5-rnc&lac&rac&cluster planning 26
TRANSCRIPT
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 1/26
RNC/LAC/RAC/Cluster Planning
ZTE University
TD&W&PCS BSS Course Team
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 2/26
RNC Definition
The principles for delimitating the network into RNC are as
follows.
The network traffic distribution: the border of RNC should be
located at the lighter traffic area.
The sites distribution: each RNC has as less neighboring and
handover relations with other RNC as possible.
Make good use of the current RNC delimitation information.
Make good use of the natural geography border.
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 3/26
RNC Definition
Distribute the traffic of each RNC evenly.
MTR sites are planned independently, and belong to the same
RNC if it is possible.
The RNC location will be determined by the switch room.
Considering the network future development, the corresponding
BSC delimitation and traffic should be considered during the
RNC delimitation.
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 4/26
RNC Definition
According to above principles and RNC numbers, the following
is the RNC definition and coverage area of 3G network.
ZTE RNC Definition
ZTE RNC Location
ZRNC101 BMI
ZRNC102 BMI
ZRNC103 BMI
ZRNC201 BPO
ZRNC202 BPO
ZRNC203 BPO
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 5/26
RNC Definition
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 6/26
RNC Traffic Based on Current Existing Traffic
ZTE RNCID RNC/Total Traffic Ratio CS traffic
(Erl)
PS traffic
(Mbps)
ZRNC101 20.00% 1527.2 15.2
ZRNC102 16.90% 1290.484 12.844
ZRNC103 14.28% 1090.4208 10.8528
ZRNC201 17.76% 1356.1536 13.4976
ZRNC202 16.11% 1230.1596 12.2436
ZRNC203 14.95% 1141.582 11.362
Total
traffic
CS (Erl)* 7636
PS (Mbps)* 76
* CS Erlang excluding SHO, include voice and video call (sum of BTS Erlang)
* BH IuPS UP Peak DL Throughput (Peak second Mbps)
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 7/26
Designed Traffic
ZTE RNCID RNC/Total
TrafficRatio
Voice
traffic (Dec 08)
(Erl)
Data
traffic
(Dec 08)
(Gbps)
Voice traffic
(FutureTraffic)
(Erl)
Data traffic
(FutureTraffic)
(Gbps)
ZRNC101 20.00% 13000 1.2 19500 1.8
ZRNC102 16.90% 10985 1.014 16477.5 1.521
ZRNC103 14.28% 9282 0.8568 13923 1.2852
ZRNC201 17.76% 11544 1.0656 17316 1.5984
ZRNC202 16.11% 10471.5 0.9666 15707.25 1.4499
ZRNC203 14.95% 9717.5 0.897 14576.25 1.3455
Total traffic
(Dec 08)
Voice (Erl) 65000
Data(Gbps) 6
Total traffic
(Future
Traffic)
Voice (Erl) 97500
Data
(Gbps)
9
* Radio traffic figures do not include soft handover.
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 8/26
Cluster Definition
The principles for delimitating the network into clusters are
as follows:
The size of the cluster should be 20-40 NodeBs generally.
The city environment factors (dense urban & mean urban etc.),
network factors (Region, RNC&LAC etc.), and coverage clutter
should be considered.
The coverage area of the cluster should be consecutive.
Each cluster has as less neighboring relations with other
clusters as possible, and the clutter & vector can be looked as
the border of the clusters, such as river, hill and buildings, etc.
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 9/26
Cluster Definition
Cluster Name Cluster Priority
Central_to_Admiralty 1
MidLevel 2
West 2 NorthPoint 2
QuarryBay_to_ShauKeiWan 2
LantauExpressway 4
Airport 4
SouthLantau 5
ToKwaWan_to_HungHom 1
HoManTin_to_MaTauWai 3
KowloonCity 1
KowloonTong 1
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 10/26
LAC/RAC Planning
Principles for Delimitating LAC/RAC
LAC/RAC should be as big as possible if the system capacity can bear
Make good use of the geographical border as the LAC/RAC border
Select the low traffic area as the border of LAC /RAC
Distribute the traffic of different LACs evenly
MTR sites are planned independently, and belong to same LAC if
possible
The main principle of LAC/RAC is to reduce location update times,
and guarantee paging success rate.
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 11/26
Paging channel features
PCH message carried by S-CCPCH channel
3gpp stipulate PCCH has two format:
240bit/10ms or 80bit/10ms
One 240bit PCCH frame can support
3 IMSI paging
2 TMSI +2 IMSI paging
1 TMSI +4 IMSI paging
5 TMSI paging paging
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 12/26
LAC/RAC Planning
System Parameters Settings
Paging period: 640ms (configurable)
RAN paging times: 4 (configurable)
CN paging times: 2
CN paging interval: 6s (configurable)
PCCH/PCH format: 240bit per 10ms
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 13/26
Paging Messages of One LAC in BH
RAN paging times maximum theoretical paging messages in BH
1 1800000
2 900000
3 600000
4 450000
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 14/26
ZTE Designed Paging Capability of One LAC in BH
RAN paging times paging capability of one LAC in BH
1 900000
2 450000
3 300000
4 225000
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 15/26
Number of Existing paging messages
NUMBER OF PAGING MESSAGES
INCLUDING BUT UP TO HSDPA3.6MBPS
(PEAK HOURLY NUMBER)
809,980 SUM OF THE PEAK HOURLY PROCESSED
PAGING MESSAGES OF ALL LIVE RNCS(IN NUMBER) (MEASUREMENT PERIOD
= 60min)
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 16/26
Required Number of LAC
RAN paging times Paging capability of one LAC in BH Number of LAC
1 900000 1
2 450000 2
3 300000 3
4 225000 4
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 17/26
Paging Load of each RNC/LAC (Message Number)
ZTE RNCID ZTE LACID RNC/Total 3G Traffic Ratio Paging load
(number)
ZRNC101 1011 20.00% 161996
ZRNC102 1021 16.90% 136886.6
ZRNC103 1031 14.28% 115665.1
ZRNC201 2011 17.76% 143852.4
ZRNC202 2021 16.11% 130487.8
ZRNC203
2031
14.95%
121092
Total paging messages
(number)
809980 100.00% 809980
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 18/26
Designed Number of LAC and Paging Load
RAN paging times 1 2 3 4
Paging capability of one LAC in BH 900000 450000 300000 225000
ZTE LACID Paging load (number) Paging loads(ratio)
1011 161996 18.00% 36.00% 54.00% 72.00%
1021 136886.6 15.21% 30.42% 45.63% 60.84%
1031 115665.1 12.85% 25.70% 38.56% 51.41%
2011 143852.4 15.98% 31.97% 47.95% 63.93%
2021 130487.8 14.50% 29.00% 43.50% 57.99%
2031 121092 13.45% 26.91% 40.36% 53.82%
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 19/26
Number of paging messages for DEC 2008 Traffic
OCT 2007 DEC 2008
Traffic(Erl) 6580 65000
Number of paging messages(peak hourly number) 809,980 8,001,322
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 20/26
Paging Load of each RNC (Message Number)
ZTE RNCID ZTE LACID RNC/Total 3G Traffic
Ratio
Paging load
(number)
ZRNC101 1011 20.00% 1,600,264
ZRNC102 1021 16.90% 1,352,223
ZRNC103 1031 14.28% 1,142,589 ZRNC201 2011 17.76% 1,421,035
ZRNC202 2021 16.11% 1,289,013
ZRNC203 2031 14.95% 1,196,198
Total paging messages
(number)
8,001,322 100.00% 8,001,322
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 21/26
Designed Numbers of LAC and Paging Load
RAN paging times 1 2 3 4
Paging capability of one LAC in BH 900000 450000 300000 225000
ZTE LACID Paging load (number) Paging loads(ratio)
1011 1,600,264 177.81% 355.61% 533.42% 711.23%
1021 1,352,223 150.25% 300.49% 450.74% 600.99%
1031 1,142,589 126.95% 253.91% 380.86% 507.82%
2011 1,421,035 157.89% 315.79% 473.68% 631.57%
2021 1,289,013 143.22% 286.45% 429.67% 572.89%
2031 1,196,198 132.91% 265.82% 398.73% 531.64%
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 22/26
Map of Designed LAC for DEC 2009
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 23/26
RAC Planning
Paging procedure in PS domain is initiated from Network
side, compared with CS domain service, paging load
should be less, so the RAC design is the same with LAC.
That is to say, there are 6 RACs suitable for the 3G
network. Of course it will be adjusted according to the
traffic and paging load growth.
According to above, 3G network LAC&RAC boundaries
are the same with RNC boundaries.
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 24/26
ZTE 3G LAC/RAC/NodeB Mapping
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 25/26
ZTE 3G LAC/RAC/MTR NodeB Mapping
7/28/2019 5-RNC&LAC&RAC&Cluster Planning 26
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/5-rnclacraccluster-planning-26 26/26