89

DAFTAR PUSTAKAArikunto, S. (2009). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.Arsyad, A. (2007). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta : PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2006). Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta : Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.Barnea, N. dan Dori, J.Y. (1999). High-School Chemistry Students Performance and Gender Differences in a Computerized Molecular Modeling Learning Environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 8, No. 4, 1999.Brady, J.E. (1999). Kimia Universitas : Asas dan Struktur. Jakarta : Binarupa Aksara.Bucat, B. dan Mocerino, M. (2009). Learning at the Sub-micro Level: Structural Representations. Kumpulan Jurnal dalam Multiple Representations In Chemical Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education 4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8 5,Chandrasegaran, et al. (2007). The Developmentof a Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument for Evaluating Secondary School Students Abilitty to Descrie and Explain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Representation. Chem Educ Pract, 8, (3), 293-307.Chittleborough, G. dan Treagust, F.G. (2007). The Modeling Ability of Non-Major Chemistry Students Their Understanding of The Sub-microscopic Level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2007. 8 (3), 274-292.Dahar, R.W. (1989). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.Davenport, et al. (2007). The Influence of Molecular Diagrams on Chemistry Learning. European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan.Devetak, I, et al. (2007). Assessing 16-Year-Old Students Understanding of Aqueous Solution at Submicroscopic Level. Res Sci Educ. DOI 10.1007/s11165-007-9077-2.Eilks, I, et al. (2007). Seventh-grade Students' Understanding of Chemical Reactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2007. 3, (4), 271-286.Eliyawati. (2009). Peranan Multimedia Berorientasi Struktur pada Pembelajaran Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit. Skripsi Sarjana pada FPMIPA UPI : tidak diterbitkan.Firman, H. (2000). Penilaian Hasil Belajar dalam Pengajaran Kimia. Bandung : Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FPMIPA UPI.Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Score. American Educational Research Associationa Division.Hakim, A.L. (2011). Analisis Hasil Belajar Level Makroskopik, Mikroskopik dan Simbolik pada Materi Wujud Zat dan Perubaahannya. Skripsi Sarjana pada FPMIPA UPI : tidak diterbitkan.Harwood, W.S. dan McMahon, M.M. (1997). Effects of Integrated Video Media on Student Achievement and Attitudes in High School Chemistry. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching. 34, No. 6, Pp. 617631.Kozma, R. dan Rusell, J. (1997). Multimedia and Understanding: Expert and Novice Responses to Different Representations of Chemical Phenomena. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching. 34, No. 9, Pp. 949968.Krisno, M.A. (2008). Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Jakarta : Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.Kurniawan, I. (2009). Peranan Multimedia Berorientasi Struktur pada Pembelajaran Larutan Penyangga. Skripsi Sarjana pada FPMIPA UPI : tidak diterbitkan.Laliyo, L.A.R. (2011). Model Mental Siswa dalam Memahami Wujud Zat dan Perubahannya. Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.Merino, C. dan Sanmarti, N. (2008). How Young Children Model Chemical Change. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 9, 196207.Ozmen, H. (2011). Turkish Primary Students' Conceptions About The Particulate Nature of Matter. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 6, No 1, January, 2011, 99-121.Prithaloka, Y. (2010). Analisis Hasil Belajar Level Makroskopik, Mikroskopik dan Simbolik padaPokok Bahasan Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan. Skripsi Sarjana pada FPMIPA UPI : tidak diterbitkan.

Riduwan, M. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Bandung : Alfabheta.Rohani, A. (1997). Media Intruksional Edukatif. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.Sabaniati, A. (2010). Analisis Hasil Belajar Level Makroskopik, Mikroskopik dan Simbolik padaPokok Bahasan Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit. Skripsi Sarjana pada FPMIPA UPI : tidak diterbitkan.Sadiman, A. (2009). Media Pendidikan : Pengertian, Pengemabangan, dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.Santyasa, I.W. (2007). Landasan Konseptual Media Pembelajaran. Makalah : Disajikan dalam Worh Shop Media Pembelajaran bagi Guru-Guru SMAN Banjarangkan Klungkung.Schank, P. dan Kozma, R. (2003). Learning Chemistry Through the Use of a Representation-Based Knowledge Building Environment. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 21, (3), 253-279.Selviyanti. (2010). Analisis Hasil Belajar Level Makroskopik, Mikroskopik dan Simbolik padaPokok Bahasan Hidrolisis Garam. Skripsi Sarjana pada FPMIPA UPI : tidak diterbitkan.Snead, L.P. (2011). Difficulties Teaching Abstract Concepts in Secondary Chemistry Classroom. Makalah dalam The National Chemical Education.Sopandi, W. (2009). Pembelajaran Kimia yang Berorientasi Pada Struktur. Disajikan pada Workshop Nasional Pembelajaran Kimia SMP tanggal 13 Agustus 2009. Sunarya, Y. (2003). Kimia Dasar 1. Gracia Indah Bestari : Bandung.Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfhabeta.Suwardi, S. (2011). Pembuatan Video Pembelajaran Sifat Diskontinu Materi. Skripsi Sarjana pada FPMIPA UPI : tidak diterbitkan.Taber, K.S. (2009). Learning at the Symbolic Level. Kumpulan Jurnal dalam Multiple Representations In Chemical Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education 4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8 5,Talanquer, V. (2010). Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry triplet. International Journal of Science Education. 33, 2, 179 -195.Tasker, R. dan Dalton, R. (2006). Research Into Practice: Visualisation of The Molecular World Using Animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 7, (2), 141-159.Treagust, et al. (2003). The Role of Submicroscopic and Simbolic Representasions in Chemical Explanations. International Journal of Education. 25, (11), 1353-1368.Tytler, et al. (2007). Representational Issues in Students Learning About Evaporation. Res Sci Educ. 37:313331.Wiersma, W dan Jurs, S,G, (2009). Research Methode in Education 9th. Pearson : United State of America. Wu, H-K. (2003). Linking The Microscopic View of Chemistry To Real Life Experiences : Intertextuality In a High School Science Clasroom. Science Education. 87, 868-891.Wu, H.-K., et al. (2001). Promoting Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Representations : Students Use of a Visualization Tool In The Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38, 821-842.Yang, M.J. (2000). Problem Solving in Chemistry at Secondary School. Tesis pada Pusat Pendidikan Sains Fakultas Sains Universitas Glosgow United Kingdom : Tidak diterbitkan.

86