9/18/2015copyright clayton m. christensen1 disrupting class: how disruptive innovation will change...
TRANSCRIPT
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 1
Disrupting Class:How Disruptive Innovation Will
Change the Way the World Learns
Curtis Johnson
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 2
The cork
New Normal
Challenge to America – to Education
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 3
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 4
Disruption in business models has been the dominant historical mechanism for making
things more affordable and accessible
Today• Toyota• Wal-Mart• Dell• Southwest Airlines• Fidelity• Canon• Microsoft• Oracle• Cingular• Merrill Lynch• Apple iPod
Yesterday• Ford• Dept. Stores• Digital Eqpt.• Delta• JP Morgan• Xerox• IBM• Cullinet• AT&T• Dillon, Read• Sony DiskMan
Tomorrow:• Chery• Internet retail• RIM Blackberry• Air taxis• ETFs• Zink• Linux• Salesforce.com• Skype• E-Trade• Cell Phones
Per
form
ance
Time
45% on$250,000
40% 20% on $2,000
Disruptive
Innovations
Time
Sustaining innovations
Ability to use
improvements
Pace of performance
improvement
Incumbents dominate sustaining battles
Entrants typically win at disruption
Decentralization is disruptive, and is hard to catch
60% on$500,000
Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 7
Centralization followed by decentralization: Computing
.com
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 9
Schools have constantly improved
Time
No
. B
as
ic S
ch
oo
ls
Time
Bre
ad
th o
f O
ffe
rin
gs
Av
era
ge
Te
st
Sc
ore
s
Pe
rce
nt
Pro
fic
ien
tJob 1: Preserve/InculcateDemocracy
Job 2: ProvideSomething for EveryStudent
Job 3: Keep AmericaCompetitive
Job 4: Eliminate Poverty
K12 business model ripe for disruption
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 10
Worn Out Assumptions Emerging Realities
Knowledge scarce, hard to access Knowledge readily available
Subjects – courses – sequence Multi-dimensional learning
Improvement by command Crucial role of motivation
Students learn same way/same time Kids more different than ever
Standardization – batch processing Radical personalization
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 11
We all learn differently
Linguistic
Logical- mathematical
Spatial
Bodily- kinesthetic
Musical
Interpersonal
Intrapersonal
Naturalist
Lea
rnin
g S
tyle
s
Mu
ltip
le I
nte
llig
ence
s
Visual
Written
Aural
Playful
Deliberate Pac
es o
f L
earn
ing
Fast
Medium
Slow
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 12
Prime examples of non-consumption
• Credit recovery
• Drop-outs
• AP Courses
• Home-schooled and homebound students
• Small, rural, and urban schools
• Tutoring
• Pre-K
Disrupting Schooling
1.0
2.0
3.0
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 13
On-line learningNow fully into 3.0
Robust across curriculum
Individualized and Interactive
Becoming the best option
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 14
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 15
Perfect opportunity to implement computer-based learning disruptively
Non-c
onsu
mer
s
or N
on-
cons
umin
g
occa
sions
Time
Computer-
based learning:
Compete against
non-consumption
Po
litic
al im
po
rtan
ce
of
pro
gra
m
Time
German
Statistics
Psychology
EconomicsEnglish language & literature
Science
Math
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 16
The substitution of one thing for another always follows an S-curve
pattern
% new
% new% old
.001
.0001
.01
0.1
1.0
10.0
09 11070503 13 15
04/21/23 Copyright Clayton M. Christensen 17
Online learning gaining adoption
Online Enrollments (9-12 Grade)
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
On
lin
e/O
ve
rall
En
roll
me
nts
(9
-12
Gra
de
)
Enrollments up from 45,000 in 2000 to 1,000,000 in 2007