6/22/2021 kwik kian gie school of business mail - [gamaijb
TRANSCRIPT
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Submission Acknowledgement
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1626701387721339804&simpl=msg-f%3A1626701… 1/1
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
[GamaIJB] Submission Acknowledgement
T. Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:42 PMTo: Mr Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
Mr Bilson Simamora:
Thank you for submitting the manuscript, "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others" to Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. Withthe online journal management system that we are using, you will be able to track its progress through the editorial process by logging in to the journal web site:
Manuscript URL: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/author/submission/43873 Username: bilsonsimamora
If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for considering this journal as a venue for your work.
T. Hani Handoko Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Unsuitable Submission
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1627220622444032656&simpl=msg-f%3A1627220… 1/1
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
[GamaIJB] Unsuitable Submission
T. Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:15 AMTo: Mr Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
Mr Bilson Simamora:
An initial review of "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others" has made it clear that this submission does not fit within the authoring guideline of Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. The manuscript should have approx 4000-7000 words in the main body and the abstract should no more than 160 words. But, your manuscript main body is 7926 words, and the abstract is 175 words. Complete your manuscript with the limitation and put all table and figures in the appendix. Please kindly check this link for the authoring guideline of GamaIJB https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/pages/view/Author%20Guideline You may resubmit the manuscript and we would be glad to review it.
Thank You, T. Hani Handoko Scopus ID: 56296792800, Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Submission Acknowledgement
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1627448123467654170&simpl=msg-f%3A1627448… 1/1
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
[GamaIJB] Submission Acknowledgement
T. Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:31 PMTo: Mr Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
Mr Bilson Simamora:
Thank you for submitting the manuscript, "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others" to Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. Withthe online journal management system that we are using, you will be able to track its progress through the editorial process by logging in to the journal web site:
Manuscript URL: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/author/submission/44042 Username: bilsonsimamora
If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for considering this journal as a venue for your work.
T. Hani Handoko Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Editor Decision
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1672425663936098229&simpl=msg-f%3A1672425… 1/1
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
[GamaIJB] Editor Decision 2 messages
Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:29 AMTo: "Dr. Bilson Simamora" <[email protected]>
Dr. Bilson Simamora:
We have reached a decision regarding your submission to Gadjah MadaInternational Journal of Business, "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others".
Our decision is: Revisions Required
With this email, we attached the reviewer's comment(s). Hopefully, the reviewer's comment(s) can help to make your manuscript better. We are looking forward to your response and expect to receive the result no later than (July 24, 2020).
Should you have any inquiries, please contact our administrative staff at [email protected].
Your kind attention and cooperation is highly appreciated.
Thank you Sincerely yours GamaIJB ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb
2 attachments
A list of Amandement Form.docx 1111K
44042-147738-1-RV.pdf 1115K
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:49 AMTo: Hani Handoko <[email protected]>
Thank you Prof. Handoko for reviewing my manuscript and this decision. I accept that my manuscript should beimproved substantially. Its my pleasure to do that sir. Thank you.
Best regards
Bilson SimamoraThe author[Quoted text hidden]
A Table of Amendment (1st Manuscript Revision)
Manuscript’s Code: 2019.03.185
Title: “How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of
Anticipated emotions of Others”
Comments of reviewer Author Amendment
Reviewer 1 1. Please rewrite the important
point from the articles that
could easily found by the
reader
Thank you for your opinion. I have changed the
manuscript totally and hopefully made the
important points of the article, as exhibited in
the Abstract, more salient.
2. Abstract and introduction
still not mention why
important and what is the
aim of the research. The
details are on the
manuscript.
I appreciate and accept your inputs. I have
accommodated your inputs as described in the
Abstract and Introduction.
3. The result and the method is
good.
Thank you very much.
4. Difficult to understand, lack
of reading attractiveness.
I strongly agree with you that my manuscript
was written in poor English, organized less-
systematically, overused of abbreviations, less-
attractive, and finally hard to understand. I
have made substantial improvements to
accommodate your inputs. To mention, here,
the list of my corrective actions:
1. Improve writing quality.
2. Re-write the Abstract and Introduction to
make the critical points more salient.
3. Re-write several hard-to-read tables (Table
6, Table 7, and Table 8) to make them more
informative and reader-friendly.
4. Avoid the over-used of abbreviations. For
simplification reason, positive AEPros is
represented by proponents’ joyfulness,
negative AEPros substituted by proponents’
distress, opponents’ joyfulness represents
positive AEOps, and opponents’ distress is
used as a proxy for negative AEOps.
5. Re-writing the literature review and add
some supporting references to make
hypothesis formulation more soundly.
6. Rearrange the structure of the manuscript.
5. Should rewrite with some
important points that should
be clear. A lot of sentences is
difficult to read and
understand.
A Table of Amendment (1st Manuscript Revision) Reviewer 2 1. The study proposes about
How Proponents and
Opponents Influence Self-
Efficacy and Achievement
Goals. In the study, the
theory of anticipated
emotions and achievement
goals was used as the basis
for self-efficacy. This model
proposed interesting.
Thank you very much.
2. In Abstract:
The author explained about
“Other researchers are
encouraged to use
anticipated emotions of
proponents and opponents as
proxy for subjective norm
the Theory of Planned
Behavior or as antecedents
of desire in the Model of
Goal-Directed Behavior to
predict behavioral
intention.” It is not a major
part of his research. It would
be better if the author also
researched gender based.
Thank you for your input. I strongly agree with
you. I have replaced “the suggestion” with the
new one:
“Further research is encouraged to
investigate the efficacy of the concept in
explaining the motivation to perform other
types of social behaviors.”
Gender-based study could not be included in the
suggestion because the body of the text has
stated:
“However, the different proportion of
males and females is expected not to affect
self-efficacy and achievement goals since
both segments are the same in terms of the
mean of the two variables.“ (Page 11,
paragraph 1).
3. For Title: It appears that the word
emotions may be a proper noun
in this context. Consider
capitalizing the word
Sorry for the typo. I have fixed the mistake and
please allow me to use the new title:
In the Name of Love and Hatred: How
Anticipated Emotions of Others Influence
Achievement Motivation.
I think this new title is more attractive.
Thank you.
4. Page 7 reveals that that males
and females have the same
mastery approach (F=0.14,
sig.=0.71), it appears "that"
author typed that twice in a row.
Consider deleting one of them.
The mistake has been fixed.
“ …. reveals that males and females have the
same mastery approach (F=0.14, sig.=0.71)
…. “
(Page 11, paragraph 1)
Thank you.
A Table of Amendment (1st Manuscript Revision) 5. Page 8
Group 1 is framed with
statement: “I you are successful
in your study, people that love. It
appears that the pronouns "I you"
are used incorrectly.
Sorry for this disturbance mistake. “I” should be
written as “If”. The mistakes have been fixed.
Group 1 is framed with the statement:
“If you are successful in your study, people
who love and care for you will feel like,
happy, satisfied, pleased, inspired, proud,
surprise, thankful, joyfulness, pleased, win
and released and confidence.” (Page 11,
paragraph 2).
Thank you.
6. Consider rewriting the phrase. Strongly agree and already done. Thank you.
7. Page 13
with achievement goals the
author ……
Consider adding a comma.
with achievement goals, the
author ……
I have accommodated you suggestion:
To test the mediating effect of self-efficacy
on the relationship between proponents’ and
opponents’ anticipated emotions with
achievement goals, the author utilizes the
method suggested by Kenny (2018)….
(page 17 paragraph 2) ….
Thank you
8. Please use the template already
given for writing References
Strongly agree. I have also found many mistakes
in the References and have made substantial
improvement subsequently using Harvard-
Anglia format.
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Editor Decision
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1674899382708353020&simpl=msg-f%3A1674899… 1/2
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
[GamaIJB] Editor Decision 2 messages
Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:48 PMTo: "Dr. Bilson Simamora" <[email protected]>
Dr. Bilson Simamora:
We have reached a decision regarding your submission to Gadjah MadaInternational Journal of Business, "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others".
Our decision is: Revisions Required
Please kindly see the attached file to see the comments from the reviewers. We hope the reviewer comment can help to make your manuscript better. We are looking forward to your response and expect to receive the result no later than (August 20, 2020).
Should you have any inquiries, please contact our administrative staff at [email protected].
Your kind attention and cooperation is highly appreciated.
Thank you Sincerely yours GamaIJB ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb
2 attachments
A list of Amandement Form.docx 1113K
44042-178939-1-RV (1).pdf 1331K
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 4:15 AMTo: Hani Handoko <[email protected]>
Dear Prof. Handoko
Thank you very much for the opportunity to revise my manuscript and the suggestions given by thereviewers. I have just finished the revision and send the results in two files. The first file consists of thedocument with tables and figure in the text for easier reading, and the second consists of separated tablesand figure from the text. I also enclose the list of amendments.
I beg you sorry that I cannot send you a traceable change Word file due to the manuscript's substantialchange to accommodate the reviewers' suggestions.
I have tried hard to revise my manuscript for an expectation that it can fulfill your requirements.However, if further corrections are needed, I will gladly make it.
Thank you very much for your attention. I am looking to hearing from you about the acceptance of mymanuscript.
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Editor Decision
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1674899382708353020&simpl=msg-f%3A1674899… 2/2
Best Regards
The Author
Bilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]
4 attachments
A List of Amendment - Round 2 (Reviewer 2).docx 17K
How Proponents and Opponents Influence - Separated Table and Picture.docx 808K
A list of Amandement Form - Round 2 (Reviewer 1 and 3).docx1117K
How Proponents and Opponents Influence - Non separated Table and Picture.docx 810K
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
Manuscript’s Code: 2019.03.185
Title: How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of
Anticipated emotions of Others
Comments of reviewer Author Amendment
Reviewer 1 1. Introduction would need to be
rewritten. It should start with
an approach to give
overview about study
background, study
limitation, and direction of
the study.
The suggestion has been accommodated
2. Problem Statement section is
not provided. In one
statement, what is the real
problem? This section
should be presented in a way
that readers after convinced
with evidence and
justification understood the
research element of the
study. It would be good to
start with the storyboard and
the end with the issue that
needs attention.
In the Introduction, the author has made clear
statement to follow the suggestion: … the
research problem is, how others’ anticipated
emotions influence individuals’ current
achievement motivation?
The author has tried to make smooth flow of
storyboard to get to the research problem.
3. No argument or justification
created to explain the
importance of study initial
trust. Please include the
problem statement and it
need to be expanded.
Problem statement has been stated clearly and
the reason why the study has been underlined in
the Introduction
4. What is the research inquiry
that leads to specific
research questions and
research objectives?
Three research question has been stated followed
research objectives. Thank you
5. Research questions and
research objectives must be
able to answer the research
problem.
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
6. The flow of the Abstract need
to be revised. To begin with
a bit on research problem
and followed by the aims of
the study.
This suggestion has been accomdate:
… However, the influence of proponents' and
opponents' future emotions on achievement
motivation remains unclear. …
7. Please include the theory used
in the study.
I have accommodated the suggestion by stating
clearly that the main theory of this study is
Mayer and Salovey’s (1997) emotional
intelligent theory in the Abstract and
Introduction. Thank you.
8. Please include the method was
applied to examine the
research model. For
example, Partial Least
Squares (PLS).
The correction has been made. In the Abstract it
is clearly stated that the Mann Whitney test with
normal approximation supported by Monte
Carlo estimation to test the main effect of the
experimentation.
To test the mediation effect, the author stated
directly the use of Bayesian estimation technic
with 5000 times bootstrapping as suggested by
Reviewer 2
9. To include the description of
the research method and
design. Please state the
selection and numbers of
participant.
In the Abstract I have accommodated this
suggestion by stating clearly that the study
utilizes static group design that involve 203
participants chosen judgmentally. Thank you.
10. To include the implication
from the findings and
suggestion avenues for
future research. Significance
- who would benefit from
this and what is new about
it?
The people who may concern with the finding
of the study have been cited in theoretical and
managerial contributions. They are any parties
that involve theoretically and managerially in
achievement-related tasks, such educational
practitioners, trainer, training centre
management, and families in general
11. The discussion on
Methodology need further
explanation / elaborations.
The suggestion has been made additional
explanations about research site, research
design, and analysis technic as also suggested
by Reviewer 2.
12. Need to include Population,
Sampling and Data
Collection Procedure.
In research method has been stated that the
population are the body of students of the
university chosen as the site of the study.
13. Measures - How would the
researcher validate the
reliability and validity of the
constructs? Details require.
The validation of the construct uses the
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with
structural equation modelling (SEM) and the
reability analysis uses Cronbach Alpha. The
author have tried to describe them in details.
Thank you.
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
14. Recommend that the
definition be provided for all
the variables under the
measurement section before
explaining the measure.
The definition about dependent variables has
been added.
15. The content and flow of
writing the introduction
chapter need to be improved.
This chapter is not well
structured.
Thank you for this suggestion. I have improved
the Introduction.
16. The write up need to be
improved. Not focus. Many
points been mixed up in a
The single sentence paragraphs has been
rewritten. The author has also utilized grammar
checking application. Thank you.
single paragraph and
section. The candidate is
strongly recommended to
use topic sentence and
conclusion sentence.
17. The justification of the study
could be better organized
through the use of
subheadings that separate
that theoretical and
managerial contribution.
Theoritical and managerial contributions have
occupied a separate section in the final part of
the manuscript.
Reviewer 2 1. See the comments
Reviewer 3 1. The authors have shown
theoretical gaps in their study.
However, there is no data to
support the actual situation
occurring in the institution unless
it is merely an assumption that
future emotions may affect
individuals’ current achievement
motivation.
Thank you
2. Abstract - it is necessary for the
author to include the
background, objectives,
methodology, significant
findings, and significance of the
study in this section. Also,
consider explaining the
implications and the conclusion
of the research briefly.
The suggestion has been accommodated. Thank
you.
3. What type of sampling design
being used?
The author has stated directly that the study uses
judgmental design. Thank you.
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
4. The statistics are appropriate and
handled with competence. The
author shows a critically
intelligent application of
appropriate principles and
practices relevant to the problem
under the study.
Thank you. The statistical method has been
improved following the Reviewer 2 suggestion
to improve the robustness of the method
5. This manuscript is very well
written. The data are
appropriately attached and can
be clearly legible. The writing
style is easily understood by
readers from various fields.
Thank you
6. There is some authors’ name that
not cited in the text but listed in
the references such as Landry
(2003), Ames & Archer. (1988),
Hsieh, Sullivan & Guerra,
(2007), Israelashvili, Sauter, &
Fischer, (2019), Malhotra
(2020), Mellers & McGraw
(2001), Nicholls (1984), and
Schunk & Pajares (2009).
Thank you for the the detail correction. It helps
me to avoid the disturbance mistake. The
corrections has been made. Ames & Archer.
(1988) and Hsieh, Sullivan & Guerra, (2007)
are skipped out. The rest have cited in text.
7. Citations in the text and
references list do not follow the
format.
The correction has been made. Thank you.
8. Cite the names of all authors in the
first citation - Hair, J.F., W.C.
Black, B.J. Babin, and R.E.
Anderson, (2014)
The suggestion has been accommated. Thank
you.
9. There are some citations in the
text but missing under the list of
references such as Bagozzi et al.
(2016), Davis and Rusbult
(2001), Darnon et al. (2007)
The mistake has been corrected. Thank you.
The List of Amendment – Round 2 (Reviewer 2)
Comment Revision
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
1 This regards the manuscript "How
Proponents and
Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy
and Achievement
Goals: The Role of Anticipated
emotions of Others,"
which is under consideration by
Gadjah Mada
International Journal of Business.
Title of paper is similar to:
“Achievement as Gift and Prestige:
Formulating Anticipated Emotion of
Others as New Determinant of
Consumer Motivation
Author: Bilson Simamora, ASEAN
MARKETING JOURNAL June
2016 - Vol.VIII - No. 1 - 29-53
Title must be changed.
The author has used the initial title.
2 Commented [A3]: Misleading need
to be aligned to content. Mediation
effect is mentioned but baseline and
conceptual model to show
mediation effects are not shown.
Only tabulation of results are
available.
The mediation effect has been stressed in the
abstract:
Using Bayesian estimation technic with 1000
times bootstrapping, this study reveals that
selfefficacy mediates the influence of
anticipated proponents’ joyfulness on
performance-
approach goals partially. Partial mediation of
self-efficacy is also apparent in the impact of
proponents’ distress on mastery-approach and
mastery-avoidance goals.
3 Commented [A4]: Literature need
to be current to
warrant strong underpinning theory
and problem formulation.
The literature has been up-dated
4 Commented [A5]: This paper
should discuss how
personality traits and self-esteem
predispose individuals to
develop and strengthen
perceived academic self-efficacy
beliefs, and how these personal
characteristics interact with
learning conditions in improving
academic performance.
The author has stressed the argument of
selfdetermination theory (Ryan and Deci 2000)
and self-esteem embedded in social envy and
schadenfreude theory (Brambilla and Riva
2017; van Dijk, van Koingsbruggen,
Ouwerkerk, and Wesseling 2011) the
Introduction
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
5 Commented [A6]: Problem
formulation is vague and
ambiguous. Should be leaning
towards Indonesian academia
context to support a cogent
foundation. Thus, this paper should
examine specific domain of
selfesteem (e.g., in the academic
context), rather than global
selfesteem, in addition to basic traits
and self-efficacy beliefs to better
understand the personality
underpinnings linked with a
successful academic performance.
The problem formulation has been improved as
also suggested by Reviewer 1
6 Commented [A7]: Outdated
literature
The author has added more up-dated literatures
7 Commented [A8]: Outdated
8 Commented [A9]: Outdated
9 Commented [A10]: Outdated,
provides weak support for
hypotheses
10 Commented [A11]: Justification for
employing 4 hypotheses has not
been addressed providing strong
structural weakness for this study.
Why has 4 hypotheses employed in
this study? This has not been
clarified and also the issue of how
formal hypotheses for mediation
effects are developed and
articulated. There are two major
approaches: segmentation and
The suggestions have been accommodated.
Thank you
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
transmittal approaches. When
adopting the segmentation
approach, three hypotheses should
be developed: H1) independent
variable (X) effects mediator (M),
H2) mediator (M) effects outcome
variable (Y) and H3) mediation
effect (e.g. M mediates the
relationship between X and Y).
Papers using the segmentation
approach include Zhou, Benton,
Schilling, and Milligan (2011),
Paulraj (2011) and Wu, Choi, and
Rungtusanatham (2010). Next, the
transmittal approach, in turn,
requires a single hypothesis stating
that mediator (M) mediates the
relationship between X and Y
without delving into hypotheses
relating X to M and M to Y are
some of the examples for theorising
mediation models using the
transmittal approach.
11 Commented [A12]: Justification on
selection of unit of
analysis is not specified.
The suggestion has been accommodated. Thank
you.
12 Commented [A13]: Population and
sample size are not
justified.
Has been justified. Thank you.
13 Commented [A14]: Participants are
not randomly
assigned to conditions or orders of
conditions because the
independent variable is
manipulated before the dependent
variable is measured.
Static group design in this study allowed
nonrandomized participants selection as long as
the population are mostly homogenous and the
researcher uses proper technic analysis
(Malhotra 2020). This statement has been
stressed in the manuscript to accommodate this
suggestion. Thank you
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
14 Commented [A16R15]: Were steps
taken to ensure that the groups are
as similar as possible? Researcher
made an assumption and not on a
standardized h test. Are the same
sex, are close in age, and have
similar learning styles? Taking such
steps would increase the internal
validity of the study because it
would eliminate some of the most
important confounding variables.
But without true random
assignment of the students to
conditions, there remains the
possibility of other important
Thank you for this suggestion. Post-analysis
revealed that there are no differences of the
responses under investigation among males and
females segment. The mediation effect using
Hayes (2020) model 7 also showed that the
coefficient h is not significant. Therefore there
is no differences in self-efficacy and
achievement goals between the two segments,
including the difference of mediation effect in
the two segments.
confounding variables that the
researcher was not able to control.
This shows a design error
15 Commented [A17]: Because
participants are not randomly
assigned—making it likely that
there are other differences between
conditions, therefore this
quasiexperiments are generally
somewhere between correlational
studies and true experiments, this
shows directionality problem
Static group experiment viewed as pre
experimental design is possible (Malhotra
2020), especially if the use of the true
experiment has its own challenge. To avoid the
violation of randomization and the normality
distribution of data, the researcher utilized
nonparametric technic, namely Mann Whitney
Test, to test the main effect of the
experimentation on the dependent variables.
To test the mediation effect, following your
suggestion, I use Bayesian estimation method
with 5000 times bootstrapping that is useful for
small sample with unknown data distribution
pattern (MacKinnon, Lockwood, and Williams
2004; Preacher and Hayes 2004; Zhao, Lynch
and Chen 2010).
Following your suggestion, I used the
procedure specified by Zhao, Lynch and Chen
16 Commented [A18]: Was a pilot test,
face validity done? This shows
reliability and validity problems.
17 Commented [A19]: Estimate
specific indirect effects, instead
of total indirect effects.
18 Commented [A20]: Explore other
methods of mediation
analysis, for example Monte Carlo
simulation and Bayesian estimation.
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
19 Commented [A21]: Researchers
should follow Preacher and Hayes’s
approach and bootstrap the
sampling distribution of the indirect
effect. The bias-corrected
bootstrapping is considered a
powerful method to detect
mediation. A statistically significant
indirect effect (t-value > 1.96, two
tailed, p < 0.05) should be taken as
an evidence for mediation (Preacher
& Hayes, 2004; Zhao et al., 2010).
Additionally, evaluating confidence
intervals is another important
condition to confirm a mediation
effect.
(2010) to start the interpretation of the
mediation from the indirect effect generated by
pre-determined 5000 times bootstrapping, then
make a check on c’ (direct effect) and the
direction of axbxc to find the kind of the
mediation.
Fortunately, Hayes’(2020) macro regression
application named Process 3.5 plugged in SPSS
22 facilitates this analysis.
20 Commented [A22]: The posited
model accounted for ? % of the
variance in grades in males and for
of the variance in females? What is
the variance accounted for academic
self efficacy in males and in
females?
21 Commented [A23]: Multiple
mediation should be employed to
reduce effect of insignificance.
Mediation is necessary to test
theories in order to understand the
causal relationship
22 Commented [A24]: This shows the
model is underpowered and needs
to be rebuilt. This because models
in the multi-group structure
equation modeling framework
(with gender) as the group variable
should employ the Akaike
Information Criterion (AIC)which
is particularly well suited for
comparing the adequacy of
nonnested models (Tabachnick &
Fidell, 2001; the lower the AIC
index, the better the goodness-offit).
A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript
Revision)
23 Commented [A25]: The main
contribution of this present study
should have been to show clearly
how both personality traits and
selfesteem influenced students'
perceived academic self-efficacy
beliefs, which in turn influenced
grades. Students' personality
antecedents in order to better attune
their efforts to improve their beliefs
about how much they are capable to
successfully pursue challenging
academic and personal goals should
have been a good contributor to
educators.
The suggestion has been accommodated in the
Introduction and General Discussion.
As a theory of personality, Ryan and Deci’s
theory states that when introjected into
selfregulation, people will internalize significant
others’ expectations and build self-esteem and
express their image as socially responsible
persons by accepting and working for it.
Therefore, as Chen et al. (2009), the
demarcation line between personal and
collective goals becomes blurred, commonly
found in an Asian family.
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Editor Decision
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1684492361826424537&simpl=msg-f%3A1684492… 1/2
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
[GamaIJB] Editor Decision 2 messages
Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:04 PMTo: "Dr. Bilson Simamora" <[email protected]>
Dr. Bilson Simamora:
We have reached a decision regarding your submission to Gadjah MadaInternational Journal of Business, "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others".
Our decision is: Revisions Required
Hopefully, the reviewer's comment(s) can help to make your manuscript better. We are looking forward to your response and expect to receive the result no later than (December 04, 2020).
Should you have any inquiries, please contact our administrative staff at [email protected].
Your kind attention and cooperation is highly appreciated.
Thank you Sincerely yours GamaIJB ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb
A list of Amandement Form.docx 1112K
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:35 AMTo: Hani Handoko <[email protected]>
Dear Prof. HandokoThank you very much for the opportunity to revise my paper. I have my paper as suggested, as can be seen in theTable of the amendment. The files have been submitted through the journal's system. However, I send them againthrough email just to make sure that the files can reach your desk well.In addition to the suggested revision, I have also:
1. Updated the references, and more than 50% of them are from 2015 or newer.2. Fixed typos and ineffective sentences.3. Checked plagiarism with Turnitin (Similarity index=9%, the result is enclosed)
I hope with this revision; my paper can fulfill your requirements. However, if there is still something missing, I willgladly fulfill it. Thank you.
Best RegardsThe author
Bilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]
3 attachments
44042-177884-6-ED - Round 3.docx 818K
A list of Amandement Form-Round 3.docx1115K
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Editor Decision
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1684492361826424537&simpl=msg-f%3A1684492… 2/2
How Proponents and Opponents Influence Achievement Motivation_ TURNITIN.pdf 7941K
A Table of Amendment (3rd Manuscript Revision)
Manuscript's Code: 2019.03.185
Title: "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of
Anticipated Emotions of Others"
Comments of reviewer Author Amendment
Reviewer 1 1. What will a new contribution to this
present study? The significance of the
research needs to be expanded.
Thank you for the suggestions. The author
has re-write and prescribed firmly present
study’s contributions and its significance for
further research in expanding the concept
and related research domains (page 34-35).
1. Abstract entirely appropriate and
comprehensive.
Thank you.
2. The methods appear to be
satisfactory
Thank you.
3. As to improve the writing style
candidate should start each
paragraph with topic sentences, and
at the end of the paragraphs or sub-
section, the candidate must draw
conclusions from the discussed
issues/points and provide his views
and stand on specific issues/points
discussed.
The author agrees that some paragraphs are
poorly written. The author has revised them
to follow the direction tightly. Substantial
changes are evident in the discussion,
limitations, and direction for further
research.
Reviewer 2 1. Since your participants came from
Business college/Accounting
courses, please state the implication
for this study's generalization.
Agree, generalization is an important issue
regarding this research. The author has made
a consideration about this issue under the
direction for further research (page 35,
paragraph 3). Thank you.
2. Gino's (2014) studies -
https://www.scientificamerican.com/
article/banking-culture-encourages-
dishonesty/ - and Abraham et al.
(2020) -
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien
ce/article/pii/S2405844020311191#b
ib33, for examples, found that
Financial sectors have unique
characteristics in terms of the peoples'
behavioral ethics and moral emotions.
Gino’s (2014) and Abraham et al.’s (2020)
works substantially help the author find
three interesting research issues for further
research. The details are given under
the Limitation and Direction for
Further research issue (page 34-35). Thank
you.
3. Could non-business/accounting
cultures reproduce similar results of
the author's present study? Please
express some statements regarding
this concern in the author's
LIMITATION, DIRECTION FOR
Agree that, as reported by recent studies
(Lipson et al. 2016; Posselt and Lipson
2016), students in different disciplines have
different mental health and sensitivity to
mental disruption. Therefore, they are very
likely different highly in responding to
stimulation as in the present study. This
A Table of Amendment (3rd Manuscript Revision) FURTHER RESEARCH AND
CONTRIBUTIONS section.
issue has been cited in the direction for
further research (page 35, paragraph 3).
Thank you.
4. Please consider the study of Arief
Darmanegara Liem dan Youyan Nie
(2008)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/a
bs/10.1080/00207590701838097
which found that "the Indonesian
students endorsed more strongly than
their Chinese counterparts on
security, conformity, tradition,
universalism and achievement values,
social-oriented achievement
motivation, and performance-
approach and mastery-avoidance
goals."
Lim and Nie’s (2008) study strengthens, not
change, theoretical perspective for the
study’s results, in which, especially, their
findings help the author to explain why
participants are more sensitive to
proponents’ anticipated distress. I see that,
among others, based on their findings, this
sensitivity is caused by the substantial
endorsement of family-oriented goals and
values to Indonesian students (Page 33,
paragraph 2). Thank you for the suggestion.
5. Saw that the author's study did not
seem aware of that psychological
facts. Could the authors integrate
Liem and Nie's (2008)'s study results
in your Discussions? How might the
facts add or change perspectives in
interpreting the author's current
results?
6. Did the authors apply the Debriefing
procedure to the author's study
participants? Please elaborate on it.
Research procedure has been elaborated
beneath “Procedure” new sub-section.
Thank you (page 14).
7. Does an Ethical Committee review
the author's experimental protocol?
Did the author's have Ethical
Approval from the Committee?
Please state them in the author's
Methods section.
Before being executed, the research
proposal was reviewed by the technical and
ethical committee. The suggestion has been
accommodated by creating the new
subsection Review and Legitimation (page
14). Thank you.
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB]Preprint file
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1690022135840044892&simpl=msg-f%3A1690022… 1/5
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
[GamaIJB]Preprint file 11 messages
GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:58 PMTo: Mr Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
Dear Mr Bilson Simamora
We hope this email finds you well.With this email, we attached the preprint file. Please kindly check it.
Sincerely yours,Gadjah Mada International Journal of BusinessMaster of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]
1-simamora-preprint.pdf 756K
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:55 AMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>
Dear Editors
Thank you for the opportunity to check the article preprint version. I have checked the article as suggested and madesome corrections as can be seen in the enclosed table of corrections. See also the highlighted spaces in the author-checked preprint version.
Since Figure 1 is included in the correction, together with this letter I have sent the high-resolution corrected model toreplace the old one.
Thank you for handling my article well. If there is something missing I will gladly fulfill it.
Best Regards
Bilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]
3 attachments
Simple Mediation Model.png 78K
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB]Preprint file
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1690022135840044892&simpl=msg-f%3A1690022… 2/5
1-simamora-preprint-author correction.pdf 683K
Table of Corrections List.docx 730K
GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:25 AMTo: Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
Hello Bilson,
We hope this email finds you well.Here is the revised version of the preprint file (1-simamora-preprint-v2.pdf).Please help us to check it carefully before it is published. Just drop us a note when there is something else to correct.
Sincerely yours,Gadjah Mada International Journal of BusinessMaster of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]
[Quoted text hidden]
1-simamora-preprint-v2.pdf 727K
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 5:51 PMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>
Dear Editors
Thank you for the opportunity to re-check the article. I have made some corrections, displayed as comments on the highlighted words or phrases. Thank you for handling my article so well.
Best RegardsBilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]
1-simamora-preprint-v2.pdf 682K
GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:46 AMTo: Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
Hello Bilson,
We hope this email finds you well.Here is the revised version of the preprint file (1-simamora-preprint-v3.pdf).Please help us to check it carefully before it is published. Just drop us a note when there is something else to correct.We thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely yours
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB]Preprint file
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1690022135840044892&simpl=msg-f%3A1690022… 3/5
Gadjah Mada International Journal of BusinessMaster of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]
[Quoted text hidden]
1-simamora-preprint-v3.pdf 724K
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:54 AMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>
Dear Editors
Thank you for the opportunity to check my article before publishing. I have re-read the article and found that so far it has almost been camera-ready. There are only two remaining minor corrections on page 3 (column 2) and page 29 (column 2). Thank you.
Best RegardsBilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]
1-simamora-preprint-v3.pdf 637K
GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 8:29 AMTo: Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
Hello Bilson,
We hope this email finds you well.Here is the revised version of the preprint file (1-simamora-preprint-v4.pdf).Again..... Please help us to check it carefully
Sincerely yours,Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Master of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]
[Quoted text hidden]
1-simamora-preprint-v4.pdf 724K
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB]Preprint file
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1690022135840044892&simpl=msg-f%3A1690022… 4/5
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 3:45 PMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>
Dear Editors
Thank you for the opportunity to re-check the preprint version of my article. I am terribly sorry for leaving some mistakes in the reference list. The details can be found in the highlighted comments. In short, here are some actions needed:
1. The name of the journals and books should be typed in italic as specified in the template.2. In Putarek et al. (2020) it is written “Euopean” and should be written “European”.3. Maddux and Rogers (1983) positioned in the old version after Reb and Connoly (2007) should be placed after
Lipson et al. (2016), and Zeelenberg (2018) should be positioned before Zhao et al. (2010).4. Following the template, the year of the reference should be written without brackets.5. Some journal names used different character
I have edited the reference in my metadata and it is now the same as the clean version reference, enclosed with this letter that hopefully can be used if it is necessary. Thank you.
Best Regards
Bilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]
2 attachments
Reference - Clean Version.docx 24K
1-simamora-preprint-v4-Checked.pdf 721K
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 3:50 PMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>
This is the most current corrected pre-print file[Quoted text hidden]
1-simamora-preprint-v4-Checked.pdf 692K
GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:07 PMTo: Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>
Hello Bilson,
We hope this email finds you well.Here is the revised version of the preprint file (1-simamora-preprint-v5.pdf).Once again thank you for this cooperation.
Sincerely yours,Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Master of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]
6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB]Preprint file
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1690022135840044892&simpl=msg-f%3A1690022… 5/5
[Quoted text hidden]
1-simamora-preprint-v5.pdf 697K
Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:28 PMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>
Dear Editors
I think this version has been clean, no more mistakes or typos found. Thank you for involving me in the correcting process.
Best Regards
Bilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]