21. contact details · 2019-01-29 · sm/217 adrian bertie & jayne neal sm/216 kurt von...

64
SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018 Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1030 I hope you will duly consider my views in reaching a decision. M/59 Fiona Cairns, Suffolk Preservation Society Duplicate of E/116 E/90 Heaton Planning Representation withdrawn E/91 Highways England Removed as not a representation 21. CONTACT DETAILS Your name Number Respondent SM/1 Dr Michael Bamford SM/2 Spencer Deakin SM/3 Miles Cooke SM/4 Peta Jessemey SM/5 Richard SM/6 Mark Blackburn SM/7 E J Peake SM/8 Steve Woolnough SM/9 Kate Dinnes SM/10 Kaye Brooks SM/11 Paul Banjo

Upload: others

Post on 07-Apr-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1030

I hope you will duly consider my views in reaching a decision.

M/59 Fiona Cairns, Suffolk Preservation Society

Duplicate of E/116

E/90 Heaton Planning Representation withdrawn

E/91 Highways England Removed as not a representation

21. CONTACT DETAILS Your name Number Respondent SM/1 Dr Michael Bamford SM/2 Spencer Deakin SM/3 Miles Cooke SM/4 Peta Jessemey SM/5 Richard SM/6 Mark Blackburn SM/7 E J Peake SM/8 Steve Woolnough SM/9 Kate Dinnes SM/10 Kaye Brooks SM/11 Paul Banjo

Page 2: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1031

SM/12 Mrs Colette Skelly SM/13 Robert Farquharson SM/14 Alex Winterbotham SM/15 Heloise Winterbotham SM/16 Kirsty MacPherson SM/17 Stacey Elliott SM/18 Leah SM/19 Jonathan Minter SM/20 Terry Corner SM/21 Terry Corner SM/22 Mr S McNamara SM/23 Richard Griffiths SM/24 Stephen Edgell SM/25 Clive Pearsons SM/26 Clive Pearsons SM/27 Robin Wraight SM/28 Ann Ross. SM/29 James Ross SM/30 James Ross SM/31 Tony Casement SM/32 Verity SM/33 Sara Farrands SM/34 Anne Eaton SM/35 Anne Eaton SM/36 Emma Williamson

Page 3: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1032

SM/37 Allan Cawthorn SM/38 Annabel Kingsman SM/39 Charlotte de Rothschild SM/40 Nicholas Chapman SM/41 Ben Hayward SM/42 Graham Fry SM/43 Lionel de Rothschild SM/44 Isobel Fraser SM/45 Laura Pirkis SM/46 Stella Morland-Pearce SM/47 M J G Fletcher SM/48 Lawrence Mallinson SM/49 Rupert Wise SM/50 Caroline Wilson SM/51 Andrew Deller SM/52 Lord and Lady Derwent SM/53 Lord and Lady Derwent SM/54 Amy Wren SM/55 Frederick Winterbotham SM/56 Barking Parish Council SM/57 James Boggis, Blythburgh with Bulcamp and Hinton Parish Council SM/58 Hugh Carson SM/59 Gillian Harrison SM/60 S Laing SM/61 Thomas Van Oss

Page 4: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1033

SM/62 Thomas Van Oss SM/63 Jack Boyer SM/64 Luke Rajah SM/65 Nicholas Ford SM/66 Rachel Wight SM/67 Richard and Margaret Sax SM/68 Richard Stevens SM/69 John Scott SM/70 Fred Cooke SM/71 P.T.E. Massey SM/72 Penelope Roskell-Griffiths SM/73 Mr J Nottage SM/74 Peter Dow, Elmswell Parish Council SM/75 E.J.V. Carey SM/76 Mary Colwell SM/77 Hugh Williamson SM/78 Annie Wootton SM/79 P. G. Parke SM/80 Alison McKay SM/81 Nat le Roux SM/82 Andrew Fuller SM/82 Andy Smedley SM/84 Wayne Jones SM/85 Paul Hegarty SM/86 Sarah Jandu

Page 5: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1034

SM/87 Tim & Marylyn Bacon SM/88 Sarah Partridge, Clerk to Kersey PC SM/89 PJ Mansfield SM/90 PJ Mansfield SM/91 PJ Mansfield SM/92 Ann SM/93 Mrs Jane Wooster SM/94 Richard Wells SM/95 Francis Johnstone SM/96 Simon Ford SM/97 Paul Bastick and Sally Kington SM/98 Daniel Jones SM/99 William Glynn SM/100 Dorothy Newton SM/101 Natasha Longman SM/102 Simon Hutley SM/103 Sam Chadd SM/104 Clive Tickner SM/105 Christopher Charles Spink SM/106 Sue Taylor SM/107 Wendy Thorpe SM/108 Elly Brindle SM/109 Deborah Bookman SM/110 Richard and Jacqueline Fortey SM/111 John Holmes

Page 6: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1035

SM/112 Eddie Wilkinson, Energy Power Resources Limited SM/113 DS Rajan SM/114 David Douce SM/115 Jennifer Plummer SM/116 Julia Johnson SM/117 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/118 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/119 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/120 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/121 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/122 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/123 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/124 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/125 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/126 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/127 Charlotte Du Cann SM/128 Katherine Hamilton SM/129 Adam Robertson-Young SM/130 Alexander Bateman SM/131 Adrian Ward SM/132 Annabel Gault SM/133 M.L. Sutton SM/134 Cecily Ross SM/135 Mark Watson SM/136 Kathy Collins

Page 7: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1036

SM/137 Mr & Mrs Sutton SM/138 Dr Caroline Hyde SM/139 Mrs Elizabeth Hunter SM/140 Representation removed on request of the author SM/141 Peter Sutters SM/142 Peter Sutters SM/143 Peter Sutters SM/144 Peter Sutters SM/145 Peter Sutters SM/146 Peter Sutters SM/147 Robert Newell, Waveney and District Ramblers SM/148 Simon Meadows SM/149 A A Ball SM/150 A Couzens SM/151 Mr Gerell SM/152 John Barry Waters SM/153 Peter and Harriet Coulter SM/154 James Forrester SM/155 James Potter SM/156 Peter Emery SM/157 Sarah Groves SM/158 Carole Youngs SM/159 Carole Youngs SM/160 Richard & Denise West SM/161 Christopher Flack

Page 8: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1037

SM/162 Philip and Joanna Gordon SM/163 Mrs V Waters SM/164 Mrs D. M.Ransom SM/165 Christina Galvin SM/166 Mr Terry Babbs SM/167 Glenn Loveday SM/168 Jonathan Worsley, PDE Consulting SM/169 Liz Muniandy SM/170 Simon Gibbs SM/171 Charles Merrifield SM/172 Mark Fletcher SM/173 Nick Miller SM/174 Jim Marshall and Sarah Cook SM/175 Jenny Newhouse SM/176 Kristian Thorpe SM/177 Ed Wyer SM/178 Marianne Ackerman SM/179 Daniel Hutton SM/180 Tony Watling SM/277 Virginia Berridge SM/181 Jane Connell-Smith, Tattingstone Parish Council SM/182 Trevor Jessop, Kettleburgh Parish Council SM/183 Rob Gray SM/184 Mike Watling SM/185 Ann Hurst

Page 9: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1038

SM/186 Mrs Christine Small SM/187 Mrs Pamela Cyprien SM/188 Patricia Gray SM/189 Andrew Eastaugh SM/190 Ruth Pigneguy SM/191 John Pigneguy SM/192 Pamela Morris SM/193 Mr & Mrs Merry SM/278 Persephone Pearl SM/194 Sally Skinner SM/195 R Binns SM/196 Sonia Jewers, Wetherden Parish Council SM/197 Mike Thompson SM/198 Clare Williams SM/199 Dr Adrian Lucas SM/200 Geoffrey Berridge SM/201 Anita Hartley SM/202 Tarja Burtsal SM/203 Joanne Feely SM/204 Richard Rider SM/205 Alison Butcher SM/206 Daniel Gower SM/207 Ms J Chambers SM/208 Thomas Spalding SM/209 James Lucas

Page 10: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1039

SM/210 Liz and David Goodman SM/211 John Hellard SM/212 Martin Soons SM/213 Simon Baker SM/214 Sarah Brownie SM/215 Sonia Plume SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes SM/222 J Baker SM/224 David Cheshire SM/223 Terence & Josephine Nicholls SM/225 Jocelyn Blakey SM/226 Judith Mitchell SM/227 Vickie Lack SM/228 Chris Heath SM/229 Glenn Mitchell SM/230 Alex Bedford SM/231 Laurence Bickell SM/232 Vanessa Selwyn SM/233 V Weston SM/234 Stephen Clarke

Page 11: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1040

SM/235 Phil Morley SM/236 Annie Jerman SM/237 Denise Alexander SM/238 John and Barbara Carter SM/239 David Lincoln SM/240 Amy Spurdens SM/241 Andy Roxburgh SM/242 Andrew Jarratt SM/243 Robert Brittain SM/244 Mr and Mrs C Farrant SM/245 Richard Dann SM/246 Ian Collins SM/247 Gavin Richards SM/248 Claire Tuddenham SM/249 Caroline Spinks SM/250 Dr J Dekkers SM/251 Lynne Jardine SM/252 Simon Clack SM/253 Richard Barnes SM/254 Amanda Barnes SM/255 Mr Robert Colerman SM/256 Julia Faulds SM/257 Jennifer Cremer SM/258 Jennifer Cremer SM/259 Lindsay Hargreaves

Page 12: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1041

SM/260 Lucy Neal SM/261 Cllr Mrs Rona Burt SM/262 Julia Crook SM/263 Catherine Louise Allen SM/264 Victoria Dickson SM/265 Graham Dudley SM/266 Joanne Bray SM/267 Colin Hinkins SM/268 Michael Bray SM/269 Colin Hinkins SM/270 Colin Hinkins SM/271 Colin Hinkins SM/272 Keith Smith SM/273 Graham Moxon SM/274 Graham Moxon SM/275 Ruby Icke SM/276 Clare Coupland SM/277 Virginia Berridge SM/278 Persephone Pearl DR/1 Representation removed on request of the author DR/2 L. Hough DR/3 Ken Jordan DR/4 Sarah Rush DR/5 Tim Gudgeon DR/6 Jean Muirhead

Page 13: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1042

DR/7 Katherine Hodge DR/8 V.Stearn DR/9 Toby Rush DR/10 Jonathan Ford DR/11 Alex Watson DR/12 Peter Holland DR/13 Andrea Eden DR/14 Anne-Marie Cracknell DR/15 Mrs D Catchpole DR/16 J.M.Wilson DR/17 James Easter DR/18 Dr Michael Bamford DR/19 J.S Barnes DR/20 Steve McNamara DR/21 John Levantis DR/22 R. Corsfield DR/23 Carol & Peter Tricky DR/24 Miss Gloria Betts DR/25 Lynda Collins DR/26 Esme Murfitt DR/27 Jennifer Easter DR/28 Mrs Pamela Tait DR/29 Catherine Dell DR/30 Tim Hunter DR/31 Tim Hunter

Page 14: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1043

E/1 W.J. Ranner E/2 Griffin Holmes E/3 Spencer Deakin E/4 Dave Crimmin – Little Cornard Parish Council E/5 Dave Crimmin - Chilton Parish Council E/6 Representation removed on request of the author E/8 Dave Crimmin – Great Waldingfield Parish Council E/10 Mary Winterbotham E/11 Lisa Ray E/12 Dave Crimmin -Polstead Parish Council E/13 Robert Jellicoe E/16 Clare Watson E/17 Simon Loftus E/18 Richard Griffiths E/19 Hugh Brody E/20 Jean Brown - Reydon Parish Council E/21 Kerry Holmes E/22 Michael and Cara Peterman E/23 Representation removed on request of the author E/24 Eddie Wilkinson, Melton Renewable Energy E/25 Representation removed on request of the author E/26 Hugh Brody E/27 Joy West E/28 Samantha Barber, Belstead Parish Council E/29 Julia Johnson

Page 15: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1044

E/30 Michael Friend E/31 M & M.J Sutton E/32 Penny Todd E/33 Helen and Michael Hall E/34 Dr FD and Mrs SJ Campbell E/35 John Morton E/36 Peter Dow, Elmswell Parish Council E/37 Carole Curtis E/38 Steve McNamara E/39 Helen Atkinson Wood E/40 Kevin West E/41 Bill Irving E/42 Aileen Irving E/43 Caroline Dowson, Barnham Parish Council E/44 Dr Martin Belsham E/45 Neil Rattenbury E/47 John Wallace Huston E/48 Paul and Jennifer Brown E/49 Jen Larner, Wetherden Parish Council E/50 Sue Nutt E/51 Ian and Jackie Clark E/52 Ian Evans E/53 Daniel Hutton E/55 Caroline Jeffery, Norfolk County Council E/56 Graham Baldry

Page 16: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1045

E/57 Christina Hunter E/58 Richard Hitt E/59 Lauren Staples E/60 Robert Jardine E/63 Russell Stott E/64 Philip Cobbold E/65 Julie Hart E/67 Mike Norris E/68 Wendy Marchant E/69 Gay McBeth E/71 Jean Muirhead E/74 Alasdair Sherry E/75 Janet Ward E/79 Malcolm Robinson, Hacheston Parish Council E/81 Kevin and Pat Keating E/82 Annie Jerman E/85 Dominic Williams E/86 Nigel and Jackie Bentley E/89 Therese Coffey MP E/92 Matthew and Gayle Cook E/93 Gordon Crosby E/94 Jennie Blackburn, Creeting St Mary Parish Council E/95 Joanne Moss E/96 David and Valerie Yorath E/97 Robin Newman

Page 17: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1046

E/99 Jennie Blackburn, Creeting St Peter Parish Council E/100 Jennie Blackburn, Creeting St Mary Parish Council E/101 Stewart and Beryl Booth E/102 Julia Faulds E/103 Lynne Edwards E/104 Cllr Joanna Spicer E/105 Stewart and Beryl Booth E/106 Phil Moss E/107 Adrian Ward E/109 David Benn E/110 Owain Griffiths, GVA Grimley Ltd

E/111 Phil Moss E/112 Barry and Donna Risby E/113 Adrian Ward E/114 Michelle Marshall, Stowmarket Town Council E/115 Lynne Jardine E/117 Fred Green E/120 Rob and Pam Rivers E/121 Theresa Mannell E/122 George Mannell E/123 Kevin and Michaela McCarthy E/124 Linda Emery E/125 Jennie Blackburn, Creeting St Peter Parish Council E/126 Jennie Blackburn, Creeting St Peter Parish Council E/127 Mr and Mrs R Mundy

Page 18: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1047

E/128 Robert Watson E/129 Clare Williams E/130 Mr. D Evenden E/131 Mrs. R Evenden E/132 Chris and Dianna Patten E/133 James and Emmeline Winterbotham E/134 Donald Hunter E/135 Iain Pocock E/136 Linda Emery E/137 Martin NIcholls E/138 Mr and Mrs J. P. Thorpe E/139 Dr Anthony and Beverley Silverstone E/140 Jill Girling E/141 Gill Peters E/142 Kevin and Michaela McCarthy E/143 William Haward E/144 Nigel MacBeth E/145 Ian and Megan Currie E/146 Patricia Davidson E/147 Philip O’ Hear, Southwold and Reydon Society E/148 Fraser Butters E/149 Annabel John E/150 Rebecca McPhie E/151 Terry Corner and Angela Chapman, Copdock and Washbrook Parish Council E/152 Mark Mathewson

Page 19: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1048

E/153 Matt Hurst M/1 J.George Coleman M/2 T.R. Colyer M/3 Peter Drane M/4 Donald Hunter M/5 Michael Moore M/6 R.G. Clift M/7 Mrs Valerie Clift M/8 Jean Brown, Wangford with Henham Parish Council M/9 Mrs C.J. Fisher M/10 Mrs Alice Bunbury M/11 Mrs Carolyn A Hodge M/12 Emma Chapman M/13 Tom Chapman M/14 Lt. Col. R.K. Chater MBE (retd) M/15 Daphne Eliss M/16 Mr. M. Curtis M/17 Mrs Karen Beaton M/18 Mr and Mrs R. Spencely M/28 Brian J Geary M/29 Mr. M Potter M/30 Mr Alan and Mrs Maureen Aldous M/31 Zena Gravener M/32 E.P. Wyatt M/33 Steven and Alison Blakeley

Page 20: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1049

M/35 Mrs. M.A.G Osborne M/36 Steven Potter M/37 Caroline N Fox M/38 Amanda Humphrey M/39 Diane Evans M/40 J.R.Castle M/41 Ian and Jackie Clark M/42 Mark Peel M/43 Mr and Mrs, R Forsdike M/44 Peter Dow, Elmswell Parish Council M/45 R Crosfield M/47 Milly Butters M/48 Virginia Taylor M/49 Terence Taylor M/50 Mr and Mrs Bahar M/51 Robert W Warnes M/52 Lesley Warnes M/53 Trevor Butters M/54 Duncan Clarke M/55 Michelle Marshall, Stowmarket Town Council M/57 Deborah Worboys

Page 21: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1050

NAME OF ORGANISATION

Number Respondent SM/98 Norfolk County Council

E/7 Geosuffolk

E/9 Essex County Council

E/15 Amec Foster Wheeler on behalf of National Grid

E/46 Shotley Holdings Ltd

E/54 Mineral Services Ltd

E/55 Norfolk County Council

E/61 Broads Authority

E/62 Mineral Products Association

E/66 CEMEX

E/70 RSPB

E/71 The Stour and Orwell Society

E/73 Forest Heath District and St Edmundsbury Borough Councils

E/76 Viridor Waste Management

E/77 Norfolk Wildlife Trust

E/78 Suffolk Wildlife Trust

Page 22: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1051

E/80 Engena Ltd

E/83 Historic England

E/84 Greater London Authority

E/87 Brett Group

E/88 Pegasus Group on behalf of Endurance Estates

E/90 Heaton Planning

E/91 Removed as not a representation

E/98 Dedham Vale AONB & Stour Valley Project Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB

E/108 The Environment Agency

E/110 GVA Grimley Ltd on behalf of NDA and Magnox Ltd

E/116 Suffolk Preservation Society

E/118 Suffolk Coastal and Waveney District Councils

E/119 Gladman Developments Ltd

E/154 Natural England

M/19 PDE Consulting Ltd

M/20 PDE Consulting Ltd

M/21 PDE Consulting Ltd

Page 23: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1052

M/22 PDE Consulting Ltd

M/23 PDE Consulting Ltd

M/24 PDE Consulting Ltd

M/25 PDE Consulting Ltd

M/26 PDE Consulting Ltd

M/27 PDE Consulting Ltd

M/34 PDE Consulting Ltd

M/46 Mineral Services Ltd

M/56 Woolnough Contractors Ltd

M/57 Cemex

M/59 Suffolk Preservation Society

Address Number Respondent SM/1 Bentley Old Hall., Bentley IP9 2LW SM/2 43 The Street, Belstead, IP8 3LY SM/3 18 Ellenbrook Road, Ipswich IP2 9RN SM/4 3 Heath Cottages, The Heath, Tattingstone, IP9 2LX SM/5 7 Holly Lane, Belstead, IP8 3LZ

Page 24: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1053

SM/6 The Stables, 1 Barnaby Green, Wangford, Beccles, Suffolk NR34 8AY SM/7 The Bogan, Grove Hill, Belstead, IP8 3LU SM/8 4 Forester Close, Thorrington Park, Ipswich, IP8 3TF SM/9 8 Belmont Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP2 9RH SM/10 22 Oxford Close, MIldenhall IP28 7RP SM/11 45 Pearsons Way, Copdock, IP8 3LG SM/12 Millfield Barn, Mill Lane, Barnham IP24 2NG SM/13 9 Lee Road, Aldeburgh IP15 5HG SM/14 46 basement flat Oakley Road SM/15 Reydon Hall, Wangford, Suffolk, IP18 6SJ SM/16 24 Charlotte Road SM/17 Flat 2 Stoneworth Court, London SE25 5DE SM/18 4 Thornbury Close, N16 8UX SM/19 Rivers Hall, Boxted, Colchester, Essex CO4 5SN SM/20 Upway, The Street, Washbrook, Ipswich, IP8 3HR SM/21 Upway, The Street, Washbrook, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP8 3HR SM/22 1, Warren Close, Elmswell IP30 9DS SM/23 66 Queen Elizabeth's Walk, London N16 5UQ SM/24 The Boundary SM/25 The Gables, Washbrook, Ipswich IP8 3HR SM/26 The Gables, Washbrook, Ipswich IP8 3HR SM/27 Belstead View, Chapel Lane, Belstead, Ipswich, IP8 3LR SM/28 Gwynair,Grove Hill, Belstead IP8 3LS SM/29 Gwynair,Grove Hill, Belstead IP8 3LS SM/30 Gwynair,Grove Hill, Belstead IP8 3LS

Page 25: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1054

SM/31 Hill Cottage, 9 The Hill, Wangford, Suffolk NR34 8AT SM/32 Sandy Lane SM/33 6 The Hill, Wangford,Beccles, Suffolk. NR34 8AT SM/34 101 Kenilworth Avenue London SW19 7LP SM/35 101 Kenilworth Avenue London SW19 7LP SM/36 53 Saint Maur Road London SW6 4DR SM/37 1, The Lilacs, Fishpond Road, Waldringfield IP12 4QX SM/38 Canterbury SM/39 Woodside, Inchmery Lane, Exbury, SO45 1AF SM/40 57a Liverpool Road SM/41 12 Monolulu Court, London SE17 2FS SM/42 Old Farm Cottage, Staploe, St Neots, PE19 5JA SM/43 10A Paultons Street, London SW3 5DR SM/43 19 Redcliffe Rd, London SM/45 8 Rawreth Walk, N1 SM/46 Hare Cottage, Oakfield Road, Ipswich, IP8 3JS SM/47 24 Rhondda Grove London E3 5AP SM/48 Aldeburgh Hall, Aldeburgh IP15 5JD SM/49 Quay House, Quay Lane, Reydon, IP18 6SF SM/50 40 Church St Wangford NR34 8RN SM/51 22 Angle End SM/52 Low Hall Hackness Scarborough YO13 0JN SM/53 Low Hall Hackness Scarborough YO13 0JN SM/54 80 Aldwickbury Crescent, Harpenden Herts AL5 5SE SM/55 Reydon Hall, Reydon IP18 6SJ

Page 26: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1055

SM/56 Melvington Willisham Road Barking Tye SM/57 No postal address provided SM/58 Broadview, Old Road, Elham, Canterbury, Kent. CT4 6AH SM/59 21, Millington Road, Cambridge CB3 9HW SM/60 Corpus Christi College, Cambridge CB2 1RH SM/61 32 Durand Gardens SM/62 32 Durand Gardens SM/63 25 Pembroke Gardens SM/64 105A Gloucester Terrace SM/65 20 Daisy Dormer Court, Trinity Gardens, London, SW9 8DW SM/66 3 Whitehouse Farm Cottages, Bulcamp, Halesworth IP19 9LG SM/67 60A Gravel Road, Kesto, Bromley BR2 8PF. SM/68 Marston's Pit, Cavenham Road, Tuddenham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP28 6SE SM/69 16 Napier Place, London W14 8LG SM/70 Wetherden Suffolk SM/71 Boldshaves, Woodchurch, Ashford, Kent TN26 3RA SM/72 Drift barn, Bulcamp Drift, Halesworth, IP19 9LG SM/73 Fairway Cottage, The Common, Southwold IP18 6AL SM/74 No postal address provided SM/75 Greenacre, Grove Hill, Belstead, Ipswich, IP8 3LP SM/76 1 Somerset St Bristol BS2 8NB SM/77 7 Chester Road, Southwold IP18 6LN SM/78 2 Dale Close Oxford OX1 1TU SM/79 17 Halesworth Road, Reydon, Suffolk IP186NH SM/80 33 Duns Tew, Bicester, OX256JS

Page 27: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1056

SM/81 Westwood, Lodge Road, Walberswick, Suffolk IP18 6UP SM/82 41 LS11 7AE SM/82 5 Low Lea Road, Marple Bridge Stockport, SK6 5AB SM/84 107 Langland Drive Stoke-on-Trent ST32HG SM/85 52 North road Southwold IP186BQ SM/86 3 Torero Mansions, 2 Honoue Lea Avenue, London E20 1DW SM/87 Ramsden farm, Stone, Tenterden Kent TN30 7JB SM/88 No postal address provided SM/89 2 Church Close, Wangford, NR34 8RQ SM/90 2 Church Close, Wangford, NR34 8RQ SM/91 2 Church Close, Wangford, NR34 8RQ SM/92 62 Ansell Rd Sheffield S11 7PE SM/93 3 Mill Gardens, Elmswell IP30 9DQ SM/94 4-6 Queen Street Southwold IP18 6EQ SM/95 2 Buer Road, London SW6 4LA SM/96 Maple Cottage, Mill Lane, Barnham, Norfolk, IP24 2NH SM/97 Bentley Old Hall Barn, Old Hall Lane, Bentley IP9 2LW SM/98 79 Kirkley Run, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0NH SM/99 18 The Crescents, Reydon IP18 6RT SM/100 30 Old Mill Heights Hillsborough BT26 6RF SM/101 77 Chesnut Grove, Balham, SW12 8JF SM/102 67 Warwick Road, Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, CM23 5NL SM/103 previous address Mardle House Wangford SM/104 Smere Corner, Rissemere Lane East, Reydon, IP186SR SM/105 5 Dales View, Washbrook, IP8 3EX

Page 28: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1057

SM/106 79 High Street, Wangford NR34 8RL SM/107 Tudor Cottage, Old London Road, Copdock, Suffolk IP8 3JW SM/108 7 Newington Green Mansions, Green Lanes, London N16 9BT SM/109 21 Warwick Gardens, London W14 8PH SM/110 Lamorna Cottage, Princess Road, Reydon IP18 6QW SM/111 White House Fram, Frostenden, Beccles, NR34 7HZ SM/112 Marsh End, Church Road, Blythburgh, Suffolk IP19 9LL SM/113 5 The Porticos, 374-384 Kings Road London SW3 5UW SM/114 Teggers Barn, Hall Farm Lane, Henstead NR34 7JZ SM/115 33 Station Road,Southwold IP18 6AX SM/116 Red House, Rissemere Lane East, Reydon, Southwold, Suffolk. IP18 6SR SM/117 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/118 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/119 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/120 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/121 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/122 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/123 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/124 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/125 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/126 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/127 Warren Cottage, Rissemere Lane East, Reydon IP18 6SW SM/128 Hill House, 61 Covert Road, Reydon Southwold IP18 6QE SM/152 Hill House, 61 Covert Road, Reydon Southwold IP18 6QE SM/130 11b Hamilton Park, London N5 1SH

Page 29: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1058

SM/131 1 Cherry Wood Back Lane Washbrook SM/132 Knodishall Hall, Saxmundham , IP171TP SM/133 2 Buckenham Court, Southwold IP18 6JT SM/134 13 Johnston St., Creemore, ON. Canada L0M 1G0 SM/135 Warren Cottage SM/136 73 Marlborough road, Southwold IP18 6BJ SM/137 Oak Lodge Warren Lane Elmswell Suffolk IP30 9DT SM/138 1 Cave Cottages, Halesworth Rd, Reydon, Southwold, IP18 6SQ SM/139 4 Buckenham Court, Southwold, IP18 6JT SM/140 Representation removed on request of the author SM/141 Springcroft, Whights Corner, Washbrook, Ipswich IP8 3LB SM/142 Springcroft, Whights Corner, Washbrook, Ipswich IP8 3LB SM/143 Springcroft, Whights Corner, Washbrook, Ipswich IP8 3LB SM/144 Springcroft, Whights Corner, Washbrook, Ipswich IP8 3LB SM/145 Springcroft, Whights Corner, Washbrook, Ipswich IP8 3LB SM/146 Springcroft, Whights Corner, Washbrook, Ipswich IP8 3LB SM/147 No postal address provided SM/148 Pinkneys Way, Mill Lane, Southwold, IP18 6HW SM/149 4 Cresmedow Way Elmswell IP30 9GL SM/150 7 Cresmedow Way Elmswell IP30 9GL SM/151 51 Church Street, Wangford NR34 8RN SM/152 9, Freemarsh Lane, Raydon, Southwold, IP18 6NP SM/153 St. Edmund's, IP18 6LA SM/154 P. O. Box 718, Lakefield, Ontario K0L 2H0 SM/155 Charity Farm, Belstead IP8 3JU

Page 30: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1059

SM/156 Belstead Old Rectory, Oakfield Road, Copdock IP8 3JS SM/157 32 Hill Road, Wangford, Suffolk NR34 8AR SM/158 Yew Tree House, The Street, Barnham IP24 2NF SM/159 Yew Tree House, The Street, Barnham IP24 2NF SM/160 3 Old Priory Gardens, Wangford, Beccles, Suffolk, NR34 8RH SM/161 3 Mendham Ct, Cavenham Rd, Tuddenham IP28 6SF SM/162 Warren Mill House, Elmswell Rd, Wetherden IP14 3LL SM/163 The Hollyhocks, 9 Three Marsh Lane, Reydon, Southwold, Suffolk, IP18 6NP SM/164 The Old Cottage The Street, Copdock. IP83HS SM/165 41 Pearsons Way, Copdock, IP8 3LG SM/166 Hillside Cottage, The Street, Copdock IP8 3HS SM/167 High Street, Tuddenham SM/168 PDE Consulting Ltd, 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR SM/169 Ryde Villa, Mount Pleasant, Reydon IP18 6QQ SM/170 Oaklands, Elm Lane, Copdock, Ipswich, IP83ET SM/110 4 Euston Road Barnham IP24 2NJ SM/172 13 Grove Hill, Belstead, Ipswich, IP8 3LU SM/173 Tiger Hill Cottage, Bures, Suffolk CO8 5BW SM/174 Hullwood Barn, Shelley, Ipswich, IP7 5RE SM/175 39 Fieldstile Rd Southwold IP18 6LD SM/176 Tudor Cottage, Old London Road, Copdock, Suffolk IP8 3JW SM/177 The Pink House Station Rd Barnham IP24 2PE SM/178 5300 Waverly St. Montreal Quebec SM/179 1 Clay Hall Cottages, Copdock, Ipswich, IP8 3JH SM/180 2 St Martins Meadow, Barnham, IP242NX

Page 31: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1060

SM/100 No postal address provided SM/181 No postal address provided SM/182 Norfolk County Council, County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich, NR1 2DH SM/182 The Old Brewhouse, The Street, Kettleburgh, Woodbridge, IP13 7JT SM/183 The Old Red House, Icklingham Road, TuddenhamIP28 6TB SM/184 Watling Whights Corner Washbrook Ipswich IP8 3LB SM/185 3 Rookery Cottages Wenham Road Washbrook IP8 6EZ SM/186 19 Mill Gardens, Elmswell, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP30 9DQ SM/187 66 Halesworth Road, Reydon, Suffolk IP18 6NS SM/188 The Old Red House, Icklingham Road, Tuddenham IP28 6TB SM/189 South Cove House SM/190 4 Lowestoft Road Reydon Southwold IP18 6RJ SM/191 3 Lowestoft Road Reydon Southwold IP18 6RJ SM/192 1 St George's Square.Reydon, IP18 6HT SM/193 The Glen Old London Road Copdock Ipswich Suffolk IP8 3JF SM/85 No postal address provided SM/194 13 The Crescents, Reydon, IP18 6RT SM/195 2 Fairway Rise, Fairfield Road, Reydon IP18 6QR SM/81 Briavel House, Stowmarket Road, Wetherden, IP14 3JP SM/197 19 B, Halesworth Road, Reydon IP18 6NH SM/198 Hall Barn SM/199 Tuddenham Barn, Icklingham Road, Tuddenham, Bury St. Edmunds IP28 6TB SM/200 2 Salisbury Road, Southwold, Suffolk, IP18 6LG SM/201 17 Leonard Drive Lowestoft NR32 4WB SM/202 1 Chestnut Cottages, Washbrook IP8 3HR

Page 32: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1061

SM/203 37 High Street, Tuddenham, Suffolk, IP28 6SQ SM/204 57 High Street, Tuddenham St Mary IP28 6SL SM/205 3 Windmill Cottages, Cavenham IP28 6DE SM/206 19 Cavenham Road, Tuddenham IP28 6SE SM/207 Kantara, The Heath, Tattingstone, IP9 2LX SM/208 18 Old School House, The Street, Cavenham IP28 6DA SM/209 Jason Cottage, The Street, Copdock,IP8 3HS SM/210 The Pightle, Cavenham Suffolk IP28 6DA SM/211 29 High Street Tuddenham St Mary Suffolk IP28 6SQ SM/212 The Old Rectory and Rectory Cottage, Higham Road, Tuddenham IP28 6SG SM/213 Waratah House, The Street, Cavenham IP28 6DE SM/214 The Both, Cavenham SM/215 The Old School House, The Street, Cavenham IP28 6DA SM/217 12, Cavenham Rd, Tuddenham St Mary, Bury St Eds, Suffolk SM/216 9 The Street, Cavehnam, IP28 6DA SM/218 3 Cavenham Road, Tuddenham, Bury St Edmunds, IP28 6SE SM/219 3 Cavenham Road, Tuddenham, Bury St Edmunds, IP28 6SE SM/220 Damson Cottage, 4 The Street, Cavenham IP28 6DA SM/221 The Old School House, The Street, Cavenham IP28 6DA SM/222 Waratah House, The Street, Cavenham IP28 6DE SM/224 7 Mardle Road, Wangford, NR34 8AT. SM/223 38 The Street, Cavenham IP28 6PE SM/225 The Martins, 13a The Green, Tuddenham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk SM/226 Homeleigh, Old London Road, Copdock, IP8 3JF SM/227 8 The Green, Tuddenham St Mary. IP28 6SD

Page 33: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1062

SM/228 Balmaha', Old London Road, Copdock, Ipswich IP8 3JF SM/229 Homeleigh, Old London Road, Copdock IP8 3JF SM/230 13 The Street, Cavenham, IP28 6DA SM/231 15 The Street, Cavenham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP28 6DA SM/232 Icknield House, The Street, Cavenham, IP28 6DA SM/233 3cThe Headlands Thorpeness IP16 4NY SM/234 Yeomans, Folly Lane, Copdock, Ipswich IP8 3JQ SM/235 14 Cavenham Road, Tuddenham, IP28 6SE SM/236 48, Wangford Road, Reydon. IP18 6QA. SM/237 29 The Street, Cavenham. IP28 6DA SM/238 5 Lakeside Park Drive, Reydon, IP18 6YB SM/239 Barn House Cherry Wood Washbrook IP8 3SN SM/240 Ipswich Road, Needham Market SM/241 14 Dales View, Washbrook, Ipswich, IP8 3EX SM/242 Icknield House, The Street, Cavenham, IP28 6DA SM/243 Nethercroft Farm Tuddenham, IP28 6TD SM/244 The Old Red House, Icklingham Road, Tuddenham St Mary, IP28 6TB SM/245 No postal address provided SM/246 Jessamy Cottage Skilmans Hill Southwold IP18 6EY SM/247 3 Hill Road, Reydon, Suffolk IP18 6NL SM/248 Lower Stones farm, Stones Lane, Todmorden, West Yorkshire OL14 7JG SM/249 18 Melrose Road, Norwich NR4 7PN SM/250 9 The Street Cavenham, IP28 6DA SM/251 Paddock Barn, Creeting Hall Farm, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QZ SM/252 Hourglass House, Keens Lane, Reydon, IP18 6NT

Page 34: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1063

SM/253 Suffolk Heritage Antiques Centre, Old London Road, IP83JF SM/254 Suffolk Heritage, Old London Road, Copdock, IP8 3JF SM/255 3 Prescott Drive, Elmswell, Bury St Edmunds IP30 9DE SM/256 Coles Green Farm Washbrook IP8 3HB SM/257 Wandelaar, Foly Lane, Copdock IP8 3JQ SM/258 Wandelaar, Foly Lane, Copdock IP8 3JQ SM/259 Cavenham House, Cavenham, Bury St Edmunds, IP28 6DF SM/260 16 Woodnook Road London SW16 6TZ SM/261 52 High Street Tuddenham Bury St Edmunds IP28 6SA SM/262 No postal address provided SM/263 Valley Farm Lower Layham Ipswich IP7 5RW SM/264 3 The Street, Cavenham, Suffolk, IP28 6DA SM/265 62a High St , Tuddenham, IP28 6SA SM/266 Hillcrest, Old London Road Copdock IP8 3JF SM/267 Spring Barn, Old London Road, Copdock, Ipswich IP8 3JW SM/268 Hillcrest Old London Road Copdock IP8 3JF SM/269 Spring Barn, Old London Road, Copdock, Ipswich IP8 3JW SM/270 Spring Barn, Old London Road, Copdock, Ipswich IP8 3JW SM/271 Spring Barn, Old London Road, Copdock, Ipswich IP8 3JW SM/272 West Hill Bungalow, Wenham Road, Copdock, Ipswich, IP8 3EY SM/273 St. Patricks, Elm Lane, Copdock, Ipswich, IP8 3ET SM/274 St. Patricks, Elm Lane, Copdock, Ipswich, IP8 3ET SM/275 43 Trinity Walk, Stowupland, IP14 4AS SM/276 26 Pheasant Rise. Copdock, IP8 3LF DR/1 Representation removed on request of the author

Page 35: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1064

DR/2 10, The Street, Barnham DR/3 Water Lane, Barnham DR/4 Old Bakery, Barnham DR/5 Blacksmith Lane, Barnham DR/6 Dovecote Cottage, West Farm, Barnham, IP24 2PL DR/7 2, Station Road, Barnham DR/8 No address provided DR/9 Rymer Farm, IP24 2DP DR/10 Snarehill View, Water Lane, Barnham, Thetford, IP24 2NA DR/11 22, Salmond Drive, Barnham DR/12 The Old Parsonage, Barnham DR/13 Thyme Cottage, 3 Thetford Road, Barnham DR/14 1 Monarch Way, Ipswich DR/15 Woodpeckers, London Road, Copdock DR/16 No address provided DR/17 Midfield, Grove Hill, Belstead DR/18 Bentley Old Hall DR/19 Lawnswood, Woolpit, Bury St Edmunds, IP30 9RS DR/20 1 Warren Close, Elmswell DR/21 Pipers, Woolpit DR/22 Mill Gardens, Elmswell DR/23 20 Mill Gardens, Elmswell DR/24 17 Mill Gardens, Elmswell, Bury St Edmunds, IP30 9PQ DR/25 Gable End, Grove Hill, Belstead, IP8 3LF DR/26 54, High St, Tuddenham St Mary

Page 36: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1065

DR/27 Midfield, Grove Hill, Belstead DR/28 ‘Peddars Way’, Mill Lane, Barnham, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2NH DR/29 Doggers, Copdock, IP8 3JF DR/30 75, Yew Tree Rise, Ipswich, IP8 3CH DR/31 75, Yew Tree Rise, Ipswich, IP8 3CH E/1 The Oaks, Newmarket Road, Worlington, IP28 8RZ E/3 43 The Street, Belstead, IP8 3LY E/4 No address provided E/4 No address provided E/5 No address provided E/6 Representation removed on request of the author E/7 No address provided E/8 No address provided E/9 No address provided E/10 The Hall, Wittersham, TN30 7PP E/11 1 Bucks Horn Place, Belstead, IP8 3GL E/12 No address provided E/13 Hall Farm, Wenhaston , IP19 9HE E/14 Ballquolly, Barnham E/15 Gables House, Kenilworth Road, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 6JX E/16 2 Elveden Road, Barnham, IP24 2PQ E/17 Bulcamp House, Bulcamp Drift, Halesworth, IP19 9LG E/18 Drift Farm. Bulcamp Drift, Halesworth IP19 9LG E/19 4 Whitehouse Farm Cottages, Bulcamp Drift, Halesworth, IP19 9LG E/20 5 Mill Lane, Wrentham, Beccles, NR34 7JQ

Page 37: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1066

E/21 2 Lowestoft, Reydon, IP18 6PT E/22 Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada E/23 Representation removed on request of the author E/24 Marsh End, Church Road, Blythburgh, Suffolk IP19 9LL E/25 Representation removed on request of the author E/26 4 Whitehouse Farm Cottages, Bulcamp Drift, Halesworth, IP19 9LG E/27 25 North Road, Southwold, IP18 6BG E/28 No address provided E/29 Red House, Rissemere Lane East, Reydon, Southwold, IP18 6SR E/30 22 Mill Gardens, Elmswell, IP30 9DQ E/31 Warren Gate, Elmswell E/32 16 Mill Gardens, Elmswell, Bury St Edmunds IP30 9DQ E/33 No address provided E/34 Wangford Farm, Mardle Road, Wangford NR34 8AU E/35 Bulcamp Cottage, Bulcamp Drift, Blythborough, IP19 9LG E/36 Parish Council Office, Station Road, Elmswell, IP30 9HR E/37 New Road, Elmswell E/38 1 Warren Close, Elmswell E/39 Bulcamp Cottage, Bulcamp Drift, Bylthborough IP19 9LG E/40 1 Ewen Close, Reydon, Suffolk IP18 6RZ E/41 Reydon Grange, Mardle Road, Wangford, NR34 8AU E/42 Reydon Grange, Mardle Road, Wangford, NR34 8AU E/43 Old West Stables, Bury Road, Barnham, IP24 2PL E/44 Jubilee Cottage, Euston Road, Barnham, IP24 2NJ E/45 The Village Store, The High Street, Wangford, Beccles NR34 8RA

Page 38: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1067

E/46 Folly Farm, Tattingstone, Ipswich, IP9 2NY E/47 Oakwood Cottage, The Street, Barnham, IP24 2NF E/48 18 Salmond Drive, Barnham, IP24 2NL E/49 No address provided E/50 Portelet, Blacksmith Lane, Barnham, Thetford, NR24 2NE E/51 Hambleden, Blacksmith Lane, Barnham, Thetford, NR24 2NE E/52 Hall Farm, Copdock E/53 No address provided E/54 PO Box 10523, Stoke by Nayland, Colchester CO6 4WJ E/55 Norfolk County Council, County Hall, Martineau Lane, Norwich, NR1 2DH E/56 28 Pheasant Rise, Copdock, Ipswich IP8 3LF E/57 Ballquolly, Barnham E/58 North Wing, Creeting Hall, Creeting St Peter, Ipswich IP6 8QZ E/59 4, Peterhouse, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QP E/60 Paddock Barn , Creeting Hall Farm, Creeting St Peter, Ipswich, IP6 8QZ E/61 Broads Authority, Yare House, 62-64 Thorpe Road, Norwich, NR1 1RY E/62 Gillingham House, 38 -44 Gillingham Street, London SW1V 1HU E/63 Willow House, Pound Road, Creeting St Peter IP6 8QR E/64 42, Beatrice Avenue, Felixstowe, IP11 9HB E/65 No address provided E/66 CEMEX UK Operations Ltd, Wolverhampton Road, Oldbury, Warley West Midlands, B69 4RJ E/67 Brackendale, 20 Stowmarket Road, Needham Market, Ipswich IP6 8DS E/68 Hallgarth House, 137 High Street, Needham Market, Ipswich, IP6 8DH E/69 30 St Mary’s Road, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8LZ E/70 Eastern England Regional Office, 65 Thorpe Road, Norwich, NR1 1UD

Page 39: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1068

E/71 Dovecote Cottage, West Farm, Barnham, IP24 2PL E/72 No address provided E/73 West Suffolk House, Bury St Edmunds E/74 Strutt and Parker, Coval Hall, Rainsford, Chelmsford CM1 2QF E/75 Applecroft, The Heath, Tattingstone IP9 2LX E/76 Century Wharf, Crayford Creek, Dartford DA1 4QG E/77 Bewick House, 22 Thorpe Road, Norwich, NR1 1RY E/78 Brooke House, Ashbocking, Ipswich, IP6 9JY E/79 No address provided E/80 The Old Stables, Bosmere Hall, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8LL E/81 Howe Farm, Mill Lane, Stowmarket, IP14 5BP E/82 No address provided E/83 Brooklands, 24 Brooklands Avenue, Cambridge CB2 8BU E/84 No address provided E/85 Hall Barn, Creeting Hall, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QZ E/86 Salix House, The Lane, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QR E/87 Robert Brett House, Ashford Road, Canterbury, CT4 7PP E/88 Suite 4, Pioneer House, Vision Park, Histon, Cambridge, CB24 9NL E/89 House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA E/90 9 The Square, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5JT E/91 Removed as not a representation E/92 Gransden House, The Street, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QT E/93 Needham Market E/94 The Wren, 1 All Saints Road, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8NF E/95 Petronilla House, The Lane, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QR

Page 40: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1069

E/96 Laburnum Cottage, Pound Road, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QR E/97 No address provided E/98 Dock Lane, Melton, Suffolk IP12 1PE E/99 The Wren, 1 All Saints Road, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8NF E/100 The Wren, 1 All Saints Road, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8NF E/101 Granary Barn, Clamp Farm, Stowmarket, IP14 5BP E/102 No address provided E/103 Cherry Tree Farm, Badley, Suffolk, IP6 8RN E/104 No address provided E/105 Granary Barn, Clamp Farm, Stowmarket, IP14 5BP E/106 Petronilla House, The Lane, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QR E/107 No address provided E/108 Iceni House, Cobham Road, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP3 9JD E/109 No address provided E/110 One, Kingsway, Cardiff, CF10 3AN E/111 Petronilla House, The Lane, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QR E/112 Barnfield, the Green, Creeting St Peter, Ipswich IP6 8QT E/113 No address provided E/114 Milton House, Milton Road South, Stowmarket, Suffolk IP14 1EZ E/115 Paddock Barn, Creeting Hall Farm, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QZ E/116 Little Hall, Market Place, Lavenham, CO10 9QZ E/117 6 Elm Lane, Copdock, IP8 3ET

E/118 East Suffolk House, Riduna Park, Station Road, Melton, Woodbridge, IP12 1RT Riverside, 4 Canning Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0EQ

E/119 Gladman House, Alexandria Way, Congleton Business Park, Congleton, Cheshire, CW12 1LB

Page 41: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1070

E/120 No address provided E/121 Highview Cottage, Mill Lane, Creeting St Peter, Ipswich, IP6 8QQ. E/122 Highview Cottage, Mill Lane, Creeting St Peter, Ipswich, IP6 8QQ. E/123 Clamp Farmhouse, Mill Lane, Creeting St Peter, Stowmarket, IP14 5BP E/124 Belstead Old Rectory, Copdock, Ipswich, IP8 3JS E/125 The Wren, 1 All Saints Road, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8NF E/126 The Wren, 1 All Saints Road, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8NF E/127 Scotsfield Cottage, The Avenue, Copdock IP8 3JR E/128 4 Kettleborrow Close, Ixworth, Bury St Edmunds, IP31 2UN E/129 Hall Barn, Creeting Hall, IP6 8QZ E/130 Moss House, Oakfield Road, IP8 3JS E/131 Moss House, Oakfield Road, IP8 3JS E/132 Jubilee House, Pound Road, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QS E/133 Reydon Hall, Wangford Road, Reydon, IP18 6SJ E/134 Balquholly, Blacksmiths Lane, Barnham IP24 2NE E/135 West Hill, Elm Lane, Copdock, IP8 3ET E/136 Belstead Old Rectory, Copdock, Ipswich, IP8 3JS E/137 No address provided E/138 Old Elm Cottage, Fen Lane, Creeting St Mary, Ipswich, IP6 8QE E/139 5 Whitehouse Cottages, Bulcamp Drift, IP19 9LG E/140 Morfield, Wenham Road, Washbrook, Ipswich IP8 3EZ E/141 No address provided E/142 Clamp Farmhouse, Mill Lane, Creeting St Peter, Stowmarket, IP14 5BP E/143 14 Evans Close, Reydon, Suffolk, IP18 6PU E/144 30 St Marys Road, Creeting St Mary, Ipswich, IP6 8LZ

Page 42: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1071

E/145 High Banks, Jacks Green Road, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8NA E/146 14, Evans Close, Reydon, Southwold, IP18 6PU E/147 Rowan Croft, Rissemere Lane East, Reydon, Southwold, IP18 6SW E/148 Fen Farm , Fen Lane, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8QD E/149 No address provided E/150 6 Peterhouse, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QP

E/151 Terry Corner - Upway, The Street, Washbrook, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP8 3HR, Angela Chapman, 65 Thorney Road, Capel St Mary, Ipswich, IP9 2LL

E/152 No address provided E/153 Millmead, The Lane, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QR E/154 Customer Services, Hornbeam House, Crewe Business Park, Electra Way, Crewe, Cheshire, CW1 6GJ IE/1 Planning and Development, Suffolk County Council, 8 Russell Road, Ipswich IP1 2BX IE/2 Transport Policy and Development, Suffolk County Council, 8 Russell Road, Ipswich IP1 2BX IE/3 Flood and Water Management, Suffolk County Council, 8 Russell Road, Ipswich IP1 2BX M/1 1 Mill Lane, Barnham, Thetford, IP24 2NH M/2

M/3 Bowmans Grove, The Heath, Tattingstone, IP9 2LX M/4 Balquholly, Blacksmiths Lane, Barnham IP24 2NE M/5 8 Mill Gardens, Elmswell, IP30 9DQ M/6 Belstead Hall, Belstead , IP8 3JT M/7 Belstead Hall, Belstead , IP8 3JT M/8 5 Mill Lane, Wrentham, Beccles NR34 7JQ M/9 41 Charlottes, Washbrook, IP8 3HZ M/10 South Green Cottage, Southwold, IP18 6ET M/11 The Palms, 13 The Charlottes, Washbrook, IP8 3HZ

Page 43: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1072

M/12 Ivy Cottage, Flixton Road, Flixton, Lowestoft, NR32 5PF M/13 9 Ash Drive, Carlton Manor Park, Chapel Road, Carlton Colville, NR33 8BL M/14 Toad Hall, Mardle Road, Wangford, Beccles, NR34 8AU M/15 1 Elm Cottages, Old London Road, Copdock, IP8 3JD M/16 Inglenook, Back Lane, Washbrook, IP8 3HS M/17 The Ramblers, Swan Hill, Washbrook, IP8 3HR M/18 39 The Charlottes, Washbrook, IP8 3HZ M/19 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/20 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/21 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/22 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/23 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/24 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/25 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/26 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/27 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/28 2 Fen View, Washbrook, IP8 3EU M/29 Charity Farm, Belstead Village, IP8 3JU M/30 31 Fen View, Washbrook, IP8 3EU M/31 Oak Barn, Copdock, Ipswich, IP8 3JN M/32 Strathmere, London Road, Copdock, IP8 3JF M/33 The Croft, Lower Layham, Ipswich, IP7 5RD M/34 6 Forbes Business Centre, Kempson Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP32 7AR M/35 Woodside, Old London Road, Copdock, IP8 3JH M/36 Tralee, Chapel Lane, Belstead, IP8 3LR

Page 44: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1073

M/37 36 Pheasant Rose, Copdock, IP8 3LF M/38 Corner Cottage, Queens Road, Reydon, Southwold, IP18 6QH M/39 Hall Farm, Church Lane, Copdock IP8 3JZ M/40 1 Elm Lane, Copdock, IP8 3ET M/41 Hambleden, Blacksmith Lane, Barnham, Thetford, NR24 2NE M/42 26 Old School Drive, Reydon, Southwold, IP18 6JZ M/43 Largona, Folly Lane, Copdock, IP8 3JQ M/44 Parish Council Office, Station Road, Elmswell, IP30 9HR M/45 18 Mill Gardens, Elmswell, IP30 9DQ M/46 PO Box 10523, Stoke by Nayland, Colchester CO6 4WJ M/47 Fen Farm, Fen Lane, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8QD M/48 Lacedean, The Lane, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QR M/49 Lacedean, The Lane, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QR M/50 Flint Hall, Creeting St Peter, IP6 8QL M/51 Fen Bungalow, Fen Lane, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8QD M/52 Fen Bungalow, Fen Lane, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8QD M/53 Fen Farm, Fen Lane, Creeting St Mary, IP6 8QD M/54 Belstead Rise, Church Lane, Copdock , IP8 3JY M/55 Milton House, Milton Road South, Stowmarket, Suffolk IP14 1EZ M/56 Low Farm, Wenhaston, Halesworth, IP19 9EL M/57 Squirrels, Rands Lane, Lower Layham, IP7 5FB M/58 Wangford Quarry, Hill Road, Wangford, NR34 8AR M/59 Little Hall, Market Place, Lavenham, CO10 9QZ

Page 45: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1074

22. REPRESENTATIONS RECEIVED AFTER THE DEADLINE REPRESENTATIONS RECEIVED AFTER THE DEADLINE

Number Respondent Representation SCC Response L/1 Ian Johns, Suffolk Coastal

and Waveney District Council

Duplicate of E/118

L/2

Mrs S. Corcoran Brackley Wood – Christopher Hudson

Air Pollution - Noise Heavy – Traffic Old London road at peak times, traffic builds up, if the A12 is at a stand still its back up along our road up to Caple. I strongly disagree with the Belstead quarry proposals. It will be and eye sore, + the air pollution, noise, heavy traffic. Why are planners tring to ruin our village and our lovely countryside. I know we need housing etc. but it should be done in a more suitable area. Copdock + Belstead, even Caple are villages and should stay that way.

L/3

Mary Woods This iste is not needed – there are others in the area. Increased traffic on old London Road, already bumper to bumper when congestion at Copdock interchange backs traffic up on A12 to proposed site area. Copdock village could not support this heavy traffic. In conjuction with proposed new houses the quality of lide would be much worsened, and the air pollution serious for health.

L/4 Robert Hignett 1) A propoer study of the traffic build up on the A12

towards the Copdock interchange needs to be carried out. Traffic is backed up to and beyond the

Page 46: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1075

Copdock/Washbrook sliproads on the A12 northbound at peak times morning and evenings + when accidents or bridge closed 2) During peak times traffic also builds up from beagle roundabout. Sometimes down Swann Hill. 3) this quarry will devalue existing properties and future 4) The proposed lorries carrying extracted material will it ba garunteed (no alternative route). The back lanes will not sustain large vehicles without the roads being widened and the old A12 will not take the constant abuse. 5)Will the lorries be washed down before proceeding onto the carriage way i.e. look at the road at Gt Blakenham.

L/5

Clare Williams I am writing to express my support for the draft Suffolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan, in particular the fact that Grove Farm Quarry is not included. I live at Hall Barn, Creeting Hall and if Grove Farm were to be given permission to extract sand and gravel it would destroy the quiet enjoyment of my home for me and all the residents of Creeting Hall. The noise, dust and vibration from extraction machinery and traffic to transport the sand and gravel away would be very intrusive and destructive. I strongly feel that industrial activity is not suited to this part of the Gipping Valley because as you travel along the river on the train you can see that there is so little left that hasn't already been developed. River valleys should be amenities for all locals, and

Page 47: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1076

there is a well known and loved walk along between Stowmarket and Needham Market. Walking is an excellent way to protect and heal physical and mental health. People need to be able to escape from the built environment to quiet places in nature so that they can contemplate, calm down and consider whatever is happening in their lives. Although I appreciate that there is actually very little of our countryside that is developed, there are still not too many places where you can walk and we need to protect them. The therapeutic benefits of walking are well proven and very importantly, this activity needs very little in the way of equipment so can be taken up by pretty much anyone, regardless of income. I sincerely hope that Grove Farm will not be included in the Minerals and Waste Local Plan, either now or in the future so that the green corridor between the two towns can remain in place to preserve the distinct characters of both and provide recreational amenity for the local population.

Please do contact me if there is a need.

L/6

Richard Pope I am writing to stress the fragility of such species as bitterns and curlews and to ask you to please reject any plan that compromises their feeding grounds. Suffolk is an important area for these birds whose numbers are declining disturbingly. I am sure you know that curlews are actually threatened with extinction (the Eskimo Curlew is already extinct; we must not lose another one). While I understand that gravel extraction is a

Page 48: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1077

necessity, surely better places could be found than farmland in an AONB near the Hen Reedbeds Nature Reserve. In the 21st century, England needs to do all it can to preserve its endangered wildlife. Bitterns and curlews are iconic birds for the area and once gone, they cannot be brought back. This is a battle I have seen fought many times elsewhere, sometimes lost, sometimes won. Please do not let this be another loss for nature and birds. We humans have a duty to act as good stewards of the planet and gravel extraction at the expense of threatened species is not good stewardship.

L/7

Reydon Action Group for the Environment

Minerals and Waste Local Plan Consultation – Preferred Options – Wangford These comments are made on behalf of Reydon Action Group for the Environment (RAGE). RAGE is a local residents’ group with some 120 members which was set up in July 2017 inter alia to protect the natural environment of Reydon and surrounding areas. We OBJECT to the inclusion of the proposed site at Lime Kiln Farm, Wangford on the grounds that it would constitute inappropriate major development in the Suffolk Coasts and Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) which would breach relevant provisions of the National Planning Policy framework (NPPF) and the equivalent environmental policy of Waveney District Council (DM29).

Page 49: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1078

We are also concerned at the likely adverse effects of Lime Kiln Farm on the nearby European protected and other protected habitat sites. AONB Out of the 10 proposed sites, we note that Wangford is the only site which is in an AONB. The total requirement for sand and gravel as per proposed policy MP1 is 10.422 Mt. The total estimated capacity of the 10 proposed sites is 16.539 Mt reducing to 13.639 Mt during the plan period. The estimated capacity of Lime Kiln Farm is 2.4Mt. It is thus apparent that policy requirements could be met without including Lime Kiln Farm. Lime Kiln Farm would be an extension of the existing Wangford quarry site and is the SCC preferred option out of three alternative sites for an extension at Wangford. We note that extremely limited information appears to have been provided by the existing operator, Cemex in appendices 1-3 of the SCC Site Selection Report. In particular, we note that although a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment has been provided for the other two sites, one has not been provided (or at least included in the consultation documents) for Lime Kiln Farm. It is stated at paragraph 5.35 of the Site Selection Report that Lime Kiln Farm is inside AONB but will be capable of mitigation if overriding need case exists. This statement in turn is derived from the Place Services Sustainability Appraisal (Table 47) but is simply an assertion: no justification is provided. The Site Selection Report correctly refers to the relevant paragraphs of the NPPF but fails properly to apply the tests set out.

Page 50: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1079

NPPF paragraph 144 states: local planning authorities should: • As far as practical, provide for the maintenance of landbanks of non-energy materials from outside ... Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty ... As we have already pointed out, Lime Kiln Farm is the only proposed site in the AONB and sufficient landbanks exist outside the AONB. Lime Kiln Farm does not meet the paragraph 144 test. NPPF paragraph 116 provides that planning permission for major developments (which SCC acknowledges would include Lime Kiln Farm) should be refused except in exceptional circumstances AND where it can be demonstrated that they are in the public interest. It then sets out criteria which should be taken into account in three bullet points. It is suggested at paragraph 7.5 of the Site Selection Report that there are exceptional reasons to justify inclusion of Like Kiln Farm in accordance with NPPF. With respect, we do not agree. Taking each of the reasons in turn: a) The existing quarry at Wangford has been in operation for several decades and is an important part of the local economy; The effect on the local economy would be negligible. Cemex indicate in its representation that it would employ only 3 people. b) There is a shortage of gravel in the market area served by this quarry and the proposed extension contains an unusually high percentage of gravel compared to most other quarries;

Page 51: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1080

No justification is provided for this assertion and the information provided by Cemex in its representation suggests otherwise. Cemex states that (only) 50% of the expected output is expected to be sold within Suffolk. The market area served by this quarry is not defined (but see (c) and (e) below) but on the face of it, any shortage of gravel in the market area is not consistent with a statement by the operator that 50% of material will be exported. c) The market area includes both Ipswich and Norwich and the gravel from Wangford is used to supplement the sand rich deposits from other quarries within the market area; Again, no justification is provided for this assertion but even if correct, it suggests that there is no requirement for a new quarry within the AONB and is inconsistent with (e) below (no other acceptable proposed sites within NE Suffolk); d) Processing is able to produce a regular spherical gravel grade product which can be used for specialist uses such as filter beds; Once again, no justification is provided for this assertion. This does not appear to accord with Cemex’s comments on its intended market: Intended markets for products would remain as per the extant local quarry, ie CEMEX readymixed concrete plants and local collect customers, with some material being sold for decorative purposes regionally/nationally. There is no suggestion that gravel is expected to be sold for use in filter beds. e) There are no other acceptable proposed sites within the north-east area of Suffolk;

Page 52: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1081

Only one of the Cemex batching plants (Flixton) listed in table 3 of the Appendices to the draft plan can be considered to be in NE Suffolk. As most of the product from this proposed site is apparently destined for markets outside NE Suffolk, this assertion is irrelevant. f) Alternative sources such as crushed rock, recycled aggregates and marine dredged sand and gravel are unable to provide a suitable alternative due to availability or economic viability; See our comments in relation to (b) to (d) above. In the absence of evidence of local shortage, the absence of these alternative sources is irrelevant. (g) It is considered that in the impact upon the wider AONB, recreation within the area, and the nearby residential properties and ecological designations could be moderated to an acceptable extent. This is a bald assertion without any justification and as such should be rejected. None of the claimed reasons set out above can be considered to be ‘exceptional circumstances’ within the meaning of NPPF paragraph 116. Nor, in our view, has the need for this site been made out. Ecology We note from the Site Selection Report that the potential effects of Lime Kiln Farm on nearby protected sites has not been assessed and it appears that there is no intention to make any assessment unless or until a planning application is made. In our view this is inappropriate. A site should not be included in the Local Plan unless it is likely to be prima facie environmentally

Page 53: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1082

acceptable. That is the purpose of the site selection process: see Aim 1, Objective 3. In view of the close proximity of Lime Kiln farm to the designated sites listed in the Site Selection Report, there is every reason to expect that it will not be environmentally acceptable. We also note that of the three nominated Wangford sites, Lime Kiln Farm was preferred on ecological grounds. Neither the Site Selection Report nor the evidence base disclose any justification for this preference. In the absence of any objective justification, the selection of Lime Kiln Farm is not sustainable. For all the reasons set out above, we urge SCC to reject the Lime Kiln Farm site.

L/8

Caroline Walker I am writing as an individual, wishing to express my objection to the proposed site for the Belstead quarry, as the local area is unable to handle the increased traffic in a safe and sustainable manner. The site plans acknowledge an increase in traffic locally if the plans are to be implemented. Swan Hill will be unable to cope with this safely. Already, it receives a large amount of traffic at peak times, with queues regularly reaching down from the roundabout to 'the street' junction and further as the road is used as a cut through for traffic from the A12. The addition of more vehicles will only make traffic into Ipswich for local residents even more challenging. This road, a 12% gradient, already sees frequent traffic accidents at the bottom of the hill with cars swerving off the road and close to (even on occasion into) houses, the risks associated with this to pedestrians walking along the road or to those

Page 54: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1083

using the bus and waiting at the bus stop opposite are significant and will only increase with more, larger vehicles using it. A further concern is the risk of traffic collisions with increased numbers and sizes of vehicles. It is difficult at present for a car to safely pass a van, let alone a bus or larger vehicle. This risk will be increased with more traffic using the road. Further concerns lie in the safety of such a site. Over the course of the past 6 months local residents (in particular of swan farm mews) have seen a dramatic increase in the frequency of petty crimes in the area, having to install CCTV cameras and lights in our communal car park adjacent to Swan Hill (contact Suffolk Police for crime reference numbers). This is due to a prolonged period of vehicle damage and fuel thefts (fuel pipes have been cut and petrol stolen, leading to expensive costs to fix cars and get them back on the road). If this is happening to personal use vehicles, the proximity of a quarry site with machinery etc, will only further encourage these crimes.

L/9

Charles Morris I am a permanent resident of Blythburgh. I appreciate that I am an hour beyond your deadline – due to being held up by the poor weather – but remain hopeful that you will accept this late email. I wish to object very strongly to the proposed land being allocated for quarrying. If we cannot protect our AONB’s, then why do we bother at all? It is bad enough to learn that a

Page 55: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1084

precious tract of visually prominent landscape is at risk, but almost worse to think that there are people so misguided and uncaring as to even consider including this site. You must think again, and restore our trust.

L/10

Richard Keating Fedders I wish to object to the proposal quarry sand and gravel in Creeting St Peter. This development is not necessary as the demand for sand and gravel is already met by existing quarry arrangements. The environmental concerns are many and various , not least pollution, noise and the general erosion and destruction of the Gipping Valley

L/11

Anna Keating Fedders wish to object to the proposal quarry sand and gravel in Creeting St Peter. This development is not necessary as the demand for sand and gravel is already met by existing quarry arrangements. The environmental concerns are many and various , not least pollution, noise and the general erosion and destruction of the Gipping Valley

L/12

Stewart Patience, Anglian Water

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Suffolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan Preferred Options consultation. The following comments are submitted on behalf of Anglian Water. I would be grateful if you could confirm receipt of this response. Policy WP3: Existing or designated land-uses potentially suitable for waste development Reference is made to waste management uses on wastewater management

Page 56: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1085

sites being limited to composting and anaerobic digestion. Anglian Water as sewerage undertaker is concerned that this is not justified in that there may be other waste management uses which would be suitable at water recycling centrese dependanpt upon both scale and location. It is therefore suggested that the above wording is removed or amended to allow for other waste management uses. Policy WP14: Waste water treatment facilities The policy refers to both new waste water treatment facilities and the extension of existing waste water treatment facilities. However there may be circumstances in which improvements e.g existing processes without the need to extend existing site. It is therefore suggested that the policy should also refer to improvements to existing sites to accommodate further growth or where required for operational reasons as well as supporting infrastructure e.g. renewables. Similarly it is assumed that all proposals will be related to discharge into water bodies and water quality. This will not be the case for all proposals and Policy WLP14 should be amended to make this clear. Finally the policy should set out the circumstances in which proposals are likely to be supported (where they meet the specified criteria). As drafted

Page 57: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1086

Policy WLP14 is not a positive policy which would allow proposals to come forward to accommodate growth and for operational reasons where it meets the specified criteria. Policy WP18: Safeguarding of waste management sites Anglian Water is generally supportive of the requirement to safeguard existing waste management uses from other uses which could prejudice the operation of existing sites. However there is a need to clarify which uses are covered by the policy. We assess the risk of odour from developments located within 400m of an existing water recycling centres (formerly sewage treatment works). Nuisance may be caused by noise, lighting and traffic movements but its most prevalent source will be odours, unavoidably generated by the treatment of sewerage. Our concern is to prevent encroachment of sensitive development (occupied land and buildings) which could give rise to future amenity loss and impose additional constraints on the operation of our assets. It is considered that planning permission must only be granted where it has been demonstrated that the proposed development would not be adversely affected by the normal operation of our operational assets.

Page 58: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1087

Therefore we would suggest Policy WP18 should refer to odour as a specific consideration, occupied land and buildings and the need to ensure to continued operation of Anglian Water’s existing infrastructure. Table 19: Wastewater treatment plants and Safeguard and Proposals Map It would be helpful to clarify whether all water recycling centres in Anglian Water’s ownership are intended to be safeguarded as part of the Minerals and Waste Local Plan. (It is assumed that this is the intention). Anglian Water would wish to have all WRCs included and that development would only be allowed where a compatible waste management use is proposed or there is no longer an operational need for a specific site. Similarly it is not made clear what distance has been used to identify the wastewater facilities safeguarding areas as this is not specified in Policy WLP18 or the related supporting text. Should you have any queries please let me know.

L/13

G Stibbe Wangford Lime Kiln Farm is close to both an AONB and Reydon Parish. This is a huge 27.7 hectare (70 acre) site by the Hen Reedbeds Nature Reserve (Suffolk Wildlife Trust), inside the Suffolk Coast and Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). Very little analysis is available about why this site has been included relative to other rejected

Page 59: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1088

sites and there has been a marked absence of local consultation. Even Reydon Parish Council was not notified. The law states that development in AONBs can only be approved in exceptional circumstances, and I do not believe it appropriate for the Council to argue exceptional circumstances in a Plan that looks forward 10 years, and already has a significant (32%) surplus built into forecast of need. If these circumstances do emerge in future, then the site can always be put forward for planning permission at that point, and argued on its merits, as opposed to second-guessing the future at the immediate and permanent cost to wildlife, landscape, and public enjoyment of this precious and scarce amenity.

L/14 Copdock and Washbrook Sustainable Community Planning

See representation – contains maps, photos, tables

L/15 Michelle Marshall, Stowmarket Town Council

Duplicate of E114, which was received on time

L/16

Mr and Mrs M.V. Woolnough

We are writing in support of the Cemex UK materials Ltd’s application to extend the Wangford Quarry. We are a local aggregate supplier and have been collecting aggregates from the Wangford site for 30 years, we employ three drivers and now have our 18-year-old son join our company, who in the future would like to continue in running the business. The Wangford quarry is a vital part of our business to which we have a large customer list. We would find it difficult to find quality aggregates nearby and feel by running our vehicles further afield to source what our customers require will not only be detrimental to

Page 60: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1089

the environment but also very expensive for everyone.

We believe that the planning application is an extension to what already exists so feel that it would make perfect sense for them to continue there. We feel strongly that the future of our business relies on this site to continue.

L/17

Deborah Worboys If Brett in Layham Pit reopens, we don’t want lorries waiting in the road with engines running early in the morning waiting for it to open. We don’t want lorry drivers to throw litter out of their windows. We don’t want lorries to drive too fast on Rands Road as it is very much a country road. We are annoyed that our property isn’t mentioned in the extensions proposed as we are very close to the entrance and the processing plant area! Literally a few hundred yards away. If they extract the proposed amount the lorries would be unbearable and create too much pollution. There would also be too much noise and dust. What will happen to the buzzards and hares that are now living there?

L/18 David Harmer, Cemex

I am the Assistant Quarry Manager at Cemex Wangford, and I would like to write to you to tell you why we need the Lime Kiln Farm extension at Wangford Quarry. Firstly, our biggest quarry in East Anglia – Flixton Park Quarry will be coming to the end of its life in the next 5 or 6 years, so we need some substantial reserves in the area to reach out to all the demand inland, and the surrounding areas.

Page 61: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1090

Wangford has been supplying high quality aggregates for decades to the surrounding east coast areas, and within the 14 years I’ve worked here we have sold hundreds of thousands of tonnes to local projects in Reydon, Southwold, Wrentham, Halesworth, Kessingland, Lowestoft etc…If we can no longer meet local demand for development in the future, then aggregates will simply have to be hauled in to the area from further afield. This will mean a significantly higher amount of energy and time will be wasted to do so. There will be more emissions, more road traffic, more congestion and less efficiency in meeting local demand.

The recent articles in local newspapers were unfair, in my opinion. I don’t feel like we will be any closer to the Hen reed beds (in Lime Kin Farm) than we are now. For years we have responsibly restored and landscaped out quarry as we go and this will not change. The areas of reinstatement in our old dig are full of wildlife, and in the summer there are wonderful sights for all to see. Deer, foxes, owls, weasels, rabbits, wood peckers, marsh harriers, buzzards, even kingfishers at our fresh water lagoon can be seen regularly. I can clearly visualize how the reinstated quarry will one day become part of the hen reed beds and care deeply about the beautiful environment in which I work.

Not only does Wangford Quarry employ a number of local people (amount varies depending on work

Page 62: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1091

load) we used locally sources responsible contractors for our maintenance and projects. We are an outlet for them to work in, and without us all the local building companies will have to travel further for aggregates. This in turn will trigger a larger carbon footprint, and pollution from the additional transportation. Lindon Pallet over at Henham is no competition for our clean, compliant and tested aggregates. We are ISO 14001 & ISO 9001 accredited.

People may have to go as far as Lowestoft & Gt Yarmouth to collect out of depots which have artic loads delivered to sell on. This will not be cheap and will mean more pollution and energy is wasted doing so. Costs will increase for local builders as it will for locals wanting building work done on their properties. If you ask any local builder within a 10 -12 mile radius of our site they will tell you how important we are to them.

On a personal level, I have worked here for 14 years and it’s been the main focus of my working life. I have a 3 year old daughter and a wife to provide for. The potential threat to my livelihood is a real worry. It would mean a lot to all the men and women who work directly and indirectly out of this quarry if we get the extension. We can continue supply all manner of local building and infrastructure projects in the surrounding areas.

L/19 Fiona Cairns, Suffolk Preservation Society

Duplicate of E116, which was received on time

Page 63: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1092

L/20 Michelle Marshall, Stowmarket Town Council

Duplicate of E114, which was received on time

L/21 Steve Merry I’ve looked at the sites and there are no significant changes to what was discussed previously. I have attached a summary of the notes for each of the sites which may be of use.

(See attachment)

L/22 Simon Curl Flood and Water teams responded in March this years to your sites consultation. Those comments remain valid. As far as the draft plan is concerned, the issues are generic. Development of sites will require a detailed Flood Risk Assessment which will need to cover all phases of a site; preparation, minerals excavation / working, reinstatement and aftercare / after use. The flood risk to off site receptors shall not be any greater, and preferably less, during all phases of a sites working. This is also the case with regard to water quality; re chemical and water borne solids/suspended solids. Operations of sites will need to be managed in the appropriate ways to ensure that flood risk and water quality are effectively managed and do not make any existing situation worse. Particular care need to be taken with regards to site restoration, the phasing and the final land surface profiles to ensure that water run off (quantity, velocity and quality) does not adversely affect flood risk to receptors and does not compromise water quality or quantum of water entering watercourses or aquifer. In summary, the development of sites within the draft

Flood risk assessment will be expected if planning applications are submitted for any of the sites.

Page 64: 21. CONTACT DETAILS · 2019-01-29 · SM/217 Adrian Bertie & Jayne Neal SM/216 Kurt von Bussmann SM/218 Helen Kerridge SM/219 Trevor Kerridge SM/220 Robert Ayers SM/221 Gavin Hughes

SMWLP, Responses to Preferred Options Consultation, March 2018

Assessment Suffolk County Council Page 1093

plan will need to be accompanied by robust Flood Risk Assessments and assessments in line with the Water Framework Directive in order to identify water management and quality impacts, and consequently detail measure to mitigate these impacts.