7th march 2012 - step change in safety · 0910 asset integrity steering group (20) steve bullock /...

39
Leadership Team 7 th March 2012 Woodbank

Upload: tranliem

Post on 23-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Leadership Team

7th March 2012

Woodbank

AGENDA

0800 FIRE & SAFETY BRIEF (5) tbc

0805 CO-CHAIR INTRODUCTION (5) Ken Robertson

0810 SAFETY MOMENT (10) Steve Bullock

0820 OIL & GAS UK UPDATE (10) Robert Paterson

0830 HSE UPDATE (10) Steve Walker

0840 INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP DAY (20) Les Linklater

0900 BREAK

0910 ASSET INTEGRITY STEERING GROUP (20) Steve Bullock / Geoff Holmes

0930 HELICOPTER SAFETY STEERING GROUP UPDATE (10) Alan Chesterman / Tim Glasspool

0940 COMPETENCE STEERING GROUP (10) Peter Murphy / Neil McCulloch

0950 HUMAN FACTORS STEERING GROUP UPDATE (10) Bob Fennell / Robin Watson

1000 SUPPORT TEAM UPDATE (20) Les Linklater

1020 AOB All

FIRE & SAFETY BRIEF

CO-CHAIR INTRODUCTION Ken Robertson

SAFETY MOMENT Steve Bullock

OGUK UPDATE Robert Paterson

EC REGULATIONS

• Meeting with the Commission reps on 28th March – Explain what is wrong with their regulatory impact

assessment. Noble Denton did the impact assessment analysis and will accompany. Also there will be OLF, together with DNV. DNV analysis of the EC impact assessment arrived at similar conclusions.

• Meetings in April with various MEPs to ensure that they too understand OGUK position.

Health and Safety Executive

Health and Safety Executive

HSE Update

Steve Walker

Step Change Leadership Team meeting

7th March 2012

Maitland Review

• In 2010 DECC announced a formal review to consider the consequences of the Macondo accident for the UK regulatory regime.

• “To carry out a review of the UK Oil and Gas regulatory regime against the issues and recommendations emerging from the key investigations into the Deepwater Horizon incident in the Gulf of Mexico and other relevant reviews”

• “To make any recommendations for improvement to the UK regime in the light of that review”

Maitland review

• Chaired by Prof. Geoff Maitland (Chair)

• Covered

– Licensing, approval & consent process

– Preventative regime (safety and environmental)

– Preparedness regime

– Liability issues

– Liaison between regulators

– Co-ordination and responsibility in a drilling activity

– Adequacy of industry response

• Published December 2011: “Offshore Oil & Gas in the UK – an independent review of the regulatory regime”. http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-demand/oil-gas/3875-offshore-oil-gas-uk-ind-rev.pdf

Recommendations

• Well planning and

control

• Environmental

protection

• Emergency response

• Learning from incidents

and best practice

• Implementation

assurance

• Competency and

training of the workforce

• Workforce engagement

• Liability and insurance

issues

• Regulator issues

• The European

dimension

• Technology

development

Recommendations

• Industry is called upon to implement many recommendations (with support in some areas from regulators)

• Other recommendations fall to the regulators to implement.

• Report to Ministers by July 2012

• Industry/regulator steering group established.

IRF 2011 Offshore Summit

• Held in Stavanger, October 2011

• Provided an opportunity for frank dialogue

on post Macondo issues

• Summary of conclusions circulated

• Should help to form ongoing priorities for

industry and regulators alike.

• Conclusions at http://www.irfoffshoresafety.com/conferences/2011Summit

INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP DAY Les Linklater

INDUSTRY SAFETY LEADERSHIP DAY

Update

• 58 Confirmed Attendees (potential 125)

• Posters – AISG (in progress) – WESG (draft submitted) – CSG (in progress) – HFSG (in progress) – HSSG (in progress) – ESRs (in progress)

• Annual Review – Comments to LL by 14th

ASSET INTEGRITY Steve Bullock / Geoff Holmes

HYDROCARBON RELEASE SEMINAR

Status

• 130 Delegates – Comms to all SCiS networks

(circa 1000)

– Broad spectrum of attendees, with direct workforce engagement

– Re-issue of Amy Li research paper, delegate pack to include HCR Reduction Toolkit and MJI Competence Guidelines.

AISG UPDATE

HCR DVD

• An updated DVD is to be made.

• Viscom have been approached and given a target production date of 1st April 2012.

HSE Secondment

• New role - supporting data sharing into and from HSE / SCiS and OGUK.

• Capturing and analysing current data, understanding root cause.

• Sharing current data in timely manner

• Graduate level with some industry experience ideal

WORKGROUP UPDATES

HCR Release Reduction

• An updated DVD is to be made. – Viscom have been approached and given a target production date of

1st April 2012.

– Push – Pull Safety message, using Spadeadam style video supported by empathic character component “play your part”. Target safety meetings etc. at worksites.

• New role - supporting data sharing into and from HSE / SCiS and OGUK. – Capturing and analysing current data, understanding root cause.

– Sharing current data in timely manner

– Graduate level with some industry experience ideal

WORKGROUP UPDATES

Verification

• 3 tier publication nearing completion – Leadership (3 page flyer)

– Workforce (16 pages)

– Practitioners Guidance (80+ pages)

• Technical Authoring resource requirement been identified – 3 companies have been approached to condense and edit the

verification document.

– Workgroup is to decide at their next meeting if all docs should be released at the SAME TIME or be DRIP FED.

WORKGROUP UPDATES

FPF / FPSO

• Workgroup had inaugural meeting to decide on terms of references, etc.

• The group is keen on further data analysis to confirm the issues on floating installations.

• Next meeting planned for 6 March 2012.

TECHNICAL AUTHORITIES

• Examining the roles TAs play within individual companies.

• Survey to be set up and sent to TAs, ops managers, etc. – Responses to be discussed at

next subgroup mtg.

• There is no intention to standardise TA role across the industry.

HELICOPTER SAFETY Alan Chesterman / Tim Glasspool

WEATHER DATA NETWORK

• The Helimet network exists to ensure the industry complies with “CAP437 Offshore Helicopter Landing Areas”. CAP437 recommends the sharing of data through a network and the use of data within 10 miles of installations to assist in the production of weather reports to helicopters.

• This sharing and use of local data ensures that the offshore industry can reduce the need for cloud and visibility equipment being installed on every installation.

• The concept will only succeed if every installation contributes to the network and uses the data it contains to provide their pre-flight weather reports.

• Oil & Gas UK have contracted with Nessco to provide this data network which became operational on 1 November 2011. At present only 62 installations contribute data to the network.

HELIDECK INTEGRITY

The Rules

JAR-OPS 3.220

Authorisation of Heliports by the Operator

(See AMC OPS 3.220)

An operator shall only authorise use of heliports that are adequate for the type(s) of helicopter and operation(s) concerned.

Salient Detail The Helideck Certification Agency (HCA) will be empowered through the MoU to withdraw Helideck Certification on behalf of the helicopter operators. Helideck Certificates will be valid for two years, with six monthly self-audit reports required from each Helideck Certificate holder to maintain this validity. This is intended to ensure that training and infrastructure is maintained between HCA visits. The Helicopter Operators have asked HCA to assess the implications of items 1-3 and the additional resources that will be required to achieve them. Once this is complete the Helicopter Operators will present a plan to the Helideck Duty Holders and OGUK with a timetable for compliance.

WAY FORWARD

• HCA will introduce this new inspection regime

– Looking for HSSG support

• Scope?

– Is this sufficient, or should more be added?

• Weather data

• Helideck structural integrity

• Helideck crew competency

COMPETENCE Neil McCulloch / Peter Murphy

MECHANICAL JOINT INTEGRITY

Guidelines

• Launch at HCR Prevention seminar (15th March)

• Communications post event to member companies and training provider network.

• Need support from member companies to promote to supply chain and adopt new standards, aligned to 50% HCR reduction target.

SAFETY LEADERSHIP

OPITO - OU Update

• No product / solution option (although 300h of

training available through OU)

• Research biased towards impact & effectiveness of leadership training.

• Output highlighted need for support post training, coaching etc. in the workplace.

Options

Do not progress

v

CSG to establish workgroup to progress to

joint solution (next page)

TEN CORE SAFETY LEADERSHIP QUALITIES

– Practical Guide

– Utilise 4 stage model 1. Training (OU content?)

2. Consolidation of skills/ embedding (OU Study highlights key success criteria)

3. Assessment

– Online – MIST style self assessment

– Onsite -worksite supervisor

4. Refresher training & assessment

EXAMPLE CORE QUALITIES

Confidence and Authority

Instil respect and command authority

Lead the team by example

Draw on knowledge and experience

Remain calm in a crisis

Empathy and Understanding

Practise “tough” empathy

Be sensitive to different cultures

Recognise the crew’s limitations

Motivation and

Commitment

Motivate and create a sense of

community

Place the safety of crew above everything

Openness and Clarity

Communicate and listen clearly

Source MCA

NEXT STEPS

Establish Industry Workgroup

Run Workshops 1 & 2

Test output at Share Fair

22nd June

Run Workshops 3 & 4

Pilot on worksites Sept 2012

Produce Practical Guide and

Assessment Framework

HUMAN FACTORS Bob Fennell / Robin Watson

HUMAN FACTORS STEERING GROUP

• Build on “First Steps” & HF model

• Shift focus to Procedural Compliance (toolkit & minimum industry standards) and away from additional case studies

• Reference / build on EI’s Human & Organisational Factors Committee (HOFCOM) 2nd Edition briefing notes (2011) plus other cross-industry material

• Change sub-group team composition to: – 2 ops managers (co-leads) – 2 ESR’s – 3 HF specialists (ex-aviation, academia…) – H&SE representative – HSE professional(s)

HUMAN FACTORS STEERING GROUP

TERMS OF REFERENCE

Objective

The aim is to establish industry minimum standards & commonality in the management of Human Factors, which will significantly contribute to “Making the UK the safest place to work in the worldwide oil and gas industry”, the stated purpose of Step Change in Safety.

Background

Building on the work done previously by the Human Factors workgroup, there is a desire to provide an appropriate structure to share and implement industry minimum standards and best practice across the UK oil and gas industry. The outline assumption is that the framework will be around the following elements: 1. Processes, Procedures & Work Aids 2. Organisational culture 3. Safety behaviour / personal accountability 4. Work supervision / expectations (all/supervisor/manager/senior manager) 5. Assurance Although the Human Factors Steering Group and work group reserve the right to develop these elements as appropriate in the course of the 2012 activities.

Deliverables

Use the existing HF model and guidance to create: 1. A toolkit for all step-change members to refer to. 2. A minimum standard for Human Factor delivery across SCLT members.

Time-frame

Development of toolkit in 2012 Development and agreement to minimum standard by end 2012 Full roll out of tool-kit and associated standard across the industry in 2013

SUPPORT TEAM Les Linklater

SUPPORT TEAM

Resource Update

• 35+ applicants for Business Analysts, closing date 16th March

• 53 applicants for Business Support, closing date 2nd March

• 13 applicants for Project Manager, closing date 16th March

Budget 2012

• 49 Members invoiced (YTD).

• 39 members still to notify of PO / be invoiced. – 10 SCLT members

– ACTION: issue membership certification and invoice to remainder (39).

EVENTS

Share Fair

• 22nd June – Focus - Linking SCiS

messages, closing the loop, communication at all levels

– Intention - utilise the existing posters (Industry Leadership Safety Day)

– Challenge – Steering / Workgroup participation, presentation.

Network

• 2 May / 12 Sep – Focus - Linking SCiS networks,

building common language and understanding of the industry challenge

– Intention – plenary, facilitated sessions by network, plenary close

– Challenge – diverse numbers in each network group, facilitation requirements.

EVENTS

ESR Network

• 21st November – Focus - visibility, participation

and challenge. Listening to & learning from our workforce

– Intention – SCLT ESRs to lead the day, focusing on direct workforce engagement.

– Challenge – annual event...(is this sufficient?) 2 events per year from 2013

SNS HCR Seminar/ Share Fair

• Date: TBC – Focus – Taking the challenges

to the industry, Linking SCiS messages, closing the loop, communication at all levels

– Intention – HCR focused plenary, utilise the existing posters (Industry Leadership Safety Day)

– Challenge – Location, Steering / Workgroup participation, presentation.

AOB