A Logical Analysis

of the lecture

“Kainat Ka Sab Se

Bada Moujaza’’ by

Dr.Taherul Qadri,

collected from: http://www.youtube.com/w

atch?v=-JEaKwdlKeo

Analaysed by: Sayyed Shamim (Common Muslim)

A Logical Analysis of the lecture “Kainat Ka Sab Se Bada Moujaza’’ by Dr.Taherul Qadri, collected from:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JEaKwdlKeo

Dr Taherul Qadri, SO CALLED SHAIKHUL ISLAM, a big, powerful, orator

who often speaks beyond the limits of religion and his INNOCENT

audiences just remain unknown to the basic fact that what he is

speaking is just his own odd, fancied, capricious idea nothing to do with

either Quran or the ways of our prophet (Sal lal-laho allyehe wassallam)

subsequently get involved in sins of which they remain unaware for

ever.

IF I AM WRONG, WHY NOT CHECK IT OUT YOURSELF HONESTLY, AND

PLEASE DON’T EXPRESS YOUR RELIEF OR TIREDNESS SIMPLY SAYING

THAT “ Ise samaj me nahi aayega- Bewakuf (He will not understand-

Foolish)”. Let the lectures of Dr Qadri be his personal views, no problem

but whenever he will associate it with Quran or the ways of prophet or

the life of prophet then it’s a distortion in religion which I must analyze.

1. Dr Qadri: At 10.00 mins to 10.50 mins of the video he said that

“When prophet declared his prophet hood, people asked from

him “ mozja’’ Miracle like previous prophets upon which

Prophet presented himself as “ mozja’’ or Miracle”. He showed

its authenticity in Quran (10:16)

FACT as per Quran:

And when Our verses are recited to them as clear evidences, those who do not expect the meeting with Us say, "Bring us a Qur'an other than this or change it." Say, [O Muhammad], "It is not for me to change it on my own

accord. I only follow what is revealed to me. Indeed I fear, if I should disobey my Lord, the punishment of a tremendous Day." Say, "If Allah had willed, I would not have recited it to you, nor would He have made it known to you, for I had remained among you a lifetime before it. Have ye then no sense?" (10:15-16)

As per Quran people asked Prophet to replace the Quran and bring

another one in its place or to change it. They do not asked for MIRACLE

similar to those of previous prophets because they, being Arabs too

Intelligent, were fully aware of this NEW CONSTITUTION in the name of

Quran which they realized to be more dread full than to ask for a time

being miracles and believe in it. They feared that this Quran will not

only change their religious lifestyle but also their prevailing system of

their might. As such Allah informed prophet later on in this regard that

whether you show miracles or something more than that to them or

not, they will not believe because they don’t fear your prophet hood

but QURAN.

Prophet never said “Take me as ‘Mojza’, rather he tried to convince people that what he has brought it from such a Great Power who wont even spare him also if HE WILL DISOBEY HIM, and in this regard he is similar to them. This ‘truth’ he tried to make his people realize presenting himself not as a MIRACULOUS PROPHET but as their yesteryears Muhammad who remained with them as “Al Amin’- The faithful for last 40 years. (Sal lallaho alleyhe wassallam). So why don’t they are trying to understand the danger of unbelief, was the matter of concern to prophet, which made him anxious.

2. Dr Qadri: At 25.49 mins to 26.12 he says that Allah asks in

Quran 2:2, that one who believes in unseen should sing ‘nath’

and religious songs ‘tarane’ without asking any question.

FACT as per Quran:

This is the Book about which there is no doubt, a guidance for those who are conscious of Allah -Who believe in the unseen, establish prayer, and spend out of what We have provided for them (2:2-3)

My question is even any layman can even understand what does Allah indicates here about unseen. Obviously it’s those portions of the Quran which indicates things unknown and hidden to man like Allah Himself, Angels, Hell, Heaven etc. Belief in unseen here means although the things are hidden but Muslims believe in those things with a firm faith, completely surrendering to the will of Allah pronouncing that “There is no God except Allah (obviously unseen) and Muhammad is his Prophet (sal lallaho allehe wassalam). But the point which is to note here is that just after this portion, Allah declares to establish prayer the second pillar of Islam and then to spend from what he earns. When the clear cut guidelines has been provided by Allah in Quran then how he introduces ‘Nath and tarane’ just after this verses of Quran implying that ‘nath and tarane’ is more important than prayers and charity after growing a faith in unseen. Dr Qadri is free to speak whatever he desires but should not attach his words with Quran thus creating a wrong guidelines among INNOCENT Pakistani Muslims who treat him as next to prophet.

3. Dr Qadri: Here right at 35.25 min to 36.06 min he said prophet

never asked from Allah any ‘Moujza’ but just at 38.07min to

38.45 min he said prophet asked from Allah ‘ Moujza De’ or

Give me Moujza upon which Allah said ‘I wont give it to you as

you yourself is Moujza’. HERE HE HAS NOT QUOTED ANY

VERSES OF QURAN. So what I find in this regard is self

explanatory and sufficient for people to understand that it’s

Quran which is “Moujza” to a prophet, and not the Prophet.

FACT as per Quran: And We have certainly given you, O Muhammad], seven of the often repeated verses and the great Qur'an. (15:87) And when you, O Muhammad, do not bring them a sign, they say, "Why have you not contrived it?" Say, "I only follow what is revealed to me from my Lord. This Qur'an is enlightenment from your Lord and guidance and mercy for a people who believe."(7:203). This Qur'an is guidance (45:11) This Qur'an is enlightenment for mankind and guidance and mercy for a people who are certain in faith. (45:20), (42:07)

But why ‘Quran’ itself is Moujza:

Say, "If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Qur'an, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants."(17:88) This Qur'an is notification for the people that they may be warned thereby and that they may know that He is but one God and that those of understanding will be reminded. (14:52) Say: "If the sea were to become ink to record the Words of my Lord, indeed the sea would be all used up before the Words of my Lord are exhausted, and it would be the same even if We were to bring an equal amount of ink."(18:109)

This is a indication of Quran as ‘Moujza’ for mankind to ponder over according to the ways of our prophet. So whether prophet asked to Allah “ Moujza De” and whether Allah replied that “Nahi Dunga, tu khud hi Moujza hai” is something very distorting and misguidance.

4. Dr Qadri: At 46.45 mins to 48.25 mins he quoted two verses of

Quran (11:27) and (18:110) wherein he mention that “The

disbelievers refused to believe him as prophet because he was

like an ordinary man like them. So when Allah heard this He

said that declare to them that “Yes Muhammad is an ordinary

man like them, but if it is so then you people become like me.”

Specifically he claims at 54.10 min to 54.15 min that it is as per

Quran.

FACT as per Quran: As he has quoted verses from Quran I checked I and found that the first portion is correct but the last one i.e So when

Allah heard this He said that declare to them that Yes Muhammad

is a ordinary man like them (This prortion is correct), but if it is so

then you people become like Muhammad (Sal lallaho allayehe

wassalam)/ (This is innovation). This portion has been introduced by him for the sake of his oration. How could our prophet be so ARROGANT to speak such nonsense, and what I found in Quran is produced below for your kind understanding so that you people could also agree with me (HONESTLY).

So the eminent among those who disbelieved from his people said, “We do not see you but as a man like ourselves, and we do not see you followed except by those who are the lowest of us [and] at first suggestion. And we do not see in you over us any merit; rather, we think you are liars."(11:27)

And the reply is:

Say, "I am only a man like you, to whom has been revealed that your god is one God. So whoever would hope for the meeting with his Lord - let him do righteous work and not associate in the worship of his Lord anyone"(18:110)

DECISION IS YOURS!!! HONESTLY; I wont discuss

5. Dr Qadri: And finally these few serious manipulations:

i) At 1.03.06 min he quotes Quran 53:17 he said directly that “ mere

mehboob tune jalwaye zaat kiya, behijab kiya, aur aakh nahi

jhapki aur aakh nahi bhatki” BLUNDER, BLUNDER, BLUNDER (We

will check Quran later on)

ii) Later at 1.03.35 min he clarifies the reason from Quran at Verse

53:08 saying “ Farmaya summa DANAaaa, phir huzur ki zaat karib

hui, aur is Danaa ke maqam per mere aaka ko FANAH fil WAHDAH

ka dariya…….is danaa ne aapko FANAH fil WAHDAAT ka Maqam

aapki manzil ke mutabiq………. Huzur uski wahdat me fanah ho

gaye.

iii) At 1.04.42 min he said after quoting chapter 53:08 from quran that

“ Tajala ke zariye ab huzur ko BAQA wil WAHDAT naseeb ho gaye.

Fanah ki vadi se guzar gaye and vice versa of vice versa. Repetion

of same things from here and there goes on.

iv) At 1.05.16 min he said “ Ab hukm hua –fa kana kaba kausain, ab do

kamano ka faisla reh gaya, wo do kamman kyat thi…….. ………

……… ye kause Mustafa thi aur who kuase khuda thi (right at

1.05.13 min)

v) Again at 1.07.06 min he showed the same verse i.e 53:09 and said

right at 1.08.11 “raha to khaliq aur makhluk magar fark mita

diya”…………… then at 1.10.05 he declared that “jisne umr bhar

Mustafa Mustafa kaha uske namaye amaal me likha gaya ke usne

khuda khuda kaha”

FACT as per Quran: In the above 5 serious manipulations let’s check

the verses from Quran in the sequences what he has quoted- (53:17 first

time, 53:08 second time and then 53:09 at last), which he has presented

in his lecture to create a impression of prophet’s visual meeting with

Allah which Pakistani Muslims don’t even try to cross check. The three

verses is from Allah but its clarifications is from WHIMSICAL Dr.

QADRI, who is supposed to be and so called Sheikhul-Islam from

Pakistani Muslims, given power to define Islam as per his own views in

spite of the fact that there are so many hadith in this regard which must

be consulted first to clarify Islam. Quran is like laws and prophet’s

sayings and actions are its implementation. How dare he inserts his

OWN VIEWS USURPING PROPHET? SURPRSING? IS THIS LOVE

FPR PROPHET OR KNIFE AT HIS BACK?

Verse 53:17-

The sight of the Prophet did not deviate, nor did it transgress its limit.

Verse 53:08

Then he drew near and came down

Verse 53:09

And was at a distance of two bow lengths or nearer.

FIRST THING WHICH SHOULD BE CLEAR THAT Quran should not be

explained in “Choose, Pick and Throw” manner and whenever any

portion of Quran is not clear then whom should we consult? Is it people

like Dr Qadri or Prophet’s sayings, Is it any sheikul-islam or hadith-un-

nabi, is it any sectarian leader or the ways of companions. If still the

matter remains unclear then let it be assured that such claims are false

and DISHONESTY as no part of our intelligence, useful for our daily life

has remain undefined by either Quran or our prophet or his

companions afterwards, so that we should not wander in wilderness

after so many years claiming that Quran and hadith is valid till Qiyamah,

but this & that is unclear and this & that is undefined. Such claims that

this matter of Islam is undefined, that portion of Quran can’t be

understood, this area has become backdated, that portion of Islam

need updating etc etc are nothing but a CHEATING form oneself and

cheating to his own conscience. No part of our intelligence, useful for

our daily life, has been remain undefined by either Quran or our

prophet or his companions afterwards, so that we should not wander in

wilderness after so many years claiming that Quran and hadith is valid

till Qiyamah, but this & that is unclear and this & that is undefined. Isint

Funny.

If agreed then let’s proceed, if we are given these three verses form

Quran selectively, nobody can gather its meaning and its real essence.

Honestly the three verses presented by Dr Qadri are in front of you.

Could you grasp anything of it? Are you able to understand even the

significance of the above three verses. Nobody can.

So we should now check that where from the Quran it is taken. This

surah is An-Najm (The Star). Surah Najm(53)

1. By the star when it descends, 2.Your companion [Muhammad] has not strayed, nor has he erred, 3. Nor does he speak from [his own] inclination, 4. It is not but a revelation revealed, 5. Taught to him by one intense in strength, 6. One of soundness. And he rose to his true form, 7. While he was in the higher part of the horizon, 8. Then he approached and descended, 9. And was at a distance of two bow lengths or nearer. 10. And he revealed to Allah’s Servant what he revealed. 11. The heart did not lie about what it saw, 12. So will you dispute with him over what he saw? 13. And he certainly saw him in another descent 14. At the Lote Tree of the Utmost Boundary 15. Near it is the Garden of Refuge 16. When there covered the Lote Tree that which covered it. 17. The sight of the Prophet did not swerve, nor did it transgress its limit. 18. He certainly saw of the greatest signs of his Lord.

Whole of the Surah 1-18 is of similar context what prophet saw, where saw, what

revealed etc. Its not only verse 8, 9 & 17. SELCTIVELY which Dr Qadri quoted. IS

NOT IT A GREAT SIN TO HIDE SOME VERSES AND DISCUSS SOME VERSES OF

QURAN , AS PER ONE’S DESIRE TO FULFILL HIS LECTURE ONLY, WHICH

PAKISTANI MUSLIMS DON’T EVEN TRY TO REALISE AS THEY DESIRE TO

REMAIN DEPENDENT UPON THE PUNDITS AND BRAHMANS OF THEIR

COUNTRY ?

Such serious topics must be thoroughly read and connected with

WHOLE of the Quran and Prophet’s sayings if it is unclear or disputable.

Let’s check whole Quran, to get into the truth for the verses of similar

context. We will find similar clarification at Surah At-Takweer (81) also.

Verse 19. Indeed, the Qur'an is a word conveyed by a noble messenger, 20. Who is possessed of power and with the Owner of the Throne, secure in position, or who is mighty and of high rank before the Lord of the throne 21. Obeyed there in the heavens and trustworthy. Or He is obeyed there and is trustworthy 22. And your companion is not at all mad 23. And he has already seen Gabriel in the clear horizon. 24. And Muhammad is not a withholder of knowledge of the unseen. 25 And the Qur'an is not the word of a devil, expelled from the heavens. 26. So where are you going?

Surah 19-25 is of similar context what prophet saw, where saw, what revealed etc.

Its not only verse 8, 9 & 17 of Surah 53 only. SELCTIVELY WHICH DR QADRI

QUOTED. IS NOT IT A GREAT SIN TO HIDE SOME VERSES AND DISCUSS SOME

VERSES OF QURAN , AS PER ONE’S DESIRE TO FULFILL HIS LECTURE ONLY,

WHICH PAKISTANI MUSLIMS DON’T EVEN TRY TO REALISE AS THEY DESIRE

TO REMAIN DEPENDENT UPON THE PUNDITS AND BRAHMANS OF THEIR

COUNTRY ?

As a layman we can’t understand who came near prophet or what

prophet saw or what the distance indicates etc etc. Actually this is the

first Surah which was publicly declared by Prophet. Previously Quran

was propagated in a hidden manner to counter the rumour that was

spread that prophet has seen or have been affected by some Evil spirit

or Jinn or Magic due to which he has become mad and spreading

nuisance, i.e the first time when he saw the Angel Geebreel, he ran

away from the hill and hid himself under a blanket in fear. So people

started suspecting him of seeing some Evil spirit or Jinn or Magic due to

which he has become mad and spreading nuisance. “Yeha to Allah ke

zaat pe bhi tohmat lag raha tha aur nabi ke zaat pe bhi tohmat lag raha

tha. So Allah himself came into action as per the lecture of Dr Qadri “ke

jab nabio ke zaat pe tohmat lagta hai to Allah use ‘moujza’ ke zariye

chup ker deta hai and here also people, Muhammad (sal lallaho allihe

wassalm) ke zaat pe yani pigambar hone ke zaat pe tohmant lagaya.

Allah action me aaya aur elan hua ke ‘O Muhammad (sal lallaho allihe

wassalm) logo ko jama karo aur yeh surah elaan karo’.

Dr Qadri sahib “ab aap kahenge ke mujza kya hua bhai kyoki paigambar e zaat pe tohmat lag raha tha, to sune janaab, jab surah khatam hua huzur sajda me gir gaye, aur sare hazreen musalmaan ho ya kafir sare ke sare sajzah me chale gaye, begair kuch dekhe, begair kuch puche, begair kuch kahe, sare ke sare huzur ke saath sajdah me chale gaye. Ye ek bahut bada, bahut hi bada moujza tha. Thodi der ke liye sare ne allah ka sajda kiya aur huzur ki baton ko jhutla na paya aur kabool farmaya. ( sirf ek ko chor ker, wo aalg kahani hai). Aapke mutabik Dr Qadri Sahab kya ise aap mojza nahi samajhte?

Hmmm ! lagta hai mai bhi Dr sahib jaisa joshila lecture dene laga. So come to point.

Keeping in view both the Chapters of Quran and both the verses from there we can easily conclude:

1) That prophet saw something in the upper Horizon who was in its original form. It later descended and approached till it was very near to the prophet.

2) This unusual thing revealed something to prophet.

3) Prophet once again saw it in its original form in one another occasion near Lote Tree during Miraj.

4) These were the ‘greatest sign’ of Allah to his prophet.

Now clarification by Allah himself of the above verses 1-18 of chapter 53, here in chapter 81 verse 18-25

5) The revelation was Quran, revealed by noble messenger, owner of power and of high rank, obeyed by others in heaven (angels).

6) Prophet saw the MESSENGER in the HORIZON who brought revelation (81:23)

7) The Messenger was not the accursed Satan obviously as declared by Allah (81:25)

Now please tell me one thing which is very easy to understand that who was this messenger if it was not accursed satan as Allah Himself declares, then who brought Quran, was it Allah Himself or Angel Gebreel.

DECISION IS YOURS. I WONT DISCUSSS IN THIS MATTR MORE AS I HAVE

PRESENTED QURAN ITSELF FOR MY JUSTIFICATION. NO HADITH OR

LECTURES OF BIG BROTHERS OF ISLAM IN THIS REGARD.

Dr Sahib, Chalo Thodi der ke liye ye maan lete hai ke Qadri Sahib Thik

keh rahe hai. Allah pehla aasman pe Muhammad (sallallaho allehe

wasslam) ke istekbal ke liya upar se niche aaye, aur dono ek dusre ki

deedar ki, aur aage jo hua so hua etc etc. To mai phir ye kahunga ke

Sare Aalim ek taraf, sare ilm-wale ek taraf, sare mazhabi parhe likhe

wale ek taraf, sare sheikul islam ek taraf aur doosri taraf Ummul

momeneen, hamari amma, sabho ki amma Hazrat Aishah ( razi alahu

taala anha) jo farmati hai( May Allah be pleased with her):

(Suppose for a time being I accept what Dr Qadri sahib is telling is

correct. Allah descended to our Horizon to greet prophet, then both of

them saw each other, then further happened what happened etc etc.

Then in this situation I must say that let all the SO CALLED educated one

be at one side, let all the SO CALLED aalims be at one side, let all the SO

CALLED seikhul islam be at one side and on another side let there be

mother of all muslims, hazrat Aishyay (peace be upon her, blessings of

allah be upon her) be on another side who says that: Narated By

Masruq : 'Aisha said, "If anyone tells you that Muhammad has

seen his Lord, he is a liar, for Allah says: 'No vision can

grasp Him.' (6.103) And if anyone tells you that Muhammad

has seen the Unseen, he is a liar, for Allah says: "None has

the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah."

BUKHARI- Vol 009, Book No 093, Hadith Number 477.

Chapter 6: Verse102-103 That is Allah, your Lord; there is no deity except Him, the Creator of all things, so worship Him. And He is Disposer of all things. Vision perceives Him not, but He perceives all vision; and He is the Subtle, the Acquainted”.

NOW WHICH SIDE WILL YOU BE, JANAB (SIR)

??? HAVE YOU COURAGE TO DENY YOUR

MOTHER OR HAVE YOU MORE COURAGE TO

DENY QURAN (6:102-103)

DECISION IS YOURS!!! By the way Dr Qadri, you can’t INFUSE love of

prophet by shouting and repeating the same thing again and again in

your lecture. This has made Pakistani Muslims to give up LEARNING

Quran and the ways of Prophet and his Companions to the people like

you so that they could enjoy the manipulated version from people like

you and enjoy it. Isn’t ?

Non-Muslim forces play with our Wealth and Health (Life & Death), but

these people play with our Eemaan and Aqidah. This is Dangerous.

Finally I must say that Reading ‘Salat-o Salam’ separately or ‘Nath’ or

‘Milad’ or celebrating ‘Prophet’s Birthday’ etc to show the love towards

prophet is just wastage of time as because Allah has clearly declared

and decided the rule to LOVE PROPHET, which is as follows:

Quran says: Say, [O Muhammad], "If you should love Allah, then follow me, [so] Allah will love you and forgive you your sins. And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful." Say, "Obey Allah and the Messenger." But if they turn away - then indeed, Allah does not like the disbelievers.

So to love Allah we have to follow prophet. And to love prophet then, obviously, we

should have to follow Prophet again. Quran speaks of the first part of love while the

ways of prophet and his companions speaks the way of following prophet. SO MY

QUESTION IS PLEASE PRODUCE THE ‘NATH’ OR ‘NAGME’ OR ‘TARAANE’ SUNG BY

Abu Bakr, SUNG by Umar, SUNG by Usam and Sung by Ali (May Allah be pleased with

all of them) in LOVE FOR PROPHET, SO THAT I COULD START WITH THE TARANE AND

NATH SUNG BY THEM AS MY DEBUT IN THE FIELD OF LOVE FOR PROPHET, now.

OR Is it not a sin to go beyond what Allah has taught?

Rabbe-zidni-ilmah (Ameeeen)

-------------- x --------------