4. chemical bonding and molecular structure

7/25/2019 4. Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure

1/36

96 CHEMISTRY

Scientists are constantly discovering new compounds, orderlyarranging the facts about them, trying to explain with the

existing knowledge, organising to modify the earlier views or

evolve theories for explaining the newly observed facts.

UNIT 4

After studying this Unit, you will be

able to

understand Kssel-Lewisapproach to chemical bonding;

explain the octet rule and itslimitations, draw Lewisstructures of simple molecules;

explain the formation of differenttypes of bonds;

describe the VSEPR theory andpredict the geometry of simplemolecules;

explain the valence bondapproach for the formation ofcovalent bonds;

predict the directional propertiesof covalent bonds;

explain the different types ofhybridisation involving s,pandd orbitals and draw shapes ofsimple covalent molecules;

describe the molecular orbitaltheory of homonuclear diatomicmolecules;

explain the concept of hydrogenbond.

CHEMICAL BONDING AND

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE

Matter is made up of one or different type of elements.Under normal conditions no other element exists as anindependent atom in nature, except noble gases. However,

a group of atoms is found to exist together as one specieshaving characteristic properties. Such a group of atoms iscalled a molecule. Obviously there must be some force

which holds these constituent atoms together in themolecules. The attractive force which holds variousconstituents (atoms, ions, etc.) together in differentchemical species is called a chemical bond.Since theformation of chemical compounds takes place as a resultof combination of atoms of various elements in different

ways, it raises many questions. Why do atoms combine?Why are only certain combinations possible? Why do someatoms combine while certain others do not? Why do

molecules possess definite shapes? To answer suchquestions different theories and concepts have been putforward from time to time. These are Kssel-Lewisapproach, Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR)

Theory, Valence Bond (VB) Theory and Molecular Orbital(MO) Theory. The evolution of various theories of valenceand the interpretation of the nature of chemical bonds haveclosely been related to the developments in theunderstanding of the structure of atom, the electronicconfiguration of elements and the periodic table. Everysystem tends to be more stable and bonding is natures

way of lowering the energy of the system to attain stability.


2/36

97CHEMICAL BONDING AND MOLECULAR STRUCTURE

4.1 KSSEL-LEWIS APPROACH TOCHEMICAL BONDING

In order to explain the formation of chemicalbond in terms of electrons, a number ofattempts were made, but it was only in 1916

when Ksse l and Lewis succeededindependently in giving a satisfactoryexplanation. They were the first to providesome logical explanation of valence which was

based on the inertness of noble gases.

Lewis pictured the atom in terms of apositively charged Kernel (the nucleus plusthe inner electrons) and the outer shell that

could accommodate a maximum of eightelectrons. He, further assumed that theseeight electrons occupy the corners of a cube

which surround the Kernel. Thus the singleouter shell electron of sodium would occupyone corner of the cube, while in the case of anoble gas all the eight corners would beoccupied. This octet of electrons, representsa particularly stable electronic arrangement.Lewis postulated that atoms achieve thestable octet when they are linked bychemical bonds.In the case of sodium and

chlorine, this can happen by the transfer ofan electron from sodium to chlorine therebygiving the Na+and Cl

ions. In the case of

other molecules like Cl2, H2, F2, etc., the bondis formed by the sharing of a pair of electrons

between the atoms. In the process each atomattains a stable outer octet of electrons.

Lewis Symbols: In the formation of amolecule, only the outer shell electrons takepart in chemical combination and they areknown asvalence electrons. The inner shell

electrons are well protected and are generallynot involved in the combination process.G.N. Lewis, an American chemist introducedsimple notations to represent valenceelectrons in an atom. These notations arecalled Lewis symbols. For example, the Lewissymbols for the elements of second period areas under:

Significance of Lewis Symbols : The

number of dots around the symbol represents

the number of valence electrons. This numberof valence electrons helps to calculate the

common or group valenceof the element. Thegroup valence of the elements is generallyeither equal to the number of dots in Lewissymbols or 8 minus the number of dots or

valence electrons.

Kssel, in relation to chemical bonding,drew attention to the following facts:

In the periodic table, the highlyelectronegative halogens and the highlyelectropositive alkali metals are separated

by the noble gases;

The formation of a negative ion from ahalogen atom and a positive ion from analkali metal atom is associated with thegain and loss of an electron by therespective atoms;

The negative and positive ions thusformed attain stable noble gas electronicconfigurations. The noble gases (with theexception of helium which has a dupletof electrons) have a particularly stableouter shell configuration of eight (octet)

electrons, ns2np6. The negative and pos itive ions are

stabilized by electrostatic attraction.

For example, the formation of NaCl fromsodium and chlorine, according to the abovescheme, can be explained as:

Na Na+ + e

[Ne] 3s1 [Ne]

Cl + e Cl

[Ne] 3s23p5 [Ne] 3s23p6or [Ar]

Na+

+ Cl

NaCl or Na+

Cl

Similarly the formation of CaF2may beshown as:

Ca Ca2+ + 2e

[Ar]4s2 [Ar]

F + e F

[He] 2s22p5 [He] 2s22p6 or [Ne]

Ca2++ 2F

CaF2 or Ca2+(F

)2

The bond formed, as a result of theelectrostatic attraction between the

positive and negative ions was termed as


3/36

98 CHEMISTRY

the electrovalent bond. The electrovalenceis thus equal to the number of unitcharge(s) on the ion. Thus, calcium isassigned a positive electrovalence of two,

while chlorine a negative electrovalence ofone.

Kssels postulations provide the basis forthe modern concepts regarding ion-formation

by electron transfer and the formation of ioniccrystalline compounds. His views have provedto be of great value in the understanding andsystematisation of the ionic compounds. Atthe same time he did recognise the fact that

a large number of compounds did not fit intothese concepts.

4.1.1 Octet Rule

Kssel and Lewis in 1916 developed animportant theory of chemical combination

between atoms known as electronic theoryof chemical bonding. According to this,atoms can combine either by transfer of

valence electrons from one atom to another(gaining or losing) or by sharing of valenceelectrons in order to have an octet in their

valence shells. This is known as octet rule.4.1.2 Covalent Bond

Langmuir (1919) ref ined the Lewispostulations by abandoning the idea of thestationary cubical arrangement of the octet,and by introducing the term covalent bond.

The Lewis-Langmuir theory can beunderstood by considering the formation ofthe chlorine molecule,Cl2. The Cl atom withelectronic configuration, [Ne]3s23p5, is oneelectron short of the argon configuration.

The formation of the Cl2 molecule can beunderstood in terms of the sharing of a pairof electrons between the two chlorine atoms,each chlorine atom contributing one electronto the shared pair. In the process both

chlorine atoms attain the outer shell octet ofthe nearest noble gas (i.e., argon).

The dots represent electrons. Suchstructures are referred to as Lewis dotstructures.

The Lewis dot structures can be writtenfor other molecules also, in which thecombining atoms may be identical ordifferent. The important conditions being that:

Each bond is formed as a result of sharingof an electron pair between the atoms.

Each combining atom contributes at leastone electron to the shared pair.

The combining atoms attain the outer-shell noble gas configurations as a resultof the sharing of electrons.

Thus in water and carbon tetrachloridemolecules, formation of covalent bondscan be represented as:

or Cl Cl

Covalent bond between two Cl atoms

Thus, when two atoms share oneelectron pair they are said to be joined bya single covalent bond.In many compounds

we have multiple bondsbetween atoms. Theformation of multiple bonds envisagessharing of more than one electron pair

between two atoms. If two atoms share two

pairs of electrons, the covalent bondbetween them is called a double bond. Forexample, in the carbon dioxide molecule, wehave two double bonds between the carbonand oxygen atoms. Similarly in ethenemolecule the two carbon atoms are joined bya double bond.

Double bonds in CO2molecule


4/36


When combining atoms share threeelectron pairs as in the case of twonitrogen atoms in the N2molecule and thetwo carbon atoms in the ethyne molecule,a triple bond is formed.

4.1.3 Lewis Representation of SimpleMolecules (the Lewis Structures)

The Lewis dot structures provide a pictureof bonding in molecules and ions in termsof the shared pairs of electrons and theoctet rule.While such a picture may notexplain the bonding and behaviour of amolecule completely, it does help inunderstanding the formation and propertiesof a molecule to a large extent. Writing ofLewis dot structures of molecules is,therefore, very useful. The Lewis dotstructures can be written by adopting thefollowing steps:

The total number of electrons required forwriting the structures are obtained byadding the valence electrons of thecombining atoms. For example, in the CH4molecule there are eight valence electronsavailable for bonding (4 from carbon and4 from the four hydrogen atoms).

For anions, each negative charge wouldmean addition of one electron. For

cations, each positive charge would result

in subtraction of one electron from thetotal number of valence electrons. For

example, for the CO32ion, the two negative

charges indicate that there are twoadditional electrons than those provided

by the neutral atoms. For NH 4+ ion, one

positive charge indicates the loss of oneelectron from the group of neutral atoms.

Knowing the chemical symbols of thecombining atoms and having knowledgeof the skeletal structure of the compound(known or guessed intelligently), it is easyto distribute the total number of electrons

as bonding shared pairs between theatoms in proportion to the total bonds. In general the least electronegative atom

occupies the central position in themolecule/ion. For example in the NF3andCO3

2, nitrogen and carbon are the central

atoms whereas fluorine and oxygenoccupy the terminal positions.

After accounting for the shared pairs ofelectrons for single bonds, the remainingelectron pairs are either utilized formultiple bonding or remain as the lone

pairs. The basic requirement being thateach bonded atom gets an octet ofelectrons.Lewis representations of a few molecules/ions are given in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 The Lewis Representation of SomeMolecules

*Each H atom attains the configuration of helium (a duplet

of electrons)

C2H

4molecule

N2molecule

C2H

2molecule


5/36

100 CHEMISTRY

Problem 4.1

Write the Lewis dot structure of COmolecule.

Solution

Step 1. Count the total number ofvalence electrons of carbon and oxygenatoms. The outer (valence) shellconfigurations of carbon and oxygenatoms are: 2s2 2p2 and 2 s2 2p4,respectively. The valence electronsavailable are 4 + 6 =10.

Step 2. The skeletal structure of CO is

written as: C OStep 3. Draw a single bond (one sharedelectron pair) between C and O andcomplete the octet on O, the remainingtwo electrons are the lone pair on C.

This does not complete the octet oncarbon and hence we have to resort tomultiple bonding (in this case a triple

bond) between C and O atoms. This

satisfies the octet rule condition for bothatoms.

Problem 4.2

Write the Lewis structure of the nitriteion, NO2

.

Solution

Step 1. Count the total number ofvalence electrons of the nitrogen atom,the oxygen atoms and the additional onenegative charge (equal to one electron).

N(2s22p3), O (2s22p4)

5 + (2 6) +1 = 18 electrons

Step 2. The skeletal structure of NO2is

written as : O N O

Step 3. Draw a single bond (one sharedelectron pair) between the nitrogen and

each of the oxygen atoms completing the

octets on oxygen atoms. This, however,does not complete the octet on nitrogenif the remaining two electrons constitutelone pair on it.

Hence we have to resort to multiplebonding between nitrogen and one of theoxygen atoms (in this case a double

bond). This leads to the following Lewisdot structures.

4.1.4 Formal Charge

Lewis dot structures, in general, do notrepresent the actual shapes of the molecules.In case of polyatomic ions, the net charge ispossessed by the ion as a whole and not by aparticular atom. It is, however, feasible toassign a formal charge on each atom. Theformal charge of an atom in a polyatomicmolecule or ion may be defined as thedifference between the number of valenceelectrons of that atom in an isolated or freestate and the number of electrons assignedto that atom in the Lewis structure. It is

expressed as :Formal charge (F.C.)on an atom in a Lewisstructure

=

total number of valenceelectrons in the freeatom

total number of nonbonding (lone pair)electrons

(1/2)total number ofbonding(shared)electrons


6/36


4.1.5 Limitations of the Octet Rule

The octet rule, though useful, is not universal.It is quite useful for understanding thestructures of most of the organic compoundsand it applies mainly to the second periodelements of the periodic table. There are threetypes of exceptions to the octet rule.

The incomplete octet of the central atom

In some compounds, the number of electronssurrounding the central atom is less thaneight. This is especially the case with elementshaving less than four valence electrons.Examples are LiCl, BeH2and BCl3.

Li, Be and B have 1,2 and 3 valence electronsonly. Some other such compounds are AlCl3and BF

3.

Odd-electron molecules

In molecules with an odd number of electronslike nitric oxide, NO and nitrogen dioxide,NO2, the octet rule is not satisfied for all the

atoms

The expanded octet

Elements in and beyond the third period ofthe periodic table have, apart from 3sand 3porbitals, 3dorbitals also available for bonding.In a number of compounds of these elementsthere are more than eight valence electronsaround the central atom. This is termed asthe expanded octet. Obviously the octet ruledoes not apply in such cases.

Some of the examples of such compoundsare: PF5, SF6, H2SO4 and a number ofcoordination compounds.

The counting is based on the assumptionthat the atom in the molecule owns oneelectron of each shared pair and both theelectrons of a lone pair.

Let us consider the ozone molecule (O3).The Lewis structure of O3may be drawn as :

The atoms have been numbered as 1, 2

and 3. The formal charge on:

The central O atom marked 1

= 6 2 12

(6) = +1

The end O atom marked 2

= 6 4 1

2(4) = 0

The end O atom marked 3

= 6 6 12

(2) = 1

Hence, we represent O3 along with the

formal charges as follows:

We must understand that formal charges

do not indicate real charge separation withinthe molecule. Indicating the charges on theatoms in the Lewis structure only helps inkeeping track of the valence electrons in themolecule. Formal charges help in theselection of the lowest energy structure froma number of possible Lewis structures for agiven species. Generally the lowest energystructure is the one with the smallestformal charges on the atoms.The formalcharge is a factor based on a pure covalentview of bonding in which electron pairs

are shared equally by neighbouring atoms.


7/36

102 CHEMISTRY

Interestingly, sulphur also forms manycompounds in which the octet rule is obeyed.

In sulphur dichloride, the S atom has an octetof electrons around it.

Other drawbacks of the octet theory

It is clear that octet rule is based uponthe chemical inertness of noble gases.However, some noble gases (for example

xenon and krypton) also combine withoxygen and fluorine to form a number ofcompounds like XeF

2, KrF

2, XeOF

2etc.,

This theory does not account for the shapeof molecules.

It does not explain the relative stability ofthe molecules being totally silent aboutthe energy of a molecule.

4.2 IONIC OR ELECTROVALENT BOND

From the Kssel and Lewis treatment of theformation of an ionic bond, it follows that theformation of ionic compounds wouldprimarily depend upon:

The ease of formation of the positive andnegative ions from the respective neutralatoms;

The arrangement of the positive andnegative ions in the solid, that is, thelattice of the crystalline compound.

The formation of a positive ion involvesionization, i.e., removal of electron(s) fromthe neutral atom and that of the negative ioninvolves the addition of electron(s) to theneutral atom.

M(g) M+(g) + e;Ionization enthalpy

X(g) + e X (g) ;

Electron gain enthalpyM+(g) + X

(g) MX(s)

The electron gain enthalpy, eg

H,is theenthalpy change (Unit 3), when a gas phase atomin its ground state gains an electron. Theelectron gain process may be exothermic orendothermic. The ionization, on the other hand,is always endothermic. Electron affinity, is thenegative of the energy change accompanying

electron gain.

Obviously ionic bonds will be formedmore easily between elements withcomparatively low ionization enthalpiesand elements with comparatively highnegative value of electron gain enthalpy.

Most ionic compounds have cationsderived from metallic elements and anionsfrom non-metall ic elements. Theammonium ion, NH4

+(made up of two non-

metallic elements) is an exception. It formsthe cation of a number of ionic compounds.

Ionic compounds in the crystalline stateconsist of orderly three-dimensional

arrangements of cations and anions heldtogether by coulombic interaction energies.

These compounds crystalli se in differentcrystal structures determined by the sizeof the ions, their packing arrangements andother factors. The crystal structure ofsodium chloride, NaCl (rock salt), forexample is shown below.

In ionic solids, the sum of the electron

gain enthalpy and the ionization enthalpymay be positive but still the crystalstructur e gets stabilized due to the energyreleased in the formation of the crystallattice. For example: the ionizationenthalpy for Na+(g) formation from Na(g)is 495.8 kJ mol1 ; while the electron gainenthalpy for the change Cl(g) + eCl(g) is, 348.7 kJ mol1only. The sumof the two, 147.1 kJ mol -1 is more thancompensated for by the enthalpy of latticeformation of NaCl(s) (788 kJ mol1).

Therefore, the energy released in the

Rock salt structure


8/36


processes is more than the energy absorbed.Thus a qualitative measure of thestability of an ionic compound isprovided by its enthalpy of latticeformation and not simply by achievingoctet of electrons around the ionic speciesin gaseous state.

Since lattice enthalpy plays a key rolein the formation of ionic compounds, it isimportant that we learn more about it.

4.2.1 Lattice Enthalpy

The Lattice Enthalpy of an ionic solid isdefined as the energy required tocompletely separate one mole of a solidionic compound into gaseous constituentions.For example, the lattice enthalpy of NaClis 788 kJ mol1. This means that 788 kJ ofenergy is required to separate one mole ofsolid NaCl into one mole of Na+(g) and onemole of Cl (g) to an infinite distance.

This process involves both the attractiveforces between ions of opposite charges andthe repulsive forces between ions of likecharge. The solid crystal being three-

dimensional; it is not possible to calculatelattice enthalpy directly from the interactionof forces of attraction and repulsion only.Factors associated with the crystal geometryhave to be included.

4.3 BOND PARAMETERS

4.3.1 Bond Length

Bond length is defined as the equilibriumdistance between the nuclei of two bondedatoms in a molecule. Bond lengths are

measured by spectroscopic, X-ray diffractionand electron-diffraction techniques aboutwhich you will learn in higher classes. Eachatom of the bonded pair contributes to the

bond length (Fig. 4.1). In the case of a covalentbond, the contribution from each atom iscalled the covalent radius of that atom.

The covalent radius is measuredapproximately as the radius of an atomscore which is in contact with the core ofan adjacent atom in a bonded situation.

The covalent radius is half of the distance

between two similar atoms jo ined by a

Fig. 4.1 The bond length in a covalentmolecule AB.

R = rA

+ rB(R is the bond length and r

Aand r

Bare the covalent radii of atoms A and B

respectively)

covalent bond in the same molecule. The vander Waals radius represents the overall sizeof the atom which includes its valence shellin a nonbonded situation. Further, the van

der Waals radius is half of the distancebetween two similar atoms in separatemolecules in a solid. Covalent and van der

Waals radii of chlorine are depicted in Fig.4.2

Fig. 4.2 Covalent and van der Waals radii in a

chlorine molecule .The inner circlescorrespond to the size of the chlorine atom(r

vdw and r

c are van der Waals and

covalent radii respectively).

r = 99 pmc 198pm

r=180pm

vdw

360pm


9/36

104 CHEMISTRY

Some typical average bond lengths forsingle, double and triple bonds are shown in

Table 4.2. Bond lengths for some commonmolecules are given in Table 4.3.

The covalent radii of some commonelements are listed in Table 4.4.

4.3.2 Bond Angle

It is defined as the angle between the orbitalscontaining bonding electron pairs around thecentral atom in a molecule/complex ion. Bondangle is expressed in degree which can beexperimentally determined by spectroscopicmethods. It gives some idea regarding thedistribution of orbitals around the centralatom in a molecule/complex ion and hence ithelps us in determining its shape. Forexample HOH bond angle in water can berepresented as under :

4.3.3 Bond Enthalpy

It is defined as the amount of energy required

to break one mole of bonds of a particulartype between two atoms in a gaseous state.

The unit of bond enthalpy is kJ mol1. Forexample, the H H bond enthalpy in hydrogenmolecule is 435.8 kJ mol1.

H2(g) H(g) + H(g); aH

= 435.8 kJ mol1

Similarly the bond enthalpy for moleculescontaining multiple bonds, for example O2andN

2will be as under :

O2(O = O) (g) O(g) + O(g);

aH

= 498 kJ mol1

N2(N N) (g) N(g) + N(g); aH

= 946.0 kJ mol1

It is important that larger the bonddissociation enthalpy, stronger will be the

bond in the molecule. For a heteronucleardiatomic molecules like HCl, we have

HCl (g) H(g) + Cl (g); aH= 431.0 kJ mol1

In case of polyatomic molecules, themeasurement of bond strength is morecomplicated. For example in case of H2Omolecule, the enthalpy needed to break the

two O H bonds is not the same.

Table 4.2 Average Bond Lengths for SomeSingle, Double and Triple Bonds

Bond Type Covalent Bond Length(pm)

OH 96CH 107NO 136CO 143CN 143CC 154C=O 121N=O 122C=C 133

C=N 138CN 116CC 120

Table 4.3 Bond Lengths in Some CommonMolecules

Molecule Bond Length(pm)

H2(H H) 74F2(F F) 144Cl2(Cl Cl) 199Br2(Br Br) 228

I2(I I) 267N2(N N) 109O2(O O) 121HF (H F) 92HCl (H Cl) 127HBr (H Br) 141HI (H I) 160

Table 4.4 Covalent Radii,*rcov/(pm)

* The values cited are for single bonds, except whereotherwise indicated in parenthesis. (See also Unit 3 for

periodic trends).


10/36


H2O(g) H(g) + OH(g); aH1

= 502 kJ mol1

OH(g) H(g) + O(g); aH2

= 427 kJ mol1

The difference in the aH

value shows thatthe second O H bond undergoes some change

because of changed chemical environment.This is the reason for some difference in energyof the same O H bond in different moleculeslike C

2H

5OH (ethanol) and water. Therefore in

polyatomic molecules the term mean oraverage bond enthalpyis used. It is obtained

by dividing total bond dissociation enthalpyby the number of bonds broken as explainedbelow in case of water molecule,

Average bond enthalpy =502 427

2

+

= 464.5 kJ mol1

4.3.4 Bond Order

In the Lewis description of covalent bond,the Bond Order is given by the number ofbonds between the two atoms in amolecule.The bond order, for example in H2(with a single shared electron pair), in O2(with two shared electron pairs) and in N

2(with three shared electron pairs) is 1,2,3respectively. Similarly in CO (three sharedelectron pairs between C and O) the bondorder is 3. For N

2, bond order is 3 and its

a HV is 946 kJ mol1; being one of the

highest for a diatomic molecule.

Isoelectronic molecules and ions haveidentical bond orders; for example, F2andO2

2 have bond order 1. N2, CO and NO+

have bond order 3.

A general correlation useful forunderstanding the stablities of moleculesis that: with increase in bond order, bondenthalpy increases and bond lengthdecreases.

4.3.5 Resonance Structures

It is often observed that a single Lewisstructure is inadequate for the representationof a molecule in conformity with itsexperimentally determined parameters. Forexample, the ozone, O3 molecule can be

equally represented by the structures I and II

shown below:

In both structures we have a OO single

bond and a O=O double bond. The normalOO and O=O bond lengths are 148 pm and121 pm respectively. Experimentallydetermined oxygen-oxygen bond lengths inthe O

3

molecule are same (128 pm). Thus theoxygen-oxygen bonds in the O3molecule areintermediate between a double and a single

bond. Obviously, this cannot be representedby either of the two Lewis structures shownabove.

The concept of resonance was introducedto deal with the type of difficulty experiencedin the depiction of accurate structures ofmolecules like O3.According to the conceptof resonance, whenever a single Lewisstructure cannot describe a molecule

accurately, a number of structures withsimilar energy, positions of nuclei, bondingand non-bonding pairs of electrons are takenas the canonical structures of the hybridwhich describes the molecule accurately.Thus for O

3, the two structures shown above

constitute the canonical structures orresonance structures and their hybrid i.e., theIII structure represents the structure of O3more accurately. This is also called resonancehybrid. Resonance is represented by a doubleheaded arrow.

Fig. 4.3 Resonance in the O3molecule

(structures I and II represent the two canonicalforms while the structure III is the resonancehybrid)


11/36

106 CHEMISTRY

Some of the other examples of resonancestructures are provided by the carbonate ionand the carbon dioxide molecule.

Problem 4.3

Explain the structure of CO32 ion in

terms of resonance.

Solution

The single Lewis structure based on thepresence of two single bonds and onedouble bond between carbon and oxygenatoms is inadequate to represent themolecule accurately as it represents

unequal bonds. According to theexperimental findings, all carbon tooxygen bonds in CO3

2are equivalent.Therefore the carbonate ion is bestdescribed as a resonance hybrid of thecanonical forms I, II, and III shown below.

Problem 4.4

Explain the structure of CO2molecule.

Solution

The experimentally determined carbonto oxygen bond length in CO

2 is

115 pm. The lengths of a normalcarbon to oxygen double bond (C=O)

and carbon to oxygen triple bond (CO)are 121 pm and 110 pm respectively.

The carbon-oxygen bond lengths inCO2 (115 pm) lie between the valuesfor CO and CO. Obviously, a singleLewis structure cannot depict thisposition and it becomes necessary to

write more than one Lewis structuresand to consider that the structure ofCO2 is best described as a hybrid ofthe canonical or resonance forms I, IIand III.

In general, it may be stated that

Resonance stabilizes the molecule as theenergy of the resonance hybrid is lessthan the energy of any single cannonicalstructure; and,

Resonance averages the bond

characteristics as a whole.Thus the energy of the O3 resonancehybrid is lower than either of the twocannonical froms I and II (Fig 4.3).

Many misconceptions are associatedwith resonance and the same need to bedispelled. You should remember that :

The cannonical forms have no realexistence.

The molecule does not exist for a

certain fraction of time in onecannonical form and for otherfractions of time in other cannonicalforms.

There is no such equilibrium betweenthe cannonical forms as we have

between tautomeric forms (keto andenol) in tautomerism.

The molecule as such has a singlestructure which is the resonancehybrid of the cannonical forms and

which cannot as such be depicted by

a single Lewis structure.

4.3.6 Polarity of Bonds

The existence of a hundred percent ionic orcovalent bond represents an ideal situation.In reality no bond or a compound is eithercompletely covalent or ionic. Even in case ofcovalent bond between two hydrogen atoms,there is some ionic character.

When covalent bond is formed betweentwo similar atoms, for example in H2, O2, Cl2,

N2or F2, the shared pair of electrons is equally

Fig.4.4 Resonance in CO32

, I, II andIII r epresent the threecanonical forms.

Fig. 4.5 Resonance in CO2molecule, I, II

and III represent the three

canonical forms.


12/36


attracted by the two atoms. As a result electronpair is situated exactly between the two

identical nuclei. The bond so formed is callednonpolar covalent bond. Contrary to this incase of a heteronuclear molecule like HF, theshared electron pair between the two atomsgets displaced more towards fluorine since theelectronegativity of fluorine (Unit 3) is fargreater than that of hydrogen. The resultantcovalent bond is a polar covalent bond.

As a result of polarisation, the moleculepossesses the dipole moment (depicted

below) which can be defined as the product

of the magnitude of the charge and thedistance between the centres of positive andnegative charge. It is usually designated by aGreek letter . Mathematically, it is expressedas follows :

Dipole moment () = charge (Q) distance of separation (r)

Dipole moment is usually expressed inDebye units (D). The conversion factor is

1 D = 3.33564 1030 C m

where C is coulomb and m is meter.

Further dipole moment is a vector quantityand by convention it is depicted by a smallarrow with tail on the negative centre and headpointing towards the positive centre. But inchemistry presence of dipole moment isrepresented by the crossed arrow ( ) puton Lewis structure of the molecule. The crossis on positive end and arrow head is on negativeend. For example the dipole moment of HF may

be represented as :

H F

This arrow symbolises the direction of theshift of electron density in the molecule. Notethat the direction of crossed arrow is oppositeto the conventional direction of dipole moment

vector.

Peter Debye, the Dutch chemist

received Nobel prize in 1936 for

his work on X-ray diffraction and

dipole moments. The magnitude

of the dipole moment is given in

Debye units in order to honour him.

In case of polyatomic molecules the dipolemoment not only depend upon the individual

dipole moments of bonds known as bonddipoles but also on the spatial arrangement of

various bonds in the molecule. In such case,the dipole moment of a molecule is the vectorsum of the dipole moments of various bonds.For example in H

2O molecule, which has a bent

structure, the two OH bonds are oriented atan angle of 104.50. Net dipole moment of 6.17 1030 C m (1D = 3.33564 1030C m) is theresultant of the dipole moments of two OH

bonds.

Net Dipole moment, = 1.85 D

= 1.85 3.33564 1030C m = 6.17 1030 C m

The dipole moment in case of BeF2is zero.

This is because the two equal bond dipoles

point in opposite directions and cancel theeffect of each other.

In tetra-atomic molecule, for example inBF

3, the dipole moment is zero although the

B F bonds are oriented at an angle of 120otoone another, the three bond moments give anet sum of zero as the resultant of any two isequal and opposite to the third.

Let us study an interesting case of NH3and NF3molecule. Both the molecules havepyramidal shape with a lone pair of electronson nitrogen atom. Although fluorine is more

electronegative than nitrogen, the resultant


13/36

108 CHEMISTRY

dipole moment of NH3( 4.90 1030C m) is

greater than that of NF3(0.8 1030C m). This

is because, in case of NH3the orbital dipoledue to lone pair is in the same direction as theresultant dipole moment of the N H bonds,

whereas in NF3 the orbital dipole is in thedirection opposite to the resultant dipolemoment of the three NF bonds. The orbitaldipole because of lone pair decreases the effectof the resultant N F bond moments, whichresults in the low dipole moment of NF3asrepresented below :

in terms of the following rules:

The smaller the size of the cation and thelarger the size of the anion, the greater thecovalent character of an ionic bond.

The greater the charge on the cation, thegreater the covalent character of the ionic bond.

For cations of the same size and charge,the one, with electronic configuration(n-1)dnnso, typical of transition metals, ismore polarising than the one with a noblegas configuration, ns2np6, typical of alkaliand alkaline earth metal cations.

The cation polarises the anion, pulling the

electronic charge toward itself and therebyincreasing the electronic charge betweenthe two. This is precisely what happens ina covalent bond, i.e., buildup of electroncharge density between the nuclei. Thepolarising power of the cation, thepolarisability of the anion and the extentof distortion (polarisation) of anion are thefactors, which determine the per centcovalent character of the ionic bond.

4.4 THE VALENCE SHELL ELECTRON

PAIR REPULSION (VSEPR) THEORYAs already explained, Lewis concept is unableto explain the shapes of molecules. This theoryprovides a simple procedure to predict theshapes of covalent molecules. Sidgwick

Dipole moments of some molecules areshown in Table 4.5.

Just as all the covalent bonds havesome partial ionic character, the ionicbonds also have partial covalentcharacter.The partial covalent characterof ionic bonds was discussed by Fajans

Type of Example Dipole GeometryMolecule Moment, (D)

Molecule (AB) HF 1.78 linear HCl 1.07 linear

HBr 0.79 linear HI 0.38 linear H2 0 linear

Molecule (AB2) H2O 1.85 bent H2S 0.95 bent CO2 0 linear

Molecule (AB3) NH3 1.47 trigonal-pyramidalNF3 0.23 trigonal-pyramidalBF3 0 trigonal-planar

Molecule (AB4) CH4 0 tetrahedralCHCl3 1.04 tetrahedralCCl4 0 tetrahedral

Table 4.5 Dipole Moments of Selected Molecules


14/36


and Powell in 1940, proposed a simple theorybased on the repulsive interactions of theelectron pairs in the valence shell of the atoms.It was further developed and redefined byNyholm and Gillespie (1957).

The main postulates of VSEPR theory areas follows:

The shape of a molecule depends uponthe number of valence shell electron pairs(bonded or nonbonded) around the centralatom.

Pairs of electrons in the valence shell repel

one another since their electron clouds arenegatively charged.

These pairs of electrons tend to occupysuch positions in space that minimiserepulsion and thus maximise distance

between them.

The valence shell is taken as a sphere withthe electron pairs localising on thespherical surface at maximum distancefrom one another.

A multiple bond is treated as if it is a single

electron pair and the two or three electronpairs of a multiple bond are treated as asingle super pair.

Where two or more resonance structurescan represent a molecule, the VSEPRmodel is applicable to any such structure.

The repulsive interaction of electron pairsdecrease in the order:

Lone pair (lp) Lone pair (lp) > Lone pair (lp) Bond pair (bp) > Bond pair (bp ) Bond pair (bp)

Nyholm and Gillespie (1957) refined theVSEPR model by explaining the importantdifference between the lone pairs and bondingpairs of electrons. While the lone pairs arelocalised on the central atom, each bonded pairis shared between two atoms. As a result, thelone pair electrons in a molecule occupy morespace as compared to the bonding pairs ofelectrons. This results in greater repulsion

between lone pairs of electrons as comparedto the lone pair - bond pair and bond pair -

bond pair repulsions. These repulsion effects

result in deviations from idealised shapes andalterations in bond angles in molecules.

For the prediction of geometrical shapes ofmolecules with the help of VSEPR theory, it isconvenient to divide molecules into twocategories as (i) molecules in which thecentral atom has no lone pair and (ii)molecules in which the central atom hasone or more lone pairs.

Table 4.6 (page110 ) shows thearrangement of electron pairs about a centralatom A (without any lone pairs) andgeometries of some molecules/ions of the type

AB. Table 4.7 (page 111) shows shapes ofsome simple molecules and ions in which thecentral atom has one or more lone pairs. Table4.8 (page 112) explains the reasons for thedistortions in the geometry of the molecule.

As depicted in Table 4.6 , in thecompounds of AB

2, AB

3, AB

4, AB

5and AB

6,

the arrangement of electron pairs and the Batoms around the central atom A are : linear,trigonal planar, tetrahedral, trigonal-bipyramidal and octahedral, respectively.Such arrangement can be seen in themolecules like BF3(AB3), CH4(AB4) and PCl5(AB5) as depicted below by their ball and stickmodels.

The VSEPR Theory is able to predictgeometry of a large number of molecules,especially the compounds ofp-block elementsaccurately. It is also quite successful indetermining the geometry quite-accuratelyeven when the energy difference betweenpossible structures is very small. Thetheoretical basis of the VSEPR theoryregarding the effects of electron pair repulsionson molecular shapes is not clear andcontinues to be a subject of doubt and

discussion.

Fig. 4.6 The shapes of molecules in whichcentral atom has no lone pair


15/36

110 CHEMISTRY

Table 4.6 Geometry of Molecules in which the Central Atom has No Lone Pair of Electrons


16/36


Table 4.7 Shape (geometry) of Some Simple Molecules/Ions with Central Ions having One orMore Lone Pairs of Electrons(E).


17/36

112 CHEMISTRY

Theoret ic al ly the shapeshould have been triangularplanar but actually it is foundto be bent or v-shaped. Thereason being the lone pair-bond pair repulsion is muchmore as compared to thebond pair-bond pair repul-sion. So the angle is reducedto 119.5 from 120.

Had there been a bp in placeof lp the shape would havebeen tetrahedral but onelone pair is present and dueto the repulsion betweenlp-bp (which is more thanbp-bp repulsion) the anglebetween bond pai rs isreduced to 107 from 109.5.

The shape should have beentetrahedral if there were all bpbut two lp are present so theshape is distorted tetrahedralor angular. The reason islp-lp repulsion is more thanlp-bp repulsion which is morethan bp-bp repulsion. Thus,the angle is reduced to 104.5from 109.5.

Bent

Trigonalpyramidal

Bent

AB2E 4 1

AB3E 3 1

AB2E2 2 2

In (a) the lp is present at axialposition so there are threelpbp repulsions at 90. In(b)the lp is in an equatorialposition, and there are twolpbp repulsions. Hence,arrangement (b) is morestable. The shape shown in (b)is described as a distortedtetrahedron, a folded square ora see-saw.

See-saw

AB4E 4 1

(More stable)

Table 4.8 Shapes of Molecules containing Bond Pair and Lone Pair

Shape Reason for theshape acquiredArrangementof electronsNo. oflonepairs

No. ofbondingpairs

Moleculetype


18/36


In (a) the lp are atequatorial position sothere are less lp-bprepulsions ascompared to others inwhich the lp are ataxial positions. Sostructure (a) is moststable. (T-shaped).

T-shapeAB3E

23 2

Shape Reason for theshape acquired

Arrangement

of electrons

No. of

lonepairs

No. of

bondingpairs

Molecule

type

4.5 VALENCE BOND THEORY

As we know that Lewis approach helps inwriting the structure of molecules but it failsto explain the formation of chemical bond. Italso does not give any reason for the dif ferencein bond dissociation enthalpies and bondlengths in molecules like H

2(435.8 kJ mol-1,

74 pm) and F2 (155 kJ mol-1, 144 pm),

although in both the cases a single covalentbond is formed by the sharing of an electronpair between the respective atoms. It also givesno idea about the shapes of polyatomic

molecules.Similarly the VSEPR theory gives thegeometry of simple molecules buttheoretically, it does not explain them and alsoit has limited applications. To overcome theselimitations the two important theories basedon quantum mechanical principles areintroduced. These are valence bond (VB) theoryand molecular orbital (MO) theory.

Valence bond theorywas introduced byHeitler and London (1927) and developedfurther by Pauling and others. A discussion

of the valence bond theory is based on the

knowledge of atomic orbitals, electronic

configurations of elements (Units 2), theoverlap criteria of atomic orbitals, thehybridization of atomic orbitals and theprinciples of variation and superposition. Arigorous treatment of the VB theory in termsof these aspects is beyond the scope of this

book. Therefore, for the sake of convenience,valence bond theory has been discussed interms of qualitative and non-mathematicaltreatment only. To start with, let us considerthe formation of hydrogen molecule which is

the simplest of all molecules.Consider two hydrogen atoms A and B

approaching each other having nuclei NAandNB and electrons present in them arerepresented by eAand eB. When the two atomsare at large distance from each other, there isno interaction between them. As these twoatoms approach each other, new attractive andrepulsive forces begin to operate.

Attractive forces arise between:

(i) nucleus of one atom and its own electron

that is NA eAand NB eB.


19/36

114 CHEMISTRY

(ii) nucleus of one atom and electron of otheratom i.e., N

A e

B, N

B e

A.

Similarly repulsive forces arise between(i) electrons of two atoms like eA eB,(ii) nuclei of two atoms N

A N

B.

Attractive forces tend to bring the twoatoms close to each other whereas repulsiveforces tend to push them apart (Fig. 4.7).

Experimentally it has been found that themagnitude of new attractive force is more thanthe new repulsive forces. As a result, twoatoms approach each other and potentialenergy decreases. Ultimately a stage isreached where the net force of attraction

balances the force of repulsion and system

acquires minimum energy. At this stage two

Fig. 4.7 Forces of attraction and repulsion duringthe formation of H2molecule.

hydrogen atoms are said to be bonded togetherto form a stable molecule having the bond

length of 74 pm.

Since the energy gets released when thebond is formed between two hydrogen atoms,the hydrogen molecule is more stable than thatof isolated hydrogen atoms. The energy soreleased is called asbond enthalpy, which iscorresponding to minimum in the curvedepicted in Fig. 4.8. Conversely, 435.8 kJ ofenergy is required to dissociate one mole ofH

2molecule.

H2(g) + 435.8 kJ mol1 H(g) + H(g)

4.5.1 Orbital Overlap Concept

In the formation of hydrogen molecule, thereis a minimum energy state when two hydrogenatoms are so near that their atomic orbitalsundergo partial interpenetration. This partialmerging of atomic orbitals is called overlappingof atomic orbitals which results in the pairingof electrons. The extent of overlap decides thestrength of a covalent bond. In general, greaterthe overlap the stronger is the bond formed

between two atoms. Therefore, according toorbital overlap concept, the formation of acovalent bond between two atoms results bypairing of electrons present in the valence shellhaving opposite spins.

Fig. 4.8The potential energy curve for the

formation of H2molecule as a function of

internuclear distance of the H atoms. The

minimum in the curve corresponds to the

most stable state of H2.


20/36


4.5.2 Directional Properties of Bonds

As we have already seen, the covalent bond isformed by overlapping of atomic orbitals. Themolecule of hydrogen is formed due to theoverlap of 1s-orbitals of two H atoms.

In case of polyatomic molecules like CH4,

NH3and H

2O, the geometry of the molecules is

also important in addition to the bondformation. For example why is it so that CH4molecule has tetrahedral shape and HCH bondangles are 109.5? Why is the shape of NH3molecule pyramidal ?

The valence bond theory explains theshape, the formation and directional propertiesof bonds in polyatomic molecules like CH

4, NH

3

and H2O, etc. in terms of overlap and

hybridisation of atomic orbitals.

4.5.3 Overlapping of Atomic Orbitals

When orbitals of two atoms come close to formbond, their overlap may be positive, negativeor zero depending upon the sign (phase) anddirection of orientation of amplitude of orbital

wave function in space (Fig. 4.9). Positive and

negative sign on boundary surface diagramsin the Fig. 4.9 show the sign (phase) of orbitalwave function and are not related to charge.Orbitals forming bond should have same sign(phase) and orientation in space. This is calledpositive overlap. Various overlaps of s andporbitals are depicted in Fig. 4.9.

The criterion of overlap, as the main factorfor the formation of covalent bonds appliesuniformly to the homonuclear/heteronucleardiatomic molecules and polyatomic molecules.

We know that the shapes of CH4, NH3, and H2O

molecules are tetrahedral, pyramidal and bentrespectively. It would be therefore interestingto use VB theory to find out if these geometricalshapes can be explained in terms of the orbitaloverlaps.

Let us first consider the CH4(methane)molecule. The electronic configuration ofcarbon in its ground state is [He]2s22p2whichin the excited state becomes [He] 2s12px

12py1

2pz1. The energy required for this excitation is

compensated by the release of energy due to

overlap between the orbitals of carbon and the

Fig.4.9 Positive, negative and zero overlaps of

s and p atomic orbitals

hydrogen.The four atomic orbitals of carbon,each with an unpaired electron can overlap

with the 1sorbitals of the four H atoms whichare also singly occupied. This will result in theformation of four C-H bonds. It will, however,

be observed that while the three p orbitals ofcarbon are at 90to one another, the HCH

angle for these will also be 90. That is threeC-H bonds will be oriented at 90 to oneanother. The 2sorbital of carbon and the 1sorbital of H are spherically symmetrical andthey can overlap in any direction. Thereforethe direction of the fourth C-H bond cannot

be ascertained. This description does not fitin with the tetrahedral HCH angles of 109.5.Clearly, it follows that simple atomic orbitaloverlap does not account for the directionalcharacteristics of bonds in CH4. Using similar

procedure and arguments, it can be seen that in the


21/36

116 CHEMISTRY

case of NH3and H2O molecules, the HNH andHOH angles should be 90 . This is in

disagreement with the actual bond angles of107 and 104.5 in the NH3 and H2Omolecules respectively.

4.5.4 Types of Overlapping and Nature ofCovalent Bonds

The covalent bond may be classified into twotypes depending upon the types ofoverlapping:

(i) Sigma() bond, and (ii) pi() bond

(i) Sigma() bond :This type of covalent bond

is formed by the end to end (head-on)overlap of bonding orbitals along theinternuclear axis. This is called as headon overlap or axial overlap. This can beformed by any one of the following typesof combinations of atomic orbitals.

s-s overlapping : In this case, there isoverlap of two half filled s-orbitals alongthe internuclear axis as shown below :

s-p overlapping: This type of overlapoccurs between half filled s-orbitals of oneatom and half filledp-orbitals of anotheratom.

pp overlapping : This type of overlaptakes place between half filled p-orbitalsof the two approaching atoms.

(ii) pi( ) bond :In the formation of bondthe atomic orbitals overlap in such a waythat their axes remain parallel to eachother and perpendicular to theinternuclear axis. The orbitals formed due

to sidewise overlapping consists of two

saucer type charged clouds above andbelow the plane of the participating atoms.

4.5.5 Strength of Sigma and pi Bonds

Basically the strength of a bond depends upon

the extent of overlapping. In case of sigma bond,the overlapping of orbitals takes place to alarger extent. Hence, it is stronger as comparedto the pi bond where the extent of overlappingoccurs to a smaller extent. Further, it isimportant to note that in the formation ofmultiple bonds between two atoms of amolecule, pi bond(s) is formed in addition to asigma bond.

4.6 HYBRIDISATION

In order to explain the characteristicgeometrical shapes of polyatomic moleculeslike CH

4, NH

3and H

2O etc., Pauling introduced

the concept of hybridisation. According to himthe atomic orbitals combine to form new set ofequivalent orbitals known as hybrid orbitals.Unlike pure orbitals, the hybrid orbitals areused in bond formation. The phenomenon isknown as hybridisationwhich can be definedas the process of intermixing of the orbitals ofslightly different energies so as to redistributetheir energies, resulting in the formation of new

set of orbitals of equivalent energies and shape.For example when one 2sand three 2p-orbitalsof carbon hybridise, there is the formation offour new sp3hybrid orbitals.

Salient features of hybridisation:The mainfeatures of hybridisation are as under :

1. The number of hybrid orbitals is equal tothe number of the atomic orbitals that gethybridised.

2. The hybridised orbitals are always

equivalent in energy and shape.


22/36


3. The hybrid orbitals are more effective informing stable bonds than the pure atomic

orbitals.

4. These hybrid orbitals are directed in spacein some preferred direction to haveminimum repulsion between electronpairs and thus a stable arrangement.

Therefor e, the type of hybridisat ionindicates the geometry of the molecules.

Important conditions for hybridisation

(i) The orbitals present in the valence shellof the atom are hybridised.

(ii) The orbitals undergoing hybridisationshould have almost equal energy.

(iii) Promotion of electron is not essentialcondition prior to hybridisation.

(iv) It is not necessary that only half filledorbitals participate in hybridisation. Insome cases, even filled orbitals of valenceshell take part in hybridisation.

4.6.1 Types of Hybridisation

There are various types of hybridisationinvolving s, p and d orbitals. The different

types of hybridisation are as under:(I) sp hybridisation: This type ofhybridisation involves the mixing of one sandoneporbital resulting in the formation of twoequivalent sp hybrid orbitals. The suitableorbitals for sp hybridisation are sand pz, ifthe hybrid orbitals are to lie along the z-axis.Each sphybrid orbitals has 50% s-characterand 50% p-character. Such a molecule in

which the central atom is sp-hybridised andlinked directly to two other central atomspossesses linear geometry. This type ofhybridisation is also known as diagonalhybridisation.

The two sphybrids point in the oppositedirection along the z-axis with projectingpositive lobes and very small negative lobes,

which provides more effective overlappingresulting in the formation of stronger bonds.

Example of molecule having sphybridisation

BeCl2: The ground state electronic

configuration of Be is 1s22s2. In the exited state

one of the 2s-electrons is promoted to

vacant 2porbital to account for its bivalency.One 2sand one 2p-orbital gets hybridised to

form two sphybridised orbitals. These twosp hybrid orbitals are oriented in oppositedirection forming an angle of 180. Each ofthe sphybridised orbital overlaps with the2p-orbital of chlorine axially and form two Be-Cl sigma bonds. This is shown in Fig. 4.10.

(II) sp2hybridisation :In this hybridisationthere is involvement of one s and two

p-orbitals in order to form three equivalent sp2

hybridised orbitals. For example, in BCl3

molecule, the ground state electronicconfiguration of central boron atom is1s22s22p1. In the excited state, one of the 2selectrons is promoted to vacant 2porbital as

Fig.4.10 (a) Formation of sp hybrids from s and

p orbitals; (b) Formation of the linearBeCl

2molecule

Be

Fig.4.11 Formation of sp2hybrids and the BCl3

molecule


23/36

118 CHEMISTRY

a result boron has three unpaired electrons.These three orbitals (one 2s and two 2p)

hybridise to form three sp2hybrid orbitals. Thethree hybrid orbitals so formed are oriented ina trigonal planar arrangement and overlap with2p orbitals of chlorine to form three B-Cl

bonds. Therefore, in BCl3

(Fig. 4.11), thegeometry is trigonal planar with ClBCl bondangle of 120.

(III) sp3 hybridisation: This type ofhybridisation can be explained by taking theexample of CH

4molecule in which there is

mixing of one s-orbital and threep-orbitals of

the valence shell to form four sp3

hybrid orbitalof equivalent energies and shape. There is 25%s-character and 75%p-character in each sp3

hybrid orbital. The four sp3hybrid orbitals soformed are directed towards the four cornersof the tetrahedron. The angle between sp3

hybrid orbital is 109.5 as shown in Fig. 4.12.

The structure of NH3and H2O molecules

Fig.4.12 Formation of sp3 hybrids by thecombination of s , p

x, p

yand p

zatomic

orbitals of carbon and the formation of

CH4molecule

can also be explained with the help of sp3

hybridisation. In NH3, the valence shell (outer)electronic configuration of nitrogen in the

ground state is 2s221xp 2

1yp 2

1zp having three

unpaired electrons in the sp3hybrid orbitalsand a lone pair of electrons is present in thefourth one. These three hybrid orbitals overlap

with 1sorbitals of hydrogen atoms to formthree NH sigma bonds. We know that theforce of repulsion between a lone pair and a

bond pair is more than the force of repulsionbetween two bond pairs of electrons. Themolecule thus gets distorted and the bondangle is reduced to 107 from 109.5. Thegeometry of such a molecule will be pyramidalas shown in Fig. 4.13.

Fig.4.13 Formation of NH3molecule

In case of H2O molecule, the four oxygen

orbitals (one 2s and three 2p) undergo sp3

hybridisation forming four sp3hybrid orbitalsout of which two contain one electron each andthe other two contain a pair of electrons. Thesefour sp3hybrid orbitals acquire a tetrahedralgeometry, with two corners occupied byhydrogen atoms while the other two by the lonepairs. The bond angle in this case is reducedto 104.5 from 109.5(Fig. 4.14) and the molecule thus acquires a

V-shape or angular geometry.

Fig.4.14 Formation of H2O molecule


24/36


4.6.2 Other Examples of sp3, sp2and spHybridisation

sp3Hybridisation in C2H

6 molecule: In

ethane molecule both the carbon atomsassume sp3hybrid state. One of the four sp3

hybrid orbitals of carbon atom overlaps axiallywith similar orbitals of other atom to formsp3-sp3 sigma bond while the other threehybrid orbitals of each carbon atom are usedin forming sp3ssigma bonds with hydrogenatoms as discussed in section 4.6.1(iii).

Therefore in ethane CC bond length is 154pm and each CH bond length is 109 pm.

sp2Hybridisation in C2H4:In the formationof ethene molecule, one of the sp2 hybridorbitals of carbon atom overlaps axially withsp2hybridised orbital of another carbon atomto form CC sigma bond. While the other two

sp2hybrid orbitals of each carbon atom areused for making sp2ssigma bond with two

hydrogen atoms. The unhybridised orbital (2pxor 2p

y) of one carbon atom overlaps sidewise

with the similar orbital of the other carbonatom to form weak bond, which consists oftwo equal electron clouds distributed aboveand below the plane of carbon and hydrogenatoms.

Thus, in ethene molecule, the carbon-carbon bond consists of one sp2sp2 sigma

bond and one pi ( ) bond betweenporbitalswhich are not used in the hybridisation andare perpendicular to the plane of molecule;the bond length 134 pm. The CH bond issp2ssigma with bond length 108 pm. The HCH bond angle is 117.6 while the HCCangle is 121. The formation of sigma and pi

bonds in ethene is shown in Fig. 4.15.

Fig. 4.15 Formation of sigma and pi bonds in ethene


25/36

120 CHEMISTRY

sp Hybridisation in C2H

2:In the formation

of ethyne molecule, both the carbon atomsundergo sp-hybridisation having twounhybridised orbital i.e.,2pyand 2px.

One sphybrid orbital of one carbon atomoverlaps axially with sphybrid orbital of theother carbon atom to form CC sigma bond,

while the other hybridised orbital of eachcarbon atom overlaps axially with the halffilled sorbital of hydrogen atoms forming

bonds. Each of the two unhybridisedporbitalsof both the carbon atoms overlaps sidewise to

form two bonds between the carbon atoms.So the triple bond between the two carbonatoms is made up of one sigma and two pi

bonds as shown in Fig. 4.16.

4.6.3 Hybridisation of Elements involvingdOrbitals

The elements present in the third periodcontain d orbitals in addition to s and porbitals. The energy of the 3d orbitals arecomparable to the energy of the 3sand 3porbitals. The energy of 3dorbitals are alsocomparable to those of 4sand 4porbitals. Asa consequence the hybridisation involvingeither 3s, 3p and 3d or 3d, 4s and 4p ispossible. However, since the difference inenergies of 3pand 4sorbitals is significant, nohybridisation involving 3p, 3dand 4sorbitals

is possible.The important hybridisation schemes

involving s,pand dorbitals are summarisedbelow:

Fig.4.16 Formation of sigma and pi bonds inethyne

Shape of Hybridisation Atomic Examplesmolecules/ type orbitals

ions

Square dsp2 d+s+p(2) [Ni(CN)4]2,

planar [Pt(Cl)4]2

Trigonal sp3d s+p(3)+d PF5, PCl5

bipyramidal

Square sp3d2 s+p(3)+d(2) BrF 5pyramidal

Octahedral sp3d2 s+p(3)+d(2) SF 6, [CrF

6]3

d2sp3 d(2)+s+p(3) [Co(NH3)6]3+

(i) Formation of PCl5(sp3d hybridisation):

The ground state and the excited state outerelectronic configurations of phosphorus (Z=15)are represented below.

sp3d hybrid orbitals filled by electron pairsdonated by five Cl atoms.


26/36


Now the five orbitals (i.e.,ones, threepandone dorbitals) are available for hybridisation

to yield a set of five sp3dhybrid orbitals whichare directed towards the five corners of atrigonal bipyramidal as depicted in the Fig.4.17.

Fig. 4.17 Trigonal bipyramidal geometry of PCl5

molecule

It should be noted that all the bond anglesin trigonal bipyramidal geometry are notequivalent. In PCl

5 the five sp3d orbitals of

phosphorus overlap with the singly occupiedporbitals of chlorine atoms to form five PClsigma bonds. Three PCl bond lie in one planeand make an angle of 120 with each other;these bonds are termed as equatorial bonds.

The remaining two PCl bondsone lyingabove and the other lying below the equatorialplane, make an angle of 90 with the plane.

These bonds are called axial bonds. As the axialbond pairs suffer more repulsive interactionfrom the equatorial bond pairs, therefore axial

bonds have been found to be slightly longer

and hence slightly weaker than the equatorialbonds; which makes PCl5 molecule morereactive.

(ii) Formation of SF6(sp3d2hybridisation):

In SF6 the central sulphur atom has the

ground state outer electronic configuration3s23p4. In the exited state the available sixorbitals i.e.,one s, threepand two dare singlyoccupied by electrons. These orbitals hybridiseto form six new sp3d2hybrid orbitals, whichare projected towards the six corners of a

regular octahedron in SF6. These six sp3

d

2

hybrid orbitals overlap with singly occupiedorbitals of fluorine atoms to form six SF sigma

bonds. Thus SF6 molecule has a regularoctahedral geometry as shown in Fig. 4.18.

sp3d2hybridisation

4.7 MOLECULAR ORBITAL THEORY

Molecular orbital (MO) theory was developedby F. Hund and R.S. Mulliken in 1932. Thesalient features of this theory are :

(i) The electrons in a molecule are presentin the various molecular orbitals as theelectrons of atoms are present in the

various atomic orbitals.

(ii) The atomic orbitals of comparableenergies and proper symmetry combineto form molecular orbitals.

(iii) While an electron in an atomic orbital isinfluenced by one nucleus, in a molecularorbital it is influenced by two or morenuclei depending upon the number ofatoms in the molecule. Thus, an atomic

Fig. 4.18 Octahedral geometry of SF6molecule


27/36

122 CHEMISTRY

orbital is monocentric while a molecularorbital is polycentric.

(iv) The number of molecular orbital formedis equal to the number of combiningatomic orbitals. When two atomicorbitals combine, two molecular orbitalsare formed. One is known as bondingmolecular orbital while the other iscalled antibonding molecular orbital.

(v) The bonding molecular orbital has lowerenergy and hence greater stability thanthe corresponding antibondingmolecular orbital.

(vi) Just as the electron probabil itydistribution around a nucleus in anatom is given by an atomic orbital, theelectron probability distribution arounda group of nuclei in a molecule is given

by a molecular orbital.

(vii) The molecular orbitals like atomicorbitals are filled in accordance with theaufbau principle obeying the Paulisexclusion principle and the Hunds rule.

4.7.1 Formation of Molecular OrbitalsLinear Combination of AtomicOrbitals (LCAO)

According to wave mechanics, the atomicorbitals can be expressed by wave functions( s) which represent the amplitude of theelectron waves. These are obtained from thesolution of Schrdinger wave equation.However, since it cannot be solved for anysystem containing more than one electron,molecular orbitals which are one electron wavefunctions for molecules are difficult to obtaindirectly from the solution of Schrdinger waveequation. To overcome this problem, anapproximate method known as linearcombination of atomic orbitals (LCAO)has

been adopted.

Let us apply this method to thehomonuclear diatomic hydrogen molecule.Consider the hydrogen molecule consistingof two atoms A and B. Each hydrogen atom inthe ground state has one electron in 1sorbital.

The atomic orbitals of these atoms may be

represented by the wave functions Aand B.

Mathematically, the formation of molecularorbitals may be described by the linearcombination of atomic orbitals that can takeplace by addition and by subtraction of wavefunctions of individual atomic orbitals asshown below :

MO

= A+

B

Therefore, the two molecular orbitalsand * are formed as :

A+

B

* = A

B

The molecular orbital formed by theaddition of atomic orbitals is called thebonding molecu lar orbital while themolecular orbital * formed by the subtractionof atomic orbital is called antibondingmolecular orbitalas depicted in Fig. 4.19.

Fig.4.19 Formation of bonding () andantibonding (*) molecular orbitals by thelinear combination of atomic orbitals

A

and Bcentered on two atoms A and B

respectively.

Qualitatively, the formation of molecularorbitals can be understood in terms of theconstructive or destructive interference of theelectron waves of the combining atoms. In theformation of bonding molecular orbital, the twoelectron waves of the bonding atoms reinforceeach other due to constructive interference

while in the fo rmation of antibonding

* = A B

A

B

A+ B


28/36


molecular orbital, the electron waves canceleach other due to destructive interference. Asa result, the electron density in a bondingmolecular orbital is located between the nucleiof the bonded atoms because of which therepulsion between the nuclei is very less whilein case of an antibonding molecular orbital,most of the electron density is located awayfrom the space between the nuclei. Infact, thereis a nodal plane (on which the electron densityis zero) between the nuclei and hence therepulsion between the nuclei is high. Electronsplaced in a bonding molecular orbital tend to

hold the nuclei together and stabilise amolecule. Therefore, a bonding molecularorbital always possesses lower energy thaneither of the atomic orbitals that have combinedto form it. In contrast, the electrons placed inthe antibonding molecular orbital destabilisethe molecule. This is because the mutualrepulsion of the electrons in this orbital is morethan the attraction between the electrons andthe nuclei, which causes a net increase inenergy.

It may be noted that the energy of theantibonding orbital is raised above the energyof the parent atomic orbitals that havecombined and the energy of the bondingorbital has been lowered than the parentorbitals. The total energy of two molecularorbitals, however, remains the same as thatof two original atomic orbitals.

4.7.2 Conditions for the Combination ofAtomic Orbitals

The linear combination of atomic orbitals to

form molecular orbitals takes place only if thefollowing conditions are satisfied:

1.The combining atomic orbitals musthave the same or nearly the same energy.

This means that 1sorbital can combine withanother 1s orbital but not with 2s orbital

because the energy of 2sorbital is appreciablyhigher than that of 1sorbital. This is not trueif the atoms are very different.

2.The combining atomic orbitals musthave the same symmetry about the

molecular axis. By convention z-axis is

taken as the molecular axis. It is importantto note that atomic orbitals having sameor nearly the same energy will not combineif they do not have the same symmetry.For example, 2p

z orbital of one atom can

combine with 2pzorbital of the other atom

but not with the 2pxor 2p

yorbitals because

of their dif ferent symmetries.

3.The combining atomic orbitals mustoverlap to the maximum extent. Greaterthe extent of overlap, the greater will be theelectron-density between the nuclei of amolecular orbital.

4.7.3 Types of Molecular Orbitals

Molecular orbitals of diatomic molecules aredesignated as (sigma), (pi), (delta), etc.

In this nomenclature, the sigma ()molecular orbitals are symmetrical aroundthe bond-axis while pi () molecular orbitalsare not symmetrical. For example, the linearcombination of 1s orbitals centered on twonuclei produces two molecular orbitals whichare symmetrical around the bond-axis. Suchmolecular orbitals are of the type and are

designated as 1sand *1s[Fig. 4.20(a),page124]. If internuclear axis is taken to be inthe z-direction, it can be seen that a linearcombination of 2pz- orbitals of two atomsalso produces two sigma molecular orbitalsdesignated as 2p

zand *2p

z.[Fig. 4.20(b)]

Molecular orbitals obtained from 2pxand2pyorbitals are not symmetrical around the

bond axis because of the presence of positivelobes above and negative lobes below themolecular plane. Such molecular orbitals, are

labelled as and * [Fig. 4.20(c)]. A bondingMO has larger electron density above and

be low the inter -nucl ea r axis. The *antibonding MO has a node between the nuclei.

4.7.4 Energy Level Diagram for MolecularOrbitals

We have seen that 1satomic orbitals on twoatoms form two molecular orbitals designatedas 1sand *1s. In the same manner, the 2sand 2patomic orbitals (eight atomic orbitalson two atoms) give rise to the following eight

molecular orbitals:


29/36

124 CHEMISTRY

Fig. 4.20 Contours and energies of bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals formed throughcombinations of (a) 1s atomic orbitals; (b) 2p

zatomic orbitals and (c) 2p

xatomic orbitals.

Antibonding MOs *2s *2pz *2p

x *2p

y

Bonding MOs 2s 2pz 2p

x 2p

y

The energy levels of these molecularorbitals have been determined experimentally

from spectroscopic data for homonucleardiatomic molecules of second row elements ofthe periodic table. The increasing order ofenergies of various molecular orbitals for O2

and F2is given below :


30/36


1s< *1s< 2s< *2s


31/36

126 CHEMISTRY

molecule, therefore, it is diamagnetic.

2. Helium molecule (He2):The electronic

configuration of helium atom is 1s2. Eachhelium atom contains 2 electrons, therefore,in He

2molecule there would be 4 electrons.

These electrons will be accommodated in 1sand *1s molecular orbitals leading toelectronic configuration:

He2: (1s)2 (*1s)2

Bond order of He2is (2 2) = 0

He2molecule is therefore unstable and doesnot exist.

Similarly, it can be shown that Be2molecule(1s)2 (*1s)2 (2s)2 (*2s)2 also does not exist.

3. Lithium molecule (Li2): The electronic

configuration of lithium is 1s2, 2s1. There aresix electrons in Li

2. The electronic

configuration of Li2molecule, therefore, is

Li2: (1s)2(*1s)2 (2s)2

The above configuration is also written asKK(2s)2where KK represents the closed Kshell structure (1s)2(*1s)2.

From the electronic configuration of Li2

molecule it is clear that there are fourelectrons present in bonding molecularorbitals and two electrons present inantibonding molecular orbitals. Its bond order,therefore, is (4 2) = 1. It means that Li

2

molecule is stable and since it has no unpairedelectrons it should be diamagnetic. Indeeddiamagnetic Li2molecules are known to existin the vapour phase.

4. Carbon molecule (C2): The electronicconfiguration of carbon is 1s22s22p2. Thereare twelve electrons in C2. The electronicconfiguration of C2molecule, therefore, is

C2:2 2 2 2 2 2( 1 ) ( *1 ) ( 2 ) ( * 2 ) ( 2 2 ) =x ys s s s p p

or 2 2 2 2( ) ( * ) ( )2 2 2 2 =KK s s p p x y

The bond order of C2is (8 4) = 2 and C 2should be diamagnetic. Diamagnetic C 2molecules have indeed been detected in

vapour phase. It is important to note thatdouble bond in C2consists of both pi bonds

because of the presence of four electrons in two

pi molecular orbitals. In most of the other

molecules a double bond is made up of a sigmabond and a pi bond. In a similar fashion thebonding in N

2molecule can be discussed.

5. Oxygen molecule (O2): The electronicconfiguration of oxygen atom is 1s22s22p4.Each oxygen atom has 8 electrons, hence, inO2 molecule there are 16 electrons. Theelectronic configuration of O2 molecule,therefore, is

2 2 2 2 22O : 1 *1 2 *2 2p z( s) ( s) ( s) ( s) ( )

( ) ( )2 2 1 12 2 * 2 *2 x y x y p p p p or

( ) ( )

2 2 2z2

2 2 1 1y x y

KK ( 2 ) ( *2 ) ( 2 )O :

2 2 , *2 *2

s s p

p p p p x

From the electronic configuration of O2

molecule it is clear that ten electrons arepresent in bonding molecular orbitals and sixelectrons are present in antibondingmolecular orbitals. Its bond order, therefore,is

[ ] [ ]b a1 1

Bond order 10 6 2

2 2

= = =N N

So in oxygen molecule, atoms are held bya double bond. Moreover, it may be noted thatit contains two unpaired electrons in *2pxand *2p

ymolecular orbitals, therefore, O

2

molecule should be paramagnetic, aprediction that corresponds toexperimental observation. In this way, thetheory successfully explains the paramagneticnature of oxygen.

Similarly, the electronic configurations of

other homonuclear diatomic molecules of thesecond row of the periodic table can be written.In Fig.4.21 are given the molecular orbitaloccupancy and molecular properties for B

2

through Ne2. The sequence of MOs and theirelectron population are shown. The bondenergy, bond length, bond order, magneticproperties and valence electron configurationappear below the orbital diagrams.

4.9 HYDROGEN BONDING

Nitrogen, oxygen and fluorine are the higly


32/36


electronegative elements. When they areattached to a hydrogen atom to form covalent

bond, the electrons of the covalent bond areshifted towards the more electronegative atom.

This partially positively charged hydrogenatom forms a bond with the other moreelectronegative atom. This bond is known ashydrogen bond and is weaker than thecovalent bond. For example, in HF molecule,the hydrogen bond exists between hydrogenatom of one molecule and fluorine atom ofanother molecule as depicted below :

H F H F H F + + + Here, hydrogen bond acts as a bridge betweentwo atoms which holds one atom by covalent

bond and the other by hydrogen bond.Hydrogen bond is represented by a dotted line( ) while a solid line represents the covalent

bond.Thus, hydrogen bond can be definedas the attractive force which bindshydrogen atom of one molecule with theelectronegative atom (F, O or N) of anothermolecule.

4.9.1 Cause of Formation of Hydrogen

BondWhen hydrogen is bonded to strong lyelectronegative element X, the electron pairshared between the two atoms moves far awayfrom hydrogen atom. As a result the hydrogenatom becomes highly electropositive withrespect to the other atom X. Since there isdisplacement of electrons towards X, thehydrogen acquires fractional positive charge( +) while X attain fractional negative charge(). This results in the formation of a polar

molecule having electrostatic force of attraction

Fig. 4.21 MO occupancy and molecular properties for B2through Ne

2.


33/36

128 CHEMISTRY

SUMMARY

Kssels first insight into the mechanism of formation of electropositive and electronegative

ions related the process to the attainment of noble gas configurations by the respectiveions. Electrostatic attraction between ions is the cause for their stability. This gives theconcept of electrovalency.

The first description of covalent bondingwas provided by Lewis in terms of the sharingof electron pairs between atoms and he related the process to the attainment of noble gasconfigurations by reacting atoms as a result of sharing of electrons. The Lewis dot symbolsshow the number of valence electrons of the atoms of a given element and Lewis dotstructures show pictorial representations of bonding in molecules.

An ionic compound is pictured as a three-dimensional aggregation of positive andnegative ions in an ordered arrangement called the crystal lattice. In a crystalline solidthere is a charge balance between the positive and negative ions. The crystal lattice isstabilized by the enthalpy of lattice formation.

While a single covalent bond is formed by sharing of an electron pair between twoatoms, multiple bonds result from the sharing of two or three electron pairs. Some bondedatoms have additional pairs of electrons not involved in bonding. These are called lone-pairs of electrons. A Lewis dot structure shows the arrangement of bonded pairs and lonepairs around each atom in a molecule. Important parameters, associated with chemical

bonds, like: bond length, bond angle, bond enthalpy, bond order and bond polarityhave significant effect on the properties of compounds.

A number of molecules and polyatomic ions cannot be described accurately by a singleLewis structure and a number of descriptions (representations) based on the same skeletalstructure are written and these taken together represent the molecule or ion. This is a veryimportant and extremely useful concept called resonance. The contributing structures orcanonical forms taken together constitute the resonance hybrid which represents themolecule or ion.

which can be represented as :

H X H X H X + + + The magnitude of H-bonding depends on

the physical state of the compound. It ismaximum in the solid state and minimum inthe gaseous state. Thus, the hydrogen bondshave strong influence on the structure andproperties of the compounds.

4.9.2 Types of H-Bonds

There are two types of H-bonds

(i) Intermolecular hydrogen bond

(ii) Intramolecular hydrogen bond(1) Intermolecular hydrogen bond : It isformed between two different molecules of thesame or different compounds. For example, H-

bond in case of HF molecule, alcohol or watermolecules, etc.

(2) Intramolecular hydrogen bond : It isformed when hydrogen atom is in between the

two highly electronegative (F, O, N) atomspresent within the same molecule. For example,in o-nitrophenol the hydrogen is in betweenthe two oxygen atoms.

EXERCISES

Fig. 4.22 Intramolecular hydrogen bonding ino-nitrophenol molecule


34/36


The VSEPRmodelused for predicting the geometrical shapes of molecules is based on

the assumption that electron pairs repel each other and, therefore, tend to remain as farapart as possible. According to this model, molecular geometry is determined by repulsionsbetween lone pairs and lone pairs; lone pairs and bonding pairsand bonding pairs andbonding pairs. The order of these repulsions being : lp-lp > lp-bp > bp-bp

Thevalence bond (VB) approachto covalent bonding is basically concerned with theenergetics of covalent bond formation about which the Lewis and VSEPR models are silent.Basically the VB theory discusses bond formation in terms of overlap of orbitals. Forexample the formation of the H2molecule from two hydrogen atoms involves the overlap ofthe 1sorbitals of the two H atoms which are singly occupied. It is seen that the potentialenergy of the system gets lowered as the two H atoms come near to each other. At theequilibrium inter-nuclear distance (bond distance) the energy touches a minimum. Anyattempt to bring the nuclei still closer results in a sudden increase in energy and consequentdestabilization of the molecule. Because of orbital overlap the electron density between the

nuclei increases which helps in bringing them closer. It is however seen that the actualbond enthalpy and bond length values are not obtained by overlap alone and other variableshave to be taken into account.

For explaining the characteristic shapes of polyatomic molecules Pauling introducedthe concept of hybridisation of atomic orbitals. sp,sp2, sp3hybridizations of atomic orbitalsof Be, B,C, N and O are used to explain the formation and geometrical shapes of moleculeslike BeCl2, BCl3, CH4, NH3and H2O. They also explain the formation of multiple bonds inmolecules like C

2H

2and C

2H

4.

The molecular orbital (MO) theorydescribes bonding in terms of the combinationand arrangment of atomic orbitals to form molecular orbitals that are associated with themolecule as a whole. The number of molecular orbitals are always equal to the number ofatomic orbitals from which they are formed. Bonding molecular orbitals increase electrondensity between the nuclei and are lower in energy than the individual atomic orbitals.Antibonding molecular orbitals have a region of zero electron density between the nucleiand have more energy than the individual atomic orbitals.

The electronic configuration of the molecules is written by filling electrons in themolecular orbitals in the order of increasing energy levels. As in the case of atoms, thePauli exclusion principle and Hunds rule are applicable for the filling of molecular orbitals.Molecules are said to be stable if the number of elctrons in bonding molecular orbitals isgreater than that in antibonding molecular orbitals.

Hydrogen bond is formed when a hydrogen atom finds itself between two highlyelectronegative atoms such as F, O and N. It may be intermolecular (existing between twoor more molecules of the same or different substances) or intramolecular (present withinthe same molecule). Hydrogen bonds have a powerful effect on the structure and propertiesof many compounds.

4.1 Explain the formation of a chemical bond.

4.2 Write Lewis dot symbols for atoms of the following elements : Mg, Na, B, O, N, Br.

4.3 Write Lewis symbols for the following atoms and ions:

S and S2; Al and Al3+; H and H

4.4 Draw the Lewis structures for the following molecules and ions :

H2S, SiCl

4, BeF

2, 23CO

, HCOOH

4.5 Define octet rule. Write its significance and limitations.

4.6 Write the favourable factors for the formation of ionic bond.


35/36

130 CHEMISTRY

4.7 Discuss the shape of the following molecules using the VSEPR model:

BeCl2, BCl3, SiCl4, AsF5, H2S, PH34.8 Although geometries of NH3 and H2O molecules are distorted tetrahedral, bond

angle in water is less than that of ammonia. Discuss.

4.9 How do you express the bond strength in terms of bond order ?

4.10 Define the bond length.

4.11 Explain the important aspects of resonance with reference to the 23

CO ion.

4.12 H3PO3 can be represented by structures 1 and 2 shown below. Can these twostructures be taken as the canonical forms of the resonance hybrid representingH

3PO

3? If not, give reasons for the same.

4.13 Write the resonance structures for SO3, NO

2and 3NO

.

4.14 Use Lewis symbols to show electron transfer between the following atoms to formcations and anions : (a) K and S (b) Ca and O (c) Al and N.

4.15 Although both CO2and H2O are triatomic molecules, the shape of H 2O molecule isbent while that of CO2is linear. Explain this on the basis of dipole moment.

4.16 Write the significance/applications of dipole moment.

4.17 Define electronegativity. How does it differ from electron gain enthalpy ?

4.18 Explain with the help of suitable example polar covalent bond.

4.19 Arrange the bonds in order of increasing ionic character in the molecules: LiF, K2O,N2, SO2and ClF3.

4.20 The skeletal structure of CH3COOH as shown below is correct, but some of thebonds are shown incorrectly. Write the correct Lewis structure for acetic acid.

4.21 Apart from tetrahedral geometry, another possible geometry for CH4is square planar

with the four H atoms at the corners of the square and the C atom at its centre.Explain why CH4is not square planar ?

4.22 Explain why BeH2molecule has a zero dipole moment although the BeH bonds arepolar.

4.23 Which out of NH3and NF3has higher dipole moment and why ?

4.24 What is meant by hybridisation of atomic orbitals? Describe the shapes of sp,sp2, sp3hybrid orbitals.

4.25 Describe the change in hybridisation (if any) of the Al atom in the followingreaction.

3 4AlCl Cl AlCl +

4.26 Is there any change in the hybridisation of B and N atoms as a result of the following


36/36


reaction ?

3 3 3 3BF NH F B.NH+ 4

4. chemical bonding and molecular structure

Documents