220 kv substations at rangala rajpur...

Draft Resettlement and Rehabilitation Action Plan – Package G 2 Substation Haryana Power System Improvement Project

HARYANA POWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

RESETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION ACTION PLAN

PACKAGE G-2

220 KV SUBSTATIONS AT

RANGALA RAJPUR (MEWAT DISTRICT) &

SAMAIN (FATEHABAD DISTRICT)

for

HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITED

January 2009

Prepared by

5th Floor, Tower C, DLF Building No.8, Cyber city Phase II

Gurgaon 122 022 (Haryana), India Tel.(91) 124 4380042, 4501100 Fax.no. (91) 124-4380043

Email: [email protected] Web: www.smec.com.au/india

RP769v2

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

mailto:[email protected]�


TTTAAABBBLLLEEE OOOFFF CCCOOONNNTTTEEENNNTTTSSS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................ 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 5CHAPTER -1: INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 7

1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 71.2 The Proposed Project ............................................................................................... 71.3 Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited ................................................................. 71.4 Sub-Project Package G-2 (220 KV Sub-Stations) ..................................................... 81.5 Measures Taken to Minimize Impacts ...................................................................... 81.6 Objectives and Scope of the Study ........................................................................... 91.7 Approach and Methodology ..................................................................................... 91.8 Structure of the Report ........................................................................................... 10

CHAPTER -2: PROFILE OF THE PROJECT AREA ........................................................................ 122.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 122.2 Profile of Mewat District ....................................................................................... 122.3 Profile of Fatehabad District .................................................................................. 13

CHAPTER -3: LAND ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ...................................... 163.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 163.2 220 KV Sub-Station at the Village – Rangala Rajpur, Mewat district ..................... 163.3 220 KV Sub-Station at Samain village, Fatehabad district ...................................... 20

CHAPTER – 4: IMPACT ON AFFECTED PERSONS ....................................................................... 234.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 234.2 Impact on Rangala Rajpur village .......................................................................... 234.3 Impact on Samain village ....................................................................................... 24

CHAPTER – 5: COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS ......................................................................... 255.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 255.2 Perceptions towards the Project at Rangala Rajpur village ..................................... 255.3 Perceptions towards the Project at Samain (Tohana) .............................................. 29

CHAPTER – 6: RESETTLEMENT POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ........................................... 336.1 Policy, Legal and Regulatory Framework .............................................................. 336.2 Procedure for Land Acquisition ............................................................................. 336.3 World Bank Operational Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12) ................. 356.4 HVPNL Environment and Social Policy and Procedures ........................................ 366.5 Social Entitlement framework ................................................................................ 37

CHAPTER – 7: COMPENSATION AND ASSISTANCE ................................................................... 427.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 427.2 Compensation for Rangala Rajpur village .............................................................. 427.3 Compensation for Samain Village .......................................................................... 42

CHAPTER – 8: INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS AND GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISMS .. 438.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 438.2 Institutional Framework ......................................................................................... 438.3 Social Procedures ................................................................................................... 448.4 Capacity Building .................................................................................................. 458.5 Grievance Redress Mechanism .............................................................................. 46

CHAPTER – 9: BUDGET ESTIMATES ........................................................................................ 48


9.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 489.2 Costs ...................................................................................................................... 48

CHAPTER – 10:IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ......................................................................... 5010.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 5010.2 Implementation issues and Schedule ....................................................................... 50

LLLIIISSSTTT OOOFFF AAANNNNNNEEEXXXUUURRREEESSS Annexure 1: Focus Group Discussion with key members ..................................................... 52Annexure 2: Consultation Checklist ..................................................................................... 58Annexure 3: Mewat – Statistics at a Glance .......................................................................... 60Annexure 4: Census/Socio Economic Survey Questionnaire ................................................ 61Annexure 5: Resolution of Dhanvala Panchayat for transfer of Panchayat land for the Construction for 220KV substation in Rangala Rajpur, Mewat ............................................. 66Annexure 6: Copy of Resolution Passed by the Panchayat, Samain ...................................... 69Annexure 7: Circular with applicable circle rate for Mewat and Fatehabad districts ............. 73


LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

BPL Below Poverty Line

ESMC Environment and Social Management Committee

ER&RC Environmental Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee

ESIU Environmental and Social Implementation Unit

ESPP Environmental and Social Policy and Procedures

GOI Government of India

GRC Grievance Redressal Committee

HH Household

HPGCL Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited.

HVPNL Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited

KV Kilo volts

IT Information Technology

LAA Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1984)

OP Operational Policy

PAF Project Affected Families

NGO Non Government Organization

NRRP National Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy 2007

PAF Project Affected Family

RRAP Resettlement and Rehabilitation Action Plan

ROW Right of Way

SAMP Social Assessment and Management Plan

SC Scheduled Castes

WB World Bank


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The proposed project – Haryana Power System Improvement Project, funded by the World Bank and implemented by Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited (HVPNL), aims to improve the accountability, efficiency and quality of electricity services in Haryana through investments in power supply infrastructure, training/capacity building and technology-transfer, and overall institutional strengthening. Scope of the Resettlement Plan This plan looks into the land acquisition issues and other impacts through social analysis. Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan has been prepared for G-2 Package consisting of two 220 KV sub-stations in Firozepur Zirka in Mewat district and Samain in Fatehabad district of Haryana. The Report is prepared for the Project in compliance with the Environment and Social Policy and Procedures (ESPP) of the HVPNL. Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement HVPNL in its attempt to locate an ideal spot for siting of the sub-station had identified two different options. For the sub-station in Firozepur Zirka, one of the sites was the finalized site on the available Panchayat land at village Rangala Rajpur. The other option was near the foothill of the Aravalli range that forms the backdrop of this village. In the first option, the site identified is barren land located on the main road, whereas the second site was away from the main road and also had physical constraints. The land required for sub-station is 16 acres. The 220 KV sub-station site has avoided impact on the habitations, agricultural land, residential and commercial areas. The impact is minimized while selecting the site. Now the impact is only on 16 acres of barren land available with the Panchayat. Since land identified in Rangala Rajpur village in Firozpur Zirka is located on the Delhi-Alwar Highway, the land requirement for temporary access tracks is avoided. Panchayat vide a resolution has agreed to give the required 16 acres of land. More importantly in context of project implementation, there are no strings attached to the transaction. For the sub-station at Samain in Fatehabad district, barren land belonging to Panchayat was finalized. Alternative was dropped due to its location in the interior. The proposed 220 KV Sub-station at the village Samain, Tohana would be a key substation. Its’ siting is consistent with the principle defined in HVPNL’s Environmental and Social Policy and Procedures (ESPP) that lays emphasis on avoidance, mitigation and alleviation. Panchayat vide a resolution has agreed to give the required 16.6 acres of land. However, the community expects uninterrupted power supply after the completion of the project in lieu of the cooperation extended by them. During the social impact assessment, it was confirmed that as a loss of this barren, uncultivable land, there shall be no displacement of any person, any adverse impacts on vulnerable group of persons, or any loss of livelihood or common property resource at both sites. Community Consultations The consultations were used as an important tool to gauge people’s perceptions and record their views with reference to the important infrastructure development in their area. Consultations were conducted with the Panchayat, village community and women group. Consultation with Panchayat brought forth that the land is being given to HVPNL and in lieu of that they will be compensated as per the policy. However, the resolution does not mention the compensation and assistance amount. The outcomes of these consultations indicated that while these sub-stations would not help address the many development challenges these villages face, they certainly shall help alleviate a few. With regard to the proposed sub-station discussions indicated that more reliable power supply would prove immensely beneficial to children for their education, for water supply for domestic and agricultural use. Besides, it would bring down the household expense on Kerosene. Overall expectations of development as a result of the sub-station too were said to be


high. Women groups were particularly positive about the impacts and mentioned that overall it would benefit them in their household work and children can study in the night. Resettlement Principles and Policy Framework This project is based on the resettlement principles of avoidance, minimization and alleviation. Among other principles, special attention has been paid for the improvement in living standards of marginalized and vulnerable groups and ensures delivery of R&R entitlements and compensation for lost assets based on HVPNL’s entitlement framework. This project has taken into account the HVPNL’s Environment and Social Policy and Procedures, which cover the mandatory social requirements for HVPNL transmission works including Land Acquisition Act 1894, Haryana Government Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy for land acquisition, WB OP 4.12 involuntary resettlement and WB OP 4.10 Indigenous People. The National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy 2007 also has been consulted while framing the ESPP. Public is informed about the project at every stage of execution by press notes and media release. During socio-economic survey taken up in parallel with land acquisition process, HVPNL’s site officials met people and inform them about the Land acquisition details, proposed R&R measures and compensation packages. Entitlement Framework HVPNL’s framework is to ensure realistic rehabilitation and compensation of the acquired assets of the affected assets covering categories such as loss of land (homestead land, agriculture land, tenants, lease-holders, encroachers/ squatters etc), loss of structure ( with valid title, tenants, lease holders, squatters, cattle sheds, workshop sheds etc.), loss of livelihood, loss of standing crops/ trees, loss of access to common property resources (CPR) and facilities, losses to host communities, Panchayat land and additional benefits for vulnerable persons. The entitlements for this project comply with the ESPP framework. In this project only transfer of Panchayat land has been covered as per the entitlement framework. Institutional Framework and Grievance Redressal A three-tier set up is proposed in the ESPP of HVPNL viz., Divisional, Zonal and at Headquarters, comprising of Officials at respective levels. At the Head Quarter Level it is Environment, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Committee (ERRC), at Zonal level it is Environment and Social Monitoring Committee (ESMC), and at the Division level it is Environment and Social Implementation unit (ESIU). Grievances, if any, will be first addressed by the ESMC. Compensation and Budget Estimates The budget estimates have been based on the provisions of the ESPP’s entitlement framework. Only transfer of land has been accounted for as per the framework as compensation to the Panchayat at circle rate. Budget has been worked out for both the substations. For Rangala Rajpur 220 KV it has been worked out at Rs. 2,68,80000/- (Rupees Two Crore Sixty Eight Lakhs Eighty Thousand) Only. For Samain substation the budget has been estimated at Rs. 1,30,77,225 (Rupees One Crore Thirty Lakhs Seventy Seven Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty Five) only. The total budget for this package comes to Rs. 3,99,57,225/- (Rupees Three Crores Ninety Nine Lakhs Fifty Seven Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty Five) Only.


CHAPTER -1: INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY

1.1 Background The state of Haryana in Northern India is located strategically close to the National Capital –

New Delhi and one third of its area falls within the National Capital Region (NCR). Its’

bordered by Himachal Pradesh and Punjab to the north and by Rajasthan to south and west.

Its’ borders to Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal to the East are defined by the river Yamuna. The

capital of the state is Chandigarh, which is administered as a Union Territory and, is also the

capital of Punjab.

With a population of 21 million people, it is one of the fastest growing economies in India.

The state’s gross state domestic product (GSDP) grew by 7.6% during the period 2003 - 2007

and is expected to grow by 11% during next five years as per Eleventh Five Year Plan.

Traditionally an agrarian economy, and originally as part of Punjab, the state was a pioneer of

green revolution with a significant portion of its economy and population dependent on

agriculture (and in turn on power supply for ground water extraction). Southern part of the

State that falls under the National Capital Region (NCR) has experienced exceptional growth

in industrial activity, particularly in sectors such as automobiles, textile and ready-made

Garments and IT.

1.2 The Proposed Project The proposed project – Haryana Power System Improvement Project, funded by the World

Bank, would aim to improve the accountability, efficiency and quality of electricity services

in Haryana through investments in power supply infrastructure (and demand-side measures),

training/capacity building and technology-transfer, and overall institutional strengthening.

Major objectives include improving service delivery, enhancing operational efficiency and

institutional capacities.

1.3 Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited In 1998, the Haryana State Electricity Board (HSEB) was re-organized into State owned

corporation namely Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited (HVPNL) for Transmission and

Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited (HPGCL). HPGCL was made responsible

for operation and maintenance of State’s own power generating stations. HVPNL was

entrusted the power transmission and distribution functions. Simultaneously, an independent


regulatory body i.e. Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (HERC), was constituted to

aid and advise the State Government on the development of the power sector, to regulate the

power utilities and take appropriate measures to balance the interest of various stake-holders

in the power sector, namely electricity consumers, power entities and generation companies

etc.

HVPNL was further reorganized on July 1, 1999 by carving out two more Corporations,

namely Utter Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (UHBVNL) and Dakshin Haryana Vitran

Nigam Ltd. (DHBVNL) with the responsibility of distribution and retail supply of power

within their jurisdiction. While UHBVNL is responsible for Panchkula, Ambala,

Yamunanagar, Kurukshetra, Kaithal, Karnal, Panipat, Sonepat, Rohtak, Jhajjar and Jind

districts, DHBVN caters to Hisar, Fatehabad, Bhiwani, Sirsa, Faridabad, Gurgaon, Mewat,

Rewari and Narnaul districts.

In response to the power demand of Haryana that on an average has been of the order of 7 to

8% in the past, but now is the range of 14% for the state as a whole and between 20-25% in

certain pockets like Gurgaon, HVPNL has made a comprehensive transmission program. The

program proposes power load growth and evacuation of the proposed capacity addition of

power at an estimated cost of Rs. 7643 crore during the 11th

1.4 Sub-Project Package G-2 (220 KV Sub-Stations)

Five year plan. Under this

program HVPNL will undertake construction of new sub-stations; installations of additional

transformers, laying of new transmission lines interlinking of lines of existing substations.

Package G-2 comprises two sub-stations – one at Rangala Rajpur village, in Ferozepur Zirka

sub-district of Mewat district and the other at Samain village, in Tohana sub-district of

Fatehabad district. Both these sub-stations shall cater to the needs of respective districts. The

present report comprises the findings of the social assessment for the affected area and its

inhabitants, prepared in conformity with the provisions of the Resettlement and Rehabilitation

Policy of the HVPNL and the World Bank Operational Policies (OP 4.12).

1.5 Measures Taken to Minimize Impacts In line with the principles of HVPNL R&R policy of avoidance, minimization and alleviation,

efforts were made to minimize the adverse impacts of the project, while selecting the site.

Weightage is given to various parameters for finalizing alternative sites, which include:

• availability of infrastructure facilities such as access roads, railheads, etc.;

• types of land viz government, revenue, private, agriculture;


• number of families; and

• cost of compensation and rehabilitation.

1.6 Objectives and Scope of the Study The main objective of the study was to:

• to identify the impacts of land acquisition and other adverse impacts for various civil

works on the people who own properties to be acquired or used for the project; and

• present an action plan for delivery of compensation and assistances outlined in the

policy to the persons identified as entitled to such assistance.

Scope of the study

The scope of the present study relates to a comprehensive survey for this sub-stations

which included:

a) identifying potentially affected populations with special attention to vulnerable group

such as indigenous/tribal populations, scheduled caste, landless households and

women headed/physically handicapped households.

b) gathering information on various categories of losses and other adverse impact likely

under the project. These include:

• loss of land and other productive assets such as trees;

• loss of structures, temporary or fixed;

• loss of access to public services (roads, drinking water, schools, medical, etc);

• loss of access to common property resources; and

• disruption of social, cultural, religious or economic ties and networks.

1.7 Approach and Methodology Approach and methodology mainly consist of qualitative and quantitative tools and

techniques. The study was conducted in three phases.

Phase I: Pre-survey Activities:

Various social research tools were employed to ensure that all issues relating to the study are

adequately addressed. The entire exercise was carried out through an appropriate mix of

social research techniques including desk research through review of information available

with HVPNL. Structured and semi-structured interviews, group discussions with the affected

people and relevant government agencies and community were undertaken. The study used

This involved collection of documents from the client that

included collection of land acquisition details and other relevant maps. The phase was

important to identify and collect the available literature and to scope the activities.


participatory instruments to collect information for the different stakeholders involved under

the project. The Questionnaires and Checklist for FGDs are presented in the Annexure-2.

Phase II: Survey Activities: As there is no loss of land to any individual, the socio-economic

survey using the questionnaire was not necessary. However, consultations were held with

concerned village panchayat officials to document their views. The consultations included

FGD with various groups, knowledgeable persons, village heads and women. It was sought to

elicit their expectations and suggestions, willingness to contribute, their perception of the

project and likely benefits that are to accrue to them.

1.8 Structure of the Report

Phase III: Post Survey Activities – Analysis and Reports

The information collected through structured interviews was cross-validated, analyzed and

recorded. Wherever required, the observations are supported from the information collected

through desk research.

The Chapterisation plan for this Resettlement and Rehabilitation Plan is given below: Chapters Title of Chapter Brief Description of Contents

1 Introduction and Methodology Project description, details on land and methodology adopted

2 Profile of Project Area Districts profiles of Mewat and Fatehabad (inclusive of Population, social composition, education, work force etc.) Impacted villages and their socio-economic profile covering Population, gender, workers, literacy, unemployment and Land use

3 Land Acquisition and Analysis of Alternatives

Adverse/positive Impacts on land/private properties/common property resource; Alternatives; Landholding size

4 Impact of the project Social impact assessment of the affected villages 5 Community Consultations

Details on the community consultation with Women and other groups and findings

6 Resettlement Policy and Legal Framework and Mitigation measures

HVPNL policy and entitlements and its applicability

7 Compensation and Assistance

Adverse impacts and mitigation measures as per entitlements/Land transfer/Lease etc.

8 Institutional Arrangements & Grievance Redress Mechanisms

Mechanisms for implementation, and grievance redressal

9 Costs and Budget

Estimate for implementation of RRAP

10 Implementation Schedule Time duration for implementation of RRAP

Annexures


Chapters Title of Chapter Brief Description of Contents

Annexure 1: Focus Group Discussion with village members Annexure 2: Consultation Checklist Annexure 3: Mewat – Statistics at a Glance Annexure 4: Census/Socio Economic Survey Questionnaire Annexure 5(A): Letter for transfer of Panchayat land for the Construction for 220KV substation in Rangala Rajpur, Mewat Annexure 5(B): Copy of Resolution Passed by the Panchayat, Rangala Rajpur and Samain Annexure 6: List of Attendees


CHAPTER -2: PROFILE OF THE PROJECT AREA

2.1 Introduction This chapter provides an overview of the two districts – Mewat and Fatehabad and particulars

on the specific project area impacted by the two sub-stations under Package G-2 i.e. 220 KV

Sub-stations at Rangala Rajpur village, Ferozepur Zirka sub-district of Mewat district, and at

Samain village, sub-district Tohana of Fatehabad district.

2.2 Profile of Mewat District The state of Haryana at the time of its formation had seven districts. Subsequently, over the

period, thirteen new districts were notified from time to time by changing boundaries of the

existing districts. District Mewat was carved out from erstwhile Gurgaon and Faridabad

districts, and came into existence on April 4th 2005 as the 20th district of the Haryana State.

Its location is shown in Figure 2.1. It comprises three sub-divisions namely Nuh, Ferozepur

Zirka and Hathin with district headquarter at Nuh. The district comprises of six blocks namely

Nuh, Tauru, Nagina, Firozpur Jhirka, Punhana and Hathin. Of the total 532 villages in the

district 27 villages are either un-inhabited or are under the jurisdiction of Municipal

Committees. The district has remained a backward district almost on every development

indicator.

2.2.1 Population Profile

Census of India 2001, put the total

population of Mewat district at 9,93,617

with the number of households at 1,42,822.

Notable feature of the break-up of the

population is that only 4.64% live in the

urban areas while the majority of the

population i.e. 9,47,495 (95.36%) live in

rural areas. The SC population in the

district is around 8%.

Figure 2.1: Map of Mewat District in Haryana


Table 2.1 below provides a comparative view of sex ratio and literacy in Mewat district and

Haryana as a whole. Table 2.1 – Comparative view of Sex ratio and literacy in Mewat and Haryana

Item Mewat Haryana

Sex ratio 894 867

Literacy 44.07 67.91

Source: Census of India, 2001

2.2.2 Occupational Profile

Land based activities – agriculture, allied and agro-based activities form the core of

occupation of the people of this district. Meos (Muslims) form the predominant population

group. The survey findings corroborated past impression as the team noted that vast stretches

of the district are dotted with agricultural fields. Except in small pockets where canal

irrigation is available, agriculture in Mewat is mostly rain fed. Past studies have indicated

that agriculture production measured in terms of crop yield per hectare is lower compared to

the other districts of the State. Farmers collectively sell the produce in nearby markets of

Gurgaon (Sohna), Rewari, Delhi, Hathin, etc. Besides agriculture another key occupation is

animal husbandry, particularly dairy that is the secondary source of income for people.

Majority of the population keep goats, besides cows and buffaloes.

2.3 Profile of Fatehabad District The district derives its name from its headquarters town Fatehabad – founded by Firuz Shah

Tughlak in the 14th century. The

Fatehabad district was carved out

of Hisar district in the year 1997.

It is located in south western part

of Haryana and surrounded by

Punjab in North, district Hisar in

south, district Jind in East and

Rajasthan and district Sirsa in the

West (Figure 2.2). It has six

blocks – Fatehabad, Tohana, Ratia,

Bhattu, Bhuna and Jakhal.

Figure 2.2: Map of Fatehabad district in Haryana


2.3.1 Population Profile

Census of India 2001, puts the total population of Fatehabad district at 8,06,158. Relatively

low degree of urbanization is seen in the population break-down with only 1,42,157 (17.6%)

living in urban areas and 6,64,001 (82.4%) living in rural areas. The SC population in the

district is around 27% of which males comprise 52% and females comprise the balance SC

population of the district. There are no Scheduled Tribes in the state of Haryana. 16% of the

total population is children in the age group of 0-6 years. The average size of the household is

6 persons per household. As observed from Table 2.3, the literacy level in the district is lower

than the state, while in terms of sex ratio, it fares better average than the state.

Table 2.3: Comparative view of sex ratio and literacy in Fatehabad and Haryana

Item Fatehabad Haryana

Sex ratio 884 867

Literacy 58.17 67.9


2.3.2 Occupational Profile

The overall work participation rate is 45% with males contributing 54.4% and females

contributing 34.4%. In a typical predominantly rural economy, the percentage of those

engaged in agriculture is 67%, while less than 3% are engaged in household industries. See

Table 2.4 below. Table 2.4: Work force Details of Fatehabad District

Item Population (%) Male (%) Female (%)

Total workers 45.0 54.4 34.4

Main workers 32.5 46.7 16.3

Marginal workers 12.6 7.7 18.1

Non-workers 55.0 45.6 65.6

Cultivators 44.5 42.0 48.9

Agricultural laborers 22.9 19.9 28.1

Workers in household industries 2.4 2.1 3.1

Other workers 30.3 36.1 19.9


2.3.3 Socio-economic profile of the Affected villages

Rangala-Rajpur: The village falls in the Ferozepur Zirka sub-district of Mewat district. As

per Census 2001, it has a total of 137 households and a total population of 1087 persons. The

household size in the village is 8 members. The sex ratio in the village is 966 females per one


thousand males. Males constitute 51% and females constitute the balance of the total

population. Scheduled Caste population of the village is 10.9%. Literacy rate of the village is

34.2%. Work participation rate of the village is 30.6% with 20.6% being the main workers.

Of the total workers, 54.1% are cultivators and 25.2% are agricultural laborers.

Samain village: The village falls in the Tohana sub-district of Fatehabad district. As per

Census 2001, it has a total of 1600 households and a total population of 9537 persons. The

household size in the village is 6 members. The sex ratio in the village is 856 females per one

thousand males. Males constitute 54% and females constitute the balance of the total

population. Scheduled Caste population of the village is 22.9%. Literacy rate of the village is

51.4%. Work participation rate of the village is 51.9% with 39.96% being the main workers.

Of the total workers, 61.6% are cultivators and 13.2% are agricultural laborers.


CHAPTER -3: LAND ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

3.1 Introduction HVPNL’s ESPP indicates that on the basis of data for various parameters considered during

selection process, a comprehensive analysis for each alternative site is carried out. Weightage

is given to various parameters for finalizing alternative sites which are often site specific. Due

consideration is given to availability of infrastructure facilities such as access roads, railheads

etc. type of land viz. government, revenue, private, agriculture. In addition, social impacts

such as number of families affected as well as cost of compensation and rehabilitation are

considered as well.

This chapter deals with the land acquisition, details of the land transaction based on

discussions with officials, villagers and review of resolutions and documents provided. It also

provides a comparison of sites identified based on the selection criteria stated above area.

3.2 220 KV Sub-Station at the Village – Rangala Rajpur, Mewat district The proposed 220 KV Sub-station at the village – Rangala Rajpur, Ferozepur Zirka sub-

district is an important infrastructural development to meet the power requirements of Mewat

district.

3.2.1 Land Use

The village has 400 acres of land in addition to which they have 150 acres of community

(panchayat) land. The land use in the village is predominantly agricultural. While, the

average landholding is 2 acres per household, nearly 90% of the households have lands with

some households having 5-6 acres. Mainly crops such as Mustard, Wheat and vegetables

such as Brinjal, Tomato, Onion are sown.

3.2.2 Analysis of Alternatives

HVPNL required 16 acres for construction of sub-station. HVPNL in its attempt to locate an

ideal spot for siting of the sub-station had identified two different options. A brief description

of the two sites along with the advantages and disadvantages cited by officials in terms of

engineering and social considerations is given below:


Table 3.1 - Criteria for selection of Rangala Rajpur site Selection criteria Followed in Remarks

Option 1 Option 2 Availability of infrastructure facilities such as access roads, railheads, etc.

Y N Option 2 is in the interiors

Type of land viz government, revenue, private, agriculture

Y Y

Number of impacted families Y Y No displacement Cost of compensation and rehabilitation Y Y Compensation as per policy Other criteria (Water logging, etc) Y Y Closer to the foothills and hence

chances of water logging was stated as a factor

Y –Yes, N- No

Option A. Rangala-Rajpur Site: The piece of land provided is one of the few patches of

barren uncultivable land amidst fertile pieces of land. Consultations with villagers and site

observations confirmed that this piece of land has been unutilized for a long period of time.

Though a few attempts had been made by the panchayat to use it for productive purposes, in

the past, they did not yield the desired result. These attempts included giving this piece of

land for cultural functions such as weddings, etc.

Photo of proposed site at Rangala Rajpur

Another attempt was to plant 3 types of plants under a much-hyped tree plantation scheme -

‘Tarun Trivani Van Yojna’. The scheme however ended in the district, owing to lack of

budgetary as well as logistic support from the administration. The land has often and on been

used as grazing land for cattle belonging to the villagers, but currently even this practice has

been discontinued. After many futile attempts to put it to productive uses, and agreed to give

it to HVNPL for construction of sub-station.


The site’s proximity to the road (Delhi-Alwar Highway) offers an advantage in case of

maintenance. Also from issue of water requirement for the sub-station, the site is well-served

by presence of a few ponds (see photo). Layout of the site is shown in Figure 1.

Pond near village Rangala-Rajpur (Mewat district)

Option B. Foothills site option at Rangala-Rajpur: This option at the site of foothills too was

considered as the piece of land was barren uncultivable piece of land amidst fertile lands.

Besides there existed a few ponds and fertile lands in area and the site was situated at the foot

hills of the Aravalli ranges. The site was away from the main road and in the interiors. In

terms of carrying out requisite maintenance operations, the site would be difficult. Besides,

there were concerns too of water-logging during rainy seasons.

This finalized site at Rangala Rajpur village is consistent with the principle enshrined in

HVPNL’s Environmental and Social Policy and Procedures (ESPP) that lays emphasis on

avoidance, mitigation and alleviation.

3.2.3 Transaction Details

Upon receipt of request from HVPNL for this piece of land, Panchayat initiated the process

and vide a resolution, passed in February, 2008 indicated its willingness to donate 16 acres of

for construction of a 220 KV Sub-station (See Annexure 5 for copy of resolution passed by

the Panchayat). During the consultations, the villagers were informed that the compensation

would be as per policy applicable of government of Haryana. It is expected that upon

completing of processing of land transfer documents, the final document would indicate the


agreed terms and conditions and would therefore be key in the smooth implementation of the

project.

Figure 1: Proposed Site for 220 KV Sub-Station at Rangala Rajpur village


3.3 220 KV Sub-Station at Samain village, Fatehabad district The proposed 220 KV Sub-station at the village Samain, Tohana would be a key substation as

in it is the starting point for 2 transmission lines – 46.5 km line from Samain to Masudpur and

other one 34.6 km line from Samain to Kirori (Fatehabad) and covers a wide area of the Sirsa

district. Besides, the sub-station, it is expected that at least two towers are planned on the

land belonging to this village. Gram Panchayat – Samain has agreed to give these 16.6 acres.

3.3.1 Land Use

The village has 6283 of land acres in addition to which they have 340 acres of community

(panchayat) land. The land use in the village is predominantly agricultural. It was reported

during consultations, while, the average landholding is small in terms of 4 acres per

household, nearly 75% of the households have lands with better off villagers having 8-10

acres.

View of Proposed Site for Sub-Station at Samain

Water Works near Sub-Station at Samain Approach Road to Sub-Station at Samain


3.3.2 Analysis of Alternatives

HVPNL in its attempt to locate ideal spot for siting of the sub-station had identified two

options in Samain village. A brief description of the two sites along with the advantages and

disadvantages cited by officials in terms of engineering and social considerations is given in

Table 3.2 below.

Table 3.2 – Criteria for selection of Samain site

Selection criteria Followed in Remarks Option 1 Option 2

Availability of infrastructure facilities such as access roads, railheads, etc.

Y Y Option 2 is in the interiors

Type of land viz government, revenue, private, agriculture

Y Y

Number of impacted families Y Y No adverse impact on families

Cost of compensation and rehabilitation Y Y Compensation as per policy

Other criteria (water works etc) Y Y Lack of water supply is a constraint in Option 2

Y –Yes, N- No

Option A at Samain village: HVPNL in its attempt to avoid fertile productive land had tried

to identify options and this piece of land in Samain village is one such patch of us-used land.

Its’ siting is consistent with the principle enshrined in HVPNL’s Environmental and Social

Policy and Procedures (ESPP) that lays emphasis on avoidance, mitigation and alleviation.

This panchayat land agreed to be given is only part of the many tracts of land that are

uncultivable (See Figure 2). Its proximity to the road (Hisar to Tohana) and the internal

connectivity vide a village road offers an advantage maintenance-wise. It is closer to the

water-works and therefore supply to the sub-station is ensured. At present, the Feeder line is

only 15-20 km away.

Option B at Samain village: This site too was on barren uncultivable land that did not have

any productive use. However, it was not considered due to two disadvantages that it

presented: i) that it was situated further in the interiors from the main road, and ii) due to its

lack of proximity to the water-works.

3.3.3 Transaction Details

Panchayat has passed a resolution indicating their willingness to donate the 16.6 acres of land

to the HVPNL for construction of the sub-station. The process was initiated by the Panchayat

vide a resolution upon receipt of request from HVPNL and the resolution was passed in the

month February this year (See Annexure 6 for copy of resolution passed by the Panchayat).


The resolution states that, the village is willing to provide land to HVPNL with a demand that

village shall be given 24 hours power supply.”

During the consultations, the villagers were informed that the compensation would be as per

policy applicable of the government of Haryana. It is expected that upon completing of

processing of land transfer documents, the final document would indicate the agreed terms

and conditions and would therefore be key in the smooth implementation of the project.

Figure 2: Proposed Site for 220 KV sub-Station at Samain village


CHAPTER – 4: IMPACT ON AFFECTED PERSONS

4.1 Introduction The ESPP as well as past experiences indicate that the social issues normally associated with

siting of sub-stations are:

• Loss of land;

• Loss of house/structures (although so far structure has been acquired by HVPNL for

its transmission projects);

• Loss of livelihood due to acquisition of private agricultural land; and

• Loss of common property resources due to acquisition of revenue land.

In case of both the substations, loss of Panchayat land is the only impact. The Consultants

verified that the sites selected for the proposed substations are barren and that there shall be

no displacement of any person(s). Further, there is no adverse impact on vulnerable group of

persons, or loss of livelihood or common property resource at both sites. The indirect impacts

as felt by the village community have been recorded in the next chapter on Community

Consultations.

4.2 Impact on Rangala Rajpur village As indicated in the earlier chapters, the village at Rangala Rajpur is poor and is backward in

terms of many infrastructural requirements. The identified site has remained barren and that it

had no productive use to anybody in the village or any section of the village. The consultants

observed and verified that it is not being used for any other purpose. Therefore, it can be

stated that there are no adverse impacts of the proposed project on a single family in Rangala

Rajpur village. In these circumstances, the most productive use of this land could have been

to site the proposed sub-station on this land.

Considering that there are no negative impacts on any section of this village, it would be

appropriate to understand what the positive impacts might be in store for the vulnerable

groups and women. While this sub-station would not help address the many development

challenges the village(s) face, they certainly shall help alleviate a few.

The proposed sub-station of 220 KV has many positive benefits for the village as a whole in

addition to the area of Mewat. In particular, this water and power starved village of Rangala

Rajpur will benefit from the improved power supply as a result of the proposed sub station.


And only the benefits are envisaged by the village community, which have discussed in the

next chapter on Community Consultations.

4.3 Impact on Samain village The proposed site for the 220 KV substation in this village is barren and uncultivable land

The site belongs to Samain Panchayat. This piece of land was of little productive use to the

village. No attempts too had been made the villagers to put the land to any productive use.

Hence the transfer of this land to the HVPNL will not adversely impact any section of the

village community. The village as mentioned before has a total land of 6283 acres of

agricultural land, in addition to 340 acres of community (panchayat) land. Poor power supply

is considered as one of impediments to achieving the full productivity potential of agriculture

but also to starting other small-scale industries in the village and its vicinity.

At this stage, the village community could envisage positive impacts as told by them, which

has been discussed in the next chapter. The proposed sub-station of 220 KV has many

positive benefits for the village as a whole in addition to the area of Fatehabad. The village

shall certainly a prime beneficiary of the improved power supply as a result improved water

supply. Education of children would be a major beneficiary besides reduction in pollution of

environment as a consequence of usage of diesel gensets. The period of construction work

too shall throw up employment of a temporary or permanent nature. Indirect benefits such as

development of the area would have spin-off effects on the village economy.


CHAPTER – 5: COMMUNITY CONSULTATIONS

5.1 Introduction Consultation refers to the two-way transfer of information or joint discussion between project

proponent and the community in concern. It helps build a rapport with the community and

also helps to provide certain details on the area that planners cannot often foresee. It helps

identify impacts, the vulnerable groups, their source of vulnerabilities and the people and

groups that are likely to be affected. Besides information provided during such consultations

helps allay fears and builds trust – a key aspect to the successful implementation of any

project.

This chapter provides details on the community consultations held and their outcomes with

respect to the villages where the two sub-stations are sited. These consultations covered a

host of issues, such as current land holding, BPL status, land provided for sub-station,

education, health and sanitation facilities prevalent, crops cultivated, employment

opportunities likely, etc. Also, an attempt was made to understand the status of power supply

and any on-going development schemes of government in the village or its vicinity.

5.2 Perceptions towards the Project at Rangala Rajpur village Consultations were held with the villagers – in general, elderly members, and women in

particular to a) inform them about the project; b) ascertain their views on the project and in

particular their views on how they might be negatively or positively impacted by the project;

and c) what improvements could be made based on the suggestions made by them that would

possibly enhance the overall aesthetics in the vicinity of the sub-station. Consultations

covered all key issues as per the checklist attached (see Annexure 3).

Project information: Consultations started with gathering details on the size of village, its

social composition, the no. of households in the village, land holding and occupation etc.

Following this, information on the project was disseminated. Information included reasons for

siting of the sub-station in the village land, coverage of the sub-station, the duration of its

construction, etc. Villagers responded with details on these issues and stated that transaction

of land between the village and HVPNL was well-known to all members and it is very much

in the interest of the village. They discussed about the multiple attempts to put the land to

productive use and resultant failures therein. They categorically stated that the piece of land


transacted had been of no use of any person or group of persons in the village. They

acknowledged the importance of the project in view of the current power supply and

associated issues of poor water supply, inadequate irrigation. They also conveyed that

Kerosene lamps were being used as alternative.

Safety issues: The villagers were informed of the safety issues such as restrictions of access in

and around the sub-station owing to presence of high voltage equipment. The villagers

understood and accepted the restrictions as requirements of such a project.

Social impacts: Village community felt that there would be no negative impact as a result of

this project. It was unlikely to cause temporary loss of income as there was no dependence on

the land currently. No disturbance is likely to be caused by the construction too as the village

is opposite to the identified sub-station site and on the other side of road (Delhi-Alwar

highway) and 3 km in the interior. Therefore, there would no loss of access to road. The

agricultural fields too were on the other side of the road and would not be impacted. Even

there is no requirement for construction of any access road to the sub-station site, as the site is

located adjacent to the highway. During the discussions, a walk through to the nearby water

bodies confirmed that the village would not suffer from any water shortage owing to the water

supply required for the sub-station.

Enhancements: In terms of any enhancement (or if any deprivation) of features of the area

around sub-station, people agreed there would be some indirect effects as new people i.e. staff

operating the sub-station would come and there would be staff quarters, etc. Improvements to

the area might take place too such as improvement of roads, etc.

Compensation and Assistance: Compensation for this land would be as per the prevalent

norms of the R&R policy of the government. It was observed that the villagers were not

aware of the rate of the land that would be applicable for compensation. They shared a copy

of the resolution wherein the sum had not been specified. Accompanying officials indicated

that the papers shall be processed indicating the rates.

The issue of provision of temporary (or permanent) employment opportunities, if any was

discussed. Villagers stated that some of their youths had undergone ITI training and these

youths should be given opportunities during the project operation period. In addition, during


construction of sub-station and staff quarters, other manual labor required too could be

obtained from the village.

Other issues: Villagers recalled that one NGO – S.M. Sehgal Foundation had been and still is

working in the area and supports programs designed to promote sustainable development at

the village level. Its goals are: i) to promote the benefits of small families in a culturally

sensitive manner; ii) to increase incomes through skills development and other initiatives; iii)

to promote environmentally sound and agricultural practices. They attempted to develop the

concept ‘model’ village, and these included key activities such as activities included water

management, health, income enhancement activities and community mobilization.

Though government schemes are operational in the Mewat region, the villagers reported only

a few schemes such as JSJY and NREGS. NREGS – a scheme that provides guaranteed

employment too did not make much of an impact as there is rocky soil in the village and

laborers too are not available to work as they migrate to work in places such as Gurgaon and

Sohna, etc. In addition, another scheme that had been launched – Food for Work scheme did

not succeed.

Outcomes: These consultations clearly brought out that this infrastructure development would

help to a great degree in meeting one of the critical needs of the village i.e. improved and

reliable power supply. While there are definitely other development challenges that the

village faces, this development is surely to make a definite positive impact on their daily lives.

More reliable power supply would prove immensely beneficial to children for their education,

for water supply for domestic and agricultural use, bring down the household expense on

Kerosene. Overall expectations of development as a result of the sub-station too were high.

Consultations with vulnerable group – women: Often project interventions have been seen to

have differential impacts on different groups of people in same area or same village or even

within the same household. It is therefore important to consult a vulnerable group such as

women when it is expected that the project shall have different impact. As they may not

always participate in public forums, it is essential to consult them separately for their views

with a view to incorporate their suggestions in planning and implementation. This was even

more important in the case of Rangala Rajpur – a Muslim dominated village where women

have lesser say in matters directly affecting them. They were consulted to:

o provide to them information on the proposed sub-station


o to elicit their views and perceptions on benefits from the better power supply

Discussions indicated that women in this village contribute to the work in the field, besides

household chores. While their work in the field is more visible, their non-wage contribution

to household subsistence includes informal contributions to collection of fuel and water, not

to mention cooking, cleaning, and child-care, is less visible. This dual role often leaves them

with little time for self or for their upbringing of the children. This is even more so in the case

of an area like Mewat, as the average size of each household is 8 members.

Absence of handpumps in the village leads to heavy dependence on water connection which

in turn depends on the power supply. During discussions, they informed that the current

supply is inadequate and often erratic. As a result they have to approach the nearby ponds to

wash clothes and fetch water for domestic use. In addition, they added that supply is

alternated every week – supply during day time during one week and the following week

there is supply at night. During such period, an additional hardship is caused as they have to

keep awake at night to avail of the water supply.

With regard to children and girls’ education in particular, they informed that nearly all of

them are illiterate. Also since the educated boys find it hard to get employed, they see

education of girl children as rather futile. Instead, the girl children help out all in domestic

chores and also in the fields as required.

In conclusion it would suffice to state that the overall expectations of development as a result

of the sub-station were high and has the potential for positive gender impact on women as its

consequence.


FGD with villagers at Rangala Rajpur (Ferozepur Zirka)

FGD with key informants at Rangala Rajpur (Ferozepur Zirka)

FGD with ladies in the village - Rangala Rajpur (Ferozepur Zirka)

5.3 Perceptions towards the Project at Samain (Tohana) Consultations were held with the Panchayat member, villagers – general community to

understand their views on the projects and the benefits that they are likely to receive. Attempt

was made to see project would impact them positively or negatively and if the sub-station

would help or deprive the aesthetics appeal of the area around this piece of land.


Consultations covered a host of issues, such as current power supply situation, land holding,

BPL status, land given to HVPNL for substation, education, health and sanitation facilities

prevalent, crops cultivated in different seasons, employment opportunities likely. Also, an

attempt was made to understand on-going development work in the village and its vicinity.

Project information and safety issues: Consultations started with details on the Sub-station, its

coverage in terms of supply, the duration of construction for Sub-station. The villagers were

informed of the safety issues such as restrictions on land use in and around the sub-station.

The villagers understood and accepted the restrictions such as boundary wall around the sub-

station. On the issue of land provision, the villagers indicated they were willing to donate

more land for such purposes.

Social impacts: The scenario of temporary loss of access to road does not arise as the site is

adjacent to a major road which cannot be disturbed. Water-works in the vicinity of the site -

one of the selection criteria, is adequate for supply to the substation as well for the village

purposes. As there is no dependence on the land that has been agreed to be given to HVPNL,

the villagers or any groups of person in the villagers are not likely to suffer any loss or impact

as a result of this loss. Villagers observed that in order to overcome this shortage there have

many cases of installation of gensets. While this increases the household expenditure on

diesel, it is also having another noticeable and negative impact i.e. pollution of the

environment. This pollution, in the long run is bound to increase and also at a faster rate if the

power supply is inadequate as both usage and population using it are increasing.

Education for children is much encouraged by all households in the village. Though there are

no constraints in terms of schools and other facilities required for education, the lack of

reliable and adequate supply is causing children to lose vital hours of studies. This is a major

cause of worry for parents and in particular for the females members consulted.

Currently the focus on agriculture is not only a result of large amount of land available with

the village but also because other small scale and household industries require lot of power for

their operations. While substitution with manual labor can be managed to a degree, viable

commercial operations are not possible without power supply. For an impetus to, and

promotion of small scale and household industries there has to be a major improvement to the

current power supply situation in the village.


A major concern for women was water supply and the hardships caused. Water supply has

been erratic for long as the village receives only about 5-6 hrs of electricity supply thus

leading to inconsistent and inadequate water supply.

Enhancements: The area is already fairly developed and consistent power supply would lead

to increased industrial and agricultural production, more employment options and overall

economic development. Majority of the consulted stakeholders including the Sarpanch

perceived that the project would have positive impact on the village. They added the major

enhancement would be to the agricultural potential as it currently is hampered owing to poor

power supply.

Temporary or permanent employment opportunities: The issue of provision of temporary (or

permanent) employment opportunities, if any was discussed. During construction of sub-

station and staff quarters, other manual labor too would be required. Villagers stated that

some of their youths had undergone ITI training. The suggested that the trained youth should

be engaged during the operations phase.


Consultation with women group in Samain

Consultation with Villagers in Samain

Consultation with Panchayat Member in Samain


CHAPTER – 6: RESETTLEMENT POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK 6.1 Policy, Legal and Regulatory Framework This section presents the legal requirements of Land Acquisition Policy and the Resettlement

and Rehabilitation Policy and entitlements for affected families. The legal framework for any

project includes process of land acquisition and measures to mitigate adverse impacts.

Haryana government had published its R&R policy last year. As a result HVPNL has joined a

list of other entities in power transmission business to have an Environment, Social Policy and

Procedures document. The features of the R&R Policy are indicative of the kind of impacts

that have been felt by such companies over many years. The features of the R&R Policy are

indicative of the kind of impacts that have been felt by such companies over many years.

HVPNL undertakes its transmission activities within purview of Indian laws keeping in mind

appropriate obligations and guidelines of statutory and funding agencies. As per provision

contained in Haryana Electricity Reforms Act 1997 & Electricity Act, 2003 Acts, HVPNL has

authority to install transmission towers in any kind of land. Electricity Act, 2003 seeks to

create a framework for the power sector development by measures conducive to the industry.

Power transmission schemes are planned in such a way that the power of eminent domain is

exercised responsibly.

Mandatory environment requirements for HVPNL transmission works include: Mandatory

social requirements for HVPNL transmission works includes Land Acquisition Act 1894,

Haryana Government Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy for land acquisition Oustees and

funding agencies requirement like WB OP 4.12 involuntary resettlement, WB OP 4.10

Indigenous People. National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy 2007 has also been

consulted while framing the ESPP.

6.2 Procedure for Land Acquisition All land acquisition for any public purpose in the state is governed by the Land Acquisition

Act 1894 as amended from time to time by the State Govt. This empowers the government to

acquire compulsorily any land not owned by it which is required for a public purpose. The

definition of land includes benefits to arise out of land & things attached to earth or

permanently fastened to any thing attached to the earth. This act applies to those with legal

entitlements to land and structures thereon.


(i) For any LA the Act under section (u/s)-4(1) stipulates publication of a notification to

that effect in the official Gazette and in 2 daily newspapers circulated in the locality, at

least, one shall be in the regional language. Such a publication authorizes an

authorized officer to enter upon such a land, make a preliminary survey ascertain its

suitability and determine the exact position of land to be acquired. However, person

can enter into any building or any enclosure attached to a dwelling house either by

giving notices of seven days to the occupant or with the consent of occupant. The

substance of this notification is given as public notice at a convenient place in the

locality in which the land to be acquired is located, such a notification provides an

opportunity to the parties interested in the land to file objections if any, u/s-5A to the

proposed acquisition.

(ii) In order to proceed with the acquisition of the land (as notified u/s-4) it is followed by

declaration u/s 6 of the ibid Act specifying that land is required for public purpose.

Every declaration is published in the official Gazette and in two daily newspapers with

circulation in the local area, thereafter revenue Department issues direction to the

Collector u/s-7 of the Act to take order for the acquisition of notified land to be

marked out, measured land/or other immovable properties, which is done under the

provision of Sec.8 of the act in question. Thereafter under the provision s contained in

Sec.-9 notices are served to the concerned persons stating the intention of the

Government to take possession of the land and that any claims for compensation

should be made to the Collector. Finally, the award of compensation is made by the

collector u/s-11 of the Act after inquiring into objections(if any) in pursuance of the

notice given u/s-9 to the measurements made u/s-8 and into the value of the land on

the date of publication of the notification/s4(1). The award u/s-11 is made within two

years from the date of publication of the declaration and if no award is made within

this period, the entire proceedings of the LA is lapsed and fresh notification u/s-(4)

needs to be initiated. Once the award is passed, the collector takes possession of the

land which there upon vests absolutely in the Government free from all encumbrances.

However, in case of urgency Section-17 of the Act empowers the Collector to take

possession of the land even though no award has been made. Such land thereupon

vests with the Government free from all encumbrances.

However, this Act further provides remedy for seeking enhancement of compensation by the

person to seek enhancement of compensation in lieu of acquired as per provisions contained

in Sec.18 of ibid Act.


This act was further amended in 1984 with respect to sections 4,23,28 and 34 which deal with

publication of primary notification determination of compensation; power of the court in

determining the amount of compensation; interest on compensation and payment of interest

respectively. To sum up the amended provisions have resulted in the following:-

• The publication of the primary notification, apart from the Official Gazette, has to be

made in two daily newspapers circulated in that locality of which at least one shall be

in the regional language.

• In addition to the market value of the land the court is to award a sum of thirty percent

as solatium on such market value in consideration of the compulsory nature of the

acquisition.

• The amount of compensation awarded by the court is not to be lower than the amount

awarded by the collector.

• The interest of excess compensation has been enhanced from 9 per cent to 15 per cent

after the date of expiry of a period of one year from the date on which possession has

been taken.

HVPNL strictly follows procedures laid down under the Land Acquisition Act (LA Act),

1894, when land is acquired for sub-stations. Once the award is passed, the collector takes

possession of the land which there upon vests absolutely in the Government free from all

encumbrances. These are further reinforced taking into consideration HVPNL’s entitlement

framework and public consultation process apart from inbuilt consultation process of LA Act,

public consultation/information by HVPNL is an integral part of the project implementation.

Public is informed about the project at every stage of execution by Press Notes and media etc.

During socio-economic survey taken up in parallel with land acquisition process, HVPNL’s

site officials meet people and inform them about the Land acquisition details, proposed R&R

measures and compensation packages

6.3 World Bank Operational Policy on Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12) The objectives of the World Bank’s Operational Policy on Involuntary Resettlement

(OP 4.12) are:

• Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring

all viable alternative project designs.

• Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be

conceived and executed as sustainable development programs. Providing sufficient


investment resources to enable the persons displaced by the project to share in project

benefits.

• Displaced persons should be meaningfully consulted and should have opportunities to

participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs.

• Displaced persons should be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and

standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels

or to levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation whichever is

higher

6.4 HVPNL Environment and Social Policy and Procedures The ESPP of the company has been developed following consideration of all the mandatory

requirements of the national and state policies and acts and also the guidelines of funding

agencies in addressing the social and environmental issues arising out of its activities. The

company is committed to identify, assess, and manage environmental and social concerns at

both organization and project levels by strictly following the basic principals of avoidance,

minimization and mitigation of environmental & social impacts with the improvement of

Management Systems and introduction of State of the Art and proven technologies.

The key principles of HVPNL’s social policy are:

• Avoid any disruption of socially sensitive areas with regard to human habitation and

areas of cultural significance;

• Wherever losses are suffered, assistance will be provided to the affected persons to

improve or at least regain their living standards;

• Consultations will be held among local population regarding finalization of proposed

route of the transmission lines and sub-stations;

• Ensure in delivering R&R entitlements and compensation for lost assets based on

HVPNL’s entitlement framework.

• Involuntary resettlement will be avoided or minimized by exploring all viable

alternative project designs.

• All adversely affected persons including those without title to land will be provided

assistance to improve or regain their living standards to the pre project levels.

• Special attention will be paid for the improvement of living standards of marginalized

and vulnerable groups.

• If any person’s remaining land holding becomes operationally non viable, the entire

holding will be acquired and compensated accordingly, if the Affected Family (AF)


desires. A similar approach will be adopted for structures affected partially.

• Physical works will not commence on any portion of land before compensation and

assistance to the affected population have been provided in accordance with the policy

framework.

6.5 Social Entitlement framework The prescriptive social entitlement framework derives from the aforementioned constitutional

directives national R&R Policy, State R&R Policy and relevant policies. Physical

displacement of people is not, and will not be, a major consequence of the company’s projects

as has been the experience in the case with the other transmission companies. Regardless of

displacement occurs, the entitlement framework will be a base for all its management

procedures. The objective of the HVPNL’s framework is to ensure realistic rehabilitation and

compensation of the acquired assets of the AFs covers categories such as Loss of Land

(Homestead land, agriculture land, tenants, lease holders, encroachers/ squatters etc), Loss of

structure ( with valid title, tenants, lease holders, squatters, cattle sheds, workshop sheds etc.),

Loss of livelihood, Loss of standing crops/ trees, Loss of access to Common Property

Resources (CPR) and facilities, Losses to host communities, Panchayat land and additional

benefits for vulnerable person.

For this package G-2, entitlement provision applicable would be as per Clause 7 of the ESPP

as per HVPNL’s social entitlement framework (see Table 6.1). In accordance with policy,

compensation amounts have been computed at circle rates prevalent and are presented under

Chapter 9 on Budget Estimates.

Table 6.1 - HVPNL's Social Entitlement Framework

Sr. No.

Type of Loss/ Impact Entitled Person/s Entitlement

1. Loss of Land

a) Homestead land with valid title, or customary or usufruct rights

Titleholders

i) Cash compensation as per LA Act 1894

ii) Actual registration charges for purchase of alternate land for maximum of compensation amount within one year as per proof of purchased land.

iii) The land owners will be paid annuity for 33 years over and above the usual land compensation. The amount of annuity will be Rs. 15,000/-per acre per annum on prorata basis. Annuity of Rs. 15,000/- will be increased by a fixed sum of Rs.500/- every year as per State Government Policy.


Sr. No.


Vulnerable person Titleholders One time additional compensation of Rs.5000 per acre on prorate basis will be paid in addition to above entitlements.

b) Agricultural Land

(i) With valid title Titleholders i) Cash compensation as per LA Act 1894

ii) Actual registration charges for purchase of alternate land for maximum of compensation amount within one year as per proof of purchased land.

The land owners will be paid annuity for 33 years over and above the usual land compensation. The amount of annuity will be Rs. 15,000/-per acre per annum on prorata basis. Annuity of Rs. 15,000/- will be increased by a fixed sum of Rs.500/- every year as per State Government Policy.

Vulnerable person Titleholders One time additional compensation of Rs.5000 per acre on prorate basis will be paid in addition to above entitlements.

(ii) tenants, sharecroppers, leaseholder including the commercial and other establishments

Individual with proof of tenancy/share cropping/leasing

Reimbursement for unexpired tenancy/share cropping/lease period.

Note: This amount will be deducted from the compensation payable to land owners.

Vulnerable person Individual with proof of tenancy/share cropping/leasing

One time additional compensation of Rs.5000 will be paid in addition to above entitlements.

(iii) Encroacher/Squatters Occupant Assistance to be provided for inclusion in various Government Schemes.

2. Loss of structure

(i) with valid title, Structure owner

i) Compensation as per Haryana PWD scheduled rates

ii) One time financial assistance of Rs.10,000/- for shifting of family, building material, belongings and cattle etc.

Affected Families will be allowed to dismantle structure and carry salvage whatever they can.

Vulnerable person Structure owner

One time additional compensation of Rs.5000 will be paid in addition to above entitlements.

(ii) Tenant, leaseholder

(who have created the

Individuals/ Party with proof of

i.) Compensation as per Haryana PWD scheduled rates.


Sr. No.


structure) tenancy/leasing

ii) One time financial assistance of Rs.10,000/- for shifting of family, building material, belongings and cattles etc.

iii) Affected Families will be allowed to dismantle structure and carry salvage whatever they can.

iv) Reimbursement for unexpired tenancy/ lease period.

Note: The amount at iv) will be deducted from the compensation payable to land owners.

Vulnerable person

(who have created the structure)

Individuals/ Party with proof of tenancy/leasing

One time additional compensation of Rs.5000/- will be paid in addition to above entitlements.

(iii) Tenant, leaseholder

(Who have not created the structure)


Reimbursement for unexpired tenancy/ lease period.

Note: This amount will be deducted from the compensation payable to land owners.

Vulnerable person

(Who have not created the structure)


Additional compensation of Rs.2000 will be paid in addition to above entitlements.

(iv) Squatters Structure

I. Compensation as per Haryana PWD scheduled rates.

II. Assistance in shifting by providing transport charges to actual or Rs.10,000/- maximum.

III. Affected Families will be allowed to dismantle structure and carry salvage whatever they can.

(v) Cattle shed

Owner/Family

Cash compensation of Rs. 15000/- for re-construction of cattle shed.

Vulnerable person Owner/Family

Additional compensation of Rs.1000 will be paid to head of family in addition to above entitlements.

(vi) Workshop sheds Owner/Family

Cash compensation of Rs. 25000/- for re-construction of workshop shed.

Vulnerable person Owner/Family

Additional compensation of Rs.2000 will be paid to head of family in addition to above entitlements.

3 Loss of livelihood


Sr. No.


i) Wage /Self employment (both agriculture and Non

Agriculture)

Each adult earning member (both men & women)

Assistance to be provided for inclusion in various State Government Schemes for self-employment.

4 Loss of standing crops/ trees

i) a) Crops

b) Trees

Cultivator title holders

In either category compensation for the total loss of crop/tree as per LA Act during construction as well as during O&M**.

5 Loss of access to Common Property Resources (CPR) and facilities

i) Common property resources / Civic amenities.

Community Replacement of CPRs/Civic amenities to ensure equivalent community resources and amenities or provisions of functional equivalence.

6 Losses to host communities

i) CPR and Civic amenities Community Augmentation of resources of host community to sustain pressure of AFs.

7 Panchayat land Village Panchayat

Compensation as per State Government Policy.

8. Other Impacts related to loss of assets/ livelihood not identified.

AFs Unforeseen impacts should be documented and mitigative measures have to be proposed with in the overall principles & provisions of ESPP.

9. Title holders affected by Transmission towers In urban/ rural areas

Title holders Compensation as per “Works of licensees Rules 2006” notified by GoI on dated 18.4.2006.

Note: *Vulnerable person means the people below poverty level, widow, physically handicap and SC/ ST. ** compensation of damage to crops/trees during O&M would be paid within one month

Cut Off dates For the non-titleholders the cut-off date will be the date of census survey conducted as part of

the socio-economic survey and for titleholders it will be the date of issuance of Section 4 (1)

notice under the LA Act.

Public Disclosure, Consultation, and Participation Public consultation has been incorporated as an integral part of the process throughout the

planning and execution of project. The Environment and Social Management Team (ESMT)

will interact closely with PAPs, host communities, project personnel, government

departments, NGOs right from the early stages of the project preparation on regular basis for

developing and implementing the RAP and EMP.


During implementation the public contact drives have been envisaged by bringing in active

NGOs in the affected area. The first step of public awareness program is the publication of the

public notification in the local newspapers as per the Section 29 of the Electricity (Supply)

Act, 1948 in which details of the proposed project are given. The objections are to be filed

within a period of 60 days from the date of publication of notification. The next step of the

program is holding of the meetings and discussions with the public during the reconnaissance

survey and again during the detailed survey/tower spotting.


CHAPTER – 7: COMPENSATION AND ASSISTANCE

7.1 Introduction This chapter deals with the mitigation measures commensurate to the loss of the property.

Besides, it elaborates on any assistance that could be provided to the affected village.

7.2 Compensation for Rangala Rajpur village The impact of the project resulting in loss of land has no adverse impacts on the village. On

the contrary, as details in the previous chapters show that this transaction would actually help

the village economy. In other words, impact is wholly positive.

As per the resolution passed by Rangala Rajpur, land shall be donated with no conditions.

Compensation for panchayat land shall be as per clause 7 of ESPP. As confirmed by the

district officials, the circle rate for land in Mewat district is Rs. 16 lakhs/acre. This shall form

basis for calculation of the compensation amount for the 16 acres of land at Rangala Rajpur.

In this context, it is to be noted that any conditions laid down by the panchayat such as

provision of employment opportunities to local youth must be recorded in the contract

agreement with HVPNL.

7.3 Compensation for Samain Village As per the resolution passed by Samain Village, Panchayat mentions that it is voluntarily

giving this piece of land with a demand that uninterrupted power supply should be provided to

this village. Compensation for panchayat land shall be as per clause 7 of ESPP. As

confirmed by the district officials, the circle rate for land in Fatehabad district is Rs. 7.5

lakhs/acre. This shall form basis for calculation of the compensation amount for the 16.606

acres of land at Samain.

In this context, it is to be noted that any conditions laid down by the panchayat such as

provision of 24 hours power supply must be recorded in the contract agreement with HVPNL.


CHAPTER – 8: INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS AND GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISMS

8.1 Introduction This section deals with the institutional arrangement and grievance redressal mechanisms as

enunciated in the ESPP of HVPNL. These would be applicable to all the sub-stations and

transmission lines that get funded under this proposed World Bank project.

8.2 Institutional Framework The company will have three levels of Institutional bodies to oversee and implement ESPP.

The bodies are constituted at Head Quarter level; Zonal level; and Divisional Level

At Head Quarter Level: Environment, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Committee (ER&R)

under the chairmanship of the Director Technical includes the concerned Chief Engineer/TS

and CE/P&D HVPN, Panchkula and Deputy Secretary/Projects as the Committee members.

Deputy Secretary/Projects will be the Member Secretary of the R&R committee

At Zonal Level: The Environment and Social Monitoring Committee (ESMC) constitute of

concerned Chief Engineer/TS , concerned Superintendent Engineer/TS, concerned Executive

Engineer/TS, Land Acquisition officer and two representatives of the AFs and ESMC would

report to Director Technical, HVPNL, Panchkula.

At Divisional Level: In addition to above, Environment and Social Implementation unit

(ESIU) will be there consisting of Executive Engineer/TS and SSE/SDO/Construction of

concerned place.

The role and functions of the ER&R, ESMC and ESIU include but are not limited to:

• Coordinate among the various agencies involved in implementation of the ESPP

programs;

• Monitor and review implementation of the ESPP plans;

• Function as a grievance redressal body; and

• Provide overall guidance and leadership for smooth implementation of the

resettlement and rehabilitation plans.

To ensure effective implementation of ESPP, HVPNL focuses on


1. strengthening the implementation of the ESPP by redeployment of appropriately

trained persons at key levels;

2. reinforcing in house capabilities by working with specialized external agencies; and

3. reviewing progress of the ESPP internally or through external agencies

8.3 Social Procedures HVPNL has developed comprehensive Environmental and Social (E&S) Management

Procedures and incorporated them to its project cycle, to ensure that its operation eliminates

or minimizes adverse environmental and social impacts. The E&S management procedures

identifies the relevant issues at early stages of project cycle and follow the basic philosophy of

sustainable development through Avoidance, Minimization and Alleviation.

HVPNL’s project cycle forms the operational framework and background through which the

environment & social issues are addressed. Key milestones in HVPNL’s transmission projects

include project conceptualization; planning; approval; design; tendering; implementation and

operation; and maintenance.

8.3.1 Project Conceptualization

During project conceptualization, HVPNL identifies the project. Identification of a power

transmission project is on the basis of demand and supply in regions and links between new

power generating projects and availability of state’s quota of power from the Powergrid.

HVPNL carries out feasibility studies encompassing demand for energy, prioritizing for

different sectors and regions, environmental and social impact assessment; economic and

financial analysis; and an implementation schedule. During feasibility studies, HVPNL

identifies and weight various line options on a survey map such that there is shortest distance

between origin of the proposed transmission line and the substations sites. At all times, while

considering line options, HVPNL keeps in view its policy of avoidance of socially (including

environmentally) sensitive areas.

8.3.2 Project Planning

During project planning, HVPNL carries out a Reconnaissance survey. A number of

alternatives are studied to minimize possible environmental impacts of transmission line.

Adequate care is taken in the route alignment to avoid forests and areas of natural resources

completely, if not possible, allow to traverses minimally. The planning exercise also ensures

that the route does not involve human habitation and areas of cultural importance. Field


officers verify critical issues e.g. river, hill, railway crossings; power and telephone lines etc.

and finalize the optimal route on the map. Once the route is finalized, HVPNL, will carry out

a Environment & Social Assessment with its own field staff and prepare a Environment &

Social Impact Assessment. Based on the assessment and the provisions under ESPP, HVPNL

will formulate an EMP (Environment Management Plan) & Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)

in consultation with AFs.

HVPNL considers various sites for substations. On the basis of data for various parameters

considered during selection process, a comprehensive analysis for each alternative site will be

carried out. Weightage will be given to various parameters for finalizing alternative sites

which are often site specific. Due consideration is given to availability of infrastructure

facilities such as access roads, railheads etc. type of land viz. government, revenue, private,

agriculture, environment and social impacts such as number of families affected as well as

cost of compensation and rehabilitation.

8.3.3 Operation and Maintenance

HVPNL continuously monitors the transmission lines and substations. The lines are patrolled

regularly to identify any defects in the components. Monitoring of the line is carried out by

the respective HVPNL field offices.

8.3.4 Project Review

The social components of the project will be reviewed by the ESMU of HVPNL on regular

basis.

8.4 Capacity Building Training and development of employees is integral to implementation of ESPP. In the

beginning, training would be imparted to the executive/non-executive from NPTI/PGCIL so

as to enable them to understand the ESPP document, to take necessary steps in right time to

implement.

It is recommended that the HVPNL carries out periodic orientation and refresher courses that

comprise of social and environmental issues applicable to such projects. Content of these

courses should also comprise of the mitigation measures that are required to be adopted in the

case of sub-stations and transmission line projects.


8.5 Grievance Redress Mechanism It is expected that through a participatory process and good compensation and support

mechanisms, acceptance of the project will be enhanced and complaints reduced. In case of

issues related to land acquisition, the LA Act provides adequate provisions at different stages

of the LA process for the AFs to object to the proposed acquisition of land and other

properties, compensation rates, etc. The LA Act also allows the affected persons to receive

the compensation under protest and then refer the case to the court for settlements. However

ESMC at the Zonal Level will hear complaints and facilitate solutions. If the grievance is not

redressed at zonal level, the affected person can appeal to the Environment R&R committee at

Corporate level. He/she can further appeal to the court if his/her grievance is not redressed at

either zonal or corporate level.

In addition to the proposed grievance redressal under the ESPP, it is recommended that

another level of grievance redressal be added at the Division level to help record complaints.

The advantage of such a mechanism would be receive, and forward it to the ESMC at Zonal

level for redressal. Past experiences in other such and other infrastructure projects too

indicate handling of issues at local level have proved more effective than if they are let to

scale up.


Organizational Structure for ESPP

ER&R High Powered Committee at HQ level Director/ Technical

Chairman

CE/ TS Concerned Member

Deputy Secy/ Projects Member Secy. (Nodal Officer)

Environment Social management Committee (ESMC) at Zonal level

CE/ TS Concerned Chairman

SE/ TS Concerned

XEN/ TS Concerned

LAO Two representatives AFs

Environment & Social Implementation Committee (ESIU) at Division level XEn/ TS

Concerned SSE/ SDO construction concerned

CE/ P&D Member

Complaint recorded at this level


CHAPTER – 9: BUDGET ESTIMATES

9.1 Introduction This chapter presents the budget estimates for this package. The costs used for the budget are

based on information collected during the site from the revenue department. The budget is

based on the entitlement matrix as given in the ESPP.

9.2 Costs Since this package involves land required for both the substations, the land rates i.e. circle rate

have been taken as prevalent in respective districts where the substations are located. Land

rates as obtained are given in Table 9.1.

Table 9.1: Land rates for substation land

Name of the Village/ District Nature of Land/ Barren Per acre costs Rangala Rajpur, Mewat district Barren land 16 lacs/acre

Samain, Fatehabad district Barren land 7.5 lacs/acre Total budget for RRAP each sub-station is presented separately in presented in Tables 9.2 and

9.3. This includes cost of land for both substations and contingency for any unforeseen

situations.

Table 9.2 : Estimated Budget for Rangala Rajpur Substation Sl. No.

ITEMS Unit Quantity Cost/ unit (In Rs.)

Financed by

World Bank (Rs)

HVPNL(Rs)

A Panchayat land (Rangala Rajpur)

Acre 16 16 lakhs per acre

25600000

B Contingency amount @ 5 % of total amount

1280000

Total (A+B) 26880000

Rupees Two Crore Sixty Eight Lakhs Eighty Thousand Only


Sl. No.

ITEMS Unit Quantity Cost/ unit (In Rs.)

Financed by

World Bank (Rs)

HVPNL(Rs)

A Panchayat land Acre 16.606 7.5 lakhs per acre

12454500

B Contingency amount @ 5 % of total amount

622725

Total (A+B)

13077225

Rupees One Crore Thirty Lakhs Seventy Seven Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty Five only

The total budget for both the substations under Package G-2, amounts to Rs. 3,99,57,225

(Rupees Three Crores Ninety Nine Lakhs Fifty Seven Thousand Two Hundred and

Twenty Five Only).

However, the resolution passed by the Dhanvala Panchayat in which the Rangala Rajpur

village is located, states that the Panchayat is voluntarily giving this piece of land as a gift

without any precondition. The resolution passed by the Samain, Panchayat also mentions

voluntarily giving this piece of land with a demand that uninterrupted power supply should be

provided to this village.


CHAPTER – 10:IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

10.1 Introduction The outcomes of this RRAP depend upon quality of implementation. This chapter deals with

the implementation schedule for the RRAP sub-stations at both the villages of Rangala-Rajpur

and Samain.

10.2 Implementation issues and Schedule Key issues in implementation are likely to be the following:

(i) Timely processing of resolution/contract agreement between HVPNL and village

and transfer of land

(ii) Release of funds as per agreement for the first year and also for subsequent

years.

Another recommended, but not mandatory measure would be for HVPNL to hold a

consultation meeting with all the members of the villages following processing of resolution

and prior to commencement of construction works. This meeting could provide information

such as duration of constructions, potential disruptions to access roads, etc. They could take

the opportunity to disseminate information on safety norms applicable and grievance

mechanisms available for recording of complaints, if any. These continued consultations shall

help understand and suitably address any changed perceptions of the people of the affected

villages..

The breakdown of each activity according to a specific time frame has been provided in the

Implementation Schedule. Implementation Schedule will require detailed coordination

between the project authority – HVPNL and other relevant line departments. Implementation

plan has been spread over a period of two years in respect of these two sub-stations that are

expected to complete in terms of construction and running.

The table below indicates the implementation schedule in case of land being donated by

Panchayat. The total implementation period is likely to be only more than 2 months from the

start date of the project. Employment opportunities, if any are likely, shall be on continuous/

continual basis.


Table 10.1 – Implementation Schedule

Week

Activity

Week

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 onwards

Processing of Resolution

Transfer of land

Release of funds


Annexure 1: Focus Group Discussion with key members

Focus Group Discussion with key members Name of the Village Rangala Rajpur (Ferozepur-Zirka block)

Date December 10, 2008

Venue Sarpanch House

No. of Persons attended: 32 persons

FGD Conducted by Srihari and Neha

Start and End Time 11.00 am - 12.00 noon

Objectives: • inform villagers about the proposed sub-station • to understand their overall socio-economic condition • to elicit their views and perceptions on project Issues discussed: Land holding: 50% of the households have land and other 50% do not. Of the total land holding 400 acres it divided 200 households giving a average land holding of 2 acres/household Land donation: Donation of community land: The panchayat comprising of 4 villages has donated the barren panchayat land of 16 acres for the sub-station. Besides community land such as the donated piece, the panchayat has another 150 acres Village and Household composition: The village has approximately 400 households with a total population of approximately 3500. In terms of household composition, it is 7-8 members per household. Education: Illiteracy is very high. The nearby – Aravalli Public school is mostly attended by children from nearby places such Sohna, Gurgaon. It has hostel facilities besides Rs. 900/- for the tuition fees. Hostel facilities at 2000/- . Additional charges for the computer lab and admission fees of Rs. 10000/-. Rs. 500/- recycle charges. Villagers of Rangala-Rajpur cannot afford to go there. Not a single female is metric (middle). FGDs with females revelaed that while male members despite being educated do not have employment, females children are of little use in getting educated Health: Dispensary closest is at Ferozepur Zirka, though doctor not available. Villagers are by and large health though occasional illness is there particularly among children Sanitation: Sanitation facilities are non-existent and one scheme for Rs. 1500/- for providing a pit and commode was prevalent a few years back, though it did not materialize Housing condition: There is a mixture of pucca and kuccha houses. While all the panchayat members including the sarpanch have pucca houses other only have kuccha houses Employment opportunities: opportunities in the village and its vicinity are non-existent as the cultivable land provides employment for a few. Majority have to work as labor outside in Gurgaon and delhi and stay away for a period of 10-15 days from the village; 4 youths have


completed ITI and 2 of them as Electrician – something that could be of use to the sub-station activities Water supply: connection provided is the main source of water though the erratic power supply makes it difficult. Handpumps are non-existent. it takes around 5 hours to irrigate 1 kila – 5 acres or 5000 it takes 5 hours.; rainfall is during the normal monsoon season for 3 months, in absence of water supply via connection, females go to the nearby 3-4 ponds to wash clothes Electricity supply: Supply is between11.00-1.00 and 3.00-5.00 pm during day times. The following week the supply is during the night time. Currently in light of the erratic electricity supply, kerosene lamps are the option, whereas it is sold even to these people at Rs. 20/litre though they are eligible as BPL households to get it at Rs. 15/- or so. For complaints on electricity, the villagers complaint to the nearby Ferozepur-Zirka office and response in attendance is low. Agriculture: Sarsoon, Wheat, Subjis such as Baingan, Tomato, Onion are sown and produce is marketed at mandis at Gurgaon, Delhi. There was a tie with Mother Diary. Weekly 3-4 times vehicles comprising the produce of 10-12 villagers are sent to these mandis; collectively. Water for cattle too is an issue as almost all households have cattle in form of cows, buffaloes, goats NGO presence: Sehgal foundation – a NGO nearby had started the concept of development of ‘model’ village. Activities included water management, health, income enhancement activities and community mobilization. Ongoing-Development Schemes: Govt. schemes such as JSJY were ongoing, NREGS – rocky soil, labors are not available as they out-migrate for work in Gurgaon and Sohna. Food for work scheme too did not succeed Outcomes: More reliable power supply is required for the village and for which the land has been donated. Overall development as a result of the sub-station too is expected in terms of employment opportunities are expected


Focus Group Discussion with women Name of the Village Rangala Rajpur (Ferozepur-Zirka block)




FGD Conducted by Neha

Start and End Time 11.00 am - 12.00 noon

Objectives: • inform villagers about the proposed sub-station • to understand their overall socio-economic condition • to elicit their views and perceptions on benefits from the better power supply Issues discussed: Education: Illiteracy is very high as not a single female is metric (middle). Since sons too do not get any employment despite education, daughters are not sent to school Health: Dispensary closest is at Ferozepur Zirka, though doctor not available. Villagers are by and large health though occasional illness is there particularly among children Employment opportunities: all of them do either household work or work in the fields. Electricity supply: Supply is between 11.00-1.00 and 3.00-5.00 pm during day times. Water supply: connection provided is the main source of water though the erratic power supply makes it difficult. Rainfall is during the normal monsoon season for 3 months. In absence of water supply via connection, females go to the nearby 3-4 ponds to wash clothes Household composition: In terms of household composition, it is 7-8 members per household. Outcomes: better power supply would help to alleviate some of the water and education related issues and the project of the proposed sub-station is welcome


Focus Group Discussion with key members Name of the Village Samain (Tohana bolck)




FGD Conducted by Nilesh, Sarika and Chandrani

Start and End Time 10.00 am - 11.300 am

Objectives: • inform villagers about the proposed sub-station • to understand their overall socio-economic condition • to elicit their views and perceptions on project Issues discussed: Land holding: 60% of the households have land and other 40% do not. Of the total land holding 6283 acres it divided 1600 households giving a average land holding of 4 acres/household Land donation: Donation of community land: The panchayat has donated the barren panchayat land of 16.6 acres for the sub-station. Besides community land such as the donated piece, the panchayat has another 324 acres Village and Household composition: The village has approximately 400 households with a total population of approximately 3500. In terms of household composition, it is 7-8 members per household. Education: despite of having 3 government schools and 7private schools Illiteracy is very high in the village. Not a single female is metric (middle). FGDs with females revealed that while male members despite being educated do not have employment except working as agricultural labourers, females children are of little use in getting educated Health: Hospital closest is at Fatehabad, though doctor not available. Villagers are by and large health though occasional illness is there particularly among children Sanitation: Sanitation facilities are non-existent and only few houses have septic tank. Housing condition: There is a mixture of pucca and semi-pucca houses. While all the panchayat members including the sarpanch are having very good houses and only few houses are in semi-pucca condition. Employment opportunities: Opportunities in the village and its vicinity are non-existent as the cultivable land provides employment for a few. There are potential for development of Small scale and household industries in the village. Water supply: connection provided is the main source of water though the erratic power supply makes it difficult. There are few Handpumps in village. it takes around 5 hours to irrigate 1 kila – 5 acres or 5000 it takes 5 hours.; rainfall is during the normal monsoon season for 3 months, in absence of water supply via connection, females go to the nearby ponds to


wash clothes Electricity supply: Electricity supply is for a few hours between 8.00 am - 10.00 am and 6.00 pm - 10.00 pm during day times. The power supply is alternated every week with day supply one week followed by night supply the following week. Currently in light of the erratic electricity supply, kerosene lamps, generator and inverter are the alternative. Agriculture: Sarsoon, Wheat, paddy, cotton, vegetable such as Brinjal, Tomato, and Onion are sown and produce is marketed at mandis at Jakhalmandi. Water for cattle too is an issue as almost all households have cattle in form of cows, buffaloes, goats, etc. NGO presence: No NGOs in the area Ongoing: Development Schemes: Govt. schemes such as JSJY were ongoing, NREGS Outcomes: More reliable power supply is required for the village and for which the land has been donated. Overall development as a result of the sub-station too is expected in terms of employment opportunities are expected


Focus Group Discussion with women and other villagers Name of the Village Samain (Tohana bolck)


Venue Substation site


FGD Conducted by Sarika and Chandrani

Start and End Time 10.00 am - 10.300 am

Objectives: • inform villagers about the proposed sub-station • to understand their overall socio-economic condition • to elicit their views and perceptions on benefits from the better power supply Issues discussed: Education: Illiteracy is very high as not a single female is metric (middle). Only 50% population is literate. Health: hospital closest is at Fatehabad, though doctor not available. Villagers are by and large health though occasional illness is there particularly among children Employment opportunities: all of them do either household work or work as agricultural labourers. Electricity supply: Supply is for a few hours between 8.00 am - 10.00 am and 6.00 pm - 10.00 pm during day times. Water supply: connection provided is the main source of water though the erratic power supply makes it difficult. Rainfall is during the normal monsoon season for 3 months. In absence of water supply via connection, females go to the nearby ponds to wash clothes Household composition: In terms of household composition, it is 6 members per household. Outcomes: better power supply would help to alleviate some of the water and education related issues and the project of the proposed sub-station is welcome


Annexure 2: Consultation Checklist CONSULTATION CHECKLIST

Name of the Village/Panchayat

Date

Venue

No. of Persons attended:

Start and End Time

Issue Covered Yes No Information about the project

Details on the Sub-station (KV, coverage of area)

Duration of construction for Sub-station

Site Specifications of Sub-station (type of land on sub-station is sited)

Safety Issues

Restrictions on land use in and around the sub-station

Social impacts

Loss of land (for substation), structures and other community property resources such as playground

Temporary Loss of access to road, etc.

Temporary loss of income

Impact on Water situation due to supply for the sub-station

Enhancement (or if any deprivation) of features of the area around sub-station

Mitigation Measures

• Compensation for land (and substation) and structures


• Provision of compensation of lost trees and CPRs

Work Opportunities

• Provision of temporary (or permanent) employment opportunities, if any


Annexure 3: Mewat – Statistics at a Glance

Area Total area (sq. km.) = 1874 No. of villages (Total) = 491 No. of Towns = 6 Blocks = 6 Sub Divisions = 3 Tehsils = 3 Sub-Tehsils = 2 Population (2001 Census) Total Population = 1078000 Males = 577934 Females = 500066 Rural Population = 1001869 Males = 537035 Females = 464834 Rural Population Percentage of total = 92.93 Urban population = 76131 Males = 40898 Females = 35233 Urban population percentage of total = 7.06 Density = 575 Scheduled Caste Population = 101211 Literates = 271492 Male = 228216 Female = 43276

Climate Average Rainfall (in inches) = 4.78

Agriculture Total area according to village papers (ha.in lakh) = 1.86 Net area sown (ha.in Lakh) = 1.46 Area sown repeatedly (ha.in lakh) = 0.66 Tractors = 5021

Irrigation Net area irrigated (ha.} = 42600 Tubewells and pumps sets = 18553

Forest Total area under forest (sq. km) = 39

Animal Husbandry Total livestock = 386 Veterinary institutions = 108

Health CHC = 4 PHC = 15 Sub-Centres = 76 Ayurvedic = 26 Homeopathic = 11

Education Primary Schools = 425 Middle Schools = 72 High Schools = 82 Hr. Sec. Schools = 12 Bal Bhawan = 3 Colleges = 3 Polytechnics = 1 ITI / VEI = 3+4=7 Teachers Training Institute = 1

Banks No. of Commercial Banks = 16

Roads Total length of metalled roads (in km) = 270.46 Villages and towns attached with roads = 491


Annexure 4: Census/Socio Economic Survey Questionnaire

HARYANA POWER PROJECT

Census/Socio Economic Survey Questionnaire

Investigator Name Supervisor Name

Respondent Name AC/BC Type of Household

Type of the Use

(Note: Provide a sketch of the property on Page 4 of this questionnaire.)

A. IDENTIFICATION

A.1 General Identification.

A.2 Type of Property Private

Government Trust Community Others

1 2 3 4 5 A.3 Ownership A.3.1 Do you own the structure/ plot/ agriculture land? A.3.2 Occupiers Name _____________________________________S/o______________________________ A.3.3 Name, Address, Phone Number and LANDMARK __________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ A.3.4 If Tenant, Name and Address and Contact Number of the Owner _____________________________

Date 2 0 0

Identification Number

/ /

Road No Side Number

General SC

ST OBC Women headed household

BPL* If BPL, card NoBPL*

1 2 3 4 5 6

Residential 1 Commercial 2 Residential cum Commercial 3 Open Land/Plot 4 Plantation/ Orchard 5 Graveyard 6 School 7 PHC/Hosp./Dispensary. 8 Industrial 9 Mazar 10 Temple 11 Masjid 12 Church 13 Shrine 14 Vill Com/ Panchyat/Govt. Land 15 Agriculture 16 Waste/ Grazing/ Barren 17 Others (specify) 99

No of Storeys G 1 G+1 2 G+2 3

State District Block Town//Village

Owner 1. Tenant 2. Encroacher 3. Squatter 4. Share Cropper 5


_________________________________________________________________________________________

A.3.5 Please provide with an ID Proof (Ration card, Voter Id, PAN Card, Driving Licence, any ONE) Record the details. _______________________________________________________________________________

A.4 Utilities on the Property

Sl.No Utilities Unit(s) owned Sl.No Live Stock Asset Numbers 1. Trees 1. Cow 2. Dug wells 2. Buffalo 3. Tube wells 3. Sheep 4. Lift Irrigation Points 4. Goat 5. Water Tap 5. Pig 6. Water Tank 6. Poultry 7. Hand Pump 7. Pond Others (Mention) 8. Cattle Shed 9 Water supply pipeline 10 Boundary wall 11 Barbed wire fence 12 Pond 13 Others (SP)

Tree type

A.5 Trees that are likely to be affected

Height of tree

Distance from tower base

1. Mango 2. Mulberry, 3. eucalyptus, 4. pine, 5. kikar, 6. shisham and 7. babul A.6 Typology of the Main Structure

Roof Wall Floor Boundary No of Rooms

RCC/RBC 1 Brick 1 Concrete 1 Brick 1 Thatched 2 Wood

Plastic 2 Mud 2 Barbed Wire 2

Mud 3 Mud 3 Stone 3 Wood 3 GI / Asbestos 4 Asbestos 4 Others 9 Others 9

Bamboo 5 Others 9 Others 9

B. Structural Details B.1.1 How old is the structure? (Mention the Year since you are operating from this structure) B.1.2. How long are you residing or operating from the structure? B.1.3 Measurement of the Land (in mts) Length:

Breadth: Total Area:

Impacted area Remarks if any

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulberry�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eucalyptus�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shisham�


B.1.4 Measurement of the Structure/Asset Length:

Breadth: Height Total area of the structure

Total Impacted area of the structure

Remarks if any

B.1.5 What type of business are you doing, in case of commercial use?

1. Tea Stall 8. Kabari Shop 15. Motel 2. Grocery/General/KiranaStore 9. Educational institution 16. Butcher/meat 3. Vegetables/ Fruits 10. Hotel/ Restaurant 17. Barber Shop 4. Cloth/Garments 11. Electrical 18. Medicine Shop 5. Tailor shop 12 Furniture 19 Wine Shop 6. Pan/ Cigarette Shop 13 Petrol Pump 20 Phone/Photocopy shop 7. Garage/ Mechanic Shop 14. Lubricant Shop 99. Any other, please specify

B.1.6 Is your business self owned? 1 -Yes / 2 - No B.1.7 How many people have you employed? (number) B.1.9 Where would you prefer to move from here ? (Residential and Commercial Both )

S No Place Where (specify) Distance in Kms from current location

1 Within the Village/ Town 2 Outside the Village / Town

B.1.10 Do you have any alternative land /structure? 1 - Yes / 2 - No B.1.11 If Yes, where?

Place (specify) Distance in Kms from existing

B.2. Agricultural Details B.2.1 Do you have agricultural land? 1 - Yes / 2 - No B.2.2 Type of Land 1. Irrigated 2. Un-irrigated 3. Waste Land 9. Other (Specify) B.2.3 What Crops you Grow ? 1. Rice 2. Maize 3. Tea 4. Wheat 5. Vegetables 6. Fruits 7. Bamboo 9. Others (Specify)__ ___________________ B.2.4 For how many years the Land being cultivated by you / your ancestors ____

C.1. Household Details

C.1.1. Caste details

C.1.2. Type of Family

C.1.2. No. of Persons in Household.

ST (hills) ST (Plain)

SC MOBC OBC General

1 2 3 4 5 6 Others Specify the Caste Group 9

Nuclear Joint Extended Sibling 1 2 3 4

Above 15 yrs Below 15 yrs


Codes for Relationship 1 Head of the House Hold 2 Wife 3 Husband 4 Son

5 Daughter 6 Son-in-law 7 Daughter-in-law 8 Grandfather

9 Grandmother 10 Grandson 11 Grand daughter 12 Grandson-in-law

13 Grand daughter-in-law 14 Brother 15 Sister 16 Brother-in-law

17 Sister-in-law 18 Father 19 Mother 20 Father-in-law

21 Mother-in-law 22 Uncle 23 Aunt 24 Cousin

25 Nephew 26 Niece 27 Any other (specify)

C.2. Family Profile. (Start from Head of the Household) Member Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

C.2.1 Name

Write down the names of all person who live and eat together in this household starting with head exclude persons under the age of 14 years.

C.2.2 Relationship HH Codes as given above

C.2.3 Sex Is the NAME male or female? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Male 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Female

C.2.4 Age How old was NAME on the last birthday?

Record the age on last birthday

C.2.5 Marital Status

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Married 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Unmarried 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Divorced 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Separated 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Widow/Widower

C.2.6 Education

The class till which the person has been educated. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Illiterate 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Primary (class 4)

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Secondary (Class 5 - 10)

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Higher (graduate) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Technical 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Vocational

C.2.7 Health

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Handicap by birth

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Handicap due to other reasons

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Any other chronic health problems

D.1. Employment Status of the Family Members D.1 Employment Status

Is the NAME working? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Yes 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 No

D.2 Occupation

The occupational activity at the place of job? This may have multiple entries

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Agriculture 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Agri Labour 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Non Agri Labour 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Business/Trade 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Govt. Service 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Private Service 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Maid Servant 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Others

D.3 Non-Working Status

What was the main reason for the NAME not working? To be filled for persons who are not working.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 No work available 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Seasonal inactivity

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Household family duties

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Old/young 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Handicapped 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Student


9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Others

D.4 Income

How much does the NAME earn in a month? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Less than Rs.2000 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Rs.2000 – 3000 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Rs. 3000 - 4000

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Above Rs 4000

D.5 Skills What type of skill possessed by the person? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Computer

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Weaving

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Typing

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mechanic

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Driving

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Others (specify)

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 None

D.6 Household Expenditure

Item Amount 1 Food 2 Cooking Fuel 3 Clothing 4 Transport 5 Health Care/Medicines 6 Education 7 Electricity/Utilities 8 Social events 9 Agriculture (Labor/ Tools) 10 Seeds/Fertilizers/Pesticides 11 Water 12 Deisel Generator 13 Others

D.7 Have you availed of benefit under any Govt. Scheme ? 1. Yes 2. No

Yes Purpose Amount Availed Training 1. JRY/ IJRY 2. DWACRA 3. IPDP 4. PMRY 5. NREGP 6. Others (Specify)

D.8 Site Observations (distance from start point):

Km Observations


Annexure 5: Resolution of Dhanvala Panchayat for transfer of Panchayat land for the Construction for 220KV substation in Rangala Rajpur, Mewat


Annexure 6: Copy of Resolution Passed by the Panchayat, Samain


Annexure 7: Circular with applicable circle rate for Mewat and Fatehabad districts

220 kv substations at rangala rajpur...

Documents