4. dynamic analysis

Upload: nguyen-sum

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    1/21

    1

    DESIGN AND CONTROL

    SERVO SYSTEM

    Professor: Seng - Chi Chen

    Name: Nguyen Van Sum

    ID: D0003002

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    2/21

    2

    Abstract

    - This paper presents a rigorous dynamic analysis for the

    Maglev system with controlled- PM electromagnets and

    robust zero- power-control strategy.- Author: Yeou-Kuang Tzeng and Tsih C. Wang

    - A variable structure control (VSC) theory using new reaching

    law method is applied to the robust controller synthesis forreducing the control- voltage chattering and enhancing the

    suspension stability analytical expressions of the rms gap

    variation.

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    3/21

    3

    I. Introduction

    - The controlled- PM electromagnet contains a PM and an

    E-shaped electromagnet, as shown in Fig.1

    - The PM is used to provide lift force for balancing overallvehicle weight, while the E-shaped electromagnet for

    maintaining suspension stability.

    - Advantages of this hybrid excited magnet mainly lie in itshigher lift- to- weight ratio and lower power consumption

    as compared to the conventional electromagnet.

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    4/21

    4

    I. Introduction

    The first is to evaluate the effect of the zero-power control

    method on the high-speed vehicle ride dynamics.

    Second, the regulated power loss due to the excitation of

    random guideway irregularity need to be investigated for

    confirming the power saving feature even with high speed

    cruise.

    Third the control- voltage chattering of the conventional VSC

    method used in should be reduced to achieve more power

    saving

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    5/21

    5

    II MODELING OF THE VEHICLE RIDE DYNAMICS

    Shown Fig.1, is simplify the analysis of a real Maglev vehicle

    dynamics. The linearized dynamic equations describing the

    motions of the cabin, the bogy, and the suspension module

    (SM) around their equilibrium points are given by

    Bogy:

    Cabin:

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    6/21

    6

    II MODELING OF THE VEHICLE RIDE DYNAMICS

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    7/217

    II MODELING OF THE VEHICLE RIDE DYNAMICS

    Suspension Module (SM):

    where

    MC, MB, and MM denote the masses of cabin, bogy and SM,

    respectively

    Ki and Bi are the spring constant and the damping constant of

    the mechanical suspension

    F: is the magnetic lift force, g the gap clearance,

    i: the coil current and f the external a load

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    8/218

    II MODELING OF THE VEHICLE RIDE DYNAMICS

    The linearized voltage equation of the control coil is

    where

    E and are the control voltage and the magnetic flux.

    R, N, and L are the resistance, the number of turns,and the inductance of the coil respectively

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    9/219

    III. DESIGN OF THE ROBUST ZERO- POWER CONTROLLER

    - The reaching-law-bad VSC method, is employed

    here for reducing the chattering of the conventional

    VSC (variable structure control) method.

    - Dynamic force through the primary suspension is

    treated as the unknown external disturbance f.- The state equation for the design of the zero-power

    controller is therefore reformulated as follows

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    10/2110

    III. DESIGN OF THE ROBUST ZERO- POWER CONTROLLER

    Where

    (5)

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    11/2111

    III. DESIGN OF THE ROBUST ZERO- POWER CONTROLLER

    (6)

    (7)

    (8)

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    12/2112

    III. DESIGN OF THE ROBUST ZERO- POWER CONTROLLER

    (9)

    (10)

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    13/2113

    IV. FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS OF ZERO- POWER-

    CONTROLLED SUSPENSION DYNAMICS

    The possibility of contact and the average regulation power lossunder the excitation of the random guideway irregularity are twoImportant performance indices for evaluating the magneticsuspension dynamics.

    (11)

    (12)

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    14/2114

    IV. FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS OF ZERO- POWER-

    CONTROLLED SUSPENSION DYNAMICS

    (14)

    The possibility of contract Pcontact and average regulation power

    loss Plave can be obtained using.

    (15)

    The above results are important to both the assessment of

    suspension dynamics the determination the controller

    parameters

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    15/2115

    V. EVALUATION OF VEHICLE RIDE DYNAMICS

    - Table 1 lists the details of the system.

    - With the guideway modeled by the power spectral

    density method,

    - Fig. 2 show the power spectral density of the cabin

    acceleration with ride quality at speed of 400 km/hr

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    16/2116

    V. EVALUATION OF VEHICLE RIDE DYNAMICS

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    17/2117

    V. EVALUATION OF VEHICLE RIDE DYNAMICS

    Fig 2 The power spectral densities of cabin vertical acceleration

    and ride quality standard at the speed of 400km/hr

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    18/21

    18

    V. EVALUATION OF VEHICLE RIDE DYNAMICS

    Fig 3 illustrates the ratio of nominal operating gap to rms

    gap variation and the average regulation power loss.

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    19/21

    19

    V. EVALUATION OF VEHICLE RIDE DYNAMICS

    Fig 4 shows the

    time domain

    responses of the

    vehicle at the

    speed of 400

    km/hr with the

    guideway modeled

    by discrete

    frequency method

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    20/21

    20

    VI. CONCLUSIONS

    - This paper presented the dynamic analysis of the Maglev

    system with controlled PM electromagnets and robust zero-

    power control strategy. The controller synthesis using reaching-

    law- based VSC method was effective in providing robust ness

    without sever chattering.

    - Numerical results gained from the power- spectrum

    integration and the time- domain simulation both indicate that,

    even with full load and high- speed operation (400 km/hr), the

    possibility of contact is nearly zero and the average regulation

    power is less than 320W/ton.

  • 8/3/2019 4. Dynamic Analysis

    21/21

    21

    THANKS YOU FOR YOUR LISTENING !