2.basicconcepts
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
1/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
14
Basic Geophysical Concepts
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
2/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
15
where density K bulk modulus = 1/compressibility shear modulus Lam's coefficient E Young's modulus Poisson's ratio
M P-wave modulus = K + (4/3)
P wave velocity
S wave velocity
E wave velocity
In terms of Poisson's ratio we can also write:
Relating various velocities:
Body wave velocities have form: velocity=modulusdensity
Moduli from velocities:
=
VS2
K = VP2
4
3
VS
2
E= VE
2M = V
P
2
VP
2
VS
2=
2 1v( )(12v)
VE
2
VP
2 =
1+ v( )(12v)(1 v)
v =V
P
22V
S
2
2(VP
2V
S
2)=
VE
22V
S
2
2VS
2
VP
2
VS
2=
4VE
2
VS
2
3VE
2
VS
2
VE
2
VS
2=
3V
P
2
VS
2 4
VP
2
VS
21
VP
=
K+ (4 / 3)
=
+ 2
VS=
VE=
E
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
3/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
16
The reflection coefficient of a normally-incident P-
wave on a boundary is given by:
where V is the acoustic impedance. Therefore,
anything that causes a large contrast in impedance
can cause a large reflection. Candidates include:
Changes in lithologyChanges in porosity
Changes in saturation
Diagenesis
We usually quantify Rock Physics relations in
terms of moduli and velocities, but in the fieldwe might look for travel time or Reflectivity
R = 2V21V1
2V2+
1V1
1V1
2V2
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
4/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
17
In an isotropic medium, a wave that is incident on aboundary will generally create two reflected waves (oneP and one S) and two transmitted waves. The total sheartraction acting on the boundary in medium 1 (due to thesummed effects of the incident an reflected waves) mustbe equal to the total shear traction acting on the boundary inmedium 2 (due to the summed effects of the
transmitted waves). Also the displacement of a point inmedium 1 at the boundary must be equal to the displace-ment of a point in medium 2 at the boundary.
VP1, VS1, 1
VP2, VS2, 2
1
1
22
ReflectedP-wave
IncidentP-wave
ReflectedS-wave
Transmitted
P-wave
TransmittedS-wave
N.4
AVOAmplitude Variation with Offset
Recorded CMP Gather Synthetic
Deepwater Oil Sand
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
5/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
18
AVO - Aki-Richards approximation:
P-wave reflectivity versus incident angle:
In principle, AVO gives us information aboutVp, Vs, and density. These are critical for
optimal Rock Physics interpretation. Well
see later the unique role of P- and S-wave
information for separating lithology,
pressure, and saturation.
Intercept Gradient
R01
2
VP
VP
+
R() R0 +1
2
VP
VP
2V
S
2
VP
2
+ 2
VS
VS
sin2
+
1
2
VP
VP
tan2 sin2[ ]
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
6/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
19
Seismic Amplitudes
Many factors influence seismic amplitude: Source coupling
Source radiation pattern
Receiver response, coupling, and pattern
Scattering and Intrinsic Attenuation
Sperical divergence
Focusing Anisotropy
Statics, moveout, migration, decon, DMO
Angle of Incidence
Reflection coefficient
Source Rcvr
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
7/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
20
Intervals or Interfaces?
Crossplots or Wiggles?
Interval Vp vs. Vs
A
B
Rock physics analysis is usually applied to intervals, where
we can find fairly universal relations of acoustic properties to
fluids, lithology, porosity, rock texture, etc.
In contrast, seismic wiggles depend on interval boundaries
and contrasts. This introduces countless variations in
geometry, wavelet, etc.
Interval Vp vs. Phi
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
8/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
21
Convolutional Model
Impedance
vs. depthReflectivity
Convolve
With
wavelet
Normal Incidence
Seismic
Normal incidence reflection seismograms can be
approximatedwith the convolutional model. Reflectivity
sequence is approximately the derivative of the
impedance:
Seismic trace is smoothed with the wavelet:
R(t) 1
2
d
dtln V( )
S(t) w(t)R(t)
Be careful of US vs. European polarity conventions!
Rock properties
in each small
layer
Derivatives of
layerproperties
Smoothed image
of derivative ofimpedance
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
9/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
22
Inversion
Two quantitative strategies to link intervalrock properties with seismic:
Forward modelingInversion
We have had great success in applyingrock physics to interval properties.
For the most part, applying RP directly tothe seismic wiggles, requires a modeling
or inversion step.
We often choose a model-based study,calibrated to logs (when possible) to
Diagnose formation properties
Explore situations not seen in the wellsQuantify signatures and sensitivities
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
10/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
23
The Rock Physics Bottleneck
SeismicAttributes
TraveltimeVnmo
Vp/Vs
Ip,Is
Ro, G
AI, EIQ
anisotropy
etc
Acoustic
Properties
Vp
Vs
Density
Q
Reservoir
Properties
PorositySaturation
Pressure
Lithology
Pressure
Stress
Temp.
Etc.
At any point in the Earth, there are only 3(possibly 4) acoustic properties: Vp, Vs,
density, (and Q).
No matter how many seismicattributes we observe, inversions can
only give us three acoustic attributesOthers yield spatial or geometric information.
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
11/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
24
Problem of ResolutionLog-scale rock physics may be different
than seismic scale
-
8/14/2019 2.BasicConcepts
12/12
Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko
25
Seismic properties (velocity, impedance,
Poisson Ratio, etc) depend on pore pressure and stress
Units of Stress:
1 bar = 106 dyne/cm2 = 14.50 psi
10 bar = 1 MPa = 106 N/m2
1 Pa = 1 N/m2 = 1.45 10-4 psi = 10-5 bar
1000 kPa = 10 bar = 1 MPa
Stress always has units of force/area
Mudweight to Pressure Gradient
1 psi/ft = 144 lb/ft3
= 19.24 lb/gal
= 22.5 kPa/m
1 lb/gal = 0.052 psi/ft