2.12 learning laboratories: strategies to support implementation (decoligny)
DESCRIPTION
This workshop will examine strategies that communities are using to promote the effective use of HPRP resources and other interventions to end homelessness. The workshop will examine the use of community learning laboratories that evaluate emerging data and HPRP implementation to refine interventions. Strategies to support the transfer of effective strategies across local communities will also be explored.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Promoting Systems Change Through Stakeholder
Convenings NAEH Conference on Ending Homelessness
July 12, 2010
Elaine de Coligny, Executive Director
1
![Page 2: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Alameda County, CA Background
• Located in the San Francisco East Bay; Population 1.5 million
• 2009 Homeless PTC=4,341, • Plan to end homelessness published
in 2006• HPRP funds enabled us to develop
our first ever countywide prevention and rapid rehousing programs.
2
![Page 3: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Alameda County, CA Background
• Alameda County looks like many other mid-size jurisdictions across the country trying to to end homelessness Diffuse government Power Structure
14 different cities and unincorporated county. Our largest city, Oakland, is 450k
No centralized mandate or champion
A collection of providers not a system of care Who got served and how a result of evolution, each
agency’s mission and funding requirements history of collaborating across jurisdictional
boundaries for our HUD NOFA app, base closures, S + C, etc.
3
![Page 4: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Alameda County, CA Background
• 2004 Three Systems of Care began working on a joint housing plan that became the EveryOne Plan
Behavioral Health Care Services Office of AIDS Administration Homeless Continuum of Care Council Planners include Social Services Agency, Housing and
Community Development, cities of Berkeley and Oakland
• Published in 2006, the Plan is widely Adopted All 14 cities and the County adopt & commit to
implementation Over 50 Housing and Service Providers endorse Plan
• It called for systems change and working together in new ways
EveryOne Home, the organization is established to coordinate implementation
4
![Page 5: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• The announcement of HPRP funds brought the community of stakeholders together to plan our approach looking at: Data from our own county Best practices across the country HUD notice
• Decided to create a single countywide program with one entry point & one set of rules
HPRP: 1st major EH Initiative
5
![Page 6: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
HPRP
• EveryOne Home facilitated program design work with jurisdictional grantees and other stakeholders including Social Services who contributed TANF ECF $
• Providers were selected in August to operate the 7 regional Housing Resource Centers
• The Priority Home Partnership is born
6
![Page 7: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Implementation & Learning Community
• Priority Home Partnership is governed by an Implementation and Learning Community
• Coordinated by EveryOne Home it includes: Jurisdictional Grantees Non-profit Executive Directors Program Directors Direct Line staff
• Shared Commitments To refining and improving program as we go Collecting quality data and using it to drive changes All members are partners in making the program its best
7
![Page 8: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ILC Structure
• Very Informal • Full ILC meets monthly• Case Managers hold bi-monthly training and TA
sessions.• Jurisdictional grantees meet as needed to address
compliance and grant management issues• Regional HRC teams also meet regularly• Work groups get formed to solve problems or
develop policy/procedures Changes in assessment tool to target more deeply Develop shelter in-reach strategies for rapid rehousing
8
![Page 9: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ILC Communication
• Between meetings Communicate using a Google group 86 members 94 files including all policies procedures and forms used in
program
• Messages posted using following headings: Policy—for everybody including EDs and Grantees Resources—things that will help clients for Case Managers HMIS—directions for anyone doing data collection and entry Ask ILC—range from help with a client issue to a policy
clarification Meeting—announcements of meetings and trainings
9
![Page 10: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Issues the ILC is addressing
• Missing Persons Showed up in data reports on numbers
screened at 211 vs numbers enrolled for services at HRC
Researching reasons people are not getting served If many not eligible could lead to revised
screening If many not contacted in time leads to
streamlining intake procedures
10
![Page 11: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Issues the ILC is addressing
• Refining our targeting/Predicting Success Ongoing discussions about factors that predict
success: e.g. rental history and income Using data collected at intake, reassessment,
and exit to look at the housing stability of households with different scores on income and rental history
Group committed to using HMIS data to drive decisions not just anecdotal experience
11
![Page 12: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Keys to Success
12
Bring stakeholders to table early and often
Commit to collecting and using data to shape and improve program
Create peer to peer forums and cross sector forums: e.g. case manager trainings and the ILC
Maintain a spirit of learning—things that don’t work can be just as valuable
![Page 13: 2.12 Learning Laboratories: Strategies to Support Implementation (deColigny)](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022051612/54c443c94a7959fc708b45b1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
MORE INFORMATION AVAILABLE
Visit www.everyonehome.org for more information, on our HPRP design, the 2008 Prevention Study, the assessment tool, our Plan
13