3.0 consumer panel

Upload: debasmita-nandy

Post on 04-Jun-2018

236 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    1/22

    1

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Consumer Panel

    Session 3

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    2/22

    2

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    IMRB Consumer Panel

    Definitions ..

    Universe Homes- Total No. of estimated households\Population in a particular zone\state\centre

    Penetration

    - Number of households which have purchased the respective segment\brand

    at least once in the give time period

    Average Consumption

    - Gives the per HH purchase in that period (i.e. ltrs purchased per Household)

    - Avg Cons(of category \segment\brand)= Total Volumes / Total Buying HHs

    Frequency of purchase

    - The average no of months in which the respective brand/segment has been

    purchased

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    3/22

    3

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    List of Analysis Penetration & Volume Trends

    - Monthly, Quarterly, Yearly

    Brand Health Report (BHP)

    - Holistic brand health report over any 2 time periods across Zones\ TCLs\SECs by:

    Penetration, Volumes/ Volume Share, Av. Consumption, Frequency of Purchase (FOP)

    Gain & Loss Analysis

    - Explains brands gains & losses by 4 parameters

    Entry Erosion

    - Gives an understanding of the consumer traffic by category\segment\ brands

    - Have retainers increased\decreased their consumption? What is the retention index?

    - Are new triers more than the lapsers?

    Whether new triers have more consumption level than the lapsers or vice versa

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    4/22

    4

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    List of Analysis Purchase Basket

    - Of Buyers, Retainers, New Triers, Lapsers of a Segment\Brand

    - Helps in understanding:

    Which other brands do they buy??

    How has the purchase basket of the buyer changed over two different time periods??

    Where have they come from??

    Which brands have they lapsed out to??

    Multiusership Analysis

    - Gives holistic picture of Solus / Dual / Multi usage between various Segments / Brands

    Profiling

    - Helps in knowing the demographic differences between various segments\brands\packs

    Cross Category Analysis

    - Various kinds of analyses possible across various FMCG categories

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    5/22

    5

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    List of Analysis

    Solus/Core/Non-core

    Measure of customer loyalty by the shares of their purchase baskets

    - Solus Users (Key Brand Buyers): Those HHs where 100% of the category requirement is met by

    that specific brand itself

    - Core Users (Main Brand Buyers):Those HHs where majority (more than 50% & less than 99%) of

    the category requirement is met by that particular brand

    - Non Core Users (Fringe Buyers):Those HHs where less than 50% of the category requirement is

    met by that particular brand

    Light Medium and Heavy

    It classifies the buyers based on the level of their contribution to the Category Volumes.

    - Heavy Buyers:Those 20% of HHs which contribute more than 50% of the total category volumes

    - Medium Buyers:Those 30% of HHs which contribute more than 30% of the total category volumes

    - Light Buyers:Those 50% of HHs which contribute more than 20% of the total category volumes

    Tag-Ons

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    6/22

    6

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Brand Health Parameter- For a Segment\Brand (AcrossSECs, TCLs, Zones)

    P1 P2 Index P1 P2 Index P1 P2 P1 P2

    TCl All 53 52 99 3091617 3017248 98 98 97 4.2 4.3

    % %

    40 lakhs + 79 80 101 60 61 98 139 136 5.1 5.1

    10 to 40 lakhs 54 53 97 15 15 96 94 93 4.2 4.35 to 10 lakhs 59 57 97 7 7 95 80 79 3.8 3.9

    1 to 5 lakhs 46 45 98 10 10 97 63 62 3.8 4.0

    Upto 1 lakh 31 29 96 7 7 97 41 42 2.6 2.9

    P1 P2 Index P1 P2 Index P1 P2 P1 P2

    SEC All 53 52 99 3091617 3017248 98 98 97 4.2 4.3

    % %

    SEC A 56 55 98 18 18 97 152 152 4.4 4.5

    SEC B 52 50 96 21 21 97 116 117 4.3 4.4

    SEC C 56 55 98 24 25 98 99 100 4.3 4.4

    SEC D/E 51 52 100 36 36 98 77 75 4.1 4.2

    P1 P2 Index P1 P2 Index P1 P2 P1 P2

    All India 53 52 99 3091617 3017248 98 98 97 4.2 4.3

    % %

    North 32 28 86 19 18 91 130 138 3.5 3.7

    East 51 53 103 9 9 98 59 56 3.8 3.8West 57 56 99 33 34 99 97 97 4.2 4.4

    South 67 68 101 39 39 99 101 100 4.6 4.7

    Penetration Volumes Avg Purchase FOP

    Avg Purchase FOPPenetration Volumes

    Avg Purchase FOPPenetration Volumes

    Branded Milk

    Brand performanceacross variousTown Classes

    Brand performanceacross various SECs

    Brand performanceacross various

    Markets

    Helps in determining the BrandPerformance on the basis of its

    Penetration, Volume share, consumption

    level & frequency of purchase

    P1: Apr 04-Sep 04P2: Oct 04-Mar 05

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    7/22

    7

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Penetration By FOP Matrix

    (Penetration, Volume Share, Avg Cons, FOP)

    (84, 31, 21, 4.8)

    (63, 16, 8, 3.9)

    (68, 14, 16, 3.3)

    (49, 11, 8, 2.3)

    (38, , 9, 3.1)(38, 5, 4, 2.8)

    Weak Markets for

    XXX brand vis--vis

    Competition

    Penetration

    FOP

    10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

    4.8

    AI Urban

    North Zone

    East Zone

    West Zone

    South Zone

    Delhi

    Pun/Har/Chn

    Rajasthan

    Uttar Pradesh

    West Bengal

    Bihar GuwahatiOrissa

    Maharashtra

    Gujarat

    Madhya Pradesh

    Tamil Nadu

    Karnataka

    Kerala

    Andhra Pradesh

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    8/22

    8

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Extent of Dual Usage

    Solus Branded

    20.5%

    (20.7)

    Solus Unbded

    22%

    (22)

    P 1 HHs: 57107.3 (000); Volumes: 2682801 Tonnes

    HHs: 57047 (000) Volumes: 2706667 TonnesP 2

    22.9%

    (22.6)

    Solus Branded

    21.4%

    21.3

    Solus Unbded

    Dual Buyers

    57.6 %

    57.3 (26.8+30.5)

    55.7%

    56.2 25.7+30.5

    Dual Buyers

    Solus Branded:12% & 10% growth

    in terms of penetration & volumes

    respectively

    Solus Unbranded:3% drop in

    terms of both penetration as well as

    volumesDual Homes:Declining but

    Unbranded oil gaining volumes in

    these homes

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    9/22

    9

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Gain & Loss- Four ways of Gaining/LosingBrand +\- Category +\-

    Consumption +\-Repertoire +\-

    A=10

    B=20

    Total=30

    A=15

    B=15

    Total=30

    A=

    Total=

    A=10

    Total=10

    A=10

    B=20

    Total=30

    A=15

    B=30Total=45

    A=10

    B=20

    Total=30

    A=10

    B=20

    C=10

    Total=40

    A gains 5 Tons from B

    C added to the basket

    without changing the

    consumption of other brands

    10 tons increase in

    consumption of brand B

    Buyers entering thecategory by brand A

    P1

    P2

    P1

    P2

    P1

    P2

    P1

    P2

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    10/22

    10

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    New Triers

    1981Avg Cons.

    0.045

    58%

    Retained

    Buyers

    Buyers in P1 2578 Buyers in P2

    4463 Avg Cons. 4558

    Avg Cons. P1 : 0.132 Avg Cons.

    0.111 P2 : 0.118 0.087

    42%

    Lapsed Buyers

    1885

    Avg Cons.

    0.083

    Entry Erosion- A look at the New Triers, Retainers &Lapsers

    Non Buyers of the brand inPeriod One & Buyers of the

    brandin Period Two

    Buyers of the brandinPeriod One & Non Buyersof the brandin Period Two

    Buyers of the brandinPeriod One as well as

    Period Two

    Percentage ofP1 buyersretained

    Percentage ofP1 buyerslapsed out

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    11/22

    11

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    LMH Usership

    57.2 56.4 58.3 65.4 62.6 58.1

    67.8 63.9

    27.5 27.2 25.322.8

    25.3

    2323

    15.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 9.2 13.1

    24.9

    12.511.8

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100%

    LEMON MANGO ORANGE COLA

    Light Medium Heavy

    22.4 18.731.2 30.2 32.9 25.4 24.1

    18.6

    30.428.6

    29.424.9 29.4 34.5

    26.2

    47.152.7

    39.445.2 41.4

    55.2

    32.5

    34.544.9

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100%

    LEMON MANGO ORANGE COLA

    HHs

    Vols (in Tons)

    9286 2597 4050 7173

    31040 3816 190337040

    8485

    42784

    6963

    24507 119840 115008

    19656 16384

    Helps in classifying the buyersin terms of LMH buyers

    Can profile these buyers, seewhich markets they come from,how does their purchase basket

    lookand many more!!

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    12/22

    12

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Solus Usership

    65.458.9

    78.971

    61.2 62.7

    19.5 26.5

    17.619.4

    7.1

    9.115.9

    25.6

    27

    17 21.7 14

    21.5

    54.946.4

    16.2

    22.619.9

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100%

    LEMON MANGO ORANGE COLA

    Fringe Core Solus

    5140.8

    81.1

    64.9

    49.5 53.8

    9.2 14.3

    35.7

    39.3

    12.2

    17.429

    37.1

    40.7

    13.319.9

    6.717.2

    53.745

    31.2

    19.317.7

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100%

    LEMON MANGO ORANGE COLA

    HHs

    Vols (in Tons)

    9286 2597 4050 7173

    31040 3816 190337040

    8485

    42784

    6963

    24507 119840 115008

    19656 16384

    Helps in classifying the buyersin terms of Solus\Core\Non

    Core buyers

    Can profile these buyers, seewhich markets they come

    from, how does their purchasebasket lookand many more!!

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    13/22

    13

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Tracking New Brand Launch

    0

    90

    180

    270

    360

    450

    Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05

    Cum New Trials Cum Repeats

    New Trial rate at 0.6% whereas the repeat rate for XXX brand at 13%

    Cum NT rate: 0.6%

    Cum RPT rate: 13%

    HHs(

    in

    000s)

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    14/22

    14

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Profile- Who are my XXX Brand Buyers???Universe Noodles Mother Brand New Variant

    TG Base (000s) 60,326 18,526 15,365 385

    % % % %

    SEC

    A 11 19 20 44

    B 19 25 26 23C 23 24 24 21

    D\E 48 33 32 12

    Town Class Level

    Metros 29 42 44 83

    10-40 L 16 17 16 8

    5-10 L 8 10 10 3

    1-5 L 19 15 15 6

    Upto 1 L 30 16 16 0

    Age of Housewife

    Upto 34 yrs 32 32 32 32

    35-44 yrs 30 31 31 30More than 45 37 37 37 39

    Household Size

    Upto 2 5 4 4 6

    3 to 4 39 43 43 54

    5 to 8 50 47 47 38

    More than 8 6 6 6 3

    Food Eating Habits

    Pure vegetarian 31 28 31 40

    Vegetarian but serve egg 5 5 5 7

    Non-vegeterian 64 67 64 53

    cabke & Satellite

    Non C&S 28 24 22 13

    C&S 59 70 73 87

    Presence of Children b\w

    Chl.01-02 yrs 11 11 11 7

    Chl.03-06 yrs 24 23 24 21

    Chl.07-14 yrs 48 48 48 49

    Chl.01-14 yrs 62 63 64 63

    HHs with Infants 3 2 2 2

    Source : IMRB

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    15/22

    15

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Subscription and repertoire markets

    Sharp and Wright (2000)

    Repertoire Marketsbuyers are not 100% loyal to the brand

    they hold personal repertoires of favourite

    brands

    A brands average buyer buys it less than 50% ofthe time

    Subscription Marketshigh levels of brand loyalty

    specific brand forms high share of categorypurchases

    buyers hold very small repertoires

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    16/22

    16

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Market share decomposition of a

    newly launched brand

    Reasons for poor market sharehigh trial but poor repeat purchase rate

    a low trial rate and a low repeat purchase ratea low trial rate but reasonably high repeat

    purchase rate

    The decomposition of market share intotrial and repeat purchases is crucial to

    answer success and failure questions

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    17/22

    17

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Clarke (1984), Rangan and Bell (1994)

    St=Tt+ FRt+ Art

    St = Cumulative Sales at time t

    Tt= Cumulative Triers at time t

    At = Cumulative number who have made at

    least one repeat at time t

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    18/22

    18

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Parfitt and Collins Model

    ms = t * r * bms = ultimate brand share

    t = ultimate trial rate of brand

    r = ultimate repeat purchase rate of brandb = buying rate index of repeat purchase of

    brand (where category buying rate = 1.0)

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    19/22

    19

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    Brand Loyalty

    rL 1

    LIndex of brand loyalty

    rthe size of the evoked

    brand set

    A A T A R M d l f I ti

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    20/22

    20

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    An A-T-A-R Model of Innovation

    Diffusion

    Profits = Units Sold x Profit Per Unit

    Units Sold = Number of buying units

    x % aware of productx % who would try product if they can get it

    x % to whom product is available

    x % of triers who become repeat purchasers

    x Number of units repeaters buy in a year

    Profit Per Unit = Revenue per unit - cost per unit

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    21/22

    21

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    a VNU business

    The A-T-A-R Model: Definitions

    Buying Unit: Purchase point (person or department/buyingcenter).

    Aware: Has heard about the new product with somecharacteristic that differentiates it.

    Available: If the buyer wants to try the product, the effort to find it

    will be successful (expressed as a percentage). Trial: Usually means a purchase or consumption of the product.

    Repeat: The product is bought at least once more, or (fordurables) recommended to others.

  • 8/13/2019 3.0 Consumer Panel

    22/22

    22

    Copyright 2003 ACNielsen

    VNU b i

    A-T-A-R Model Application

    10 million Number of owners of video cellphones

    x 40% Percent awareness after one year

    x 20% Percent of aware owners who will try product

    x 70% Percent availability at electronics retailers

    x 20% Percent of triers who will buy a second unit

    x Rs 500 Price per unit minus trade margins and

    discounts (Rs 5000) minus unit cost at the

    intended volume (Rs 4500)

    = Rs 56,000,000 Profits