49

CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

The data gathered from the respondents were analysed

and interpreted according to the specific questions that are

directed this study.

I. PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS

TABLE 1Distribution of Respondents by Course

COURSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE%

CACBS Criminology 13 13.3ABLLT 2 2.0AB Political Science 2 2.0AB Sociology 2 2.0

CABSABS Fi AquaBS ForestryBSA ASBS AED

11114

1.01.01.01.04.0

CEBSCE 7 7.1BSEE 5 5.1BSME 3 3.0BSAE 1 1.0

BAHRM 6 6.1Management 3 3.0Marketing 3 3.0Economics 2 2.0

6.1BSA 6COED

BEED 8 8.1BSHE 3 3.0BEEDHE 2 2.0BSIE 2 2.0BTET 2 2.0BSED ENG 1 1.0

50

BSED Social StudiesBSED Math

11

1.01.0

BSED MAPEH 1 1.0CVM

CVM 1 1.0BSMT 2 2.0

CSBSIT 5 5.1BS Bio 2 2.0BS ESBS Math

21

2.01.0

CNBS Nursing 2 2.0

TOTAL 99 100%

Table 1 presents the respondents’ distribution by

course.

This showed the total number of respondents as a result

from computed value using the Slovin’s formula. Students

were divided according to the total number of students in

the university and in every course. Of the 99 respondents,

13 or 13% were from BS Criminology; 8 or 8% were from BS

Elementary Education; 7 or 7% were from BS Civil

Engineering; 6 or 6% were from BS Hotel and Restaurant

Management and BS Accountancy; 5 or 5% were from BS

Information Technology and BS Electrical Engineering; 4 or

4% from BS Agricultural Education; 3 or 3% from BS

Mechanical Engineering, BS Home Economics, BS Marketing and

BS Management; 2 or 2% were from ABLLT, AB Political

Science, AB Sociology, BS Economics, BS Elementary Education

51

major in Home Economics, BS Industrial Education, BTET, BS

Meat Technology, BS Biology, BS Environmental Science and BS

Nursing; and 1 or 1% from BS Agriculture, BS Fisheries and

Aquatic Resources, BS Forestry, BSA AS, BS Agricultural

Engineering, BS Education major in English, Social Studies,

Mathematics and MAPEH, Veterinary Medicine and BS

Mathematics.

Data revealed that majority of the respondents came

from BS Criminology. This implies that BS Criminology the

biggest enrolees in the university.

TABLE 2 Distribution of Respondents by Subject/Concept

TOPICS/CONCEPTS ON DISASTER PREPAREDNESS IN ANY SUBJECT

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

NSTP-CWTS 8 8.08

NSTP- ROTC 2 2.02

Earthquake Engineering 3 3.03

Geology Engineering 3 3.03

Environmental Engineering 3 3.03

Emergency Disaster Nursing 2 2.02

Earthquake Drill 5 0.50

Community Development 1 1.01

First Aid and Water Supply 1 1.01

TOTAL 28/99 23.73/100%

52

Table 2 presents the respondents’ distribution subject

or concept.

Out of 99 respondents, 28 or 28.28% stated that they

have concepts or subjects in relation to disaster

preparedness. In order of frequency counts 8 or 8.08% for

NSTP-CWTS; 5.05% for Earthquake Drill; 3 or 3% for

Earthquake Engineering, Geology Engineering and

Environmental Engineering; 2 or 2% for Emergency Disaster

Nursing; and 1 or 1% for Community Development and Water

Supply. Data revealed that not all courses in UEP have

tackled disaster preparedness in their course. The NSTP-CWTS

gathered the highest score. It implies that R.A. 10121 have

already been integrated in the NSTP curriculum.

Table 3

Distribution of Respondents by Number of Trainings

NUMBER OF TRAININGS ATTENDED FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Fire and Earthquake Drill 13 12.87

Disaster Preparedness 2 1.98

Fire Prevention Month/Drill 2 1.98

Disaster Management 1 0.99

Disaster Awareness 1 0.99

Fire Drills 1 0.99

Information Drive Campaign 1 0.99

53

Disaster Calamities Seminar 1 0.99TOTAL 22/99 21.78%/100%

Table 3 presents the respondents’ distribution by

number of trainings.

Of the 99 respondents, 22 or 21.78% attended trainings

or seminars. This data shows that the Fire and Earthquake

drill has the highest and is most common training that the

respondents have attended. Therefore, the Bureau of

Protection in collaboration with the PDRRMC is active in

implementing the mandates of R.A. 10121.

According to Stimulus-Response theory, people tend to

do practices and preparations such as drills and trainings

which help them to avoid or lessen the damages during

occurrence of natural disasters. The findings in table 3

upholds this theory to the extent of implementing one of its

mandates as per the law.