2016.12.20 - acea answers to additional emis questions (14.07) · 4 • the clean air act obliges...

4
1 NEW EMIS QUESTIONS Q1. In their EMIS hearing, VW declared that, from next year onwards, they would only bring new gasoline engines to market that are equipped with a particulate filter. In light of the upcoming discussions on the 3rd RDE package in the TCMV that will define the procedure dealing with a Conformity Factor for Particle Number (PN) and since the technology is available to meet real-world PN emissions below a Conformity Factor of 1.0 (see AECC position on third real-driving emissions (RDE) Regulatory Package), including in direct injection gasoline engines, and since VW declared it would equip all its new cars with this technology (the ceramic particulate filter), would ACEA endorse the use of this technology amongst all its members and agree with the fact that, this time (in the 3rd RDE package), no conformity factor is needed to deviate from the emission standards? A1. ACEA will not comment on the accuracy of reporting of what VW may or may not have said to EMIS, which is made less clear by how the question mixes up ‘new gasoline engines’ and ‘new cars’, or whether VW’s “decision” will be matched by other OEM’s. However, ACEA would like to explain some issues that will impact how each OEM would address the measurement of PN on an RDE test. The third RDE package will include the measurement of particle emissions over an RDE test for gasoline direct injection engines (GDI) and this new test will drive the use of gasoline particle filters (GPF). New instruments are becoming available for such measurements. The GPF can be applied in two ways (a) as a separate device(s) installed in the exhaust line(s) close to the engine (together with the associated control modules and functional sensors) or (b) integrated together with the catalytic function that presently reduces emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) that is commonly known as a 3-way catalyst into a new 4-way catalyst device. A 4-way catalyst will also require the associated control module and functional sensors and may be situated a little further from the engine. Space to accommodate either the GPF or 4-way catalyst in a GDI vehicle is required. A traditional diesel particle filter (DPF) is very efficient and it accumulates soot from the engine in a soot cake that builds on the filter substrate and acts as a magnet to catch other soot particles, at least until the filter is clogged and exhaust gas flow, engine performance, fuel economy/CO2 emissions are compromised and the filter must be regenerated. A gasoline direct injection engine emits much less total particle mass than a diesel engine so the rate of particle build-up on the filter substrate (enhancing the trapping efficiency) is much less. Accordingly, the characteristics of the GPF substrate must be different to a DPF and it must itself trap particles instead of waiting to accumulate particles to help perform the trapping function. The trapping efficiency of the GPF substrate will also dictate its impact on fuel economy/CO2 emissions, which should not be ignored. RDE package 3 also addresses cold engine start emissions and particle emissions during the cold engine start-warm-up phase will also play a role in deciding the characteristics of a GPF. Until the RDE package 3 is agreed and published in the Official Journal, ACEA cannot comment on the type and characteristics of GPF’s that manufacturers will employ on new GDI models. However, what we can say is the figures provided by the Commission to the member states behind the closed door of the TCMV regarding the cost of a GPF and the work still needed in order to employ them on new vehicles are disappointingly underestimated. It appears technically feasible for a GPF to enable compliance with the PN limit of 6 × 10 11 particles per km over the new WLTP laboratory test and over an RDE test à this means a conformity factor of 1.0. However, the inclusion of cold engine start in RDE package 3 requires further R&D to A 013390 21.12.2016

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2016.12.20 - ACEA answers to additional EMIS questions (14.07) · 4 • The Clean Air Act obliges the EPA to provide industry with adequate lead-time to comply, depending on the circumstances

1

NEWEMISQUESTIONS

Q1.IntheirEMIShearing,VWdeclaredthat,fromnextyearonwards,theywouldonlybringnewgasolineenginestomarketthatareequippedwithaparticulatefilter.Inlightoftheupcomingdiscussionsonthe3rdRDEpackageintheTCMVthatwilldefinetheproceduredealingwithaConformityFactorforParticleNumber(PN)andsincethetechnologyisavailabletomeetreal-worldPNemissionsbelowaConformityFactorof1.0(seeAECCpositiononthirdreal-drivingemissions(RDE)RegulatoryPackage),includingindirectinjectiongasolineengines,andsinceVWdeclareditwouldequipallitsnewcarswiththistechnology(theceramicparticulatefilter),wouldACEAendorsetheuseofthistechnologyamongstallitsmembersandagreewiththefactthat,thistime(inthe3rdRDEpackage),noconformityfactorisneededtodeviatefromtheemissionstandards?

A1.ACEAwillnotcommentontheaccuracyofreportingofwhatVWmayormaynothavesaidtoEMIS,whichismadelessclearbyhowthequestionmixesup‘newgasolineengines’and‘newcars’,orwhetherVW’s“decision”willbematchedbyotherOEM’s.However,ACEAwouldliketoexplainsomeissuesthatwillimpacthoweachOEMwouldaddressthemeasurementofPNonanRDEtest.

ThethirdRDEpackagewillincludethemeasurementofparticleemissionsoveranRDEtestforgasolinedirectinjectionengines(GDI)andthisnewtestwilldrivetheuseofgasolineparticlefilters(GPF).Newinstrumentsarebecomingavailableforsuchmeasurements.TheGPFcanbeappliedintwoways(a)asaseparatedevice(s)installedintheexhaustline(s)closetotheengine(togetherwiththeassociatedcontrolmodulesandfunctionalsensors)or(b)integratedtogetherwiththecatalyticfunctionthatpresentlyreducesemissionsofcarbonmonoxide(CO),hydrocarbons(HC)andoxidesofnitrogen(NOx)thatiscommonlyknownasa3-waycatalystintoanew4-waycatalystdevice.A4-waycatalystwillalsorequiretheassociatedcontrolmoduleandfunctionalsensorsandmaybesituatedalittlefurtherfromtheengine.SpacetoaccommodateeithertheGPFor4-waycatalystinaGDIvehicleisrequired.

Atraditionaldieselparticlefilter(DPF)isveryefficientanditaccumulatessootfromtheengineinasootcakethatbuildsonthefiltersubstrateandactsasamagnettocatchothersootparticles,atleastuntilthefilteriscloggedandexhaustgasflow,engineperformance,fueleconomy/CO2emissionsarecompromisedandthefiltermustberegenerated.Agasolinedirectinjectionengineemitsmuchlesstotalparticlemassthanadieselenginesotherateofparticlebuild-uponthefiltersubstrate(enhancingthetrappingefficiency)ismuchless.Accordingly,thecharacteristicsoftheGPFsubstratemustbedifferenttoaDPFanditmustitselftrapparticlesinsteadofwaitingtoaccumulateparticlestohelpperformthetrappingfunction.ThetrappingefficiencyoftheGPFsubstratewillalsodictateitsimpactonfueleconomy/CO2emissions,whichshouldnotbeignored.

RDEpackage3alsoaddressescoldenginestartemissionsandparticleemissionsduringthecoldenginestart-warm-upphasewillalsoplayaroleindecidingthecharacteristicsofaGPF.

UntiltheRDEpackage3isagreedandpublishedintheOfficialJournal,ACEAcannotcommentonthetypeandcharacteristicsofGPF’sthatmanufacturerswillemployonnewGDImodels.However,whatwecansayisthefiguresprovidedbytheCommissiontothememberstatesbehindthecloseddooroftheTCMVregardingthecostofaGPFandtheworkstillneededinordertoemploythemonnewvehiclesaredisappointinglyunderestimated.

ItappearstechnicallyfeasibleforaGPFtoenablecompliancewiththePNlimitof6×1011particlesperkmoverthenewWLTPlaboratorytestandoveranRDEtestàthismeansaconformityfactorof1.0.However,theinclusionofcoldenginestartinRDEpackage3requiresfurtherR&Dto

A 013390 21.12.2016

Page 2: 2016.12.20 - ACEA answers to additional EMIS questions (14.07) · 4 • The Clean Air Act obliges the EPA to provide industry with adequate lead-time to comply, depending on the circumstances

2

confirmtheGPFtechnologyiseffectiveoverboththecompleteRDEtripandtheurbanpartforallplannedGDImodels.Untilthen,wecannotconfirmthataconformityfactorof1.0isfeasibleforallplannednewGDImodels.

Amajorconcernistheaccuracyofthenewportableparticleinstruments–hereindustryfundamentallydisagreeswiththeshort-cutanalysisoftheCommissionthatassumesanerrormarginofonly0.5wouldbealsosuitableforPNasforthemoredevelopedNOxinstruments.ThePNinstrumentsrequirefurtherreviewtoconfirmtheirabilitytoperformaccurateandrepeatablemeasurementsduringon-roadRDEtestingacrosssummerandwinterseasons.ThetechnicaldetailsofRDEpackage3givefartoomuchflexibilitytouselooselypreparedPNinstrumentsforRDEtestingandthatposesunfairriskstomanufacturers.

LikeVW,someothermanufacturershaveannouncedplanstointroduceGPF’sonnewGDImodelsbutthatwilltaketime.TheRDEpackage3isverylate.TheCommissionmayhavesetthePNlimitforGDIinRegulation459/2012andincludedanambiguouslywordedfootnoteindicatinganRDEtestforPNwouldbeapplicable2017/2018.However,itisnownearly4½yearssinceRegulation459/2012waspublishedandaPNRDEtestisstillnotready.Onthisbasis,itisentirelyjustifiedforindustrytorequestadequatelead-timefromwhenthenewPNRDElegislationisfinished(nowlikelytobepublishedintheOfficialJournalaroundApril/May2017)towhenallnewGDIvehiclesshouldcomply.TheGPFtechnologyisfeasiblebutimplementingthenewPNRDEtestfromSeptember2017isahugechallenge.

Inaddition,ACEAhasconcernsabouttheuseofmarketgasolineforconductingPNRDEtests.Availabledata(andnewdataisbeingcollected)showsthateventhoughmarketgasolinemaycomplywiththeFuelQualityDirectiveandthestandardEN228,thechoicearefinertakesonthegasolineblendcomponents(particularlythedistillationcharacteristics)willhaveanegativeeffectonparticleemissions.ACEAcallsontheCommissiontoaccountformarketgasolinevariabilityinRDEpackage3or4andspecificallyaddressthisinthenextrevisionoftheFuelQualityDirective.Itisonlyright,sincein-useemissionsarenowthefocus,thattheengine,theexhaustaftertreatmentsystemandthefuelqualityworkinharmonytoreducein-useemissions.

Q2.Duringthesamehearing,VWalsodeclaredthat,inthefuture,itwouldonlyallowemissiontestingtobedonebyindependentpartnersandnotin-housebytheOEM.DoesACEAagreewithVWthatfortypeapprovalandconformityofproductiontesting,noinhouseemissionstestingshouldbeallowedandthat,asageneralrule,thistestingshouldbedonebyindependenttechnicalservices(typeA)?

A2.ThereportingofwhatVWsaidinEMISaboutindependentverificationshouldbere-checkedinrelationtotheframingofthisquestion.

Type-approval,conformityofproductionandin-usecompliancetestingrequiresaccesstohighlyaccurateandwell-calibratedtestingfacilitiesthathavebeencertifiedbyanindependentthirdparty.InordertobringvehiclestothemarketwithoutdelaysandaccordingtoanOEM’snewmodelrelease,absoluteandtimelyaccesstosuchfacilitiesisrequired.

ItisabsolutelynecessaryforallOEMstohavetheirourownin-housetestingfacilitiesandequipmentwhichisaccreditedbyathirdpartyforitsmeasurementreliabilityandaccuracy.Itisacceptedpracticethatanyin-housetestingperformedbyOEMsisdoneunderthefullsurveillanceandobservationbyindependentandcertifiedthirdparties.

Themassiveincreaseintype-approvaltestingdemandedbyRDEandWLTPandinaveryshortperiodoftimemeansthatputtingalltestingouttoindependentpartnersisnotpossible,evenifthoseindependentpartnersallhadaccesstothesamefacilitiesandequipmentastheOEM’shave

Page 3: 2016.12.20 - ACEA answers to additional EMIS questions (14.07) · 4 • The Clean Air Act obliges the EPA to provide industry with adequate lead-time to comply, depending on the circumstances

3

hadtoinvestinandcontinuallyimproveovermanyyears.

Q3.Carmanufacturershaveclaimedthatthereisnotasufficientlywater-tightdefinitionofnormaluseofvehiclesintheEU'semissionsregulations.However,sincethe2ndRDEpackage,"realconditionsofuse"havebeenclearlydefined,makingclearhowOEMsandnationaltypeapprovalauthoritiesshouldinterpretart.5(1)of715/2007.AreACEAanditsmembersableandwillingtorecalltheEuro5and6carsalreadyontheroadinordertorecalibratethemtomeettheEuroemissionlimitsontheroad?AndaretheyableandwillingtorecallandreprogramvehiclesoncetheEuropeanCommissionandnationalType-ApprovalAuthoritieshavecomeforwardwithguidelinestointerprettheexemptionsonthebanondefeatdevicesinArticle5(2)ofthe715/2007Regulation?

A3.ACEAwillnotanswerontheabilitytoandthejustificationtorecallandrectifyvehiclesontheroad.Allvehiclesontheroadhavebeentype-approvedandhavebeenproducedincompliancewithEurostandardsinplaceatthetimeoftype-approval.

NewrequirementssuchasWLTPandRDEenterintoforcealreadyfromSeptember2017andasecondRDEstepwillapplysoonafterfromJanuary2020.RDEpackage3nowseekstoaddmorenewrequirementswithinsufficientlead-timebeingproposed.Industryistotallyfocussedonwhatitmustdonext.

Theprincipleofanticipatedorretro-activeimplementationoffutureregulationsismorethanquestionableinlaw.

Q4.RegardingdiscrepanciesbetweenrealemissionsandthemandatorylimitsinEuro5andEuro6:forhowlonghasACEAdiscussedtheissuewithEuropeanauthorities?Couldyoudisclosethefulllistofmeeting(who,when...)withtheCommissiononthesubject?

A4.ThediscrepancyonlycameintothelightinSeptember2015.ACEAneverhadreasontodiscuss‘discrepancies’withtheCommissionsincethediscrepancieswerenotobservedorcommunicatedtoACEAbytheCommissionoranymemberstate.Consequentlytherewerenomeetingsonthisissue.OthermeetingsbetweenACEAandtheCommissionareaddressedintheregisterofmeetings.

Q5.HowhavethepracticesoftheCommission,includingthecurrent"betterregulation"driveandthenewproposalsfor"cooperatoryregulation"inEUtradedeals,shapedthewaysinwhichACEAdiscussesandinfluencesEUindustryregulation,includingemissionstandards?

A5.Therehasbeennoimpactatall.ThebetterregulationdrivehasgeneratedmanywordsbutsofarnoactionbytheCommissiontotakeintoaccounttheprinciplesofbetterregulationontherecentandcomingemissionstandardsaddressingWLTPandRDE.

Forexample,wehaveanRDEpackage3thatissupposedtobeagreedinlateDecember.ItwilllikelybepublishedaroundApril/May2017andtheCommissionproposesitmustapplyfromSeptember2017àthatis4to5monthslead-timetoaddressverycomplexnewrequirementsthatrequirevehiclere-designandnewhardwareimplementations.

Let’scomparethattotheUnitedStates,longseenastheguidinglightofemissionstandards.EPArulemakingfollowsawell-definedprotocolandprinciplesoflegislation-makingtheEUcouldtakenoteof:

Page 4: 2016.12.20 - ACEA answers to additional EMIS questions (14.07) · 4 • The Clean Air Act obliges the EPA to provide industry with adequate lead-time to comply, depending on the circumstances

4

• TheCleanAirActobligestheEPAtoprovideindustrywithadequatelead-timetocomply,dependingonthecircumstancesofthelegislation.

• TheCleanAirActspecificallylaysdownthefollowingprinciplesforstandardsaffectingheavy-dutyvehicles:

o Newstandardsmustgiveindustry4modelyearsoflead-time.

o Newstandardsmustgiveindustry3modelyearsofregulatorystability.

• EPAregulationsdonotapplytoallvehiclesfromacertaindate.Regulationsarephased-inoverafewyearsthatallowsindustrytoaddresscertainnewmodelsfirstandbuildupto100%vehiclecompliance.