6wdwhzlgh )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhuv · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Fish Passage Barrier Removal in Washington State
Thanks to:Julie Heilman, WSDOT
Heather Pittman, WSDOTKeelan Jensen, WESTShelby Fowler, WEST
Dan EggersWEST Consultants, Inc.
![Page 2: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Statewide Fish Passage Barriers
![Page 3: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Fish Passage Barrier
WSDOT-Redrawn from Fish Passage Short Course, John Runyon
Definition: Anything that hinders any life stage of fish from moving through a water way.
Types:o Velocity
o Depth
o Water surface drop
o Slope
o Structures such as tide or flood gates
![Page 4: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Fish Passage Design Criteria and Guidelines
https://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01501/wdfw01501.pdf
Regulations
o Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 220-660-190
Design Guidelineso 2013 WDFW Water Crossing Design Guidelines
(WCDG)
o WSDOT Hydraulics Manual – Chapter 10 (LWM)
o 2008 USFS Stream Simulation Manual
o HEC-18 (Scour)
o Others
![Page 5: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Fish Passage Design Approaches
Geomorphic Approach
o Minimize the effect on the natural processes
Stream Simulation
o Typically smaller crossings with bankfull width less than 15 feet
o Reference Reach
Bridge Design
o Crossings with bankfull width over 15 feet
o Confined or unconfined
Hydraulic Design
o Typically for structures such as ladders, weirs, roughened channel.
Source: WDFW WCDG 2013
![Page 6: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Geomorphic Data Collection
Bankfull Width (BFW)
o Most important parameter in culvert design
o Reach consensus in field with stakeholders present
Longitudinal Profile
o Used to establish crossing elevation and channel slope
o Typically detailed survey +/- 300 feet from crossing. LiDAR used to supplement.
Channel Substrate (Pebble Counts)
Channel Shape and Pattern
Large Woody Material (LWM)
Constraints
![Page 7: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Stream Simulation Approach
Suitable for sites with:
o BFW less than 15 feet
o Moderately confined
Structure Size
o Minimum opening = 1.2*BFW + 2 ft
Structure Slope
o Not to exceed 25% of existing reach slope
Countersink
o 30-50% of culvert rise
Freeboard
o 1 to 2 feet during 100-year peak flow
Source: WDFW WCDG 2013
Source: WDFW WCDG 2013
![Page 8: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Bridge Design Approach
Two Methods
o Confined or Unconfined determined by floodplain utilization ratio (FUR)
o May need reach assessment
Structure Size
o Confined: apply a factor of safety
o Unconfined: Compare velocity of natural channel to channel velocity within proposed bridge. Ratio ~ 1
Freeboard
o 3 feet during 100-year event
Source: WDFW WCDG 2013
Source: WDFW WCDG 2013
![Page 9: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
H&H Analysis
Modeling
o 1-D HEC-RAS
o SRH-2D
Hydraulic Results used for
o Scour Analysis (HEC-18)
o Proposed Streambed Material Size
o Habitat Design
o Compliance with Design Criteria
Hydrology
o Available Gage Data
o USGS regression equations
o Flood Insurance Study
o Climate Change
![Page 10: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Proposed Streambed Material
Proposed Gradation
o Match existing channel material (if in equilibrium) based on D50.
o Designed for stability of D84 during 100-year event using modified shields approach or unit discharge method.
o Proposed mix designed by combining WSDOT standard materials using a “Scoop Ratio.”
![Page 11: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Confined Bridge Example
![Page 12: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Confined Bridge Example
![Page 13: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Existing Site Conditionso Existing Culvert – Twin 6-ft
Concrete Pipes
o Existing BFW = 24 ft
o Confined System (FUR<3)
o Constraints: Tidally Influenced, Road on Upstream Right Bank, House on Immediate Downstream Right Bank, Large Conifers
![Page 14: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Bankfull Width?
March 2016 May 2016
![Page 15: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Bankfull Width?
![Page 16: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Tidal Influence
![Page 17: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Pebble Count Locations/Reference Reach
![Page 19: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Proposed Designo Proposed BFW = 24 ft with
32 ft Minimum Section
o FOS = 1.33
o 45’ Opening Chosen in Negotiation with WDFW to Allow for Tidal Processes
o FOS = 1.88
o Habitat Features included Large Wood
![Page 20: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Proposed Plan
![Page 21: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Olsen Creek – Proposed Section
![Page 22: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
BEFORE: D50=1.4 in, D84=3.1 in
AFTER: D50=1.5 in, D84=4.1 in
Olsen Creek – Streambed Material
50% Streambed Sediment, 35% 6in Streambed Cobble, 15% 8in Streambed Cobble
![Page 23: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
BEFORE
AFTER
Olsen Creek - Structure
![Page 24: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Lessons Learned
o Important to obtain concurrence from all stakeholders on bankfull width.
o Minimum bridge opening width of 32 feet based on riverine hydraulics did not account for tidal processes. Based on Neah Bay tidal data, upstream channel only influenced by very high tides, but Neah Bay tidal data may not perfectly represent site.
o Habitat features are located in the field by Engineer during construction. Stakeholders should be present during placement if possible.
![Page 25: 6WDWHZLGH )LVK 3DVVDJH %DUULHUV · )lvk 3dvvdjh %duulhu 5hprydo lq :dvklqjwrq 6wdwh 7kdqnv wr -xolh +hlopdq :6'27 +hdwkhu 3lwwpdq :6'27.hhodq -hqvhq :(67 6khoe\ )rzohu :(67 'dq (jjhuv](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042612/5f47363ba2adac699a0e21c6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)