42486-016: madhya pradesh urban services improvement project€¦ · 1. the project loan for madhya...

Initial Environmental Examination

Document stage: Final

Project Number: 42486-016

October 2019

IND: Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Program – Water Supply Improvement in Boda, Kurawar and Kothri Towns (PART A)

Package No: MPUSIP-1A

Prepared by Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company, Government of Madhya Pradesh for the Asian Development Bank.

This final initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the ‘terms of use’ section on ADB’s website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Final Initial Environmental Examination Oct 2019

IND: Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project Package 1A - Water Supply Improvement in Boda, Kurawar and Kothri Towns Prepared by Project Management Unit – Safeguards Team Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Government of Madhya Pradesh for the Asian Development Bank Note: This Final Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) updates the Draft IEE for Package 1A which has been cleared by ADB on December 19, 2016 and disclosed on http://www.mpudc.co.in/safeguardpolicies.aspx

http://www.mpudc.co.in/safeguardpolicies.aspx

2

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of June 1, 2019)

Currency unit = Rupee (INR)

USD 1.00 = INR 70.89

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank

APM - Assistant Project Manager

CDO - Community Development Officer

CTE - Consent to Establish

CTO - Consent to Operate

CWS - Clear Water Sump

DBO - Design-Build-Operate

DI - Ductile Iron

DMA - District Metered Area

DPM - Deputy Project Manager

EA - Executive Agency

EE - Executive Engineer

EHS - Environmental Health and Safety

EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment

EMP - Environmental Management Plan

FGD - Focus Group Discussions

GOI - Government of India

GLSR - Ground Level Service Reservoir

GOMP - Government of Madhya Pradesh

GRC - Grievance Redress Committee GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism

HDPE - High density poly ethylene

IA - Implementing Agency

IEE - Initial Environmental Examination

IFC - International Finance Corporation

KL - kilo litre

MCM - million cubic meter

MLD - Million liters per day

MPN - Most probable number

MPPCB - Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board

MPUDC - Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company

MPUSIP - Madhya Pradesh Services Improvement Project

NH - National Highway

O&M - operation and maintenance

OHT - Overhead Tank

PIU - Project Implementation Unit

PMC - Program Management Consultant

PMU - Program Management Unit

PWD - Public works Department

ROW - Right of Way

SEMP - Site Environmental Management Plan

SO - Safeguard Officer

SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement

UDHD - Urban Development and Housing Department

ULB - Urban Local Body

WRD - Water Resource Department

WSS - Water Supply Scheme

WTP - Water Treatment Plant

iii

Table of Contents

UPDATED FINAL IEE OF PACKAGE 1A ................................................................................... 1

I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1

II. Updated Package Scope ................................................................................................ 2

III. Statutory Clearance Required for Package 1A ..............................................................48

IV. Update on Baseline Environment Conditions .................................................................48

V. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ...........................................................50

VI. Consultations and Disclosure Conducted ......................................................................76

VII. Package-Specific Grievance Redress Mechanism ........................................................77

VIII. Package Specific Roles and Responsibility of MPUSIP Safeguard Team Focal Persons

84

IX. Monitoring and Reporting ..............................................................................................87

X. EMP Implementation Cost .............................................................................................87

List of Tables

Table 1: Package 1A- Components based on Detailed Engineering Design ................................... 3

Table 2: Comparison of Components in the Preliminary and Detailed Engineering Design ........ 41

Table 3: Site Environmental Features of New Sites Selected during Detailed Design ................. 47

Table 4: Water Quality at the Proposed Intake Site, Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam ........................... 50

Table 5: Comparison of Impacts in the Draft IEE and Per Detailed Engineering Design ............. 51

Table 6: Design Phase Environmental Management Plan ................................................................ 62

Table 7: Pre Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan ............................................... 63

Table 8: Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan ...................................................... 64

Table 9: Construction Phase Environmental Monitoring Plan for Package 1A .............................. 67

Table 10: List of GRC members at town level in Boda, Kurawar and Kothri .................................. 78

Table 11: List of Focal persons Responsible for Package 1A, MPUSIP Safeguard Team .......... 85

Table 12: EMP Implementation Cost .................................................................................................... 87

List of Figures

Figure 1: Google map showing subproject town Boda, Kurawar and Kothri .................................... 2

Figure 2: Water Supply System Components and Alignments in Boda ............................................ 6

Figure 3: Google image of Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam ......................................................................... 7

Figure 4: Raw and Clear Water Mains- Boda ...................................................................................... 10

Figure 5: WTP (1.50 MLD) site location- Boda .................................................................................... 11

Figure 6: Hydraulic Flow Diagram- WTP Boda .................................................................................... 12

iv

Figure 7: WTP Layout Plan- Boda ......................................................................................................... 13

Figure 8: Water Supply Zone Map of Boda .......................................................................................... 14

Figure 9: Distribution Network Zone 1 (Boda) ..................................................................................... 15

Figure 10: Distribution Network Zone 2 (Boda) ................................................................................... 16



Figure 13: Google map showing proposed components from source to OHTs - Kurawar town . 19

Figure 14: Drawing of Floating Pontoon for Kurawar WSS ............................................................... 20

Figure 15: OHT 250 KL site location- Kurawar .................................................................................... 21

Figure 16: WTP & 900 KL OHT site location- Kurawar ...................................................................... 22

Figure 17: Hydraulic Flow diagram- WTP Kurawar ............................................................................ 23

Figure 18: WTP layout plan- Kurawar ................................................................................................... 24

Figure 19: Water Supply Zone Map of Kurawar .................................................................................. 25

Figure 20: Distribution Network Zone 1- Kurawar ............................................................................... 26




Figure 24: Schematic diagram of proposed water supply system- Kothri ....................................... 30

Figure 25: Location of proposed Tube well points- Kothri town ........................................................ 31

Figure 26: OHT 400 KL site location- Kothri ........................................................................................ 32

Figure 27: OHT 60 KL site location- Kothri .......................................................................................... 33

Figure 28: GLSR 200 KL site location- Kothri ...................................................................................... 34

Figure 29: GLSR 150 KL site location- Kothri ...................................................................................... 35

Figure 30: Water Supply Zone Map of Kothri ...................................................................................... 36

Figure 31: Distribution Network Zone 1- Kothri ................................................................................... 37




Figure 35: Work Flow Diagram of GRM ................................................................................................ 80

Figure 36: Structure and Process of GRC ............................................................................................ 83

List of Appendices

Appendix 1: Copy of WRD Clearance for Boda town ......................................................................... 89

Appendix 2: Copy of WRD Clearance for Kurawar town ................................................................... 91

Appendix 3: Draft copy of Application and payment receipt of MPPCB for Consent to Establish

(CTE) for Boda WTP ................................................................................................................................ 93

Appendix 4: Draft copy of Application and payment receipt of MPPCB for Consent to Establish

(CTE) for Kurawar WTP .......................................................................................................................... 95

Appendix 5: Geophysical Investigation Report of Kothri .................................................................... 97

Appendix 6: Groung water recharge and conservation plan for Kothri town .................................. 98

v

Appendix 7: Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam Quality Results at Proposed floating Pontoon (this

source is used for Boda & Kurawar towns) .......................................................................................... 99

Appendix 8: Drinking Water Standards ............................................................................................... 100

Appendix 9: Site Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) .......................................................... 102

Appendix 10: Monitoring Checklist Format (1 to 11) Being Used at Work Sites .......................... 103

Appendix 11: Summary of Consultation with Stakeholders at Subproject Towns Under Package

1A .............................................................................................................................................................. 119

Appendix 11: Stakeholder Consultation Photographs & List of Participants ................................ 123

Appendix 13: Office Order of EA to Establish GRC at subproject town level ............................... 134

Appendix 14: Letter to PIU From MPUDC (IA) to Establish GRC at subproject town level ........ 137

Appendix 15: Letter to ULB From MPUDC to Establish GRC at subproject town level ............. 139

Appendix 16: Letter for GRC Established in Boda Nagar Parishad ............................................... 141

Appendix 17: Letter for GRC Established in Kurawar Nagar Parishad ......................................... 143

Appendix 18: Letter for GRC Established in Kothri Nagar Parishad .............................................. 145

Appendix 19: Grievance Registration Form ....................................................................................... 147

1

UPDATED FINAL IEE OF PACKAGE 1A

I. Introduction

1. The project loan for Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project (MPUSIP) was approved in May 2017, and got effective in August 2017. Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) of the Government of Madhya Pradesh (GOMP) is the Executing Agency (EA); and Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) is the Implementing Agency (IA). MPUDC established a project management unit (PMU) and five project implementation units (PIUs) to implement the project. A Project Management Consultant (PMC), centrally-based at Bhopal, and with field offices at PIUs are providing support to PMU and PIUs in implementing MPUSIP. PIU and PMC supervises and monitors the EMP implementation and reporting tasks, while PMU oversees the overall implementation and monitoring of safeguard tasks in the project ensuring compliance. 2. MPUSIP comprises 28 contract packages, which include 24 water supply and 4 sewerage packages. The water supply schemes may include creation of source, mostly based on surface water sources, treatment facility, transmission and distribution system, and individual house service connections. The sewerage infrastructure improvement may include sewage collection, conveyance, treatment and disposal facilities. A package/ subproject may cover one or more towns (3 to a maximum of 7 towns) depending on the technical feasibility. The packages/ subprojects being implemented on a design-build-operate (DBO) scheme, where in which contractor is responsible for detailed design, construction, commissioning and operation for a period of 10 years. 3. Categorization. MPUSIP is classified as Category B according to ADB SPS 2009 (some negative impacts but less significant than category A). Prior to award of contracts, the potential impacts of the packages/ subprojects were assessed based on preliminary designs. The findings and recommendations to ensure that execution of the works will not cause significant impacts are reported in the Draft Initial Environmental Examination (IEE). To ensure the environmental safeguards are considered in the packages/subprojects, the Draft IEE is made part of the DBO bid and contract documents. The Draft IEEs are required to be updated/finalized once the detailed design is completed. The DBO contractors are required to submit site-specific EMPs to PIU to commencement of works. 4. Final IEE. This Final IEE for Package 1A covers water supply improvement in Boda, Kurawar and Kothri towns. This Final IEE has been prepared based on detailed design and following the recommendations of the Draft IEE of Package 1A cleared by ADB in December, 2016. The Draft IEE has been disclosed on http://www.mpudc.co.in/safeguardpolicies.aspx and provided to PIU and stakeholders. The contract has been awarded on June 24, 2017 to M/s REAN Water Tech Private Limited, Kolkata. 5. The objectives of this Final IEE for Package 1A are:

i. provide information on the detailed engineering design, significant findings, and recommended actions;

ii. provide information on national and local statutory requirements applicable to Package 1A;

iii. update information on environmental baseline conditions based on DBO contractors pre-works documentations;

http://www.mpudc.co.in/safeguardpolicies.aspx

2

iv. report on package’s impacts to physical, biological, socio-economic and physical cultural resources if not yet covered in the Draft IEE;

v. report the mitigation measures, monitoring program, and any residual negative impacts that cannot be mitigated;

vi. describe engagement of stakeholders, information disclosure measures, and consultation plans during package/subproject implementation;

vii. describe the package/subproject‘s grievance redress mechanism for resolving complaints about environmental performance;

viii. submit the site-specific EMP; and ix. provide the costs and who is responsible for carrying out the mitigation and

monitoring measures. II. Updated Package Scope

6. Package 1A covers three towns of Boda, Kurawar and Kothri. These are small towns having the status of Municipal Council (Nagar Parishad). It is proposed to improve water supply in the towns, with town-wise new independent water supply schemes, to achieve safe and sustainable water services both in terms of services to customers and cost recovery by providing 100% coverage with continuous, pressurized and safe drinking water services. The subproject includes the civil works, project implementation and management and non-physical investments.

Figure 1: Google map showing subproject town Boda, Kurawar and Kothri

3

7. Based on detailed engineering design of DBO Contractor, Table 1 shows the details of the proposed civil works components. The detailed engineering design has been reviewed by the PMC and approved by the PMU. Figures 2 to 34 present the location, layout and alignment of components.

Table 1: Package 1A- Components based on Detailed Engineering Design

S. No Components Description

A. Boda

1 Floating Pontoon in existing dam

Water will be lifted from Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam with the help of Submersible Floating Pumps. Submersible Pumps will be mounted on Floating Barge / Pontoon. -10 m x 10 m will be constructed near dam. -Pump House cum Store Room -63 Transformer (KVA) for running of pump sets 1 Km HT / LT Line

2 Raw water pumping station

Discharge = 52.142 m3/hour, head = 27 m, 2(1W+1S), at Intake arrangement

3 Raw water rising main (RWRM)

Length= 14128 m of dia. 200 mm and DI K-9 pipes, from Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam to WTP- Boda

4 Water Treatment Plant (WTP)

1.50 MLD; Rapid Sand Filter Type 63 KVA transformer- 2 km HT/LT line

5 Clear water pumping station

For Existing Discharge = 49.57 m3/hour, head = 30 m, 2(1W+1S), at WTP clear water sump

6 Clear water rising main (CWRM)

Length= 1486 m of dia. 150 mm and DI K-9 pipes, from WTP to existing 500 KL OHT

7 Distribution network Length= 25764 m of dia. 75 mm to 250 mm, HDPE PN 10

Diameter (mm)

Length (m)

Pipe Material

75 mm 10578 m HDPE PN 10

90 mm 2306 m HDPE PN 10

110 mm 5171 m HDPE PN 10

125 mm 1248 m HDPE PN 10

140 mm 4428 m HDPE PN 10

160 mm 641 m HDPE PN 10

180 mm 415 m HDPE PN 10

225 mm 324 m HDPE PN 10

250 mm 653 m HDPE PN 10

Total 25764 m HDPE PN 10

Location: Along the public road in the entire town

8 Bulk meters 03 no’s

9

House service connections

2,147 no’s

B. Kurawar

1 Floating Pontoon in existing dam

Water will be lifted from Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam with the help of Submersible Floating Pumps. Submersible Pumps will be mounted on Floating Barge / Pontoon. -10 m x 10 m will be constructed near dam. -Pump House cum Store Room -112 Transformer (KVA)

4


1 Km HT / LT Line

2 Raw water pumping station

Discharge = 97.81 m3/hour, head = 86.60 m, 4(2W+2S), at Intake arrangement (Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam)

3 Raw water rising main (RWRM)

Length= 33840 m of dia. 300 mm and DI K-9 pipes, from Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam to WTP- Kurawar

4 Water Treatment Plant (WTP)

4.70 MLD; Rapid sand filter type, 112 KVA Transformer- 2 km HT/LT line Location: Old WTP at Mahammadpur Road, Kurawar

5 Clear water pumping station

(i) For Existing OHT 300 KL - Discharge= 34.74 m3/hour, head = 30.5 m, 2(1W+1S)

(ii) For Existing OHT 110 KL and Proposed OHT 250 KL- Discharge= 42.15 m3/hour, head = 30.0 m, 2(1W+1S)

(iii) For Proposed OHT 900 KL- Discharge= 118.51 m3/hour, head = 30.5 m, 2(1W+1S)

Location: WTP clear water sump


Length = 3577 m of diameter 100 mm to 200 mm and DI K-9 pipes

Diameter (mm)

Length (m)

Pipe Material

100 mm 727 m DI K- 9

150 mm 506 m DI K- 9

200 mm 2344 m DI K- 9

Total 3577 m DI K- 9

7 Overhead Tanks (OHTs)

2 no’s

1. 900 KL capacity at WTP campus (Mahammadpur Road, Kurawar)

2. 250 KL capacity at Near Govt. Hospital, Kurawar

8 Distribution network Length= 53618 m of diameter 75 mm to 280 mm, HDPE PN 10

Diameter (mm)

Length (m)

Pipe Material

75 mm 26730 m HDPE PN 10 90 mm 5815 m HDPE PN 10

110 mm 6095 m HDPE PN 10

125 mm 2081 m HDPE PN 10

140 mm 7389 m HDPE PN 10

160 mm 757 m HDPE PN 10

180 mm 969 m HDPE PN 10

200 mm 727 m HDPE PN 10

225 mm 268 m HDPE PN 10

250 mm 1178 m HDPE PN 10

280 mm 1609 m HDPE PN 10


Alignment: Along the public road in the entire town


10 House service connections

3,265 no’s

C. Kothri

5


1 New Tube wells 7 no’s of tube wells of depth 90 m & diameter 350 mm Tube well require a very small area (1 m x 1m) All the tube well sites are located along/banks of a stream within the municipal boundary.

2 Chlorination Plant 3 no’s: Electronically controlled -Chlorination units producing chlorine from common salt -Chlorination units are located in a small room at sumps (ground level reservoirs)


Length = 4054 m of diameter 75 mm to 160 mm and HDPE PN 8

Diameter (mm)

Length (m)

Pipe Material

75 mm 357 m HDPE PN 8

110 mm 2854 m HDPE PN 8

160 mm 843 m HDPE PN 8


4 Overhead Tanks (OHTs)/ Ground water storage reservoirs (GLSRs)

OHTs- 2 no’s 1. 400 KL capacity, Near Highway at Govt. Hospital 2. 60 KL capacity, Near Primary school at Mainakhedi village GLSRs- 2 no’s 1. 200 KL capacity at Graveyard (marghat) and near kothri nagar parishad 2. 150 KL capacity, Near Graveyard (marghat)

5 Distribution network Length= 41284 m of dia. 75 mm to 250 mm, HDPE PN 10

Diameter (mm)

Length (m)

Pipe Material

75 mm 25743 m HDPE PN 10

110 mm 12631 m HDPE PN 10

160 mm 1888 m HDPE PN 10

200 mm 839 m HDPE PN 10

250 mm 183 m HDPE PN 10


Location: Pipes will be laid underground along the public roads, and public lands.


7 House service connections

2,141 no’s

6

Figure 2: Water Supply System Components and Alignments in Boda

7

Figure 3: Google image of Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam

10

Figure 4: Raw and Clear Water Mains- Boda

11

Figure 5: WTP (1.50 MLD) site location- Boda

12

Figure 6: Hydraulic Flow Diagram- WTP Boda

13

Figure 7: WTP Layout Plan- Boda

14

Figure 8: Water Supply Zone Map of Boda

15

Figure 9: Distribution Network Zone 1 (Boda)

16


17


18


19

Figure 13: Google map showing proposed components from source to OHTs - Kurawar town

20

Figure 14: Drawing of Floating Pontoon for Kurawar WSS

21

Figure 15: OHT 250 KL site location- Kurawar

22

Figure 16: WTP & 900 KL OHT site location- Kurawar

23

Figure 17: Hydraulic Flow diagram- WTP Kurawar

24

Figure 18: WTP layout plan- Kurawar

25

Figure 19: Water Supply Zone Map of Kurawar

26

Figure 20: Distribution Network Zone 1- Kurawar

27


28


29


30

Figure 24: Schematic diagram of proposed water supply system- Kothri

Existing OHT/+487

220kl

Menakhedi OHT

R-5 -TW

200kl Sump near

Grave Yard; +484m

R-6 -TWR-7 -TW

R-8 -TW

Hospital OHT

R-10 -TW

R-3 -TW

R-2 -TW

150kl Sump/+487m

Ward-11 -TW

Ward-15 -TW

Anganwadi -TW

Existing -TW

Nala -TW

50kl/+484m

350kl/+488m110mm HDPE PN10

110mm HDPE PN10 110mm HDPE PN10

160mm HDPE PN10

110mm HDPE PN10

75mm HDPE PN10

75mm HDPE PN1075mm HDPE PN10

75mm HDPE PN10

110mm HDPE PN10

31

Figure 25: Location of proposed Tube well points- Kothri town

32

Figure 26: OHT 400 KL site location- Kothri

33

Figure 27: OHT 60 KL site location- Kothri

34

Figure 28: GLSR 200 KL site location- Kothri

35

Figure 29: GLSR 150 KL site location- Kothri

36

Figure 30: Water Supply Zone Map of Kothri

37

Figure 31: Distribution Network Zone 1- Kothri

38


39


40


41

8. Table 2 provides the comparison of components in the Draft IEE (preliminary design) and components in the detailed engineering design. Table 3 presents the site environmental features of the new sites selected during the detailed design.

Table 2: Comparison of Components in the Preliminary and Detailed Engineering Design

Infrastructure Details of Proposed component as per Preliminary Design

Details of component as per DBO Contractor’s Detailed Engineering Design

Detailed reason for change in component design / quantity / location

A. Boda

Floating Pontoon in existing dam

Water will be lifted from Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam with the help of Submersible Floating Pumps. Submersible Pumps will be mounted on Floating Barge / Pontoon. -10 m x 10 m will be constructed near dam. -Pump House cum Store Room -63 Transformer (KVA) 1 Km HT / LT Line


No change

Raw water pumping station

Discharge = 52.142 m3/hour, head = 27 m, 2(1W+1S)

Location: At Intake arrangement (Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam)



No change

Raw water rising main (RWRM)

Length : 12800 m - 200 mm diamerter Ductile Iron (DI) K-9 pipe Alignment: From Kunwar Chain Sagar dam to WTP; along a public road

Length : 14128 m - 200 mm diameter DI K-9 pipe Alignment: From Kunwar Chain Sagar dam to WTP along a public road

Increase in length by 1,328 m due to change in location of WTP site

Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and clear water sump (CWS)

1.5 MLD capacity WTP with arrangements: - Alum coagulation & flocculation - Tube settler - Sedimentation - Rapid gravity filtration - Disinfection with chlorine - Wash water recovery - Sludge drying beds - Miscellaneous infrastructure (compound wall, landscaping, lighting, rest rooms etc)

Khasra no. 811/1

1.5 MLD capacity WTP with arrangements: - Alum coagulation & flocculation - Tube settler - Sedimentation - Rapid gravity filtration - Disinfection with chlorine - Wash water recovery - Sludge drying beds -Miscellaneous infrastructure (compound wall, landscaping, lighting, rest rooms etc)

Khasra no. 1251/2

Location has been changed; Initially WTP was proposed near the existing OHT in land owned by a school; School Authority denied to provide the land so WTP shifted to other location. Alternative site owned by ULB located along Kurawar- Boda- Talen road is finalized for WTP

42




Location: Near Govt. school/ Near 500 KL OHT in Boda town, site owned by Education Department, GoMP.

Location: At Kurawar- Boda- Talen road, 1 km from Boda town, site owned by Urban Local Body (ULB).

Clear Water Pumping Station


Location: WTP


Location: WTP

No change

Clear water rising main (CWRM)

200 m; DI K- 9 and 150 mm dia.

Location: underground along the main public roads in the town, which are wider.

1486 m; DI K- 9 and 150 mm dia.


Variation in length due to change in location of WTP; CWRM length has been increased by1,286 m

Distribution Network

9672 m- 75 mm to 250 mm diameter, HDPE PN 10

Location: underground along the main public roads/ street in the town, which are wider.



Length of distribution pipeline increased by 16,092m after detailed survey

Bulk Flow Meters

03 no’s 03 no’s No change

Household Connections with flow meters

2,091 Nos. 2,147 Nos. Household connections are increased by 56 numbers as per the household survey conducted by DBO Contractor

B. Kurawar


Water will be lifted from Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam with the help of Submersible Floating Pumps. Submersible Pumps will be mounted on Floating Barge / Pontoon. -10 m x 10 m will be constructed near dam. -Pump House cum Store Room -112 KVA Transformer system 1 Km HT / LT Line


No change


Discharge = 97.81 m3/hour, head = 86.60 m, 4(2W+2S)


No change

43







21500 m; DI K-9 and 300 mm dia. Alignment: From Kunwar Chain Sagar dam to WTP; along a public road

33840 m; DI K-9 and 300 mm dia. Alignment: From Kunwar Chain Sagar dam to WTP; along a public road

Length of RWRM increased by 12,340 m.

In the per preliminary design, RWRM proposed through agricultural land;

RWRM is realigned during detailed design by DBO contractor along the Kurawar- Boda Road to avoid agricultural lands, due to which the length of pipeline increased.

Water Treatment Plant (WTP)

4.70 MLD capacity WTP with arrangements: - Alum coagulation & flocculation - Clariflocculator - Sedimentation - Rapid sand filtration - Disinfection with chlorine - Wash water recovery - Sludge drying beds - Miscellaneous infrastructure (compound wall, landscaping, lighting, rest rooms etc) -112 KVA Transformer- 2 km HT/LT line

Khasra no. 653/1/1/1

Location: Near Govt. Hospital, Kurawar. Site owned by GoMP.


Khasra no. 1058/2

Location: Old WTP Campus, Mahammadpur Road, Kurawar. Site owned by Urban Local body (ULB).

Location has been changed; Initially WTP was proposed near government hospital’; Hospital Authority denied to provide the land so WTP shifted to other location in the old WTP campus owned by ULB

Clear water pumping station





No change

44





Location: Clear water sump at WTP




2185 mm; 100 to 200 mm diameter, DI K-9 pipe Location: underground along the main public roads in the town, which are wider.

3577 m; 100 to 200 mm diameter, DI K-9 pipe

100 mm dia- 727 m 150 mm dia- 506 m 200 mm dia- 2344 m Location: underground along the main public roads in the town, which are wider.

1392 m length has increased

Length changed due to change in location of WTP, 900 KL and 250 KL OHT

Overhead Tank (OHT) - 1

900 KL capacity

Khasra no. 657

Location: In Galla mandi, Site is owned by GoMP.

900 KL capacity

Khasra no. 1058/2

Location: Old WTP campus, Mahammadpur Road, Kurawar (Proposed 4.70 MLD WTP premises), site owned by Urban Local body (ULB)

OHT site changed to old WTP campus, owned by ULB


250 KL capacity reinforced cement concrete (RCC) tank with compound wall

Khasra no. 634/2/1

Location: At Police Station Premises, Ward no. 13, Site owned by Police department.


Khasra no. 658/3

Location: Near Govt. Hospital, Kurawar, site owned by Urban Local body (ULB)

Location has been changed as permission was denied to construction OHT in land owned by Police Department; alternative site owned by ULB finalized






Length of distribution pipeline increased by 14,737m after detailed survey.

Bulk Flow Meters



3,378 Nos. 3,265 no’s

113 no. connections are reduced as per the household survey conducted by DBO Contractor.

45




C. Kothri

New Tube wells 7 no’s of tube wells of depth 90 m & diameter 350 mm

Tube well require a very small area (1 m x 1m)

All the tube well sites are located along/banks of a stream within the municipal boundary.

7 no’s of tube wells of depth 90 m & diameter 350 mm



No change

Chlorination Plant

3 no’s: Electronically controlled chlorination units producing chlorine from common salt

Location: Chlorination units will be located in a small room at sumps (ground level reservoirs). These are ULB owned lands, and are currently vacant.

3 no’s: Electronically controlled chlorination units producing chlorine from common salt

Location: Chlorination units will be located in a small room at sumps (ground level reservoirs). These are ULB owned lands, and are currently vacant.

No change


7605 m; 75 mm to 160 mm diameter, HDPE PN 8

Alignment: underground along the main public roads in the town, which are wider.

4054 m; 75 mm to 160 mm diameter, HDPE PN 8


Length of CWRM reduced by 3,551 m after detailed survey and design

Overhead tanks (OHT)- 1


Khasra no.- 1093/1

Location: Near the Highway at govt. hospital, site owned by GoMP.

400 KL capacity reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) tank with compound wall

Khasra no.- 1093/1


Capacity of OHT has been changed after detailed survey and design; location remain same



Khasra no.- 100

Location: Near Primary school at Mainakhedi village, Site owned by GoMP.


Khasra no.- 100

Location: Near Primary school at Mainakhedi village. Site owned by GoMP.

No change

46




Ground level storage reservoir (GLSR)- 1

200 KL capacity

Khasra no.- 600

Location: At Graveyard (marghat) near Kothari nagar Parishad, site owned by Urban Local body (ULB)

200 KL capacity

Khasra no.- 600


No change


150 KL capacity

Khasra no.- 1109/1

Location: At existing 220 KL OHT, site owned by Urban Local body (ULB)

150 KL capacity

Khasra no.- 1177

Location: At Graveyard (marghat), Near existing 220 KL OHT, site owned by Urban Local body (ULB)

Location changed to an alternative site, close to the original site, during the detailed design


51,832 m; 75 mm to 250 mm, HDPE PN 10


41,284 m; 75 mm to 250 mm, HDPE PN 10


Length of distribution pipelines reduced by 10,548 m after detailed survey and design

Bulk Water Meters



2,500 no’s Location. Water delivery pipe will be connected to distribution lines and meters will be attached to the delivery pipe at each house with a meter chamber


359 no’s connections are reduced as per the household survey conducted by DBO Contractor.

47

Table 3: Site Environmental Features of New Sites Selected during Detailed Design

Components

Location

Plot No. (Khasra No)

Site environmental features

Site Photograph (Sites as per detailed design by DBO contractor)

1. Boda


Kurawar- Boda-Talen road, 1 km from the Boda town

1251/2, Site owned by Urban Local Body (ULB)

Site is vacant and fairly covered with small shrubs and grass; and there is no sensitive environmental feature. Site is surrounded by agricultural land; this WTP site has direct approach road from the town.

2. Kurawar

Water Treatment Plant (WTP) & OHT- 2: 900 KL

Mahammadpur Road, Kurawar

1058/2, site owned by Urban Local Body (ULB)

Site is located within the campus of old WTP site. Site is surrounded by urban area and agricultural land. Around the boundary of this land small and large trees are there, but no harm to trees during construction activities, no tree cutting is required. The trees surrounding the sites are Mango (Mangifera indica), Tamarind (Tamarindus indica), Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), Dhak/Palash (Butea monosperma) and Babul (Vachellia nilotica) etc.

48

OHT- 1 (250 KL)

Near Hospital, Kurawar

658/3, Site owned by Urban Local Body (ULB)

There is no environmental specific feature under proposed land of OHT and site is vacant. The OHT: 250 KL is proposed in campus of existing 300 KL OHT.

3. Kothri

GLSR- 2 (150 KL)

Near

Gravey

ard

(Margh

at)

1177, Site owned by Urban Local Body (ULB)

The land is vacant and barren; and free from vegetation and trees. This land is surrounded by agricultural land and adjacent to the existing 220 KL OHT. At the distance of 5-10 m from the site boundary some trees are there. (i.e. Dhak/Palash- Butea monosperma), but no any harm to trees during construction activities.

III. Statutory Clearance Required for Package 1A

9. Water abstraction permit/clearance. Clearance required from Water Resources Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh for water abstraction and installation of floating pontoon in Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam has been obtained on Dec 30, 2017 for Boda and Kurawar towns (Refer Appendix 1 and 2). 10. Consent to Establish (CTE) for WTPs. Applications to obtain CTE from Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board (MPPCB), which is mandatory for the WTPs, have been submitted for both Boda and Kurawar WTPs, and is in process with MPCCB (Refer Appendix 3 and 4). 11. Environmental Compliance Certificate. The Package is not included in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification Act’s Schedule 1 thus environmental clearance is not required.

IV. Update on Baseline Environment Conditions

12. The baseline environmental conditions as reported in the Draft IEE are still applicable as there are no significant changes in locations and alignments. Few component sites are changed in Boda and Kurawar, but these are within the project area, and has similar baseline environmental features. The package components are not located within nor adjacent to environmentally-sensitive areas.

49

A. Boda & Kurawar 13. At present water supply to the towns is based on groundwater sources. Considering the falling groundwater levels in the Boda and Kurawar towns, and also looking into future growing water demand, and sustainability of the proposed system, a surface water based system is proposed. Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam (also known as Dudhi Dam), which is located at a distance of 14 km and 33 kms from Boda and Kurawar respectively, is the identified as source. The Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam located in the Rajgarh District of Madhya Pradesh.

14. Water Quantity Security for Boda; For the Boda town, the demand of water supply for the year 2018, 2033 & 2048 are estimated to the tune of 1.00 MLD, 1.20 MLD & 1.40 MLD respectively. Thus maximum of 1.50 MLD intake form the source per annum i.e. 550 ML (0.55 MCM) of drawl of water is to be ensured. Dead storage capacity is 5.85 MCM and live storage is 20.81 MCM. The dam is around 14 km away from Boda town.

15. Water Quantity Security for Kurawar; For the Kurawar town, the demand of water supply for the year 2018, 2033 & 2048 are estimated to the tune of 3.20 MLD, 4.50 MLD & 6.40 MLD respectively. Thus maximum of6.40 MLD intake form the source per annum i.e. 2336 ML (2.336 MCM) of drawl of water is to be ensured. Gross storage capacity is 26.66 MCM, dead storage capacity is 5.85 MCM and live storage capacity is 20.81 MCM. The dam is around 33km away from Kurawar town.

B. Kothri

16. The current water supply system in Kothari is completely groundwater based, and is not able to provide adequate supply. As per the municipality, of 8 tube wells drilled last year, 3 were dried up, and 5 are under operation. These tube wells are drilled very deep (500 feet, ~ 150 m) but due to limited yield, tube wells are operated only for about 10 hours a day. Given this situation, a surface source identification exercise was conducted during the project preparation.

17. The nearest surface water source is River Parvati, flowing at 4-5 km north of Kothari Town. This river is one of the main tributaries of River Chambal, part of the Yamuna River basin. However in view of the following reasons, Parvati River source is not considered dependable for Kothari water supply: (i) river is seasonal; carries significant flows during the monsoon, and in summers the river completely dries up; (ii) water flow in the river is reduced significantly by upstream dams; (iii) information from the upstream towns (Astha and other towns and villages), which are sourcing water from the Astha, indicate very low yield during the summers.

18. Hence, it is recommended to continue the groundwater source for Kothari water supply. However given the low yield of existing tube wells and frequent failures, Geophysical Investigation study (Refer Appendix 5) and Ground water recharge and conservation Plan (Refer Appendix 6) are prepared by DBO Contractor to ensure sustainability of tube wells to supply water to Kothri town.

19. As per the sampling surveys conducted during the project preparation and design, water quality of Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam is good. As per sampling done by DBO Contractor “M/s REAN Water Tech Private Limited, Kolkata” presented in the Table 4 below and also Refer Appendix 7, all the parameters of water quality in comparison with drinking water standards (Refer Appendix 8)are within the stipulated levels. Conventional water treatment and disinfection is proposed in project to ensure that potable water is supplied all times.

50

Table 4: Water Quality at the Proposed Intake Site, Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam

V. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures

20. The Draft IEE cleared by ADB assessed all potential impacts of the package/subproject based on preliminary design. The Draft IEE concluded that the package/subprojects will not cause any significant adverse impacts due to: (i) schemes are relatively small and their effect will be local and site-specific which is manageable and controllable and (ii) impacts are site-specific and likely to be associated with the construction process and are produced because the process is invasive, involving excavation and earth movements. 21. Table 5 provides the assessment of the potential impacts of components based on detailed engineering design. Based on the results, the potential impacts identified in the Draft IEE are similar in nature and remains as not significant. The findings have been verified by the PIU and PMC. The table also shows specific mitigation measures used in developing the site-specific EMPs (SEMP).

S. No.

Parameters Unit Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam

(water quality results)

Drinking Water Standards (BIS Standard: IS: 10500:2012

Desirable limits Permissible limits in the absence of

alternative

1 pH Value pH Scale 7.75 6.5 to 8.5 No relaxation

2 Chlorides (as Cl) mg/l 8.99 250 1000

3 Nitrate (as NO3) mg/l 9.72 45 No relaxation

4 Fluorides (as F) mg/l 0.49 1.0 1.5

5 Oil & Grease Mg/l <2.00 0.5 No relaxation

6 MPN of Coli form

Per 100 ml 84.00 0 -

7 Faecal Coli form Per 100 ml 22.00 0 -

51

Table 5: Comparison of Impacts in the Draft IEE and Per Detailed Engineering Design



Any change recommended by DBO Contractor (If yes detail of that subcomponent with approval)

Whether any new impacts due to changes/impacts that were not assessed in the draft IEE

Mitigation measures

A. Boda




No change n/a n/a


Discharge = 52.142 m3/hour, head = 27 m, 2(1W+1S) Location: At Intake arrangement (Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam)

Discharge = 52.142 m3/hour, head = 27 m, 2(1W+1S) Location: At Intake arrangement (Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam)

No change n/a n/a


Length : 12800 m - 200 mm diameter Ductile Iron (DI) K-9 pipe Alignment: From Kunwar Chain Sagar dam to WTP; along a public road

Length : 14128 m - 200 mm diameter DI K-9 pipe Alignment: From Kunwar Chain Sagar dam to WTP along a public road

Length of RWRM increased by 1328 m due to change in WTP site

No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable

Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing roads

Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and clear water sump (CWS)

1.5 MLD capacity WTP with arrangements: - Alum coagulation & flocculation - Tube settler - Sedimentation - Rapid gravity filtration - Disinfection with chlorine

1.5 MLD capacity WTP with arrangements: - Alum coagulation & flocculation - Tube settler - Sedimentation - Rapid gravity filtration - Disinfection with chlorine

Location has been changed; School Authority denied permission to provide the land to WTP; so WTP location shifted to a new site, owned by ULB


Mitigation measures in draft IEE applicable

52





Mitigation measures

- Wash water recovery - Sludge drying beds - Miscellaneous infrastructure (compound wall, landscaping, lighting, rest rooms etc)

Khasra no. 811/1

Location: Near Govt. school/ Near 500 KL OHT in Boda town, site owned by Education Department, GoMP.

- Wash water recovery - Sludge drying beds - Miscellaneous infrastructure (compound wall, landscaping, lighting, rest rooms etc)

Khasra no. 1251/2

Location: At Kurawar- Boda- Talen road, 1 km from Boda town, site owned by Urban Local Body (ULB).

Clear Water Pumping Station


Location: WTP


Location: WTP

No change n/a n/a


200 m; DI K- 9 and 150 mm dia.


1486 m; DI K- 9 and 150 mm dia.


Length of CWRM increased by 1286 m.




Distribution pipe line of total length 9672 m- 75 mm to 250 mm diameter, HDPE PN 10

Location: Pipes will be laid underground along the public roads; this work will cover entire area of the towns; in narrow roads, where there is no place, the pipeline will be laid in the center of the road ;


Location: Pipes will be laid underground along the public roads; this work will cover entire area of the towns; in narrow roads, where there is no place, the pipeline will be laid in the center of the road ; where

Length of distribution pipeline increased by 16092 m.



53





Mitigation measures

where the roads are very wide , the pipelines will be laid in the road shoulder.

the roads are very wide , the pipelines will be laid in the road shoulder.

Bulk Water Meters

03 no’s Location: Fixed with the pipe section at strategic locations like source, WTP, OHTs, DMA inlets etc.,

03 no’s Location: Fixed with the pipe section at strategic locations like source, WTP, OHTs, DMA inlets etc.,

No change n/a n/a

Consumer Connection with flow meters



56 no’s of Household connections are increased as per actual survey which was missing in DPR.

n/a n/a

B. Kurawar




No change n/a n/a




No change n/a n/a

54





Mitigation measures




21500 m; DI K-9 and 300 mm dia.

Alignment: From Kunwar Chain Sagar dam to WTP; along a public road

33840 m; DI K-9 and 300 mm dia.

Alignment: From Kunwar Chain Sagar dam to WTP; along a public road

Length of RWRM increased by 12,340 m.





Khasra no. 653/1/1/1

Location: Near Govt. Hospital, Kurawar. Site owned by GoMP.


Khasra no. 1058/2

Location: Old WTP Campus, Mahammadpur Road, Kurawar. Site owned by Urban Local body (ULB).

Location has been changed; Government Hospital Authority denied permission to provide the land initially identified for WTP, so WTP shifted to old WTP campus, owned by ULB

The alternative site selected by Kurawar ULB is old WTP campus. Part of the site is covered with old/dilapidated structures of WTP. These required to be dismantled for construction of WTP. This activity will generate construction debris and waste, which need to be disposed safely. Impacts due to disposal of construction waste and debris is already considered in the draft IEE.

Mitigation measures in draft IEE applicable: it provides detailed measures to safely dispose the wastes. Measures prioritize beneficial use of construction debris / surplus soil.

Clear water pumping station



No change n/a n/a

55





Mitigation measures








2185 mm; 100 to 200 mm diameter, DI K-9 pipe


3577 m; 100 to 200 mm diameter, DI K-9 pipe

100 mm dia- 727 m 150 mm dia- 506 m 200 mm dia- 2344 m


Length of CWRM increased by 1392 m.




900 KL capacity

Khasra no. 657

Location: In Galla mandi, Site is owned by GoMP.

900 KL capacity

Khasra no. 1058/2

Location: Old WTP campus, Mahammadpur Road, Kurawar (Proposed 4.70 MLD WTP premises), site owned by Urban Local body (ULB)

OHT site changed to old WTP campus, owned by ULB





Khasra no. 634/2/1

Location: At Police Station Premises, Ward no. 13,


Khasra no. 658/3

Location: Near Govt. Hospital, Kurawar, site

OHT site changed to a site owned by ULB as permission was denied for OHT construction in Police Station premises



56





Mitigation measures

Site owned by Police department.

owned by Urban Local body (ULB)



Location: Pipes will be laid underground along the public roads; this work will cover entire area of the towns; in narrow roads, where there is no place, the pipeline will be laid in the center of the road ; where the roads are very wide , the pipelines will be laid in the road shoulder.



Length of distribution pipeline increased by 14737 m.



Bulk Water Meters

10 no’s

Location: Fixed with the pipe section at strategic locations like source, WTP, OHTs, DMA inlets etc.,

10 no’s


No change n/a n/a

Consumer connection with flow meters

3,378 no’s

Location. Water delivery pipe will be connected to distribution lines and meters will be attached to the delivery pipe at each house with a meter chamber

3,265 no’s


113 no’s of connections reduced after the detailed household survey.

n/a n/a

C. Kothri

New Tube wells 7 no’s of tube wells of depth 90 m & diameter 350 mm

7 no’s of tube wells of depth 90 m & diameter 350 mm

No change n/a n/a

57





Mitigation measures





Chlorination Plant

3 no’s: Electronically controlled chlorination units producing chlorine from common salt Chlorination units will be located in a small room at sumps (ground level reservoirs). These are government owned lands, and are currently vacant.

3 no’s: Electronically controlled chlorination units producing chlorine from common salt Chlorination units will be located in a small room at sumps (ground level reservoirs). These are government owned lands, and are currently vacant.

No change n/a n/a


7605 m; 75 mm to 160 mm, HDPE PN 8


4054 m; 75 mm to 160 mm, HDPE PN 8


Length of CWRM reduced by 3551 m after detailed survey and design





Khasra no.- 1093/1


400 KL capacity reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) tank with compound wall

Khasra no.- 1093/1


No change in location; capacity of OHT has been changed by 50 KL






No change n/a n/a

58





Mitigation measures

Khasra no.- 100

Location: Near Primary school at Mainakhedi village, Site owned by GoMP.

Khasra no.- 100

Location: Near Primary school at Mainakhedi village. Site owned by GoMP.


200 KL capacity

Khasra no.- 600


200 KL capacity

Khasra no.- 600


No change n/a n/a


150 KL capacity

Khasra no.- 1109/1

Location: At existing 220 KL OHT, site owned by Urban Local body (ULB)

150 KL capacity

Khasra no.- 1177

Location: At Graveyard (Marghat), Near existing 220 KL OHT, site owned by Urban Local body (ULB)

Location changed to an alternative site, close to the original site








Length of distribution pipeline reduced by 10548 m.



59





Mitigation measures

Bulk Water Meters

17 no’s


17 no’s


No change n/a n/a

Consumer connection with flow meters

2,500 no’s


2,141 no’s


359 no’s of connections reduced after the detailed household survey.

n/a n/a

60

22. Mitigation Measures Considered in the Detailed Engineering Design. Package 1A water supply schemes considered the location of the nearest surface water body i.e. Kunwar Chain Sagar dam for Boda and Kurawar; and Ground water for Kothri. Proposal of Floating pontoon is selected such that adequate water is available throughout the year to provide water supply. Clearances required from Water Resources Department for water abstraction and installation of floating pontoon in Chain Sagar Dam have been obtained. A regular water quality regime needs to be established for checking the raw water quality. The water supplied to the consumers at all-time must meet the drinking water standards (Refer to Appendix 8). 23. Metal floating barge type intake proposed for Boda and Kurawar towns– no construction work is proposed in dam; no impacts envisaged. In Kothiri, groundwater source is proposed due to lack of feasible surface water source despite history of failing ground water tube wells in the town. To ensure groundwater sustainability, draft IEE suggested various measures, such as geophysical investigation study, and preparation and implementation of groundwater conservation plan. Accordingly, Geophysical Investigation study and Ground water recharge and conservation Plan are prepared by DBO Contractor. 24. As the WTP will generates sludge from sedimentation, chemical flocculation, residuals of excess chemical dosage, plankton etc; and wastewater from rinsing and back washing of filter. Final IEE includes design measures for proper management of sludge and wastewater. Wastewater will be collected and recirculated, resulting in zero waste discharge, and settled sludge will be dewatered, dried, and disposed by land filling/reused in beneficial purposes. Various pollution prevention measures included in IEE for construction phase to control dust, noise, emissions from construction vehicles, silt-laden surface runoff during rains etc. 25. For the proposed WTPs, enhancement measures like proper wash water recovery, sludge management, chlorine safety facilities and quick leak detection and rectification to save the resources, etc. are included are already included in the designs. CTE from MPPCB, which is mandatory for the WTP, it is in under process. 26. Mitigation Measures Considered in the Construction Phase. The roads in the core area of the town are very narrow and congested with pedestrians and vehicles, while the roads in outer areas are wide. Civil works include linear excavation for laying pipes along the roads, placing pipes in the trench and refilling with the excavated soil. The trenches will be of 0.4 m – 0.7 m wide and 0.8 to 1 m depth. Earth work excavation will be undertaken by machine (backhoe excavator) or manually and include danger lighting and using barricades at every 100 m. As trenches are a maximum of 1.2 m, there is no risk of collapse of trenches or risk to surrounding buildings. However, necessary protection measures will be provided where required depending on the site specific requirement during trench excavation. 27. Sufficient care will be taken while laying so that existing utilities and cables are not damaged and pipes are not thrown into the trenches or dragged, but carefully laid in the trenches. The minimum working hours will be 8 hours daily, the total duration of each stage depends on the soil condition and other local features. 28. Total earthwork excavation is 141,646 cubic meter (m3), of which about 91% of the excavated soil will be used for refilling the refilling the trench after placing the pipe and therefore residual soil after pipe laying and refilling is 12719 m3, which is not significant. This excess soil shall be used for construction. Material will be sourced from existing licensed quarries. An estimated 1140 m3 of fine aggregate (sand) and 1958 m3 of coarse aggregate will be used in the construction.

61

29. Road reinstatement will be undertaken by the contractor as part of the civil works 30. Other civil works in the subproject include construction of water treatment plant, water tanks and pumping stations at the identified sites. These works will be confined to sites, and construction will include general activities like excavation for foundation, construction of foundations, columns, walls and roof in cement concrete and masonry, and fixing of mechanical and electrical fixtures, etc. 31. Although construction of these project components involves quite simple techniques of civil work, the invasive nature of excavation and the project locations in the built-up areas of the town where there are a variety of human activities, will result in impacts to the environment and sensitive receptors such as residents, businesses, and the community in general. The mitigation measures are discussed in the SEMP. 32. PMU, with assistance of PMC, has developed standardized SEMP, which has been shared with all DBO Contractors. This standardized SEMP includes specific mitigation measures and monitoring checklists applicable to construction activities common in all Phase 1 works. The contractor of package 1A has submitted SEMP. Refer Appendix 9 for Site Specific EMP prepared by Contractors with help of PIU- PMC/PMU. 33. The SEMP given here includes the design measures for (i) wash water recovery for the WTP to prevent effluent to be discharged; (ii) safe disposal of sludge coming out of wash water tanks from WTP (iii) beneficial use of treated sludge; (iv) energy efficient pumping equipment and (v) quick leak detection and rectification to save the resources, etc. During execution phase, the EMP includes mitigation measures such as (i) implementation of traffic management plan in coordination with local traffic police to minimize traffic impacts (ii) awareness campaigns and consultations to inform residents and businesses of potential disturbances; (iii) provision of walkways and planks over trenches to ensure access will not be impeded; (iv) use of noise-dampening measures in areas with sensitive receptors such as hospitals, schools, places of worships and other silence-zones; (v) use of dust-suppression methods such as watering and/or covering of stockpiles; and (vi) finding beneficial use of excavated materials to extent possible to reduce the quantity that will be disposed off. As for the O&M phase, facilities will need to be repaired from time to time, but environmental impacts will be much less than those of the construction period as the work will be infrequent, affecting small areas only. The design of the WTP includes dewatering and drying areas as part of sludge management. The EMP includes mitigation measures and monitoring plan to ensure compliance to environmental standards during O&M phase. 34. Environmental standards (IFC’s EHS Guidelines): DBO contractor will apply pollution prevention and control technologies and practices consistent with international good practices as reflected in internationally recognized standards such as the World Bank Group’s Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines and will adopt cleaner production processes and good energy efficiency practices. If less stringent levels or measures are appropriate in view of specific project circumstances, the DBO contractor will provide full and detailed justification for any proposed alternatives that are consistent with the requirements presented in ADB SPS. 35. The Final IEE and SEMP shows how (i) design provides for pollution prevention from WTP, and (ii) how dust noise, air emissions, and water pollution will be controlled during the construction. Also the Final IEE and SEMP provides specific information on (i) how DBO contractor will implement occupational health and safety.

62

36. The Final IEE and SEMP includes more detailed checklists such (i) contractors twice a week EHS Checklist; (ii) contractors monthly SEMP Implementation Report; and (iii) PIU environmental safeguards compliance. The subproject will not add any incremental impacts to the environment. Site monitoring checklists and formats are given in Appendix 10. 37. A copy of the approved SEMP will be kept onsite during the construction period at all times. The EMP included in the bid and contract documents. Non-compliance with, or any deviation from, the conditions set out in this document constitutes a failure in compliance. 38. For civil works, the contractor will be required to (i) carry out all of the mitigation and monitoring measures set forth in the approved SEMP; and (ii) implement any corrective or preventative actions set out in safeguards monitoring reports that the employer will prepare from time to time to monitor implementation of this IEE and SEMP. The budget has been allocated for compliance with these SEMP measures, requirements and actions. 39. The following tables 6 to 8 show the anticipated environmental impacts, proposed mitigation measures, project implementation phase wise, and responsible agencies for implementation and monitoring. Table 9 shows the construction phase environmental monitoring plan.

Table 6: Design Phase Environmental Management Plan

(These are to be implemented and complied by DBO Contractor During the detailed Design Phase)

Anticipated Impact Mitigation Measures

Design of water supply system -Unsustainable source; resource & energy use: Kothri Groundwater Source

• Conduct a detailed groundwater study and prepare a groundwater sustainability plan for Kothari to address the groundwater sustainability issue.

• Implementation of Source Sustainability Plan will be part of the project and will inter alia include measures like sub-surface dykes; a combination of sub-surface dyke and check dam; check dam; recharge pits; recharge shafts, community roof top rainwater harvesting systems, etc.,

• All the proposed tube wells are located in along a seasonal stream. The groundwater recharge occurs mainly from the flowing stream, and partly from agricultural field. The recharge will increase the water is retained in the stream for more time. Construction of a series small check dams in the stream (say at every 500 m or as appropriate) will ensure water retention thereby augmenting the groundwater recharge. Check dams can be constructed with locally available material (say stone masonry or soil), and the height of which shall be limited, so that water inundation is confined to the stream section itself. No water abstraction directly from the storage shall be allowed.

• Creation of recharge shafts in the stream body. This will involve creation of bore hole of appropriate depth and of larger size and filled with filler material (like gravel, aggregate). This will augment the recharge.

• Creation of artificial recharge pits in public places / public buildings. Local body can issue a notification to this effect.

• Household level artificial recharge (like roof top rainwater harvesting) should be encouraged.

• Groundwater regulation – all the tube wells in houses in Kothari to be discontinued in a phased manner once the project is implemented

• Measures should be taken to control the open defecation, and to close all unsafe latrines (for example pit latrines).

• Awareness programs shall be conducted regarding the sanitation practices and its effect on groundwater quality

63

Source sustainability & water use conflicts - Water abstraction from Kunwar Chain Sagar Dam

• Discontinuation of current unsustainable groundwater source and creating new water supply system based on a nearest surface water sources (Kunwar chain Sagar Dam) for Kurawar and Boda

• Obtain permission from Water resources department, GoMP – this is already obtained on Dec 30, 2017

Water supply system design – pollution prevention / control, resource conservation

• Recovering wash water from treatment process

• Treatment and reuse of sludge from treatment process

• Minimizing water losses from pipelines by perfect jointing and alignments using appropriate techniques (HDPE pipes up to 150 mm dia joined by electro fusion couplers using on-site electro fusion welding, and all higher dia pipes by on site butt welding)

• Designing the entire system to maintain optimal flow and terminal pressure, and optimizing the overall energy usage

• Reducing the incidence of water borne diseases by providing 100% population including urban poor with potable water supplies

• Improve water use efficiency and reduce water wastage at household level by recording and monitoring the water usage, and charging the consumers as per usage; due consideration to urban poor

• Minimize unaccounted for water (UFW) losses using district metered area approach with flow meter and pressure logging arrangements to identify and rectify the leaks, and unauthorized connections

• Using low-noise and energy efficient pumping systems

• During the design, construction, and operation of the project, apply pollution prevention and control technologies and practices consistent with international good practice, as reflected in internationally recognized standards such as the World Bank Group’s Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines (IFC’s General EHS Guidelines and Sector Specific (Water and Sanitation) Guidelines ).

Environmental pollution- Waste generation from WTP operations

• Obtain CTE from MPPCB for WTPs prior to start of construction– application to MPPCB submitted, and It is under process with MPPCB

Chlorine usage as disinfectant at WTP - Chlorine handling & application risk – health & safety risk to workers and general public

• Provide the following measure at the chlorine application unit:

• Chlorine neutralization pit with a lime slurry feeder

• Proper ventilation, lighting, entry and exit facilities

• Facility for isolation in the event of major chlorine leakage (if needed)

• Personal protection and safety equipment for the operators in the chlorine plant

• Provide training to the staff in safe handling and application of

• chlorine; this shall be included in the contract of Chlorinator supplier

• Supplier of Chlorinator equipment shall provide standard operating manual for safe operation and as well as maintenance and repairs; preferably these shall be provided both in English and Hindi Languages

Table 7: Pre Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan

(These are to be implemented and complied by DBO Contractor prior to start of construction work)

Anticipated Impact Mitigation Measures Preconstruction phase

Unsatisfactory compliance to EMP

• Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) Supervisor will be mobilized to carryout environmental safeguard tasks

• Updated IEE / site specific EMP will be submitted

Utilities on sites (electric, telephone lines, water pipes etc.)

• Location of utilities and respective operators will be identified, and measures to avoid damage/disruption will be implemented

• Contingency plan will be prepared and implemented in case of service disruption

Construction materials

• Construction materials will be obtained only from government approved quarries

• All clearance/license copies of quarries / borrow areas will be provided to PIU for prior approval

64

Anticipated Impact Mitigation Measures

• A monthly report will be submitted to PIU on construction material quantity (sources-wise)

• No new borrow areas / quarries will be created for the work

Approvals, permission, insurances, licenses, etc., for construction work

• All necessary permissions will be obtained prior to start of works

• Copies of all permission/approvals will be submitted to PIU prior to start of work

Training to staff & workers

• Staff and key workers will be trained (in construction methods, safety, EMP, EHS policy) prior to start of work

Guidelines to be followed for establishing construction camps / labour camps

• Camp sites shall be away from residential areas (100 m), sensitive areas (schools, hospitals, etc. 250 m,), water bodies (500 m) and forests (more than 1 km)

• Use unused, vacant lands; no trees shall be cut

• Provide a proper fencing/compound wall

• Prepare a site layout plan & display at the site; uniformly label (name boards) all the places in the facility

• Entire site/facility area shall be provided with hard leveled surface as appropriate; no loose soil, slush, water logging etc.,

• Living quarters and construction camps shall be provided with standard materials; no shacks or huts

• Adequate lighting and ventilation

• Provide drinking water, water for other uses, and sanitation facilities; drinking water should be regularly tested

• Provide clear pathways for safe movement

• Provide cooking fuel (cooking gas); and a separate safe place to cook; fire wood not allowed

• Construct septic tanks and soak pit arrangement for wastewater disposal

• Solid waste shall be properly manager – provide separate bins, compost biodegradable waste; sell recyclable waste

• Camp sites shall be cleared and restored to original after completion of work, all debris, wreckage cleared

Work site management

• Provide a proper fencing/compound wall

• Prepare a site layout plan & display at the site; uniformly label (name boards) all the places in the facility

• Entire site/facility area shall be provided with hard leveled surface as appropriate; no loose soil, slush, water logging etc.,

• Provide clear pathways (for workers/staff) and roads (for vehicles) for safe movement in the work site

Worker amenities at all work sites

• A temporary rest area for workers (for resting in break time, protection against rain/sun, eating etc.,)

• Drinking water

• Wash area, toilets (separate for women); mobile toilets for linear work

• Septic tank and soak pits for waste disposal

• First aid

Table 8: Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan

(These are to be implemented and complied by DBO Contractor during construction work)

Anticipated

Impact

Mitigation Measures

Intake works (floating pontoon) in Kunwar Chain Sagar dam

• Metal floating barge type intake proposed for Boda and Kurawar towns– no construction work is proposed in dam; no impacts envisaged

65

Anticipated

Impact

Mitigation Measures

Bore well drilling in Kothri town

• Slurry generated from drilling will be stored in temporary ditch for some time to allow sedimentation of solids, and then disposed to drains

Dust Control • Dust screen will be provided around work sites (OHT, GLSR, WTP, intake etc.,)

• Loose soil on work sites, vehicle and worker movement areas will be properly rammed and stabilized to minimize dust generation; it will be ensured that no loose soil surface at working places

• Water will be sprinkled adequately (at least daily 3 times in dry weather) to maintain surface in stabilized and damp condition

• Prior to any leveling or earth moving activity, water will be sprinkled to avoid dust

• Material stocks will be covered with tarpaulins/covers at the sites

• Access to work area will be controlled; unnecessary movement of vehicles, workers and public in work areas will be controlled to minimize soil disturbance

• Loose material (soil, sand, aggregate etc.,) will be covered with tarpaulins to when transported by open trucks;

• Loose material from trucks will be unloaded in a barricaded area and with water sprinkling

• Wheels and undercarriage of haul trucks will be cleaned prior to leaving construction site

Dust control from pipeline works

• Construction area will be barricaded on both sides using hard barricades of 2m height

• Site clearance and excavation work will be commenced only after barricading the site

• Works and all associated activities (material, soil, debris, equipment and machinery) will be confined to barricaded area.

• Excavated soil storage will be removed from the site immediately & stored/disposed at identified site

• Work will be undertaken section wise (100-500 m) at various places; these sections will be demarcated and barricaded and trench filled

• Work will be conducted work sequentially - excavation, pipe laying, backfilling; testing section-wise (for a minimum length as possible) so that backfilling, stabilization of soil can be done

• Excavated soil will be removed section-wise, and used for filling the previous section, this is to avoid stocking of excavated soil

• Road restoration will be taken up immediately after backfilling by proper consolidation

Noise control • Noisy works will be avoided in the night

• Proper noise control apparatus (silencers, mufflers etc.,) will be ensured for construction equipment

• Maximum sound level of 75 db at a distance of 10 m from source will be ensured

• Before undertaking work with heavy noise/vibration, surrounding area/buildings will be surveyed to identify any old / sensitive buildings at risk, and necessary precautions will be taken to avoid any risk

• Drivers will be trained to avoid usage of horns unnecessarily

• Noisy works will not be conducted near sensitive places (hospitals, schools, etc.,) and at sensitive times (festivals etc.,); works will be scheduled accordingly

Vehicle emissions

• All the construction equipment, machinery will be fitted with pollution control devises

• Pollution under control (PUC) certificate will be obtained for all vehicles, equipment, and records maintained

Water pollution / works in rainy season

• No earthwork will be conducted during rainy season

• Stockpiles of earth will be covered by tarpaulins or plastic sheets

• Excess soils, debris and materials will be reused in the construction works

• Disposal sites will be selected prior to start of construction following the EMP guidelines

• Temporary silt traps or sedimentation basins will be provided to control water pollution

• Storage areas for fuels and lubricants will be located away drainage lines & water bodies

• Fuels, construction chemicals etc. will be stored on an impervious floor, and carefully handled to avoid spillage; spill collection arrangement will be provided

• Wastes generated by construction activities will be disposed only in designated sites

66

Anticipated

Impact

Mitigation Measures

• Surface water quality monitoring will be conducted as per the EMP

• Temporary drains or bunds will be created around the periphery of work area to avoid flooding, and entry of runoff

• Accumulated water in work areas / excavated pits will be pumped to a temporary ponds/sedimentation basins; only clarified water will be disposed into drains

• Safety measures will be undertaken to avoid any risk of collapse due to water entry

Traffic management / access during pipeline works

• Pipeline work implementation plan will be prepared for each road; works will not be conducted in all roads at once in a locality; alternative roads for traffic movement will be ensured

• A simple traffic management plan will be prepared in consultation with traffic police for each road, and displayed on site; one-week prior notice will be provided

• Temporary diversions will be provided as required, with prior public information

• Work area will be properly defined, barricaded; minimum strip of land will be used

• Material / waste / soil will not be stocked obstructing the traffic, pedestrian etc.,

• Trench width will be minimized as much as possible by adopting best construction methods with proper shoring/bracing

• Work site will be kept free from all unnecessary obstructions

• Public information boards, sing boards, caution boards will be provided along with contact numbers

• Prior to start of pipeline work, information will be provide to the public through media – newspapers and local cable television (TV) services

Access to houses/business during pipeline works

• Gaps/wooden or metal planks will be provided on excavated trenches for access

• Access to any house, business or property will not be blocked completely, at least safe pedestrian access will be maintained

• Local/affected people/business will be informed 1-week in advance about the work and access restrictions

Material transport using heavy trucks

• Material haulage vehicles will main/wide roads as far as possible

• Transportation / hauling activities will be conducted during non-peak hours (indicate time: from 10:30 PM to 12:30 AM hrs)

• Proper entry and exits to facilities will be provided facilities at low traffic places

• Drivers will be trained to drive vehicles in a considerate manner and following all traffic rules

Local employment

• Local labors will be employed as far as possible

Safety at work sites

• Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) Policy/ plan will be established

• Site will be prepared and maintained to create safe working conditions; workers will be provided with safe work areas, elevated platforms, steps, ladders, walkways /access to work areas and amenities

• Deep excavations (more than 1 m) will be properly protected to avoid collapse (safety measures such as / shoring / safe slopes)

• Hard barricading will be provided around deep trenches / pits of more than 1.5 m deep

• All necessary precautions will be taken to avoid collapse of trench/pit, and damage to surrounding structures

• Proper personnel protection equipment will be provided to all workers / staff; and its use will be ensured

• Proper audible back-up alarms will be ensured for all moving equipment/machinery

• All installations will be properly secured; hazardous locations will be properly marked

• All work sites will be properly secured, barricaded to avoid unauthorized public/traffic entry

• Provide road signs and flagman to regulate traffic / pedestrians / road users, of on-going trenching activities

• Provide safety sign, caution, information boards on site for workers and staff awareness, follow up

• Health and safety orientation training will be provided to all workers

• First aid, and staff with training in first aid will be made available at all sites

• Site safety orientation will be provided to all visitors to the site

67

Anticipated

Impact

Mitigation Measures

• Drinking water, sanitation, washing and resting facilities will be provided at all sites; separate sanitation facilities for women

• Emergency procedures and contact information will be provided on all sites

• Accidents will be promptly registered and reported; register will be maintained at every work site

• Public compliant box and compliant register will be provided at every work site

Construction waste / debris disposal

• Construction waste management plan will be prepared

• Excess soil / debris will be utilized in construction / useful purposes to avoid disposal

• Excess soils/debris will be removed from site on regular basis to avoid stockpiling at site

• Disposal site will be identified prior to start of work following EMP guidelines

• Domestic waste generated at camp sites will be properly segregated; biodegradable waste composted in impervious pit at site; recyclable waste will be sold in market

• Residual and hazardous wastes such as oils, fuels, and lubricants will be disposed via licensed agencies by MPPCB

• Burning of waste will not be allowed

• Sites will be managed neatly; waste collection bins will be provided, awareness will be created among workers, staff in site cleanliness

• All camp/work sites will be restored to original condition after the completion of work

Chance find protocol

• If any chance find is suspected during excavation/works, work will be immediately stopped, and report to PIU/PMU and PMC

• Necessary action as suggested by concerned authorities will be undertaken

AC pipes • Location of existing/old AC pipes will be identified prior to excavation for new pipes

• Underground AC pipes will left as it is in the ground without disturbing / touching

• Awareness will be created among workers and supervisors on AC pipes

Post construction clean up

• All spoils wreckage, rubbish, or temporary structures (such as latrines) will be removed

• All excavated roads will be reinstated to original condition

• All disrupted utilities will be restored

• Any spillage of substances like oils, paints etc., will be cleaned up

• All hardened surfaces in work/camp areas will be ripped, all materials removed, and top soiled

• Restoration to original will be documented and reported to PIU

Table 9: Construction Phase Environmental Monitoring Plan for Package 1A

(This is to be carried out by DBO Contractor as per the frequency given below)

Monitoring field

Monitoring Location

Monitoring Parameters Frequency

Ambient air quality

Total six (6)

locations in three

(3) towns

Kurawar (3 nos.)

1. OHT No. 1

2. WTP/ OHT No.

2

3. pipeline work

sites

Boda (1 nos.)

1. WTP/ pipeline

work sites

Kothri (2 nos.)

PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, CO • Once prior to start of

work

• Quarterly during

construction

68

1. OHT No. 1

2. OHT No. 2/

pipeline work

sites

Ambient Noise

6 locations in 3

towns – same as

above

Noise Level – 24 hours – hourly measurements – day and night time noise levels

• Once prior to start of

work

• Quarterly during

construction

Surface water quality

1 location in

Kunwar Chain

Sagar Dam

pH, Cl, F, NO3, TC, FC, Hardness, Turbidity COD, DO, Oil & grease, total alkalinity

• Once prior to start of

work

• Once after placing

intake barge/ floating

Pontoon

76

VI. Consultations and Disclosure Conducted

40. The active participation of stakeholders including local community, NGOs/CBOs, and the media in all stages of project preparation and implementation is essential for successful implementation of the project. It will ensure that the subprojects are designed, constructed, and operated with utmost consideration to local needs, ensures community acceptance, and will bring maximum benefits to the people. 41. Most of the main stakeholders have already been identified and consulted during preparation of this IEE, and any others that are identified during project implementation will be brought into the process in the future. Primary stakeholders of the subproject are: residents, shopkeepers and business people who live and work alongside the roads in which network improvements will be provided and near sites where facilities will be built (WTP and water tanks), and government and utility agencies responsible for provision of services in subproject towns. 42. The stakeholders were involved in developing the IEE through discussions on-site and public consultation at several places in the town, after which views expressed were incorporated into the IEE and in the planning and development of the project. The IEE has been made available at public locations and disclosed to a wider audience via MPUDC and PMU websites. The consultation process has been continued and expanded during project implementation to ensure that stakeholders are fully engaged in the project and have the opportunity to participate in its development and implementation. 43. During implementation of the subprojects, an extensive consultation program is carried out with various stakeholders such as respective ULBs, other line departments, general public, vendors etc., in line with the requirements pertaining to disseminate the project information, in particular agreed resettlement framework. General public, business owners mainly shopkeepers likely to be affected people were informed about the possibility of disruption due to subproject. The tools used for consultations were stakeholder workshops and meetings, interviews and focus group discussions (FGD). These consultations provided inputs for identification of the felt needs of the communities, and the relevant stakeholders. Meaningful consultations have been continued with local inhabitants which include all section of society 44. PIU, with the support of PMC experts and field staff, conducted various consultations with the public to understand their views on existing water supply status. At the same time, the communities were informed about the MPUSIP project in detailed along with proposed water supply infrastructure in the town. During consultations, community enquired about the perceived benefits of water supply scheme. During implementation period, there has been consultations on project design, features, implementation procedures, health and sanitation, formation of GRC, possible positive and negative impacts of the project and other safeguard issues. There is great acceptance of the project as there is only positive impact on the life of community. 45. Stakeholder Consultation/s was held in Boda, Kurawar and Kothri municipal offices. Several other meetings also conducted at ward level with communities and in market areas. Town level consultation meetings were conducted in Boda, Kurawar and Kothri towns in May 2018, Dec 2018 and February and April 2019. The details of consultation are provided in (Appendix 11 and Appendix 12). Besides, several other meetings also conducted at ward-level with communities, and at market with street vendors and hawkers.

77

46. During the consultation/s the following queries were raised by the local community and it was responded by the concerned PIU/ PMC and DBO Contractors.

• All stakeholders were very supportive of the project, and extended full cooperation during the works as the activities are proposed to improve the water supply service levels and the living standards. All three towns currently faces severe water supply problem

• Stakeholder expressed their concern regarding water charges, affordability, and capacity of ULB to operate water supply system after the DBO contractor terms gets over

• Disturbance to access and traffic movement during construction

• The project team explained the proposed mitigation measures to mitigate / minimize such issues. Attention of stakeholders drawn to the EMP, and explained to them how the construction phase issues by avoided, minimized or mitigated and managed.

47. Executive summary of the IEE has been translated in Hindi and made available at the offices of PMU, PIU, Nagar Parishad offices, and also displayed on their notice boards. Hard copies of the IEE will be accessible to citizens as a means to disclose the document and at the same time creating wider public awareness. Electronic version of the IEE in English and Executive Summary in Hindi has been placed in the official website of the MPUDC, PMU after approval of the IEE by ADB. Stakeholders will also be made aware of grievance register and redress mechanism. 48. Local communities has been continuously consulted regarding location of construction camps, access and hauling routes and other likely disturbances during construction. The road closure together with the proposed detours will be communicated via advertising, pamphlets, radio broadcasts, road signage, etc. 49. The PMC/PIU and DBO Contractor will continue meaningful consultations and information disclosure during the construction phase. DBO Contractor will include records of consultations, issues/concerns, attendance sheets, and resolutions to the progress report to be submitted to PIU. This will be included by PMU in the environmental monitoring report to be submitted to ADB on a semi-annual basis.

VII. Package-Specific Grievance Redress Mechanism

50. The GRM is envisaged to provide a time bound and transparent mechanism to voice and resolve social and environmental concerns linked with the project. In this regard, MPUSIP had issued an official order along with the guideline to all PIUs and ULBs to establish grievance redress committee (GRC) at all awarded subproject towns. Copy of government orders to form GRC in subproject towns is enclosed as Appendix 13-15. Accordingly, GRC established in Boda, Kurawar and Kothri towns, order letter of GRC committee formation enclosed in Appendix 16-18. List of GRC members at town level in Boda, Kurawar and Kothri towns under Package- 1A is given in Table 10.

78

Table 10: List of GRC members at town level in Boda, Kurawar and Kothri

Particulars Subproject towns

Boda Kurawar Kothri

GRC formed on dated 22nd Jan 2018 1st Dec 2017 11st Dec 2017

Gender- Male (no’s) 4 4 4

Gender- Female (no’s) 1 1 1

List of GRC members

1. Project Manager MPUDC Shri V.K. Tiwari Shri V.K. Tiwari Shri V.K. Tiwari

2. Elected Member Nominated by Mayor in Council/President in Council

Smt Seema Verma Shri Dinesh Mandloi Shri Rupesh Patel

3. Social Worker Shri Vishnu Prasad Gudniya

Smt Ramadevi Jagirdar

Smt Manisha Manakchand Jain

4. Commissioner / CMO/Community Organizer of ULB

Shri Md. Saleem Khan

Shri Ashok Singh Thakur

Shri Nandkishore Jharvariya

5. Community Deployment Officer of related PIU / Nodal officer

Shri Rakesh Shandilya



A) Structure of GRM and its Functions 51. The GRM will have a three- tier decision making process. The first tier which is at the town level aims to resolve all construction related grievances which require quick and efficient action. The second tier which is at the project implementation unit (PIU) will handle complaints that could not be resolved by the first- tier level and/or grievances related to land acquisition and compensation. The third tier which is at the project management unit (PMU) or state level will handle complaints which are over and above the scope for the first and second tier and/or complaints which could not be resolved by the first and second tier levels. 53. Contact numbers of GRC Chair-person and members, CDO and contractor’s focal person will be placed at appropriate locations like construction sites, ULB office etc. 54. The three-tier Grievance Redress Mechanism under MPUSIP is described below: 1st tier (At Town Level): Composition of the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC):

• A representative of Chief Municipal Officer associated with Urban Local Body, Chairperson;

• CDO of ULB designated/nominated by ULB.

• Field Engineer of Project Management Consultants;

• Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town;

• Field Engineer of concerned ULB designated by the respective PIU, Secretary; Major Functions: The major functions of town level GRC is as follows:

• Registration of Grievances by the Local person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town Sorting of Grievances by Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town and Chairperson;

79

• Forwarding grievances to concerned authorities i.e. Site Engineer for resolution;

• Information to the complaint on the decision taken to address registered complaint and expected time to resolve issue;

• Resolution of issues emerged due to construction;

• Feedback to the complainant on action completed against registered complaint and seeking complaint feedback on level of satisfaction;

• Closure of grievances by CDO-ULB or forwarding of complaint to PIU GRC if grievance remains unresolved.

2nd Tier {At PIU Level}: Composition of the PIU level GRC:

• Project Manager, associated with Project Implementation Unit (PIU) of Madhya Pradesh

• Urban Development Company Limited - Chairperson

• An elected member nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of associated

• Urban Local Body (ULB).

• A Social Worker nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of associated Urban Local Body

• Commissioner of associated Urban Local Body/Chief Municipal Officer or Community

• Development Officer/Community Organizer of Urban Local Body.

• Community Development Officer CDO-PIU - Secretary Major Functions: The following functions will be performed by the PIU level GRC:

• Registration of complaints by CDO-PIU from the 1st tier GRC and/or affected people;

• Eligibility assessment of grievances by the GRC Chairperson;

• Information to the complainant about eligibility of the complaint;

• Grievance Redress Committee meetings to discuss grievances and action required;

• Ensuring collection of detailed information about the eligible complaint;

• Assessment of complaint, draw conclusion from discussions and make recommendations;

• Develop action plan outlining activities required to implement the recommendations;

• Ensuring implementation of recommendations by stakeholders or concerned authorities;

• Monitoring actions of the recommendations in view of timeline;

• Feedback to the complainant on action completed against registered complaint and seeking complainant feedback on level of satisfaction;

• Closure of grievances by CDO-PIU or forwarding of complaint to PMU GRC if grievance remains unresolved.

3rd Tier {At PMU- State Level} Composition of State Level GRC:

• Engineer in Chief, MPUDC – Chairperson

• Deputy Project Director (T)

80

• Deputy Project Director (A) (Secretary)

• Project Officer

• Community Development Officer CDO- PMU

• PMC TL or representative Advisor Major Functions: The state level GRC will be responsible to perform the following functions:

• Registration of complaints received from GRC PIU and/or affected people;

• Information to the complainant about eligibility of the complaint;

• Eligibility assessment of grievances by the GRC PMU chairperson with support of the

• Secretary of state GRC- – whether grievance is eligible for consideration or not at the state level;

• Ensuring collection of required information about the eligible complaint;

• Assessment of complaint to draw conclusion from discussions and make recommendations;

• Develop action plan outlining activities required to implement the recommendations;

• Ensuring implementation of recommendations by stakeholders or concerned authorities;

• Monitoring actions of the recommendations in view of timeline;

• Closing complaint after all actions taken as per recommendations and feedback to the complainant.

• Advise to complainants about approach /appeal to the concerned department in case the complainant is not satisfied or complaint is beyond the scope of the GRC PMU.

Figure 35: Work Flow Diagram of GRM

B) Action Plan for the formation of the GRM

S. No Action Plan Time Line

81

A Action required at PMU/PMC

A1 Letter for formation of GRC and follow up Pre -construction

A2 Development of GRM Manual Pre -construction

A3 Orientation of GRC members by integrating with training/workshops/meetings

Construction

A4 Integration of GRC topic in BCC – like availability of GRC and its procedure

Construction

A5 Review of functioning of GRC by integrating with meetings and visits Construction

B Action at Town level

B1 Formation of GRC at town level and inform to the PMU/PMC Pre -construction

B2 Information to All ULB Officials/Public about existence of GRC, its committee members and their function

Construction

B3 Orientation of all GRC members during visit of PMU and PMC officials Construction

B4 Tracking of complaint registered and its status Construction

B5 Sharing status of grievances with PIUs with the help of GRC person Construction

B6 Training of selected women to maintain grievances at customer service center (Educated Prerak (Motivator) may be considered)

Construction

B7 Complaint management Operation and maintenance phase

C) Process of Grievance Redress Mechanism 55. The following process shall be adopted for receiving complaints and addressing received complaints: Step 1: Receiving Grievances/ Complaints and its Registration at town Level

• All grievances, complaints, concerns shall be submitted verbally or in writing to CDO contractor’s focal person or any GRC members – by filling the Complaint Registration Slip (Appendix 19) and putting into the complaint box placed at construction sites or ULB office.

• Received complaints shall be recorded, compiled and Registered(Grievance Number) in a register (database) placed at the ULB by CDO with support of the contractor’s focal person on a daily basis (24 hours). Each grievance shall be given a number to track status.

Step 2: Review of Grievances, Sorting, Information and Forwarding (24 hours)

• Registered grievances shall be reviewed by the CDO with support of the contractor’s focal person.

• Based on type of grievances, CDO shall sort out grievances with support of the contractor’s focal person.

• CDO (ULB) shall inform the GRC Chairperson about all grievances either by phone or in writing. At that time, CDO may suggest grievances can be managed by the site engineer to the GRC Chairperson;

• GRC Chairperson will determine eligibility of the complaints. Inconveniences caused by minor construction related issues shall be referred to the site engineer to resolve immediately or within 24 hours. For example -site engineer shall be instructed to resolve grievances associated with construction at the town such as restoration of road, obstruction in accessing house/shop or any place due to dumping of construction materials, dust etc. Site engineer will be responsible to respond to the complaints immediately. On the other hand, issues which cannot be resolved by the site engineer and if it is complex in nature shall be referred to GRC.

82

• CDO shall receive acknowledgement from concerned authorities (site engineer) on receipt of the grievances shared with them. CDO shall inform complainants regarding eligibility of their complaint and action to be taken by the concerned authority (site engineer/ GRC) within (24 hours). If the grievance is ineligible, complainants should be informed of the reasons;

Step 3: Eligibility and Preparation for GRC meeting (3 days)

• GRC Chairperson shall receive eligible complaints (copy of written complaint document or verbally recorded messages) from the CDO (ULB) and review details; GRC Chairperson may ask to collect baseline information about the grievances registered, if required.

• GRC Chairperson shall share list of documents with the GRC Secretary to collect baseline information on selected grievances to be addressed.

• The GRC Secretary shall arrange all documents with the help of CDO-ULB, CDO-PIU or the contractor’s focal person in a proper way to present in front of GRC.

• GRC Chairperson shall call a meeting as per convenient date and time of the committee members.

Step 4: Assessment of the Grievance, Meeting and Plan of Action (7 days)

• If necessary, the GRC shall consult and seek relevant information about complaint from the concerned parties.

• On basis of the collected evidences, GRC shall draw conclusions and make recommendations for a solution.

• GRC Secretary shall keep record of the proceedings and decisions taken by GRC members to further track the status as per decided time line.

• The GRC shall agree on the action plan required to be implemented according to the recommendations made. The action plan shall include detailed activities along with timeline.

• GRC Secretary shall inform to the complainant about the decisions taken by the committee members and expected date of resolution of the grievance.

• If the complaint is complex, the GRC may request for additional time and resolution after proper assessment or refer the complaint to the GRC-PMU Level.

Step 5: Implementation of Action (30 days)

• The concerned parties shall be responsible to implement action plan according to recommendations of the GRC.

• The GRC members may arrange field trip and interact with the concerned persons, if needed before reaching the conclusion.

Step 6: Monitoring and Reporting (Monthly)

• CDO (ULB) shall be responsible to track and record status of all complaints -whether forwarded to site engineer or GRC in the database as follows – Grievance registered, Grievance in process to be resolved, Grievance addressed and closed, and Grievance forwarded to concerned authorities.

• CDO (ULB) shall be responsible to report/inform status of the complaints (received, addressed and forwarded) to the contractor for further reporting to respective PIU.

83

• Overall GRC chairperson shall be responsible for effective management of complaints at the town level.

Step 7: Closure of the Complaint

• GRC Secretary shall prepare a summary of the findings and share with GRC members.

• On agreement of all GRC members, GRC Secretary shall provide information to the complainant about decisions taken in writing/verbal on the registered complaint and seek feedback of the complainant about the decisions taken. A copy of the letter shall be kept as record with GRC Secretary and CDO (ULB).

• Complaint shall be considered closed if all actions have been taken and the complainant satisfied with the resolution.

• GRC Secretary shall prepare a closure report of the grievances handled by GRC members and the closure shall be documented by the CDO (ULB) in his register.

Step 8: Appeal to the State level GRC

• In the event that GRC PIU cannot make a decision on how to resolve the complaint, or if a complainant is not satisfied with the actions taken to resolve the complaint by the GRC (PIU), an appeal can be made to state level GRC (PMU) either by the GRC Chairperson (PIU) or complainant directly.

• GRC Chairperson (PIU) or complainant shall submit an appeal in writing to the state level GRC established at PMU.

• The state GRC Secretary shall register the case in consultation with Chairperson and provide a number of the grievances to be tracked.

• The state GRC Secretary shall acknowledge the registration of the grievance to the complainant in writing.

• The Secretary of the GRC shall review the registered grievances and collect required evidences from relevant parties to present case to the GRC.

• The state GRC Chairperson shall call a GRC meeting to review the complaint. GRC members shall get information about the meeting in advance to ensure their availability in the meeting.

• The state GRC shall draw conclusions and recommendations based on the evidence in the meeting. At the same time an action plan shall be developed for implementation with a timeline.

• The state GRC Secretary shall communicate decisions of the State GRC to the complainant in writing. The copy of the communication shall be kept with the state GRC Secretary as record.

• The recommendations shall be implemented immediately

• Upon completion of the recommended actions, the state GRC Secretary shall prepare a report on the closure of the complaint which will be signed by the complainant and state GRC Chairperson. A copy of the same shall be kept for record.

56. The structure and process of GRM is presented below for detailed understanding

Figure 36: Structure and Process of GRC

84

D) Monitoring and Evaluation systems of GRM 57. All grievances, concerns and complaints received shall be recorded by concerned authorities to be tracked. The status of the grievances shall be discussed in the review meetings organized at PIU and PMU level. The following indicators shall be monitored and recorded:

• Number and type of complaints received;

• Number and % of complaints that have been resolved;

• Number and % of complaints that are unresolved; 58. The State GRC shall review grievance related data on monthly basis to evaluate the functionality of the system, as well as to note the followings:

• Failures to follow GRM procedures;

• Delays in complaint resolution, particularly those that can affect project construction;

• Most frequent types of grievances and complaints;

• Location(s) producing the most grievances and complaints;

VIII. Package Specific Roles and Responsibility of MPUSIP Safeguard Team Focal Persons

59. Implementation Arrangements. Project Officer (Environment) at PMU and Assistant Safeguard Officer (ASO) at each of the PIU will be responsible for environment safeguards tasks, and will be supported by PMC. At PMC’s environmental safeguards staff include an

85

Environmental Specialist Consultant located centrally in Bhopal, and will be responsible for all safeguard tasks, and he/she is supported by an Environmental Engineer in each PIU. Contractor personnel will include an Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) supervisor. The DBO Contractor requires mobilization of an Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) supervisor. 60. Safeguards tasks at PMU are coordinated by Technical Officer designated as Project Officer (Environment), who is supported by an Environmental Engineer and a Social Specialist. PMU designated an Assistant Project Manager (APM) / Deputy Project Manager (DPM) in PIUs as Assistant safeguards officer for supervision all safeguard tasks at PIU level. PMU also assigned safeguard tasks to Civil Engineers posted in project towns for supervision all safeguard tasks. PMC environmental safeguard personnel comprise an Environmental Specialist, stationed at Bhopal, and five environmental engineers has been placed in each of the five PIUs. At the time of submission of this updated IEE, Environmental Specialist at Bhopal has been appointed in PMC, also Environmental Engineer has been appointed in PIU PMC - Bhopal. EHS supervisor is also mobilized by DBO contractor “M/s REAN Water Tech Private Limited., Kolkata”. Deployment details of focal persons for package specific and their roles & responsibility is depicted below in the Table 11. Table 11: List of Focal persons Responsible for Package 1A, MPUSIP Safeguard Team

Name Designation/ Office

Email Address Contact Number

Roles

1. PMU

Mr. PL Barange

PO (Environment) [email protected] 7987227974 Overall Responsible for environmental safeguard tasks and EMP Implementation at PMU level

Ms. Sukhpreet Dhanoa

Environment Engineer

[email protected]

9179749366 Assisting PO (Environment) for EMP Implementation & safeguard issues at PMU level

Mr. Girish Nair

Community Development Officer

[email protected]

9993646487 Assist PO (Environment), for social safeguard issues/monitoring at PMU level

2. PIUs (PMU) – Bhopal Mr. Raghvendra Narayan Singh

Assistant Safeguard Officer (ASO)

[email protected] 9425182531 Responsible for environment safeguards tasks to ensure mitigation of negative environmental impacts due to the subproject, if any at PIU level and report to PO (Environment) at PMU

Mr. Rakesh Shandilya

Community Development Officer

[email protected]

9981086438 Assist Social & Gender Officer at PMU and PIU / ULBs for compliance of social safeguard requirements of the Program Safeguard System (PSS at PIU level

Ms. Meghna Vijayvargiya

Sub Engineer (Civil)- Assigned

[email protected]

9752554821 Assigned safeguard tasks to Civil Engineers posted

86

Name Designation/ Office

Email Address Contact Number

Roles

for Safeguard Tasks

at PIU Bhopal & Assist ASO Bhopal, for social & environmental safeguard issues/monitoring and EMP implementation at PIU level

Mr. Sheela Dangi

Sub Engineer (Civil )- Assigned for Safeguard Tasks

[email protected]

8817178093

3. Consultants (PMC) – Bhopal Mr. Rajeev Sharma

Safeguard Expert-Resettlement

[email protected]

9310103101 Assist PMU / PIU / ULBs for compliance of social safeguard requirements of the Program Safeguard System (PSS)

Mr. Md. Qamruzzaman

Safeguard Expert- Environment

[email protected]

8789164746 Assist PMU / PIU/ contractor to ensure compliance with environmental requirement of the Program Safeguard System (PSS)

Dr. Savita Jain

Gender and Communication Expert

[email protected]

9131200746 Assist PMU/PIU for implementation monitoring and reporting of gender activities as per the PAP and DLI and ensure a gender-sensitive communication plan is designated and implemented

4. PIU (PMC)- Bhopal

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh

Environmental Engineer

[email protected]

9691750703 Assist Environment Expert in the work and responsible for implementing and monitoring safeguards compliance activities at PIU level and report to PM/ASO at PIU Bhopal.

Mr. Deepak Yadav

Resettlement Coordinator

[email protected]

9754119943 Assist the Resettlement safeguard Expert in performing all works as per requirements of the Program Safeguard System (PSS) at PIU level

Mr. Kailash Bangre

Communication Assistant

[email protected] 9752777559 Assist Gender and Communication Expert in the work at PIU level

5. Contractor EHS staff_ M/s REAN Water Tech Pvt. Ltd.

Mr. Md. Mahboob Hussain

EHS Supervisor [email protected]

9934634361 EMP implementation on site

Mr. Firoj Alam Safety Steward- Boda

[email protected] 8240018017 Assist the EHS Supervisor in EMP implementation on site at town level Mr. Ratul

Sinha Safety Steward- Kurawar

[email protected]

8240654303

Mr. Ashish Agrawal

Safety Steward- Kothri

[email protected]

9928254311

87

IX. Monitoring and Reporting

61. PMU, with assistance of PMC, has developed standardized site wise inspection Checklists and SEMPs, which has been shared with all DBO Contractors. This standardized site wise Inspection checklist / SEMP includes specific mitigation measures and monitoring checklists applicable to construction activities common in all Phase 1 works. Monitoring formats shall be filled by the contractor EHS supervisor as per the requirement; photographs of site, DBO Contractor’s EHS supervisor to fill checklist twice a week and PMC Environmental Engineer/Field Engineer to check weekly once. Contractor to submit this checklist on 5th of every month for the preceding month along with site photographs, on site consultations with workers and local people should be documents, and these shall then form part of SEMRs. Any non-compliance shall be immediately be brought to the notice of Environmental Specialist of PMC, and Team Leader of PMC, and PMU safeguards officer, and corrective actions shall be initiated. 62. EMP implementation and monitoring checklists are being submitted by DBO Contractor “M/s REAN Water Tech Private Limited, Kolkata” and it is closely monitored by respective PMC PIU Bhopal – Environmental Engineer. Corrective actions, if required are immediately provided by PIUs and PMC. 63. The contractor “M/s REAN Water Tech Private Limited, Kolkata” of Package 1A have submitted SEMP. Refer Appendix 9 for SEMP prepared by Contractors with help of PIU- PMC/PMU. X. EMP Implementation Cost

64. Most of the mitigation measures require the contractor to adopt good site practice (such as dust and pollution control, community and occupation safety, labour welfare etc.,), which are part of their normal procedures already. The costs which are specific to EMP implementation include staff and ambient environmental quality monitoring to be conducted via an accredited laboratory. These are given in the following table.

Table 12: EMP Implementation Cost

Particulars Stages Unit Total Number

Rate (INR)

Cost (INR)

Costs Covered By

A. Implementation staff

1 EHS Supervisor Construction per month

24 30,000 720,000 DBOC

Subtotal (A) 720,000

B. Mitigation Measures

1 Consent for establishments & consent for operation from MPPCB

Pre construction

Lump sum

50,000 Project costs

Subtotal (B) 50,000

C. Capacity Building

1. Training on EMP implementation

Pre- construction

Lump 100,000 PMU

88

Particulars Stages Unit Total Number

Rate (INR)

Cost (INR)

Costs Covered By

sum

2. Preparation of plans and protocols (traffic management plan, waste (spoils) management plan etc., chance find protocol

Pre- construction

Lump Sum

50,000 DBOC

3. Contractors orientation to workers on EMP implementation

Prior to dispatch to worksite

Lump Sum

25,000 DBOC

4. Communication Activity

Lump Sum

300,000 DBOC

Subtotal (C) 475,000 D. Monitoring

Measures

1 Air quality monitoring Construction / sample 54 5,000 270,000 DBOC

2 Noise levels monitoring

Construction / sample 54 1,500 81,000 DBOC

3 Surface water monitoring

Construction / sample 2 5,000 10,000 DBOC

4 Water and sludge Operation LS / yr - - 100,000 DBOC

Subtotal (D) 461,000

Total (A+B+C+D) INR 1,706,000

89

Appendix 1: Copy of WRD Clearance for Boda town

90

Summary translation in English: WRD Clearance for Boda

91

Appendix 2: Copy of WRD Clearance for Kurawar town

92

Summary translation in English: WRD Clearance for Kurawar

93

Appendix 3: Draft copy of Application and payment receipt of MPPCB for Consent to Establish (CTE) for Boda WTP

95

Appendix 4: Draft copy of Application and payment receipt of MPPCB for Consent to Establish (CTE) for Kurawar WTP

97

Appendix 5: Geophysical Investigation Report of Kothri

AMAY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANCIES, BHOPAL

2018

Improvement of water supply in

Kothari Nagar Parishad in Sehore

District in Madhya Pradesh, package

no. MpUSIP-'1A. Geophysical Investigation Report

B H O P A L M P

CONTENTS PAGE NO.

1. Background

2. Location and Accessibility

3. Aims and Objectives

4. Land use Pattern

5. Topography and Slope

6. Ground Water Issue in watershed area

7. Characteristics of Datada and Kothari Watershed

8. Depth to Water level in the Ashta Observation well

9. Operation and Methodology

9.1 Hydrogeological Field Observation in different village

9.2 Geophysical Investigation:

9.2.1 Geo electrical Gradient Profile:

10. Pumping Test/ Slug test

11. Conclusion

1. Background

The AMAY Environmental Consultancy was carried out a task to Hydro geophysical

investigation 4950.54 Ha area at – Kothari Watershed, Sehore district.

This investigation in the areas under concern was carried out between the periods

20/03/2018 to 21/03/2018, planned to understand the prevailing on – site scenario,

regarding the total water requirement within 4950.54 Ha area and also to delineate the

aquifer disposition with their lateral and vertical extents and their quality.

Sustainable & desired quantum of availability of water is depended on the feasible site

location and proper tube well/bore well construction with augmentation of rainwater

conservation measures and recharge through suitable structure- Direct injection well

/Recharge shaft.

2. Location and Accessibility

The investigation area is being proposed in two micro watershed of Ashta block, Sehore

District. The total area is about 4950.54 ha area, out of which 83.58% is cultivable land (i.e.

4137.66 ha).

Micro Watershed Area (Ha) No. of Villages Length

Kothari nala 1200.32 1 9 km

Datada Nala 3750.54 4 12.71 km

Hydro Geological travers have been carried out along all seven villages in the period

05/03/2017 and 17/03/2017 for conception planning with Hydraulic behavior of

watershed for sustainable water availability and work plan for structures of intervention.

Datada Nala micro watershed area falls in North 23°0'3.874"N 23°6'30.546"N to East

76°48'37.008"E 76°52'40.453"E in 55 A/16 – 3B. The main stream is “Datada Nala” originate in SE of area and joining Prabati river in NW. The length of Datada Nala

watershed is about 12.71 km and and the length of Kothari watershed is about 9 km

elevation ranges from 536-477 m amsl (i.e. 47m). The slope of area is 3.64 m per km.

Normal Annual Rainfall at Ashta rain guage station 1054.9 mm.

3. Aims and Objectives

The present study has been carried out mainly on the Hydro geological studies using

integrated approach with Geophysical Investigations, remotely sensed data and GIS

technique for the development and management of groundwater potential as well as water

quality status in Kothari and Datada Watershed to define major water bearing zones,

location, extent and interrelationship of hydrological parameters of aquifers viz.

transmissivity, storativity and hydraulic conductivity of aquifers subjected to well testing .

The groundwater potentiality of the area has been assessed through integration of the

relevant layers which include Geology, Hydro-geomorphology, DTM, Lineament, Drainage,

Slope, Aquifer thickness etc. in GIS environment.

Recommendation based on the studies would be on

1. Suitable locations for tube well construction

2. Effective measures for water conservation techniques in and around Kothari and

Datada Watershed.

3. Demarcation of recharge worthy area’s and suitable locations for groundwater recharge structures through arresting the catchment runoff.

Self sustained source- Design and mode of construction of Recharge shaft or

recharge trench.

4. Land use Pattern:

S.No Name of

Village

Total

Geographical

Land (ha)

Cultivable

land (Ha)

Uncultivable

Land (ha)

Pastures

Land (in

Hectares)

Fallow

Land (in

Hectares)

1 Kothari 2334.7 1992.5 285.65 11.54 28.01

2 Mainakhedi 817.69 771.55 45.92 18.73 1.49

3 Tipakhedi 259.81 223.4 10.2 0 12.21

4 Gawakheda 796.21 564.98 199.39 14.64 20.2

5 Mullani

Mangalpur

741.67 448.42 254.29 9.56 37.4

Total 4950.08 4000.85 795.45 54.47 99.31

5. Topography and Slope:

The study area lies in the part of Malwa plateau with an undulating topography. The area is

primarily an agricultural land occupying the Chambal and Narmada basin valley, having

predominantly an agricultural economy. Agriculture is the main occupation of the people in the

watershed area. Wheat, Rice, Jawar, Maize and Soyabean are the major crops sown in the district.

Ground water has an important role to play for irrigation.

The elevation in the watershed area ranges from 536 to 477 amsl. The slope map of the area has

been prepared using the cartosat DEM and as shown in the map the area has moderate slope from

SE to NW direction.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Total Geographical

Land (ha)

Cultivable land (Ha) Uncultivable Land

(ha)

Pastures Land (in

Hectares)

Fallow Land (in

Hectares)

Diagram Showing the Villagewise Status of LULC

Kothari Mainakhedi Tipakhedi Gawakheda Mullani Mangalpur

6. Ground Water Issue in watershed area:

Sustainable high yield aquifer zone is between 12.20 – 13.70m having discharge

range 3.8 – 7.6 lps in the winter season and become low yield zone between 0.8 –

1.0 lps in month of December/January.

The flowing well taping aquifer zones occur between 12.20 – 13.70 m is in the

depth range of bore well 30.50 to 38.50 mbgl.

The collapsible red bole zone occurs in the area between 39.60 – 45.90 mbgl.

The only two watering is available for Rabi cropsin the area along villages -

Gawakhedi and Tipakheri. The three watering is also available in the north east of

Kothari village along Mainakhedi.

7. Characteristics of Datada and Kothari Watershed:

High yield bore wells is in the west of reservoir having discharge more than 7.50 lps

and become sustainable in summer.

The aquifer zone between 12.20 – 13.70 mbgl in the bore depth 30.50 – 38.50 mbgl

forms Artisan condition flowing well till the end of December.

In the area three aquifer zones occur in the bore well depth 106 – 110, at depth of

19.80, 27.40 and 82.30 mbgl.

The lineament in also working in the North West direction in the village mulani to

tipakheri.

In the gawakhedi area the aquifer occurs at 15.30 – 18.30 mbgl forms flowing

condition of bore.

Borewell tapping both artisan zone flowing aquifer with deeper aquifer in depth of

27.40 - 82.30 mbgl.

Alluvium aquifer occurs in the area in the NE of Kothari – Mainakhedi to

PrabatiRiver. The thickness of alluvium varies from 18.30 – 20 m and sand gravel

formation forming aquifer which occurs at 18.30 – 19.80 mbgl which sustain yield

of 1 – 1.5lps.

In the mining activity along tipakheri area is at jointed/ fractured basalt that

percolation impact in NE of the area along Kothari Kalan.

Base flow along the Datada Nala have been observed along village tipakheri

Two watering in Rabi crop in the SW of watershed and three watering in NW of the

area near Prabati river.

8. Depth to Water level in the Ashta Observation well:

Year Pre-Monsoon Post Monsoon

1996 9.45 3.15

1997 8.2 3.4

1998 7.4 2.1

1999 9.12 1.49

2000 8.53 6.3

2001 11.35 6.67

2002 11.77 5.96

2003 13.25 6

2004 14.41 2.39

2005 9.1 2.56

2006 11.93 2.42

2007 9.72 4.05

2008 13.5 3.17

2009 14.41 6.25

2010 - 10.56

2011 10.4 7.4

2012 8.5 3.32

2013 6.35 2.9

2014 8.45 4.58

2015 6 3.2

2016 - 1.25

9. Operation and Methodology

9.1 Hydrogeological Field Observation in different village:-

A. Village: Gawakheda

There are three types of wells in the area:-

Wells Depth (mbgl) Aquifer (mbgl)

Dugwells 15.25 – 18.30 16.75 – 18.30

Borewells (Deep) 91.45 – 129.55 42.65, 79.75-85.35

Borewell (shallow) flowing wells 30.50-38.10 15.30-18.30

Flowing wells in the area (approx 50%) tapping aquifer below 15.30-18.30mbgl.

There are 3 aquifer zone in the area occurs at 19.50, 127.45, 52.30 m.

B. Village: MainaKhedi

Mainakhedi upto parbati joint no structures.

Between mainakhedi – Kothari two broken bhandhara 23o05’35.9” 76o49’04.9” width of structure is about 12.8 m and height is about 2.40m, about 3 km from

parbati river close to village.

Thickness of soil along banks is about 2.60m close to village and nala width is 10.20

m.

12 m width of nala near old dam with height is about 2.5 m, thickness of soil varies

from 12.90 – 15.25 m.

9.2 Geophysical Investigation:

The main purpose of applying geophysical methods for the selection of appropriate site for

artificial recharge studies is to assess the unknown sub-surface hydrogeological conditions

economically, adequately and unambiguously. Mostly it is employed to narrow down the

target zone, pinpoint the probable site for artificial recharge structure and its proper

design.

Nevertheless, the application of geophysical methods is to bring out a comparative picture

of the sub-surface litho environment, surface manifestation of such structures and

correlate them with the hydrogeological setting. Besides defining the sub-surface structure

and lithology, it can identify the brackish/ fresh ground water interface, contaminated zone

(saline).

Using certain common geophysical methods, it is possible to model the

1. Stratification of aquifer system and spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity of

the characteristic zone, suitable for groundwater recharge

2. Negative or non-productive zones of low hydraulic conductivity in unsaturated and

saturated zones

3. Vertical hydraulic conductivity discontinuities, such as dyke and fault zone

4. Moisture movement and infiltration capacity of the unsaturated zone

5. Direction of ground water flow under natural/ artificial recharge processes

6. The application of proper techniques, plan of survey and suitable instruments can

yield better understandable results.

Geophysical investigations in study area have been carried using Gradient profile. One

Gradient profiles have been conducted to cover entire area of investigation.

9.2.1 Geo electrical Gradient Profile:

All the Gradient profiles were taken to delineate the Lateral variation of saturated and

unsaturated alluvium zones in the alluvium formation. Low and High resistivity value

indicates the sand, gravel and sand with clay consider for location of vertical electrical

sounding.

Gradient profile conducted in study area is the mapping of disposition and lateral variation

of saturated and unsaturated zones at particular locations. It is carried out by moving all

the four electrodes for electrical measurements across the structure with fix spacing and

the central one-third collinear section is discretely scanned with potential electrodes.

A. GPI Site No. 01

Gradient Profile: A gradient profile has been conducted in the shamshanghat area having

a length of 240 along S to N direction. The resultant graph indicates a wide low resistivity

zone in north direction having a resistivity value ranging from 80 to 22 ohms in between

15 to 25 m distance and highest resistivity of about 124 ohms m occurs at -15 m distance

from center in south direction.

The low resistivity value indicates that probable fracture zone is present between 15 to 25

m distances from center in north direction. Which indicates that soil with clay and

weathered rock is present in this zone? The thickness of this is about 10 m.

B. GPI Site No. 02

Gradient Profile: This gradient profile has been conducted in the school campus area

having a length of 240 m. A wide low resistivity zone in the resultant graph is present

within a distance of -25 to 15 m having a range of resistivity value from 120 to 83 ohms.

The width of this zone is about 40 m. The highest resistivity of about 155 ohms m occurs at

-30 m distance.

The low resistivity value indicates that soil, weathered or fractured rock is present in this

zone

C. GPI Site No. 03

Gradient Profile: This gradient profile has been conducted close to the Bhatta area having

a length of 240 m. The resultant graph shows a declining trend in the right side. A wide low

resistivity zone in the resultant graph is present within a distance of -15 to 25 m having a

range of resistivity value from 150 to 100 ohms. The highest resistivity of about 260 ohms

m occurs at -40 m distance in left side.

A Probable fracture zone with the low resistivity value is present in 15 to 25 m distance.

The thickness of this zone is about 10 m.

Vertical Electrical Sounding: A Schlumberger Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) was conducted

near Bhatta Area. The observed vertical variation in apparent resistivity is presented figure below.

The interpreted results and nature of VES curves is indicative of potential aquifers within the depth

range of 30-120 m bgl. The details of subsurface lithology of the area have been described below in

the table:-

Estimated Litholog in VES-01

Site Longitude Elevation Depth Depth Lithology Elevation

Latitude (amsl) 1 2 Top Bottom

VES-

01

76°49'41.00"E

23° 4'24.00"N

486

0 2.58 Soil with Clay 486 483.42

2.58 11.2 Weathered Vesicular

Basalt

483.42 474.8

11.2 39.1 Massive Basalt 474.8 446.9

39.1 120 Fractured Basalt 446.9 366

D. GPI Site No. 04

Gradient Profile: This gradient profile has been conducted near the papal Tree having a

length of 240 m. The resultant graph shows variation in the resistivity values. The range of

resistivity value in this profile varies from 42 to 90 ohms m and having more declining

trend in the Left side. A low resistivity zone in the resultant graph is present within a

distance of -10 to -25 m having a range of resistivity value from 48 to 70 ohms. The highest

resistivity of about 90 ohms m occurs at -15 m distance in left side.

A Probable fracture zone with the low resistivity value is present in 15 to 25 m distance.

The thickness of this zone is about 10 m. Which indicates that soil, clay weathered basalt is

present in this zone?

E. GPI Site No. 05

Gradient Profile: This gradient profile has been conducted near the mangal bhawan

campus having a length of 240 m is west to east direction. The resultant graph shows less

variation in the resistivity values where the range of resistivity value varies from 30 to 44

ohms m. A low resistivity zone in the resultant graph is present within a distance of 15 to -

30 m having a range of resistivity value from 35 to 30 ohms. The highest resistivity of about

43 ohms m occurs at 35 m distance in east direction of the profile.

A Probable fracture zone with the low resistivity value is present in -25 to 25 m distance.

The thickness of this zone is about 50 m.

F. GPI Site No. 06

Gradient Profile: This gradient profile has been conducted near the pump house having a

linear length of 240 m. The resultant graph shows variation in the resistivity values where

the range of resistivity value varies from 26 to 44 ohms m. A low resistivity zone in the

resultant graph is present within a distance of -30 to -40 m having a range of resistivity

value from 26 to 30 ohms. The thickness of this zone is about 50 m. The highest resistivity

of about 43 ohms m occurs at 20 m distance in right side.

A low resistivity zone indicates that soil, clay weathered basalt is present in this zone?


near the pump house. The observed vertical variation in apparent resistivity is presented figure

below. The interpreted results and nature of VES curves is indicative of potential aquifers within

the depth range of 30-120 m bgl. The details of subsurface lithology of the area have been described

below in the table:-




VES-

02

76°49'28.00"E 487 0 4.21 Soil with Clay 487 482.79

23° 4'14.00"N 4.21 12.9 Weathered Vesicular

Basalt

482.79 474.1

12.9 120 Massive Basalt 474.1 367

G. GPI Site No. 07

Gradient Profile: This gradient profile has been conducted near the guwakheda Pulia by

taking the linear electrode length of 240 m. The resultant graph shows that the range of

resistivity value varies from 105 to 58 ohms m. A low resistivity zone in the resultant graph

is present within a distance of -25 to -40 m having a range of resistivity value from 70 to 58

ohms. The highest resistivity of about 105 ohms m occurs at 10 m distance in right side.

A Probable fracture zone with the low resistivity value is present in -25 to -40 m distance.

Having a thickness of about 15 m.

H. GPI Site No. 08

Gradient Profile: This gradient profile has been conducted maina Khedi village having a

linear electrode length of 240 m along N to S direction. In the resultant graph the range of

resistivity value varies from 98 to 45 ohms m. A low resistivity zone in the resultant graph

is present within a distance of 5 to -20 m having a range of resistivity value from 60 to 40

ohms. The highest resistivity of about 98 ohms m occurs at 15 m distance in south

direction.

A Probable fracture zone with the low resistivity value is present in 5 to - 20 m distance.

The thickness of this zone is about 15 m. This indicates that soil with clay, weathered and

fractured rock is present in this zone.


near the pump house. The observed vertical variation in apparent resistivity is presented figure

below. The interpreted results and nature of VES curves is indicative of potential aquifers within

the depth range of 30-120 m bgl. The details of subsurface lithology of the area have been described

below in the table:-




VES-

02

76°49'16.00"E

23° 4'56.00"N

483 0 6.41 Soil with Clay 483 476.59


Basalt

476.6 464.4

18.6 68.2 Massive Basalt 464.4 414.8


Basalt

414.8 389.1

93.9 137 Massive Basalt 389.1 346

> 137 Weathered Vesicular

Basalt

I. GPI Site No. 09

Gradient Profile: This gradient profile has also been conducted in maina Khedi village

having a linear electrode length of 240 m along east to west direction. The graph shows the

increasing trend in the west direction. The range of resistivity value varies from 44 to 110

ohms m. A low resistivity zone in the resultant graph is present within a distance of - 20 to -

35 m having a range of resistivity value from 44 to 55 ohms in the east direction. The

highest resistivity of about 110 ohms m occurs at 25 m distance in west direction.

A Probable fracture zone with the low resistivity value is present in -20 to 35 m distance in

the east direction. The thickness of this zone is about 15 m and indicates that soil

weathered rock is present in this zone.

10. Pumping Test/ Slug test:

Site No.01: Slug test have been conducted at 76°49'58.11"E 23° 4'13.61"N near over head

tank (Shamshan Ghat -02). The recharge rate of the slug test has been calculated 10 lps in

this site.

Site No. 02: this slug test has been conducted at 76°49'58.20"E 23° 4'10.30"N in front of

Shamshan Ghat 02 gate. The recharge rate of the slug test has been calculated 20 lps in this

site.

11. Conclusion:

Based on field and geophysical investigation 5 sites have been selected for construction of

tube well / Recharge Well.

Name of the Village Location of structure (

Longitude / Latitude)

Proposed

Depth (m)

Expected Yield

Mainakhedi 76°49'16.00"E 23° 4'56.00"N 180 1800-2400 GPH

Mangal Bhawan, Kothari 76°49'57.67"E 23° 4'11.78"N 180 1800-2400 GPH

Nankundi Kothari 76°49'40.80"E 23° 4'13.30"N 180 1800-2400 GPH

42486-016: madhya pradesh urban services improvement project€¦ · 1. the project loan for madhya...

Documents