a ladder of lies the adaptive advantages of - article

2
BOOK REVIEW Open Access A ladder of lies: the adaptive advantages of deception Lora E Adair * and Haley M Dillon The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life, by Robert Trivers. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books, 2011. The ultimate effect of shielding men from the effects of their folly is to fill the world with fools. - Herbert Spencer Largely through historical examples and personal an- ecdotes, Robert Trivers builds the foundation for an evo- lutionary theory of self-deception and deceit in his recent book, The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life. Beginning with the evolu- tionary roots and logic of our unrivaled ability to hide the truth from ourselves and others, Trivers then ex- plores phylogenetic, psychological, anthropological, and historical examples of deception, its consequences, and its propagation. Perhaps the most thought-provoking aspect of The Folly of Fools is Trivers visiting, and revisiting of the (seemingly) incompatible notions that: (1) of the most complex creatures that have ever evolved, we have a sen- sory system that provides us with an incredibly rich image of the world around us; yet (2) our brains swiftly bend, distort, or ignore this information. In other words, why, at the expense of valuable energetic resources, has evolution favored such sensitive truth-detecting and truth-dispensing processes? It is worth noting that this stark truth/lie dichotomy is likely a bit of an exaggeration; for example, visual per- ception does not have to wait for processing in visual areas of the brain to be distorted. The bending and ag- gregating of visual information begins as early in sensory processing as retinal ganglion cells. This relative lack of truthin our sensory experience is, later in the text, ad- dressed by Trivers: At every single stage - from its biased arrival, to its biased encoding, to organizing it around false logic, to misremembering and then misre- presenting it to others, the mind continually acts to dis- tort information flow…’ (p. 139). To marry these two general findings - that we are sen- sitive and attentive to information in our environment and that we are adept self-deceivers - Trivers proposes, we deceive ourselves the better to deceive others(p. 3). It becomes clear that Trivers favors, as he explains it, this offensiveview of self-deception, compared to a more popular defensiveview of self-deception - that we deceive ourselves to protect against attacks to our happi- ness and contentment from the (sometimes painful) truth of our surroundings (p. 54). This is a convincing claim, and establishes the foundation for a theory of de- ception - which will hopefully provide the impetus for much-needed empirical work in this area. Building an evolutionary theory of deception necessi- tates not only examples of self-deception - which seem to run deep in our evolutionary waters, as evidenced by the extensive deceit and self-deception involved in cuckoo hatchling care by self-deceived foster parents and overconfident chimpanzee warfare - but a compel- ling case for selection for such a costly enterprise. Tri- verscase for why evolution should favor deceit and self- deception is two-fold: first, deception is unconscious, and second, deception is bounded. These two points are important to keep in mind as Trivers explores examples of deception in our lives: the lies we tell to our partner (s), the lies we tell to ourselves about our abilities (which, when overestimated can lead to losses on the stock market or catastrophes such as plane crashes and war), and our histories (which cleverly disguise the blemishes of our past so that derogation, discrimination, and even genocide can continue to be perpetuated to further personal and political gain). Indeed, our talent for hiding the truth from ourselves - designed to provide social benefits, specifically the ability to exploit others with conflicting goals - can make us quite socially vul- nerable: if we are found out, Your entire environment may be oriented against you, all with superior know- ledge, while you peer out, ignorant and hobbled by self- deception(p. 176). In sum, selection for deception must involve advantages that outweigh, or circumvent, the * Correspondence: [email protected] Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA © Adair and Dillon; licensee Springer. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Adair and Dillon Evolution: Education and Outreach 2013 2013, 6:31 http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/6/1/31

Upload: brzrkr8818

Post on 04-Sep-2015

10 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

the adaptive advantages of deception

TRANSCRIPT

  • BOOK REVIEW

    t

    Adair and Dillon Evolution: Education and Outreach 2013, 6:31http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/6/1/31involve advantages that outweigh, or circumvent, the* Correspondence: [email protected] State University, Manhattan, KS, USAdressed by Trivers: At every single stage - from itsbiased arrival, to its biased encoding, to organizing itaround false logic, to misremembering and then misre-presenting it to others, the mind continually acts to dis-tort information flow (p. 139).

    for hiding the truth from ourselves - designed to providesocial benefits, specifically the ability to exploit otherswith conflicting goals - can make us quite socially vul-nerable: if we are found out, Your entire environmentmay be oriented against you, all with superior know-ledge, while you peer out, ignorant and hobbled by self-deception (p. 176). In sum, selection for deception musttruth in our sensory experience is, later in the text, ad- further personal and political gain). Indeed, our talentA ladder of lies: the adapdeceptionLora E Adair* and Haley M Dillon

    The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deceptionin Human Life, by Robert Trivers. Philadelphia, PA: BasicBooks, 2011.The ultimate effect of shielding men from the effects of

    their folly is to fill the world with fools. - Herbert SpencerLargely through historical examples and personal an-

    ecdotes, Robert Trivers builds the foundation for an evo-lutionary theory of self-deception and deceit in hisrecent book, The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit andSelf-Deception in Human Life. Beginning with the evolu-tionary roots and logic of our unrivaled ability to hidethe truth from ourselves and others, Trivers then ex-plores phylogenetic, psychological, anthropological, andhistorical examples of deception, its consequences, andits propagation.Perhaps the most thought-provoking aspect of The

    Folly of Fools is Trivers visiting, and revisiting of the(seemingly) incompatible notions that: (1) of the mostcomplex creatures that have ever evolved, we have a sen-sory system that provides us with an incredibly richimage of the world around us; yet (2) our brains swiftlybend, distort, or ignore this information. In other words,why, at the expense of valuable energetic resources, hasevolution favored such sensitive truth-detecting andtruth-dispensing processes?It is worth noting that this stark truth/lie dichotomy is

    likely a bit of an exaggeration; for example, visual per-ception does not have to wait for processing in visualareas of the brain to be distorted. The bending and ag-gregating of visual information begins as early in sensoryprocessing as retinal ganglion cells. This relative lack of Adair and Dillon; licensee Springer. ThiAttribution License (http://creativecommons.orin any medium, provided the original work is p

    2013Open Access

    ive advantages of

    To marry these two general findings - that we are sen-sitive and attentive to information in our environmentand that we are adept self-deceivers - Trivers proposes,we deceive ourselves the better to deceive others (p. 3).It becomes clear that Trivers favors, as he explains it,this offensive view of self-deception, compared to amore popular defensive view of self-deception - that wedeceive ourselves to protect against attacks to our happi-ness and contentment from the (sometimes painful)truth of our surroundings (p. 54). This is a convincingclaim, and establishes the foundation for a theory of de-ception - which will hopefully provide the impetus formuch-needed empirical work in this area.Building an evolutionary theory of deception necessi-

    tates not only examples of self-deception - which seemto run deep in our evolutionary waters, as evidenced bythe extensive deceit and self-deception involved incuckoo hatchling care by self-deceived foster parentsand overconfident chimpanzee warfare - but a compel-ling case for selection for such a costly enterprise. Tri-vers case for why evolution should favor deceit and self-deception is two-fold: first, deception is unconscious,and second, deception is bounded. These two points areimportant to keep in mind as Trivers explores examplesof deception in our lives: the lies we tell to our partner(s), the lies we tell to ourselves about our abilities(which, when overestimated can lead to losses on thestock market or catastrophes such as plane crashes andwar), and our histories (which cleverly disguise theblemishes of our past so that derogation, discrimination,and even genocide can continue to be perpetuated tos is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commonsg/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproductionroperly cited.

  • Received: 30 August 2013 Accepted: 20 October 2013Published:

    ReferencesTrivers, RL. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B Campbell (Ed.),

    Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136-179). Chicago:Aldine-Atherton.

    Cite this article as: Adair and Dillon: A ladder of lies: the adaptiveadvantages of deception. Evolution: Education and Outreach

    Adair and Dillon Evolution: Education and Outreach Page 2 of 2

    18 Nov 2013

    10.1186/1936-6434-6-31

    2013, 6:31

    2013, 6:31http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/6/1/31social and personal (for example, suppressed immunefunction, negative affect) costs.Trivers suggests that circumventing (some of) these

    costs is indeed possible, given the unconscious quality ofour deception. Many of the costs associated with decep-tion - from being discovered as a liar by those aroundyou to the personal immunological costs of suppressingsome known truth - imply conscious awareness of thetruth and the lie. However,

    The bias occurs right away. People simply do not attendto the negative information, do not look at it, and do notremember it. Thus, the possible negative immune effectsof affect suppression do not need to arise. This must bea general rule - the earlier during information processingthat self-deception occurs, the less its negative down-stream immunological effects. (p. 134)

    If, as Trivers contends, our deception occurs earlyenough that conflicting information from the outsideworld can simply be ignored, we can successfully sidestepmany of the negative consequences mentioned above.Further, some of these negative consequences are pro-

    tected against given the bounded quality of our decep-tion. To understand this point, Trivers uses an exampleof the popular connotation of narcissist. The narcissistdoes not welcome being named so this name suggeststhat their self-deception is so widespread that it isno longer an advantage to them (p. 18). Alternatively,Trivers suggests that our systems of self-deception runalongside truth-storing mechanisms (p. 28). Althoughwe may not be consciously aware of the whole truth thatit might be more advantageous to ignore (perhaps thatwe are not, as we believe, better-than-average profes-sionals, lovers, and fighters), this information is notcompletely unavailable to us. Trivers describes thisbounded quality with the following empirical finding,

    When people are shown a full array of photos ofthemselves, from 50 percent more attractive to 50percent less attractive, they choose the 20 percentbetter-looking photo as the one they like the mostand think they most resemble. This is an important,general result: self-deception is bounded - 30 percentbetter-looking is implausible, while 10 percent betterfails to gain the full advantage. (p. 16)

    In The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life, Trivers has demonstrated hiscontinued ability to further the fields of evolutionarybiology, psychology, and anthropology (among others),by reaching just beyond what anecdote and empirical

    evidence suggests to establish an evolutionary theory ofdeceit and self-deception. It is likely that this theory,Submit your manuscript to a journal and bene t from:

    7 Convenient online submission7 Rigorous peer review7 Immediate publication on acceptance7 Open access: articles freely available online7 High visibility within the eld7 Retaining the copyright to your articlemuch like his theory of parental investment (Trivers1972), can inform our empirical investigations of the in-dividual acting in a social context where, often, his/herown goals are not compatible with the goals or interestsof others.

    Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors' contributionsBoth authors read and approved the final manuscript. Submit your next manuscript at 7 springeropen.com

    Competing interestsAuthors' contributionsReferences

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False

    /CreateJDFFile false /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false /GenerateStructure true /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles true /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /NA /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /LeaveUntagged /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice