and dH20(40 lL). Gelified samples were reconstituted by adding dis-tilled nuclease-free water and the template DNA. For simul-taneous labeling and PCR amplification, the field thermocyclerwas programmed as follows: 95�C, 5 min; 10 · (95�C 20 s, 50�C30 s, 68�C 60 s); 25 · (95�C 20 s, 48�C 30 s, 68�C 60 s + 5 s percycle); 68�C 10 min; 4�C.
2.8. Oligonucleotide microarray hybridizationin the field laboratory
Oligonucleotide microarrays containing specific probes forprokaryotic microorganisms, like our previously reportedprokaryotic acidophile microarray (PAM), were printed andtreated as described by Garrido et al. (2008). This microarraywas specially developed for the detection of prokaryoticacidophiles in several field campaigns to the extremely acidicenvironment of Rıo Tinto (Huelva, Spain), but it also con-tains specific oligonucleotide probes for the 16S and 23SrRNA genes from other universal groups: Alpha-, Beta-,Gamma-, and Deltaproteobacteria, as well as Firmicutes (lowGC content), high-GC-content Gram-positive bacteria, Ar-chaea, and so on. Fluorescently labeled 16S rRNA geneamplicons were checked by agarose gel electrophoresis thenpurified with Qiagen PCR purification kit columns (Qiagen,CA, USA) and set to hybridize in HibIt hybridization buffer(Arrayit Corp.) at 50�C for 12 h in a water bath. They werethen washed and scanned for fluorescence as previously
described (Garrido et al., 2008). Because the probes for Beta-and Gammaproteobacteria correspond to sequences from the23S rRNA gene and we used only the amplicon from 16SrRNA gene for fluorescent labeling, we could not detectthese types of bacteria in hybridization with the oligonucle-otide microarray.
2.9. Determination of total protein and sugarcontent in the field laboratory
Total protein and sugar content in the samples was de-termined in the field laboratory as follows: 1 g of sample(powder) was subjected to 3 · 1 min ultrasonication cycles in2 mL of distilled water with 1–2 min stops by using ahandheld sonicator (Dr. Hielscher 50W DRH-UP50H soni-cator, Hielscher Ultrasonics, Berlin, Germany). Samples werecentrifuged at 2000g to sediment the mineral particles, andthe supernatants were directly assayed for protein concen-tration by using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent(Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) (Smith et al., 1985) and sugarcontent as described by Dubois et al. (1956), respectively. ANanoDrop (NanoDrop Int.) instrument was used for spec-trophotometric measurements.
2.10. Agarose gel electrophoresis
For DNA fractionation and visualization a pre-stainedagarose gel and a portable FlashGel System (Cambrex, EastRutherford, NJ, USA) were used and run following themanufacturer’s recommendations. A personal digital camera(Panasonic) was used to take pictures of the gel.
2.11. Phylogenetic analysis by cloning and sequencingof the bacterial 16S rRNA gene
The extracted environmental DNA was used as templatefor PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene withthe primer pair 16SF-16SR. The product from this reactionwas used as template for a second PCR amplification withprimers 63F (positions 43–63, 5¢CAGGCCTAACACATGCAAGTC) and 907R (positions 906–926, 5¢-CCGTCAATTCMTTTGAGTTT). The amplicon was cloned into vector pTOPO-TA (Invitrogen) and sequenced from both ends in an ABI3710 automatic sequencer (PE Biosystems, General Electrics).Sequences were assembled with the package Phred-Phrap-Consed, with use of a Perl wrapper that automaticallyclustered and processed the chromatograms correspondingto individual clones (Ewing et al., 1998; Gordon, 2004).Putative chimeras were discarded after screening the as-sembled clone sequences with Bellerophon (Huber et al.,2004). The remaining clone sequences were assigned to tax-onomical categories with use of the Ribosomal DatabaseProject (RDP) web server (Cole et al., 2009). Complementarytaxonomical information was obtained by comparing theclone sequences against the NCBI NR database with BLAST(Altschul et al., 1997). The alignments generated by RDPwere used as input for Mothur application (Schloss et al.,2009) to calculate distance matrices ignoring terminal gaps,cluster clone sequences into operative taxonomical units(OTUs), generate rarefaction curves, identify OTUs sharedacross samples, and calculate the Ace and Chao1 estimatorsfor species richness and the Simpson Index (D) for commu-nity diversity.
974 PARRO ET AL.
2.12. Phylogenetic analysis by cloning and sequencingof the archaeal 16S rRNA gene
For archaeal 16S rRNA gene amplification, two rounds ofPCR amplification were performed with the universal ar-chaeal primer pair 21F-958R (Delong, 1992) for the firstround and the specific pair for the domain ArchaeaARC344F-ARC915R (Stahl and Amann, 1991) for the secondround. The thermocycler was programmed as follows: 94�C,7 min; 30 · (94�C, 1 min; 56�C, 1 min); 72�C, 7 min; 4�C forthe first round, and 94�C, 4 min; 10 · (94�C, 1 min; 68�C - 1�Cper cycle, 1 min; 72�C, 1.5 min); 20 · (94�C, 1 min; 60�C, 1min; 72�C , 1.5 min); 72�C, 30 min; 4�C, for the second round.We used the Go-Taq Green master mix and the GoTaqpolymerase (Promega Corp., WI, USA) in a 50 lL final re-action volume.
2.13. DAPI staining
To visualize cells with optical microscopy, the microor-ganisms from the ground samples were separated from theinorganic and humic fractions with physical dispersiontechniques, such as low- and high-speed centrifugation. Two5 g aliquots of the samples analyzed by DAPI were re-suspended in 50 mL of extraction buffer (1.5 M NaCl, 0.15%Tween 20, 10 mM Tris pH8, and 100 mM EDTA), then incu-bated for 2 h at room temperature in a roller and subse-quently centrifuged at 2000g for 2 min. The pellet, whichconsisted mainly of minerals and coarse material, was dis-carded, and the supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000g for10 min. The resulting new pellet was washed in 300 lL of theextraction buffer and centrifuged at 15000g for 5 min. Thesupernatant was discarded, and a few cells were collectedwith a sterile loop-spreader from the upper section of the wetpellet, spread on a microscope slide, left to dry, and incu-bated with 5 lL of 1 lg mL - 1 DAPI-blue stain solution for1 min. The slide was rinsed with water and then with 80%ethanol to remove the non-specific-bound DAPI stains. Cellswere visualized in an Olympus Bx40 microscope at · 100augmentations. Images were captured with an OlympusDP70 camera. Additionally, small pieces of core sampleswere subjected to a quick stain with DAPI in an Eppendorftube, washed with buffer, and observed directly under themicroscope. Under these conditions, we visualized cells withflagellar movement.
2.14. Biochemical extractions
Extracts were prepared from 20 to 40 g of different sam-ples with GuHCl buffer (4 M guanidine-hydrochloride, 0.5 MEDTA, 0.5 M Tris pH 7.4) following the procedure describedby Tuross and Stathoplos (1993). The final extracts were re-suspended in sterile distilled water, dialyzed ( > 1200 Dacutoff) against water, and finally lyophilized. These extractswere used for the identification of amino acids by gaschromatography–mass spectrometry (see Section 2.15).
2.15. Determination of amino acids
For the identification of amino acids, the samples werefirst hydrolyzed with 6 M HCl at 110�C for 24 h and thenfreeze-dried to remove water, HCl, and any volatile organics.The hydrolyzed samples were analyzed, in a way similar tothat described by Ruiz-Bermejo et al. (2007), by high-pressure
liquid chromatography after derivatization with phenyl-isothiocyanate (Thermo-Fischer) with use of the followingconditions: Solvent A: 50 mM NH4OAc buffer, pH 6.5; Sol-vent B: 100 mM NH4OAc-CH3CN (50:50), pH 6.5; 0 min 0% B(100% A), 45 min 70% B (30% A), 46 min 70% B (30% A),48 min 100% B (0% A). The flow was 2 mL min - 1, the columnwas thermostated at 52�C, and the chromatogram registeredat 254 nm. High-pressure liquid chromatography analyseswere carried out on a Surveyor (ThermoFinnigan, ScientificInstruments Services, Ringoes, NJ, USA) with a photodiodearray detector with a Kromasil 100 C18 5 lm 25 · 0.46 col-umn. The identifications of the amino acids were verified bycomparing the retention times and UV absorbance spectrawith external standards, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich andFluka (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
2.16. Determination of total organic carbon
Up to 2 g of sample were dried by incubating at 110�C for24 h. Total organic carbon was estimated by the weight ofsample lost after a second incubation at 550�C for 3 h.
2.17. Testing the deliquescence propertiesof the drilled samples
To test the capacity of the collected samples to absorb anddeliquesce atmospheric water vapor, we proceeded as fol-lows: 2 g of samples was exhaustively dried at 110�C for 24 h(until no further weight loss was measurable); then theywere stored in identical 100 mL glass beakers covered byaluminum foil (ajar) in a cold room at 4�C and below 75%relative humidity. Over the next 20 days, the samples wereweighted daily. The water-weight gain was plotted as thepercentage of the initial dried weight. Deliquescence, definedas the process by which a substance absorbs moisture fromthe atmosphere until it dissolves in the absorbed water andforms a solution, was clearly visible to the naked eye. Someof the samples even showed liquid water accumulating at thebottom of the beaker after only 5 days.
2.18. Ion chromatography analysis
Samples (10 g) were sonicated (3 · 1 min cycles) in 20 mLof water, and the mineral particles were removed by cen-trifugation. The supernatants were collected and loaded intoa Metrohm 861 Advanced compact ion chromatographer IC(Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland) undiluted or at dilu-tion values of either 50% or 20%. For all the anions, exceptperchlorate, the column Metrosep A supp 7-250 was used with3.6 mM sodium carbonate (NaCO3) as eluent. For perchloratemeasurements, we used a Metrosep A supp 4-250 column with1.9 mM Na2CO3, 1.9 mM NaHCO3, 25% (w/v) acetonitrile aseluent. The pH of the water solutions was measured withan inoLab pH meter (WTW, GmbH & Co. KG, Weilheim,Germany) after 24 h of solution stabilization.
2.19. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Scanning electron micrographs were made with gold-coated pieces of core samples by using a JEOL JSM-5600 LVinstrument ( JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). To examine the micro-morphology and mineralogy, it was operated at accelerationvoltages of 10–20 kV and 2–3 kV. The phase compositionswere measured by using energy-dispersive X-ray (INCA
LIFE-DETECTION EXPERIMENT IN ATACAMA SUBSURFACE 975
X-Sight, Oxford), with acceleration voltages of 10 kV forminerals and 2 kV for microorganisms.
3. Results
3.1. LDChip300 detected in situ microbial biomarkersin the Atacama subsurface
A 1-week duration drilling campaign was carried out inthe apron at the base of a mountain to the west of SalarGrande (Materials and Methods; Fig. 1). We drilled a 5.2 mdeep hole (reported here) and another one of 75 cm to theeast of Salar Grande (not shown). More than 40 samples thatcontained the chips and came up and out of the hole werecollected. Additionally, several intact core pieces from 160 to310 cm deep were also recovered (Fig. 1B). This 1.5 m of solidcore corresponded to several hard layers of solid material.The rest of the core mostly corresponded to soft or weaklycemented material, except approximately 1 m that we lost atthe bottom of the hole (from approx. 4 to 5.20 m) when wefinished the drilling operations. The loss of this core was dueto a failure in the clamping system in the corer tip. Thegeological profile of the whole core showed thin gypsumcrusts at the upper parts followed by fine-grained halite-cemented sand layers with and without pebbles (Fig. 1B).The recovered strongly compacted cores contained halite-cemented breccia and halite veins. These samples were an-alyzed with a field-portable Raman spectrometer renderingspectra with peaks identified as halite and anhydrite (CaSO4)crystals (Fig. 2).
Forty powder- and chip-containing samples recoveredfrom the core (from 0 to - 5 m) were analyzed in the field byfluorescent sandwich antibody microarray immunoassaywith LDChip300 (Figs. 3 and 4; see Materials and Methods).The fluorescent signal of each of the 300 antibodies (Fig. 3)was quantified and plotted, which generated an im-munogram from each sample (Fig. 4). Positive reactions wereidentified with several antibodies in several samples. Espe-cially significant were those taken at depths around 2 m(samples 185, 200, and 216), where positive reactions corre-
sponded to antibodies raised against environmental bio-chemical extracts, microbial extracts, and biologicalcompounds like DNA, EPS, or lipoteichoic acid polymersfrom Gram-positive bacteria, and others (Fig. 3 and Table 3).Among the microorganisms, we detected Gram-negativeAlphaproteobacteria (weak signal from an Acetobacteraceae)and Gammaproteobacteria (Acidithiobacillus, Halothiobacillus,and Pseudomonadaceae), Gram-positive Actinobacteria andFirmicutes (Bacillales), Bacteroidetes, and the archaeon Ha-lorubrum spp. The LDChip results confirm that complexpolymers (EPS and lipoteichoic acids) were present in theanalyzed samples, which, in turn, constitutes direct evidenceof viable life or the remains of recently viable life withabundances especially high at *2 m. A strong fluorescentsignal was obtained with an anti-steroid antibody in most ofthe samples below 2 m. We hypothesize that organomineralcomplexes bearing structurally similar compounds producedeither by bacteria or fungi may have been responsible forsuch a high signal. A likely candidate was ergosterol, a tri-terpene lipid that forms part of the fungal cell membranesand functions like cholesterol in animal cells (Weete et al.,2010). To verify the authenticity of the antigen-antibody re-actions, some samples were heated over a flame in sterilealuminum foil for 10 min in the field laboratory and thenanalyzed with LDChip300. Most (at least 90%) of the fluo-rescent signals disappeared from the immunograms, whichindicates that the signals detected in the biochip were indeeda consequence of a sandwich immunoassay against organic(most probably biological) complex polymers.
3.2. Biochemical and molecular analysesin the field supported the LDChip300 results
We successfully extracted DNA from two out of eightsamples assayed in the field: one from the surface (sample 0)and the other from a depth of 2 m (sample 200). The last onealso had the strongest molecular biomarker signals obtainedwith LDChip300 (Figs. 3 and 4). The failure in obtainingDNA from the other samples may have been due to a lowernumber of cells. The obtained DNA was checked
FIG. 2. Raman spectroscopy identified anhydrite and halite in the field. (A) Detailed image of one of the cores used forRaman analysis. (B) A characteristic Raman spectrum showing halite (NaCl) and the other abundant mineral, anhydrite(CaSO4). Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ast
976 PARRO ET AL.
FIG. 3. LDChip300 detected microbes and polymeric biological remains at 2 m deep under the Atacama surface. (A) Apicture showing the nine flow cells for nine simultaneous LDChip300 assays in the MAAM device (see Section 2.6.1). (B) Apicture of the SOLID3 instrument in the field, showing its two functional units: the Sample Preparation Unit (SPU) and theSample Analysis Unit (SAU) (See Section 2.6.2). (C) LDChip300 image obtained with sample 200 (top) indicating some of thespots with the highest fluorescent signals. The cartoon shows how capturing antibodies (Y forms) bind biological polymers(rhombi) and how they are sandwiched by fluorescent (F) tracer antibodies. The image obtained with the negative control(bottom) was used as a baseline (blank) to calculate spot intensities in the test samples. Long yellow rectangles encompass afluorescent spot gradient. (D) Immunogram showing the fluorescence intensity of the positive spots. The peak numbers,antibody name, and immunogen can be seen in Table 3 (see also Table 2). Circles and squares indicate the main antibodyclusters: (I) antibodies against whole extracts from sediments, biofilms, and water from Rıo Tinto rich in Gammaproteo-bacteria; (II) Gammaproteobacteria (Halothiobacillus spp., Acidithiobacillus spp.); (III) Desulfosporosinus, Pseudomonas,Salinibacter; (IV) different peptides and proteins; (V) cell wall polymeric components like lipoteichoic acids, lipidA, orpeptidoglycan; (VI) nitroaromatic compounds and nucleotide derivatives. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ast
LIFE-DETECTION EXPERIMENT IN ATACAMA SUBSURFACE 977
spectrophotometrically and by using PCR amplification ofthe 16S rRNA gene with bacterial and archaeal universalprimers (See Sections 2.11 and 2.12, Materials and Methods).Additionally, the PCR amplicon from sample 200 wasfluorescently labeled and used to hybridize to an oligonu-cleotide microarray designed for the analysis of prokaryoticdiversity (Garrido et al., 2008). The results further confirmthe presence of bacteria, mainly from the Gram-positive low-GC-content Firmicutes group, as well as from the high-GC-content Gram-positive bacteria (Fig. 5 and Table 3). Totalprotein and sugar contents were also determined in the fieldlaboratory, showing a peak in the samples around 2 m deep(Fig. 6), which is in agreement with LDChip300 and DNA
microarray analyses, although sugars still remain high to thebottom of the hole. All these data support and validate the insitu LDChip300 results and are consistent with the presenceof a subsurface microbial habitat.
3.3. Geochemical analyses revealed a hypersalinehabitat in the Atacama subsurface
The analysis of all powder- and chip-containing samplescollected during drilling by ion chromatography showed aspecific geochemical pattern at around 2 m deep (Fig. 6),which is in agreement with the results obtained in the field.A slight decrease in the pH of water solutions is coincidentwith a high increase of salt content (NaCl) and conductivity,both decreasing just when nitrates, perchlorates, and formatecontents increase and remain steady down to the bottom ofthe borehole (5.2 m). In contrast, sulfate content is slightlyhigher in the first 2–3 m. A peak of total protein and sugarprofiles is consistent with the salinity (halite), conductivity,the maximal deliquescence capacity, and LDChip300 results,while the pH of the water solution used for ion chromatog-raphy analysis (Section 2.18) showed a small acidification.This subsurface habitat is characterized by the presence ofhigh amounts of nitrates, sulfates, and perchlorates, all ofwhich are capable of working as electron acceptors for bac-terial respiration. The presence of small organic acids is alsohighly remarkable, with propionate and acetate dominatingin the upper part, while formate increases from 2 m deep(Fig. 6). All of them can be used as electron donors to supportbacterial nitrate, sulfate, and perchlorate reduction. Ad-ditionally, amino acids were also detected by gas chroma-tography–mass spectrometry in polymeric material extractedwith guanidine-hydrochloride buffer (see Section 2.14, Ma-terials and Methods) from different depths (Table 4). Theseamino acids may come either from extracellular or intracel-lular fractions because we cannot rule out the cell lysis withthe extraction method used.
3.4. Microscopy and molecular phylogeny confirmed thepresence of bacteria and archaea in the Atacamasubsurface
Further analyses in the laboratory were performed to ob-tain new information and to validate the results obtainedin the field. Core samples were assayed for microscopicevidence of cells either by SEM or optical microscopy.The scanning electron microscope images (Fig. 7) show thepresence of cellular and biofilm morphologies together withmineralized cellular moulds excavated in the halite, whichhas a high signal for organic carbon. Fluorescent DNA-specific staining (DAPI) and microscopy analysis revealedthe presence of cells with different morphologies: coccoid-,rod-, and comma-shaped, and vibrioid (Fig. 8A). After ad-dition of water to the sample, some of these cells showedflagellar movement under the microscope, with and withouta quick DAPI staining (see Section 2.13). These cells weremetabolically active probably due to the water captured bythe core during transport and storage in a cold room.
Phylogenetic analyses of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (Fig.8B) indicated that the most abundant clones found at 2 mdeep were closely related to the Gammaproteobacteria class(most of them Vibrio spp. and some Pseudomonas spp.). Ad-ditionally, many clones corresponded to the phylum
FIG. 4. LDChip300 immunoprofiling identified a newhabitat in the Atacama subsurface. Ordered immunogramsobtained after analyzing samples from different depths withLDChip300. The arrow indicates sample 200, collected at 2 mdeep. Note that the most abundant and intense fluorescentsignals are in and around this sample (see Fig. 3 and Table 3for details). See also text for explanation.
978 PARRO ET AL.
Table 3. LDChip300-Detected Microbial Compounds at 2 m Deep
LDChip300
Phylum/group No. AntibodyImmunogen
(See also Table 2) PAM (16 S) 16S rRNA seq.
Gamma-proteobacteria
1 IA1C1 3.2 damp water cellular fraction(Gamma, Nitrospira)
Gammaproteobacteria
2 IA1S1 3.2 damp water supernatant Vibrionaceae3 IA2S1 Green filaments EPS (Eukaryotes,
Gamma .)Xanthomonadaceae
4 IC1C1 3.2 beach cells (Nitrospira, Gamma)5 IC6C1 3.1 beach under-crusts cells6 ID1C1 Jarosite Nac. Cells (Gamma, Nitrospira,
others)7 ID1C3 Jarosite Nac. Sonicated Cells after
EDTA8 IVE3C1 Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans intact cells9 IVE6C1 A. caldus
10 IVE7C1 Halothiobacillus neapolitanus12 IVF2C1 Shewanella gelidimarina (marine broth
15�C)13 IVF2S2 S. gelidimarina (Alteromonadaceae)21 IVI1C1 Pseudomonas putida
(Pseudomonadaceae)Pseudomonadaceae
23 IVI6C3 Azotobacter vinelandii(Pseudomonadaceae)
Alphaproteobacteria 14 IVG1C1 Acidocella aminolytica(Acetobacteraceae)
15 IVG2C1 Acidiphilium spp.
Actinobacteria 11 IVE8C1 Acidimicrobium ferrooxidans HGC_G + Actinobacteria
Firmicutes 20 IVI19C1 Desulfosporosinus meridiei (Clostridiales.G + SRB)
LGCa_G + Firmicutes
28 Lmo Listeria monocitogenes (Bacillales,Listeriaceae)
LGCb_G + Bacillaceae
26 G + Bact Gram + LTA (crossreacts Bacillales) LGCc_G + Paenibacillaceae19 IVH1C1 Bacillus subtilis spores (Bacillaceae) Lactobacillaceae43 LTA LTA, L. monocitogenes (Bacillales,
Listeriaceae)Leuconostaceae
Acidobacteria 16 IVG3C1 Acidobacterium capsulatum(Acidobacteria)
Deinococcus 17 IVG4C1 Thermus scotoductus (Deinococci-Thermales)
18 IVG4C2 T. scotoductus
Bacteroidetes 22 IVI21S1 Salinibacter ruber PR1 (Bacteroidetes)Euryarchaeota 24 IVJ8C1 Halorubrum spp. (Halobacteriaceae) Halorubrum spp.
Epsilonproteobac. 27 Hpyl Helicobacter pylori (Gram-negativeepsilon div.)
Nucleic acidsand derivatives
29 dsDNA(hu) dsDNA (Human plasma)
46 cGMP(bio) cGMP-2¢-succi-BSA49 cGMP(ups) cGMP-BSA50 GMP_N GMP-BSA51 cAMP_sh cAMP-BSA52 Thiamine Thiamine-BSA
Cell wall 41 EPS_SP EPS Santa Pola (Alicante, Spain)42 Lectin Lectin potato specific for NAG-NAM
oligomers44 LipidA LipidA (monoclonal Ab, clon 43)25 Cortisol Cortisol-17-BSA47 Digoxin Digoxin (monoclonal Ab, mouse)
Xenobiotics 45 Atrazine Atrazine-BSA48 DNP Dinitrophenol-BSA
(continued)
LIFE-DETECTION EXPERIMENT IN ATACAMA SUBSURFACE 979
Firmicutes (most of them Bacillus spp.), and others from thephylum Actinobacteria (Microbacterium spp.). These resultsare again consistent with those obtained with LDChip300(Table 3), where the antibodies show positive reactions thatcan be grouped into Gammaproteobacteria (Shewanella,Pseudomonas, strains or natural extracts enriched in thesetypes of microorganisms like Acidithiobacillus, Halothioba-cillus, and environmental extracts from Rıo Tinto), the Gram-positive Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Additionally, weobtained several sequences closely related to the archaealgenus Halorubrum. Again, this result is in agreement withLDChip and corroborated the first report about archaea inthe Atacama subsoil.
4. Discussion
4.1. LDChip300 detected microbes and molecularbiomarkers in the Atacama subsurface
We previously described the performance of former ver-sions of LDChip (Parro et al., 2008b; 2011a, 2011b; Rivas et al.,2008). Herein, we demonstrate the unprecedented capacity ofan immunosensor chip for the detection of microbes andmolecular biomarkers in the subsurface of one of the bestMars analogues on Earth: the Atacama Desert (Fig. 3).Samples were immediately analyzed in the field after theircollection from the core. Thirty samples can be assayed si-multaneously with LDChip300 and the results obtained after3 h, which allowed us to perform nearly real-time monitor-ing. It was highly relevant that several positive reactionsobtained around 2 m deep corresponded to antibodiesagainst Gram-positive bacterial antigens from the groupFirmicutes (Table 3). This is the case for IVI19C1, raisedagainst Desulfosporosinus meridiei (Clostridiales, Gram-
positive sulfur-reducing bacteria); Lmo, for Listeria mono-citogenes (Bacillales, Listeriaceae); G + Bact, Gram-positivelipoteichoic acids (cross reacts with Bacillales); IVH1C1, forBacillus subtilis spores (Bacillaceae); or LTA, for LTA from theGram-positive bacterium Listeria monocitogenes (Bacillales,Listeriaceae). The presence of bacteria from the Firmicutesgroup was demonstrated in the field by DNA extractionfrom the same sample, PCR amplification and fluorescentlabeling of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, and hybridizationwith a phylogenetic oligonucleotide microarray (Fig. 5).
Some of the antibodies raised against the Rıo Tinto acidicenvironment or acidophilic strains showed significant fluo-rescent signals, which indicates the presence of similar mo-lecular biomarkers or microorganisms, or both. This is thecase for peaks 1–7 in Fig. 3 (Table 3), which correspond toextracellular polymeric material or cellular fractions obtainedfrom water, biofilms (filaments), sulfur-rich samples (drycrusts, sediments, jarosite and iron-sulfate precipitates), andpeaks 8 and 9 from iron-sulfur bacteria of Acidithiobacillusgenus. The presence of molecular biomarkers and bacteriacharacteristic of acidic environments might be related to thefact that Atacama soils may contain strong acids in accu-mulated dust particles, as reported by Quinn et al. (2005).They concluded that extremely low pH resulting from acidaccumulation combined with limited water availability andhigh oxidation potential may result in acid-mediated reac-tions at the soil surface during low-moisture transient wet-ting events (i.e., thin films of water). These micro-nichesmight support the growth of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria likeAcidithiobacillus spp. and Hallothiobacillus spp., iron-reducingbacteria like Acidocella spp. and Acidiphilium spp., which maytolerate up to pH 5 (Lu et al., 2010), or iron-oxidizing bacterialike Acidimicrobium spp.
Table 3. (Continued)
LDChip300
Phylum/group No. AntibodyImmunogen
(See also Table 2) PAM (16 S) 16S rRNA seq.
Peptides 30 ApsA Adenylylsulfate reductase peptide(Desulfovibrio desulfuricans)
31 ASB_prot Bacterial ATPsynthase F1 subunitAlpha (prot)
32 Beta-Glu Beta-glucanase (E. coli)33 CcdA CcdA peptide (Cytochrome
biogenesys. Geobacter)34 DhnA DhnA (Dehydrin) peptide (Nostoc)35 Hsp70 Chaperon Hsp70 (M. tuberculosis)36 ModA Molibdate transport peptide
(Leptospirillum ferrooxidans)37 NifH2 NifH nitrogenase peptide
(L. ferrooxidans)38 NorB NorB protein (Nitrobacter hamburgensis)39 Pfu_fer Ferritin (Pyrococcus furiosus) protein40 Stv Streptavidin
List of the antibodies showing positive reaction in LDChip300 with sample 200 and comparison to the results obtained witholigonucleotide microarray (PAM) in the field, and by cloning and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene in the laboratory.
Column No. indicates the number of each of the peaks of the immunogram in Fig. 3. The column PAM (16S) indicates the group of bacteriadetected after fluorescent hybridization of bacterial 16S rRNA gene in the field: HGC_G + , high-GC-content Gram-positive bacteria;LGCa,b,c_G + , low-GC-content groups a, b, and c of Gram-positive Firmicutes (see Fig. 5). Alpha, Beta, Gamma: division of proteobacteria.LTA, lipoteichoic acids. EPS, Exopolysaccharides. dsDNA, double-stranded DNA. cGMP and cAMP, cyclic guanine and adeninemonophosphate nucleotides, respectively.
980 PARRO ET AL.
The relatively high fluorescent signal obtained with anti-bodies IVI21S1, IVJ8C1, EPS_SP raised against Salinibacterruber, Halorubrum spp., and exopolymeric substances fromthe Santa Pola solar saltern (Alicante, Spain), respectively,indicates the presence of archaea at 2 m deep. This fact wasconfirmed by molecular phylogenetic studies in the labora-tory by amplification and sequencing the archaeal 16S rRNAgene. Archaea have been reported in superficial samplesfrom the Atacama (Lizama et al., 2001; Demergasso et al.,2004), but until very recently they were not detected in thesubsurface (Gramain et al., 2011). Our work further confirmsand expands the presence of these prokaryotes in the Ata-cama soil subsurface.
Sugars and proteins followed a parallel pattern up to near3 m, where proteins drop dramatically but sugars continuewith relatively high levels. The peak in protein content couldbe associated with a more active microbial population, as aconsequence of higher water availability due, in turn, to the
presence of materials with higher deliquescence capacity.The microbial activity would produce acids that might ex-plain the small drop in the pH of water solutions in thesesamples. By contrast, the permanent sugar level below 3 mmight be due to the accumulation of extracellular polysac-charides (EPS) produced as a response to lower water ac-tivity, as it has been reported in some bacteria (e.g., Robersonand Firestone, 1992) or in soil environments (Foster, 1981).The strong correlation between protein content, halite, smallacidification, and maximal deliquescence capacity (Fig. 6)with LDChip results, together with microscopic and molec-ular phylogenetic analyses, indicates the presence of an ac-tual or recently colonized habitat, a true microbial oasis.
4.2. A hygroscopic mineral-driven subsurfacehypersaline habitat: implications for Mars
We described a new hypersaline subsurface habitat wherethe presence of hygroscopic minerals (halite, perchlorate, andanhydrite) may be responsible for water retention. Samplescontained 10–41 ppm (mg Kg - 1) of perchlorate and a peakof NaCl of 260 g Kg - 1 at 2 m depth, high enough to promotedeliquescence. In fact, these samples showed the higherdeliquescence capacity (Figs. 6 and 9) by accumulatingnearly 60% of the initial weight of liquid water in 20 days(e.g., sample 200). After 5 days, no significant differenceswere observed; but later, a clear increase in the capacity ofwater absorption and deliquescence was recorded for sample200 and those in close proximity to it, coincident with thehighest halite content. Moreover, deliquescence increaseswhen organic matter (ca. 1.9% in sample 200) is removed(Fig. 10). These results are consistent with those of Davilaet al. (2008), which demonstrated that water vapor condensesand deliquesces on the halite surface and pores at low rela-tive humidity (75%). The ability of halite and perchloratesalts to absorb water and form a liquid solution (deliquesce)is highly relevant for the search for life on Mars. Zorzanoet al. (2009) demonstrated that small amounts of sodiumperchlorate spontaneously absorb moisture and melt into aliquid solution under martian atmospheric conditions. Inaddition, Davila et al. (2010) reported the deliquescence ca-pacity of hygroscopic salts and their hypothetical capacity tosupport microbial growth or metabolic activity under sim-ulated martian conditions.
Our AtacaMars field campaign demonstrates that sub-surface hygroscopic salt environments may be true oasis formicrobial life and further supports the possibility of a sub-surface martian habitat based on the deliquescence capacityof similar hygroscopic salts. We hypothesize an ecosystemfueled by reduced compounds from hydrothermal activity(H2, SH2, acetate, formate, etc.). Potential martian microor-ganisms could use perchlorates, nitrates, or sulfates as elec-tron acceptors as shown in the Atacama subsurface (Fig. 11).Strong gradients of salts can be formed, and microorganismswould use flagella to move in search of nutrients. Whenwater is scarce, microorganisms produce abundant exopo-lymeric material that helps them to avoid desiccation andattaches them to mineral surfaces, where they form smallbiofilms or cell clusters. After the death of the microorgan-isms, the polymeric remains (EPS, proteins, nucleic acids,etc.) or other metabolites are retained by electrostatic chargesof mineral and salt crystals. These interactions with minerals,
FIG. 5. Detection of bacteria by DNA hybridization insample 200. Microarray image showed positive fluorescentspots (top figure) corresponding to universal eubacterial probes(UNI1392, EU338, Y2R), high-GC-content Gram-positivebacteria (Actinomycetes group, probe HGC236), the low-GC-content Gram-positives Firmicutes including the Lactobacillussubgroup (LGC354a), the Bacillus subgroup (LGC354b), andthe Streptococcus subgroup (LGC354c); Deltaproteobacteria(DELTA495a); and Archaea (1Af). This last probe correspondsto a highly degenerated oligonucleotide considered specific forArchaea. Because the fluorescent probe was amplified withprimers for Eubacteria, we did not expect positive results with1Af unless it came from similar sequences from unknownbacteria. (Bottom figure) Plot showing the quantification offluorescent signals from nonsaturated images. Color imagesavailable online at www.liebertonline.com/ast
LIFE-DETECTION EXPERIMENT IN ATACAMA SUBSURFACE 981
in addition to high salt concentrations, hinder enzymaticdegradation. Similar niches could be present in the martiansubsurface, where small organic acids can be supplied fromthe partial photodestruction of complex meteoritic organicmatter. Halite and perchlorate salts have two main advan-tages to sustain a hypothetical subsurface martian ecosys-tem: they trap and form liquid water and simultaneouslylower its freezing point. Additionally, high salt concentra-tions inhibit enzymes like DNAses, which allows betterpreservation of biological polymers.
4.3. LDChip for life detection on Mars
Our LDChip is suited to the search for microbial life inplanetary exploration, particularly for Mars. We hypothesizethat microorganisms living in similar habitats under similarphysicochemical parameters share similar molecular mech-anisms to deal with such conditions. Those mechanisms willproduce similar biomolecules that constitute a good set ofmolecular biomarkers. We suggest two strategies for targetselection: (i) a direct approach, in which well-known bio-molecules or their diagenetic products from those listed byParnell et al. (2007) and Parro et al. (2008a) are used as
FIG. 6. Biogeochemical analyses of the samples collected along the whole core. Sample names and depths, the assayed com-pound or parameter, the units, and the scale are indicated at the top of the figure. Arrows point to sample 200. The horizontal linesdelimit the samples with the higher halite and protein concentration, the highest deliquescence capacity, and a small decrease inpH, defining a geological unit for a subsurface habitat. (Deliq) Deliquescence capacity of the samples after 20 days at 4�C and 75%relative humidity, expressed as the percentage (% dw) of adsorbed water with respect to the initial dry weight (2 g per sample),showing a maximum of 58% at sample 200 (See Figs. 9 and 10).
Table 4. Amino Acids Detected in Polymeric
Material ( > 1200 Da) Extracted by Guanidine
Chloride Buffer
Sample Amino acids
0 Gly, Ala, + 3 unidentified amines5 Glu, Ser, Gly, Ala, + 3 unidentified amines
60 Asp (traces), Glu (traces), Ser, Gly, Ala,unidentified amines
140 Asp (traces), Glu (traces), Ser, Gly, Ala,5 unidentified amines
200 Asp, Glu, Ser, Gly, Ala, unidentified amines286 Asp (traces), Glu (traces), Ser, Ala, Pro, Val,
2 unidentified amines305 Asp (traces), Glu (traces), Ser, Gly, Ala, 2
unidentified amines398 Asp, Glu, Ser, Gly, Ala, 2 unidentified amines431 Asp (traces), Glu (traces), Ser, Gly, Thr, Ala460 ND507 Asp, Glu, Ser, Gly, Ala, 3 unidentified amines
ND, Not detected.
982 PARRO ET AL.
antigens to produce antibodies; and (ii) a shotgun strategywhere whole or fractionated biochemical extracts from ter-restrial Mars analogues are used as targets for antibodyproduction (Parro et al., 2008a, 2011a; Rivas et al., 2008; Parroand Munoz-Caro 2010). We have produced polyclonal anti-bodies against biochemical extracts from environments thatare acidic and iron-sulfur-rich, hydrothermal, permanentlyfrozen, hypersaline, and so on (Table 2). Samples were takenfrom water, sediments, mineral deposits (sulfate precipitates,jarosite, hematite, etc.), rocks, and subsurface cores duringdrilling campaigns. Simultaneously, we can produce anti-bodies against different kinds of universal macromoleculeslike EPS, anionic polymers, cell wall components, nucleicacids, nucleotides and derivatives, phylogenetically con-served proteins, and so on. There are commercial antibodiesagainst single- or double-stranded DNA, all recognizingstructures and features of terrestrial DNA. In the case of an
eventual martian DNA made up of slightly different nucle-otides, it probably would not be recognized with antibodiesagainst terrestrial counterparts, except in those cases wherethe antibodies were recognizing common structures. It ispossible to make antibodies against modified nucleotides,but it is unknown which modifications to target. Alternativenucleobases (e.g., xantine, aminated, or methylated deriva-tives of the four known nucleotides) can be used as targets.However, considering that some nucleobases (e.g., adenine)can be obtained abiotically (Yuasa et al., 1984), the detectionof these types of compounds by itself is not a biomarker,unless they were forming part of a polymer like DNA or asecondary structure like a double or triple helix. Universalmodified nucleotides that are widely used for life as signal-transducers, for example, cyclic adenosine monophosphate(cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) (Go-melsky, 2011), are good targets for antibody production.
FIG. 7. Microbial forms under the Atacama surface bound to halite crystals. Scanning electron microscope images andenergy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra showed halite crystals with incipiently mineralized microbial cells. (A) Halite crystalwith elongated morphology and rough surface showing nanoparticles and mineralized microbial cell-like structures (arrows)on its surface. EDX spectrum of the crystal (inset) indicates that it is composed of Na and Cl (halite). (B) Close-up of twomicrobial cells from (A) attached to the halite crystal surface (arrows). (C) Halite crystal showing empty voids whichcorrespond to mineralized moulds of degraded microbial cells, most probably bacteria (arrows), some of them with clearvibriod form. Note that EDX spectrum displays Na, Cl, C, O, and N. The four latter elements come, most probably, fromorganic compounds of microbial cells. The pie chart shows the percentage of the main elements. (D) Close-up of twomicrobial cells attached to the halite crystal surface (arrow) and the EDX spectrum of one of them. The EDX spectracorrespond to the green squares. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ast
LIFE-DETECTION EXPERIMENT IN ATACAMA SUBSURFACE 983
There are commercial antibodies against these compounds(Table 2), and we have also produced our own stock. In fact,LDChip300 showed strong signals for antibodies againstthese compounds (see peaks 46, 49, and 50, all against cGMP,in Fig. 3 and Table 3), which indicates that some microor-ganisms might be producing and even secreting cGMP or itsderivatives. In fact, it has been recently reported that theAlphaproteobacterium Rhodospirillum centenum secretes rel-
atively high amounts of cGMP to trigger the formation ofmetabolically dormant cells, called cysts, which are highlyresistant to desiccation (Berleman and Bauer, 2004; Mardenet al., 2011). High salt concentration inhibits degrading en-zymes, among them the nucleases, which may explain why,in this hypersaline environment, DNA and nucleotidederivatives are well-preserved. Additionally, the binding tomineral surfaces may be an additional factor of stabilization
FIG. 8. Microbial cells and phylogenetic analysis of bacterial DNA from 2 m deep. (A) Sample 200 was stained with DNA-specific stain (DAPI). Rod- and comma-shaped or vibrioid forms (arrows) can be detected. Bar, 5 lm. (B) Phylogenetic treeobtained with the 16S rRNA gene sequences from sample 200 (see text for explanations). Sequences obtained from sample 200were named as 4E1..Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ast
984 PARRO ET AL.
and aggregation (Romanowski et al., 1993). Whether thepositive signals obtained with anti-cGMP antibodies are in-deed due to the presence of cGMP is yet to be determined.Positive signals from a SMI indicate that we are detecting atleast a dimer, an oligomeric or polymeric compound, orother types of aggregate, because at least two antigen-bind-ing sites are necessary; one to bind to the capturing antibodyand another to bind to the fluorescent tracer.
LDChip300 contains antibodies against other universalcompounds like protoporphyrin IX, lipidA, peptidoglycan,amino acids, vitamin K12, some antibiotics, and antibodiesagainst proteins and peptides from relevant microbial metab-olisms: nitrogen fixation; sulfate, nitrate, and perchlorate re-duction; iron oxi-reduction; and so on. (Table 2). Theoretically,it is possible to produce antibodies against any type of terres-trial biomolecule or even molecules that could be consideredan extraterrestrial substitute. But, given that we know onlyterrestrial life, we must focus on making antibodies for that.
5. Conclusion
We have discovered a new hypersaline subsurface habitatin the Atacama. The presence of highly hygroscopic saltdeposits associated with the microorganisms indicates thatthis habitat constitutes a true microbial oasis. Hygroscopicsalts promote the deliquescence of water on the mineralsurfaces and form thin liquid films that can maintain mi-crobial growth. Our LDChip300 detected microbes andmolecular biomarkers in this hypersaline subsurface envi-ronment. The relatively high number of antibodies against arational and structured panel of target molecular biomarkersmakes LDChip a suitable tool for the search for life forplanetary exploration. Halite- and perchlorate-rich subsur-face environments on Mars should be considered targets forfuture life-detection missions. The known destructive effectson organic matter by thermal oxidation promoted by per-chlorates (Navarro-Gonzalez et al., 2010) are not a constraintfor our LDChip-SOLID system (Parro et al., 2011a). The useof a SOLID-like Life Detector Chip and instrumentation aspart of the payload of future missions could be an importantcontribution to the search for life on Mars.
FIG. 9. Deliquescence capacity of the samples at different depths. (Top) Photographs showing the aspect of the samples after20 days of deliquescence assay (see Section 2.17). The accumulation of liquid water is clearly visible. (Middle) The water retainedby each of the samples was estimated as the percentage of the initial dry weight along the time course: 1, 5, 7, 9, 18, and 20 days.(Bottom) Liquid water recovered from some of the samples. Color images available online at www.liebertonline.com/ast
FIG. 10. The presence of ca. 2% organic matter in thesamples diminishes the deliquescence capacity to about 50%.Two aliquots of 2 g of sample 200 were dried, their organicmatter kept ( + OM) or baked at 550�C to destroy it (-OM),and finally subjected to the deliquescence capacity assay for20 days (see Materials and Methods). The adsorbed waterwas measured as the percentage of the initial dry weight(gray) and as the total liquid water recovered (black). Totalorganic carbon in sample 200 was 1.98 – 0.15%.
LIFE-DETECTION EXPERIMENT IN ATACAMA SUBSURFACE 985
Acknowledgments
This work has been funded by the Spanish Ministerio deCiencia e Innovacion (MICINN) grant No. AYA2008_04013. Wethank Patricio Raul Arias for his assistance in the field work,Companıa Minera Cordillera for their help during the fieldcampaign, and Drs. Josefa Anton and Fernando Santos (Uni-versidad de Alicante, Spain) for providing halophilic strains.
Abbreviations
BSA, bovine serum albumin; cAMP, cyclic adenosinemonophosphate; EPS, exopolysaccharides; cGMP, cyclic gua-nosine monophosphate; LDChip, Life Detector Chip; MAAM,MultiArray Analysis Module; OTUs, operative taxonomicunits; PAM, prokaryotic acidophile microarray; RDP, the Ri-bosomal Database Project; SAU, Sample Analysis Unit; SEM,scanning electron microscopy; SMI, sandwich microarrayimmunoassay; SPU, Sample Preparation Unit; SOLID, SignsOf LIfe Detector.
References
Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z.,Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search pro-grams. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402.
Berleman, J. and Bauer, C.E. (2004) Characterization of the cystcell formation in the purple photosynthetic bacterium Rho-dospirillum centenum. Microbiology 150:383–390.
Bobst, A.L., Lowenstein, T.K., Jordan, T.E., Godfrey, L.V., Ku,T.L., and Luo, S. (2001) A 106 ka paleoclimate record fromdrill core of the Salar de Atacama, northern Chile. PalaeogeogrPalaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 173:21–42.
Cabrol, N.A., Chong-Diaz, G.C., Wettergreen, D., Stoker, C.R.,Dohm, J.M., Reaten, R., Schwher, K., Gulick, V.C., Landheim,R., Lee, P., Roush, T.L., Zent, A.P., Herrera-Lameli, C., JensenIglesia, A., Pereira Arredondo, M., Dunfield, G.C., Pedersen,L., Bualat, M.G., Christian, D., Mina, C., Sims, M.H., Thomas,H.J., Tucker, D.J., and Zbinden, E. (2001) Science results of theAtacama Nomad rover field experiment, Chile: implicationsfor planetary exploration. J Geophys Res 106:7664–7675.
Cabrol, N.A., Wettergreen, D., Warren-Rhodes, K., Grin, E.A.,Moersch, J., Diaz, G.C., Cockell, C.S., Coppin, P., Demergasso,C., Dohm, J.M., Ernst, L., Fisher, G., Glasgow, J., Hardgrove,C., Hock, A.N., Jonak, D., Marinangeli, L., Minkley, E., Ori,G.G., Piatek, J., Pudenz, E., Smith, T., Stubbs, K., Thomas, G.,Thompson, D., Waggoner, A., Wagner, M., Weinstein, S., andWyatt, M. (2007) Life in the Atacama: searching for life withrovers (science overview). J Geophys Res 112, doi:10.1029/2006JG000298.
Cameron, R. (1969) Abundance of microflora in soils of desertregions. NASA Technical Report 32-1378, National Aero-nautics and Space Administration, Washington DC.
Chong-Dıaz, G., Mendoza, M.N., Garcıa-Veigas, J., Pueyo, J.J.,and Turner, P. (1999) Evolution and geochemical signatures ina Neogene forearc evaporitic basin: the Salar Grande (CentralAndes of Chile). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 151:39–54.
Cole, J.R., Wang, Q., Cardenas, E., Fish, J., Chai, B., Farris, R.J.,Kulam-Syed-Mohideen, A.S., McGarrell, D.M., Marsh, T.,Garrity, G.M., and Tiedje, J.M. (2009) The Ribosomal DatabaseProject: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA anal-ysis. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D141–D145.
Dartnell, L.R., Desorgher, L., Ward, J.M., and Coates, A.J. (2007)Modeling the surface and subsurface martian radiation envi-ronment: implications for astrobiology. Geophys Res Lett 34,doi:10.1029/2006GL027494.
FIG. 11. A potential martian biota based on the Atacama’s hypersaline subsurface habitat. Deliquescence on mineralcrystals would dissolve salts and small organic compounds to provide energy sources and nutrients for microorganisms (seeSection 4.2 for explanation). SRB, NRB, and PRB: sulfate-, nitrate-, and perchlorate-reducing bacteria, respectively. Colorimages available online at www.liebertonline.com/ast
986 PARRO ET AL.
Davila, A.F., Gomez-Silva, B., de los Rios, A., Ascaso, C., Oli-vares, H., McKay, C.P., and Wierzchos, J. (2008) Facilitation ofendolithic microbial survival in the hyperarid core of theAtacama Desert by mineral deliquescence. J Geophys Res 113,doi:10.1029/2007JG000561.
Davila, A.F., Duport, L.G., Melchiorri, R., Janchen, J., Valea, S.,de Los Rios, A., Fiaren, A.G., Mohlmann, D., McKay, C.P.,Ascaso, C., and Wierzchos, J. (2010) Hygroscopic salts and thepotential for life on Mars. Astrobiology 10:617–628.
Delong, E.F. (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environments.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:5685–5689.
Demergasso, C., Casamayor, E.O., Chong, G., Galleguillos, P.,Escudero, L., and Pedros-Alio, C. (2004) Distribution of pro-karyotic genetic diversity in athalassohaline lakes of the Ata-cama Desert, Northern Chile. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 48:57–69.
Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., and Smith,F. (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars andrelated substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356.
Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M., and Green, P. (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred I Accuracyassessment. Genome Res 8:175–185.
Fernandez-Calvo, P., Nake, C., Rivas, L.A., Garcıa-Villadangos,M., Gomez-Elvira, J., and Parro, V. (2006) A multi-arraycompetitive immunoassay for the detection of broad rangemolecular size organic compounds relevant for astrobiology.Planet Space Sci 54:1612–1621.
Fish, S.A., Shepherd, T.J., McGenity, T.J., and Grant, W.D. (2002)Recovery of 16S ribosomal RNA gene fragments from ancienthalite. Nature 417:432–436.
Foster, R.C. (1981) Polysaccharides in soil fabrics. Science214:665–667.
Garrido, P., Gonzalez-Toril, E., Garcıa-Moyano, A., Moreno-Paz,M., Amils, R., and Parro, V. (2008) An oligonucleotide pro-karyotic acidophile microarray (PAM): its validation and itsuse to monitor seasonal variations in extreme acidophilic en-vironments with total environmental RNA. Environ Microbiol10:836–850.
Glavin, D.P., Cleaves, H.J., Schubert, M., Aubrey, A., and Bada,J.L. (2004) New method for estimating bacterial cell abun-dances in natural samples by use of sublimation. Appl EnvironMicrobiol 70:5923–5928.
Gomelsky, M. (2011) cAMP, c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP and nowcGMP: bacteria use them all! Mol Microbiol 79:562–565.
Gordon, D. (2004) Viewing and editing assembled sequencesusing Consed. In Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, edited byA.D. Baxevanis and D.B. Davison, John Wiley & Sons, NewYork, pp 11.2.1–11.2.43.
Gramain, A., Dıaz, G.C., Demergasso, C., Lowenstein, T.K., andMcGenity, T.J. (2011) Archaeal diversity along a subterraneansalt core from the Salar Grande (Chile). Environ Microbiol13:2105–2121.
Hecht, M.H., Kounaves, S.P., Quinn, R.C., West, S.J., Young, S.M.,Ming, D.W., Catling, D.C., Clark, B.C., Boynton, W.V., Hoffman,J., Deflores, L.P., Gospodinova, K., Kapit, J., and Smith, P.H.(2009) Detection of perchlorate and the soluble chemistry ofmartian soil at the Phoenix lander site. Science 325:64–67.
Huber, T., Faulkner, G., and Hugenholtz, P. (2004) Bellerophon;a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequencealignments. Bioinformatics 20:2317–2319.
Kminek, G. and Bada, J.L. (2006) The effect of ionizing radiationon the preservation of amino acids on Mars. Earth Planet SciLett 245:1–15.
Lizama, C., Monteoliva-Sanchez, M., Prado, B., Ramos-Cormenzana, A., Weckesser, J., and Campos, V. (2001) Taxo-
nomic study of extreme halophilic archaea isolated from the‘‘Salar de Atacama’’, Chile. Syst Appl Microbiol 24:464–474.
Lester, E.D., Satomi, M., and Ponce, A. (2007) Microflora of ex-treme arid Atacama Desert soils. Soil Biol Biochem 39:704–708.
Lu, S., Gischkat, S., Reiche, M., Akob, D.M., Hallberg, K.B., andKusel, K. (2010) Ecophysiology of Fe-cycling bacteria in acidicsediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:8174–8183.
Marden, J.N., Dong, Q., Roychowdhury, S., Berleman, J.E., andBauer, C.E. (2011) Cyclic GMP controls Rhodospirillum cen-tenum cyst development. Mol Microbiol 79:600–615.
McLennan, S.M., Bell, J.F., III, Calvin, W.M., Christensen, P.R.,Clark, B.C., de Souza, P.A., Farmer, J., Farrand, W.H., Fike,D.A., Gellert, R., Ghosh, A., Glotch, T.D., Grotzinger, J.P.,Hahn, B., Herkenhoff, K.E., Hurowitz, J.A., Johnson, J.R.,Johnson, S.S., Jolliff, B., Klingelhofer, G., Knoll, A.H., Learner,Z., Malin, M.C., McSween, H.Y., Pocock, J., Ruff, S.W., So-derblom, L.A., Squyres, S.W., Tosca, N.J., Watters, W.A.,Wyatt, M.B., and Yen, A. (2005) Provenance and diagenesis ofthe evaporite-bearing Burns Formation Meridiani PlanumMars. Earth Planet Sci Lett 240:95–121.
Murchie, S.L., Mustard, J.F., Ehlmann, B.L., Miliken, R.E., Bishop,J.L., McKeown, N.K., Dobrea, E.Z.N., Seelos, F.P., Buczkowski,D.L., Wiseman, S.M., Arvidson, R.E., Wray, J.J., Swayze, G.,Clark, R.N., Des Marais, D.J., McEwen, A.S., and Bibring, J.P.(2009) A synthesis of martian aqueous mineralogy after 1 Marsyear of observations from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. JGeophys Res 114, doi:10.1029/2009JE003342.
Navarro-Gonzalez, R., Rainey, F.A., Molina, P., Bagaley, D.R.,Hollen, B.J., de la Rosa, J., Small, A.M., Quinn, R.C., Grun-thaner, F.J., Caceres, L., Gomez-Silva, B., and McKay, C.P.(2003) Mars-like soils in the Atacama Desert, Chile, and thedry limit of microbial life. Science 302:1018–1021.
Navarro-Gonzalez, R., Vargas, E., de la Rosa, J., Raga, A.C., andMcKay, C.P. (2010) Reanalysis of the Viking results suggestsperchlorate and organics at mid-latitudes on Mars. J GeophysRes 115, doi:10.1029/2010JE003599.
Osterloo, M.M., Hamilton, V.E., Bandfield, J.L., Glotch, T.D.,Baldridge, A.M., Christensen, P.R., Tornabene, L.L., and An-derson, F.S. (2008) Chloride-Bearing Materials in the SouthernHighlands of Mars. Science 319:1651–1654.
Parnell, J., Cullen, D., Sims, M.R., Bowden, S., Cockell, C.S.,Court, R., Ehrenfreund, P., Gaubert, F., Grant, W., Parro, V.,Rohmer, M., Sephton, M., Stan-Lotter, H., Steele, A., Toporski,J., and Vago, J. (2007) Searching for life on Mars: selection ofmolecular targets for ESA’s Aurora ExoMars mission. Astro-biology 7:578–604.
Parro, V. (2010) Antibody microarrays for environmentalmonitoring. In Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Micro-biology, edited by K.N. Timmis, Springer-Verlag Berlin, pp2699–2710.
Parro, V. and Munoz-Caro, G. (2010) Solid carbonaceous andorganic matter in space, macromolecular complexes, bio-markers, and microarray-based instrumentation for in situdetection. In Astrobiology: Emergence, Search and Detection ofLife, edited by V.A. Basiuk, American Scientific Publishers,Los Angeles, pp 376–398.
Parro, V., Rodrıguez-Manfredi, J.A., Briones, C., Compostizo, C.,Herrero, P.L., Vez, E., Sebastian, E., Moreno-Paz, M., Garcıa-Villadangos, M., Fernandez-Calvo, P., Gonzalez-Toril, E.,Perez-Mercader, J., Fernandez-Remolar, D., and Gomez-Elvira, J. (2005) Instrument development to search forbiomarkers on mars: terrestrial acidophile iron-powered che-molithoautotrophic communities as model systems. PlanetSpace Sci 53:729–737.
LIFE-DETECTION EXPERIMENT IN ATACAMA SUBSURFACE 987
Parro, V., Rivas, L.A., and Gomez-Elvira J. (2008a) Protein mi-croarrays-based strategies for life detection in astrobiology.Space Sci Rev 135:293–311.
Parro, V., Fernandez-Calvo, P., Rodrıguez Manfredi, J.A., Moreno-Paz, M., Rivas, L.A., Garcıa-Villadangos, M., Bonaccorsi, R.,Gonzalez-Pastor, J.E., Prieto-Ballesteros, O., Schuerger, A.C.,Davidson, M., Gomez-Elvira, J., and Stoker, C.R. (2008b) SO-LID2: an antibody array-based life-detector instrument in a Marsdrilling simulation experiment (MARTE). Astrobiology 8:987–999.
Parro, V., de Diego-Castilla, G., Rodrıguez-Manfredi, J.A., Rivas,L.A., Blanco-Lopez, Y., Sebastian, E., Romeral, J., Compostizo,C., Herrero, P.L., Garcıa-Marın, A., Moreno-Paz, M., Garcıa-Villadangos, M., Cruz-Gil, P., Peinado, V., Martın-Soler, J., Perez-Mercader, J., and Gomez-Elvira, J. (2011a) SOLID3: a multiplexantibody microarray-based optical sensor instrument for in situlife detection in planetary exploration. Astrobiology 11:15–28.
Parro, V., Fernandez-Remolar, D., Rodrıguez-Manfredi, J.A.,Cruz-Gil, P., Rivas, L.A., Ruiz-Bermejo, M., Moreno-Paz, M.,Garcıa-Villadangos, M., Gomez-Ortiz, D., Blanco-Lopez, Y.,Menor-Salvan, C., Prieto-Ballesteros, O., and Gomez-Elvira, J.(2011b) Classification of modern and old Rıo Tinto sedimen-tary deposits through the biomolecular record using a lifemarker biochip: implications for detecting life on Mars. As-trobiology 11:29–44.
Piatek, J.L., Hardgrove, C., Moersch, J.E., Drake, D.M., Wyatt,M.B., Rampey, M., Carlisle, O., Warren-Rhodes, K., Dohm,J.M., Hock, A.N., Carbol, N.A., Wettergreen, D.S., Grin, E.A.,Diaz, G.C., Coppin, P., Weinstein, S., Cockell, C.S., Mar-inangeli, L., Ori, G.G., Smith, T., Jonak, D., Wagner, M.,Stubbs, K., Thomas, G., Pudenz, E., and Glasgow, J. (2007)Surface and subsurface composition of the life in the Atacamafield sites from rover data and orbital image analysis. J Geo-phys Res 112, doi:10.1029/2006JG000317.
Quinn, R.C., Zent, A.P., Grunthaner, F.J., Ehrenfreund, P., Tay-lor, C.L., and Garry, J.R.C. (2005) Detection and character-ization of oxidizing acids in the Atacama Desert using theMars Oxidation Instrument. Planet Space Sci 53:1376–1388.
Rivas, L.A., Garcıa-Villadangos, M., Moreno-Paz, M., Cruz-Gil,P., Gomez-Elvira, J., and Parro, V. (2008) A 200-antibody mi-croarray biochip for environmental monitoring: searching foruniversal microbial biomarkers through immunoprofiling.Anal Chem 80:7970–7979.
Rivas, L.A, Aguirre, J., Blanco, Y., Gonzalez-Toril, E., and ParroV. (2011) Graph-based deconvolution analysis of multiplexsandwich microarray immunoassays: applications for envi-ronmental monitoring. Environ Microbiol 13:1421–1432.
Roberson, E.B. and Firestone, M.K. (1992) Relationship betweendesiccation and exopolysaccharide production in a soil Pseu-domonas sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1284–1291.
Romanowski, G., Lorenz, M.G., and Wackernagel, W. (1993)Plasmid DNA in a groundwater aquifer microcosm-adsorp-tion, DNAase resistance and natural genetic transformation ofBacillus subtilis. Mol Ecol 2:171–181.
Ruiz-Bermejo, M., Menor-Salvan, C., Osuna-Esteban, S., andVeintemillas-Verdaguer, S. (2007) Prebiotic microreactors: asynthesis of purines and dihydroxy compounds in aqueousaerosol. Orig Life Evol Biosph 37:123–142.
Schloss, P.D., Westcott, S.L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J.R., Hartmann, M.,Hollister, E.B., Lesniewski, R.A., Oakley, B.B., Parks, D.H.,Robinson, C.J., Sahl, J.W., Stres, B., Thallinger, G.G., VanHorn, D.J., and Weber, C.F. (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source platform-independent community-supported softwarefor describing and comparing microbial communities. ApplEnviron Microbiol 75:7537–7541.
Schweitzer, M.H., Wittmeyer, J., Avci, R., and Pincus, S. (2005)Experimental support for an immunological approach to thesearch for life on other planets. Astrobiology 5:30–47.
Shafaat, H.S., Cable, M.L., Ikeda, M.K., Kirby, J.P., Pelletier, C.C.,and Ponce, A. (2005) Towards an in situ endospore detectioninstrument. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), NewYork, pp 660–669.
Shkrob, I.A., Chemerisov, S.D., and Marin, T.W. (2010) Photo-catalytic decomposition of carboxylated molecules on light-exposed martian regolith and its relation to methane pro-duction on Mars. Astrobiology 10:425–436.
Skelley, A.M., Scherer, J.R., Aubrey, A.D., Grover, W.H., Ivester,R.H.C., Ehrenfreund, P., Grunthaner, F.J., Bada, J.L., andMathies, R.A. (2005). Development and evaluation of a mi-crodevice for amino acid biomarker detection and analysis onMars. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1041–1046.
Smith, P.K., Krohn, R.I., Hermanson, G.T., Mallia, A.K., Gartner,F.H., Provenzano, M.D., Fujimoto, E.K., Goeke, N.M., Olson,B.J., and Klenk, D.C. (1985) Measurement of protein usingbicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 150:76–85.
Stahl, D.A. and Amann, R. (1991) Development and applicationof nucleic acid probes. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in BacterialSystematics, edited by E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow,John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, pp 205–248.
Stan-Lotter, H., Leuko, S., Legat, A., Fendrihan, S. (2006) Theassessment of the viability of halophilic microorganisms innatural communities. In Methods in Microbiology. Extremophiles,edited by A. Oren and F. Rainey, Elsevier, Oxford, pp 569–584.
Tuross, N. and Stathoplos, L. (1993) Ancient proteins in fossilbones. Methods Enzymol 224:121–129.
Weete, J.D., Abril, M., and Blackwell, M. (2010) Phylogeneticdistribution of fungal sterols. PLoS One 5:e10899.
Weinstein, S., Pane, D., Ernst L.A., Warren-Rhodes, K., Dohm,J.M., Hock, A.N., Piatek, J.L., Emani, S., Lanni, F., Wagner, M.,Fisher, G.W., Minkley, E., Dansey, L.E., Smith, T., Grin, E.A.,Stubbs, K., Thomas, G., Cockell, C.S., Marinangeli, L., Ori,G.G., Heys, S., Teza, J.P., Moersch, J.E., Coppin, P., Diaz, G.C.,Wettergreen, D.S., Cabrol, N.A., and Waggoner, A.S. (2008)Application of pulsed-excitation flourescence imager fordaylight detection of sparse life in tests in the Atacama Desert.J Geophys Res 113, doi:10.1029/2006JG000319.
Yuasa, S., Flory, D., Basile, B., and Oro, J. (1984) Abiotic syn-thesis of purines and other heterocyclic compounds by theaction of electrical discharges. J Mol Evol 21:76–80.
Zorzano, M.P., Mateo-Martı, E., Prieto-Ballesteros, O., Osuna, S.,and Renno, N. (2009) Stability of liquid saline water on pres-ent day Mars. Geophys Res Lett 36, doi:10.1029/2009GL040315.
Address correspondence to:Vıctor Parro
Department of Molecular EvolutionCentro de Astrobiologıa (INTA-CSIC)
Carretera de Ajalvir km 4Torrejon de Ardoz, 28850
MadridSpain
E-mail: [email protected]
Submitted 23 March 2011Accepted 1 September 2011
(Table 2 in Appendix follows/)
988 PARRO ET AL.
Ap
pen
dix
Ta
bl
e2.
An
tib
od
ie
sD
ev
el
op
ed
an
dU
se
din
Th
is
Wo
rk
Ab
No
Ab
nam
eS
ourc
e/S
trai
nS
amp
le/C
ult
ure
con
dit
ion
sIm
mu
nog
en/F
ract
ion
Hos
tS
up
p.
Ref
eren
ces
1IA
1C1
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.2w
ater
dam
)W
ater
Cel
lula
rfr
acti
on
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
2IA
1S1
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.2w
ater
dam
)W
ater
Su
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
3IA
1S2
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.2w
ater
dam
)W
ater
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
4IA
1C2
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.2w
ater
dam
)W
ater
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
085
IA1S
100
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.2w
ater
dam
)W
ater
So
lub
lece
llu
lar
frac
tio
nS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
6IA
1C3
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.2w
ater
dam
)W
ater
ED
TA
was
hed
cell
s(s
on
icat
ed)
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
7IA
2C1
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.1st
ream
)G
reen
fila
men
tsC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
088
IA2S
1R
ıoT
into
(3.1
stre
am)
Gre
enfi
lam
ents
Su
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
9IA
3C1
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.1st
ream
)B
lack
fila
men
tsC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0810
IA3S
1R
ıoT
into
(3.1
stre
am)
Bla
ckfi
lam
ents
Su
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
11IC
1C1
Rıo
Tin
to(P
lay
a3.
2)S
edim
ents
Cel
lula
rfr
acti
on
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
12IC
1S1
Rıo
Tin
to(P
lay
a3.
2)S
edim
ents
Su
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
13IC
1S2
Rıo
Tin
to(P
lay
a3.
2)S
edim
ents
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
14IC
2C1
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.1w
ater
dam
)D
ark
red
sed
imen
tsC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0815
IC2S
2R
ıoT
into
(3.1
wat
erd
am)
Dar
kre
dse
dim
ents
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
16IC
2C3
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.1w
ater
dam
)D
ark
red
sed
imen
tsE
DT
Aw
ash
edce
lls
(so
nic
ated
)R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0817
IC3C
1R
ıoT
into
(Mai
nsp
rin
g)
Bro
wn
fila
men
tsC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0818
IC3S
2R
ıoT
into
(Mai
nsp
rin
g)
Bro
wn
fila
men
tsS
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0819
IC3C
3R
ıoT
into
(Mai
nsp
rin
g)
Bro
wn
fila
men
tsE
DT
Aw
ash
edce
lls
(so
nic
ated
)R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0820
IC4C
1R
ı oT
into
(3.2
wat
erd
am)
Bro
wn
fila
men
tsC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0821
IC4S
2R
ıoT
into
(3.2
wat
erd
am)
Bro
wn
fila
men
tsS
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0822
IC5C
1R
ıoT
into
(Pla
ya
3.1)
Red
cru
sts
Cel
lula
rfr
acti
on
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
23IC
5S1
Rıo
Tin
to(P
lay
a3.
1)R
edcr
ust
sS
up
ern
atan
tR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0824
IC6C
1R
ıoT
into
(Pla
ya
3.1)
Red
sed
imen
t1–
2cm
un
der
cru
stC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0825
IC6S
1R
ıoT
into
(Pla
ya
3.1)
Red
sed
imen
t1–
2cm
un
der
cru
stS
up
ern
atan
tR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0826
IC7C
1R
ıoT
into
(3.2
wat
erd
am)
Dri
edw
all
sed
imen
tsC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0827
IC8C
1R
ıoT
into
(3.1
stre
am’s
ban
ks)
Gre
en-o
ran
ge
sed
imen
tsC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0828
IC8S
1R
ıoT
into
(3.1
stre
am’s
ban
ks)
Gre
en-o
ran
ge
sed
imen
tsS
up
ern
atan
tR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0829
IC9C
1R
ıoT
into
(3.1
min
e’s
ruin
s)R
ed-g
rey
sulf
ate-
rich
pre
cip
itat
esC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0830
A13
8R
ıoT
into
(‘‘N
acim
ien
to’’)
Yel
low
mat
s(c
entr
alst
ream
)W
ho
leG
u/
HC
lex
trac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0831
A14
0R
ıoT
into
(3.0
stre
am)
Pin
ksu
per
fici
alla
yer
Cel
lula
rfr
acti
on
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
32A
141
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.0st
ream
)P
ink
sup
erfi
cial
lay
erS
up
ern
atan
tR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0833
A14
3R
ıoT
into
(3.2
wat
erd
am)
Wal
lse
dim
ents
.L
ith
ified
ov
erg
row
thW
ho
leG
u/
HC
lex
trac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0834
A15
2R
ıoT
into
(3.0
stre
am)
Pin
ksu
per
fici
alla
yer
Wh
ole
Gu
/H
Cl
extr
acti
on
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
35ID
1C1
Rıo
Tin
to(M
ain
spri
ng
)Ir
on
sulf
ate–
rich
pre
cip
itat
esC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0836
ID1S
1R
ıoT
into
(Mai
nsp
rin
g)
Iro
nsu
lfat
e–ri
chp
reci
pit
ates
Su
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
37ID
1S2
Rıo
Tin
to(M
ain
spri
ng
)Ir
on
sulf
ate–
rich
pre
cip
itat
esS
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0838
ID1C
3R
ıoT
into
(Mai
nsp
rin
g)
Iro
nsu
lfat
e–ri
chp
reci
pit
ates
ED
TA
was
hed
cell
s(s
on
icat
ed)
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
39ID
2S2
Pen
ad
eH
ierr
o(1
48m
dee
p)
4-59
csa
mp
le(M
AR
TE
pro
ject
)S
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0840
ID3S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(96
md
eep
)4-
39c
sam
ple
(MA
RT
Ep
roje
ct)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
41ID
4S2
Pen
ad
eH
ierr
o(1
54m
dee
p)
4-61
asa
mp
le(M
AR
TE
pro
ject
)S
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0842
ID5S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(141
md
eep
)4-
56c
sam
ple
(MA
RT
Ep
roje
ct)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
(con
tin
ued
)
989
Ta
bl
e2.
(Co
nt
in
ue
d)
Ab
No
Ab
nam
eS
ourc
e/S
trai
nS
amp
le/C
ult
ure
con
dit
ion
sIm
mu
nog
en/F
ract
ion
Hos
tS
up
p.
Ref
eren
ces
43ID
7S2
Pen
ad
eH
ierr
o(8
4–97
md
eep
)8-
42b
+43c
+45a
bc+
46b
c(M
AR
TE
pro
ject
)S
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
/g
uan
idin
ium
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
44ID
10S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(119
–127
md
eep
)8-
54a+
54c+
56c
(MA
RT
Ep
roje
ct)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
A/
gu
anid
iniu
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
08
45ID
11S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(138
md
eep
)8-
60b
+60c
(MA
RT
Ep
roje
ct)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
A/
gu
anid
iniu
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
08
46ID
12S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(147
–152
md
eep
)8-
63b
+64b
+64c
+65b
(MA
RT
Ep
roje
ct)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
A/
gu
anid
iniu
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
08
47ID
13S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(2–3
md
eep
)8-
2a(M
AR
TE
pro
ject
)S
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
/g
uan
idin
ium
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
48ID
18S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(93
md
eep
)8-
45b
(MA
RT
Ep
roje
ct)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
A/
gu
anid
iniu
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
08
49ID
14S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(105
md
eep
)8-
49b
(MA
RT
Ep
roje
ct)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
A/
gu
anid
iniu
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
08
50ID
15S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(119
md
eep
)8-
54a
(MA
RT
Ep
roje
ct)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
A/
gu
anid
iniu
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
08
51ID
16S
2P
ena
de
Hie
rro
(152
md
eep
)8-
65b
(MA
RT
Ep
roje
ct)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
A/
gu
anid
iniu
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
08
52ID
17C
1R
ıoT
into
(3.2
wat
erd
am)
Yel
low
Fe-
S–r
ich
salt
pre
cip
itat
esC
ellu
lar
frac
tio
nR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0853
ID17
S1
Rıo
Tin
to(3
.2w
ater
dam
)Y
ello
wF
e-S
–ric
hsa
ltp
reci
pit
ates
Su
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
54A
hy
dY
ello
wst
on
eN
atio
nal
Par
kH
yd
rog
enob
acte
rac
idop
hil
us
(Bac
teri
a,A
qu
ifica
e)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Sch
wei
tzer
etal
.,20
05
55A
cyan
Yel
low
sto
ne
Nat
ion
alP
ark
Cy
anid
ium
spp
.(E
uk
ary
ote
,R
ho
do
ph
yta
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Sch
wei
tzer
etal
.,20
05
56A
185
Aci
dip
hil
ium
spp
.B
atch
cult
ure
Wh
ole
cell
s(i
nta
ct+
son
icat
ed)
Rb
Par
roet
al.,
2005
57A
139
Lep
tosp
iril
lum
ferr
oox
idan
sB
atch
(N2
fix
ing
)S
on
icat
edce
lls
Rb
Par
roet
al.,
2005
58A
186
L.
ferr
oox
idan
sB
atch
cult
ure
Wh
ole
cell
s(i
nta
ct+
son
icat
ed)
Rb
Par
roet
al.,
2005
59IV
E1C
1L
.p
her
rifi
lum
(LP
H2)
Fer
men
tor
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0860
IVE
1S1
L.
ph
erri
filu
m(L
PH
2)F
erm
ento
rC
ult
ure
sup
ern
atan
tR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0861
IVE
1C2
L.
ph
erri
filu
m(L
PH
2)F
erm
ento
rIn
solu
ble
cell
pel
let
fro
mS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
62IV
E1S
100
L.
ph
erri
filu
m(L
PH
2)F
erm
ento
rS
olu
ble
cell
ula
rfr
acti
on
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0863
IVE
1BF
L.
ph
erri
filu
m(L
PH
2)F
erm
ento
rB
iofi
lmR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0864
IVE
2C1
L.
ph
erri
filu
msp
p.
Bat
ch+
Fe2
+W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
65IV
E2S
1L
.p
her
rifi
lum
spp
.B
atch
+F
e2+
Cu
ltu
resu
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
66IV
E2S
100
L.
ph
erri
filu
msp
p.
Bat
ch+
Fe2
+S
olu
ble
cell
ula
rfr
acti
on
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0867
A18
2A
cid
ith
ioba
cill
us
ferr
oox
idan
sB
atch
+F
e2+
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bP
arro
etal
.,20
0568
A18
3A
t.fe
rroo
xid
ans
Bat
ch+
Fe2
+W
ho
lece
lls
(so
nic
ated
)R
bP
arro
etal
.,20
0569
IVE
3C1
At.
ferr
oox
idan
sB
atch
+F
e2+
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0870
IVE
3S1
At.
ferr
oox
idan
sB
atch
+F
e2+
Cu
ltu
resu
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
71IV
E3C
2A
t.fe
rroo
xid
ans
Bat
ch+
Fe2
+In
solu
ble
cell
pel
let
fro
mS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
72IV
E3S
100
At.
ferr
oox
idan
sB
atch
+F
e2+
So
lub
lece
llu
lar
frac
tio
nS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
73A
184
At.
thio
oxid
ans
Bat
ch+
SW
ho
lece
lls
(in
tact
+so
nic
ated
)R
bP
arro
etal
.,20
0574
IVE
4C1
At.
thio
oxid
ans
Bat
ch+
SW
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
75IV
E4C
2A
t.th
ioox
idan
sB
atch
+S
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0876
IVE
4S10
0A
t.th
ioox
idan
sB
atch
+S
So
lub
lece
llu
lar
frac
tio
nS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
(con
tin
ued
)
990
Ta
bl
e2.
(Co
nt
in
ue
d)
Ab
No
Ab
nam
eS
ourc
e/S
trai
nS
amp
le/C
ult
ure
con
dit
ion
sIm
mu
nog
en/F
ract
ion
Hos
tS
up
p.
Ref
eren
ces
77IV
E5C
1A
t.al
bert
ensi
sB
atch
+S
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0878
IVE
5C2
At.
albe
rten
sis
Bat
ch+
SIn
solu
ble
cell
pel
let
fro
mS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
79IV
E5S
100
At.
albe
rten
sis
Bat
ch+
SS
olu
ble
cell
ula
rfr
acti
on
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0880
IVE
6C1
At.
cald
us
Bat
ch+
SW
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
81IV
E6S
2A
t.ca
ldu
sB
atch
+S
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
82IV
E6C
2A
t.ca
ldu
sB
atch
+S
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0883
IVE
6S10
0A
t.ca
ldu
sB
atch
+S
So
lub
lece
llu
lar
frac
tio
nS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
84IV
E7C
1H
alot
hio
baci
llu
sn
eap
olit
anu
sB
atch
+S
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
1185
IVE
8C1
Aci
dim
icro
biu
mfe
rroo
xid
ans
Bio
mas
sfr
om
DS
MN
�103
31W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Th
isw
ork
86IV
E8S
2A
cid
imic
robi
um
ferr
oox
idan
sB
iom
ass
fro
mD
SM
N�1
0331
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Th
isw
ork
87IV
F1S
1S
hew
anel
lag
elid
imar
ina
Bat
ch(M
arin
eb
roth
15�C
)C
ult
ure
sup
ern
atan
tR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0888
IVF
2C1
S.
gel
idim
arin
aB
atch
(Mar
ine
bro
th4�
C)
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0889
IVF
2S2a
S.
gel
idim
arin
aB
atch
(Mar
ine
bro
th4�
C)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
90IV
F2S
2bS
.g
elid
imar
ina
Bat
ch(M
arin
eb
roth
4�C
)S
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0891
IVF
2C2
S.
gel
idim
arin
aB
atch
(Mar
ine
bro
th4�
C)
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0892
IVF
2S10
0S
.g
elid
imar
ina
Bat
ch(M
arin
eb
roth
4�C
)S
olu
ble
cell
ula
rfr
acti
on
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0893
IVF
3C2
Psy
chro
serp
ens
burt
onen
sis
Bat
ch(M
arin
eb
roth
15�C
)In
solu
ble
cell
pel
let
fro
mS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
94IV
F4C
1P
.bu
rton
ensi
sB
atch
(Mar
ine
bro
th4�
C)
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0895
IVF
4S1
P.
burt
onen
sis
Bat
ch(M
arin
eb
roth
4�C
)C
ult
ure
sup
ern
atan
tR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0896
IVF
4S2a
P.
burt
onen
sis
Bat
ch(M
arin
eb
roth
4�C
)S
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0897
IVF
4S2b
P.
burt
onen
sis
Bat
ch(M
arin
eb
roth
4�C
)S
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0898
IVF
4S10
0P
.bu
rton
ensi
sB
atch
(Mar
ine
bro
th4�
C)
So
lub
lece
llu
lar
frac
tio
nS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
99IV
F5C
1P
sych
roba
cter
frig
idic
ola
Bat
ch(H
arp
o’s
med
ium
15�C
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
100
IVF
5S1
Ps.
frig
idic
ola
Bat
ch(H
arp
o’s
med
ium
15�C
)C
ult
ure
sup
ern
atan
tR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0810
1IV
F5C
2P
s.fr
igid
icol
aB
atch
(Har
po
’sm
ediu
m15
�C)
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0810
2IV
F5S
100
Ps.
frig
idic
ola
Bat
ch(H
arp
o’s
med
ium
15�C
)S
olu
ble
cell
ula
rfr
acti
on
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0810
3IV
F6C
1C
ryob
acte
riu
mp
sych
rop
hil
um
Bat
ch(T
SA
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
104
IVF
6S1
C.
psy
chro
ph
ilu
mB
atch
(TS
A)
Cu
ltu
resu
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
105
IVF
6S2
C.
psy
chro
ph
ilu
mB
atch
(TS
A)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
106
IVF
6C2
C.
psy
chro
ph
ilu
mB
atch
(TS
A)
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0810
7IV
F6S
100
C.
psy
chro
ph
ilu
mB
atch
(TS
A)
So
lub
lece
llu
lar
frac
tio
nS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
108
IVF
7C1
Col
wel
lia
psy
chre
ryth
raea
Bat
hcu
ltu
re(M
arin
eb
roth
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
109
IVF
7S1
C.
psy
chre
ryth
raea
Bat
hcu
ltu
re(M
arin
eb
roth
)C
ult
ure
sup
ern
atan
tR
bT
his
wo
rk11
0IV
F7S
2C
.p
sych
rery
thra
eaB
ath
cult
ure
(Mar
ine
bro
th)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Th
isw
ork
111
IVG
1C1
Aci
doc
ella
amin
oly
tica
DS
M11
237
Bat
ch(D
SM
Zm
ediu
mN
�269
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
112
IVG
2C_1
85A
cid
iph
iliu
msp
p.
Bat
ch(D
SM
Zm
ediu
mN
�269
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Th
isw
ork
113
IVG
2C1
Aci
dip
hil
ium
sp.
Bat
ch(D
SM
Zm
ediu
mN
�269
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
114
IVG
3C1
Aci
dob
acte
riu
mca
psu
latu
mD
SM
1124
4B
atch
(DS
MZ
med
ium
N�2
69)
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
11
115
IVG
4C1
Th
erm
us
scot
odu
ctu
sB
atch
(TY
G)
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
1111
6IV
G4C
2T
.sc
otod
uct
us
Bat
ch(T
YG
)In
solu
ble
cell
pel
let
fro
mS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
117
IVG
5C1
Su
lfob
acil
lus
acid
oph
ilu
sB
iom
ass
fro
mD
SM
No
1033
2W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
118
IVG
6C1
T.
term
oph
ilu
sB
atch
(TY
G)
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bT
his
wo
rk11
9IV
H1C
1B
acil
lus
subt
ilis
(sp
ore
s)B
atch
(Sch
aeff
erm
ediu
m)
Wh
ole
spo
res
Rb
Fer
nan
dez
-Cal
vo
etal
.,20
0612
0IV
I1C
1P
seu
dom
onas
pu
tid
aB
atch
(LB
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
(con
tin
ued
)
991
Ta
bl
e2.
(Co
nt
in
ue
d)
Ab
No
Ab
nam
eS
ourc
e/S
trai
nS
amp
le/C
ult
ure
con
dit
ion
sIm
mu
nog
en/F
ract
ion
Hos
tS
up
p.
Ref
eren
ces
121
IVI1
C2
P.
pu
tid
aB
atch
(LB
)In
solu
ble
cell
pel
let
fro
mS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
122
IVI1
S10
0P
.p
uti
da
Bat
ch(L
B)
So
lub
lece
llu
lar
frac
tio
nS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
123
IVI1
RB
P.
pu
tid
aB
atch
(LB
)R
ibo
som
efr
acti
on
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
124
IVI2
C1
Bac
illu
ssp
p.
(en
vir
on
.is
ol.
)*B
atch
(LB
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
125
IVI2
S2
Bac
illu
ssp
p.
(en
vir
on
.is
ol.
)*B
atch
(LB
)S
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0812
6IV
I2C
2B
acil
lus
spp
.(e
nv
iro
n.
iso
l.)*
Bat
ch(L
B)
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0812
7IV
I2S
100
Bac
illu
ssp
p.
(en
vir
on
.is
ol.
)*B
atch
(LB
)S
olu
ble
cell
ula
rfr
acti
on
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0812
8IV
I3C
1S
hew
anel
laon
eid
ensi
sB
atch
(LB
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
129
IVI3
S2
S.
onei
den
sis
Bat
ch(L
B)
Su
per
nat
ant
fro
mE
DT
Aw
ash
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
130
IVI3
C2
S.
onei
den
sis
Bat
ch(L
B)
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0813
1IV
I3S
100
S.
onei
den
sis
Bat
ch(L
B)
So
lub
lece
llu
lar
frac
tio
nS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
132
IVI4
C1
Bu
rkh
old
eria
fun
gor
um
Bat
ch(L
B)
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0813
3IV
I4S
2B
.fu
ng
oru
mB
atch
(LB
)S
up
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
hR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0813
4IV
I4C
2B
.fu
ng
oru
mB
atch
(LB
)In
solu
ble
cell
pel
let
fro
mS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
135
IVI4
S10
0B
.fu
ng
oru
mB
atch
(LB
)S
olu
ble
cell
ula
rfr
acti
on
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0813
6IV
I5C
1S
.on
eid
ensi
sA
nae
rob
ic(f
um
arat
e)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
137
IVI5
S1
S.
onei
den
sis
An
aero
bic
(fu
mar
ate)
Cu
ltu
resu
per
nat
ant
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
138
IVI5
C2
S.
onei
den
sis
An
aero
bic
(fu
mar
ate)
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0813
9IV
I5S
100
S.
onei
den
sis
An
aero
bic
(fu
mar
ate)
So
lub
lece
llu
lar
frac
tio
nS
100
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
140
IVI6
C3
Azo
toba
cter
vin
elan
dii
Bat
chcu
ltu
re(L
B)
ED
TA
was
hed
cell
s(s
on
icat
ed)
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
141
IVI7
C1
B.
subt
ilis
168
Bat
chcu
ltu
re(L
B)
veg
etat
ive
cell
sW
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
142
IVI8
C1
B.
subt
ilis
3610
Bio
film
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0814
3IV
I8S
1B
.su
btil
is36
10B
iofi
lmC
ult
ure
sup
ern
atan
tR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0814
4IV
I9C
1D
ein
ococ
cus
rad
iod
ura
ns
Bio
mas
sfr
om
DS
MZ
No
2053
9W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
145
IVI1
0C1
Des
ulf
ovib
rio
vu
lgar
is(v
ulg
aris
)B
iom
ass
fro
mD
SM
ZN
o64
4W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
146
IVI1
1C1
Geo
bact
ersu
lfu
rred
uce
ns
Bio
mas
sfr
om
DS
MZ
No
1212
7W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
147
IVI1
2C1
Geo
bact
erm
etal
lire
du
cen
sB
iom
ass
fro
mD
SM
ZN
o72
10W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
148
IVI1
3C1
Th
erm
otog
am
arit
ima
Bio
mas
sfr
om
DS
MZ
No
3109
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0814
9IV
I14C
1V
erru
com
icro
biu
msp
inos
um
Bio
mas
sfr
om
DS
MZ
No
4136
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0815
0IV
I15C
1M
eth
ylo
mic
robi
um
cap
sula
tum
Bio
mas
sfr
om
DS
MZ
No
6130
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0815
1IV
I16C
1P
lan
ctom
yce
sli
mn
oph
ilu
sB
iom
ass
fro
mD
SM
ZN
o37
76W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
152
IVI1
7C1
Hy
dro
gen
obac
ter
ther
mop
hil
us
Bio
mas
sfr
om
DS
MZ
No
6534
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0815
3IV
I19C
1D
esu
lfos
por
osin
us
mer
idie
iB
iom
ass
fro
mD
SM
No
1325
7W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
154
IVI2
0C1
Sal
inib
acte
rru
ber
M8
Bat
ch(S
W25
%m
arin
esa
lt)
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
1115
5IV
I21C
1S
.ru
ber
PR
1B
atch
(SW
25%
mar
ine
salt
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
156
IVI2
1C2
S.
rube
rP
R1
Bat
ch(S
W25
%m
arin
esa
lt)
Inso
lub
lece
llp
elle
tfr
om
S10
0R
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
1115
7IV
I21S
1S
.ru
ber
PR
1B
atch
(SW
25%
mar
ine
salt
)C
ult
ure
sup
ern
atan
tR
bT
his
wo
rk15
8IV
J1C
1H
alof
erax
med
iter
ran
eiB
atch
(SW
25%
mar
ine
salt
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
159
IVJ2
C1
Met
han
ococ
coid
esbu
rton
iiB
iom
ass
fro
mD
SM
ZN
o62
42W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
160
IVJ3
C1
Th
erm
opla
sma
acid
oph
ilu
mB
iom
ass
fro
mD
SM
ZN
o17
28W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
161
IVJ4
C1
Met
han
obac
teri
um
form
icic
um
Bio
mas
sfr
om
DS
MZ
No
1535
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0816
2IV
J5C
1M
eth
anos
arci
na
maz
eii
Bio
mas
sfr
om
DS
MZ
No
3647
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0816
3IV
J6C
1P
yro
cocc
us
furi
osu
sB
iom
ass
fro
mD
SM
No
3638
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
1116
4IV
J8C
1H
alor
ubr
um
sp.
Bat
ch(S
W25
%m
arin
esa
lt)
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
1116
5IV
J9C
1H
alob
acte
riu
msp
.B
atch
(SW
25%
mar
ine
salt
)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
(con
tin
ued
)
992
Ta
bl
e2.
(Co
nt
in
ue
d)
Ab
No
Ab
nam
eS
ourc
e/S
trai
nS
amp
le/C
ult
ure
con
dit
ion
sIm
mu
nog
en/F
ract
ion
Hos
tS
up
p.
Ref
eren
ces
166
A-E
coli
1E
sch
eric
hia
coli
E.
coli
cult
ure
All
sero
typ
esR
bU
SB
iolo
gic
al(E
3500
-26)
167
A-H
py
lori
Hel
icob
acte
rp
ylo
riB
atch
cult
ure
(AT
CC
4350
4)W
ho
lece
lls
Rb
BIO
DE
SIG
N(B
6566
0R)
168
A-L
mo
no
L.
mon
ocy
tog
enes
Bat
chcu
ltu
re(A
TC
C43
251)
Wh
ole
cell
sR
bB
IOD
ES
IGN
(B65
420R
)16
9A
-My
cob
My
coba
cter
ium
gen
us
Bat
chcu
ltu
reM
.tu
berc
ulo
sis
Gen
us-
spec
ific
anti
gen
sex
trac
tR
bB
IOD
ES
IGN
(B47
827R
)17
0A
-Pae
rP
.ae
rug
inos
aB
atch
cult
ure
(P.
aeru
gin
osa)
Ou
ter
mem
bra
ne
pro
tein
extr
act
Gp
igB
IOD
ES
IGN
(B47
578G
)17
1A
-Sal
mS
alm
onel
lasp
.(O
+H
Ag
s)B
atch
cult
ure
Mix
S.
ente
riti
dis
,ty
ph
ym
.,h
eid
elb
urg
Rb
BIO
DE
SIG
N(B
6570
1R)
172
A-G
+Ag
Gra
m-p
osi
tiv
ean
tig
enC
ult
ure
Gra
m-p
osi
tiv
ean
tig
enM
(Mab
)B
IOD
ES
IGN
(C11
333M
)17
3A
-G+B
acG
ram
-po
siti
ve
Bac
teri
aC
ult
ure
Lip
ote
ich
oic
acid
Gra
m-p
osi
tiv
esM
(Mab
)B
IOD
ES
IGN
(C65
380M
)17
4A
-PG
Pep
tid
og
lyca
nC
ult
ure
(Str
epto
cocc
us
mu
tan
s)In
solu
ble
PG
extr
act
ob
tain
edb
yT
CA
M(M
ab)
CH
EM
.IN
TE
R.
(MA
B99
7)
175
A-l
ipid
AL
ipid
A(E
.co
liO
157)
Cu
ltu
reW
ho
lece
lls
pre
po
fli
pid
AG
oat
BIO
DE
SIG
N(B
6569
2G)
176
A-L
TA
Lip
ote
ich
oic
acid
Cu
ltu
reN
ativ
eS
trep
toco
ccu
sp
yro
gen
esR
bB
IOD
ES
IGN
(B30
103R
)17
7A
-NA
GN
-Ace
tylg
luco
sam
ine
NA
Go
np
rote
ins
NA
G-K
LH
con
jug
ated
M(M
ab)
BIO
DE
SIG
N(H
6710
8M)
178
A-D
NA
1ss
,d
sDN
AB
ov
ine
ss,
dsD
NA
Cal
fth
ym
us
DN
AM
(Mab
)U
SB
iolo
gic
al(D
3878
-05)
179
A-D
NA
2D
NA
102
(hu
man
)d
sDN
AA
uto
imm
un
eH
uS
chw
eitz
eret
al.,
2005
180
A-d
sDN
A(h
u)
dsD
NA
(hu
man
pla
sma)
dsD
NA
Au
toim
mu
ne
Hu
BIO
DE
SIG
N(K
0711
2H)
181
A-R
NA
pII
RN
Ap
oly
mer
ase
IIE
uk
ary
oti
cR
NA
po
lW
hea
tg
erm
RN
Ap
ol
II(p
uri
fied
)M
(Mab
)B
IOD
ES
IGN
(M55
701M
)18
2A
-Gro
EL
Gro
EL
(E.
coli
)R
eco
mb
inan
tG
roE
L(p
uri
fied
)R
bS
igm
a-A
ldri
ch(G
6532
)18
3A
-Hsp
70H
SP
-70
Bat
chcu
ltu
re(M
.tu
berc
ulo
sis)
HS
P-7
0(p
uri
fied
pro
tein
)M
(Mab
)B
IOD
ES
IGN
(H86
313M
)18
4A
-Las
nas
eL
-Asp
arag
inas
e(E
.co
li)
Bat
chcu
ltu
reL
-Asp
arag
inas
e(p
uri
fied
)R
bB
IOD
ES
IGN
(K59
171R
)18
5A
-BG
alb
eta
dG
alac
tosi
das
e(E
.co
li)
Bat
chcu
ltu
reB
eta
dG
alac
tosi
das
e(p
uri
fied
)R
bB
IOD
ES
IGN
(K03
450R
)18
6A
-Glu
Ox
idG
luco
seo
xid
ase
Bat
chcu
ltu
re(A
sper
gil
lus
nig
er)
Glu
cose
ox
idas
e(p
uri
fied
)R
bB
IOD
ES
IGN
(K59
137R
)18
7A
-GS
TG
luta
thio
ne-
S-t
ran
sfer
ase
Rec
om
bin
ant
(S.
jap
onic
um
)G
ST
(pu
rifi
ed)
Rb
Sig
ma-
Ald
rich
(G77
81)
188
A-S
tvS
trep
tav
idin
Cu
ltu
re(S
trep
tom
yce
sav
idin
ii)
Str
epta
vid
in(p
uri
fied
)R
bS
igm
a-A
ldri
ch(S
6390
)18
9A
-Th
ioT
hio
red
ox
in(E
.co
li)
Rec
om
bin
ant
Th
iore
do
xin
(pu
rifi
ed)
Rb
Sig
ma-
Ald
rich
(T08
03)
190
A-B
glu
B.
subt
ilis
bet
a-g
luca
nas
eR
eco
mb
inan
t(B
.su
btil
is)
Bet
a-g
luca
nas
eS
DS
-PA
GE
pu
rifi
edR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
08
191
A-C
snB
.su
btil
isch
ito
san
ase
Rec
om
bin
ant
(B.
subt
ilis
)C
snS
DS
-PA
GE
pu
rifi
edR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0819
2A
-Hfe
rH
um
anfe
rrit
inF
rom
hu
man
liv
erF
erri
tin
(pu
rifi
ed)
M(M
ab)
BIO
DE
SIG
N(H
5371
5)19
3A
1484
NIF
H3
pep
tid
ese
q.
AK
GIL
KY
AN
SG
GV
RL
KL
Hco
nju
gat
eR
bF
ern
a nd
ez-C
alv
oet
al.,
2006
194
A14
85N
IFD
2p
epti
de
seq
.Y
RS
MN
YIS
RH
ME
EK
YK
LH
con
jug
ate
Rb
Fer
nan
dez
-Cal
vo
etal
.,20
0619
5A
1487
HS
CA
2p
epti
de
seq
.T
FT
IDA
NG
ILD
VR
AL
KL
Hco
nju
gat
eR
bF
ern
and
ez-C
alv
oet
al.,
2006
196
A14
90F
DX
2p
epti
de
seq
.H
VII
TE
GF
DN
LS
PM
EK
LH
con
jug
ate
Rb
Fer
nan
dez
-Cal
vo
etal
.,20
0619
7A
1492
GL
NB
2p
epti
de
seq
.V
ET
AL
RIR
TG
ET
GD
AK
LH
con
jug
ate
Rb
Fer
nan
dez
-Cal
vo
etal
.,20
0619
8A
1494
MO
DA
2p
epti
de
seq
.M
LA
PL
HK
KIV
YA
NT
LK
LH
con
jug
ate
Rb
Fer
nan
dez
-Cal
vo
etal
.,20
0619
9A
1496
NIF
S2
pep
tid
ese
q.
LP
VN
KE
GR
VE
IET
LK
KL
Hco
nju
gat
eR
bF
ern
and
ez-C
alv
oet
al.,
2006
200
Lec
tin
Po
Lec
tin
po
tato
pro
tein
(no
tA
b)
SD
S-P
AG
Ep
uri
fied
pro
tein
No
tap
pli
cab
le—
CA
LB
IOC
HE
M(4
3178
8)20
1A
-cA
MP
1C
ycl
icA
MP
Cy
clic
AM
P3¢
-5¢-c
AM
P-2
¢-BS
Aco
nju
gat
edR
bS
igm
a-G
eno
sys
(A06
70)
202
A-c
AM
P2
Cy
clic
AM
PH
um
ancA
MP
Su
ccin
yla
ted
cAM
P-B
SA
con
ju-
gat
edR
bU
SB
iolo
gic
al(C
8450
-05)
203
A-c
AM
P3
Cy
clic
AM
PC
ycl
icA
MP
Su
ccin
yla
ted
cAM
P-B
SA
con
ju-
gat
edS
hee
pB
IOD
ES
IGN
(Q55
101S
)
204
A-A
spA
spar
tate
Pu
rifi
edA
spA
sp-K
LH
con
jug
ated
Rb
Sig
ma-
Ald
rich
(A96
84)
205
A-G
luG
luta
mat
eP
uri
fied
Glu
Glu
-KL
Hco
nju
gat
edR
bS
igm
a-A
ldri
ch(G
6642
)
(con
tin
ued
)
993
Ta
bl
e2.
(Co
nt
in
ue
d)
Ab
No
Ab
nam
eS
ourc
e/S
trai
nS
amp
le/C
ult
ure
con
dit
ion
sIm
mu
nog
en/F
ract
ion
Hos
tS
up
p.
Ref
eren
ces
206
A-T
rpT
ryp
top
han
Try
pto
ph
anT
rp-g
luta
rald
ehy
de-
Po
ly-l
ysi
ne
Rb
US
Bio
log
ical
(T90
13-0
5)20
7A
-po
lyH
isP
oly
His
tid
ine
Po
ly-H
isH
is-T
agg
edfu
sio
np
rote
inM
(Mab
)S
igm
a-A
ldri
ch(H
1029
)20
8A
-Co
rtis
ol
Co
rtis
ol
Co
rtis
ol
Co
rtis
ol-
21-h
emis
ucc
.-T
hy
rog
lob
uli
nR
bS
igm
a-A
ldri
ch(C
8409
)
209
A-E
stra
d1
Est
rad
iol
17-b
eta-
Est
rad
iol
17-b
eta-
Est
rad
iol-
BS
AM
(Mab
)B
IOD
ES
IGN
(E86
022M
)21
0A
-Est
rad
2E
stra
dio
l17
-bet
a-E
stra
dio
lE
stra
dio
l-17
-bet
a-6-
BS
Aco
nju
-g
ated
M(M
ab)
BIO
DE
SIG
N(H
3110
0M)
211
A-P
enP
enic
illi
nP
enic
llin
and
der
ivat
ives
Pen
icil
lin
-BS
Aco
nju
gat
edM
(Mab
)B
IOD
ES
IGN
(G13
011M
)21
2A
-Tc
Tet
racy
clin
eT
etra
cycl
ine
Tet
racy
clin
e-B
SA
Rb
US
Bio
log
ical
(T29
65-0
5)21
3A
-Vit
B12
Vit
amin
B12
Cy
ano
cob
alam
ine
Vit
amin
B12
-BS
Aco
nju
gat
edR
bU
SB
iolo
gic
al(C
8400
-10)
214
A-A
traz
ine
Atr
azin
eA
traz
ine
Atr
azin
e-B
gG
Rb
BIO
DE
SIG
N(K
8210
2R)
215
A-H
BV
Ag
Hep
atit
isB
vir
us
surf
ace
Ag
Hep
atit
isB
vir
us
surf
ace
anti
gen
Hig
hly
pu
rifi
edH
epat
itis
Ban
ti-
gen
Go
atA
BC
AM
(ab
9216
)
216
A-S
urf
acti
n_N
Su
rfac
tin
Sig
ma
S35
23S
urf
acti
n-A
min
e-B
SA
Rb
Th
isw
ork
217
A-A
SB
_113
62A
rch
aeog
lobu
sfu
lgid
us
AT
Psy
nth
ase,
sub
un
itB
(Arc
hae
a)P
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk21
8A
-AS
F1_
1135
5T
her
mot
oga
mar
itim
aA
TP
syn
thas
eF
1,su
bu
nit
Alp
ha
(Bac
teri
a)P
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk
219
A-B
aFE
RB
acte
rio
ferr
itin
Bac
teri
ofe
rrit
inP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
11**
220
A-C
rReT
s_97
7T
.sc
otod
uct
us
Ch
rom
ate
red
uct
ase
(mem
bra
ne)
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
221
A-C
spA
-113
57P
.p
uti
da
Co
ldsh
ock
pro
tein
AP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk22
2A
-Dsr
A-1
1365
Dsr
A(A
rch
aeog
lobu
sfu
lgid
us)
Dis
sim
ilat
ory
sulfi
tere
du
ctas
eP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk22
3A
-Dsr
B_1
1368
Dsr
B(A
rch
aeog
lobu
sfu
lgid
us)
Dis
sim
ilat
ory
sulfi
tere
du
ctas
eP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk22
4A
-EF
G_1
1359
Th
erm
otog
am
arit
ima
Elo
ng
atio
nfa
cto
rG
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
225
A-F
dh
FF
DH
F(E
.co
liK
12)
Sel
eno
po
lyp
epti
de
sub
.F
orm
ate
DeH
ase
HP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk
226
A-F
eReT
s_98
3Ir
on
red
uct
ase
(T.
scot
odu
ctu
s)Ir
on
red
uct
ase
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
227
A-H
tpG
Htp
G(N
osto
cP
CC
7310
2)H
tpG
ho
mo
log
ou
sto
HS
P90
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
228
A-H
up
LH
up
L(A
t.fe
rroo
xid
ans)
Ni-
Fe
mem
bra
ne
hy
dro
gen
ase
Lch
ain
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
229
A-H
up
SH
up
S(L
.fe
rroo
xid
ans)
Ni-
Fe
mem
bra
ne
hy
dro
gen
ase
Sch
ain
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
230
A-H
yfG
Hy
fG(E
.co
li)
Hy
dro
gen
ase
4,co
mp
on
ent
BP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk23
1A
-Mcr
B_1
1378
Mcr
B(M
eth
anoc
occo
ides
burt
onii
)M
eth
yl
Co
Mre
du
ctas
eI,
Bsu
bu
nit
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
232
A-N
AD
H_1
1363
Nu
oF
(P.
pu
tid
a)N
AD
Hd
ehy
dro
gen
ase
I(q
uin
on
e)P
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk23
3A
-Nif
D_1
1466
Nif
D(G
.m
etal
lire
du
cen
s)N
ifD
pro
tein
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
234
A-N
irS
_113
69N
irS
(P.
aeru
gin
osa)
Nit
rite
red
uct
ase
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
235
A-N
OR
1_11
375
NO
R1
(N.
ham
burg
ensi
s)N
itri
teo
xid
ore
du
ctas
eB
eta
sub
un
itP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk23
6A
-NR
A-1
1912
NR
A(G
.m
etal
lire
du
cen
s)N
itra
tere
du
ctas
esu
bu
nit
Alp
ha
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
237
A-O
mp
AO
mp
A(E
.co
li)
Om
pA
mem
bra
ne
pro
tein
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
238
A-O
pp
AO
pp
A(B
acil
lus
subt
ilis
)O
lig
op
epti
de
bin
din
gp
rote
insu
bA
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Th
isw
ork
239
A-P
fuD
PS
DP
S(P
yro
cocc
us
furi
osu
s)F
e-b
ind
ing
and
sto
rag
ep
rote
inD
pS
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
**24
0A
-Pfu
FE
RF
erri
tin
(P.
furi
osu
s)F
erri
tin
Fe-
bin
din
gan
dst
ora
ge
pro
tein
Pu
rifi
edre
com
bin
ant
po
lip
epti
de
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2011
**24
1A
-Rb
cL_R
B11
374
Rb
cL(A
t.fe
rroo
xid
ans)
Ru
bis
cola
rge
sub
un
itP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk24
2A
-Ru
stic
yan
inR
ust
icy
anin
(At.
fero
oxid
ans)
Ru
stic
yan
inP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bT
his
wo
rk24
3A
-Sso
DP
SD
PS
(Su
lfol
obu
sso
lfat
aric
us)
Fe-
bin
din
gan
dst
ora
ge
pro
tein
Dp
SP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
11**
244
A-A
BC
tran
sA
BC
tran
spo
rter
(T.
scot
odu
ctu
s)A
BC
-tra
nsp
ort
erp
rote
inP
uri
fied
reco
mb
inan
tp
oli
pep
tid
eR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
1124
5A
-Ap
sA-1
1754
Ap
sA(D
esu
lfov
ibri
od
esu
lfu
rica
ns)
HM
ML
RE
MR
EG
RG
PIY
CC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
(con
tin
ued
)
994
Ta
bl
e2.
(Co
nt
in
ue
d)
Ab
No
Ab
nam
eS
ourc
e/S
trai
nS
amp
le/C
ult
ure
con
dit
ion
sIm
mu
nog
en/F
ract
ion
Hos
tS
up
p.
Ref
eren
ces
246
A-B
fRB
FR
(D.
des
ulf
uri
can
s)C
AE
NF
AE
RIK
EL
FF
EP
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk24
7A
-Ccd
AC
cdA
(Geo
bact
ersu
lfu
rred
uce
ns)
CL
LG
EK
RL
QV
HR
KP
AG
YC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
248
A-c
yd
A-1
1758
Cy
dA
(S.
onei
den
sis)
YIL
KK
RD
LP
FA
RR
SF
AC
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk24
9A
-Dh
nA
1D
hn
A(N
osto
cP
CC
7310
2)L
RN
NA
FK
QD
KD
YH
LA
CC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
250
A-D
hn
A2
Dh
nA
(Nos
toc
PC
C73
102)
SG
RK
AF
QR
PF
EE
GV
KL
CC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
251
A-F
tsZ
Fts
ZP
seu
dom
onas
pu
tid
aC
PF
EG
RK
RM
QIA
DE
GIR
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk25
2A
-GG
DE
F_1
1760
Sen
sory
bo
x/
GG
DE
FD
om
ain
IDL
DE
FK
RIN
(DT
)FG
HK
EG
DK
VC
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk25
3A
-Gro
elG
roE
L(G
.m
etal
lire
du
cen
s)E
TE
MK
EK
KA
RV
ED
AL
CC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
254
A-I
CD
H_1
1755
ICD
H-N
AD
(C.
hy
dro
gen
ofor
-m
ans)
VL
(ES
)IK
KN
KV
AL
KG
PC
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk
255
A-I
siA
1Is
iA,
PS
II(N
osto
cP
CC
7310
2)E
ISR
YK
PE
IPM
GE
QG
CC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
256
A-I
siA
2Is
iA,
PS
II(N
osto
cP
CC
7310
2)F
HF
EW
ND
PK
LG
LIL
CC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
257
A-K
tran
s_11
750
K+
-tra
nsp
ort
er(G
.m
etal
lire
du
-ce
ns)
LA
MS
LG
RK
GE
GG
TIV
CC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
258
A-N
ifD
1_12
288
Nif
D1
(Bu
rkh
old
eria
xen
ovor
ans)
VF
DK
AD
PD
KR
PD
FV
SC
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk25
9A
-Nif
D3_
1228
9N
ifD
3(B
.x
enov
oran
s)V
FG
GD
KK
LD
KII
DE
ICC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
260
A-N
ifH
1_12
291
Nif
H1
(B.
xen
ovor
ans)
CN
ER
QT
DK
EL
EL
AE
AL
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk26
1A
-Nif
H2_
1229
3N
ifH
2(B
.x
enov
oran
s)E
FA
PE
SK
QA
EE
YR
QL
CC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
262
A-O
mcS
Om
cS(G
.su
lfu
rred
uce
ns)
CH
DP
HG
KY
RR
FV
DG
SI
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk26
3A
-Ph
aC1
Ph
aC(P
seu
dom
onas
pu
tid
a)C
SL
AP
DS
DD
RR
FN
DP
AC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
264
A-P
haC
2P
haC
(P.
pu
tid
a)C
LG
ER
AG
AL
KK
AP
TR
LC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
265
A-P
hcA
1P
hcA
(Nos
toc
PC
C73
103)
NT
EL
QS
AR
GR
YE
RA
AC
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk26
6A
-Ph
cA2
Ph
CA
(Nos
toc
PC
C73
104)
TP
GP
QF
AA
DS
RG
KS
KC
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk26
7A
-Pu
fM1
Pu
fM(R
hod
osp
iril
lum
rubr
um
)S
RL
GG
DR
EV
EQ
ITD
RC
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk26
8A
-Pu
fM2
Pu
fM(R
hod
osp
iril
lum
rubr
um
)S
RL
GG
DR
EV
EQ
ITD
RC
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk26
9A
-RR
OR
ub
red
ox
in(D
.des
ulf
uri
can
sG
20)
CH
TQ
DE
TM
KA
LE
IKK
DV
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk27
0A
-So
dA
So
dA
(G.
sulf
urr
edu
cen
s)C
ML
DY
GL
KR
PD
YIE
AF
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk27
1A
-So
dF
So
dF
(G.
sulf
urr
edu
cen
s)C
AR
IDK
DF
GS
FD
KF
KE
EC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
272
A-W
shR
Wat
erst
ress
pro
tein
(P.
pu
tid
aF
1)C
VR
FT
DE
GK
LD
LP
KG
TC
on
jug
ate
Rb
Th
isw
ork
273
A-A
eKaC
_SA
EK
AC
pep
tid
eA
EK
AC
-sy
nth
etic
Co
nju
gat
eR
bT
his
wo
rk27
4A
-EP
S_S
PE
xo
po
lysa
cch
arid
esS
ola
rsa
lter
n(S
anta
Po
la,
Ali
can
te,
Sp
ain
)E
PS
extr
act
Rb
Th
isw
ork
275
A-L
PS
_NL
PS
(Pse
ud
omon
assp
.)L
PS
-BS
AR
bT
his
wo
rk27
6A
-Lip
idA
_43
Lip
idA
Lip
idA
Mab
Hy
cult
bio
tech
.(H
M20
46)
277
A-A
MP
_NA
MP
AM
P-O
H-B
SA
Rb
Th
isw
ork
278
A-c
AM
P_N
cAM
PcA
MP
-OH
-BS
AR
bT
his
wo
rk27
9A
-cA
MP
_sh
cAM
PS
ucc
iny
late
dcA
MP
-BS
AR
bA
bca
m(a
b83
2)28
0A
-cG
MP
(bio
)cG
MP
2¢O
-su
ccin
yl
gu
ano
sin
e-3¢
,5¢
cGM
PR
bM
BL
,In
c.(J
M-3
568-
100)
281
A-c
GM
P_N
cGM
PcG
MP
-OH
-BS
AR
bT
his
wo
rk28
2A
-Co
A_S
Co
enzy
me
AC
oA
-SH
-BS
AR
bT
his
wo
rk28
3A
-Dig
ox
inD
igo
xin
Dig
ox
in-K
LH
Mab
SIG
MA
(D81
56)
285
A-d
init
rop
h.
Din
itro
ph
eno
lD
init
rop
hen
ol-
BS
AR
bS
IGM
A(D
9656
)28
6A
-cG
MP
(up
s)cG
MP
2¢-M
on
osu
ccin
yl
cycl
icG
MP
-KL
HR
bU
PS
TA
TE
287
A-G
MP
_NG
MP
GM
P-O
H-B
SA
Rb
Th
isw
ork
(con
tin
ued
)
995
Ta
bl
e2.
(Co
nt
in
ue
d)
Ab
No
Ab
nam
eS
ourc
e/S
trai
nS
amp
le/C
ult
ure
con
dit
ion
sIm
mu
nog
en/F
ract
ion
Hos
tS
up
p.
Ref
eren
ces
288
A-P
roto
IX_N
Pro
top
orp
hy
rin
IXP
roto
ph
orp
hy
rin
IX-O
H-B
SA
Rb
Th
isw
ork
289
A-T
hia
min
eT
hia
min
eT
hia
min
e-B
SA
Rb
US
Bio
log
ical
(T50
04)
290
A-A
rgA
rgin
ine
Arg
inin
eA
sym
met
ric
NG
-NG
-dim
eth
yl
arg
inin
eR
bS
anta
Cru
zB
iote
ch.s
c-57
626
292
A-A
la_N
Ala
Ala
-NH
2-B
SA
Rb
Th
isw
ork
294
A-a
a_N
Am
ino
acid
sC
ys-
SH
-BS
AR
bT
his
wo
rk29
5A
-Gly
_NG
lyG
ly-N
H2-
BS
AR
bT
his
wo
rk29
6A
-His
_NH
isH
is-N
H2-
BS
AR
bT
his
wo
rk29
8A
-Ph
e_N
Ph
eP
he-
NH
2-B
SA
Rb
Th
isw
ork
299
A-T
yr_
NT
yr
Ty
r-N
H2-
BS
AR
bT
his
wo
rk30
0A
-Val
_NV
alV
al-N
H2-
BS
AR
bT
his
wo
rk30
1P
-139
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
302
P-1
496
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
303
P-I
A1S
2P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0830
4P
-IA
1C1
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
305
p-I
A2S
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bT
his
wo
rk30
6p
-IA
3C1
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Th
isw
ork
307
P-I
C1S
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0830
8P
-IC
1C1
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Riv
aset
al.,
2008
309
p-I
C4C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bT
his
wo
rk31
0p
-IC
7C1
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Th
isw
ork
311
P-I
C8C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0831
2p
-IC
9C1
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Th
isw
ork
313
P-I
D4S
2P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0831
4P
-IV
E1C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0831
5P
-IV
E3C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0831
6P
-IV
E4C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0831
7P
-IV
E5C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0831
8P
-IV
E6C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0831
9P
-IV
F2C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0832
0p
-IV
G2C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bT
his
wo
rk32
1p
-IV
G4C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bT
his
wo
rk32
2P
-IV
I2C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0832
3P
-IV
I8C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
0832
4p
-IV
I10C
1P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bT
his
wo
rk32
5p
-IV
I120
C1
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Th
isw
ork
326
p-A
BC
tran
sP
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bT
his
wo
rk32
7p
-CrR
eTs-
977
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Th
isw
ork
328
p-F
eReT
s-98
3P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
IgG
frac
tio
n(p
rote
inA
pu
rifi
ed)
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mR
bT
his
wo
rk32
9p
-FeR
eTs-
984
Pre
-Im
mu
ne
seru
mIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rum
Rb
Th
isw
ork
330
p-p
oo
lP
re-I
mm
un
ese
rap
oo
lIg
Gfr
acti
on
(pro
tein
Ap
uri
fied
)P
re-I
mm
un
ese
rap
oo
lR
bR
ivas
etal
.,20
08
C1,
cell
ula
rfr
acti
on
;C
2,in
solu
ble
cell
pel
let
fro
mS
100;
C3,
ED
TA
was
hed
cell
s;S
1,cu
ltu
resu
per
nat
ant;
S2,
sup
ern
atan
tfr
om
ED
TA
was
h.
Rb
,p
oly
clo
nal
anti
bo
die
sfr
om
rab
bit
;M
(Mab
),m
on
ocl
on
alA
bs
fro
mm
ou
se;
Mab
,m
on
ocl
on
alan
tib
od
y;
Hu
,h
um
an;
Gp
ig,
Gu
inea
pig
.*E
nv
iro
nm
enta
lis
ola
ted
fro
mR
ıoT
into
(kin
dly
pro
vid
edb
yF
elip
eG
om
ez-G
om
ez).
**A
nti
gen
s(p
uri
fied
pro
tein
s)w
ere
kin
dly
pro
vid
edb
yD
r.T
rev
or
Do
ug
las,
Cen
ter
for
Bio
Insp
ired
Nan
om
ater
ials
,M
on
tan
aS
tate
Un
iver
sity
,B
oze
man
,M
T.
996