2017 statistical profile - durham insight · 2014/15 2014/15 2014 2015 2011 2013/14 2015/2016 2013...

Altogether better

Durham

4 Together Partnership

4 Together Partnership

2017Statistical Profile

Contents PageMap 1

Geography 2Background 2Notes 3Useful Links 4Updates 4

Useful Links 6Background 6Domains and Geography 7Deprivation Geography 7Main Points 8

1114

Population change (ONS mid-year estimates) 15Population Structure (ONS mid-year estimates) 16Dependency ratios (ONS mid-year estimates) 19Ethnicity (2011 Census) 21Religion (2011 Census) 22Occupied households (2011 Census) 23

2527

272728293032343638404041Average Weekly Income and Median House Price (ONS Small area

estimates 2011/12)

Place of Employment (2011 Census)

Students in Higher Education Institutions (Higher Education StatisticsAgency)Business Enterprises (Uk Business Counts - NOMIS)Retail Unit Occupancy Rates (DCC)Average House Prices (ONS Experimental House Price Index)Fuel Poverty (Department for Energy and Climate Change)Housing Benefit (Department for Works and Pensions)Worklessness (Department for Works and Pensions)Claimant Count - Working Age (ONS/Job Centre Plus)Claimant Count - Young People (ONS/Job Centre Plus)Job Seekers Allowance - Long Term Claimants (ONS/Job Centre Plus)Jobs - BRES 2015

People and Place

WealthierQualifications (2011 Census)

Sub-county Statistical ProfileSummary Sheets

4 Together Partnership AAP

Deprivation by Geography: % population living in deprived areas (Index

Introduction

Deprivation

Deprivation Map

Research and Consultation TeamAssistant Chief Executives OfficeDurham County CouncilTel. 03000 268032Email: [email protected]: www.durham.gov.uk/stats



Contents Page

Key Stage 2 Attainment (Department for Education) 45Key Stage 4 Attainment (Department for Education) 47Child Poverty (HM Revenue & Customs) 48

Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability (2011 Census) 50General Health (2011 Census) 51Provision of Unpaid Care (2011 Census) 52

53Personal Independence Payments (PIPs) (DWP) 55Premature Mortality (Primary Care Mortality Database) 56

60

Road Traffic Accidents (Durham County Council) 63

Average Domestic Energy Consumption (Dept. ECC) 64Car Ownership (2011 Census) 65Estimated Annual Vehicle Miles (DfT) 66

Greener

SaferRecorded Crime and Anti Social Behaviour (ASB) Incidents (police.ukwebsite)

Healthier

Disability Living Allowance (Department for Works and Pensions

Children and Young People

Research and Consultation TeamAssistant Chief Executives OfficeDurham County CouncilTel. 03000 268032Email: [email protected]: www.durham.gov.uk/stats

For a map of the area please refer to the annual profiles on the INA site:http://www.countydurhampartnership.co.uk/article/8469/Profiles



Research and Consultation TeamAssistant Chief Executives OfficeDurham County CouncilTel. 03000 268032Email: [email protected]: www.durham.gov.uk/stats 1 of 65

Geography

4 Together Partnership AAPArea_Action_Partnerships

Sub-county StatisticalProfile Summary Sheets

Area Action Partnerships: Developed following local government re-organisation in 2009 the AAPshave been set up to give people in County Durham a greater choice and voice in local affairs. Thepartnerships allow people to have a say on services, and give organisations the chance to speakdirectly with local communities. Figures quoted are derived from the Census Lower Super OutputArea (LSOA) geography through a process of aggregation and estimation as LSOA boundaries donot fully match AAP boundaries.


Background

• • • • Bishop Auckland and Shildon

• • • • East Durham Rural

Great Aycliffe & Middridge

• • • • Spennymoor

Situated to the south of the county, the AAP stretches from Chilton in the south to Cornforth in the

north. The 4 Together Partnership is bordered by the other AAPs of:

The 4 Together Partnership is predominantly ‘urban’ in nature with a population of over 17,500 .

Covering an area of over 4,300 hectares (16.7 sq. miles), the AAP has a population density of 4.1

(people/hectare), which is nearly twice that of the county (2.3).

Ferryhill, Chilton and West Cornforth were traditional mining settlements. The town of Ferryhill and its

surrounding villages grew rapidly in the 1900s around the mining industry, with the last mine closing

in 1966. The nearby village of Chilton has seen significant regeneration in recent years, with the

opening of the bypass in 2005, and the refurbishment of the main thoroughfare. West Cornforth is to

the North East of Ferryhill and was home to an iron works.

The 4 Together Partnership covers the town and parish councils of Bishop Middleham, Chilton,

Cornforth, Windlestone and Ferryhill.



Notes

Geography Number of AreasClinical Commissioning Groups 2

Clinical Commissioning Localities 6Strategic Partnership Areas 5Major Centres 12Area Action Partnerships 14Electoral Divisions 63

Index of Deprivation (9 pages)People and Place (10 Pages)The 5

themes are:(20 Pages)

(5 Pages)

(10 Pages)(3 Pages)(3 Pages)Greener: Ensuring an attractive and 'liveable' local environment, and

contributing to tackling global environment challenges

Children & YP: Enabling children and young people to develop and achievetheir aspirations and to maximise their potential in line withEvery Child Matters

Healthier: Improving health and wellbeingSafer: Creating a safer and more cohesive county

This profile summarises key indicators across the 5 Durham County Council corporate themes withan additional introductory section on deprivation and people and place.

The indicators are presented for principal geographies used by Durham County Council and itspartners for service provision and administration within County Durham. These principal geographiesare:

Figures for the Partnerships Areas, Clinical Commissioning area and Major Centres are derived fromaggregation of the Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) Census geography. (In 2001 there were 320LSOAs rising to 324 LSOAs in 2011). Further details on this geography are available from the Officefor National Statistics website, (link given below).

Figures for Area Action Partnerships derived from a combination of aggregation and estimationthrough a best fit process, as they are not completely co-terminus with LSOAs boundaries.Therefore figures for these areas should be considered as estimations only.

The indicators are grouped into 5 themes plus an introductory population section and a section onthe Index of Deprivation, presented on separate worksheets which can be printed off as hand-outs.

Wealthier: Focusing on creating a vibrant economy and puttingregeneration and economic development at the heartof all our plans




Useful Links:Durham County Council Statistics: http://www.durham.gov.uk/statsOffice for National Statistics: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/index.htmlNeighbourhood Statistics: http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.ukNOMISWEB: http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/

UpdatesIndicator (Source) Latest Data

201520152015201120112011

2015

2011

2013/14

2016201320142014November 2016August 2016March 2017March 2017March 2017

Claimant Count - Young People (ONS/Job Centre Plus)Job Seekers Allowance - Long Term Claimants (ONS/Job Centre Plus)

Retail Unit Occupancy Rates (DCC)Average House Prices (ONS Experimental House Price Index)Fuel Poverty (Department for Energy and Climate Change)Housing Benefit (Department for Works and Pensions)Worklessness (Department for Works and Pensions)Claimant Count - Working Age (ONS/Job Centre Plus)

Religion (2011 Census)Occupied households (2011 Census)

Index of Deprivation

Qualifications (2011 Census)Students in Higher Education Institutions (Higher Education StatisticsAgency)Business Enterprises (Uk Business Counts - NOMIS)

Population change (ONS mid-year estimates)Population Structure (ONS mid-year estimates)Dependency ratios (ONS mid-year estimates)Ethnicity (2011 Census)




Updates - continuedLatest Data20152011

2011/12

201120112011

August 2016

January 20172013/14

2014/152014/152014

201520112013/14

2015/20162013

Recorded Crime and ASB Incidents (police.uk website)Road Traffic Accidents (Durham County Council)

Key Stage 2 Attainment (Department for Education)Key Stage 4 Attainment (Department for Education)Child Poverty (HM Revenue & Customs)

Average Domestic Energy Consumption (Dept. ECC)Car Ownership (2011 Census)Estimated Annual Vehicle Miles (DfT)

Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability (2011 Census)General Health (2011 Census)Provision of Unpaid Care (2011 Census)Disability Living Allowance (Department for Works and Pensions(DWP))Personal Independence Payments (PIPs) (DWP)Premature Mortality (Primary Care Mortality Database)

Indicator (Source)Jobs - BRESEmployment (2011 Census)Average Weekly Income - ONS model-based small area incomeestimates by MSOA


Contents PageBackground 5Domains and Geography 6Deprivation Geography 6Main Points 7

10

Useful Links

ID2015 national release:

ID2015 County Durham report:

Background



Deprivation

Deprivation by Geography: % population living in deprived areas(Index of Deprivation 2015)

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015

Since the 1970s the Department of Communities and Local Government and its predecessors havecalculated various local measures of deprivation in England. The increasing availability ofadministrative data at local levels has driven developments in the definition and measurement ofdeprivation. This release contains the latest version of these statistics, mainly from the period2012/13 and form the English Indices of Deprivation 2015. It is important to note that these statisticsare a measure of relative deprivation, not affluence, and to recognise that not every person in ahighly deprived area will themselves be deprived. Equally, there will be some deprived people living inthe least deprived areas.

Deprivation covers a broad range of issues and refers to unmet needs caused by a lack of resourcesof all kinds, not just financial. The English Indices of Deprivation attempt to measure a broaderconcept of multiple deprivation, made up of several distinct dimensions, or domains, of deprivation.

The vast majority of data that underpin the 2015 indices reflect the period 2012/13 while the 2010indices reflect data from 2008. Communities and Local Government undertook a review of statisticaloutputs before deciding to release the ID 2015.

http://www.countydurhampartnership.co.uk/article/8468/Population-Poverty-and-Deprivation




DeprivationDomains and Geography

Deprivation Geography

The English Indices of Deprivation 2015 (ID2015) use 37 separate indicators (the 2010 Indices used38), organised across seven distinct domains of deprivation which can be combined, usingappropriate weights, to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 (IMD 2015).

This is an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in an area and iscalculated for every Lower layer Super Output Area (LSOA) in England (32,844 LSOAs). The ID2015can be used to rank every LSOA in England according to their relative level of deprivation.

The seven distinct domains that have been identified in the English Indices of Deprivation are;Income Deprivation, Employment Deprivation, Health and Disability Deprivation, Education Skills andTraining Deprivation, Barriers to Housing and Services, Living Environment Deprivation and Crime.

Two additional indices are also included in the ID2015 release, although they are not included in theoverall index. These indices are the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) and theIncome Deprivation Affecting Older People Index (IDAOPI) 2015 at Lower layer Super Output Area(LSOA) level.

The ID2015, (along with the previous ID2010, ID2007 and ID2004), was constructed using theCensus Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) geography, (there were 32,884 LSOAs in England in 2011,the previous ID's used the 2001 definition of 32,482 LSOAs). Within County Durham there are 324LSOAs (Previously there were 320 LSOAs).

This means that it is not possible to provide national deprivation ranks for the geographies used inthis report. Instead figures quoted in this report estimate deprivation across the areas by measuringthe percentage of the county's population living in deprived LSOAs within the specified area using aprocess of aggregation and estimation based upon LSOA populations.

In addition the areas are then ranked. For example there are five Partnership areas in CountyDurham. These are ranked 1 to 5 with 1 having the largest population living in deprived areas and 5having the least.




DeprivationIndex of DeprivationMain Points - County Durham

·

·

·

·

County Durham is now the 75th most deprived area out of 326 single and lower tierlocal authorities in England (based on the rank of average score). This is 13 placeslower (improved) than in the previous IMD released in 2010 when the county wasranked as the 62nd most deprived LA in England.

Within the region County Durham remains the most deprived local authority in terms ofboth income and employment deprivation compared with the other 11 authorities in theregion (Table 1 below).

Nationally the majority (83 per cent) of neighbourhoods that are the most deprivedaccording to the 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation were also the most deprivedaccording to the 2010 Index.

61 per cent of local authority districts contain at least one of the most deprivedneighbourhoods in England.

Middlesbrough, Knowsley, Kingston upon Hull, Liverpool and Manchester are the localauthorities with the highest proportions of neighbourhoods among the most deprived inEngland.

The 20 most deprived local authorities are largely the same as found for the 2010Index, but the London Boroughs of Hackney, Tower Hamlets, Newham and Haringeyhave become relatively less deprived and no longer feature in this list.

The underlying data from the ID2015 indicates that in 2012/13 42.2% of the county’spopulation lived in the top 30% most deprived areas. Within the sub-domains:

46.1% of the county’s population were experiencing income deprivation,(an increase in relative income deprivation from 42.4% in the ID2010),

60.8% of the working age population (aged 18-59/64 – old definition)were experiencing some form of employment deprivation, (animprovement from 64.9% in the ID2010),

67.5% of the population were experiencing health deprivation, (animprovement from 70.8% in the ID2010),

37.7% of the population were experiencing education deprivation, (animprovement from 46.8% in the ID2010); all higher than the 30%average across England.




DeprivationMain Points - County Durham

·

Note:

2015 2010 2007134 138 1337 7 865 64 58

113 112 10264 67 6231 29 2679 78 7051 53 5294 94 8378 77 6875 81 7527 28 24

The proportion of the county’s LSOAs in the most deprived deciles has remainedhigher than the proportion nationally as illustrated below.

Figure 1: Proportion of LSOAs in the same decile of the ID2010 and ID2015. (County Durham:313/324 LSOAs; England: 31,672/32,844).

Table 1a: The Income Scale: ID2007, 2010 and ID 2015 rankings for the North East localauthorities

LA NAME

DarlingtonCounty DurhamGateshead

E06000057Redcar and ClevelandSouth TynesideStockton-on-TeesSunderland

CODE

E06000005E06000047E08000037E06000001

NorthumberlandE08000022

E06000003E08000023E06000004

HartlepoolMiddlesbroughNewcastle upon TyneNorth Tyneside

E08000024

Rank1 of Income Scale

E06000002E08000021

Some LSOAs were either split or merged in the 2011 Census and so the graph above representsonly those LSOAs not amended in 2011.

County Durham is ranked as the most deprived local authority in the North East forboth the Income and Employment measure in the ID2015.

1. Ranks are based on the number of people who are income or employment deprived within aspecific local authority.

89%

76%69%

59%

39%47%

52% 50%

67%

77%84%

64%57%

52% 49% 46% 45% 48%56%

76%

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10ID Decile

County Durham England





2015 2010 2007133 133 1235 5 457 53 47

110 100 9063 66 5823 20 1872 64 5742 29 2688 79 6768 62 5566 67 6216 11 7

Main Points - County Durham

County DurhamE08000037 Gateshead

CODE LA NAME Rank1 of Employment Scale

E06000047E06000005 Darlington

Sunderland

E08000022 North Tyneside

E08000023 South Tyneside

Table 1b: The Employment Scale: ID2007, 2010 and ID 2015 rankings for the North East localauthorities

E06000001 HartlepoolE06000002 MiddlesbroughE08000021 Newcastle upon Tyne

1. Ranks are based on the number of people who are income or employment deprived within aspecific local authority.

As can be seen from the table above, all North East local authorities have experiencedslight changes in their rankings. County Durham is the only one that has seen itsranking for the income measure decline since 2007 and has seen the smallestimprovement in the employment measure. As these metrics reflect the number ofpeople who are income and employment deprived, (and not the proportion) CountyDurham remains the most deprived local authority in the north east in terms of theincome and employment summary measures.By dividing the LSOAs national rankings into 10 equal intervals it is possible to give anindication of the distribution of deprived population in County Durham. The followingchart gives these results:

E06000004 Stockton-on-Tees

E06000057 NorthumberlandE06000003 Redcar and Cleveland

E08000024





Main Points - 4 Together Partnership AAP

·

·

Figure 3: Change in the percentage of the County’s population living in deprived LSOAs inCounty Durham 2004 to 2015 (all LSOAs).

Estimated percentage of the population living in deprived areas (Index of Deprivation 2015)

A lower proportion of the population (7.3%) in the 4 Together Partnership AAP live inthe top 10% most deprived LSOAs nationally than do across County Durham (10.2%).County Rank = 6 (1=Most Deprived,14=least deprived).

This is a decrease in the proportion of the population living in deprivedLSOAs within the 4 Together Partnership AAP area from 8.5% in theID2010.

A higher proportion of the population (73.5%) in the 4 Together Partnership AAP live inthe top 30% most deprived LSOAs nationally than do across County Durham (42.2%).County Rank = 1 (1=Most Deprived,14=least deprived).

This is an increase in the proportion of the population living in deprivedLSOAs within the 4 Together Partnership AAP area from 62.4% in theID2010.

Deprivation by geographic area

Figure 2: Percentage of the population in County Durham by LSOA by deprivation score in theIndex of Deprivation:

10.2%

17.1%14.9% 15.2%

10.3%

6.5%8.0% 7.5%

6.1% 4.2%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<More deprived Less deprived>

10% average line

16.3%

50.1%

12.6%

46.1%

11.4%

45.5%

10.2%

42.2%

Top 10% Top 30%Most Deprived Deprived

OverallID2004ID2007ID2010ID2015




Deprivation

Area Overall Income Employment Health Education

7.3 7.3 41.2 41.2 7.3

(8.5) (8.5) (46.9) (49.3) (33.5)

-16.5 -16.5 -14.7 -18.7 -78.7

County Durham 10.2 11.7 25.6 29.9 7.1(11.4) (9.0) (30.9) (27.5) (15.3)-9.6 31.1 -15.8 10.7 -52.8

10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0

Area Housing Crime Environment Income:Child Index

Income:Older

Person

0.0 15.2 0.0 21.6 0.0

(0.0) (16.5) (0.0) (8.5) (11.2)0.0 -10.3 0.0 146.0 0.0

County Durham 3.4 4.8 1.0 12.9 4.9(1.8) (4.4) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0)88.4 9.7 n/a 0.0 0.0

10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0

% change1

% change1

4 Together PartnershipAAP

% change1

England & Wales

(ID2010)

England & Wales

(ID2010)

(ID2010)

(ID2010)

Table 2a: Percentage of the resident population living in the top 10% most deprived LSOAsnationally by domain

Deprivation be geographic area - 4 Together Partnership AAP

Source: Communities and Local Government Index of Deprivation 2015, ONS revised 2012population estimates. Figures refer to the area and not the communities within the area. 'n/a'division by zero.1. % change refers to the percentage change in the number of people living in deprived areasbetween the ID2015 and ID2010.


% change1




DeprivationDeprivation be geographic area - 4 Together Partnership AAP

Area Overall Income Employment Health Education

73.5 73.5 92.6 88.9 73.5

(62.4) (54.9) (92.9) (100.0) (74.3)14.7 30.3 -3.1 -13.5 -3.8

County Durham 42.2 46.1 62.0 67.5 37.7(45.5) (42.4) (64.9) (70.8) (46.8)-5.8 10.4 n/a -3.0 -3.3

30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0

Area Housing Crime Environment Income:Child Index

Income:Older

Person

0.0 29.5 0.0 73.5 49.6

(0.0) (21.6) (0.0) (46.6) (57.2)0.0 32.6 0.0 53.6 -15.7

County Durham 15.3 15.6 2.8 44.4 38.2(8.2) (21.6) (0.7) (34.7) (40.0)89.1 -26.5 298.8 n/a 29.9

30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0

% change1

% change1


1. % change refers to the percentage change in the number of people living in deprived areasbetween the ID2015 and ID2010.

Estimated percentage of the population living in deprived areas (Index of Deprivation 2015)continuedTable 2b: Percentage of the resident population living in the top 30% most deprived LSOAsnationally by domain

Source: Communities and Local Government Index of Deprivation 2015, ONS revised 2012population estimates. Figures refer to the area and not the communities within the area. 'n/a'division by zero.

England & Wales

(ID2010)

(ID2010)

England & Wales


(ID2010)% change1

(ID2010)% change1




Deprivation

For a map of deprivation in the area please refer to the annual profiles on the INA site:http://www.countydurhampartnership.co.uk/Pages/ina.aspx

4 Together Partnership AAP ID2015 top 10%, 10 - 20% and 20 - 30% most deprived LSOAs nationally in the


Contents PagePopulation change (ONS mid-year estimates) 14Population Structure (ONS mid-year estimates) 15Dependency ratios (ONS mid-year estimates) 18Ethnicity (2011 Census) 20Religion (2011 Census) 21Occupied households (2011 Census) 22

Table 1a: Population change between 2010 and 2015

Area 0-4 5-15Working

Age1 Retired2 85+

0.7 -2.4 -3.4 9.7 1.9

County Durham 1.1 0.8 -1.2 13.5 12.6North East 1.1 0.5 -1.1 12.1 11.5England & Wales 4.5 4.1 1.5 13.3 11.0

Source: ONS mid year population estimates.1. Working age is defined as those people aged 16 to 64.2. Retired is defined as those people aged 65 and over.



People and Place


Those aged 85 and over increased by 1.9% between 2010 and 2015 in the 4Together Partnership AAP.

The overall population of 4 Together Partnership AAP decreased by 0.6%between 2010 and 2015.There has been an increase of 0.7% in the pre-school age group (0 to 4) since2010 in the 4 Together Partnership AAP.The number of children aged 5 to 15 decreased by 2.4% between 2010 and 2015in the 4 Together Partnership AAP.The number of people of working age (aged 16 to 64) decreased by 3.4%between 2010 and 2015 in the 4 Together Partnership AAP.Those aged 65 and over increased by 9.7% between 2010 and 2015 in the 4Together Partnership AAP.

% change by age group between 2010 and 2015


2010 and 2015Population: ChangePopulation change: percentage changebetween (select years):

2010 2015



People and PlacePopulation: Change - continued

Area All people

-0.6

County Durham 1.8North East 1.5England & Wales 3.9


Population: Age structureTable 1b: Population counts by age group for 2015

Area 0-4 5-15Working

Age1 Retired2 85+

994 2,019 10,920 3,742 440

County Durham 28,446 60,207 327,617 103,425 11,824North East 150,100 314,917 1,660,407 499,197 60,769England & Wales 3,610,602 7,349,801 36,588,665 10,336,345 1,374,590

Area All people

17,675

County Durham 519,695North East 2,624,621England & Wales 57,885,413





2015 age groups

Table 1a: Population change between 2010 and 2015




People and PlacePopulation: Age structure - continuedFigure 1: Population change by age group between 2010 and 2015

England &Wales

0 - 4 1000 (5.6) 28,400 (5.5) 150,100 (5.7) (6.3)5 - 9 1000 (5.4) 28,900 (5.6) 149,200 (5.7) (6.1)

10 - 14 900 (5.0) 25,900 (5.0) 135,800 (5.2) (5.5)15 - 19 1000 (5.4) 30,800 (5.9) 156,800 (6.0) (5.9)

20 - 24 1000 (5.5) 37,600 (7.2) 189,200 (7.2) (6.6)25 - 29 1,000 (5.9) 30,300 (5.8) 169,300 (6.5) (6.8)

30 - 34 900 (5.1) 30,300 (5.8) 159,800 (6.1) (6.8)35 - 39 900 (5.2) 27,800 (5.3) 145,100 (5.5) (6.2)

40 - 44 1,100 (5.9) 32,000 (6.2) 164,900 (6.3) (6.7)45 - 49 1,400 (7.8) 37,900 (7.3) 185,300 (7.1) (7.1)50 - 54 1,400 (7.8) 39,000 (7.5) 191,100 (7.3) (6.9)55 - 59 1,300 (7.1) 35,100 (6.8) 173,700 (6.6) (5.9)60 - 64 1,200 (7.0) 32,100 (6.2) 155,600 (5.9) (5.4)65 - 69 1,200 (6.7) 33,500 (6.4) 157,100 (6.0) (5.5)

70 - 74 900 (5.2) 24,800 (4.8) 113,500 (4.3) (4.1)75 - 79 800 (4.3) 19,700 (3.8) 95,400 (3.6) (3.3)80 - 84 400 (2.5) 13,600 (2.6) 69,100 (2.6) (2.4)

85+ 400 (2.5) 11,800 (2.3) 60,700 (2.3) (2.4)

North East4 Together PartnershipAAP County Durham

Table 2: Resident Population (% of total resident population in the area) by 5 year age groups

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.06.08.0

10.012.014.016.0

All People 0 to 4 5 to 15 Working Age Retired 85+

% c

hang

e

4 TogetherPartnership AAP

County Durham

North East

England & Wales


2015 population in the area)Resident Population (% of total residentAge Groups for : 2015



People and PlaceResident Population by Age: Comparison between 2010 and 2015Figure 2: 4 Together Partnership AAP: Age Pyramid: 2010/2015:

Percentage of the 4 Together Partnership AAP population by gender and 5 year age groups.

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0%% Females

Females 2015

Females 2010

10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0%

0 ‒ 4

5 ‒ 9

10 ‒ 14

15 ‒ 19

20 ‒ 24

25 ‒ 29

30 ‒ 34

35 ‒ 39

40 ‒ 44

45 ‒ 49

50 ‒ 54

55 ‒ 59

60 ‒ 64

65 ‒ 69

70 ‒ 74

75 ‒ 79

80 ‒ 84

85+

% Males

Age Groups

Males 2015

Males 2010




People and PlaceDependency Ratios

Overall ratio

Table 3a: Change in overall dependency ratio 2010 to 2015

Area 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

572 580 604 611 613 619

540 546 562 570 579 586540 544 557 566 574 581545 548 561 570 577 582


Figure 3a: Change in overall dependency ratio 2010 to 2015


England & Wales

County Durham

A high dependency ratio implies that an area is suffering from the effects of its age structure, withchildren and the elderly unable to contribute to service provision in the ways that those of workingage do, potentially putting pressure on local services such as schooling, health, and social care.

The 4 Together Partnership AAP had a higher overall dependency ratio thanCounty Durham indicating a lower number of people of working age in the areacompared to the number of children and retired people in the area whencompared to the county.

North East

The dependency ratio compares how many people there are in the area who are assumed to beworking (that is people aged 16-64) against both the number of children aged 0-15 and those ofretirement age (65+).

530540550560570580590600610620630

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


County Durham

North East

England & Wales




People and PlaceDependency Ratios

Older person ratio

Table 3b: Change in older person dependency ratio 2010 to 2014

Area 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

302 308 327 333 338 343

275 280 293 301 310 316265 269 280 288 295 301253 256 266 273 279 283


Figure 3b: Change in overall dependency ratio 2010 to 2014

England & Wales

The 4 Together Partnership AAP had a higher older person dependency ratiothan County Durham indicating a lower number of people of working age in thearea compared to the number of retired people in the area when compared to thecounty.

4 Together PartnershipAAPCounty DurhamNorth East

240

260

280

300

320

340

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015


County Durham

North East

England & Wales




People and PlaceLocal DiversityEthnicity

Table 4: Change in the proportion of the ethnic population between 2001 and 2011

Area White Mixed AsianBlack

African/Caribbean

% change -0.7 0.3 0.3 0.02011 count 17,471 86 76 22% change -0.8 0.3 0.4 0.1

2011 count 503,769 3,094 4,856 701

North East -2.3 0.4 1.3 0.4England & Wales -5.3 0.9 2.7 1.1

Area Other Non White% change 0.1 0.7

2011 count 17 201% change 0.0 0.8

2011 count 822 9,473North East 0.3 2.3England & Wales 0.6 5.3Source: 2011 Census (from NOMIS)


County Durham


County Durham

The proportion of the ethnic population in the 4 Together Partnership AAPincreased by 0.7% points between 2001 and 2011. However numbers are stillrelatively low with 201 people living in the area from a non-white ethnicbackground.

Figure 4: Change in the proportion (point change) of the ethnic population between 2001 and2011

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6


County Durham England & Wales North East

Cha

nge

in p

ropo

rtio

n20

01 to

201

1

WhiteMixedAsianBlack African/CaribbeanOtherTotal Non White

Area




People and PlaceLocal Diversity - continuedReligion

Area Has religion Christian Buddhist Hindu

% change -13.7 -14.1 0.1 0.12011 count 13,059 12,920 28 14

% change -7.8 -8.3 0.1 0.02011 count 375,599 369,715 1,001 607

North East -8.8 -10.1 0.1 0.1England & Wales -4.2 -7.3 0.2 0.5

Area Jewish Muslim Sikh No religion

% change 0.0 0.1 0.1 10.7

2011 count 2 31 19 3,563

% change 0.0 0.2 0.0 11.92011 count 208 1,934 609 107,281

North East 0.1 0.8 0.0 12.8England & Wales 0.0 2.1 0.2 11.4Source: 2011 Census (from NOMIS)

County Durham



County Durham

The proportion of the population with a religion in the 4 Together Partnership AAPdecreased by 13.7% points between 2001 and 2011 while the proportion with aChristian religion decreased by 14.1% points. The proportion with a non-Christianreligion increased by 0.7% points between 2001 and 2011.

Table 5: Change in proportion of religion between 2001 and 2011 (resident population;'Religion not stated' and 'Other religion' category not shown)

Figure 5: change in the proportion (point change) of religion (people) between 2001 and 2011

-20-15-10

-505

1015


County Durham England & Wales North EastCha

nge

in p

ropo

rtio

n20

01 to

201

1

Has ReligionChristianBuddhistHinduJewishMuslimSikhOther religion

Area




People and PlaceOccupied Households

Table 6a: Change in households between 2001 and 2011

Area AllHousheolds

OccupiedHouseholds

AllHousheolds

OccupiedHouseholds

8,617 8,134 8,627 8,142

216,449 207,436 233,537 223,8031,111,393 1,066,292 1,179,194 1,129,935

22,387,923 21,660,475 24,429,618 23,366,044

Area AllHousheolds

ProportionOccupied1

0.1 0.02

7.9 0.006.1 0.129.1 1.15

Source: 2011 Census (from NOMIS)1. Percentage change in proportion between 2001 and 2011.

2001

In 2011 there were 8,142 occupied household spaces in the 4 TogetherPartnership AAP representing 94.4% of all household spaces in the area. Thiswas an increase of 0.1% in the number of occupied spaces between 2001 and2011.

4 Together PartnershipAAPCounty DurhamNorth EastEngland & Wales


2011

England & Wales

% change




People and PlaceOccupied Households - continuedTable 6b: Proportion of households by household type in 2011

Area Total (1)

Of which:All aged 65+(% of Total

(1))

Total (2)


(2))

Of which:Lone parent(% of Total

(2))

35.0 41.9 61.4 14.5 18.1

County Durham 31.3 43.6 63.8 13.6 17.6North East 31.9 42.3 62.4 13.1 19.0England & Wales 30.2 41.1 61.8 13.2 17.2

Area Total (3)

Of which:Full time

students (%of Total (3))


(3))

3.6 1.0 5.1

4.9 13.7 5.45.7 12.5 4.57.9 7.2 3.6

Source: 2011 Census (from NOMIS)England & Wales

Other households

Proportion by household type (%)



One person households One family household


Contents Page2426

262627293032343638

404042

QualificationsIn the 16+ population - 2011 Census



Wealthier

Qualifications (2011 Census)Students in Higher Education Institutions (Higher EducationStatistics Agency)Business Enterprises (Uk Business Counts - NOMIS)Retail Unit Occupancy Rates (DCC)Average House Prices (ONS Experimental House Price Index)Fuel Poverty (Department for Energy and Climate Change)Housing Benefit (Department for Works and Pensions)Worklessness (Department for Works and Pensions)Claimant Count - Working Age (ONS/Job Centre Plus)Claimant Count - Young People (ONS/Job Centre Plus)Job Seekers Allowance - Long Term Claimants (ONS/Job CentrePlus)

Place of Employment (2011 Census)Average Weekly Income (ONS Small area estimates 2011/12)

14.7% of the 16+ population in the 4 Together Partnership AAP had Level 4 or abovequalifications in 2011, lower than the 21.5% across the county. (North East: 22.2%,England & Wales: 27.2%)

4.9% of the 16+ population in the 4 Together Partnership AAP were educated toapprenticeship level, higher than the 4.2% across the county. (North East: 4.7%,England & Wales: 3.6%)

Jobs - Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES)

32.8% of the 16+ population in the 4 Together Partnership AAP had no qualifications,higher than the 27.5% across the county. (North East: 26.5%, England & Wales:22.7%)




WealthierQualificationsIn the 16+ population - 2011 CensusFigure 1: Percentage of the 16+ population by level of qualification in 2011

NotesSource: ONS 2011 Census (NOMIS extract) These Groups include:No Qualifications: No academic or professional qualifications.Level 1 qualifications: 1-4 O Levels/CSE/GCSEs (any grades), Entry Level, Foundation Diploma,NVQ level 1, Foundation GNVQ, Basic/Essential Skills.

Level 2 qualifications: 5+ O Level (Passes)/CSEs (Grade 1)/GCSEs (Grades A*-C), SchoolCertificate, 1 A Level/ 2-3 AS Levels/VCEs, Intermediate/Higher Diploma, Welsh BaccalaureateIntermediate Diploma, NVQ level 2, Intermediate GNVQ, City and Guilds Craft, BTEC First/GeneralDiploma, RSA Diploma Apprenticeship.

Level 3 qualifications: 2+ A Levels/VCEs, 4+ AS Levels, Higher School Certificate,Progression/Advanced Diploma, Welsh Baccalaureate Advanced Diploma, NVQ Level 3; AdvancedGNVQ, City and Guilds Advanced Craft, ONC, OND, BTEC National, RSA Advanced Diploma.

Level 4+ qualifications: Degree (for example BA, BSc), Higher Degree (for example MA, PhD,PGCE), NVQ Level 4-5, HNC, HND, RSA Higher Diploma, BTEC Higher level, Foundation degree(NI), Professional qualifications (for example teaching, nursing, accountancy).Other qualifications: Vocational/Work-related Qualifications, Foreign Qualifications (Not stated/level unknown).

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

Non

e

Leve

l 1

Leve

l 2

Appr

entic

eshi

p

Leve

l 3

Leve

l 4

Oth

er


County Durham

North East

England & Wales




WealthierStudents in Higher Education Institutions

Business EnterprisesChange between 2014 and 2016

Note

Table 1: Change in business units between 2014 and 2016

Area 2014 2015 2016 % changeRate (per

10,000population)

695 760 795 14.4 449.8

11,810 13,040 13,370 13.2 257.359,340 65,735 67,800 14.3 258.3

2,040,235 2,214,095 2,313,510 13.4 399.7

Source: NOMIS; Uk Business Counts

Retail Unit Occupancy RatesChange between 2012 and 2013

County DurhamNorth EastEngland & Wales

Percentage of the resident 18+ population taking first year places on degree courses2013/2014 (at UK and overseas universities and higher education establishments)

Around 2.1% (303 people) of the 18+ population in the 4 Together Partnership AAPenrolled for the first time on degree courses at university in 2013/2014. This was anincrease of 0.7% from the previous year and represented 3.5% of the total number ofpeople in the county taking up university places in 2012/2013.

In County Durham 1.8% of the 18+ population enrolled for the first time on degreecourses at university, while across the North East 2% of the 18+ population wereenrolled on degree courses with the national figure being 2.4%.


The number of business enterprises in the 4 Together Partnership AAP increased by14.4% between 2014 and 2016. These enterprises represented 5.9% of all businessenterprises in the county, equal to a rate of 449.8 units per 10,000 population.

Figures for this indicator are only available for major centres.

An enterprise can be thought of as the overall business, made up of all the individualsites or workplaces. It is defined as the smallest combination of legal units (generallybased on VAT and/or PAYE records) that has a certain degree of autonomy within anenterprise group.




WealthierAverage house pricesChange between 2008 and 2014

Figure 2: House prices since 2008

The average house price in the 4 Together Partnership AAP in 2014 was £117,300, anincrease of 8% since 2008. Prices in this area are 7.2% below the county average.

Source: County and sub-geographies: Land Registry 'Price Paid' dataset. North East and E&W:ONS Experimental House Price Index.

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 20144 Together

Partnership AAP £108,600 £107,800 £111,900 £114,000 £109,400 £118,000 £117,300

County Durham £125,600 £123,900 £127,700 £121,500 £121,100 £121,700 £126,400North East £158,500 £156,800 £161,500 £153,300 £152,500 £154,400 £161,600England & Wales £233,800 £230,300 £256,900 £251,200 £251,900 £257,100 £273,900

£50,000

£100,000

£150,000

£200,000

£250,000

£300,000




WealthierFuel Poverty (Households)Percentage of households in fuel poverty in 201210% Rule

Percentage of households in fuel poverty in 2014LIHC Rule

·

·

Table 2a: Fuel poverty (10% rule) 2008 to 2012: percentage of total households

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

24.2 27.0 24.9 21.1 18.7

22.3 25.0 21.9 19.5 17.921.2 24.1 21.2 19.0 17.815.6 18.4 16.4 14.6 13.9

Source: Department of Energy and Climate Change

10% rule

4 Together PartnershipAAPCounty DurhamNorth EastEngland

Area

A household is said to be fuel poor if it needs to spend more than 10 per cent of itsincome on fuel to maintain an adequate standard of warmth. This is usually defined as21 degrees for the main living room and 18 degrees for other occupied rooms. Data isavailable up to 2012.

18.7% of households in the 4 Together Partnership AAP were estimated to be in fuelpoverty in 2012. This was higher than the average across the county (17.9%) and a22.9% fall since 2008.

New definition from 2011: Under the Low Income High Costs definition, a household isconsidered to be fuel poor if:

13% of households in the 4 Together Partnership AAP were estimated to be in fuelpoverty in 2014. This was higher than the average across the county (12.2%) and a6.9% fall since 2011.

they have required fuel costs that are above average (the nationalmedian level) and,were they to spend that amount, they would be left with a residualincome below the official poverty line.




WealthierFuel Poverty (Households) - continuedPercentage of households in fuel poverty in 2014

2011 2013 2014% change

2008 - 201210% rule

% change2011 - 2014LIHC rule

14.0 12.3 13.0 -22.9 -6.9

13.0 11.5 12.2 -19.4 -6.4

12.4 11.8 12.2 -15.8 -1.110.9 10.4 10.6 -10.6 -3.2

Source: Department of Energy and Climate Change

Housing Benefit ClaimsChange in claims between December 2012 and November 2016

Table 3a: Total housing benefit claims November 2016

Claims

% change inclaims since

December2012

% of allDwellings

(2011)

2,268 -5.4 26.3

47,061 -4.9 20.2252,766 -6.6 21.5

4,143,533 -9.1 17.0


County DurhamNorth EastEngland

Area

% change

Source: Department for Works and Pensions: StatsXplore database derived from the Single HousingBenefit Extract (SHBE) compiled from local authority returns. Census 2011 Household data.

Area

LIHC rule


There were 2,268 housing benefit claims in November 2016 in the 4 TogetherPartnership AAP representing an estimated 26.3% of all occupied households in thearea and a fall of 5.4% in claims since December 2012.

Within this group the number of claims in social housing fell by 7% to 1,405 claims,while private rented household claims fell by 2.8% to 863 claims.

Figures across the county show that there was a fall in total claims of 4.9% withsocially rented claims falling by 6.7% and private rented claims falling by -0.9% overthe same period.

Table 2b: Fuel poverty (LIHC rule) 2011 to 2014: percentage of total households and % changefor both rules




WealthierHousing Benefit Claims - continuedChange in claims between December 2012 and November 2016

Table 3b: Social and private rented housing benefit claims November 2016

Claims


December2012

% of socialdwellings

(2011)

% of allDwellings

(2011)

1,405 -7.0 67.8 16.3

31,472 -6.7 69.9 13.5178,263 -7.1 68.7 15.1

2,824,987 -5.9 68.6 11.6

Claims


December2012

% of privatedwellings

(2011)

% of allDwellings

(2011)

863 -2.8 73.7 10.0

15,589 -0.9 55.4 6.774,503 -5.5 48.2 6.3

1,318,546 -15.3 33.8 5.4

Social HB Claims (November 2016)

Area


Source: Department for Works and Pensions: StatsXplore database derived from the Single HousingBenefit Extract (SHBE) compiled from local authority returns. Census 2011 Household data.

Area


Private HB Claims (November 2016)




WealthierOut of Work Benefits (Worklessness)

Note:

Area16 to 64

Population1

November2013 (base

year)August 2014 August 2015 August 2016

10,920 18.4 17.1 16.6 15.2

(2,015) (1,875) (1,805) (1,650)327,617 13.9 13.0 12.5 11.6

1,660,407 14.2 13.3 12.7 11.836,588,665 10.4 9.8 9.1 8.5

1

2

34

Out of Work Benefit Claimants (16 to 64 age group)Rate2

(count)

Percentage of the working age population (16 to 64) claiming key out of work benefitsbetween November 2013 and August 2016

Worklessness figures are represented by the Department for Works (DWP) andPensions statistical group ‘out of work benefits’ which includes people claiming JSA,Incapacity Benefit, Employment & Support Allowance (ESA) and ‘other’ income relatedbenefit claimants; lone parents are also included in this group.

In August 2016 15.2% (1,650 people) of the working age population (aged 16 to 64) inthe 4 Together Partnership AAP were claiming key out of work benefits, compared to11.6% in the county, 11.8% in the region and 8.5% nationally.

This is a fall of 18.1% in the number of claimants since November 2013 compared tofalls of 16.9% in the county, 17.3% in the region and 18.4% nationally.

Table 4: Change in the rate of out of work benefit claimants for the 16 to 64 age group sinceNovember 2013


CountCounty DurhamNorth East

Additionally, to reflect the introduction of Universal Credit (UC) in the county, estimatesof UC claimants have been added to the DWP figures.

England & Wales

Latest ONS Population Estimates for the 16 to 64 age group. Figures vary year onyear.ONS Claimant Count, 16 to 64 age group, expressed as a % of the resident 16 to 64population.Average of rate between November 2013 and August 2016.% change in the claimants between November 2013 and August 2016.

Source: Department for Works and Pensions; NOMIS Office for National Statistics Experimental Claimant Count; NOMIS




WealthierOut of Work Benefits (Worklessness) - continued

Area16 to 64

Population1

10,920 16.8 -

- -18.1327,617 12.8 -16.9

1,660,407 13.1 -17.336,588,665 9.5 -18.4

1

2

34

Figure 3: Change in the rate out of work benefit claimants since November 2013

Source: Department for Works and Pensions; NOMISLatest ONS Population Estimates for the 16 to 64 age group. Figures vary year onyear.ONS Claimant Count, 16 to 64 age group, expressed as a % of the resident 16 to 64population.Average of rate between November 2013 and August 2016.% change in the claimants between November 2013 and August 2016.


CountCounty DurhamNorth EastEngland & Wales

3 YearAverage of

Rate3

% Change4

in claimants

Table 4 (continued): Change in the rate of out of work benefit claimants for the 16 to 64 agegroup since November 2013

02468

101214161820

Nov

embe

r 201

3

Febr

uary

201

4

May

201

4

Augu

st 2

014

Nov

embe

r 201

4

Febr

uary

201

5

May

201

5

Augu

st 2

015

Nov

embe

r 201

5

Febr

uary

201

6

May

201

6

Augu

st 2

016


County Durham

North East

England & Wales




Wealthier

Working Age (aged 16 to 64)

Note:

Area16 to 64

Population1April 2014(base year) March 2015 March 2016 March 2017

10,920 4.8 3.2 3.3 3.4

530 345 355 375

327,617 3.3 2.3 2.4 2.51,660,407 4.1 3.0 3.1 3.236,588,665 2.7 2.0 1.9 1.9

1

2

34

Source: Department for Works and Pensions; NOMIS

Claimant Count (Experimental statistics: Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) + UniversalCredit claimants (UC))

Percentage of the working age population (16 to 64) claiming JSA or UC between April 2014and March 2017

The roll out of Universal Credit (UC) has led ONS/DWP to change their headlineClaimant Count measure. Previously the Claimant Count reflected solely the numberof people claiming JSA. It now includes a count of those people claiming UC and canbe used as a proxy to measure unemployment at a sub-county level. Figures for theelectoral divisions are not currently available.

In March 2017 3.4% (375 people) of the working age population (aged 16 to 64) in the4 Together Partnership AAP were claiming JSA or UC, compared to 2.5% in thecounty, 3.2% in the region and 1.9% nationally.

This is a fall of 29.2% since April 2014 compared to falls of 24.6% in the county,20.7% in the region and 28.4% nationally.

Table 5: Change in the ONS Claimant Count rate: percentage of the 16 to 64 agegroup since April 2014


Count


(count)Claimant Count (16 to 64 age group) - %2

Latest ONS Population Estimates for the 16 to 64 age group. Figures vary year onyear.ONS experimental Claimant Count, 16 to 64 age group, expressed as a % of theresident 16 to 64 population.Average of rate between April 2014 and March 2017.% change in the claimants between April 2014 and March 2017.




Wealthier

Working Age (aged 16 to 64)

Area16 to 64

Population1

10,920 3.4 -

- -29.2

327,617 2.4 -24.61,660,407 3.1 -20.736,588,665 2.0 -28.4

1

2

34

Figure 4: Change in working age ONS Claimant Count rate since April 2014

Source: Department for Works and Pensions; NOMISLatest ONS Population Estimates for the 16 to 64 age group. Figures vary year onyear.ONS experimental Claimant Count, 16 to 64 age group, expressed as a % of theresident 16 to 64 population.Average of rate between April 2014 and March 2017.% change in the claimants between April 2014 and March 2017.

3 YearAverage of

Rate3

% Change4

in claimants


Count


Claimant Count (Experimental statistics: Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) + UniversalCredit claimants (UC)) - continued

Table 5 (continued): Change in the ONS Claimant Count rate: percentage of the16 to 64 age group since April 2014

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

April

-201

4

Sept

embe

r-201

4

Febr

uary

-201

5

July

-201

5

Dec

embe

r-201

5

May

-201

6

Oct

ober

-201

6

Mar

ch-2

017

4 TogetherPartnership AAPNorth East

County Durham

England & Wales




Wealthier

Young People (aged 16 to 24)

Note:

AreaUnder 24


1,918 8.4 5.4 5.4 6.3

150 95 95 110

61,425 5.1 3.5 3.2 3.4318,692 5.7 4.0 3.7 3.9

6,537,491 3.6 2.6 2.3 2.3

1

2

34

Source: Department for Works and Pensions; NOMISLatest ONS Population Estimates for the 16 to 24 age group. Figures vary year onyear.ONS experimental Claimant Count, 16 to 24 age group, expressed as a % of theresident 18 to 24 population.Average of rate between January 1900 and January 1900.% change in the claimants between January 1900 and January 1900.

Claimant count (aged 24 and under) - %2

(count)

Claimant Count (Experimental statistics: Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) + UniversalCredit claimants (UC)) continued

Percentage of young people (aged 24 and under) claiming JSA or UC between April 2014 andMarch 2017

The roll out of UC has led ONS/DWP to change their headline Claimant Countmeasure. Previously the Claimant Count reflected solely the number of peopleclaiming JSA. It now includes a count of those people claiming UC and can be used asa proxy to measure unemployment at a sub-county level. Figures for the electoraldivisions are not currently available.

In March 2017 6.3% (110 people) of young people (aged 24 and under) in the 4Together Partnership AAP were claiming JSA, compared to 3.4% in the county, 3.9%in the region and 2.3% nationally.This is a fall of 26.7% since April 2014 compared to falls of 33.9% in the county,32.7% in the region and 38.6% nationally.

Table 6: Change in the ONS Claimant Count rate: percentage of the 24 and under age groupsince April 2014


Count





Wealthier

Young People (aged 16 to 24)

AreaUnder 24

Population1

1,918 5.7 -

- -26.7County Durham 61,425 3.5 -33.9North East 318,692 4.0 -32.7England & Wales 6,537,491 2.4 -38.6

1

2

34

Figure 5: Change in the young person ONS Claimant Count rate since April 2014


Percentage of young people (aged 24 and under) claiming JSA or UC between April 2014 andMarch 2017

% Change4

in claimants

Latest ONS Population Estimates for the 16 to 24 age group. Figures vary year onyear.ONS experimental Claimant Count, 16 to 24 age group, expressed as a % of theresident 18 to 24 population.Average of rate between April 2014 and March 2017.% change in the claimants between April 2014 and March 2017.

Claimant Count (Experimental statistics: Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) + UniversalCredit claimants (UC)) continued

Table 6 (continued): Change in the ONS Claimant Count rate: percentage of the 24 and underage group since April 2014


Count

3 YearAverage of

Rate3

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

April

-201

4

Sept

embe

r-20

14

Febr

uary

-201

5

July

-201

5

Dec

embe

r-20

15

May

-201

6

Oct

ober

-201

6

Mar

ch-2

017


County Durham

North East

England & Wales




Wealthier

Note:

Area16 to 64


10,920 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.5

(180) (100) (75) (60)County Durham 327,617 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.5North East 1,660,407 1.4 0.9 0.7 0.7England & Wales 36,588,665 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.4

1

2

34

Source: Job Centre Plus; NOMIS

(count)

Job Seekers Allowance: Long Term Claimants (12 months or more): Working Age(aged 16 to 64)

Percentage of the working age population (16 to 64) claiming JSA for 12 months or more,between April 2014 and March 2017

UC was rolled out across the county in September 2015 for single people with nodependents. As this rollout is continuing no long term data is available yet. Thesefigures are based upon the number of people claiming JSA for 12 months or longer.

In March 2017 0.5% (60 people) of the working age population (aged 16 to 64) in the 4Together Partnership AAP had been cliaming JSA for 12 months or more, comparedto 0.5% in the county, 0.7% in the region and 0.4% nationally.

This is a fall of 66.7% in the area compared to a decrease of 55.6% in the county,48.6% decrease in the region and 53.6% decrease nationally.

Table 7: Change in long term JSA claimants: percentage of the 16 to 64 agegroup since April 2014


Count

Long Term JSA Claimants (16 to 64 age group) - %2

Latest ONS Population Estimates for the 16 to 64 age group. Figures vary year onyear.JSA claimant count, 16 to 64 age group, expressed as a % of the resident 16 to 64population.Average of rate between April 2014 and March 2017.% change in the claimants between April 2014 and March 2017.




Wealthier

Area16 to 64

Population1

10,920 0.9-

- -66.7County Durham 327,617 0.6 -55.6North East 1,660,407 0.8 -48.6England & Wales 36,588,665 0.5 -53.6

1

2

34

Source: Job Centre Plus; NOMIS


Count

3 YearAverage of

Rate3

% Change4

in claimants

Job Seekers Allowance: Long Term Claimants (12 months or more): Working Age(aged 16 to 64)Percentage of the working age population (16 to 64) claiming JSA for 12 months or more,between April 2014 and March 2017

Table 7 (continued): Change in long term JSA claimants: percentage of the 16 to64 age group since April 2014

Figure 6: Change in the Long Term JSA claimant rate since April 2014

Latest ONS Population Estimates for the 16 to 64 age group. Figures vary year onyear.JSA claimant count, 16 to 64 age group, expressed as a % of the resident 16 to 64population.Average of rate between April 2014 and March 2017.% change in the claimants between April 2014 and March 2017.

0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.8

April

-201

4

Sept

embe

r-201

4

Febr

uary

-201

5

July

-201

5

Dec

embe

r-201

5

May

-201

6

Oct

ober

-201

6

Mar

ch-2

017


County Durham

North East

England & Wales




WealthierJobs - Business Register and Employment Survey (BRES)Estimates of jobs in the area in 2015Note

··

Further information:

Place of Employment (2011 Census)Percentage of the resident 16+ population in employmentNote:

Private sector: 69.1% were full-time and 30.9% were part-time,

Public sector: 46.3% were full-time and 53.7% were part-time.

As this is a sample survey the figures quoted below may not add up to area/countytotals and percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding issues and samplingerrors.There were an estimated 3,450 jobs in the 4 Together Partnership AAP in 2015. Ofwhich 65% were full-time jobs and 35% were part-time jobs. (County Durham full-timejobs = 68.1%, part-time jobs = 31.9%).Of these 3,450 jobs an estimated 82.2% were in the private sector and 17.8% werepublic sector jobs. Within these sectors:

These figures are base upon the best fit of middle super output areas (MSOAs)covering the area. Therefore the figures quoted here may include other settlementsoutside of the area as MSOA boundaries may extend beyond the boundary of the areaselected, for example AAPs.

In the 2011 Census 9,781 residents in the 4 Together Partnership AAP andsurrounding area were recorded as employed with 14.8% employed (working) in thearea. A further 53.7% worked elsewhere in the county. 27.8% worked elsewhere in theNorth East and 3.6% worked in other parts of England and Wales).

In 2011 a further 1,582 people travelled from other areas to work in the 4 TogetherPartnership AAP and surrounding area, (from other parts of the NE and E&W).

In 2011 there were 8,803 jobs (filled) in the 4 Together Partnership AAP of which1,452 were filled by residents of the area, representing 16.5% of the total filled jobs inthe 4 Together Partnership AAP.

https://www.ons.gov.uk

The following estimates are from the Business Register and Employment Survey(BRES) 2015. The BRES is a sample survey of approximately 82,000 Great Britaintrading businesses registered for VAT and/or PAYE, (Northern Ireland data is receiveddirect from Northern Ireland Department of Enterprise, trade and Investment (DETINI)which we use to create UK estimates).

Across the county there were 192,187 people in employment in 2011; 127,585residents worked in the county with 64,602 working elsewhere. A further 35,081 peopletravelled into County Durham to work in 2011 from the rest of the NE and E&W. Thisgives an estimated jobs total for the county of 162,666.




Wealthier

Place of Employment (2011 Census)Percentage of the resident 16+ population in employmentTable 8a: Where people from the 4 Together Partnership AAP worked in 2011

People % ofworkers

1,452 14.85,251 53.72,724 27.8354 3.6

9,781 100.0Source: 2011 Census (from NOMIS)

Percentage of the resident 16+ population in employment - 2011 Census

Table 8b: Where people who worked in the 4 Together Partnership AAP lived in 2011

Jobs % of jobs

1,452 16.5

5,769 65.51,582 18.0

1,430 16.2152 1.7

8,803 100.0Source: 2011 Census (from NOMIS)


Where they workedWhere they lived4 Together PartnershipAAP

Outside County DurhamOf which:

Rest of the North East

Rest of County Durham

Where they worked

4 Together Partnership AAPCounty DurhamRest of the North East

Rest of England & WalesTotal Jobs (filled) in the area


Where they lived

Total Workers living in the areaRest of England & Wales




WealthierAverage Weekly Income and Median House Prices

Note:

· Total household weekly income.· Net household weekly income.· Net household weekly income before housing costs.· Net household weekly income after housing costs.· Net weekly income (£) Housing Affordability.· Median house price.· House price to income ratio.

For further information on this dataset and explanations on the above indicators:http://www.ons.goc.uk/ons/rel/ness/small-area-model-based-income-estimates/2011-12/index.html

These data contain statistics of model-based small area income estimates for2011/12, following the previous estimates of income for 2007/8. The small areaincome estimates are available for middle layer super output Areas (MSOAs) inEngland and Wales.

Estimates by geography are produced using a 'best fit' approach with the MSOAboundaries. In the case of the AAPs some MSOAs may cover more than one AAPand therefore be included in those areas estimates.

Estimates of average income are produced for 2011/12 and 2007/08, on MSOAs forthe following four income types:

Estimated average weekly income and median house prices for small areas: 2007_08 and2011_12




WealthierAverage Weekly Income and Median House Prices- continued

·

·

·

·

Net weekly income also increased over this period by 0.97% (by £4.18 to £436.68).This suggests that while total weekly income has increased the cost of living in thearea has either remained the same or fallen over this period.

The summary data in the table below also shows/suggests that in the 4 TogetherPartnership AAP area:

In 2011_12 the average total weekly household income in the 4 Together PartnershipAAP was £560.80, 4.34% (£23.30) higher than the average of £537.50 in 2007_08.

The 4 Together Partnership AAP is ranked 11th out of the 14Area_Action_Partnerships areas in the county in terms of total weekly income, (1=highest, 14=lowest).

estimated average weekly income is lower than the county average of£589.07 while the average house prices in the area were lower at£98,475.00 compare to the county average of £102,498.75,the 4 Together Partnership AAP was ranked 8th out of the 14Area_Action_Partnerships in the county in terms of average house pricein 2014, (1= highest, 14=lowest).

estimated average weekly housing costs were lower, costing £44.88 perweek compared to £48.97 on average across the county,

it is estimated that it is less affordable for a resident to purchase ahouse in their area than it is across the county on average and the areais ranked 9th out of the 14 Area_Action_Partnerships areas in thecounty, (1= least affordable, 14=most affordable).





WealthierAverage Weekly Income and Median House Prices- continued - continued

Area Total weeklyincome (£)

Net weeklyincome (£)

Differencein NET

income andNet income

afterhousing

costs (£)1

Medianhouse price,

2014 (£)

House priceto income

ratio (lower= more

affordable)

£561 £437 £45 £98,500 226

County Durham £589 £456 £49 £102,500 225North East £560 £439 £53 £118,000 269England & Wales £705 £532 £81 £181,300 341

Area

% ChangeTotal weekly

income2007/08 to

2011/12

% ChangeNet weekly

income2007/08 to

2011/12

% ChangeNet income

beforehousing

costs2007/08 to

2011/12

4.34 0.97 10.24

County Durham 6.28 1.00 11.26North East 5.73 2.07 10.44England & Wales 11.91 4.37 10.22Source: ONS Small Area Model-Based Income Estimates

1

Table 9: Small area (MSOA) weekly income and housing estimates for 2011/12

Net household weekly income after housing costs (equivalised) is composed of thesame elements of net household weekly income but is subject to the followingdeductions prior to the OECD’s equivalisation scale being applied:

• rent (gross of housing benefit);• water rates, community water charges and council water charges;• mortgage interest payments (net of any tax relief);• structural insurance premiums (for owner occupiers); and• ground rent and service charges.





Contents PageKey Stage 2 Attainment (Department for Education) 45Key Stage 4 Attainment (Department for Education) 47Child Poverty (HM Revenue & Customs) 48

Note

Key Stage 2 AttainmentNote

The figures quoted below for pupil attainment are estimates based upon the academicachievement of pupils who live in the area. Therefore these figures will differ fromthose normally quoted which are for academic achievement by pupils attendingschools in the county. Please note that some pupils attend schools outside their areaof residence and even schools outside of the county, in a few cases. Similarly somepupils attending schools in the county do not reside in the county. North East andEngland figures refer to ALL state funded schools.

The measure of KS2 attainment was altered during the academic year 2012/13 bymeasuring reading, writing and grammar as separate elements of English, which wasthe composite measure used prior to this year. Therefore only data from 2012/13 to2014/15 are included in this report.

In 2014/15 80.4% of KS2 pupils living in the 4 Together Partnership AAP achievedlevel 4 or above in Reading, Writing and Maths. This is lower than the 81.7% recordedacross County Durham and higher than the 77.8% recorded in 2012/13 in the area.(2014/15 North East= 82%, England= 81%)

In 2014/15 91% of KS2 pupils living in the 4 Together Partnership AAP achieved level4 or above in Reading.This is higher than the 90.6% recorded across County Durhamand higher than the 85.2% recorded in 2012/13 in the area. (2014/15 North East=90%, England= 91%)

Main points:



In 2014/15 84.7% of KS2 pupils living in the 4 Together Partnership AAP achievedlevel 4 or above in Writing.This is lower than the 86.8% recorded across CountyDurham and lower than the 87.5% recorded in 2012/13 in the area. (2014/15 NorthEast= 88%, England= 94%)

In 2014/15 85.2% of KS2 pupils living in the 4 Together Partnership AAP achievedlevel 4 or above in Maths.This is lower than the 89.4% recorded across CountyDurham and lower than the 89.2% recorded in 2012/13 in the area. (2014/15 NorthEast= 89%, England= 90%)

Children and Young People




Children and Young PeopleKey Stage 2 Attainment - continued

Source: Department for Education

Figure 1b: Percentage of KS2 pupils achieving level 4 or above in: Reading

Figure 1a: Percentage of KS2 pupils achieving level 4 or above in: Reading, Writing andMaths

Figure 1d: Percentage of KS2 pupils achieving level 4 or above in: Maths

Figure 1c: % KS2 pupils achieving level 4 or above in: Writing

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

4 Together Partnership AAP County Durham North East England

2012/132014/15

40

50

60

70

80

90

100


2012/132014/15

40

50

60

70

80

90

100


2012/132014/15

405060708090

100


County Durham North East England

2012/132014/15




Children and Young PeopleKey Stage 4 Attainment

Source: Department for Education

In 2014/15 58.3% of KS4 pupils living in the 4 Together Partnership AAP achieved 5 ormore grade A-C GCSE's (including English and Maths). This is higher than the 55.3%recorded across County Durham and higher than the 57.7% recorded in 2013/14 in thearea. (2014/15 North East= 53.8%, England= 57.1%).

Figure 2a: Percentage of KS4 pupils achieving 5 or more A-C GCSE's

Figure 2b: Percentage of KS4 pupils achieving 5 or more A-C GCSE's - including English andMaths

In 2014/15 70% of KS4 pupils living in the 4 Together Partnership AAP achieved 5 ormore grade A-C GCSE's. This is higher than the 65.3% recorded across CountyDurham and higher than the 64.3% recorded in 2013/14 in the area. (2014/15 NorthEast= 64.9%, England= 66.5%).

50

55

60

65

70

75

2013/14 2014/15


County Durham

North East

England

35

40

45

50

55

60

2013/14 2014/15


County Durham

North East

England




Children and Young PeopleChild Poverty - 2009 to 2014

Note

Figure 3a: Change in the percentage of the number of children aged 0-4 in families in poverty2009 to 2014

(Children in families receiving Working Tax Credits and Child Tax Credits, and income <60%median income)

This indicator provides data on the number/percentage of children living in familieseither in receipt of out-of-work benefits or in receipt of tax credits with a reportedincome which is less than 60 per cent of national median income. NB. Until 2013 thisindicator was known as Child Poverty (NI 116).This measure provides a broad proxy for The Households Below Average Income(HBAI) measure of national child poverty for small areas down to the LSOA level. TheHBAI measure is currently only available for local authorities and above.The base population (denominator) for this percentage is the number of children livingin families claiming child benefit.

Children age 0 to 4An estimated 370 children aged between 0 and 4 in families were in poverty in the 4Together Partnership AAP in 2014 representing 38.1% of young children in familiesclaiming child benefit in the area. This is higher than the 27.1% recorded acrossCounty Durham in 2014 and higher than the 35.9% recorded in 2009 in the area.(2014 North East= 27.7%, England= 20.9%)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


County Durham

North East

England




Children and Young PeopleChild Poverty - 2009 to 2014

Source: HM Revenue & Customs

An estimated 915 children aged under 16 in families were in poverty in the 4 TogetherPartnership AAP in 2014 representing 30.1% of children in families claiming childbenefit in the area. This is higher than the 23.9% recorded across County Durham in2014 and higher than the 29.8% recorded in 2009 in the area. (2014 North East=24.9%, England= 20.3%)

Figure 3a: Change in the percentage of the number of children aged under 16 in families inpoverty 2009 to 2014

(Children in families receiving Working Tax Credits and Child Tax Credits, and income <60%median income)Children age under 16

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014


County Durham

North East

England


Contents PageLimiting Long Term Illness or Disability (2011 Census) 50General Health (2011 Census) 51Provision of Unpaid Care (2011 Census) 52

53

Personal Independence Payments (PIPs) (DWP) 55Premature Mortality (Primary Care Mortality Database) 56

Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability (LLTI) - 2011 CensusLLTI in the resident population

Area

TotalPopulation

(2011Census)

Day-to-dayactivities

limited (%)

Day-to-dayactivities

not limited(%)

26.9 73.1

Count 17,672 (4,762) (12,910)

County Durham 513,242 23.6 76.4North East 2,596,886 21.6 78.4England & Wales 56,075,912 17.9 82.1Source: ONS 2011 Census (NOMIS extract)



Healthier

Disability Living Allowance (Department for Works and Pensions(DWP))

In the 2011 Census 4,762 people recorded themselves as having a LLTI that limitedday to day activities in the 4 Together Partnership AAP representing 26.9% of theresident population in the area. This was higher than the 23.6% recorded acrossCounty Durham.

Within this group 2,367 people of working age (aged 16 to 64) recorded themselves ashaving a LLTI that limited day to day activities in the 4 Together Partnership AAPrepresenting 21.1% of the resident working age population in the area. This washigher than the 17.8% recorded across County Durham.

Table 1a: Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability (LLTI) - percentage of the residentpopulation in 2011 (Census)


Total




Healthier

Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability (LLTI) - 2011 Census

LLTI in the resident population

Area

16 to 64Population

(2011Census)

Day to dayactivities

limited (%)

Day to dayactivities

not limited(%)

21.1 78.9

Count 11,231 (2,367) (8,864)County Durham 332,913 17.8 82.2North East 1,684,964 16.2 83.8England & Wales 36,273,707 13.0 87.0Source: ONS 2011 Census (NOMIS extract)

General Health - 2011 CensusGeneral Health in the resident population

·

·Table 2: General Health - percentage of the resident population in 2011 (Census)

Area

TotalPopulation

(2011Census)

% in 'Good'Health

% in 'Fair'Health

% in 'Poor'Health

71.7 18.5 9.7

Count 17,672 (12,678) (3,275) (1,719)County Durham 513,242 75.8 16.1 8.2North East 2,596,886 77.3 15.2 7.4England & Wales 56,075,912 81.2 13.2 5.6Source: ONS 2011 Census (NOMIS extract)

71.7% of the resident population (12,678 people) reported they were in 'good health' inthe 4 Together Partnership AAP in the 2011 Census. This is lower than the 75.8%recorded across County Durham.

18.5% of the resident population (3,275 people) reported they were in'fair health' in the 4 Together Partnership AAP. (County Durham =16.1%).9.7% of the resident population (1,719 people) reported they were in'poor health' in the 4 Together Partnership AAP. (County Durham =8.2%).



Table 1b: Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability (LLTI) - percentage of the working age (16to 64) population in 2011 (Census)




Healthier

Provision of Unpaid Care - 2011 CensusProvision of Unpaid Care in the resident population

Table 3a: Unpaid Care Provision - percentage of the resident population in 2011 (Census)

Area None Providescare

1 to 19hours

20 to 49hours

50 hours ormore

88.1 11.9 6.4 1.9 3.6Count 15,571 2,101 1,133 338 630

County Durham 88.3 11.7 6.7 1.7 3.3Count 453,187 60,055 34,336 8,826 16,893

North East 89.0 11.0 6.4 1.6 3.0Count 2,310,535 286,351 165,828 41,778 78,745

England & Wales 89.7 10.3 6.5 1.4 2.4Count (000s) 50,275.7 5,800.2 3,665.1 775.2 1,360.0

Source: ONS 2011 Census (NOMIS extract)

Provision of Unpaid Care by young people (aged 15 and under)

Area None Providescare

1 to 19hours

20 to 49hours

50 hours ormore

98.8 1.2 1.1 0.0 0.1Count 2,970 36 33 0 3

County Durham 98.8 1.2 0.9 0.1 0.1Count 86,930 1,054 835 119 100

North East 98.9 1.1 0.9 0.1 0.1Count 457,283 5,154 4,055 565 534

England & Wales 98.9 1.1 0.9 0.1 0.1Count (000s) 10,460.2 119.0 96.1 12.0 10.9

Source: ONS 2011 Census (NOMIS extract)

11.9% of the resident population (2,101 people) were providing some level of unpaidcare in the 4 Together Partnership AAP (from the 2011 Census). This is higher thanthe 11.7% recorded across County Durham.

Level of provision (hours per week) - %

Level of provision (hours per week) - %


1.2% of the resident population (36 people) were providing some level of unpaid carein the 4 Together Partnership AAP (from the 2011 Census). This is lower than the1.2% recorded across County Durham.

Table 3b: Unpaid Care Provision by young people - percentage of the 0-15 population in 2011(Census)





Healthier

Disability Living Allowance (DLA) - November 2013 to August 2016Disability Living Allowance ClaimantsNote:

AreaTotal

Population1

November2013 (base

year)August 2014 August 2015 August 2016

9.3 9.2 8.3 7.5

Count 17,547 (1,640) (1,610) (1,460) (1,310)County Durham 517,773 7.9 7.7 7.2 6.4North East 2,618,710 6.9 6.8 6.5 5.8England & Wales 57,408,654 5.2 5.1 4.8 4.2

1234 % change in the claimants between November 2013 and August 2016.

Source: Department for Works and Pensions; NOMISLatest ONS Population Estimates. Figures vary year on year.DLA Claimant Count, expressed as a % of the resident population.Average of rate between November 2013 and August 2016.


(count)DLA Claimants Rate2

Disability Living Allowance (DLA) is a tax-free benefit for disabled children and adultsto help with extra costs they may have because they are disabled. It is not based ontheir disability but the needs arising from it. Data given here is for all age groups.

From April 2013 the government started a pilot in selected areas of the north-west andnorth-east to replace DLA with the new Personal Independence Payments (PIPs) forpeople aged 16 to 64 with full roll-out planned across great Britain from October 2015.

Further details on PIPs are given below.

In August 2016 7.5% (1,310 people) in the 4 Together Partnership AAP were claimingdisability living allowance, compared to 6.4% in the county, 5.8% in the region and4.2% nationally.This is a fall of 20.1% in the number of claimants since November 2013 compared tofalls of 18.6% in the county, 16.5% in the region and of 18% nationally.

Table 4: Change in DLA Claimants since November 2013




Healthier

Disability Living Allowance (DLA) - November 2013 to August 2016 - continuedDisability Living Allowance Claimants

Area

8.6

Count -20.1County Durham 7.3 -18.6North East 6.5 -16.5England & Wales 4.8 -18.0

1234

Figure 1: Change in DLA claimants since November 2013

Table 4 (continued): Change in DLA Claimants since November 2013

Latest ONS Population Estimates. Figures vary year on year.DLA Claimant Count, expressed as a % of the resident population.


3 YearAverage of

Rate3

% Change4

in claimants


Average of rate between November 2013 and August 2016.% change in the claimants between November 2013 and August 2016.

0123456789

10

Nov

embe

r20

13

Febr

uary

2014

May

201

4

Augu

st20

14

Nov

embe

r20

14

Febr

uary

2015

May

201

5

Augu

st20

15

Nov

embe

r20

15

Febr

uary

-20

16

May

-201

6

Augu

st-

2016

% o

f the

resi

dent

pop

ulat

ion 4 Together

PartnershipAAP

County Durham

North East

England &Wales




Healthier

Personal Independence Payments (PIPs) - April 2013 to January 2017Personal Independence Payment Claimants aged 16 to 64 - County Durham OnlyNote:

Main points:

Figure 2: Change in PIP claimants since April 2013 and January 2017

Personal Independence Payment (abbreviated PIP) is a welfare benefit in the UnitedKingdom which is available to help with costs caused by a health condition or disability.It is non-means-tested, non-contributory, and can be paid whether the recipient isemployed or not. PIP is based upon the effects of a condition on a person rather thanthe condition itself.

PIP was introduced in 2013 by the Welfare Reform Act 2012 and replaces theDisability Living Allowance (DLA) from 8 April 2013 for people aged 16 to 64 and isbeing phased in over the following few years. PIP is to replace Disability LivingAllowance gradually, with initial pilots in selected areas of north-west and north-eastEngland which began in April 2013. A full roll-out across Great Britain was planned forOctober 2015 but this roll out has been delayed, and ministers announced that the rollout would happen 'more gradually' than originally planned.

Data is currently only available at the local authority area level and above.

Since it's introduction in April 2013 the number of working age people claiming PIPs inCounty Durham has increased to 14,457 representing 4.4% of the 16 to 64 population,(January 2017).Within this age group 72.9% of claimants (10,536 people) were aged 40 to 64.

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.0

Apr-1

3

Jul-1

3

Oct

-13

Jan-

14

Apr-1

4

Jul-1

4

Oct

-14

Jan-

15

Apr-1

5

Jul-1

5

Oct

-15

Jan-

16

Apr-1

6

Jul-1

6

Oct

-16

Jan-

17

% o

f 16

to 6

4 po

pula

tion

40 to 64

Total

16 to 39




Healthier

Premature Mortality (only available for the geographies below)Definition:

All Causes

Lower Limit Upper LimitCounty Durham 397.1 386.6 407.5

380.1 365.1 395.2341.4 312.4 370.4417.2 391.8 442.6367.6 343.3 391.9411.8 397.3 426.2368.3 345.1 391.6455.7 429.2 482.2413.2 387.8 438.6

366.4 343.8 389.0455.7 429.2 482.2391.0 370.8 411.2416.3 396.3 436.3295.3 262.6 328.0

Source: Primary Care Mortality Database - Based on MSOA level data

Note: Values of 0.0 indicate that figures for this indicator at this geography are not available.1

South Durham PGThe Dales PG

North Durham PG

Clinical CommissioningGroup/Locality

Central Durham PGEast Durham PG

Table 5 continued on the next page

DASRs are calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the actual local populationin a particular age group multiplied by the standard population for that particular agegroup and summing across the relevant age groups. The rate is usually expressed per100,000.

DASR1Confidence Interval

Partnership Area

Deaths occurring before the age of 75. It is measured, for this indicator, by using theEuropean Age-Standardised mortality rate for people aged under 75.The European Age-Standardised mortality rate is a weighted sum of age-specificmortality rates and is used here to indicate the overall mortality rate. It follows astandard methodology, which was updated in 2013, allowing for comparisons betweencountries and over time.

Chester-le-Street CCLDerwentside CCL

Durham CCL

Area

North Durham CCG

DDES CCGDurham Dales CCLEast Durham CCL

Sedgefield CCL

Table 5: Premature All-Cause mortality Directly Age Standardised Rates (DASRs) per 100,000,with 95% confidence intervals 2011-13 pooled (under 75s)

Premature Mortality - please select cause: All Causes




Healthier

Premature Mortality (only available for the geographies below) - continued

Lower Limit Upper LimitCounty Durham 397.1 386.6 407.5

436.1 386.2 485.9455.2 396.6 513.8

445.7 406.8 484.5

341.4 312.4 370.4

423.3 386.5 460.2339.6 310.6 368.5397.7 372.8 422.7593.2 536.5 649.9

410.7 363.8 457.6

385.4 345.4 425.4356.5 308.1 404.8444.4 400.1 488.7291.6 254.0 329.2306.6 241.8 371.3

Source: Primary Care Mortality Database - Based on MSOA level dataNote: Values of 0.0 indicate that figures for this indicator at this geography are not available.

Table 5 (continued): Premature All-Cause mortality Directly Age Standardised Rates (DASRs)per 100,000, with 95% confidence intervals 2011-13 pooled (under 75s)

Area Action Partnerships

Great Aycliffe & MiddridgeAAPMid Durham AAPSpennymoor AAPStanley AAPTeesdale AAP

Chester-le-Street & DistrictAAPDerwent Valley AAPDurham AAPEast Durham AAPEast Durham Rural AAP

Weardale AAP

1. DASRs are calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the actual local population in aparticular age group multiplied by the standard population for that particular age group and summingacross the relevant age groups. The rate is usually expressed per 100,000.

DASR1Confidence Interval

3 Towns Partnership AAP4 Together Partnership AAPBishop Auckland andShildon AAP

Area




Healthier

Premature Mortality (only available for the geographies below)

Figure 4: Clinical Commissioning Localities - Premature All-Cause mortality Directly AgeStandardised Rates (DASRs) per 100,000, with 95% confidence intervals 2011-13 pooled(under 75s)

Figure 3: Area Action Partnerships - Premature All-Cause mortality Directly Age StandardisedRates (DASRs) per 100,000, with 95% confidence intervals 2011-13 pooled (under 75s)

0100200300400500600700

Cou

nty

Dur

ham

3 To

wns

Partn

ersh

ip A

AP

4 To

geth

erPa

rtner

ship

AAP

Bish

op A

uckl

and

and

Shild

on A

AP

Che

ster

-le-S

treet

& D

istri

ct A

AP

Der

wen

t Val

ley

AAP

Dur

ham

AAP

East

Dur

ham

AAP

East

Dur

ham

Rur

al A

AP

Gre

at A

yclif

fe &

Mid

drid

ge A

AP

Mid

Dur

ham

AAP

Spen

nym

oor A

AP

Stan

ley

AAP

Tees

dale

AAP

Wea

rdal

e AA

P

DAS

R

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Cou

nty

Dur

ham

Che

ster

-le-S

treet

CC

L

Der

wen

tsid

eC

CL

Dur

ham

CC

L

Dur

ham

Dal

esC

CL

East

Dur

ham

CC

L

Sedg

efie

ld C

CL

DAS

R




Healthier

Premature Mortality (only available for the geographies below) - continued

Figure 5: Partnership Areas - Premature All-Cause mortality Directly Age Standardised Rates(DASRs) per 100,000, with 95% confidence intervals 2011-13 pooled (under 75s)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Cou

nty

Dur

ham

Cen

tral

Dur

ham

PG

East

Dur

ham

PG Nor

thD

urha

m P

G

Sout

hD

urha

m P

G

The

Dal

esPG

DAS

R


Contents Page60

Road Traffic Accidents (Durham County Council) 62

Note

Recorded (mapped) crimes in 2015/16



Safer

Recorded Crime and ASB Incidents (police.uk website)

Recorded Crime and Anti Social Behaviour Incidents (estimates) - 2013/14 to2015/16

The figures reported here for the area and county are estimates from recordedmapped (geo-coded) crimes/ASB incidents in County Durham downloaded from thepolice.uk website. This does not represent all reported incidents in the county as asmall percentage do not contain sufficient geographical information for them to beassigned to the geographies used in this profile.

Additionally figures for County Durham refer to the local authority area and not theCounty Durham Police Authority area which includes Darlington. Therefore ratesgiven in this document should not be compared with nationally published policeauthority, regional and national datasets.

The estimated overall rate of recorded offences (Crime and ASB, geo-coded incidentsonly) in the 4 Together Partnership AAP was 352.2 incidents per 1,000 people in2015/16, which was higher than the rate of 109.1 in the area in 2013/14. (CountyDurham rates were 90.4 in 2013/14 and 89.7 in 2015/16 respectively).

The estimated overall rate of recorded crime incidents (geo-coded incidents only) inthe 4 Together Partnership AAP was 198.5 incidents per 1,000 people in 2015/16,which was higher than the rate of 50.2 in the area in 2013/14. (County Durham rateswere 44.3 in 2013/14 and 51 in 2015/16 respectively).

The estimated overall rate of recorded ASB offences (geo-coded incidents only) in the4 Together Partnership AAP was 153.7 incidents per 1,000 people in 2015/16, whichwas higher than the 58.9 recorded offences in the area in 2013/14. (County Durhamrates were 46.1 in 2013/14 and 38.6 in 2015/16 respectively).




Safer

Recorded (mapped) incidents in 2015/16 - continuedTable 1a: Total Recorded Incidents - rate per 1000 population

2013/14 2014/15 2015/16

109.1 333.4 352.2

90.4 89.2 89.7

1Table 1b: Total Recorded Crimes - rate per 1000 population

2013/14 2014/15 2015/16

50.2 166.5 198.5

44.3 45.2 51.0

Source: police.uk website: https://data.police.uk/data/1

Anti Social Behaviour (ASB) Incidents (mapped) crimes in 2015/16

Table 2: ASB - rate per 1000 population

2013/14 2014/15 2015/16

58.9 167.0 153.7

46.1 44.0 38.6Source: police.uk website: https://data.police.uk/data/

1

Area1

4 Together PartnershipAAPCounty Durham

The estimated overall rate of recorded ASB offences (geo-coded incidents only) in the4 Together Partnership AAP was 153.7 incidents per 1,000 people in 2015/16, whichwas higher than the 58.9 recorded offences in the area in 2013/14. (County Durhamrates were 46.1 in 2013/14 and 38.6 in 2015/16 respectively).

Figures for the area and county are estimated from geo-coded offences only.

Area1


County Durham

Total Recorded Incidents

Recorded Crime Incidents

Total ASB Incidents



Area1





Safer

Recorded (mapped) Crime and ASB incidents 2013/14 to 2015/16 - continuedFigure 1: Change in crime and ASB rates: 2013/14 and 2015/16

Road Traffic Accidents between 2008 and 2013Note:

Main points:

Table 3: Road Traffic Accidents: 2008 to 2014

CountRate (per1000 road

miles)1Injuries % of total

RTAs% of totalinjuries

248 2.9 326 94.0 87.4

7,225 2.3 10,234 95.2 88.5Source: Durham County Council; OS OSCAR road coverage

1 Estimated from the OS OSCAR road coverage network.


These figures represent the total number of Road traffic Accidents (RTAs) recorded inCounty Durham between 2008 and 2013. Incidents have been aggregated up to theLSOA geography and estimates then calculated for the various geographical areas inthe county (see introductory notes on page 1).

The road mileages used in this dataset were estimated from the Ordinance SurveyOSCAR road coverage which covers all types of roads in the county from motorway tounclassified.

There were an estimated 248 RTAs in the 4 Together Partnership AAP between 2008and 2013, equivalent to 2.9 RTAs per 1000 road miles in the area and resulting in 326injuries over this five year period.The majority were classed as 'slight' (94%) and represented 87.4% of all injuries overthe five year period.

RTAs: 'Slight'Total RTAs

Area

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16

Recorded Crime ASB

4 Together Partnership AAP County Durham


Contents PageAverage Domestic Energy Consumption (Dept. ECC) 63Car Ownership (2011 Census) 64Estimated Annual Vehicle Miles (DfT) 65

Mega-watt hours (mWh) per annum

Table 2: Average domestic energy consumption per dwelling in 2015

Area

Total - Gasand

Electricity(mWh)

% changesince 2008

15.2 -3.6

16.0 -4.615.8 -5.515.3 -7.5

AreaTotal -

Electricity(mWh)

% changesince 2008

Total - Gas(mWh)

% changesince 2008

3.1 -1.7 12.1 -4.1

3.4 -1.1 12.7 -5.53.4 -1.6 12.4 -6.54.0 -1.8 11.4 -9.3

Source: Department of Energy & Climate Change



Greener

Average Domestic Energy Consumption - change between 2008 and 2015

On average, each dwelling in the 4 Together Partnership AAP consumed 15.2 mWh ofdomestic energy (gas and electricity) in 2015, 3.6% lower than 2012 consumption.This is lower than the average consumption across the county of 16 mWh per annumin 2015. (North East 15.8 mWh, England & Wales 15.3 mWh per annum).

Average domestic energyconsumption in 2015

County DurhamNorth EastEngland & Wales (000s)

4 Together PartnershipAAPCounty DurhamNorth EastEngland & Wales (000s)





GreenerCar OwnershipPercentage of households with access to 1 or more cars - 2011 Census

Area Householdswith cars

Access to 1car

Access to 2cars

Access to 3cars

Access to 4or more cars

68.5 43.3 19.7 4.1 1.4Count (2011) (5,578) (3,527) (1,607) (331) (113)

72.8 42.9 23.6 4.8 1.568.5 42.2 21.1 4.1 1.274.4 42.2 24.7 5.5 1.9

Area Householdswith no cars

Totalnumber ofcars in the

area31.5

Count (2011) (2,564) 8,253

27.2 248,58631.5 1,150,13325.6 27,294,656

Source: ONS 2011 Census




The number of households with access to at least 1 car increased by 7.4% between2001 and 2011 to 5,578 households in the 4 Together Partnership AAP, compared toincreases across County Durham, North East and England & Wales of 14.5%, 13.3%and 9.6% respectively.

Table 3: Households with access to 1 or more cars - percentage of occupied households -2011 (Census)

The total number of cars in the 4 Together Partnership AAP increased by 0.16% to8,253 cars in 2011.





GreenerTraffic Counts - estimated annual vehicle miles travelled

Note

Main points:

Table 4: Estimated annual vehicle miles - percentage change since 2014

Area % changefrom 2008

MilesTravelled

(000's)

% changefrom 2008

MilesTravelled

(000's)

% changefrom 2008

MilesTravelled

(000's)

4 TogetherPartnershipAAP

-6.3 142838.0 -7.5 106270.0 -16.1 13445.0

CountyDurham

0.8 1,704,778 0.8 1,320,920 -12.1 112,801

Source: Department for Transport - traffic countsLink (County Durham): http://www.dft.gov.uk/traffic-

counts/area.php?region=North+East&la=Durham

Estimated annual miles traveled by vehicles - percentage change between 2008 and 2014

All Traffic All Cars All HGVs

These annual mileage figures are estimates calculated from data collected from 128traffic counts taken across the county on principal 'A' roads including trunk roads andmotorway locations during 2014. Miles shown are per thousand vehicle miles.Therefore a mileage of 1,000,000 would be shown as 1,000k.

The estimated total number of vehicle miles travelled in the 4 Together PartnershipAAP in 2014 fell by 6.3% to 142,838k miles.The estimated total number of car/taxi miles travelled in the 4 Together PartnershipAAP in 2014 fell by 7.5% to 106,270k miles.The estimated total number of HGV miles travelled in the 4 Together Partnership AAPin 2014 fell by 16.1% to 13,445k miles.


Altogetherbetter

DurhamArea Action Partnership

t: 03000 268 032e: [email protected] www.countydurhampartnership.co.uk/article/8461/Intergrated-Needs-Assessment

Http://www.countydurhampartnership.co.uk/article/8461/Integrated-Needs-Assessment

mailto:[email protected]

2017 statistical profile - durham insight · 2014/15 2014/15 2014 2015 2011 2013/14 2015/2016 2013...

Documents