9/11 conspiracy theroies

18
9/11 CONSPIRACY THEORIES Top 8 Conspiracy Claims and Why They are Wrong

Upload: michael-cahill

Post on 17-Jun-2015

2.097 views

Category:

News & Politics


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Powerpoint debunking conspiracy theories. Done for HS Honors English class.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

9/11 CONSPIRACY

THEORIESTop 8 Conspiracy Claims and

Why They are Wrong

Page 2: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

WTC Controlled Demolitions  

• Bombs

• Seismic Spikes  

• WTC 7 collapse

• Fire cannot cause collapse

• Early Flash

• Severe damage

• Steel frame failure

• No bomb fragments

• Fires assisted by structural failure

• Pictures and videos of planes

Believer Perspective Debunking

Page 3: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies
Page 4: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

• MQ-4 Global Hawk

• No windows on planes

• “Commercial” planes were in gray military livery

• 767 does not resemble MQ-4

• No clear side views of planes

• Missing planes/people

• United livery visible

Believer Perspective Debunking

Plane Was Not a Commercial Airliner

Page 5: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

LEFT: United Airlines 767 before crashing into the WTC.

BELOW: United Airlines 767 in 2001 livery.

Boeing 767 RQ-4

Page 6: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

Al Qaeda Not Responsible  

• Tapes faked

• Polls

• Population in Al Qaeda innocence

• Tapes sent by Bin Laden

• Polls

• Hasty generalization

Believer Perspective Debunking

Page 7: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

Example of a Poll

Page 8: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

WTC Hit by Missile  

• Plane launched missile

• Missile attached to plane

• Early flash

• Frame-by-frame

• “Pods” part of all 767s

Believer Perspective Debunking

Page 9: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

Frame 1 Frame 2 Frame 3

Frame-by-frame shows small explosion upon

impact, not before.

No explosion

before impact.

#1: Two pods#2: A bulge

#3: The missile itself

Conspiracy Theorists’

Interpretation

“Bulge” is actually landing gear housing.

“Pods” are present on a clear view of a

United 767.

“Pods”“Missile” is a

standard protrusion on

all 767s.

Page 10: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

U.S. Military Responsible  

• USAF plane hit WTC and/or Pentagon

• U.S. missile

• No air support

• Planes’ paint schemes not USAF

• Pictures of planes

• Lack of contingency plans

• Inefficient communications

Believer Perspective Debunking

Page 11: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

Single tail fin

American Airlines Flight 11

RQ-4Global Hawk

Dual tail fin

United Airlines

Flight 175

United Two-Tone Paint

Scheme

United “U” Tail Logo

Note: Military aircraft have a one-tone white or gray paint scheme.

Page 12: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

Pentagon Hit by Missile  

• Tomahawk missile

• No plane visible

• Not all security camera footage released

• No missile contrails

• Tail partially visible

• Classified security footage

• Plane parts found

Believer Perspective Debunking

Page 13: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

Pentagon Case Study Video  

Page 14: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

Flight 93 Shot Down  

• Scattered debris

• Small pieces of debris

• Retired Lt. Col. says F-16 shot down Flight 93

• Flying debris upon impact

• F-16 pilot was nowhere near crash site

Believer Perspective Debunking

Page 15: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies
Page 16: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

Flight 93 Staged  

• Flight 93 landed safely

• Debris was placed

• Explosives used to make crater

• Plane emergency lands at KCLE @ 10:10, UAL93 passed KCLE @ ~9:35

• Witnesses

• Response within 30 min.

• Black box/cockpit recordings

• Phone calls

Believer Perspective Debunking

Page 17: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

KCLE

Piece of UAL93 debris 2001 United Paint Scheme

Page 18: 9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

Conclusion

• Based on available facts and evidence, we have concluded that 9/11 was not a government conspiracy– Most conspiracy theories have a plausible explanation that

debunks them

– Many conspiracy theorists overanalyze available information