554474 appeal decision

Upload: mariae2

Post on 05-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 554474 Appeal Decision

    1/2

    STATE OF NEW YORK

    UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEAL BOARD

    PO Box 15126

    Albany NY 12212-5126

    DECISION OF THE BOARD

    Mailed and Filed: JUNE 20, 2011

    IN THE MATTER OF: Appeal Board No. 554474

    PRESENT: GEORGE FRIEDMAN, GERALDINE A. REILLY MEMBERS

    The Department of Labor issued the initial determination disqualifying the claimant fromreceiving benefits, effective September 11, 2009, on the basis that the claimant

    voluntarily separated from employment without good cause. The claimant requested a

    hearing.

    The Administrative Law Judge held a hearing at which all parties were accorded a full

    opportunity to be heard and at which testimony was taken. There were appearances by

    the claimant and on behalf of the employer. By decision filed October 12, 2010 (), the

    Administrative Law Judge sustained the initial determination.

    The claimant appealed the Judge's decision to the Appeal Board.

    Based on the record and testimony in this case, the Board makes the following

    FINDINGS OF FACT: The claimant worked for the employer for approximately 21 months

    when she found it necessary to take a leave of absence for medical reasons. The

    employer granted the claimant FMLA leave, and subsequently extended the claimant's

    leave of absence after the Family and Medical Leave Act no longer applied. The

    employer required medical documentation, however, to substantiate the claimant's need

    for ongoing leave. The employer directed that the medical documentation be sent to the

    employer's headquarters in Maryland. The claimant understood that her physician was

    forwarding her medical documentation to the location that the employer designated. The

    employer did not receive the documentation it required. By letter dated March 8, 2010,

    the employer terminated the employment relationship based on the claimant's failure to

    provide the required documentation.

    OPINION: The credible evidence establishes that the employer discharged the claimant

    when the employer did not receive medical documentation that the employer required in

  • 7/31/2019 554474 Appeal Decision

    2/2

    order to continue the claimant's medical leave. Because the employer discharged the

    claimant, the claimant did not quit. Nor can it be said that the claimant provoked her

    discharge by failing to comply with the employer's medical documentation requirement.

    The doctrine of provoked discharge applies only to those cases in which a claimant

    "voluntarily engages in conduct which transgresses a legitimate known obligation andleaves the employer no choice but to discharge him." (Matter of DeGrego, 39 N.Y.2d

    180, 183). Here, the employer may have felt justified in discharging the claimant, but this

    choice was nevertheless discretionary. Accordingly, we conclude that the claimant did

    not quit her job, and the claimant is entitled to benefits.

    DECISION: The decision of the Administrative Law Judge is reversed.

    The initial determination, disqualifying the claimant from receiving benefits, effective

    September 11, 2009, on the basis that the claimant voluntarily separated from

    employment without good cause, is overruled.

    The claimant is allowed benefits with respect to the issues decided herein.

    GEORGE FRIEDMAN, MEMBER

    GERALDINE A. REILLY, MEMBER