#9 new research on pedestrian and bicycle behavior: perceptions, attitudes, and habits - sanders

26
Exploring Traffic Danger for Bicyclists Initial Findings from a Recent Survey of Drivers and Bicyclists in the Bay Area Rebecca Sanders, UC Berkeley Pro Walk Pro Bike September 11, 2012

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Exploring Traffic Danger for Bicyclists

Initial Findings from a Recent Survey of Drivers and Bicyclists in the Bay Area

Rebecca Sanders, UC Berkeley Pro Walk Pro Bike

September 11, 2012

Page 2: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

•  Survey on perceived and actual bicycle danger •  Findings: Detecting trends

–  Cyclist groups worry about different safety issues

–  Frequent cyclists’ worries related to near misses and actual collisions for self, friends, and family

–  Infrequent cyclists slightly affected by personal experiences and those of friends and family

–  Potential cyclists slightly affected by experiences of friends and family

–  Near misses need more attention

–  Support for bicycling associated with worries about cycling

Overview

2

Page 3: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

3

Methodology & Study Area

Image credit: Bay Area Air Quality Management District

• Internet survey • Convenience sample • 467 respondents (42% response rate) • Surveyed summer, 2011

95

226 74

30

14

3

2

7

Page 4: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Population

4

Total (N=467) *Bay Area (N=4,496,326)

Age Range % %

18-24 6 9

25-34 36 15

35-44 18 15

45-54 21 15

55-64 16 12

65+ 4 12

Sex

Male 45 49

Female 54 51

Age Range and Sex Comparison of Survey and Bay Area Populations

Source: U.S. Census Summary File 1, Table QT-P1 Age Groups and Sex

Page 5: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Population

5

Age Range

Non-cyclists (n=194)

%

Infrequent cyclists (n=171)

%

Frequent cyclists (n=102)

%

18-24 4 5 10

25-34 34 35 41

35-44 18 18 17

45-54 16 29 16

55-64 21 11 16

65+ 7 2 -

Survey Respondents by Age and Cycling Frequency

Chi-square significant p < 0.10

Page 6: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Population

6

Survey Respondents by Sex and Cycling Frequency

Sex

Non-cyclists (n=194)

%

Infrequent cyclists (n=171)

%

Frequent cyclists (n=102)

%

Male 33 56 48

Female 64 43 51 Chi-square significant p < 0.000

Page 7: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Population

7

Race/Ethnicity

Total (N=467)

%

*Bay Area (N=4,496,326)

%

Caucasian/White 59 50

Asian 15 23

African American/Black 5 9

Hispanic 5 22

Native American/Alaska Native - 1

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 1 1

Other 7 10

Two or more races 4 6

Race and Ethnicity Comparison of Survey and Bay Area Populations

Source: U.S. Census Summary File 1, Table QT-P3 Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin

Page 8: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Population

8

Race/Ethnicity

Non-cyclists (n=194)

%

Infrequent cyclists (n=171)

%

Frequent cyclists (n=102)

%

Caucasian/White 53 61 69

Asian 19 13 10

African American/Black 7 4 3

Hispanic 5 5 5

Native American/Alaska Native 1 - -

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 1 2 1

Other* 8 8 6

Two or more races 5 5 4

Survey Respondents by Race/Ethnicity and Cycling Frequency

*Other included Indian and Middle Eastern Chi-square significant p < 0.10

Page 9: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

9

Survey Population

Annual HH Income

Total (N=467)

%

*Bay Area (N=4,496,326)

%

< $35k 15 22

$35k-$49k 10 11

$50k-$74k 19 16

$75k-$99k 13 13

$100k-$149k 18 18

$150k + 12 19

Income Comparison of Survey and Bay Area Populations

Source: 2010 American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates, Table S-1901 Income in the Past 12 Months

Page 10: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

10

Survey Population

Annual HH Income

Non-cyclists (n=194)

%

Infrequent cyclists (n=171)

%

Frequent cyclists (n=102)

%

< $35k 15 12 17

$35k-$49k 12 9 8

$50k-$74k 19 19 20

$75k-$99k 13 13 13

$100k-$149k 14 22 20

$150k + 11 13 12

Survey Respondents by Income and Cycling Frequency

Chi-square not significant

Page 11: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results

11

Percentage of Respondents who Feel Safe Traveling on Different Street Types

Non-cyclists (n=193)

%

Infrequent cyclists (n=171)

%

Frequent cyclists (n=102)

%

Total (N=466)

%

Residential

Bicycle* 71 78 83 76

Drive 89 91 89 90

Walk 89 95 96 93

Commercial

Bicycle 29 23 32 28

Drive 73 74 67 72

Walk* 76 81 85 80 * Significant difference at level of p < 0.10

Page 12: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results

12

Percentage of Respondents who Feel Safe Traveling on Different Street Types

Non-cyclists (n=193)

%

Infrequent cyclists (n=171)

%

Frequent cyclists (n=102)

%

Total (N=466)

%

Residential

Bicycle* 71 78 83 76

Drive 89 91 89 90

Walk 89 95 96 93

Commercial

Bicycle 29 23 32 28

Drive 73 74 67 72

Walk* 76 81 85 80 * Significant difference at level of p < 0.10

Page 13: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results

13

Percentage of Respondents who Feel Safe Traveling on Different Street Types

Non-cyclists (n=193)

%

Infrequent cyclists (n=171)

%

Frequent cyclists (n=102)

%

Total (N=466)

%

Residential

Bicycle* 71 78 83 76

Drive 89 91 89 90

Walk 89 95 96 93

Commercial

Bicycle 29 23 32 28

Drive 73 74 67 72

Walk* 76 81 85 80 * Significant difference at level of p < 0.10

Page 14: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results

14

The Extent to which Safety Concerns “Strongly Influence” Potential and Infrequent Cyclists, and “Always Worry” Frequent Cyclists

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

I'll be hit by an inattentive driver

Drivers will drive too fast near me

Drivers will drive too close to me

I'll be cut off while turning

I'll make a mistake and hurt myself or

others

I'll be hit by a car door

Drivers will be aggressive toward

me

Potential Cyclists (n=148) Infrequent Cyclists (n=168) Frequent Cyclists (n=94)

Page 15: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results

15

The Extent to which Safety Concerns “Strongly Influence” Potential and Infrequent Cyclists, and “Always Worry” Frequent Cyclists

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

I'll be hit by an inattentive driver

Drivers will drive too fast near me

Drivers will drive too close to me

I'll be cut off while turning

I'll make a mistake and hurt myself or

others

I'll be hit by a car door

Drivers will be aggressive toward

me

Potential Cyclists (n=148) Infrequent Cyclists (n=168) Frequent Cyclists (n=94)

Page 16: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

16

Survey Results The Extent to which Safety Concerns Have “Some Influence” on Potential and Infrequent Cyclists, and “Sometimes Worry” Frequent Cyclists

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

I'll be hit by an inattentive driver

Drivers will drive too fast near me

Drivers will drive too close to me

I'll be cut off while turning

I'll make a mistake and hurt myself or

others

I'll be hit by a car door

Drivers will be aggressive toward

me

Potential Cyclists (n=148) Infrequent Cyclists (n=168) Frequent Cyclists (n=94)

Page 17: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results Potentially Dangerous Incidents for Bicyclists – Bicyclists’ Self Report (n=273)

Incident Incidence

Cyclist was passed with fewer than 3 feet 65%

Driver blocked bike lane while waiting for someone or parking 54%

Driver/passenger opened car door and hit / almost hit cyclist 45%

Driver hit / almost hit cyclist while turning 41%

Driver honked / yelled at cyclist when s/he was not in the wrong 42%

Driver merged into lane and hit / almost hit cyclist 31%

Driver drove aggressively around cyclist 42%

Driver tried to beat cyclist to a turn and hit / almost hit him/her 23%

Driver blocked cyclist from merging into lane after cyclist signaled 25%

Page 18: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results Potentially Dangerous Incidents for Bicyclists – Bicyclists’ Self Report (n=273)

Incident Incidence Actually

hit?

Cyclist was passed with fewer than 3 feet 65% 2%

Driver blocked bike lane while waiting for someone or parking 54% 2%

Driver/passenger opened car door and hit / almost hit cyclist 45% 6%

Driver hit / almost hit cyclist while turning 41% 8%

Driver honked / yelled at cyclist when s/he was not in the wrong 42% 2%

Driver merged into lane and hit / almost hit cyclist 31% 4%

Driver drove aggressively around cyclist 42% 2%

Driver tried to beat cyclist to a turn and hit / almost hit him/her 23% 3%

Driver blocked cyclist from merging into lane after cyclist signaled 25% 1%

Page 19: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results Potentially Dangerous Incidents for Bicyclists – Bicyclists’ Self Report (n=273)

Incident Incidence Actually

hit? Incident :

Hit

Cyclist was passed with fewer than 3 feet 65% 2% 29

Driver blocked bike lane while waiting for someone or parking 54% 2% 37

Driver/passenger opened car door and hit / almost hit cyclist 45% 6% 8

Driver hit / almost hit cyclist while turning 41% 8% 5

Driver honked / yelled at cyclist when s/he was not in the wrong 42% 2% 23

Driver merged into lane and hit / almost hit cyclist 31% 4% 8

Driver drove aggressively around cyclist 42% 2% 23

Driver tried to beat cyclist to a turn and hit / almost hit him/her 23% 3% 8

Driver blocked cyclist from merging into lane after cyclist signaled 25% 1% 34

Page 20: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results

Influence of Collision and Near Miss Experiences on Worries about Safety

Related Collision Related Near Miss

Potential cyclist

(n=145)

Infrequent cyclist

(n=164)

Frequent cyclist (n=93)

Potentialcyclist

(n=145)

Infrequent cyclist

(n=164)

Frequent cyclist (n=93)

Worry about being cut off by a turning driver n/a * * n/a - *** Worry about being doored n/a - * n/a - *** Worry about drivers passing too close n/a - - n/a - * Worry about aggressive drivers n/a - - n/a - ***

Significance indicated at the following levels: * p ≤ 0.10; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001

Page 21: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results

Influence of the Experiences of Friends and Family on Worries about Safety

You, friends, or family have crashed with a cyclist while driving

You, friends, or family have crashed with a driver while

bicycling

Potential cyclist

(n=145)

Infrequent cyclist

(n=164)

Frequent cyclist (n=93)

Potential cyclist

(n=145)

Infrequent cyclist

(n=164)

Frequent cyclist (n=93)

Worry about being cut off by a turning driver - - * - - ** Worry about being doored * - - * - * Worry about drivers passing too close - - - - * - Worry about making a mistake - - * - - *

Significance indicated at the following levels: * p ≤ 0.10; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001

Page 22: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Survey Results

Significant correlation (p < 0.10) between support for bicycling in one’s city and the following worries about safety: 1.  Worry about being hit by a car door 2.  Worry about aggressive driving 3.  Worry about drivers passing too close 4.  Worry about making a mistake that could hurt oneself or

others 5.  Worry about losing one’s balance

Page 23: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Limitations & Future Research

23

• Systematic sample • Internet/email population not representative • Potential self-selection bias

• Trip Diary • Count “near misses” and hits • Recall bias

• Revised survey • Uniform scales

Page 24: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

•  Frequent cyclists consistently affected by personal experiences and those of friends and family

•  Infrequent cyclists slightly affected by personal experiences and those of friends and family

•  Potential cyclists –  Slightly affected by experiences of friends and family

–  Worried about different occurrences than frequent cyclists

–  More worried than frequent cyclists about most encounters

•  Near misses influential and pervasive

•  Significant relationship between worries about safety and support for bicycling

Conclusions

24

Page 25: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Next Steps

25

•  Detailed crash analysis of Bay Area •  Exploration of attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge of

roadway laws and their relationship to •  Perceived safety •  Roadway design preferences

Page 26: #9 New Research on Pedestrian and Bicycle Behavior: Perceptions, Attitudes, and Habits - Sanders

Thank you!

26