7-1 copyright © 2013 by the mcgraw-hill companies, inc. all rights reserved.mcgraw-hill/irwin
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
![Page 2: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
7-2
2•Crimes
•Intentional Torts•Negligence and Strict Liability•Intellectual Property and Unfair
Competition
Crimes and Torts
PA
R
T
![Page 3: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
7-3
Negligence and Strict Liability
PA ET RHC 7
Mistakes are a fact of life. It is the response to error that counts.
Nikki Giovanni
![Page 4: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
7-4
Learning Objectives
• Identify the elements of negligence• Define the reasonable care standard
and the role of for eseeability• Explain whether a defendant has
breached a duty of reasonable care and applicable defenses
• Understand special doctrines and injuries in the law of negligence
![Page 5: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
7-5
• Elements of a negligence claim are:
1.Defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff,
2.Defendant committed a breach of duty,
3.Breach was actual and proximate cause of the injury experienced by plaintiff
Negligence
![Page 6: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
7-6
• In general, a defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of reasonable care if the plaintiff would foreseeably be at risk of harm from the defendant’s conduct– A duty may arise if a special relationship
existed between the parties•Examples of a special relationship:
doctor-patient, lawyer-client, accountant-client
Duty of Due Care
![Page 7: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7-7
• If a duty exists, then the question is whether the defendant acted as a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would have acted under the same or similar circumstances– Reasonable person standard
• The test focuses on defendant’s behavior, not defendant’s intent– Reckless behavior may be unreasonable
Breach of Duty of Due Care
![Page 8: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
7-8
• Based on the duty a property owner or tenant has to those on the property
• Duty varies with type of person on property
• Invitee (business visitor or member of the public)– Owner or tenant must exercise
reasonable care for safety of his/her invitees
Premises Liability Cases
![Page 9: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
7-9
• Licensee (those on property for his/her own purpose)– Owner or tenant obligated only to warn
licensee of hidden, dangerous conditions
• Trespasser (those on property illegally)– Owner or tenant owes no duty, but may
not willfully injure trespassers
Premises Liability Cases
![Page 10: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
7-10
• The defendant’s violation of such laws may create a breach of duty and may allow the plaintiff to win the case if the plaintiff – (1) was within the class of persons intended to
be protected by the statute or other law, and– (2) suffered harm of a sort that the statute or
other law was intended to protect against
Negligence Per Se
![Page 11: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
7-11
• Injuries may include bodily or emotional injury, and property or economic damage
• Causal link between the alleged misconduct and the injury requires:– Actual cause: plaintiff would not have
been hurt “but for” defendant’s breach of duty (act or omission)
– Proximate cause: plaintiff’s injury was foreseeable consequence of defendant’s act or omission
Causation and Injury
![Page 12: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
7-12
• An event that occurs after initial breach of duty may worsen a plaintiff’s injury– Example: plaintiff injured in accident and
while unconscious, a thief steals the plaintiff’s wallet
• If latter event is foreseeable, defendant will be deemed liable
• If latter event not foreseeable, defendant will be absolved from liability– Example: Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co.
Causation and Injury
![Page 13: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
7-13
• An important doctrine concerning causation is res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself)
• Res ipsa applies when: (1) defendant has total control of the instrument of harm, (2) harm would not occur in absence of negligence, and (3) plaintiff not responsible for his own injury– Example: after abdominal surgery, patient
complains of pain in abdomen and X-ray shows surgical clamp left in abdomen
Causation and Injury
![Page 14: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
7-14
• Contributory negligence is the plaintiff ’s failure to exercise reasonable care for his/her own safety– Example: auto accident in which
defendant rear-ended plaintiff but alleges that plaintiff was talking on a cell phone and not driving carefully
Defenses: Contributory Negligence
![Page 15: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
7-15
• Contributory negligence used to be a complete defense, but most states enacted comparative negligence systems in which a court or jury determines relative negligence of parties and awards damages in proportion to each party’s degree of negligence
• See Berberich v. Jack
Comparative Negligence
![Page 16: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
7-16
• Assumption of risk is plaintiff’s voluntary consent to known danger– Example: plaintiff snowboards
and breaks leg during a fall
• Exculpatory clause: plaintiff expressly assumes risk of injury by a contract term that attempts to relieve defendant of a duty of care otherwise owed to plaintiff
Defenses:Assumption of Risk
![Page 17: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
7-17
• Liability without – or irrespective – of fault• Thus, a defendant is liable even though
s/he did not intend to cause harm and did not act recklessly or negligently
• Basic for product liability cases
Strict Liability
![Page 18: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
7-18
• Imposing strict liability is a social policy decision that risk associated with an activity, especially abnormally dangerous activities, should be borne by those who pursue it, rather than by innocent persons who are exposed to that risk
Strict Liability
![Page 19: 7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56649ef15503460f94c031ea/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
7-19
Thought Question
• Does tort law have a useful purpose in society? Do the remedies make sense?