a lecture on nahjul balagha
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
1/39
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
2/39
a lecture on
nahju l-balghah
by:
allamah sayyid saeed akhtar rizvi
Published By :
BILAL MUSLIM MISSION OF TANZANIA
P.O.BOX 20033
DAR ES SALAAM
TANZANIA
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
3/39
All Rights Reserved
Bilal Muslim Mission of Tanzania
Title:
A Lecture On Nahju l-Balghah
Author:
Allamah Sayyid Saeed Akhtar Rizvi
Printed and Published By:
Bilal Muslim Mission of Tanzania
Typeset By:
Ahlul~Bayt (a.s.) Assembly of Tanzania
First Edition: Copies: 2001 / 1422 2000
ISBN: 9987 620 18 3
Bilal Muslim Mission of Tanzania
P.O.Box 20033, Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaTel: 2120111 / 2112419 - Fax: 255 22 2116550
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
4/39
content
1 Preface 2
2 A lecture on Nahju l-balghah 3
3 Note on miraculous sermons of Imm Ali (a.s) 25
4 e Sermon of Imm Ali (a.s) without dot 28
5 e Sermon of Imm Ali (a.s) without alif 30
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
5/39
1
IN THE NAME OF ALLH,THE BENEFICENT, THE MERCIFUL.
All Praise belongs to Allh, the Lord of the worlds;
The Beneficient, the Merciful:
the Master of the Day of Judgement;
Thee only we worship, and Thee we beseech
for help;
Guide us to the straight path;
The path of those upon whom Thou hast bestowed
favours,
not of those inflicted by Thy wrath,nor of those gone astray.
* * * * *
O Allh! send your blessings to the head ofYour messengers and the last of
Your prophets Muhammad ,
and his pure and cleansed progeny.
Also send Your blessings to all the
Prophets and Imams.
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
6/39
2
preface
This is a lecture on Nahju l-balghah, which also
clarifies some misunderstandings which some people
had shown about this august book.
In the end I have given two miraculous sermons ofImm Ali (a.s.) which the Imm (a.s.) had delivered
on two different occasions: the First, without dot and
the Second without the letter alif.
15/5/1422 Sayyid Saeed Akhtar Rizvi
4/8/2001 Dar-es-Salaam
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
7/39
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
8/39
4
It was done in order that if any piece of that lecture
etc. was not available at that time and came to hand
at a later date, it could be inserted therein. This bookbecame a huge success from the day one, because
the writings and lectures of Amru l-muminn were
held in high esteem from the beginning of the Islam
era; and people used to collect them, learn them and
memorize them. Even in Sayyid Rais own time, a
scholar, Ali ibn an-Nasir, wrote a short commentary
on it which he called Alm Nahju l-balghah. Its
manuscript was preserved in the library of Mumtazu
l-ulam Sayyid Muhammad Taqi in Lucknow. Then
a detailed Sharwas written by Said ibn Hibatullah
ibn al-Hasan ar-Rwandi. However the most well-known and popular Sharwas written by Izzuddin
Abdu l-amd ibn Abi l-add al-Mutazili
al-Madini. He started writing it on 1st Rajab, 644
A.H. and completed it in the month of Safar 649 A.H.
and sent it as present it to Muayyiduddin al-Asadial-Alqami, who was the Minister of al-Mustaim
billah, the last Abbasid caliph. Before Ibn Abi
l-add, many well known Sunni scholars had
written commentaries on Nahju l-balghah, e.g.
Abu l-asan Ali ibn Abu l-Qsim al-Bayhaqi
(d. 565), al-Imm Fakhruddin ar-Rzi (606), Sadu
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
9/39
5
d-Din Taftzni. In this way we see that upto 150
years after the compilation of Nahju l-balghah, no
serious doubt was expressed about the authenticity ofthe material collected in that book. Thefirst man who
tried to create some doubt about it was Ibn khallikn
who died in 681 A.H., who was not in Iraq or Egypt
nor in the centre of Islamic learning, but in Qairawan
and Cordova under the Umayyad kingdom of Spain.
He wrote while writing about as-Sayyid Murtaa,
the elder brother of ash-Sharf ar-Rai: People are
of different views about the book,Nahju l-balghah
which is a collection of the talks of Ali ibn Abilib,
whether it was compiled by him, i.e. Sayyid Murtaa
or his brother, Sayyid Rai. It is said that this is notfrom the speeches of Ali ibn Abi lib, but it was
compiled by the man who forged it; and Allh knows
better.
This short remark shows that Ibn Khallikn waseven unaware of who was the compiler of Nahju
l-balghah, and then he has used the word, It is
said, but does not mention who had said it that it
was not the speech of Ali ibn Abi lib; and then he
ends at the phrase, and Allh knows better. So in this
way he for the first time sowed the seed of suspicion
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
10/39
6
and doubt about this book. Also he does not say that
the scholars or Ulam have different views; he just
says that people have different views. Now onecentury after Ibn khallikn came adh-Dhahabi whose
prejudice against the Shias is well-known and he
went even further. He writes in the life-history of
Sayyid Murtaa: Whoever would see this book,
Nahju l-balghah, will understand surely that it is
spurious and forged in the name of Amiru mumineen,
because in this book is open denunciation of the two
Sheikhs, Abu Bakr and Umar.
Is it not strange that for two hundred and fifty years
there was no controversy aboutNahju l-balghah. IbnKhallikn, sitting in al-Maghhrib, said that the people
had different views that whether it was compiled by
Sayyid Murtaa or Sayyid Rai, and then said that
it is said that it was not the speeches and writings
of Ali ibn Abi lib. Then one hundred years afterthat came adh-Dhahabi who tried to cast doubt and
suspicion on the ground that the book contained open
denunciation of Abu Bakr and Umar.
Before commenting on this view, a few things should
be mentioned before hand.First: It is not that Sayyid
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
11/39
7
Rai was the first man to compile the lectures,
sermons and letters of Ali ibn Abi lib (a.s.).
al-Masdi (who died in 340 A.H. long before thebirth of Sayyid Rai, and who was a contemporary of
not only Shaykh Mufd, but even of Shaykh adq)
writes: The people had memorized his (i.e. Alis)
lectures and sermons and different epistles, and their
number reaches more than 480 lectures; they were
delivered extempore, but people momorized them and
continued to narrate them and teach them.1Now if
these more that 480 lectures could be found, they would
have made a bigger volume thanNahju l-balghah.
There was Abdu l-amd al-Ktib ibn Yay, who
died in 132 A.H., and Ibn Abi l-adid quotes him inhis Commentary that he said: I memorized 70 lectures
from the lectures of Ali, and its benefits continued
to grow and grow. Ibn al-Muqaffa, who died in 142
A.H., used to say: I drank from the sermons and
lectures of Ali and its pleasing benefi
ts grew andgrew. That is why Allama asan al-Nadubi writes
in his foot-notes of al-Bayn wat-tabyinof al-Ji:
Obviously he learned and acquired his rhetorics from
the lectures of Imam Ali. Ibn Nubtah, who died in
374 A.H., said: I memorized 100 pieces of sermons of
1Marju dh-dhahab, vol. 2 p. 33, Egypt ed.
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
12/39
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
13/39
9
Abdullah Hasani, who was a companion
of Imam Ali an-Naqi (a.s.) had compiled
Kitabu Khutub-i Amri l-mumineen (a.s.)6
.5. Abu l-Khayr Sad ibn Abi ammd ar-Rzi, a
contemporary of the above-mentioned Abdu
l-Am. He had also collected a similar book7.
6. Ali ibn Muammad ibn Abdullah Madini
(d. 335 A.H.) He had also compiled lectures
and letters of Ali (a.s.).8
7. Abu Muammad Abdu l-Azz al-Jaldi (d.
330 A.H.). He had compiled several books
separately on lectures of Ali, Letters of Ali,
Sermons of Ali etc 9.
8. Abu Muammad asan ibn Ali ibn Shubahal-alabi (d. 320 A.H.) He had narrated some
sayings, maxims and lectures of Ali (a.s.) in
his well-known book, Tuafu l-Uql. He
writes at the end: If we were to write here all
the sermons and sayings of Ali which he spokeon only one subject, Taweed, (leave aside all
other subjects), it would be equal in volume to
this book of ours.
6Ibid.
7Ibid.
8Mujamu l-udab, of Yaqb al-amawi, vol. 5; p. 313.9 a-si, al-Fihrist; an-Nijashi,Rijl.
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
14/39
10
Also there are many books written before ash-Sharf
ar-Rai, in which many speeches and talks of Ali (a.s.)
have been quoted on various occasions. For example,al-Ji (d. 255 A.H.); al-Bayn wa t-tabyn, Ibn
Qutaybah Dnawari (d. 276 A.H.). Uyunu l-Akhbr
wa Gharibu l-Hadith; Ibn WiYqbi (d. 278):
Trikh Yqbi,Kitab al-Mubarradof Abu l-Abbs
al-Mubarrad (d. 286):Kitabu al-Kmil; the Historian,
Ibn Jarr a-abari (d. 310): Trkhabari; Ibn Durayd
(d. 321): Kitb al-Mujtan; Ibn Abd Rabbih, (d.
328): al-Iqd al-Fard; al-Kulayni (d. 329): al-Kfi;
al-Masdi (d. 346):Maruju dh-dhahab; Abu l-Faraj
Isfahni (d. 356):Kitab al-Aghni, Abu Ali al-Qri
(d. 356):Kitab an-Nawdir; ash-Shaykh A-adq (d.381)Kitb at-Tawhdand his many other collections
of traditions; as-Shaykh al-Mufd (d. 416):Kitb al-
IrshdandKitb al-Jamal.
If the lectures and sermons of Ali (a.s.) quoted inthe above-mentioned books are compared with those
collected in Nahju l-balghah, they appear to be
the same or almost the same, with minor verbal
differences.
Not only those who preceded ash-Sharf ar-Rai, but
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
15/39
11
even his contemporaries or those who came soon after
him, had collected and committed many sermons and
speeches of Ali (a.s.) to memory, and some of themhave mentioned them in their books. For example,
Ibn Miskawayh (d. 421): Tajribu l-umam; fi
Abu Nuaym Ifahni (d. 430): ilyatu l-Awliy;
ash-Shaykh a-si (d. 460) at-Tahdhband al-Amli;
Abdu l-Wid ibn Muammad ibn Abdu l-Wid
al-midi (who was a contemporary of ash-Shaykh
a-si) collected short maxims and sayings of Ali
(a.s.), in a book which he named Ghuraru l-ikam
wa Duraru l-Kilamprinted in Egypt, Lebanon and
India, and which has also been translated in Urdu;
Abu Sad Manr ibn Husayn al-bi al-Wazr, (d.422):Nuzhatu l-adab wa nathru d-durar; and Qi
Abu Abdillah Muammad ibn Salmah ash-Shafii
(d. 453): his well-known book on this very subject,
Dasturu malimi l-ikam, has been printed in
Egypt. All these authors were almost contemporaryto Sayyid Rai, and except the book of abu Sad,
all other books are printed and well-known in the
Muslim word. Whatever is collected in those books,
is the same or has the same style as found inNahju
l-balghah. After that period, we come to those
who appeared centuries later, like Ibn Abi l-add
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
16/39
12
(d. 655), Sib Ibn Jauzi (d. 606) and many others
who tried to collect the sayings and sermons of Ali
(a.s.) for completing what was left out by ash-Sharfar-Rai in Nahju l-balghah. ash-Sharf ar-Ras
main emphasis was on rhetorics, and therefore he
named the book The Path of Eloquence. That is why
he had not given whole sermons and lectures, but only
those pieces wich he considered of the top standard
in rhetorics and eloquence. There was another factor
which compelled ash-Sharf ar-Rai to leave out
many sermons and saying: It was either because of
unavailability of referrence books, or because the
copies in his hand were damaged or illegible. That is
why he could not write completely even many of thosesermons which are included in his book. That is why
we see in many places that he gives a part of a sermon
and then adds wa minh (and the following
also is a part of that sermon). This prompted the later
scholars to write al-Mustadrakand al-Mustadrak alaal-MustadrakofNahju l-balghah, to complete what
was omitted or left out by ash-Sharf ar-Rai. That is
why we find in the Sharof Nahju l-balghah(by
Ibn Abi l-add) that wherever possible he writes
complete sermons and lectures, and gives also the
occasion and background of that lecture. These
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
17/39
13
attempts to complete the collection had continued upto
the last century, when Allamah Shaykh Hdi Kshifu
l-ghi wroteMustadraku Nahji l-balghah, whichwas printed in Najaf.
We also find that the contemporaries of as-Sayyid
ar-Rai had paid attention to Nahju l-balghah,
and the late-comers, most of them Sunnis like Imam
Fakhru d-Din ar-Rzi, Ibn Abi l-add and others,
wrote its Commentaries. We know how the scholars
usually attempt to attack or belittle the books of their
contemporaries; yet none of them ever said that those
lectures, sermons or sayings of Ali (a.s.) were forged
by as-Sayyid ar-Rai which he had wrongly attributedto Ali (a.s.). Also no one ever said that, because
the lectures and writings attributed to Ali (a.s.) in
Nahju l-balghahwere spurious, therefore we are
collecting his genuine and authentic lectures, sermons,
and letters in order to remove the misunderstandingscreated by as-Sayyid ar-Rai.
Also ninety percent of the sermons etc. of Nahju
l-balghah are found in earlier books which are
extant. Allamah Shaykh Hdi Kshifu l-ghi wrote
Madariku Nahji l-balghah, i.e. Sources of Nahju
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
18/39
14
l-balghah. Then Allamah Sayyid Sibu l-asan
Hanswi of India wroteMinhaj Nahji l-balghahin
Urdu. In this book the learned scholar also dealt withall the objections levelled againstNahju l-balghah
by Khali. Then Mr. Imtiaz Ali Arshi, the librarian
of the Raza Library, Rampur, (India), a reputed Sunni
scholar, wroteIstindu Nahji l-balghah, in which
he quoted most of the material ofNahju l-balghah
and their references from earlier books. Latest attempt
in this field was made by Allamah Abdu z-Zahr
al-Kabi, who wrote Madiru Nahji l-balghah
in three volumes. All these books are printed and
are easily available. In this way, we find that the
objections of some misguided people against thisnoble book have no leg to stand upon.
The fact remains that the main reason of this attempt
to discreditNahju l-balghahlies in the third sermon,
known as ash-Shiqshiqiyahin which Ali (a.s.) hasscathingly criticised his three predecessors and
showed defects of them and their methods. Just to
show what is involved in this lecture, I quote here a
few lines from it. He begins:
Well, by Allah! the son of Abu Qafah (i.e. Abu
Bakr) dressed himself with it (i.e. the caliphate) and
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
19/39
15
he certainly knew that my position in relation to it
was the same as the position of the axis in relation to
the hand-mill.
Then after commenting on the first caliphate, he turns
to the second. He says:
It is strange that during his lifetime he [i.e. Abu
Bakr] wished to be released from the caliphate but
he confirmed it for the other one after his death. No
doubt these two shared its udders strictly among
themselves. This one put the caliphate in a tough
enclosure where the utterance was haughty and the
touch was rough. Mistakes were in plenty and so also
the excuses therefore.
Thus commenting on that era, he comes to the third
caliphate. He says:
Nevertheless, I remained patient despite length
of period and stiffness of trial, till when he went hisway (of death) he put the matter (of caliphate) in a
group and regarded me to be one of them. But good
Heavens! what had I to do with this consultation?
Where was any doubt about me with regard to the first
of them that I was now considered akin to these ones?
But I remained low when they were low and flew high
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
20/39
16
when they flew high. One of them turned against me
because of his hatred and the other got inclined the
other way due to his in-law relationship and this thingand that thing, till the third man of these people stood
up with heaving breasts between his dung and fodder.
With him the children of his grand-father, (Umayyah)
also stood up swallowing up Allhs wealth like a
camel devouring the foliage of spring, till his rope
broke down, his actionsfinished him and his gluttony
brought him down prostrate.
So actually this is the reason of all these attacks
against the book, as adh-Dhahabi has let the cat out of
the bag. He thinks thatNahju l-balghahis spuriousbecause there are in it scathing remaks against Abu
Bakr and Umar.
However, let us see whether this sermon was really
forged by ash-Sharf ar-Rai. I think I can do no betterthan to quote here views of some Sunni scholars of
old days:
Shah Waliyullah Dehlawi comments on this tendency
of the Sunnis in his famous book, at-Tafhmt al-
Ilhiyah: He says: There are many people who
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
21/39
17
claim that there was no difference among the abah
and that all of them were friends to each other. This
thinking is against the historical facts and against thereality. Of course, they had quarrelled with each other,
fought with each other and disparaged each other. But
we should not say any thing against them, because
what they did was not based on bad intentions; it was
rather in good faith.
Ibn Abi l-add al-Mutazili has written at length
about this sermon in his Shar. He writes that his
Master, Abu l-Khayr Muaddiq ibn Shabb al-Wsii
(d. 605) stated that he heard this sermon from his
Shaykh Abu Muammad Abdullah ibn Amad al-Baghddi (d. 567), known as Ibn al-Khashshb; and
when he reached the place where Ibn Abbas expresses
his sorrow on this sermon remaining incomplete, Ibn
al-Khashshb said to him: If I had heard this expression
of sorrow from Ibn Abbas, I would have certainlyasked him, if there had remained with his cousin any
further unsatisfied desire at all, because excepting
the Prophet he had spared neither predecessors nor
the followers and had uttered all that he wished to
utter. Why should therefore be any sorrow that he
could not say what he wished. Muaddiq says that Ibn
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
22/39
18
al-Khashshb was a man of jolly nature and decent
taste. I enquired from him whether he too regarded
this sermon to be a fabrication. He replied: By Allah!I believe it to be Amiru l-mumineens words, as I
believe you to be Muaddiq ibn Shabb. I said. Some
people regard it as a fabrication of as-Sayyid ar-Rai.
He replied: How can ar-Rai have such touch and
such style of writing? I have seen as-Sayyid ar-Ras
writing and know his style of composition. Nowhere
is his writing like this one; and I have seen it in the
books written 200 years before the birth of as-Sayyid
ar-Rai; and I have seen it in familiar hand writings
about which I know by which scholar or which man
of letter they were compiled; at that time not onlyar-Rai, but even his father, Abu Amad an-Naqb
was not born.
Thereafter, Ibn Abi l-add writes: I saw this sermon
in the compilation of my Master, Abu l-QsimAbdullah ibn Amad al-Balkhi (d. 317); he was the
Imam of the Mutazilites in the reign of al-Muqtadir
Billh [295-320 A.H.], which was much earlier than
the birth of as-Sayyid ar-Rai.
He further writes: I saw this sermon in Abu Jafar
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
23/39
19
Muammad ibn Abdu r-Ramn ibn Qibahs book,
al-Inf. He was a student of Abul Qsim al-Balkhi
and a theologian of Imamiah sect10
.
Ibn Maytham al-Barani (d. 679) writes in his Shar
that he had seen one copy of this sermon which bore
the handwriting of Al-Muqtadir Billahs minister, Abu
l-asan Ali ibn Muammad ibn al-Furt (d. 312)11.
ash-Shaykh Qutbu d-Dn ar-Rwandi (whose
Commentary ofNahju l-balghah, namedMinhju
l-barah, is earlier than that of Ibn Abi l-add),
gives his chain of narrators of this sermon. He
narrates it from ash-Shaykh Abu Nar al-asanibn Muammad ibn Ibrhm, from Al-fiAbu
l-Waf Muammad ibn al-Badi, al-usayn ibn
Amad ibn al-Bai and al-usayn ibn Amad ibn
Abdu r-Ramn, and also from al-j Abu Bakr
Amad ibn Musa ibn Marduwayh al-Ifahni (d. 416),from Al-fiz Abu l-Qsim Sulaymn ibn Amad
a-abarni (d. 360), from Amad ibn Ali al-Abbs,
from al-fiSad Abu Salmah ad-Dimashqi, from
Junayd ibn Thalab, from A ibn Abi Rab, from
10 SharNahju l-balghah of Ibn Abi l-add, vol. 1, pp. 205-206.11 SharNahju l-balghah of Ibn Maytham, vol. 1, pp. 252-253.
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
24/39
20
Ibn Abbas. This chain of narrators has been quoted
by al-Majlisi inBiru l-anwrvol. 8, pp. 160-161.
Allamah Majlisi also writes that this sermon is alsofound in the compilations of Abu Ali Muammad ibn
Abdu l-Wahhb al-Jubbi (d. 303). Also he says:
al-Qi Abdu l-Jabbr ibn Amad Asadbdi (d.
415), a staunch Mutazilite, has tried to re-interpret
some expressions of this sermon in his book,
al-Mughni, but he does not deny its being of Alis
composition (Ibid, p.161). ash-Shaykh a-adq
gives his own chain of narrators of this sermon:
Muammad ibn Ibrhm ibn Isq a-liqni, from
Abdu l-Azz ibn Yay al-Jaldi (d. 332), from
Abu Abdillah Amad ibn Ammr ibn Khlid, fromYayibn al-amd al-immni (d. 228), from s
ibn Rshid, from Ali ibn udhayfah, from Ikrimah,
from Ibn Abbas12.
as-Sayyid Nimatullh al-Jaziri writes: Theauthor of Kitb al-Ghrt, Abu Isq Ibrhm ibn
Muammad ath-Thaqafial-Kfi(d. 283) has related
this sermon through his own chain of narrators. The
date of completion of writing this book is Tuesday,12Ilalu sh-Sharaye, vol. 1, ch. 122 p. 144;Mani l-akhbr,ch. 22,
pp. 330-361. He also gives another chain of narrators in the same bookon p. 146 & 361, respectively.
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
25/39
21
13thShawwl, 255 A.H., and it is the same year when
as-Sayyid Murtaa al-Msawi (the elder brother of
as-Sayyid ar-Rai) was born13
.
Likewise, Abu Uthmn Amr ibn Bar al-Jihas
recorded the following words of Ali (a.s.) in his
book, which are no less witty than the criticism of the
sermon of ash-Shiqshiqiyah. He quotes:
Those two basterdized and the third one rose
like a crow whose courage is confined to the bit. It
would have been better if his wings had been cut and
his head severed.
Leaving aside many other authorities and scholars ofthe Sunni faith, we come to our own times and meet
ash-Shaykh Muammad Abduh, the Grand Mufti
of Egypt, recognizing it as Alis composition and
writing its Commentary. Professor Muammad Muyi
d-Dn Abdu l-amd of al-Azhar University (Cairo)has added notations on the Explanations of Nahju
l-balghahwritten by Muammad Abduh; adding
a Foreword in the beginning, where he recognizes
all such sermons which contain disparaging remarks
against the previous caliphs and companions, as being
13 al-Anwr an-Numniyah, p. 37
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
26/39
22
the composition of Ali (a.s.).
In the light of all these references, is it not absurd toclaim that this Sermon was forged by as-Sayyid Rai,
when it is found in the books written centuries before
the birth of as-Sayyid Rai?
Now we come to a new objection levelled against
Nahju l-balghahby al-Khali. His main objection
is that the Sermons and talks containsaj, i.e. rhymed
prose. He thinks that the ancient Arabs did not speak
in hymed prose; it was a style developed in later days.
This claim is really astonishing; and one has a right to
ask whether Mr. Khali had ever read the Quran!!Did not he know that all the chapters revealed at
Mecca are in rhymed prose? In fact, even the Medinite
chapters end on rhymed prose, although they seem
less pronounced because the Medinite verses are
lengthier. In fact, in the words of Rodwel, Arabicis a language in which it is difficult not to speak in
rhym. And Ali (a.s.) was brought up in the lap of the
Prophet from his early childhood, and he drank from
the springhead of the Quran from before his teen age;
because the Quran was revealed in his presence and
he went on memorizing it. Would it be very surprising
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
27/39
23
if his way of speech were so saturated withsaj; and
is it really surprising that we findsaj, rhymed prose,
in his sermons, when every one who was in contactwith him whether friend or foe knew that it was
his style of talking. When Alis daughter, Zaynab,
was brought into the court of Ubaydullah ibn Ziyd
in Kufa, and she replied to some disparaging remarks
of Ibn Ziyd against Imam Husayn and his family, she
refuted his comments in such a forceful way that Ibn
Ziyd had to say:
She speaks in hymed prose and her father too spoke
in rhymed prose.
Then Mr. Khali says: There are some words usedin the sermons ofNahju l-balghahwhich were not
used in ancient Arabic; and he has given a list of such
words, which according to him prove late origin of
these sermon. Sayyid Sibul Hasan Hanswi has clearly
shown in his book,Minhaj Nahju l-balghah, fromthe quotations of Islamic literature that those words
were in common use in old Arabic language.
Mr. Khalis third objection: Some of these sermons
contain terminologies of philosophy; while the
philosophical terms did not enter Arabia before the
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
28/39
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
29/39
25
Now we propose to adorn this booklet with two
miraculous sermons of Ali (a.s.) not found in
Nahju l-balghah. First is his sermon which is free
from diacritical point the whole sermon does
not contain a single letter with dot. It is narrated in
al-Manqib from Ibn Shahr shb, al-Kalbi and
Ibn Babuwayh, through his chains from Imam Ali
ar-Ri (a.s.) that he narrated this eternal miracle
of his forefather, Amiru l-mumineen (a.s.), i.e. the
blessed sermon, free from dot.
It has been narrated by Abu Hshim al-Jubbi from
his father Abu Ali, from Abu Yaqb ash-Sham,
from Abu l-Hudhayl al-Allf, from Abu Uthmn
a-awl, from Wil ibn A, from Abu Hshim
Abdullah ibn Muammad ibn Ali, from his father,Muammad ibn al-anafyah, from Ali (a.s.)
It is also given by ash-Shaykh Muammad Ri
al-akmi in his book, Salni Qabla an Tafqidni,
vol. 2, pp. 442-443.
0
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
30/39
26
The second is his sermon which is free from the letter
alif. Some people had gathered around him, and were
discussing writing method. They all agreed that noletter is more prevalent in speech than alif , and that
it is very difficult to speak without using it. At this
juncture Ali (a.s) delivered this sermon extempore,
without any preparation, and it is totally free of alif .
It is given by al-Kafami, ash-Shaykh Taqyu d-Dn
Ibrhm al-mili in his al-Mib, vol. 2, pp. 849-
852 (which was written in 895 A.H.)
Also it is narrated from other sources by al-Majlisi
(d. 1110 A.H.) inBiru l-anwr(new ed.) vol. 74p. 242.
We have copied it from Bir; there are minor
variations in wordings in al-Mibwhich have been
given here in brackets.
It should be recorded here that my teacher, Ayatullah
Sayyid Zafru l-asan Rizvi (Jawadia, Benaras) had
translated it in Urdu, in the same style, i.e. without alif.
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
31/39
27
the serman without dot
()
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
32/39
28
(
)
() ()
: []
[]
.
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
33/39
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
34/39
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
35/39
31
()
!
.
:
.
.
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
36/39
32
.
(
)
() ()))
( ()
)
()
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
37/39
33
()
()
(
)
(
)
(
)
()))
()
(
)
(
)
() ()
()
(
() )
)
(
)
) ( () )
()
()
) ()
(
)
(
()
( ()
(
()
)
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
38/39
34
)
.
()
( ) ( ()
)
)
).
)
.
.
*****
- [[
.
- [[
. -
- (
(
-
8/10/2019 A Lecture on Nahjul Balagha
39/39
ISBN 9987 620 18 3
B I L A L M U S L I M O F T A N Z A N I A