3-d seismic imaging of complex intrusions · seismic surveys have also been used to help in the...

12
3-Dseismicimagingofcomplexintrusions 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions Hans-Henrik Westbroek and Robert R. Stewart ABSTRACT The goal of this research is to assess the feasibility of using 3-D seismology for the prospecting and delineation of ore bodies. Since 3-D seismic surveying has been successfully used to define many complicated geologic structures in the oil and gas industry, it would seem to be a very promising survey for hard rock environments. Due to the complexity of the structure, accurate migration of the data is critical for proper interpretation. The initial phase of this research is to compare 2-D and 3-D migration techniques on physical modeling data obtained from an extremely rugose target. A copper nugget was used as the target. The data obtained from the model showed many strong, heavily scattered reflections from the surface of the nugget. 2-D migration proved to be quite successful in delineating the bulk dimensions of the nugget and showing the surface profile. We anticipate that the 3-D migration will provide a more accurate image especially in terms of detail along the surface of the nugget. More structural information will be attained by taking time slices through the 3-D data volume. INTRODUCTION Common geophysical techniques used in the prospecting for ore bodies include magnetic, EM, gravity, resistivity and IP methods (Dobrin, 1976) as many ore bodies are characterized by high conductivity, high density, and high magnetic susceptibility because of the presence of magnetite as an associated or marker mineral. However, these methods are not always applicable as some ore zones are associated with structure which remains hidden by highly conductive overburden (Hearst et al., 1994). Furthermore, non-seismic methods may not provide accurate or unique images at the depths now required for mining. Seismic reflection surveys have played a large role in the exploration and development of hydrocarbons in the oil and gas industry. With the use of 3-D reflection seismic techniques, complex geological structures have been better resolved resulting in greater drilling success (Nestvold, 1992; Greenlee et al., 1994). It would seem, then, that 3-D seismic might have the same potential to resolve complex structure associated with intrusives and other geological settings in which ore bodies are found. Of course, seismic reflection surveys can only be effective where there is an appreciable variation in acoustic impedance such that reflections occur. Noponen (1979) demonstrated that this is true for crystalline rocks. In fact 2-D seismic surveying has already proven to be successful in these less traditional geological environments for seismic exploration. One of the first vibroseis reflection surveys at a mine site in North America was conducted at the Buchans mine in Newfoundland (Thurlow et al., 1992). The ore bodies consist of polymetallic sulfide deposits in a stratigraphic sequence of CREWESResearchReport Volume6 (1994) 16-1

Upload: others

Post on 27-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

3-Dseismicimagingof complexintrusions

3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions

Hans-Henrik Westbroek and Robert R. Stewart

ABSTRACT

The goal of this research is to assess the feasibility of using 3-D seismology forthe prospecting and delineation of ore bodies. Since 3-D seismic surveying has beensuccessfully used to define many complicated geologic structures in the oil and gasindustry, it would seem to be a very promising survey for hard rock environments. Dueto the complexity of the structure, accurate migration of the data is critical for properinterpretation. The initial phase of this research is to compare 2-D and 3-D migrationtechniques on physical modeling data obtained from an extremely rugose target.

A copper nugget was used as the target. The data obtained from the modelshowed many strong, heavily scattered reflections from the surface of the nugget. 2-Dmigration proved to be quite successful in delineating the bulk dimensions of the nuggetand showing the surface profile. We anticipate that the 3-D migration will provide amore accurate image especially in terms of detail along the surface of the nugget. Morestructural information will be attained by taking time slices through the 3-D datavolume.

INTRODUCTION

Common geophysical techniques used in the prospecting for ore bodies includemagnetic, EM, gravity, resistivity and IP methods (Dobrin, 1976) as many ore bodies arecharacterized by high conductivity, high density, and high magnetic susceptibilitybecause of the presence of magnetite as an associated or marker mineral. However,these methods are not always applicable as some ore zones are associated with structurewhich remains hidden by highly conductive overburden (Hearst et al., 1994).Furthermore, non-seismic methods may not provide accurate or unique images at thedepths now required for mining.

Seismic reflection surveys have played a large role in the exploration anddevelopment of hydrocarbons in the oil and gas industry. With the use of 3-Dreflection seismic techniques, complex geological structures have been better resolvedresulting in greater drilling success (Nestvold, 1992; Greenlee et al., 1994). It wouldseem, then, that 3-D seismic might have the same potential to resolve complex structureassociated with intrusives and other geological settings in which ore bodies are found.Of course, seismic reflection surveys can only be effective where there is an appreciablevariation in acoustic impedance such that reflections occur. Noponen (1979)demonstrated that this is true for crystalline rocks. In fact 2-D seismic surveying hasalready proven to be successful in these less traditional geological environments forseismic exploration.

One of the first vibroseis reflection surveys at a mine site in North America wasconducted at the Buchans mine in Newfoundland (Thurlow et al., 1992). The orebodies consist of polymetallic sulfide deposits in a stratigraphic sequence of

CREWESResearchReport Volume6 (1994) 16-1

Page 2: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

Westbroek and Stewart

volcanogenic felsic pyroclastic rocks which was structurally repeated many times bythrust faults. In this case, the seismic survey provided a cost-effective means to obtainvaluable knowledge of the Buchans structure. Direct detection of massive sulfidebodies has been attempted as well (Fais et al., 1991; Hearst et al., 1994). The Fais et al.(1991) experiment was quite successful (Figure 1) while Hearst et al. (1994) met withlimited success due in part to acquisition problems precipitated by extreme weatherconditions.

Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This isespecially true in the coal industry where seismic surveys are primarily used for mineplanning and safety rather than for the exploration of new coal fields (Gochioco, 1990;Lambourne et al., 1991). Seismic surveys have also been taken completely undergroundin a potash mine for this purpose (Gendzwill, 1993).

2-D seismic surveying is already prevalent as a technique for mineralprospecting so it would seem that the next logical step is the investigation andapplication of 3-D techniques for better refinement of complex structure. This paper isa first step in this investigation by studying the resolving capabilities of 3-D migrationversus 2-D migration for a complex target. This investigation is simplified by using adata set which was collected over a rugose target submerged in water.

DATA ACQUISITION

Acquisition of the data was performed in a small physical modeling tank. Acopper nugget, approximately 23 cm by 13.5 cm was used as the target (Figure 2).Figure 3 shows a schematic of the model setup including the tank, nugget and imagearea. The scale of the modeling tank is 1:10000. The acquisition parameters are listedin table 1. The survey was run in a single offset mode whereby the source and receiverwere placed next to each other in the inline direction and stepped to each station where ashot was recorded. To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, each shot was stacked 32times. This resulted in a 100% single-fold single-offset dataset. PVC foam was used toline the bottom of the tank in an attempt to lessen the effect of bottom reverberation.

ACQUISITION PARAMETERSSource Parametricstransducer(1MHz)Receiver Parametricstransducer(1MHz)

StationSpacing 20mLineSpacing 20mNo. of InlineTraces 100No. of Crossline Traces 180

SampleRate 1msNo. Samples per Trace 2000BinSize 20mby20mShotStacking 32Offset 220mDataset size (SEG-Y) 148MB

TABLE 1. Survey acquisition parameters scaled to field dimensions.

16-2 CREWESResearchReport Volume6 (1994)

Page 3: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

3-Dseismicimagingofcomplexintrusions

PROCESSING

The processing flow is relatively simple and includes application of the propershooting geometry, correction for spherical divergence, NMO correction to true zero-offset and migration (Figure 4). The relevant medium velocities are listed in Table 2.

Spherical divergence compensates for the geometric spreading of the sourceenergy from the shot point. NMO is applied to correct the data for the single offsetmoveout. The data is then migrated in a 2-D and 3-D sense and displayed. Variouslines within the dataset are compared before and after the migration algorithms havebeen applied. The 3-D migrated result will also be analyzed via an interpretationpackage for structure and time slices of the 3-D volume.

Figures 5 and 6 show Inline 90 and Crossline 50 as representative seismic linesfrom the raw data. Both are lines that run directly over the middle of the nugget. Theextent of scatter is easily seen. Figures 7 and 8 show the same sections respectivelyafter a 2-D migration algorithm has been applied. Note that the result gives good bulkdimensions of the nugget (length, width and height) as compared to the actual measureddimensions. The 3-D migrated results have yet to be produced for comparison.

Medium Velocity(m/s)

Water 1498

Copper 4658PVC foam 984

TABLE 2. Relevant medium velocities used for processing.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-D time migration algorithm applied to the two representative lines workedwell in determining the dimensions of the nugget. However, we anticipate that the 3-Dmigrated results will provide better results especially when time slices are provided ofthe data volume.

FUTURE WORK

The final stages of processing as described above will be completed shortly.Further research in this area will include similar studies on more realistic geologicmodels such as kimberlite pipes. Turning-ray migration may be useful in imaging thesides of these carrot-shaped structures. Full elastic 3D seismic surveying will beutilized in these studies. We also hope to acquire some real data for processing andinterpretation.

CREWESResearchReport Volume6 (1994) 16-3

Page 4: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

Westbroek and Stewart

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to extend our thanks to Mr. Eric Gallant for setting up the physicalmodel and collecting the data. Our appreciation to Mr. Glenn Larson and Mr. MarkLane for their helpful discussions during processing and preparation of this document.

REFERENCES and FURTHER READING

Dobrin, M.B., 1976, Introduction to geophysical prospecting, 3rd Ed., McGraw Hill.Doyle, H.A., 1990, Geophysical exploration for gold - A review, Geophysics, 55, 2, p. 134-146.Fais, S., Porceddu, E. and Tocco, R., 1991, High-resolution seismic reflection survey of a massive

sulfide orebody in Sardinia, Italy - An experiment, Ore Geology Reviews, 6, 1, p. 1-8.Gendzwill, D.J. and Brehm, R., 1993, High-resolution seismic reflections in a potash mine, Geophysics,

58, 5, p. 741-748.Greenlee, S.M., Gaskins, G.M. and Johnson, M.G., 1994, 3-D seismic benefits from exploration through

development: An Exxon perspective, The Leading Edge, July, p. 730-734.Gochioco, L.M., 1990, Seismic surveys for coal exploration and mine planning, Geophysics: The

Leading Edge of Exploration, 9, 4, p. 25-28.Hearst, R.B., Morris, W.A. and Scheick, D.G., 1994, Reflection seismic profiling for massive sulphides

in the Arctic, 64th Annual Meeting of the S.E.G., Technical Program Expanded AbstractsWith Authors' Biographies, p. 531-533.

Lambourne, A.N., Hatherly, P.J. and Evans, B.J., 1991, 3D Seismic Reflection: Examples of itsApplication to Mine Planning and Safety in Australian Coalfields, Exploration Geophysics,22, 1, p. 227-230.

Milkereit, B., Stumpel, H. and Rabbel W., 1986, Shear-wave reflection profiling for near-surface ligniteexploration, Geophysical Prospecting, 34, p. 845-855.

Nestvold, E.O., 1992, 3-D Seismic: Is the promise fulfilled?, Geophysics: The Leading Edge ofExploration, June, p. 12-19.

Noponen, I., Heikkinen, P. and Mehrotra S., 1979, Applicability of Seismic Reflection Sounding InRegions of PreCambrian Geology, Geoexploration 17, p. 1-9.

Thurlow, J.G. et. al., 1992, Geological interpretation of a high resolution seismic survey at Buchansmine, Newfoundland, Can. J. Earth Sci., 29, p. 2022-2037.

Yilmaz, O., 1987, Seismic data processing, SEG Investigations in Geophysics, Volume 2.

16-4 CREWES Research Report Volume 6 (1994)

Page 5: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions

I0 20 30 40 50 60 0.00

200

400

600

800

FIG. 1. Interpreted section from experimental survey showing top of the sulfide

orebody at a, bottom of the orebody at b and fracture zones F and F'. The otherreflectors labelled c, d andf are discussed in the text of Fais' (1991) paper.

CREWES Research Report Volume 6 (1994) 16-5

Page 6: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

Westbroek and Stewart

FIG. 2. Photograph of the copper nugget with transducers (top) and physical modelingtank set-up (bottom).

16-6 CHEWES Research Report Volume 6 (1994)

Page 7: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions

A

WATER SURFACE

NUGGET LOWVELOCITYPVC

/ OAMB

IMAGED

"! JAREA

NUGGET i_"

'_ i 7-

,_ ,o,ioe_o i - I _

' _i ,

o , l_-

.__

r I_ _ I

EDGEOFTANK .25c 13.5cm .25c XLINE

FIG. 3. Schematic diagram showing the acquisition set-up and actual dimensions incrossection (A) and plan view 03).

CREWES Research Report Volume 6 (1994) 16-7

Page 8: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

Westbroek and Stewart

GEOMETRY

SPHERICALDIVERGENCE

NMO

i cO EOTO12-D MIGRATION a-D MIGRATION

FIG. 4. Basic processing flow.

16-8 CREWES Research Report Volume 6 (1994)

Page 9: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions

CDP 8901 851::1 8921 853::1 8541 8951 8560 8970 8580 8990XLZ],II_.._0 I 6 11 16 21 2G 31 8E 41 48 51 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 50 $5

0

DIRECT 1ooARRIVAL

20O

300

4O0

50O

7O0

8O0

9O0

NUGGET looo

1100

1200

1300

BO'I-FOM 14oo

1500

1GO0

1700

1800

1500

FIG. 5. Inline 90 from the raw data. See Figure 3 for location. The data was cropped toa maximum sample length of 1995ms. The data have also been bandpassed filtered toeliminate noise. No AGC was applied.

CREWES Research Report Volume 6 (1994) 16-9

Page 10: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

Westbroek and Stewart

o

_-< w O

--_ _ 0,'7< Z m

Fig. 6. CrosslJne 50 from the raw data. See Figure 3 for its location. This data wastreated in the same manner as Inline 90 (Figure 5).

16-10 CREWES Research Report Volume 6 (1994)

Page 11: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions

CDP 1 11 _1 31 4_ 51 6_ 71 01 91

XL__R0 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 06 41 46 51 55 00 65 70 75 80 05 90 950

100

2OO

30O

400

SO0

GO0

700

000

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

1_00

1700

1800

1900

Inline 90 after time migration has been applied. It shows the width of the nuggetapproximately 13cm (in unscaled dimensions).

CREWES Research Report Volume6 (1994) 16-11

Page 12: 3-D seismic imaging of complex intrusions · Seismic surveys have also been used to help in the development of mine works. This is especially true in the coal industry where seismic

Westbroek and Stewart

Fig. 8. Crossline 50 after time migration has been applied. It shows the length of thenugget to be approximately 23cm and the height of the nugget to be 7.5cm at the highestpoint (dimensions not scaled).

16-12 CREWES Research Report Volume6 (1994)