5f2a31a2baec406b0f5f0749bde92686.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofitpublishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access tocritical research.
Notes on reproductive biology of two species of cracids innortheastern BrazilAuthor(s): Guilherme Santos Toledo-Lima , Tonny Marques de Oliveira Junior ,Phoeve Macario , Damio Valdenor de Oliveira , and Mauro Pichorim Source: The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 125(3):665-669. 2013.Published By: The Wilson Ornithological SocietyDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1676/12-149.1URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1676/12-149.1
BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in thebiological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable onlineplatform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations,museums, institutions, and presses.
Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated contentindicates your acceptance of BioOnes Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use.
Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercialuse. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to theindividual publisher as copyright holder.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1676/12-149.1http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1676/12-149.1http://www.bioone.orghttp://www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_usehttp://www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use
-
The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 125(3):665669, 2013
Notes on Reproductive Biology of Two Species of Cracids inNortheastern Brazil
Guilherme Santos Toledo-Lima,1,2,4 Tonny Marques de Oliveira Junior,1,3
Phoeve Macario,1,2 Damiao Valdenor de Oliveira,1 and Mauro Pichorim1
ABSTRACT.We describe nests, eggs, and somebreeding aspects of the Rusty-margined Guan (Penelopesuperciliaris) and Speckled Chachalaca (Ortalis gut-tata) in the Atlantic Rainforest of northeastern Brazil.Two active nests of P. superciliaris were found, the firstwas 50 cm above the ground and the second was 2.6 m.Both were bowl shaped and had three and two eggs,respectively. One egg from each nest was measured andweighed: 64.3 3 42.1 mm (61.5 g) and 55.5 3 38.0 mm(42.5 g). An active nest of O. guttata was found 3.2 mhigh on top of a tree. Initially, there was a single egg inthe nest but two more were laid. The average eggmeasurements and weight were 55.0 3 38.4 mm and43.3 g. The eggs of both species were rather similarwith a dull white color, rough shell, and smeared withorganic matter from the nest. We observed anincubation period of 2930 days for the chachalaca,which was longer than previous estimates of thisspecies. The guan nests were found in an advanced
stage of development, which prevented accuratetracking of their incubation periods. Although theprimary social reproductive strategy in most cracidsis monogamy, it is possible that P. superciliaris ispolygynous in our study area, justifying the absence of amale near the nest or even a nest territory.
Key words: breeding, Cracidae, life history, Rusty-
margined Guan, Speckled Chachalaca.
Cracids are gallinaceous birds found in
Neotropical regions and include three distinct
groups: chachalacas, guans, and curassows. They
are predominantly arboreal inhabitants of forest,
woodland, and scrub, and feed primarily on plant
parts, thus playing an important role in disper-
sion of certain plant species (del Hoyo 1994,
Brooks and Fuller 2006). Habitat loss and perse-
cution from hunters are the two major threats faced
by cracids, making this family the most threatened
in the New World, with approximately one-half ofthe species threatened with extinction (del Hoyo
1994, Brooks and Fuller 2006, Brooks and Strahl
2006).
The Speckled Chachalaca (Ortalis guttata) and
Rusty-margined Guan (Penelope superciliaris)
are regularly reported in the Atlantic Rainforest
1 Laboratorio de Ornitologia, Departamento de Botanica,
Ecologia e Zoologia, Centro de Biociencias, Universidade
Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 59.078-900, Natal, RN,
Brazil.2 Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Ecologia, Universidade
Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 59.090-002, Natal, RN,
Brazil.3 Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Ciencias Biologicas, Uni-
versidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 59.078-900, Natal,
RN, Brazil.4 Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected]
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 665
-
of northeastern Brazil (Schulz-Neto 1995, Silveira
et al. 2003, Telino-Junior 2005, Farias et al.
2007). Data regarding their life histories and
breeding aspects in Brazil, such as clutch size and
incubation period (Euler 1900, Ihering 1900, Sick
1997), are scarce, perhaps because of their
discreet behavior, local extinctions, or low
densities experienced by some populations in
unprotected areas (del Hoyo 1994, Pereira and
Wajntal 1999, Brooks and Fuller 2006).
The study of tropical bird life history traits is
important to address questions highlighting dif-
ferences between temperate and tropical species
(Martin 1996, Stutchbury and Morton 2001,
Tarwater and Brawn 2010). Nevertheless for
many species of tropical birds descriptions of
their nests or eggs do not exist (Marini et al.
2010). Therefore, many field researchers havebeen involved increasingly in providing descrip-tions and detailed studies about bird breeding inthe Neotropical realm (Vasconcelos et al. 2006,Londono et al. 2007, Bodrati and Castillo 2008,Lima et al. 2010).
During our current fieldwork focusing on thedemography and breeding biology of birds innortheast Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest, we en-countered active nests and captured and markedyoung cracids for a monitoring program. Thisexperience provided us with descriptions andmeasurements of the nests, eggs, and other aspectsof reproduction of the Speckled Chachalaca andRusty-margined Guan.
OBSERVATIONS
We reported nests and juvenile birds in theBarreira do Inferno Launch Center (05u 549 S,35u 109 W), a protected military area that harbors,1,800 ha of tropical semideciduous lowlandforest, located in Parnamirim Municipality, RioGrande do Norte, Brazil. The nests were revisitedon alternate days to check contents and estimateincubation period. Nest classification followsSimon and Pacheco (2005) and egg shape followsBaicich and Harrison (1997). To reduce the riskof nest disturbance, we took many precautionarymeasures such as avoiding egg or chick handling.Birds were trapped in mist nets and marked withnumbered aluminum leg bands supplied byCEMAVE/ICMBio.
Rusty-margined Guan.On 2 February 2012,two active nests were found: one contained threeand the other two short subelliptical, white andrough eggs with dark stains from the moist leavesand twigs which composed the internal chamber.One egg from each nest was measured andweighed: 64.3 3 42.1 and 55.5 3 38.0 mm and61.5 and 42.5 g, respectively.
The first nest was discovered among terrestrialbromeliad leaves (Aechmea aquilega) 50 cmabove the ground with three eggs in advanceddevelopment. Besides some dry bromeliad leavesthat supported the entire nest, a shallow basketthat shaped the internal chamber was composed ofleaves of Anacardium occidentale and severaltwigs and leaves of plants from the Myrtaceaefamily, apparently gathered while green (Fig. 1).The nest had a low cup/base and its measure-ments were: largest external diameter 5 45.0 cm,smallest external diameter 5 35.5 cm, largestchamber diameter 5 38.5 cm, smallest chamber
FIG. 1. Female Rusty-margined Guans incubating
nests, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. (A) Nest near the
ground among bromeliads leaves; and (B) another nest in
the low canopy. Photographs by Guilherme S. Toledo-
Lima.
666 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 125, No. 3, September 2013
-
diameter 5 26.0 cm, external height 5 19.0 cm,and depth 5 8.0 cm. On 10 February 2012, thenest was found only with eggshells and noevidence of predation.
The second nest of P. superciliaris was 2.6 mabove the ground and low cup/fork in structure,placed within interlaced branches of two pairedtrees (A. occidentale and Myrcia sp.). The nestcontained two eggs in the incubation chamber,and another on the ground in the leaf litter underthe nest; this egg was probably rejected ordropped during incubation and was collected.The nest was bowl shaped and was made with
twigs and leaves recently removed from either thesupport plants or the same species in the vicinity(Fig. 1). On 10 February 2012, we flushed anadult from the ground below the nest, where therewas a broken egg. Apparently the nest wasdepredated, and the damage prevented us fromtaking measurements.
On 20 August 2011, we captured an immatureguan (mass 5 514.5 g) which was probably bornduring the breeding season of the same year. Theplumage and morphology were similar to an adult(mass 5 9501,150 g; del Hoyo 1994), but thebird was smaller with a duller supercilium thanadult birds.
Speckled Chachalaca.An active nest ofOrtalis guttata was found on 3 February 2012,approximately 3.2 m high on top of a tree ofMyrcia sp. among dense foliage also formed by aliana plant. The nest was low cup/fork with abasket and the internal chamber flat without anydistinct material, and probably built with drytwigs and leaves of the support tree. Initially therewas a single egg in the nest, but two more werelaid: one the following day and the last probablyon 5 February, but it was not observed until themorning of 6 February. The eggs had a shortsubelliptical shape, were dull white, and had arough shell that was smeared with organic matterfrom the nest and possibly some female blood.The egg measurements were: 53.4 3 37.0, 55.4 338.4 and 56.3 3 39.7 mm and weighed 39.75,43.25 and 46.75 g, respectively. We observed anadult bird that flushed from the vicinity of the neston several occasions when the nest was inspected,while another bird (probably the female) remainedmotionless in the nest only leaving when severalresearchers approached. During the morning of 5March, the breeding pair of chachalacas could notbe seen within the vicinity of the nest, whichcontained one intact egg and the other two hadapparently hatched since there were no predationsigns such as blood or chick remains. These shellswere still wet and dirty with some residue; thus,we concluded the chicks hatched earlier that sameday with an incubation period of approximately2930 days, considering a synchronic incubation.On the same day the nest was damaged by heavyrains, preventing accurate measurements. Thenon-hatched egg was collected and artificiallyincubated for three days, but the chick did nothatch (Fig. 2).
On 8 May 2011, we caught three youngchachalacas that were #1 month old. They
FIG. 2. (A) One of the young Speckled Chachalacas
captured in Barreira do Inferno Launch Center, Parnamirim,
RN, Brazil. (B) The non-hatched Speckled Chachalaca egg
collected on 5 March 2012. Photographs by Tonny M. de
Oliveira Junior.
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 667
-
weighed 70, 76 and 94 g (mean 5 80 g). Theirfeathers were growing; the plumage was a browncoloration, darker on the back and brighter onhead, breast, and abdomen. The small one hadmore downy plumage, including a wide black lineextending from the crown to the nape, wing andtail feathers not fully developed, and the outer pairof rectrices was chestnut in color in contrast to theother which had browner plumage (Fig. 2).
DISCUSSION
Our observations regarding reproductive tim-ing were similar to previous studies in southernBrazil. Specimens of O. guttata were collected inreproductive condition in October and November(Belton 1994), and P. superciliaris most likelyhad its breeding season between October andMarch (Mikich 1996). When additional studies inSouth America countries are combined, the mainnesting season emerges as September throughMarch (Brooks et al. 1993, Begazo and Bodmer1998, Almendras et al. 1999, Bodrati and Castillo2008, Herrera et al. 2009).
The reports on clutch size and egg character-istics follow the previous available descriptionsfor these species (del Hoyo 1994, Begazo andBodmer 1998, Almendras et al. 1999, Bodrati andCastillo 2008, Herrera et al. 2009). The incubationperiod that we observed for O. guttata was longerthan previous estimates of this species (e.g.,21 days; Sick 1997) and other congeners (24 days;del Hoyo 1994).
Nests of cracids are built at variable heights inforest vegetation and in different support plants(del Hoyo 1994), as we found guan nests rangingfrom 0.5 m in a bromeliad to 2.6 m on top of atree. Furthermore, nests were chiefly constructedof material from the supporting plant or possiblycollected from surrounding areas as reported inother cracid species (del Hoyo 1994, Bodrati andCastillo 2008, Herrera et al. 2009).
The primary social reproductive strategy inmost cracids is monogamy, with the breeding pairstaying together during incubation and defendingintruders from the nest territory (del Hoyo 1994).We concordantly encountered a pair of chachala-cas near the nest on several occasions. In contrast,we did not observe any birds near the guan nestswhile monitoring them except for the incubatingfemales. There is insufficient information aboutthe reproductive strategy used by Penelope sp.,but other guans such as the Horned Guan(Oreophasis derbianus) and Highland Guan
(Penelopina nigra) are perhaps polygynous (delHoyo 1994, Gonzalez-Garca 1995). It is possiblethat P. superciliaris is also polygynous in ourstudy area, justifying the absence of a male nearthe nest or even a nest territory. More detailedstudies are needed to clarify these issues.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This field work was supported by the Brazilian Research
and Technological Development Council (CNPq Process
474945/2010-3). G. S. Toledo-Lima, P. Macario and T. M.
Oliveira Junior received scholarships from the Coordina-
tion for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel
(CAPES). We are grateful to Barreira do Inferno Launch
Center for permission to access the study area, and the
Brazilian Bird Research and Conservancy Center (CE-
MAVE) for supplying the aluminum leg bands. J. G. Jardim
helped us to identify the plant species. We especially thank
R. M. Costa and K. Lundberg for assistance in improving
the English manuscript, and the valuable suggestions of the
editor and two anonymous reviewers.
LITERATURE CITED
ALMENDRAS, E. G., D. M. BROOKS, AND G. SEDAGHATKISH.
1999. Notas sobre la historia natural de los cracidos
albergados en el Museo Noel Kempff Mercado,
Santa Cruz, Bolivia, con notas sobre la taxonomia de
las pavas del genero (Pipile). Boletn del Grupo de
Especialistas en Cracidos 8:2426.
BAICICH, P. J. AND C. J. O. HARRISON. 1997. A guide to the
nest, eggs, and nestlings of North American birds.
Second Edition. Academic Press, San Diego, Califor-
nia, USA.
BEGAZO, A. J. AND R. E. BODMER. 1998. Use and
conservation of Cracidae (Aves: Galliformes) in the
Peruvian Amazon. Oryx 32:301309.
BELTON, W. 1994. Aves do Rio Grande do Sul: Distribuicao
e biologia. Editora UNISINOS, Rio Grande do
SulBrasil.
BODRATI, A. AND H. D. CASTILLO. 2008. Descripcion de un
nido de la yacupo (Penelope superciliaris) en el
bosque atlantico de Paraguay. Revista Nuestras Aves
53:911.
BROOKS, T., R. BARNES, L. BARTRINA, S. H. M. BUTCHART,
R. P. CLAY, E. Z. ESQUIVEL, N. I. ETCHEVERRY, J. C.
LOWEN, and J. VINCENT. 1993. Bird surveys and
conservation in the Paraguayan Atlantic Forest. Project
CANOPY Study Report Nu 57. BirdLife International,Cambridge, United Kingdom.
BROOKS, D. M. AND R. A. FULLER. 2006. Biology and
conservation of cracids. Pages 921 in Conserving
cracids: the most threatened family of birds in the
Americas (S. L. Pereira and D. M. Brooks, Editors).
Miscellaneous Publications of The Houston Museum
of Natural Science, Number 6, Houston, Texas, USA.
BROOKS, D. M. AND S. D. STRAHL. 2006. Methods. Pages
2224 in Conserving cracids: the most threatened
family of birds in the Americas (S. L. Pereira and
668 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY N Vol. 125, No. 3, September 2013
-
D. M. Brooks, Editors). Miscellaneous Publications of
The Houston Museum of Natural Science, Number 6,
Houston, Texas, USA.
DEL HOYO, J. 1994. Family Cracidae (chachalacas, guans
and curassows). Pages 310363 in Handbook of the
birds of the world. Volume 2. New World Vultures to
Guineafowl (J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, and J. Sargatal,
Editors). Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain.
EULER, C. 1900. Descripcao dos ninhos e ovos das aves do
Brasil. Revista do Museu Paulista 4:9148.
FARIAS, G. B., A. G. C. ALVES, AND A. C. B. L. SILVA.
2007. Riqueza de aves em cinco fragmentos de
Floresta Atlantica na Zona da Mata Norte de
Pernambuco, Brasil. Biotemas 20:111122.
GONZALEZ-GARCIA, F. 1995. Reproductive biology and
vocalizations of the Horned Guan Oreophasis derbia-
nus in Mexico. Condor 97:415426.
HERRERA, M., J. Q. VIDOZ, A. M. MAMANI, V. SANDOVAL, H.
ARANIBAR, AND G. SANCHEZ. 2009. Notes on the
reproductive biology of five cracid species in Bolivia.
Boletn del Grupo de Especialistas en Cracidos 28:2226.
IHERING, H. vON. 1900. Catalogo crtico-comparativo dos
ninhos e ovos das aves do Brasil. Revista do Museu
Paulista 4:191300.
LIMA, P. C., R. GRANTSAU, R. C. F. R. LIMA, T. N. C. LIMA-
NETO, AND L. E. S. SILVA. 2010. Ninhos de especies
ameacadas, endemicas e outras de comportamento
reprodutivo pouco conhecido, na patria da arara-azul-
de-lear (Anodorhynchus leari) (Psittaciformes: Psitta-
cidae), destacando-se novos dados sobre o comporta-
mento reprodutivo do besourinho-de-cauda-larga
(Phaethornis gounellei) (Apodiformes: Trochilidae) a
descricao do ninho da choca-do-nordeste (Sakesphorus
cristatus) (Passeriformes: Thamnophilidae) e do jacu-
caca (Penelope jacucaca) (Galliformes: Cracidae).
Atualidades Ornitologicas 153:6971.
LONDONO, G. A., M. C. MUNOZ, AND M. M. RIOS. 2007.
Density and natural history of the Sickle-winged Guan
(Chamaepetes goudotii) in the Central Andes, Colom-
bia. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 119:228238.
MARINI, M. A., C. DUCA, AND L. T. MANICA. 2010.
Tecnicas de pesquisa em biologia reprodutiva de aves.
Pages 295312 in Ornitologia e Conservacao - Ciencia
Aplicada, Tecnicas de Pesquisa e Levantamento (S. V.
MATTER, F. C. STRAUBE, I. ACCORDI, V. PIACENTINI,
and J. F. CANDIDO-JR, Organizers). Technical Books
Editora, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
MARTIN, T. E. 1996. Life history evolution in tropical and
south temperate birds: what do we really know?
Journal of Avian Biology 27:263272.
MIKICH, S. B. 1996. Analise quali-quantitativa do compor-
tamento de Penelope superciliaris (Aves, Cracidae).
Iheringia, Serie Zoologia 81:8795.
PEREIRA, S. L. AND A. W. WAJNTAL. 1999. Reintroduction
of guans of the genus Penelope (Cracidae, Aves) in
reforested areas in Brazil: assessment by DNA
fingerprint. Biological Conservation 87:3138.
SCHULZ-NETO, A. 1995. Lista das aves da Paraba. Instituto
Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais
Renovaveis, Superintendencia da Paraba, Paraba,
Brasil.
SICK, H. 1997. Ornitologia Brasileira. Nova Fronteira, Rio
de Janeiro, Brasil.
SILVEIRA, L. F., F. OLMOS, AND A. J. LONG. 2003. Birds in
Atlantic Forest fragments in north-east Brazil. Cotinga
20:3246.
SIMON, J. E. AND S. PACHECO. 2005. On the standardization
of nest descriptions of neotropical birds. Revista
Brasileira de Ornitologia 13:143154.
STUTCHBURY, B. J. M. AND E. S. MORTON. 2001.
Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. Academic Press,
London, United Kingdom.
TARWATER, C. E. AND J. D. BRAWN. 2010. The post-
fledging period in a tropical bird: patterns of parental
care and survival. Journal of Avian Biology 41:
479487.
TELINO-JUNIOR, W. R. 2005. Avifauna de fragmentos de
Mata Atlantica da Zona da Mata de Pernambuco,
Brasil, com enfase na estrutura trofica. Thesis.
Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo, Brasil.
VASCONCELOS, M. F. DE, C. CIENFUEGOS, AND L. PALU.
2006. Registros reprodutivos do jacuacu Penelope
obscura Temminck, 1815 (Aves: Cracidae) na porcao
meridional da Cadeia do Espinhaco, Minas Gerais,
Brasil. Lundiana 7:145148.
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 669