PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIONEQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION REVIEW BOARD

PHOENIX, AZSEPTEMBER 25, 1980

c$ 1 pepyg'~R 4Doc~g~+ eroeg~ i05pagg~8('Ag(

I

f

4I'

1980

J F M A M J J A 0 N J F M A

1981

A S D J F M A M

1982

J J A S

PVNGSLICENSING

CESSAR START PR EP

DOCKET FOR SYS REV

PVNGS DOCKET

NR C STARTDEDICATEDREVIEW

.PVNGSFUEL"LOAD

DC POWER

AC POWER

AUXILiARYFEEDWATER

EQUIPMENTQUAL IFICATION

BOP IRC 0 CI

LEGEND:

REVIEW BOARD MEETING

Q TRANSCRIPT TO NRC

0 RESPONSES TO ACTION ITEMS TO NRC

0 BOARD COMMENTSOR RESPONSESTO NRC

Q FINAL RESPONSES TO ACTION ITEMS TO NRC(IF RED'0)

LICENSING EVENT

FIREPROTECTION

CONTROL ROOMDESIGN

'REVIBN BOARDSCHEDULE'FIGURE

1'

,

e

EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION REVIEW BOARD AGENDA

INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND

A, PVNGS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

B, INPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN CRITERIA FOR

EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION

C, SCOPE OF PVNGS QUALIFICATION

D, PROJECT MILESTONES/QUALIFICATION

REQUIREMENTS TIME LINE

E, QUALIFICATION PROGRAM ELEMENTS

F, SAFETY RELATED BOP EQUIPMENT

QUALIFICATION METHODS

G, QUALIFICATION PROCESS

H, EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION SCHEDULE

I, BOP EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION SUMMARY-

DES IGN CRITERIA

A, OVERVIEW OF DESIGN CRITERIA

1, DEFINITIONS

2, SAFETY RELATED OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS

3, QUALIFIED LIFE

4, INFORMATION REQUIRED

5, DOCUMENTATION

6, IEEE 323

7, IEEE 627

8, STANDARDIZED APPEND ICES

ENCLOSURE i

0

e

EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION REVIEW BOARD AGENDA (CONTINUED)

B,

C,

ENV I RONNENTAL QUALIFICATION CRITERIA

1, STANDARD REVIEW PLAN 3 11

2, GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA 1, 2, 4, 23

3, IEEE STDS, 279, 308, 317, 323, 334, 379,

382, 383, 387, 535, 627, 650

REG, GUIDES 1,32, 1,40, 1,53, 1,63, 1,73,

1,89, 1,131

5, NUREG 0588

6, CONNISSION ORDER CLI 80-21

7, IE BULLETIN 79-01B

8, 10CFR50 APPENDIX B

9, PVNGS ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFICATIONS

SE I SNI C QUALIFICATION CRITERIA

1, PVNGS SEISNIC CLASSIFICATIONS

2, STANDARD REVIEW PLANS 3,9,2, 3,9,3, 3,10

3, GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA 1, 2, 4, 14, 15

4, IEEE STANDARD 344

5, REG, GUIDES 1,20, 1,48, 1,60, 1,61, 1,67,

1,68, 1,92, 1,100, 1,124, 1,130

IV, EQU IPNENT QUALIFICATION PROCESS

A, PURPOSE

B, SPECIFICATION INSPECTION PLAN/HOLD/WITNESS

C, SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION PLANS/PROCEDURES

D, QUALIFICATION TEAN REVIEW

ENCLOSURE ii

(

I

IV,

V,

VI,

~S')~A BOP ESFAS

B, BOP INSTRUMENTATION

C; DIESEL GENERATOR

D, BATTERY CHARGER

EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION REVIEl< BOARD AGENDA (CONTINUED)I

EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION PROCESS (CONTINUED)

E, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST

F, SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST

6, SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION TESTING/ANALYSIS

H, AUDIT OF TESTING

DOCUMENTATION

EXAMPLE QUALIFICATIONS

V

A, BOP ESFAS

B, BOP INSTRUMENTATION

C, DIESEL GENERATOR

D, BATTERY CHARGER

E, CABLES

QUALIFICATION PROBLEM AREAS

A, ENVIRONMENTAL

B, SEISMIC

ENCLOSURE iii

e

STANDARDNSSS

~ STANDARDLIC EN SIN G

APPROVAL

~ BOP

INTERFACEREQUIREMENTS

UTILITYAPPLICANT

SPECIFICREQUIREMENTS

DESIGNCRITERIA Q~~>

('TILITYAPPLICANTLIC EN SIN G

DOCUMENTS

DEVELOPMENTOF

STANDARD0 ESI GN

ENGINEER'S

BALANCE OF PLANTINFORMATION

~ SCHEDULE

~ BOPINTERFACE

~ LICENSING

~ BASIC CRITERIA

~ PEI 0'S

~ SINGLE LINES

PLANT ARRANGEMENT

MODULARCONCEPT

DESIGN

MODEL

~ DETAILEDCONSTRUCTIONDRAWINGS

~ PLANNINGPHOTOGRAPHS

~ PROCUREMENTSPECIFICATIONS

~ SYSTEM

DESCRIPTIONS

~ ENGINEERINGSCHEDULE

~ CONSTR U CTI0 N

SPECIFICATIONS

~ TEST

SPECIFICATIONS

~ STATIONMANUAL

PVNGS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

FIGURE 2

SUPPLIER SPECIFICATIONS

QUALPLANS,PROCEDURES,REPORTS

„,::,.':;P APS/BPC Y;.-:.":„:";:„

: .-'"".;.""-'„.SEISMIC/j„:-::".",j.".

')ENVIRONMENTAL)'UALIFICATIONi

DESIGNCRITERIA

INDEPENDENTQUALIF I CATIONPROGRAMS(RECALCITRANTSUPPLIER)

PVNGSSITERECORDS

QUALCRITERIA

FSAR

QUALSUMMARY

IMPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN CRITERIAFOB EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION

FIGURE 3

0

PVNGS

CE BECHTEL

INSTRUMENTATIONAND CONTROLEQUIPMENT

NSSS EQUIP(NON ICE)

INSTRUMENTATIONANO CONTROL,ELECTRICALEQUIPMENT

NON.ELECTRICALEQUIPMENT

PLANTPROTECTIVESYSTEM

LPSI

PUMP BOP ESFASDIESELGENERATOR

IN.CONTAINMENTSENSORS ANOTRANSMITTERS

SUPPLEMENTARYPROTECTIONSYSTEM

HPSI

PUMP

VALVES

BATTERYCHARGER

BOP INSTRUMENTATION

AUXILIARYFEEOWATERSYSTEM

ESSENTIALSPRAYPONDPUMPS

CETOPI GALS~ CENPO 255~ CENPD 182

CESSAR-F PVNGS FSAR

SCOPE OF PYNGS QUALIFICATION

FIGURE 4

i

8'

1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980

PSAR

CONSTRUCTIONPERMIT

I

I

INUREG 0588 L

FSAR

DOCKET

APPLICABLEGUALSTANDARDSIE EE 323-1 974IEEE 344-1975R.G. 1.89

IE BULL79-01B X

IEEE 627 4

Cu 80-21 X

MAJOR CE PURCHASE ORDERS

LPSI

HPSIPZR SOLENOID

MS VALVES VALVES

MOV

CENTCHARG f PUMPS

MAJOR BDP PURCHASE ORDERS

PROJECT MILESTONESfauauFICaTION REQUIRE¹NTSTIME LINE

FIGURE 5

BOP QUALIFICATIONPROGRAM

QUALIFICATIONOF 1ECOMPONENTS

QUALIF ICATIONOF OTHERSAFETY-RELATEDCOMPONENTS

SERVICE CONDITIONS SERVICE CONDITIONS

SEISMIC

~ SSE

ENVIRONMENTAL

~ TEMPERATURE

~ PRESSURE

~ RADI ATION

~ CHEMICAL

SEISMIC ENVIRONMENTAL

~ SSE +TEMPERATURE

~ PRESSURE

~ RADIATION

~ CHEMICAL

MAJORQUALIFICATIONCRITERIA

MAJORQUALIFICATIONCRITERIA

NUREG 0588 IEEE 627-1980

I EEE 323-1 974 IEEE 344-1975

IEEE 344-1975

QUALIFICATIONPBOGBAM ELEMENTS

FIGURE 6

"fABLE 1

BOP EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION METHODS

SAFETY-RELATEDEQUIPMENT CATEGORY

QUALIFICATIONMETHODS

A IN CONTAINMENTEQUIPMENT

1",2,3,4, OR 5

EXAMPLES

~ WIRE AND CABLE

~ VALVES

B OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT—POSSIBLE HARSHENVIRONMENT

C OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT-NON HARSHENVIRONMENT

1",2,3,4,0R 5

EXAMPLES

~ MCC'S

~ VALVES

1",2,3,4,085EXAMPLES

'DIESEL GENERATOR

~ CONTROL PANELS

D OUTSIDE CONTAINMENTNO AGE SENSITIVECOMPONENTS,PHYSICAL INTEGRITYREQUIRED

"TYPE TESTING IS PREFERRED METHOD

2,3,4,0R 5

EXAMPLES

~ Q COOLING COILS

~ CONTROL ROOM CEILING

METHOD 1 - TYPE TESTING

METHOD 2 - DOCUMENTED ANALYSIS

'ETHOD 3- DOCUMENTED OPERATING EXPERIENCE

METHOD 4-ONGOING QUALIFICATIONPROGRAM

METHOD 5 - COMBINATIONDF METHODS

0

APS/BECHTEL EQUIPMENTSUPPLIER

DESIGN ~

CRITERIA

SPECIFICATIONS

INSPECTION/NOLO/WITNESS PLAN

. SUPPLIERDESIGN ANDMANUFACTURING

QUALIFI CATIONTEAMREVIEW

QUA LIFICATIONPLANS/PROCEDURES

QUA LIF I CATIONAUDIT OFTESTING

TESTING ANALYSIS

QUAL IF I CATIONTEAMREVIEW

SUPPLIERQUALIFICATIONREPORT

FSAR DATASUMMARY

PVNGS SITERECORDS

QUAL IF I CATIONDOCUMENTATION

QUIPMEMT QUAllFICATIONPROCESS

0

J F M

1980

A M J J A S 0 N D J M A

1981

A S 0 N

1982

J A S 0 N D

MAY77

SUBMITCENPD

182

RECEIVE REVIEW

QUESTIONS ION CENPD 255

AND CENPD 1&2PREP

PAC

DATATOPVNGS

ARE DOCUMENTATION SITE

AGES l A

DATATOPVNGS

SITEA

NRCOOCKETSCESSAR

l4

INITIALEQUIPMENTQUAL IF I CATIONSUMMARYSUBMITTALTO NRC

FINAL EQUIPMENT

QUALIFICATION SUMMARYSUBMITTALTO NRC

NRC STARTSREVIEW OF

FSARNRC DOCKETSFSAR

NRC/ANPP REVIEW MEETINGS

I I .IREVIEW ALLQUAL'S, PLANS/RPTS

SUBMITTED TO DATE ANOESTABLISH ACTION PLAN

IPREPARE DOCUMENTATIONFOR FINALSUBMITTALHOLD QUALIFICATION

REVIEW MEETINGSWITH ALL44 PO

VENDORS

PREPARE DOCUMENTATION

FOR 1ST SUBMITTALPACKAGES

DATATOPVNGSSITE

I

INITIALEQUIPMENTQUALIFICATIONAMENDMENTTO NRC

NRC REVIEW ANO QUESTIONS

DATATOPVNGS

NRC

ISSUES

SERUNIT 1

FUEL LOADDATE

SER

SUPPLEMENTI I I

FINALEQUIPMENTQUALIFICATIONAMENDMENTTO NRC

mm+EQUIP QUALREVIEW BOARD

W WI

PVNGS

SITERECORDS

EGUIPNlEItIT QUALIFICATIONSCHEDULE '.

FIGURE 8

PVNGSSITERE ORD

0!

ENG INEER I NG

S

ARCHITECTURAL

CONTROLS.

ELECTRICAL

CABLE

EQU IPMENT

'MECHANICAL

NUCLEAR

PLANT DESIGN

TOTAL

PURCHASE

ORDERS

REQUIRING

QUALIFI-

9

12

17

59

PURCHASE ORDERS

N/QUALIFICATIONS

COMPLETED PRIOR

0 088

15

PURCHASE ORDERS

W/QUALIFICATIONS

COMPLETE PER

0

.00

FIGURE 9

e

III,A, OVERYIEH OF DESIGN CRITERIA

1) DEFINITION

~ SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT

~ QUALIFICATION

e SERYICE CONDITIONS

2) S D OP A 0 R QUIR M NTS

~ GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA 1. 2. 4 AND 23 OF APPENDIX A, AND SECTION III AND XI OF

APPENDIX B TO 10CFR PART 50,

~ IEEE 323-1974 AND,DAUGHTER DOCUMENTS

~ IEEE 627-1980

~ NRC REGULATORY GUIDES

EXHIBIT IIIA-1

5) PURPOS OF S B ISH NG A QUA IF ED FE FOR SAFE R ED A IP E

~ PROVIDE A LIMIT TO PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION

~ ESTABLISH AN ASSUMED END OF LIFE CONDITION BEFORE EAUIPMENT IS SUBJECTED TO

DESIGN BASIS EVENT CONDITIONS, INCLUDING SEISMIC,

4) I FO TO R QU R FO C SAFETY R A ED EAUIP EN I E

IDENTIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT AND ITS SAFETY RELATED FUNCTION

~ DETERMINATION OF OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS.

RANGE OF SERVICE CONDITIONS DURING NORMAL, ABNORMAL, DESIGN BASIS EVENT, POST

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT AND IN SERVICE TEST CONDITIONS

~ IDENTIFICATION OF COMPONENTS AND/OR MODULES OF THE EQUIPMENT HHICH ARE SUBJECT

TO AGING DETERIORATION

EXHIBIT IIIA-2

l

5) OCUME T T ON FO QUA FICATIO ME HODS SED

~ MUST BE IN AUDITABLE FORM

~ MUST BE AVAILABLEAND MAINTAINED BY LICENSEE AND/OR SUPPLIER FOR LIFE OF Pl ANT,

6) APP C TION OF I EE-323- 97 PRINCIPLES AND CRI E I

~ ELECTRICAL SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT

o OTHER SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT

7) PP 0 OF I 62 — 980 PRI CIP ES ND CRI ER

e NON-ELECTRICAL SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT

EXHIBIT I I IA-5

0

l

8) S AN ARDIZED SEISMIC ND ENVIRONMENTAL QUA IFIC TION SP CIFICATION PP DI S

~ APPENDIX 4E SEISMIC QUALIFICATION AND OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC

CATEGORY I ACTIVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

~ APPENDIX 4F SEISMIC QUALIFICATION AND OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC

CATEGORY I NONACTIVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

~ APPENDIX 4G GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF SEISMIC

CATEGORY II ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

~ APPENDIX 4H TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE

EQUIPMENT

~ APPENDIX 4I SEISMIC QUALIFICATION AND OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR

CATEGORY I ACTIVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

EXHIBIT IIIA-4

i'

~ APPENDIX 4J SEISMIC QUALIFICATION FOR SEISMIC CATEGORY I NONACTIVE

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

~ APPENDIX 4K TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE

EQUIPMENT — (PSAR)

~ APPENDIX 4T SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E CONTROL AND

INSTRUMENTATION DEVICES

e APPENDIX 4U SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E CONTROL PANEL

ASSEMBLIES

e APPENDIX 4V QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT,

DEVICES, AND INSTRUMENTATION

~ APPENDIX 4Y ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY-RELATED

CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION DEVICESb

EXHIBIT IIIA-5

ENVIRONMENTALQUAL IF ICATIONPROGRAM

QUALIFICATIONOF1E COMPONENTS

QUALIFICATIONOF OTHERSAFETY-BELATED COMPONENTS

NUREG 0588 IEEE 627-1 980

IEEE 323-1974

IEEE 535-1979

IEEE 650-1979

~ IEEE 323-1974

IEEE 387-1977

GENERALDESIGN CRITERIA

IEEE STANDARDSREGULATORYGUIDES

GDC 1-QUALITY

GDC2 —NAT PHEONOMENA

GDC 4 —ENVIRONMENTAL

GDC 23 —PROTECTION

IEEE 279-1971

IEEE 308-1974

IEEE 317-197F

IEEE 323-1974

RG 1.32, REV 0

BG 1.40, REV 0

RG 1.53, REV 0

RG 1.63, REV2

IEEE 334-1971 RG 1.73, REV 0

IEEE 379-1972 RG 1.89, REV 0

IEEE 382-1972 RG 1.131, REV 0

IEEE 383-1974

ENVIRONMENTALQUALIFICATIONCRITERIA

FIGURE 11

e',

I I I,B,1- STANDARD REVIEW PLAN 3,11, REV, 1

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Q IRMET

1, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

(1) EQUIPMENT SHALL BE DESIGNED TO HAVE THE CAPA-

BILITY OF PERFORMING DESIGN SAFETY FUNCTIONS

UNDER ALL NORMAL, ABNORMAL AND ACCIDENT ENVIRON-

MENTS, (2) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CAPABILITY

SHALL BE DEMONSTRATl:D BY TESTING AND/OR ANALYSES'S

APPROPRIATE, (3) A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM

MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 50 APPENDIX B

SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AND IMPLEMENTED TO PROVIDE

ASSURANCE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN

SATISFACTORILY ACCOMPLISHED, THE ENVIRONMENTAL

DESIGN OF SAFETY-RELATED MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL

EQUIPMENT IS ACCEPTABLE WHEN IT CAN BE ASCERTAINED

THAT ALL THREE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET,

EXHIBIT IIIB-1

PVNGS POS

IN AGREEMENT WITH GENERAL

REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL

SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT

0

SRP 3,11

REQ IR M T

2, APPLICABILITY OF IEEE 323-1974

IEEE STANDARD 323, ALTHOUGH SPECIFICALLY WRITTEN

FOR CLASS IE ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT, CONTAINS A CLEAR

PRESENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA THAT

ARE GENERIC TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

PROCESS ITSELF; THEREFORE, IEEE STANDARD 323 IS

CONSIDERED APPLICABLE TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI-

FICATION OF OTHER TYPES OF EQUIPMENT, THE

ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN AND QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY-"

RELATED EQUIPMENT IS ACCEPTABLE WHEN IT IS ASCER-""

TAINED THAT THE CRITERIA OF IEEE STANDARD 323

HAVE BEEN MET,

PVNG POS

IN AGREEMENT WITH THE

APPLICATION OF

IEEE 323-1974

PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA TO

THE QUALIFICATION OF ALL

SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-2

0'

SRP 3,11

R QUIR M NT PVNG POS I

THE FOLLOWING IEEE STANDARDS SHOULD BE USED IN

CONJUNCTION WITH IEEE 323-1974 FOR QUALIFICATION

OF SPECIFIC ITEMS AS APPROPRIATE:

~ IEEE 317 ELECTRICAL PENETRATIONS (AS MODIFIED

BY RG 1,63)

IN AGREEMENT WITIl THE USE

OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL

STANDARDS IN CONJUNCTION

WITH IEEE 323-1974 FOR

QUALIFICATION OF SPECIFIC

ITEMS AS APPROPRIATE,

IEEE 334, ELECTRIC MOTORS (AS MODIFIED BY

RG 1,40)

IEEE 382, VALVE OPERATORS (AS MODIFIED BY

RG 1,73)

IEEE 383, WIRE AND CABLE (AS MODIFIED BY

RG 1,131)

EXHIBIT IIIB-3

SRP 3,11

R QUIR MENT PVNG POSI ION

4, CHEMICAL QUALIFICATION

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT IS

ACCEPTABLE IF IT REFLECTS THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION

OF ALL FLUIDS AND ADDITIVES PRESENT IN THE PRIMARY

SYSTEM OR ADDED TO THE CONTAINMENT ENVIRONMENT IN

THE COURSE OF THE ACCIDENT FOR VARIOUS MODES OF

EQUIPMENT OPERATION,

IN AGREEMENT WITfl THE

CHEMICAL QUALIFICATION

REQUIREMENTS,

5, RADIATION QUALIFICATION

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE RADIATION ENVIRONMENT IS

ACCEPTABLE IF IT REFLECTS SOURCE TERMS COMPARABLE

TO THOSE POSTULATED IN REGULATORY GUIDE 1,89,

IN AGREEMENT WITH TIIE

RADIATION QUALIFICATION

REQUIREMENTS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-4

e

0

III,B,2 10CFR50 APP A,

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA

PVNGS POSI ON

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION 01, QUALITY

STANDARDS AND RECORDS

~ QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS OF

APP, B TO 10CFR50 ARE MET,

STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS

IMPORTANT TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED,

AND TESTED TO QUALITY STANDARDS COMMENSU-

RATE WITH THE SAFETY FUNCTION TO BE

PERFORMED, APPROPRIATE RECORDS OF TESTING

SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE LIFE

OF THE UNIT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-5

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION ¹2, DESIGN BASES

FOR PROTECTION AGAINST NATURAL PHENOMENA

PVNGS POSI ON

STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS IMPOR- ~ STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT IMPORTANT TO

TANT TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED TO SAFETY ARE PROTECTED FROM THE EFFECTS

WITHSTAND THE EFFECTS OF NATURAL PHENOMENA OF ADVERSE METEOROLOGICAL PHENOMENA, AS

WITHOUT LOSS OF CAPABILITY TO PERFORM DESCRIBED IN FSAR SECTIONS 3,3 AND 3,0,

THEIR SAFETY FUNCTIONS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-6

GENERAl DESIGN CRITERION P4,

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MISSILE DESIGN BASES

GS

IN AGREEMENT, IN ADDITIOtl, THE FOLLOWING

DESIGN FEATURES ARE PROVIDED:

STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS

IMPORTANT TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED TO

ACCOMMODATE THE EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL

CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH NORMAL OPERA-

TION, MAINTENANCE, TESTING AND POSTULATED

ACCIDENTS INCLUDING LOSS OF COOLANT

ACCIDENTS,

~ SYSTEMS AND COf"lPONENTS OUTSIDE

CONTAINMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY ARE

PROVIDED WITH REDUNDANCY,

~ PHYSICAL INDEPENDENCE HAS BEEN

PROVIDED FOR REDUNDANT EQUIPMENT TO

PRECLUDE FAILURES If'3 ONE TRAIN FROM

ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE REDUNDANT

TRAIN,

EXHIBIT I I IB-7

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION 825,

PROTECTION SYSTEM FAILURE MODES

THE PROTECTION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED

TO FAIL INTO A SAFE STATE —IF CONDITIONS

SUCH AS DISCONNECTION OF THE SYSTEM, OR

POSTULATED ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTS ARE

EXPERIENCED,

~ A SINGLE FAILURE OF ANY PROTECTIVE

CHANNEL HILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT

THE SAFETY OF THE PLANT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-8

III,B;5 IEEE 279-1971

CRITERIA FOR PROTECTION SYSTEMS

FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS

UIREMENT PV GS POSI IO

1) TYPE TEST DATA OR EXTRAPOLATION BASED ON

TEST DATA SHALL BE AVAILABLETO VERIFY THAT

PROTECTION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT SHALL MEET

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ACHIEVING THE

SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS,

THE REQUIRED DATA WILL BE

AVAILABLE,

2) THE RANGE OF TRANSIENT AND STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS

OF BOTH THE ENERGY SUPPLY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (FOR

EXAMPLE, VOLTAGE, FREQUENCY, TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY,

PRESSURE, VIBRATION, ETC) DURING NORMAL, ABNORMAL,

AND ACCIDENT CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL BE DOCUMENTED,

OPERATING PARAMETERS ARE

DOCUMENTED IN THE EQUIP-

MENT SPECIFICATIONS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-9

u'

I EEE 279-1971

REQ IR MEN PVNGS P SITIO

5) MINIMUM PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE

DOCUMENTED, THESE INCLUDE SYSTEM RESPONSE

TIMES, SYSTEM ACCURACIES, AND RANGES (NORMAL,

ABNORMAL, AND ACCIDENT CONDITIONS) OF THE

MAGNITUDES AND RATES OF CHANGE OF SENSED

VARIABLES TO BE ACCOMMODATED UNTIL PROPER

CONCLUSION OF THE PROTECTIVE ACTION IS

ASSURED,

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

ARE DOCUMENTED IN THE

EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-10

IEEE 308-1974

IEEE .STANDARD CRITERIA FOR

CLASS IE POWER SYSTEMS FOR

NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS

R QUIREM N VNG OS

THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF SYSTEMS PROVIDE ELECTRIC POWER TO

CLASS 1E EQUIPMENT:

1) ALTERNATING CURRENT POWER SYSTEMS

2) DIRECT CURRENT POWER SYSTEMS

3) VITAL INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL POWER

SYSTEMS'ACH

TYPE OF CLASS 1E POWER EQUIPMENT SHALL BE QUALIFIED BY

ANALYSIS, SUCCESSFUL USE UNDER SIMILAR CONDITIONS, OR BY

ACTUAL TEST TO DEMONSTRATE ITS ABILITY TO PERFORM ITS

FUNCTION UNDER NORMAL AND DESIGN BASIS EVENTS,

EQUIPMENT COVERED BY

SPECIFICATIONS EM-051,

JM-104, JM-105, JM-108,

JM-ill, JM-200, JM-359,

JM-391, MM-018 AND MM-234A

ARE BEING QUALIFIED USING

IEEE 308 IN CONJUNCTION

WITH IEEE 323, EACH

REQUIRES FULL COMPLIANCE

WITH THESE IEEE STANDARDS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-11

IEEE 517-1976

IEEE STANDARD FOR ELECTRIC PENETRATION ASSENBLIES

IN CONTAINNENT STRUCTURES FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS

FINITIO

ELECTRIC PENETRATION ASSENBLY — AN ASSENBLY OF INSULATED

ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS, CONDUCTOR SEALS, AND APERTURE SEALS

THAT PROVIDES THE PASSAGE OF ELECTRIC CONDUCTORS THROUGH

A SINGLE APERTURE IN THE CONTAINNENT STRUCTURE blHILE

PROVIDING A PRESSURE BARRIER BETWEEN THE INSIDE AND

OUTSIDE OF THE CONTAINNENT STRUCTURE,

EXHIBIT IIIB-12

i

I EEE 317-1976

REQUIREME T PVNGS POSI IO

1) DESIGN QUALIFICATION SHALL BE VERIFIED BY MATERIAL

TESTS AND TYPE TESTS PERFORMED ON REPRESENTATIVE

ELECTRIC PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES, EXISTING

QUALIFICATION TEST DATA MAY BE USED WHEN IT CAN

BE SHOWN BY DOCUMENTED ANALYSIS OR ADDITIONAL

TESTING OF COMPONENTS OR ASSEMBLIES OR BOTH THAT

THE EXISTING TEST DATA ARE VALID FOR THE PENETRATION

BEING QUALIFIED,

o SPECIFICATION EMO35A

REQUIRES QUALIFICATION

OF PENETRATION UNDER ALL

POSTULATED SERVICE

CONDITIONS, TESTING IN

PROGRESS,

2) MARGINS SHALL BE APPLIED AS FOLLOWS:

~ CURRENT +5%

~ VOLTAGE +10%

~ TEMP +80C

~ SPECIFICATION REQUIRES

FULI COMPLIANCE WITH

IEEE 317, TESTING IN

PROGRESS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-13

'

I EEE 317-1976

R Q IR M PVNG POSI IO

e PRESSURE +10% OF GAUGE NOT TO EXCEED 10 PSI

~ VIBRATION +10%

~ RADIATION +10% AN ACCIDENT DOSE

3) CONDUCTORS TO MEET IEEE 383 FLAME TESTS IN AGREEMENT MITH REQUIRE-

MENTS OF IEEE 383 FLAME

TESTS,

EXHIBIT I I IB-14

I

IEEE 323-1974

IEEE STANDARD FOR QUALIFYING CLASS IE

EQUIPMENT FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS

THE CAPABILITY OF CLASS IE EQUIPMENT FOR PERFORMING

ITS REQUIRED FUNCTION SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED,

A, PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES FOR DEMONSTRATING THE ~ CLASS IE EQUIPMENT HILL

QUALIFICATION OF'CLASS IE EQUIPMENT INCLUDE: BE QUALIFIED,

(1) ASSURANCE THAT THE SEVERITY OF THE

QUALIFICATION METHODS EQUAL OR EXCEED .

THE MAXIMUM ANTICIPATED SERVICE

REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS

(2) ASSURANCE THAT ANY EXTRAPOLATION OR

INFERENCE BE JUSTIFIED BY ALLOWANCES FOR

KNOWN POTENTIAL FAILURE MODES AND THE

MECHANISM LEADING TO THEM

EXHIBIT IIIB-15

I EEE 323-1974

PVNGS OS IO

(3) ON-GOING QUALIFICATION TESTING OF INSTALLED

EQUIPMENT WHOSE QUALIFIED LIFE IS LESS THAN

THE DESIGN LIFE OF THE EQUIPMENT

ON-GOING QUALIFICATION

PROGRAMS ARE DISCOURAGED

(4) DOCUMENTATION FILES WHICH PROVIDE THE BASIS

FOR QUALIFICATION

DOCUMENTATION WILL BE

PROVIDED,

(5) QUALIFICATION TEST DATA AS REQUIRED FOR

ON-GOING QUALIFICATION TESTING

(6) QUALIFICATION OF ANY INTERFACES ASSOCIATED

WITH CLASS IE EQUIPMENT

EXHIBIT IIIB-16

I EEE 525-1974

B, SEVERAL DEMONSTRATION METHODS ARE ACCEPTABLE,

SERVICE CONDITIONS, SIZE, AND AGING ARE

FACTORS WHICH DETERMINE THE DEMONSTRATION

METHOD TO BE USED TO ASSURE PROPER

QUALIFICATION,

~ METHODS OF QUALIFICATION

PER TABLE 1

C, IDENTIFICATION OF CI ASS IE EQUIPMENT ~ CLASS IE EQUIPMENT IS

IDENTIFIED BY SYSTEM

AND ITEM

EXHIBIT IIIB-17

I EEE 323-1974

PVNGS POS IO

D, METHODS OF QUALIFICATION

~ TYPE TESTING OF ACTUAL EQUIPMENT USING

SIMULATED SERVICE CONDITIONS IS THE

PREFERRED METHOD, TESTING SHALL

DEMONSTRATE THAT EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE

MEETS OR EXCEEDS SPECIFICATION REQUIRE-

MENTS, USING A PLANNED SEQUENCE OF TEST

CONDITIONS THAT MEET OR EXCEED THE

EXPECTED OR SPECIFIED SERVICE CONDITIONS,

INCLUDING MARGIN, UNDER NORMAL AND

ABNORMAL OPERATION,

~ TYPE TESTING IS PRE-

FERRED FOR 1E ITEMS IN

CONTAINMENT AND OTHER

HARSH ENVIRONMENT AREAS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-18

0

0

I EEE 323-1974

PVNGS POS ION

~ OPERATING EXPERIENCE, EQUIPMENT THAT HAS

OPERATED SUCCESSFULLY CAN BE CONSIDERED

QUALIFIED FOR EQUAL OR LESS SEVERE SERVICE,

THE VAI IDITY OF OPERATING EXPERIENCE SHAI L

BE DETERMINED FROM THE TYPE AND AMOUNT OF

DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTING THE SERVICE .

CONDITIONS AND EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE,

~ USE OF OPERATING

EXPERIENCE ALONE IS

DISCOURAGED, CAN BE

USED IN CONJUNCTION

NITH OTHER METHODS WHEN

PROPERLY DOCUMENTED,

EXHIBIT IIIB-19

I EEE 323-1974

V G POS I

~ ANALYSIS, QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS REQUIRES

THE CONSTRUCTION OF A VALID MATHEMATICALMODEL

OF THE ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT TO BE QUALIFIED,

THE VALIDITYOF THE MODEL SHALL BE JUSTIFIED

BY TEST DATA, OPERATING EXPERIENCE, OR PHYSICAL

LAWS OF NATURE ~

~ QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS

MUST BE SUPPORTED BY SOME

TYPE TESTING, OR DOCU-

MENTED OPERATING

EXPERIENCE,

DATA USED SHALL BE PERTINENT TO THE APPLICATION

AND IN AN AUDITABLE FORM,

EXHIBIT IIIB-20

,

I EEE 323-1974

PVNGS P

~ ONGOING QUALIFICATION USED IN THE EVENT

EQUIPMENT HAS QUALIFIED LIFE LESS THAN

ANTICIPATED INSTALLED LIFE,

(1) AGING AND TESTING OF IDENTICAL

EQUIPMENT OR COMPONENTS MAY CONTINUE

DURING THE QUALIFIED LIFE PERIOD

OF THE INSTALLED EQUIPMENT,

~ AN ONGOING QUALIFICATION

PROGRAM USING IDENTICAL

EQUIPMENT HAVING AN

IDENTIFIED QUALIFIED

LIFE IS ACCEPTABLE,

(2) ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT COULD BE

INSTALLED BESIDE THE REQUIRED

EQUIPMENT, REMOVED BEFORE THE END

.OF THE QUALIFIED LIFE PERIOD, AND

BE TYPE TESTED TO DETERMINE ITS

ADDITIONAL QUALIFIED LIFE,

EXHIBIT IIIB-21

'

I EEE 323-1974

VN S POS 0

3) OTHER METHODS WITH PROPER JUSTIFICATION

MAY BE FOUND EQUIVALENT,

~ COMBINED QUALIFICATION, EQUIPMENT MAY

BE QUALIFIED BY TYPE TEST, PREVIOUS

OPERATING EXPERIENCE, ANALYSIS, OR ANY

COMBINATION OF THESE METHODS,

~ COMBINATION QUALIFICA-

TION PROGRAMS ARE

ACCEPTABLE,

EXHIBIT IIIB-22

I EEE 323-1970

PVNGS POS T 0

~ DOCUMENTATION, .DOCUMENTATION SHALL

YERIFY THAT EACH TYPE OF ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT IS QUALIFIED FOR ITS

APPLICATION AND MEETS ITS SPECIFIED

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS, THE BASIS

OF QUALIFICATION SHALL BE EXPLAINED TO

SHOW THE ADEQUACY OF THE COMPLETE

EQUIPMENT, DATA SHALL BE ORGANIZED IN

AN AUDITABLE FORM,

IN AGREEMENT WITH DOCUMENTA-

TION REQUIREMENTS. PROPRIETARY

DATA MAY REQUIRE AUDIT IN

SUPPLIER'S FACILITY,

EXHIBIT IIIB-23

4

0

IEEE 323-1974

PVNGS POS I

~ AGING, THE OBJECTIVE OF AGING IS TO

ACHIEVE END-OF-LIFE CONDITION, PREVIOUS

AGING CAN BE UTILIZED PROVIDED DATA ARE

APPLI CABLE AND JUSTIFIABLE, ACCELERATED

THERMAL AGING PRODUCES SOME DETERIORATION

AND, WHEN FOLLOWED BY VIBRATION, MAY

PRODUCE REALISTIC FAILURE MODES, RADIATION

SHALL BE ADDED WHERE APPROPRIATE, MARGINS

SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE APPLICATION OF EACH

INFLUENCE, ELECTROMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

SHALL BE OPERATED TO SIMULATE EXPECTED

MECHANICAL WEAR AND ELECTRICAL CONTACT

DEGRADATION, AN ACCELERATED RATE FOR THE

NUMBER OF CYCLES EQUAL TO THE REQUIRED

NUMBER DURING THE DESIGN LIFE MAY BE

UTILIZED,

~ AGING MUST BE CONSIDERED

REGARDLESS OF THE QUALI-

FICATION METHOD USED,

EXHIBIT IIIB-24

I EEE 523-1974

PVN S POS TIO

FOR INSULATING MATERIALS, A REGRESSION

LINE (SEE IEEE STD 101-1972, GUIDE FOR

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THERMAL LIFE

TEST DATA) MAY BE USED AS A BASIS FOR

SELECTING THE AGING TIME AND TEMPERATURE,

SAMPLE AGING TIMES OF LESS THAN 100 HOURS

SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED,

~ ARRHENIUS METHODOLOGY IS

CONSIDERED AN ACCEPTABLE

METHOD OF ADDRESSING

ACCELERATED AGING,

OTHER METHODS ARE

POSSIBLE,

IN AGREEMENT WITH AGING

REQUIREMENTS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-25

I EEE 323-1970

PVNGS PO I IO

o TEST SEQUENCE, TYPE TESTS SHALL BE

RUN ON THE EQUIPMENT IN A SPECIFIED

ORDER, THE SEQUENCE USED SHALL BE

JUSTIFIED AS THE MOST SEVERE FOR THE

ITEM BEING TESTED,

~ TYPE TESTING SHOULD BE

DONE IN SEQUENCE ON THE

SAME ITEM EXCEPT IF

IMPRACTICAL,

(1) INSPECTION, THIS INSPECTION SHALL

NOT BE DIRECTED TO SELECT A SPECI-

FIC UNIT FOR TYPE TESTING,

IN AGRFEMENT.

EXHIBIT IIIB-26

,

IEEE 323-1974

PVNGS POS IO

(2) OPERATION UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS

TO PROVIDE A DATA BASE FOR COMPARISON

WITH PERFORMANCE UNDER MORE HIGHLY

STRESSED CONDITIONS,

IN AGREEMENT,

(3) OPERATION TO THE EXTREMES OF ALL

PERFORMANCE AND ELECTRICAL CHARACTER-

ISTICS EXCLUDING DESIGN BASIS EVENT

AND POST DESIGN BASIS EVENT CONDITIONS

DATA FROM OTHER TESTS ON IDENTICAL OR

ESSENTIALLY SIMILAR EQU I PMENT ARE

ACCEPTABLE,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-27

'

IEEE 323-1974

PVNGS POSI IO

(4) EQUIPMENT SHALL BE AGED TO PUT IT IN A

CONDITION WHICH SIMULATES ITS.EXPECTED

END-OF-QUALI F IED-LIFE CONDITION INCLU-

DING THE EFFECT OF RADIATION (DESIGN

BASIS EVENT RADIATION MAY BE INCLUDED),

IF THE REQUIRED RADIATION LEVEL CAN BE

SHOWN TO PRODUCE LESS EFFECT THAN THAT

WHICH WOULD CAUSE LOSS OF THE EQUIPMENT'S

CLASS IE FUNCTION, RADIATION NEED NOT BE

INCLUDED AS PART OF AGING, CERTAIN KEY

MEASUREMENTS SHOULD BE MADE FOLLOWING

AGING TO DETERMINE IF THE EQUIPMENT IS

PERFORMING SATISFACTORILY PRIOR TO

SUBSEQUENT TESTING,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-28

I EEE 323-1974

PV G POS

(5) AGED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SUBJECTED TO

MECHANICAL VIBRATION AS WILL BE SEEN

IN SERVICE, THIS SHOULD INCLUDE S IMU-

LATED SEISMIC VIBRATION, SELF-INDUCED

VIBRATION, OR VIBRATION FROM OTHER

CAUSES (SUCH AS MIGHT BE SEEN BY

PIPE-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT),

IN AGREEtIENT,

EXISTING EQUIPMENT

QUALIFICATION BEING

REVIEWED FOR

COMPLIANCE,

(6) OPERATE AGED EQUIPMENT WHILE EXPOSED TO

THE SIMULATED DESIGN BASIS EVENT

(RADI ATION MAY BE EXCLUDED IF INCORPO-

RATED IN (4) ABOVE), FUNCTIONS WHICH MUST

BE PERFORMED DURING THE SIMULATED DESIGN

BASIS EVENT SHALL BE MONITORED,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXISTING EQUIPMENT

QUALIFICATION BEING

REVIEWED FOR

COMPLIANCE,

EXHIBIT IIIB-29

'

IEEE 323-1974

PVNGS 0 10

(7) OPERATE EQUIPMENT WHILE EXPOSED TO

THE SIMUI ATED POST ACCIDENT CONDITIONS

(FOLLOWING EXPOSURE TO ACCIDENT

CONDITIONS), FUNCTIONS WHICH MUST

BE PERFORMED FOLLOWING THE SIMULATED

DESIGN BASIS EVENT SHALL BE MONITORED,

IN AGREEMENT, .

(8) DISASSEMBLE, TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY

FOR INSPECTION OF THE STATUS AND

CONDITION OF THE EQUIPMENT AND RECORD

THE FINDINGS,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-30

I EEE 323-1974

VNGS POS I IO

~ MARGIN IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE

MOST SEVERE SPECIFIED SERVICE CONDI-

TIONS OF THE PLANT AND THE CONDITIONS

USED IN TYPE TESTING TO ACCOUNT FOR

NORMAL VARIATIONS IN COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTION OF EQUIPMENT AND REASONABLE

ERRORS IN DEFINING SATISFACTORY

PERFORMANCE, THE QUALIFICATION TYPE

TESTING SHALL INCLUDE ADEQUATE MARGIN,

~ MARGIN MUST BE INCLUDED

IN ALL TYPE TEST PRO-

GRAMS AND IN ANALYSIS

OF MATERIALS AND

COMPONENTS,

IN AGREEMENT WITH

MARGIN REQUIREMENTS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-31

'

I EEE 323-1974

PVNGS PO 0

SUGGESTED FACTORS TO BE APPLIED TO SERVICE

CONDITIONS FOR TYPE TESTING ARE AS FOLLOWS:

(1) TEMPERATURE: +15 F (8 C)

(2) PRESSURE: +10 PERCENT OF GAUGE,

BUT NOT MORE THAN 10 tap/IN

(3) RADIATION: +10 PERCENT (ON

ACCIDENT DOSE),

(4) VOLTAGE: +10 PERCENT OF RATED

VALUE,

EXHIBIT IIIB-32

I

I EEE 323-1974

PVNGS P SI IO

(5) FREQUENCY: +5 PERCENT OF RATED

VALUE,

(6) TIME: +10 PERCENT OF THE PERIOD

OF TIME THE.EQUIPMENT IS REQUIRED

TO BE OPERATIONAL FOLLOWING THE

DESIGN BASIS EVENT,

(7) ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSIENTS: THE

INITIALTRANSIENT AND THE DWELL

AT PEAK TEMPERATURE SHALL BE

APPLIED AT LEAST TWICE,

LOCA AND MSLB PROFILES DO

NOT CONTAIN TWO PEAK

TRANSIENT PERIODS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-33

IEEE 525-1974-

(8) VIBRATION: +10 PERCENT ADDED TO

THE ACCELERATION OF THE RESPONSE

SPECTRUM AT THE MOUNTING POINT OF

THE EQUIPMENT,

NOTE: NEGATIVE FACTORS SHALL BE APPLIED WHEN LOWERING THE VALUE OF THE SERVICE CONDITIONS

INCREASES THE SEVERITY OF THE TEST,

EXHIBIT IIIB-54

IEEE 334-1974

IEEE STANDARD FOR TYPE TESTS OF CONTINUOUS DUTY CLASS IE

MOTORS FOR NUCLEAR POWER GEf'lERATING STATIONS

~ TEST PROCEDURES TO DEMONSTRATE

ADEQUACY FOR TllE REQUIRED CLASS 1E

FUNCTIONS REQUIRE KNOWLEDGE OF MOTOR

CONSTRUCTIOI'J AND THE PARTICULAR FEA-

TURES UPON WHICH EXPECTED PERFORMANCE

DEPENDS,

EQUIPMENT COVERED BY SPECIFICATION MM-093

IS BEING QUALIFIED USING IEEE-334 IN

CONJUNCT IOI'1 WITH IEEE-323,

THE SPECIFICATION REQUIRES -FULL COMPLI-

ANCE WITH THESE IEEE STANDARDS,

(NOTE: I'10 CONTINUOUS DUTY MOTORS INSIDE

CONTAItlMENT)

EXHIBIT IIIB-35

l

tI EEE 379-1972

IEEE TRIAL-USE GUIDE FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION

TO NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATION PROTECTION SYSTEMS

THE SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION IS A BASIC

PRINCIPLE IN THE DESIGN OF RELIABLE SYSTEMS,

SINGLE FAILURES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE

SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION, REGARDLESS OF

WHETHER OR NOT THEY VIOLATE THE SINGLE-

FAILURE CRITERION, ARE CLASSIFIED AS FOLLOWS:

TYPE 1: A DETECTABLE FAILURE RESULTING

FROM ONE FAILED COMPONENT OR MODULE OR

FROM A CIRCUIT FAULT

THERE ARE OTHER APPROACHES TO HIGH SYS-

TEM RELIABILITY, NOT INCLUDED IN THIS

GUIDE, SUCH AS EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION,

PERIODIC TESTING, AND THE SETTING AND

ACHIEVEMENT OF RELIABILITYGOALS,

(QUALIF I CATION PRECLUDES CONSIDERATION

OF COMMON NODE)

EXHIBIT IIIB-36

1

l

I EEE 379-1972

TYPE 2: MULTIPLE DETECTABLE FAILURES

RESULTING FROM A SINGLE CAUSE EXTERNAL

TO THE PROTECTION SYSTEM

TYPE 3: 'MULTIPLE DETECTABLE FAILURES

RESULTING FROM A SINGLE CAUSE WITHIN THE

PROTECTION SYSTEM

THE MULTIPLE FAILURES OF TYPES 2 AND 3 ARE

EXAMPLES OF COMMON-MODE FAILURES, OTHER

COMMON-MODE FAILURES RESULTING FROM MANUFAC-

TURING AND MAINTENANCE.ERRORS, CERTAIN UNANTIC-

IPATED DESIGN SHORTCOMINGS, AND FACTORS NOT

CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN BASIS SHOULD BE

-CONSIDERED,

EXHIBIT IIIB-37

I

IEEE 382-1972

IEEE TRIAL-USE GUIDE FOR TYPE TEST OF CLASS I ELECTRIC VALVE

OPERATORS FOR flUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS

~ GENERAL, THE TYPE TEST SHALL DEMONSTRATE

THAT THE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF

THE VALVE OPERATOR ADHERE TO THE EQUIP-

MENT SPECIFICATIONS, THE TEST FOR THE

SAMPLE VALVE OPERATOR SHAI L CONSIST OF

SUBJECTING IT TO THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE

OF COHDITIOf]S TO SIMULATE THE DESIGN

BASIS SERVICE CONDITIONS OF THE OPERATOR,

(1) AGING, (2) SEISMIC, AflD (3) ACCIDENT

OR OTfkER SPECIAL ENVIRONMENT 'AS APPLICABLE,

~ EQUIPMENT COVERED BY SPECIFICA-

TIONS JM-601A, JM-601B, JM-603,

JM-605, PM-221A, PM-221B AND PM-221C

ARE BEING QUALIFIED USING IEEE-382

IN CONJUNCTION 'krITH IEEE-393, EACH

REQUIRES FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THESE

IEEE STANDARDS,

NOTE: IEEE 382-1980 HAS BEEN

APPROVED, BUT IS NOT YET AVAILABLE

ON DISTRIBUTION,

EXHIBIT I I IB-38

I EEE 382-1972

Q

~ INSPECTION

UPON COMPLETION OF THE TESTS THE VALVE

OPERATOR SHALL BE DISMANTLED AND

VISUALLY INSPECTED, THE CONDITION OF

COMPONENTS SHALL BE RECORDED,

IN AGREENENT WITH THF. INSPECTION

REQUIREMENT,

~ DOCUMENTATION

THE TYPE TEST DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE

SUFFICIENT TO VERIFY THE EQUIPMENT

MEETS ITS SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

REQUIREMENTS,'

DOCUMENTATION PER IEEE 323-1974

REQUIRED,

EXHIBIT IIIB-39

1

i

IEEE 383-1974

IEEE STANDARD FOR TYPE TEST OF CLASS IE ELECTRIC CABLES, FIELD SPLICES,. AND CONNECTIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS

o TYPE TESTS AS QUALIFICATION METHOD

TYPE TESTS ARE THE PREFERRED METHOD TO

DEMONSTRATE OR ASSIST IN DEMONSTRATING THAT

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT IS CAPABLE OF MEETING

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS UNDER SERVICE CONDITIONS

WHICH INCLUDE NORMAL AilD DESIGN BASIS EVENT

ENVIRONMENTS, TO PERFORM TYPE TESTS FOR- CABLE,

FIELD SPLICES, AND CONNECTIONS REQUIRES:

(1) IDENTIFICATION OF CABLE, (2) DESCRIPTION

OF SIGNIFICANT ASPECTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT, AND

(3) DESCRIPTION OF CABLE PERFORMANCE REQUIRED

THESE, WITH ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE

IN INSULATING MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS FORM A BASIS

FOR DESIGNING TYPE TESTS TO DEMONSTRATE THE

G POS 0

EQUIPMENT COVERED BY SPECI-FICATIONSNS

EM-021, EM-022,

EM-035A, EM-051, EM-057,

EM-058, EM-060, EM-061,.

EM-062, EM-064, EM-064A,

EM-106A, EM-106B, EM-117,

JM-104, JM-105, JM-108,

JM-111, JM-200, JM-311,

JM-359 AND JM-391 ARE BEING

QUAI IFIED USING IEEE-383 IN

CONJUNCTION WITH IEEE-323

EACH REQUIRES FULL COMPLI-

ANCE WITH THESE IEEE

STANDARDS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-40

l

IEEE 387-1977

P S OS 0

CAPABILITIES, QUALIFICATION OF ONE CABLE

HAY PERNIT EXTRAPOLATION OF RESULTS TO QUALIFY

OTHER CABLES OF THE SANE TYPE,

FACTORY REPAIRS AND

l'1ANUFACTURING SPLICES ARE

REQUIRED TO BE TESTED,

FLANE TESTS PER SEC-

'ION 2,5, GAS BURNER

NETHOD ARE REQUIRED USING

AT LEAST 70,000 BTU

BURNER INPUT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-COA

I EEE 383-1974

A SAMPLE FIELD SPLICE OR CONNECTION OR BOTH MUST BE

TYPE TESTED WITH THE CABLE TO DEMONSTRATE ITS ELEC-

TRICAL, MECHANICAL, AND CHEMICAL COMPATIBILITY IN THE

ENVIRONMENTS.

~ DOCUMENTATION

PROVIDE DATA NECESSARY TO DOCUMENT SATISFACTORY COM-

PLIANCE, CERTIFICATION OF PRIOR TEST RESULTS WILL BE

PROVIDED WHEN REQUIRED,

~ DOCUMENTATION PER

IEEE 323-1974

REQUIRED, PRIOR

TEST RESULTS

ACCEPTABLE IF THESE

ENVELOPE PVNGS

CONDITIONS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-41

IEEE 387-1977

IEEE STANDARD CRITERIA FOR DIESEL GENERATING UNITS APPLIED AS STANDBY PONER

SUPPLIES FOR NUCLEAR POl<ER GENERATING STATIONS

~ THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO THE APPLICATION OF DIESEL GEN-

ERATOR UNITS OR INDIVIDUALUNITS OF THE STANDBY POttER

SUPPLIES IN STATIONARY NUCLEAR PONER GENERATING STATIONS,

~ ITEMS INCLUDED — SEE FIG 387-1,

~ RATINGS

CONTINUOUS — 8760 HOURS PER YEAR

SHORT TIME - 2 HOURS IN ANY 24 HOURS WITHOUT EXCEEDING

MANUFACTURER RATINGS

EXHIBIT IIIB-42

I

CLASS IE A.C.DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

CTREMOTEPROTECTIVESYSTEM

O.C.POWERSUPPLY

NEMO'TE CONTROLa SURVEILLANCESYSTEM

EXHAUST'SINK

PT

GENERATORTERMINALS

CPS CPS

LUBE OILSYSTEM

LOCALCONTROL,PROTECTION B,

SURVEILLANCESYSTEM ICPS)

I

II

I

CPS

EXHAUSTSYSTEM

EXCITER GVOLTAGE REG.ULATOR SYSTEM

GENERATORFLY.WHEEL

DIESEL ENGINE GOVERROR

CPS

STARTINGENERGYSYSTEM

STARTINGSYSTEM

CPS

COMBUSTIONAIR SYSTEM

COOLINGWATERSYSTEM

I CPS

FUEL OILSYSTEM

LILIITOFSCOPE OFDIESEL ~

GENERATORUNIT

SERVICEENVIRONMENT

DIESEL ~ GENERATOR UNITFOUNDATION

DIESEL ~ GEN.ERATOR UNITENCLOSURE

COOLINGAIR

VENTILA.TINGSYSTEM

AIRSUPPLY

COOLINGWATERSUPPLYSYSTEM

FUEL OII.STORAGEBISUPPLY

LEGEND:ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS (CONTROL, AUXILIARYPOWER, ETC;MAINPOWERI

NON ELECTRICALCHANNELS (OIL, AIR, EXHAUST, ETC; DRIVE)

EINI'IOf SCOPE OF NIECES.CEIIEIIAtOANNltWIININtERFACE (+)CONTROL PROTECTION AND SURVEILLANCESYSTEMS

FIGURE 387-1

l

IEEE 387-1977

~ TYPE QUALIFICATION TESTING PROCEDURES AND METHODS

DIESEL-GENERATORS OF TYPES NOT PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED AS

A STANDBY POltER SOURCE FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING

STATIONS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A TYPE QUALIFICATION

TESTING PROGRAM CONSISTING OF LOAD CAPABILITY QUALIFI-

CATION, START AND LOAD ACCEPTANCE QUALIFICATION, AND

MARGIN QUALIFICATION, QUALIFICATION TESTS MAY BE

PERFORMED ON ONE OR MORE UNITS, ALTHOUGH QUALIFICATION

OF ONE UNIT HILL QUALIFY LIKE UNITS OF THAT TYPE FOR

EQUAL OR LESS SEVERE SERVICE, IF START AND LOAD

ACCEPTANCE QUALIFICATION TESTS ARE PERFORMED USING

MORE THAN ONE IDENTICAL UNIT, THEN EACH OF THESE UNITS

MUST BE TESTED FOR LOAD CAPABILITY QUALIFICATION AND

MARGIN QUALIFICATION,

~ THE DIESEL-GENERATORS

COVERED BY SPECIFICA-

TION MM-018 ARE BEING

QUALIFIED USING

IEEE 387 IN CONJUNC-

TION WITH IFEE-323,

THE SPECIFICATION

REQUIRES FULL COM-

PLIANCE i'IITH TflESE

IEEE STANDARDS,

TESTS IN MANUFAC-

TURERS FACILITY

PREFERRED,

EXHIBIT I I IB-43

8

I

I EEE 387-1977

TYPE QUALIFICATION TESTS ON THE COMPLETE DIESEL-GENERATOR UNIT

SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ADDITION TO SEISMIC ANALYSIS OR SEISMIC

TESTING BY THE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH

IEEE STD 344-1975,

TYPE QUALIFICATION TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED FOLLOWING SUCCESS-

FUL COMPLETION OF THE DIESEL BREAK-IN RUld, AND THE FACTORY

PRODUCTION TESTS,

FOLLOWING THE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF TYPE QUALIFICATION TESTS

THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFAC-

TURER'S STANDARD PROCEDURE, AND INSPECTION RESULTS SHALL BE

DOCUMENTED,

~ DOCUMENTATION

TESTS SHALL BE COMPLETELY DOCUMENTED, INCLUDING RECORDS OF

FAILURES, THEIR REPAIR AND RETESTING,

'N AGREEMENT WITH THE

DOCUMENTATION

REQUIREMENTS,

NOTE: P387/D4 OF JULY 1, 1980 HAS BEEN PROPOSED, AMONG OTHER CHANGES, THIS DRAFT PLACES

ALL QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS IN ONE SECTION AND USES METHODS AND PRINCIPALS OF

I EEE 323-1974,EXHIBIT IIIB-44

'

IEEE 535-1979

IEEE STANDARD FOR QUALIFICATION OF CLASS 1E LEAD STORAGE BATTERIES

FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIOf'lS

~ QUALIFICATION REQUIRED IN ANSI/IEEE

STD 279-1971 AND IEEE STD 308-1978, CAN BE

DEMONSTRATED BY USING THE PROCEDURES PROVIDED

IN THIS STANDARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH IEEE

STD 323-1974,

~ BATTERIES COVERED BY

SPECIFICATION El"l-050 ARE

BEOG QUALIFIED USING

IEEE-535 IN COiilJUVCTIO'3

WITH IEEE-323, THE SPECI-

FICATION REQUIRES FULL

COMPLIA'NCE L'(ITH THESE IEEE

STANDARDS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-45

IEEE 535-1979

~ PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF QUALIFICATION

THE CAPABILITY OF CLASS 1E I EAD STORAGE BAT-

TERIES AND RACKS, INCLUDING INTERFACES, TO

PERFORM THEIR REQUIRED FUNCTIONS SHALL BE

DEMONSTRATED,

IN AGREEMENT WITH THE

PRINCIPLES AND METHODS OF

QUALIFICATION,

~ TYPE TESTING

EQUIPMENT TO BE TESTED IS AGED TO AN

ANTICIPATED QUALIFIED LIFE SUBJECTED TO ALL

ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES KNOWN TO AFFECT

PERFORMANCE AND OPERATED UNDER SIMULATED

CONDITIONS

e IN AGREEMENT WITH TYPE

TESTING REQUIREMENTS

EXHIBIT IIIB-06

0

IEEE 555-1979

~ OPERATING EXPERIENCE

BATTERIES AND RACKS THAT HAVE OPERATED

SUCCESSFULLY CAN BE CONSIDERED QUALIFIED

FOR EQUAL OR LESS SEVERE SERVICE,

THE VALIDITYOF OPERATING EXPERIENCE AS

A MEANS OF QUALIFICATION SflALL BE DETER-

MINED FROM THE TYPE AND AMOUNT OF DOCU-

MENTATION SUPPORTING THE SERVICE

CONDITIONS AND TllE PERFORMANCE OF THE

BATTERY AND RACK DURING THIS TIME,

pi

~ IN AGREEMENT WITH TflE

OPERATING EXPERIENCE

PIIILOSOPHY,

EXHIBIT IIIB-07

4

IEEE 555-1979

~ ANALYSIS

QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS SHALL REQUIRE THE

CONSTRUCTION OF A VALID MATHEMATICALMODEL,

THE VALIDITYOF THE MATHEMATICALMODEL SHALL

BE JUSTIFIED BY TEST DATA, OPERATING EXPERIENCE

OR PHYSICAL LANS OF NATURE,

~ NOT CONSIDERED

ACCEPTABLE DUE TO

INABILITYTO CON-.

STRUCT ADEQUATE

MATHEMATICALMODEL,

EXHIBIT IIIB-48

l

S

IEEE 555-1979

e ACCELERATED THERMAL AGING FACTORS ~ IN AGREEMENT WITH TflE ACCEL-

ERATED THERMAL AGING FACTORS,

PLATE

CONSTRUCTION

LEAD CALCIUM—

PASTED 20 10

TEST DAYS AT TEST DAYS AT

62,8 C (145 F) 71 C (160 F)

TO EQUAL 1 YR AT TO EQUAL 1 YR AT

25 C (77 F) 25 C (77 F)

LEAD CALCIUM BATTERIES ARE

USED, SPECIFIED POSITIVE

PLATE POTENTIAL (RELATIVE TO

ELECTROLYTE) DIFFERENTIAL

BETWEEN OPEN CIRCUIT AND

CHARGING CONDITIONS IS MAIN-

TAINED DURING ACCELERATED

AGING AT 160~F,

EXHIBIT IIIB-49

IEEE 555-1979

o DOCUMENTATION

DOCUMENTATION SHALL VERIFY THAT THE BATTERY

AND RACK ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE APPLICATION

AND MEET SPECIFIED PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS,

IN AGREEMENT WITH TllE

DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS,

~ THE USER SHALL MAINTAIN A QUALIFICATION

FILE,

~ IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-50

0

IEEE 627-1980

STANDARD FOR DESIGN QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT

USED IN NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS

ANDA 0 R Q

o A DESIGN QUALIFICATION PROGRAM FOR SAFETY SYSTEM EQUIPMENT

USED IN A NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATION SHALL INCLUDE

THE FOLLOWING:

(1) QUALIFICATION CRITERIA

(2) A QUALIFICATION PROGRAM TO DEMONSTRATE SATISFACTION OF

QUALIFICATION CRITERIA BY ANALYSIS, TEST, OPERATING

EXPERIENCE OR A COMBINATION'OF THESE,

(3) EVIDENCE OF SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF QUALIFICATION

(4) DOCUMENTATION FILE CONTAINING (1), (2) AND (3),

IN AGREEMENT, IEEE-627

WILL BE USED TO QUALIFY

NON-ELECTR ICAL EQUIPMENT

EXHIBIT IIIB-51

IEEE 627-1980

S 0

FUND H N A U

a TO ESTABLISH EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION, IT- SHALL BE DEMON-

STRATED THAT TflE EQUIPMENT CAN PERFORM THE SAFETY FUNC-

TION(S) REQUIRED WHEN OPERATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL

LOADS ARE IMPOSED ON THE EQUIPMENT BY OCCURRENCE OF ANY

POSTULATED SERVICE CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

SPECIFICATIONS,

~ IN AGREEMEWT WITH THE

FUNDAI'lENTAL QUALIFI CA-

TION REQUIREMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-52

IEEE 627-1980

APO

o EQUIPMENT SHALL BE QUALIFIED TO VERIFY THAT ITS SPECIFI- ~

CATION CRITERIA ARE SATISFIED, THE CRITERIA GENERALLY

COVER A SINGLE APPLICATION, BUT MAY ENVELOP MORE THAN

ONE APPLICATION, A FAMILY OF EQUIPMENT MAY BE QUALIFIED

BY QUALIFYING ONE OR MORE MEMBERS AND EXTENDING THE

QUALIFICATIOil ACROSS THE FAMILY BY ANALYTICALMETHODS OR

COMPLIANCE WITH GUIDE INES GIVEN IN SPECIFICEQUIPMENT'OCUMENTS,

SUCH ANALYSIS REQUIRES CONSIDERATION OF

SIGNIFICANT DESIGN PARAMETERS TO ESTABLISH THE

SIMILARITY OF THE QUALIFIED MEMBER(S) TO THE FAMILY

OF EQUIPMENT.

IN AGREEMENT.WITH TflE

QUALIFICATION

APPROACHES,

EXHIBIT IIIB-55

S

I EEE 627-1980

t

~ THE PRESSURE COfJTAIflNENT INTEGRITY AND PASSIVE STRUCTURAL

REQUIRENENTS OF NECIIANICAL EQUIPNENT COVERED BY ASNE, AISC

OR ACI CODES ARE CONSIDERED QUALIFIED BY ADHERENCE TO

THOSE CODES,

~ DOCUf"lENTATIOf'f

THE QUALIFICATION OF THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE DOCUNEHTED BY

QUALIFICATION FILE IN AUDITABLE FORN,

IN AGREENEHT

IN AGREENENT WITff THE

DOCUNENTATION

REQU IRENENT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-54

,

IEEE 650-1979QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE STATIC BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS

FOR NUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS

1) DESCRIBES METHODS FOR QUALIFYING STATIC BATTERY CHARGERS AND

INVERTERS FOR CLASS lE INSTALLATIONS IN El'lVIRONMENTALLYCON-

TROLlED AREAS OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT, THE PURPOSE OF THIS

STANDARD IS TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC PROCEDURES TO MEET THE

REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE STD 323-1974, QUALIFICATION MAY BE

ACCOMPLISHED IN SEVERAL WAYS: TYPE TESTING, OPERATING

EXPERIENCE, OR ANALYSIS. THESE METHODS MAY BE USED INDIVIDU-

ALLY OR IN COMBINATION, THE QUALIFICATION METHODS IN THIS

STANDARD EMPLOY A COMBINATION OF TYPE TESTING AND ANALYSIS,

OPERATING EXPERIENCE IS A METHOD OF LIMITED USE AS A SOLE

MEANS OF QUALIFICATION, QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS SHALL

INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION OF METHODS, THEORIES, AND ASSUMPTIONS

USED, IN GENERAL, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS ARE TOO

COMPLEX TO BE QUALIFIED BY ANAI YSIS Al ONE ALTHOUGH IT IS

EFFECTIVE IN THE EXTRAPOLATION OF TEST DATA AND DETERMINA-

~ BATTERY CHARGERS

AND INVERTERS

COVERED BY SPECI-

FICATIONS EM-051

AND EM-054

RESPECTIVELY,

ARE BEING

QUALIFIED USING

IEEE-650 IN CON-

JUNCTION WITH

IEEE-323, EACH

SPECIFICATION

REQUIRES FULL

COMPLIANCE WITH

THESE IEEE

STANDARDS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-55

4lI

i

IEEE. 650-1979

TION OF THE EFFECTS OF MINOR DESIGN CHANGES TO

EQUIPMENT PREVIOUSLY TESTED,USE OF THE METHODS

OF THIS STANDARD

ARF CONSIDERED

APPLICABLE TO

OTHER EQUIPMENT

CONTAINING

ELECTRONIC COM-

PONENTS, ASSEMBLIES,

AND NODULES,

EXHIBIT IIIB-55A

''

IEEE 650-1979

2) THE EFFECT OF AGING ON THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS IS NOT

SIGNIFICANT WITHIN THE MAXIMUM QUALIFIED LIFE OBJECTIVE

OF THE EQUIPMENT (TYPICALLY 00 YEARS) WHEN USED WITHIN

THEIR DESIGN RATING:

(A) SILICON SEMICONDUCTORS

(B) RESISTORS

(C) TANTALUM DRY ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS

(D) CERAMIC. CAPAC ITORS

(E) DRY PAPER AND PLASTIC FILM CAPACI'TORS

(F) MICA CAPACITORS

(G) GLASS CAPACITORS

(H) INTEGRATED MICROELECTRONIC DEVICES

(I) HYBRID MICROCIRCUITS

~ IN AGREEMENT WITH

THE AGING STATEMENT,

STRESS CALCULATION

REQUIRED,

EXHIBIT IIlB-56

I I I. 8,4 REGULATORY GUIDE 1.52

CRITERIA FOR SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRIC P01<ER SYSTENS

FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

R QU

THE QUALIFICATION REQUI REf'1ENTS

OF IEEE 508-1974 SHALL BE NET,

IN CONPLIANCE WITH QUALIFICATION

PROVISIONS OF IEEE 508-1974,

EXHIBIT I I IB-57

'

0

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,40

QUALIFICATION TESTS OF CONTINUOUS-DUTY NOTORS INSTALLED

INSIDE THE CONTAINNENT OF MATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

THE QUALIFICATION REQUIRENENTS OF IEEE 334-1971

SHALL BE NET, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:

1, AUXILIARYEQUIPNENT THAT WILL BE PART

OF THE INSTALLED NOTOR ASSENBLY SHOULD

ALSO BE QUALIFIED,

NOT APPLICABLE, THERE ARE

NO SAFETY-RELATED CONTINUOUS-

DUTY NOTORS INSTALLED INSIDE

THE CONTAINNENT,

2, TESTS SHOULD S INULATE ALL DESIGN BASIS

EVENTS WHICH AFFECT OPERATION OF THE NOTOR'S

AUXILIARYEQUI PNENT,

EXHIBIT IIIB-58

0'

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,53

APPLICATION OF THE SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION TO

NUCLEAR PONER PLANT PROTECTION SYSTEMS

THE QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE 379-1972

SHALL BE MET,

IN AGREEMENT WITH QUALIFICATION

PROVISIONS OF IEEE 308-1974,

EXHIBIT IIIB-59

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,63

ELECTRIC PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES IN CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES

FOR LIGHT-HATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

THE QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE 317-1976 SHALL BE MET,

SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:

SECTION 6.A.~, "DIELECTRIC-STRENGTH TEST," SHOULD BE SUPPlE-

MENTED, FOR QUALIFICATION TESTING ONLY, BY THE FOLLOWING:/

(3) EACH MEDIUM-VOLTAGE POMER CONDUCTOR SHALL BE GIVEN

AN IMPULSE WITHSTAND TEST BY APPLYING A 1,2 X 50 S IMPULSE

VOLTAGE TEST SERIES CONSISTING OF THREE POSITIVE AND THREE

NEGATIVE IMPULSE VOLTAGES, IF FLASHOVER OCCURS ON ONLY ONE

TEST DURING ANY GROUP OF THREE CONSECUTIVE TESTS, THREE MORE

SHALL BE MADE, IF NO FLASHOVER OCCURS IN THE SECOtlD GROUP

OF TESTS, TllE FLASHOVER IN THE FIRST GROUP SllALL BE CON-

SIDERED RANDOM FLASHOVER AND THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CONSIDERED

AS HAVING PASSED THE TEST,

EXHIBIT I I IB-60

IN AGREEMENT HITH

QUALIFICATION

PROVISIONS OF

IEEE 317-1976,

IN AGREEMENT WITH

REQUIREMENT 1,

1,63

THE TEST VOLTAGES FOR THE ABOVE SHALL BE BASED ON THE VOLTAGE

RATING OF THE CONDUCTOR IH ACCORDANCE MITH TflE FOLLOMING TABLE:

CO U

OS

300 AND 600

1000

5000

8000

15,000

60,000

95,000

95,000

2) THE 500-HOUR AGING TIME AT MINIMUM AGING TEMPERATURE OF SEC-

TION 6.3.3 IS A PRINTING ERROR AND SHOULD BE CHANGED TO

5000 HOURS,

~ IN AGREEMENT

HITH REQUIRE-

MENT 2,

EXHIBIT IIIB-61

- REGULATORY GUIDE 1,73

QUALIFICATION TESTS OF ELECTRIC VALVE OPERATORS INSTALLED

INSIDE THE CONTAINNENT OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

THE REQUIRENENTS OF IEEE 382-1972 SHALL BE NET, SUBJECT TO

THE FOLLOWING:

1, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, AUXILIARYEQUIPNENT (E,G„

LINIT SWITCHES) THAT IS NOT INTEGRAL WITH THE VALVE

OPERATOR NECHANISM BUT MILL BE PART OF THE INSTALLED

VALVE OPERATOR ASSEMBLY SHOULD BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE

WITH THE SUBJECT STANDARD,

2, THE TEST SEQUENCE DESCRIBED IN SECTION 4,5,2 OF THE

STANDARD SHOULD BE USED UNLESS THE ANTICIPATED ACTUAL

SERVICE OPERATING SEQUENCE FOR THE VALVE OPERATOR IS

EXPECTED TO CREATE A 'NORE SEVERE OPERATING CONDITION

THAN DESCRIBED IN SECTION 4.5.2. IN SUCH CASE, THE

ACTUAL SERVICE SEQUENCE SHOULD BE USED IN THE TEST,

IN AGREENENT

WITH REQUIRE-

NENT 1,

IN AGREEMENT

WITH REQU IRE-

NENT 2,

EXHIBIT IIIB-62

TO ASSURE THAT THE VALVE OPERATOR IS TESTED UNDER AN

ENVIRONMENT OF SUFFICIENT SEVERITY, THE MAGNITUDE OF THE

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (E, 6 „TEMPERATURE, PRESSURE,

RADIATION, HUMIDITY) THAT SIMULATE THE CONDITIONS TO

WHICH THE VALVE OPERATOR IS EXPECTED TO BE EXPOSED DURING

AND FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT (SECTION 4,4, SECOND

PARAGRAPH) SHOULD BE BASED ON CONSERVATIVE CALCULATIONS,

THE RADIOLOGICAL SOURCE TERM FOR QUALIFICATION TESTS IN

A NUCLEAR RADIATION ENVIRONMENT SHOULD BE BASED ON THE

SAME SOURCE TERM USED IN REGULATORY GUIDE 1,7, "CONTROL

OF COMBUSTIBLE GAS CONCENTRATIONS IN CONTAINMENT FOLLOWING

A LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT," FOR BWRS AND PWRS, THE

CONTAINMENT SIZE SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR EACH

CASE, FOR EXPOSED ORGANIC MATERIALS, CALCULATIONS SHOULD

TAKE INTO ACCOUNT BOTH BETA AND GAMMA RADIATION,

IN AGREEMENT

WITH REQUIRE-

MENT 3,

IN AGREEMENT

WITH REQUIRE-

MENT 4,

(BETA DOSES ARE

UNDER REVIEW)

EXHIBIT IIIB-63

'

REGULATORY GUIDE 1.89QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE EQUIPMENT FOR NUCLEAR PGL'lER PLANTS

R ~

THE REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE 323-1974 SHALL

BE MET SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:

IN COMPLIAI'lCE AS CLARIFIED BELOW; REFER TO

FSAR SECTIONS 3,10 AND 3,11,

2)

THE SPECIFIC APPLICABILITY OR

ACCEPTABILITY OF IEEE STD 344 WILL BE

COVERED SEPARATELY If'l OTHER REGULA-

TORY GUIDES WHERE APPROPRIATE,

THE RADIOLOGICAL SOURCE TERM FOR

QUALIFICATION TESTS IN A NUCLEAR RADIA-

TION ENVIRONMENT SHOULD BE BASED ON THE

SAME SOURCE TERM AS THAT USED IN REGULA-

TORY GUIDE 1.7 (I,E„ 100% OF THE NOBLE

GASES, 50% OF THE HALOGErfS, AND 1% OF .

THE REMAINING SOLIDS), THE CONTAINMENT

SIZE SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN

EACH CASE, FOR EXPOSED ORGANIC MATE-

RIALS, CALCULATIONS SHOULD TAKE INTO

ACCOUflT BOTH BETA AND GAMMA RADIATION.

A, FOR EQUIPMENT THAT HAS BEEN SEISMICALLY

QUALIFIED BY TlfE TESTING PROCEDURES

REFERENCED IN FSAR SECTIOf'l 3.10, PRIOR

TO QUALIFICATION TESTING TO IEEE

323-1974, THE SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF

IEEE-323-1974 OF THE AGED EQUIPMENT IS

BY ANALYSIS USING THE TESTING OUTLINED

IN FSAR SECTIOI'l 3,10 AND, IF NECESSARY,

APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMENTAL TESTS AS A

BASIS FOR THE ANALYSIS, THIS COMBINED

QUALIFICATION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH

SECTIONS 5,3 AND 5,4 OF IEEE 323-1974,

JUSTIFICATION FOR QUALIFICATION OV

EQUIPMENT Ifl T>fIS MANNER WIlL BE PRO-

VIDED ON AN INDIVIDUALBASIS If'l QUALI-

EXHIBIT IIIB 64

B, OBJECTIVES AND METHODS DESCRIBED FOR

AGING ARE DIFFICULT TO APPLY TO MUCH OF

THE EQUIPMENT, THE USE OF THERMAL AND

VIBRATIONALTECHNIQUES TO SIMULATE AGING

MAY BE VALID FOR SOME COMPONENTS (CABLE

OR MOTOR INSULATION), BUT IS NOT VALID

OR PRACTICAL FOR MANY ITEMS, ANY VARI-

ATION IN AGING METHODS OR PROCEDURES

HILL BE IDENTIFIED AND JUSTIFIED ON AN

INDIVIDUALBASIS IN QUALIFICATION

REPORTS,

EXHIBIT IIIB-65

0

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,131

QUALIFICATION TESTS OF ELECTRIC CABLES, FIELD SPLICES, AND CONNECTIONS

FOR LIGHT-WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

THE REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE 383-1974 SHALL BE MET, SLlBJECT TO THE

FOl LOWING:

1) ALL DESIGf'l BASIS EVENTS SllOULD BE COf'ISIDERED AS APPLICABLE

TO THE FUfkCTION OF TllE CONPONEflT,

2) ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CHARACTERIZATION. OF PRESSURE,

TEMPERATURE, RADIATIOf'l, ETC, SHALL BE PLAl'lT SPECIFIC OR

ACCEPTABLY ENVELOPE PLANT SERVICE CONDITIONS,

3) IF THERE IS NOT SUFFICIEflT EVIDENCE THAT ACCELERATED AGING

TECHNIQUES CAN RELIABLY PRODUCE END-OF-LIFE CONDITIONS, AN

ONGOING QUALIFICATIOfl PROCEDURE SHOULD BE USED, IF ON-GOING

QUALIFICATION DEMONSTRATES THAT THE QUALIFIED LIFE IS LESS

THAN THE DESIGN LIFE, A PERIOD REPLACEMEf'lT Pl AN SHOULD BE

INSTITUTED,EXHIBIT IIIB-66

IN AGREEMENT WIT[i

QUALIFICATION PRO-

VISIONS OF

IEEE 383-1974,

IN AGREEMENT WITH

REQUIREMENT 1

IN AGREEMENT WITff

REQUIREMENT 2,

IN AGREEMEHT WITH

REQUIREMENT 3

RADIoLoGICAL souRCE TERM sHALL BE CONSISTENT MITH

REGUL'ATORY GUIDE 1,89,

5) FLAME RESISTANCE TESTING SHALL INCLUDE BOTH AGED AND UNAGED

CABLE SPECIMENS,

6) INDIVIDUALFIRE TESTS ARE USEFUI TO SCREEN OUT INADEQUATE

MATERIALs, INDIVIDUALTEsTs SHouLD NOT BE CothsTRUED As

QUALIFYING A GROUPED ARRANGEMENT,

7) THE GAS BURNER FLAME SOURCE SHALL RELEASE APPROXIMATELY

70,000 BTU/HR, BURLAP BAG FIRE TESTING IS NOT ENDORSED,

IN AGREEMENT HIT>I

REQUIREMENT LI,

IN AGREEMENT WITH

REQUIREMENT 5,

IN AGREEMENT MITII

REQUIREMENT 6,

PVNGS CABLES ARE

TESTED AT 70,000

BTU BURNER INPUT

OR HIGHER,

EXHIBIT I I IB-67

III,B,5 NUREG-0588

INTERIM STAFF POSITION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF

SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

~ POSITIONS ARE APPLICABLE TO PLANTS THAT ARE, OR HILL BE, IN THE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT

(CP) OR OPERATING LICENSE (OL) REVIEW PROCESS AND THAT ARE REQUIRED TO SATISFY THE

REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN EITHER IEEE-323-1971 OR 1974,

~ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RESULTING FROM REVIEl< OF THE THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 2 EVENT ARE

NOT INCLUDED,

POSITIONS PROVIDE GUIDANCE ON ESTABLISHMENT OF SERVICE CONDITIONS, METHODS OF QUALI-

FICATION AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS, SEISMIC QUALIFICATION IS NOT COVERED,

~ EQUIPMENT REFERS TO SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR ACCIDENT MITI-

GATION, POST ACCIDENT MONITORING AND SAFE SHUTDOWN,

~ PVNGS MUST COI'lFORM HITH STAFF POSITIONS OF NUREG 0588 CATEGORY 1 (IEEE 323-1974),

EXHIBIT IIIB-68

NUREG-0588

S

~ CALCULATE LOSS OF COOLANT ACCIDENT TEMPERATURE AND

PRESSURE ENVIRONMENT USING CONTEMPT-LT OR EQUIVA-

LENT INDUSTRY CODES, ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE FROM SRP

SECTION 6,2,1,1, A (NUREG-75/087),

~ MAIN STEAM LINE BREAK INSIDE CONTAINMENT ENVIRON-

MENTAL PARAMETERS SHOULD BE CALCULATED FROM PLANT

SPECIFIC MODEL REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY STAFF,

o CHEMICAI SPRAY SHOULD BE ADDRESSED FOR EQUIPMENT

QUALIFICATION,

~ RADIATION ENVIRONMENT.SHOULD BE BASED ON THE

NORMAL RADIATION ENVIRONMENT PLUS THAT ASSOCI-

ATED YlITH THE MOST SEVERE DBA, DBA OCCURS AT

END OF EQUIPMENT QUALIFIED LIFE, BETA RADIATION

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED,

IN COMPLIANCE, COPATTA

CODE HAS USED (DERIVED

FROM CONTEMPT),

~ PLANT SPECIFIC PARAMETERS

ARE USED,

~ IN AGREEMENT THAT CHEMICAL

SPRAY BE ADDRESSED,

~ IN AGREEMENT,

BETA EFFECTS ARE UNDER

REVIEW,

EXHIBIT IIIB-69

'

NUREG-0588

~ FOR EQUIPMEl'lT INSIDE CONTAINMENT TYPE

TESTING SHOULD BE EMPLOYED FOR

QUALIFICATION,

~ TEMPERATURE OF EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE

DEFINED BY THERMOCOUPLE READING ON OR

NEAR EQUIPMENT SURFACE,

o EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO OPERATE HITHIN

SECONDS OR MINUTES INTO DBA MUST BE

OPERABLE FOR A PERIOD OF AT LEAST 1 HOUR

IN EXCESS OF THE TIME ASSUMED IN THE

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS,

e AGING EFFECTS SEIOULD BE CONSIDERED AND

INCLUDED IN QUALIFICATION PROGRAMS,

o ARRHENIUS METHODOIOGY IS CONSIDERED AN

ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF ADDRESSING AGING

EXHIBIT IIIB-70

~ IN AGREENENT I'IETHODS AND

SEQUENCE OF IEEE 323-1979 ARE

SPECIFIED,

~ SEPARATI Of'1 PRECLUDES FAILURE

OF REDUNDAN7 EQUIPMENT,

~ IN AGREEMENT

IN AGREEMENT THAT AGING EFFECTS

BE CONSIDERED AND INCLUDED IN

QUALIFICATION PROGRAMS,

~ IN AGREEMENT THAT THE ARRHENIUS

METHOD IS ACCEPTABLE FOR AGING,

NUREG-0588

G S

~ - PERIODIC SURVEILLANCE TESTING UNDER

NORMAL SERVICE CONDITIONS IS NOT

CONSIDERED AN ACCEPTABLE METHOD FOR

ONGOING QUALIFICATION,

~ DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS OF IEEE

323-1970 ARE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE,

~ IN AGREENENT, 'PERIODIC

TESTING OF EQUIPMENT WITH

SOME PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED

QUALIFIED LIFE IS ACCEPTABLE

FOR AN ONGOING PROGRAM,

o IN AGREEMENT WITH DOCUMENTA-

TION REQUIREMENTS,

(NOTE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

ON NUREG 0588 DOCUMENTATION

REQUIREMENTS AND PVNGS

PRESENTATION FORMAT IS PRO-

VIDED IN PART V),

EXHIBIT IIIB-71

0

I I I,B,6 COMMISS ION ORDER CLI-80-21

ALL APPLICANTS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS

OF NUREG 0588,

IN AGREEMENT,

WILL FOLLOW GUIDANCE OF

CATEGORY I ( IEEE 323-74)

EXHIBIT IIIB-72

S

I I I .B,7 IE BULLETIl'l 79-01B

1) COMPLY WITH NUREG 0588, IN AGREENENT — CATEGORY j. OF NUREG 0588

APPLIES,

2) REVIEti FSAR SERVICE CONDITIONS FOR DBA

AND ENSURE ALL SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT

IS QUALIFIED FOR DBA. SPECIFICALLY

REVIEW THE FOLLOHING SERVICE CONDITIONS:

A, TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE STEAM

CONDITIONS

~ FSAR TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE

SERVICE CONDITIONS ARE CORRECT,

IN AGREEMENT,

B, RADIATION (CONSIDER GAMMA AND BETA

DOSES UNLESS BETA DOSE IS LESS THAN

10% OF GAMMA DOSE,)

~ (A) GAMMA DOSES IN FSAR REFLECT

TID 14800 SOURCES,

IN AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT IIIB-75

0,

IE 79-018

(B) BETA DOSES NOT INCLUDED IN

FSAR, EFFECT OF BETA DOSE

ON METALLIC COMPONENTS (PIPES,

VALVES, CABINETS) IS NOT SIG-

NIFICANT. EFFECT OF BETA

DOSES ON NON-METALLIC COMPO-

NENTS IS UNDER REVIB,

C, SUBMERGENCE

D. SPRAY CHEMICAI S

~ SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL COMPO-

NENTS ARE LOCATED ABOVE CONTAINMENT

FLOOD LEVEL,

~ SPRAY CHENISTRY IS INCLUDED IN

ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION FOR

QUALIFICATION.

EXHIBIT IIIB-7Q

I

0

III,B.8 10CFR50 APP B,

QUALITY ASSURANCE CRITERIA

EVERY APPLICANT FOR AN OPERATING LICENSE

IS REQUIRED TO INCLUDE INFORMATION

PERTAINING TO MANAGERIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

CONTROLS TO BE USED TO ASSURE SAFE

OPERATION,

~ PVNGS MEETS FULL REQUIREMENTS OF

lOCFR50 APPENDIX B,

~ THE APPLICANT SHALL BE

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE

ESTABLISHMENT AND EXECUTION

OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE

PROGRAM,

EXHIBIT IIIB-75

4i

I I I, 8, 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFICATION

1, PARAMETER VALUES MERE CALCULATED BY APPROPRIATELY CONSERVATIVE ANALYSES.

2, VALUES HAVE BEEN GROUPED ON THE BASIS OF PLANT ARRANGENENT TO FORM MAXIMUM LIMITS

FOR EACH IDENTIFIED AREA,

EXHIBIT IIIB-76

4I

0'

MAINSTEAM SUPPORT STRUCTURE

CONTAINMENTBLDG

TURBINE BUILDING

AUXILIARYBLDG

FUEL BLDG

RADWASTE BUILDING

II

rI

DIESEL GENBUILDING

CONTROL BUILDING

LAUNDRY'ECONTAMINATIONFACILITYIUNIT1 ONLYI

PLANT NORTH

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION

FIGURE 12

0

ENVIRONMENTALDESIGNATORS

0II:

M.S.S.S.

CONT'M'T.o BLDG~0 0Qoa

AUX. BLDG.

nIII-

. o H

Q

-0 9 'jj

LCD (CD CD

o ~ ~ a

CONTROL BLDG.

'~i~= '0r Q

DIESEL GEN

BLDG

FIGURE i3

i

CONDITION DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)

PARAMETER

TEMPERATURE 50 — 120

(F)

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

LOCA

350350

302302-270270-200

370

350

302302-270

270-200

4 MIN

8 MIN

8 HR

42 HR

2 MK

NsLB DUUi50N

PRESSURE

(PSIG)

RELATIYE

HUMIDITY

(K)

ATM,

20 — 90%-

60

55

25

10

STEAM/AIR MIXTURE

12 MIN

8 HR

42 HR

2 MK

RADIATION - 1 x 10(RADS)

(40 YEAR

INTEGRATED

DOSE)

CHEMICALS

3,3 x 10 GAMMA

2 x 108 BETA (NON-SPRAYED

ENCLOSURES)

1 x 10 BETA (ALL OTHER

AREAS)

~ 4400 PPM BORON

~ 50 PPM HYDRAZINE

~ pH ADJUSTED TO 7,0-8,5AFTER 4 HOURS USING

TR I SODIUM PHOSPHATE

TABLE 2 (SHEET j. OF 2)

0

0

CONDITION

CONTAINMEHT BUILD I HG— ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR I

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

PARAMETER

SUBMERGENCE NONE

LOCA/MSLB

BELOW PLANT EL, 91'.

DUST 1,52 vG/M~ 650 vG/M~

SEISMIC 2 OBE'S

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

1 SSE

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

REQUIREMENTS

REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

REQUIREMENTS

AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 00 YEAR

LIFE FOR EHVIROtJMENTAL

PARAMETERS

EQUIPMENT MUST BE.

QUALIFIED FOR 00 YEAR

LIFE PLUS DBA FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS

TABLE 2 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

e,

0

0

CONDITION

PARAMETER

MAIN STEAM SUPPORT STRUCTURE - ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR II

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

LOCA/MSLB

TEMPERATURE

(F)

PRESSURE

(PSIG)

RELATIVE

HUMIDITY

(%)

RADIATION

(RADS)

(40 YEAR

INTEGRATED

DOSE)

CHEMICALS

28 — 120

ATM

20 — 90X

(103

NONE

300 (ABOVE 100')

21 (ABOVE 100')

STEAM/AIR MIXTURE

(ABOVE 100')

106 (ABOVE 100')

TABLE 3 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

0

0

P

MAIN STEAM SUPPORT STRUCTURE — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR II

COND IT ION

PARAMETER

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

LOCA/MSLB

SUBMERGENCE NONE NONE

DUST

- SEISMIC

1,52 vG/M (BELOW EL, 100')61,3 vG/M3 (ABOVE EL, 100')

2 OBE'S

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

.650 vG/M (BELOW EL, 100')131 MG/M3 (ABOVE EL, 100')

1 SSE

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

REQUIREMENTS

REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

REQUIREMENTS

AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL

PARAMETERS

EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LIFE PLUS DBA FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS

TABLE 3 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

e

0

CONDITION

AUXILIARYBUILDING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR III

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

PARAMETER

TEMPERATURE

(F)

PRESSURE

(PSIG)

50 -104

ATM

LOCA/MSLB

50 — 104

ATM

RELATIVE

HUMIDITY

(%)

RADIATION

(RADS)

(40 YEAR

INTEGRATED

DOSE)

CHEMICALS

20 — 90%

5,5 X 10 (ACCESSIBLE AREAS)

1,25 X 10 (VOLUME CONTROL

TANK)

2,7 X 109 (PURIFICATION ION

EXCH,)

NONE

20 — 90%

1 X 10 (ACCESSIBLE AREAS)

1,25 X 10/ (VOLUME CONTROL TANK)

2,7 X 109'. (PURIFICATION ION

EXCH,)'ONE

TABLE 4 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

I

AUXILIARYBUILDING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR I I I

COriDITION

PARAMETER

SUBf'lERGENCE

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

LOCA/NSLB

DUST 1,52 vG/N~ 650 vG/N~

SEISMIC 2 OBE'S

(REFER TO SEISNiIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

1- SSE

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

DYfIIAI'lIC REFER TO EQUIPf'1ENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

REQUIRENENTS

REFER TO EQUIPNENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

REQUIRENENTS

EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 00 YEAR

LIFE FOR ENVIRONfIENTAL

PARAMETERS

TABLE LI (SHEET 2 OF 2)

EQUIPNENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 00 YEAR

LIFE PLUS DBA FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL PARANETERS

0

0

CONTROL BUILDING - ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR IV

CONDITION

PARAMETER

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

(INCI UDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)

LOCA/MSLB

TEMPERATURE

(F)CONTROL ROOM 75+5

ELEC, EQUIP, ROOMS

(EL, 100') 60-77

OTHER 40-104

CONTROL ROOM 75+5

ELEC, EQUIP, ROOMS

(EL, 100') 60-104

OTHER 40-104

PRESSURE

(PSIG)

RELATIVE

HUMIDITY

(%)

RADIATION

(RADS)

(40 YEAR

INTEGRATED

DOSE)

CHEMICALS

ATM

CONTROL AND ELEC, EQUIP,

ROOMS (EL, 100') 40-60%

OTHER 20 — 90%

(IP5

NONE

. ATM

CONTROL AND ELEC, EQUIP, ROOMS

(EL, 100') 40-60%

OTHER 20 — 90%

(10

NONE

TABLE 5 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

e,

0

CONDITION

PARAMETER

CONTROL BUILDIiNG — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIG[3ATOR IV

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

LOCA/MSLB

SUBMERGENCE NONE NONE

DUST 1,52 iG/M~ 420 i G/M~

SEISMIC 2 OBE'S

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

1 SSE

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

.REQUIREMENTS

REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

REQUIREMENTS

AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL

PARAMETERS

TABLE 5 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LIFE PLUS DBA FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS

0

0

COND IT ION

PARAMETER

DIESEL GENERATOR BUII DING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR V

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

LOCA/MSLB

TEMPERATURE.

(F)

PRESSURE

(PSIG)

RELATIVE

HUMIDITY

(%)

.RADIATION(RADS)

(40 YEAR

INTEGRATED

DOSE)

CHEMICALS

50 — 122 (D,G, CONTROL ROON)

50 — 140 (D,G, AREA)

ATM

<10

NONE

50 - 122 (D,G, CONTROL ROON)

50 — 140 (D,G. AREA)

ATM

<105

NONE

TABLE 6 (SHEET 1 OF 2)

DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR V

CONDITION

PARAMETER

SUBMERGENCE

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

LOCA/MSLB

DUST

SEISMIC

1,52 ~G/M3 (D,G, CONTROL ROON)

61,3 ~G/M3 (D,G, AREA)

2 OBE'S

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

420 ~G/M3 (D,G,CONTROL'OOM)

131 MG/M3 (D.G, AREA)

1 SSE

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

'REQUIREMENTS

REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

REQUIREMENTS

AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL

PARAMETERS

TABLE 6 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LIFE PLUS DBA FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS

0

1

CONDITION

FUEL BUILDING — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR V I

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

PARAMETER

TEMPERATURE

(F)

PRESSURE

(PSIG)

RELATIVE

HUMID]TY

(%)

'ADIATION

(RADS)

(40 YEAR

INTEGRATED

DOSE)

CHEMICALS

50 — 104

ATM

20 — 90%

<10

LOCA/MSLB

50 — 104

ATM

20 — 90%

10'ONE

TABLE 7 (SflEET 1 OF 2)

0

0

FUEL BUILDING - ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR VI

CONDITION

PARAMETER

SUBMERGENCE

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

NONE

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

LOCA/MSLB

NONE

DUST 1,52 ~G/M 650 vG/M~

SEISMIC 2 OBE'S

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

1 SSE

-(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

. REQUIREMENTS

REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIfICATIONS FOR

REQUIREMENTS

AGING EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL

PARAMETERS

TABLE 7 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

EQUIPMENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LIFE PLUS DBA FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS

0

0

CONDITION

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

(INCLUDES 40 YEAR INTEGRATED)

OUTSIDE AREAS — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR YII

PARAMETER

TEMPERATURE

(F)

PRESSURE

(PS!G)

RELATIYE

HUMIDITY

(%)

RAD IATION

(RADS)

(40 YEAR

INTEGRATED

DOSE)

CHEMICALS

25 — 116

ATM

U .— 100%

(103

NONE

LOCA/MSLB

25 — 116

ATM

13 — 100%

(103

TABLF 8 (SfIEET 1 OF 2)

0

hi

),I

0

0OUTSIDE AREAS — ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR VI I

COND ITION

PARAMETER

SUBMERGENCE

NORMAL/ABNORMAL

DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT

LOCA/MSLB

NOr<E

DUST 61,3 ~e/M3

(GEOMETRIC MEAN)

131 ve/M3

SEISMIC 2 OBE'S

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

1 SSE

(REFER TO SEISMIC

RESPONSE SPECTRA)

DYNAMIC REFER TO EQUIPMENT

, SPECIFICATIONS FOR

REQUIREMENTS

REFER TO EQUIPMENT

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

- REQUIREMENTS

AGING EQUIPttENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LIFE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL

PARAMETERS

. TABLE 8 (SHEET 2 OF 2)

EQUIPNENT MUST BE

QUALIFIED FOR 40 YEAR

LI'FE PLUS DBA FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS

e

e

l

li

PVNGSSITEINVESTIGATION

SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA

FREE-FIELD SPECTRAREG

GUIDE'l.60

IN-STRU CTURESEISMIC DATA

REG

GUIDE1.61

REG

GUIDE1.29

EQUIPMENTSPEC IF I CATIO NS

STANDARDIZEDSEISMICQUALIFICATIONREQUIREMENTS

SUPPLIERPROGRAM

SEISMIC QUALlFICATION

FIGURE 14

0

EVEHT

SEISMIC LEVEL

SELECTED BASED

ON SITE II'lVESTIGATION

SEISMIC LEVEL

USED IN DESIGN OF

STRUCTURES R EQUIPMENT

SAFE SHUTDOI'JH EARTHQUAKE (SSE) 0,20G 0,2SG

OPERATIHG BASIS EARTHQUAKE (OBE) 0,10G 0,15G

PVNGS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA

TABLE 9

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,60

DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR SEISMIC DESIGN

OF NUCLEAR POHER PLANTS

G 0

1) THE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL COMPONENT GROUND DESIGN

RESPONSE SPECTRA, WITHOUT SOIL-STRUCTURE INTER-

ACTION EFFECTS, OF THE SSE, 1/2 TklE SSE, OR THE

OBE Old SITES UNDERLAIN BY ROCK OR BY SOIL SHOULD

BE LINEARLY SCALED FROM TIIEIR RESPECTIVE

HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL DESIGN RESPOI'1SESPECTRA'RESENTED

IH THE REG, GUIDE IN 1,60-1 IN

PROPORTIOtl TO THE MAXIMUM flORIZONTAL GROUND

ACCELERATIOlh SPECIFIED FOR THE EARTllOUAKE

CHOSEN,

II AGREEMENT, FIGURE 1,G0-1 I

SHOMS THE PVNGS llORIZONTAL

RESPONSE SPECTRA IN COM-

PARISON TO TklE REG GUIDE

SPECTRA,

EXHIBIT I I IC-1

0

0

.0

1000

500

200

100

CQCh

50

20Cl

O10

Og

C~C~

Pgb'n

++c+

~oDISPLACEMENT = 36 in.FOR 1.0g MAX GROUNDACCELERATION

DAMPING FACTOR,%

0.5

2

5

7

10

o

~o

10

20

50

100

,I

0.5

0.05

0.1

0.2

0.1 0.2 0.5 "'2 5

FREQUENCY, cps

10 20 50 100

PVNGS 0;25 g DESIGNSPECTRA FOR 2% DAMPING

HORIZONTAL DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRA —SCALED TO 1g HORIZONTAL

GROUND ACCELERATION

FIGURE 1.60.l

0'

REGULATORY GUIDE 1.61

DAMPING VALUES

(PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING)

STRUCTURE OR COMPONENT

OPERATING BASIS

EARTHQUAKE OR 1/2 SAFE

SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE

SAFE SHUTDOWN

EARTHQUAKE

EQUIPMENT AND LARGE-DIAMETER PIPING SYSTEMS,

PIPE DIAMETER GREATER THAN 12 IN,

SMALL-D-IANETER PIPING SYSTEMS, DIAMETER EQUAL

TO OR LESS THAN 12 IN,

WELDED STEEL STRUCTURES ,

BOLTED STEEL. STRUCTURES ,

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURES ,

REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES

TABLE 10

5.6DAMPING

0.5%

, 4.81%

4,02%

3.2tDI-cC

~ Z.4

5%

10%

1.6

0.80.56g

0.01 0.10

PERIOD (SEC)

1.00 10.00

'.-AUXILIARYBUILDING SSE HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION

RESPONSE SPECTRA EL 100'.0'0, ROOF -,

FIGURE 15

30

20f

10

4

'IRC)

2cCCC

1.0

0.8

' I~ I

NOTE -,

3

I ~

I I ~

I I I l I

NOTE; .

I 2 MII

I i II, I ~

= NOTES:

,-f 'I. SSE GROUND ACCELERATION = 025g.'-'. DAMPING ~2%

"', 3. DAMPING ~3%

.. 4. ELEVATION HIGHEST EQUIPMENTFLOOR LEVEL (178 FT)

.". 5. APPLICABLETO BOTH HORIZONTALAND VERTICAL DIRECTIONS, ALLBLDGS '.

I

~lf~ I

'I ~ +

I I ~

~ Q

-.: ZPA (ZERO PERIOD ACCELERATION)

:: WALL-MOUNTEDAND FLOOR-MOUNTED.=.—,. " CONTROL PANEL ASSEMBLIES

0.4~

'.2

l

0 1

1 4 6 8

I i I ~

I I II ~ I I l ~ I ~

10 20 40 70 100 200 400 600 800

FREQUENCY IN HZ

.:REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRUM (RRS) FOR SSE FOR PALO VERDE

NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION ...„.:,,'..., .'...« ~ I .fflI >* " ',III'..~ . ~ ~ l -..«I ~, ~

FIGURE 16

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,29

SEISMIC DESIGN CLASSIFICATION

1) SPECIFIES THE STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS

OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REQUIRED TO BE DESIGNATED

AS SEISMIC CATEGORY I AND WHICH MUST BE DESIGNED

TO WITHSTAND THE EFFECTS OF THE SSE AND REMAIN

FUNCTIONAL, Tl-lE PERT INENT QUALITY ASSURANCE

REQUIREMENTS OF APPENDIX B TO 10 CFR PART 50

SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ALL ACTIVITIES AFFECTING THE

SAFETY-RELATED FUNCTIONS OF THESE STRUCTURES,

SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS,

IN AGREENEIIT, A LISTING

OF ALL SEISMIC CATEGORY I

STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND

COMPONENTS FOR PVNGS IS

PROVIDED IN FSAR TABLE 5,2-1, .

EXHIBIT IIIC-2

0

0h

0STANDARDIZED SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

APPENDIX 4E SEISMIC QUALIFICATION AND OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC

CATEGORY I ACTIVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

APPENDIX 4H TECH'AICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE EQUIPMENT

E.PPENDIX 4J SEISHIC QUALIFICATIO,"I FOR SEISMIC CATEGORY I '.lOAACTIVE MEClkAihICAL

EQUIP ME'AT

EXHIBIT IIIC-5

0

0

STANDARDIZED SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED)

APPENDIX 4T SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E CONTROL AND

INSTRUMENTATION DEVICES

APPENDIX 4U SEISMIC QUAI IFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E CONTROL PANEL

ASSEMBLIES

APPENDIX 4V QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS 1E ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, DEVICES,

AND INSTRUMENTATION

EXHIBIT IIIC-4

0

SAFETY SYSTEMSEISMIC QUALIFICATION

STANDARDREVIEWPLAN3.9.2, REV 1

STANDARDREVIEWPLAN3.9.3, REV 0

STANDARDREVIEWPLAN3.10, REV 0

REGULATORYGUIDES

GENERALDESIGNCRITERIA

GENERALDESIGNCRITERIA

GENERALDESIGNCRITERIA

RG 1.60

RG 1.61

GOC1

GDC2

GDC4

GDC14

GD C-1

GOC-2

GDC4

IEEE 344-1975

GOC2

IEEE 344-1975

RG 1.92

RG 1.100

RG 1.124

RG 1.130.

GDC 15

REGULATORYGUIDES

REGULATORYGUIDES

RG 1.48

RG 1.20 RG 1.67

RG 1.68

FIGURE 17

0,

III, C,2 STANDARD REYIEW PLAN ",9,2, REY, j.

DYNAMIC TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, AND EQUIPMENT

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

1) A TEST PROGRAM IS REQUIRED TO CONFIRM THE ABILITY OF

ALL SEISMIC CATEGORY I MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO

FUNCTION AS NEEDED DURING AND AFTER AN EARTHQUAKE

OF MAGNITUDE UP TO AND INCLUDING TflE SSE,

A, ANALYSIS WITHOUT TESTING IS ACCEPTABLE IF

STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ALONE CAN ASSURE THE

INTENDED FUNCTION, WHEN A COMPLETE SEISMIC

TEST IS IMPRACTICABIE, A COMBINATION OF

TEST AND ANALYSIS IS ACCEPTABLE,

I~i AGREEMENT.

(TESTING PREFERRED)

EXHIBIT I I IC-5

SRP 5,9,2

B, EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE TESTED IN THE OPERATIONAL

CONDITION, LOADINGS SIMULATING THOSE OF

PLANT NORMAL OPERATION, SUCH AS THERMAL AND

FLOW-INDUCED LOADINGS, IF ANY, SHOULD BE

CONCURRENTLY SUPERIMPOSED UPON THE SEISMIC

LOADING. OPERABILITY SHOULD BE VERI F I ED

DURING AND AFTER THE TEST,

I.'l AGREEMENT,

C, THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SEISMIC INPUT

MOTION SHOULD BE SPECIFIED BY RESPONSE

SPECTRUM, POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY FUNCTION,

OR tIME HISTORY,:

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-6

SRP 3,9,2

D, THE TEST INPUT MOTION SHOULD-- BE CHARACTERIZED

IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE SEISMIC INPUT

MOTION, AND THE CONSERVATISM IN AMPLITUDE AND

FREQUENCY CONTENT SHOULD BE DEMONSTRATED,

Il AGREEMENT,

E, SEISMIC EXCITATIONS GENERALLY HAVE A BROAD

FREQUENCY CONTENT, MULTI-FREQUENCY INPUT

MOTION SHOULD BE USED IN THE TESTING,

I:l AGREEMENT,

(1-33 HZ)

F, THE TEST INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE APPLIED TO

ONE VERTICAL AXIS AND ONE PRINCIPAL HORIZONTAL

AXIS (OR THO ORTHOGONAL HORIZONTAL AXES)

SIMULTANEOUSLY UNLESS IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED

THAT THE EQUIPMENT RESPONSE IN THE VERTICAL

DIRECTION IS NOT SENSITIVE TO THE VIBRATORY

MOTIOrl IN THE HORIZONTAL DIRECTION, AND

VICE VERSA, EXHIBIT I I IC-7

I.'l AGREEMENT,

e

0

SRP 3,9,2

G, DYNAMIC COUPLING BETWEEN THE EQUIPMENT AND

RELATED SYSTEMS, IF ANY, SUCH AS CONNECTED

PIPING AND OTHER MECHANICAL COMPONENTS,

SHOULD BE CONSIDERED,

IN AGREEI'1ENT,

H, THE FIXTURE DESIGN SHOULD SIMULATE THE ACTUAL

SERVICE MOUNTING AND CAUSE NO EXTRANEOUS

DYNAf'1IC COUPLING TO THE TEST ITEM,

IN AGREEMENT,

I. THE IN SITU APPLICATION OF VIBRATORY DEVICES

TO SUPERIMPOSE THE SEISMIC VIBRATORY

LOADINGS ON A COMPLEX ACTIVE DEVICE FOR

OPERABILITY TESTING IS ACCEPTABLE IF IT IS

SHOWN THAT A flEANINGFUL TEST CAN BE MADE

IN Tl-lIS WAY.

IN AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT IIIC-8

4

1

SRP 5,9,2

GS 0

J, THE TEST PROGRAM f'lAY BE BASED UPON SELECTIVELY

TESTING A REPRESENTATIVE NUMBER OF MECHANICAL

COMPONENTS ACCORDING TO TYPE, LOAD LEVEL,

SIZE, ETC., ON A PROTOTYPE BASIS,

IN AGREEMENT,

ANALYSES OR TESTS SHOULD BE PERFORl'lED FOR ALL

SUPPORTS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO ASSURE

THEIR STRUCTURAL CAPABILITY TO WITHSTAND

SEISMIC EXCITATION, THE ANALYTICALRESULTS

MUST INCLUDE CHARACTERIZATION OF REQUIRED

INPUT MOTIONS TO THE MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, AND

EVIDENCE THAT THE COMBINED STRESSES OF THE

SUPPORT STRUCTURES ARE MITHIN THE LIMITS OF

THE ASME CODE, SUBSECTION NF, "COMPONENT

SUPPORT STRUCTURES,-

- IN AGREEMENT,

EXH IBIT I I IC-9

4

SRP 5,9,2

L, SUPPORTS SHOULD BE TESTED WITH EQUIPMENT

INSTALLED OR WITH AN EQUIVALENT MASS THAT

SIMULATES THE EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC COUPLING TO

THE SUPPORT,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-10

0

e

STANDARD REVIEW PLAN 3,9,3

ASME CODE CLASS 1, 2, AND 3 COMPONENTS, COMPOjNENT SUPPORTS

AND CORE SUPPORT STRUCTURES

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

1) QUALIFICATION TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SRP

OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH IEEE 344-1975 AND

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,100,

IN AGREEMEllT,

2) PUMP AND VALVE SUPPORT STRESS LIMITS SHALL BE

WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ASME CODE, SUBSECTION NF,

COMPONENT SUPPORT STRESS LIMITS SHALL MEET THE

CRITERIA OF REGULATORY GUIDES 1,124 AND 1,130,

I"l AGREEMENT, HOWEVER,

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,130

IS NOT APPLICABLE SINCE

THERE ARE NO CLASS 1

PLATE-AND-SHELL SUPPORTS

FOR BOP COMPONENTS

EXHIBIT I I IC-11

0

0

SRP 3.9,3

EQU

3) THE REQUIREf1ENTS OF REGULATORY GUIDE 1,67 SHALL

BE NET.

REGLATORY GUIDE 1,67

ADDRESSES DESIGN CONCERNS

ONLY AND IS THUS NOT

APPlICABLE TO THIS

PRESENTATION,

EXH IBIT I I IC-12

0

0

STANDARD REVIB< PLAN 3,10, REV, 0

SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF CATEGORY I INSTRUMENTATION AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

1) SE

A, TESTS AND ANALYSES ARE REQUIRED TO CONFIRM THE

FUNCTIONAL OPERABILITY OF ALL SEISMIC CATEGORY I

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION DURING

AND AFTER AN EARTHQUAKE OF MAGNITUDE UP TO AND

INCLUDING THE SSE, ANALYSES ALONE, lr(ITHOUT

TESTING, ARE ACCEPTABLE AS A BASIS FOR SEISMIC

QUALIFICATION ONLY IF THE NECESSARY FUNCTIONAL =

OPERABILITY OF TViE INSTRUMENTATION OR EQUIPMENT

IS ASSURED BY ITS STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ALONE,

NHEN COMPLETE SEISMIC TESTING IS IMPRACTICAL,

A COMBINATION OF TESTS AND ANALYSES IS ACCEPTABLE,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-13

e

P

SRP 3,10

B, THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE REQUIRED (SEISMIC)

INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE SPECIFIED=BY RESPONSE

SPECTRUM, POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY FUNCTION, OR

TIME HISTORY METHODS. THESE CHARACTERISTICS,

DERIVED FROM THE STRUCTURES OR SYSTEMS SEISMIC

ANALYSIS, SHOULD BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

SEISMIC INPUT MOTION AT THE EQUIPMENT

MOUNTING LOCATIONS,

IN AGREEMENT,

C, EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE TESTED IN THE OPERATIONAL

CONDITION, OPERABILITY SHOULD BE VERIFIED

DURING AND AFTER,THE TESTING,

IN AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT I I IC-14

O

0

I

0l

SRP 3,10

D. THE ACTUAL (TEST) INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE

CHARACTERIZED IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE, REQUIRED

INPUT MOTION, AND THE CONSERVATISM IN AMPLITUDE

AND FREQUENCY CONTENT SHOULD BE DEMONSTRATED.

IN AGREENE'-tT,

E, RANDOM VIBRATION INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE USED,

HOWEVER, SINGLE FREQUENCY INPUT MOTIONS ARE

ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE

REQUIRED INPUT MOTION INDICATE THAT THE MOTION

IS, DOMINATED BY ONE FREQUENCY, THE ANTICIPATED

RESPONSE OF THE EQUIPMENT IS ADEQUATELY REPRESENTED

BY ONE MODE, OR THE INPUT HAS SUFFICIENT INTENSITY

AND DURATION TO EXCITE ALL MODES TO THE REQUIRED

AMPLITUDES SUCH THAT THE TESTING RESPONSE SPECTRA

MILL ENVELOPE THE CORRESPONDING RESPONSE SPECTRA

OF THE INDIVIDUALMODES,

EXHIBIT IIIC-15

IN AGREEMENT,

e'

t

SRP 5,10

F, THE TEST INPUT MOTION SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ONE

VERTICAL AXIS AND ONE PRINCIPAL HORIZONTAL AXIS

(OR TWO ORTHOGONAL flORIZONTAL AXES) SIMULTANEOUSLY

UNLESS IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE EQUIPMENT

RESPONSE IN THE VERTICAL DIRECTION IS NOT

SENSITIVE TO THE VIBRATORY MOTION IN THE

HORIZONTAL DIRECTION, AND VICE.VERSA,

IN AGREEMENT,

G. THE FIXTURE DESIGN SHOULD SIMULATE THE ACTUAL

SERVICE MOUNTING AND SHOULD NOT CAUSE ANY

EXTRANEOUS DYNAM.IC COUPLING TO THE TEST ITEM.

IN AGREEMENT,

EXH IBIT I I IC-16

0

SRP 5,10

01

H, THE IN SITU APPLICATION OF VIBRATORY DEVICES TO

SUPERINPOSE THE SEISNIC VIBRATOR NOTIONS ON A

COMPLEX ACTIVE DEVICE FOR OPERABILITY TESTING

IS ACCEPTABLE MHEN IT IS SHOMN THAT A NEANINGFUL

TEST CAN BE HADE IN THIS MAY,

IN AGREENENT,

I. THE TEST PROGRAN MAY BE BASED UPON SELECTIVELY

TESTING A REPRESENTATIVE NUNBER OF CONPONENTS

ACCORDING TO TYPE. LOAD LEVEL. SIZE. ETC, ON

A PROTOTYPE BASIS,

IN AGREENENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-17

1;

SRP 5,10

2) S

A. ANALYSES OR TESTS StlOULD BE PERFORMED FOR ALL

SUPPORTS OF SEISMIC CATEGORY I ELECTRICAL

EQUIPMENT AthD INSTRUMENTATION TO ASSURE THEIR

STRUCTURAL CAPABILITY TO WITHSTAND SEISMIC

EXCITATION,

IN AGREEMENT,

B, THE ANALYTICALRESULTS SHOULD INCLUDE THE REQUIRED

INPUT MOTIONS TO THE MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AS OBTAINED

AND CIIARACTERIZED IN THE MANNER STATED IN A(2),

ABOVE AND THE COMBIl'lED STRESSES OF THE SUPPORT

STRUCTURES SHOULD BE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE ASME

CODE, SECTION III, SUBSECTION NF, "COMPONENT

SUPPORT STRUCTURES",

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-18

SRP 5,10

V G

C, SUPPORTS Sl-IOULD BE TESTED WITH EQUIPMENT

INSTALLED OR WITH A DUMMY SIMULATING THE

EQUIVALENT EQUIPMENT INERTIAL.MASS EFFECTS AND

DYNAMIC COUPLING TO THE SUPPORT, IF THE EQUIP-

f'lENT IS INSTALLED IN A NONOPERATIONAL MODE FOR

THE SUPPORT TEST, THE RESPONSE IH THE TEST AT

THE EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATION SHOULD BE

MONITORED AND CHARACTERIZED IH THE MANNER AS

STATED If1 A(2), ABOVE, IN SUCH A CASE, EQUIP-

MENT SHOULD BE TESTED SEPARATELY FOR OPERABILITY

AND THE ACTUAL INPUT MOTION TO THE EQUIPMENT IN

THIS TEST SHOULD. BE MORE CONSERVATIVE IN

AMPLITUDE AND FREQUENCY CONTENT THAN THE

MONITORED RESPONSE FROf'I THE SUPPORT TEST,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-19

0

0

N

SRP 3,10

3) DOCUNENTATION REQUIRED TO DENONSTRATE EQUIPNENT

SEISNIC QUALIFICATION SHALL BE RETAINED,

IN A6REEHENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-20

0

J

0

III, C,5 10CFR50 APP A,

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION ¹1, QUALITY

STANDARDS AND RECORDS

STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS IMPORTANT

TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGtxiED, AflD TESTED TO

QUALITY STANDARDS COMMENSURATE WITH THE

SAFETY FUNCTION TO BE PERFORMED. APPROPRIATE

RECORDS OF TESTItlG SflALL BE MAINTAINED

THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE UNIT,

o QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

OF APP, B TO 10CFR50 ARE MET.

EXH IBIT I I IC-21

lOCFR50 APP A,

PGS

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION P2, DESIGN BASES

FOR PROTECTION AGAINST NATURAL PHENOMENA

STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS IMPORTANT

TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE

EFFECTS OF NATURAL PHENOMENA WITHOUT LOSS OF

CAPABILITY TO PERFORM THEIR SAFETY FUNCTIONS,

~ STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT IMPOR-

TANT TO SAFETY ARE DESIGNED TO

SEISMIC CATEGORY l REQUIREMENTS,

EXHIBIT IIIC-22

0

0

10CFR50 APP A,

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION P4,

ENVIRONf'1ENTAL AND MISSILE DESIGN BASES

STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS

IMPORTANT TO SAFETY SHALL BE DESIGNED

TO ACCOMMODATE THE EFFECTS- OF ENVIRON-

MENTAL CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED YlITH NORMAL

OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, TESTING AND

POSTULATED ACCIDENTS INCLUDING LOSS

OF COOLANT ACCIDENTS.

IN AGREEMENT, Ifl ADDITION, THE

FOLLOWING DESIGf'3 FEATURES ARE

PROVIDED:

SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS OUTSIDE

CONTAINMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY ARE

PROVIDED WITH REDUNDANCY,

PHYSICAL INDEPENDENCE HAS BEEN

PROVIDED FOR REDUNDANT EQUIPMEHT TO

PRECLUDE FAILURES IN ONE TRAIN FROM

ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE REDUNDANT

TRAIN,

EXHIBIT IIIC-23

S

V GS S 395

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION ¹14

REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY

THE REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY SHALL

BE DESIGNED, FABRICATED, ERECTED, AND

TESTED SO AS TO HAVE AN EXTREMELY LOW

PROBABILITY OF ABNORMAL LEAKAGE, OF

RAPIDLY PROPAGATING FAILURE, AND OF

GROSS RUPTURE,

NOT APPLICABLE TO SEISMIC QUALIFICA-

TION OF BOP COMPONENTS,

EXHIBIT IIIC-24

6

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION ¹l5,REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM DESIGN

THE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED AUXILIARY,

CONTROL, AND PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED

WITH SUFFICIENT MARGIN TO ASSURE THAT THE DESIGN

CONDITIONS OF THE REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY

ARE NOT EXCEEDED DURING ANY CONDITION OF NORMAL

OPERATION, INCLUDING ANTICIPATED OPERATIONAL

OCCURRENCES,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-25

l

8,

t

I I I, C,9 IEEE 344-1975

IEEE RECOf"ff'1EHDED PRACTICES FOR

SEISf"fIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS lE EQVIPNEf'kT FOR

rdUCLEAR POWER GENERATING STATIONS .

1) GENERAL

A, THE SEISNIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS 1E EQUIPNENT

SHOULD DENONSTRATE AN EQUIPMENT'S ABILITYTO

PERFORN ITS REQUIRED FUNCTION DURING AND AFTER

THE TINE IT IS SUBJECTED TO THE FORCES RESULTING

FRON ONE SSE, IN ADDITION, THE EQUIPNENT NUST

WITHSTAND THE EFFECTS OF A NUNBER OF OBES PRIOR

TO THE APPLICATION OF AN SSE AS FOLLOWS.

I'3 AGREEI"IENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-26

IEEE 344-1975

~ FOR QUALIFICATION BY ANALYSIS —.5 OBES

(UNLESS A LESSER SITE SPECIFIC VALUE

CAN BE JUSTIFIED)

IN AGREEMENT,

~ FOR QUALIFICATION BY TEST — 1 OR MORE

OBE TESTS THAT PRODUCE THE EQUIVALENT

EFFECT OF 5 OBES (UNLESS A LESSER SITE

SPECIFIC VALUE CAN BE JUSTIFIED)

IN AGREEMENT,

B, QUALIFICATION SHOULD BE BY ANALYSIS, TEST,

OR COMBINATION,

IN AGREEMENT,.

C, MARGINS SPECIFIED IN IEEE 323-1974 SHALL BE

EMPLOYED WHERE APPLICABLE,

IN AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT,IIIC-27

„

IEEE 344-1975

2) ANALYSIS

A, FOR STATIC ANALYSIS, THE RESPONSE OF THE

EQUIPMENT IS ASSUMED TO BE THE PEAK OF THE

RRS AT A CONSERVATIVE AND JUSTIFiABLE VALUE

OF DAMPING. THIS RESPONSE IS THEN MULTIPLIED

BY A STATIC COEFFICIENT OF 1,5,

IN AGREEMENT,

B, FOR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS, THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE

MODELED TO REPRESENT MASS DISTRIBUTION AND

STIFFNESS CHARACTERISTICS, THIS MODEL IS USED

TO DETERMINE IF THE EQUIPMENT IS RIGID OR

FLEXIBLE, AND UPON THIS DETERMINATION DEPENDS

THE SUBSEQUENT ANALYTICALSTEPS, IF THE MODEL

HAS NO RESONANCES IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE BELOtt

THE HIGH-FREQUENCY ASYMPTOTE (ZPA) OF THE RRS IT

IS CONSIDERED RIGID AND ANALYZED STATICALIY,

EXHIBIT IIIC-28

IN AGREEMENT,

0

I EEE 344-1975

IF FLEXIBLE, THE NODEL CAN BE ANALYZED USING THE

RESPONSE SPECTRUN NODAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE OR A

TINE HISTORY ANALYSIS, THE RESPONSE OF INTEREST

IS DETERNINED BY CONBINING EACH NODAL RESPONSE

CONSIDERING ALL SIGNIFICANT NODES BY THE SQUARE

ROOT OF THE SUN OF THE SQUARES, THE ABSOLUTE

SUN OF SINILAR EFFECTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR

CLOSELY SPACED IN-PHASE NODES,

IN AGREENENT,

IN THE ANALYSIS, THE EFFECTS OF EACH OF THE TWO

f'lAJOR HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONS AND THE VERTICAL

DIRECTION SHOULD. BE CONSIDERED,

IN AGREENENT,

EXHI BIT I I IC-29

0

IEEE 344-1975

3) TESTING

A, SEISMIC TESTS SHOULD BE PERFORMED BY SUBJECTING

EQUIPMENT TO VIBRATORY MOTION MHICfl CONSERVA-

TIVELY SIMULATES Tl-lAT POSTULATED AT THE

EQUIPMENT MOUNTING DURING AN SSE. EQUIPMENT

SHOULD BE TESTED TO CONSERVATIVELY ACCOUNT FOR

MULTIDIRECTIONALEFFECTS OF THE EARTHQUAKE,

IN AGREEMENT,

8, THE EQUIPMENT TO BE TESTED SHALL BE MOUNTED ON

THE VIBRATION GENERATOR IN A MANNER THAT

SIMULATES THE INTENDED SERVICE MOUNTING,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-30

4

IEEE 304-1975

C. SUFFICIENT MONITORING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED TO

EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EQUIPMENT BEFORE,

DURING, AND AFTER TflE TEST. IN ADDITIOf'l, ENOUGH

VIBRATION MONITORING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED TO

ALLOW DETERMINATION OF THE APPLIED VIBRATION LEVELS,

IN AGREEMENT,

D. EXPLORATORY VIBRATION TESTS AID IN TtlE DETERMINING

OF TtjE TEST METHOD THAT HILL BEST QUALIFY OR

DETERMINE TIRE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE

EQUIPMENT,

IN AGREEMENT,

E, SEISMIC QUALIFICATION TESTS ON CLASS 1E EQUIPMENT

SHALL BE PERFORf'lED WITH THE EQUIPMENT SUBJECTED TO

fuORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS.

IN 'AGREEf'lENT,.

EXHIBIT IIIC-31

IEEE 544-1975

F, THE CHOICE BETWEEN SINGLE AND MULTI-FREQUENCY

TESTING SHALL BE MADE AS FOLLOWS:

~ WHEN THE SEISMIC GROUND MOTION HAS BEEN

FILTERED DUE TO ONE PREDOMINANT

STRUCTURAL MODE, A SHORT DURATION

STEADY-STATE VIBRATION CAN BE A CON-

SERVATIVE INPUT EXCITATION TO THE SHAKE

TABLE.

~ WHEN THE SEISMIC GROUND MOTION HAS NOT

BEEN STRONGLY F ILTERED, MULTI-FREQUENCY

TESTING IS APPLICABLE FOR QUALIFICATION,

~ IN AGREEMENT,

e IN AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT IIIC-52

0

0

IEEE 544-1975

G, SINGLE-AXIS TESTS ARE ALLOWED IF THE TESTS ARE

DESIGNED TO CONSERVATIVELY REFLECT THE SEISMIC

EVENT AT THE EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS OR

IF THE EQUIPMENT BEING TESTED CAN BE SHOWN TO

RESPOND INDEPENDENTLY IN EACH OF THE THREE

ORTHOGONAL AXES OR OTHERWISE WITHSTAND THE

SEISMIC EVENT AT ITS MOUNTING LOCATION. OTHER-

WISE, MULTIAXIS TESTING SHOULD BE USED, THE

MINIMUM IS BIAXIALTESTING WITH SIMULTANEOUS

INPUTS IN A PRINCIPAL HORIZONTAL AND THE

VERTICAL AXES,

'NAGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT I I IC-SS

IEEE 544-1975

4) COMBINED ANALYSIS AND TESTING

WHERE EQUIPMENT IS T00 LARGE OR COMPLEX OR NHERE

A NUMBER OF SIMILAR CONFIGURATIONS EXIST, A

COMBINATION OF ANALYSIS AND TEST MAY BE USED,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-54

i

III,.C,5 REGULATORY GUIDE 1,20

COMPREHENSIVE VIBRATION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

FOR REAC|OR INTERNALS DURING

l'REOPERATIONAL AND INITIALSTARTUP TESTING

V G

A COMPREHENSIVE VIBRATION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM SHOULD

Bk. ESTABLISHED FOR IHE REACTOR INTERNALS,

NOT APPLICABLE TO SEISMIC

QUALIFICATION OF BOP

COMPONENTS,

EXHIBIT IIIC-55

0

REGULATORY GUIDE j.,48

DESIGN LIMITS AND LOADING COMBINATIONS FOR SEISMIC CATEGORY I

FLUID SYSTEM COMPONENTS

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

THIS REGULATORY GUIDE SETS FORTH DESIGN LIMITS AND

LOADING COMBINATIONS FOR VARIOUS ASME SECTION IIICLASS 1, 2, AND 5 t;OMPONENTS,

LOADING. COMBINATIONS ARE

PRESENTED IN FSAR

CHAPTER S,9, DESIGN

LIMITS ARE IN ACCORDANCE

WITH ASME SECTION I I I,

EXHIBIT IIIC-56

l

I(

REGULATORY GUIDE l,67

INSTALLATION OF OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION DEVICES

THIS GUIDE PROVIDES REQUIRENENTS FOR THE ANALYSIS

AND DESIGN OF PIPING FOR PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE

STATIONS,

NOT'APPLICABLE TO SEISNIC

QUALIFICATION OF

,EQUIPmENT.

EXHIBIT IIIC-37

j,

'jIj

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,68

INIr IAC TEST PROGRAMS FOR HATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

EACH APPLICANT OR LICENSEE SHOULD PREPARE AND

CONDUCT AN INITIALTEST PROGRAM TO DEMONSTRATE

THAT THE PLANT CAN BE OPERATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH

DESIGN REQUIREMENTS IMPORTANT TO SAFETY. SUITABLE

TESTS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED TO VERIFY THF PERFORMANCE

CAPABILITIES OF SAFETY RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS,

AND COMPONENTS, .

NOT APPLICABLE FOR SEISMIC

QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-58

,

0

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,92

COMBINING MODAL RESPONSES

j.) COMBINATION OF MODAL RESPONSES

A, IN A RESPONSE SPECTRUM MODAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

WITHOUT CLOSELY SPACED MODES, TIIE MODAL

RES[ ONSES SHOULD BE COMBINED USING THE SQUARE

ROOT OF THE SUM QF THE SQUARES METHOD (SRSS).

IN AGREEMENT,

B, IN A RESPONSE SPECTRUM MODAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

WITH CLOSELY SPACED MODES, THE MODAL RESPONSES

SHOULD BE COMBINED USING ONE, OF THE FOLLOWING

NETHODS: GROUPING METHOD, TEN PERCENT METHOD,

OR DOUBLE SUM METHOD.

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-39

R,G, 1,92

2) COMBINATION OF EFFECTS DUE TO THREE SPATIAL

COMPONENTS OF AN EARlHQUAKE

A. IN A RESPONSE SPECIRA METHOD, THE RESPONSES TO

tACH OF THE THREE COMPONENTS OF EARTHQUAKE

MOTION SHOULD BE COMBINED BY TAKING fHE SQUARE

ROOT OF THE SUM OF THE SQUARES METHOD,

IN AGREEMENT,

B, IN A TIME-HISTORY ANAI YSIS HHEN THE RESPONSES

DUE TO EACH OF THE THREE COMPONENTS OF EARTH-

QUAKE MOTION ARE CALCULATED SEPARATELY, THE

RESPONSES SHOULD,BE COMBINED BY TAKING THE

SQUARE ROOT OF THE SUM OF THE SQUARES METHOD,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-40

0

1

R.G, 1,92

C. IN A TIME-HISTORY ANALYSIS WHEN THE RESPONSES

FROM EACH OF THE THREE COMPONENTS OF THE

EARTHQUAKE MOTION ARE CALCULATED BY THE

STEP-BY-STEP METHOD AND COMBINED ALGEBRAICALLY

AT EACH TIME STEP, THE MAXIMUM RESPONSE CAN BE

OBTAINED FROM THE COMBINED TIME SOLUTION.

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-01

0

0

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,100

SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRIC

EQUIPMENT FOR NUCLEAR POHER PLANTS

USE OF IEEE STD 344-1975 FOR CONDUCTING SEISMIC QUALIFICATION

OF CLASS 1E EQUIPMENT, IN CONJUNCTION MITH REGULATORY

GUIDE 1,89, PROVIDES AN ADEQUATE BASIS FOR COMPLYING WITH

DESIGN VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEISMIC ADEQUACY OF

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:

4

1, THE USE OF 1,5 AS THE STATIC COEFFICIENT IS

ACCEPTABLE FOR VERIFYING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF

FRAME-TYPE STRUCTURES, FOR EQUIPMENT HAVING

CONFIGURATIONS OTHER THAN A FRAME-TYPE STRUCTURE,

JUSTIFICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR USE OF A

STATIC COEFFICIENT,

IN 'AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT IIIC-42

0

R,G, 1,100

. ~

2, IT IS NECESSARY THAT THE TRS CLOSELY ENVELOP THE

APPLICABLE PORTION OF THE RRS TO VERIFY THE

ADEQUACY OF TEST INPUT MOTION,

IN AGREEMENT

IN THE ABSENCE OF JUSTIFICATION, THOSE PORTIONS OF

SECTION 6,6.2,5, "SINE SWEEP TEST," WHICH INDICATE

THAT, FOR QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT USING THE SINE SWEEP

TEST INPUT, THE TRS MUST ENVELOP THE RRS ACCORDING

IO THE CRITERIA DESCRIBED IN SECTIONS 6,6,2 AND 6,6,2;1

SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE,

IN AGREEMENT,

EXHIBIT I I IC-45

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,124

SERVICE LIHITS AND LOADING CGPlBINATIOfjS

FOR CLASS 1 LINEAR-TYPE CONPONEHI SUPPORTS

THE GUIDE REQUIRES CONPLIANCE MITH SUBSECTION NF OF SECTION IIIOF ASNE BRPV CODE AS NODIFIED NITHIN THE GUIDE FOR DIFFERENT

STRESS AND LOAD VALUES,

IN AGREEf'1ENT,

EXHIBIT IIIC-44

REGULATORY GUIDE 1,130

SERVICE LIMITS AND LOADING COMBINATIONS

FOR CLASS 1 PLATE-AND-SHELL-TYPE COMPONENT SUPPORTS

THIS GUIDE DELINEATES ACCEPTABI E LEVELS OF SERVICE

LIMITS AND APPROPRIATE COMBINATIONS OF LOADINGS

ASSOCIATED WITH NORMAL OPERATION, POSTULATED

AC.CIDENTS, AND SPEC'IFIED SEISMIC EVENTS FOR THE

DESIGN OF CLASS 1 PLATE-AND-SHELL-TYPE COMPONENT

SUPPORTS AS DEFINED IN SUBSECTION NF OF SECTION IIIOF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS

(ASME) BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE.,

NOT APPLICABLE SINCE THERE

ARE NO CLASS 1 PLATE,-'AND-

'SHELL SUPPORTS FOR BOP

COMPONENTS,

EXHIBIT IIIC-45

0

APS/BECHTEL EQUIPMENTSUPPLIER

DESIGNC RITE RI'A

SPEC IF I CATI 0 NS

INSPECTION/HOLD/WITNESS PLAN

SUPPLIERDESIGN ANDMANUFACTURING

QUA LIF ICAT I 0 N

TEAMREVIEW

QUALIFICATIONPLANS/PRO CEO URES

QUAL IF ICATIONAUDIT OFTESTING TESTING'NALYSIS

QUAL IF I CATIONTEAMREVIEW

SUPPLIERQU AL IF I CATI 0 N

REPORT

FSAR DATASUMMARY

PVNGS SITERECORDS

QUALIFICATI0NDOCUMENTATION

I

~EQUIPMENT QUAI.IFICATION PROCESS

FIGURE 7 .

e

PURPOSE

e COMPLIANCE WITH DESIGN CRITERIA

COMPLIANCE WITH QUALITY REGULATIONS, CODES AND STANDARDS

~ COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS

EXHIBIT IV-j.

0

SPECIFICATION

INSPECTION/HOLD/WITNESS PLAN

a INPLENENT DESIGN CRITERIA

e ESTABLISHNENT OF HOLD AND TEST POINTS

o REYIEH BY RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER AND SPECIALISTS AS REQUIRED

~ RESIDENT/PERIODIC INSPECTION

EXHIBIT IV-2

SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION PLANS/PROCEDURES

~ DESCRIPTION OF QUALIFICATION METHODS

TESTING

ANAI YS IS

OPERATING EXPERIENCE

ONGOING QUALIFICATION

COMBINATION OF METHODS

DESCRIPTION OF QUALIFICATION PROCEDURES

EXHIBIT IV-5

f

it

QUALIFICATION TEAM REVIEW

~ PLANS AND PROCEDURE

APS CHECKLIST

BECHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK LIST

BECHTEL SEISMIC CHECK LIST

SPECIALISTS REVIEW AS REQUIRED

UPGRADING TO NUREG 0588

~ QUALIFICATION REPORTS

APS REYIE'W

BECHTEL RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER AND SPECIALIST

REVIEW AS REQUIRED

REVIEW OF DOCUMENTATION

FSAR AMENDMENT

COMPLIANCE TO NUREG 0588

EXHIBIT IV-0

0

SUPPLIERSU 8MITTAL

QUALIFI CATION'REVIEWTEAM

BECHTEL APS

SEISMICREVIEWERS

ENVIRONMENTALREVIEWERS

NUCLEARSERVICESREVIEWGROUP

STRESSREVIEWERS(AS REQ'D)

RfSPONSIBLE ENGINEER

COMMENT COORDINATION

COMMENTR ESO LUTI0N

NOTACCEPTABLE

ACCEPTABLE

RECORDSRETENTION

QUALIFICATIONINFORMATION REVIEW

QUALIFICATIONTEAM REVIEWFIGURE 18

8'

APS ENVIRONMENTAL AND SEISMIC CHECK LIST

I, GENERAL

DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT

APPLICABLE SPEC IF I CAT ION APPENDIX

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITIONS

LIFE LIMITING COMPONENTS

I I, IEEE 323-1974. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION METHOD

IDENTIFICATION OF METHOD AND EXCEPTIONS

III, IEEE-344-1975 SEISMIC QUALIFICATION METHOD

IDENTIFICATION OF METHOD AND DESCRIPTIONS

IV SPECIAL MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE

V IEEE-323-1974 TYPE TEST PROGRAM/PLAN

DESCRIPTION, PROCEDURE, TEST PLAN, REQUIREMENTS, PERFORMANCE LIMITS, FAILURE

DEF IN IT ION, DOCUMENTATION

vi IEEE-323-1974 OPERATING EXPERIENCE PROGRAM/PLAN

IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC FEATURES TO BE DEMONST>ATED, PAST HISTORY OF

PERFORMANCE AND SERVICE CONDITIONS, ENVELOPE FOR OPERATING EXPERIENCE

INCLUDES EQUIPMENT TO BE QUALIFIED,

EXHIBIT IV-510-09-80

f

0

VII IEEE-525-1974 ANALYSIS TEST PROGRAM/PLAN

ASSUMPTIONS, EMPIRICALLY DERIVED VALUES, MATHEMATICALMODELS AND JUSTIFICATIONS

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS

BASIS FOR EXTRAPOLATION

FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS IDENTIFICATION

V I I I IEEE-525-1970 ON-GOING QUALIFICATION PROGRAM/PLAN

EXHIBIT IV-5A10-09-80

0

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (BECHTEL)

GENERAL

DESCRIPTION R LOCATION OF. COMPONENT

OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS

DESIGNATOR, DBA, TIME, OPERATION, FUNCTION

DESIGNATED ENVIRONMENT

FROM FSAR

QUALIFIED ENVIRONMENT

FROM SUPPLIER

MARGIN

FROM SUPPLIER

EQUIPMENT MOUNTING AND ORIENTATION

EXHIBIT IV-6

I

~

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (BECHTEL) (CONTINUED)

VII. QUALIFICATION METHOD

TYPE, SEQUENCE, SPECIMEN, INSTRUMENTATION, AGING METHOD, HUMIDITY AGING,

PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTIC MONITORING, INSTRUMENTATION CALIBRATION, COMPONENT

INTERFACES,

V I I I, EVALUATION

IX. DEFICIENCIES

EXHIBIT IV-7

,

0

EXHIBIT 1

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER

COIITIO( ÃSIQ OASIS ACCIKÃT(ACES 40 TEAR IRIE6RATEO)

PKSSO(E(PSI6)

KIATIYEIRRII0 ITT(5)

RAOIATIOI(R405)(10 TEAR

IRTESRAIEO

l05E)

OUI)CALS

EXHIBIT 2

QUALIFICATION MARGIN

CÃIITIOI

PRANKSTER

TOPE RATORE

(P)

P%55VRE

(PSI6)

RELATIVE

I(PI I 0 IT T

(6)

RAOIATIOt(RAOS)

(40 TEAR

IRTE6RATEO

OOSE)

06(I(ALS

KSI6R IASIS ACCICOIT

(IRCLIIKS 40 TEAR IRTE6RATEO)

EXHIBIT IV-8

SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST (BECHTEL)

I, COMPONENT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

I I, EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION METHOD

III, VIBRATION INPUT

LOADS, RESPONSE SPECTRA, REQUIRED ACCELERATION

IV, QUALIFICATION TEST DATA

FREQUENCY, AXIS, NO, OF TESTS, FREQUENCY RANGE, TRS, LAB MOUNTING, VERIFICATION OF

FUNCTIONAL OPERABILITY, TEST RESULTS,

V, ANALYSIS TEST DATAl

METHOD MODEL TYPE, COMPUTER CODES, COMBINATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSES, DAMPING,

SUPPORT CONSIDERATIONS, CRITICAL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS.

VI, DEFICIENCIES

EXH IBIT IV-9

i

0

SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION TEST I NG/ANALYSIS

o TESTING

ACTUAL EQUIPMENT OR PROTOTYPE

LAB PROCEDURES

SEQUENCE — ENVIRONMENTAL, SEISMIC, LOCA

SCHEDULE

o ANALYSIS

DESCRIPTION OF METHOD

o DESCRIPTION OF OTHER METHODS

OPERATING EXPERIENCE

ONGOING QUALIFICATION

COMBINATION OF METHODS

EXHIBIT IV-10

AUDIT OF TESTING

~ CONDUCTED BY SUPPLIER QUALITY REPRESENTATIVE (SQR)

~ REVIEW TEST PROCEDURES, PLANS AND REPORTS FOR COMPLIANCE

W ITH SPECIFICATION

e REVIEW REPORT DATA

e REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMING TESTS, COLLECTING AND

REDUCING DATA

~ VERIFY CAPABILITY OF TEST EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION

TO'ERFORM TESTS

~ VERIFY INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION TRACEABLE TO NBS

e VERIFY TEST PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURES AND

DEVIATIONS NOTED

~ VERIFY EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER

TEST

~ VERIFY RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS REFLECT TEST DATA

o EXAMINE INTERNAL REVIEW PROCESS, SIGN OFF PROCEDURES

AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES

~ VERIFY EXISTENCE OF "AGING LIBRARY" OR "EXTENSIVE

LITERATURE DATA BANK." IF REFERENCED,

EXHIBIT IV-11

1

~

0

SUPPLIER QUALIFICATION DOCUNENTATION

o BECHTEL LOG NO„REPORT NO, AND SUBJECT TITLESTATUS j.

o PROPRIETARY INFORNATION

'SUBJECT

LOCATION

EXHIBIT V-j.

i

0

SITE RECORDS

o COMPLETENESS OF RECORDS

o REFERENCE TO LOCATION OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

EXHIBIT V-2

FSAR DATA SUMMARY

o TYPE OF EQUIPMENT (COMPONENT)

o EQU IPMENT LOCATION

o BUILDING

o ELEVATION

o MANUFACTURER

o MODEL NUMBER

o PVNGS SPECIFICATION NUMBER

o ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATOR

o QUALIFICATION METHODS

o QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENT

o TIME BASE

o SEISMIC QUALIFICATION

o QUALIFICATION METHOD

o EXCITATION METHOD

o FREQUENCY RANGE (HZ)

o OPERABILITY

o . TIME WHEN REQUIRED

o DEMONSTRATED

EXHIBIT V-3

,

o ACCURACY

o REQUIRED

o DEMONSTRATED

o ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT/REVISION NUMBER

o QUALIFICATION LIFE (YEARS)

EXHIBIT V-0

f

I /I

CHECK LIST

ENVIRONMENTAL UPJ IFICATION

I General

This checklists is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met.- Completeone checklist sheet for IE components. Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on the same sheet.

Type ofEquipmentComponent

EquipmentLocation

Bldg. Elev. ManufacturerModelNumber

PVNGSSpec.

P VNGS

TagNumbers

ho~ ex~~~ colum ~ iso'eNeaatATa hah L

f~ jSQA~ COQ~ -+AS -4045

Additional Information

Environ«mental

Designator

DesignBasis

Accident

Time WhenReq'd T 0

9 Initiationof DBA

Natureof

OperationEquipment Function

Lo CA

+',/LB0-30 hh lM. <Pal Ir4zegp

B4F AC3 u.at.ioQLo hO

PE'gvEN C.l N +

Additional Information

III Desi nated Environment

Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization

EXHIBIT VI-1

0

Page -2-

IV uglified Environment

Complete exhibit 1 ~ Compare exhibit 1 to FSAR designated service condition.Does supplier's qualified service meet or exceed the FSAR requirements?

I

Q Yes — Proceed to item VNo — Describe the differences ~ Indicate whether differences will

impair the equipment function. Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable.(Attach additional sheets as required.)

HAD jWT'ioN EFFE'cd N oT CoH SIQEAE'0

Qxc Ea vi~~

V ~Mar in

Identify margins, if any, provided by qualification if. any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to IEEE-323-1974 requirements- Are marginsacceptable?

0 Yes — Proceed to item VI e

Q No - Describe differences and indicate whether or not differences aresignificant

Q Significant P) Not Significant

Justification: AM EFFEC L C 6PT RADIAT<6N

(5es <ram M Hp Vt. ulcc,c iW

EXHIBIT VI-2

Page -3-

VI E ui ment Mountin and Orientationh

1) Was .equipment qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc.)? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible) ~

g Horizontal (egeg floor)Q Vertical (egeg wall)Q Canted at degrees fram vertical (eg., piping)

No orientation requirementOther — Clarify

2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc. )

Was test mount same as intended site installation?

Q Yes — Proceed to item VIIQ Nn - Explain

A. Identify qualification method:

g Type Test - Report 8 F Il5

Q Analysis - Report 8

Q Operating Experience Report //

Q OnWoing Qualification - Report P

Q Combination of Methods (check all that apply)

B. Describe qualification method- What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualificationis used, describe program and identify scope and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis, or inspection.

Zero 323- t>7q ~pe. res(

EXHIBIT VI-3

Page -4-

C. Were tests conducted in the folloving sequence? (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable) Sequence specified in IEEE 323-1974.

1. Inspection2. Operation (baseline)3.'peration (extremes)4. Aging5. Seismic6. DBA Operation7. Post DBA Operation8. Inspeection

Was actual test sequence

s

Q Yes Proceed to DK,,„„„,„~rsc fAP g(flu a4'7" A+PLJEP l~ Sl El 5C 4AJP 7 >T+Cg HJI5E IP E'WIT(d4i

equal to or more sever than this sequence?

Q Yes - ExplainP Nc - Equipment is not qualified

D. Provide additional test data as noted:

1) ieisnic testing consisted of ~~ OBE s bet'reo/ d neo~oSSEs'singthe required response spectra/required input motion noted in PSAR

Section 3 7.l- I-

2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment:

8 Yes - Proceed to 3

P No - Explain:

3) Test temperatures vere measured by

Q Direct Mounted Thermocouple - Proceed to 4

g Other - Explain and Justify UdAd DEC C'EVIEAJ

4) Heat aging ves conducted by

Q Arrhenius Methods - Proceed to 5

P Other - Explain and Justify E~l <R.ATd88 C.VZLIWG,.

Jl P/lb'/7 4)AS 7 EWE EC'ATTIRE O'Yd~> /gyT/uE5 +5 gRpoF

ns td'ctoss' $0~~Crsis FRo vinzS c40 Pp+ OC I + ~++Qg~ ~p~~pgg+7+g)+id co~a irrn~~uc fdrcueESQ

EXHIBIT VI-4

0

0"

fIf

Page -5-

5) Humidity aging'as conducted by:

6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?

C3 Yes - Proceed to 7

a)No — Justify: 'Ehl- 6N t

7) The performance characteristics required to be monitored were:

Pe%. Lo |c- 6 RwY'ice

8) The performance characteristics monitored were:

PkoPeR Lo + < c- oPe~~i orq

9) Performance characteristics during testing were monitored

5g ContinuouslyQ Intermittently at intervalsg Not applicable - Justify:

~V Nuou 'b u.iN GEE'i AND hS E H AseuNe

AnJD GX~mP EPOCH ~D AF~w ACr(M+

10) Does test report identify that instrumentation was in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?

Rj Yes - Proceed to llQ No - Justify:

EXHIBIT VI-5

0

Page -6-

11) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supportsetc-) simulate installed condition?

g Yes — Proceed to VIIIQ No — Justify:

VIII Evaluation

Qualified lifetime is:

40 yearsOther - Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s):

Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:

BechtelLog No.

ReportNo Subject

Proprietay (Yes/No)(If proprietary identify location of report)

Ytog —So

Clod -'786'-tl5-7'-

t l5-709

PE'tP&t C.

Gatv I kOH-%FAT'AL

Evalua tion Approval:

Reviewing Engineer:

Group Supervisor:

EXHIBIT VI-6

EXHIBIT 1

ENVIR'OhMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER

~III%

TE)PENT)DEe)

i%SINEesl6)

%1ATITEAID ITTIS)

ILIA)I(%INAOS)

t10 TEAA

INESNATGIR50

06IIEAIS

+o -/ov/rm a5

%SIN 0NS IS KEITENT

t)KIDDO 00 TEAN IDIE6NATED)

ZucA +5~9+o-r~w

4'ism

Og

EXHIBIT 2QUALIFICATIOh'ARGIN

CXIITIOI

TE)DE NATONAL

IT)

I%SQlfesto

%LATIVENRIDITTIS)

DADIATII))INAOS)

Il0 TEAN

IÃTESNATG)

00SE)

r +~+

/0 >'+9~

0

KSI60 IASIS K(IDENIIKUm N0 TEAN INTE6AATED)

/ neh m 5~cP

+ 2Q

Io r 0+$

EXHIBIT VI-7

ualif ication Summar of E ui ment

I. Plant Name: Pl/A/6'6 l I Pg

). Utility:Type:

2. NSSS: C'. A/E: Bechtel B4'R

I I . Com onent Name: agP A@I+)N<ggEP <ABET'} FEAVVEM ACTAA7IN/SYS7EW

I. Scope: [ ) NSSS [ pf BOp

Pa2. Numbe r: ELE~~OO47 Quant ity:

ELQ4HW

3. Vendor: LECT S D

If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included: L 0~« ~~~R'-<g ANnlua'CIAT& RELAY AG7uAT>oh( f8'Physical Description a. Appearance

jl II I/b. Dimeasions~O DE

c. Veight

6. Location: Building:

Elevation:

Field Mounting Conditions [ ) Bolt (No. , Size

)

8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

I I

9. a. Functional Description: Eb. Is the equipment required for [ ) Hot Standby [ ) Cold Shutdown

[Vf Both

10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: -ir 8(ne wo)

EXHIBIT YI-8

III. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in tbe plant: [ p[ Y

IV. E ui ment uali fxcation Method: Test:

Analysis:

Combination of Test and Anal'>'sis:

Test and/or Analysis by LE L 0 0(Name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.)

V. Vibration In ut:

1. Loads considered: l. [4 Seismic only 2. [ ] Hydrodynamic only

3. f ) Explosive only 4. [ ) Ot.her (Specify)

5. [ ) Combination of

6. Method of combining RRS: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS [ ](other, specify.i

2. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):

3. Required Accelerat.ion in Each Direction:/58 s~ I,g~~z~t S/S =,0 OSE F/B =~, 47

VI. If uglification b'est then Com lete:

I,5g ssco86

l. [ ) Single Frequency

2. f ] Single Axis

[ ~random[v(Multi-Frequency: [ ) sine beat

f )

f ~Multi-Axis

3. No. oi Qualiiication Tests: OSE [3 SEE~Other(specify)

4. Frequency Range: F 0 g Z o ZS4ZTRS enveloping RRS using Mluti-ireq uecny Test [b[iyes [plot TRS on RRS graphs)

f ) No

EXHIBIT VI-9

N

g.09 ops ZOg08~ 2'0 o8EJAN~ z,~ mE'. Input tt-level Test at S/S = F/B = '

V .= Z~f SSd

7. Laboratory Mounting: L a 3 E Ez =%2 /Jacks

l. [ ) Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ )

6. Functional operability verified: [Q Yes [ ) No [ ] Not Applicable

!('. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including resultsj:

Vi!. If ualxficataon bv Ana'is or b "the Combination of Test and Analysis ther.

C~nm let.e

l. Description of Test including Results:

.'!echo" cf Analysis

Static Analysis) Dynamic Analysis

[ ] Equivalent Static Analysxs[ ] Time-History[ ) Response Spectrum

3- Rode! Taupe: [ ) 3D f ) 2D

) Finite Element [ ) Bean

[)lD[ ) Closed Form Solution

[ ] Computer Codes:a

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:

] Hand Calculations

."method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS

] Other:(specify)

6. Damping: Basis for the damping used:

7. Support Considerations in the model:

EXHIBIT VI-10

4

0

BOP

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Loador Response

A. Identification Location CombinationSeismicStress

To talStress

StressAllowable

B. Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional

0 erabilit

VIII. uglification Deficiencies

The following is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:

Work orders written:

Evaluation Approval:

Reviewing Engineer 7 ~ l4<< +6

Group Supervisor

EXHIBIT YI-11

0.09.08.07.06.0

5.0

4.0

I'

E: ~:.:I'

~ ~

~ ~ I

".:.I i'.i~ '.'

P ~

I. MI

3.0

2.0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I ~ i

ZPA ~ 1.6 0

1.0Ec 0.9

0.8 .tAA4J 0.7

rL: I

t"--"-'-IF—=—4==.-E=i -''1=-IE-'I'-

0.5

0.4

~ ~ -I=L'.3

0.2~ - I ~

~ PI

I ~

0.12 3 4 5 6 78910

FRElgENCY (HZ)

20 30 40 50 60 100

NOTES: I, OAIIPINC 3~+

2. APPLICABLE TO BOTH HORIZONTAL ANO VERTICAL DIRECTIONS

Fig, 4. Required response spectrum for SSE

II GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY

SIZE CODE IDENT. NO. DWD. NO.

A 32334SCALE' EV.

ELA 342-'0061

SHEET 8 of 23

Bo-ifORhl OAIOZeA-2

BH IBIT YI-12

7.06.0

5.0

4.0

~ .'

( I

I I

~ ~

i ~

I ~

I !I I i

3.0

2.0

1.0,0.90.8 '.

0 7

0 ~ 6

0.5

0.4

~ id I I, i i

~ ~

0.3

0.2

0.12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 100

FREQUENCY (HZ)

NOTES: I. DAMP.ING 2>2 ~ APPLICABLE TO BOTH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL DIRECTIONS

Fig. 3. Required response spectrum for OBE

Og GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANYWa ee Co me~

ISCALE RE Y. B SHEET

FORM OAIO24A-2

Sl?E COOK lOEHT. HO. OWO. HO.

3 9 3 3 4 ELA 342-0061

0

CHECK LIST

ENVIRONMENTAL UPJ IFICATION

I General

This checklist is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met. Completeone checklist sheet for IE components. Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on the same sheet.

Type ofEquipmentComponent Bldg. Elev.

EquipmentLocation

ManufacturerModelNumber

PVNGS

Spec.

PVNGS

TagNumbers

~c.a/ Mc<-QoliN'ttD

QQLlfo

r

Q-Rp,-eQ,A,Q+gg -cOWP

Additional Information + WC4 NU~l SFR. ~ MOME-ES A4E LLS~D OP4

hl7hC.RED <6Rl-I P I C AR oH

Environ-mental

Designator

DesignBasis

Acc'dent

Time WhenReq'd T 09 Initiation

of DBA

Natureof

OperationEquipment Function

8'5T l REDbh CON~N W6~

P~ ~~ A0N ll 0RdN+~b CgN~L

Additional Information

III Desi nated Environment

Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization

EXHIBIT VI-14

,

Page -2-

IV uglified Environment

Complete exhibit 1. Compare exhibit 1 to FSAR designated service condition.Does supplier.'s qualified service meet or exceed the FSAR requirements?

Q Yes —Proceed to item V

Q No - Describe the differences'ndicate whether differences willimpair the equipment function. Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable.(Attach additional sheets as required.)

R.aDi~YloN ez u OetZ. kEvi ~u.~ <O LE4eLS COnlSiD~~D H < H H~~io iT

Ghl 4 Y Hi~ gu~ i Di7 >g Wo~ P4~4<~W4

THAN L~~ .

V ~Mar ia

Identify margins,.if any, pro'ded by qualification if any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to,IEEE-323-1974 requirements. Are marginsacceptable?

C3 Yes — Proceed to item VIQ No — Describe differences and indicate whether or not differences are

significant

Q Significant

Justif ication: KM 1 >g Not Significant

1T VAC<V i SO Al ~ 9<0~ RH

~C l P~ 04 NPt. ~N 5 i

EXHIBIT VI-15

I

Page -3-

VI E ui nent Mountin and Orientation

1) Was equipment qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc )? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible).

IZ Horizontal (eg., floor)Q Vertical (eg., wall)Q Canted at degrees from vertical (eg., piping)

No orientation, requirementOther — Clarify

2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc-)

Was test mount same as intended site installation?

0 Yes — Proceed to item VIIQ Nn — Explain So <~a - AgA<Ys<s

Wv.Sr<pi~S A~ rAei Li

VII uglification Method

A. Identify qualification method:

gg Type Test — Report 8 Q<AASll l5 Ig t 19 ~ Z7>M>33 3>f'j

V 8,88~ Co J ham a,c AAA LeQ Analysis - Report 0 A AOS G& Q,+AWSO'i t QO94

Q Operating Experience Report 8

Q On-Going Qualification — Report /!

g Combination of Methods (check all that apply)

B. Describe qualification method. What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualificationis used, describe program and identify scope and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis, or inspection.

tNObu<P A. Gab t ieiC.Mian U.Sih ATuMLLAWD (W > 4AC 6 Du. Le4 AN C~P.RENr-

Lo Dg c. l o &obu L.G

EXHIBIT VI-16

Page -4-

C. Were tests conducted in the following sequence? (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable) Sequence specified in IEEE 323-1974.

1. Inspection2. Operation (baseline)3. Operation (extremes)4. Aging5. Seismic6. DBA Operation7. Post DSA Operation8. Inspeection

g Yes — Proceed to D

Q No - Explain test sequence

Was actual test sequence equal to or more severe than this sequence?

Q Yes - ExplainQ No — Equipment is not qualified

D. Provide additional test data as noted:

I) Seismic testing consisted of 5 ORE's before/after ~ SSE'susing the required response spectra/ noted inFEAR Section B~7I.

2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment: „

l3 Yes - Proceed to 3 lsNo — Explain: . PN AL'/>lb ~< 5 iM i LAR." gP~~

3) Test temperatures were measured by

0 Direct Mounted Thermocouple — Proceed to 4

Q Other — Explain and Justify @NOD~ kE'llP~

4) Heat aging was conducted by

Arrhenius Methods - Proceed to 5Other - Explain and Justify iVATc444c. A6-ih(

QHIBIT YI-17

R

0

Page -5-

5) Humidi'ty aging,was conducted by: NA >RML. A IN

6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?

C3 Yes — Proceed to 7

g No — Justify: Na RAD1WT')@hi BXPOSQkE

7) The performance characteristics required to be monitored vere:

6<vpu.r SH'ww

8) The performance characteristics monitored vere:

84>'Pu.l- SA i P T

9) Performance characteristics during testing vere monitored

Q Continuously l0tLklH AQ Intermittently at intervalsD Not applicable — Justify:

10) Does test report identify that instrumentation vas in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?

D Yes — Proceed to llQ No - Justify: i+~EK Re'Vl~

EXHIBIT VI-18

01

Page -6-

ll) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supportsetc-) simulate installed condition?

H Yes — Proceed to VIIIQ ho — Justify:

VIII Evaluation

Qualified lifetime is:

40 yearsOther - Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s): FATS V~~~

5t= M~lvhcD To I O yehrz.S By Wlvh<Ys <S

Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:

BechtelLog No.

ReportNo Subject

Proprietay (Yes/No)(If proprietary identify location of report)

WLLi-L l5 ENV L Loh)&NIALSgl SWLLC

Evaluation Approval:

Reviewing Engineer:

Group Supervisor:

EXHIBIT YI-19

S

I

EXHIBIT 1

ENVIRONHENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER

CONITIOI

TE)PEAATIOE(F)

l%SSNE(lS!6)

KUTIYEIl)II0 (IT(S)

RNIATIOI(AAOS)

W) TEAA

IlIESAATEOlOSE)

RN%JAOKAW.

+O-/o+

KSI(N OASIS KCIOEAT(IKUICES AO TEAA IIITESAATEO)

@ISO(-"A m 5C++'n -ioy

47 WAS

AJAVQ

EXHIBIT 2

QUALIFICATION MARGIN

(NO ITIOI

tMhlEKA

TE)PEAATINE(f)

l%SSOAEPSI6)

KIATIVEIl)II0 ITT(S)

AAOIATI(W(AAOS)

(AO TEAR

IIITE6AATEO

OOSE)

-'3o~ +Co

(PiuE) + 4$

'ESIN OASIS KCIOEIIT

(IKUNES AO TEAA IAIESAATEO)

r i'W5z+4

G'vow

i +IS

EXHIBIT VI-20

1

ENGINEERING DOCUMENTATION REPORT - ENVIRONMENTAL

1. Purchase Order Number 10407 13-JM-ill.

2. Arizona Public, Service Company - Palo Verde Nuclear GeneratingStation Units 1, 2 and 3.

3. Safety related rack mounted devices supplied by Foxboro:

Device alification Re ort Rev. W//I—

2AC-M32AI-Z2V2AI-I3V2AZ-T2V

'AO-L2C-R

2AO-VAZ ECEP 92062AO-V3I2AP+ALM-AR2AP+ALM-AS2AP+SQE2ARPS-A62ANU-D2AX+DZO2AX+DP102AX+DS12AX+VE2AX+AM

QOAAA05QOAAB35QOAAB13QOAAB28QOAAB60QOAAB44QOAAB11QOAAB33QOAAB19QOAAB48QOAAB25QOAAB58QOAAA05QOAAB14QOAAB18QOAAA05QOAAB27

5. Test plans, specifications and objectives are containedand QOAAA02.

6. Test results are contained in the Qualification Reports

4.. Equipment performance specifications are defined in theReports (See Ztem 3).

Qualification

F$'/8

B 9aA 9'9A //7A /OJB 92,A /00A gdB lo&A 9'7

A /OQA '88BBA 88A yy %.

'~ >

in QOAAA01

(See Itexr 3).

7. Supporting data are contained in QOAAB01. (To be submitted)

8. Analysis data are contained in QOAAA05 and QOAAA06. -zz/-z

9. P rril'r4.APPROVED DATE

pl~~ i(g OF I,;~4»

C. »»»I

CHl!.OS

g Ni» 2GG73 o /j~'o "'C, @~i'".F

tvrNiEXHIBIT VI-21

ENGINEERING DOCUMENTATION REPORT - SEISMIC

Purchase Order Number 10407 13-JM-ill;

Arizona Public Service Company - Palo Verde Nuclear GeneratingStation Units 1, 2 and 3.

Safety-related rack-mounted devices supplied by Foxboro:

Device alification Re rt, Rev.

2AC-M32AI-Z2V2AI-Z3V2AI-T2V2AO-L2C-R2AO-VAI ECEP 92062AO-V3I2AP+ALM-AR2AP+ALM-AS2AP+SQE2 ARPS-A62ANU-D2AX+DZO2AX+DP102AX+DS12AX+VE2AX+AM2ES-BXXX RackVeldable Base

Devices cualified by type

QOAAA05QOAAB35QOAAB13QOAAB28QOAAB60QOAAB44QOAABllQOAAB33QOAAB19QOAAB48QOAAB25QOAAB58QOAAA05QOAAB14QOAAB18QOAAA05QOAAB27QOAAA20 PlActon Report 14096

similarity to tested

AABAAABAABAAABBAAA0

devices:

wP//Ptp 39'9

//7/o//OOO'Cp

/0297

/o3ge

Ps88588$

~ //a

Similar Device'ested Device ification Re rt2AX+DZO2AX+VE2AC-M3

2AX+DS12AX+P2AC-M2

QOAAB18QOAAB21QOAAB27

Rev. BRev. BRev. A

v5/$ 0

Rp

Test response spectra, acceptance criteria, and test results forQ-Class (Seismic Class 1) devices are contained in the individualtype test reports and in QOAAA20, Parts 1 and 2. Test response -F'~/ -Vjspectra, acceptance criteria, and test results for R-Class (SeismicClass 9) devices are contained in QOAAA20, Part 1. The model -F52AO-L2C-R experienced contact chatter at the Foxboro generic SSFresponse spectra but did not chatter at the generic OBE responsespectra which exceed the project SSE floor response spectra forelevation 140 feet. See SDDR No. 1902, attached.

EXHIBIT VI-22

6. Test response spectra are contained in QOAAA20 and Qualification -Z'5 i~->0Reports.

. 7. Devices are to mounted in Model N-2ES racks or as shown ondimensional dravings.

8. Device specifications and physical properties are contained inQOAAA05 and Qualification Reports.

9. Test facility:

10.

Acton Environmental Testing CorporationActon, Massachusetts

Test equipment information is contained in QOAAA20 and Qualifies- -PS/- h'0tion Reports.

~ ]'I, Test method is described in QOAAA04.

Test data are contained in QOAAA20.

-aj~-iW

pg r'PP

13. Test results are contained in QOAAA20 and Qualification Reports.

14. Identification of the device features that vere qualified bygeneric tests and justification and certification of similarityto the tested devices are contained in QOAAA05.

15. Approved:

~<as OF i+r+i;cP CgC~

ZOSEPHg/ wC.

CHILDS.,~ IIO. 2u673 O

i

jiiwm'ate

EXHIBIT VI-23

ualification Sumnar of E ui ment

' I. plane liame: PpN g 5 ( Z eI. 3l. Utility: AP I %DNA, PUB L IC SERVIC 6

Type:

PWR X

NSSS: C E 3. A/E: Bechtel BUR

11. Com onent Name: BC' N LO (NS'TRUDGENP- %ZA - co z. A

%ZA COdaNo o'-s - co

Scope: [ ] NSSS [vJ BOP

2. Hadal Number: 2 E5-B Quantity: ~darNtT

3. Vendor: THE Fc )C BQ RO CON PAW

4. 1f the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included: SEE A PEND(

5. Physical Description a. Appearance MALo (nl T'g CA& WENT

a ~

b. Dimensions 32. w' 3' D X t I 8 H

c. 't eight [ 0 Sc> ~

6. Location: Bui lding: Co+TR o L.

Elevation: (4.o -0

Field Mounting Conditions [ g Bolt (No. >, Size /a Zo ) To BAspBoLTBD 'T> wet'Ass [ Q Veld (Length I 8" )WaLDeD To >LooR [ ]

8. Natural Frequencies, in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S: F/B: i3 iC V: (~,S

9. a. Functional Description: S~wcTt'aLATaP GONTINLJoUS PRoCB'55 MoglloC(~

b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X] Both

10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 3 3'itA WAIT(~g F INAL GUALIFt CATION D>C AMKQT

EXHIBIT VI-24

'

l]1. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in the Plant: [M) Ye;

I'V. E ui ment ualafxcation Method: Test:

Ko

Analysis:

Combination of Test. and Analysis:

V. Vibration In ut

Test and/or Analysis by AC o Vl os ~ A aS rN ~RP.(Name of Company or Laborat.ory 6 Report No. )

T~sr ma

pohcy

0 I+~2, 2A HALT's r 5 R6poRY W I 4 o g Q

l. Loads considered: I [X) Seismic only 2. [ ) Hydrodynamic only

3. [ ) Explosive only 4. [ ) Other (Specify)

5. [ ) Combination of

6. Method of combining RRS: [ ) Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS [ )(other, specifv)

Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): SEr 4 r aaDrx'r

3. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: + F'A, 5 sE

S/S =~ S g

VI. If ua'.ifacation b 'est then Com lete:

l. [ ) Single Frequencyg] random

[X) Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat.)

2. [ ) Single Axis [g) Multi-Axis

3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other(specify)

4. Frequency Range: ).2,5 — Ioo IIa.

5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ) }'es (plot TRS on RRS graphs)[g No r art<sr.y'z I 4 2.g H~.

AWAr r(aC7 FrnlAL Q tARr-r r=r cP'TroN >ocular+

EXHIBIT VI-25

0

e. 1aPvt S-level Test at S/S = RR& F/B = RRS V = PRsa

7. Lahnra tory Mounting: 0 LTED Vv'(THouT )MELD Ches&

1. [2) Bol t (No. Q, Size i2 ) [ ] Meld (Length ) [ ]

8. Functional operability verified: [X) Yes [ ) No [ ] Not Applicable

9. Test Results including modifications made: V~IX> lmC/Rt /O tJ S

1t . Othe r tests performed (such as fragxlity test, including results1:

1 f ua.'> f>cat>on bv Ana'is or b the Combination of Test and Analysis ther.

~Com ! ete:

Description of Test including Results: 8 l —Ax(AL Ad~ N 9 oC AS IS4!=TS

.'1e.r.: 'f Analyses: tO tJ vl C Ard L s>S o wCLO BAsC & t Y

Static Analysis[>() Dynam:c Analysis

[ ] Equivalent Static Analysxs[ ] Tame-History[ ) Response Spectrum

3. Node 'y~e: [>,') 3D ) 2D

[/) Finite Element [ ) Beam

[ ] lD

] Closed Form Solut>or.

) Computer Codes: fFrequency Range and ho. of modes considered:

[ ] Hand Calculations

Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [' Absolute Sum [X) SRSS

[ ] Other:(speci fy1

6. Damping: Basis for the damping used:

7. Support Considerations in the model:

(7 tSQ Ft<AL gt Ai<F I MTiSBnJ P OC tS ~=g T

EXHIBIT VI-26

0

BOP

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Loador Response

A. Identification Location CombinationSeismicStress

To talStress

StressAllowable

B. Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional

0 erabilit

+ AHAJTN/4 Filv'AL Q4lALIP'l B'AV(an/ 8o

VIII. alification Deficiencies

The following is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:

cwork orders written:

Evaluation Approval:

Reviewing Engineer

Group Supervisor

EXH IBIT V I-27

0

CHECK LIST

ENVIRONMENTAL UPJ IFICATION

I General

This checklist is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met. Completeone checklist sheet for IE components- Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on .the same sheet.

Type ofEquipmentComponent

EquipmentLocation

Bldg. Elev. ManufacturerModelNumber

PVNGSSpec.

PVNGS

TagNumbers

FLEGTRIG6 E~ECAroR

VlfSfc.

QlfSFL lao PARs~v-Pf~'8c Fs4-I/099 WA-oi g

Dt' -8oiDcy Ho I

Additional Information

II 0 erabilit Re uirements

Environ-mental

Designator

DesignBasis

.Acc'dent

Time WhenReq 1 T 0

9 Initiationof DBA

Natureof

OperationEquipment Function

ioch/WS~8

g&T iRF-a84 g~riuuo ug

gpugghrE ENEPAFwc.V

poaEC

Additional Information

III Desi nated Environment

Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization

EXHIBIT VI-28

Page -2-

IV uglified Environment

Complete'exhibit 1. Compare exhibit 1 to FSAR designated service condition.Does supplier's qualified service meet or exceed the FSAR requirements?

Q Yes - Proceed to item V

g) No - Describe the differences ~ Indicate whether differences willimpair the equipment function. Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable-(Attach additional sheets as required.)

gtoa 1'w~ OuwER QEVEaoP~E~7-

V ~Man in

Identify margins, if any, provided by qualification if any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to IEEE-323-1974 requirements. Are marginsacceptable?

0 Yes — Proceed to item VIg No — Describe differences and indicate. whether or not differences are

significant

Q Significant Q Not Significant

Justif ication: i 8~5 C'8& ON>EK'E'VE<ul ~ E~t

EXHIBIT VI-29

Page -3-

VI E ui ment Mountin and Orientation

1) . Was equipme'nt qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc )? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible) ~

0 Horizontal (eg., floor)Q Vertical (eg-, wall)Q Canted at degrees from vertical (eg., piping)

No orientation requirementOther - Clarify PRO 8 UIVVEJC 'DELJEC.Ol &EAl 7

2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc. )

Was test mount same as intended site installation?

C3 Yes - Proceed to item VII|2 No — Explain i 806r84/N L)~>E8 PF O'QOf~E~T

VII uglification Method

A. Identify qualification method:

R Type Test - Report 8

R Analysis — Report Pr

Q Operating Experience Report 8

Q On-Going Qualification - Report 8

R Combination of Methods (check all that apply)

B. Describe qualification method. What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualificationis used, describe program and identify scope and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis; or inspection.

RP448~ uA'PER DEvEcolwE~r

EXHIBIT VI-30

0

l

l

Page -4-

C. Were tests conducted in the following sequence~ (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable) Sequence specified in IEEE 323-1974.

1- Inspection2. Operation (baseline)3. Operation (extremes)4. Aging5. Seismic6. DBA Operation7. .Post DBA Operation8. Inspeection

Q Yes — Proceed to D

gg No — Explain test sequence U~<+ >~~~<4'~~~~

Was actual test sequence equal to or more severe than this sequence?

Q Yes - ExplainQ No — Equipment is not qualified

D- Provide additional test data as noted: PRMtWW ON>CC PF VG~f~E~I) Seismic testing consisted of Ogg's before/after SSE's

using the required response spectra/required input motion noted inFSAR Section

2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment:

Q Yes — Proceed to 3

Q No — Explain:

3) Test temperatures were measured by

0 Direct Mounted Thermocouple - Proceed to 4

P Other - Explain and Justify

4) Heat aging was conducted by

Q Arrhenius Methods - Proceed to 5

Q Ocher — Explain and Justify

EXHIBIT V I-31

0

0

l

Page -5-

5) Humidity aging was conducted by:

6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?

C3 Yes — Proceed to 7

Q No - Justify:

7) The per formance characteristics required to be monitored vere:

8) The performance characteristics monitored were:

9) Performance characteristics during testing vere monitored

Q ContinuouslyQ Intermittently at

g Not applicable — Justify:intervals

10) Does test report identify that instrumentation vas in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?

0 Yes - Proceed to llQ No - Justify:

EXHIBIT VI-32

e

Page -6-

11) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supportsetc.) simulate installed condit'ion?

P Yes — Proceed to VIIIQ No - Justify:

VIII Evaluation

Qualified lifetime is:

40 yearsOther — Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s):

QVAQ(F Id.ATIo~ 8/D7 C orbs PIETE

Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:

BechtelLog No.

ReportNo Subject

Proprietay (Yes/No)(If proprietary identify location of rep'ort)

MoMEhdAiC.Z8c, E

Evaluation Approval:

Reviewing Engineer:

Group Supervisor:

EXHIBIT V I-33

EXHIBIT 1

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER

CRITIII %SIN l(6IS CCIKÃl(IKUCES C l%% IDTESAATED)

t'Rc ( em~U&ee. e

PEv Fc.or

aMT'%ZQK

(DSli)

ITIVEWflDITT(S)

WIATltÃ(DADS)IIO TEAA

IDTKSAAIED

N)SE)

06)I(NS

EXHIBIT 2

QUALIFICATION MARGIN

CRITIC KSIR DASIS KCITEXT(IKLllKS«) TEAA INESAATED)

KPEAATIA(E(T)

l%$QJK(DS16)

%1NIYEI(DIIDITT(S)

DADIATIO((AADS)

W TEAA

IDTESAATED

N)SE)

()GII(A(S

EXHIBIT YI-54

0

e

ualif ication Sugar of E ui ment

Plant Name: PVP W Q1. '= Utility:2. NSSS: 3. A/E:

Type:

Bechtel BWR

Quantity

11. Con onent Yienr: pi[/+ C pede'pdB A~o sg

1. Scope: [ ] NSSS JIP BOP

2. Model Number: L, - 0

3. Vendor: Et EC T KoOoc.VSAH.Zo~ —S c C6<C;5 E'L.Ec TIr rc Pko Doc T5)

4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included:

Physical Description a. Appearance

b. Dimensions loCs E'u C 0

REC, 7+a r Mg,

c. Weight

6. Location: Building: D I M E'ER, AT-c

Elevation: M SZ.

3APieid Nonnting C ndioti so[op Bolt (No., Site~

[ ) Weld (Lengt l[ )

8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):S /APok Cy, cB Co. o6 fee i . i '~F': T&

9. a. Functional Description: tPKovl og BmC c Ere'c. PogE~

b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

(g Both

10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: /< 4 -/> -4 -

0/8'XHIBIT

VI-35

e

111. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in the Plant: Ye.

IV. E ui ment ualxfxcation Method: Test:

! No

hna lysis:

Combination of Test and Analysis:

Test and/or Analysis by AlSS C.o Sc c.7Am' - //~f(Name of Company or Laboratory 6 Report No.)

V. Vibration In ut:

Loads considered: 1. (P Seismic only 2. [ ) Hydrodynamsc on)y

5. [ ) Combination of 4

e'

6. Method of combining RRS: [ ) hbsolute Sum [ J SRSS ( J

(other, specxfylCea r e~ C]VE AC.y

Required Response Spectra {at tach the graphs):

3. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:

S/S = F/B "-

VI. I! ua.'i f>cation" b Test then Com Iete:

1. [ ) Single Frequency J Multi-Frequency:J random) sine beat

2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-hxis

3. No; of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other(speci fy)

4, Frequency Range:

5. TRS enveloping RRS.using Multi-Frequency Test [ ) Yes (plot TRS on RRS graphs)[ ] No

EXHIBIT VI-56

e!

I

0g

l

Input g-level Test at S/S =

7. Lahnratory Mounting:

i/B = V =

1. f ) Bolt (No. , Size ) f ) Me)d (Length ) f )

S. Functional operability verified: f ] yes f ) No f ] Not Applicable

9".. Test Result,s including modifications made:

ll, Ot.her tests performed (such as fragility test, including resultsj:

Vi.'. lf Qualification bv Ana'is or b the Combination of T'est and Analysis t.her.

~corn ) etc:

1. Description of Test including Results:

Me h: 'f Ana.'ysis

! Static AnalysisDynamic Analysis

f ] Equivalent St,at.ic Analysis) Time-History

f ) Response Spectrum

3. Mode: Tpge: f]3D f ) 2D f)lD) Finite Element f ) Beam

f ) Computer Codes: g5'requencyRange and No. of modes consider'ed:

] Hand Calculat,ions

] Closed Form Solution

Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: f ) Absolute Sum f ] SRSS

f ) Other:(speci fy)

6. Damping: Basis for the damping used:

7. Support Considerations in the model: 8 I~IOL Un/ F

Q p V/Bh/

EXHIBIT VI-57

0

BOP

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Loador Response

A. Identification Location CombinationSeismicStress

To talStress

StressAllowable

B- Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional

0 erabilit

~h/ REVi<~

VIII'lificationDeficiencies

The following is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:

Work orders written:

Evaluation Approval:

Reviewing Engineer

Group Supervisor

EXHIBIT VI-38

0

I

I

e

ualif ication Summar of E ui ment

I. Plant Name;,P Y/[[/'6S

) .;, Uti )it'y:Type:

pw x

3. A/E.: Bechte) Bt'R

II. Com onent Name:

l. Scope: I J NSSS (gJ BOPs

2 . Node) Numbe r: Quan t i ty: ~sf ~Zu~ir )

3. Vendor:

4. lf the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included:

5. Physical Description a. Appearance

b. Dimensions

c. freight ~ O

6. Location: Building:

Elevationg4

7. Field [iounting Conditions [i[] Bolt (go.~ , gize~y )

[ J Veld (Length )! J

8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S: F/B: V:

9. a. Functional Description: M vc ~e mc A C i~v

b. Is the equipment required for fQ Hot Standby JA) Cold Shutdown

fXJ Both

10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 'D4'd7 -/3- AP-o/g

EXHIBIT VI-39

e

Ill. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in the Plant: [P] Ye=

IV. E ui ment uglification Method: Test:

! No

Analysis:

Combinat.ion of Test and Analysis:

Test and/or Analysis by C" > V/-(Name of Com ~ or Laboratory 6 Report No.)

V. Vibration In ut:

1. Loads considered: l. [g Seismic only 2. [ ) Hydrodynamic only

3. [ ] Explosive only 4. [/) Other (Specify)

5. P<) Combination of

o/'gwvi Q

6. Met.hod of combining RRS: [jQ Absolut.e Sum [ ) SRSS [(other, specify)

14'.

Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): ~Pe'r ™c

3. Required Accelerat,ion in Each Direct.ion:

S/S = F/B =

VI. If uglification b Test t.hen Com let.e:

I. [ ] Single Frequency) random

] Multi-Frequency: [ ) sine beat.

[ ]

2. [ ] Single Axis J Multi-Axis

3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Ot.her(speci fy)

4. Frequency Range:

5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ) Yes (plot TRS on RRS graphs)[ ] No

EXHIBIT V I-40

i

~ ~

~ ~, ~ ~ ~

~ ~ I ~

~ ~ I ~

~ ~ ' ~ I ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~' ~

~ ~

~ ' . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I . II ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

I . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~

0

t

BOP

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Loador Response

A Identification Location CombinationSeismicStress

To talStress

StressAllowable

B., Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional

0 erabilit

+ ~N ae~iE~

VIII alification Deficiencies

The following is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:

Work orders written:

Evaluation Approval:

Reviewing Engineer

Group Supervisor

EXHIBIT V I-42

0

e

ualification Suaxna of E ui ment

~ 1. Plant Name: / V+l . Uti 1 ity:2. NSSS:

Type:

3. A/E: Bechte) BUR

I I . Com oaent Name: g~y~g ggg~gpgg gggggp~ gggj/Scope: f ] NSSS ]Q BOP

Hwo- 8 1-7/dS-SS'odel

Number: Quaniiry: ~MO&it)ck+~ ~A~rwzc ~~A'~~

Vendor:~4sz~y TEA'r>SIf the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the

devices included: ~ 4 >9rgnrsuu rb'ZF~.

Physi cal Descripti on a. Appearance /de jgg 73@~~

b. Dimens ions 7+& g W$ ~ 8 4 /<~c. 4'eight

6. 'Location: Building:

Elevation

7. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No. , Size )Veld (Lengt ) arcedt) ac 7Fdrll.W4'L~

8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

g~~~dul4 AT F/B: W V:7pgg 7j'/$E ZA/7ZOL . SNZP~nfcy'Z5SZ

9. a. Functional Description: i2

b. Is the equipment required for t ] Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdown

Both

10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: -D/g

id+~ p g6 k'TS P /~~+)

EXHIBIT VI-C5

0

I

J

CHECK LIST

ENVIRONMENTAL UALIFICATION

I General

This checklist is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met. Completeone checklist sheet for IE components- Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on the same sheet.

Type ofEquipmentComponent Bldg» Elev.

EquipmentLocation

ManufacturerModelNumber

PVNGS

Spec.

PVNGS

TagNumbers

7owcR. ~~ VER.SI

AqOMClS, INC. ~0 ~E'- pw - Hli<- er.c.—ua,6-PL% - Qia

Additional Information

Environ-mental

Designator

DesignBasis

Accident

Time @henReq'd T 06 Initiation

of DBA

Natureof

- OperationEquipment Function

(VLOC.~

MSW

Ehf7lRZ

Dew CoN l-lHuo«T'0 CHa~ CLP ss16

~ 5<rt ea,i es<+HYlN4LSVRL$

Additional Information

III Desi nated Environment

Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization

EXHIBIT V I-44

e

Page -2-

IV uglified Environment

Complete exhibit 1 ~ Compare exhibit 1 to PSAR designated service condition.Does supplier's qualified service meet or exceed the PSAR requirements?

Q Yes — Proceed to item V

{g No - Describe the differences ~ Indicate whether differences willimpair the equipment function. Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable.(Attach additional sheets as required.)

rVOPM kL RAWIAT'I4~ A/07 C'&5 / PE'R'ED . 5EE'7-Em

Z

V ~Mar in

Identify margins, if any, provided by qualification if any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to IEEE-323-1974 requirements. Are marginsacceptable?

0 Yes - Proceed to item VIg No - Describe differences and indicate whether or not differences are

significant

Q Significant g Not Significant

Justif i~~tio~: f.gC55U gC. 8 > ~AL gAZ gRriOM Pa

~or /Ayah Af+gA>M. SimCE ghr<EteY cHACQER

IA) V&JT]<ATES we~ fXEssoP2(+zs 0'die wrac,PRE5SuC'E ROE'5 Wa r gEeuiRE mWRc i~. D8A

RADr47'I om >aug'g+L Egc GEps ~nEwAcg~P]+7-]0< POSE g Y 84&4'5T ~

PEP''R'4

0 urrov E,

EXH IBIT V I-45

0

Page -3-

VI E ui ment Mountin and Orientation

1) Was 'equipment qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc.)? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible) ~

El Horizontal (eg., floor)Q Vertical (eg-, wall)Q Canted at degrees from vertical (eg., piping)

No orientation requirementOther - Clarify

2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc. ) UWR PZ CEO'iE AJ

Was test mount same as intended site installation?

C3 Yes - Proceed to item VIIQ Nn — Explain

VII ua1ification Method

A. Identify qualification method:

g Type Test - Report 8 44 ia ++

Q Analysis — Report

Q Operating Experience Report P

Q OnWoing Qualification - Report />

Q Combination of Methods (check all that apply)

B. Describe qualification method. - What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualificationis used, describe program and identify scope 'and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis, or inspection.

T.EKE 9%5- t g Z6E~ 3g -l97%QgF~ 450 —l +$ +E't P ~ —(97 f

EXHIBIT VI-46

0

Page -4-

C. Were tests conducted in the following sequence? (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable) Sequence specified in IEEE 323-1974.

1. Inspection. 2. Operation (baseline)

3. Operation (extremes)4. Aging5 ~ Seismic6. DBA Operation7. Post DBA Operation8. Inspeection

Pg Yes —'roceed to D

Q No — Explain test sequence

Was actual test sequence equal to or more severe than this sequence?

C3 Yes - ExplainQ No - Equipment is not qualified

D. Provide additional test data as noted:

1) Seismic testing consisted of ~ OBE's before/~~ l SSE'susing the required response spectra/required input motion noted in'FSAR Section 3~

2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment:

El Yes — Proceed to 3

Q No — Explain:

3) Test temperatures were measured by

0 Direct Mounted Thermocouple - Proceed to 4

g Other - Explain and Justify DK R6 I KVJ

4) Heat aging was conducted by

QArrhenius Methods — Proceed to 5

g Other - Explain and Justify hJDGR R.CUIT'uJ

EXHIBIT VI-47

0

0

Page -5-

5) Humidity aging was conducted by: 5 /A

6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?

CI Yes - Proceed to 7

Q No — Justify:

7) The performance characteristics required to be monitored vere:

V e LT'A GuPuT')

The performance characteristics monitored were:

R.

9) Performance characteristics during testing vere monitored

Q ContinuouslyQ Intermittently at

g Not applicable — Justify:intervals

hJ V 1 euJ

10) Does test report identify that instrumentation was in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?

0 Yes - Proceed to llg No - Justify: QhJDER. V l 6'4J

EXHIBIT V I-48

0

Page -6-

11) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supportsetc.) simulate installed condition?

El Yes - Proceed to VIIIQ No - Justify:

VIII Evaluation

Qualified lifetime is,:

40 yearsOther — Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s):

Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:

Bechtel'og

No.Report

No SubjectProprietay (Yes/No)

(If proprietary identify location of report)

Gs I Q7+uAl.LfSCAT(I4

QR. I+OO ~ MASAN i66Am ea>

'tes +~c.~ma >.t). <. Gn

~

~ ~

o~ea. <a~vCmiM PR.»><>~qa C. ~v. «vs'.~ i~M T~

Evaluation Approval:

Reviewing Engineer:

Group Supervisor:

EXHIBIT YI-49

0

0

0

EXHIBIT 1

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED(TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER

~ITIR

NN%1U

T9VENlLKe)

l%$SNKesto

%&TIVEIkklI0 ITT(S)

lOIATIR(Ok(51W TEAA

IOTE6kATEO

15E)

OflllCA(S

32- I Q.Q.

ATMOS

0 - 9s

%AIR RSIS CCIIEÃT(lated e me IOTENATEO)

LOCO mS t.tk

3L I RQ

kronos

0 — 9S

Jo

EXHIBIT 2

QUALIFICATION MARGIN

(tw)ITIR KSISA OASIS kCCICO(T

(IO(UCES AO lEAk INTE6kATEO)

TE)PEAATIOK

e)

esl6)

DATIVEWIIOITT(1)

OAOIATtR(kAOS)(lO TEAR

INTE6kATEO

N)SE)

C)6(l CAIS

i lS

~20 +5

0

-8 &lan0

1'

9 p lo

N/A

EXHIBIT V I-50

0

a

ualification Sunxnar of E ui ment

I

Pr'h'GS >I. Utility:

Type:

Q PVR

2. NSSS:. 3. A/E Bechtel BVR

Il. Com onent

'3

Namr: g /~AIF~+Ag g(Ynganlsivz~

C~)-Nndet Number: 0 — r;m= Quantity:

rMJ ~>-0 Ce

Vendor: / dA'f

the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of thedevices included: je

Physical Description a. Appearance

Jlb. Dimensions

c. Veight

Location: Building:

Elevation:

A A?dl.

e

Field Mounting Conditions, [ ] Bolt (}o., SizeVeld (Len th

I ]

Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical);

S/S: F/B: v: /a. , Functional Description:

CLA55 18 S rx7/OW gg~mi~b. Is the equipment required for I ] Hot Standby

~ Both

] Cold Shutdown

10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:

C4) wEs7- spaz~ gpPwnrki~ ~ DPc7~K~ Wg4 ~/n/C ~~~~+

F-/)p'EA i. IK Wd T /A/cd~&~.EXHIBIT VI-51

0'

III. Is E ui ment Available for Ins ection in the Plant: ~ Yt = Kotlat.E ui ment ugly fxcation Method: Test:

Analysis:

Combination of Test and AnaIysis: lAPgTy

Test andior Analysis by

V. Vibration In ut:

O'T-/me ~f ompany or Laboratory & Report ho.)~~ zdN rdPz~ EPWS-v r

1. Loads considered: l." [g Seismic only 2. f ] Hydrodynamic only

3. [ ) Explosive only 4. [ ] Other (Specify)

5. [ ) Combination of

6. Method of combining RRS: [ ) Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [ ]

Z. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):

(other, specify,l

//@ af

3. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:

s(s = .4/ F/B =~,If ua.'if>cation b 'est then Com lete:

I

1, [ ) Single Frequencyrandom

[Q Multi-Frequency: [ ) sine beat[ ]

2. [ ) Single Axis ~ Multi-Axis~-F9/v z-Fd/y

3. lio. of Qualification Tests: OBE~ $$/y SEE~I-SS Other(specify)

nFrequency Range:

TRS enveloping RRSeusing Multi-Frequency Test Q Yes (plot TRS on RRS graphs)) No

EXHIBIT V I-52

Qi

t. Input s-level .Test at s/s =~ p/B = ~st v = ~7. Lal oratory Mounting: Zc5 7 8

1 ~/We7S. Functional operability verified: ~ Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable

Test Results including modifications made:7 4

;!. lf

Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results!:

4' P Szx 'Egu~~~r~r~7-i~w ~z7. QPmP4+rE.ualiFication bv Ana'is or b 'he Combination of Test and Analvsis ther.

C~am lets: pg y /Ir/ppgyg+Qm~Description of Test including Results:t '')eth; ' f Ana.'ysis:

l Static Analysis) Dynam c Analysis

f ) Equivalent. Static Analysis[ ] Ti.me-History[ ) Response Spectrum

3. Node'pge: [ ] 3D t)2D[ ) Finite Element [ ) Bear.

[)lD) Closed Form Sclutio..

[ ) Computer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:

] Hand Calculations

method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other:(specify)

e

6. Damping:r

Basis for the damping used:

7. Support Considerations in the model:

EXHIBIT VI-53

e

e

l

BOP

8- Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Loador Response

A. Identification - Location CombinationSeismicStress

To talStress

StressAllowable

B Max. Deflection LocationEffect Upon Functional

0 erabilit

VIII. alification Deficiencies

The following- is a list of qualification deficiencies requiring work orders:

Work orders written:

Evaluation Approval:

Reviewing Engineer

Group Supervisor

EXHIBIT VI-50

0

CHECK LIST

ENVIRONMENTAL UPJ IFICATION

I General

This checklist is designed as an aid for reviewing Class IE Equipment Qualifi-cation reports and to assure that all requirements have been met. Completeone checklist sheet for IE components- Like components with the same environ-mental designator can be listed on the same sheet.

Type ofEquipmentComponent

Q oo V. Pinup gCASvcS

Bldg.

Cunt/8zN-rAEJVj

Elev.

EquipmentLocation

ManufacturerModelNumber

V<gewp u.

PVNGSSpec.

l)-GM-OS8

PVNGS

TagNumbers

N le

Additional Information CA6LC hS CWSS- t (QKe5 PoL, El K LeHE'

6$,a~~ og

Environ-mental

Designator

Design, BasisAccident

Time WhenReq'd T 0

9 Initiationof DBA

Natureof

OperationEquipment Function

l oca

M. S t.E

mriRePs+ C4nll raw y~

DEMI&~/ dwEKcg+$ $ ,

lE'4

cePneuw

Additional Information

III Desi nated Environment

Append copy of FSAR Table 3E-1 Environmental Designator service conditioncharacterization

EXHIBIT VI-55

0

0

Page -2-

IV uglified Environment

Complete exhibit 1. Compare exhibit 1 to FSAR designated service condition.Does supplier's qualified service meet or exceed the FSAR requirements?

g Yes — Proceed to item V

0 No — Describe the differences ~ Indicate whether differences willimpair the equipment function- Justify any conclusions thatqualification to less than full service conditions is acceptable.(Attach additional sheets as required.)

R Yes — Proceed to item VIQ No - Describe differences and indicate whether or not differences are

significant

Q Significant Q Not Significant

t V ~Mar ia

Identify margins, if any, provided by qualification if any, on Exhibit 2.Compare the listed margins to IEEE-323-1974 requirements. Are marginsacceptable?

Justification:

EXH IB IT VI-56

0

i

Page -3-

VI E ui ment Mountin and Orientation

1) Was equipment qualified for a unique installed orientation (horizontal,vertical, upsidedown, etc.)? Specifiy orientation of required installa-tion (check all that are permissible) ~

Cl Horizontal (eg., floor)Q Vertical (eg., wall)Q Canted at degrees from vertical (eg , piping)

No orientation requirementOther - Clarify

e

2) Mounting method (welding, bolts, rivets, etc. )

Was test mount same as intended site installation?

0 Yes — Proceed to item VIIg Hn — Explain nfo7- haec.i CAd C.e

VII uglification Method

A- Identify qualification method:

g Type Test - RepetrpP.sett pyty RGpoCT g+M~ C/aK/7$

Q Analysis - Report 0

Q Operating Experience Report P

Q OnWoing Qualification — Report 8

Q Combination of Methods (check all that apply)

B. Describe qualification method. What codes and standards were utilized?Discuss all extrapolations from, test data that supplier claims qualifydifferent items by a prototye/modulator test. If on-going qualification'is used, describe program and identify scope =and schedule of requiredre-testing, re-analysis, or inspection.

~GGE ~~~ -)9~V z-eeE ~53- !579

EXHIBIT VI-57

0

i I

Page -4-

C. Were tests conducted in the following sequence? (Steps may be omitted ifnot applicable)'equence specif ied in IEEE 323-1974.

1. Inspection2. Operation (baseline)3. Operation {extremes)4. Aging5. Seismic g Yes - Proceed to D6. DBA Operation Q No - Explain test sequence7. Post DBA Operation8- Inspeection

Was actual test sequence equal to or more severe than this sequence?

C3 Yes - ExplainQ No — Equipment is not qualified

D. Provide additional test data as noted:

1) Seismic testing consisted of — OBE's before/after ggg'susing the required response spectra/required input motion noted inFSAR Section

2) Speciman tested is identical to permanent plant equipment:

g Yes « Proceed to 3

Q No - Explain:

3) Test temperatures were measured by

Q Direct Mounted Thermocouple - Proceed to 4

R Other - Explain and Justify ANDES. 6PVleuJ

4) Heat aging was conducted by

E Arrhenius Methods - Proceed to 5

@Other- Explain and Justify

EXHIBIT VI-58

0

e

Page -5-

5) Humidity aging was conducted by:

6) Were heat, humidity, and radiation aging performed simultaneously?

0 Yes - Proceed to 7

Q No — Justify: tAHOGR Rr 1 ew

7) The performance characteristics required to be monitored were:

t'riN 5(STANCs N 0 tMSNLA'TlaN

I 1

8) The pe'rformance characteristics monitored were:

VMOea ~i ewer

9) Performance characteristics during testing. were m'onitored

Q ContinuouslyQ Intermittently at

g Not applicable — Justify:intervals

10) Does test report identify that instrumentation was in current calibrationand traceable to the National Bureau of standards?

Cl Yes - Proceed to 11

R No - Justify:

EXHIBIT VI-59

0

Page -6-t11) Did qualification test interfaces (electrical connections, piping, supports

etc.) simulate installed condition?

QYes - Proceed to VIIIg No — Justify: Vle&

VIII Evaluation

Qualified lifetime is:

40 yearsOther - Specify time(s) and replacement schedule(s):

Identify documentation that supports qualification evaluation:

BechtelLog No.

ReportNo Sub)ect

Proprietay (Yes/No)(If proprietary identify location of report)

Ec 5'8 —i~gbc~g~ QuAVl'<ch7l CW

RePo Az'F F(ILcwh~c/aa.he cM4E4

Evalua tion Approval:

Reviewing Engineer:

Group Supervisor:

EXHIBIT VI-60

0

0

EXHIBIT 1

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITION AS QUALIFIED{TEST, ANALYSIS, ETC) BY SUPPLIER

tsK)ITIa

DAAAIUEA

TUSE'IAIEtT)

lKSSLREPSI6)

KLATI)E)ASIIDITTIS)

M!AT laWt)S)W TEAA

IDTESAATED

DOSE)

EK)IItALS

l ed

/y/0

KSIID IASIS CEIKÃ1tIKLXES a TEAA IDIENATED)

LOCA ASKED

370

stew~ / A)4.AtixruKF

g.3 )ceo 7

~ P+M aims~ ter) HyOrblKihl6'P

EXHIBIT 2

QUALIFICATION MARGIN

ttDD)It la

TAAIKTEA

19'AIWEtf)

DKSSNEPSI6)

KLATIYE

lthlDITTtS)

DAD)AT)aIAADS)IID TEAR

INTE6AAIED

DE)SE)

DUIIEALS

+JO

KS I6)) DAS IS KEIDOITIIDELDEES DD IEAA IN1ESAATED)

oem n Sc.8

+t84E) PPAA hokoa

EXHIBIT YI-61

0

EM-051

BATTERY

CHARGERS

POWER

CONVERSION

PRODUCTS

SAFETY-RELATED DESIGN PROBLEMS WITH BATTERY CHARGERS

HAVE PREVENTED SHIPMENT TO THE SITE AND'WILL

REQUIRE REWORK, TELEX SENT TO PCP 8/22/80 ADDRESS-

ING QUALIFICATION AREAS TO BE RESOLVED,

JM-108 SESS

(SAFETY EQUIP-

MENT STATUS

SYSTEM)

BETA PRODUCTS TEST PLAN DUE TO BE RESUBMITTED BY 8/8/80 HOT YET

RECEIVED. SUPPLIER IS NOT RESPONSIVE,

JM-601A NUCLEAR CONTROL

SERVICE- VALVES COMPONENTS,

INC.

START OF TESTING AT HYLE LABORATORIES DELAYED PEND-

ING BECHTEL REVIEW OF REVISED QUALIFICATION PLANS

NOW FORECAST TO BE RETURNED TO VENDOR AS STATUS 2

ON 9/22/80, FINAL AGREEMENT HAS NOT BEEN REACHED

WITH VENDOR ON Af'lOUNT OF ADDITIONAL COSTS,

EXHIBIT VII-1

(CONTINUED)

P 0

JM-601B NUCLEAR F ISCHER

SERVICE CONTROL CONTROLS

VALVES

SUPPLIER HAS NOT RESOI VED BCP COMMENTS ON ITT-GC

FINAI REPORT FOR THE VALVE ACTUATOR, FISCHER.CON-

TROLS IS NOT BEING RESPONSIVE,

MM-018 DIESEL

GENERATOR SET

COOPER ENERGY BPC IS STILL WAITING FOR CES DOCUMENT TRANSMITTALS,

SERVICES A LETTER WAS SEI'LT TO CES ON 9/4/80 REQUESTING A

TEST PROGRAM SCHEDULE BY 9/10/80 AND A TEST PROGRAM

BY 11/1/80, NO RESPONSE TO DATE,

MM-021 BINGHAM-

AUXILIARYFEED W I LLAMETTE/

WATER PUMPS TERRY

PM-221A DRESSER/

NUCLEAR SERVICE ROTORK

VALVE

BINGHAM-WILLAMETTEHAS BEEN REQUESTED TO PREPARE A

COST ESTIMATE AND SCHEDULE TO COMPLETE THE QUALIFI-

CATION PROGRAM, ESTIMATE DUE 8/15/80 NOT YET

RECEIVED,

AGING TEST OF ROTORK ACTUATOR DUE TO START 8/20/80

NOT YET STARTED, TEST PLAN STILL NOT FORMALLY SUB-

MITTED, TWX SENT TO EXPEDITE,

EXHIBIT VII-2