2.basicconcepts

Upload: knyazev-danil

Post on 30-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    1/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    14

    Basic Geophysical Concepts

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    2/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    15

    where density K bulk modulus = 1/compressibility shear modulus Lam's coefficient E Young's modulus Poisson's ratio

    M P-wave modulus = K + (4/3)

    P wave velocity

    S wave velocity

    E wave velocity

    In terms of Poisson's ratio we can also write:

    Relating various velocities:

    Body wave velocities have form: velocity=modulusdensity

    Moduli from velocities:

    =

    VS2

    K = VP2

    4

    3

    VS

    2

    E= VE

    2M = V

    P

    2

    VP

    2

    VS

    2=

    2 1v( )(12v)

    VE

    2

    VP

    2 =

    1+ v( )(12v)(1 v)

    v =V

    P

    22V

    S

    2

    2(VP

    2V

    S

    2)=

    VE

    22V

    S

    2

    2VS

    2

    VP

    2

    VS

    2=

    4VE

    2

    VS

    2

    3VE

    2

    VS

    2

    VE

    2

    VS

    2=

    3V

    P

    2

    VS

    2 4

    VP

    2

    VS

    21

    VP

    =

    K+ (4 / 3)

    =

    + 2

    VS=

    VE=

    E

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    3/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    16

    The reflection coefficient of a normally-incident P-

    wave on a boundary is given by:

    where V is the acoustic impedance. Therefore,

    anything that causes a large contrast in impedance

    can cause a large reflection. Candidates include:

    Changes in lithologyChanges in porosity

    Changes in saturation

    Diagenesis

    We usually quantify Rock Physics relations in

    terms of moduli and velocities, but in the fieldwe might look for travel time or Reflectivity

    R = 2V21V1

    2V2+

    1V1

    1V1

    2V2

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    4/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    17

    In an isotropic medium, a wave that is incident on aboundary will generally create two reflected waves (oneP and one S) and two transmitted waves. The total sheartraction acting on the boundary in medium 1 (due to thesummed effects of the incident an reflected waves) mustbe equal to the total shear traction acting on the boundary inmedium 2 (due to the summed effects of the

    transmitted waves). Also the displacement of a point inmedium 1 at the boundary must be equal to the displace-ment of a point in medium 2 at the boundary.

    VP1, VS1, 1

    VP2, VS2, 2

    1

    1

    22

    ReflectedP-wave

    IncidentP-wave

    ReflectedS-wave

    Transmitted

    P-wave

    TransmittedS-wave

    N.4

    AVOAmplitude Variation with Offset

    Recorded CMP Gather Synthetic

    Deepwater Oil Sand

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    5/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    18

    AVO - Aki-Richards approximation:

    P-wave reflectivity versus incident angle:

    In principle, AVO gives us information aboutVp, Vs, and density. These are critical for

    optimal Rock Physics interpretation. Well

    see later the unique role of P- and S-wave

    information for separating lithology,

    pressure, and saturation.

    Intercept Gradient

    R01

    2

    VP

    VP

    +

    R() R0 +1

    2

    VP

    VP

    2V

    S

    2

    VP

    2

    + 2

    VS

    VS

    sin2

    +

    1

    2

    VP

    VP

    tan2 sin2[ ]

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    6/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    19

    Seismic Amplitudes

    Many factors influence seismic amplitude: Source coupling

    Source radiation pattern

    Receiver response, coupling, and pattern

    Scattering and Intrinsic Attenuation

    Sperical divergence

    Focusing Anisotropy

    Statics, moveout, migration, decon, DMO

    Angle of Incidence

    Reflection coefficient

    Source Rcvr

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    7/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    20

    Intervals or Interfaces?

    Crossplots or Wiggles?

    Interval Vp vs. Vs

    A

    B

    Rock physics analysis is usually applied to intervals, where

    we can find fairly universal relations of acoustic properties to

    fluids, lithology, porosity, rock texture, etc.

    In contrast, seismic wiggles depend on interval boundaries

    and contrasts. This introduces countless variations in

    geometry, wavelet, etc.

    Interval Vp vs. Phi

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    8/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    21

    Convolutional Model

    Impedance

    vs. depthReflectivity

    Convolve

    With

    wavelet

    Normal Incidence

    Seismic

    Normal incidence reflection seismograms can be

    approximatedwith the convolutional model. Reflectivity

    sequence is approximately the derivative of the

    impedance:

    Seismic trace is smoothed with the wavelet:

    R(t) 1

    2

    d

    dtln V( )

    S(t) w(t)R(t)

    Be careful of US vs. European polarity conventions!

    Rock properties

    in each small

    layer

    Derivatives of

    layerproperties

    Smoothed image

    of derivative ofimpedance

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    9/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    22

    Inversion

    Two quantitative strategies to link intervalrock properties with seismic:

    Forward modelingInversion

    We have had great success in applyingrock physics to interval properties.

    For the most part, applying RP directly tothe seismic wiggles, requires a modeling

    or inversion step.

    We often choose a model-based study,calibrated to logs (when possible) to

    Diagnose formation properties

    Explore situations not seen in the wellsQuantify signatures and sensitivities

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    10/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    23

    The Rock Physics Bottleneck

    SeismicAttributes

    TraveltimeVnmo

    Vp/Vs

    Ip,Is

    Ro, G

    AI, EIQ

    anisotropy

    etc

    Acoustic

    Properties

    Vp

    Vs

    Density

    Q

    Reservoir

    Properties

    PorositySaturation

    Pressure

    Lithology

    Pressure

    Stress

    Temp.

    Etc.

    At any point in the Earth, there are only 3(possibly 4) acoustic properties: Vp, Vs,

    density, (and Q).

    No matter how many seismicattributes we observe, inversions can

    only give us three acoustic attributesOthers yield spatial or geometric information.

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    11/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    24

    Problem of ResolutionLog-scale rock physics may be different

    than seismic scale

  • 8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts

    12/12

    Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko

    25

    Seismic properties (velocity, impedance,

    Poisson Ratio, etc) depend on pore pressure and stress

    Units of Stress:

    1 bar = 106 dyne/cm2 = 14.50 psi

    10 bar = 1 MPa = 106 N/m2

    1 Pa = 1 N/m2 = 1.45 10-4 psi = 10-5 bar

    1000 kPa = 10 bar = 1 MPa

    Stress always has units of force/area

    Mudweight to Pressure Gradient

    1 psi/ft = 144 lb/ft3

    = 19.24 lb/gal

    = 22.5 kPa/m

    1 lb/gal = 0.052 psi/ft