2016 - juvenile court judges' commission · 2019-05-17 · 2016 pennsylvania juvenile court...

PennsylvaniaJUVENILE COURT DISPOSITIONS

20162016

2016PENNSYLVANIA

Juvenile Court Dispositions

Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaHon. Tom Wolf, Governor

Juvenile Court Judges’ CommissionChairman

Hon. Kim Berkeley Clark Allegheny County

Vice-ChairmanHon. Carol L. Van Horn

Franklin/Fulton Counties

Secretary Hon. David R. Workman

Lancaster County

Hon. J. Brian JohnsonLehigh County

Hon. Stephen P. B. MinorPotter County

Hon. Margaret T. MurphyPhiladelphia County

Hon. Nathaniel C. NicholsDelaware County

Hon. Walter J. Olszewski

Philadelphia County

Hon. Maureen A. Skerda Warren/Forest Counties

Richard D. SteeleExecutive Director

Members

2016PENNSYLVANIA

Juvenile Court Dispositions

JUVENILE COURT JUDGES’ COMMISSIONRichard D. Steele, Executive DirectorRobert J. Tomassini, Deputy Director

Rebecca AndersonHeather Armstrong-Shugart

Susan BlackburnSeth Bloomquist

Julie ByersSharon Chamberlin

Susan ConnerRobert DiehlRandy Fisher

Chris HeberligLanette Hutchison

Monica Iskric

Linda MillerBarbara Mull

Christy NailorDonna ReasnerJames Stewart

Michael TanTyler TomlinsonSherry VarnerSteve Varner

Jarrett VoightNancy WitterTim Wright

Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission Center for Juvenile Justice Training & Research 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 9100 Shippensburg University P.O. Box 62425 1871 Old Main Drive Harrisburg, PA 17106-2425 Shippensburg, PA 17257-2299

www.jcjc.pa.gov

Susan BarketBarbara BarnesJustine Fowler

Keith GraybillLeo J. Lutz

CENTER FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE TRAINING AND RESEARCHKelly Waltman-Spreha, Director

Appendices

2016 Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Dispositions Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission ƒ Center for Juvenile Justice Training and Research

Foreword

This report provides an overview of juvenile court dispositions in Pennsylvania during 2016 and preceding years, and summarizes juvenile court statistical data provided by county juvenile probation departments. Without the support of the courts and juvenile probation departments, this report would not be possible.

Although the report focuses primarily on delinquency dispositions, information has again been included on depen-dency cases that have been referred to juvenile probation departments. While county children and youth agencies handle the overwhelming majority of cases involving dependent children in the Commonwealth, some juvenile pro-bation departments provide services to children who are alleged to be dependent on the basis of ungovernability or chronic truancy.

The information contained in this report is of value to all individuals, agencies, and organizations having an interest in Pennsylvania’s juvenile justice system. However, it is not intended to reflect the total workload of juvenile courts or juvenile probation departments.

It is with great pleasure that we dedicate this report to the judges, probation officers, victim advocates, district attor-neys, defenders, service treatment providers, and other professionals who work on a daily basis in the Pennsylvania juvenile court system.

Respectfully submitted,

Richard D. Steele Honorable Kim Berkeley ClarkExecutive Director Chairman

The format and presentation of the data in this report are intended to help summarize various trends in juvenile courts within the Commonwealth. In addition to the graphs and charts, narrative is included that is intended to help readers more quickly recognize various statewide trends, as well as highlight information not reflected in the visual displays.

Please note that some 2015 data have been updated since the initial release of the 2015 Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Disposition Report. Those updates are reflected in the current relevant charts and graphs, as well as in the narrative on year-to-year comparisons.

The data within this report are generally organized in a manner that reflect the chronological processing of juvenile court delinquency cases, with the exception of pages 3-5 (Delinquency Dispositions through Frequencies of Statewide Delinquency Dispositions).

Within this report, some of the data are organized and presented in graphs by County Class to help readers make comparisons across counties of similar size and demographic composition.

While some county-specific data are presented within the body of the report, all of the raw data for each of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties remain available for viewing. For each section within the report, please reference the appendices to review county-specific data on that topic.

Appendices


Table of Contents

Terms ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1Highlights ................................................................................................................................................................ 2

Delinquency DispositionsDelinquency Dispositions (Map) ............................................................................................................................ 3Delinquency Dispositions, 2012-2016 ................................................................................................................... 4Frequency of Statewide Delinquency Dispositions ............................................................................................... 5Source of Allegation ................................................................................................................................................ 5Attorney Representation in Formal Delinquency Proceedings ............................................................................ 6Median Time Lapse for Formal vs. Informal Proceedings by Type of Disposition ............................................. 7Median Time Lapse for Formal vs. Informal Proceedings, 2012-2016 ................................................................ 8

Delinquency OffensesAlleged Offenses, 2012-2016 .................................................................................................................................. 9Substantiated Offenses, 2012-2016 ..................................................................................................................... 10Selected Offenses, 2012-2016 .............................................................................................................................. 11

Secure DetentionSecure Detention Overview ................................................................................................................................. 12Codes Related to JCJC Standards Governing the Use of Secure Detention Under The Juvenile Act .............. 12Secure Detention Admissions, 2012-2016 .......................................................................................................... 13Length of Stay in Secure Detention ..................................................................................................................... 14Secure Detention Admissions by Standard Section Codes ................................................................................. 15Utilization Rates for Pennsylvania Juvenile Detention Centers ........................................................................ 16

Delinquency PlacementsDelinquency Placements, 2012-2016 ................................................................................................................... 17Delinquency Placements as a Percent of Dispositions, 2012-2016 .................................................................... 17Delinquency Placements as a Percent of Dispositions (Map) ............................................................................ 18New Allegation Placements vs. Disposition Review Placements ....................................................................... 19Total Delinquency Placements by Type ............................................................................................................... 21

Disposition and Placement ReviewsOutcomes of Delinquency Disposition Reviews.................................................................................................. 22Outcomes of Delinquency Placement Reviews .................................................................................................... 22

DemographicsSelected Dispositions by Gender .......................................................................................................................... 23Total Dispositions by Age, 2015-2016 ................................................................................................................. 24Total Dispositions by Selected Variables ............................................................................................................. 25Educational Status ................................................................................................................................................ 25Family Status ........................................................................................................................................................ 26


Table of Contents

Demographics (Continued)Race and Ethnicity ................................................................................................................................................ 27Total Delinquency Dispositions by Race and Ethnicity ...................................................................................... 28Selected Delinquency Dispositions by Race and Ethnicity ................................................................................. 29Secure Detention by Race and Ethnicity ............................................................................................................. 31Transferred to Criminal Proceedings by Race and Ethnicity ............................................................................. 31

Dependency DispositionsDependency Dispositions .................................................................................................................................... 32Dependency Dispositions by Age ........................................................................................................................ 33

Appendices1: County Class and Population ........................................................................................................................ 352: Delinquency Dispositions, 2012-2016 .......................................................................................................... 363: Delinquency Dispositions as a Percent of Juvenile Population .................................................................. 384: Delinquency Dispositions by Type ................................................................................................................405: Delinquency Dispositions by Source of Allegation .......................................................................................446: Type of Attorney Representation in Delinquency Proceedings ...................................................................467: Time Lapse from Allegation to Disposition for Delinquency Cases ............................................................488: Alleged Offenses by Type ............................................................................................................................... 509: Substantiated Offenses by Type .................................................................................................................... 5210: Length of Stay in Secure Detention ..............................................................................................................5411: Secure Detention Admissions by Standard Section Codes .......................................................................... 5612: Secure Detention Admissions by Selected Codes and County Class .......................................................... 5813: Delinquency Placements, 2012-2016 ............................................................................................................6614: Delinquency Placements by Type ..................................................................................................................6815: Outcomes of Delinquency Disposition Reviews ........................................................................................... 7216: Outcomes of Delinquency Placement Reviews ............................................................................................. 7417: Delinquency Placement Review Transfers by Type of Placement ................................................................ 7618: Delinquency Dispositions by Age ..................................................................................................................8019: Delinquency Dispositions by School Status ..................................................................................................8420: Delinquency Dispositions by Highest Grade Completed .............................................................................8621: Delinquency Dispositions by Family Status .................................................................................................8822: Delinquency Dispositions by Living Arrangement of Youth .......................................................................9023: Delinquency Dispositions by Race and Ethnicity ......................................................................................... 9224: Secure Detention Admissions by Race and Ethnicity ...................................................................................9425: Summary of All Delinquency and Dependency Dispositions ......................................................................96

Appendices

2016 Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Dispositions Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission ƒ Center for Juvenile Justice Training and Research Page 1

Terms

This report is a compilation of the data collected from the juvenile probation departments throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

As in the past, to avoid confusion regarding the unit of count used in tabulating juvenile court statistics and to improve the understanding of how data can be interpreted, please note:

1. The primary unit of count is the disposition. A disposition is defined as an allegation of delinquency disposed of by the juvenile probation department and/or the court. Within a single delinquency allegation, a youth may be charged with a number of offenses. Any one youth may be involved in a number of dispositions within a calendar year. In addition, a youth may be referred on more than one occasion and receive only one disposition. Dependency dispositions include only those referrals to probation departments alleging dependency that are not accompanied by an allegation of delinquency. Therefore, the reader is cautioned NOT to attempt to interpret dispositions as the number of youth who are processed by the court or the number of offenses;

2. The unit of count refers to a case or cases disposed of by a juvenile court and/or juvenile probation department. The term disposed means that a definite action/decision has been implemented;

3. The statistical system is constructed to collect up to the seven (7) most serious offenses per delinquency disposition;

4. The Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission collects additional information on disposition reviews, placement reviews, and selected special conditions attached to a disposition. A disposition review is a hearing conducted before the court regarding a previous disposition which did not result in out-of-home placement. A placement review is a hearing conducted before the court regarding a previous disposition which did involve out-of-home placement;

5. The data in the secure detention section of this report were collected in conjunction with the Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission’s Secure Detention Monitoring Program; and

6. The tables containing rows with “percent of total” may not total 100 percent due to rounding.

Appendices

2016 Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Dispositions Page 2 Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission ƒ Center for Juvenile Justice Training and Research

Highlights

We draw your attention to the following statistical highlights of 2016:

• There were 23,014 delinquency-related dispositions in Pennsylvania during 2016. This represents a 4.7% decrease from 2015 and a 25.9% decrease since 2012 (page 4).

• Statewide, secure detention admissions have declined 4.4% since 2015 (page 13) and 38.2% since 2012.

• Statewide, delinquency placements have declined each year since 2012 with an overall decrease of 34.5%, and a decrease of 6.5% since 2015 (page 17).

• Seventeen-year-olds accounted for the most dispositions of any age group in 2016, representing 26.0% of all dispositions, followed in descending order by sixteen-year-olds (21.2%) and fifteen-year-olds (16.7%) (page 24).

• Youth whose biological parents were reported as “never married” represented more than 50% of all delinquency dispositions, while youth whose parents were reported as “married” represented 16.4% (page 26).

• Statewide, 47.8% of youth with a delinquency disposition were reported as residing only with their mother, while 17.0% of youth resided with both biological parents (page 26).

• The majority of all delinquency dispositions involved White Non-Hispanic youth (45.1%), followed in descending order by Black Non-Hispanic youth (37.9%) and Hispanic youth (12.7%) (page 28).

Appendices


Delinquency Dispositions

1,20

1 - 2

,500

2,50

1+50

1 - 1

,000

1,00

1 - 1

,200

101

- 20

0

201

- 50

0

1 - 5

0

51 -

100

Che

ster

590

Cla

rion

51

D

ela-

w

are

1,22

7

Lanc

aste

r78

1

Lehi

gh89

8

Mon

tgom

ery

1,01

0

Phila

delp

hia

2,73

7

Ada

ms

225

Alle

ghen

y2,

830

Arm

stro

ng94

Bea

ver

331

Ber

ks71

7

Bed

ford

36

Cam

bria

235C

lear

field

48

Clin

ton

88

Hun

tingd

on48

Bla

ir30

8

Bra

dfor

d12

0

Buc

ks70

1

But

ler

227

Cam

eron

4

Car

bon

103

Cen

tre

113

Col

umbi

a64

Cra

wfo

rd11

7

Cum

berla

nd51

3

Dau

phin

802

Elk

41

Erie

547

Faye

tte36

2

Fore

st2

Fran

klin

417

F

ulto

n 2

6G

reen

e28

Indi

ana

136

Jeffe

rson

43

Juni

ata

18

Lack

awan

na32

7

Law

renc

e17

3

Leba

non

272

Luze

rne

520

Lyco

min

g29

4

McK

ean

96

Mer

cer

211

Mifflin 88

Mon

roe

247

Mon

-to

ur

Nor

tham

pton

618

North

umbe

rland

2

22

Perr

y58

Pike 76

Potte

r26

Schu

ylki

ll21

3

Snyd

er74

Som

erse

t77

Sulli

van

3

Susq

ueha

nna

30Ti

oga

61

Uni

on59

Vena

ngo

222

War

ren

58

Was

hing

ton

310

Way

ne59

Wes

tmor

elan

d52

4

Wyo

min

g47

York

1,39

7

14

2016 D

elinquency

Dis

posit

ions

Appendices



Delinquency Dispositions, 2012-2016

From 2015 to 2016, the Commonwealth’s largest jurisdictions, Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties, both reported decreases in delinquency dispositions. Allegheny County reported a decrease of 1%, and Philadelphia County reported an 11.5% decrease.

3,083 3,244 3,180 2,841 2,830

5,769 5,366 4,005 3,094 2,737

22,22720,347

18,383 18,204 17,447

31,07928,957

25,56824,139 23,014

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


Allegheny Philadelphia Remaining Counties Statewide

3,083 3,2443,180 2,841 2,830

5,7695,366

4,0053,094

2,737

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


Allegheny Philadelphia

There were 23,014 delinquency-related dispositions in Pennsylvania during 2016. This represents a 4.7% decrease from 2015 and a 25.9% decrease since 2012. Forty percent of the total dispositions occurred in the five jurisdictions reporting more than 1,000 dispositions (see map on page 3).

Note: Dispositions resulting from Disposition Reviews, Placement Reviews, and Dependency referrals are not included.

Appendices


Police and Magisterial District Judges continued to be the primary sources of delinquency allegations – 75.9% and 15.5% respectively.

Note: The category “Other” includes delinquency allegations received from schools, social agencies, relatives, and cases transferred from criminal court.

Source of Allegation

Frequencies of Statewide Delinquency Dispositions

Dispositions of Consent Decree, Probation, and Informal Adjustment continued to represent over half (56.5%) of all dispositions. Placement dispositions resulting from new allegations of delinquency decreased (7% to 6.3%) from 2015 to 2016.

Note: Does not include disposition reviews and placement reviews.

Police, 75.9%

Magisterial District Judge,

15.5%

Other Juvenile Court, 4.7%

Probation, 0.1%

Other, 3.7%

Source of Allegation, 2016

0.0%

0.3%

0.3%

1.8%

3.1%

3.6%

4.1%

5.6%

6.3%

7.2%

11.2%

16.7%

17.5%

22.3%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

Protective Supervision

Transferred To Criminal Proceedings

Referral To Agency/Individual

Continued Previous Disposition

Warned, Case Closed

Dismissed

Transfer To Other Court

Complaint Withdrawn

Placement

Fines/Costs Ordered

*Other Dispositions

Informal Adjustment

Probation

Consent Decree

Frequencies of Statewide Delinquency Dispositions, 2016


*The “Other Dispositions” category includes dispositions of Case Closed, Accepted Courtesy Supervision, Com-munity Service Only, Case Closed-Fines Paid, Other, Case Closed-Unable to Locate Juvenile, Restitution Only Ordered, Administrative Supervision Only/Collections, and Judgement Filed/Case Closed.

Appendices


Attorney Representation in Formal Delinquency Proceedings, 2016

Legal representation provided by Public Defenders continued to be the most common form of representation in delinquency proceedings (66.4% in 2016). Legal representation was provided by Court Appointed or Private Counsel in 33.4% of delinquency proceedings. (An entry of “Court Appointed” includes cases where counsel other than the public defender was appointed by the court.) Delinquency proceedings were conducted without defense counsel (waived or not present) in less than 1% of all delinquency proceedings.

Public Defender, 66.4%

Court Appointed, 21.3%

Private, 12.1%

Waived, < 1.0%No Attorney

Present, < 1.0%

Type of Attorney Representation, 2016


Appendices


Median Time Lapse for Formal vs. Informal Proceedings by Type of Disposition, 2016

A formal proceeding is defined as a hearing held before a judge or hearing officer, after the filing of a petition. The time lapse is measured from the Date of Allegation to the Date of Disposition. An informal proceeding results in a decision being made without a formal appearance before a judge or hearing officer.

Statewide, cases handled through informal proceedings were typically disposed of more quickly than cases handled through formal proceedings (71 days vs. 102 days). The number of dispositions by disposition type are also indicated in the charts below.

Note: Does not include disposition reviews and placement reviews.

FORMAL DISPOSITIONS NUMBER OF MEDIANTYPE OF DISPOSITION DISPOSITIONS DAYS

PLACEMENT ................................................................ 1,460 ....................... 72.0PROTECTIVE SUPERVISION ............................................ 1 ........................77.0TRANSFER TO OTHER COURT .................................... 837 ....................... 84.0CONSENT DECREE .....................................................4,417 ........................91.0PROBATION ................................................................ 4,027 ......................109.0DISMISSED ......................................................................712 ......................115.0WARNED, CASE CLOSED ............................................. 166 ......................119.5*OTHER DISPOSITIONS ................................................ 594 ......................124.5TRANSFERRED TO CRIMINAL COURT .......................... 62 ......................126.5FINES/COSTS ORDERED .............................................. 222 ...................... 141.0COMPLAINT WITHDRAWN .............................................674 ......................145.0CONTINUED PREVIOUS DISPOSITION ....................... 323 ..................... 203.0REFERRED TO AGENCY/INDIVIDUAL .............................14 ...................... 247.0

TOTAL .........................................................................13,509 .................... 102.0

Formal Dispositions

INFORMAL DISPOSITIONS NUMBER OF MEDIANTYPE OF DISPOSITION DISPOSITIONS DAYS

TRANSFER TO OTHER COURT ...................................... 98 ........................10.0FINES/COSTS ORDERED ........................................... 1,434 ........................15.0REFERRED TO AGENCY/INDIVIDUAL ............................ 61 ....................... 40.0INFORMAL ADJUSTMENT .......................................... 3,838 ....................... 64.0CONSENT DECREE ....................................................... 723 ....................... 90.0WARNED, CASE CLOSED ............................................. 544 ....................... 90.5COMPLAINT WITHDRAWN ............................................ 621 ......................104.0*OTHER DISPOSITIONS ............................................. 1,984 ......................182.0DISMISSED ......................................................................113 ...................... 197.0CONTINUED PREVIOUS DISPOSITION ......................... 89 ..................... 306.0

TOTAL .......................................................................... 9,505 ....................... 71.0

Informal Dispositions


*The “Other Dispositions” category includes disposi-tions of Case Closed, Community Service Only, Other, Administrative Supervision Only/Collec-tions, Restitution Only Ordered, Case Closed-Fines Paid, and Judgement Filed/Case Closed.

*The “Other Dispositions” category includes disposi-tions of Case Closed, Accepted Courtesy Supervision, Case Closed-Fines Paid, Community Service Only, Case Closed-Unable to Locate Juvenile, Other, and Resitution Only Ordered.

Appendices


Median Time Lapse for Formal vs. Informal Proceedings, 2012-2016

The time lapse for formal proceedings, as measured by the Date of Allegation to the Date of Disposition, has increased by 4.1% since 2015 (from 98 to 102 days). Since 2012, the median time lapse has increased 10.9%.

The time lapse for informal proceedings, also measured by the Date of Allegation to the Date of Disposition, in-creased by 6.0% since 2015 (from 67 to 71 days). Since 2012, the median time lapse for informal proceedings has increased by 42.0%.

92 91 9398

102

0102030405060708090

100110

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Formal Proceedings Time Lapse, 2012-2016

Median in Days

50 5258

6771

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Informal Proceedings Time Lapse, 2012-2016

Median in Days


Appendices


Alleged Offenses, 2012-2016

The total number of alleged offenses has increased by less than 1% from 2015 to 2016 and has decreased by 21.2% since 2012. The number of alleged offenses within the Drug offense category has shown the largest decrease (3.4%) from 2015, followed by Person offenses (3.0%). “Other” offenses increased by 6.9% and Property offenses increased by less than 1% from 2015 to 2016.

Since 2012, Property offenses have shown the sharpest decline (26.1%). Drug and Person offenses have also declined considerably, 24.1% and 20.5% respectively, with “Other” offenses decreasing 16.1% over the same period.

26,229 23,633 20,903 21,514 20,860

26,31423,509

19,747 19,428 19,451

12,86512,506

10,675 10,107 9,767

28,896

24,980

22,784 22,694 24,256

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Alleged Offenses by Type, 2012-2016

Person Property Drug Other

Delinquency Offenses

Note: The “Other” offenses category includes, but is not limited to: Public Order offenses, such as Disorderly Conduct or Possession of Weapon on School Property; Firearms offenses; and Certifications from the minor judiciary that a juvenile failed to comply with a lawful sentence imposed for a summary offense.

Appendices


*A substantiated offense is any petitioned offense the court finds the juvenile committed.

Substantiated Offenses, 2012-2016*

Substantiated offenses increased from 2015 to 2016 (1.7%), with the largest increase occurring in the “Other” offense category (23.0%). Person offenses decreased by 9.4%, Drug offenses decreased by 6.1%, and Property offenses increased by less than 1%.

The total number of substantiated offenses remains well below 2012 levels. Similarly, each category of substantiated offenses (Person, Property, Drugs, and “Other”) remained below their respective 2012 levels.

7,3065,204 4,881 4,547 4,118

8,871

5,737 5,143 4,728 4,770

4,202

3,1742,861 2,641 2,481

5,609

4,2693,901

3,495 4,299

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Substantiated Offenses by Type, 2012-2016*

Person Property Drugs Other


Note: The “Other” offenses category includes, but is not limited to: Public Order offenses such as Disorderly Conduct or Possession of a Weapon on School Property; Firearms offenses; and Certifications from the minor judiciary that a juvenile failed to comply with a lawful sentence imposed for a summary offense.

Appendices


Selected Offenses, 2012-2016

Due to their severe nature, the following crimes are examined separately each year: rape, robbery, aggravated assault, and felony drug offenses.

The chart at the right shows the statewide total of the number of alleged rapes, robberies, aggravated assaults, and felony drug offenses that occurred between 2012 and 2016. Only the most serious charge per disposition is depicted. For example, a disposition with an alleged robbery charge and an alleged drug charge would be counted in the robbery category. The Crime Severity key below shows the crime severity ranking employed for coding purposes.

There were decreases in the number of alleged offenses committed across all four crime categories between 2015 and 2016. Felony drugs had the largest decrease (17.7%), followed by rape (10.9%), aggravated assault (7.6%), and robbery (5.1%).

CRIME SEVERITY1. Rape2. Robbery3. Aggravated Assault4. Felony Drugs

2,3692,114

1,8761,701

1,571

1,188 1,165997

888 731

263 278 217 248 221

1,271 1,2081,018

914 867

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Selected Alleged Offenses, 2012-2016

Agg. Assault Felony Drugs Rape Robbery

The chart on the left shows the most serious substantiated charges using the same Crime Severity Ranking methodology as noted above. The number of substantiated charges for each of these crime categories also showed decreases from 2015 to 2016. Substantiated rape charges decreased by 36.0%, felony drugs by 27.4%, aggravated assault by 16.3%, and robbery by 13.2%.

399

270 266 246 206

436

414

285 277

201

33 34 16 25 16

435438

362319

277

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Selected Substantiated Offenses, 2012-2016*

Agg. Assault Felony Drugs Rape Robbery


*A substantiated offense is any petitioned offense the court finds the juvenile committed.

Appendices


Secure Detention

In accordance with the Standards Governing Secure Detention, all counties report their secure detention admissions to the Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission. Detention information was extracted from the Pennsylvania Juvenile Case Management System and secure detention database at the Center for Juvenile Justice Training and Research. The secure detention database is populated with data reported directly from juvenile detention centers each month.

When interpreting the data contained in these tables, the reader should note the following:

1. The unit of count is the admission of a juvenile to a secure detention center;

2. A juvenile who is admitted to a secure detention center and subsequently transferred to another secure detention center without release is counted as two admissions.

Secure Detention Overview

Codes Related to JCJC Standards Governing the Use of Secure Detention Under The Juvenile ActEach month, all juvenile detention centers report a Statement of Facts and Reasons that must accompany every probation-authorized admission to secure detention. Below are the Section Codes related to this process.

100 Codes Circumstances under which secure detention may be authorized on the basis of an alleged offense or on the basis of an alleged offense and the child’s current status with the court or prior record.

200 Codes Circumstances under which secure detention may be authorized on the basis of a child’s status as an absconder or fugitive; on the basis of a child’s record of failing to appear at previous juvenile proceedings; or because of extraordinary circumstances which require secure detention to prevent a child from absconding.

300 Codes Circumstances under which secure detention may be authorized on the written request of the child or child’s attorney.

400 Codes Circumstances under which secure detention may be ordered pending disposition, subsequent to a finding that a child committed a delinquent act or is a delinquent child.

500 Codes Circumstances under which secure detention may be ordered following disposition pending transfer to placement.

600 Codes Circumstances under which secure detention may be authorized on the basis of the child’s status, pending or subsequent to a disposition review proceeding.

Code 701 Circumstances under which secure detention may be authorized on the basis of extraordinary and exceptional circumstances.

Appendices


PERCENTAGE CHANGE OF DETENTION ADMISSIONS

2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

STATEWIDE -16.6% -12.8% -11.1% -4.4%

ALLEGHENY COUNTY -20.4% -13.6% -16.7% -6.9%

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY -23.6% -12.0% -11.7% -8.1%

REMAINING COUNTIES -9.6% -12.9% -8.5% -1.1%

Secure Detention Admissions, 2012-2016

Statewide, detention admissions have declined each year since 2012, with a 38.2% overall decrease and a 4.4% decrease from 2015 to 2016. Allegheny County detention admissions decreased by 6.9% from 2015 to 2016, while Philadelphia County admissions declined by 8.1% during the same time period. Overall statewide admissions, excluding Allegheny and Philadelphia, decreased by 1.1% from 2015. Philadelphia County and Allegheny County account for 29.2% and 18.4%, respectively, of all secure detention admissions.

2,9672,362 2,040 1,699 1,581

4,6123,525 3,101 2,738 2,515

6,328 5,7184,979

4,556 4,504

13,90711,605

10,1208,993

8,600

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Detention Admissions, 2012-2016

Allegheny County Philadelphia County Remaining Counties Statewide

Secure Detention

Appendices


COUNTY NUMBER OF ADMISSIONS

MEDIAN LENGTH OF STAY IN DAYS

DELAWARE 606 10.0

JUNIATA 7 10.0

WASHINGTON 124 10.0

LYCOMING 28 9.5

BEDFORD 7 9.0

BLAIR 18 9.0

LUZERNE 50 9.0

POTTER 6 9.0

SCHUYLKILL 22 9.0

CLEARFIELD 31 8.0

CLINTON 25 8.0

DAUPHIN 223 8.0

JEFFERSON 2 7.5

ALLEGHENY 1,512 7.0

CRAWFORD 4 7.0

LACKAWANNA 151 7.0

PHILADELPHIA 2,507 7.0

MONTGOMERY 511 6.0

SNYDER 5 6.0

BRADFORD 3 5.0

NORTHUMBERLAND 32 5.0

FAYETTE 28 4.0

INDIANA 13 4.0

BUCKS 638 3.0

MERCER 1 3.0

SOMERSET 3 3.0

TIOGA 4 3.0

CAMERON 0 0.0

CLARION 0 0.0

FOREST 0 0.0

FULTON 0 0.0

GREENE 0 0.0

VENANGO 0 0.0

*TOTAL 8,168 8.0

Length of Stay in Secure Detention, 2016

Secure Detention

In 2016, the statewide median length of stay in secure detention was 8 days, which is a decrease of one day from 2015. The table below shows the median length of stay by county, from greatest to least number of days. Multiple counties with identical length of stay are listed alphabetically. This data, sorted by greatest to least number of admissions, can be found in Appendix 10.



SULLIVAN 2 109.0

ADAMS 3 47.0

ARMSTRONG 1 44.0

WYOMING 3 41.0

CAMBRIA 8 36.0

MONTOUR 2 26.5

SUSQUEHANNA 1 25.0

BUTLER 5 24.0

WAYNE 12 23.0

BEAVER 27 19.0

CHESTER 185 19.0

WARREN 2 18.5

LANCASTER 127 18.0

LAWRENCE 1 18.0

NORTHAMPTON 160 18.0

MIFFLIN 46 17.0

MCKEAN 2 16.0

PERRY 10 16.0

CENTRE 29 15.0

LEHIGH 137 15.0

COLUMBIA 3 14.0

MONROE 69 14.0

BERKS 214 13.0

CUMBERLAND 37 13.0

WESTMORELAND 125 13.0

YORK 135 13.0

HUNTINGDON 12 12.5

FRANKLIN 21 12.0

LEBANON 59 12.0

UNION 3 12.0

ERIE 136 11.0

ELK 2 10.5

PIKE 16 10.5

CARBON 12 10.0

NOTE: This table only includes those admissions for which a date of release was reported.

*Includes 174 secure detention admissions to the Jefferson Detention Center in Ohio by the following counties: Armstrong (1); Beaver (28); Butler (6); Fayette (8); and Washington (131).

Appendices


Code 206 - The child presents extraordinary circumstances requiring secure detention to prevent him/her from absconding. (Such circumstances may include, but are not limited to: the child’s age, character, mental condition, ties to the community, the nature of the child’s family relationships, drug or alcohol addiction, and substance abuse.)

Code 701 - Circumstances under which secure detention may be authorized on the basis of extraordinary and exceptional circumstances.

The Unreported category, as shown in this report, indicates that a code was not reported to the JCJC. Secure detention admissions that are authorized without codes are not in compliance with JCJC Standards.

The utilization of Codes 206, 701, and admissions with an Unreported code accounted for 44.0% of all secure detention admissions in 2016. The utilization of Code 206 decreased from 25.5% in 2015 to 22.0% in 2016. The use of code 701 increased from 6.1% in 2015 to 7.4% in 2016, as did the use of Unreported codes from 13.6% in 2015 to 14.6% in 2016.

Secure Detention Admissions by Standard Section Codes

In 2016, the overwhelming majority of secure detention admissions were authorized under the 100 and 200 Codes – 28.6% and 33.3%, respectively. This trend has remained constant since 2012.

Special attention is given to the utilization of Codes 206, 701, and Unreported. In instances where secure detention is authorized under Codes 206 or 701, the juvenile probation officer is required to provide a detailed written explanation of the reasons that necessitate secure detention. These codes were intended to be utilized in limited circumstances where the other codes are not applicable.

100, 28.6%

201-205, 11.3%

206, 22.0%

300, 0.0%

400, 2.0%

500, 5.4%

600, 8.8%

701, 7.4%

Unreported, 14.6%

Detention Section Codes as a % of Total Admissions, 2016

26.0% 25.6% 24.0% 25.5%22.0%

5.1% 4.8% 5.4% 6.1% 7.4%

16.7%13.8% 14.6% 13.6% 14.6%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Detention Section Codes 206, 701, and Unreported as a % of Total Admissions, 2012-2016

206 701 Unreported

Secure Detention

Appendices


Utilization Rates for Pennsylvania Juvenile Detention Centers, 2016

59.4%

61.5%

75.0%

70.7%

50.5%

53.6%

37.6%

69.7%

86.6%

34.9%

70.9%

33.6%

68.7%

48.3%

39.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Westmoreland (9.5/16)

Philadelphia (113.2/184)

Northampton (27.0/36)

Montgomery (25.4/36)

Lancaster (24.2/48)

Lackawanna (5.4/10)

Erie (7.5/20)

Delaware (46.0/66)

Cornell-Abraxas (15.6/18)

Chester (16.8/48)

Central Counties (9.9/14)

**Cambria (4.0/12)

Bucks (24.7/36)

Allegheny (57.9/120)

Abraxas-Morgantown (21.5/54)

Utilization Rate Detention Center (ADP/CAP)*

Secure Detention

*A center’s utilization rate is equal to its average daily population (ADP) divided by the licensed bed capacity (CAP). Average Daily Population (ADP) is calculated by the sum of all utilized bed days divided by the number of days in the reporting period.

**This facility was closed in May 2016.

Appendices


Delinquency Placements Including Disposition Reviews, 2012-2016

Statewide, delinquency placements have declined each year since 2012, with an overall decrease of 34.5%. Placements in all counties other than Allegheny and Philadelphia decreased each year since 2012, representing an overall decrease of 35.2% in these jurisdictions. Delinquency placements in Allegheny County increased 1.9% and placements in Philadelphia decreased 8.2% from 2015 to 2016.

Delinquency Placements as a Percent of Dispositions, 2012-2016

Delinquency placements as a percentage of total dispositions, including disposition reviews, decreased from 2015 (7.1%) to 2016 (6.9%). Philadelphia County placements as a percentage of total dispositions increased from 6.8% in 2015 to 6.9% in 2016. Allegheny County placements also increased from 5.9% in 2015 to 6.2% in 2016. In all counties other than Allegheny and Philadelphia, the percentage decreased from 7.4% in 2015 to 7.0% in 2016.

See the map on the next page for individual county delinquency placements as a percentage of total dispositions.

5.4%5.7%

6.0% 5.9%6.2%

7.4% 7.6% 7.3%6.8% 6.9%

9.0% 8.6%8.2%

7.4%7.0%

8.1% 7.9% 7.7%7.1%

6.9%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

11.0%

12.0%

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Delinquency Placements as a Percent of Dispositions, 2012-2016


387 404 412 378 385

1,630 1,546 1,290 1,041 956

3,150 2,8122,451 2,200 2,041

5,167 4,7624,153

3,6193,382

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Delinquency Placements Including Disposition Reviews, 2012-2016


Delinquency Placements

Appendices


Che

ster

8.8%

Cla

rion

4.6%

D

ela-

w

are

5.1%

Lanc

aste

r2.

8%

Lehi

gh 5

.9% M

ontg

omer

y7.

2%

Phila

delp

hia

6.9%

Ada

ms

3.7%

Alle

ghen

y6.

2%

Arm

stro

ng5.

1%B

eave

r9.

2%

Ber

ks7.

7%

Bed

ford

10.6

%

Cam

bria

8.6%

Cle

arfie

ld23

.7%

Clin

ton

2.8%

Hun

tingd

on18

.5%

Bla

ir3.

2%

Bra

dfor

d7.

8%

Buc

ks7.

7%

But

ler

9.9%

Cam

eron

0

.0%

Car

bon

12.2

%C

entr

e8.

6%

Col

umbi

a6.

9%

Cra

wfo

rd5.

1%

Cum

berla

nd3.

3%

Dau

phin

6.

3%

Elk

12.2

%

Erie

18.9

%

Faye

tte4.

6%

Fore

st0.

0%

Fran

klin

5.1%

F

ulto

n0.

0%G

reen

e7.

1%

Indi

ana

3.2%Jeffe

rson

13.2

%

Juni

ata

12.1%

Lack

awan

na5.

5%

Law

renc

e1.

9%

Leba

non

9.8%

Luze

rne

5.6%

Lyco

min

g5.

2%

McK

ean

0.5%

Mer

cer

9.5%

Mifflin 7.4

%

Mon

roe

18.2

%

Nor

tham

pton

1

0.0%

North

umbe

rland

6.

0%

Perr

y10

.3%

Pike

13.7

%

Potte

r9.

8%

Schu

ylki

ll10

.8%

Snyd

er4.

0%

Som

erse

t2.

2%

Sulli

van

0.0%

Susq

ueha

nna

5.0%

Tiog

a3.

1%

Uni

on1.

5%

Vena

ngo

1.7%

War

ren

15.7

%

Was

hing

ton

12.3

%

Way

ne8.

1%

Wes

tmor

elan

d6.

7%

Wyo

min

g6.

2%

York

7.5%

11

.1%

15.1

% -

20.0

%

20.1

% -

100%

7.1%

- 10

.0%

10.1

% -

15.0

%

0.0%

- 5.

0%

5.1%

- 7.

0%

Mon

tour

Delinquency Placements2016 D

elinquency

Pla

cem

ents a

s a

Percent o

f Dis

posit

ions

Inclu

din

g D

isposit

ion R

evi

ew

s

Appendices


The following chart depicts the relative percentage of placements that resulted from new allegations versus disposition review proceedings. A disposition review is a hearing conducted by the court regarding a previous disposition which did not result in out-of-home placement.

The percentage of placements resulting from both new allegations and disposition reviews is shown for each county by County Class.

Statewide, over half of delinquency placements (56.8%) were ordered as a result of a disposition review. This figure, however, was notably influenced by Philadelphia, which accounted for 28.3% of all delinquency placements statewide, and where 72.0% of all delinquency placements were ordered as a result of a disposition review.

Across all other County Class groups, the average distribution of delinquency placements was nearly 50% from new allegations and 50% from disposition reviews.Philadelphia, Allegheny, and Class 2A are the County Class groups with a majority of delinquency placements originating from disposition reviews.

New Allegation Placements vs. Disposition Review Placements


COUNTY NEW ALLEGATION PLACEMENTS

DISPOSITION REVIEW PLACEMENTS

TOTAL PLACEMENTS

CLASS 1PHILADELPHIA 28.0% 72.0% 956

CLASS 2ALLEGHENY 26.0% 74.0% 385

CLASS 2A (AVERAGE) 37.2% 62.8%BUCKS 19.8% 80.2% 101

DELAWARE 38.0% 62.0% 184

MONTGOMERY 48.6% 51.4% 140

CLASS 3 (AVERAGE) 57.8% 42.2%BERKS 41.4% 58.6% 87

CHESTER 92.6% 7.4% 68

CUMBERLAND 51.9% 48.1% 27

DAUPHIN 22.1% 77.9% 95

ERIE 87.5% 12.5% 128

LACKAWANNA 35.3% 64.7% 34

LANCASTER 68.8% 31.3% 32

LEHIGH 75.0% 25.0% 76

LUZERNE 70.8% 29.2% 48

NORTHAMPTON 51.3% 48.7% 78

WESTMORELAND 45.2% 54.8% 73

YORK 50.0% 50.0% 168

CLASS 4 (AVERAGE) 59.9% 40.1%BEAVER 52.9% 47.1% 34

BUTLER 37.2% 62.8% 43

CAMBRIA 74.4% 25.6% 39

CENTRE 75.0% 25.0% 12

FAYETTE 72.2% 27.8% 18

FRANKLIN 75.7% 24.3% 37

MONROE 69.7% 30.3% 89

SCHUYLKILL 55.2% 44.8% 29

WASHINGTON 43.9% 56.1% 66

CLASS 5 (AVERAGE) 50.4% 49.6%ADAMS 15.4% 84.6% 13

BLAIR 53.8% 46.2% 13

LAWRENCE 75.0% 25.0% 4

LEBANON 61.3% 38.7% 31

LYCOMING 41.9% 58.1% 31

MERCER 58.6% 41.4% 29

NORTHUMBERLAND 50.0% 50.0% 14

Appendices


New Allegation Placements vs. Disposition Review Placements continued


COUNTY NEW ALLEGATION PLACEMENTS

DISPOSITION REVIEW PLACEMENTS

TOTAL PLACEMENTS

CLASS 6 (AVERAGE) 58.9% 41.1%ARMSTRONG 50.0% 50.0% 6

BEDFORD 80.0% 20.0% 5

BRADFORD 70.0% 30.0% 10

CARBON 55.6% 44.4% 18

CLARION 60.0% 40.0% 5

CLEARFIELD 50.0% 50.0% 14

CLINTON 75.0% 25.0% 4

COLUMBIA 50.0% 50.0% 8

CRAWFORD 70.0% 30.0% 10

ELK 100.0% 0.0% 5

GREENE 100.0% 0.0% 2

HUNTINGDON 40.0% 60.0% 10

INDIANA 80.0% 20.0% 5

JEFFERSON 57.1% 42.9% 7

MCKEAN 0.0% 100.0% 1

MIFFLIN 36.4% 63.6% 11

PERRY 85.7% 14.3% 7

PIKE 72.2% 27.8% 18

SOMERSET 0.0% 100.0% 2

SUSQUEHANNA 0.0% 100.0% 2

TIOGA 100.0% 0.0% 3

VENANGO 80.0% 20.0% 5

WARREN 69.2% 30.8% 13

WAYNE 0.0% 100.0% 9

CLASS 7 (AVERAGE) 64.3% 35.7%JUNIATA 50.0% 50.0% 4

SNYDER 75.0% 25.0% 4

UNION 100.0% 0.0% 1

WYOMING 60.0% 40.0% 5

CLASS 8 (AVERAGE) 50.0% 50.0%

CAMERON 0.0% 0.0% 0

FOREST 0.0% 0.0% 0

FULTON 0.0% 0.0% 0

MONTOUR 100.0% 0.0% 2

POTTER 25.0% 75.0% 4

SULLIVAN 0.0% 0.0% 0

STATEWIDE TOTALS 43.2% 56.8% 3,382

Appendices


Total Delinquency Placements by Type, 2016 Including Disposition Reviews

Beginning in 2016, the collection of delinquency placement-related data was enhanced within the Pennsylvania Juvenile Case Management System (PaJCMS). All residential placement programs are now categorized by licensed service types, which are determined by 55 PA Code Chapter 3140. For the purposes of this report, there are three overarching service types: Community Based, Institutional, and “Other.”

0.1%

0.1%

0.4%

0.7%

1.3%

4.8%

5.0%

8.1%

8.5%

14.4%

22.4%

34.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

CRR HOST HOME

INPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH

SUPERVISED INDEPENDENT LIVING

TRANSITIONAL LIVING

FOSTER CARE

YDC/YFC NON-SECURE

SECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

YDC SECURE

RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT FACILITY (RTF)

DRUG AND ALCOHOL PROGRAM

COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL SERVICE/GROUP HOME

GENERAL RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

Delinquency Placements by Type, 2016


Due to changes in classification of placement service types in 2016, the reader is cautioned against comparing this data to previously published (2015 and earlier) delinquency placement data.

General Residential Services, Community Residential Service/Group Homes, and Drug and Alcohol Programs were the most frequently used programs in 2016, comprising 71.1% of all delinquency placements.

Community Based category: • Community Residential

Service/Group Home• Foster Care• Supervised Independent

Living• Transitional Living

Institutional category: • General Residential• Secure Residential• YDC Secure• YDC/YFC Non-Secure

“Other” category: • CRR Host Home • Drug and Alcohol Program• Inpatient Mental Health• Residential Treatment

Facility (RTF)

Appendices


Outcomes of Delinquency Disposition Reviews, 2016 Although the majority of delinquency placements resulted from disposition reviews (see page 19), less than 1 in 10 disposition review proceedings resulted in a delinquency placement. The vast majority of disposition reviews resulted in an order of Continued on Previous Disposition.

Outcomes of Delinquency Placement Reviews, 2016

0.1%

0.2%

0.2%

2.5%

6.8%

7.3%

20.3%

62.4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

REFERRED

DISMISSED

WITHDRAWN

PROBATION

CONSENT DECREE

PLACEMENT

*OTHER

CONTINUED ON PREVIOUS DISPOSITION

Outcomes of Delinquency Disposition Reviews as a % of Total, 2016

0.1%

0.1%

1.9%

4.1%

4.7%

5.5%

6.2%

6.6%

8.3%

11.2%

18.6%

32.6%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL SVC/GRP HOME

GENERAL RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

SECURE RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

YDC SECURE

RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT FACILITY (RTF)

TRANSITIONAL LIVING

FOSTER CARE


SUPERVISED INDEPENDENT LIVING

YDC/YFC NON-SECURE


CRR HOST HOME

Transferred Placements by Type, 2016

CONTINUED, 64.1%

RELEASED, 29.0%

TRANSFERRED, 6.9%

Outcomes of DelinquencyPlacement Reviews, 2016

Disposition and Placement Reviews

In the small percentage of placement reviews in which a transfer to another placement was ordered, most transfers were to a community residential service/group home.

As mentioned above, the majority of delinquency placement review proceedings resulted in an order of Continued in Previous Placement.

*The “Other” category includes dispositions of Case Closed, Case Closed-Fines Paid, Administrative Supervision Only/Collections, Judgement Filed/Case Closed,Other, Fines and/or Costs Ordered, Restitution Only Ordered, Informal Adjustment, Transferred to Criminal Court, Accepted Courtesy Supervision, and Community Service Only.

A placement review is a hearing conducted by the court regarding a previous disposition which resulted in out-of-home placement.

Appendices


Male,80.9%

Female,19.1%

Probation

Male,88.8%

Female,11.2%

Placement

Male,65.8%

Female,34.2%

Informal Adjustment

Demographics

Selected Dispositions by Gender, 2016

SELECTED DISPOSITIONS TOTAL MALE FEMALE

ALL DISPOSITIONS 23,014 73.8% 26.2%INFORMAL ADJUSTMENT 3,838 65.8% 34.2% CONSENT DECREE 5,140 73.8% 26.2% PROBATION 4,027 80.9% 19.1% PLACEMENT 1,460 88.8% 11.2% TRANSFERRED TO CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 62 98.4% 1.6%

Male,98.4%

Female,1.6%

Transferred to Criminal Proceedings

Male,73.8%

Female,26.2%

Consent Decree

Male,73.8%

Female,26.2%

All Dispositions

Juvenile Court dispositions in Pennsylvania continued to primarily involve males. As reflected in the charts below, the proportion of males receiving delinquency dispositions related to new allegations of delinquency increases as the disposition type becomes more restrictive.

Appendices


Total Dispositions by Age, 2015-2016

This table reflects the age of the juvenile at the time of disposition.Note: The data does not include dispositions resulting from disposition review and placement review hearings.

86296

747

1,596

2,885

4,150

5,039

6,369

2,971

89289

756

1,535

2,698

3,844

4,869

5,994

2,940

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18+

Total Dispositions by Age 2015 2016

Demographics

Seventeen-year-olds accounted for 5,994 (26.0%) of all juvenile delinquency dispositions in 2016, representing the most dispositions for any age group. Juveniles aged 16 accounted for 4,869 (21.2%), while 15-year-olds accounted for 3,844 (16.7%) of the dispositions.

Appendices


Total Dispositions by Selected Variables, 2016

The following charts reflect the distribution of all juvenile delinquency dispositions in 2016 by the selected variables.

Educational Status The vast majority (87.4%) of delinquency dispositions in 2016 reflected youth who were reported as In School at the time of disposition. Seventy-two percent of youth were reported as having completed grades 9, 10, 11, or 12, or as being in an “Other” educational program.

22.4%

17.3%19.8%

16.9%

12.9%

5.3% 5.4%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

Highest Grade Completed, 2016

In School,87.4%

Out of School,

7.4%

Not Reported,

5.2%

School Status, 2016

Demographics

Note: The data does not include dispositions resulting from disposition review and placement review hearings.

Appendices


Total Dispositions by Selected Variables, 2016

0.1%4.2%5.2%5.6%6.1%

12.2%16.4%

50.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

BOTH PARENTS DECEASED

ONE PARENT DECEASED

NOT REPORTED

SEPARATED

OTHER

DIVORCED

MARRIED

NEVER MARRIED

Family Status, 2016

1.1%1.6%

5.0%5.8%6.0%6.9%8.7%

17.0%47.8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

FOSTER FAMILY

FATHER/STEP-MOTHER

NOT REPORTED

MOTHER/STEP-FATHER

OTHER

RELATIVE

FATHER

BOTH PARENTS

MOTHER

Living Arrangement, 2016

Family StatusIn juvenile delinquency dispositions, youth whose biological parents were reported as never married represented the largest group – more than 50%. In only 16.4% of cases, the biological parents were reported as married at the time of disposition.

Demographics

Note: The data does not include dispositions resulting from disposition review and placement review hearings.

In 2016, 47.8% of youth resided only with their mother, while only 17.0% of juveniles resided with both biological parents.

Appendices


Demographics

Race and Ethnicity

On the following pages, data on race and ethnicity trends related to Juvenile Court dispositions are provided. A few points of clarification regarding the reading and interpretation of this data should be noted.

The Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission’s Center for Juvenile Justice Training and Research collects data on race and ethnicity from each of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties. The collection of this data is done in concert with the protocols outlined in Guidelines for Collecting & Recording the Race and Ethnicity of Juveniles in Conjunction with Juvenile Delinquency Disposition Reporting to the Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission (National Center for Juvenile Justice, 2006). As such, race and ethnicity are collected and recorded as two separate and distinct sets of data.

Trends related to both race and ethnicity are presented within the following charts, graphs, and tables. References to racial or ethnic groups are defined as follows:

White Non-Hispanic reported as Non-Hispanic for ethnicity and White for race

Black Non-Hispanic reported as Non-Hispanic for ethnicity and Black for race

Hispanic reported as Hispanic for ethnicity regardless of reported race

Other and Unknown reported as Non-Hispanic for ethnicity and one of the following races: Asian, Pacific Islander, Native Hawaiian, Native Alaskan, Native American, or Multi-Racial; or race and ethnicity was reported as unknown

Appendices


Demographics

71.9%

14.0%10.2%

3.9%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2015 Pennsylvania Population* Ages 10 to 17N = 1,239,195

Total Delinquency Dispositions by Race and EthnicityIn 2016, White Non-Hispanic youth represented the largest racial/ethnic category for all delinquency dispositions. However, in comparison to the racial/ethnic distribution of all youth in Pennsylvania ages 10-17 the representation of Black Non-Hispanic youth is disproportionate: 14.0% of the total population versus 37.9% of all delinquency dispositions. When excluding Philadelphia County and Allegheny County, Black Non-Hispanic youth represent 8.2% of the youth population, but 27.9% of all delinquency dispositions. See Appendix 23 for the number of delinquency dispositions by race and ethnicity for each county.

45.1%37.9%

12.7%4.3%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2016 Delinquency DispositionsN = 23,014

*At the time of publication of the 2016 Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Dispositions, the 2016 Population Estimates have not yet been published. We have included the 2015 Population Estimates in the charts above. 2015 Population Estimates retrieved from The Centers for Disease Control available online at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/bridged-race-population.html

Appendices


Demographics

Selected Delinquency Dispositions by Race and Ethnicity

The following charts show the distribution of various dispositions by race and ethnicity.

For some delinquency dispositions that did not result in an out-of-home placement (Informal Adjustment and Consent Decree), Black Non-Hispanic youth comprised a smaller proportion of cases, while White Non-Hispanic youth comprised a larger proportion of cases than what is reflected in all delinquency dispositions.

3.2%

13.6%

35.1%

48.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Other/Unknown

Hispanic

Black Non-Hispanic

White Non-Hispanic

Consent DecreeN = 5,140

3.7%

14.8%

36.3%

45.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Other/Unknown

Hispanic

Black Non-Hispanic

White Non-Hispanic

ProbationN = 4,027

5.6%

9.7%

36.6%

48.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Other/Unknown

Hispanic

Black Non-Hispanic

White Non-Hispanic

Informal AdjustmentN = 3,838

Appendices


Demographics

Additionally, the representation of Black Non-Hispanic youth (63.4%) within secure placement settings was disproportionate to the percentage of Black Non-Hispanic youth in all placement dispositions (48.2%).

For dispositions that resulted in an out-of-home placement (not including disposition reviews and placement re-views), the proportion of both Hispanic (14.5%) and Black Non-Hispanic (48.2%) youth exceeded their represen-tation in the total number of delinquency dispositions (12.7% and 37.9% respectively).

Selected Delinquency Dispositions by Race and Ethnicity continued

4.2%

14.5%

48.2%

33.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Other/Unknown

Hispanic

Black Non-Hispanic

White Non-Hispanic

PlacementN = 1,460

2.0%

15.6%

63.4%

19.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Other/Unknown

Hispanic

Black Non-Hispanic

White Non-Hispanic

All Secure Placements N = 442

Appendices


Transferred to Criminal Proceedings by Race and EthnicityStatewide, White Non-Hispanic youth comprised a smaller proportion of cases transferred to criminal proceed-ings (24.2%) compared to the 45.1% represented in all delinquency dispositions; while Black Non-Hispanic youth comprised a greater proportion of cases transferred to criminal proceedings (59.7%) than what is reflected in all delinquency dispositions (37.9%).

Secure Detention by Race and Ethnicity

For secure detention, Black Non-Hispanic youth comprised 58.2% of all secure detention admissions in 2016. When excluding Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties, Hispanic youth and Black Non-Hispanic youth represent approximately 16.2% and 43.0%, respectively, of all secure detention admissions. In Philadelphia County, 71.4% of secure detention admissions involved Black Non-Hispanic youth. In Allegheny County, 80.3% of secure deten-tion admissions involved Black Non-Hispanic youth. See Appendix 24 for the number of secure detention admis-sions by race and ethnicity for each county.

Demographics

4.3%

14.0%

58.2%

23.6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Other/Unknown

Hispanic

Black Non-Hispanic

White Non-Hispanic

Secure DetentionN = 8,600

3.2%

12.9%

59.7%

24.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Other/Unknown

Hispanic

Black Non-Hispanic

White Non-Hispanic

Transferred to Criminal ProceedingsN = 62

Appendices


Dependency Dispositions

COUNTY TOTAL DISPOSITIONS

WARNED, COUNSELED,

CASE CLOSED

DISMISSED

REFERRED TO

ANOTHER AGENCY

INFORMAL ADJUSTMENT

CONSENT DECREE OTHER PLACEMENT PROTECTIVE

SUPERVISION

BEAVER 57 14 5 0 7 0 0 22 9

BRADFORD 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

CAMBRIA 135 13 15 0 66 0 5 0 36

MONTGOMERY 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

NORTHUMBERLAND 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

PHILADELPHIA 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

SNYDER 20 0 0 0 6 0 14 0 0

WESTMORELAND 60 1 0 0 59 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 278 29 21 0 139 0 22 22 45% OF TOTAL 100.0% 10.4% 7.6% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 7.9% 7.9% 16.2%

Dependency Dispositions, 2016

Note: This data does not include dispositions resulting from disposition review and placement review hearings.

Since 1991, the Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission collects information on dependency cases processed by juvenile probation departments. These figures do not reflect the total number of dependency cases in the Commonwealth. A dependency case is defined as a new referral that is processed by the juvenile probation department and that does not have accompanying delinquency allegations.

Only the counties that reported dependency dispositions are shown in the tables in this section.

Appendices


Dependency Dispositions


9 & UNDER 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18+ NOT

REPORTEDBEAVER 57 25 4 1 1 1 7 9 6 2 1 0

BRADFORD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

CAMBRIA 135 3 1 1 7 25 29 27 39 3 0 0

MONTGOMERY 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

NORTHUMBERLAND 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

PHILADELPHIA 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

SNYDER 20 0 0 0 1 3 2 3 8 1 2 0

WESTMORELAND 60 0 0 2 6 8 12 11 9 9 3 0

TOTAL 278 28 5 4 15 37 50 51 64 15 9 0% OF TOTAL 100.0% 10.1% 1.8% 1.4% 5.4% 13.3% 18.0% 18.3% 23.0% 5.4% 3.2% 0.0%

Dependency Dispositions by Age, 2016

Note: This data does not include dispositions resulting from disposition review and placement review hearings.

Age calculated at date of disposition.

Appendices


Appendices

Appendices


Population Statistics

County Class and Population

Note: At the time of publication of the 2016 Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Dispositions Report, the 2016 Population Estimates have not yet been published. We have included the 2015 Population Estimates for the charts above. 2015 Population Estimates retrieved from The Centers for Disease Control available online at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/bridged-race-population.html

COUNTY CLASS TOTAL POPULATION

JUVENILE POPULATION

10-17Philadelphia 1 1,567,442 141,550

Allegheny 2 1,230,459 104,949

Bucks 2A 627,367 65,864

Delaware 2A 563,894 57,599

Montgomery 2A 819,264 83,831

Berks 3 415,271 44,344

Chester 3 515,939 57,471

Cumberland 3 246,338 22,990

Dauphin 3 272,983 27,591

Erie 3 278,045 27,698

Lackawanna 3 211,917 19,683

Lancaster 3 536,624 57,674

Lehigh 3 360,685 38,365

Luzerne 3 318,449 29,545

Northampton 3 300,813 30,027

Westmoreland 3 357,956 32,262

York 3 442,867 46,274

Beaver 4 168,871 15,371

Butler 4 186,818 18,663

Cambria 4 136,411 12,466

Centre 4 160,580 11,187

Fayette 4 133,628 12,275

Franklin 4 153,638 15,806

Monroe 4 166,397 18,031

Schuylkill 4 144,590 13,419

Washington 4 208,261 19,373

Adams 5 102,295 10,158

Blair 5 125,593 11,751

Lawrence 5 88,082 8,504

Lebanon 5 137,067 14,272

Lycoming 5 116,048 10,669

Mercer 5 114,234 11,234

Northumberland 5 93,246 8,424

COUNTY CLASS TOTAL POPULATION

JUVENILE POPULATION

10-17Armstrong 6 67,052 6,073

Bedford 6 48,586 4,878

Bradford 6 61,281 6,128

Carbon 6 63,960 6,078

Clarion 6 39,498 3,358

Clearfield 6 80,994 7,116

Clinton 6 39,441 3,592

Columbia 6 66,672 5,487

Crawford 6 86,484 8,663

Elk 6 30,872 2,966

Greene 6 37,519 3,382

Huntingdon 6 45,668 4,018

Indiana 6 86,966 7,262

Jefferson 6 44,430 4,302

McKean 6 42,412 4,007

Mifflin 6 46,500 4,811

Perry 6 45,685 4,682

Pike 6 55,949 5,883

Somerset 6 75,522 6,692

Susquehanna 6 41,666 3,900

Tioga 6 41,877 3,766

Venango 6 53,119 4,995

Warren 6 40,396 3,841

Wayne 6 51,198 4,524

Juniata 7 24,737 2,648

Snyder 7 40,444 4,168

Union 7 44,954 3,969

Wyoming 7 27,800 2,723

Cameron 8 4,732 382

Forest 8 7,410 292

Fulton 8 14,629 1,481

Montour 8 18,557 1,729

Potter 8 17,093 1,717

Sullivan 8 6,328 362

Appendix 1

Appendices


COUNTY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 % CHANGE 2015-2016

ADAMS 255 251 207 174 225 29.3%

ALLEGHENY 3,083 3,244 3,180 2,841 2,830 -0.4%

ARMSTRONG 95 93 87 123 94 -23.6%

BEAVER 442 427 326 366 331 -9.6%

BEDFORD 81 85 53 44 36 -18.2%

BERKS 1,202 1,319 1,027 765 717 -6.3%

BLAIR 354 358 273 303 308 1.7%

BRADFORD 117 126 128 141 120 -14.9%

BUCKS 878 677 605 733 701 -4.4%

BUTLER 266 240 226 235 227 -3.4%

CAMBRIA 322 301 252 282 235 -16.7%

CAMERON 9 12 9 15 4 -73.3%

CARBON 156 124 117 91 103 13.2%

CENTRE 61 118 90 97 113 16.5%

CHESTER 774 773 676 759 590 -22.3%

CLARION 59 53 47 62 51 -17.7%

CLEARFIELD 72 72 52 53 48 -9.4%

CLINTON 126 98 83 94 88 -6.4%

COLUMBIA 132 132 96 84 64 -23.8%

CRAWFORD 193 145 207 170 117 -31.2%

CUMBERLAND 564 569 480 505 513 1.6%

DAUPHIN 759 689 550 659 802 21.7%

DELAWARE 1,451 1,216 1,183 1,039 1,227 18.1%

ELK 78 77 52 45 41 -8.9%

ERIE 823 710 663 599 547 -8.7%

FAYETTE 398 361 427 420 362 -13.8%

FOREST 5 10 6 3 2 -33.3%

FRANKLIN 485 475 508 479 417 -12.9%

FULTON 28 20 30 24 26 8.3%

GREENE 69 64 40 28 28 0.0%

HUNTINGDON 48 56 53 53 48 -9.4%

INDIANA 134 107 104 106 136 28.3%

JEFFERSON 102 98 60 65 43 -33.8%

JUNIATA 29 19 27 20 18 -10.0%


The information in this section includes those cases referred to juvenile probation with alleged delinquent offenses. Disposition reviews and Placement reviews, and dispositions involving children alleged to be dependent, are not included.

Appendix 2

Appendices


COUNTY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 % CHANGE 2015-2016

LACKAWANNA 302 283 280 308 327 6.2%

LANCASTER 1,134 1,031 862 821 781 -4.9%

LAWRENCE 249 261 164 166 173 4.2%

LEBANON 249 239 233 221 272 23.1%

LEHIGH 1,231 1,059 1,074 1,109 898 -19.0%

LUZERNE 542 506 583 610 520 -14.8%

LYCOMING 495 423 349 343 294 -14.3%

MCKEAN 87 76 140 112 96 -14.3%

MERCER 296 235 264 261 211 -19.2%

MIFFLIN 77 66 60 74 88 18.9%

MONROE 320 249 245 239 247 3.3%

MONTGOMERY 1,461 1,215 1,136 1,071 1,010 -5.7%

MONTOUR 28 30 19 24 14 -41.7%

NORTHAMPTON 725 655 559 663 618 -6.8%

NORTHUMBERLAND 369 296 318 248 222 -10.5%

PERRY 93 71 73 66 58 -12.1%

PHILADELPHIA 5,769 5,366 4,005 3,094 2,737 -11.5%

PIKE 119 102 97 96 76 -20.8%

POTTER 27 26 25 25 26 4.0%

SCHUYLKILL 325 356 262 269 213 -20.8%

SNYDER 182 149 123 66 74 12.1%

SOMERSET 122 81 69 56 77 37.5%

SULLIVAN 2 2 8 5 3 -40.0%

SUSQUEHANNA 51 60 45 50 30 -40.0%

TIOGA 91 93 69 85 61 -28.2%

UNION 57 54 43 30 59 96.7%

VENANGO 200 180 158 210 222 5.7%

WARREN 103 83 68 93 58 -37.6%

WASHINGTON 462 450 429 382 310 -18.8%

WAYNE 112 86 52 105 59 -43.8%

WESTMORELAND 582 610 576 518 524 1.2%

WYOMING 60 58 68 46 47 2.2%

YORK 1,507 1,387 1,188 1,196 1,397 16.8%

TOTAL 31,079 28,957 25,568 24,139 23,014 -4.7%

NOTE: This data does not include dispositions resulting from disposition review and placement review hearings.

Delinquency Dispositions, 2012-2016continued

Appendix 2

Appendices



% OF STATEWIDE

DISPOSITIONS

AGE 10-17 POPULATION

JUVENILE POPULATION

RANK

DISPOSITION RANK PER

100,000

DISPOSITIONS AS A % OF JUV. POP.

ADAMS 225 1.0% 10,158 31 14 2.2%

ALLEGHENY 2,830 12.3% 104,949 2 6 2.7%

ARMSTRONG 94 0.4% 6,073 40 38 1.5%

BEAVER 331 1.4% 15,371 22 15 2.2%

BEDFORD 36 0.2% 4,878 44 64 0.7%

BERKS 717 3.1% 44,344 9 35 1.6%

BLAIR 308 1.3% 11,751 27 9 2.6%

BRADFORD 120 0.5% 6,128 38 20 2.0%

BUCKS 701 3.0% 65,864 4 55 1.1%

BUTLER 227 1.0% 18,663 19 50 1.2%

CAMBRIA 235 1.0% 12,466 25 23 1.9%

CAMERON 4 0.0% 382 65 56 1.0%

CARBON 103 0.4% 6,078 39 31 1.7%

CENTRE 113 0.5% 11,187 29 58 1.0%

CHESTER 590 2.6% 57,471 7 57 1.0%

CLARION 51 0.2% 3,358 58 39 1.5%

CLEARFIELD 48 0.2% 7,116 36 67 0.7%

CLINTON 88 0.4% 3,592 56 10 2.4%

COLUMBIA 64 0.3% 5,487 42 53 1.2%

CRAWFORD 117 0.5% 8,663 32 46 1.4%

CUMBERLAND 513 2.2% 22,990 16 13 2.2%

DAUPHIN 802 3.5% 27,591 15 4 2.9%

DELAWARE 1,227 5.3% 57,599 6 16 2.1%

ELK 41 0.2% 2,966 59 43 1.4%

ERIE 547 2.4% 27,698 14 19 2.0%

FAYETTE 362 1.6% 12,275 26 3 2.9%

FOREST 2 0.0% 292 67 65 0.7%

FRANKLIN 417 1.8% 15,806 21 7 2.6%

FULTON 26 0.1% 1,481 64 29 1.8%

GREENE 28 0.1% 3,382 57 61 0.8%

HUNTINGDON 48 0.2% 4,018 50 52 1.2%

INDIANA 136 0.6% 7,262 35 25 1.9%

JEFFERSON 43 0.2% 4,302 48 59 1.0%

JUNIATA 18 0.1% 2,648 61 66 0.7%

Delinquency Dispositions as a Percent of Juvenile Population, 2016

Appendix 3


Appendices



% OF STATEWIDE

DISPOSITIONS

AGE 10-17 POPULATION

JUVENILE POPULATION

RANK

DISPOSITION RANK PER

100,000

DISPOSITIONS AS A % OF JUV. POP.

LACKAWANNA 327 1.4% 19,683 17 32 1.7%

LANCASTER 781 3.4% 57,674 5 45 1.4%

LAWRENCE 173 0.8% 8,504 33 18 2.0%

LEBANON 272 1.2% 14,272 23 22 1.9%

LEHIGH 898 3.9% 38,365 10 12 2.3%

LUZERNE 520 2.3% 29,545 13 28 1.8%

LYCOMING 294 1.3% 10,669 30 5 2.8%

MCKEAN 96 0.4% 4,007 51 11 2.4%

MERCER 211 0.9% 11,234 28 24 1.9%

MIFFLIN 88 0.4% 4,811 45 26 1.8%

MONROE 247 1.1% 18,031 20 44 1.4%

MONTGOMERY 1,010 4.4% 83,831 3 51 1.2%

MONTOUR 14 0.1% 1,729 62 62 0.8%

NORTHAMPTON 618 2.7% 30,027 12 17 2.1%

NORTHUMBERLAND 222 1.0% 8,424 34 8 2.6%

PERRY 58 0.3% 4,682 46 49 1.2%

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 11.9% 141,550 1 21 1.9%

PIKE 76 0.3% 5,883 41 48 1.3%

POTTER 26 0.1% 1,717 63 40 1.5%

SCHUYLKILL 213 0.9% 13,419 24 37 1.6%

SNYDER 74 0.3% 4,168 49 27 1.8%

SOMERSET 77 0.3% 6,692 37 54 1.2%

SULLIVAN 3 0.0% 362 66 60 0.8%

SUSQUEHANNA 30 0.1% 3,900 53 63 0.8%

TIOGA 61 0.3% 3,766 55 34 1.6%

UNION 59 0.3% 3,969 52 42 1.5%

VENANGO 222 1.0% 4,995 43 1 4.4%

WARREN 58 0.3% 3,841 54 41 1.5%

WASHINGTON 310 1.3% 19,373 18 36 1.6%

WAYNE 59 0.3% 4,524 47 47 1.3%

WESTMORELAND 524 2.3% 32,262 11 33 1.6%

WYOMING 47 0.2% 2,723 60 30 1.7%

YORK 1,397 6.1% 46,274 8 2 3.0%

TOTALS 23,014 100.0% 1,239,195 1.9%


Delinquency Dispositions as a Percent of Juvenile Population, 2016

continued

Appendix 3

Appendices


COUNTY TOTAL DISPOS.

TRANSFERRED TO CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

TRANSFER TO OTHER

COURT

COMPLAINT WITHDRAWN

WARNED, CASE

CLOSED

INFORMAL ADJUSTMENT

FINES/ COSTS

ORDEREDDISMISSED

ADAMS 225 0 16 12 3 38 8 10

ALLEGHENY 2,830 1 14 406 156 1,006 0 103

ARMSTRONG 94 0 11 1 0 17 5 2

BEAVER 331 0 5 23 1 25 7 72

BEDFORD 36 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

BERKS 717 1 32 53 6 119 55 23

BLAIR 308 1 6 12 0 25 68 15

BRADFORD 120 1 3 6 32 17 1 3

BUCKS 701 0 65 45 6 67 82 5

BUTLER 227 0 33 14 0 16 0 2

CAMBRIA 235 1 6 4 0 5 8 35

CAMERON 4 1 0 0 0 2 0 0

CARBON 103 0 18 2 17 0 7 3

CENTRE 113 0 17 8 0 13 0 1

CHESTER 590 2 41 12 12 144 71 3

CLARION 51 0 2 2 0 4 1 2

CLEARFIELD 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CLINTON 88 1 3 7 0 16 1 5

COLUMBIA 64 0 5 0 1 30 0 0

CRAWFORD 117 0 9 3 0 24 3 2

CUMBERLAND 513 0 94 17 2 106 14 6

DAUPHIN 802 11 41 10 0 172 12 4

DELAWARE 1,227 8 56 39 1 144 15 29

ELK 41 0 0 5 0 6 2 0

ERIE 547 1 4 39 53 137 8 1

FAYETTE 362 0 3 15 127 59 0 10

FOREST 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 417 1 6 39 7 22 61 0

FULTON 26 0 1 1 0 0 3 1

GREENE 28 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

HUNTINGDON 48 0 11 0 2 0 3 3

INDIANA 136 0 12 1 0 22 45 0

JEFFERSON 43 0 2 1 0 1 0 1

JUNIATA 18 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Delinquency Dispositions by Type, 2016


Appendix 4

Appendices


COUNTY PROTECTIVE SUPERVISION

REFERRAL TO AGENCY/ INDIVIDUAL

CONSENT DECREE* PROBATION

CONTINUED PREVIOUS

DISPOSITION

OTHER DISPOSITIONS PLACEMENT

ADAMS 0 0 53 48 2 33 2

ALLEGHENY 0 0 453 250 4 337 100

ARMSTRONG 0 1 20 20 1 13 3

BEAVER 0 0 90 25 1 64 18

BEDFORD 0 0 22 9 0 0 4

BERKS 0 0 235 57 2 98 36

BLAIR 0 0 119 19 18 18 7

BRADFORD 0 0 39 11 0 0 7

BUCKS 0 0 214 154 21 22 20

BUTLER 0 0 66 72 0 8 16

CAMBRIA 1 0 74 39 25 8 29

CAMERON 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

CARBON 0 0 35 8 0 3 10

CENTRE 0 0 45 17 1 2 9

CHESTER 0 0 74 141 9 18 63

CLARION 0 1 17 11 1 7 3

CLEARFIELD 0 0 7 31 0 3 7

CLINTON 0 0 15 12 5 20 3

COLUMBIA 0 0 9 10 0 5 4

CRAWFORD 0 0 22 40 0 7 7

CUMBERLAND 0 0 92 40 2 126 14

DAUPHIN 0 1 117 119 2 292 21

DELAWARE 0 0 234 376 39 216 70

ELK 0 0 14 7 0 2 5

ERIE 0 0 65 96 0 31 112

FAYETTE 0 10 40 26 0 59 13

FOREST 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

FRANKLIN 0 0 136 68 4 45 28

FULTON 0 0 15 4 0 1 0

GREENE 0 0 10 9 0 6 2

HUNTINGDON 0 1 17 7 0 0 4

INDIANA 0 0 16 25 0 11 4

JEFFERSON 0 0 30 1 2 1 4

JUNIATA 0 0 9 3 2 0 2

Delinquency Dispositions by Type, 2016 continued

Appendix 4


Appendices



TRANSFERRED TO CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

TRANSFER TO OTHER

COURT

COMPLAINT WITHDRAWN

WARNED, CASE

CLOSED

INFORMAL ADJUSTMENT

FINES/ COSTS

ORDEREDDISMISSED

LACKAWANNA 327 2 6 30 7 53 0 12

LANCASTER 781 1 33 43 90 220 10 6

LAWRENCE 173 0 0 0 0 47 0 18

LEBANON 272 0 12 6 3 14 10 2

LEHIGH 898 3 36 41 11 49 148 9

LUZERNE 520 2 17 33 21 65 50 14

LYCOMING 294 2 7 20 24 46 0 11

MCKEAN 96 0 2 4 0 8 35 5

MERCER 211 0 15 7 0 36 6 8

MIFFLIN 88 2 3 0 2 8 3 3

MONROE 247 0 13 11 0 1 0 22

MONTGOMERY 1,010 2 53 44 5 122 214 39

MONTOUR 14 0 3 0 0 1 0 0

NORTHAMPTON 618 4 61 24 76 143 41 4

NORTHUMBERLAND 222 3 19 2 5 67 45 0

PERRY 58 0 3 0 0 18 1 2

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 5 9 122 0 310 1 272

PIKE 76 0 4 1 0 0 16 0

POTTER 26 0 2 0 0 2 2 0

SCHUYLKILL 213 0 9 21 1 51 6 3

SNYDER 74 0 6 7 0 12 4 0

SOMERSET 77 0 1 23 7 0 6 0

SULLIVAN 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

SUSQUEHANNA 30 1 1 1 0 7 0 1

TIOGA 61 1 1 3 0 0 3 0

UNION 59 2 5 0 0 9 4 0

VENANGO 222 0 3 13 1 5 0 0

WARREN 58 0 1 3 0 2 4 0

WASHINGTON 310 0 15 14 7 68 49 5

WAYNE 59 0 8 1 0 0 6 1

WESTMORELAND 524 1 34 14 1 29 45 34

WYOMING 47 0 6 2 0 0 0 1

YORK 1,397 1 26 27 23 208 467 12

TOTAL 23,014 62 935 1,295 710 3,838 1,656 825% OF TOTAL 100.0% 0.3% 4.1% 5.6% 3.1% 16.7% 7.2% 3.6%


Delinquency Dispositions by Type, 2016continued

Appendix 4

Appendices


COUNTY PROTECTIVE SUPERVISION

REFERRAL TO AGENCY/ INDIVIDUAL

CONSENT DECREE* PROBATION

CONTINUED PREVIOUS

DISPOSITION

OTHER DISPOSITIONS PLACEMENT

LACKAWANNA 0 0 102 89 4 10 12

LANCASTER 0 0 58 261 5 32 22

LAWRENCE 0 0 39 37 27 2 3

LEBANON 0 0 141 58 3 4 19

LEHIGH 0 45 139 267 2 91 57

LUZERNE 0 0 60 58 12 154 34

LYCOMING 0 1 135 26 0 9 13

MCKEAN 0 0 24 16 0 2 0

MERCER 0 6 41 50 6 19 17

MIFFLIN 0 0 27 35 0 1 4

MONROE 0 0 23 99 1 15 62

MONTGOMERY 0 0 109 309 2 43 68

MONTOUR 0 0 5 3 0 0 2

NORTHAMPTON 0 4 68 111 8 34 40

NORTHUMBERLAND 0 0 25 30 13 6 7

PERRY 0 0 10 12 1 5 6

PHILADELPHIA 0 1 1,049 258 145 297 268

PIKE 0 0 4 30 0 8 13

POTTER 0 0 12 5 0 2 1

SCHUYLKILL 0 1 27 30 11 37 16

SNYDER 0 1 6 5 0 30 3

SOMERSET 0 0 19 11 6 4 0

SULLIVAN 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

SUSQUEHANNA 0 0 8 8 0 3 0

TIOGA 0 0 27 8 8 7 3

UNION 0 0 18 16 1 3 1

VENANGO 0 0 29 29 0 138 4

WARREN 0 0 19 18 1 1 9

WASHINGTON 0 0 31 79 0 13 29

WAYNE 0 0 11 17 0 15 0

WESTMORELAND 0 1 143 117 1 71 33

WYOMING 0 0 5 16 3 11 3

YORK 0 0 320 164 10 55 84

TOTAL 1 75 5,140 4,027 412 2,578 1,460% OF TOTAL 0.0% 0.3% 22.3% 17.5% 1.8% 11.2% 6.3%

Delinquency Dispositions by Type, 2016 continued

Appendix 4

*The following counties had a total of 1,187 cases where the disposition was reported as either deferred adjudication or deferred placement with no reported adjudication of delinquency at the time of disposition. These dispositions have been included with the disposition of Consent Decree. (Adams-9, Beaver-1, Bedford-1, Bucks-41, Butler-3, Centre-2, Chester-18, Clarion-2, Crawford-8, Cumberland-4, Delaware-5, Erie-6, Franklin-56, Fulton-4, Juniata-1, Lackawanna-18, Lehigh-1, Luzerne-13, Lycoming-39, McKean-5, Mercer-28, Mifflin-1, Northumberland-2, Philadelphia-769, Somerset-1, Venango-2, Wayne-4, Westmoreland-3, York-140.).

Appendices



POLICEMAGISTERIAL

DISTRICT JUDGE

OTHER JUVENILE

COURTPROBATION OTHER

N % N % N % N % N %ADAMS 225 144 64.0% 63 28.0% 18 8.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

ALLEGHENY 2,830 1,832 64.7% 417 14.7% 76 2.7% 1 0.0% 504 17.8%

ARMSTRONG 94 69 73.4% 13 13.8% 12 12.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BEAVER 331 216 65.3% 99 29.9% 16 4.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BEDFORD 36 36 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BERKS 717 588 82.0% 84 11.7% 31 4.3% 2 0.3% 12 1.7%

BLAIR 308 210 68.2% 72 23.4% 7 2.3% 0 0.0% 19 6.2%

BRADFORD 120 89 74.2% 26 21.7% 0 0.0% 3 2.5% 2 1.7%

BUCKS 701 560 79.9% 110 15.7% 20 2.9% 3 0.4% 8 1.1%

BUTLER 227 216 95.2% 0 0.0% 7 3.1% 0 0.0% 4 1.8%

CAMBRIA 235 197 83.8% 35 14.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 1.3%

CAMERON 4 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CARBON 103 80 77.7% 12 11.7% 9 8.7% 0 0.0% 2 1.9%

CENTRE 113 112 99.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9%

CHESTER 590 507 85.9% 52 8.8% 28 4.7% 2 0.3% 1 0.2%

CLARION 51 47 92.2% 2 3.9% 1 2.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.0%

CLEARFIELD 48 47 97.9% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CLINTON 88 64 72.7% 2 2.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 21 23.9%

COLUMBIA 64 33 51.6% 21 32.8% 10 15.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CRAWFORD 117 86 73.5% 24 20.5% 6 5.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.9%

CUMBERLAND 513 462 90.1% 27 5.3% 23 4.5% 0 0.0% 1 0.2%

DAUPHIN 802 690 86.0% 86 10.7% 23 2.9% 3 0.4% 0 0.0%

DELAWARE 1,227 1,057 86.1% 93 7.6% 70 5.7% 4 0.3% 3 0.2%

ELK 41 32 78.0% 7 17.1% 2 4.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

ERIE 547 486 88.8% 35 6.4% 10 1.8% 7 1.3% 9 1.6%

FAYETTE 362 166 45.9% 179 49.4% 10 2.8% 1 0.3% 6 1.7%

FOREST 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

FRANKLIN 417 234 56.1% 72 17.3% 21 5.0% 0 0.0% 90 21.6%

FULTON 26 22 84.6% 3 11.5% 1 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

GREENE 28 20 71.4% 6 21.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 7.1%

HUNTINGDON 48 45 93.8% 0 0.0% 2 4.2% 0 0.0% 1 2.1%

INDIANA 136 84 61.8% 42 30.9% 10 7.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

JEFFERSON 43 35 81.4% 3 7.0% 4 9.3% 1 2.3% 0 0.0%

JUNIATA 18 18 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Delinquency Dispositions by Source of Allegation, 2016

Appendix 5


Appendices



POLICEMAGISTERIAL

DISTRICT JUDGE

OTHER JUVENILE

COURTPROBATION OTHER

N % N % N % N % N %LACKAWANNA 327 304 93.0% 0 0.0% 20 6.1% 0 0.0% 3 0.9%

LANCASTER 781 644 82.5% 108 13.8% 28 3.6% 1 0.1% 0 0.0%

LAWRENCE 173 130 75.1% 38 22.0% 3 1.7% 0 0.0% 2 1.2%

LEBANON 272 254 93.4% 0 0.0% 4 1.5% 0 0.0% 14 5.1%

LEHIGH 898 598 66.6% 227 25.3% 61 6.8% 0 0.0% 12 1.3%

LUZERNE 520 286 55.0% 159 30.6% 21 4.0% 0 0.0% 54 10.4%

LYCOMING 294 198 67.3% 84 28.6% 10 3.4% 0 0.0% 2 0.7%

MCKEAN 96 59 61.5% 32 33.3% 3 3.1% 0 0.0% 2 2.1%

MERCER 211 184 87.2% 18 8.5% 9 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MIFFLIN 88 80 90.9% 0 0.0% 7 8.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.1%

MONROE 247 176 71.3% 32 13.0% 38 15.4% 0 0.0% 1 0.4%

MONTGOMERY 1,010 719 71.2% 245 24.3% 41 4.1% 0 0.0% 5 0.5%

MONTOUR 14 12 85.7% 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 1 7.1%

NORTHAMPTON 618 479 77.5% 94 15.2% 44 7.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.2%

NORTHUMBERLAND 222 142 64.0% 64 28.8% 14 6.3% 1 0.5% 1 0.5%

PERRY 58 56 96.6% 0 0.0% 2 3.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 2,538 92.7% 0 0.0% 199 7.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

PIKE 76 55 72.4% 10 13.2% 7 9.2% 2 2.6% 2 2.6%

POTTER 26 21 80.8% 4 15.4% 1 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SCHUYLKILL 213 157 73.7% 32 15.0% 22 10.3% 0 0.0% 2 0.9%

SNYDER 74 63 85.1% 7 9.5% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 3 4.1%

SOMERSET 77 53 68.8% 20 26.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 3 3.9%

SULLIVAN 3 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SUSQUEHANNA 30 26 86.7% 2 6.7% 2 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

TIOGA 61 52 85.2% 4 6.6% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 4 6.6%

UNION 59 49 83.1% 7 11.9% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 2 3.4%

VENANGO 222 75 33.8% 146 65.8% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

WARREN 58 53 91.4% 5 8.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

WASHINGTON 310 180 58.1% 67 21.6% 20 6.5% 0 0.0% 43 13.9%

WAYNE 59 42 71.2% 13 22.0% 4 6.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

WESTMORELAND 524 381 72.7% 115 21.9% 26 5.0% 1 0.2% 1 0.2%

WYOMING 47 37 78.7% 8 17.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 4.3%

YORK 1,397 880 63.0% 448 32.1% 63 4.5% 1 0.1% 5 0.4%

TOTAL 23,014 17,476 75.9% 3,574 15.5% 1,073 4.7% 34 0.1% 857 3.7%

Delinquency Dispositions by Source of Allegation, 2016 continued


Appendix 5

Appendices


Type of Attorney Representation in Delinquency Proceedings, 2016

COUNTY NUMBER OF PROCEEDINGS

PUBLIC DEFENDER % COURT

APPOINTED % PRIVATE % WAIVED %NO

ATTORNEY PRESENT

%

ADAMS 144 126 87.5% 6 4.2% 12 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

ALLEGHENY 1,251 796 63.6% 180 14.4% 275 22.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

ARMSTRONG 55 36 65.5% 6 10.9% 13 23.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BEAVER 127 101 79.5% 12 9.4% 14 11.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BEDFORD 36 29 80.6% 0 0.0% 7 19.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BERKS 461 306 66.4% 126 27.3% 29 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BLAIR 196 122 62.2% 72 36.7% 2 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BRADFORD 37 24 64.9% 10 27.0% 3 8.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BUCKS 510 388 76.1% 54 10.6% 68 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BUTLER 204 134 65.7% 40 19.6% 30 14.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CAMBRIA 163 122 74.8% 28 17.2% 13 8.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CAMERON 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CARBON 45 26 57.8% 16 35.6% 3 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CENTRE 93 49 52.7% 3 3.2% 41 44.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CHESTER 360 267 74.2% 43 11.9% 50 13.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CLARION 40 38 95.0% 0 0.0% 2 5.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CLEARFIELD 40 29 72.5% 8 20.0% 3 7.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CLINTON 47 46 97.9% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

COLUMBIA 28 22 78.6% 2 7.1% 4 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CRAWFORD 80 49 61.3% 26 32.5% 5 6.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CUMBERLAND 208 145 69.7% 49 23.6% 14 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

DAUPHIN 386 294 76.2% 0 0.0% 92 23.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

DELAWARE 894 651 72.8% 77 8.6% 157 17.6% 6 0.7% 3 0.3%

ELK 15 10 66.7% 5 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

ERIE 271 189 69.7% 64 23.6% 18 6.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

FAYETTE 60 52 86.7% 3 5.0% 5 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

FOREST 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

FRANKLIN 174 141 81.0% 16 9.2% 17 9.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

FULTON 10 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

GREENE 15 7 46.7% 6 40.0% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

HUNTINGDON 45 42 93.3% 2 4.4% 1 2.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

INDIANA 61 56 91.8% 0 0.0% 5 8.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

JEFFERSON 40 40 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

JUNIATA 16 16 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Appendix 6


Appendices


Type of Attorney Representation in Delinquency Proceedings, 2016

continued


COUNTY NUMBER OF PROCEEDINGS

PUBLIC DEFENDER % COURT

APPOINTED % PRIVATE % WAIVED %NO

ATTORNEY PRESENT

%

LACKAWANNA 237 101 42.6% 107 45.1% 29 12.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

LANCASTER 411 278 67.6% 81 19.7% 52 12.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

LAWRENCE 111 111 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

LEBANON 242 133 55.0% 91 37.6% 18 7.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

LEHIGH 473 385 81.4% 65 13.7% 23 4.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

LUZERNE 219 147 67.1% 61 27.9% 11 5.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

LYCOMING 208 195 93.8% 9 4.3% 4 1.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MCKEAN 51 38 74.5% 0 0.0% 13 25.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MERCER 151 113 74.8% 26 17.2% 11 7.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.7%

MIFFLIN 77 57 74.0% 15 19.5% 5 6.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MONROE 209 153 73.2% 32 15.3% 24 11.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MONTGOMERY 664 466 70.2% 4 0.6% 194 29.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MONTOUR 13 11 84.6% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

NORTHAMPTON 313 232 74.1% 53 16.9% 28 8.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

NORTHUMBERLAND 98 42 42.9% 56 57.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

PERRY 37 36 97.3% 0 0.0% 1 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

PHILADELPHIA 2,305 1,033 44.8% 1,095 47.5% 177 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

PIKE 63 47 74.6% 0 0.0% 16 25.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

POTTER 20 20 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SCHUYLKILL 103 82 79.6% 12 11.7% 9 8.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SNYDER 27 21 77.8% 6 22.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SOMERSET 24 21 87.5% 1 4.2% 2 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SULLIVAN 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SUSQUEHANNA 19 14 73.7% 2 10.5% 3 15.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

TIOGA 53 45 84.9% 1 1.9% 7 13.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

UNION 45 28 62.2% 15 33.3% 2 4.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

VENANGO 70 16 22.9% 44 62.9% 10 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

WARREN 34 25 73.5% 6 17.6% 3 8.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

WASHINGTON 169 117 69.2% 31 18.3% 21 12.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

WAYNE 38 34 89.5% 0 0.0% 4 10.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

WESTMORELAND 419 282 67.3% 64 15.3% 65 15.5% 0 0.0% 8 1.9%

WYOMING 41 37 90.2% 0 0.0% 4 9.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

YORK 448 291 65.0% 142 31.7% 15 3.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

TOTAL 13,509 8,973 66.4% 2,882 21.3% 1,636 12.1% 6 0.0% 12 0.1%

Appendix 6

Appendices


Time lapse information is calculated from the date of allegation to the date of disposition. Disposition reviews, placement reviews, and dependency cases are not included. Dispositions are grouped into one of two categories: “formal” or “informal”. A disposition is counted in the “formal” category if a date was reported in the Date of Hearing field indicating that a hearing before a judge or hearing officer was conducted, other than a detention hearing, following the filing of a petition.


FORMAL DISPOSITIONS

INFORMAL DISPOSITIONS

TOTAL MEDIAN IN DAYS TOTAL MEDIAN

IN DAYSADAMS 225 144 130.0 81 126.0

ALLEGHENY 2,830 1,251 128.0 1,579 126.0

ARMSTRONG 94 55 101.0 39 25.0

BEAVER 331 127 123.0 204 33.0

BEDFORD 36 36 89.5 0 0.0

BERKS 717 461 140.0 256 60.5

BLAIR 308 196 73.0 112 1.0

BRADFORD 120 37 172.0 83 92.0

BUCKS 701 510 85.0 191 64.0

BUTLER 227 204 67.0 23 40.0

CAMBRIA 235 163 136.0 72 127.0

CAMERON 4 1 674.0 3 71.0

CARBON 103 45 174.0 58 154.0

CENTRE 113 93 125.0 20 90.5

CHESTER 590 360 228.0 230 121.0

CLARION 51 40 84.0 11 210.0

CLEARFIELD 48 40 154.5 8 111.0

CLINTON 88 47 103.0 41 184.0

COLUMBIA 64 28 102.0 36 65.5

CRAWFORD 117 80 154.0 37 1.0

CUMBERLAND 513 208 92.0 305 78.0

DAUPHIN 802 386 120.0 416 147.0

DELAWARE 1,227 894 123.5 333 211.0

ELK 41 15 115.0 26 39.5

ERIE 547 271 170.0 276 120.5

FAYETTE 362 60 203.5 302 203.0

FOREST 2 2 1,041.5 0 0.0

FRANKLIN 417 174 80.5 243 64.0

FULTON 26 10 124.5 16 78.5

GREENE 28 15 143.0 13 140.0

HUNTINGDON 48 45 96.0 3 70.0

INDIANA 136 61 92.0 75 44.0

JEFFERSON 43 40 43.0 3 50.0

JUNIATA 18 16 33.5 2 247.5

Time Lapse from Allegation to Disposition for Delinquency Cases, 2016

Appendix 7


Appendices



Time Lapse from Allegation to Disposition for Delinquency Cases, 2016

continued


FORMAL DISPOSITIONS

INFORMAL DISPOSITIONS

TOTAL MEDIAN IN DAYS TOTAL MEDIAN

IN DAYSLACKAWANNA 327 237 85.0 90 175.5

LANCASTER 781 411 118.0 370 54.0

LAWRENCE 173 111 79.0 62 101.5

LEBANON 272 242 158.5 30 135.5

LEHIGH 898 473 59.0 425 43.0

LUZERNE 520 219 158.0 301 189.0

LYCOMING 294 208 29.5 86 37.0

MCKEAN 96 51 107.0 45 186.0

MERCER 211 151 95.0 60 71.0

MIFFLIN 88 77 73.0 11 51.0

MONROE 247 209 97.0 38 76.5

MONTGOMERY 1,010 664 121.0 346 1.0

MONTOUR 14 13 48.0 1 39.0

NORTHAMPTON 618 313 75.0 305 35.0

NORTHUMBERLAND 222 98 146.5 124 86.0

PERRY 58 37 92.0 21 40.0

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 2,305 60.0 432 3.0

PIKE 76 63 120.0 13 8.0

POTTER 26 20 100.5 6 86.5

SCHUYLKILL 213 103 91.0 110 27.5

SNYDER 74 27 124.0 47 148.0

SOMERSET 77 24 154.0 53 88.0

SULLIVAN 3 2 211.0 1 79.0

SUSQUEHANNA 30 19 99.0 11 55.0

TIOGA 61 53 74.0 8 203.5

UNION 59 45 120.0 14 105.0

VENANGO 222 70 98.0 152 1.0

WARREN 58 34 74.0 24 24.0

WASHINGTON 310 169 69.0 141 28.0

WAYNE 59 38 109.5 21 144.0

WESTMORELAND 524 419 101.0 105 43.0

WYOMING 47 41 78.0 6 62.0

YORK 1,397 448 142.0 949 54.0

TOTAL 23,014 13,509 102.0 9,505 71.0

Appendix 7

Appendices


COUNTY PERSON PROPERTY DRUG OTHER* TOTALADAMS 122 75 150 197 544

ALLEGHENY 2,275 2,024 985 2,921 8,205

ARMSTRONG 80 73 90 93 336

BEAVER 206 224 90 264 784

BEDFORD 25 21 21 15 82

BERKS 960 831 270 864 2,925

BLAIR 170 313 118 298 899

BRADFORD 65 101 60 83 309

BUCKS 471 472 581 550 2,074

BUTLER 176 120 123 170 589

CAMBRIA 267 175 64 248 754

CAMERON 0 2 9 2 13

CARBON 80 73 46 76 275

CENTRE 106 221 79 162 568

CHESTER 915 803 508 855 3,081

CLARION 299 33 16 151 499

CLEARFIELD 31 48 31 29 139

CLINTON 53 32 73 80 238

COLUMBIA 32 39 19 70 160

CRAWFORD 119 117 51 100 387

CUMBERLAND 294 383 297 279 1,253

DAUPHIN 380 415 385 549 1,729

DELAWARE 2,013 1,490 514 1,576 5,593

ELK 30 63 5 22 120

ERIE 390 753 177 438 1,758

FAYETTE 180 179 43 880 1,282

FOREST 6 3 0 1 10

FRANKLIN 225 278 224 403 1,130

FULTON 27 58 10 26 121

GREENE 13 31 2 24 70

HUNTINGDON 46 25 25 47 143

INDIANA 47 98 71 159 375

JEFFERSON 24 9 36 22 91

JUNIATA 86 10 11 7 114

Alleged Offenses by Type, 2016

Appendix 8

NOTE: Includes most serious seven offenses and counts reported on each case.

*The “Other” offenses category includes, but is not limited to: Public Order offenses such as Disorderly Conduct or Weapon on School Property; Firearms offenses; and Certifications from the minor judiciary that a juvenile failed to comply with a lawful sentence imposed for a summary offense.

Appendices


COUNTY PERSON PROPERTY DRUG OTHER* TOTALLACKAWANNA 296 237 112 310 955

LANCASTER 400 713 332 701 2,146

LAWRENCE 112 185 66 147 510

LEBANON 140 416 126 216 898

LEHIGH 545 525 227 867 2,164

LUZERNE 297 328 180 582 1,387

LYCOMING 205 224 128 255 812

MCKEAN 82 96 26 97 301

MERCER 155 181 69 166 571

MIFFLIN 36 112 37 70 255

MONROE 319 118 87 261 785

MONTGOMERY 1,361 992 602 1,336 4,291

MONTOUR 17 3 1 15 36

NORTHAMPTON 457 356 302 539 1,654

NORTHUMBERLAND 148 134 86 255 623

PERRY 41 31 42 44 158

PHILADELPHIA 4,072 2,640 841 3,167 10,720

PIKE 29 83 50 44 206

POTTER 3 29 20 23 75

SCHUYLKILL 196 301 98 184 779

SNYDER 35 68 31 47 181

SOMERSET 30 96 36 98 260

SULLIVAN 5 0 0 1 6

SUSQUEHANNA 33 15 12 48 108

TIOGA 31 46 49 35 161

UNION 29 48 22 54 153

VENANGO 103 108 69 202 482

WARREN 53 42 22 52 169

WASHINGTON 232 137 149 732 1,250

WAYNE 25 56 18 62 161

WESTMORELAND 399 275 242 477 1,393

WYOMING 47 24 17 37 125

YORK 714 1,240 484 1,471 3,909

TOTAL 20,860 19,451 9,767 24,256 74,334% OF TOTAL 28.1% 26.2% 13.1% 32.6% 100.0%


Alleged Offenses by Type, 2016 continued

Appendix 8


Appendices


COUNTY PERSON PROPERTY DRUG OTHER* TOTALADAMS 19 26 26 29 100

ALLEGHENY 284 312 103 360 1,059

ARMSTRONG 14 14 13 7 48

BEAVER 12 36 8 17 73

BEDFORD 3 6 11 3 23

BERKS 137 166 75 136 514

BLAIR 32 25 10 25 92

BRADFORD 8 12 8 5 33

BUCKS 247 243 332 226 1,048

BUTLER 42 23 32 46 143

CAMBRIA 36 17 3 34 90

CAMERON 0 0 0 0 0

CARBON 14 15 10 8 47

CENTRE 33 40 44 19 136

CHESTER 147 141 111 95 494

CLARION 11 5 3 4 23

CLEARFIELD 28 42 22 27 119

CLINTON 5 5 10 10 30

COLUMBIA 7 8 6 17 38

CRAWFORD 41 45 27 28 141

CUMBERLAND 55 78 45 26 204

DAUPHIN 205 180 131 234 750

DELAWARE 314 194 88 140 736

ELK 7 5 2 2 16

ERIE 104 239 46 127 516

FAYETTE 31 151 10 181 373

FOREST 1 0 0 0 1

FRANKLIN 61 105 58 68 292

FULTON 1 18 0 3 22

GREENE 11 23 2 13 49

HUNTINGDON 10 17 12 28 67

INDIANA 11 26 17 20 74

JEFFERSON 2 0 1 3 6

JUNIATA 26 7 7 7 47

Substantiated Offenses by Type, 2016

Appendix 9



Appendices


COUNTY PERSON PROPERTY DRUG OTHER* TOTALLACKAWANNA 72 73 22 52 219

LANCASTER 229 415 122 170 936

LAWRENCE 14 50 16 17 97

LEBANON 60 155 59 68 342

LEHIGH 211 210 79 273 773

LUZERNE 56 91 56 108 311

LYCOMING 42 45 35 34 156

MCKEAN 10 22 5 7 44

MERCER 48 62 24 36 170

MIFFLIN 36 44 23 20 123

MONROE 86 42 26 85 239

MONTGOMERY 312 271 173 191 947

MONTOUR 3 0 0 5 8

NORTHAMPTON 99 76 59 53 287


PERRY 11 6 11 9 37

PHILADELPHIA 278 189 137 140 744

PIKE 11 28 22 13 74

POTTER 0 3 7 0 10

SCHUYLKILL 46 37 16 39 138

SNYDER 3 13 4 3 23

SOMERSET 1 7 6 2 16

SULLIVAN 0 0 0 1 1


TIOGA 3 7 5 2 17

UNION 7 11 3 7 28

VENANGO 22 26 13 18 79

WARREN 21 16 7 21 65

WASHINGTON 99 52 56 495 702

WAYNE 11 16 11 11 49

WESTMORELAND 91 79 49 112 331

WYOMING 12 8 5 3 28

YORK 245 458 129 335 1,167

TOTAL 4,118 4,770 2,481 4,299 15,668% OF TOTAL 26.3% 30.4% 15.8% 27.4% 100.0%


Substantiated Offenses by Type, 2016 continued

Appendix 9


Appendices




PHILADELPHIA 2,507 7.0

ALLEGHENY 1,512 7.0

BUCKS 638 3.0

DELAWARE 606 10.0

MONTGOMERY 511 6.0

DAUPHIN 223 8.0

BERKS 214 13.0

CHESTER 185 19.0

NORTHAMPTON 160 18.0

LACKAWANNA 151 7.0

LEHIGH 137 15.0

ERIE 136 11.0

YORK 135 13.0

LANCASTER 127 18.0

WESTMORELAND 125 13.0

WASHINGTON 124 10.0

MONROE 69 14.0

LEBANON 59 12.0

LUZERNE 50 9.0

MIFFLIN 46 17.0

CUMBERLAND 37 13.0

NORTHUMBERLAND 32 5.0

CLEARFIELD 31 8.0

CENTRE 29 15.0

FAYETTE 28 4.0

LYCOMING 28 9.5

BEAVER 27 19.0

CLINTON 25 8.0

SCHUYLKILL 22 9.0

FRANKLIN 21 12.0

BLAIR 18 9.0

PIKE 16 10.5

INDIANA 13 4.0

CARBON 12 10.0

HUNTINGDON 12 12.5

Number of Admissions and Length of Stay in Secure Detention, 2016

This table reflects the median length of stay in secure detention. The median is defined as the value above and below which half the cases fall. In 2016, the statewide median length of stay in secure detention was 8 days, which is a decrease of one day from 2015.

Appendix 10

Appendices


Number of Admissions and Length of Stay in Secure Detention, 2016 continued



WAYNE 12 23.0

PERRY 10 16.0

CAMBRIA 8 36.0

BEDFORD 7 9.0

JUNIATA 7 10.0

POTTER 6 9.0

BUTLER 5 24.0

SNYDER 5 6.0

CRAWFORD 4 7.0

TIOGA 4 3.0

ADAMS 3 47.0

BRADFORD 3 5.0

COLUMBIA 3 14.0

SOMERSET 3 3.0

UNION 3 12.0

WYOMING 3 41.0

ELK 2 10.5

JEFFERSON 2 7.5

MCKEAN 2 16.0

MONTOUR 2 26.5

SULLIVAN 2 109.0

WARREN 2 18.5

ARMSTRONG 1 44.0

LAWRENCE 1 18.0

MERCER 1 3.0

SUSQUEHANNA 1 25.0

CAMERON 0 0.0

CLARION 0 0.0

FOREST 0 0.0

FULTON 0 0.0

GREENE 0 0.0

VENANGO 0 0.0

*TOTAL 8,168 8.0


Appendix 10

Appendices


COUNTY TOTAL ADMISSIONS 100 201-205 206 300 400 500 600 701 UNREPORTED

ADAMS 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

ALLEGHENY 1,581 235 71 1,069 0 6 9 39 82 70

ARMSTRONG 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BEAVER 28 8 4 12 0 0 0 0 0 4

BEDFORD 8 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

BERKS 227 96 20 41 0 17 5 8 27 13

BLAIR 19 2 1 10 0 2 0 2 0 2

BRADFORD 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

BUCKS 668 49 41 159 1 1 4 41 8 364

BUTLER 6 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

CAMBRIA 8 5 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0

CAMERON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CARBON 12 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

CENTRE 29 10 2 8 0 0 0 9 0 0

CHESTER 205 84 24 22 0 49 3 8 14 1

CLARION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CLEARFIELD 31 6 0 16 0 3 0 2 3 1

CLINTON 25 5 7 0 0 0 0 1 11 1

COLUMBIA 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

CRAWFORD 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

CUMBERLAND 42 8 5 22 0 0 0 0 2 5

DAUPHIN 242 143 40 17 0 5 1 6 13 17

DELAWARE 706 212 1 6 0 2 0 478 0 7

ELK 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

ERIE 142 46 25 15 0 6 9 20 0 21

FAYETTE 28 9 10 1 0 0 0 4 2 2

FOREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 27 21 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

FULTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GREENE 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HUNTINGDON 12 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 3

INDIANA 13 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 8 0

JEFFERSON 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

JUNIATA 8 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Secure Detention Admissions by Standard Section Codes, 2016

Appendix 11

Appendices


COUNTY TOTAL ADMISSIONS 100 201-205 206 300 400 500 600 701 UNREPORTED

LACKAWANNA 156 54 7 18 0 7 3 18 11 38

LANCASTER 152 81 29 19 1 0 6 8 8 0

LAWRENCE 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

LEBANON 62 25 7 27 0 0 0 0 0 3

LEHIGH 151 63 11 17 0 3 2 4 33 18

LUZERNE 51 11 6 8 0 6 0 4 0 16

LYCOMING 29 11 8 4 0 1 1 1 0 3

MCKEAN 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

MERCER 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MIFFLIN 48 28 2 12 0 0 0 5 0 1

MONROE 77 26 4 33 0 0 3 4 1 6

MONTGOMERY 540 90 6 5 0 8 1 18 160 252

MONTOUR 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

NORTHAMPTON 177 56 8 92 0 5 1 6 1 8

NORTHUMBERLAND 33 9 4 8 0 2 3 1 0 6

PERRY 12 0 3 0 0 9 0 0 0 0

PHILADELPHIA 2,515 916 521 143 0 3 401 1 195 335

PIKE 19 4 5 4 0 1 0 3 0 2

POTTER 7 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

SCHUYLKILL 22 12 5 0 0 0 0 2 2 1

SNYDER 6 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0

SOMERSET 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

SULLIVAN 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1

SUSQUEHANNA 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

TIOGA 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

UNION 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

VENANGO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WARREN 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

WASHINGTON 131 21 9 12 0 22 3 5 35 24

WAYNE 13 2 2 4 0 0 0 1 4 0

WESTMORELAND 131 42 15 16 0 2 4 40 3 9

WYOMING 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

YORK 152 28 37 58 0 7 3 9 3 7

*TOTAL 8,600 2,458 969 1,893 2 168 465 755 638 1,252% OF TOTAL 100.0% 28.6% 11.3% 22.0% 0.0% 2.0% 5.4% 8.8% 7.4% 14.6%


Secure Detention Admissions by Standard Section Codes, 2016continued

Appendix 11

Appendices


Secure Detention Admissions by Selected Codes and County Class, 2016

The following charts display the utilization of selected codes as a percentage of total secure detention admissions. Counties reporting zero percent utilization of a selected code are not displayed.

Appendix 12

Code 206 The child presents extraordinary circumstances requiring secure detention to prevent him/her from absconding. (Such circumstances may include, but are not limited to: the child’s age, character, mental condition, ties to the community, the nature of the child’s family relationships, drug or alcohol addiction and substance abuse.)

67.6%

23.8%

0.8%

0.9%

5.7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ALLEGHENY

BUCKS

DELAWARE

MONTGOMERY

PHILADELPHIA

Secure Detention Admissions - Section 206Class 1,2,2a

18.1%

10.7%

52.4%

7.0%

10.6%

11.5%

12.5%

11.3%

15.7%

52.0%

12.2%

38.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BERKS

CHESTER

CUMBERLAND

DAUPHIN

ERIE

LACKAWANNA

LANCASTER

LEHIGH

LUZERNE

NORTHAMPTON

WESTMORELAND

YORK

Secure Detention Admissions - Section 206

Class 3

NOTE: Counties that did not use Section Codes 206, 701 or did not have Unreported codes are not included.

Appendices



continued

Appendix 12

42.9%

16.7%

27.6%

3.6%

14.8%

42.9%

9.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BEAVER

BUTLER

CENTRE

FAYETTE

FRANKLIN

MONROE

WASHINGTON

Secure Detention Admissions - Section 206Class 4


52.6%

43.5%

13.8%

24.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BLAIR

LEBANON

LYCOMING

NORTHUMBERLAND


Appendices


Secure Detention Admissions by Selected Codes and County Class, 2016continued

Appendix 12

25.0%

51.6%

33.3%

25.0%

21.1%

50.0%

25.0%

30.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BRADFORD

CLEARFIELD

ELK

MIFFLIN

PIKE

SOMERSET

TIOGA

WAYNE


16.7%

50.0%

14.3%

66.7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

SNYDER

MONTOUR

POTTER

SULLIVAN

Secure Detention Admissions - Section 206Class 7 & 8


Appendices



continued

Appendix 12

5.2%

1.2%

29.6%

7.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ALLEGHENY

BUCKS

MONTGOMERY

PHILADELPHIA

Secure Detention Admissions - Section 701Class 1,2,2a

11.9%

6.8%

4.8%

5.4%

7.1%

5.3%

21.9%

0.6%

2.3%

2.0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BERKS

CHESTER

CUMBERLAND

DAUPHIN

LACKAWANNA

LANCASTER

LEHIGH

NORTHAMPTON

WESTMORELAND

YORK



Code 701 Circumstances under which secure detention may be authorized on the basis of extraordinary and exceptional circumstances.


Appendices



Appendix 12

66.7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ADAMS


12.5%

25.0%

8.3%

9.7%

44.0%

41.7%

61.5%

30.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BEDFORD

BRADFORD

CARBON

CLEARFIELD

CLINTON

HUNTINGDON

INDIANA

WAYNE



16.7%

7.1%

1.3%

9.1%

26.7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BUTLER

FAYETTE

MONROE

SCHUYLKILL

WASHINGTON


Appendices



continued

Appendix 12

4.4%

54.5%

1.0%

46.7%

13.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ALLEGHENY

BUCKS

DELAWARE

MONTGOMERY

PHILADELPHIA

Secure Detention Admissions - UnreportedClass 1,2,2aClass 1,2,2a


Unreported The Unreported category, as shown in this report, indicates that a code was not reported to the JCJC.


16.7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

SNYDER

Secure Detention Admissions - Section 701Class 7 & 8


Appendices



Appendix 12

14.3%

16.7%

7.1%

7.8%

4.5%

18.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BEAVER

BUTLER

FAYETTE

MONROE

SCHUYLKILL

WASHINGTON

Secure Detention Admissions - UnreportedClass 4


5.7%0.5%

11.9%7.0%

14.8%24.4%

11.9%31.4%

4.5%6.9%

4.6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BERKSCHESTER

CUMBERLANDDAUPHIN

ERIELACKAWANNA

LEHIGHLUZERNE

NORTHAMPTONWESTMORELAND

YORK


10.5%

50.0%

4.8%

10.3%

18.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BLAIR

LAWRENCE

LEBANON

LYCOMING

NORTHUMBERLAND


Appendices



continued

Appendix 12

25.0%

3.2%

4.0%

33.3%

50.0%

25.0%

50.0%

2.1%

10.5%

50.0%

50.0%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

BRADFORD

CLEARFIELD

CLINTON

COLUMBIA

CRAWFORD

HUNTINGDON

JEFFERSON

MIFFLIN

PIKE

SUSQUEHANNA

WARREN

Secure Detention Admissions - Unreported

Class 6

12.5%

33.3%

33.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

JUNIATA

UNION

SULLIVAN

Secure Detention Admissions - UnreportedClass 7 & 8


Appendices


COUNTY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016PERCENT CHANGE

2015-2016

PLACEMENT AS A % OF

DISPOSITIONADAMS 19 9 15 9 13 44.4% 3.7%

ALLEGHENY 387 404 412 378 385 1.9% 6.2%

ARMSTRONG 9 8 3 5 6 20.0% 5.1%

BEAVER 37 47 32 27 34 25.9% 9.2%

BEDFORD 14 6 8 8 5 -37.5% 10.6%

BERKS 118 96 97 106 87 -17.9% 7.7%

BLAIR 17 14 13 18 13 -27.8% 3.2%

BRADFORD 6 5 3 9 10 11.1% 7.8%

BUCKS 203 192 162 132 101 -23.5% 7.7%

BUTLER 38 44 38 52 43 -17.3% 9.9%

CAMBRIA 16 16 15 20 39 95.0% 8.6%

CAMERON 1 5 1 2 0 -100.0% 0.0%

CARBON 22 16 18 20 18 -10.0% 12.2%

CENTRE 2 8 4 3 12 300.0% 8.6%

CHESTER 116 113 69 74 68 -8.1% 8.8%

CLARION 13 12 7 3 5 66.7% 4.5%

CLEARFIELD 15 10 8 11 14 27.3% 23.7%

CLINTON 13 9 5 7 4 -42.9% 2.8%

COLUMBIA 12 8 4 4 8 100.0% 6.9%

CRAWFORD 9 14 15 15 10 -33.3% 5.1%

CUMBERLAND 19 28 25 23 27 17.4% 3.3%

DAUPHIN 174 158 116 107 95 -11.2% 6.3%

DELAWARE 384 363 273 226 184 -18.6% 5.1%

ELK 10 10 5 4 5 25.0% 12.2%

ERIE 184 155 177 179 128 -28.5% 18.9%

FAYETTE 14 10 13 14 18 28.6% 4.6%

FOREST 0 0 2 1 0 -100.0% 0.0%

FRANKLIN 61 50 43 28 37 32.1% 5.1%

FULTON 4 3 3 3 0 -100.0% 0.0%

GREENE 8 4 2 1 2 100.0% 7.1%

HUNTINGDON 4 6 3 9 10 11.1% 18.5%

INDIANA 5 3 2 5 5 0.0% 3.2%

JEFFERSON 17 13 15 17 7 -58.8% 13.2%

JUNIATA 8 3 8 7 4 -42.9% 12.1%

Delinquency Placements, 2012-2016 Including Disposition Reviews

Appendix 13

NOTE: This data does not include placement reviews resulting from a placement review hearing.

Appendices


COUNTY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016PERCENT CHANGE

2015-2016

PLACEMENT AS A % OF

DISPOSITIONLACKAWANNA 37 33 31 34 34 0.0% 5.4%

LANCASTER 89 70 54 47 32 -31.9% 2.8%

LAWRENCE 11 8 7 6 4 -33.3% 1.9%

LEBANON 38 59 48 52 31 -40.4% 9.8%

LEHIGH 138 134 124 95 76 -20.0% 5.9%

LUZERNE 94 96 70 52 48 -7.7% 5.6%

LYCOMING 75 48 49 35 31 -11.4% 5.2%

MCKEAN 4 3 4 3 1 -66.7% 0.5%

MERCER 45 36 48 34 29 -14.7% 9.4%

MIFFLIN 10 10 9 8 11 37.5% 7.4%

MONROE 124 93 97 80 89 11.3% 18.2%

MONTGOMERY 250 170 163 117 140 19.7% 7.2%

MONTOUR 4 5 3 5 2 -60.0% 11.1%

NORTHAMPTON 82 76 76 57 78 36.8% 10.0%

NORTHUMBERLAND 26 13 20 16 14 -12.5% 6.0%

PERRY 9 9 6 9 7 -22.2% 10.3%

PHILADELPHIA 1,630 1,546 1,290 1,041 956 -8.2% 6.9%

PIKE 23 23 12 16 18 12.5% 13.7%

POTTER 2 3 2 2 4 100.0% 9.8%

SCHUYLKILL 46 38 44 30 29 -3.3% 10.8%

SNYDER 12 10 16 9 4 -55.6% 4.0%

SOMERSET 13 1 1 4 2 -50.0% 2.2%

SULLIVAN 1 2 0 1 0 -100.0% 0.0%

SUSQUEHANNA 2 5 2 3 2 -33.3% 5.0%

TIOGA 5 10 6 8 3 -62.5% 3.1%

UNION 8 3 5 1 1 0.0% 1.4%

VENANGO 25 23 17 12 5 -58.3% 1.7%

WARREN 14 15 6 11 13 18.2% 15.7%

WASHINGTON 105 112 70 72 66 -8.3% 12.3%

WAYNE 10 13 7 9 9 0.0% 8.1%

WESTMORELAND 89 80 83 73 73 0.0% 6.7%

WYOMING 6 2 5 11 5 -54.5% 6.2%

YORK 181 171 162 139 168 20.9% 7.4%

TOTAL 5,167 4,762 4,153 3,619 3,382 -6.5% 6.9%

NOTE: This data does not include placement reviews resulting from a placement review hearing.

Delinquency Placements, 2012-2016 Including Disposition Reviews

continued

Appendix 13

Appendices


Delinquency Placements by Type, 2016 Including Disposition Reviews

COUNTY TOTAL PLACEMENTS

COMMUNITY BASEDCOMMUNITY

RESIDENTIAL SERVICE/ GROUP HOME

FOSTER CARESUPERVISED

INDEPENDENT LIVING

TRANSITIONAL LIVING

ADAMS 13 5 0 0 0

ALLEGHENY 385 81 0 0 5

ARMSTRONG 6 3 0 0 0

BEAVER 34 6 0 0 0

BEDFORD 5 1 0 0 0

BERKS 87 22 4 0 0

BLAIR 13 3 1 0 0

BRADFORD 10 2 0 0 0

BUCKS 101 42 2 0 0

BUTLER 43 20 0 0 6

CAMBRIA 39 7 0 0 0

CAMERON 0 0 0 0 0

CARBON 18 5 0 0 0

CENTRE 12 2 0 0 0

CHESTER 68 24 1 2 0

CLARION 5 5 0 0 0

CLEARFIELD 14 4 0 0 0

CLINTON 4 2 0 0 0

COLUMBIA 8 2 1 0 0

CRAWFORD 10 6 0 0 0

CUMBERLAND 27 6 2 0 0

DAUPHIN 95 17 2 0 0

DELAWARE 184 40 0 3 1

ELK 5 1 0 0 0

ERIE 128 30 0 0 1

FAYETTE 18 2 0 0 0

FOREST 0 0 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 37 15 0 0 0

FULTON 0 0 0 0 0

GREENE 2 0 0 0 0


INDIANA 5 2 0 0 0

JEFFERSON 7 3 0 0 0

JUNIATA 4 2 0 0 0

Appendix 14

Appendices



continued

COUNTY

INSTITUTIONAL OTHERGENERAL

RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

SECURE RESIDENTIAL

SERVICESYDC SECURE YDC/YFC

NON-SECURECRR HOST

HOME



RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT

FACILITY (RTF)ADAMS 1 2 0 0 0 4 0 1

ALLEGHENY 176 19 11 18 0 58 0 17

ARMSTRONG 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

BEAVER 7 1 0 0 0 20 0 0

BEDFORD 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0

BERKS 31 7 3 0 0 16 0 4

BLAIR 6 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

BRADFORD 1 0 2 2 0 3 0 0

BUCKS 27 6 2 14 0 2 0 6

BUTLER 6 1 1 1 0 5 0 3

CAMBRIA 18 0 0 0 0 14 0 0

CAMERON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CARBON 0 2 7 2 0 2 0 0

CENTRE 3 0 0 0 0 5 0 2

CHESTER 16 7 4 2 0 8 0 4

CLARION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CLEARFIELD 5 0 1 0 0 4 0 0

CLINTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

COLUMBIA 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1

CRAWFORD 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0

CUMBERLAND 8 4 0 0 0 7 0 0

DAUPHIN 37 4 20 9 0 6 0 0

DELAWARE 83 10 2 0 0 37 1 7

ELK 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ERIE 51 6 10 0 0 19 0 11

FAYETTE 7 1 0 0 0 7 0 1

FOREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 13 1 2 1 0 2 0 3

FULTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GREENE 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

HUNTINGDON 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0

INDIANA 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

JEFFERSON 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JUNIATA 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Appendix 14

Appendices






INDEPENDENT LIVING

TRANSITIONAL LIVING

LACKAWANNA 34 9 0 0 0

LANCASTER 32 14 0 0 0

LAWRENCE 4 1 0 0 1

LEBANON 31 2 0 0 0

LEHIGH 76 7 0 0 0

LUZERNE 48 17 1 1 0

LYCOMING 31 9 0 0 0

MCKEAN 1 0 0 0 0

MERCER 29 16 0 0 1

MIFFLIN 11 1 0 0 0

MONROE 89 6 0 0 0

MONTGOMERY 140 20 16 0 0

MONTOUR 2 1 0 0 0



PERRY 7 3 0 0 0

PHILADELPHIA 956 157 6 7 2

PIKE 18 5 0 0 0

POTTER 4 0 1 0 0

SCHUYLKILL 29 8 2 0 0

SNYDER 4 0 0 0 0

SOMERSET 2 2 0 0 0

SULLIVAN 0 0 0 0 0


TIOGA 3 1 0 0 0

UNION 1 0 0 0 0

VENANGO 5 5 0 0 0

WARREN 13 4 0 0 2

WASHINGTON 66 21 0 0 1

WAYNE 9 3 0 0 0


WYOMING 5 2 0 0 0

YORK 168 23 2 0 0

TOTAL 3,382 758 44 13 22% OF TOTAL 100.0% 22.4% 1.3% 0.4% 0.7%

Appendix 14

Delinquency Placements by Type, 2016 Including Disposition Reviewscontinued

Appendices


COUNTY



SECURE RESIDENTIAL


NON-SECURECRR HOST

HOME




FACILITY (RTF)LACKAWANNA 20 1 0 0 0 2 0 2

LANCASTER 11 3 0 0 0 4 0 0

LAWRENCE 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

LEBANON 19 1 0 0 0 7 0 2

LEHIGH 18 3 20 22 0 3 0 3

LUZERNE 17 8 0 2 0 0 0 2

LYCOMING 16 4 2 0 0 0 0 0

MCKEAN 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MERCER 4 0 0 3 0 4 0 1

MIFFLIN 5 1 0 1 0 2 0 1

MONROE 56 4 5 2 0 5 0 11

MONTGOMERY 56 5 3 7 0 14 0 19

MONTOUR 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

NORTHAMPTON 8 0 0 2 0 30 0 4


PERRY 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

PHILADELPHIA 321 49 125 24 1 104 4 156

PIKE 6 0 6 1 0 0 0 0

POTTER 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

SCHUYLKILL 7 0 4 3 0 2 0 3

SNYDER 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SOMERSET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SULLIVAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUSQUEHANNA 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

TIOGA 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

UNION 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VENANGO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WARREN 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 4

WASHINGTON 22 1 1 1 0 15 0 4

WAYNE 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0

WESTMORELAND 15 3 6 0 0 26 0 1

WYOMING 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

YORK 36 7 34 44 1 14 0 7

TOTAL 1,160 169 273 162 4 486 5 286% OF TOTAL 34.3% 5.0% 8.1% 4.8% 0.1% 14.4% 0.1% 8.5%

Appendix 14


continued

Appendices


COUNTY TOTAL DISPOSITIONS WITHDRAWN DISMISSED REFERRED CONSENT

DECREE PROBATIONCONTINUED

ON PREVIOUS DISPOSITION

OTHER PLACEMENT

ADAMS 129 0 0 0 1 1 83 33 11

ALLEGHENY 3,379 24 3 0 10 33 2,334 690 285

ARMSTRONG 23 0 0 1 0 0 13 6 3

BEAVER 39 0 1 0 0 0 21 1 16

BEDFORD 11 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 1

BERKS 415 4 0 1 2 45 194 118 51

BLAIR 95 2 0 0 2 1 50 34 6

BRADFORD 8 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 3

BUCKS 614 0 0 0 1 116 337 79 81

BUTLER 206 0 0 0 0 5 155 19 27

CAMBRIA 217 0 16 1 0 5 62 123 10

CAMERON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CARBON 45 0 0 0 0 1 34 2 8

CENTRE 27 0 0 0 8 4 9 3 3

CHESTER 182 4 0 0 0 35 127 11 5

CLARION 59 0 1 0 0 2 41 13 2

CLEARFIELD 11 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 7

CLINTON 55 0 0 0 0 1 41 12 1

COLUMBIA 52 1 0 3 0 8 29 7 4

CRAWFORD 78 0 0 1 0 4 65 5 3

CUMBERLAND 313 0 0 0 3 1 138 158 13

DAUPHIN 713 0 0 4 42 139 287 167 74

DELAWARE 2,400 0 1 5 3 7 1,798 472 114

ELK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ERIE 130 0 0 0 0 5 108 1 16

FAYETTE 32 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 5

FOREST 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

FRANKLIN 307 1 0 0 8 1 66 222 9

FULTON 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0

GREENE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HUNTINGDON 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

INDIANA 20 0 0 0 0 2 17 0 1

JEFFERSON 10 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 3

JUNIATA 15 0 0 0 0 8 5 0 2

Outcomes of Delinquency Disposition Reviews, 2016

A disposition review is a hearing conducted by the court regarding a previous disposition which did not result in out-of-home placement.

Appendix 15

Appendices


COUNTY TOTAL DISPOSITIONS WITHDRAWN DISMISSED REFERRED CONSENT

DECREE PROBATIONCONTINUED

ON PREVIOUS DISPOSITION

OTHER PLACEMENT

LACKAWANNA 297 5 0 0 0 1 183 86 22

LANCASTER 346 2 0 1 1 34 297 1 10

LAWRENCE 39 0 11 0 0 0 17 10 1

LEBANON 43 0 0 0 1 2 22 6 12

LEHIGH 400 0 0 1 0 4 341 35 19

LUZERNE 344 2 0 0 3 3 204 118 14

LYCOMING 298 5 7 1 9 15 126 117 18

MCKEAN 96 1 0 0 0 0 86 8 1

MERCER 96 3 0 1 1 4 44 31 12

MIFFLIN 61 0 0 0 0 3 31 20 7

MONROE 243 0 0 0 0 0 124 92 27

MONTGOMERY 948 0 0 1 1 11 455 408 72

MONTOUR 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0

NORTHAMPTON 164 1 0 0 0 6 78 41 38

NORTHUMBERLAND 11 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 7

PERRY 10 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1

PHILADELPHIA 11,148 2 9 6 1,691 105 7,103 1,544 688

PIKE 55 0 0 1 0 2 25 22 5

POTTER 15 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 3

SCHUYLKILL 55 0 1 1 0 3 29 8 13

SNYDER 27 0 0 0 0 2 6 18 1

SOMERSET 14 1 0 0 0 3 8 0 2

SULLIVAN 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0

SUSQUEHANNA 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 2

TIOGA 36 0 0 0 0 0 17 19 0

UNION 10 0 0 1 0 1 6 2 0

VENANGO 74 0 0 0 0 0 71 2 1

WARREN 25 0 0 0 1 1 18 1 4

WASHINGTON 228 0 0 0 0 12 164 15 37

WAYNE 52 0 0 0 0 1 15 27 9

WESTMORELAND 562 0 0 2 0 10 264 246 40

WYOMING 34 2 0 0 0 1 19 10 2

YORK 859 5 0 1 3 3 527 236 84

TOTAL 26,216 65 52 33 1,792 661 16,370 5,321 1,922% OF TOTAL 100.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 6.8% 2.5% 62.4% 20.3% 7.3%

NOTE: Dispositional outcomes were combined for these tables. Informal Adjustment and Fines and Costs are included in the category titled Other. Transferred to Other Juvenile Court and Referred to Another Agency/Individual are included in the category Referred. Complaint Withdrawn and Warned, Counseled, Case Closed are included in the category Withdrawn. Protective Supervision and Probation with Day Treatment are included with Probation.

Outcomes of Delinquency Disposition Reviews, 2016 continued

Appendix 15

Appendices


COUNTYTOTAL

PLACEMENT REVIEWS

OUTCOME

CONTINUED RELEASED TRANSFERRED

ADAMS 28 18 8 2

ALLEGHENY 1,142 667 370 105

ARMSTRONG 10 5 5 0

BEAVER 47 19 22 6

BEDFORD 11 9 2 0

BERKS 214 105 86 23

BLAIR 37 14 18 5

BRADFORD 9 2 6 1

BUCKS 293 148 107 38

BUTLER 85 39 33 13

CAMBRIA 46 14 27 5

CAMERON 2 2 0 0

CARBON 28 12 13 3

CENTRE 13 6 7 0

CHESTER 154 84 55 15

CLARION 10 3 7 0

CLEARFIELD 18 16 2 0

CLINTON 11 6 5 0

COLUMBIA 12 2 7 3

CRAWFORD 22 15 4 3

CUMBERLAND 37 17 17 3

DAUPHIN 171 93 71 7

DELAWARE 405 205 171 29

ELK 3 3 0 0

ERIE 287 95 127 65

FAYETTE 15 4 10 1

FOREST 2 2 0 0

FRANKLIN 91 49 38 4

FULTON 14 10 2 2

GREENE 5 5 0 0

HUNTINGDON 22 14 8 0

INDIANA 4 4 0 0

JEFFERSON 16 7 6 3

JUNIATA 15 9 4 2

Outcomes of Delinquency Placement Reviews, 2016

A placement review is a hearing conducted by the court regarding a previous disposition that resulted in out-of-home placement.

Appendix 16

Appendices


COUNTYTOTAL

PLACEMENT REVIEWS

OUTCOME

CONTINUED RELEASED TRANSFERRED

LACKAWANNA 58 28 25 5

LANCASTER 135 69 43 23

LAWRENCE 13 4 4 5

LEBANON 61 39 11 11

LEHIGH 170 95 64 11

LUZERNE 111 64 34 13

LYCOMING 55 22 24 9

MCKEAN 5 1 2 2

MERCER 74 30 36 8

MIFFLIN 24 10 12 2

MONROE 200 111 79 10

MONTGOMERY 363 194 138 31

MONTOUR 7 5 1 1

NORTHAMPTON 85 72 11 2

NORTHUMBERLAND 23 12 10 1

PERRY 17 11 6 0

PHILADELPHIA 5,067 3,925 1,012 130

PIKE 29 14 14 1

POTTER 13 9 4 0

SCHUYLKILL 41 26 9 6

SNYDER 18 11 4 3

SOMERSET 4 3 1 0

SULLIVAN 2 0 0 2

SUSQUEHANNA 7 4 3 0

TIOGA 11 4 5 2

UNION 5 4 1 0

VENANGO 26 20 6 0

WARREN 39 25 6 8

WASHINGTON 180 71 67 42

WAYNE 13 7 5 1

WESTMORELAND 182 78 71 33

WYOMING 8 0 8 0

YORK 251 109 115 27

TOTAL 10,576 6,780 3,069 727% OF TOTAL 100.0% 64.1% 29.0% 6.9%

Outcomes of Delinquency Placement Reviews, 2016continued

Appendix 16

Appendices


Appendix 17

Delinquency Placement Review Transfers by Type of Placement, 2016





INDEPENDENT LIVING

TRANSITIONAL LIVING

ADAMS 2 0 0 0 0

ALLEGHENY 104 46 0 3 6

ARMSTRONG 0 0 0 0 0

BEAVER 6 2 0 0 0

BEDFORD 0 0 0 0 0

BERKS 23 8 1 0 1

BLAIR 5 0 2 0 0

BRADFORD 1 1 0 0 0

BUCKS 38 9 5 0 0

BUTLER 13 8 0 0 3

CAMBRIA 5 0 0 0 0

CAMERON 0 0 0 0 0

CARBON 3 0 1 0 0

CENTRE 0 0 0 0 0

CHESTER 15 6 1 5 0

CLARION 0 0 0 0 0


CLINTON 0 0 0 0 0

COLUMBIA 3 0 1 0 0

CRAWFORD 3 1 0 0 0

CUMBERLAND 3 1 0 0 0

DAUPHIN 7 2 1 0 0

DELAWARE 29 11 3 1 0

ELK 0 0 0 0 0

ERIE 65 29 0 0 3

FAYETTE 1 0 0 0 0

FOREST 0 0 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 4 1 0 0 0

FULTON 2 1 0 0 0

GREENE 0 0 0 0 0


INDIANA 0 0 0 0 0

JEFFERSON 3 1 1 0 0

JUNIATA 2 0 0 0 0

Appendices


Appendix 17


continued

COUNTY



SECURE RESIDENTIAL


NON-SECURECRR HOST

HOME




FACILITY (RTF)ADAMS 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

ALLEGHENY 21 9 6 5 0 4 0 4

ARMSTRONG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BEAVER 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

BEDFORD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BERKS 7 1 0 0 0 3 0 2

BLAIR 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

BRADFORD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BUCKS 8 7 3 3 0 0 0 3

BUTLER 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CAMBRIA 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

CAMERON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CARBON 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

CENTRE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CHESTER 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

CLARION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CLEARFIELD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

CLINTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

COLUMBIA 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

CRAWFORD 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

CUMBERLAND 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

DAUPHIN 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0

DELAWARE 6 2 1 0 1 1 0 3

ELK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ERIE 20 3 3 0 0 3 0 4

FAYETTE 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

FOREST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

FULTON 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

GREENE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HUNTINGDON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

INDIANA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JEFFERSON 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

JUNIATA 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Appendices


Appendix 17

Delinquency Placement Review Transfers by Type of Placement, 2016continued





INDEPENDENT LIVING

TRANSITIONAL LIVING

LACKAWANNA 5 0 0 0 0

LANCASTER 23 7 2 0 0

LAWRENCE 5 1 0 0 1

LEBANON 11 1 3 0 0

LEHIGH 11 2 0 1 0

LUZERNE 13 5 1 0 0

LYCOMING 9 4 0 1 1

MCKEAN 2 0 0 0 1

MERCER 8 5 1 0 1

MIFFLIN 2 0 0 0 0

MONROE 10 0 1 0 0

MONTGOMERY 31 2 7 1 0

MONTOUR 1 0 0 0 0



PERRY 0 0 0 0 0

PHILADELPHIA 130 34 6 17 11

PIKE 1 0 0 0 0

POTTER 0 0 0 0 0

SCHUYLKILL 6 2 1 0 0

SNYDER 3 2 0 0 0

SOMERSET 0 0 0 0 0

SULLIVAN 2 1 0 0 0


TIOGA 2 1 0 0 0

UNION 0 0 0 0 0

VENANGO 0 0 0 0 0

WARREN 8 4 0 0 0

WASHINGTON 42 20 1 0 3

WAYNE 1 0 0 0 0


WYOMING 0 0 0 0 0

YORK 27 6 0 1 7

TOTAL 726 237 40 30 45% OF TOTAL 100.0% 32.6% 5.5% 4.1% 6.2%

Appendices


Appendix 17


continued

COUNTY



SECURE RESIDENTIAL


NON-SECURECRR HOST

HOME




FACILITY (RTF)LACKAWANNA 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

LANCASTER 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0

LAWRENCE 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LEBANON 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0

LEHIGH 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0

LUZERNE 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 1

LYCOMING 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

MCKEAN 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MERCER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

MIFFLIN 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

MONROE 4 1 3 0 0 1 0 0

MONTGOMERY 8 2 0 0 0 2 0 9

MONTOUR 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NORTHAMPTON 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


PERRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PHILADELPHIA 9 15 25 1 0 4 1 7

PIKE 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

POTTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SCHUYLKILL 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0

SNYDER 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

SOMERSET 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SULLIVAN 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

SUSQUEHANNA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TIOGA 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

UNION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

VENANGO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WARREN 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

WASHINGTON 7 3 0 2 0 2 0 4

WAYNE 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

WESTMORELAND 8 1 1 0 0 1 0 3

WYOMING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

YORK 0 1 3 2 0 4 0 3

TOTAL 135 81 60 14 1 34 1 48% OF TOTAL 18.6% 11.2% 8.3% 1.9% 0.1% 4.7% 0.1% 6.6%

Appendices



10 11 12 13

N % N % N % N %ADAMS 225 1 0.4% 1 0.4% 8 3.6% 19 8.4%

ALLEGHENY 2,830 17 0.6% 47 1.7% 106 3.7% 187 6.6%

ARMSTRONG 94 1 1.1% 3 3.2% 2 2.1% 6 6.4%

BEAVER 331 2 0.6% 6 1.8% 10 3.0% 27 8.2%

BEDFORD 36 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 8.3% 1 2.8%

BERKS 717 3 0.4% 3 0.4% 28 3.9% 47 6.6%

BLAIR 308 0 0.0% 3 1.0% 13 4.2% 16 5.2%

BRADFORD 120 1 0.8% 3 2.5% 4 3.3% 4 3.3%

BUCKS 701 1 0.1% 3 0.4% 13 1.9% 42 6.0%

BUTLER 227 0 0.0% 2 0.9% 13 5.7% 13 5.7%

CAMBRIA 235 1 0.4% 7 3.0% 10 4.3% 9 3.8%

CAMERON 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CARBON 103 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 2 1.9% 8 7.8%

CENTRE 113 1 0.9% 1 0.9% 5 4.4% 3 2.7%

CHESTER 590 0 0.0% 3 0.5% 19 3.2% 33 5.6%

CLARION 51 0 0.0% 3 5.9% 1 2.0% 6 11.8%

CLEARFIELD 48 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 4.2% 4 8.3%

CLINTON 88 2 2.3% 2 2.3% 1 1.1% 2 2.3%

COLUMBIA 64 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 6.3%

CRAWFORD 117 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 6.0%

CUMBERLAND 513 3 0.6% 6 1.2% 13 2.5% 23 4.5%

DAUPHIN 802 4 0.5% 15 1.9% 31 3.9% 56 7.0%

DELAWARE 1,227 2 0.2% 27 2.2% 53 4.3% 97 7.9%

ELK 41 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 7.3% 10 24.4%

ERIE 547 3 0.5% 13 2.4% 22 4.0% 48 8.8%

FAYETTE 362 1 0.3% 5 1.4% 20 5.5% 20 5.5%

FOREST 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

FRANKLIN 417 1 0.2% 6 1.4% 15 3.6% 29 7.0%

FULTON 26 0 0.0% 3 11.5% 1 3.8% 3 11.5%

GREENE 28 0 0.0% 1 3.6% 4 14.3% 1 3.6%

HUNTINGDON 48 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 4.2% 3 6.3%

INDIANA 136 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 5 3.7% 8 5.9%

JEFFERSON 43 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 7.0% 2 4.7%

JUNIATA 18 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 16.7% 2 11.1%

Delinquency Dispositions by Age, 2016 Age calculated at date of disposition

Appendix 18


Appendices


COUNTY14 15 16 17 18 AND OVER

N % N % N % N % N %ADAMS 14 6.2% 25 11.1% 42 18.7% 69 30.7% 46 20.4%

ALLEGHENY 310 11.0% 505 17.8% 652 23.0% 664 23.5% 342 12.1%

ARMSTRONG 7 7.4% 11 11.7% 20 21.3% 28 29.8% 16 17.0%

BEAVER 45 13.6% 49 14.8% 73 22.1% 83 25.1% 36 10.9%

BEDFORD 5 13.9% 5 13.9% 10 27.8% 8 22.2% 4 11.1%

BERKS 81 11.3% 107 14.9% 167 23.3% 176 24.5% 105 14.6%

BLAIR 33 10.7% 71 23.1% 64 20.8% 85 27.6% 23 7.5%

BRADFORD 14 11.7% 14 11.7% 27 22.5% 36 30.0% 17 14.2%

BUCKS 61 8.7% 115 16.4% 152 21.7% 219 31.2% 95 13.6%

BUTLER 27 11.9% 47 20.7% 41 18.1% 65 28.6% 19 8.4%

CAMBRIA 38 16.2% 45 19.1% 49 20.9% 49 20.9% 27 11.5%

CAMERON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0%

CARBON 4 3.9% 20 19.4% 16 15.5% 28 27.2% 24 23.3%

CENTRE 15 13.3% 21 18.6% 19 16.8% 27 23.9% 21 18.6%

CHESTER 49 8.3% 75 12.7% 110 18.6% 153 25.9% 148 25.1%

CLARION 4 7.8% 6 11.8% 4 7.8% 19 37.3% 8 15.7%

CLEARFIELD 8 16.7% 4 8.3% 9 18.8% 12 25.0% 9 18.8%

CLINTON 6 6.8% 9 10.2% 20 22.7% 33 37.5% 13 14.8%

COLUMBIA 3 4.7% 16 25.0% 20 31.3% 10 15.6% 11 17.2%

CRAWFORD 18 15.4% 31 26.5% 17 14.5% 29 24.8% 15 12.8%

CUMBERLAND 54 10.5% 72 14.0% 110 21.4% 166 32.4% 66 12.9%

DAUPHIN 75 9.4% 125 15.6% 147 18.3% 233 29.1% 116 14.5%

DELAWARE 169 13.8% 193 15.7% 235 19.2% 278 22.7% 173 14.1%

ELK 3 7.3% 7 17.1% 3 7.3% 10 24.4% 5 12.2%

ERIE 74 13.5% 92 16.8% 103 18.8% 130 23.8% 62 11.3%

FAYETTE 36 9.9% 55 15.2% 68 18.8% 87 24.0% 70 19.3%

FOREST 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0%

FRANKLIN 36 8.6% 61 14.6% 89 21.3% 137 32.9% 43 10.3%

FULTON 1 3.8% 4 15.4% 7 26.9% 4 15.4% 3 11.5%

GREENE 3 10.7% 3 10.7% 5 17.9% 8 28.6% 3 10.7%

HUNTINGDON 4 8.3% 10 20.8% 17 35.4% 6 12.5% 6 12.5%

INDIANA 13 9.6% 16 11.8% 22 16.2% 47 34.6% 24 17.6%

JEFFERSON 4 9.3% 5 11.6% 7 16.3% 15 34.9% 7 16.3%

JUNIATA 3 16.7% 6 33.3% 2 11.1% 2 11.1% 0 0.0%


continued

Appendix 18


Appendices


COUNTY TOTAL10 11 12 13

N % N % N % N %LACKAWANNA 327 3 0.9% 2 0.6% 10 3.1% 23 7.0%

LANCASTER 781 4 0.5% 3 0.4% 17 2.2% 41 5.2%

LAWRENCE 173 1 0.6% 3 1.7% 1 0.6% 8 4.6%

LEBANON 272 1 0.4% 2 0.7% 11 4.0% 10 3.7%

LEHIGH 898 0 0.0% 11 1.2% 33 3.7% 81 9.0%

LUZERNE 520 3 0.6% 6 1.2% 14 2.7% 24 4.6%

LYCOMING 294 2 0.7% 3 1.0% 11 3.7% 26 8.8%

MCKEAN 96 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 4 4.2% 9 9.4%

MERCER 211 0 0.0% 3 1.4% 8 3.8% 11 5.2%

MIFFLIN 88 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 1 1.1% 11 12.5%

MONROE 247 0 0.0% 6 2.4% 10 4.0% 18 7.3%

MONTGOMERY 1,010 2 0.2% 9 0.9% 35 3.5% 69 6.8%

MONTOUR 14 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.1%

NORTHAMPTON 618 0 0.0% 14 2.3% 26 4.2% 48 7.8%

NORTHUMBERLAND 222 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 4 1.8% 8 3.6%

PERRY 58 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 2 3.4% 2 3.4%

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 15 0.5% 28 1.0% 89 3.3% 193 7.1%

PIKE 76 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0%

POTTER 26 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.8% 0 0.0%

SCHUYLKILL 213 1 0.5% 2 0.9% 4 1.9% 11 5.2%

SNYDER 74 3 4.1% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 9 12.2%

SOMERSET 77 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 1 1.3% 5 6.5%

SULLIVAN 3 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 0 0.0%

SUSQUEHANNA 30 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 1 3.3% 2 6.7%

TIOGA 61 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 5 8.2% 4 6.6%

UNION 59 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 11.9%

VENANGO 222 0 0.0% 2 0.9% 2 0.9% 26 11.7%

WARREN 58 2 3.4% 1 1.7% 2 3.4% 5 8.6%

WASHINGTON 310 1 0.3% 3 1.0% 15 4.8% 26 8.4%

WAYNE 59 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 3.4% 5 8.5%

WESTMORELAND 524 4 0.8% 6 1.1% 4 0.8% 38 7.3%

WYOMING 47 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 1 2.1%

YORK 1,397 3 0.2% 11 0.8% 25 1.8% 73 5.2%

TOTAL 23,014 89 0.4% 289 1.3% 756 3.3% 1,535 6.7%

Delinquency Dispositions by Age, 2016 Age calculated at date of dispositioncontinued

Appendix 18


Appendices



COUNTY14 15 16 17 18 AND OVER

N % N % N % N % N %LACKAWANNA 43 13.1% 62 19.0% 74 22.6% 66 20.2% 44 13.5%

LANCASTER 71 9.1% 148 19.0% 170 21.8% 226 28.9% 101 12.9%

LAWRENCE 22 12.7% 31 17.9% 35 20.2% 52 30.1% 20 11.6%

LEBANON 50 18.4% 45 16.5% 45 16.5% 52 19.1% 56 20.6%

LEHIGH 116 12.9% 151 16.8% 183 20.4% 251 28.0% 72 8.0%

LUZERNE 55 10.6% 58 11.2% 105 20.2% 133 25.6% 122 23.5%

LYCOMING 51 17.3% 51 17.3% 68 23.1% 63 21.4% 19 6.5%

MCKEAN 11 11.5% 9 9.4% 17 17.7% 31 32.3% 14 14.6%

MERCER 33 15.6% 48 22.7% 41 19.4% 43 20.4% 24 11.4%

MIFFLIN 14 15.9% 18 20.5% 21 23.9% 16 18.2% 6 6.8%

MONROE 29 11.7% 32 13.0% 62 25.1% 56 22.7% 34 13.8%

MONTGOMERY 98 9.7% 146 14.5% 244 24.2% 275 27.2% 132 13.1%

MONTOUR 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 5 35.7% 5 35.7% 2 14.3%

NORTHAMPTON 82 13.3% 111 18.0% 124 20.1% 171 27.7% 42 6.8%

NORTHUMBERLAND 31 14.0% 28 12.6% 52 23.4% 59 26.6% 39 17.6%

PERRY 5 8.6% 9 15.5% 14 24.1% 18 31.0% 7 12.1%

PHILADELPHIA 370 13.5% 495 18.1% 614 22.4% 657 24.0% 276 10.1%

PIKE 7 9.2% 6 7.9% 24 31.6% 24 31.6% 14 18.4%

POTTER 6 23.1% 2 7.7% 3 11.5% 9 34.6% 5 19.2%

SCHUYLKILL 29 13.6% 37 17.4% 52 24.4% 52 24.4% 25 11.7%

SNYDER 11 14.9% 15 20.3% 11 14.9% 15 20.3% 9 12.2%

SOMERSET 9 11.7% 6 7.8% 13 16.9% 17 22.1% 25 32.5%

SULLIVAN 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SUSQUEHANNA 4 13.3% 4 13.3% 8 26.7% 9 30.0% 1 3.3%

TIOGA 4 6.6% 6 9.8% 11 18.0% 15 24.6% 15 24.6%

UNION 9 15.3% 8 13.6% 9 15.3% 20 33.9% 6 10.2%

VENANGO 33 14.9% 51 23.0% 54 24.3% 35 15.8% 19 8.6%

WARREN 9 15.5% 9 15.5% 18 31.0% 9 15.5% 3 5.2%

WASHINGTON 40 12.9% 52 16.8% 54 17.4% 88 28.4% 31 10.0%

WAYNE 4 6.8% 5 8.5% 14 23.7% 19 32.2% 10 16.9%

WESTMORELAND 54 10.3% 99 18.9% 94 17.9% 172 32.8% 53 10.1%

WYOMING 4 8.5% 9 19.1% 7 14.9% 16 34.0% 9 19.1%

YORK 177 12.7% 266 19.0% 296 21.2% 402 28.8% 144 10.3%

TOTAL 2,698 11.7% 3,844 16.7% 4,869 21.2% 5,994 26.0% 2,940 12.8%


continued

Appendix 18

Appendices


COUNTY TOTAL DISPOSITIONS IN SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL NOT REPORTEDADAMS 225 179 32 14

ALLEGHENY 2,830 2,750 78 2

ARMSTRONG 94 80 11 3

BEAVER 331 286 34 11

BEDFORD 36 35 1 0

BERKS 717 660 54 3

BLAIR 308 297 11 0

BRADFORD 120 98 16 6

BUCKS 701 622 55 24

BUTLER 227 212 7 8

CAMBRIA 235 229 5 1

CAMERON 4 3 1 0

CARBON 103 84 19 0

CENTRE 113 108 3 2

CHESTER 590 521 36 33

CLARION 51 47 2 2

CLEARFIELD 48 36 12 0

CLINTON 88 84 2 2

COLUMBIA 64 59 4 1

CRAWFORD 117 104 10 3

CUMBERLAND 513 483 30 0

DAUPHIN 802 742 57 3

DELAWARE 1,227 1,122 88 17

ELK 41 37 2 2

ERIE 547 480 57 10

FAYETTE 362 314 46 2

FOREST 2 2 0 0

FRANKLIN 417 339 43 35

FULTON 26 24 2 0

GREENE 28 26 2 0

HUNTINGDON 48 43 5 0

INDIANA 136 113 14 9

JEFFERSON 43 39 3 1

JUNIATA 18 16 2 0

Delinquency Dispositions by School Status, 2016

Appendix 19


Appendices


COUNTY TOTAL DISPOSITIONS IN SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL NOT REPORTEDLACKAWANNA 327 313 11 3

LANCASTER 781 661 69 51

LAWRENCE 173 159 13 1

LEBANON 272 217 50 5

LEHIGH 898 760 72 66

LUZERNE 520 415 44 61

LYCOMING 294 272 22 0

MCKEAN 96 60 3 33

MERCER 211 184 13 14

MIFFLIN 88 86 2 0

MONROE 247 232 15 0

MONTGOMERY 1,010 845 59 106

MONTOUR 14 11 3 0

NORTHAMPTON 618 610 8 0

NORTHUMBERLAND 222 196 19 7

PERRY 58 48 10 0

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 2,239 351 147

PIKE 76 58 6 12

POTTER 26 25 1 0

SCHUYLKILL 213 145 33 35

SNYDER 74 65 4 5

SOMERSET 77 58 6 13

SULLIVAN 3 3 0 0

SUSQUEHANNA 30 26 2 2

TIOGA 61 54 7 0

UNION 59 53 5 1

VENANGO 222 182 5 35

WARREN 58 57 1 0

WASHINGTON 310 246 14 50

WAYNE 59 51 6 2

WESTMORELAND 524 516 8 0

WYOMING 47 42 2 3

YORK 1,397 959 93 345

TOTAL 23,014 20,122 1,701 1,191% OF TOTAL 100.0% 87.4% 7.4% 5.2%


Delinquency Dispositions by School Status, 2016continued

Appendix 19

Appendices



UNDER 9TH 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH OTHER NOT

REPORTEDADAMS 225 35 29 38 42 49 18 14

ALLEGHENY 2,830 806 262 652 525 471 108 6

ARMSTRONG 94 16 10 21 16 17 10 4

BEAVER 331 71 59 73 51 52 14 11

BEDFORD 36 4 3 5 5 5 14 0

BERKS 717 171 133 202 114 81 3 13

BLAIR 308 57 53 68 76 43 11 0

BRADFORD 120 20 21 25 21 19 8 6

BUCKS 701 113 104 139 136 159 18 32

BUTLER 227 49 46 32 42 40 10 8

CAMBRIA 235 74 41 43 43 30 3 1

CAMERON 4 0 0 0 1 3 0 0

CARBON 103 19 18 30 18 14 4 0

CENTRE 113 31 15 20 28 14 2 3

CHESTER 590 118 96 113 113 98 12 40

CLARION 51 19 4 9 10 6 1 2

CLEARFIELD 48 11 6 11 6 12 2 0

CLINTON 88 15 8 9 18 32 4 2

COLUMBIA 64 10 18 11 9 14 1 1

CRAWFORD 117 20 26 9 6 12 39 5

CUMBERLAND 513 74 73 87 108 62 109 0

DAUPHIN 802 200 141 140 137 115 67 2

DELAWARE 1,227 321 225 247 198 140 79 17

ELK 41 20 5 4 5 5 0 2

ERIE 547 163 102 94 86 54 38 10

FAYETTE 362 106 77 70 43 26 37 3

FOREST 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

FRANKLIN 417 77 52 74 62 77 40 35

FULTON 26 9 1 9 2 4 1 0

GREENE 28 9 2 9 4 3 1 0

HUNTINGDON 48 12 9 9 8 8 1 1

INDIANA 136 29 17 23 21 31 6 9

JEFFERSON 43 8 7 9 8 9 1 1

JUNIATA 18 9 5 0 1 1 2 0

Delinquency Dispositions by Highest Grade Completed, 2016

Appendix 20


Appendices



UNDER 9TH 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH OTHER NOT

REPORTEDLACKAWANNA 327 56 62 77 46 35 46 5

LANCASTER 781 103 154 157 151 129 36 51

LAWRENCE 173 45 24 28 29 22 24 1

LEBANON 272 57 57 51 41 44 17 5

LEHIGH 898 202 220 157 127 103 14 75

LUZERNE 520 119 94 95 65 70 16 61

LYCOMING 294 85 56 57 53 29 14 0

MCKEAN 96 14 11 3 8 17 6 37

MERCER 211 45 44 45 29 28 6 14

MIFFLIN 88 27 21 11 18 9 2 0

MONROE 247 61 34 63 48 38 3 0

MONTGOMERY 1,010 224 166 195 173 141 3 108

MONTOUR 14 2 3 2 3 2 2 0

NORTHAMPTON 618 152 122 121 127 95 1 0

NORTHUMBERLAND 222 33 36 48 47 27 24 7

PERRY 58 10 13 10 5 9 11 0

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 594 680 588 356 162 210 147

PIKE 76 4 8 14 17 14 7 12

POTTER 26 2 5 3 1 13 2 0

SCHUYLKILL 213 38 42 34 34 19 11 35

SNYDER 74 19 13 8 13 7 5 9

SOMERSET 77 13 7 13 6 15 6 17

SULLIVAN 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

SUSQUEHANNA 30 8 2 7 9 0 2 2

TIOGA 61 16 12 10 15 7 1 0

UNION 59 15 5 14 13 10 1 1

VENANGO 222 59 35 34 25 20 14 35

WARREN 58 15 10 17 11 3 2 0

WASHINGTON 310 63 49 46 59 33 10 50

WAYNE 59 13 13 12 9 9 1 2

WESTMORELAND 524 130 102 116 162 10 4 0

WYOMING 47 6 7 12 6 10 2 4

YORK 1,397 219 210 215 209 140 57 347

TOTAL 23,014 5,147 3,986 4,549 3,878 2,976 1,225 1,253% OF TOTAL 100.0% 22.4% 17.3% 19.8% 16.9% 12.9% 5.3% 5.4%

Delinquency Dispositions by Highest Grade Completed, 2016continued

Appendix 20


Appendices


COUNTY

FAMILY STATUS OF YOUTH’S BIOLOGICAL PARENTS

TOTAL DISPOSITIONS MARRIED DIVORCED SEPARATED

ONE PARENT

DECEASED

BOTH PARENTS

DECEASED

NEVER MARRIED OTHER NOT

REPORTED

ADAMS 225 48 53 17 7 0 67 19 14

ALLEGHENY 2,830 376 70 20 75 3 2,281 0 5

ARMSTRONG 94 18 31 13 7 0 18 3 4

BEAVER 331 62 73 8 8 0 129 40 11

BEDFORD 36 8 7 0 3 0 4 14 0

BERKS 717 113 84 29 28 1 449 1 12

BLAIR 308 53 34 68 6 0 114 33 0

BRADFORD 120 22 47 1 5 0 37 2 6

BUCKS 701 179 136 44 55 0 241 22 24

BUTLER 227 76 64 16 11 1 39 12 8

CAMBRIA 235 38 33 19 13 1 125 1 5

CAMERON 4 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0

CARBON 103 21 27 4 6 0 45 0 0

CENTRE 113 35 29 1 3 0 33 10 2

CHESTER 590 84 20 6 2 0 31 424 23

CLARION 51 12 15 2 1 0 7 13 1

CLEARFIELD 48 14 16 6 0 0 10 2 0

CLINTON 88 20 32 8 4 0 15 7 2

COLUMBIA 64 12 11 7 6 1 26 0 1

CRAWFORD 117 18 22 10 3 0 26 33 5

CUMBERLAND 513 144 103 25 24 0 105 112 0

DAUPHIN 802 152 85 25 42 0 457 39 2

DELAWARE 1,227 192 125 46 60 1 669 117 17

ELK 41 6 11 1 9 0 10 2 2

ERIE 547 69 77 33 40 0 310 8 10

FAYETTE 362 45 39 16 5 0 245 10 2

FOREST 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 417 92 79 18 16 1 152 24 35

FULTON 26 6 10 1 1 0 6 2 0

GREENE 28 7 10 1 4 0 2 4 0

HUNTINGDON 48 9 19 3 2 0 13 2 0

INDIANA 136 35 28 13 7 0 29 15 9

JEFFERSON 43 12 18 0 1 0 10 1 1

JUNIATA 18 1 6 1 1 0 9 0 0

Delinquency Dispositions by Family Status, 2016

Appendix 21


Appendices


COUNTY

FAMILY STATUS OF YOUTH’S BIOLOGICAL PARENTS

TOTAL DISPOSITIONS MARRIED DIVORCED SEPARATED

ONE PARENT

DECEASED

BOTH PARENTS

DECEASED

NEVER MARRIED OTHER NOT

REPORTED

LACKAWANNA 327 56 56 9 13 0 189 4 0

LANCASTER 781 166 123 25 36 2 374 3 52

LAWRENCE 173 18 34 19 12 0 67 22 1

LEBANON 272 41 68 13 6 0 138 2 4

LEHIGH 898 113 104 68 55 2 465 8 83

LUZERNE 520 73 70 45 21 1 229 19 62

LYCOMING 294 43 31 19 21 0 173 7 0

MCKEAN 96 7 17 3 1 0 10 32 26

MERCER 211 30 28 32 6 1 96 4 14

MIFFLIN 88 19 25 1 4 1 37 1 0

MONROE 247 66 54 8 9 0 108 2 0

MONTGOMERY 1,010 250 192 45 33 0 341 41 108

MONTOUR 14 2 3 0 2 0 7 0 0

NORTHAMPTON 618 142 21 371 11 1 2 70 0

NORTHUMBERLAND 222 60 43 17 11 0 74 10 7

PERRY 58 13 12 3 2 0 15 13 0

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 171 31 19 130 4 2,160 75 147

PIKE 76 13 14 2 3 0 27 5 12

POTTER 26 7 16 1 1 0 1 0 0

SCHUYLKILL 213 35 36 5 11 0 85 8 33

SNYDER 74 24 24 1 1 0 13 8 3

SOMERSET 77 15 10 7 2 0 20 9 14

SULLIVAN 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

SUSQUEHANNA 30 8 6 4 2 0 5 3 2

TIOGA 61 13 14 0 5 0 18 11 0

UNION 59 8 15 3 7 0 24 1 1

VENANGO 222 56 31 24 3 0 61 13 34

WARREN 58 10 14 2 3 1 28 0 0

WASHINGTON 310 49 66 10 17 0 105 13 50

WAYNE 59 12 11 2 5 0 25 2 2

WESTMORELAND 524 90 18 8 4 0 404 0 0

WYOMING 47 8 15 5 5 1 8 1 4

YORK 1,397 173 182 48 66 2 542 39 345

TOTAL 23,014 3,770 2,800 1,282 963 25 11,571 1,398 1,205% OF TOTAL 100.0% 16.4% 12.2% 5.6% 4.2% 0.1% 50.3% 6.1% 5.2%


Delinquency Dispositions by Family Status, 2016continued

Appendix 21

Appendices



BOTH PARENTS MOTHER FATHER RELATIVE

FATHER/ STEP-

MOTHER

MOTHER/ STEP-

FATHER

FOSTER FAMILY OTHER NOT

REPORTED

ADAMS 225 47 73 22 14 11 20 3 21 14

ALLEGHENY 2,830 352 1,811 252 281 22 65 20 26 1

ARMSTRONG 94 17 31 10 12 1 15 1 3 4

BEAVER 331 60 143 34 25 6 13 0 39 11

BEDFORD 36 8 9 2 2 3 3 2 7 0

BERKS 717 134 380 54 36 17 39 7 49 1

BLAIR 308 48 178 41 11 0 6 1 23 0

BRADFORD 120 19 48 6 11 5 11 2 12 6

BUCKS 701 182 243 63 65 23 56 1 44 24

BUTLER 227 62 97 15 15 6 9 1 15 7

CAMBRIA 235 51 105 28 12 5 15 2 14 3

CAMERON 4 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

CARBON 103 23 45 10 5 2 7 1 10 0

CENTRE 113 37 38 18 4 1 9 0 4 2

CHESTER 590 108 296 85 24 5 10 2 37 23

CLARION 51 12 25 2 4 0 1 1 5 1

CLEARFIELD 48 14 12 6 7 1 5 0 3 0

CLINTON 88 18 27 9 6 7 9 4 6 2

COLUMBIA 64 13 19 6 4 4 11 1 5 1

CRAWFORD 117 17 32 13 5 3 7 0 35 5

CUMBERLAND 513 149 177 50 28 16 61 3 29 0

DAUPHIN 802 159 377 57 52 19 78 5 53 2

DELAWARE 1,227 201 616 95 85 20 89 17 87 17

ELK 41 7 18 9 2 1 0 0 2 2

ERIE 547 81 278 52 37 8 31 0 50 10

FAYETTE 362 46 207 40 17 2 14 0 34 2

FOREST 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 417 89 147 24 2 8 47 6 59 35

FULTON 26 6 6 7 2 1 2 0 2 0

GREENE 28 7 9 3 0 1 5 3 0 0

HUNTINGDON 48 8 16 9 2 2 4 0 7 0

INDIANA 136 33 49 10 5 2 6 6 16 9

JEFFERSON 43 11 16 4 4 0 3 0 4 1

JUNIATA 18 1 10 1 5 0 0 1 0 0

Delinquency Dispositions by Living Arrangement of Youth, 2016

Appendix 22


Appendices



BOTH PARENTS MOTHER FATHER RELATIVE

FATHER/ STEP-

MOTHER

MOTHER/ STEP-

FATHER

FOSTER FAMILY OTHER NOT

REPORTED

LACKAWANNA 327 56 186 40 20 3 12 5 5 0

LANCASTER 781 167 296 62 50 21 78 6 50 51

LAWRENCE 173 18 78 21 13 6 10 3 23 1

LEBANON 272 40 130 31 20 5 29 2 11 4

LEHIGH 898 130 450 83 56 16 74 5 25 59

LUZERNE 520 159 198 31 11 6 29 5 21 60

LYCOMING 294 49 145 35 31 5 15 5 9 0

MCKEAN 96 6 23 13 5 2 2 3 16 26

MERCER 211 34 80 23 11 6 24 0 19 14

MIFFLIN 88 19 30 8 9 3 15 0 4 0

MONROE 247 65 89 23 22 2 17 16 13 0

MONTGOMERY 1,010 190 476 79 54 19 52 10 22 108

MONTOUR 14 1 4 0 1 0 0 1 7 0

NORTHAMPTON 618 142 306 58 31 4 18 6 53 0

NORTHUMBERLAND 222 50 75 16 14 3 27 13 17 7

PERRY 58 13 17 7 4 1 8 1 7 0

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 206 1,661 199 266 13 69 39 137 147

PIKE 76 13 23 4 7 3 6 1 7 12

POTTER 26 5 7 3 4 2 2 0 3 0

SCHUYLKILL 213 39 90 10 17 3 13 0 8 33

SNYDER 74 21 22 8 6 2 6 1 8 0

SOMERSET 77 13 37 8 3 1 2 0 5 8

SULLIVAN 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

SUSQUEHANNA 30 7 6 3 2 0 4 0 6 2

TIOGA 61 17 21 3 8 1 7 2 2 0

UNION 59 9 25 5 7 2 5 3 3 0

VENANGO 222 44 75 17 11 4 29 2 6 34

WARREN 58 8 27 4 4 2 11 1 1 0

WASHINGTON 310 57 99 27 9 4 22 0 42 50

WAYNE 59 15 24 10 1 2 2 0 3 2

WESTMORELAND 524 100 266 60 16 1 4 3 74 0

WYOMING 47 9 16 6 3 0 6 0 5 2

YORK 1,397 185 480 78 99 24 96 29 62 344

TOTAL 23,014 3,909 11,003 2,013 1,599 368 1,346 252 1,377 1,147% OF TOTAL 100.0% 17.0% 47.8% 8.7% 6.9% 1.6% 5.8% 1.1% 6.0% 5.0%


Delinquency Dispositions by Living Arrangement of Youth, 2016continued

Appendix 22

Appendices


Appendix 23


WHITE NON-HISPANIC

BLACK NON-HISPANIC HISPANIC OTHER / UNKNOWN

ADAMS 225 140 27 28 30

ALLEGHENY 2,830 853 1,871 25 81

ARMSTRONG 94 88 2 0 4

BEAVER 331 187 118 9 17

BEDFORD 36 33 2 1 0

BERKS 717 168 129 386 34

BLAIR 308 259 34 7 8

BRADFORD 120 116 3 1 0

BUCKS 701 435 169 74 23

BUTLER 227 181 33 7 6

CAMBRIA 235 158 47 1 29

CAMERON 4 3 0 1 0

CARBON 103 74 15 10 4

CENTRE 113 105 5 2 1

CHESTER 590 268 168 118 36

CLARION 51 45 0 1 5


CLINTON 88 85 2 0 1

COLUMBIA 64 49 11 4 0

CRAWFORD 117 92 13 3 9

CUMBERLAND 513 351 73 52 37

DAUPHIN 802 299 398 97 8

DELAWARE 1,227 337 804 40 46

ELK 41 24 2 0 15

ERIE 547 217 233 68 29

FAYETTE 362 243 88 5 26

FOREST 2 2 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 417 260 85 44 28

FULTON 26 24 1 0 1

GREENE 28 26 0 2 0


INDIANA 136 94 18 5 19

JEFFERSON 43 42 0 0 1

JUNIATA 18 17 1 0 0

Delinquency Dispositions by Race and Ethnicity, 2016


Appendices


Appendix 23


WHITE NON-HISPANIC

BLACK NON-HISPANIC HISPANIC OTHER / UNKNOWN

LACKAWANNA 327 198 76 50 3

LANCASTER 781 360 135 232 54

LAWRENCE 173 93 54 11 15

LEBANON 272 128 18 120 6

LEHIGH 898 219 224 432 23

LUZERNE 520 296 104 105 15

LYCOMING 294 184 96 2 12

MCKEAN 96 89 3 0 4

MERCER 211 137 63 3 8

MIFFLIN 88 78 2 2 6

MONROE 247 99 92 40 16

MONTGOMERY 1,010 382 541 53 34

MONTOUR 14 8 4 1 1

NORTHAMPTON 618 288 192 128 10


PERRY 58 54 3 0 1

PHILADELPHIA 2,737 169 2,000 447 121

PIKE 76 46 14 14 2

POTTER 26 25 0 0 1

SCHUYLKILL 213 163 28 21 1

SNYDER 74 69 0 2 3

SOMERSET 77 70 5 1 1

SULLIVAN 3 3 0 0 0


TIOGA 61 52 0 9 0

UNION 59 38 15 6 0

VENANGO 222 189 26 6 1

WARREN 58 57 1 0 0

WASHINGTON 310 206 79 3 22

WAYNE 59 52 5 2 0


WYOMING 47 43 1 3 0

YORK 1,397 637 454 215 91

TOTAL 23,014 10,376 8,731 2,917 990% OF TOTAL 100.0% 45.1% 37.9% 12.7% 4.3%

Delinquency Dispositions by Race and Ethnicity, 2016continued


Appendices


Secure Detention Admissions by Race and Ethnicity, 2016

COUNTY TOTALWHITE NON-

HISPANIC

% OF TOTAL

BLACK NON-

HISPANIC

% OF TOTAL HISPANIC % OF

TOTALOTHER/

UNKNOWN% OF

TOTAL

ADAMS 3 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3%

ALLEGHENY 1,581 198 12.5% 1,270 80.3% 20 1.3% 93 5.9%

ARMSTRONG 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BEAVER 28 8 28.6% 18 64.3% 2 7.1% 0 0.0%

BEDFORD 8 7 87.5% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 0 0.0%

BERKS 227 36 15.9% 48 21.1% 140 61.7% 3 1.3%

BLAIR 19 14 73.7% 4 21.1% 1 5.3% 0 0.0%

BRADFORD 4 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

BUCKS 668 378 56.6% 208 31.1% 80 12.0% 2 0.3%

BUTLER 6 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CAMBRIA 8 3 37.5% 5 62.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CAMERON 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CARBON 12 8 66.7% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 0 0.0%

CENTRE 29 25 86.2% 4 13.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CHESTER 205 73 35.6% 69 33.7% 59 28.8% 4 2.0%

CLARION 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CLEARFIELD 31 27 87.1% 3 9.7% 1 3.2% 0 0.0%

CLINTON 25 25 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

COLUMBIA 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CRAWFORD 4 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

CUMBERLAND 42 17 40.5% 12 28.6% 11 26.2% 2 4.8%

DAUPHIN 242 26 10.7% 188 77.7% 23 9.5% 5 2.1%

DELAWARE 706 131 18.6% 524 74.2% 24 3.4% 27 3.8%

ELK 3 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

ERIE 142 38 26.8% 82 57.7% 8 5.6% 14 9.9%

FAYETTE 28 13 46.4% 13 46.4% 0 0.0% 2 7.1%

FOREST 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

FRANKLIN 27 13 48.1% 7 25.9% 5 18.5% 2 7.4%

FULTON 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

GREENE 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

HUNTINGDON 12 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

INDIANA 13 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

JEFFERSON 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

JUNIATA 8 6 75.0% 0 0.0% 2 25.0% 0 0.0%

Appendix 24

Appendices


COUNTY TOTALWHITE NON-

HISPANIC

% OF TOTAL

BLACK NON-

HISPANIC

% OF TOTAL HISPANIC % OF

TOTALOTHER/

UNKNOWN% OF

TOTAL

LACKAWANNA 156 83 53.2% 39 25.0% 34 21.8% 0 0.0%

LANCASTER 152 42 27.6% 45 29.6% 63 41.4% 2 1.3%

LAWRENCE 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

LEBANON 62 22 35.5% 6 9.7% 34 54.8% 0 0.0%

LEHIGH 151 27 17.9% 48 31.8% 75 49.7% 1 0.7%

LUZERNE 51 23 45.1% 16 31.4% 12 23.5% 0 0.0%

LYCOMING 29 11 37.9% 18 62.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MCKEAN 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MERCER 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

MIFFLIN 48 45 93.8% 2 4.2% 1 2.1% 0 0.0%

MONROE 77 28 36.4% 39 50.6% 9 11.7% 1 1.3%

MONTGOMERY 540 194 35.9% 245 45.4% 38 7.0% 63 11.7%

MONTOUR 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

NORTHAMPTON 177 61 34.5% 63 35.6% 52 29.4% 1 0.6%

NORTHUMBERLAND 33 24 72.7% 4 12.1% 5 15.2% 0 0.0%

PERRY 12 5 41.7% 4 33.3% 3 25.0% 0 0.0%

PHILADELPHIA 2,515 141 5.6% 1,796 71.4% 449 17.9% 129 5.1%

PIKE 19 9 47.4% 4 21.1% 6 31.6% 0 0.0%

POTTER 7 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SCHUYLKILL 22 13 59.1% 5 22.7% 3 13.6% 1 4.5%

SNYDER 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SOMERSET 4 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SULLIVAN 3 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

SUSQUEHANNA 2 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0%

TIOGA 4 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

UNION 3 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

VENANGO 0 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

WARREN 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

WASHINGTON 131 63 48.1% 61 46.6% 4 3.1% 3 2.3%

WAYNE 13 10 76.9% 2 15.4% 1 7.7% 0 0.0%

WESTMORELAND 131 73 55.7% 46 35.1% 4 3.1% 8 6.1%

WYOMING 3 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0%

YORK 152 37 24.3% 83 54.6% 27 17.8% 5 3.3%

TOTAL 8,600 2,029 23.6% 5,001 58.2% 1,200 14.0% 370 4.3%

Secure Detention Admissions by Race and Ethnicity, 2016continued

Appendix 24

Appendices



DELINQUENCY CASES DEPENDENCY CASES

SUBTOTAL NEW ALLEGATIONS

DISPOSITION REVIEWS

PLACEMENT REVIEWS SUBTOTAL NEW

ALLEGATIONSDISPOSITION

REVIEWSPLACEMENT

REVIEWSADAMS 382 382 225 129 28 0 0 0 0

ALLEGHENY 7,351 7,351 2,830 3,379 1,142 0 0 0 0

ARMSTRONG 127 127 94 23 10 0 0 0 0

BEAVER 474 417 331 39 47 57 57 0 0

BEDFORD 58 58 36 11 11 0 0 0 0

BERKS 1,346 1,346 717 415 214 0 0 0 0

BLAIR 440 440 308 95 37 0 0 0 0

BRADFORD 138 137 120 8 9 1 1 0 0

BUCKS 1,608 1,608 701 614 293 0 0 0 0

BUTLER 518 518 227 206 85 0 0 0 0

CAMBRIA 701 498 235 217 46 203 135 65 3

CAMERON 6 6 4 0 2 0 0 0 0

CARBON 176 176 103 45 28 0 0 0 0

CENTRE 153 153 113 27 13 0 0 0 0

CHESTER 926 926 590 182 154 0 0 0 0

CLARION 120 120 51 59 10 0 0 0 0

CLEARFIELD 77 77 48 11 18 0 0 0 0

CLINTON 154 154 88 55 11 0 0 0 0

COLUMBIA 128 128 64 52 12 0 0 0 0

CRAWFORD 217 217 117 78 22 0 0 0 0

CUMBERLAND 863 863 513 313 37 0 0 0 0

DAUPHIN 1,686 1,686 802 713 171 0 0 0 0

DELAWARE 4,032 4,032 1,227 2,400 405 0 0 0 0

ELK 44 44 41 0 3 0 0 0 0

ERIE 964 964 547 130 287 0 0 0 0

FAYETTE 409 409 362 32 15 0 0 0 0

FOREST 6 6 2 2 2 0 0 0 0

FRANKLIN 815 815 417 307 91 0 0 0 0

FULTON 55 55 26 15 14 0 0 0 0

GREENE 33 33 28 0 5 0 0 0 0

HUNTINGDON 76 76 48 6 22 0 0 0 0

INDIANA 160 160 136 20 4 0 0 0 0

JEFFERSON 69 69 43 10 16 0 0 0 0

JUNIATA 48 48 18 15 15 0 0 0 0

Summary of All Delinquency and Dependency Dispositions, 2016

Appendix 25

Appendices



DELINQUENCY CASES DEPENDENCY CASES

SUBTOTAL NEW ALLEGATIONS

DISPOSITION REVIEWS

PLACEMENT REVIEWS SUBTOTAL NEW

ALLEGATIONSDISPOSITION

REVIEWSPLACEMENT

REVIEWSLACKAWANNA 682 682 327 297 58 0 0 0 0

LANCASTER 1,262 1,262 781 346 135 0 0 0 0

LAWRENCE 225 225 173 39 13 0 0 0 0

LEBANON 376 376 272 43 61 0 0 0 0

LEHIGH 1,468 1,468 898 400 170 0 0 0 0

LUZERNE 975 975 520 344 111 0 0 0 0

LYCOMING 647 647 294 298 55 0 0 0 0

MCKEAN 197 197 96 96 5 0 0 0 0

MERCER 381 381 211 96 74 0 0 0 0

MIFFLIN 173 173 88 61 24 0 0 0 0

MONROE 690 690 247 243 200 0 0 0 0

MONTGOMERY 2,323 2,321 1,010 948 363 2 2 0 0

MONTOUR 25 25 14 4 7 0 0 0 0

NORTHAMPTON 867 867 618 164 85 0 0 0 0

NORTHUMBERLAND 257 256 222 11 23 1 1 0 0

PERRY 85 85 58 10 17 0 0 0 0

PHILADELPHIA 18,954 18,952 2,737 11,148 5,067 2 2 0 0

PIKE 160 160 76 55 29 0 0 0 0

POTTER 54 54 26 15 13 0 0 0 0

SCHUYLKILL 309 309 213 55 41 0 0 0 0

SNYDER 139 119 74 27 18 20 20 0 0

SOMERSET 95 95 77 14 4 0 0 0 0

SULLIVAN 9 9 3 4 2 0 0 0 0

SUSQUEHANNA 47 47 30 10 7 0 0 0 0

TIOGA 108 108 61 36 11 0 0 0 0

UNION 74 74 59 10 5 0 0 0 0

VENANGO 322 322 222 74 26 0 0 0 0

WARREN 122 122 58 25 39 0 0 0 0

WASHINGTON 718 718 310 228 180 0 0 0 0

WAYNE 124 124 59 52 13 0 0 0 0

WESTMORELAND 1,329 1,268 524 562 182 61 60 1 0

WYOMING 89 89 47 34 8 0 0 0 0

YORK 2,507 2,507 1,397 859 251 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 60,153 59,806 23,014 26,216 10,576 347 278 66 3100.0% 99.4% 0.6%

Summary of All Delinquency and Dependency Dispositions, 2016continued

Appendix 25

07/17/2017

2016 - juvenile court judges' commission · 2019-05-17 · 2016 pennsylvania juvenile court...

Documents