9.0 construction equipment and methods

154
9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS Paving mixtures containing asphalt emulsions have been successfully mixed and placed using a wide range of techniques and equipment in both the mixing and spread- ing operations. Several excellent references are available which contain details on construction methods and equipment which have successfully been used with emulsified asphalt mixtures (3, 6, 9). Brief discus- sions of the various construction methods follow. 9.1 Mixing and Spreading Successful mixing and spreading of emulsified asphalt mixtures have been accomplished using diverse techniques ranging from in-place mixing with a moto"r grader blade to central plant mixing using a batch or drum plant. Blade. Blade m1x1ng is probably the least efficient of available mixing methods for emulsions mixtures {6}. However, it is also the least complicated. Basically, the procedure consists of spray applying water and emulsion using a distributer truck to a flattened windrow of aggregate. Mixing is accom- plished through blading the materials back and forth several times to distribute the emulsion through the aggregate. Spreading of the mixed material is accomplished by careful blading with the grader. Travel Plants. A travel plant is a self-propelled pugmill which proportion and mix emulsions and aggregates in place as the plant moves along the road (6). Two types of plants which are classified on method of receiving aggregate are available. The first is a dump-feed type which receives aggregate from a dump truck. The second is a pick-up type which receives aggregate by picking it up from pre- viously prepared windrows. With each plant type, emulsion is introduced into the mixing chamber using spray bars. Generally, pick-up type plants leave the mixture in a windrow after mixing. Thus, the mixture must be spread using a motor grader. Dump feed plants generally place the mixtures uniformly by use of a screed thus eliminating the necessity of blade spreading. The dump feed travel plant has been found to be a very effective, successful, and popular method of mixing and placing emulsified mixtures. 85

Upload: others

Post on 08-Dec-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

90 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

Paving mixtures containing asphalt emulsions have been successfully mixed and placed using a wide range of techniques and equipment in both the mixing and spreadshying operations Several excellent references are available which contain details on construction methods and equipment which have successfully been used with emulsified asphalt mixtures (3 6 9) Brief discusshysions of the various construction methods follow

91 Mixing and Spreading

Successful mixing and spreading of emulsified asphalt mixtures have been accomplished using diverse techniques ranging from in-place mixing with a motor grader blade to central plant mixing using a batch or drum plant

Blade Blade m1x1ng is probably the least efficient of available mixing methods for emulsions mixtures 6 However it is also the least complicated Basically the procedure consists of spray applying water and emulsion using a distributer truck to a flattened windrow of aggregate Mixing is accomshyplished through blading the materials back and forth several times to distribute the emulsion through the aggregate Spreading of the mixed material is accomplished by careful blading with the grader

Travel Plants A travel plant is a self-propelled pugmill which proportion and mix emulsions and aggregates in place as the plant moves along the road (6) Two types of plants which are classified on method of receiving aggregate are available The first is a dump-feed type which receives aggregate from a dump truck The second is a pick-up typewhich receives aggregate by picking it up from preshyviously prepared windrows With each plant type emulsion is introduced into the mixing chamber using spray bars Generally pick-up type plants leave the mixture in a windrow after mixing Thus the mixture must be spread using a motor grader Dumpfeed plants generally place the mixtures uniformly by use of a screed thus eliminating the necessity of blade spreading The dump feed travel plant has been found to be a very effective successful and popular method of mixing and placing emulsified mixtures

85

Rotary Mixers Rotary mixers generally consist of a mobile mixing chamber which contains rotary shafts with cutting blades mounted on a self-propelled machine (6) The mixer loosens in place material to the required depth and then mixes it with emulsion Emulsified application may be either through a spray bar in the mixer or by a distributer truck ahead of the mixer

Central Plant Emulsified asphalt mixtures have been successfully mixed in standard pugmill batch plants and continuous drum-mix plants Mixtures may be made using either cold (ambient temperature) mixshying or hot (elevated temperature) mixing (6) These mixtures may be spread using conventional equipment and techniques used for hot-mixed asphalt concrete With central plant cold mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures stockpiling of the mixture for long perishyods of time prior to use as is often the case with cutback asphalt mixtures may not be possible Length of time an emulsified asphalt mixture may be stockpiled prior to use depends on the type of emulshysion and aggregate used

92 Compacting

Equipment and techniques used to compact emulsified asphalt mixtures depend on the method used for mixshying and the type of mixture being placed During compaction it is necessary to consider and make appropriate compensation for the amount of water in the mixture

Mixed-in-Place Mixed-in-place emulsified asphalt mixtures generally use local aggregate materials which are of low to marginal quality Compaction of these materials is generally accomplished by initishyally compacting (breakdown rolling using a sheepsshyfoot or pneumatic tired roller just before or just as the emulsified asphalt binder begins to break Attempting to intially compact too soon may result in mixture shoving by the roller due to presence of excessive moisture in the mixture which will deshycrease mixture stability Rolling to meet density requirements may be accomplished using steel wheel pneumatic or vibratory rollers Finish rolling should be performed with a steel wheel roller Further details of compaction techniques and equipshyment may be found in References 3 6 and 9

86

Central Plant Mixed For central plant mixed emulshysified asphalt mixtures rolling should generally be performed as soon as possible after lay down as in many cases due to the time required for hauling and placing of the mixture the emulsion may have begun to break However initial rolling should not be performed until the mixture is stable enough to support the roller Initial rolling is generally accomplished using pneumatic rollers intermediate rolling with either pneumatic or steel wheel rolshylers and finish rolling with steel wheel rollers Further information on compaction of plant-mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures are also found in Refershyences 3 6 and 9

87

100 CONCLUSIONS

Based on testing mixture designs and analyses pershyformed with the materials studied during this investishygation several conclusions regarding the use of solshyvent free asphalt and sulfur-extended asphalt emulshysions with aggregates from California may be drawn

101 Solvent Free Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significant at the 95 percent confidence level is tabulated in Table 33 This table shows for nearly all dependent variables that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggreshygate are significant effects For several paramshyeters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the asphalt emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free cationic slow set and catshyionic medium set asphalt emulsions can be proshyduced which meet Caltrans specifications for cationic emulsionse

2 Solvent free cationic asphalt emulsions can effectively coat aggregates with minus No 200 mesh contents in excess of 10 percent and sand equivalent values as low as 15 Greater degrees of coating are obtained with solvent free catshyionic slow set emulsions than with solvent free cationic medium set emulsions

3 In the laboratory and for the materials used in this study greater degrees of compaction can be obtained using a conventional cationic medium set emulsion which contains 7 percent solvent than with solvent free asphalt emulsions

4 Higher stabilometer values cohesiometer values and resilient moduli are obtained for laboratory mixtures containing low quality aggregates with the solvent free asphalt emulsions than with the emulsion containing solvent This is believed due to the higher viscosity of the solvent free emulsion residues when compared to the residue from the emulsion containing solvent

88

Table 33

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE

Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA

2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y

Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y

LEGEND

Effects

A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

89

5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent

6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance

8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

90

- - - --- ----------

102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions

2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates

3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent

4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent

5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent

6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials

91

Table 34

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS

effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

A a E AQ AE QE AQE

Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA

2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y

Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y

Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer - y y - y - -

COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -

MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y

~ y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion

LEGEND

Effects

A = Q = E =

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

92

8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

93

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 2: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

Rotary Mixers Rotary mixers generally consist of a mobile mixing chamber which contains rotary shafts with cutting blades mounted on a self-propelled machine (6) The mixer loosens in place material to the required depth and then mixes it with emulsion Emulsified application may be either through a spray bar in the mixer or by a distributer truck ahead of the mixer

Central Plant Emulsified asphalt mixtures have been successfully mixed in standard pugmill batch plants and continuous drum-mix plants Mixtures may be made using either cold (ambient temperature) mixshying or hot (elevated temperature) mixing (6) These mixtures may be spread using conventional equipment and techniques used for hot-mixed asphalt concrete With central plant cold mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures stockpiling of the mixture for long perishyods of time prior to use as is often the case with cutback asphalt mixtures may not be possible Length of time an emulsified asphalt mixture may be stockpiled prior to use depends on the type of emulshysion and aggregate used

92 Compacting

Equipment and techniques used to compact emulsified asphalt mixtures depend on the method used for mixshying and the type of mixture being placed During compaction it is necessary to consider and make appropriate compensation for the amount of water in the mixture

Mixed-in-Place Mixed-in-place emulsified asphalt mixtures generally use local aggregate materials which are of low to marginal quality Compaction of these materials is generally accomplished by initishyally compacting (breakdown rolling using a sheepsshyfoot or pneumatic tired roller just before or just as the emulsified asphalt binder begins to break Attempting to intially compact too soon may result in mixture shoving by the roller due to presence of excessive moisture in the mixture which will deshycrease mixture stability Rolling to meet density requirements may be accomplished using steel wheel pneumatic or vibratory rollers Finish rolling should be performed with a steel wheel roller Further details of compaction techniques and equipshyment may be found in References 3 6 and 9

86

Central Plant Mixed For central plant mixed emulshysified asphalt mixtures rolling should generally be performed as soon as possible after lay down as in many cases due to the time required for hauling and placing of the mixture the emulsion may have begun to break However initial rolling should not be performed until the mixture is stable enough to support the roller Initial rolling is generally accomplished using pneumatic rollers intermediate rolling with either pneumatic or steel wheel rolshylers and finish rolling with steel wheel rollers Further information on compaction of plant-mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures are also found in Refershyences 3 6 and 9

87

100 CONCLUSIONS

Based on testing mixture designs and analyses pershyformed with the materials studied during this investishygation several conclusions regarding the use of solshyvent free asphalt and sulfur-extended asphalt emulshysions with aggregates from California may be drawn

101 Solvent Free Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significant at the 95 percent confidence level is tabulated in Table 33 This table shows for nearly all dependent variables that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggreshygate are significant effects For several paramshyeters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the asphalt emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free cationic slow set and catshyionic medium set asphalt emulsions can be proshyduced which meet Caltrans specifications for cationic emulsionse

2 Solvent free cationic asphalt emulsions can effectively coat aggregates with minus No 200 mesh contents in excess of 10 percent and sand equivalent values as low as 15 Greater degrees of coating are obtained with solvent free catshyionic slow set emulsions than with solvent free cationic medium set emulsions

3 In the laboratory and for the materials used in this study greater degrees of compaction can be obtained using a conventional cationic medium set emulsion which contains 7 percent solvent than with solvent free asphalt emulsions

4 Higher stabilometer values cohesiometer values and resilient moduli are obtained for laboratory mixtures containing low quality aggregates with the solvent free asphalt emulsions than with the emulsion containing solvent This is believed due to the higher viscosity of the solvent free emulsion residues when compared to the residue from the emulsion containing solvent

88

Table 33

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE

Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA

2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y

Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y

LEGEND

Effects

A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

89

5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent

6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance

8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

90

- - - --- ----------

102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions

2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates

3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent

4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent

5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent

6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials

91

Table 34

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS

effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

A a E AQ AE QE AQE

Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA

2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y

Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y

Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer - y y - y - -

COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -

MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y

~ y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion

LEGEND

Effects

A = Q = E =

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

92

8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

93

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 3: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

Central Plant Mixed For central plant mixed emulshysified asphalt mixtures rolling should generally be performed as soon as possible after lay down as in many cases due to the time required for hauling and placing of the mixture the emulsion may have begun to break However initial rolling should not be performed until the mixture is stable enough to support the roller Initial rolling is generally accomplished using pneumatic rollers intermediate rolling with either pneumatic or steel wheel rolshylers and finish rolling with steel wheel rollers Further information on compaction of plant-mixed emulsified asphalt mixtures are also found in Refershyences 3 6 and 9

87

100 CONCLUSIONS

Based on testing mixture designs and analyses pershyformed with the materials studied during this investishygation several conclusions regarding the use of solshyvent free asphalt and sulfur-extended asphalt emulshysions with aggregates from California may be drawn

101 Solvent Free Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significant at the 95 percent confidence level is tabulated in Table 33 This table shows for nearly all dependent variables that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggreshygate are significant effects For several paramshyeters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the asphalt emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free cationic slow set and catshyionic medium set asphalt emulsions can be proshyduced which meet Caltrans specifications for cationic emulsionse

2 Solvent free cationic asphalt emulsions can effectively coat aggregates with minus No 200 mesh contents in excess of 10 percent and sand equivalent values as low as 15 Greater degrees of coating are obtained with solvent free catshyionic slow set emulsions than with solvent free cationic medium set emulsions

3 In the laboratory and for the materials used in this study greater degrees of compaction can be obtained using a conventional cationic medium set emulsion which contains 7 percent solvent than with solvent free asphalt emulsions

4 Higher stabilometer values cohesiometer values and resilient moduli are obtained for laboratory mixtures containing low quality aggregates with the solvent free asphalt emulsions than with the emulsion containing solvent This is believed due to the higher viscosity of the solvent free emulsion residues when compared to the residue from the emulsion containing solvent

88

Table 33

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE

Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA

2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y

Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y

LEGEND

Effects

A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

89

5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent

6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance

8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

90

- - - --- ----------

102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions

2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates

3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent

4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent

5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent

6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials

91

Table 34

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS

effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

A a E AQ AE QE AQE

Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA

2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y

Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y

Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer - y y - y - -

COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -

MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y

~ y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion

LEGEND

Effects

A = Q = E =

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

92

8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

93

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 4: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

100 CONCLUSIONS

Based on testing mixture designs and analyses pershyformed with the materials studied during this investishygation several conclusions regarding the use of solshyvent free asphalt and sulfur-extended asphalt emulshysions with aggregates from California may be drawn

101 Solvent Free Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significant at the 95 percent confidence level is tabulated in Table 33 This table shows for nearly all dependent variables that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggreshygate are significant effects For several paramshyeters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the asphalt emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free cationic slow set and catshyionic medium set asphalt emulsions can be proshyduced which meet Caltrans specifications for cationic emulsionse

2 Solvent free cationic asphalt emulsions can effectively coat aggregates with minus No 200 mesh contents in excess of 10 percent and sand equivalent values as low as 15 Greater degrees of coating are obtained with solvent free catshyionic slow set emulsions than with solvent free cationic medium set emulsions

3 In the laboratory and for the materials used in this study greater degrees of compaction can be obtained using a conventional cationic medium set emulsion which contains 7 percent solvent than with solvent free asphalt emulsions

4 Higher stabilometer values cohesiometer values and resilient moduli are obtained for laboratory mixtures containing low quality aggregates with the solvent free asphalt emulsions than with the emulsion containing solvent This is believed due to the higher viscosity of the solvent free emulsion residues when compared to the residue from the emulsion containing solvent

88

Table 33

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE

Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA

2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y

Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y

LEGEND

Effects

A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

89

5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent

6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance

8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

90

- - - --- ----------

102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions

2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates

3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent

4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent

5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent

6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials

91

Table 34

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS

effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

A a E AQ AE QE AQE

Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA

2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y

Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y

Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer - y y - y - -

COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -

MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y

~ y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion

LEGEND

Effects

A = Q = E =

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

92

8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

93

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 5: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

Table 33

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS A a E AQ AE OE AQE

Emulsion Conpatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA - NA - NA NA

2 Day bdulus y y y - y y y

Full cure Ddulus y y y - - - -Density y y y - - - -Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer y y y y Y y -Cohesiometer y y y y y - -MVS Stabilometer y y y - y y -MVS Cohesiometer - - y - - - -SWell y y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion y y y y y y y

LEGEND

Effects

A = effect of aggregate type Q = effect of aggregate quality level E = effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

89

5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent

6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance

8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

90

- - - --- ----------

102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions

2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates

3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent

4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent

5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent

6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials

91

Table 34

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS

effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

A a E AQ AE QE AQE

Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA

2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y

Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y

Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer - y y - y - -

COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -

MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y

~ y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion

LEGEND

Effects

A = Q = E =

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

92

8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

93

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 6: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

5 Laboratory specimens containing solvent free asphalt emulsions experience higher losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivity procedure than specishymens with the asphalt emulsion containing solshyvent This effect however may be related to the lesser degrees of compaction attained when using the solvent free asphalt emulsions as comshypared to the emulsion containing solvent

6 Laboratory specimens which contained the solvent free asphalt emulsions with lower quality aggreshygates experienced higher amounts of swell and greater surface abrasion losses than specimens with the emulsion containing solvent

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the solvent free asphalt emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thicknesses are required when using solvent free emulsions It is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials which may be an important factor in field performance

8 Most of the paving mixtures investigated which contained the low quality aggregates and the solvent free asphalt emulsions met stabilometer requirements for Caltrans Type C asphalt conshycrete However only three of the mixtures also met moisture vapor susceptibility and swell requirements Mixtures which met these requireshyments were - FH with CSS-0 emulsion GRH with CMS-0 emulsion and GRH with CMS-7 emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other considershyations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

90

- - - --- ----------

102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions

2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates

3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent

4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent

5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent

6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials

91

Table 34

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS

effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

A a E AQ AE QE AQE

Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA

2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y

Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y

Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer - y y - y - -

COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -

MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y

~ y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion

LEGEND

Effects

A = Q = E =

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

92

8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

93

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 7: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

- - - --- ----------

102 Sulfur-Extended-Asphalt Emulsions

A summary of ANOVA significance at the 95 percent confidence level is shown in Table 34 This table showsmiddotfor nearly all parameters that emulsion type aggregate quality level and aggregate are signifishycant effects For several parameters several interactions are also significant Conclusions reached during the SEA emulsion experiment are

1 Stable solvent free water based anionic slow set emulsions using sulfur-extended-asphalt (SEA) base stocks can be produced which meet most Caltrans specifications for anionic slow set emulsions

2 Anionic SEA emulsion can effectively coat both low and high quality aggregates

3 Use of SEA emulsions resulted in higher resilshyient modulus values for both low and high qualshyity aggregates than use of the emulsion containshying solvent

4 Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions had higher stabilometer values with low quality aggregates than mixtures with the emulsion containing solshyvent

5 Specimens containing the SEA emulsion with low quality aggregates swelled to a greater extent and experienced higher surface abrasion losses than those with the emulsion containing solvent

6 Specimens containing the SEA emulsions experishyence greater losses of stabilometer value after conditioning using the moisture vapor sensitivshyity procedure than specimens with the solvent asphalt emulsion indicating a greater sensitivshyity to moisture

7 Due to the greater stiffness of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions as compared to the solvent asphalt emulsion lesser pavement thickshynesses would be required when using SEA emulshysions Again it is noted that the pavement section design procedure used herein does not consider the moisture sensitivity of the materials

91

Table 34

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS

effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

A a E AQ AE QE AQE

Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA

2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y

Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y

Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer - y y - y - -

COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -

MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y

~ y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion

LEGEND

Effects

A = Q = E =

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

92

8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

93

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 8: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

Table 34

SUMMARY OF ANOVA SIGNIFICANCE AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL

SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT EMULSION EXPERIMENT

DEPENDENT VARIABLES EFFECTS

effect of aggregate type effect of aggregate quality level effect of emulsion type

AQ = aggregate-aggregate quality interaction AE = aggregate-emulsion ineteraction QE = aggregate quality-emulsion interaction

A a E AQ AE QE AQE

Emulsion Compatability y y y - y - -Film Stripping y NA y NA y NA NA

2 Day Mxfalus y y y - y y y

Full Cure Mldulus y - y - - - -Density y y y - - y y

Air Voids y y y - - - -

Stabilometer - y y - y - -

COhesiometer - y - - - - -MIS Stabilaneter y y y y y - -

MVS COhesianeter y y y - y y -y

~ y y y y y y

Surface Abrasion

LEGEND

Effects

A = Q = E =

AQE = three-way interaction

Significance

Y = significant at the 95 confidence level = not significant at the 95 confidence level

NA = does not apply as analysis is a two-way

92

8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

93

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 9: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

8 All of the paving mixtures containing low qualshyity aggregates and SEA emulsions studied met Caltrans stabilometer requirements (30 minimum) for Type C asphalt concrete however several mixtures did not meet swell and moisture vapor susceptibility requirements for Type C asphalt concrete Mixtures containing the SEA emulsions which met swell requirements were FH GRH and GRL with SS-15 SEA emulsion and SBH FH FL GRH and GRL with SS-30 SEA emulsion MVS conshyditioned stabilometer value requirements were met only by FL and GRH with the SS-15 SEA emulshysion and GRH with the SS-30 SEA emulsion

9 The desirability of using solvent free aqueous emulsion asphalt concrete mixes for secondary road construction in view of the positive and negative laboratory test results obtained for laboratory prepared and tested specimens must remain a judgement of the highway construction engineer who must consider pollution abatement achievable through the use of emulsified asphalt systems and weigh this against other consider~ ations as cost effectiveness and road durability among others

93

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 10: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

110 RECOMMENDATIONS

111 This study has investigated the properties of paving mixtures containing several low quality aggregates and several types of emulsified binders Test methshyods and criteria used to design and assess mixture characteristics were those specified for hot-mix asphalt concrete in California An objective of the research study is to determine if solvent free emulshysified binders can be used in place of cutback asphalt binders Therefore in order to permit drawing of appropriate conclusions from the data presented in this report on the effectiveness of the emulsions studied for replacing cutback asphalts additional laboratory work is required It is suggested that properties and characteristics of mixtures containing the project aggregates and cutshyback asphalts be determined The study should evalshyuate the same properties considered in this study Determination of mixture characteristics using cutshyback binders would permit direct comparisons between the cutback and emulsified binder systems and the drawing of more definite conclusions Additionally a study which would determine properties of mixtures containing hot-mixed asphalt cement would be of aid in evaluating results

112 After completion of the additional laboratory studshyies if results so indicate it is recommended that several field experimental studies using aggregates ranging in quality from low to high with solvent free emulsified asphalt binders be undertaken Projects should be constructed in several climatic regions in California (wet and arid) and should include control sections containing both cutback and if possible hot-mixed asphalts Proper labshyoratory mixture designs construction control and field monitoring of results and performance should be used Results of these experiments should proshyvide indications of performance of the various mixtures in actual use

113 Results of this study indicate that mixtures conshytaining the SEA binders are detrimentally affected by moisture to a greater degree than with standard emulsions However performance of mixtures conshytaining the SEA emulsions may be adequate in arid regions Therefore it is recommended that in order

94

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 11: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS

to further investigate the usefulness of paving mixshytures containing the SEA emulsions that field experimental test sections using the SEA emulsions be constructed and evaluated$

It is strongly suspected that the moisture vapor susceptibility of the solvent free asphalt emulsion mixes evaluated herein could be reduced by a slight modification of the emulsion formulations This possibility should be evaluated

95

References

1 Request For Proposals Investigation Into The Nature Of Emulsified Asphalts Compatible With California Local Aggregates And Substitution Of Sulfur For Asphalt In Aqueous Emulsified Systems California Air Resource Board Research Division Sacramento Calishyfornia March 1980

2 American Society for Testing and Materials 1981 Annual Book of Standards Part 15 Road Paving Bituminous Materials Travelled Surface Characterisshytics Philadelphia PA 1981

3 Interim Guide to Full-Depth Asphalt Paving Using Varshyious Asphalt Mixes The Asphalt Institute Pacific Coast Division PCD-1 January 1976

4 Kennepahl GJA Logan A and Bean D C Conshyventional Paving Mixes with Sulfur-Asphalt Binders Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

5 Deme Imants Processing of Sand-Asphalt-Sulfur Mixes Proceedings AAPT Volume 43 1974

6 A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual The Asphalt Instishytute Manual Series No 19 MS-19) March 1979

7 Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Waste Management Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park North Carolina October 17 1977

8 Highway Chemicals Newsletter Armak Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois Fall 1981

9 Bitumils Mix Manual Chevron USA Asphalt Division January 1977

10 Asphalt Pavement Engineering Wallace Hugh A and Martin J Rogers McGraw Hill Book Company New York 1967

11 Spahr J D The Use of Emulsified Asphalt in Conshystruction and Maintenance Proceedings AAPT Volume 44 1975

96

12 Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design Asphalt Emulsions Volume 4 1977

13 Dybalski J N 11 The Chemistry of Asphalt Emulsions Presented at the Fifty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington D C January 1976

14 Beagle C w Deflection and Performance of Deep Lift Asphalt Emulsion Base Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

15 Meier w J Asphalt Emulsion Construction on the Navajo Reservation Twenty-Fifth Annual Arizona Conshyference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 22-23 1976

16 Kallas B F and Shock J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Find Report - Parts I and

11II Research Report 77-1 The Asphalt Institute November 1977

17 Shook J F San Diego County Experimental Base Project Analysis of Performance Proceedings AAPT Volume 45 1976

18 Wimberly C M Emulsified Asphalt Mixes in Arizona Proceedings 24th Annual Arizona Conference on Roads and Streets University of Arizona April 17-18 1975

19 Izalt J O Galloway B M and Saylock D SandshyAsphalt-Sulfur Pavement Experimental Project Highway US 77 Kennedy County Texas Texas Transportation Institute April 1977

20 McBee w c and Sullivan T A Direct Substitution of Sulfur for Asphalt In Paving Materials 11 Report of Investigations 8303 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines 1978

21 Ludwig A C Gerhardt B B and Dale JM Materials and Techniques for Improving the Engineering Properties of Sulfur Report No FHWA-RD-80-023 Fedshyeral Highway Administration June 1980

22 Jiminez R A and Stakes K J Effects of Heat and Air on the Viscosity of Sulfur-Asphalt Mixtures Preshysented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologies San Diego California February 16-18 1981

97

23 Chehovits J G and Anderson D A Upgrading of Marginal Aggregates for Improved Water Resistance of Asphalt Concrete Transportation Research Record 762 pages 46-52 1981

24 Rosner JC and Chehovits J G Highway Binder Materials From Modified Sulfur-Water Emulsionsn Report No FHWARD-82035 Federal Highway Administration November 1981

25 Standard Specifications State of California Department of Transportation January 1978

26 Applied Linear Statistical Models Neter I and Wasserman w Richard D Irwin Inc Homewood Illinois 1974

27 Burr I W and Foster LA A Test For Equality of variances Mimeograph Series No 282 Statistics Department Purdue University Lafayette Indiana 1972

28 Applied Statistical Methods Burr I W Academic Press Inc New York 1974

29 Parr W K Field Observations of the Behavior of Bituminous Pavements As Influenced By Moisture 11 ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 3-16--I959

30 Rice JM Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures ASTM Special Technical Publication No 240 pages 17-34 1959

31 Lettman R P and Johnson D L 11 Pressure Induced Stripping in Asphaltic Concrete Highway Research Record 340 pages 13-28 1970

32 Waller F H Jr Emulsion Mix Design Methods An Overview 11 Transportation Research Record 754 1980

33 Design of Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Mixtures Report R6-350(74) US Forest Service 1974

34 11Mix Design Procedure For Dense-Graded Emulsified Asphalt Pavement FHWA Region 10 Office of Federal Highway Projects

98

35 Darter M I Ahlfield S R Wilky P L and Wasill R G Development of Emulsified Asphalt Aggregate Cold Mix Design Procedure Research Report 505-5 Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois 1978

36 A A Gadallah L E Wood and E J Yoder A Suggested Method for the Preparation and Testing of Asphalt-Emulsion-Treated Mixtures Using Marshall Equipment Proceedings AAPT Volume 46 1977

37 Marshall Stability Highway Chemicals Department Armak Company McCook Illinois

38 Jiminez R A Final Report-Phase I Asphalt Emulsion Treated Aggregates University of Arizona Research Report HPR-1-13(150) January 1977

39 George K P Interim Report on Criteria for Emulshysified Asphalt Stabilization of Sandy Soils Univershysity of Mississippi for Mississippi State Highway Department October 1976

40 Fong G K Mix Design Methods for Base and Surface Courses Using Emulsified Asphalt A State-of-the-Art Report Report No FHWA-RD-78-113 Federal Highway Administration October 1978

41 Schmidt R J A Practical Method for Measuring the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt-Treated Mixes Highway Research Record 404 1972

42 Manual of Test Volume 2 State of California Department of Transportation Transporation Laboratory Third Edition 1978

43 Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete Manual Series No 2 (MS-2) The Asphalt Institute March 1979

99

-

APPENDIX A

OPTIMUM FLUIDS AT COMPACTION DATA

-

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table Al

Percent Residue

631 631 631

702 702 702

595 595 595

678 678 678

689 689 689

645 645 645

Fluids at Compaction Data css-o

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

467 367 216

1098 998 847

571 413 360

1273 1115 10 62

455 370 341

1050 965 936

590 450 400

1268 1128 1078

492 183 109

1181 872 798

404 311 139

1049 956 784

Dry Density

(pcf)

1304 1337 1347

1283 1326 1306

133l 1310 9 1317

1328 1295 1304

1404 1529 154 1

1429 1466 1462

Al

css-o CSS-0HIGH QUALITY155- DRY LOW QUALITYbull SAN BERNARDINO 1551

bull SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO 150-I I 150 FRESNObull GRANITEROCK bull GRANITEROCK

I ~

145 LoPT=B5 145 () () - -0 0

~140 gt1401 L- 0 PT= 85 OPT=100gt-i

N Cl) OPT=100 Cl)

DRYZ 135 Z 135w w Cl Cl

amp130 amp130 Cl 0

125 125

120 I i I I i I i I I I 120 I I J I I i I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure Al Fluids at Compaction Figure A2 Fluids at Compaction High Quality Aggre-gate CSS-0 Low Quality CSS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A2

Percent Residue

605 605 605

704 704 704

595 595 595

695 695 695

556 556 556

604 604 604

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-0

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

4 16 316 183

1021 921 788

494 389 262

1198 1093

966

529 392 360

1124 987 955

519 479 301

1214 1174

996

284 187 124

840 743 680

319 256 165

923 860 769

Dry Density

(pcf)

1331 131 6 1316

1305 1320 1313

1282 1313 1312

1321 1298 1279

1478 1479 1463

1452 1463 1453

A3

155 CMS-0 HIGH QUALITY

150~ DRY bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

145 bull GRANITEROCK72_ OPT=90 0 0

~140gt-ii OPT=105i Cl)

Z 135 w 0

gt- D~0 130 middot 0

125 [OPT100

120 I i I i i I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A3 Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-0

155] 150

0 1451 0

~140gt- Cl)

Z 135 w 0

fc130 0

125

120 I 6

CMS-0

LOW QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

v[A OPTf90

pound 0 PT12DoOPTr110

7 I a 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A4 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-0

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A3

Percent Residue

769 769 769

746 746 746

595 595 595

714 714 714

570 570 570

587 587 587

Fluids at Compaction Data CMS-7

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

460 391 294

1229 1160 1063

573 436 301

13 19 1182 1047

513 380 2 57

1108 975 852

513 404 334

1227 1118 1048

231 170 080

801 740 650

263 146 109

850 733 6096

Dry Density

(pcf)

1329 1377 1376

1335 135l 134 2

1357 1333 1342

1299 1317 1308

1519 1523 1498

1503 1517 1514

AS

CMS-7 155-- HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNOlSO~ nPT80 145

0 -0 -140 middot gt-

r t deg Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fi130 Cl

125-1

120 I 6

GRANITEROCK

~OPT=105

IJ

I 7

I I i I i I 8 9 10 11 12 13

TOTAL FLUIDS

I 14

I 15

Figure AS Fluids at Compaction High Quality CMS-7

155

150

145

0 -0

gt--140

t Cl)

Z 135 w Cl

fc 130 Cl

125

120 I 6

CMS-7 LOW QUALITY

C bull SAN BERNARDINO

FRESNO

GRANITEROCKOPT 80

~OPT105

~

tos i I I i J i i I I 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A6 Fluids at Compaction Low Quality CMS-7

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table A4

Percent Residue

765 765 765 765 765 765

815 815 815 815 815 815

765 765 765

817 817 817 817 817 8el7

574 574 574

738 738 738 738 738 738

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 15 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

563 426 315 580 346 178

1328 1191 1080 1345 1111

943

595 418 309 599 256 137

14 10 1233 1124 1414 1071 952

600 440 356

1365 1205 1121

683 541 418 629 457 283

1500 1358 1235 1446 1274 1100

374 247 128

948 821 702

451 301 175 435 186 073

1189 1039

913 1173

924 811

Dry Density

(pcf)

1289 1319 1335 1286 1331 1332

1278 1314 1315 1276 1304 1299

1281 1325 1313

1259 1290 1303 1275 1292 1294

1450 1485 1482

1428 1459 1468 1437 1465 1465

A7

bull bull

SS 15 SEA 155 HIGH QUALITY

bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

150 FRESNO

bull GRANITEROCK

145

0 0 -

OPT=75

-_ gt=140 I-ii OPT100co C)

z 135 w _--0PTr1200

gt-0 130--0

125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure A7 Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 15 SEA

SS 15 SEA LOW QUALITY155

bull SAN BERNARDINO-

FRESNO 150

bull GRANITEROCK 145

~-0 0 LOPT=80a140gt-t Cf)

Z135 w r-OPT=105 0

gt-0 130 -~middot 0

OPT120J 125

120 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS

Figure AB Fluids at Compaction Low Quality SS 15 SEA

Aggregate

SBH

SBL

FH

FL

GRH

GRL

Table AS

Percent Residue

688 688 688

722 722 722 722 722 722

680 680 680 680 6 80 680

726 726 7 26 726 726

510 510 510

596 596 596 596 596 596

Fluids at Compaction Data SS 30 SEA

Moisture at Compaction

Percent Total Fluids

595 468 150

1283 1156

838

645 438 267 660 566 440

1367 1160

989 1382 1288 1162

650 531 432 629 422 332

1330 1211 1112 1309 1102 1012

767 614 443 547 370

1493 1340 1169 1273 1096

413 300 167

923 810 677

468 3 46 191 485 258 096

1064 942 787

10 ~ 81 854 692

Dry Density

(pcf)

1299 1337 1332

1286 1319 1324 1281 1302 1326

129l 1315 1333 1294 1333 131 5

1259 1278 1322 1294 1313

1464 1509 1496

1435 1472 1499 1426 1487 1476

A9

SS 30 SEASS 30 SEA LOW QUALITY

155 HIGH QUALITY 1551 bull SAN BERNARDINOmiddotbull SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

FRESNO 150150-I -middotmiddot-- -bull --middotmiddot I ~ t -- a GRANITEROCK a GRANITEROCK

145145

~-bull80 0 --0 00 ~140~140

J-gt- gt-~ I- = OPT=100 Cl)0 Cl) [Ij 135Z 135

lJJ Cl

gt- ~1300 130 middot ClCl ( 0

OPT=110 125~ OPT=115125

120-t----~--------------r---120 I l J J J I I I I I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 156 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

TOTAL FLUIDS TOT AL FLUIDS

Figure A9 Fluids at Compaction Figure AlO Fluids at Compaction High Quality SS 30 SEA Low Quality SS 30 SEA

-~

i

APPENDIX B

MIXTURE DESIGN DATA

TABLE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality css-o Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absortied Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcf

StabiJcneter Value

~iareter Value

Jesilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

500

----------

40

u 30 ltgt

ffi 20 w ~10

m lt

o

w l 400 lt gt a w t 300 0 iii ~ 200 8

100 12

10111

ui 0

i5 8gt lt

6

4

50

21740

24488

112

194

100

400

1357

375

197

117

345

60

21823

24163

97

199

100

500

1362

330

207

134

271

70

21772

23853

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

Iesign 7 0

87

208

100

600

1359

272

193

118

260

24

22d c lt i

20i

= 0 i5

18 gt

16

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0

134

132

bull 500 a

0 400 uil 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii w a

--

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE CONTENT Jo (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl

TABLE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0intent 50 60 70 Dsian 7 o

Bulk Siecipoundic Gravity 21804

llleoretical Specipoundic Gravity 24280

Air Voids 102

VMA 192

Absorbed Asphalt 063

Efpoundective Asphalt 437

Unit Weight pf 1361

Stabilcirieter Value 427

Cbhesicireter Value 352

Fesilielt Mxlulus 103psi

2-day 85

middotFinlJ 355

50

40

_ gt a 30 w w

~ 20 10

500

300

200

100

8

6

4

l 400 gt

~ w 0

~ 8

12

_ 10

= 0 gt

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21863 21992

23964 23660

88 71 71

197 200 200

063 063 063

537 637 637

1364 1372 1372

363 313 313

292 234 234

63 83 83 429 232 232

24

22

ci i

20i

= = 0 gt

18

16

138

p6 ~ Q

134 a w

o 132

130

500 Q -

o 400 --3 300 0 ~-~ 200 a ~ 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COtlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B2

TABLE B3 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

~fective Asphalt

Unit Weight middotCf

Stabilareter VaJue

Cbhesiareter VaJue

Resilient l-bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

11140 gt o30 IU w ~20

m

10

w l 400 gt 0

~ 0 ~ 200 8

100

14

12 11-

In Q

ho C

8

6

50 60 70 Dsi9 7 O 21308 21729 21595 24562 24235 23922

132 103 97 97 210 202 215 215 113 113 113 113 387 487 587 587

1329 1356 1348 1348 378 345 375 375

314 270 280 280

82 96 104 104 281 260 267 267

500

300 ~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

24

11-22ci

ltI i i 20 Cl) Q 180 gt

16

138

136 u - 134 Cl) z IU Q

132

130

bull500

400 Inl 300 Q bull~ 200 z ~ 100middot IU 0

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS

FIGURE B3 Mixture Design Data Sari Bernardin6 High Quality CMS o Replication 1

B3

TABLE B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue GJntent

Bulk seecific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

50

21491

24334

60

21459

24014

70

21526

23709

Iesiqn 70

Air Voids 117 106

VMA 204 212

Absocbed Asphalt 0 72 o 72

Effective Asphalt 428 528

Unit Weight pcf 1341 133 9

Stabilrneter Value 437 406

GJhesiareter Value 337 248 3

Iesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-cay

Final

50

w 40 gt 0 30 w w 0 20 co 10

500

w

3 400 gt 0 w t- 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

_ 10

0 8gt -lt

6

4

FIGURE

61 66

410 318

24

22~ ci

i 20

~

18 a gt

16

138

_136 u a 134 z ~ w 0

132

130

bull500

a

a 400 -3 300 _ a ~ 200 z ~ 100-

w 0

90 90

21 7 21 7

0 72 072

628 628

1343 1343

344 J44

252 252

82 82

250 250

---------

D 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDU CONTENT I (A_GGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B4 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B4

TABLE BS Mixture Design Data San Bernardin9 High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Siecific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

lir Voids

VMA

2bserberl Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stalgtilaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

Ill 30 lt( gt a 20 Ill Ill 0 10

~ iii lt CII 0

400

Ill

3 300 lt(

gt a Ill200 == 0

~100 c 8

0

12

10 ui 0

0 8gt 5 lt(

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

5 6 7 84 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

50 60 70 Cesian 70

21652

24484

21904

24149

22005

23828

116

198

107

3-93

135l

345

224

18

240

93 77 77 196 200 200 107 107 107 493 593 593

1367 1373 1373 288 235 235

136 80 80

17 21 21 128 78 78

24

22ci lt(

z 20il

= CII C 0

18 gt

16

I-~

140

+38- ~136 1- z Ill 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400 3 300 C

~ 200 z 100 Ill a ~

0 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino_BS High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

BS

TABLE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Content

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tmit WeightL pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesllllleter Value

Iesilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

a 20 UI w i

~10

lt 0

400

3300 lt gt a ~200 w i 0

119 93

197 l93

126 126

374 474

l353 l372

357 283

l26 l03

45 36

203 132

2440

30 22 0 0lt ltgt

16

~100 ~ 8 0 132

500 a

o 400 --ai 300 -

middot 0

~

~

w a

_ 10

ltn 0

0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

50 60 70 Cesign 7 o

2l679

24595

21990

24255

22190

23931

- i 20

a 180 gt

140

138 - a

~136 z w 0 134

200

100middot

0 4

73 73

193 193

126 1 26

574 574

1385 1385

235 235

82 82

3l 3l

64 64

-0 $ e

~ 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B6 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B6

TABLE B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Qlnte~t

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Speciic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

~tabilcmeter Value

ohesicrneter Value

resilient lbdulus l0 3psi

2-aay

Final

60 72 8 5 Iesicm 75

21762 21906 21779

23981 23617 23245 93 73 63 70

202 205 220 21 0

063 063 063 063

537 657 787 687

1358 1367 1359 1365 375 290 203 270

474 401 239 360

163 172 161 170 449 329 310 320

2440

ii 30 22 ci

Cl c cgt z 20 201 s ~ 310 e 18 0

gt c

0 16

500 140

w

3 400 _138c gt

~ 300 s 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

- 10 0 0 0 8gt c

6

4

FIGURE

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIOUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COITEIT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

B7 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

il36 z IU Cl 134

132

bull 500

c 400 -

3 300 - Cl

sectl 200 ~- z ~ 100

w

0

B7

111 10 ui e 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

TABLE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

500

400 gt C

72 85 resian 7 s

21873 21738

23581 23210

72 63 70 207 22l 21 0

055 055 055 665 795 695

1365 1356 1365 287 188 265

349 341 345

191 187 190 287 266 280

24 ------------

111 22

Cl Cl lt -i ~ 20

= a 18 0 gt

16 _____________

138

136 a 134 () w a

132

130___________

soar------------ D a

1 400 ~

ui3 300 C

~ 200

100

w C

0---------------------5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUlc CONTENT lt

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B8 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

BB

Fesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value 3Resilient -bdulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

m 50 - 40

IIJ ~ 30 CJ lt 1- 20

60

21669

23943

95

205

055

545

1352

560

416

195

425

~ 300 0 ()

~ 200 8

100---------------

12 -------------

RESIDUE CONTENT lto (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B9 Mixture Design Data San Ber~irdino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Pesiclue Content 60 Z1 as D=sign 7 5

Bulk Spccific Gravity 21697 21368 21255

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 23973 23610 23238

Air Voids 94 95 85 93

VMA 204 225 middot 23 8 230

middot-Absorbed Asphalt 061 061 061 061

Effective Asphalt 539 659 789 689

middot middotmiddotUnit Weight pcf 1354 133 3 1326 1330

-Stabilareter Value 460 375 225 340

CohesianeterValue 400 422 499 440

Iesilient MxUlus 103psi

2-oay 159 i0s 185 185

Final 290 299 283 295

60

w

l 400

24

22

ci 0 i 20l

= Q 180 gt

16

138

136

gt a 134~ 300 w l z0 IU 132 200

8 130

100-----------------_---I

12 ---------------- 500

o 400 10 ~

300 bull bullQ

Q0 8gt ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w a4 ___ __________ o

5 6 7 8 9 s 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COtlTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B9 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication l

B9

TABLE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Pesidue Conte1t 60 72 85 resign 75

Bulk Spcecific Gravity

Theoretical Sjeeipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Ohesianeter Value

Pesilient ~us 103psi

2---day

Final

60

50 lt gt cc40 w -w

~30 = CJ

lt 20

21635

24066

10l

206

078

522

1350

51 8

482

151

285

21481

23699

94

221

078

642

1341

378

459

150

286

24

11-22

ci Cl lt

~ 20 z

C 18

0 gt

21302

23323

87 92

237 225

078 078

7 72 6 72

1329 1338

246 350

343 430

162 155

254 280

I 16

500 138

UJ

400 136 lt gt

acc ~ UJ

134 300 z2 UI CJ_32 ~ 200

8 130

bull500

a

c 400 - 10 300 ~ Jf

C0 8gt ~ 200 ~ lt z

6 ~ 100-

UJ 0

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDU~ COrlTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE BlO Mixture Design Data San Bernardino

100 12

~

Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

BlO

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

TABLE Bll

Residue Content

Bulk Secific Gravity

Iheiretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicrneter Value

Resilient MXiulus l03psi

2-day

Final

60 72 85 D=sign 75

21817 22108 21917

23977 23601 23216

90 63 56 62

200 198 215 200

o 72 o 72 o 72 o 72

528 648 778 678

136l 1380 1368 137 5

242 162 76 130

151 175 215 190

52 63 41 55

202 122 60 110

244middot0

~ 30 22 ci lt 20 i 201 IU = en ~ 10 E 18 m 0lt gt

0 16

----

w

l 400 lt gt a ~ w 0 ~ 8

12

-t

ltn 0 0 gt a lt

FIGURE

5

500

300

200 ~ 100

10

8

6

134

500 a

c 400 -

_ 300 0

g 200

~ 100 ~in IU a

0 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Bll Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

142

I-40 u a

~ 138 in w 0

136 ~

Bll

TABLE Bl2 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Q)ntent

Bulk Spzcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specipoundic

Air Voids

V bull t-LA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Gravity

60

22026

24085

85

192

092

508

72

22062

23705

69

200

092

628

85

21901

23315

61

215

092

758

resign 75

67

205

092

6 58

Unit Weight pcf 1374

Stabiloreter Value 193

Ohesiareter Value 177 3

Resilient Mxrulus 10 psi

2-day 63

Fi-ial 138

40

m 30 J lt gt a 20 IU w 0 10 ~ lt

0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 9 ~ 200 _________ 8

100 12

10 9 0 8gt ~6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE 8ASISI

1377

127

193

1367

90

160

137 5

120

180

53

107

32

52

48

95

24

22ci 0 lt

20

= ~

9 18 0 gt

16

142

140 a

~138 z w C

136

134

9

500 a

dego 400-

3 300 ~- a ~ 200 z ~ 100

w a

0 5

~ 6 7 8 9

RES IOU~ CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl2 Mixture Design Data -san Bernardino Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl2

TABLE Bl 3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Pesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcrneter VaJue

CJgthesiarneter Value

Pesilient MxbJ11lS 10 3psi

2-day

Final

60

so gt

40a w 0 30 GI 20

500

l 400 gt a w t- 300 w 5 rn ~ 200 8

100 12

Ill 10 0 8gt

6

4

50

21789

24250

10l

164

1 95

305

1360

513

330

191

282

~ bull

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASIS)

60

21762

2 34 34

91

173

1 95

405

135middot8

567

284

168

434

24

Ill 22ci Cl

is 20

= 0 gt

18

16

142

140- ~138 iii z 0

136

134

bull500

o 400 -

l 300 C

~ 200 z 100 iii a

0 4

70 resign 70

21872

23632

75 75 177 177

1 bull 95 1 95 505 505

136S 136S 393 393

280 280

217 217 482 482

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT L (AGGREGATE BASISI

FIGURE Bl3 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality css~o Replication 1

Bl3

--------------

TABLE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Resid= Content 50 60 70 eesicn 7o

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21692 21677 21662

Ihroretical Specific Gravity 24501 24176 23865

Air Voids 115 103 92 92

VMA 169 176 185 185

Absorbed Asphalt 240 240 240 240

Effective Asphalt 260 360 460 460

Unit Weight pcpound 1354

Stabilaneter Value 580

Cohesicrneter Value 270 3Resilielt Mdulus 10 psi

2-day 149

Final 408

60

w so lt gt

w C o w le 0 30 m lt

20

500

w

~ 400 lt gt C

~ 300 w S ~ 200 ~ 8

100 12

- 10 m a 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AG GREGATE BASIS)

1353 1352 1352

442 327 327

276 183 183

173 191 191

373 299 299

24

22d c lt z

20E 18 0 gt

16

140

138 u C

136 w C 134

132

500 C

1 400 gt- m =gt 300 a ~ 200

l 100- IU C

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl4 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CSS-0 Replication

Bl4

2

bull bull bullbull

TABLE Bl5 Mixture Design-Data Fresno High Quality CMS-QReplication 1

Bulk Spcific Gravity

lheoreticaJ Specific Gravity Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mldulus l0 3psi 2-clay

Final

60

m 50 C gt a 40 w w

~ 30 C m

10

~idue Content 50 6_ 0 70 Daisi2 7 O

5oor----------

w

l 400 C gt a ~ 300 w I 0 iii ~ 200 8

100-------------

12 ----------

111 10 C

0 8gt C

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AG GREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl5 Mixture

21755 21305 23795 23497 86 93 93

163 198 198 l 69 l 69 l69 431 531 531

1336 1329 1329 420 307 307

247 230 230

180 i55 155

246 253 253

24

22d

Cl C

i 20I

J ~ C 18 ~ 0 gt

16

21434

24106

11l

179

l69

331

1337

472

373

175

247

138

136- 134 z w C

132

130

bull 500

dego 400 - l 300 C

~ 200 z l 100 iii w a

0

-~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT J (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Bl5

TABLE Bl6 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

helretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabil=ter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eesilient Mxrulus 10

2-day

Firal

60

50 J gt c 40

~ 30 m 20

500

w

l 400 gt a ~ 300 w

3psi

50 60 70

21339 2 1398 21475

24241 23925 23623

120 106 91

181 187 192

1 94 l 94 1 94

306 406 506

1331 1335 1340

558 43 7 377

340 313 219

149 152 154

317 345 288

Jesign70

91

192

194

506

1340

377

219

154

288

24

22d CJ i sect 20

= a 18 ~ 0 gt

16

138

136

a 134

z w ~ C ~ 200 132 8

130 100

14 500 a

o 400 - 12

3 300 - ~ 0 C gt 10 a ~ 200 ~ z

l 100

8

w a

0 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl6bull Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Bl6

TABLE Bl 7 Mixture Qesign Data Fresno High Quality CMS- 7 Replication 1

Pesidue Content 50 60 70 Cesign 7 O

Bulk siec~tic Gravity 21959 22101 22128

Iheoretical Specific Gravity 24539 24201 23879

Air Voids 105 87 73 73

VMA 158 160 167 167

~rbed Asphalt 252 252 252 252

Effective Asphalt 248 348 448 448

Unit Weight pcf 1370 1379 1380 1380

S~ter Value 467 370 213 213

Clgthesiareter Value 289 3Resilient l-Ddulus 10 psi

2-clay 47

FinaJ 294

50

Ill 40 o(

gt cc 30 Ill w 0 20 lt 10

500

w l 400 lt gt cc ~ 300 Ill 0 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

10 deg C

0 gt 8 ~l lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

147 122 122

65 35 35

214 75 75

22

J 20 o(

ii 18 16 ~ 0 gt

14

142

140 u Q

~138 z Ill

Cl 136

134

500 Q

o400 uil 300 Cl

g 200 z ~ 100 ~w cc

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

IIESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Bl7

TABLE Bl8 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Dsiqn 70

Bulk Specific Gravity 22191 22285 22092

Theoretical Specific Gravity 24199 23874 23563

Air Voids 82 66 62 62

VMA 149 153 168 168

Absorled AsphaJt 192 192 192 192

Effective AsphaJt 308 408 508 508

Unit Weight pcf 1385

Stabilareter Value 357

Cohesianeter Value 268 3Resilient MxhIJus 10 psi

2-day 75

Final 217

40

w 30 J lt gt a 20 w w i

~ 10

0

500

w

3 400 gt a

l 300 w i

ltn

~ 200 8

139l

342

238

137 9

233

192

137 9

233

192

84

117

63

73

63

73

20

0 0 ~ i

= 0 gt

18

16

14

12

~

144

142 140 z w 0

138

136 100-----1---1--1---l

12 ---------- 500 0bull

o 400 -11110 en a 3 300 = 0 08gt ~ 200

z 6 ~ 100middot

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT

4

RESIDUE CONTENT

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Bl8

FresnoTABLE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Low Quality css-o Replication 1

Eesidlle Content 60 70 80 Dasi51 7 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 21698 21611 21514 Iheoretical Specilic Gravity 23803 23505 23220

Air Voids 89 81 73 77

VMA 175 186 198 192

Absorbed Asphalt 171 l 71 171 171

Effective Asphalt 429 529 629 679

Unit Weight pcf 1354 1349 1342 1345

Stabi]cmeter Value 513 398 359 380

eohesianeter value 506 449 481 465

Resilient Modulus 10 3psi

2-day 176 176 241 205

Final 312 383 353 365

2460

all so 22 ci cgt

40 I-

20 E

I = g 30 18iii 0 gt

20

16

500

300

100

10

8

6

4

138

136l 400

u -gt a

~ I 0 in l1200 8

12

111 Q

0 gt ~

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT Jo RESIDUE COITENT Jo

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

~ ~ 134 z w 0

132

130

500 -

l 400 -

300 ~n

Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 in Ill IC

0

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE Bl9 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

Bl9

TABLE B20 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residlle Content i

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihegtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJhesiareter Value 3

Resilient Mxfulus 10 psi

2-day

Finll

60

50 lt 40 w w

~ 30 m lt 20

500

w

3 400 lt gt a ~ ~ 300 w 51 rn 200 8

100----------------

12 --------------

10 9 0 8gt lt

6

4 s 6 7 8

RESIDUE COPlTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

60 70 80 resign 75

21451 21476 21666

23932 23629 23340

104

185

194

406

1339

586

436

147

313

91

192

1 94

506

1340

403

416

179

347

24

22 0 0 lt

~ 20

= 9 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - Cl

136 w cl34

132

bull 500

-0 400__

3 300 I

~ 200

~ 100 rn w a

0

7 2 82

192 192

194 194

606 656

1352 1345

24 8 325

333 375

186 182

361 358

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE COPITEPlT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

~

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

B20

TABLE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

lesidue Content 60 70 80 resign 75

Bulk Siecific Gravity 21525 21406 21152 lllroretical Specific Gravity 23855 23555 23268 Air Voids 98 91 91 91 VMA 182 194 211 2middot03 1osorled Asphalt 180 1 80 180 180 Effective Asphalt 420 520 620 570 Ulit Weight pcf 1343 1336 1330 1335 Stabilateter Value 487 460 373 415 Oxlesiareter Value 418 392 323 355

3lesilielt Mldulus 10 psi

2-clay 188 177 200 190

Final 289 299 281 290

6or----------- 24

m 50 lt gt 11 40 w w I

~ 30 m lt 20

_J_

22ci 0 lt z

20EE

= 0 180 gt

16

5oor---------- 138

w

l 400 lt gt

136- a ~ 300 w i 0

fa34 z w

~ 200 Cll32 -8

100-----------i-~ 130

12 ------------ 500bulla

10 ________ o 400 - 0

0 gt

8

gJdeg 300 0

~- 200 ---e-

lt z

6 l 100 w 4

5 6 7 8 9 0

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B21 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B21

1

TABLE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Fesidue Cbntent 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21243

lheoretical Specific Gravity 23859

Air Voirls 109

VMA 189

Absorbed Asphalt 152

Effective 1spralt 398

Unit Weight pd 1326

atabil~ter Value 620

Cbhesiareter Value 430 3Fesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-oay 160

Final 387

70

a 60 gt a 50 w w == = 40 0

m

30

500

w l 400 lt gt cc

~ 3001- 0 ~ 200 8

100

16

136

134 u Q

iu2 z w 0 130

128

12 -----------

10 bull

ltIi 0

~ s

6

4middot1-_________ _

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l _AGGREGATE BASIS)

21164

23557

101

200

152

498

1321

481

432

180

377

24

22

z 20Si

= 18e 0 gt

bull 500

o 400-ltIi j 300 0

~ 200 zl 100 w cc

0

65 75 iesiqn 7 s

21095

23269

93 93

210 210

152 l 52

598 598

1316 1316

367 367

450 450

171 171

387 387

-----~bull-----

8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B22 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B22

1 TABLE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Low Quality CMS-7 Replication

70 -~ 0 Cesign 75 Pesidue Content

Bulk Spcific Graviv1

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stallilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2--day

Final

40

Ill 30 c gt 0 20 UI lo Q 10=c 0

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w lo Q 200 8

100

~

60

21829

23899

87

170

197

403

1362

293

206

84 144

21981

23587

67

l73

197

503

1372

200

249

76 131

21960

23289

5middot 7

middot18l

197

603

1370

100

241

69 93

62

177

197

553

1370

150

245

73

110

12

10 5 Q 8gt 5 lt

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (ACGREGATE BASIS)

24

It

22 t-ci c

z 20i

= 5 18 t-Q gt

16

142

140 - 638

z w Q

136

134

bull 500

o 400 - 3 300 0

~ 200 z 100 iii UI 0

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (ACGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B23 Mixture Design Data Fresno LOW Quality CMS-7 Replication

B23

1

TABLE B24 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Residue Cbntent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

Iheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Urit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Glhesianeter Value

Resilient Mldulus 10

2-day

Final

40

m 30 gt c 20 w ~ w i

~ 10 m lt ~ 0

3psi

24

22

C C lt i

20~ ~

9 18 0 gt

16

500 142

w 1403 400 gt

Ca gt138I 300 tw

i z w Q 136~ 200

8

134

~

~

100 12 500

C

dego 400 - Ill 10 3 300 0 0 Q8gt ~ 200

~ z 6 100middot

w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIOUC CONTENT

(AGGREGATE 8ASIS] (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

80

21686

23262

68

19l

l91

609

1353

125

215

77

114

Cesign 75

71

184

L 91

559

1360

200

235

77

135

60

21936

23870

81

166

191

409

1369

358

252

84

211

70

21850

23559

73

177

191

509

1364

270

250

77

157

Mixture Design Data FresnoFIGURE B24 Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B24

TABLE B25 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-Or Replication 1

Residue Clgtntent 47

Bulk Siecific Gravity 23965

llleoretical Specific Gravity 26825

Air Voids 107

VMA 207

Absorbed Asphalt 27

Effective Asphalt 443

Unit Weight pcf 1495

Stabilaneter Value 302

Cohesiaoeter Value 235 3

Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day 158

Final 300

40

30 _ gt a 20I- ii 0_

10iii I-en 0 500----------

Ill

3 400 gt ati 300 ii 0 iii l 200 8

100---i----L---J

12 ----------

jit 10 e 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I 4

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

57 67 Design 55

24521 24581

26411 26017

72 55 80

196 202 200

27 27 27

543 643 523

1530 1534 1520

247 200 27

275 203 275

164 116 160

276 197 280

24

jlt

22ci c i

20Si

= en e 18 0 gt

16

156

_154 ~ i152 iii z C

150

148

soo----------

dega 400 _

en

~300 ~ ~ 200 1-zl 100 iii w a

01----~-i--J 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Mixture Design Data GraniterockFIGURE B25 High Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

B25

TABLE B26 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Besidue Content If 7 57 67 D2sign 55

Bulk SfeCific Gravity 2 4131 24573 24597

lhagtreticai Specific Gravity 26951 26532 26134

Air Voids 105 74 59 78

VMA 20l 195 20l 197

Absorted Asphalt 46 46 46 46

Effective Asphalt 424 524 624 504

Unit Weight pcf 1506 1533 1535 1525

stabi1anaiter Value 282 258 is2 270

Cllhesicmter Value 204 155 138 160

Resilient Mdulus 103psL

2-day 115 143 126 130

Final 313 225 173 240

40

w 30 lt gt a 20 w w la 0 10 m lt

0

~

24

22ci C

lt z

20la ~ = E 18 -0 gt

16

156

154 - a

~152 z w r0

150

148

-

500

o 400 ~

300 0

g 200 ~ z -~ 100

500

w ~ 400 lt gt a IU t- 300 w la 0 ~ 200

~8

100 12

10 0 0 8gt lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

w a

o 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT lo RESIDUE CONTENT II

-cGREGATE s-s1s1 (-GGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B26 Mixture Design Data Grani terock High Quality CSS-0 Replication

B26

2

TABLE B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Residue Ogtntent 47 57 67 ~ign 55

Bulk Spcific Gravity 23886 24116 24078

Ihooretical Specific Gravity 26675 26267 25879

Air Voids 105 81 70 82

VMA 210 210 21 8 210

Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 oos 005

Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545

Unit Weight pcf 149l 1505 1502 1505

Stabilareter Value 337 350 250 350

Ogthesicneter Value 238 3

Eesilient Mldulus l0 psi

2-day 104

Final 287

50

Ill 40 J C gt cc 30 Ill Ill l 0

C

10

20iii 500

w

l 400 C gt cc I 300 Ill l 0 in ~ 200 8

100 12

1110 0 0 8gt

c cc

6

4

FIGURE

~

~

177 204 200

144 150 140

254 247 260

24 ----------

a 18 0 gt

16 __i____i_-J

154

j52 u -a

~1501- ------iiiz -Ill 0

148

______________ 146

soar---------- a

o 400 1--

~ 300 _ ~

~ 200 z ~ 100 en w 0

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B27 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

B27

8

TABLE B28 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Residue Ointent 4 7 57 67 Cesign 55

Bulk Specific Gravity

Ihroretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

CJlhesianeter Value

Pesilient Mldulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

40

30 lt gt = w 20 0

- 10 lt

0

500

w - 3 400

lt gt a l 300 w 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

i 10 ui C

0 8gt lt

6

4

FIGURE

23861

26649

10S

207

014

456

1489

338

145

124

307

~

--------

~ 5 6 7 84

RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

24025 23925

26242 25855

85

210

014

556

1499

283

135

135

307

24

22

0 lt i

20i

= 18 0 gt

16

154

152 u Q

i150 z w 0 148

146middot

500- o 400 -

300 _ Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 4

75 87

220 209

014 014

656 536

1493 1490

220 300

129 140

142 130

277 307

_--

~

-___

85 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT _ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B28 bull Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

B28

TABLE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Pesicllle Cbntent 47 57 67 resign 55 Bulk Siecific Gravity 24618 24637 24728 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26905 26475 26066 Air Voids 84 69 51 71 VlltLA 185 192 197 190 Absocbed Asphalt 047 0 bull 47 047 047 Effective Aspbalt 423 523 623 503 Urit Weight pcf 1536 1537 1543 1537 Stabilaneter Value 410 330 198 350 QJhesianeter Value 166

Resiliextt Mldulus 10 3psi

2-clay

Final

50

40 c

ffi 30 IE g20 iii c

10

500

l 400 c

a ~ 300 IE C ~ 200 8

100 12

ot 10 C

0 8

5

C

6

4

46

158

~

~ 4 5 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

120 131 130

35 30 38

56 28 80

24

gt11 22

c c c

i 2031

= ~ C 180

16

158

156 t-

u - 154 z w 0

152

150

500

~

~ 0

bull a 400 - uil 300 ~

200

C

~ z ~ w a

100middot

8 4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B29 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B29

TABLE B30 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

Pesidue Content 4-7 h---7 6 -7 IEsicn 5 5

Bulk Specific Gravity 24519 24638 24706 Iheoretical Specific Gravity 26609 26265 25793 Air Voids 79 62 42 65 VMA 189 192 198 19l

middot Absorbed Asphalt aas 005 005 005 Effective Asphalt 465 565 665 545 Unit Weight pcf 1530 1537 1542 1535 Stabilareter Value 420 327 247 350 Cohesiareter Value 126

3Resilient Mldulus 10 psi

Z--day 47 Final 144

50

40 J lt gt a 30 w w

~ 20 m lt 10

500

w

3 400 lt gt a

~ 300 w 2 ~ 200 8 ~

100 12

111- 10 ui 0 gt 8

lt

6

4

114 182 120

43 29 45

79 33 90

24

ii-22

ci 0 lt i

20l ~= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 0

l 154 z ~w c 152

150

500

Q -dego 400 - ui3 300 C

~ 200 z

~ 100middot~

w a ~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8 4 5 6 7 RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

8

FIGURE B30 Mixture Design Data High Quality CMS-7

Graniterock Replication 2

B30

TABLE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 1

~sidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weigllt pcf

Stabi]aneter Value

Cohes~ter Value

~silient MXJulus 103psi

2--day

final

40

30 C gt ffi20

~10 iii C ltII 0

500

l 400 C gt IC

~ 300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

11 10 0

0 8gt C

6

4

55 65 75 resign 60 24268 24286 24206

26358 25966 25592 80

200

020

530

t515

80

268

182

338

~

65

207

020

630

t515

t_92

233

169

308

24

bull 220 0 C

ze 20

= 0 18 -0 gt

16

156

154

u i152 ~ z 0

150 bull

148

54 72

21 7 204

020 020

730 580

1511 1515

90 235

193 250

145 175

250 320

500 o 400 - l 300 0

~ 200 zi 100 iii IC

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT -_ (AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B31 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replicationl

B31

TABLE B32 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication 2

Residue 0ntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

llleoretical Speipoundic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

-Absorled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabilcIIeter Value

Qlhesianeter Value 3Jesilient middotMgtdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

40

m30 lt gt cc20 w

w E

~10 ID lt 0

79

198

027

523

1518

203

243

201

354

~ soar-----------

w

400 lt gt a

~ 300 w E 0 ~ 200 8

100---I--~---------

12 -----------

111 10 C

0 8gt lt

6 --4

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT l (ACiCiFIECiATE BASIS)

FIGURE B32 Mixture

55 65 75 Lesign 6 0

24329 24246 24077

26401 26007 25632

68 61 73 208 22l 203

027 027 027 623 723 573

1513 1502 1515

165 110 185 215 205 225

168 184 185 340 272 345

24

22 C C

z i 20

= 0 0

18 gt

16

156

154

a

gt152 en z Ill 0 150

148

bull 500 Q

deg 0 400- =gt 300 0

~ 200 z l 100 w

-

0 4 5 6middot 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(ACiGFIEGATE BASIS)

Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CSS-0 Replication

B32

2

TABLE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 1

Eesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheore_tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VbullMA

lbsorbed_ Asphalt

Effective_ Asphalt

Qnit Weight pcf

~~ter Value

Q)hesianeter Value

Resiiient Mxlulus 10 3psi

2~y

Final

40

11130 C

a20 =

~10 C m

ltII 0

500

Ill

3 400 C

a ~ 300 w = 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

ll 10 ui E 0 8

c

6

4

I-

1-

55

23824

26318

95

215

014

536

1487

287

381

224

380

65 75

23896 23701 25928 25555 78 73

220 233

014 014 636 736

1491 1479 195 161

265 212

212 196

404 341

24

11 22d

c

z 20i

= ltII E 18 0

16

154

152- a

150 I-

Iesign 6 0

84

218

014

586

1490

240

320

215

395

z w Q

148

bull 146

500 a

c 400 ~ ui

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

l 300 Q

~ 200 zl 100 w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIOUla CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

FIGURE B33 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-a Replication 1

B33

- - ----- -

TABLE B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication 2

Rssidue Ogtntent

Bulk Secific Gravity

lhairetical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsoIbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabil~ter Value

Olhesiareter Value 3lesilient Mldulus 10 psi

2-day

Firal

40

m 30 lt gt a 20 w w

= ~ 10

m lt

0

- --- -middot -middot 500

w l 400 lt gt

Ea

300 0 ~ 200 8

100 12

1l 10 middot 0 gt 8

lt

6

4 4

FIGURE

55

23834

26371

96

214

022

528

1487

279

207

176

332

65

23784

25978

84

223

022

628

1484

208

270

185

336

75

23628

25604

77

236

022

728

1474

167

334

181

350

iesiqn 6 bull 0

90

21 8

022middot

578

1485

245

240

180

334

~

~

24

1l 22

0

lt i

20i

= 0 gt

18

16

152

150 - 148

~ 146

144

500

o-400 middot --- J 300 C

~ 200 z

middot ~ 100 en a

0 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

B34 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-0 Replication

B34

2

B35 Mixture Design Data GraniterockTABLE Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

Residue Content 55

Bwk Specific Gravity 24720

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26164

Air Voids 55

VMA 185

Absorbed Asphalt 001

Effective Asphalt 549

Unit Weight pcf 1543

StabilCampTeter value 293

Ohesiareter Value 174

Besilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day 69

Final 153

40

~ 30 _

c gt ffi 20 w I

Q 10

c 0

500

w 3 400 -

c gt a

~ 300 w I g bull ~ 200 8 ----r

100middot

10

8 -

~

Q

0 6gt a =c

4 ~ 2

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 DesiSE 60

2 4 720 24515

25767 25388

40 34 48

193 207 189 001 001 001 649 749 599

1543 1530 1543 205 97 250

156 283 170

46 22 55 72 so 110

24

~

22ci C c

i 20i

= Cl 180 gt

16

lSadeg

156

u -a

654 z 0 152

150

500 ii a

a 400 - 3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7

FIGURE B35 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 1

B35

12 r---------- 500bull _ 10

o 400 -middot 0 gt 5 C

8

tnl 300 Q

~ 200 z

6 ~ 100 ~ IU 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGCREGA TE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

TABLE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

55 65 75 resicn 6 0 Residue Content

Bulk siecific Gravity 24816 2 4721 24560

lheoretical Specific Gravity 26389 25983 25596

Air Voids 60 49 40 55

VMA 182 193 205 187

Absorlei Asphalt middot 035 035 035 035

Effective Asphalt 515 615 715 565

UUt Weight cf 1548 1543 1533 1545

Stabilaneter Value 298 193 130 250

Qlhesicmeter Value 188 I57 118 180 3

Resilient MJdulus 10 psi

soor-----------158

w l 400 Ishy 156 gt lt u

0a

w

300 w ~154E 0 z

w Q ~ 200 152

8 150100----middot-~-1-__c__~

2-day

Final

40

~ 30 J lt gt a 20 w

s 10 0

lt

0

92 43 27 65 186 79 46 135

24

22

~ =

ci lt 0

i 20~

18 0 gt

16

FIGURE B36 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality CMS-7 Replication 2

B36

Table B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

FJiuivalent ~sidue amtent 60 70 80 resign 70

Iesidue Ontent

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absomed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

lhit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value Ohesiareter Value

~ilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

Ill

50

40 A gt a w 30 w i 0 J

iii 201-

10

400

w3 300 gt a Ill t 200 i 0

8 ~iii ll 100 1-

0 12

lit 10 0 0 8gt a lt

6

4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630

21584

24451

117

210

140

460

1347

415

208

735

21570

24143

107

219

140

560

1346

488

61

840

21385

23848

103

233

140

660

1334

382

63

resign 7 35

107

219

140

560

1346

488

63

96

339 141

325

126

299 141 325

24

lit 22d

Cl

z 20i

= 0 180

gt

16

138

136 ltgt

i134 iii ~ z w 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 -

3

300 ------------- 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w o_____________a

9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT l (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B37 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B37

----

Table B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Pesidue omtent 60 70 80 Design 70

Pesidue omtent 630 735 8 40 Dsign 735

Bulk Specific Gravity 21710 21722 21714

lllroretical Specific Gravity 24298 23995 23705

Air Voids

VMA

lbsorted Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Chhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2--clay

Final

so

40 J w

gt a 30 w w 0 20 m

10 400

w 300 gt a w 200 w i 100 8

0

12

if 10 a

~0 8gt a lt

6

4

107

205

112

488

1355

395

llO

113

290

95

213

112

588

1356

398

62

122

271

84

22l

112

688

1355

318

70

138

282

24

22 c 0

20

0 180 gt

16

140

138 -a

136 _iii z bull --w 0 134

132

bull 500 a

o 400

m 300 J 0 bull ~ 200 z 100

w a

0

95

213

)12

588

1356

398

62

122

271

5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT J

(AGCilEGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B38 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B38

Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Table B39

Fquivalent ~idue COntent

~idue Cbntent

Bulk SJecific Gravity lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Oihesianeter Value

~ilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Fiial

so

w 40 lt gt cc 30 ~ w E

0 20 m lt 10

400

m POO lt gt a U 200 E 0 iii w c 100 8

0

12

- 10 vi Cl

0 gt ac

6

60 70 80

690 805 920

21790 21826 21910

24255 23977 23710

102 90 76

207 214 219

080 080 080

610 710 810

1360 1362 1367

437 400 289

219 229 202

141 158 184

333 282 273

24

~ 22ci

CJ lt z

20ii

= Cl 180

gt

16

----------

~ lo

140

138 Q l136 iii w Cl

134

132

500 Q

0 400 n3 300 Cl

~ 200 i-bull

100

z ~ 0 a

Cesign 70

Cesign 805

90

214

080

710

1362

400

229

158

282

-------

-

-~

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B39 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication l

B39

8

Table B40 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Eesidue cantent

Iesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhagtretical Speiliic Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Abro1plusmned Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilareter Value

OJhesianeter Value

EEsilient Mldulus l03psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 J lt gt a 30 w

w i

3 20 lt 0 10

400-----------

DI 3 300 lt gt a wti 200 i 0 w8100

0 -------l--l-1

12 ----------

- 10 ltn 0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

60 70 80 690 805 920

21986 21964- 21948

24499 2A212 23938

103 93 83

200 209 218

124 124 l24

476 576 676

1372 1371 1360

422 403 265

270 306 160

99 140 154

298 310 254

24

-22

ci lt

=i 20i

a 0 18 0 gt

16

140

138 - a

l136 z w 0 134

132

bull500

a

o 400 -

ltn =gt 300 -J a

~ 200 z 100 DI 0

0 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT Ii (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Dsign 70

Design 805

93

209

124

576

1371

403

306

140

310

9

Figure B40 Mixture Design Data High Quality SS-30

San Bernardino SEA Replication 2

B40

Table B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent lesidue ~tent

Ilesidue Omtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lbagtretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcpound

Stabilateter Value

CllhesiaIEter Value

Resilient MXlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w 40 i- _ gt 30a w I- ~ w 0 20 m I-CII 10

400

w l 300 gt a w lj 200 0 w 100 8

0

12

111 10 Q

0 8gt a ~

6

4

~

6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

65 75 85 Design 75 683 789 89J tesign 789

21624 21445 21375 24097 23802 23520

103 99 92 213 228 238 100 100 100 550 650 750

1349 1338 1334 423 295 285 70 174 82

150 139 138 318 310 2S4

24

22d i

20ii

= CII Q 180 gt

16

138

- 136

u

134I- z ~132

130

bull 500 o 400 _ l 300 1- Q

sectl 200 I-z ~ 100 CII w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

99

228

100

650

1338

295

174

139

310

5

Figure B41 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B41

Table B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent PesidJJe Content

Residue Omtent

Bulk Specific GIavity

lheoretical Specific GIavity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit weight pcpound

Stabiloreter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Resilient Mxulus 103psi

SC

w 40 gt a 30 w w i 0 J 20

10

400

w 3 300 gt a w t 200 i

9 ltI)

w = 1008

0

12

11 10 u a 0 8gt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

~

5 6 7 8 flESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGflEGATE BASIS)

65 75 85

683 788 89J 21424 21394 21455

24147 23851 23567

ll3 103 90

22l 229 234

l09 l09 l09

541 641 741

133 7 1335 1339

412 328 280

129 103 81

167 141 162

325 260 280

24

22ci 0 201

= 0 gt

18

16

i-

138

136 Q i134 _ 0 z w bull0 132

130

soor----------- D C

o 400

ltn3 300 a ~ 200 z 100 (I)

w

-

~

a 0------------ 5 6 7 8 9

flESIOUE CONTENT I

(AGGflEGA TE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 7 86

103

229

l09

641

1335

328

103

141

260

9

Figure B42 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B42

Table B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent Residue Omtent

Residue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllagtreticalSpecilicGravity

Air Voids

VMA

AbsorlJed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcpound

Stabilcrreter value

Cllhesianeter value

lelilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

400-----------

Illl 300 lt gt a w t 200 lo 0 w 8100

0 ________ ___ __

12 ----------

~ 10 0

~ 8 bull a c

6

4 -_______ ___ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS

65 75 85 748 863 978 21752 21661 21638 24136 23863 23602 99 92 83

213 225 234 081 081 081 569 669 769

1357 1352 1350 466 367 235

224 266 138

220 189 209 478 337 281

Ilsign 75

Design 863

92

225

081

669 1352

367

266

189

337

24 ----------

~

220 Cl lt ii 20

0 18 0

gt

16 ----------------14or-----------

138 -0 a 136 z w Q

134

132

= c 400 - l 300 Q

~ 200 f-middot z 100 w a o----------

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

_____________J

Figure B43 Mixture Design Data San Bernardinor Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B43

Table B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Iesidue Cbntent 65 75 85 Design 75

lesidue Omtent 748 86~ resign~Zl 863

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asjtlalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

lesilient Mxlulus 103psi

2-day

Final

so

w gt 0 30 IE 0 20 iii lt

10

400

3 300 lt gt 0 w l 200 IE 0 X w

100 8

0

12

- 10 en 0 0 8gt

6

4

~ 40 bull

~ 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

21676

23998

97

208

055

595

1353

409

248

189

308

24

22

ci c lt i

20ii

= 0 0

18 gt

16

21711 21641

23729 23472

85 78 85

223 234 223

055 oss 055

695 795 695

1355 135l 1355

283 227 283

187 186 187

198 177 198

255 285 255

140

138 a

136 - z 0 134 --

132

500 a

o 400 -

vi3 300 - 0

sectj 200 z ~ 100

0 0 5 6 middot 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B44 Mixture Design Data San Bernardino~ Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B44

Table B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent Jesidue Content 60 70 80 Design 70

tesidue Content

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

trut Weight pcpound

Stabilcineter Value

Cbhesiateter Value

tesilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

IU 40 _ C gt 30a IU IU = middoto 20 m C (I) 10

400

IU

300 C gt a IU

ti 200 = 0 ~ IU c 100 8

0

12

10 ai 0 8gt C

6

4

~

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT - (AGGREGATE BASIS)

630 735 840 Design 7 35

21651 21581 21592

24033 23739 23457

99 91 80 91 180 190 198 190

399 499 599 499 135l 1347 134 7 1347

309 439 358 439

150 236 202 236

140 171 148 171 294 390 367 390

24

bull 22

Cl Cl C

i 20i

= (I) Q 180

gt

16 140

138 0 a

i136 z IU

134 bull bull

Q

132

500 D

c 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 IU a

0 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B45 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B45

Table B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Cbntent 60 70 80 Design 70 Residue Cbntent 6JO Z35 EdQ Jesign 7 35

Bulk Spcific Gravity 21413 21627 21711 lhroretical Specific Gravity 24321 24017 23726 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilcneter Value

Ohesianeter Value

llesilient Mgtdulus 10 3psi

2-day

Final

so

Ill 40 I lt gt 0 30 w Ill i 0 20 Cl lt

10

400

111

l 300 lt gt 0 w lj 200 i

~ w = 1008 -----___

0

12

II- 10 a 0 8gt lt

6

4

120

189

249

351

1336

407

79

147

361

24

II-22

ci

lt ~ 20i

= 0

0 18

gt

16

138

136 u C

l134 w 132

130

bull 500

C

o 400 ~

---------_J 300 0

~ 200

~ 100 Ill 0

0

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

85

193

249

551

1355

360

64

175

305

99

189

249

451

1350

396

76

165

340

5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT 1

9 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE COIHENT f

9

(AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B46 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B46

---------

Table B4 7 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Bulk Specific Gravity

lhalretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlled Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilaieter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

llesilient MJdulus 103psi

2-clay

Final

50

40w lt(

gt IC 30 w w

0 20 iii lt( ltI)

10

400

w 3 300 ~ lt(

gt IC w t 200 0 iii 111 i 100 8

0 ___ _______ __ _ __

12 ----------

Fquivalent Pesidue Content 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Pesidue Qlntent 690 805 92Q Dcsign 805

21958 22006

24182 23909

92 88 92

18l 188 18l 256 256 256

444 544 444

1370 1373 1370

342 291 342

78 73 78

184 167 184

303 298 303

10 0

0 8gt IC

c 6

4 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B47 Mixture

21880

24453

105

176

256

344

1365

443

58

174

381

24

22ci

5 20

= 0

0 18

gt

16

~ I I

138

136 ~ ~134 bull z 111 0 132

130

bull 500

o 400 3 300 - Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 ltI) 111 IC

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT lo (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B47

Table B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

El_uivalent Residue Cbntait 60 70 80 Iesign 70

Residue Cbntent 690 aQi 2 2Q Dsign 805 Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Olhesiateter Value

Resilient Mldulus middot103psi

2-day

Final

21816

24403

106

178

244

356

1361

482

136

183

393

21806

24120

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

21996

23849

78

189

244

556

1373

314

106

260

361

96

187

244

456

1361

411

130

187

374

24so

w 40 22 ci 0 gt a 30 ~ 20w w = 20 ishy C 18iii 0 gt Ill 10 _ ___ ____________

16 400------------

140

w l 300 138 gt 0

Qa w

636t 200 z0 w --------_ Qw 134c 100 8

0 ___ _____________ 132

bull50012 -----------

a

1 400 -_ 10

ltti ltti l 300 -C 0 C8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 l 100 w a

04 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT S RESIDUE CONTENT S (AGGREGATE BASIS (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B48 Mixture Design Data Fresno High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B48

Table B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

EquivaJent Residue antent 65 75 85 Design 75 Residue Content 63J z aa a 23 resign 7 88 Bulk Specific Gravity 21404 21439 21381 lheoretical Specific Gravity 23563 23286 Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cohesianeter Value

~ient 1bdul11S 103psi

2~y

Firal

50

w 40 gt a 30 w w 0 20 iii lt 10

400

3 300 w

gt a w t 200 0 in i w

100 8

0 12

10 0 Q

0 8gt a c

6

4 5 6

23020 92 79 71 79

193 199 209 199 140 140 140 140 510 610 710 610

1336 1338 1334 1338 424 397 308 397 79 308 266 308

173 185 196 185 330 319 285 319

24

22ci c lt

~ 20c Q 180

gt

16

138

136 u -Cl

~134 in ~z w 132

130

soar----------- Qbull

o 400

middot3 300 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a Q___________ ___ __

7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT deg RESIDUE COIITENT deg (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B49 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B49

Table BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Fquivalent lesidue Content

Besidlle 0-ntent

Bulk Specific Gravity

Illeoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pf

Stabilcmeter Value

ltbhesiaieter Value

Besilient Mxlulus 103psi

2--day

Final

50

~ 40 I lt gt 30 w 0 20 01 lt 10

400

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 w r lOO 8

o 12

10 ai ~ 0 8gt a lt

6

~

4 5 6 7 8

IIESIOUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

9

65 75 85 683 788 893 21527 21362 21337

24013 23721 23441 104 99 90

188 202 211

225 225 225

425 525 625

1343 1333 1332

410 418 290

261 62 100

188 197 211

334 348 331

24

22 ~ ci c lt

20 f 18 0 gt

16

138

136 0 a

134 z w 0 132

130

500 a

o 400

ai bull 300 I bull C

~ 200 z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

IIESIDUE CONTENT I

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 75

Design 788

99

202

225

525

1333

418

62

197

348

Figure BSO Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

BSO

Table B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno

Fquivalent Residue Clintent

Residue 0rrtent

Bulk Specific Gravity

lheoretical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorlei Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

thlit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter value

Ohesiaretel value 3lelilient MJdulus 10 psi

2-day

Final

50

w

40

c gt a 30 w w = g 20 iii c Ill 10

400----------

middota

l 300 bull c gt a w t 200 = 0 w c 100 8

0 _______ ____ _

12 ------------

_ 10 ~ 8 c

6

4 _________ __

5 6 7 8 9 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B51 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B51

Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

65 75 85 748 863 978

21728

24022

96

186

200

450

1356

436 100

199

376

24

11 22

c c c

z 20ii

Ill0 180

gt

16

Design 75

Design 863

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21716

23753

86

195

200

550

1355

392 260

212

362

21673

23495

78

205

200

650

1353

378 201

230

3l7

~

140

138 Q j136 bull --_ z w 0134

132

500 Q

o 400 bull -l 300 ~ 0 ~ 200 I-z ~ 100 w a

0 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Table B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent lesidue OJntent 65 75 85 Design 75 Pesidue Ointent 748 863 978 Design 863 Bulk Specific Gravity 21595 21708 21637 ~retical Specific Gravity 23977 23708 23452 Air Voids 99 84 77 84 VMA 19l 195 206 195 Absorbed Asphalt l92 l92 l92 l92 Effective Asphalt 458 558 658 558 Unit Weight pf 1347 1354 1350 1354 Stabilareter Value 502 262 239 262 Cllhesianeter Value 257 136 154 136 Pesilient MJdulus 103psi

2--day 217 201 228 201 Final 371 307 290 307

2450

w 40 22 0 0lt ltgt ia 30

bull 20i

= 0 20 18iii 0lt gt 10

16 400

~

~

140

w 3 300 -ltgt

138 lt gt

aa w t 200 deg136 z0 w 0

134 w

100 8

1320

12 500 a

0 400 10

3 300 C 0 Q8gt ~ 200 lt z

6 100 w a

4 0 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9

RESIDUE CONTENT ~ RESIDUE CONTENT ~ (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B52 Mixture Design Data Fresno Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B52

Table B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

Fquivalent ~sidue Cbntent 45 55 65 Design 55 ~idue Cbntent 473 578 6~~ Design 5 78 Bulk Specific Gravity 24210 24403 24473 llleoretical Specific Gravity 26934 26528 26142 Air Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Unit Weight pcf

StabiJaneter Value

Cbhesiareter Value

Iesilient M)dulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

w _ 40 C gt II 30w w 0 20 iii C ~

10

400

w l 300 C gt II

iiw

200

~ w --------r 100 8

0 12

ot 10 -0

0 8gt II c

6

4

101 80 64 80 199 20l 206 20l

022 022 022 022 423 523 623 523

151l 1523 1527 1523 308 288 197 288

ll7 ll2 140 112

95 llO 122 llO 306 272 214 272

24

ci 22

C

i -~20Es = E 18 0

gt

16

156

154 - gt152 iii z ~ w 0

150

148

bull 500

o 400 Inl 300 0

~ 200 z ~ 100 w II

0

--~

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT r (AGGREGATE BASIS)

4 5 6 7 8 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B53 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B53

Table B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Residue Glntent 45 ss 65 Jesign 55 Residue Omtent 47 5 ZB 6 83 resign ~za Bulk Specific Gravity 24197 24253 24435 lheoretical Specific Gravity 26843 26441 26058 Air Voids 99 83 62 83 VMA 199 206 208 206 Absorbed Asphalt 09 09 09 09 Effective Asphalt 441 541 641 541 lklit Weight P=f 1510 1513 152S 1513 StabLkmter Value 38l 307 204 307 CJgthesianeter Value 73 85 149 85 Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

2-day 170 159 142 159 Final 333 367 193 367

so

w 40 J lt gt 0 30w w le 0 20J

CJ lt 10

24

It

22ci 0 lt i -------20 = 18 0 gt

16 400

____

~

156

w 3 300 154 lt gt - a0 w gt 152l 200 le __-0 z w w c 150 8100

148 0

12 500

D C

o 400 r- 10 -u 300

J 0 9

8 Cgt ~ ~ 200 z

6 ~ 100

w 0

4 0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT RESIDUE COIITEIIT (AGGREGATE BASIS) (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B54 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B54

----------

Table B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Rep~ication 1

Equivalent Residue Contentmiddot

Residue Ontent

Bulk Spcific Gravity

~tical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

tklit Weight pcpound

Stabilaneter value

Cbhesiaieter Value

Resilient -bdulus 103psi

2-day

Final

45 55 65

518 633 748

24695 24765 24666

26898 26520 26160

82 66 57

187 193 205

001 001 001

449 549 649

154l 1545 1539

41l 310 24l

159 157 165

183 178 193

371 318 250

50

w 40 c gt a 30 w-w == 0 20 ~ 10

400------------

~ 300 lt(

gt a

t 200 == 0 in bullw 8100

0 __ ________ ___ ___

12 ----------

t 10 rti C

~ 8 a c

6

4 s 6 7

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASISI

4

24

Ill 22

0 c c

ze 20

II)

C 18 0

gt

16

158

156- 154 Ill z w 0 152

150

500 iii

8 4

~

0 400-

i300-~ g 200 1-z l 100 iii a 0 __ _______ ____

5 6 7 RESIDUE COHTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Design 55

Design 633

66

193

001

549

1545

310

157

178

318

___

8

Figure B55 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

BSS

Table B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality

Equivalent Rsidue Content 45

Rsidue Cbntent 518

Bulk Specific Gravity

lllooretical specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

lbsoibed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

unit Weight pcf

Stabilareter Value

Cohesicmeter Value 3

Iesilient Mldwus 10 psi

2--day

Final

400-----------

w l 300 lt gt a w l 200 I 0 ltII w8100

olt----__1__--1_---1

12 ----------

10 u

0 8gt a lt

6

4 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

24594

27024

90

190

019

431

1535

450

198

191

360

24

Ill 22

0 C

lt i

20i ~ ltII C 18 C gt

16

158

156 0

i54 iii z ILi

J52

150

SS-30 SEA

55 65

63J 7 ~a 24844

26641

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

24856

26276

54

199

019

631

155l

234

225

166

259

_________

~

500----------- 0

dego 400 -

~300~~ C

~ 200 z i 100

w a

0 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COIITEHT l

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Replication 2

Design 55

Lesign 633

67

190

019

531

1550

324

212

173

308

Figure B56 Mixture Design Data Graniterock High Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B56

---------

Table B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality

ElIuivaJent lesidue Omtent

lesidue Cbntent

Bulk Spacific Gravity

~retical Specific Gravity

Air Voids

VMA

Absorbed Asphalt

Effective Asphalt

Uut Weight pcf

Stabilaneter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

lesilient Mldulus 103psi

so

w 40 lt gt a 30 w w ~ 20 m lt II)

10

400

w 3 300 lt gt a w lj 200 0 w z 1008

0 12

Ill 10 Q

0 8gt lt

6

4

2-day

Final

~

4 5 6 7 8 RESIDUE CONTENT (AGGREGATE BASIS)

so 530

24024

26676

99

207

031

469

1499

354

138

183

352

SS-15 SEA Replication 1

60 70 Design 60 636 7 42 Design 636

24040 23986 26279 25901 85 74

214 223

031 031 569 669

1500 1497 223 149

222 126

159 160 302 234

24

Ill

c 22 ~ c

lt i

20i1

== (II C 180 gt

16

152

150 u -a

648 z w Q

146 1-

144

bull 500 a

o 400 - 3 300 C

~ 200 z ~ 100 (II w a

~ 0

4 5 6 7 RESIDUE COIITENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

85

214

031

569

1500

223 222

159

302

8

Figure B57 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 1

B57

Table B58 Mixture Design Data Low Quality SS-15

Fquivalent Residue Content 60 60

Rsidue Cbntent 525 630

23944

~retical Specific Gravity

Bulk Sjecific Gravity 26592

Air Voids 100

209VMA

1bsocbed Asphalt 015

Effective Aspbalt 485

Unit Weight pcf 1494

Stabilareter Value 377

Olhesiaeter Value 151

Resilient Mgtdulus 103psi

162

375 2-day

Final

so

w 40 _ gt c 30 w w i

~20 m I-0

10

400

Ill

300 gt w I 200 i 2 w i 100 8

_________ 0 --middotmiddot-

12-------bull------

ti 10 9 0 8gt

6

4

24

- 22ci

0

20i

= 9 18 0 gt

16

152

150 u a

148 z---- w0146

144

500 Q

o 400 _ 300 Q

~ 200 I-z ~ 100

w a

23988

26022

84

215

015

585

1497

307

180

165

356

Graniterock SEA Replication 2

70

735 23793

25830

79

229

015

685

1485

217

170

169

277

~

~

0 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7

RESIOUE CONTENT li RESIDUE COPlTENT li (AGGREGATE 8ASIS) (AGGREGATE 8ASIS)

Design 60

resign 630

84

215

585

1497

307

180

165

356

8

Figure B58 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-15 SEA Replication 2

B58

Table B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

Equivalent esidue omtent 5 0 60 70 Design 60

esidue Cbntent 5 75 690 805 Dsign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity 24389 24362 24419

Jheo=eticaJ Specific Gravity 2 6670 26303 25953

Air Voids 8 6 74 59 7 4

VMA 198 207 214 20 7

Absorbed Asphalt 009 009 009 009

Effective Asphalt 491 591 691 591

Unit Weight pcf 1522 1520 1524 1520

Stabilareter Value 38l 292 220 292

Cbhesiclneter Value 263 186 176 186

~t Mldulus 103psi

2-day 222 222 207 222

Fulal 380 289 293 289

5

w 40 C gt a 30 Ill ~ 20 m C 1- 10

24 ----------

22 bull C Cl C

zi 20

C1 o 18 0 gt

16 ___-________-------i-_-

400---------- 15a------------

156l 300 C gt - a =deg 154ti 200

iii z0 IUiii 0 152 bull bull~ 10018

150 ___ _______ __J0 ---i--J~-L--1

500----------12 ----------- bull o 400 -

Ill 10 ui l 300 -Q

Qg 8 g 200a lt z 6 l 100

iii a

01--J-----__ __4 -------r------- 4 5 6 7 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE CONTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

RESIDUE COrlTENT I (AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B59 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 1

B59

Table B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

Equivalent Fesidue Content 50 60 70 Design 60

Eeidue omtent 575 690 805 D=sign 690

Bulk Specific Gravity

llleo~tical Specific Gravity

1lir Voids

VMA

Absocbed Asralt

Effective Asphalt

Ulit Weight pcf

Stabilcmeter Value

Cbhesianeter Value

Eeilient Mldulus 103psi

2-day

Final

50

Ill 40 J

lt gt a 30 w I-w 0 20 Ill lt I-

10

400

w 300 lt gt a w l 200 0 Id

8100

0 12

10 m Q

0 8gt 5 lt

6

4 4 5 6 7

~

RESIDUE CONTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASISI

24371 24441 24445

26744 26373 26020

89 73 61 73

199 205 213 205

019 019 019 019

481 581 681 581

1521 1525 1525 1525

335 236 191 236

220 164 180 164

194 199 191 199

388 329 294 329

24

22

ci 0 lt i

20i

= a

= 18 0 gt

16

158

156 u a

deg154 = w Q

152 ---------150

500 a

1 400 m3 300 1 Q

~ 200 z ~ 100

Ill a

0 8 4 5 6 7 8

RESIDUE COHTENT $

(AGGREGATE BASIS)

Figure B60 Mixture Design Data Graniterock Low Quality SS-30 SEA Replication 2

B60

APPENDIX C

DATA ANALYSIS SOLVENT FREE AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

Table Cl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL e_AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

95 85 80

867

76

88

90 85 85

867

29

33

95 85 85

883

58

65

85 70 80

783

76

98

100 100 100

1000

00

00

100 100 100

1000

00

00

C M s 0

D A T A x s

CV

80 80 80

800

00

oo

80 75 75

767

29

38

75 80 70

750

50

67

70 80 75

750

50

67

90 90

100

933

58

62

95 100

95

967

29

30

C M s 1

D A T A

X s

CV

80 75 70

750

50

67

60 70 55

617

76

124

70 70 65

683

-2 9

42

65 70 60

650

50

77

65 70 70

683

29

42

70 60 65

650

50

77

Table C2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

F01

E 2 ll877 7777778 243aassese9 1)75102041 329 532 ~ middot2 1ll77777777~ 73RBSeSf89 32571~2-~5 3~ 29 532 J 1 150 ooocooo 150JOJOOOO 5f122llll9 414 746

EA ll 8114 llllll11444 2111111111 3J51224 266 396 -E~ middot2- 1-0frOOfr~ 0-9 middot50-middot000 3 oco middot2middot20110816 middot 329 532 Agt 2 77 7777778 38 8815589 17142857 329 532 nJ 4 1555555~55 388881889 171112857 266 396

FR RmiddotJR 36 8166666567 225851B52

------------------------------------------------middot---------------------ronmiddotL 53 -esoo--000000r

Cl

100

P

c5 75 z-t-lt8 50 w t-lt bull css-oC

CMS-0w 25a C middot+ CMS-7 C lt

0-----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl Mean AggregateCqqting at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 867 css-o 883 CSS-0 783 css-o 1000 css-o 1000middotcss-o middot I I CMS-0 800 CMS-0 7~ 7 CMS-0 750 CMS-0 933 CMS-0 967lrMS-0 750

I CMS-7 750 CMS-7 617 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 65 0 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

C2

Table C3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

C s s 0

D A T A

5

0

10

5

5

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

75

35

47l

25

35

1414

C M s 0

D A T A

0

5

5

7

0

0

X s

CV

25

35

1414

60

14

236

00

oo oo

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0

0

5

0

0

X s

CV

00 OQ 00

25 35

1414

00 00

oo

Table C4 ANOVA Summary Film Stripping

AN-OVA

middotmiddotDPmiddot -ss- F middotFe5

E 2 33 7777778 1euro8888889 23555191 426 802 A 2 -ti8 7777778 343888889 4 7984496 426 802

E X II 4 9 2222226 23055557 3217054 363 642 ERROI 9 645000000 71666667 ---------------TOTAL 17 1762777782

C3

fl w 0 lti 1L a =gt en C w C C-a I-en

40

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-730

20

10

0 SB F GR

Figure C3 Film Stripping

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

css-o 25 css-o 75 css-o 25

GMS-0 25 CMS-0 60 CMS-0 oo

CMS-7 oo CMS-7 25 CMS-7 oo

----middot----middot-middotmiddotmiddot

Nlte Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

C4

Table CS 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue

Content 10 3 psi

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW D

118 170A 217 205 160 175

C T 83 190 191 182 130 185A s )ts 101 180 204 194 145 180

0 s 25 14 18 16 21 7

CV 246 79 90 84 146 39 D 104 185 155A 190 140 215

C T 82 155 154 171 130 180A M x 93s 170 155 181 135 198

s 16 21 1 13 7 250 CV 167 125 05 74 52 125

D A ab 55 35 73 38 55

C T

82A 48 63 77 45 65 M X s pound81 -- - 52 49 75 42 60 s7 l 5 20 3 5 7

CV 18 96 404 38 11 9 11 8

Table C6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

A N ) V l

-D-F -SS

E 2 832263888888 _ 2-- -5441-- 722-2222-J 1 89933611111

E~ 4 5386 7777779 -1J- 2- -3-8-1-+-rG-55--5-5-5 7- bull AJ 2 144235~899 EA 4 58024444443

ERROR 113- 3951500 00~-J

---------------------------------------------------------------------TOT-W- -3-5 -11806-4---638 881gt-9-

(116131944444 2720-8611111 89933611111 13466944445 1-9Q lh-5--amp7--+7-8-7211944445

14506111111 219 527-7778

1895577629 -12 394-1541-409569480

61345059 S-~937872 32952081 56gt7870Ll

357 3-S7 443 295

-]y5+ 3S7 295

605 6 05--833 461

-6--05-605 461

cs

bull css-omiddot 300 C CMS-0

M 0 diams CMS-7

(J

3200 gt C 0 E 1-

ffi 100

01----------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure CS 2 Day ResiLient Modulus

SAN middotBERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 101 css-o 180 rss-o 204 css-0_194 CSS-0 145 CMS-0 198

CMS-0 93 CMS-0 170 ICMS-0 155 CMS-0 181 CMS-0 135 css-o 180l l l I I CMS-7 81 CMS-7 52 CMS-7 49 CMS-7 75 CMS-7 42 CMS-7 60

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C6 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking 2 Day

Resilient Modulus 10 3 psi

C6

Table C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Content 10 psi

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A (

s

CV

260

232

246

20

80

320

280

300

28

94

482

299

391

129

33l

365

358

362

5

l4

280

240

260 28

109

320

345

333

18

53

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

267

250

259

12

47

295

280

288

ll

37

253

288

271

25

92

290

387

339

69

203

260

307

284

33

11 7

395

334

365

43

118

C M s 7

D A T A

X

s

CV

78

64

71-

10

139

110

95

103

ll

104

75

73

74

l

19

110

135

123

18

144

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

123

18

144

middotTable C8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

-~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------F-r05- ---F-01--

E

J El -E- Al EAJ

-ERRJR

2 2-1 4 -~ 2 4

18

3592750555555 -14506 722-2221-171610COOOOJ 147394444445

1---1-1----lf466-li-+ 19215000000 55353333333

2850GOOC0000

17-16375277778 72~336H-1-11

1716100)0000 36848611111 sect8~5833---3-33--9607500000

13840833333 ~ 58-3 33-33 333

11315528C7 -45810702

109385263 23272807 ~U981l-2-1-6067895 3741579

357 -3 r7 443 2 95 3~7-357 295

605 605 833 461 605 605 4 6 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------~- 3-5- -448+1----2-222-2-

C7

bull css-o500

CMS-0 U) diams CMS-7C

C) 400 middoto -

~ 300

J Ci 200

1-z 100 J-UJ UIa

01-------------------------~---~-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

eMS-0 259 ess-a 300 ess-a 391 ess-a 362 eMS-0 284 CMS-0 365

ess-o 246l l l l l ICMS-0 288 eMS-0 271 CMS-0 339 ess-o 260 ess-o 333

CMS-7 71 CMS-7 103 CMS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-ote Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ca Newrnan-Keuls Ranking Full Cure 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

ca

Table C9 Density at Design Residue Content pcpound

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

1359

1372

1366

09

07

1365

1365

1365

0

0

1365

1352

1359

09

07

1345

1345

1345

0

0

1520

1525

1523

04

02

1515

1515

1515

0

0

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1348

1343

1346

04

03

1330

1338

1334

06

04

1329

1340

1335

08

06

1335

1316

1326

- 13

10

1505

1490

1498

11

07

1490

1485

1488

04

02

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

1373 1385

1379

09 06

1375 137 5

1375

0 0

1380

1379

1380

01 01

1370

1360

1365

07 05

1537

1535

1536

01 01

1543

1545

1544

01 01

Table ClO ANOVA Surtunary Density

A II O V ~

-SS F bull O1

E _ 0

2 i

lCB4155555 Z08-tOS389

II 311277~

54207777R 1 ouos2sirrs

4340277

135q23660 -25lS 7i80R63-

1087331173

3S7 3 ~7 443

i()5 605 83

EA Q

4 -2

1599U4U5 _iuseeg

399E11 -3-3UUL45-

10J17398 bull~3785-C7

295 -~S7-

4 f 1 -6CS

A) 2 13772222 o6886111 17251218 357 605 EAJ q 2C361111 5090278 12752262 295 4 61

-ERRJR- 13- 718-()001 399166-7-

35

C9

bull css-o160 CMS-0 diams CMS-7

150

() -a gt 140 -en z w

middotC 13

1201~bull-------------r---------------SBH SBL FH FL ~RH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C9 - Density at Design Residue Content

SAN middotBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 138o CMS-7 1365ICMS-7 1375 CMS-7 1544

css-o 1366

I-7 bull rMS-7 1536

css-o 1365 css-o 1359 css-o 1345 css-o 1523 CSS-0 j515

CMS-0 1346 CMS-0 1334 CMS-0 1335 CMS-0 132 6 CMS-0 1498 CMS-0 1488

Nte Values with a ccmnm vertical line are not statistically different

Figure ClO Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcpound

ClO

Table Cll Air Voids at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D 87 7 0-A 75 77 80 72

C T 71 70 92 82 78 73A s )s 79 70 84 80 79 73

0 s ll 0 12 04 01 01

CV 143 0 144 45 18 10 D 97 93A 93 91 82 84

C T 90 92 A

91 93 87 90

M x 94 93 92 s 92 84 87 s os 01 01 _0l 04 04

0 53 08 15 15 42 49CV D A 77 62 73 62 71 48

C T 73 61 62 71 65A 55

M X s 75 62 68 67 68 52 s 03 01 08 06 04 057

CV 38 12 115 96 62 96

Table Cl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A I O Y 11

-DF ss -F 05 F01

E 2 382650000 191325000 69)150301 3~7 605 -A 2 -2-681667 1340334 ll03567311 -3- 57 605

Q 1 2f677778 26677778 952324f6 4 13 I 33 EA lj 13S33333 3313333 122011409 2 95 Ii 61 ti -2 l8105555- -905-277-8- 326553tO 357 tiOS II) 2 6572221 3296111 11953707 357 605 E~l 4 88411445 2211111 797552 795 4 f 1 ERElll 111 11991)0)00 bull2172222-

-------------------------~------------------------------------------rou1 s SJ 3100000-

Cll

11

10

iP- en 0-0 gt aa

9

8

7

6

5

4

bull css-o CMS-o diams CMS~7

SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

F-igure Cll Air Voids at middotoesign Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 94 CMS-0 93 CMS-0 92 ICMS-0 92 CMS-0 84 ICMS-0 87

IIcss-o 79 css-o 7 0 I II

css-o 79 css-o 73

I ~_ I~ CMS-7 7 5 CMS-7 62 CMS-7 68 CMS-7 48 - - bull-- ~ -----~middot-middotmiddot--middot-middotmiddot-middot ---middotmiddot

~= Values with a OCIlOn vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Cl2

Table Cl3 Stabilorneter Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

272

3113

293 29

99

270

265

268 04

13

393

327

360 47

130

380

325

353 39

110

270

270

270 0

0

235

185

210 35

168

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

375

344

360

22

61

340

350

345

07

21

307

377

342

50

145

415

367

39l

33

85

350

300

3-2 5

35

109

240

245

243

04

15

C M s 7

D A T A

x s

CV

235

23-5

235

0

0

130

120

125

07

57

213

233

-223

14

63

150

200

175

35

202

350

350

350

0

0

250

250

25 o_ 0

0

Table Cl4~ ANOVA Summary Stabilorneter Value

A N O V 1

soua= SS r 01

E 2 2

7086172721 9702C93fl9

3543086361 4SS10Uf95

505343236 ~-9189501

357 357

605 605

) 1 175 6950250 1756950250 25053)2i8 443 833 EA 4 6718347112 167 9586 778 23955053 2 95 461 ~ ~544 -4 Q-432-ll-25-0- --S--~ 38 ~5-19- -3 5- ios AJ 2 941227166 47(1euro13583 57122663 357 605 EAJ 4 289779333 72319A33 10314831 2 95 II f 1

Ell ngtR -18 1r2024gt0) -i- bull112472-

---------------------------------------------------------------------0-T- ----5- 4-9B1 is~v~

Cl3

50

w 40 I ltgt a 30w I-w ~ 200 I-m lt 10I-u

0 SSH SBL FH FL GRH

AGGREGATE

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

GRL

Figure Cl3 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 350 CMS-7 250ICMS-0 360 ICMS-0 345 r=ss-o 36o rMS-0 39l

css-o 268 CMS-0 342 css-o 353 CMS-0 325 CMS-0 243Icsbull-bull _ CMS-7 235 CMS-7 12S CMS-7 223 CMS-7 175 css-o 270 css-o 210

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Cl4

Table Cl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOWHIGH LOW LOWHIGH D 360193 280 465 275 250A T 234 345 183 375 160 225C A

s x 214 353 232 420 218 238s s 29 11 69 64 18810

136 30 296 152 37 4 74CV D 280 440 230 355 200 320 T A

252 430 219 450 140 240C A M x 266 435 225 403 170 280s s 20 7 67 428 570

74 16 16735 250 202CV D

80 190 122 245 130 170 T A

82 180 192 235 120 180C A M X 81 185 157 240 125 175s s l 7 so 7 777

CV 18 3038 31 5 57 40

Table Cl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

-SS--

pound 2 1309717272222 654858611111 1102309084 357 605 __ 2 3Ber61222222 194033611--111 -1-1t2J3570 -3 57 605 J 1 12)524904445 120524f94111145 711)1137379 1143 l 33

EA 4 2311~U411111145 57795111111 355~57119 295 4 ~ 1

~ + --8-066---H~i-i--2 ---4-B3-a~--H ~T4-=7-7S~J -3 S7 605 1J 2 111206 7222222 71033511111 ll3~31111 3 57 605 EAJ 4 500gt1111111 12512777778 7587162 235 4 (- 1

RAO- -18 -999 500-000( -1-6--2-7 -75-00000-

--------------------------------------------------------------------tO+--l- el-i- 3-fi-99g6-3-R-~

Cl5

bull css-o500

Q1__________---___-----~

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure ClS CohesiometerValue at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

css-o 232rMS-0 435 CMS-0 280rMS-0 266 rss-o 420 tss-o 218

css-o 214 css-o 353 CMS-0 225 CMS-0 403 css-o 238ICMS-0 170

CMS-7 81 CMS-7 185 CMS-7 157 CMS-7 240 CMS-7 125 CMS-7 175

Nrte Values with a oamon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Cl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

~400 -I ltgt cc 300 w 1-w E 2000 -() w c 1008

CMS-0 diams CMS-7

Cl6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Table Cl7 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

0 0000 0003 0000 0008 0000 0000A C T 0000 0005 0000 0007 0000 0002

A 0000 0004 0000 0009 0000 0000 s j( 00000 00040 00000 00080s 00000 00007

0 s 00000 00010 00000 0 0010 00000 00012

CV 00 250 00 125 00 1732 D 0000 _o 045 0020 0036 0000 0000A 0006 0029 0018 0040 0001 0000TC A 0007 0040 0022 0039 0000 0000

M x 00043 00380 00200 00383 00003 00000 s s 00038 00082 00020 00021 00006 00000 0

874 215CV 100 54 1732 oo

D 0000 0004 0000 0003 0000 0000A T 0000 0002 0000 0000 0000 0000

C A 0000 0001 0000 0000 0000 0000

M x 00000 OQ023s 00000 00010 00000 00000 s 00000 00015 00000 00017 00000 00000

7 oo 655 1732CV 00 00 oo

Table Cl8 ANOVA Summary Swell

P N O V ~

SOUR-middotEmiddot l)f -ss- -lSmiddot F rs FM

-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------E 2 C031905 )015953 7576385211 329 532 J 2 0012203 OOOf112 2~97R1n75 329 532 l 000858(1 )()QSf80 11122112111111 414 846

H LI 0016535 00)111311 1963258575 266 396 Emiddot) middot2middot 00079 51- a0ll397S 1eg ~16527 329 532 AJ 2 00011958 )0021179 111 ns1ne 329 532 EAJ II 0006609 OC01652 7e117l97t3 266 396

EDl 36 )000751 OOOJ021

TOBImiddot middot53middot ----008959-9-middot

Cl7

05

04

z 03

-I -I w

u 3 02

01

0 SBH SBL FH

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FL GRH GRL AGGREGATE

FigureCl Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 00003 css-o 00007CMS-0 00043 CMS-0 -0380 CMS-0 00200 CMS-0 00303

CMS-0 00000css-o 00080 css-o 00000Icss-o 00000 Icss-o 00040 ICSS-0 00000

CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00000CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00023 CMS-7 00000 CMS-7 00010

Rte Values with ~--~~~ ~~ lb-le are not ~tatistically different

Figure Cl8 Newman-Keuls Ranking swell in

Cl8

Table Cl9o MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

GRANITEROCKFRESNOSAN BERNARDINO

LOW LOWHIGH HIGH LOW HIGH D

124 72198 137 287 243A 227 90145 178 83 260TC 57197 135 252 270A

s 207 104 258 73139 239s s 17 05 56 29 14 17

0 CV 82 280 82638 233 53

D 197 160145 145 90 205A 19l 17092 100 80 220TC 158 105 138190A M x 182 119 11 7 85 205 156 s s 21 37 25 1607 15 0

115 737 105316 21l 83CV D 21 omiddot 240202 185 98 330A

220 20087 181 34588TC 216 210138 223 77 338A M x 215 217142 196 88 338s

s 2111 0805 58 237

23 405 120 22 96118CV

Table C20 ANOVA Summary -MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

----------------------- I N O V A

SO0RE --DF -lS--

middotE __ 2 2

401 11310n -5831137037

2008568519 --2915568519

166S53085 2111762euro92-

3-9 J29

532 532

Q 1 14f5364f296 14653646296 1215099198 4 14 746 EA-Ev

4 -frac34

2784740740 -1-1-i 0359259

696185185 -56-tl-1-79tr30-

5 772 8571 -6450815

266 middot-3-29

396 -5-32middotmiddot

110 2 355470370 177735185 1bull11738C30 329 532 EAO II 12794711075 3198euro9519 25523909 266 396

-Ei8JB 36- 11311 111euro66euro7 120596296

---------------------------------------------------------------------FOTAJ- --5-3- -31131--343-14 8-1-

Cl9

50 bull css-o ti) CMS-0 gt 40 diams CMS-7E I

a w 30I-w E 0 -I 20-ca ltC I-Cl) 10

0--------------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Cl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOWmiddot HIGH LOW

CMS-7 215 CMS-7 142 css-o 104 I ICMS-7 338 CMS-7 21 7

css-o 207 css-o 139 i CMS-7 88 CMS-0 156middot css-o middot

CMS-0 182 CMS-Q 119 CMS-0 117 CMS-0 85 CMS-0 205 css-o 73

Ngtte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

C20

-----------------------------------------

Table C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

IEMULSON

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIG_H LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A x s

CV

135 104 104

114

18

157

70 85 51

69

17

248

105 66

136

102

35

343

148 197

-173

35

201

107 101

72

93

19

201

74 107

92

91

17

182

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

128 85

174

119

31

256

73 59 -

66

10

150

69 36 65

56

18

318

158 110

-134

34

253

77 96 68

80

14

178

53 66

113

77

32

408

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

141 79 52

91

46

503

185 60 63

103

71

695

125 201

96

141

54

386

192 164 126

161

33

206

131 130 120

127

6

48

72 230

76

126

90

715

Table C22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

l II O Y A

-soaas -OF- -S-S- -F- FrOS

E -llmiddot J

n -tJ-AO EllJ

RROi

----------

2 2 1 u -2-2 4

36middot -------

199090000000 middot 39113 411111111111

4111296296 61982222222

-t-72-1-middot-11181-18-1-754737037011 41156 5185186

85722 middotbull)0(0000 ----------------

995115000000 -1971-7222222

11111216296 151195555556 -360-yen5-110-711 1middot

j8236851852 11166296297

middotmiddot2381 166667

111805138 -0280488 17265A9 6507548

-36111086-15058033

41589422

329 329 414 2 66 329 329 266

532 -532 746 396

-532 532 3915

-----------------------------------lOo-1- middottt 1-300-lamp833-333-3-

C21

400

CJgt ~ 300 I

0 w I-w 200

-~ 0 CJwc 1000 ()

0

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure C21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Valueat Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-0 ll9 CMS-7 103 ICMS-7 141 css-o 173 CMS-7 127 CMS-7 126

css-o ll4 css-o 69 1middotcss-o 102 CMS-7 161 css-o 93 css-o 91

CMS-7 91 CMS-0 66 middotCMS-0 56 CMS~O 134 CMS-0 80 CMS-0 77

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure C22 Newrnan-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

C22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table C23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

D A T A

X s

CV

724 811 637

724

123

170

1289 -

1276

1283

09

07

627 628 695

650

39

60

622 940

1427

996

405

407

475 407

1276

719

483

672

803 790 498

697

172

247

C M s 0

D A T A

x s

CV

1217 393

1260

957

489

511

2075 2879 1875

2276

532

233

1943 1195 2012

171 7

453

264

1241 1224 1208

1224

1 7

13

676 574 550

600

67

112

986 787 815

863

108

125

C M s 7

D A T A x s

CV

642 620 774

679

83

123

102 426 662

397 281

709

59 7 369 470

479 114

239

588 60l 290

493

176

357

301 263 393

319

67

210

238 284 227

250 30

121

Table C24 ANOVA Surmnary Surface Abrasion

Fmiddot F01middotmiddotss --------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------

e Amiddot

2 -gt

530361248149 22)938237037

315180624075 110469111)519

432152433 1sn1of15

329 329

532 532

1 n

1 4

[14699201852 9733 179629euro

446992gt1952 24332949074

61289-8 3335u~111

414 266

746 396

EJ J

2 2

middot59516003103 85017525926

291seoo1as1 425)8752963

4 9nn2 5 828630

329 329

532 532

EI 4 196475151852 4911877963 57349619 266 396

ERRJl 36 262551800000 72931l~-556

--------------------------------------------------------------------

middotTnUmiddot 53- middot159689-~0964815middot

C23

300

E C)

C)200 Cl)

0 J

z 0 en 100 lti a al lti

01-----r----~---------r---------SBH SBL

Figure C23

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

CMS-0 957 CMS-0 2276

css-o 724 css-o 1283

CMS-7 679 CMS-7 397

bull css-o CMS-0 diams CMS-7

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

FRESNO

HIGH

CMS-0 171 7

css-o 65o

CMS-7 479l

LOW

CMS-0 1224

ICSS-0 996

CMS-7 493

GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW

css-o

CMS-0

719

600

ICMS-0 863Icss-

CMS-7 319 CMS-7 250

Ngtte Val~ with~ ~n vertical line are not stati~tically different

Figure C24 Newman-Keuls Ranking Surface Abrasion grams

C24

APPENDIX D

DATA ANALYSIS SULFUR-EXTENDED-ASPHALT AND CONVENTIONAL EMULSIONS

----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Table Dl Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

75 85 85

85 80 85

80 75 70

65 70 70

85 90 90

80 85 85

X s

tV

817

58

71

833

29

35

7-50

50

67

683

29

42

middot88 3

29

33

833

29

35

ss 30 see

D A T A

85 80 85

75 80 80

75 85 85

70 80 70

90 85 95

90 80 90

x s

CV

833

29

35

783

29

37

81 7

58

71

733

58

79

-900

50

56

883

29

33

C M s 7

D A T A

80 75 70

60 70 55

70 70 65

65 70 60

65 70 70

70 )0 65

x s

CV

750 50

67

617 76

124

683 29

42

650 50

77

683 29

42

650

50

77

Table D2 ANOVA Summary Aggregate Coating

rmiddot rs F05 F 0 1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------F 2 235 712593 1179 f-296297 553913Q113 329 532 a 2 63 bullTlt1ll81I R 31L97UC7U 1521731 3 29 532 E~

11 3f2 116i14f Jmiddot 39 (1)7111~gtI 1

3~2 ~-2900 9976~5185

17 ~li347F3 UfB47826

4 14 256

746 96

i) ~ pound 2S 11252i 12 29(-29 bull 5086957 329 532

a~ 2 12 ~-~737r o lt19518~ 2E260e7 329 53 2 u ll 1f3 bull illf illt7 41t3S1B52 191156522 2 G6 3~f

iE1190il 3i 76 pound61iz~57 212~-25

Dl

-~ -CJ z I-lt(

0 0 U1 -lt( C bull SS 15 SEA w 25 SS 30 SEA CJ cc

diams CMS - 7CJ lt(

0 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dle Mean Aggregate Coating at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

I SS-30 733SS-301 $33 SS-15amp 833 lss-301 sn 7 I ISS-30 900 SS-30 883

SS-151 817 SS-301 783 SS-15 683 SS-15 883 SS-15 833SS-lSi 750

CIS--7 750 CS-7 617 OS-7 683 CMS-7 650 CMS-7 683 CMS-7 650

Ngtte Values with a comon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D2 Newman-Keuls Ranking Mean Aggregate Coating

D2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------

Table D3 Film Stripping

EMULSION

AGGREGATE SAN

BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITE-ROCK

s s

15

0 A T A

30

15 20

30 15

25

X s

CV

225

106

47l

250

71

283

200

71 354

s s

30

D A T A

25

25

0

0

5

0

X s

CV

25middoto

oo

00

oo oo

oo

2middotmiddot5

35

1413

C M s 7

D A T A

0

0 0

5

0 0

X s

CV

oo

00 oo

25

35

1413

oo

00 oo

Table D4 ANOVA Swnmary Film Stripping

----------------- ---------------- --middot-----------middot----- middot--middotmiddotmiddot middot- middotmiddot-middot----middot -middot-- middotmiddotmiddot--- --- -------- -A N O V J

-SW~ middotnt r-

pound 2 14333333113 7166666667 27 1S78lttl7 l 2 2]33333333 1165666euro67 middot11t1210~26 Eirl 141 55f 3333335 13958333311 i2894737

Dlli~RI 9 237 50CCDIOmiddot) 2638888P9

lOUL t7 bull--- bullbull - bull- 0 bull bullbull bull- bull bull 0 -------- bull-- bull- bull---bull ---- lt -bullbull bull - bullbullbull--bullbullbullbullbull-bullbull-- bullbullbull bull ___ bull --bull bull bull bull --- bull bull-bullho bullbull bull- bull bull ~-- bull- UO rArr-d bull

D3

cit -w

0 lt( ll a (I)

C w 0 C-a I-ti)

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

20

1

0 SB F GR

Figure D3c Film Stripping

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO

Iss-3

SS-15

250

225

SS-15~7 250

25

SS-15

ISS-30

200

25

ClIS-7 oo middot SS-30 00 CMS-7 00

~ Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D4 Newman-Keuls Ranking Film Stripping

D4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus at Design Residue 3Content 10 psi

-------ElAULSWN

----QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCK SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

D S$ 1U H9 171 185 110 159

i22 2~1 165 197 159 165A15Jo-ot----t----+---ii---+----t-----ti 132 140 168 191 135 162

SEA s i3 1 4 9 35 4

CV Ul2 10 25 44 258 26

$5 ---

D

~ A

158

140

189

198 184 187

212

201

178

173

222

199

gtUfl x l49 194 186 207 176 211 SEA s 13 6 2 8 4 16

CV 85 33 11 38 20 77

C M

D A T A

80

82 55 48

35

63

73

77

38

45 55

65

s x 81 52 49 75 42 60

7 s

CV

1

18

5

96 20

404

3

38 5

119

7

118

Table D6 ANOVA Summary 2 Day Modulus

--=======-=-middot------=====--=- ---------------------==-~----------=-----e=-----BF SS lS F F05 F01

pound 2 ln~13~ 3lBillllll1l 52367 191141145 3715181747 357 605 I 2 29111 GllS5SSS6 111155 bull 5211778 103289966 357 605 l 1 3l$3351l11112 33$3-3611112 240095590 4113 A33 lEamp liL 31121111l11U1t zst-n22t77 8 ssu21119a 295 461 pound~ 2 1217222222 16093611111 432112657 357 605 III 2 n~ bullEHOq 1a ----------

521iwSSSS5 15S911111111 25Jot 5lll)~Oll)il))I

31l527777R 4117277777~ iJl9166657

22C3627) -2H1157

357 2~95

6~5 11 61

-=====------middot--- -- -- middotmiddot-- --middot-llOl~L lS

DS

bull SS 15 SEA 11 SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-(D -l Q 0 E J-

ffi 1 J-(J wa gtlt 0 Q--------------------------SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL (I

AGGREGATE

Figure D5 2 Day Resilient Modulus

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-3~1 l49 SS-3H J86 SS-10 207 SS-30 176 SS-30 211

SS-15amp 132 SS-15amp l40 SS-151168 SS-l51 l91 ss-lSi 135 SS-15 162I I I CS-7 81 CMS-7 52 OS-7 42 CMS-7 60

llite Values with a amron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D6 Newman-Keuls Ranking 2 Day 3Resilient Modulus 10 psi

D6

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------

Table D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design 3Residue Contentr 10 psi

-EMULSION OUALITY LEVELcAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15

SEA

D A T A

325

271

l]JD

260

390

340

319

348

272

367

302

356

x s

CV

29S

38

128

285

35

124

365

35

97

334

21

62

320

67

21 0

329

38

116

ss 30 SEJ

0 A T A

282

310

337

255

303

374

362

307

318

308

289

329

x s

CV

296

20

67

296

58

196

339

50

148

335

39

116

313

7

23

309

28

92

C M s 7

D A T A

78

64

110

95

75

73

110

135

80

90

85

7

83

110

135

x s

CV

71

10

139

103

11

104

74

1

19

123

18

144

123

18

144

Table D8 ANOVA Summary Full Cure Resilient Modulus

A N O V ll

E 2- 3r39El11 3middotl8tB89 196 994 L19 44 44 5 178 q233024 3 57 6 CS 2 9111~7222223 4058 3611112 3 57577(13 357 6csbulla 11 611~ li9llll41115 ~16 ampll44445 S585579 443 833

_n_ sect 251l-illll41sectl41 -531 31i 11111 AS7121pound3 295 4 61 EJ 2 lt 115 $555555 227 521777 8 1994213 357 605 iampJ 2 170555555 15)277778 0770121 357 605 __ElJ 1324111ilJlilil4 5 208 bull 11Ul 11 bull 184922 2 95 4 ( 1

nan 11 19P73 SOOJIO~ 11111D833l33

middotmiddot-- =--=--=-==-===--c-=-c------_--=--ngtllllll

----------------------------------middot----

D7

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

traquo diams CMS - 7a ()

0--Gl ~- I J _J bull C 02 E I-z w J-(J w C

SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATEmiddot

Figure D7 Full Cure Resilient Modulus at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HJGH lOW HJGH LOW HIGH LOW

I I I Iss-il51 298 1SS-31l 295 ss-]5~ 365 SS-30 335 1middot SS-15 320 SS-15 329

SS-301 296 SS-l5amp 235 SS-301 339 SS-15 334 SS-30 313 SS-30 309

CIIS--7 71 OS-7 103 CHS-7 74 CMS-7 123 CMS-7 85 CMS-7 123

t-bte Values with a armon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D8 Newman-Keuls Ranking Full Cure

Resilient Modulus 103 psi

D8

----- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D9 Density at Design Residue Content pcf

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOWHJGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH D l341 6 ll339 1347 1338 1523ss 1500A T 1356 133S 1350 1333 1513 1497A

1~ x l351 l337 1349 1336 1518 1499 sSEA 07 02 02 04 07 02

05 02 02 03CV 05 01

D 1362 1352 1370 1355 1545A 1520ss T 1371 1355 1361 1354 1550 1525

30 A

x 1367 1354 1366 1355 1548 1523 SEA 02 06s 06 01 04 04

05 02 05 01 02 02CV D 1373 1375 1380 1370 1537 1543AC T 1385 1375 137 9 1360 1535 1545AM x 1379 1375 1380 1365 1536 1544s s 09 oo 01 07 01 017

06 ooCV 01 05 01 01

Table DlO ANOVA Summary Density

N O V ll -----middotmiddotmiddotmiddotmiddot---middotmiddotmiddot-- -- --------- -------middot --------------- ----- - - -

smI=pound DF ss F F05 F01

pound 2 2738H9 310369445 153505090 357 605 ~ 2 2273iWlllbull38B9 11369544445 5530 gt35704 357 lj -~5 ~ 1 11-6~2SilllaquollO 12 602500C 524057772 443 R33 n I tpoundlUll11 Jl-69lll45 2-324621e 2 95 4 61 E 2 3131poundpound57 15i5S33J 7 7537nB 357 li os lJ 2 ltClfltSf-57 0433334 21458C6 357 s 05 n~ Iii )l216poundfi6lii 9556667 47372764 295 451

EHJii 11l 3 bull nsilraquorn 2019444

------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -- -middotmiddot-middot ----- -middotmiddot - middot-------

35 23611rJC556

D9

1 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

-0 a gt1 ()

z

diams CMS-7

w C

120 SSH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D9 Density at Design Residue Coritent

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

OS--7 1379 aS-7 ]375 IClIS-7 l380 IOlS-7 1365 ISS-30 1548 CMS-7 1544ISS-30~ 1367 SS--30~ J354 SS-30~ 1366 SS-30~ 1355 CMS-7 1536 SS-30 1523

SS-15bull 1351 ss-is~ 1337 SS-15bull 1349 ss-1s 1336 SS-15 1518 SS-15 1499

NJte Values with a omron vertical lme are not statistically different

Figure D10 Newman-Keuls Ranking Density pcf

DlO

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Table D11 Air Voids at Design Residue Content

-EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

107

)5

9 10l

91

99

79

99

80

83

8 bull5

84

I s

ICY

U)

Ill 9

B4

10l

03

28

95

06

60

89

14

159

82

02

26

85

01

08

ss 30j

SEA

D A T A

90

93

92

85

92

96

86

84

66

67

74

73

x s

CV

92

02

23

89

05

56

94

03

30

85

01

l 7

67

01

ll

74

01

10

C M s 7

D A T A

77

73

62

61

73

62

63

71

71

65

48

55

x s

CV

75

03

38

62

O~l

12

68

08

u5

67

06

96

68

04

62

52

05

96

Table Dl2 ANOVA Summary Air Voids

A ll O V A --e--ee-ee=-==== -- -- middot- -- --- middot- - ------- - middot-----middot----middot ______ __________ ---middot- ----- - ------------- -

iiUEllilE ss ~s F F01

E 45111Hoiii6pound 225l08333 812457541 357 605 ll 1~-lilliillt~~)Q 7930)000 2519405 357 505 IJJ 11 ili$6J4141~ 16469444 59230768 443 8 33 E1 2J53ll3ll -5S5333 4 -2 bull 11755245 295 4 6 1

EJ 15672223 bull 783pound 112 2~131820 357 605 I 21022223 bull 1li 1112 bull 3$35365 357 cs

EampJ 2971111ll J27778 26713286 2 95 4t1 iElllllHgt 5cgt~SiIJOIgt -2790556

-middot--middot ------- --middot - middotmiddot- -middotmiddot--middot-- --3li

D11

11 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

-l

a - 8

-a 0 7gt tc ltI 6

5

4 SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dll

SAN BERNARDINOmiddot

middot HIGH LOW

SS-]5amp JlJl ISS-ll5~ 10l

ISS-301 92 SS-311l11 89ICMS-7 75 CS-7 fi2

Air Voids at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

=- 95 I I ISS-15 89 SS-15 82 SS-15 8 5

SS-31 94 SS-30 85 SS-30 74ICMS-7 68

OS-7 68 CMS-7 67 SS-30 67 CMS-7 52

Ngtte Values with a ommn vertical line are not statistically dilferent

Figure D12 Newman-Keuls Ranking Air Voids

Dl2

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

middotmiddotEMULSION OUAUTY LEVEL

~- AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

48S 3g_g

295

middot 32 8

439

396

397

418

288

307

223

307

X s

CV

443

64

144

312

23

75

418

30

73

408

15

36

298

13

45

265

59

224

ss 3Wo SEA

0 A T A

400

403

367

283

342

411

392

262

310

32-4

292

236

x s

CV

402

02

05

325

59

183

377

49

130

327

92

281

31 7

10

31

264

40

150

C M s 7

D A T A

235

235

130

120

213

233

150

200

350

350

250

250

x s

CV

235

00

00

125

07

57

223

14

63

175

35

202

350

oo oo

250

00

oo

Table Dl4 ANOVA Swnrnary Stabilometer Value

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------A N O V A

---------~----------middot------middot-middotmiddot-- -middot--middot--middotmiddot--middot------ bull middotmiddotmiddotmiddot--middot middot------middot-middot--middotmiddotmiddot middotmiddot--- --middotmiddot ---_ -- middotmiddot-middotmiddot-- -- - - - -----ss r r05 r01

2 1 i 7~ Sbull1lfipound5161S 5879033333 332259711 357 605 I 2 igtS895QGDgt 279475000 195117552 357 ~os i ll ~l ~

11 111 2 2

l~illflll1111111 7DS nll3331

1~il])2222] 755J5556

~ 111 8 11111~=-- 10115 834 71011111

37 7502778

275769841 128178912

U938281 251M309

11113 295 357 357

833 4f1 605 605

Ell~ 14middot 3~53lt1$1H 116340278 5750926 295 461 fElilli U 25977~illlllCII~ 1111H72222

------------------------ bull- ~bull OOM---bullbullbullbull- - bull------_________ _

roru

013

w J ltC gt a w 1-w E 0 I-m ltC Ishyen

SBH SBL FH FL

bull SS 15 SEA 5S 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure D13 Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-)Sll 441_3 SS-l 325I SS-JSi 4131 SS-15 40 8 CMS-7 350 SS-15 265

SS-30 402 SS-JSa 31_2I ISS-30~ 377 SS-30~ 327 SS-30 317 SS-30 264

CS-7 235 CMS-7 125 ISS-15 298 CMS-7 250

Nlte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D14 Newman-Keuls Ranking Stabilometer Value

Dl4

-------------------

Table Dl5 Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 SEA

D A T A

ii3

ii2

l7-1

ilJD3

236

76

308

62

112

85

222

180

l s

CY

63

lJ1

10

Jl39

SlJ

363

l56

J13

725

185

174

940

99

19

194

201

30

148

ss 30 SEA

0 A T A

229

306

266

187

78

130

260

136

157

212

186

164

x s

CV

268

55

204

227

56

247

104

37

354

198

88

443

185

39

211

175

16

89

C M s 7

D A T A

80

82

190

180

122

192

245

235

130

120

170

180

x s

CV

81

l

18

185

7

38

157

50

315

240

7

30

125

7 57

175

7

40

Table Dl6 ANOVA Summary Cohesiometer Value

--------------------middot--------------------------------------------------------------A N O V A

-=====-=-=--=-- ===== ss

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1i712 7222222 83563611111 226671165 357 605 I 2 l~12 lllllliilllllllB9 71144441145 129864 357 605 ~ 1l 251116l 144141llllj 2ti-~H~bull4dimiddot4 4 44 5 71775602 443 833 n l4 37511ll 777JTI7JJ S395bull J 9 ~4middot444 2548 5405 295 4 e 1 poundJ 2 72lllS3SlffiifISlmiddot9 3fi22f9111114UU 9026921 357 6C5

n 2 1 iSigt555S

11321Bl 111111I 117lIT177778

33220277778 1277032 9~11333

357 297

605 461

Eliflll 11 f15357 tlOilOOibull 3ilf65Jgt)oo

---------------------------------------middot-------------------------------------------

D15

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7w

J lt(

gt a w Jshyw I 0-() w

8

O--------r-----r-----------r----r-SBH SBL FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

c 1

Figure D15

SAN BERNARDINO

HIGH LOW

SS-3(1JlS 268

81IOS-7

ISS-]5i 63 SS-lSl 139

Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 240 SS-30 185 SS-15 201

SS-lSi 155 SS-30l 198 CMS-7 125 SS-30 175

SS-JOi 104 SS-151 185 SS-15 99 CMS-7 175

Note Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure Dl6 Newman-Keuls Ranking Cohesiometer Value

D16

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table D17 Swell at Design Residue Content in

EfAULSEON

~ QUALITY LEVEL CAGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDI NO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH lOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

ss 15 s~

D A T A

048 -

0413

06S

069

on

005

006

008

-025 045

005

004

004

005

009

014

Jt s

CY

HS

0010

000

D68

-003

45

bull 006

002

241

035

010

286

004

001

133

009

005

483

ss 30 SEA

D A T A

023

023

020

063

066

055

000

ooo

008

031

023

028

000 000 003

ooo

001

000

x s

CV

022

002

79

061

006

93

003

005

1732

027

004

148

oin

002

1732

ooo

001

1732

C M s 7

D A T A

000

ooo

000

004

002

001

ooo

ooo

000

003

000

ooo 000 000 ooo

ooo

ooo

000

x s

CV

000

ooo

ooo

002

002

655

ooo

ooo

ooo

001

002

1732

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

ooo

000

Table D18 ANOVA Summary Swell ( Transformed Data)

A N O Y A

E 2 _1025326 0912663 2353471(154 329 532 -Amiddot middotmiddot2 1366452 0683226 1761825136 329 532 0 1 0368219 03613219 949521081 1114 7116

EA 11 04627$7 0115697 298345558 266 396 -EQ- 2-- --006-903G- -0(134515-middot -8-9003553 middot3l9 -S-32 A) 2 0150358 ~0075179 193863014 329 532 UO 4 0083986 0020997 54143375 26 396

-ERRORmiddot 36 0139606middot 0003178

-TOTIIL 53 --446-576-11

D17

05 bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA

04

z -J

J w IJJ

SBH SBL

diams CMS - 7

~oo

_02

01

FH FL GRH GRL

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl7 Swell at Design Residue Content

SAN B_ERNARDINOmiddot FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

SS-ll51 ii-IS SS-]5i il68 SS-15 a006 SS-15 bull 035 SS-15 004 SS-15 009I I I I SS-3Cli 022 SS-301 061 ISS-301 003 SS-30 bull 027 ISS-30 bull 001 ISS-30 bull 000

ClS-7 000 CIS-7 002 OS-7 000 OIS-7 001 CMS-7 000 CMS-7 000

NJte Values with a omron vertical line are not statistically different

Figure D18 Newman-Keuls Ranking Swell in

D18

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------

Table Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

EMULSl10N

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

FRESNO GRANITEROCKSAN BERNARDINO

LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOWHIGH 0 156 48 175 229 2lO 125ss A ll5 60 20l ll7 228 120T 13_g 4e 170 132 212 130A15 i 137 52 182 200 2l 7 125 smiddotSEA 2l 37 l7 30 lO 05

1middot5]CY 133 92 148 46 40 D 98 106 lll 76 2l 0 lllAss 203 109 76 5l 235 95T ll3 85 63 59 233 125

30 A

x 138 100 83 62 226 llOSEll s 57 l3 25 l3 l4 l5

412 131 298 206 62 136CV D 2lO 202 185 98 330 240A 220 87 18l 88 345 200C T 216 138 223 77 338 2lOAM x 215 142 196 88 338 217s

5805 23 lls 08 2l7

23 405 ll8 120 22 96CV

Table D20 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Stabilorneter Value

N O V A

-------middot------------------------------------------------------ ---------------DF -$ -F os- r01

pound 2 5919875926 2l59917963 39C147075fl 329 53 2 690 i1111pounda$11 iii 345 022110111 US51521111 329 5 32 Ill 1 763129-i296 763 1296 296 100671B132 414 7 U6

Ea t93 11171111]J)7lll 1007863519 1329576P8 266 391bullIEill -2 middot -E~ti35~259 -23middot0-H9fgt29 C-~6522- middot3 29 532 AO 2 S3amp11171t1137ll 11192351$5 55305370 329 532 El s1111i1r1075 135268519 17~qq579 266 396bullmiddotDll~t 311i 27239~333~ 7 5903711)111

53

--------------------------------------------------------middot-----------------------

D19

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA0)

gt diams CMS - 7 l I

a w 30fshyw E 0 J 2-en ltC Ishyen 10

SBH SSL FH FL GRH GRL01amp---------------------------_

AGGREGATE

Figure Dl9 MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

middotHtGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

QS-1 235 CS-7 142 196 SS-15 200 CMS-7 338 CMS-7 217GS-

Iss-3H uaI I I ISS-3Qi lilG SS-15i ]S2 IOMS-7 88 SS-30 22~ SS-15 125

SS-151 137 ss-i5~ 52 SS-30~ 83 SS-30 62 SS-15 217 SS-30 110

fute Values with a ccmron vertical line are not statistically dipoundferent

Figure D20 Newman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Stabilometer Value

D20

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Table D2l MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

-------_cEMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

ss 1 sa

D A T A

x s

HIGH

Ul3 ~ JlU

43

64

IOW

~ TWlI ~

--

H1GH

159 1-43 126

143

17

LOW

123 187

60

123

64

HIGH

130 179 153

154

25

LOW

120 104 143

122

20

CV D A5S T A30 x

SEA s

171

139 88

104

110

26

-98 91 -95

4

116

114 116

69

100

27

515

TWT TWT TWT

--

159

111 101 15~

122

28

160

83 65 63

70

11

CV D AC T AM x5 s

7 CV

236

141 79 52

91

46

503

37

185 60 63

103

71

695

267

125 201

96

141

54

386

-192 164 126

161

33

206

23l

131 130 120

127

6

48

157

72 230

76

126

90

715

Too weak to test

Table D22 ANOVA Summary MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

SOO~e 55- -f middotFmiddot OS- F01

pound 2 19956 G31tl3Tt 99780165185 52791162 329 532 -1 2- 223ii~ 92592~-~ middot111544629630 -59015431 3middot29 5 32 J 1 n21lliiilliEiiii~ 1middot112106656666 75185029 414 746 lEJ Ill 32il76711ltCl~lll9l 132191851852 43485622 2euro6 396 ~ 2- ~373hllllllllllllllqSmiddot iiilfgtamp 1222-223- -3bull6middot3300811 -3 29 532 1i 2 1S011Hil12 75i0555556 bull ~397100 329 532 Eli

-a~llt-Iii

36 511J7777777

middot5B11113BB333 12799444444 129e l9 25 92 6middot

5771861 266 396

D21

bull SS 15 SEA U) SS 30 SEA gt diams CMS - 7E I

a w J-~ 200 0 en w5 100 0

SBH SBL FH FL AGGREGATE

GRH GRL

Figure D21 MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value at Design Residue Content

SAN GRANITEROCKBERNARDINO FRESNO

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

CMS-7 126SS-15 154]03 JCMS-7 161106-7 rmm SS-15 122CMS-7 127SS-30amp 95 ltMgt-7 ]Aj_ SS-15 123

SS-30 70

t-bte Values with a camon vertical line are not statistically different

SS-30 122SS-151 93 SS-l51 fflT SS-30amp 100 SS-30 TWT

Figure D22 Ne-wman-Keuls Ranking MVS Conditioned Cohesiometer Value

D22

Table D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content grams

EMULSION

QUALITY LEVEL

~AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK

HIGH LOW HIGH LOW LOW

ss 15 SEA

ss 30 SEA

C M s 7

HIGH D bullbullmiddot 979 715A middot 1143 569T A 1047 599

X - - 1056 - 628 s - - 82 - 77

CV - - 78 - 123

D 987 1474 548A T 907 1536 433 A 1447 615

x - - 947 1486 532 s - 57 46 92

CV - - 60 31 173 D 642 102 597 588 301A T 620 426 369 60l 263 A 774 662 470 290 3q_3

x 679 397 479 493 31 9

s 83 281 114 176 67

CV 123 709 239 357 21 0

1285 1353 1493

1377

106

77

627 72 2 634

661

53

80

238 284 22 7

250

30

121

Specimen swelled during soak could not ne tested Specimen disintegrated during testing

D23

300

E CJgt -200 en

en 0 J

z0 middot cii 100 lt( cc CD lt(

bull SS 15 SEA SS 30 SEA diams CMS - 7

01--------r----T----J-----r----r SBH FH FL GRH GRL

middotAGGREGATE

Figure D23 Surface Abrasion at Design Residue Content

D24

APPENDIX E

FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL DESIGNS

Table El

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfyl

Tensile Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

Subirade l~octulus psi 30~0 6000 12000 30oco

Jverage Ann~abullAir erlerature J degF lt40 40-55 55-65 gt65 40 40-55 55-65 gt65 lt40 40-55 55-651gt65 lt4 0 40-55 55-65 gt65

T~affic EALbull 10bull

IllIf psi 50000 4 9 66 7 8 91 37 50 5e 66 2 26 28 29 2 2 2 2

1000~0 37 5 3 62 12 27 40 47 53 2 21 25 26 2 2 2 2

300000 21 J4 4 3 51 2 28 31 middot3 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

600000 2 24 3 2 39 2 2 2 _2 28 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2middot 2 2 2 290JCOO 2 2 26 33 2 2 2 22 2 2 2

Traffic EAL= 10s

trJ MR psi bull 50000 83 ll5 139 165 70 97 112 127 54 1-3 83 93 2 3 27 28 29 f-J

42 58 69 78 2 25 27 27100000 63 90 108 129 54 76 91 105

3COOOO 4o 58 73 8 3 3 51 60 73 24 39 ~8 56 2 2 20 22

600000 28 45 55 67 21 37 47 55 2 21 36 44 2 2 2 2

900000 21 37 4 7 57 2 30 39 48 2 21 29 37 2 I 2 2 2

TraCf1c 2 ~AL a 10~ I ia psi bull 50000 130 161 216 2~ 116 16l 187 213 98 131 151 172 63 66 93 58

82 0100000 98 14) 171 203 68 126 152 176 75 106 125 142 52 7 3

3CCOOO 6o 91 11 3 139 55 82 101 122 4 7 69 86 102 31 49 59 59

e~oooo 46 68 86 106 ~o 60 76 94 3middot 3 52 64 i9 2 35 4 r 54

900~00 37 56 72 69 )2 51 63 80 24 4 3 5 4 67 2 28 3 8 ul Trarr1el EAL~ 10 7

la psi bull 50000 192 24 24 24 178 239 24 24 156 205 235 24 12l 153 165 17 3 I

24 24 228 24 119 168 195 222 95 129 147 1s IlCOOCO 1~5 21 0 13 5 193

56 aa 10a 12 I-3CC000 aa 136 167 205 ~-3 12 156 186 74 11l 138 16~

I- l 6 a2 10060~ 1 ouo 6 4 100 125 156 59 92 ll 6 l~ 5 53 82 104 128

108 3 3 53 6 8 859ccooo 53 82 10 5 132 so 77 97 121 4 ~ 68 86

For asphalt volume Vb= 11 are air voids Va= 5 Use Figure El to correct thickness of other valuemiddots of Vb and Va

Table E2

Subsradlt Mcdulus psi

Thickness T in Inches to Satisfys Subgrade Strain Requirements (Reference 3)

6100 120003000 300CC

tr N

A~erage A~nual Ar Te11perature degF

Traffic EALbull 10bull

~IP psi 50000a

100000

300000

600000

900000

Traffic EAL 10 5

MR psibull 50000

lC0000

300000

600000

900000

Tra~~lc EAL c 1c6

MR psibull 50000

100000

300000

600POO

900000

Trafficz EALbull 10 7

MRt psibull 50000

100000

300000

600000

900000

lt40

55

55

55

55

55

81

81

81

81

81

115

115

115

115

115

155

155

155

155

155

40-55

83

60

55

55

55

121

87

81

Bl

Bl

168

123

11

115

ll5

226

165

155

155

155

55-65 gt65 lt40

108 115 46

73 82 46

55 55 46

5_ 45

55 55 46

145 165 69

106 120 69

a1 81 69

81 81 69

81 81 69

201 224 98

14B 165 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

115 115 98

24 24 1)6

199 222 135

15 155 136

155 155 136

155 155 136

40-55

10

50

46

46

46

103

74

69

69

69

150

108

98

98

9B

204

150

135

136

136

55-65 G5 lt40

83 93 30

61 70 30

46 46 30

45 46 30

46 46 30

124 139 55

91 102 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

69 69 55

173 193 83

130 147 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

98 98 83

239 24 120

179 199 120

136 136 120

136 136 120

135 136 120

40-55

4

3~

30

30

30

83

60

55

55

55

122

90

83

83

83

17 5

130

120

middot12 o

120

55-65 gt65 lt~O

62 69 25

46 53 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

30 30 25

9 106 29

82 29i 2 middot 55 55 29

55 55 29

55 55 29

144 15S 60

108 12l 60

83 83 60

83 83 60

83 83 6 0

205 226 90

155 112 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

120 120 90

40-55

31

25

25

25

25

52

30

29

29

29

86

65

60

60

60

127

98

90

90

90

55-65 bull65

33 35

29 3c

25 25 I 25 25 i 25 2s

51 67

47 52

29 29

29 29

29 29

95 10

76 85

60 I 6C

6C i 6o 50

14bull 3 14

112 126

90 90

90 90

90 90

Tj In Tc In 24 2 22

20

18

16 3

14

12 4

~ 10 Va+ vb 5

099

8 08 6

077 7 06

6 805

9045 1003

4 12

14

3 16

18

20

22 2 24

Figure El Correction of Pavement Design Thickness for Air Voids and

Asphalt Content of Mix (Reference 3)

E3

-------

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000 psi

MAAT 55- 65 F-Ul 400 CL

C) 0 300 (J) J

~ 200 0 ~

I- 100z w J-(J) 0+----------------------C w 0 2 4 6 8 middot10 12

THICKNESS IN

1X104 EAL

1X105EAL

Figure E2 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

M-AAT )65 F- -~---Ul 400 1x104 EALCL

CW)

0 300 (J) J 200C 0 ~

-~ 100 w -J -(J) 0w 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a

THICKNESS IN

1X105EAL

Figure E3 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E4

w 400 c

()

0 300 () - 200 Cl 0 E

~ 100 w J-

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 56-65 F

1x10 EALI 4

I 1X105 EAL

w o~---------------------r-w 1 2 3 4a

THICKNESS IN

Figure E4 Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT )65F-w 400 4I 1X10 EALc () I 1X105EAL 0 300 I () I - I 200C I0 E I I- 100z w I-J I-() 0w 1 2 3 4c

THICKNESS IN~

Figure ES Thickness For Tensile Strain Requirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65Fs

ES

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MAAT 55-65 F-en400 41X10 EALIC

(I) 1X105EAL middot 0

I I 300

en I J 200C 0

f-- 100z w J-en 0LU 2 4 6 8 10 14a

-THICKNESS IN

Figure E6 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 6000psi

MmiddotAAT )65 F cn4oo I 1X104 EALa

(I) 1X105EAL 0 300

I I

en -I

~200 0 ~ 100 LU --en -I

0-1-----------------------LU 2 4 6 8 10 middot12 14a THICKNESS IN

Figure E7 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 6000 psi MAAT = )65F

E6

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000 psi

MAAT 55-65 F-u 400 41x10 EAL0

M 1x105EAL 0 T- 300 -en J 200C 0 E I- 100z w-J- en 0w C 0 middot1 2 3 4 middot5 6

THICKNESS IN

Figure E8 Thickness For Subgrade Strain Requirement Es= 30000 psi MAAT = 55-65F

SUBGRADE MODULUS 30000psi

M-AAT )65 F-en400

I --- - - ~- 1X104 EAL

C

a 1X105 EAL

0 I T- 300

I-en J

200 C 0 E

I- 100z w J-en 0w 1 2 3 4 5 6 70

THICKNESS IN

Figure E9 Thickness For Subgrade StrainRequirement E = 30000 psi MAAT = )65F

s

E7

Table E3

Thickness Requirements inches

= 6000 psi EAL= 1 X 104 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

MrT

l

CF Tc Ts

246000 34

64 37 43

300000 31

68 4middot 0 43

391000 27

lt 61 33 43

362000 28

64 31 43

260000 28

bull bull 61 35 43

333000 30

65 33 43

C M s 0

Mr Ti CF T Tc

s

259000 29

59 36 43

288000 32

bull 61 3 8 43

271000 32

59 39 43

339000 30

60 37 43

284000 32

59 40 43

365000 29

60 37 43

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

71000 55

65 60 43

103000 47 71

45 43

74000 54

67 53 43

123000 44 69

45 43

85000 52

65 54 43

123000 44

73 46 43

ss 15

M T7

l

CF T Tc s

298000 31

57 40 43

285000 32

59 38 43

365000 28

58 37 43

334000 30

61 36 43

320000 30

60 36 43

329000 30

61 36 43

ss 30

M T7

l

CF Tc Ts

296000 31

60 37 43

296000 31

62 36 43

339000 30

59 38 43

335000 30

bull 63 35 43

313000 31

65 34 43

309000 31

65 34 43

Ngtte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi TI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume middotTc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= llrickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E8

Table E4

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

246000 68

64 74 70

300000 62 68

62 68

391000 55 61

65 68

362000 57 64

63 68

260000

57 bull 61

68 70

333000 59 65

65 68

C M s 0

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

259000 65 59

80 70

288000 63

bull 61 75 68

271000 64 59

78 70

339000 59 60

72 68

284000 63 59

78 68

365000 57 60

70 68

C M s 7

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

71000 100

bull 65 107 105

103000 90 bull 71

84 88

74000 100

67 102 104

123000 85 69

85 81

85000 95 65

102 97

123000 85 73

78 81

ss 15

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

298000 62 57

78 68

285000 63 59

76 68

365000 57 58

72 68

334000 59 61

72 68

320000 60 60

73 68

329000 59 61

70 68

ss 30

M T7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 62

60 74 68

296000 62

62 71 68

339000 59 59

72 68

335000 59

63 68 68

313000 60

bull 65 65 68

309000 60

65 65 68

1bte

M = Resilient mJdulus in psirf = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

E9

Table ES

Thickness Requirements inches 4

Es= 6000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION

~ QUALITY LEVEL AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M Tdeg

J

CF T Tc

246000 40

64 46 45

300000middot 37 68

37 43

391000 33 61

38 43

362000 35

64 39 43

260000 39

61 45 45

333000 35

65 38 43

C M s 0

MT J

CF T Tc

s

259000 39 59

48 45

288000 38 61

middot4 6 44

271000 38 59

47 44

339000 35 60

43 43

284000 38 59

46 44

365000 35 60

43 43

C M s 7

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

71000 60 65

65 68

103000 52 71

48 64

74000 60 67

60 68

123000 50 bull 69 59 62

85000 58 65

63 67

123000 50 73

49 62

ss 15

M T7

J CF T Tc

s

298000 37 57

50 43

285000 38 59

48 44

365000 35 58

45 43

334000 35 61

43 43

320000 3 6

60 44 43

329000 37 61

45 43

ss 30

M T7

J CF TTc

s

296000 37 60

45 43

296000 37 62

43 43

339000 35 59

44 43

335000 35 bull 63

41 43

313000 36

65 39 43

309000 36

65 39 43

Nrte

M = Resilient nodulus in psiTI= Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T

5 = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El0

Table E6

Thickness Requirements inches

105E = 6000 psi EAL= 1 x psi MAAT = )65Fs

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000

79 64

87 70

300000

74 68

74 70

391000 69

61 81 70

362000 70

64 77 70

260000 77

61 90 70

333000 71

65 77 70

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 77

59 94 70

288000 75

61 90 70

271000 76

59 92 70

339000 71

60 87 70

284000 75

59 91 70

365000 69

60 85 70

C M s 7

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 111

65 118 112

103000 103

middot11 95 98

74000 111

67 110 11l

123000 98

69 95 93

85000 109

65 119 109

123000 98

73 87 93

ss 15

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

298000 74 57

94 70

285000 7 5 59

94 70

365000 69 58

88 70

334000 7 1 middot 61

84 70

320000 72 60

87 70

329000 71 61

84 70

ss 30

M T

l

CF T Tc

s

296000 74

60 90 70

296000 74

62 86 70

339000 71 59

87 70

335000 71

63 82 70

313000 73

bull 65 78 70

309000 73

65 78 70

Note

M = Resilient midulus in psi11 = Unoorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness f9r tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade stram requirements inches

Ell

Table E7

Thickness Requirements inches4

= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

middot~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO -GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

246000 2 0

64 23 25

300000 20

68 2middot 0 25

391000 20

61 24 25

362000 20

64 23 25

260000 20

61 24 25

333000 20

65 22 25

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 20

59 25 25

288000 20

bull 61 24 25

271000 20

59 25 25

339000 20

60 25 25

284000 20

59 25 25

365000 20

60 25 25

C M s 7

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

71000 20

65 22 31

103000 20

middot71 20 29

74000 20

67 21 31

123000 20

69 20 28

85000 20

65 22 30

123000 20

73 20 28

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 20

365000 20

334000 20

320000 2 0

329000 20

15 CF T Tc

s

57 26 25

59 25 25

58 26 25

61 24 25

bull 60 25 25

61 24 2 i

ss 30

M T7

l

CF TTc

s

296000 20

60 25 25

296000 20

62 24 25

339000 20

59 25 25

335000 20

bull63 23 25

313000 20

65 22 25

309000 20

65 22 25

N)te

M = Resilient nodulus in psi middot T7 = Unrorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inchesct= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume T = Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches T~ = Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El2

Table E8

Thickness Requirements inches

Es= 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 5 MAAT = 55-65F

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s

M T7

l

246000 22

300000 20

391000 20

362000 20

260000 21

333000 20

s 0

CF T Tc

s

64 24 32

68 20 29

61 24 29

64 23 29

61 24 l 1

65 23 29

C M s 0

M T7

l

CF T Tc

s

259000 21 59

25 31

288000 21

bull 6J 24 30

271000 21 59

25 30

339000 20 60

25 29

284000

21 59

25 1 n

365000

20 60

25 2 q

C M

M T7

l

71000 27

103000 25

74000 27

123000 24

85000

26

123000

24 s 7

CF T Tc

s

65 28 53

71 24 45

bull 67 28 53

69

23 43

65

27 49

73

22 43

ss M T7

l

298000 20

285000 21

365000 20

334000 20

320000 20

329000 20

15 CF

TTc

s

57 27 29

59 26 30

58 27 29

61 24 29

60 25 29

61 24 2 q

ss 30

M r~i CF T Tc

s

296 ooomiddot 20 60

24 29

296000 20 62

23 29

339000 20 59

24 29

335000 20 63

23 29

313000 20 65

23 29

309000 20 65

23 29

i-krte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psiTf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for sulgrade strain requirements inches

El3

Table E9

Thickness Requirements inches 4 = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

EMULSION __ QUALITY LEVEL

AGGREGATE

SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROC K HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

246000 20 64

23 25

300000 20 68

21 25

391000 20 61

24 25

362000 20 64

23 25

260000 20 61

24 25

333000 20 65

22 25

C M s 0

259000 20 59

26 25

288000 20

bull 61 middot24 25

271000 20 59

26 25

339000 20 60

25 25

284000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 60

25 25

C M s 7

MT7

1 CF T Tc

s

71000 20 65

22 58

103000 2~0 middotn

20 52

74000 20 67

21 58

123000 20 69

20 48

85000

20 65

22 57

123000

20 73

20 48

$$

15

MTdeg

1

CF T Tc

s

-298 000 20 57

27 25

285000 20 59

26 25

365000 20 58

26 25

334000 20 61

24 25

320000 2 0 60

25 25

329 000 20 61

24 25

ss 30

MT7

1

CF T Tc

s

296000 20 60

25 25

296000 20 62

24 25

339000 20 59

26 25

335000 20 63

23 25

313000 20 65

22 25

309000 20 65

22 25

tote

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot rf = Unagtrrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Thickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

El4

Table ElO

Thickness Requirements inches 5E = 30000 psi EAL= 1 x 10 MAAT = )65F

s

EMULSION QUALITY LEVEL

~ AGGREGATE SAN BERNARDINO FRESNO GRANITEROCK HIGH LOW HIGH LOW HIGH LOW

C s s 0

M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

246000

24 64

27 31

300000

23 68

24 29

391000

22 61

25 29

362000

22 64

2_s 29

260000

26 61

31 30

333000

22 65

24 29

C M s 0

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

259000 23

59 28 30

288000 23

bull 61 27 30

271000 23

59 28 30

339000 22

60 26 29

284000 23

59 28 30

365000 21

60 25 29

C M s 7

ss 15

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s M T--deg

J

CF T Tc

s

71000 28

bull 65 30 61

298000 23 57

25 29

103000 27

~ 71 27 52

285000 23 59

28 30

74000 28

bull 67 28 60

365000 22

58 28 29

123000 26

69 26 48

334000 22 61

25 29

85 000 28

65 31 58

320000 22

60 26 29

123000 26

73 24 48

329000 22 61

25 29

55

30

M T7

J

CF T Tc

s

296000 23

60 27 29

296000 23

62 27 29

339000 22 59

27 29

335000 22

63 25 29

313000 22

65 24 29

309000 23

65 25 29

tbte

M = Resilient rrodulus in psi middot Tf = Uncorrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches CF= Correction factor for air voids and binder volume Tc= Corrected thickness for tensile strain requirements inches Ts= Ihickness for subgrade strain requirements inches

II11~~~1~~i~IIII 08860 ElS

Page 12: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 13: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 14: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 15: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 16: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 17: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 18: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 19: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 20: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 21: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 22: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 23: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 24: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 25: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 26: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 27: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 28: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 29: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 30: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 31: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 32: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 33: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 34: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 35: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 36: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 37: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 38: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 39: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 40: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 41: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 42: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 43: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 44: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 45: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 46: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 47: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 48: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 49: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 50: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 51: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 52: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 53: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 54: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 55: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 56: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 57: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 58: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 59: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 60: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 61: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 62: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 63: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 64: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 65: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 66: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 67: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 68: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 69: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 70: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 71: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 72: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 73: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 74: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 75: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 76: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 77: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 78: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 79: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 80: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 81: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 82: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 83: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 84: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 85: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 86: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 87: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 88: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 89: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 90: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 91: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 92: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 93: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 94: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 95: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 96: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 97: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 98: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 99: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 100: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 101: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 102: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 103: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 104: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 105: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 106: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 107: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 108: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 109: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 110: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 111: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 112: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 113: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 114: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 115: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 116: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 117: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 118: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 119: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 120: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 121: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 122: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 123: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 124: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 125: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 126: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 127: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 128: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 129: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 130: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 131: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 132: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 133: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 134: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 135: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 136: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 137: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 138: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 139: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 140: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 141: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 142: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 143: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 144: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 145: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 146: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 147: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 148: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 149: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 150: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 151: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 152: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 153: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
Page 154: 9.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS