a methodology to analyze interoperability in crisis and disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · disaster...

15
Establish Pan-European Information Space to Enhance seCurity of Citizens Funded from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/SEC 2013.5.1-1 under the grant agreement no. 607078 “EPISECC”. A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady , Czech Republic, September 2015

Upload: others

Post on 30-Dec-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Establish Pan-European Information Space to Enhance seCurity of Citizens

Funded from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/SEC 2013.5.1-1 under the grant agreement no. 607078 “EPISECC”.

A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and

Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks

Poděbrady, Czech Republic, September 2015

Page 2: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Motivation EPISECC will provide a concept of a common information space. To ensure that the required information will be provided

• Best practices and shortcomings of the management of past disasters need to be analysed

• Such analyses need to be performed in a way allowing comparable and quantifiable comparisons (taking data protection requirements into account)

• Questions of stakeholders on the management of past disasters will be answered

That is what the EPISECC inventory ensures

www.episecc.eu 2

Page 3: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Concept: Analyzing the response to questions from stakeholders

www.episecc.eu 3

Questions are related to: a. Selected disasters b. Processes/measures of responding to the specific disaster

a.

b.

Page 4: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Pan European Inventory of events/disasters, considering time dimension

• Technical Approach: Development process of EPISECC inventory

www.episecc.eu 4

Stakeholder Consultation

Pre-Questioning

Online Questionnaire

Interviews with Stakeholders

Page 5: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Approach 1. Generation of SQL statement – combining adequate fields of information 2. Generation of tables – further processing in Excel – Example of a table

www.episecc.eu 5

Page 6: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Standards used by organizations

www.episecc.eu 6

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Num

ber o

f use

rs

Page 7: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Standards used by organizations 17 organizations stated using a total of 27 different standards. • The only standard that appears to be widely used (7

mentions) is the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) • Other standards used by multiple organizations include

UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction and Insarag Guidelines

• Otherwise no clear trends – many standards used by only one organization

www.episecc.eu 7

Page 8: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Type of responding organizations

www.episecc.eu 8

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Num

ber o

f Org

anis

atio

ns

Stakeholder Type

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Num

ber o

f Org

anis

atio

ns

Responsibility Type

Page 9: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Tools used by organizations

www.episecc.eu 9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Num

ber o

f use

rs

Page 10: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Tools used by organizations 18 organizations stated using a total of 27 different tools. • Most widely-used:

Common Emergency Communication and Information System (CECIS) with 7 mentions

• Followed by: VirtualOSOCC, JIXEL, OCHA Relief Web (5, 3 and 3 mentions respectively)

• 5 organizations claiming to use 4 or more tools 8 organizations claiming to use only one

www.episecc.eu 10

Page 11: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Interoperability

www.episecc.eu 11

Page 12: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Interoperability

www.episecc.eu 12

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0,45 0,47 0,48 0,51 0,53 0,54 0,61 0,66 0,68 0,70 0,71 0,74 0,75 0,77 0,78 0,91 1,00

Num

ber o

f inc

iden

ts

Indicator value 0 = no interop., 1 = good interop.

Interoperability Indicator

Page 13: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Interoperability - Analysis Mean values and standard deviations for the four parameters: • Setup time = 0.05 ± 0.11 (range: 0-1; best case = 0) • Exchange time = 0.15 ± 0.21 (range: 0-1; best case = 0) • Data transmitted = 93 ± 9 (range: 0-100; best case = 100) • Data understood = 86 ± 13 (range: 0-100; best case = 100)

Limiting factors appear to be exchange time and the amount of data understood

www.episecc.eu 13

Page 14: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Discussion Currently, the review process is still in progress. However, preliminary conclusions can be drawn

• Nine different types of input fields are provided – avoiding free text improves analysis considerable (nevertheless there is need for narrative explanation in some cases)

• However, there is urgent need to consider the context in order to avoid unsuitable comparisons (e.g. can the time of arrival of first responders be compared in case of an earth quake in Haiti and flooding scenarios in mid-Europe?)

www.episecc.eu 14

Page 15: A Methodology to Analyze Interoperability in Crisis and Disaster … · 2016. 4. 28. · Disaster Management IDIMT - Interdisciplinary Information and Management Talks Poděbrady,

Funded from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/SEC 2013.5.1-1 under the grant agreement no. 607078 “EPISECC”.

www.episecc.eu