a finance ontology for global city indicators (iso...

42
Global City Indicator Finance Ontology 1 A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120) Iris Zhongxiu WANG and Mark S. FOX [email protected]; [email protected] Enterprise Integration Laboratory, University of Toronto 5 King’s College Road, Toronto ON, M5S 3G8 EIL Working Paper, First Published: 6 June 2016 1. Introduction As Lord Kelvin supposedly said 1 : "If you can not measure it, you can not improve it." If we want to make cities smarter, we have to improve what currently exists, hence we have to measure them. Measuring a city’s performance is a challenge given their breadth and complexity. The standardization of city indicators, as found in ISO 37120 (2014), is a first step towards making cities smarter. But it is only the first step. The second step is to understand why a city is underperforming. In order to understand why, we need to know two things: 1. How a city is being measured. In other words the definition of the indicator, and 2. How the measurement (i.e., indicator value) was derived. In other words does the derivation of the indicator conform to its definition. The current approach to validating a city’s reported indicators is for the city to submit to a certification process. The World Council on City Data provides a certification process for ISO 37120 2 . A drawback of the certification process is that the data used to derive indicator values remains closed; a recent study has shown that cities do not openly publish the data required by citizens to verify a city's indicators (Fox & Pettit, 2015). Consequently, without the underlying data, we cannot identify the root causes of a city's performance. Even if we had access to the data, it is too large and complex for an ordinary citizen to analyse. The goal of the PolisGnosis Project is to automate the analysis of city performance in order to identify their root causes (Fox, 2015). In particular, we wish is to automate longitudinal analysis, i.e., how and why a city’s performance changes over time, and transversal analysis, i.e., how and why cities’ performance differ from each other at the same time. We care creating an intelligent agent that is able to take as input: an indicator definition, and the data cities use to derive their indicator values, then analyse it to determine the root causes of their performance. However before we can focus on analysis, 1 http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/quotes/ 2 http://www.dataforcities.org/global-cities-registry/

Upload: others

Post on 27-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 1

AFinanceOntologyforGlobalCityIndicators(ISO37120)

[email protected];[email protected]

EnterpriseIntegrationLaboratory,UniversityofToronto

5King’sCollegeRoad,TorontoON,M5S3G8

EILWorkingPaper,FirstPublished:6June2016

1. IntroductionAsLordKelvinsupposedlysaid1:"Ifyoucannotmeasureit,youcannotimproveit."Ifwewanttomakecitiessmarter,wehavetoimprovewhatcurrentlyexists,hencewehavetomeasurethem.Measuringacity’sperformanceisachallengegiventheirbreadthandcomplexity.Thestandardizationofcityindicators,asfoundinISO37120(2014),isafirststeptowardsmakingcitiessmarter.Butitisonlythefirststep.Thesecondstepistounderstandwhyacityisunderperforming.Inordertounderstandwhy,weneedtoknowtwothings:

1. Howacityisbeingmeasured.Inotherwordsthedefinitionoftheindicator,and2. Howthemeasurement(i.e.,indicatorvalue)wasderived.Inotherwordsdoesthederivationof

theindicatorconformtoitsdefinition.Thecurrentapproachtovalidatingacity’sreportedindicatorsisforthecitytosubmittoacertificationprocess.TheWorldCouncilonCityDataprovidesacertificationprocessforISO371202.Adrawbackofthecertificationprocessisthatthedatausedtoderiveindicatorvaluesremainsclosed;arecentstudyhasshownthatcitiesdonotopenlypublishthedatarequiredbycitizenstoverifyacity'sindicators(Fox&Pettit,2015).Consequently,withouttheunderlyingdata,wecannotidentifytherootcausesofacity'sperformance.Evenifwehadaccesstothedata,itistoolargeandcomplexforanordinarycitizentoanalyse.ThegoalofthePolisGnosisProjectistoautomatetheanalysisofcityperformanceinordertoidentifytheirrootcauses(Fox,2015).Inparticular,wewishistoautomatelongitudinalanalysis,i.e.,howandwhyacity’sperformancechangesovertime,andtransversalanalysis,i.e.,howandwhycities’performancedifferfromeachotheratthesametime.Wecarecreatinganintelligentagentthatisabletotakeasinput:anindicatordefinition,andthedatacitiesusetoderivetheirindicatorvalues,thenanalyseittodeterminetherootcausesoftheirperformance.Howeverbeforewecanfocusonanalysis,

1http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/quotes/2http://www.dataforcities.org/global-cities-registry/

Page 2: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 2

wehavetosolvetheindicatorrepresentationproblem.Therepresentationproblemcanbedividedintofiveparts:

1. Howdowerepresentthemetadataassociatedwithapublishedindicatorvalue?Forexample,itsunits,scale,it’sprovenance(whenitwascreated,whocreatedit,whatprocesswasusedtocreateit),thedegreeofcertaintyinthevalue,andthedegreetowhichwetrusttheorganizationthatcreateditand/ortheprocesstheyused?

2. Howdowerepresentthedefinitionofanindicator?Inorderfortheanalysisofindicatorstobeautomated,thePolisGnosissystemmustbeabletoreadandunderstandthedefinitionofeachindicator,whichmaychangeovertime.

3. Howdowerepresentthedatausedtoderiveanindicatorvalue?Anindicatoristheapexofatreeofsupportingdatathatisaggregatedacrossplace,time,organizations,etc.Howisthisrepresented?

4. Howdowerepresentindicatorthemespecificknowledge?Eachtheme,suchasEducation,Health,Shelter,etc.,hasacoresetofknowledgethathastoberepresentedinboththedefinitionofanindicatorandinpublishinganinstanceofanindicatoranditssupportingdata.

5. Howdowerepresentacity'sthemespecificknowledge?Eachcitymaydefineconceptssuchas"primaryschool","grades","teachers",etc.differently.Differencesinindicatorvaluesmaybeduetodifferencesintheinterpretationofthesetermsbetweencities.

ThispaperdefinestheGCIFinanceOntologycomposedofclassescovering:Debt,AssetandLiability,Revenue,Expenditure,TaxandMonetarymeasures.ThedesignoftheGCIFinanceontologyisguidedbytherequirementtorepresentthedefinitionofISO37120FinanceThemeindicators,andprovideastandardontologyforcitiesthatwishtoopenlypublishthedatausedtoderivetheirFinanceindicators.Secondly,weusetheGCIFinanceOntologytorepresenteachISO37120FinanceIndicator.

2. IndicatorsandTheirCompetencyRequirementsBasedontheontologyengineeringmethodologyofGrüninger&Fox(1995),therequirementsfortheGCIFinanceontologyaredefinedbyasetofCompetencyQuestions(CQs).CQsarequestionsthattheontologymustbeabletosupporttheansweringofifitistorepresenttheindicatordefinition.Theyarederivedfromthedefinitionoftheindicators.Competencyquestionsfallintothefollowingcategories(Fox,2013):

• Factual(F):Questionsthataskwhatthevalueofsomepropertyis.• Consistency-Definitional(CD):Determinewhethertheinstantiationofanindicatorbyacityis

consistentwiththeISO37120definition.• Consistency-Internal(CI):Determinewhetherdifferentpartsoftheinstantiationareconsistent

witheachother.• Deduced(D):Avalueorrelationshipthatcanbededucedformtheinstantiation.

Ineachofthefollowingsubsections,weprovidetheISO37120definitionofeachindicatorandspecifyasetofCQsthatareentailedbythedefinition.

Page 3: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 3

2.1. Debtserviceratio(debtserviceexpenditureasapercentageofamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenue)(coreindicator)(ISO37120:9.1)

ReproducedfromISO37120:“Debtserviceratioistheratioofdebtserviceexpendituresasapercentofamunicipality’sownsourcerevenue.Debtserviceratioshallbecalculatedasthetotallong-termdebtservicingcostsincludingleasepayments,temporaryfinancingandotherdebtcharges(numerator)dividedbytotalownsourcerevenue(denominator).Theresultshallthenbemultipliedby100andexpressedasapercentageofdebtserviceexpenditureasapercentofamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenue.

Totalownsourcerevenueshallbecalculatedasthetotalrevenuelesstransfers.”CompetencyQuestions

1. (F)Whatcityistheindicatorfor?2. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodisthedebtserviceexpenditureofamunicipalitymeasured?Forwhat

timeperiodisamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenuemeasured?3. (F)Whatarethemunicipality’stotalexpenditureanddebtforthefiscalyear?4. (D)Whatpercentageofthetotaldebtisrepaid?5. (F)Whattypesofdebtareincludedinthemunicipality’sdebtexpenditure?6. (D)ForeachdebtexpendituretypeX,whatpercentagedoesitcontributetothetotaldebt

expenditure?7. (F)ForeachdebttypeX:Whoisthecreditor?Whatistheinterestrate?Whatisthepayment

periodandwhatarethepaymentterms?8. (D)WhatpercentageofeachdebttypeXisrepaid?9. (F)Whatisthetotalrevenueforthefiscalperiod?10. (F)Whatisthetotaltransfersrevenueforthefiscalperiod?11. (F)Whatisamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenue?12. (D)ForeachrevenuetypeY,whatpercentagedoesitcontributetothetotalown-source

revenue?13. (F)Fromwhichsourcesdotransferrevenuesoriginate?14. (F)Whatcurrencyandexchangeratioareusedinreportingdebtserviceexpenditureandown-

sourcerevenue?

2.2. Capitalspendingasapercentageoftotalexpenditures(supportingindicator)(ISO37120:9.2)

ReproducedfromISO37120:“Thecapitalspendingasapercentageoftotalexpendituresshallbecalculatedasthetotalexpenditureonfixedassetsintheprecedingyear(numerator)dividedbythetotalexpenditure(operatingandcapital)(denominator)bythecityinthatsameperiod.Theresultshallthenbemultipliedby100andexpressedasapercentageofcapitalspendingasapercentoftotalexpenditures.”

Page 4: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 4

“NOTE Fixedassetsarenotexpectedtobeconsumedorconvertedintocashinthenormalsourceofbusiness.Theyarelong-term,morepermanentor“fixed”items,suchasland,building,equipment,fixtures,furniture,andleaseholdimprovements.”

CompetencyQuestions

1. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodisthecapitalspendingofamunicipalitymeasured?Forwhattimeperiodareamunicipality’stotalexpendituresmeasured?

2. (F)Whichfixedassetsareincludedwhencalculatingthecapitalspending?3. (D)WhatpercentageofthecapitalspendingdoesfixedassetXcontributeto?4. (F)ForafixedassetX,isitrented,leasedorpurchased?5. (F)ForwhatperiodoftimeisthemunicipalityinpossessionoffixedassetX?Whatarethe

termsonobtainingassetX?6. (F)Whatsourcescontributetothetotaloperatingexpenditure?7. (D)WhatpercentageoftheoperatingexpendituredoesexpenseitemYcontributeto?

2.3. Own-sourcerevenueasapercentageoftotalrevenues(supportingindicator)(ISO37120:9.3)

ReproducedfromISO37120:“Own-sourcerevenueasapercentageoftotalrevenuesshallbecalculatedasthetotalamountoffundsobtainedthroughpermitfees,userchargesforcityservices,andtaxescollectedforcitypurposesonly(numerator),dividedbyalloperatingorre-occurringrevenuesincludingthoseprovidedbyotherlevelsofgovernmenttransferredtothecity(denominator).Theresultshallthenbemultipliedby100andexpressedasapercentage.

Own-sourcerevenueasapercentageoftotalrevenuesrepresentthepercentageoflocalgovernmentrevenuesoriginatingfromfees,chargesandtaxesaspermittedbylaworlegislationinrelationtoallrevenuesincludingthoseprovidedbyotherlevelsofgovernment,(whichincludesoperatingorreoccurringrevenuesdeterminedthroughmethodssuchasformuladrivenpaymentsorrepatriationofincometax,grantdonationsfromhighergovernmentlevelsincludingnationalorstategovernmentsandothertypesoffinancialtransfersthatmaybetiedtothedeliveryofspecificservices.”

Competencyquestions:

1. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodistheown-sourcerevenueofamunicipalitymeasured?Forwhattimeperiodareamunicipality’stotalrevenuesmeasured?

2. (F)Whatisthebudgetforown-sourcerevenueandtotalrevenuesforthefiscalyearmeasured?3. (F)Whatrevenuesourcesdoesamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenuecomprise?4. (F)Whatrevenuesourcesdothetotalrevenuesinclude?5. (D)Whatpercentageofown-sourcerevenuedoesrevenueXcontributeto?Whatpercentage

ofthetotalrevenuesdoesXcontributeto?6. (F)IsrevenueXanoperatingorrecurringrevenue?

Page 5: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 5

2.4. Taxcollectedasapercentageoftaxbilled(supportingindicator)(ISO37120:9.4)ReproducedfromISO37120:

“Thetaxcollectedasapercentageoftaxbilledmeasurestheratiooftheactualtaxcollectedtothemandatedtax.Itshallbecalculatedasthetotalrevenuesgeneratedbytaxcollection(numerator)dividedbytheamountoftaxesbills(denominator).Theresultshallthenbemultipliedby100andexpressedasapercentage.”

Competencyquestions:

1. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodisthetaxcollectedandtaxbilledmeasured?2. (F)Aretheindividualtaxpayersresidentsofthecity?Arethelegalentitytaxpayersbasedinthe

city?3. (F)WhatistheageandemploymentstatusofindividualtaxpayerX?4. (F)WhatistheownershiptypeoflegalentitytaxpayerX?5. (F)Whattypesoftaxesdotaxcollectedandtaxbilledcomprise?6. (D)WhatpercentageoftaxcollectedandtaxbilleddoestaxYcontributeto?7. (F)Whatarethethreshold,rateandimposingagentfortaxY?Whatisthepenaltyforfailureto

paytaxYontime?

3. BackgroundTheGCIFinanceontologyisbuiltontheGlobalCityIndicatorFoundationOntology(Fox,2013;2015)3,whichintegratesthefollowingontologies:

• Time(Hobbs&Pan,2006),• Measurement(Rijgersbergetal.,2011),• Statistics(Pattuelli,2009),• Validity(Fox&Huang,2005),• Trust(Huang&Fox,2006),and• Placenames(www.geonames.org),

andextendsthemwithcityindicatorspecificconceptsofpopulations,measurements,etc.InthissectionwereviewexistingFinanceontologiesthatwemayre-useinorinspireourontologydesign.MostoftheontologieswereviewedlackCQs,nordidtheyhavedocumentation,whichmadetheirevaluationmoredifficult.Themajorityofthefinancialontologiesfocusonfinancialinstrumentsandindustries,andwecouldnotfindanyontologiesthatfocusedonpublicfinance.

3.1. Resourcesandontologiesthatprovideinformationdirectlyrelevanttomunicipalfinance

OpenCYC(Matuszeketal.,2006)containedthelargestnumberofclassesandpropertiespertinenttoourcompetencyquestions4.Theclassesarecomparativelywelldefined.Theconceptswere-usedfromOpenCYCinclude‘asset’,‘monetaryvalue’,‘expensefigure’and‘revenue’.

3TheGCIFoundationontologycanbefoundathttp://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/GCI/GCI-Foundation.owlalongwithitsdocumentationathttp://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/GCI/GCI-Foundation.html.Wewillusetheprefix“gci”whereneeded.

Page 6: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 6

Theclass‘cyc:asset’isasubclassof‘cyc:Possession’,andisdefinedasaclassofwhich“Eachinstanceisananythingofmaterialvalueorusefulness.”InordertoanswerthecompetencyquestionsraisedforthesecondGCIFinanceIndicator,weneedclassestocaptureconceptsaboutfixedassets,whichisatypeofassets.AlthoughISO37120doesnotincludeadirectdefinitionoffixedassets,itdoeslistexamplesoffixedassets,allofwhichbeingoflong-termorpermanentmaterialvalueorusefulness.ThisconceptisconsistentwiththedefinitionprovidedbyOpenCYC.Similarly,were-usecyc:’intangibleasset’asasubclassofcyc:Asset.AlthoughOpenCYCdoesnotprovideanexplicitdefinitionfor‘intangibleasset’,itdoesspecifythatitisequivalenttothisconceptdefinedatWikipedia5.

ISO37120standardshavelistedbuildingandfixtureasexamplesoffixedassets.Cyc:buildingandcyc:fixturearesubsumedbycyc:’architectural_structure’andcyc:’solidobject’,respectively,andarethereforerelevanttothefixedassetcategoriesmentionedabove.

Inordertomeasurethesizesofmonetaryquantitiesforallfourindicators,weneedaconcepttocapturemonetaryvalues.OpenCYChasaclass‘monetaryvalue’whichisdefinedasacollectionofwhicheachinstanceis“avaluebymeansofwhichpayments,wealth,capital,assets,etc.,aremeasured”.Italsoindicatesthat“eachinstanceofthiscollectionisanabstractobject,nottobeconfusedwiththephysicalobjectsusedaslegaltender”.Thisconceptisconsistentwithwhatweneedinordertoanswerthecompetencyquestions.Cyc:’monetaryvalue’isaccompaniedwithcomments“SinceinstancesofMonetaryValuearenotpurenumbersbutquantitiesofsomeparticularcurrency,theyaredenotedbymeansofthecollectionUnitOfMoney”.Theconcept“UnitOfMoney”iswhatweneedtocapturetheunitsofmonetaryquantities,andconsistentwithgci:’MonetaryUnit’,whichwillbeusedinourontology.

OpenCYCdefinesnumeroussubtypesof‘monetaryvalue’,suchas‘closingprice’and‘grossincome’.Weusetwoofthesesubclassestohelpanswerthecompetencyquestions:‘expensefigure’and‘revenue’.AlthoughOpenCYCdoesn’tprovidedirectdefinitionfortheseterms,itdoesspecifythat‘expensefigure’hasEnglishaliases‘expense’,andthat‘revenue’hasEnglishaliases‘monetaryvaluesthatisrevenueofasocialagent’and‘valueofwhichsomeparticularsocialagenthasrevenue’.Sincebothclassesaresubsumedbycyc:’monetaryvalue’,thesealiasesindicatethattheycaptureconceptsthatmeasuremonetaryquantitiesforexpenseandrevenue,andcanbeusedtoconstructanswerstothecompetencyquestions.

SUMO(Niles&Pierce,2001)isanupperlevelontologythatcontainsabroadspanofconcepts6,andalsocontainsclassespertinenttoourcompetencyquestions.Anumberofcompetencyquestionsaredirectlyrelatedtothedebtofthemunicipality.Torefinethedefinitionofdebt,weneedtointroduceconceptssuchasdebtorandcreditor.ThenatureoftheISO37120standardsimpliesthatwhenspeakingofdebt,wemeanthedebtofthemunicipality,whichisthereforethedebtor.Sumo:Creditor

4TheOpenCYContologycanbefoundathttp://sw.opencyc.org/.Wewillusetheprefix“cyc”whereneeded.5Thedefinitionfor‘intangibleasset’canbefoundathttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intangible_asset.6TheSUMOontologycanbefoundathttp://ontologyportal.org/sumo.owl.Wewillusetheprefix“sumo”whereneeded.

Page 7: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 7

isdefinedas“apersontowhommoneyisowedbyadebtor;someonetowhomanobligationexists”,whichisconsistentwithourunderstandingfortheconceptcreditor.ThelastFinanceindicatorexplicitlyconcernstax.InSUMOOntology,theconcept‘Tax’hasthedefinitionof“chargeagainstacitizen'spersonorpropertyoractivityforthesupportofgovernment”.Wethereforeusethisclassasatypeofown-sourcerevenue,asdefinedinISO37120standards.

SUMOalsocontainsclasses‘Equipment’and‘Furniture’,whichareconsistentwiththedefinitionfromISOFinanceindicatorsfortheseterms.

3.2. ResourcesandontologiesindirectlyrelatedtomunicipalfinanceSchema.orgcontainsawiderangeofconceptsandproperties7.However,itdoesnotincludeschemasdirectlyrelatedtofinancialmatters.Instead,itprovidesdefinitions,propertiesandaxiomsforconceptssuchasOrganizationandPerson.Inourontology,wewillutilizeitsPersonclass.TheclassOrganizationhasalreadybeendefinedandincludedintheGCIFoundationontology,whichwillbeusedinourcomputationalrepresentationoftheFinanceindicators.

WhensearchingforclassesandpropertiesrelatedtoFinanceorPublicFinance,wecameacrossthetermFinancialServiceinschema.org.However,thisclassdescribesthefinancialservicesbusiness,andisclassifiedunderPlaceandOrganization.Inourstudyregardinggovernmentfinanceandfinancialservices,wefocusonthebranchofeconomicsthatassessesthegovernmentrevenueandgovernmentexpenditureofthepublicauthoritiesandtheadjustmentofoneortheothertoachievedesirableeffectsandavoidundesirableones8.Sc:FinancialServiceisthusirrelevantanddoesnotoverlapwiththetermsinourontologies.

Sc:AccountingServiceisasubclassofsc:FinancialService,andthereforeinheritsallthepropertiesfromFinancialService.ItisalsoasubclassofPlaceandOrganization,andwecannotuseitforourpurposes.

3.3. OtherontologiesreviewedFIBO(FinancialIndustryBusinessOntology,Bennett,2013)byObjectManagementGroupisoneofthemostimportanteffortsintheFinanceindustrytostandardizeknowledgerepresentation.IthasincludedproperdocumentationtoexplainthecontentsandapplicationsofFIBO,butmainlycontainsconceptsregardinginvestmentandbusinessreporting.FIBOcontainsclassessuchasEquities,DerivativesandLoans,andtheyareallsubclassofFinancialInstruments.Althoughpublicfinanceisinfluencedbythefinancialmarkets,financialinstrumentssuchasbondsandsecuritiesarenotneededinordertoanswerthecompetencyquestions.FIBOalsodefines‘monetaryamount’as‘themeasurewhichisanamountofmoneyspecifiedinmonetaryunits’9,whichisconsistentwithOpenCYC’sdefinitionfor’monetaryvalue’.

7Thisontologycanbefoundunderhttp://schema.org/.Wewillusetheprefix“sc”whereneeded.8Thedefinitionofpublicfinancecanbefoundathttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_finance.9http://www.omg.org/spec/EDMC-FIBO/FND/Accounting/CurrencyAmount.rdf.

Page 8: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 8

OtherseeminglyusefulontologiesthatwehavediscoveredincludetheLSDISFinanceontology10,whichcontainsimportantfinancialconceptssuchasequityandliability.However,thesearesimplyemptyclasses,anddonotincludedefinitionsorpropertiestohelpidentifywhethertheyrepresentthecorrectconceptsandcanbereused.

4. ArchitectureoftheISO37120OntologyAsexplainedintheIntroductionofthispaper,ISO37120defines100globalcityindicators.Thefollowingdiagram(Fox,2013)depictsthemodulesthatareusedtodefinetheISO37120indicators.Theinternationalizedresourceidentifier(IRI)foreachISO37120indicatoriscontainedintheISO37120moduleatthehighestlevel.Forexample,theIRIfortheDebtServiceRatioindicatoris:“http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/ISO37120.owl#9.1”.AnISO37120theme'sindicatorsaredefinedinaseparatefile.AcompleteOWLdefinitionforallfouroftheGCIFinanceindicatorscanbefoundinISO37120-Finance.owl.TheGCIOntologylevelprovidesspecificontologiesrequiredtodefineeachtheme'sindicators.TheFinanceindicatorsaredefinedwithconceptssuchasrevenue,expenditure,debt,creditor,etc.TheseconceptsarecapturedinGCI-Finance.owl,andareusedinISO37120-Finance.owl.AlloftheontologiesspecifictoindividualthemesarebuiltonbaseonGCIFoundationontology,whichdefinesgenericconceptssuchasmonetaryunitsandratios,meta-information,etc.TheEnterpriseOntologylevelcontainstheTOVEEnterpriseModelingontologies(Fox&Gruninger,1998).HereonlyOrganization.owl(Foxetal.,1998)isshown11.Lastly,theFoundationOntologylevelcontainstheverybasicontologieswhichserveasthefoundationforeverythingabove.

10http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/meteor-s/wsdl-s/ontologies/LSDIS_FInance.owl11The Organization ontology can be found at http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/organization.owl along with its documentation at http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/organization.html. We will use the prefix “org” where needed.

Page 9: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 9

Figure1:ISO37120OntologyModules(Fox,2013)

5. GCIFinanceOntologyInordertoanswerthecompetencyquestions,additionalclasses,propertiesandaxiomsarerequiredtocoverthefollowingaspects:

• Thetypesofdebtandassetsamunicipalityhas,andthepropertiesandtermsofthedebt,• Thesourcesthatcontributetorevenue,andwhattypeofrevenueeachsourcecontributesto,• Thetypesofexpenditures,andthepurposeofeachexpenditure,and• Thetypesoftaxesandtaxpayersfortaxcollectedandtaxbilled.

InthissectionweprovidedescriptionoftheclassesandpropertiesdefinedintheGCIFinanceOntology.TheGCIFinanceontologycanbefoundathttp://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/GCI/Finance/GCI-Finance.owl.

5.1. Debt,AssetandLiabilityClassesSomeofthecompetencyquestionsaredirectlyrelatedtodebt,assetsandliability:

1. (F)Whatarethemunicipality’stotalexpenditureanddebt?2. (D)Whatpercentageofthetotaldebtisrepaid?

ISO37120

Education.owl

Energy.owl

Finance.owl

Health.owl

Education.owl

GCI-Energy.owl Finance.owl

GCI-Health.owl

Foundation.owl

organization.o

ontology_v3

(Geonames)

govstat.owl (Statistics)

trust.owl

Page 10: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 10

3. (F)Whattypesofdebtarepaidforbyamunicipality’sdebtexpenditure?4. (D)ForeachdebtexpendituretypeX,whatpercentagedoesitcontributetothetotaldebt

expenditure?5. (F)ForeachdebttypeX:Whoisthecreditor?Whatistheinterestrate?Whatisthepayment

periodandwhatarethepaymentterms?6. (D)WhatpercentageofeachdebttypeXisrepaid?7. (F)Whichfixedassetsareincludedwhencalculatingthecapitalspending?8. (D)WhatpercentageofthecapitalspendingdoesfixedassetXcontributeto?9. (F)ForafixedassetX,isitrented,leasedorpurchased?10. (F)ForwhatperiodoftimeisthemunicipalityinpossessionoffixedassetX?Whatarethe

termsonobtainingassetX?

Figure2:DebtTaxonomy

ThetaxonomyofDebtisderivedfromthedefinitionsinISO37120forcoreindicator–debtserviceratio:“Debtserviceratioshallbecalculatedasthetotallong-termdebtservicingcostsincludingleasepayments,temporaryfinancingandotherdebtcharges...”Therefore,theDebtclasssubsumesLeasePayments,TemporaryFinancingandOtherDebt.ThefollowingtabledescribesthepropertiesandaxiomsoftheclassDebt.Eachdebtitemsmayhaveonecode(ID),exactlyoneduedate,oneinterestrate,onepaymentterms,andsomecreditor.AllthesubclassesofDebtalsoinheritthesepropertiesandaxioms.Class Property ValueRestrictionDebt owl:subClassOf GCIFinanceThing

due_Date exactly1xsd:dateTimehas_Amount exactly1cyc:'monetaryvalue'has_Code max1xsd:stringhas_Creditor min1CreditorinterestRate exactly1xsd:doublepaymentTerms exactly1xsd:string

LeaseFinancing owl:subClassOf Debtlease_Property min1Asset

Page 11: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 11

TemporaryFinancing owl:subClassOf Debthas_Liability someCurrentLiability

OtherDebt owl:subClassOf DebtIntheabovetable,acreditorisanindividualororganizationthatthemunicipalityowesmoneyto.TheclassCreditorhastwosubclasses:CreditorIndividualandCreditorOrganization,whichareunderPersonandOrganizationclasses,respectively.Theywillbeexplainedindetailinsection5.4.Eachdebtitemhasanamountthatisamonetaryvalue.Amonetaryvalueisatypeofquantity,asexplainedinsection5.6.ThefollowingdiagramdescribesthetaxonomyofAssetclasses.Twomajorassetclassesaretangibleassetsandintangibleassets12.ISO37120andourcompetencyquestionsonlyconcernFixedAssetdirectly,whichisasubclassofTangibleAsset,becausefixedassetsaredirectlytiedtocapitalspendingasthenumeratorofthesecondGCIFinanceindicator.ISO37120:9.2definesfixedassetsas"long-term,morepermanentor'fixed'items,suchasland,building,equipment,fixtures,furniture,andleaseholdimprovements".Thesecategories,suchasland,buildingandequipment,arethesubclassesofFixedAsset.

Figure3:AssetTaxonomy

Class Property ValueRestrictioncyc:Asset owl:subClassOf GCIFinanceThing

ending_Month exactly1xsd:intending_Year exactly1xsd:inthas_Owner someOrganizationhas_Owner somePersonstarting_Month exactly1xsd:intstarting_Year exactly1xsd:int

cyc:’intangibleasset’ owl:subClassOf AssetdisjointWith TangibleAsset

12ThisclassificationcomesfromWikipedia:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asset.

Page 12: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 12

TangibleAsset owl:subClassOf AssetdisjointWith cyc:'intangibleasset'

FixedAsset owl:subClassOf TangibleAssetCurrentAsset owl:subClassOf TangibleAssetcyc:building owl:subClassOf FixedAssetsumo:Equipment owl:subClassOf FixedAssetcyc:fixture owl:subClassOf FixedAssetsumo:Furniture owl:subClassOf FixedAssetLand owl:subClassOf FixedAssetLeaseholdImprovement owl:subClassOf FixedAssetOtherFixedAsset owl:subClassOf FixedAssetLiabilityclassesarenotdirectlymentionedinISOstandards,buttheyareinseparablefromDebtconcepts.Currentliabilitydescribesallliabilitiesofthebusinessthataretobesettledincashwithinthefiscalyearortheoperatingcycleofagivenfirm,whicheverperiodislonger13.Thepropertyhas_LiabilityhavingarangeofCurrentLiabilitydistinguishestemporaryfinancingfromleasefinancing.Payablesoveratermexceedingoneyearwouldbefixedliabilitiesorlong-termliabilities.

Figure4:LiabilityTaxonomy

Class Property ValueRestrictionLiability owl:subClassOf GCIFinanceThing

ending_Month exactly1xsd:gMonthending_Year exactly1xsd:gYearstarting_Month exactly1xsd:gMonthstarting_Year exactly1xsd:gYear

CurrentLiability owl:subClassOf LiabilitydisjointWith {FixedLiability,LongTermLiability}

FixedLiability owl:subClassOf LiabilitydisjointWith {CurrentLiability,LongTermLiability}

LongTermLiability owl:subClassOf LiabilitydisjointWith {FixedLiability,CurrentLiability}

13https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_liability

Page 13: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 13

5.2. RevenueClassesSomeofthecompetencyquestionsaredirectlyrelatedtopublicrevenue:

1. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodisamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenuemeasured?2. (F)Whatisthetotalrevenueforthefiscalperiod?3. (F)Whatisthetotaltransfersrevenueforthefiscalperiod?4. (F)Whatisamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenue?5. (D)ForeachrevenuetypeY,whatpercentagedoesitcontributetothetotalown-source

revenue?6. (F)Fromwhichsourcesdotransferrevenuesoriginate?7. (F)Whatcurrencyandexchangeratioareusedinreportingdebtserviceexpenditureandown-

sourcerevenue?8. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodistheown-sourcerevenueofamunicipalitymeasured?Forwhattime

periodareamunicipality’stotalrevenuesmeasured?9. (F)Whatisthebudgetforown-sourcerevenueandtotalrevenuesforthefiscalyearmeasured?10. (F)Whatrevenuesourcesdothetotalrevenuesinclude?11. (D)Whatpercentageofown-sourcerevenuedoesrevenueXcontributeto?Whatpercentage

ofthetotalrevenuesdoesXcontributeto?12. (F)IsrevenueXanoperatingorrecurringrevenue?

Twooftheindicators(ISO37120:9.1andISO37120:9.3)directlyinvolverevenueofthecitygovernment,andISO37120:9.4concernstax,whichisasubclassofpublicrevenue.ThissectionexplainsthetaxonomyoftheRevenueclass,aswellasitspropertiesandaxioms.ISO37120:9.1(debtserviceratio)definestotalownsourcerevenueastotalrevenuelesstransfers,whereasISO37120:9.3(own-sourcerevenueasapercentageoftotalrevenues)definesownsourcerevenueasthetotalamountoffundsobtainedthroughpermitfees,userchargesforcityservices,andtaxescollectedforcitypurposesonly.

Figure5:RevenueTaxonomy

Class Property ValueRestrictionRevenue owl:subClassOf GCIFinanceThing

has_amount exactly1cyc:'monetaryvalue'

Page 14: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 14

revenueSource min1xsd:stringhasCode max1xsd:string

PrivateRevenue owl:subClassOf RevenuedisjointWith PublicRevenue

PublicRevenue owl:subClassOf RevenuedisjointWith PrivateRevenue

OwnSourceRevenue owl:subClassOf PublicRevenueTransfersRevenue owl:subClassOf PublicRevenuesumo:Tax has_Taxpayer onlyTaxPayer

imposed_By min1OrganizationAgenttax_Rate min1xsd:doubletax_Threshold exactly1xsd:doubleowl:subClassOf OwnSourceRevenue

Fees owl:subClassOf OwnSourceRevenueCharges owl:subClassOf OwnSourceRevenueRecurringRevenue owl:subClassOf PublicRevenueOperatingRevenue owl:subClassOf PublicRevenueEachrevenueitemmayhaveanIDorcodeassociatedtoit,dependingontheformatofreporting.OwnSourceRevenuecanbeclassifiedintotax,feesandcharges,asexplainedinIntroductiontoPublicFinance(Plehn,1902),aswellasinthedefinitionforownsourcerevenueinISO37120:9.3.Publicrevenuecantakeformofoperatingrevenueorre-occurringrevenue,alsoasindicatedinISO37120:9.3.Additionally,publicrevenuecanbeexpressedasownsourcerevenueplustransfers,basedonISO37120:9.1.TaxisthesubclassofrevenuethatwewillfocusonforthefourthFinanceindicator.Eachtaxitemhasataxpayer,whichcanbeanindividualoranorganization,andarateandthresholdoftaxcollection.Thetaxonomyoftaxwillbefurtherexplainedinthefollowingsections.AllthesubclassesofRevenueinherititsproperties.

5.3. ExpenditureClassesSomeofthecompetencyquestionsarepertinenttopublicspending:

1. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodisthedebtserviceexpenditureofamunicipalitymeasured?2. (F)Whatarethemunicipality’stotalexpenditureanddebt?3. (D)Whatpercentageofthetotaldebtisrepaid?4. (F)Whattypesofdebtarepaidforbyamunicipality’sdebtexpenditure?5. (D)ForeachdebtexpendituretypeX,whatpercentagedoesitcontributetothetotaldebt

expenditure?6. (F)Whatcurrencyandexchangeratioareusedinreportingdebtserviceexpenditureandown-

sourcerevenue?7. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodisthecapitalspendingofamunicipalitymeasured?Forwhattime

periodareamunicipality’stotalexpendituresmeasured?8. (D)WhatpercentageofthecapitalspendingdoesfixedassetXcontributeto?

Page 15: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 15

9. (F)Whatsourcescontributetothetotaloperatingexpenditure?10. (D)WhatpercentageoftheoperatingexpendituredoesexpenseitemYcontributeto?

Figure6depictsthetaxonomyforpublicexpenditureintheGCIFinanceontology.Sincethecounterpartofcapitalexpenditureisoperationalexpenditure14,anyoneofamunicipality’sexpenseitemsshouldbeeithercapitalspendingoroperatingexpenditure.Bydefinitionofoperatingexpense15,DebtExpenditureisasubclassofOperatingExpenditure.ISO37120:9.1specifiesthat"totallong-termdebtservicingcostsincludeleasepayments,temporaryfinancingandotherdebtcharges",whichiswhatwebaseontocreatesubclassesofDebtExpenditure.ThesumofthesethreetypesrepresentTotalDebtExpenditure.

Figure6:ExpenditureTaxonomy

ThefollowingtableshowsthepropertiesofExpenditureanditssubclasses.Class Property ValueRestrictionExpenditure expensePurpose min1String

has_Code max1Stringhas_amount exactly1‘monetaryvalue’om:unit_of_measure gct:’MonetaryUnit’owl:subClassOf GCIFinanceThing

CapitalSpending expense_For SomeFixedAssetowl:subClassOf PublicExpendituredisjointWith OperatingExpenditure

DebtExpenditure expense_For SomeDebtowl:subClassOf OperatingExpenditure

PublicExpenditure owl:subClassOf ExpendituredisjointWith PrivateExpenditure

PrivateExpenditure owl:subClassOf ExpendituredisjointWith PublicExpenditure

14DetailedexplanationcanbefoundonWikipedia:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_expenditure.15https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_expense.

Page 16: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 16

OperatingExpenditure owl:subClassOf PublicExpendituredisjointWith CapitalSpending

TotalPublicExpenditure owl:subClassOf PublicExpendituresum_Term only(CapitalSpendingor

OperatingExpenditure)LeasePayments owl:subClassOf DebtExpenditure

expense_For someLeaseFinancingdisjointWith {TemporaryFinancingPayment,

OtherDebtCharges}TemporaryFinancingPayment owl:subClassOf DebtExpenditure

expense_For someTemporaryFinancingdisjointWith {LeasePayments,OtherDebtCharges}

OtherDebtCharges owl:subClassOf DebtExpenditureexpense_For someOtherDebtdisjointWith {TemporaryFinancingPayment,

LeasePayments}Likerevenue,eachexpenditureitemmighthaveitscodeorIDdependingontheformatofreporting.Atthesametime,eachexpenditureitemhasapurpose,orreasonofexpense.CapitalSpending,accordingtoitsdefinitioninISO37120:9.2,isthetypeofexpenditureonfixedassets,andDebtExpenditureisthetypeofexpensefordebtitems.Bothrelationshipsarecaptureswiththepropertygcif16:expense_For.Allotherexpendituresubclasseswithoutexplicitexpensesubjectsthatarepertinenttoourindicatorshavethepropertygcif:expensePurpose,whosevalueisaString.EachsubclassofExpenditureinheritsitsproperties.

5.4. PersonandOrganizationClassesInordertocollectinformationregardingdebtserviceexpenditureandtax,weintroducetheclassesCreditorandTaxPayer,whichappearintheformofeitherindividualsororganizations.FollowingarethecompetencyquestionsrelatedtoPersonandOrganization:

1. (F)ForeachdebttypeX:Whoisthecreditor2. (F)Aretheindividualtaxpayersresidentsofthecity?Arethelegalentitytaxpayersbasedinthe

city?3. (F)WhatistheageandemploymentstatusofindividualtaxpayerX?4. (F)WhatistheownershiptypeoflegalentitytaxpayerX?

16gcifistheprefixforGCIFinanceontology.

Page 17: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 17

Figure7:PersonandOrganizationTaxonomy

ThePersonclassisimportedfromAssetDescriptionMetadataSchema17,asitisconsistentwithourdefinitionforpersonindividuals.ForeachPerson,ourontologyhasincludedpropertiessuchasbirthdate,residencyandemploymentstatus.TheOrganizationclassisinheritedfromtheTOVEOrganizationontology,togetherwithitsproperties,suchasname,legalnameandownership.Asexplainedearlierinthischapter,eachdebtitemhasoneormoreCreditor.Thefourthindicatorhasanumeratorandadenominatorastaxcollectedandtaxbilled,bothofwhichhavecorrespondingtaxpayers.CreditorandTaxPayercanbeindividualsororganizations.Class Property ValueRestrictionorg:Organization org:hasName onlyString

org:hasLegalName exactly1Stringorg:has_Ownership exactly1Ownership

sc:Person has_Birthdate exactly1xsd:dateTimehasEmploymentStatus exactly1EmploymentStatusresident_Of min1Citygci:has_Primary_Residence exactly1Addressowl:subClassOf GCIFinanceThing

sumo:Creditor owl:subClassOf GCIFinanceThingTaxPayer owl:subClassOf GCIFinanceThingTaxPayerOrganization based_In exactly1City

owl:subClassOf TaxPayerowl:subClassOf org:Organization

TaxPayerIndividual owl:subClassOf adms:Personowl:subClassOf TaxPayer

CreditorOrganization owl:subClassOf org:Organizationowl:subClassOf sumo:Creditor

17http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#

Page 18: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 18

CreditorIndividual owl:subClassOf adms:Personowl:subClassOf sumo:Creditor

5.5. TaxClassesThefourthGCIFinanceindicator(ISO37120:9.4)regardstaxcollectedandtaxbilled.Therefore,allofitscompetencyquestionsarerelatedtotaxclasses:

1. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodisthetaxcollectedandtaxbilledmeasured?2. (F)Aretheindividualtaxpayersresidentsofthecity?Arethelegalentitytaxpayersbasedinthe

city?3. (F)WhatistheageandemploymentstatusofindividualtaxpayerX?4. (F)WhatistheownershiptypeoflegalentitytaxpayerX?5. (F)Whattypesoftaxesdotaxcollectedandtaxbilledcomprise?6. (D)WhatpercentageoftaxcollectedandtaxbilleddoestaxYcontributeto?7. (F)Whatarethethreshold,rateandimposingagentfortaxY?Whatisthepenaltyforfailureto

paytaxYontime?InourFinanceontology,sumo:TaxisasubclassofOwnSourceRevenue,andSumodefinestwosubclassesofTax–IncomeTaxandDutyTax.TheclassOtherTaxisdefinedtocapturedothertaxcategoriesnotbelongingtoincomeordutytypes.TheclassesTaxCollectedandTaxBilledaredefinedbecausetheyarethenominatoranddenominatorofthelastFinanceindicator,andtheyaredisjointwitheachother,becausetheyrepresenttaxatdifferentstages.Eachtaxitemhasataxpayerwhichcanbeeitheranindividualororganization,andalsoimposedbyanOrganizationAgent.

Figure8:TaxTaxonomy

Class Property ValueRestrictionsumo:Tax owl:subClassOf OwnSourceRevenue

has_Taxpayer someTaxPayerIndividualhas_Taxpayer someTaxPayerOrganizationimposed_By min1OrganizationAgent

Page 19: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 19

tax_Rate min1Doubletax_Threshold exactly1Double

TaxBilled owl:subClassOf sumo:TaxdisjointWith TaxCollected

TaxCollected owl:subClassOf sumo:TaxdisjointWith TaxBilled

sumo:IncomeTax owl:subClassOf sumo:TaxdisjointWith sumo:DutyTax,OtherTax

sumo:DutyTax owl:subClassOf sumo:TaxdisjointWith sumo:IncomeTax,OtherTax

OtherTax owl:subClassOf sumo:TaxdisjointWith sumo:DutyTax,sumo:IncomeTax

Classesregardingtaxpayerhasbeenexplainedin5.4inthispaper.Accordingtothedefinitionoftax18,eachtaxitemhasitstaxpayer,threshold,taxrateandimposingagent.TaxbilledandtaxcollectedarebothsubclassesofTax.

5.6. MonetaryMeasurementClassesThefollowingcompetencyquestion:

1. (F)Whatcurrencyandexchangeratioareusedinreportingdebtserviceexpenditureandown-sourcerevenue?

introducesarepresentationalrequirementnotseeninotherthemes.TheFinanceindicatorsaredifferentinthatnoneoftheirmeasuresarerepresentedaspopulationsizes.Instead,theyexistascontinuousquantities.Additionally,allthenumeratorsanddenominatorsintheFinanceindicatorsmayincurdifferentcurrenciesandexchangerates,increasingthepotentialofinconsistencyinternally.Inordertomeasuretotalfinancialquantities,weneedaconcepttocapture‘monetaryvalue’,whichisdefinedinOpenCYC.Thisclasssubsumesconceptsrepresentingmonetaryvaluesfordebt,tax,expenseandrevenue.Eachofthemonetaryvaluesubtypescontainstotalquantitiesforfinancialactivities.Forexample,TaxMonetaryValuesubsumesTotalTaxCollectedandTotalTaxBilled,bothofwhichofcertaintypesoftaxmonetaryvalue.ThetaxonomyformonetaryvaluerepresentationisshowninFigure9.

18https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax.

Page 20: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 20

Figure9:MonetaryValueTaxonomy

ThemonetaryconceptsrelatedtomeasureandunitareinferredfromOMOntology19.EachoftheindicatorsunderGCIFinanceisanom:Quantity,andhasaMonetaryRatioUnitwhichisanom:UnitOfMeasure.AnyMonetaryValuehasaMonetaryUnitthatisacurrency.EachGCIFinanceindicatorhasanumeratorandadenominator,bothofwhicharemonetaryvalues.

Figure10:MonetaryUnitTaxonomy

‘MonetaryUnit’hasalreadybeendefinedinGCIFoundationontology,andhereweimportthecorrespondingclassesintotheFinanceontology.PropertiesofMonetaryValue'originalCurrency''exchangeRatio'capturetheexchangerateofMonetaryValuetoadifferentcurrency.Whenreviewingexistingontologies,wefoundthatOpenCYCincludesanddefinessomeFinanceterms,suchas‘monetaryvalue’,‘expensefigure’and‘revenue’,whichareequivalenttoclasses

19TheOMontologycanbefoundathttp://www.wurvoc.org/vocabularies/om-1.6/.Wewillusetheprefix“om”whereneeded.

GCIFinanceThingcyc:'monetaryvalue'

DebtMonetaryValue TotalDebt

TaxMonetaryValueTotalTaxCollected

TotalTaxBilled

ExpenseMonetaryValue

TotalDebtExpenditure

TotalPublicExpenditure

RevenueMonetaryValue

TotalOwnSourceRevenue

TotalPublicRevenue

Page 21: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 21

MonetaryValue,ExpenseMonetaryValueandRevenueMonetaryValueinourFinanceontology,respectively.Thepropertysum_Termdenotesallthetermswhosevaluesneedtobeaddedtocalculatethesum.Forexample,TotalDebthassum_Termof(LeaseFinancingandOtherDebtandTemporaryFinancing),meaningthatTotalDebtisthesumofthemonetaryvaluesofLeaseFinancing,TemporaryFinancingandOtherDebt.Thesetermsneedtobedisjointwitheachother.Class Property ValueRestrictioncyc:’monetaryvalue’ owl:subClassOf GCIFinanceThing

owl:subClassOf om:Quantitygci:unit_of_measure exactly1gci:‘MonetaryUnit’exchangeRatio exactly1DoubleoriginalCurrency exactly1gci:‘MonetaryUnit’

DebtMonetaryValue owl:subClassOf cyc:’monetaryvalue’amount_Of exactly1Debt

TotalDebt owl:subClassOf DebtMonetaryValuesum_Term only(LeaseFinancingandOtherDebtand

TemporaryFinancing)TaxMonetaryValue owl:subClassOf cyc:’monetaryvalue’

amount_Of exactly1TaxTotalTaxBilled owl:subClassOf TaxMonetaryValue

sum_Term only(sumo:IncomeTaxandsumo:DutyTaxandOtherTax)

TotalTaxCollected owl:subClassOf TaxMonetaryValuesum_Term only

(sumo:IncomeTaxandsumo:DutyTaxandOtherTax)

ExpenseMonetaryValue owl:equivalentTo cyc:’expensefigure’owl:subClassOf cyc:’monetaryvalue’

TotalPublicExpenditure owl:subClassOf ExpenseMonetaryValuesum_Term only

(CapitalSpendingandOperatingExpenditure)

TotalDebtExpenditure owl:subClassOf ExpenseMonetaryValuesum_Term only

(LeasePaymentsandOtherDebtChargesandTemporaryFinancingPayments)

RevenueMonetaryValue owl:equivalentTo cyc:revenueowl:subClassOf MonetaryValue

TotalPublicRevenue owl:subClassOf RevenueMonetaryValuesum_Term only

((OperatingRevenueandRecurringRevenue)or(OwnSourceRevenue

Page 22: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 22

andTransferRevenue))TotalOwnSourceRevenue owl:subClassOf RevenueMonetaryValue

6. GCIFoundationOntologyInfrastructureTheGCIFoundationOntology(Fox,2013)definesthebasicstructureofaratioindicator,whichisthebasisofthefinanceindicatorsontologythatwe’regoingtodiscussinthenextsection.TheGCIFoundationOntologyusestheOMmeasurementontology(Rijgersbergetal.,2011)toprovidetheunderlyingsemanticsofanumber,suchaswhatisbeingmeasuredandtheunitofmeasurement.Thisensuresthecomparabilityofthenumbers,e.g.,themonetaryvalueofdebtserviceexpenditureandownsourcerevenue,whichcomprisethedebtserviceratio,areofthesameunitandusethesameconversionstandards.Figure11depictsthebasicclassesoftheOMontologyusedtorepresentanindicator.TherearethreemainclassesinOM:a‘Quantity’thatdenoteswhatisbeingmeasured,e.g.,diameterofaball;a‘UnitofMeasure’thatdenoteshowthequantityismeasured,e.g.,centimeters;anda‘Measure’thatdenotesthevalueofthemeasurementwhichislinkedtoboth‘Quantity’and‘UnitofMeasure’.Forexample,DebtServiceRatioisasubclassof‘Quantity’thathasavaluethatisasubclassof‘Measure’whoseunitsarea‘Monetaryratiounit’thatisasubclassof‘UnitofMeasure’.Theactualvaluemeasuredisapropertyofthe‘Measure’subclass‘DebtServiceRatioMeasure’.

om:Quantity

om:Unit_of_ measure

om:Measure

Global_city_ indicator

om:Unit_ division Finance_GCI

Debt_service_ratio_GCI

Debt_service_ ratio_ measure

Monetary_ ratio_unit

"an object property"

om:value

om:unit

om:unit_of_measure

owl:subClassOf

Page 23: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 23

Figure11.MeasurementOntology

Thedebtserviceratioindicatorisbasedonameasureofthemonetaryvalueofdebtexpenditureandownsourcerevenue,whichsatisfytheindicators’definitionofeach,withinacity’sfinances.Bothcanbeviewedasastatisticalmeasurementinthesensethatthereisamonetaryvaluethatwewanttoperformameasurementof,themeasurementbeingameasureofthequantityoffinancialactivitysizethatsatisfyadescriptionofthedebtserviceexpenseandownsourcerevenue,respectively.Whiletheindicatorsrequireameasureoftransactionsofthefinancialactivities,othermeasuresmayrequirestatisticssuchasmean,standarddeviation,etc.Allofthefinanceindicatorsareratios.Aratioindicator(Figure12)hasaunitofmeasuredefinedtobea‘MonetaryRatioUnit’thatspecifiesthattheindicatoristheratioofthefinancialquantity(monetaryvalue).Onemonetaryvalueisthenumeratorandtheotherthedenominator.A‘monetaryvalue’hasaunitofmeasurewhichisa‘MonetaryUnit’.

Figure12.FoundationOntologyMonetaryRatiodefinition

7. ISO37120FinanceIndicatorsOntologyTheGCIFinanceontologyprovidestheclassesandpropertiesnecessarytorepresentthedefinitionsoftheISO37120Financethemeindicators.ThissectiondepictstherepresentationofthefourISO37120Financeindicators.TheOWLrepresentationofthefinanceindicatordefinitionscanbefoundathttp://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/GCI/ISO37120/Finance.owl.

om:unit_of_measure om:unit_of_measure

GCI_ Quantity

gci: Monetary_ ratio_unit

Ratio Indicator Fiscal_Year

gci:City

cyc:'monetary value' cyc:'monetary value'

gci:Monetary_Unit gci:Monetary_Unit

owl:subClassOf "an object property"

:unit_of_measure gci:for_ FiscalYear

gci:numerator gci:denominator

gci:for_city

Page 24: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 24

7.1. Debtserviceratio(debtserviceexpenditureasapercentageofamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenue)(coreindicator)(ISO37120:9.1)

ThefirstISO37120Financeindicatorisacoreindicator,andisdefinedastheratioofdebtserviceexpenditureasapercentofownsourcerevenue.ThefollowingdiagramdepictsthedefinitionofISO37120:9.1.Forthenumeratoranddenominator,themonetaryvalueisrepresentedastheamountofDebtExpenditureandOwnSourceRevenue,respectively.9.1_TotalDebtExpenditureisthedebtserviceexpenseforthisindicator,andistheexpensefor9.1_TotalDebt.GCIFinanceontologydefinesTotalDebtExpenditureasthesumofLeasePayments,TemporaryFinancingPaymentsandOtherDebtCharges.Ownsourcerevenueistotalrevenuelesstransfers,andtherefore9.1_TotalRevenueissumofonly9.1_TotalOwnSourceRevenueand9.1_TransferRevenue.Inordertoanswerthecompetencyquestionsrelatedtototalrevenueandtotalexpenditure,theISOFinanceontologyalsoincludes9.1_TotalRevenueand9.1_TotalExpenditureandtheirmonetaryvalue.Additionally,wedepictthefiscalyearandwhichcityitisreportedfor.

Figure13:ISO37120financeIndicato-9.1Definition

Intheabovediagramandthefollowingtables,iso37120:9.1isequivalenttoclass‘Debtserviceratio(debtserviceexpenditureasapercentageofamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenue)(coreindicator)’in

iso37120:9.1

gci:numerator gci:denominator

gci:City

gci:for_city

FiscalYear

gci:for_FiscalYear

9.1_TotalDebtExpenditure

9.1_TotalDebt

expe

nse_

For

9.1_TotalOwnSourceRevenue

9.1_TotalDebt_MonetaryValue

amount_Of

9.1_Creditor has_Creditor

gcif:Expense MonetaryValue

gcif:Revenue

MonetaryValue

9.1_Lease Payments

9.1_Temporary FinancingPayments

9.1_Other DebtCharges

9.1_Total Revenue

Sum_Term

9.1_TransferRevenue Sum_Term

"anobjectproperty"

Owl:subClassOf

Page 25: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 25

Finance.owl.ItdefinestheratioforthefirstFinanceindicatoraswellasitsnumeratoranddenominator,andisimportedfromGCIFoundationontology.Class Property ValueRestrictioniso37120:9.1 owl:subClassOf gci:‘FinanceIndicators’

gci:‘forcity’ exactly1gci:Cityfor_FiscalYear exactly1FiscalYeargci:numerator exactly19.1_TotalDebtExpendituregci:denominator exactly19.1_TotalOwnSourceRevenue

Debtserviceexpenditureisdefinedasthesumofleasepayments,temporaryfinancingpaymentandotherdebtcharges,whereasownsourcerevenueisthedifferencebetweentotalrevenueandtransfersrevenue.Althoughsubtypesofownsourcerevenuearespecifiedin9.3,theyarenotconsideredhereduetothedefinitionusedinthefirstindicator.ThewayISOFinanceOntologyrepresentstheserelationshipsisdemonstratedinthefollowingtable.Class Property ValueRestriction9.1_TotalDebtExpenditure owl:subClassOf gcif:TotalDebtExpenditure

gcif:for_FiscalYear exactly19.1_FiscalYeargcif:sum_Term only(9.1_LeasePaymentsand

9.1_OtherDebtChargesand9.1_TemporaryFinancingPayments)

expense_For only9.1_TotalDebt9.1_TotalOwnSourceRevenue owl:subClassOf gcif:TotalOwnSourceRevenue9.1_TotalRevenue owl:subClassOf gcif:TotalPublicRevenue

sum_Term only(9.1_TotalOwnSourceRevenueand9.1_TransferRevenue)

Additionalaxiomsareneededtocompletetheabovedefinitions:

1. Debttypes'LeaseFinancing''TemporaryFinancing'and'OtherDebt'allhavesome'Creditor'.2. 'LeasePayments'istheexpensefor'LeaseFinancing','TemporaryFinancingPayments'isthe

expensefor'TemporaryFinancing',and'OtherDebtCharges'istheexpensefor'OtherDebt'.3. 'TotalDebt'isthesumofterms'LeaseFinancing','TemporaryFinancing'and'OtherDebt'.4. 'TotalOwnSourceRevenue'isatermofthesumquantity'TotalPublicRevenue'.

7.2. Capitalspendingasapercentageoftotalexpenditures(supportingindicator)(ISO37120:9.2)

ThesecondISO37120Financeindicatorisasupportingindicator,andisdefinedasthecapitalspendingasapercentageoftotalexpenditures.SincecapitalspendingisdefinedinISO37120asthetotalexpenditureonfixedassets,weneedtoincludeclassesrepresentingfixedassetsinourontology,includingspecifictypesoffixedassetsaslistedinISO37120:9.2.

Page 26: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 26

Inthefollowingdiagram,tablesandcontents,weuse“iso37120:9.2”torepresenttheclass“Capitalspendingasapercentageoftotalexpenditures(supportingindicator)”.

Figure14:ISO37120-9.2Definition

SimilartoISO37120:9.1,indicator9.2definestheratiobetweentwomonetaryvalues–capitalspendingandtotalexpenditure.Theclass'iso37120:9.2'hasbeendirectlyimportedfromGCIFoundationontology,andISOFinanceontologydefinesitspropertiesincluding'forcity',for_FiscalYear,numeratoranddenominator.Class Property ValueRestrictioniso37120:9.2 owl:subClassOf gci:‘FinanceIndicators’

gci:‘forcity’ exactly1gci:Cityfor_FiscalYear exactly1FiscalYeargci:numerator exactly19.2_CapitalSpendinggci:denominator exactly19.2_TotalExpenditure

ISO37120:9.2indicatesthattotalexpenditurecomprisescapitalspendingandoperatingexpenditure,andthatcapitalspendingistheexpenditureonfixedassets,whichcanbebuilding,equipment,fixture,furniture,land,leaseholdimprovementorotherfixedasset.

iso37120:9.2

gci:numerator gci:denominator

gci:City gci:for_city

FiscalYear gci:for_FiscalYear

9.2_CapitalSpending

9.2_FixedAsset_Buliding

gci:expense_For

9.2_TotalExpenditure

9.2_OperatingExpenditure

sum_Term

9.2_FixedAsset_Equipment

9.2_FixedAsset_Fixture

9.2_FixedAsset_Furniture

9.2_FixedAsset_Land

9.2_FixedAsset_LeaseholdImprovement

9.2_FixedAsset_Other

"anobjectproperty"

Owl:subClassOf

Page 27: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 27

Class Property ValueRestriction9.2_CapitalSpending_MonetaryValue owl:subClassOf gcif:ExpenseMonetaryValue

gcif:amount_Of exactly19.2_CapitalSpending9.2_CapitalSpending owl:subClassOf gcif:CapitalSpending

gcif:expense_For only(9.2_FixedAsset_Buildingor9.2_FixedAsset_Equipmentor9.2_FixedAsset_Fixtureor9.2_FixedAsset_Furnitureor9.2_FixedAsset_Landor9.2_FixedAsset_LeaseholdImprovementor9.2_FixedAsset_OtherFixedAsset

9.2_TotalExpenditure owl:subClassOf gcif:TotalExpendituregcif:sum_Term only(9.2_CapitalSpendingand

9.2_OperatingExpenditure)

7.3. Own-sourcerevenueasapercentageoftotalrevenues(supportingindicator)(ISO37120:9.3)

ThethirdISO37120Financeindicatorisasupportingindicator,andisrelatedtoonlypublicrevenues.Itisdefinedastheratiobetweenown-sourcerevenueandtotalrevenues.InthefirstFinanceindicator,wehavealreadydefinedandexpandedonown-sourcerevenue.HereISO37120:9.3providesanotherdefinitionofown-sourcerevenue:thetotalamountoffundsobtainedthroughpermitfees,userchargesforcityservices,andtaxescollectedforcitypurposesonly.Thisdefinitionisdifferentfromtheonein9.1,andherewedon'tneedtotalrevenuetocalculateownsourcerevenue.9.3indicatesthattotalrevenueincludesoperatingrevenueandre-occurringrevenue,whichiscapturedintheISO37120Financeontology.Wewilluseiso37120:9.3torepresentthemainclass‘Own-sourcerevenueasapercentageoftotalrevenues(supportingindicator)’inthefollowing.

Page 28: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 28

Figure15:ISO37120-9.3Definition

Likepreviousindicators,ISO37120:9.3alsocapturesthecityandfiscalyearthattheindicatorisfor.'iso37120:9.3'hasbeenimportedfromunder‘FinanceIndicators’classinGCIFoundationontology.Class Property ValueRestrictioniso37120:9.3 owl:subClassOf gci:‘FinanceIndicators’

gci:‘forcity’ exactly1gci:Cityfor_FiscalYear exactly1FiscalYeargci:numerator exactly19.3_TotalOwnSourceRevenuegci:denominator exactly19.3_TotalRevenue

Asexplainedabove,totalownsourcerevenueisthesumoffees,chargesandtax,andtotalpublicrevenueisthesumofoperatingrevenueandre-occurringrevenue.Class Property ValueRestriction9.3_TotalOwnSourceRevenue owl:subClassOf gcif:TotalOwnSourceRevenue

gcif:sum_Term only(9.3_Chargesand9.3_Feesand9.3_Tax)

9.3_TotalRevenue owl:subClassOf gcif:TotalRevenuegcif:sum_Term only(9.3_OperatingRevenueand

9.3_Recurring_Revenue)

"anobjectproperty"

Owl:subClassOf iso37120:9.3

gci:numerator gci:denominator

gci:City gci:for_city

FiscalYear gci:for_FiscalYear

9.3_TotalOwnSourceRevenue 9.3_TotalRevenue

9.3_Charges

sum_Term

9.3_Fees 9.3_Tax

9.3_OperatingRevenue 9.3_RecurringRevenue

sum_Term

Page 29: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 29

7.4. Taxcollectedasapercentageoftaxbilled(supportingindicator)(ISO37120:9.4)Thefourthindicatorisalsoasupportingindicator.Itfocusesontax,whichisaformofpublicrevenue.Itisdefinedastheratiooftheactualtaxcollectedtothemandatedtax(taxbilled).Thisindicatorisdistinctfromthepreviousthreeindicators,becauseinordertoanswersomeofitscompetencyquestionsweneedtoconsidernotonlythefinancialactivitiesandmonetaryvalues,butalsoindividualtaxpayers,eitherpersonororganization.Eachtaxitem,collectedorbilled,isimposedbyoneormoreorganizations/agents.Italsohasatleastoneofindividualtaxpayersororganizationtaxpayers.Thesepropertiesareshowninthefollowingdiagram.ForeachTaxpayerIndividual,wehavedefinedproperty“resident_Of”inordertocapturewhetherthetaxpayersresideinthecitythattheindicatorisfor.Thisclassalsoinheritspropertiessuchasbirthdateandemploymentstatus,whichareusedtoanswercompetencyquestionsthatconcerntheindividuals'backgroundinformation.9.4_TaxpayerOrganizationisasubclassof“gcif:TaxpayerOrganization”,andwedefineitsownershipas“9.4_Ownership”,apropertyinheritedfromgci:Organization.

Figure16:ISO37120-9.4Definition

"anobjectproperty"

Owl:subClassOf iso37120:9.4

9.4_TotalTaxBilled 9.4_TotalTaxCollected

gci:numerator gci:denominator

gci:City gci:for_city

FiscalYear gci:for_FiscalYear

amount_Of

9.4_TaxCollected

amount_Of

9.4_TaxBilled

gci:OrganizationAgent

Imposed_By

Imposed_By

9.4_Taxpayer Individual

9.4_TaxpayerOrganization

has_Taxpayer has_Taxpayer

has_Taxpayer has_Taxpayer

Resident_Of

gci:City

has_Ownership

9.4_Ownership

Page 30: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 30

Thistableshowshowiso37120:9.4definesthemainclasswhichcapturestheratiooftheindicator.Class Property ValueRestrictioniso37120:9.4 owl:subClassOf gci:‘FinanceIndicators’

gci:‘forcity’ exactly1gci:Cityfor_FiscalYear exactly1FiscalYeargci:numerator exactly19.4_TotalTaxCollectedgci:denominator exactly19.4_TotalTaxBilled

Asexplainedabove,taxcollectedandtaxbilledneedpropertiestocapturetheirimposingagentandtaxpayerinformation.Becauseeachtaxcanbeenforcedby1ormoreorganizationagents,9.4_TaxBilledand9.4_TaxCollectedhaveproperty“imposed_Bymin1OrganizationAgent”.Class Property ValueRestriction9.4_TotalTaxCollected owl:subClassOf gcif:TotalTaxCollected

gcif:sum_Term only(9.4_CapitationTaxCollectedand9.4_ConsumptionTaxCollectedand9.4_EffectiveTaxCollectedand9.4_FeesTollsTaxCollectedand9.4_IncomeTaxCollectedand9.4_OtherTaxCollectedand9.4_PayrollTaxCollectedand9.4_PropertyTaxCollectedand9.4_TariffTaxCollected)

owl:subClassOfowl:subClassOf

gcif:TotalTaxBilled9.4_Things

9.4_TotalTaxBilled gcif:sum_Termowl:subClassOf

only(9.4_CapitationTaxBilledand9.4_ConsumptionTaxBilledand9.4_EffectiveTaxBilledand9.4_FeesTollsTaxBilledand9.4_IncomeTaxBilledand9.4_OtherTaxBilledand9.4_PayrollTaxBilledand9.4_PropertyTaxBilledand9.4_TariffTaxBilled)gcif:TotalTaxBilled

AllthesubtypesofTaxBilledandTaxCollectedhavethefollowingproperties:Class Property ValueRestriction9.4_IncomeTaxBilled imposed_By some9.4_OrganizationAgent

gcif:has_Taxpayer only(9.4_TaxpayerIndividualor9.4_TaxpayerOrganization)

Inordertocompletetheabovedefinitions,weneedadditionalaxiomsregardingtaxpayerandownership:

1. Each'TaxpayerIndividual'isa'resident_Of'a'City'.2. Each'TaxPayerOrganizationhasan'Ownership'.

Page 31: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 31

Class Property ValueRestriction9.4_Taxpayer owl:subClassOf gcif:TaxPayer9.4_TaxpayerIndividual owl:subClassOf 9.4_Taxpayer

owl:subClassOf gcif:TaxPayerIndividualresident_Of gci:City

9.4_TaxpayerOrganization owl:subClassOf 9.4_Taxpayerowl:subClassOf gcif:TaxPayerOrganizationhas_Ownership 9.4_Ownership

9.4_Ownership owl:subClassOf gci:Ownership

8. EvaluationInthissectionweverifytheFinanceontologybydemonstratingthatitcananswerthecompetencyquestions.WeusetheCityofTorontointheProvinceofOntario,Canadatoanswerthecompetencyquestions.InthefollowingwedefinetheexamplefromtheCityofToronto,usingourontology,thatwillusedtoanswerthecompetencyquestions.Instance Property Valuegn:6251999 rdfs:label Canada

rdfs:type gn:Featurerdfs:type sc:Country

gn:6093943 rdfs:label “Ontario”rdfs:type gn:Featurerdfs:type sc:Province

gn:6167865 rdfs:label “Toronto”rdfs:type gn:Featurerdfs:type sc:City

alan_inc rdfs:type gcif:CreditorOrganizationgci:hasLegalName “AlanIncorporated”gci:has_Ownership “AlanGroup”

Instancesthatinstantiatethe6.1indicatoraredefinedinthefollowingtable:Instance Property Value9.1_ex(instanceof9.1)

rdfs:type iso:9.1gci:numerator 9.1_DE_totalgci:denominator 9.1_OSR_totalgcif:for_FiscalYear 9.1_FiscalYeargci:for_City gn:6167865

Page 32: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 32

om:phenomenon gn:6167865om:value 9.1_ex_value

9.1_ex_value(thevalueof9.1)

rdfs:type om:Measureom:numerical_value 0.018om:Unit gci:Monetary_Ratio_Unit(changetoinstance)

9.1_DE_total(numeratorof9.1)

rdfs:type isof:9.1_TotalDebtExpendituregcif:sum_Term 9.1_LPgcif:sum_Term 9.1_ODCgcif:sum_Term 9.1_TFPom:value 9.1_DE_total_value

9.1_DE_total_value(valueofthenumeratorof9.1)

rdfs:type om:Measureom:numerical_value 153,838,048gcif:originalCurrency gci:Monetary_Unit(changetoinstance)gcif:exchangeRatio Double(changetoinstance)om:unit gci:Monetary_Unit(changetoinstance)

9.1_OSR_total(denominatorof9.1)

rdfs:type isof:9.1_TotalOwnSourceRvenueom:value 9.1_OSR_total_value

9.1_OSR_total_value(valueofthedenominatorof9.1)

rdfs:type om:Measureom:numerical_value 8,546,558,272gcif:originalCurrency gci:Monetary_Unit(changetoinstance)gcif:exchangeRatio Double(changetoinstance)om:unit gci:Monetary_Unit(changetoinstance)

9.1_DE_total(Numeratormonetarysum)

rdfs:type isof:9.1_DebtExpenditure_MonetaryValuegcif:sum_Term 9.1_LPgcif:sum_Term 9.1_ODCgcif:sum_Term 9.1_TFP

9.1_LP rdfs:type isof:9.1_LeasePaymentsgcif:expense_For 9.1_LF

9.1_LF rdfs:type isof:9.1_LeaseFinancing9.1_ODC rdfs:type isof:9.1_OtherDebtCharges

gcif:expense_For 9.1_OtherDebt9.1_OD rdfs:type isof:9.1_OtherDebt9.1_TFP rdfs:type isof:9.1_TemporaryFinancingPayments

gcif:expense_For 9.1_TF9.1_TF rdfs:type isof:9.1_TemporaryFinancing9.1_exp_total rdfs:type isof:9.1_TotalExpenditure

gcif:for_FiscalYear 9.1_FiscalYeargci:for_City gn:6167865om:value 9.1_totalexp_value

9.1_totalexp_value rdfs:type om:Measureom:numerical_value 10,650,071,000om:unit gci:Monetary_Unit(changetoinstance)

Page 33: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 33

9.1_TR_amt rdfs:type isof:9.1_TransferRevenue_MonetaryValuegcif:amount_Of 9.1_TRom:phenomenon 9.1_TRom:value 9.1_TR_value

9.1_TR_value rdfs:type om:Measureom:numerical_value 3,174,610,000om:unit CAD

9.1_TR rdfs:type isof:9.1_TransferRevenuegcif:for_FiscalYear 9.1_FiscalYeargci:for_City gn:6167865gcif:revenueSource String(Changetoinstance)

9.1_rev_total rdfs:type isof:9.1_TotalRevenuegcif:sum_Term 9.1_OSR_totalgcif:sum_Term 9.1_TRom:value 9.1_totalrev_value

9.1_totalrev_value rdfs:type om:Measureom:numerical_value 11,345,858,000om:unit gci:Monetary_Unit(changetoinstance)

9.1_totaldebt rdfs:type isof:9.1_TotalDebtgcif:sum_Term isof:9.1_LFgcif:sum_Term isof:9.1_TFgcif:sum_Term isof:9.1_ODom:value 9.1_totaldebt_value

9.1_totaldebt_value rdfs:type om:Measureom:numerical_value 3,418,623,309om:unit CAD

bond_payment refs:type isof:9.1_DebtExpendituregcif:expense_For 10yr_gov_bond

bond_payment_amt refs:type isof:9.1_DebtExpenditure_MonetaryValuegcif:amount_Of bond_paymentom:value bond_payment_value

bond_payment_value rdfs:type om:Measureom:numerical_value 250om:unit CAD

10yr_gov_bond rdfs:type isof:9.1_TemporaryFinancingorg:memberOf 9.1_TFgcif:paymentTerms Principaldueonmaturitydate;interestduefirstmonth

ofeachyeargcif:due_Date "2022/10/10"gcif:interestRate "0.025"gcif:has_Creditor alan_inc

10yr_bond_amt rdfs:type gcif:'monetaryvalue'

Page 34: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 34

gcif:amount_Of 10yr_gov_bondom:value 10yr_bond_value

10yr_bond_value rdfs:type om:Measureom:numerical_value 12,500om:unit CAD

9.1_FiscalYear gcif:starting_Year 2012gcif:starting_Month Januarygcif:ending_Year 2012gcif:ending_Month December

ThefollowingillustrateshowthecompetencyquestionsforISO37120:9.1areimplementedinSPARQL.

1. (F)Whatcityistheindicatorfor?SELECT?citynameWHERE

{9.1_exgci:for_City?city?cityrdfs:label?cityname}

Answer:“Toronto”

2. (CI)Forwhattimeperiodisthedebtserviceexpenditureofamunicipalitymeasured?Forwhattimeperiodisamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenuemeasured?SELECT?startyear1?startmonth1?endyear1?endmonth1WHERE {9.1_TDEgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear1. ?fyear1gcif:starting_Year?startyear1. ?fyear1gcif:starting_Month?startmonth1. ?fyear1gcif:ending_Year?endyear1. ?fyear1gcif:ening_Month?endmonth1}Answer:2011 January 2011 DecemberSELECT?startyear2?startmonth2?endyear2?endmonth2WHERE {9.1_TOSRgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear2. ?fyear2gcif:starting_Year?startyear2. ?fyear2gcif:starting_Month?startmonth2. ?fyear2gcif:ending_Year?endyear2. ?fyear2gcif:ening_Month?endmonth2}Answer:2011 January 2011 December

3. (F)Whatarethemunicipality’stotalexpenditureanddebtforthefiscalyear?

Page 35: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 35

SELECT?expvalueWHERE{9.1_exgci:for_City?city.9.1_exgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear.?expamtom:value?expvalue.?expamtgcif:amount_Of?totalexp.?totalexpgci:for_City?city.?totalexpgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear.?totalexprdfs:typeisof:9.1_TotalExpenditure}

Answer:10650071000

SELECT?debtvalueWHERE{9.1_exgci:for_City?city.9.1_exgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear.?debtamtom:value?debtvalue.?debtamtgcif:amount_Of?debt.?debtgcif:sum_term9.1_LF.?debtgcif:sum_term9.1_TF.?debtgcif:sum_term9.1_OD.?debtgci:for_City?city.?debtgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear}

Answer:4411296000

4. (D)Whatpercentageofthetotaldebtisrepaid?SELECT(?debtexpvalue/?debtvalue)AS?percentageWHERE

{9.1_exgci:for_City?city.9.1_exgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear.9.1_exgci:numerator?debtexpvamt.?debtexpamtom:value?debtexpvalue.?debtamtom:value?debtvalue.?debtamtgcif:amount_Of?debtagg.?debtagggcif:defined_by?debt.?debtgci:for_City?city.?debtgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear.?debtrdfs:typeisof:9.1_TotalDebt}

Answer:0.35

5. (F)Whattypesofdebtarepaidforbyamunicipality’sdebtexpenditure?SELECT?debtWHERE

{9.1_exgci:numerator?debtexpamt.

Page 36: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 36

?debtexpamtgcif:amount_Of?debtexp.?debtexpgcif:defined_by?debtexp.?debtexpgcif:sum_term?determ.?determgcif:expense_For?debt}

Answer:9.1_LF 9.1_OD 9.1_TF

6. (D)ForeachdebtexpendituretypeX,whatpercentagedoesitcontributetothetotaldebtexpenditure?SELECT(?bondpayvalue/?debtexp)as?debtcontributionWHERE

{?bondpayamtom:value?bondpayvalue.?bondpayamtgcif:amount_Of?bondpay.?bondpaygcif:expense_For10yr_gov_bond.?debtamtom:value?debtvalue.?debtamtgcif:amount_Of?debt.?debtgcif:sum_term9.1_LF.?debtgcif:sum_term9.1_TF.?debtgcif:sum_term9.1_OD}

Answer:0.00008

7. (F)ForeachdebttypeX:Whoisthecreditor?Whatistheinterestrate?Whatisthepaymentperiodandwhatarethepaymentterms?SELECT?creditor?interest?due?termsWHERE

{10yr_gov_bondgcif:has_Creditor?creditor.10yr_gov_bondgcif:interestRate?interest.10yr_gov_bondgcif:paymentTerms?terms}

Answer:alan_inc “0.025” “2022/10/10”“Principaldueonmaturitydate;interestduefirstmonthofeachyear”

8. (D)WhatpercentageofeachdebttypeXisrepaid?SELECT(?bondpayvalue/?bondvalue)as?repaypercWHERE

(?bondpayamtom:value?bondpayvalue.?bondpayamtgcif:amount_Of?bondpay.?bondpaygcif:expense_For10yr_gov_bond.?bondamtgcif:amount_Of10yr_gov_bond.?bondamtom:value?bondvalue}

Answer:0.02

Page 37: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 37

9. (F)Whatisthetotalrevenueforthefiscalperiod?SELECT?revvalueWHERE

{9.1_exgci:for_City?city.9.1_exgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear.?revamtom:value?revvalue.?revamtgcif:amount_Of?totalrev.?totalrevgci:for_City?city.?totalrevgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear.?totalrevrdfs:typeisof:9.1_TotalRevenue}

Answer:11345858000

10. (F)Whatisthetotaltransfersrevenueforthefiscalperiod?

SELECT?tranvalueWHERE{?tranamtom:value?tranvalue.?tranamtgcif:amount_Of9.1_TR}

Answer:2799300000

11. (F)Whatisamunicipality’sown-sourcerevenue?SELECT(?revvalue-?tranvalue)as?osrvalueWHERE

{?revamtom:value?revvalue.?revamtgcif:amount_Of9.1_totalrev.?tranamtom:value?tranvalue.?tranamtgcif:amount_Of9.1_TR}

Answer:8546558000

12. (D)ForeachrevenuetypeY,whatpercentagedoesitcontributetothetotalown-sourcerevenue?SELECT(?revxvalue/?revvalue)as?revxcontributionWHERE

{?revxamtom:value?revxvalue.?revxamtgcif:amount_Of?revx.?revxorg:memberOf?revclass.9.1_totalrevgcif:sum_Term?revclass.?revamtgcif:amout_Of9.1_totalrev.?revamtom:value?revvalue}

Answer:0.753

Page 38: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 38

13. (F)Fromwhichsourcesdotransferrevenuesoriginate?SELECT?revsourceWHERE

{9.1_exgci:for_City?city.9.1_exgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear.?tranrevgci:for_City?city.?tranrevgcif:for_FiscalYear?fyear.?tranrevrdfs:typeisof:9.1_TransferRevenue.?tranrevgcif:revenueSource?revsource}

Answer:“Internaltransfers”

14. (F)Whatcurrencyandexchangeratioareusedinreportingdebtserviceexpenditureandown-sourcerevenue?SELECT?decurr?deexch?osrcurr?osrexchWHERE

{9.1_exgci:numerator?deamt.?deamtom:value?devalue.?devaluegcif:originalCurrency?decurr.?devaluegcif:exchangeRatio?deexch.9.1_exgci:denominator?osramt.?osramtom:value?osrvalue.?osrvaluegcif:originalCurrency?osrcurr.?osrvaluegcif:exchangeRatio?osrexch}

Answer:“CAD” “1” “CAD” “1”

9. ConclusionsThegoalofthisresearchwastodefineanontologyfortherepresentationofISO37120Financethemeindicatordefinitionsandthedatausetoderiveacity’sspecificindicatorvalue.Inordertoconstructthisontology,wehadtodefineageneric(akacommonsense)ontologyforFinanceknowledge.TheISOdefinitionsrelyonthiscommonsensefinanceknowledgeinconstructingtheirdefinitions.Forexample,informationthatisn'tdirectlyincludedintheindicators,suchascreditor,assetandtaxpayer,iscapturedintheFinanceontology.Inconstructingthegenericfinanceontology,wefoundalackoffinanceontologiesthatcoveruniversallyusedfinancialentitiesandrelationships.Insummary,thisresearchhasmadethefollowingcontributions:

1) Definesafinanceontologythatcoversabroaderrangeoffinancialconceptsrelatedtopublicfinanceandmayalsobeapplicabletosomedomainswithcorporatefinance,aswellasmorein-depthdefinitionsandpropertiesfortheseclasses;

2) Usestheaboveconceptstosupportandexpandthedefinitionsforindicatorsin"ISO37120:9.Finance";

Page 39: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 39

3) DefineseachoftheISO37120:9FinanceindicatorsusingthefoundationandGCIFinanceontology,providingaformalizedcomputationallyprecisedefinition;and

4) Providesastandardrepresentationforgeneralfinanceknowledgerelatedtoindicators,cityspecificversionsoffinanceknowledgeandthedatausedtoderiveanindicator’svalue.

10. AcknowledgementsThisresearchissponsoredbytheNaturalScienceandEngineeringResearchCouncilofCanada.

11. ReferencesCityofToronto,(2012),“2011StatisticalInformation”,CityofTorontoFinancialReport,http://www1.toronto.ca/city_of_toronto/accounting_services/financial_reports/files/pdf/2011fr_si.pdf.CityofToronto,(2012),“2011Treasurer’sReport”,CityofTorontoFinancialReport,http://www1.toronto.ca/City%20Of%20Toronto/Accounting%20Services/Financial%20Reports/Files/pdf/2/2011fr_treasurersreport.pdf.CityofToronto,(2012),“2011ConsolidatedFinancialStatements”,CityofTorontoFinancialReport,http://www1.toronto.ca/city_of_toronto/accounting_services/financial_reports/files/pdf/2011fr_cfs.pdf.Forde,A.,andFox,M.S.,(2015),"AnInnovationOntologyforGlobalCityIndicators(ISO37120)",WorkingPaper,EnterpriseIntegrationLaboratory,UniversityofToronto,http://eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Innovation-Ontology-v15.pdf.Fox,M.S.,(2013),“AFoundationOntologyforGlobalCityIndicators”,WorkingPaper,EnterpriseIntegrationLab,UniversityofToronto,http://eil.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/smartcities/papers/GCI-Foundation-Ontology.pdf.Fox,M.S.,(2014),“AnEducationOntologyforGlobalCityIndicators(ISO37120)”,WorkingPaper,EnterpriseIntegrationLab,UniversityofToronto,http://eil.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/smartcities/papers/GCI-Education.pdf.Fox,M.S.,(2015),“PolisGnosisProject:OntologiesforCityIndicators”,MechanicalandIndustrialEngineeringDepartment,UniversityOfToronto,http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/smartcities/papers/PolisGnosis-11mar2015.pdf.Fox,M.S.,andGrüninger,M.,(1998),"EnterpriseModelling",AI&Magazine,AAAIPress,Fall1998,pp.109-121.Fox,M.S.,andHuang,J.,(2005),“KnowledgeProvenanceinEnterpriseInformation”,International

Page 40: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 40

JournalofProductionResearch,Vol.43,No.20.,pp.4471-4492,http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/km/papers/fox-ijpr05.pdf.Fox,M.S.,andPettit,C.J.,(2015)“OntheCompletenessofOpenCityDataforMeasuringCityIndicators”,ProceedingsoftheIEEEConferenceonSmartCities,GuadalajaraMexico.Grüninger,M.,andFox,M.S.,(1995),“MethodologyfortheDesignandEvaluationofOntologies.”,ProceedingsoftheWorkshoponBasicOntologicalIssuesinKnowledgeSharing,IJCAI-95,Montreal,Canada.Hobbs,J.R.,andPan,F.,(2006),“TimeOntologyinOWL”,http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/.Huang,J.,andFox,M.S,(2006),"AnOntologyofTrust–FormalSemanticsandTransitivity,"ProceedingsoftheInternationalConferenceonElectronicCommerce,pp.259-270,http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/km/papers/huang[ec06.pdf.IntangibleAsset.(n.d.).InWikipedia.RetrievedJanuary14,2016,fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intangible_asset.Iqbal,R.,etal.,AnAnalysisofOntologyEngineeringMethodologies:ALiteratureReview.2013.6(16):p.2993-3000.ISO37120,(2014),“ISO37120:SustainableDevelopmentofCommunities–IndicatorsforCityServicesandQualityofLife”,InternationalOrganizationforStandardization,FirstEdition,2014-05-15,ISO37120:2014(E).Kanter,R.M.,&Litow,S.S.(2009).“Informedandinterconnected:Amanifestoforsmartercities.”HarvardBusinessSchoolGeneralManagementUnitWorkingPaper,09-141.Availablefromhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1420236.Lebo,T.,Sahoo,S.,andMcGuinnes,D.,(2013),“PROV-O:ThePROVOntology”,https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/.Liability.(n.d.).InWikipedia.RetrievedJanuary14,2016,fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liability.ListofTaxes.(n.d.).InWikipedia.RetrievedJanuary14,2016,fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_taxes.Matuszek,C.,etal.,(2006),“AnIntroductiontotheSyntaxandContentofCyc”,InProceedingsofthe2006AAAISpringSymposiumonFormalizingandCompilingBackgroundKnowledgeandItsApplicationstoKnowledgeRepresentationandQuestionAnswering.Niles,I.,andPease,A.,(2001),“TowardsaStandardUpperOntology”,InProceedingsofthe2ndInternationalConferenceonFormalOntologyinInformationSystemsFOIS-2001,

Page 41: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 41

Ogunquit,Maine.NewYork:ACMPress.Pattuelli,M.C.,(2003),“TheGovStatOntology:TechnicalReport”.TheGovStatProject,IntegrationDesignLaboratory,SchoolofInformationandLibraryScience,UniversityofNorthCarolinaatChapelHill,http://ils.unc.edu/govstat/papers/govstatontology.doc.Plehn,C.C.,(1902),IntroductiontoPublicFinance.Retrievedfromhttp://www.isec.ac.in/Introduction_%20to_%20public_%20finance.pdf.Rijgersberg,H.,vanAssem,M.,Top,J.,(2012),“Ontologyofunitsofmeasureandrelatedconcepts”,SemanticWebJ.4,3e13.Rijgersberg,H.,Wigham,M.,andTop,J.L.,(2011),“HowSemanticscanImproveEngineeringProcesses:ACaseofUnitsofMeasureandQuantities”,AdvancedEngineeringInformatics,Vol.25,pp.276-287.StatisticsCanada,(2015),“OwnSourceRevenue”,http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/68f0023x/2006001/app-ann/app-ann3/01-eng.htm.StatisticsCanada,(2015),“Classificationofgovernmentrevenueandexpenditures”,http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/68f0023x/2006001/chap/chap6-eng.htm.TangibleProperty.(n.d.).InWikipedia.RetrievedJanuary14,2016,fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangible_property.TemporaryFinancing.(n.d.).InNasdaq.RetrievedFebruary1,2016,fromhttp://www.nasdaq.com/investing/glossary/t/temporary-financing.Uceda-Sosa,R.,Srivastava,B.,andSchloss,B.,(2012),“BuildingaHighlyConsumableSemanticModelforSmarterCities”,InProceedingsoftheworkshoponAIforanIntelligentPlanet,ACM.

12. AppendixTheGlobalCityIndicatorFoundationontologycanbefoundin:http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/GCI/Foundation/GCI-Founation.owl.TheGlobalCityIndicatorFinanceontologycanbefoundin:http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/GCI/Finance/GCI-Finance.owl.URIsforalloftheISO37120indicatorscanbefoundin:http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/ISO37120.owl.

Page 42: A Finance Ontology for Global City Indicators (ISO 37120)eil.mie.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GCI-Finance-20160606.pdf · The design of the GCI Finance ontology is guided

GlobalCityIndicatorFinanceOntology 42

DefinitionsoftheISO37120Financeindicators,usingtheGCIFoundationandFinanceontologiescanbefoundin:http://ontology.eil.utoronto.ca/GCI/ISO37120/Finance.owl.