a-f school grading presentation october 2, 2013. history of a to f school grading system preliminary...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary SchoolA-F School Grading Presentation
October 2, 2013
![Page 2: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
History of A to F School Grading System
Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11 were released in January, 2012MLKE earned a C
Methodology changed before the first official scores were released in July, 2012 for data years SY09-10 through SY11-12MLKE earned a C
At the elementary and middle school levels, the methodology stayed the same for the grades released in July of 2013MLKE earned a C
![Page 3: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Components of A to F GradeCurrent Standing
40 points
School Growth 10 points
Student Growth of Highest Performing Students (top 75% of students) 20 points
Student Growth of Lowest Performing Students (bottom 25% of students)
20 points
Opportunity to Learn 10 points
Bonus Points up to 5 points
Growth-related components equal approximately 65% of the school grade
![Page 4: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Current Standing (40 points total)
25 points – Based on percentage of students proficient
% proficient in reading x 12.5 possible points = ? points
% proficient in math x 12.5 possible points = ? points
15 points – Based on “conditional status” Value Added Model
Conditional status – Was the percentage of students proficient higher or lower than predicted by the PED based on prior achievement?
![Page 5: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Percentage of students proficient in Reading and Math 2011-2013
![Page 6: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Points earned in Current StandingReading Math
% of students proficient
69.1% proficient x 12. 5 possible points =
8.63 points
61.4% proficient x 12.5 possible points
= 7.67 points
Conditional Status Value Added Model points
6.83 out of 7.5 possible points
6.07 out of 7.5 possible points
Total points per content
8.63 + 6.83 = 15.46 points
7.67 +6.07 = 13.74 points
Total combined points for MLKE
29.2 points (Letter grade = B)
Average combined points for schools across the state
21.3 points (Letter grade = C)
![Page 7: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Change in average scale score points 2011 to 2013
2011 2012 20130
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
ReadingMath
Proficient = 40
Student scores can range from 0 to 80 on the SBA
![Page 8: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
School Growth
Reading: Earned 4.4 out of 5 possible points
Math: Earned 1.9 out of 5 possible points
MLKE total points: 6.3 out of 10
State average: 5.8
School growth compares the growth of this year’s students to PED predictions based on the performance of students in previous years.
![Page 9: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Student GrowthDid individual students grow more than the PED predicted
through a Value Added Model from one grade level to the next?
Students are divided into two categories based on their score two years ago: Top 75% of students within that grade level at that school Bottom 25% of students within that grade level at that school
Students in the lowest 25% category are expected to “meaningfully close the achievement gap”.
Therefore, they must demonstrate more growth per year to earn the same number of points.
![Page 10: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Growth of individual students as compared to PED predictions of student growth
Grew at rate PED expected
![Page 11: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Growth of lowest performing students
Although the lowest performing students grew more than predicted by the PED in both Reading and Math, the school only earned 5.1 out of 20 possible points.
MLKE grade for this category = F
![Page 12: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Most elementary schools in the state have an F in this category
Grade Number of Schools
Percentage of Schools
A 2 0.46%
B 8 1.9%
C 14 3.3%
D 34 7.9%
F 371 86.5%
429
Percentage of Schools
Above average (A or B schools)
2.36%
Average (C schools) 3.3%
Below average (D or F schools)
94.4%
![Page 13: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Opportunity to LearnAttendance
5 possible pointsTarget is 95%Actual rate was 96.2% MLKE, therefore, earned 5.06 points
Opportunity to Learn SurveyTen question survey given to students in
grades 3-5 when they take the SBA5 possible pointsMLKE earned 4.0 points
MLKE Rating = A
![Page 14: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Student survey results
![Page 15: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Bonus PointsSchools can submit “atypical” activities in the
following areas: Student engagement Parental engagement Extracurricular activities Truancy improvement
A team of staff members at the PED rates the activities
MLKE earned 1.7 points
State average is 1.6 points
![Page 16: A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, 2013. History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062714/56649cfa5503460f949ccd9d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
MLKE Overall Grade = C
Grade
Number of Schools
Percentage of Schools
A 3 0.6%
B 82 19.1%
C 132 30.8%
D 150 35.0%
F 62 14.5%
429
Percentage of Schools
Above average (A or B schools)
19.7%
Average (C schools)
30.8%
Below average (D or F schools)
49.5%
Since approximately half the elementary schools in the state have a rating of D or F, then MLKE can be considered above average even with a rating of a C.