6. facility layout (1)
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
1/28
Facility Layout
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
2/28
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
3/28
Minimize material-handling costs
Utilize space efficiently
Utilize labor efficiently Eliminate bottlenecks
Facilitate communication and interaction
Reduce manufacturing cycle time
Reduce customer service time
Eliminate wasted or redundant movement
Increase capacity
Facilitate entry, exit, and placement of material, products, and people
Incorporate safety and security measures
Promote product and service quality Encourage proper maintenance activities
Provide a visual control of activities
Provide flexibility to adapt to changing conditions
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
4/28
The relationship between volume-variety-flow providescrucial inputs to the layout problem.
Variety
Very low variety Medium Variety High VarietyOne-offExecutive
Flowattributes
Stream lined flowMultiple flow
pathsDisorganised
flowJumbled
flow
Volumeattributes
High Mid-volume Low One piece
Examples ofoperatingsystem
Process industry,Mass product/
serviceprovider
Batchmanufacturing
firms
Job shops,Customized
serviceProject shops
Types oflayoutused
Line layout:Product layout
Group technologylayout
Process layoutFixedpositionlayout
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
5/28
Arrangement of resources on the basis of processcharacteristics of the resources available.
Sequence of visits for a product to different machinesdepends on routing.
When number of jobs to be processed in large thenthere will be enormous amount of crossings in the flow
of jobs. This poses challenges in material handling and
production control.
TYPES OF LAYOUT
1. Process Layout
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
6/28
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
LM
M
M
M
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
G
G
G
G
G
G
A A AReceiving andShipping Assembly
Painting Department
Lathe Department MillingDepartment Drilling Department
GrindingDepartment
P
P
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
7/28
The order in which resources are placed exactlyfollows the visiting sequence of the product asper routing information.
The required set of resources for every productis made available in a dedicated fashion.
Material handling and production control issuesare simpler.
2. Product Layout
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
8/28
L
L
L
D
M
D
M
D
G
L
G
G
Product A
Product B
Product C
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
9/28
PROCESS LAYOUT PRODUCT LAYOUT
ADVANTAGES
Sharing of specializedand costly equipment
More Flexibility Less vulnerable to
breakdowns
Standardizedproduct/ Processrouting
Operational controlsimpler
High output rate is
possible
DISADVANTAGES
Large inventory buildup Operational control is
difficult
Excess materialhandling
Low tolerance forbreakdown
Duplication ofequipments leading
to high capital costs Less flexibility due
to dedicatedresources
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
10/28
3. GROUP TECHNOLOGY LAYOUT
Configuring resources that have mid-volume, mid-variety product portfolios.
GT is a philosophy that seeks to exploitcommonality in manufacturing and uses this as thebasis for grouping components and resources.
The implementation of GT is often known ascellular manufacturing.
In cellular manufacturing, the availablecomponents are grouped into part families &
corresponding to each part family, machine groupsare identified.
Production Planning and Control (PPC) becomessimpler.
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
11/28
C
A
B Raw materials
Assembly
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10
11
12
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
12/28
3
6
9
Assembly
12
4
8 10
5
7
11
12
A B C
Raw materials
Cell 1
Cell 2
Cell 3
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
13/28
4. FIXED POSITION LAYOUT
Product manufactured isbulky, difficult to moveand if often made in oneor a few pieces.
The specific orientationof the product willdictate the placement ofspecific resources
required for the process.
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
14/28
Designing Process Layouts
Goal: minimize material handling costs
Block Diagramming minimize nonadjacent loads
use when quantitative data is available
Relationship Diagramming based on location preference between areas
use when quantitative data is not available
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
15/28
Block Diagramming
Unit load
quantity in whichmaterial is normally
moved Nonadjacent load
distance farther thanthe next block
STEPS
create load summarychart
calculate composite(two way) movements
develop trial layoutsminimizing number of
nonadjacent loads
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
16/28
Block Diagramming: Example
Department 1 2 3 4 5
Load Summary Chart
FROM/TO DEPARTMENT
1 100 502 200 503 60 40 50
4 100
605 50
1 2 3
4 5
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
17/28
Block Diagramming: Example(cont.)
2 3 200 loads2 4 150 loads
1 3 110 loads1 2 100 loads4 5 60 loads3 5 50 loads2 5 50 loads3 4 40 loads1 4 0 loads1 5 0 loads
1 2 3
4 5
100 200
150 50 50
60
40
110
Grid 1
Nonadjacent Loads:110+40=150
1 2
3
4
5
100
200
150
50
50 6040
110
Grid 2
Nonadjacent Loads:0
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
18/28
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
19/28
Relationship
DiagrammingProduction
Offices
Stockroom
Shipping andreceiving
Locker room
Toolroom
A A
AO
O
OO
O
U
UU
U
EX
I
A Absolutely necessaryE Especially importantI Important
O OkayU UnimportantX Undesirable
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
20/28
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
21/28
(b) Relationship diagram of revised layout
Offices
Stockroom
Lockerroom
Toolroom
Shippingand
receiving
Production Key: AEIOUX
Relationship Diagrams: Example(cont.)
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
22/28
Computerized layout Solutions
CRAFT Computerized Relative Allocation of Facilities
Technique
CORELAP Computerized Relationship Layout Planning
PROMODEL and EXTEND visual feedback
allow user to quickly test a variety of scenarios Three-D modeling and CAD
integrated layout analysis
available in VisFactory and similar software
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
23/28
Designing Product Layouts
Line Balancing technique is employed fordesigning of product layouts
Estimation of exact number of resources and
the sequence of resources requiredTasks are optimally combined without
violating precedence constraints and certainnumber of workstations designed to complete
the tasksTries to equalize the amount of work at each
station
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
24/28
productionActual
timeworkavailable
timeCycle
timeCycle
timestask
ns,workstatioltheoreticaofNumber T
N
timecyclestations)N(
timetaskTotalnutilizatioResourcesAverage
A
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
25/28
Line Balancing Example
Task Time Required(in min.)
Precedes
A 2.2 B, C, D
B 3.4 E
C 1.7 E
D 4.1 F
E 2.7 F
F 3.3 G
G 2.6 --
Company operates one shift per day Available time per shift is 450 minutes
Production rate is 75 units/day
Cycle time = 450/75 = 6 minutes/part
NT = 20/6 = 3.33 = 4 stations
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
26/28
Precedence Diagram
A
B
C
D
E
F G
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
27/28
Task Assignment
Station
Time
Avail.
Elig.
Tasks
Will
Fit?
Task
Assign.
Idle
Time
1 6.0 A A A
3.8 B,C,D B,C B
0.4 C,D -- -- 0.4
2 6.0 C,D C,D D
1.9 C C C
0.2 E -- -- 0.2
3 6.0 E E E
3.3 F F F 0.0
4 6.0 G G G 3.4
-
7/31/2019 6. Facility Layout (1)
28/28
Line Balancing Solution
A
B
C
D
E
F G
Station 1
Station 2
Station 3
Station 4