a machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases
DESCRIPTION
A Machine Learning Approach to Coreference Resolution of Noun Phrases. By W.M.Soon, H.T.Ng, D.C.Y.Lim Presented by Iman Sen. Outline. Introduction Process Overview Pipeline Process to find Markables Feature Selection The Decision Tree Results for MUC-6, MUC-7 & error analysis - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A Machine Learning Approach to Coreference Resolution of Noun Phrases
By W.M.Soon, H.T.Ng, D.C.Y.Lim Presented by Iman Sen
Outline
Introduction Process Overview Pipeline Process to find Markables Feature Selection The Decision Tree Results for MUC-6, MUC-7 & error analysis Conclusions
Introduction Coreference for general noun phrases from
unrestricted text. Learns using the decision tree method from a
small annotated corpus. First learning based system that performed
comparably with the best non-learning systems.
Process Overview
Markables are the union of all the noun phrases, named entities and nested noun phrases found.
Find markables using a pipeline of NLP modules Form feature vectors for appropriate pairs of markables.
These are the training examples. Train the decision tree classifier on these examples. For testing, determine pairs of markables in test
document and present to the classifier. Stop after first successful coreference.
Tokenization & Sentence Segmentation
Morphological Processing
Free Text
POS tagger NP Identification
Named Entity Recognition
Nested NounPhrase
Extraction
Semantic Class
DeterminationMarkables
Pipelined NLP modulesStandard
HMM based tagger
HMM Based,
uses POS tags from previous module
HMM based, recognizes
organization,person,
location, date, time, money,
percent
2 kinds: prenominals
such as ((wage)
reduction) and
possessive NPs such as ((his) dog).
More on this in a bit!
Determining the Markables for trainingSentence 11. (Eastern Airlines)a2 executives notified (union)el leaders that the carrier wishes to
discuss selective ( (wage)c2 reductions)d2 on (Feb. 3)b2.2. ((Eastern Airlines)5 executives)6 notified ( (union)7 leaders)8 that
(the carrier)9 wishes to discuss (selective (wage)10 reductions)11
on (Feb. 3)12.Sentence 21. ( (Union)e2 representatives who could be reached)f1 said (they)f2 hadn't
decided whether (they)f3 would respond.2. ( (Union)13 representatives)14 who could be reached said (they)15 hadn't
decided whether (they)16 would respond.
• The first version of each sentence is the manual coreference annotation, the second is the result of the pipeline modules.
• The letters in the 1st sentence denote coreference chains• We make up pairs (i, j) as training examples• We take only those NPs in a coreference chain where the NP boundaries
match (shown in blue).
Determining the markables for training continued…
+ve examples -ve examples
((union)7 , (union)13) ((the carrier)9,(union)13)
((wage)10,(union)13)
((selective wage reductions)11,(union)13)
((Feb 13)12, (union)13) In general, if a1, a2, a3 is a coreference chain correctly
identified, then make up (a1,a2), (a2,a3) as +ve examples, and for all NPs found in between, say, a2 & a3, called e, make up –ve examples (e, a3).
Then a feature vector is generated for each pair
Markables for testing
For testing, every antecedent i, before j, is tried. Start with the immediate preceding i, and go
backwards. Stop when you find the first +ve coreference. For nested NPs, we avoid the current markable. For example, in ((his) daughter), we do not try to
see if “his” corefers to “his daughter”.
Feature Selection
The authors selected the following 12 features:1) Distance Feature (DIST): If (i,j) are in the same sentence then equal to 0, if
one sentence apart, then equal to 1 and so on.2) i-Pronoun Feature (I_PRONOUN): Values are true or false. Return true if i
in (i , j) is a pronoun.3) j-Pronoun Feature (J_PRONOUN): Tests if j is a pronoun in (i,j).4) String Match Feature (STR_MATCH): Returns true or false. Removes
articles and demonstrative pronouns (such as “that”, “those”, etc) and tests for a match.
5) Definite NP Feature (DEF_NP): If j starts with “the” return true, else false.6) Demonstrative Noun Phrase Feature (DEM_NP): If j starts with “this, that,
these, those” then return true, else false.7) Number Agreement Feature (NUMBER): Morphological root is used to
determine if noun is singular or plural (if not a pronoun), returns true or false.
Feature Selection continued…8) Semantic Class Agreement Feature (SEMCLASS): returns true, false or
unknown. Classes are “male, female, person, organization, location, date, time, money, percent, object”. Decided by the semantic module (pick 1st sense from WordNet), and is true if same or child of the other. For ex, male, female are persons, the others are objects. If either is unknown, compare head nouns, and if same, return true.
9) Gender Agreement Feature (GENDER): derive from “Mr.,Mrs.” or “he, she”. If names not referred to with one of above, then look up database of common names. Gender of objects is “neutral”. Unknown classes will have “unknown” gender. Return true is gender matches.
10) Both Proper Names Feature (PROPER_NAME): Look at capitalization and return true or false.
11) Alias Feature (ALIAS): return true for aliases. For “persons”, last names are compared. For “dates”, day, month , year is extracted. For “organizations”, acronyms are checked.
12) Appositive Feature (APPOSITIVE): if j is in apposition to i, return true. Check for (absence of) verbs and proper punctuation (like “,”).
A Training ExampleFor each markable pair, a feature vector is derived and this constitutes a
training example.Sentence: Separately, Clinton transition officials said that Frank Newman, 50,
vice chairman and chief financial officer of BankAmerica Corp., is expected to be nominated as assistant Treasury secretary for domestic finance.
Feature vector of the markable pair (i = Frank Newman, j = vice chairman).
DIST 0 i and j are in the same sentenceI_PRONOUN - i is not a pronounJ_PRONOUN - j is not a pronounSTR_MATCH - i and j do not matchDEF_NP - j is not a definite noun phraseDEM_NP - j is not a demonstrative noun phraseNUMBER + i and j are both singularSEMCLASS 1 i and j are both persons (unknown is 2) GENDER 1 i and j are both males PROPER_NAME - Only i is a proper nameALIAS - j is not an alias of iAPPOSITIVE + j is in apposition to i
The Decision Tree
The decision tree learning algorithm used is C5, an updated version of C4.5(Quinlan 1993).
Basic idea is to pick a feature, split the training set into subsets based on the different values of the feature. If subset consists of instances from the same class (after pruning), stop, else split on a different feature.
The feature with the greatest information gain is picked as the next feature to split on. Information gain is measured in terms of entropy, and in this case the feature that will yield the lowest possible entropy is selected.
Example:“(Ms.Washington)’scandidacy is being championed by (severalpowerful lawmakers)including ((her) boss).”
Feature set:DIST SEMCLASS NO. GENDER PROPER_NAME ALIAS J_PRON DEF_NP DEM_NP STR_MATCH APPOSITIVE I_PRON
(0 1 + 1 - - + - - - - -) Does (Ms. Washington, her) corefer?
The Decision Tree
STR_MATCH
+ J_PRONOUN
+ -
+ -APPOSITIVE
+ -+ ALIAS
+ -+ -
GENDER0
- 2-1
I_PRONOUN+ -
DIST<=0 >0
-NUMBER+ -+ -
Note: Only 8 out of 12 features areused in the final tree
Results
MUC-6: Recall 58.6%, Precision 67.3%, F-Measure: 62.6%. Pruning set at 20%, min. no. of instances set at 5
MUC-7: Recall 56.1%, Precision 65.5%, F-Measure: 60.4%.Pruning set at 60%, min. no. of instances set at 2.
Results about 3rd or 4th amongst the best MUC-6 and MUC-7 systems
Errors inherited from the pipeline NLP modules: POS tagger (96%), Named Entity Recognizer ( only 88.9%), and NP identification (about 90%) . Overall, in one test of 100 MUC annotated documents, achieved about 85% accuracy.
Error Analysis (on 5 random documents from MUC-6)The types and frequencies of errors that affect precision.Types of Errors Causing Spurious Links Frequency %Prenominal modifier string match 16 42.1%Strings match but noun phrases refer to 11 28.9% different entitiesErrors in noun phrase identification 4 10.5%Errors in apposition determination 5 13.2%Errors in alias determination 2 5.3%
The types and frequencies of errors that affect recall.Types of Errors Causing Missing Links Frequency %Inadequacy of current surface features 38 63.3%Errors in noun phrase identification 7 11.7%Errors in semantic class determination 7 11.7%Errors in part-of-speech assignment 5 8.3%Errors in apposition determination 2 3.3%Errors in tokenization 1 1.7%
Conclusions Very good results (comparatively) for a relatively simple set of features. The 3 most important features were STR_MATCH, APPOSITIVE & ALIAS
(discovered by training & testing with just these features). In fact, these 3 features account for 60.3%, 59.4% of the F-measure for MUC-6, MUC-7 respectively. Which means the other 9 features contribute only 2.3%(for MUC-6) and 1% for MUC-7.
Some reasons why it performed better than the only comparable system in MUC(RESOLVE from UMass) are:
Higher recall using the larger no. of semantic classes. The 3 crucial features (RESOLVE did not have the
APPOSITIVE feature). Stopping at the first +ve coreference.