a crosswalk between college and career ready standards and educator evaluation systems 2012 esea...
TRANSCRIPT
A Crosswalk Between
College and Career Ready Standards
and
Educator Evaluation Systems
2012 ESEA Title II, Part A - National Meetings March 5-7, 2012
Presenters
Janice Poda Strategic Initiative Director for Education Workforce and
Director of State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE), CCSSO
Kathleen Paliokas Director, Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support
Consortium (InTASC), CCSSO
College and Career Ready (CCR) and Educator Evaluation
Disconnect between state implementation toward CCR and state educator evaluation work
Waiver applications are evidence of the divide
Let’s explore the bridge between the two
Aligning visions (standards) across the system
Transforming K-12 instruction to get to CCR
Evaluation and professional growth
Leveraging state teams, higher education, and a variety of stakeholders via multiple national efforts
• ICCS, SCEE, TPL, CRP, etc.
Table Discussions – 5 minutes
What is something new you learned from the pyramid?
College and Career Ready
Students who are college- and career-ready is the larger goal.
Common Core State Standards are a tool for getting us there
They define performance standards for today’s students – the WHAT
HOW we get to readiness is through effective instruction
Teaching standards define what effective instruction looks like
Leadership standards define what school leaders do to support instruction
The goal of professional development is to improve instruction
A New Vision of Teaching
• Developmental Continuum
• A Focus on 21st Century Knowledge and Skills
• Personalized Learning for Diverse Learners
• Increased Emphasis on Assessment Literacy
• A Collaborative Professional Culture
• New Leadership Roles for Teachers and Administrators
The Learner and LearningStandard #1: Learner Development Standard #2: Learning Differences Standard #3: Learning Environments ContentStandard #4: Content Knowledge Standard #5: Application of Content
Groupings of Standards
Groupings of Standards
Instructional PracticeStandard #6: Assessment Standard #7: Planning for Instruction Standard #8: Instructional Strategies Professional ResponsibilityStandard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Standard #10: Leadership and Collaboration
InTASC Teaching Standards Linked to Common Core Student Standards
InTASC Teaching Standards
Standard 5:CCSS Mathematics
Table Discussions – 10 minutes
In planning implementation of the CC, is your state going beyond providing educators with content workshops to thinking about how overall instruction needs to change? What would that look like?
Evaluation and Professional Growth
Balancing accountability and support
Translating educator standards into action
• Learning progressions for educators
• Evaluation frameworks
Data systems and feedback loops
Incorporating “effectiveness” into the system (e.g. measures of student growth)
Leveraging State Teams
Making connections across a variety of projects
ICCS – Implementing the Common Core Standards
SCEE – State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness
CRP – College Readiness Partnership
TPL – Transforming Professional Learning
Implementing the Common Core Standards (ICCS)
CCSSO collaborative of 32 states with 6-member teams meets three times per year
Teams include assessment coordinators, curriculum and instruction, professional development coordinators, SEA staff, math and ELA specialists, LEA staff
Areas of focus – professional development, curriculum, instructional materials, assessment, communications, transition plans
Systemic approach
State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)
Purpose is to help states develop coherent standards-based educator effectiveness SYSTEMS Preparation, Licensure, Professional Development,
Evaluation
28 state teams of 6 members each SCEE provides states with a forum for sharing via
Monthly webinars Collaborative work site National summit Regional/topical meetings
Areas of Focus
SCEE Support to States on Evaluation
Topical Meeting on Educator Evaluation
October 13-14, 2011 in St. Louis
Webinars
November 1, 2011 - Continuing the Conversation about Educator Evaluation
December 13, 2011 - Legal Defensibility
January 11, 2012 - Principle 3, ESEA Flexibility
Waiver Application Support
Expert review of draft applications with feedback
January 26-27, 2012 in Dallas, TX
SCEE Summit – May 2-4, 2012 in Seattle, WA
Transforming Professional Learning
A partnership between Learning Forward and CCSSO
LF recently released updated Standards for Professional Learning that promotes job-embedded, ongoing, professional learning within a team culture
Goal is to develop model(s) of a comprehensive and coherent statewide professional development system to support implementation of CCSS and new student assessments.
20www.learningforward.org
KENTUCKY(Demonstration
State)
KENTUCKY(Demonstration
State)
UTCritical Friend State
WACritical Friend State
GACritical Friend StateNH
Critical Friend State
NJCritical Friend State
CCSSOCCSSOLearning ForwardLearning Forward
AACTEAACTE NGANGA NASBENASBE
DIP
DIP
DIP
ILCritical Friend State
College Readiness Partnership:NATIONAL PARTNERS
AASCU
American Association of State Colleges and Universities
Connect to local (institutional) postsecondary partners
CCSSO
Council of Chief State School Officers
Connect to state and local K-12 partners
SHEEO
State Higher Education Executive Officers
Connect to state-level postsecondary partners
College Readiness Partnership:GOALS
Collaborative leadership and communication
• Connect state and local leaders in K-12 and postsecondary
• Communicate regularly; collaborate for success
Shared understanding of college readiness
• Work from CCSS in English and mathematics
• Align HS exit expectations with postsecondary entrance
Redesign of teacher preparation and PD
Connection to other CCSS initiatives in states
• Common Assessment Consortia – PARCC, SBAC
• Race to the Top, state strategic plans, etc.
College Readiness Partnership:PLAN OF WORK
7 “State Leadership Teams” KY, MA, ME, MO, OR, TN, WI
States in different stages of CCSS implementation
Distributed regionally, assessment consortia participation
Work with states to develop plans Phase I: SHEEOs, CSSOs, AASCU presidents
Phase II: Principals, Faculty (K-12 and HE), Deans
Redesign teacher preparation programs Common Core State Standards and assessments
Clinical Practice Integration: NCATE Blue Ribbon Report
Teacher Performance Standards: InTASC Framework
Develop plans for in-service teacher PD
For More Information
www.ccsso.org/intascwww.ccsso.org/sceewww.ccsso.org/iccs
www.learningforward.org/advancing/transformingprofessionallearning.cfm
