document26
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Three Dimensional CFD Analysis of
Backward Curved Radial Tipped Blade
Centrifugal Fan Designed as per Unified
Methodology with Varying Number of
Blades
N. Vibhakar #1
, S. D. Masutage#2
, S. A. Channiwala#3
#1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Sarvajanik College of Engineering & Technology, Surat – 395 001,
Gujarat, India, [email protected], Phone No. 0919428868858. #2
Mechanical Engineering Department, Sarvajanik College of Engineering & Technology, Surat – 395 001,
Gujarat, India, [email protected], Phone No. 0917567261003. #3
Mechanical Engineering Department, S. V. National Institute of Technology, Ichhchhanath, Surat - 395 007,
Gujarat, India, [email protected], Phone No.0919924166200.
Abstract The centrifugal fan designed by unified method is simulated using computational fluid
dynamics (CFD) approach. Fine mesh is generated for impeller blade zone to capture the
complex flow behaviour inside blades and mesh independency test is carried out for whole
computational domain. This three dimensional numerical analysis is steady and uses moving
reference frame (MRF) approach also known as frozen rotor method. Performance curves
are obtained under different variable inlet parameters like volume flow rate, rotational speed
and number of impeller blades. It is observed that number of blades increases, circulatory
flow reduces in blade passage and more energised flow develops. The recirculation and
separation phenomenon of fluid flow is observed inside centrifugal fan passages specifically
near tongue region. The results of this numerical analysis shows similar trend to standard
performance curves and validates unified design methodology. However, quantitative
agreement remains rather poor at off design condition.
Keywords: CFD, Centrifugal fan, Numerical simulation
#1
Corresponding Author
Nomenclature- As specified within text.
1.1 Introduction
The performance curves of a turbo machine can be obtained by theory, computation, and
by series of experiments. The experimental analysis is difficult, costly and time
consuming. To evaluate predicted performance of theoretical design, various
computational methods are available. They offer optimum design solutions without actual
fabrication or making prototypes which save time and expenditure.
Fluid passing through turbo machine or centrifugal fan in this case involves complex fluid
dynamics like flow separation, flow reversal, secondary flow, turbulent flow, boundary
layer effects, compressibility effects, heat transfer etc. This physics of flow can be
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 246
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
![Page 2: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
simulated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) softwares in discrete form of
calculations.
The most important and initial step in numerical simulation is geometry definition and grid
generation of computational domain. This process includes selection of grid types, grid
refinements and defining correct boundary conditions. Centrifugal fan involves flow
through rotating impeller and vaned or vaneless stationary diffuser. Meakhail and Park [1]
have studied the impeller-diffuser-volute casing interaction in centrifugal fan
experimentally and validated it numerically. They have used steady analysis results as an
initial parameter for unsteady analysis later on. Karnath and Sharma [2, 3] suggested
performance enhancement methods in blade passage of centrifugal fan using CFD
analysis. Trammel and Taulbee [4] had substituted blades by equivalent forces to avoid
time consumption and transient 3D simulation for their analysis of squirrel-cage blower.
Hassan, Sardar and Ghias [5] found large air flow deviation in test and CFD results at high
pressure and low air flow condition, using steady realizable k- model and concluded CFD
analysis to be more accurate for smaller mass flow rate. Steady-state interaction between
volute and impeller is studied by Fahua Gu, Engeda [6], using frozen rotor model and
explained the role of volute in reduced efficiency at off-design conditions. Power loss
occurs due to fluid drag on the reverse surface of the impeller back plate as rightly pointed
out by W.C. Osborne [7].
In this course of work, fan geometry is obtained as per unified design methodology
developed by Shah, Vibhakar and Channiwala [8]. CFD analysis carried out in this work is
to understand the volute-impeller interaction at design and off-design conditions under
varying mass flow rates, rotational speeds and number of blades. Steady, realizable k-
model with MRF approach is used to evaluate the flow behaviour inside centrifugal fan by
using ANSYS software.
2.1 Centrifugal Fan
The geometry of radial tipped backward curved centrifugal fan consisting inlet nozzle,
impeller (with 16 numbers of blades) and vaneless volute casing is shown in figure 1. The
blades are shrouded for mechanical strength and to reduce leakage losses between blades
and casing. Figure 2 shows wire meshing of centrifugal fan geometry.
Fig. 1 Wire Frame Diagram of Centrifugal Fan
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 247
![Page 3: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Fig.2 Wire Frame and Volume Meshed Diagram of Centrifugal Fan
Table 1 show the specifications of the centrifugal fan and Table 2 gives the input design
point parameters for the fan under consideration.
Table 1
Specification of the simulated Centrifugal Fan
Table 2
Input Design Point Parameters for centrifugal fan
Parameters Values
Discharge Q 0.5
m3/s
Differential pressure p 981.2
Pa
Impeller speed N 2800
rpm
Suction pressure at nozzle inlet -196.4
Parameters Dimensions
Inlet nozzle Inlet diameter dn in 174 mm
Inlet nozzle Outlet diameter dn
out
155 mm
Impeller Inlet diameter d1 155 mm
Impeller Outlet diameter d2 303 mm
Impeller Width b2 56 mm
Outlet section area h*w 346 *111
mm2
Blade Inlet blade angle 1 42.270
Blade Outlet blade angle 2 900
Blade Thickness tblade 2 mm
Volute Casing Inlet diameter d3 303 mm
Volute Casing Outlet diameter
d4
591 mm
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 248
![Page 4: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
psuction Pa
Fan inlet STP
3.1 Numerical Analysis
Numerical analysis software Gambit-FLUENT is used for this course of work. The Gambit
is a pre-processor, used for geometry and grid generation purpose. Tetrahedral elements
are used in all three zones of impeller, inlet nozzle and volute casing. After successful grid
generation, its independency test is carried out before proceeding for final simulation. Test
grid independency results are shown in fig. 3 graphically and numerically in Table 3.
Fig. 3 Mesh Independency Test
Table 3
mesh independency values
Mesh No. of mesh
elements
Pressure
ratio
a 219210 1.00788
b 419633 1.00825
c 869068 1.00824
d 1934222 1.008237
Figure 3 clearly indicates steady trend of pressure ratio after mesh b which is having
419633 numbers of tetrahedral elements and at pressure ratio 1.00825. Hence mesh b is
selected for further simulation work to reduce computational time, without affecting
optimum performance.
4.1 Simulation Parameters
Three dimensional simulation is carried out using ‘Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes’
equations (RANS) and ‘Realizable k- model’. This selected model gives superior
performance for flows involving rotation, separation and recirculation. The ‘standard’ wall
function is used to resolve the wall flows. The ‘SIMPLE’ algorithm is used for coupling
pressure and velocity.
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 249
![Page 5: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The discretization of pressure is done by using PRESTO scheme to obtain good results in
vortex flow field. The momentum, turbulent kinetic energy, turbulent dissipation rate and
energy are discretized using second order upwind method. The solution convergence
criterion is kept at maximum residuals of less than 10-5
.
The inlet nozzle and volute casing are stationary zones and impeller is a moving zone.
Being steady flow and very low pressure ratio in this case, moving reference frame (MRF)
approach is used to impose rotational field to impeller zone of centrifugal fan. The blades
are moving with a same rotational velocity as impeller zone by giving moving wall
condition with zero relative rotational speed to adjacent cell zone. Shadow wall method is
used as interior surface to create continuous flow path between moving and stationary
zones.
The mass flow rate is used as the inlet boundary condition at nozzle inlet and zero gradient
outflow condition is used at the casing outlet, assuming fully developed flow conditions.
At the inlet boundary condition, 5% turbulent intensity and 0.5 turbulent length scale is
applied, which is the cube root of domain volume and is used for turbulent specification
method. No-slip boundary condition is used for all the walls. The discharge is varied by
varying the input boundary condition i.e. mass flow rate at the nozzle inlet at the constant
rotational speed of impeller.
5.1 Results
The post processing work of this fan is done using FLUENT software. Inlet quantities are
calculated at the nozzle inlet plane and outlet quantities are calculated at the casing outlet
plane. Performance graphs are plotted in figure 3 by keeping rotational speed of impeller
constant and varying;
1. Number of impeller blades as 12, 16 and 24
2. Volume flow rate from 0.1 to 0.5 m3/sec
It is revealed from figure 3 (a) that static pressure decreases when discharge increases and
progresses to higher values with respect to increase in number of blades. This is because
pressure loss occurs within the blade passage due to flow separation. As number of blades
increases the flow within blades get more kinetic energy compared to fewer numbers of
blades. This extra kinetic energy increases the attachment of flow to the blade surface and
reduces flow separation effect. Design point change in static pressure is 981 Pa for 16
numbers of blades [8] and simulated result shows 834.7 Pa for similar conditions. This is
15% deviation between experiment and numerical results. Figure 3 (b) and 3 (c) shows
that when flow coefficient increases, pressure rise coefficient decreases and power
coefficient increases correspondingly. For 16 numbers of blades at design point discharge
0.5 m3/s, pressure rise coefficient reaches to 2.92 and power coefficient reaches at
maximum to 3.46 and subsequently decreases. Figure 3 (d) shows maximum total
efficiency 45.89%, which occurs at 0.25 flow coefficient.
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 250
![Page 6: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
(a)
(b)
(c)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7St
atic
Pre
ssu
re (
Pa)
Volume Flow Rate (m3/s)
z=12
z=16
z=24
Design point Z=16
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Pre
ssu
re R
ise
Co
eff
icie
nt
Flow Coefficient
z=12z=16z=24Design point Z=16
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Po
we
r C
oe
ffic
ien
t
Flow Coefficient
z=12
z=16
z=24
Design point Z=16
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 251
![Page 7: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
(d)
Fig 4. (a) Static pressure Vs. volume flow rate (b) Pressure rise coefficient Vs. flow
coefficient (c) Power coefficient Vs. flow coefficient (d) Efficiency Vs. flow coefficient
for constant rotational velocity N=2800 rpm with 12, 16 and 24 numbers of blades
with design point.
The figure 5 shows the effect of varying rotational speed while 16 numbers of blades kept
constant. As per figure 4(a), the static pressure increases till the rotational speed
approaches design point speed. This is for the reason that, impeller blade profile is
designed for specific set of input parameters. Its performance deviates at off design
conditions and turbulence losses increases due to rotation of flow within blade passage.
Volume flow rate and rise in static pressure difference across the fan directly proportionate
to rotational speed till design conditions. Afterwards they remain constant for same
geometry. Dimensionless coefficients such as pressure rise coefficient, power coefficient
and efficiency are almost unaffected near design flow coefficient and has different values
at lower and higher flow coefficients (fig. 4 (b), (c) and (d)).
(a)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5Ef
fici
en
cy
Flow Coefficient
z=12z=16z=24Design point Z=16
0
250
500
750
1000
1250
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Stat
ic P
ress
ure
(P
a)
Volume Flow Rate (m 3/s)
N = 2500
N = 2650
N = 2800
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 252
![Page 8: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig 5. (a) Static pressure Vs. volume flow rate (b) Pressure rise coefficient Vs. flow
coefficient (c) Power coefficient Vs. flow coefficient (d) Efficiency Vs. flow coefficient
for 2500,2650 and 2800 rpm keeping no. of blades Z=16 constant
Efficient energy transfer in a centrifugal fan depends upon proper blade profile, gradual
change in area of volute casing and smooth surface finish. For such energy transfer Flow
lines must be parallel to each other and should generate streamlined flow within guided
three dimensional passages.
Figure 6 shows the streamlines in simulated centrifugal fan at mid-plane surface. The
streamlines remains parallel except near tongue region. Tongue obstruction creates flow
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6P
ress
ure
Ris
e C
oe
ffic
ien
tFlow Coefficient
N = 2500
N = 2650
N = 2800
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Po
we
r C
oe
ffic
ien
t
Flow Coefficient
N=2500
N=2650
N=2800
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Effi
cie
ncy
Flow Coefficient
N=2500
N=2650
N=2800
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 253
![Page 9: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
deviation and change in local velocity and also generates recirculation of flow. Flow
rotation within blade passage is also observed.
Fig 6 Streamlines at mid-plane iso-surface in simulated centrifugal fan for Z=16
The figure 7 shows velocity contours at mid-plane of an impeller varying blades in step of
12, 16 and 24 keeping rotation speed constant as 2800 rpm and at constant discharge
Q=0.5 m3/s.
As numbers of blade increases, fluid is efficiently guided within blade passage and vortex
region seen near tongue region also decreased. The large velocity region seen near
impeller zone suggests higher energy conversion in impeller and as per Austin Church [9],
it is advantageous to have large part of the total head developed from impeller.
Z=12
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 254
![Page 10: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Z=16
Z=24
Fig 7 Velocity contours at mid plane for Q=0.5 m3/s, N=2800 rpm and Z=12, Z=16
and Z=24
Here casing is designed by four arcs method which generates large exposure to flow at
exit. This tends to permit reversal of flow at fan outlet. As a result, large velocity
difference regions are observed near volute casing exit in velocity contours. Basic
intention of large exit area is to permit free vortex flow within entire casing volume. This
happens only at design point condition but at off design conditions it creates tendency of
retardation of flow and results in eddy formation within flow.
6.1 Conclusions
1.The results of numerical analysis, clearly follows the standard performance curves of a
centrifugal fan. Present numerical analysis is closer to design point parameters, for
centrifugal fan under study.
2.The mean pressure distribution around the volute casing is not uniform and jet and
wakes are observed in the vicinity of tongue region. Since the flow is considered
incompressible, pressure fluctuations at impeller outlet region is affecting flow around
impeller zone.
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 255
![Page 11: Document26](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081202/55cf9ba1550346d033a6c8ba/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
3.The flow phenomenon of recirculation near tongue region is confirmed by numerical
analysis.
4.The exact amount of circulatory flow depends upon the shape of the blade passage. For a
given impeller more vanes make the passage narrower giving greater guidance to the
fluid and reducing the circulatory flow effect. Hence all the quantities varying with flow
coefficient are increased as the number of blades increases.
5.The streamlines clearly shows the rotating effect of blades on flow, within and outside of
impeller zone, which is imposed using MRF approach.
6.The numerical analysis shows that, for efficient energy transfer i.e. to achieve optimum
performance in centrifugal fan designed by unified methodology number of blades
should increase.
Acknowledgments
We are sincerely thankful to our institutes and management for permitting us to use
infrastructure, library and computational resources.
References
[1] Meakhail T. and Park S. O., A study of impeller-diffuser-volute casing interaction in a
centrifugal fan, Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 127, pp. 84-90, January 2005.
[2] Karanth K. V. and Sharma N. Y., Numerical analysis on the effect of varying number of
diffuser vanes on impeller-diffuser flow interaction in a centrifugal fan, World Journal
of Modeling and Simulation, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 63-71, 2009.
[3] Karanth K. V. and Sharma N. Y., Numerical Analysis of a Centrifugal Fan for
Improved Performance using Splitter Vanes, World Academy of Science, Engineering
and Technology, pp. 453-459, 2009.
[4] Tremmel M. and Taublee D. B., Calculation of the time averaged flow in squirrel-cage
blowers by substituting blades with equivalent forces, Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol.
130, pp. 031001-1-- 031001-11, July 2008.
[5] Hassan M. B., Sardar A. and Ghias R., CFD simulations of an automotive HVAC
blower operating under stable and unstable flow conditions, SAE International 2010.
[6] Fahua Gu and Abraham Engeda, A numerical investigation on the volute/impeller
steady-state interaction due to circumferential distortion, Proceedings of ASME
TURBO EXPO 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 2001-GT-0328, June 4-7, 2001.
[7] W. C. Osborne, Fans, 2nd
edition, PERGAMON press, 1977.
[8] Shah K. H., Vibhakar N. N. and Channiwala S. A. Unified design and comparative
performance evaluation of forward and backward curved radial tipped centrifugal fan,
Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering 2003
(ICME2003), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 26- 28 December 2003.
[9] A. H. Church, Centrifugal Pumps & Blowers, Robert E. Krieger publishing company,
1972.
[10] FLUENT user guide 6.3, ANSYS Inc.
International Journal of emerging trends in engineering and development Issue 2, Vol.1 (Jan-2012) ISSN 2249-6149
Page 256